Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Executive Committee 2004
c. erTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/04 February 6, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #1/04, was held in the South Theatre, on Friday, February 6, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m. PRESENT David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair REGRETS Maria Augimeri Member Michael Di Biase Member Rob Ford Member Dave Ryan Member RES. #B1 /04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT the Minutes of Meeting #12/03, held on January 16, 2004, be approved. CARRIED SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B2 /04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Duffins Creek Watershed 1320991 Ontario Ltd., CFN 35037. Purchase of property located west of the 10th Line, north of 19th Avenue (Village of Stouffville), Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed. 1 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.17 hectares (2.89 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from 1320991 Ontario Ltd., being Part of Lot 33, Concession 9 and designated as Block 28 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Donevan Fleischmann Petrich Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 2002 - 191 -2, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, located west of the 10th Line, north of 19th Avenue (Village of Stouffville); THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Barbara Lanys of Bloom & Lanys, Barristers & Solicitors, the owner's lawyer. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Duffins Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision 19T(W)- 99001, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands to include the regional storm flood plain plus a 10 metre buffer and any contiguous vegetation beyond the buffer. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville for management. 2 FINANCIAL DETAILS Costs related to this purchase will be charged to the TRCA land acquisition capital account, funding for which is included in the draft 2004 budget. The estimated legal and environmental audit costs are $5,000. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: January 22, 2004 Attachments: 1 3 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2006 Rood Min and Convervatian Component; DuRins Crack Wotaratted • . 1320991 Ontario Ltd. . CFN 35037 I, ; / / (' !.., T' ,/, i . 1,.s. I ,r-■,i STOUFFV1LLE 2 ,.. , .* f, ......t • 4, / ,( ..,,.... . * *-;•":7.' • 1 : / + e • -, I , 121 - .. -.,•: .' / ,,,) I 0 vOle, : • f J / 1 •. 4 )00rngewation for The Living City r 71117CA LANDS • '45.1 sUBJECt PROPERTY RES.#B3/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Duffins Creek Watershed Lebovic Enterprises Ltd., CFN 35038. Purchase of property located west of the 10th Line, north of 19th Avenue (Village of Stouffville), Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 3.10 hectares (7.66 acres), more or Tess, of vacant land be purchased from Lebovic Enterprises Ltd., being Part of Lot 34, Concession 9 and designated as Block 68 and 69 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Donevan Fleischmann Petrich Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 2002 - 191 -1, together with a hydro easement across Block 68, Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, located west of the 10th Line, north of 19th Avenue (Village of Stouffville); THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231 /00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Barbara Lanys of Bloom & Lanys, Barristers & Solicitors, the owner's lawyer. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 5 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Duffins Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision 19T(W)- 98006, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands to include the regional storm flood plain plus a 10 metre buffer and any contiguous vegetation beyond the buffer. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Costs related to this purchase will be charged to the TRCA land acquisition capital account, funding for which is included in the draft 2004 budget. The estimated legal and environmental audit costs are $5,000. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: January 22, 2004 Attachments: 1 6 Attachment 1 -v4e4t-4-. ' ' ; 6 .' 1 : / fl.•-; ' , : ' ' kY:•••■ - . 4,,,...„_,,,•:-.. - •• . • f • •••• , -• t / • 7 ...■ $. i,,-5 e , :„..,•- .,4 . . , ..i. i'-:-.- • ••■ , •• Z•4 11. :.' , . :' .1 4:."' / ''' '•- I • ' - • 1 ' ,r,.. 1 „.." , ,0 • s' p....•-c.: ; ...----„- STOUFFYILLE ,, ,-.: / 2--... "- i • ' . - 7: • ' - a / 4. / / t • V' ••.4 4. •••• ' 4.5ir ' • 5 • .; • oirsirVal-To n NATURAL. HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component; Coffins Crook Watershed LebavIe Enterprises ud, ,;■• ' ilTRCA LANDS 4 :I( far nee Livia.; City CFN 35038 , I 2„"st:I=MISUDJECT PROPERTY • - . , $ 3. 9.!--icf,lx••••• r • 7 RES. #B4/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed Lindy Barrow, CFN 35034. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located on the east side of Innis Lake Road, north of Patterson Sideroad, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 2.8 hectares (6.9 acres), more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land, be purchased from Lindy Barrow, said land being Part of Lot 27, Concession 2 (Albion) and designated as Part 5 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc., under their project No. 03- B4677A, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, on the east side of Innis Lake Road, north of Patterson Sideroad; THAT the purchase price of the conservation easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the conservation easement required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231 /00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Lindy Barrow has entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement conditional upon receiving approval for the creation of a residential lot. Subsequently, this prospective purchaser has received conditional approval from the Town of Caledon Committee of Adjustment (Consent Application B19/03 -C) to sever a portion of land from The Estate of H.T.W. Atcheson (c /o Fred Smith) to create a 15 acre residential lot; a report regarding the purchase of an adjacent conservation easement from the Atcheson Estate is also on this agenda. As identified by TRCA staff through the review of the consent application, the subject lands contain significant environmental features and staff has requested a conservation easement be placed in TRCA's favour over the lands below the previously established top -of -bank as well as associated limits of contiguous significant features. 8 Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Bruce Milburn of Aird and Berlis, Barristers and Solicitors, the owner's lawyer. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this conservation easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The portion of the subject property subject to the conservation easement is comprised of a valley corridor associated with a tributary of the Centreville Creek within the Humber River watershed, which is situated within the Caledon Hills Complex Environmentally Significant Area, and falls within the TRCA's approved Natural Heritage Lands Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to the conservation easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Costs related to this purchase will be charged to the TRCA land acquisition capital account, funding for which is included in the draft 2004 Budget. The estimated legal costs are $2,000. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: January 22, 2004 Attachments: 1 9 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT2001-2005 –. Flood Plain and ConseingsUon Component ! Humber River Watershed j. —Lindy Barrow CFN 3511114 , ;70 : ^--""•1/4 4 --. t JraralC1014-Nr-• onservatton tor The Living City —11_ TRCA LANDS ' M:.„ 1 ; agiMISUR,IECT PRCPERIY : - ! f 10 RES.#B5/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed The Estate of H.T.W. Atcheson (c /o Fred Smith), CFN 35033. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located on the east side of Innis Lake Road, north of Patterson Sideroad, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 18.7 hectares (46.2 acres), more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land, be purchased from The Estate of H.T.W. Atcheson c/o Fred Smith, said land being Part of Lot 27, Concession 2 (Albion) and designated as Part 2 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc., under their Project No. 03- B4677A, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, on the east side of Innis Lake Road, North of Patterson Sideroad; THAT the purchase price of the conservation easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the conservation easement required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the. appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. The Estate of H.T.W. Atcheson (c /o Fred Smith) has received conditional approval from the Town of Caledon Committee of Adjustment (Consent Application 818/03 -C) to re- establish the lot line between the East and West Halves of Lot 27 in Concession 2 (Albion) which has merged over time. The West Half of Lot 27 is the severed land and the East Half of Lot 27 remained as the retained land. Once the title to these two parcels was re- established, a second consent application (619/03 -C) was granted and conditionally approved for Lindy Barrow, a prospective purchaser, to sever a new 15 acre residential lot from the northern portion of the re- created severed parcel of land (i.e. West Half of Lot 27); a report regarding the purchase of an adjacent conservation easement from the Barrow property is also on this agenda. As identified by TRCA staff through the review of both consent applications, the severed lands 11 contain significant environmental features and staff has requested a conservation easement be placed in TRCA's favour over the lands below the previously established valley top -of -bank as well as associated limits of contiguous significant features. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Bruce Milburn of Aird and Berlis, Barristers and Solicitors, the owner's lawyer. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this conservation easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The portion of the subject property subject to the conservation easement is comprised of a valley corridor associated with a tributary of the Centreville Creek within the Humber River watershed, which is situated within the Caledon Hills Complex Environmentally Significant Area, and falls within lands identified in the TRCA's Natural Heritage Lands Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to the conservation easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Costs related to this purchase will be charged to the TRCA land acquisition capital account, funding for which is included in the draft 2004 Budget. The estimated legal costs are $2,000. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: January 21, 2004 Attachments: 1 12 Attachment 1 , I • ••• - ... \ .4- NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 ' v;•." 7 Flood ;Noir* and Consume lion Component; Humber flier Watershed , The Estate of H.T.W.Atoheson (c/o Fred Smith) ,CFN 35033 ' 7t. i • ,I -,' •/- ,7- 4.f.'s. ' - x,...?<,,,' it• -7- w I. i '.. .... * .• • :s ' ..!.' NA-, --z-:i,, A ••114..., 4 ' '1,., 14S.....— - ....: • • ' .1 . ". • ... 7/.: 5/ Sk, •• ...:•".r- ..... • .t .- ,....., "..... to -.1*"......_. ‘: - ..' •• • ••• ./ ..`■ . V • • • •• "'" • ... -1 '''...... •'' . . s. . t.te -• • • / 7 - ..., ; ., . .•..-_,-A, , ' . 6 e r'? / 1 . . ' • •:,/,•- ...` . ; au CT PHOPERIY i " l• -.• • • ,14.: 0 • '' ,_,., .', '!• !. i • 4.•••1/ ‘o. • ...0.•11116.: AP' . •• • onservatron for The liteigg I Ite.A LANDS -i4SUEL,IFCTPROPERTf ' - ' • 13 • it RES. #B6/04 - MERIN INVESTMENTS INC. AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MARKHAM Request for a Permanent Easement for a Storm Sewer and Outfall in Exchange for a Small Fragment of Land, CFN 34886. Receipt of a request from Merin Investments Inc. and the Corporation of the Town of Markham to provide a permanent easement for storm sewer and outfall in exchange for a small fragment of land, located east of Markham Road, south of Regional Road #7, in the Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Merin Investments Inc. and the Corporation of the Town of Markham to provide a permanent easement for storm sewer and outfall in exchange for a small fragment of land, located east of Markham Road, south of Regional Road #7, in the Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River Watershed; AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is In the best interests of the TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Merin Investments Inc. and the Corporation of the Town of Markham in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA provide a permanent easement for storm sewer and outfall in exchange for a small fragment of land on the following basis: a) The permanent easement containing a total of 0.036 hectares (0.088 acres), more or less, be granted to the Corporation of the Town of Markham for storm sewer and outfall, said land being Part of the West Half of Lot 9, Concession 8, Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York; b) Merin Investments Inc. will convey to TRCA a fragment of land containing a total of 0.011 hectares (0.028 acres), more or less, said land being Part of the West Half of Lot 9, Concession 8, Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York; and c) Merin Investments Inc. Is to pay TRCA the consideration of $22,243.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the Merin Investments Inc. Is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims for injuries, damages, or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or carrying out of construction; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to the commencement of construction; 14 THAT Merin Investments Inc. provide security by way of Letter of Credit to ensure all construction is done to the satisfaction of TRCA; THAT Merin Investments Inc. ensure that TRCA's tenant has access to the rental dwelling at all times during construction; THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of TRCA staff; THAT an archaeological review be carried out with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA, all at the expense of Merin Investments Inc.; THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject lands were acquired by TRCA from Michael and Mary Riley on September 17, 1993 and from Kenneth Ng on December 19, 2000 under the Rouge River component of the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project. Kenneth Ng sold the remainder of his property to Merin Investments Inc. (Merin), and Merin is in the process of developing the property. Merin has requested a permanent easement from TRCA for a storm sewer and outfall to service this development. In finalizing the subdivision development Merin has made minor modifications to the road pattern which has cut off TRCA's access to the subdivision road. Merin has agreed to convey the small strip of land between the new road and TRCA lands to maintain TRCA road frontage as part of this transaction. A plan illustrating the permanent easement and the small fragment of land is attached. FINANCIAL DETAILS Merin will assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. TRCA requires that its funding partners (Town of Markham and the Province of Ontario) for the purchase of these lands, allow TRCA to utilize the funds for this transaction for the purchase of other high priority flood plain, valley, lake ontario shoreline and natural heritage properties under the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Date: January 26, 2004 Attachments: 1 15 Attachment 1 MERIN INVESTMENTS INC. AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MARKHAM Request for a Permanent EaLSEIMellt for a Storm Sewer and Outfall In Exchange for a Small Fragment of Land CFN 34886 t , a • 1 1..4 "liN3 . -• II • - 1 A \1 k 0 0 ni / Zs,* • 1 *CV— s'N • - • LANDS TO RE CONVEYED TO TRCA .?, PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT — - r • S, 4c.je, ft. V`.., • r..• .1? • • lk I • 16 • ••.. • 1' RES. #B7/04 - FRENCHMAN'S BAY - WEST ROUGE CANOE CLUB Licence Agreement Extension, CFN 26339. To extend the temporary licence agreement with the West Rouge Canoe Club for the existing location on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay in the City of Pickering for the next three years commencing with the period November 1, 2003 to October 31, 2004. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the request to extend the temporary licence agreement with the West Rouge Canoe Club for a paddling facility on Frenchman's Bay for the next three years commencing November 1, 2003, be approved subject to conditions satisfactory to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff and solicitor; THAT the Authority's approval be subject to the City of Pickering Council's concurrence with the temporary licence agreement extension for the next three years; THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action is required in connection with the continuation of the West Rouge Canoe Club paddling facility on TRCA lands, including the execution of appropriate documents; AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority meeting #1 /01, held on February 23, 2001, Resolution #A19/01 was adopted as follows: THAT the request to extend the temporary licence agreement with the West Rouge Canoe Club for a paddling facility on Frenchman's Bay for the next three years on an annual basis commencing with the period November 1, 2000 to October 31, 2001 be approved; THAT the Authority's approval be subject to the Council of the City of Pickering's concurrence with the extension to the temporary lease agreement; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action is required in connection with the continuation of the West Rouge Canoe Club paddling facility on Authority lands, including the execution of appropriate documents. City of Pickering Council has supported in previous years the use of the lands on a temporary basis by the West Rouge Club. Discussions with the City of Pickering Planning and Development, and Operations and Emergency Services Departments have been held on the request to extend the licence agreement for a further temporary period based on the results of 1994 to 2003 operations of the paddling facility by the West Rouge Canoe Club. 17 RATIONALE The paddling facility is consistent with the environmentally - friendly recreation activities which are suitable for the Bay and with the current park operations. This proved to be the case for the operating seasons 1994 to 2003 with no objections from the residents and users of the park. The Director of Planning and Development for Pickering who is coordinating this request has indicated their staff's support for the licence agreement extension for the next three years on an annual basis. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Approval from the City of Pickering to extend the temporary licence agreement for the next three years running the period November 1, 2003 to October 31, 2004 will be required. The temporary licence extension request by the West Rouge Canoe Club will be considered by Council at a meeting in March, 2004. The Pickering Harbour Company will be notified of this licence agreement extension as owners of the abutting lake bed of Frenchman's Bay. The TRCA and the City of Pickering staff, along with the West Rouge Canoe Club will investigate opportunities for a permanent location consistent with TRCA/Pickering waterfront plans. Staff, upon approval by the Authority, will prepare and execute the necessary documents for the period November 1, 2003 to October 31, 2004. FINANCIAL DETAILS The Club will continue to pay annually $500 rent for the next 3 -year lease period. The Club will continue to cover the costs of one portable toilet which will be accessible to park users, and any additional costs deemed appropriate to cover the TRCA property taxes for the site area. The Club also agrees to assist TRCA with on -site clean -up and assist in monitoring any activities deemed detrimental to the public's enjoyment of this area. The Club will also maintain the trailers to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303; Larry Field, extension 5243 For Information contact: Larry Field, extension 5243 Date: December 18, 2003 Attachments: 1 18 Attachment 1 19 RES. #B8/04 - PHASE 2 CONSULTING ASSIGNMENT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE REDESIGN OF THE LIVING CITY CENTRE AT KORTRIGHT The re- evaluation of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) sustainable building opportunities with respect to the redesign of The Living City Centre at Kortright, and subsequent revision to Phase 2 of the consulting team's scope of work for professional services. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Phase 2 of architectsAlliance's consulting assignment to provide professional services for the sustainable building, site and infrastructure redesign for The Living City Centre at Kortright be revised to reflect the recommended options evaluated during the Phase 1 work by both the consulting team and staff; THAT Phase 2 of the previously approved work plan be sub - divided into detailed design, tendering and construction administration components, costing $146,425 (excluding GST) and $380,675 (excluding GST), respectively, to reflect a new construction limit of $5.4 million, based on a 7.5% architectural fee; THAT the design fees be allocated on a sliding scale basis, as contained in the architectsAlliance fee proposal, and be prorated accordingly, should the final construction costs be lower than the estimated $5.4 million; THAT staff proceed with the Phase 2 tendering and construction component of the project'upon successful completion of a detailed design by architectsAlliance, and once capital funding is secured; THAT staff be authorized to approve additional unspecified expenditures to a maximum of fifteen percent of the total design fees as a continguency allowance to architectsAlliance, if deemed necessary; AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to provide updates to the Authority on the status of the project. CARRIED BACKGROUND The TRCA invited consultants to submit proposals outlining a detailed work plan, budget and schedule to develop designs and specifications for a sustainable retrofit of The Living City Centre (LCC) at the Kortright Centre for Conservation, site servicing and other site plan issues as they relate to the proposed operational and functional changes to the facility. The TRCA was looking to undertake modifications in a manner that supports its new environmental sustainability program. 20 Kortright, located on 324 hectares of pristine woodlands and wetlands (Boyd North Conservation Lands) along the Humber River valley in the City of Vaughan, is operated by the TRCA. The site itself is made up of the Kortright building, woodland (most of it forested slope), reforested farmland and meadow. Formal educational hiking trails traverse the property, which is interspersed with a number of smaller ancillary buildings. With approximately 130,000 visitors of all ages annually, Kortright is Canada's largest public environmental and outdoor education facility. Its mission is to promote the wise and appropriate use of natural resources through educational (programs, presentations, workshops) walks, exhibits, demonstrations and special events. The Kortright building is approximately 2,900 m2 and features a theatre, cafe, gift shop, class rooms, office space and two levels of exhibit space. The building is normally described as a three level, open concept, laminated post and beam structure. The architect was Shore Tilbe Henschel Irwin, and the building was completed in November 1977 at a cost of $1.2 million. It was officially opened to the public on June 21, 1979. In 1982, a glass and wood pavilion was added, and in 1999 a new sewage treatment facility (Living Machine) was added adjacent to the main building. In 2000, the TRCA embarked on a redesign of Kortright to update its facilities and programs to meet the demands and pressures of an evolving society. It was the intent that The LCC become a world -class education and demonstration hub linked to other sustainability centres across the globe - a physical and virtual meeting place for dialogue and for learning consistent with The Living City vision and strategy approved by the Authority in May 2003. The TRCA, through The Living City vision, is taking a leadership role in the development of the greater Toronto region as a more sustainable community. The Living City Centre at Kortright is to be the strategic heart of the vision, a window into The Living City, promoting in every way possible the active implementation of sustainability in community life. The LCC's vision is to engage leadership in transforming the greater Toronto region into one of the most sustainable, liveable communities in the world. The LCC will become the heart of sustainable living in the greater Toronto region, recognized for designing and implementing powerful transformational initiatives with measurable improvements. Reflecting the values and multicultural nature of the city region, it will be a highly visible education and demonstration centre. The LCC will connect local and global initiatives, linking with other centres across Canada and around the world, and will promote sustainable living by employing a wide range of mechanisms, including research, education, demonstration, advocacy, training, promotion, celebration and partnerships aimed at developing innovative projects and programs. It will be an example of sustainability in terms of its physical structure and in terms of its operation. The LCC will incorporate and model new types of construction, energy use and waste management that will be practical and realistic, yet environmentally friendly. To this end, the TRCA embarked on the development of a case for support to identify key issues necessary to attract partnerships and to develop a detailed plan for The LCC. The five main components are: 1. A needs assessment to identify the rationale and TRCA interest and strategic benefits to developing such a centre. 2. A building assessment to address the current condition of facilities on site, renovations and costs to make them functional as part of the new centre. 21 3. Sustainability Education Program scoping - preliminary program scoping and design. 4. Preliminary conceptualization of the program /activities, exhibits, demonstrations, site development and buildings and costs to develop and operationalize The LCC. 5. Business plans including: market assessment, feasibility study and implementation plan to assess the viability of the project. As a framework for the eventual building redesign, TRCA commissioned a pre- engineering building assessment to address the condition of the facility, the required renovations, and the anticipated costs. On May 3, 2002, the Executive Committee approved Resolution #B50/02 which follows: THAT Enermodal Engineering Ltd. be hired to undertake the Kortright Building Assessment; AND FURTHER THAT we approve the extra costs associated with the Ergonomic and Functionality Assessment. The review was completed in January 2003 by Enermodal Engineering Limited. Their findings indicated that although the building was considered to be structurally sound, it was in dire need of extensive repairs (roof, siding, windows, mechanical systems, etc.), and of additional operating space to effectively meet its program objectives. Enermodal's preliminary estimates to undertake these repairs in a sustainable manner were in the order of $2 million. Subsequent to Enermodal's assesment, TRCA let a consulting assignment in July 2003 to a consulting team lead by architectsAlliance to build on this pre- engineering work and to develop detailed designs, in consultation with staff, for the sustainable retrofit of The Living City Centre at Kortright. At Authority meeting #6/03, held on July 25, 2003, Resolution #A142/03 was approved as follows: THAT Phase 1 Pre - Design of the consulting assignment to provide professional services for the sustainable building, site and infrastructure design for The Living City Centre at Kortright be awarded to the consulting team led by architectsAlliance at a cost not to exceed $25,000 (excluding GS7); THAT architectsAlliance be awarded Phase 2 (Detailed Design, Tendering and Construction Administration) of the consulting assignment at a cost not to exceed $254,250 (excluding GST), upon completion of the Phase 1 work to the satisfaction of TRCA staff; THAT staff be authorized to approve additional unspecified expenditures to a maximum of fifteen percent of the total design fees, as a contingency allowance, to architectsAlliance if deemed necessary; AND FURTHER THAT staff provide a status report to the Authority on the completion of each Phase of the work. 22 architectsAlliance's fee proposal was based on the completion of the following tasks, and on the assumption that the construction costs would be in the order of $2 million: General • Prepare and submit preliminary and final design drawings providing all necessary information for approvals from all approval agencies; • Prepare conceptual plans for the proposed new office /conference building; • Prepare tender specifications and contract documents ready for tendering; • Review and provide recommendations of tenders received; • Review and approve shop drawings; • Issue addendums and change orders; • Provide on -site periodic inspection when requested by TRCA; • Attend meetings during design and construction stages; • Review final as built drawings; • Prepare a detailed work plan, work schedule, budget and delivery plan to be included with the proposal; and • Prepare a manual for the general building maintenance and for the operation and maintenance of all equipment and fixtures, including manufacturing specifications and brochures. Detailed Design Work Plan Using the Building Assessment completed by Enermodal Engineering Limited and the overall vision for The LCC as a foundation, undertake a review and design of: • Daylighting with respect to window area and placement, window glass properties, room size and function, space configuration, room colour, etc.; • Solar thermal air heating with respect to ventilation, air heating and domestic hot water preheating; • Mechanical distribution system; • Water supply system with respect to capacity, plumbing and treatment; • Electrical distribution system, controls and fixtures; • Internal and external communications systems; • Installation of energy management controls such as economizers, natural ventilation, temperature setback and zoning; • Interior design elements that considers: removal of most of existing offices and conversion of existing mezzanine to exhibit space, building an upper viewing platform (clerestory), extend level 2 floor to provide additional space, add windows to level 2 roof, extend level 1 balcony and add north and west glass wall, add sub -floor below level 1 for possible office relocation or storage space or propose alternate area for this function, noise proofing throughout, enlarging the entrance and foyer, enlarging and equipping washrooms and kitchen to accommodate larger groups, 23 replacing gazebo, all finishes, hardware, and fixtures, and fire and security systems; • Structural impacts due to building modifications; • Exterior design elements that consider replacement or improvements to: wall cladding, roofing, overhang floor upgrade and general weatherproofing; • Site plan issues required to accommodate the proposed building modifications, including: servicing and supply, - septic system, solid waste removal, storm water management, fire access, all traffic flow, site security, facility entrances, and - parking; • Landscape elements within the identified construction limits; and • Conceptual floor and site plans and architectural elevations for new office /conference building. In their proposal, architectsAlliance provided design fees for alternate construction estimates (Table 1) on a sliding scale basis, in the event that the proposed construction costs exceeded the preliminary project estimate. The fees on this table formed the basis of staff's recommendation with the assumption that the projected construction costs will now range from and estimate of $3.9 million to $5.4 million. The estimated construction costs reflect the options (1 and 2) that the staff and consulting team recommended that the TRCA pursue, following the completion of the Phase 1 Pre - Design work. Further, the increase in costs from an estimate of $2 million, can directly be attributed to a recommendation by staff that the design for the site and building should address the space requirements of the existing and proposed programming, and also embody and demonstrate leading edge sustainable design principles, rather than simply repairing the building in a sustainable way. 24 Table 1 Estimated Fees and Expenses Based On Construction Costs of $5.4 Million: TASK COST STATUS Pre - Design Architectural Services Schematic Design (15 %) Design Development (10 %) Contract Documents (45 %) Tendering (5 %) Construction Administration (25 %) Total Architectural Fees (100 %) Site Services Design Estimated Disbursements Exhibit/Interpretive Design Cost Estimating Development Approvals Sub -Total Phase 2a (Detailed Design) Sub -Total Phase 2b (Tendering and Construction) TOTAL UPSET FEE 25,000 60,750 40,500 182,250 20,250 101,250 405,000 8,250 24,750 7,725 23,175 18,200 11,000 19,000 10,000 146,425 380,675 527.100 Phase 1 - Completed (December 2003) Phase 2a Phase 2a Phase 2b Phase 2b Phase 2b (7.5% of 5.4 million) Phase 2a Phase 2b Phase 2a Phase 2b Phase 2a Phase 2a Phase 2b Phase 2b Note: Fees would be pro -rated to exact final construction costs (i.e. less costly option would see a reduction in the total upset fee.) RATIONALE Meetings, discussions and a workshop were held over the last six months in conjunction with the consulting team in order to identify priorities and goals of The Living City Centre, functional use of the Kortright building, space program, site plan, building opportunities and exhibit scope. The general consensus was that the building must "walk the talk ", and that therefore we should go beyond a standard retrofit of the existing building and take advantage of the circumstances to investigate opportunities that: • considered a site and building approach which embodied and demonstrated sustainable design principles and practices; • re- focussed the building to look externally by maximizing daylighting opportunities; 25 • created an inspiring sustainable campus and meeting place; and • looked to increase visitor capacity without increasing wear on natural landscape or harming sensitive environmental areas. Taking this into consideration, several alternative approaches were identified and reviewed (see Table 2). Table 2 Option # Option Name Total Gross Force Area Estimated Construction Cost (building only) Option 1 Retain existing building + Retrofit were necessary 33,800 square feet (sf) (28,800sf renovated 5,000sf new infill) $3,880,000 Option 2a Retain and retrofit existing building+ Expand to address program needs 38,600sf (28,800sf renovated, 9,800sf new infill) $5,335,000 Option 2b Retain, reconfigure, and retrofit existing building + Expand to address program needs 38,600sf (28,800sf renovated, 9,800sf new infill) $5,335,000 Option 3 Retain and retrofit existing building + Reorient (reusing structural material) + Expand to address program needs 38,600sf (20,600sf renovated, 18,000sf new) $6,072,000 Option 4 Reuse + Reorient at new location on site 38,600sf new construction (recycled materials) $7,720,000 Table 2 presents a summary of the four options and sub - options that were prepared and evaluated during the pre- design phase of the work. In addition to their presentation and evaluation at a formal workshop held on November 7, 2003 and follow -up, architectsAlliance held informal meetings with TRCA staff and potential funding agencies. Based on these discussions, the consulting team is recommending that TRCA proceed with a more detailed design and analysis of options #1 and #2 during the detailed design phase, for the following reasons: a) Options #1 and #2 present a range of sub - options which appear to be either affordable to TRCA or with reasonable limits for fundraising. b) Options #1 and #2 both have the potential to fulfil the basic space requirements of the TRCA by allowing for the provision of a Gross Floor Area of at least 33,000 square feet; therefore, the projected construction costs will now range from an estimate of $3.9 to $5.4 million. 26 c) Options #1 and #2 present an opportunity to demonstrate a good range of sustainable and /or green building strategies, including those related to the adaptive re -use of existing buildings. d) While considered interesting, options #3 and #4 are expensive and the goals they set would be accomplished more effectively by an entirely new building, which the TRCA is not in a position to fund. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Consultant work programme for Phase 2 - Detailed Design to include the following: 1) Review and revision of the space programme with TRCA staff. 2) Preparation of preferred site plan for the Kortright campus as a whole, showing the location of existing and potential new buildings including the potential conference centre. 3) Preparation of detailed schematic designs for options #1, #2a and #2b as outlined earlier in the Phase 1 report. 4) Preparation of draft interpretive and exhibition programmes. 5) Preliminary costing of optional designs. 6) Workshop to review and evaluate schematic design options. 7) Selection and elaboration (i.e. with two and three - dimensional drawings and models) of a preferred schematic design. Staff will provide a status report to the Authority on the completion of each phase of the project. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the consulting assignment are budgeted in The Living City Centre Project Budget, in account number 314 -60. Report prepared by: Nick Saccone, extension 5301 For information contact: Nick Saccone, extension 5301 Date: January 23, 2004 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B9/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; 27 (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.3 - 8.1.8, with the exception of Minor Works permits 8.1.4 - KWOK Ching Chan and 8.1.7 - Rober Mah), which are listed below. RES.#B10/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow CARRIED THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.19 - 8.1.21, inclusive), which are listed below. RES. #B11 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Suzan Hall CARRIED THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.4 - KWOK Ching Chan and 8.1.7 - Rober Mah) which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.1 ANTHONY AND SANDRA GRAY To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, Plan M -917, 714 Simpson Avenue, in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed as located on the property owned by Anthony and Sandra Gray. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Frenchman's Bay to facilitate the construction of a detached garage and storage shed on a single family residential lot. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 28 • Red -Line Revised Site Plan, prepared by Anthony Gray, received November 3, 2003. • Elevations - Storage Shed (Building A), Sheet Number 1, prepared by Home Building Centre, dated April 2003, received November 3, 2003. • Foundation /Floor Plan - Storage Shed (Building A), Sheet Number 2, prepared by Home Building Centre, dated April 2003, received November 3, 2003. • Elevations - Garage (Building B), Sheet Number 1, prepared by Home Building Centre, dated April 2003, received November 3, 2003. • Foundation /Floor Plan - Storage Shed (Building B), Sheet Number 2, prepared by Home Building Centre, dated April 2003, received November 3, 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Frenchman's Bay to facilitate the construction of a new detached storage shed and detached garage. The subject property is partially located within the Fill Regulated Area and within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Frenchman's Bay. However, the proposed shed and garage are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain and set back 10 metres from the floodline. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and hence, the storage or conveyance of flood waters is not affected. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering Frenchman's Bay which is located approximately 24 m away. Conservation of Land: The proposed shed and garage are located entirely on tableland (manicured portion of side and rear yard of residence) and there are no geotechncial /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. Furthermore, there will be no impacts to other significant natural features. Plantings As the proposed works are located within the existing manicured portion of the subject lands and since no vegetation will be removed, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34856 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: January 28, 2004. 29 Application #: 441/03/PICK CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.2 SEANG BUN KUOCH To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 19, Concession 4; Lot 8, Plan 65M -3229, (89 Villandry Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Seang Bun Kuoch. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a sun room addition to the rear of an existing detached residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Survey, dated November 4, 1998, revised November 11, 2003, received by the TRCA on December 19, 2003, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material. • Sunroom Plan and Wall View, dated December 5, 2003, received by the TRCA on December 18, 2003. • Footing Columns Structure Plan, dated December 5, 2003, received by the TRCA on December 18, 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a sun room addition to the rear of an existing detached residential dwelling. The proposed works will be contained within the rear manicured yard. The sun room will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed sun room will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: The proposed sun room will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, as delineated through the subdivision approval process. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. 30 Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34939 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: January 26, 2004 Application #: 470 /03/VAUG CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.3 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on Lot 8, Concession 1, Lot 8, Plan 735, (Old Kingston Road over Highland Creek), in the Toronto East Community Council, Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to reconstruct the Old Kingston Road Bridge over Highland Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Construction notes prepared by TSH Associates received on January 26, 2004. • Drawing Nos. S- 5008 -16, Site Plan; S- 5008 -17, General Arrangement; and S- 5008 -18, Environmental Protection (redlined), dated January 2004, prepared by TSH Associates and received on January 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to remove and replace the existing deck and repair the existing rip -rap and gabion baskets below the deck of the Old Kingston Road Bridge over Highland Creek located west of Military Trail. Control of Flooding: The proposed works do not result in the placement of fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Coffer dams and protective platforms will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment and construction debris from entering the watercourse. 31 Conservation of Land: There are no slope stability issues associated with this project and there will be no impact on significant resource features or riparian vegetation. TRCA technical staff are satisfied that the proposed works will not impact fish habitat and therefore Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) authorization is not required. A letter of advice will be issued for the proposed works. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized immediately after construction and will be restored or re- vegetated with native shrubs as soon as conditions allow. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies. CFN: 35055 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 27, 2004 Application #: 025/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.4 KWOK CHING CHAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 32, Plan M -1280, (43 Beardmore Crescent), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Kwok Ching Chan. The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a single storey addition to the front of the existing house. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan and Construction Details, prepared by Swiss Design, dated August 8, 2003, received January 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place and excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a one storey addition to the front of the existing dwelling. The subject property is located east of Bayview Avenue and north of Finch Avenue East. 32 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A silt fence will be installed and maintained during construction. All excavated material will be removed from site. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope instability issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35053 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 26, 2004 Application #: 023/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.5 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on (Lower Riverwood Landfill - East of South Kingsway, South of Floor Street), in the Toronto West Community Council, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order to facilitate the installation of a gas collection system adjacent to the Lower Riverwood Landfill Site. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 1152 - 2003 -14, Lower Riverwood Landfill - gas collection system, Toronto Humber Yacht Club - 101 Humber Valley Road, dated May 14, 2003, received September 8, 2003 and prepared by City of Toronto, Works and Emergency Services Dept. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 33 Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation of a 1.2m (4') wide trench for a length of 35m (115') along the southerly edge of the existing gravel parking area located at the Toronto Humber Yacht Club. A 200mm (8 ") gas collection pipe would be laid in the trench surrounded by crushed limestone and covered with soil. Three turbine vent pipes would be connected to the gas collection pipe in order to safely vent off gases collected from the adjacent landfill site. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 40m (131') away. Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings All existing trees will be protected during construction and damaged grass will be resodded. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34611 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 21, 2004 Application #: 345/03/TOR 8.1.6 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on P Lot 1, Concession 4, (Martin Grove Road), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek, in order to facilitate repairs to Martin Grove Road Bridge.. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 616 -S- 3016 -20, Martin Grove Road Bridge over Mimico Creek, Structural Rehabilitation, General Arrangement dated January 14, 2004, received January 19, 2004, prepared by Giffels Associates Ltd. 34 • Drawing Sheet No.1, Typical Watercourse/Traffic Protection Details, dated October 22, 2003, received December 29, 2003, prepared by Giffels. • Schedule "B ", Special Specifications, S -5 Access and Protection, S -14 Sediment Control Fence, 66. Temporary Protective Platforms, undated, received December 29, 2003, prepared by Giffels. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of repairs to the existing bridge as follows: • removal of existing decking and sidewalk and replace with a new decking and sidewalk. • patch repair to deteriorated concrete in abutments, wingwalls and retaining walls. • patch repair to deteriorated concrete in precast girders and deck soffit. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A debris containment system will be installed beneath the bridge and sediment fencing will also be utilized around the construction site to prevent sediment and debris from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings No new plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34962 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 Date: January 21, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON Application #: 001 /04/TOR MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.7 ROBERT MAH To place fill within a regulated area on (180 Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Robert Mah. 35 The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 180 Old King Road, in the Village of Bolton. The proposal involves the construction of a sun room addition to an existing residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Floor Plan, prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms, dated January 15, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on January 15, 2004. • Foundation Plan, prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms, dated January 15, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on January 15, 2004. • Back Elevation & Side Elevation, prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms, dated January 15, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on January 15, 2004. • Side Elevation, prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms, dated January 15, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on January 15, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms, dated January 15, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on January 15, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill in order to facilitate the construction of a 16.6 square metre (178.8 square foot) sun room addition to the rear of an existing detached residential dwelling at 180 Old King Road in the Village of Bolton. The proposed works will be contained within the rear manicured yard. The subject property is entirely within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As a result, the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected. Pollution: The subject property is located approximately 80 metres away from the nearest watercourse. The proposed works will not result in the sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. There are no fisheries related concerns with the proposed works. Plantings As the proposed works are located within the existing manicured portion of the subject lands and since no vegetation will be removed, no plantings are required as part of this application. 36 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - Minor Additions of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35056 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: January 27, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 026/04 /CAL 8.1.8 MERIN INVESTMENTS (MARKHAM) INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, Concession 8 Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Block C, Plan 18, (southeast of Highway 7 and Highway 48), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Merin Investments (Markham) Inc.. The purpose is to place /move fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a subdivision and an associated storm water outfall to the Rouge River valley. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. GP, General Plan, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. GR, Grading Plan, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. P1, Plan and Profile James Walker Crescent, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. P2, Plan and Profile Torrance Road, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. P3, Plan and Profile Sanitary Sewer @ Block 33 & 39, prepared by Roberts Bell • Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. P4, Plan and Profile Laneway @ Lot 29 to Lot 32, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. STM, Storm Drainage Area Plan, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. SAN, Sanitary Drainage Area Plan, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. ES, Erosion & Siltation Control Plan, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, date last revised August 8, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. DE1, Standard Drawings and Details, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. 37 • Drawing No. DE2, Standard Drawings and Details, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing No. DE3, Rear Re- Grading Details, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, dated February 14, 2003, received by TRCA November 12, 2003. • Drawing R1, Slope Stabilization and Outfall Restoration Planting Plan, prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, dated September 3, 2003, received by TRCA September 10, 2003. • Drawing R2, Details, prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, dated September 3, 2003, received by TRCA September 10, 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place /move fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a 32- lot residential draft plan of subdivision and the associated storm water outfall. Authority staff reviewed the Planning application for this subdivision and recommended conditions of draft approval, including obtaining any permits necessary under Ontario Regulation 158. The underground storm sewer connection and the storm water outfall crosses Authority owned lands. This permit will not be released until the Authority agrees to register an easement in favour of the applicant, or the Town of Markham, for this storm sewer and outfall. The report by the Authority's Property Section, in support of this easement, is also on the agenda for today's meeting of the Executive Committee. Control of Flooding: The proposed outlet is appropriately designed in order to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the valley will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and the work will not affect any significant natural heritage features. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings Following construction, the area around the outfall will be landscaped with native trees and shrubs. This landscape plan was reviewed to the satisfaction of staff. 38 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34237 Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: January 27, 2004 39 Application #: 108 /03 /MARK THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS: RES. #812/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.9 - 8.1.17, with the exception of Minor Works permits 8.1.12 - John Favo and 8.1.15 - Eric Paskevics, which was withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. CARRIED RES. #B13 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Suzan Hall THAT the Minor Works permit granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application 8.1.12 - John Favo, that had been scheduled on the agenda as an errata item for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.9 BRAM EAST PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT GROUP LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, 9, 10, Concession 9, 10 NDS, (The Gore Road), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a watermain crossing under the West Humber River adjacent to the Gore Road in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Durmuid Horgan, of Candevcon Limited, dated February 4, 2004, to address ecological and engineering concerns. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 40 Proposal: This project is a planned component of the Region of Peel's servicing master plan, which will extend existing watermain services north from Cottrelle Parkway to Castlemore Road along The Gore Road in the City of Brampton. This extension is being completed to facilitate current and proposed residential development within this area. As one section of this extension, this application is to facilitate the construction of a bored watermain crossing underneath the west Humber River. No in -water works are proposed with this application, and a depth of at least 1.5 metres below the stream invert will be maintained. Control of Flooding: The works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however this is a temporary project (being completed within The Gore Road right -of -way) for which permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are not anticipated. Pollution. Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. The Region of Peel is proposing to widen this section of The Gore Road and expand the existing culverts within the area in the near future. As a result, vegetation affected during the construction process will not be restored until the road widening works are completed. All disturbed areas will be appropriately stabilized until such time as the affected vegetation is restored. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. No fisheries concerns exist with respect to this project, as there are no in -water works. Plantings Affected lands will be restored to pre- construction condition after the forthcoming road widening works are completed. The applicant has provided a letter of commitment in support of this application relating to the restoration of any disturbed areas through the TRCA permit to be issued for the expansion of The Gore Road in this area. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section - 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35054 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: January 26, 2004 Application #: 024 /04 /BRAM 8.1.10 MENKES INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, 15, Concession 7, 8, in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. 41 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a sanitary sewer crossing under Mimico Creek in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Dan Arts of Menkes Development, dated February 4, 2004, to address ecological and engineering concerns. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This project involves the extension of an existing sanitary sewer line to service proposed industrial development at Goreway Drive and Steeles Avenue in the City of Brampton. This application is to facilitate the construction of a bored watermain crossing underneath Mimico Creek (through directional drilling), adjacent to the Goreway Drive. No in -water works are proposed with this application, and a depth of at least 1.5 metres below the stream invert will be maintained. Control of Flooding: The works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however this is a temporary project for which permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are not anticipated Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. No fisheries concerns exist with respect to this project, as there are no in -water works. Plantings Affected lands will be restored to pre- construction condition. Significant restoration of this valley corridor is anticipated in conjunction with adjacent proposed industrial developments, with which this servicing is associated. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section - 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35045 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: January 21, 2004 42 Application #: 019/04 /BRAM CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 8.1.11 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area (1996 Rathburn Road West, 4333 Garnetwood Chase, 1900 Sismet Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Mississauga. The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail and pedestrian bridge crossings within a valley corridor of the Etobicoke Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Michael Gusche of the City of Mississauga, dated February 4, 2004, to address ecological and engineering concerns. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill and undertake minor grading to facilitate the extension of the Etobicoke Creek trail between Burnhamthorpe Road East, and Highway 401 in the City of Mississauga. This proposal also involves the construction of three pedestrian bridge crossings of Etobicoke Creek, which link the proposed trail to the surrounding network. This proposed extension will connect to the existing Etobicoke Creek trail south of Burnhamthorpe Road, which was approved by the Authority on April 7, 2000. The multi -use trail (combined use as per TRCA Trail Guidelines) will be located on lands managed by the City of Mississauga. Control of Flooding: The works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however no significant impacts to the storage and conveyance of streamflows are anticipated. The proposed trail will be constructed at or near the existing grade, and the proposed bridge crossings will not be an impediment to storm flows. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. This trail is being constructed within the right -of -way of an approved sanitary sewer line, (approved by the TRCA under Permit C- 03298) and the construction of the trail will coincide with the construction of sewer line. As a result, no additional surrounding vegetation will be disturbed during the construction process. 43 Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to the proposed trail construction or operation. The works may in fact result in reduced erosion and sedimentation by constructing a defined trail where currently an ad hoc trail exists. There are no fisheries concerns with this proposal. Plantings No significant vegetation will be disturbed as a result of this project. A restoration plan for areas adjacent to the trail within the sewer line right -of -way is associated with the separate sanitary sewer project. Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section - 4.22, Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities/ Highly Urbanized Areas, and Section - 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34901 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: January 27, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 463/03/MISS MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.12 JOHN FAVO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 27, Plan 65M -3067, (111 Gidleigh Park Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by John Favo. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and associated landscaping within the rear manicured yard of an existing residential lot. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by Solda Pools, dated January 15, 2003, received by the TRCA on January 22, 2004, redline revised to indicate that drainage from the pool will be directed toward the front of the subject property and to delete reference to completing the armourstone and water feature within 5 years from the installation of the pool. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 44 Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed development involves excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and landscaping within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The proposed works will be contained within the manicured yard, which is delineated by a chain link fence. The proposed development will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted in association with the proposed pool construction to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34863 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: January 26, 2004 Application #: 444 /03/VAUG 8.1.13 WILFRID AND VIVIAN DEVREEZE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 98, Plan 3765, (14 Riverside Boulevard), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Wilfrid and Vivian Devreeze. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the replacement of an existing single detached residential dwelling with a new one - storey single detached residential dwelling and deck. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006. 45 • Landscape Plan, prepared by Walter's Landscaping Limited, dated January 29, 2004, received February 2, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by David Wooldridge Inc., received November 12, 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the demolition and replacement of an existing single detached residential dwelling. The existing dwelling is located within 10 metres of the top of bank. The footings of the proposed replacement dwelling, including deck, will be located no closer than 3.65 metres from the top of bank, as requested by TRCA geotechnical staff. The proposal also involves the construction of a drain and vegetative buffer to temporarily collect and hold storm water and prevent direct runoff over the sloped portion of the site. TRCA staff are confident that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the location of the proposed development. Control of Flooding: The proposed residential dwelling and deck will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are confident that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the location of the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings A vegetative buffer consisting of native, non - invasive species will be established along the top of bank. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34873 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: January 26, 2004 46 Application #: 446 /03/VAUG CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO SOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.14 BILL ROSS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Plan 5454, (88 Post Road), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mansour Shamsipour. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a new two storey dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006. • Landscape Plan, prepared by Framar, dated April 21, 2003, received February 2, 2004. • Landscape Grading Concept, Drawing No. L1, prepared by MSL Landscape Architects, dated May 23, 2003, received February 2, 2004. • Drawings A -, Site Plan; No. A -2, Basement Floor Plan; No. A -3, Ground Floor Plan; No. A -4, Second Floor Plan; No. A -5, North and South Elevations; No. A -6, West and East Elevation; and No.A -7, Section Details, prepared by M -Arch Design Group Inc., dated October 3, 2003, received February 2, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a new two storey single family dwelling having the gross floor area of 652.35 square metres (7, 022 square feet). The existing dwelling will be demolished. The property is adjacent to Wilket Creek. The proposed works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 70 metres away. Conservation of Land: The proposed works will not impact any significant natural features and no geotechnical /slope instability or fisheries issues are associated with the project. Plantings The applicant is proposing new plantings of trees and shrubs as part of the overall site development. 47 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2. (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35052 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 26, 2004 Application #: 022/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.15 ERIC PASKEVICS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (42 Bonnyview Drive), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Eric Paskevics. • Withdrawn TOWN OF AJAX 8.1.16 GUINNESS PLACE DEVELOPMENTS INC. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1, 2 3, Concession 3 Part Lot 9, Plan 40R- 21732, Harwood Avenue & Taunton Road, in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Guinness Place Developments Inc. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer outfall adjacent to a draft approved residential subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2009. • General Plan - Guinness Place, Drawing No. G -101, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated August 2003, received October 22, 2003. • Old Hardwood Avenue (Closed), Drawing Nos. P -101 & P -102, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated August 2003, received October 22, 2003. • Hardwood Avenue, Drawing Nos. P -103 & P -104, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated August 2003, received October 22, 2003. • Easement, Drawing No. P -105, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated August 2003, received October 22, 2003. • CPR Sanitary & Storm Sewer Crossing, Drawing No. P -106, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated August 2003, received October 22, 2003. • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. ER -101, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated October 2003, received January 29, 2004. 48 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Miller Creek, a tributary of Duffins Creek, in order to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer outfall adjacent to a draft approved residential subdivision (S -A- 2002 -04). The draft plan of subdivision was accepted by staff through our review of the subdivision application and conditions of draft approval were issued on September 24, 2003. This permit application for servicing fulfills a condition of draft approval issued by TRCA staff. The proposed storm outfall is located approximately 15 metres from Miller Creek. The outfall drains a storm sewer line that connects to a proposed stormwater pond, located on the east side of the CP Railway. The underground storm sewer line runs under the rail line to Harwood Avenue, traverses 840 metres south and emerges to outfall at Miller Creek. The stormwater pond and draft approved subdivision are not subject to a permit under Ontario Regulation 158 as they are not located within a Fill Regulated Area or within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Control of Flooding: TRCA engineering staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed works and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage and conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and approved by staff, will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this proposal. The proposed outfall is setback approximately 15 metres from Miller Creek, a tributary of Duffins Creek and thus there are no fisheries impacts. No other significant natural resource features will be impacted by the proposed outfall. Plantings The disturbed area immediately surrounding the proposed outfall will be planted with native, non - invasive species, in accordance with TRCA requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34822 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: January 28, 2004. 49 Application #: 421/03 /AJAX TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.17 RICHMOND HILL GOLF CLUB To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 36, 37, 38, Concession 1, (8755 Bathurst Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Richmond Hill Golf Club. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River, in order to facilitate minor modifications of ponds on the 12th and 13th holes of the existing Richmond Hill Golf Club. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to June 1, 2006. • Location Plan, Figure 1, Richmond Hill Golf Club, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., Dated January 14, 2004, received January 15, 2004. • Armour Stone Retaining Wall - Typical Section, Figure 2. Richmond Hill Golf Club, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated January 14, 2004, received January 15, 2004. • Proposed Armour Stone Perimeter, drawing Number 1. Richmond Hill Golf Club, Modifications to the 12th and 13th hole ponds, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated January 14, 2004, received January 15, 2004. • Proposed Herbacious Wetland Planting, drawing Number L5. Richmond Hill Golf Club, Modifications to the 12th and 13th hole ponds, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated January 30, 2004, received January 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate minor modifications to the ponds located on the 12th and 13th holes. Armour stone will be added to the perimeter of both ponds. The stones will be placed above the normal water level below the surrounding ground elevation. The armour stone will be placed for aesthetic reasons, as the golf course seeks to improve the layout of the golf course and keep the facilities up -to -date. The 12th hole pond is located approximately 15m from the watercourse and 13th hole pond is located approximately 28m from the watercourse. Control of Flooding: Though the proposed works are in the flood plain of the Don River, they are outside of the hydraulic floodway. TRCA engineering staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that the minor works will not result in any impacts to the storage or conveyance of waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected between the work sites and the watercourse and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. 50 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The 12th and 13th hole ponds, located approximately 15m and 23m from the watercourse, respectively, are off -line, not connected to the watercourse and therefore do not constitute Federal fisheries waters under the Fisheries Act. There are no other natural heritage features that may be negatively impacted by the proposed works. All disturbed areas are to be stabilized following construction. Plantings The armour stone will preclude both emergent and peripheral plantings adjacent to the ponds. As such, native plantings around the ponds and within the emergent zone will be required as part of the restoration plan, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 H) - Existing Resource Based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35035 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: January 29, 2004 CITY OF BRAMPTON Application #: 016/04/RH 8.1.18 REGION OF PEEL To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on east on Drew Road, (north of Derry Road, east of Bramalea Road), north on Torbram Road to CN tracks south of Steeles Avenue, east to the west side of the Etobicoke Creek, north to Highway 407), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for 1475mm x 2310 elliptical concrete sanitary sewer, 1800mm concrete sanitary sewer, 375mm sanitary sewer) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (manholes) within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated January 13, 2004; received January 13, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 51 Proposal: The proposal consists of the twinning of an existing sanitary sewer which is located north of Derry Road, eastbound along Drew Road to Torbram Road, northbound on Torbram to the CN, eastbound to the Etobicoke Creek and northbound to Highway 407. There will be two watercourse crossings via tunneling and a stretch of the sanitary sewer will be located on the west side of the Mimico Creek. Staff negotiated with the Region and the consultant to redesign and relocate the proposed sewer as far west as possible to avoid impacts from the watercourse. Spring Creek, a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek, in the extreme west of the project will be crossed by a tunnel, as well as the small tributary just south of the CN tracks on Torbram Road. Both Spring Creek and Mimico Creek have Regional Storm Flood Plains associated with them as well as Fill Regulation Lines. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, dewatering trap) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Staff has requested that the crossings be conducted during the warmwater timing window, July 1 to March 31. The proposed works will impact no significant resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34507 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: February 2, 2004 52 Application #: 277/03/BRAM TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.19 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on 9th Line between Major Mackenzie Drive and Stouffville Side Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct the bore holes and tunnel, and install the pipe that is part of the 9th Line Trunk Sewer beneath Tributary "4" of Little Rouge Creek using the jack and bore method of construction. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of undertaking dated February 5, 2004 to submit details regarding the bore pits and tunnelling under Tributary 4 as well as a restoration plan and erosion and sediment control plan at the bore pits, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: As part of the Region of York's York - Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) project, construction of a trunk sewer on the east side of 9th Line is required. Permit Application 452 /03 /MARK is for the alteration to a watercourse as required to facilitate the construction of the tunnel beneath Tributary 4, an intermittent tributary of the Little Rouge Creek. There are two other permit applications associated with this section of the 9th Line YDSS project. 1. Permit Application 032 /04 /MARK is for the alteration to the watercourse that is required at Little Rouge Creek such that the creek will be used to accept flows associated with the dewatering from Manhole 14A to the project limits south of Major Mackenzie Drive. It is predicted that the maximum velocity to enter the creek during pumping will be 6.2 L/s. 2. Permit Application 033 /04 /MARK is for the alteration to the watercourse that is required so that the receiving watercourse can accept flows associated with the dewatering from the project limits at Main Street in Stouffville to Manhole 14A. Control of Flooding: Any fill placement required will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with Toss of storage or conveyance. 53 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Erosion and sedimentation controls will be in place where the drainage ditch discharges to the Tributary "4 ". There are no significant natural features associated with this project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34880 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: February 5, 2004 8.1.20 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Application #: 452 /03 /MARK To alter a waterway on 9 Line between Major Mackenzie Drive and Stouffville Side Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to dewater from the aquifer to the Little Rouge Creek to facilitate the construction of the 9th Line Trunk Sewer along the east side of 9th Line from south of Major Mackenzie Drive to Manhole 14A. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of undertaking dated February 5, 2004 to: 1. Submit the current condition details of the drainage ditch connection to the Little Rouge valley. Pursuant to TRCA staff review, the Region of York will undertake the necessary alterations to ensure that there is no potential for valley erosion with the increased discharge rates. 2. Implement a monitoring plan for the locally significant woodlot and submit to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 54 Proposal: As part of the Region of York's York - Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) project, construction of a trunk sewer on the east side of 9th Line is required. Permit Application 032 /04 /MARK is for the alteration to the watercourse that is required at Little Rouge Creek such that the creek will be used to accept flows associated with the dewatering from Manhole 14A to the project limits south of Major Mackenzie Drive. It is predicted that the maximum velocity to enter the creek during pumping will be 6.2 L/s. An application for a permit to take water from the Ministry of the Environment is currently being reviewed by that agency. There are two other permit applications associated with this section of the 9th Line YDSS project. 1. Permit Application 452 /03 /MARK is for the alteration to a watercourse as required to facilitate the construction of the tunnel beneath Tributary 4, an intermittent tributary of the Little Rouge Creek. 2. Permit Application 033 /04 /MARK is for the alteration to the watercourse that is required so that the receiving watercourse can accept flows associated with the dewatering from the project limits at Main Street in Stouffville to Manhole 14A. Control of Flooding: Any fill placement required will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with Toss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, dewatering trap) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be no in- stream works associated with this project. Erosion and sedimentation controls will be in place where the drainage ditch discharges to the Little Rouge Creek. In addition, a locally significant woodlot is located near the northern limit of the project within the predicted zone of influence. The required monitoring plan will assess impacts to the woodlot and require mitigation if impacts are detected. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. 55 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35094 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: February 5, 2004 Application #: 032 /04 /MARK 8.1.21 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on 9th Line between Major Mackenzie Drive and Stouffville Side Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to dewater from the aquifer to the Rouge River watershed to facilitate the construction of the 9th Line Trunk Sewer along the east side of 9th Line from approximately Manhole 14A to the project limits at Main Street in Stouffville. There are two options being considered for discharging the water. Option 1 is to discharge to Tributary "4" of Little Rouge Creek. Option 2 is to discharge to Little Rouge Creek itself. The permit will be issued for the period of February 6, 2004 to February 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 1. Letter of undertaking dated February 5, 2004 to: 1. Confirm which option for construction shall be used, as outlined in the TRCA letter dated February 5, 2004. 2. Provide the detailed mitigation plan described in described in the TRCA letter dated February 5, 2004, and work with TRCA staff to ensure that all concerns are satisfied, if Option 1 is selected. 3. Provide the hydraulic analysis and drainage ditch connection details as requested and make appropriate alterations pursuant to TRCA staff review of the information, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff if Option 2 is selected. 4. Implement a detailed monitoring plan for the locally significant wetland as required to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: As part of the Region of York's York - Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) project, construction of a trunk sewer on the east side of 9th Line is required. Permit Application 033 /04 /MARK is for the alteration to the watercourse that is required so that the receiving watercourse can accept flows associated with the dewatering from the project limits at Main Street in Stouffville to Manhole 14A. 56 There are two options for discharging the dewatering volumes that are being considered by Region of York and TRCA staff. Option 1: The discharge waters will be directed to Tributary 4, an intermittent tributary of the Little Rouge Creek. If this option is selected by the Region then a detailed mitigation plan which addresses water quantity, water quality, aquatic habitat and thermal impacts is required. Option 2: The discharge waters will be directed to the Little Rouge Creek. If this option is selected than a hydraulic analysis of the drainage ditch and a review and possible alterations to the area where the drainage ditch enters the Little Rouge valley will be required. It is predicted that the maximum velocity to enter the creek during pumping will be 26.6 L/s if the dewatering is directed to Tributary 4 (option 1) or 32.8 L/s if the dewatering is to the Little Rouge Creek (Option 2). An application for a permit to take water from the Ministry of the Environment is currently being reviewed by that agency. There are two other permit applications associated with this section of the 9th Line YDSS project. 1 Permit Application 452/03 /MARK is for the alteration to a watercourse as required to facilitate the construction of the tunnel beneath Tributary 4, an intermittent tributary of the Little Rouge Creek. 2. Permit Application 032 /04 /MARK is for the alteration to the watercourse that is required at Little Rouge Creek such that the creek will be used to accept flows associated with the dewatering from Manhole 14A to the project limits south of Major Mackenzie Drive. It is predicted that the maximum velocity to enter the creek during pumping will be 6.2 L/s. Control of Flooding: Any fill placement required will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, dewatering trap) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: If the Region chooses to dewater to Tributary 4 as identified in Option 1, then there will be in- stream works associated with this project. If effective erosion and sedimentation controls can be designed, and thermal impacts and impacts to the aquatic community can be eliminated, then the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). If the Region chooses to dewater to the Little Rouge Creek as identified in Option 2, then there • will be no in- stream works associated with this project. Erosion and sedimentation controls will be in place where the drainage ditch discharges to the Little Rouge Creek. 57 In addition, a locally significant wetland is located near the northern limit of the project within the predicted zone of influence. The required monitoring plan will assess impacts to the wetland and require mitigation if impacts are detected. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35095 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: February 5, 2004 Application #: 033 /04 /MARK RES.#B14/04 - APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Beth Williston. Appointment of Enforcement Officer to administer Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation (Ontario Regulation 158). Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT Beth Williston be appointed as an Enforcement Officer for the purpose of enforcing Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterway Regulations (Ontario Regulation 158) made by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), pursuant to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Conservation Authorities Act provides for a conservation authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to enforce its regulations. There are several TRCA staff who currently have this designation, both for the purpose of enforcing TRCA's regulations and for authorizing the issuance of permits approved by the Executive Committee under the regulation. 58 RATIONALE Ms. Beth Williston has recently been appointed to the position of Watershed Policy and Planning Specialist, within the Development Services Section. In this position, she has the responsibility for supervising the TRCA's regulation services associated with the review and approval of applications. The appointment as Enforcement Officer will enable her to authorize the issuance of approvals for the work that she supervises and will allow her to assist with the enforcement of the regulation as required. Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Date: January 13, 2004 RES. #B15/04 - AUTHORITY REALTY TAXES Contract for Property Tax Consultant, CFN 26340. Hiring of Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation (formerly Yeoman & Associates Inc.). Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT the firm of Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation be engaged to assist Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff with: a review of all realty taxable TRCA holdings; negotiation with the Assessment Offices; and any necessary assessment appeals at a cost not to exceed $15,000 plus G.S.T. and reasonable expenses; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to contact the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) to express TRCA concerns about recurring overvaluation of TRCA properties and request MPAC to investigate other methods in determining current value assessment that would generate more accurate Fair Market Value for TRCA properties. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Province of Ontario introduced a province wide current value realty tax system in 1998. This new system was to be phased in over a five -year period. For the first three years (1998, 1999 and 2000) the current values of properties in the province were based on their value as of June 30, 1996. For the years 2001 and 2002, the current values of properties in the province are based on their value as of June 30, 1999. Yearly assessments began in 2003 for the 2004 taxation year. The valuation date is December 31st of the year preceding the taxation year. Starting in 2005, assessed values will be an average of the current year and the previous year, and in 2006 this will be expanded to include the two previous years. 59 This re- assessment was done in a much shorter period of time than most experts advised. The assessments were generated using computer models, a method which is fairly accurate for similar types of properties with large volumes of sales such as residential. As TRCA lands are unique, there was a high probability that there would be incorrect assessments when determining current value assessment. In 1998, quotations were obtained from three tax consultants to assist with: a review of all realty taxable TRCA holdings; negotiation with the Assessment Offices; and any necessary assessment appeals. Yeoman & Associates Inc. was the successful firm and was contracted to undertake this work in May of 1998 (note that in April 2003, Yeoman & Associates Inc. merged with the Altus Group to become Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation). While the focus of the initial phase of this project was to review all TRCA holdings to identify assessments that were unreasonable, there was some flexibility to undertake discussions with the various Assessment Offices to resolve any significant discrepancies in values. As a result of this review and discussions with the Assessment Offices, Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation achieved an initial reduction in 1998 taxes of approximately $70,000. Also, as a result of this review process, appeals were filed in 1998 for 116 roll numbers. In late 1998, Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation was engaged by the TRCA to finalize the outstanding 1998 assessment appeals. As a result of the 1998 province wide re- assessment, a high number of assessments were considered incorrect and an overwhelming number of assessment appeals were filed with the Assessment Review Board. This created quite a back log for the Assessment Review Board resulting in hearing dates for 1998 appeals being delayed. In the case of the TRCA, pre- hearing dates for TRCA's outstanding 1998 assessment appeals were delayed until early 2000. The 116 roll numbers were automatically appealed for 1999 and 2000 with no additional appeal fees being payable. The TRCA also appealed an additional 24 roll numbers for properties that were acquired during that time. Through extensive negotiations with Assessment Offices in the Regions of York, Durham and Peel, on behalf of the TRCA, Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation was able to achieve for the years 1998 to 2000, reductions of taxes of approximately $85,000 per year on top of the approximate $70,000 achieved from the initial review in 1998. For 2001 and 2002, a total of 138 properties were appealed by the TRCA and Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation was able to achieve an additional tax savings of approximately $193,800. For the 2003 tax year a total of 81 properties were appealed in Durham, York and Peel Regions. To date, 32 of the 81 appeals for 2003 have been finalized and achieved reductions in taxes of approximately $37,500. Negotiations with Assessment Officials are ongoing for the 2003 taxation year, and we anticipate resolving these appeals in early 2004. 60 Given Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation's involvement with the TRCA's tax assessment appeals as well as their understanding of the unique characteristics of TRCA owned lands, staff is recommending hiring Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation to continue to undertake a review of all new 2004 assessments. In recognizing that there is an opportunity to have discussions with Assessment Offices prior to the March 31, 2004 appeal deadline with the possibility of reaching an agreement to reduce the assessment without the TRCA having to pay any appeal fee, it is important to undertake the necessary review of all our assessments in a timely manner. The appeal fee for 2004 is $50 per roll number. RATIONALE The knowledge gained and extensive database developed by the Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation of TRCA properties and their values during the 1998 -2003 appeals is considered essential in the review of the 2004 assessments. The historical TRCA property list on the existing Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation database will quantify historical assessments with new assessments tax class changes, identify percentage valuation change and recommendations on whether appeals should be pursued. The Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation has demonstrated their ability and experience in dealing with assessment related matters. FINANCIAL DETAILS The upset limit of fees to Altus Realty Tax Management Corporation in 2004 is $15,000 Funds are provided for this activity in the budget for the Property Section, account code 003 -70. Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 Date: January 13, 2004 RES.#B16/04 - PRODUCTION OF AN INTEGRATED WATERSHED TRAILS MAP Approval of City of Mississauga / TRCA partnership and Terms of Reference. Approval to enter into an agreement with the City of Mississauga to undertake a joint project (Integrated Watershed Trails Map) to fulfill the objectives of Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT staff be authorized to enter into an agreement with the City of Mississauga to implement Phase I of the Integrated Watershed Trails Plan for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks; AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to take such action as is necessary to implement the agreement including the signing of documents. CARRIED 61 BACKGROUND The Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force identified three issues (pp. 216 -218 Greening Our Watersheds) revolving around trails in the watershed: 1) lack of watershed trail master plans; 2) trail fragmentation; and 3) trail maintenance. The task force recommended the development of watershed trails master plans by 2006, and further recommended that trail design guidelines be developed to ensure that both human and environmental needs are met in the development of trails throughout the watersheds. The Sustainable Communities Working Group of the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition (hereafter "Coalition ") identified the production of an integrated trails map as a priority action in their workplan. The map would be the first step in producing a watershed trails master plan that would identify existing trail alignments, future build -out scenarios, capital budget allocations and overlay Community Action Area plans and projects. Integration of the existing municipal trails plans of Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton and Caledon is the first step in producing a watershed trails master plan. The Coalition, at its January 22, 2004 meeting, endorsed the production of an Integrated Watershed Trails Map in partnership with the City of Mississauga. RATIONALE Greening Our Watersheds, pp. 216 -218, describes the issues and current conditions in the watersheds and sets a target for the production of a trails master plan for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks watersheds. The Sustainable Communities Working Group initiated this project under their 2003 workplan and are continuing their efforts in 2004. Michael Gusche, a member of the Sustainable Communities Working Group, and City of Mississauga (Community Services Department) Parks and Recreation staff member has volunteered to coordinate the production of a map through the hiring of a student, and liaise with his municipal parks and recreation colleagues to produce an integrated GIS trails map for the watersheds. Given the relationships established by Mr. Gusche with municipal parks and recreation staff, and the ability to hire a student to undertake the work on behalf of the Coalition, the production of a GIS map is recommended to be sole- sourced to the City of Mississauga. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Production of the map through a partnership with the City of Mississauga would complete Phase I of the integrated trails plan project. The four project phases to produce a watershed trails master plan are summarized below. Project Phases Phase I: Collect and electronically amalgamate trail master plans of Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton and Caledon. Outline present status, proposed future scenarios, 10 -year capital forecast and linkage opportunities across municipal boundaries. Phase II: Identify priority projects within the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks watersheds. Phase III: Review the municipal, TRCA Trail Planning and Design, Waterfront Regeneration Trust and Ministry of Transportation guidelines by 2006. 62 Phase IV: Advocate for trail completion, restoration of disturbed areas and associated interpretive signs as a means of expressing the human heritage and ecology of the community action areas within the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks watersheds. The City of Mississauga Community Services Department will lead the development of the first phase (described above) in partnership with the TRCA and other watershed municipalities. Phase I Workplan • January 2004 - May 2004: assemble electronic and paper versions of municipal trails master plans assemble four GIS layers focusing upon the trails within the watersheds boundaries: - current trail system build -out trail system (choose a year close to 2025 for standardizing different municipal trail build -out schedules and Greening Our Watersheds mandate) ten year forecasted trail construction linkage opportunities a focused smaller scale examination of the above within current community action areas boundaries: Heart Lake, South Mimico, Malton, Snelgrove, Central Mississauga, Central Toronto and South Mississauga. • Liaise with TRCA / Mississauga staff to write accompanying explanatory text for GIS layers developed by the student. • Present a draft to municipalities and TRCA for review and comment in May 2004. • Present a draft to the June 2004 Sustainable Communities and Outreach Working Group for review and comment. • Make revisions and produce final report and presentation for September 2004 Sustainable Communities and Outreach Working Group. • Present to the Coalition for their approval and endorsement. • November / December 2004 - Send electronic and paper copies to municipalities. The Sustainable Communities and Outreach Working Group will provide guidance to the project and will bring a progress report to the Coalition in the future. FINANCIAL DETAILS The work is estimated at $5,000 for completion of Phase I and will not exceed $7,500 according to a letter of understanding with the City of Mississauga. Funds are available for this project. Project coordination, staff supervision and GIS production of the integrated trails map will be solely undertaken by'the City of Mississauga, with liaison from watershed municipalities and technical support from TRCA. In -kind technical and coordination support for the project is estimated at $2,500 for the TRCA and $1,000 for each of the watershed municipalities of Toronto, Mississauga, Caledon and Brampton. Report prepared by:Paul Willms, extension 5316 For Information contact:Chandra Sharma, extension 5237 Date: January 26, 2004 63 RES. #B17/04 - HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES Renewal of hydrogeological services contract. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT Dr. Rick Gerber's contract with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) be renewed until December 31, 2004, with an upset limit of $60,000, including GST, to provide expert hydrogeological services. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Executive Committee approved the contract with Dr. Gerber at meeting #4/01, held on June 8, 2001 and renewed the contract at meeting #5/02, held on June 2, 2002. Dr. Gerber successfully completed the work under both of these projects, including: • set -up, calibration, and reporting for the 3 -D groundwater flow model for A Watershed Plan for Duffins and Carruthers Creeks; • technical input into water budget calculation methodologies; • advice regarding the TRCA groundwater monitoring network design; • advice to TRCA regarding the Pickering Growth Management Study; • representation of TRCA interests in the YPDT groundwater management project; • supervision of consultants for the core and regional groundwater model development; and • preparation for an OMB hearing on the proposed North Leslie development. Although the TRCA now has a hydrogeologist on staff, a renewal of Dr. Gerber's contract is necessary for the following projects: • continued technical input into TRCA's assessment of water budget methodologies; • technical guidance regarding the use of the YPDT groundwater flow model; • continued input into the Pickering Growth Management Study; • expert witness on behalf of the TRCA for the North Leslie OMB Hearing; and • ongoing expert hydrogeological advice for review of complex development applications. RATIONALE For the past twelve years, Dr. Gerber has been conducting research on groundwater in the Greater Toronto Area, and he is a recognized expert in the field of hydrogeology. His knowledge and objectivity cannot be matched by other private sector consultants at equivalent rates. It was on this basis that the TRCA previously retained Dr. Gerber's services, and we have a need to continue the relationship for a number of ongoing initiatives. Dr. Gerber has offered the TRCA the same low rate of $50 per hour for the first 100 hours per month of his time. Additional time will be charged at a rate of $100 per hour, but the TRCA's requirements can be fulfilled within the 100 hours per month. 64 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is available in the York, Peel, and Toronto Capital Budget account. Report prepared by: Donald Ford, extension 5369 For Information contact: Donald Ford, extension 5369 Date: January 13, 2004 RES.#B18/04 - SHOREPLAN ENGINEERING LIMITED - CONTRACT EXTENSION Approval to extend Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) contract with Shoreplan Engineering Limited to develop preliminary designs in support of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC) approval for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park project. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT Shoreplan Engineering Limited be contracted to complete preliminary designs for shore protection of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park, at a cost not to exceed $20,000, plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting #14/00, held on February 2, 2001, the Executive Committee approved the retention of Shoreplan Engineering Limited to undertake the coastal analysis component of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Study and environmental assessment. At meeting #8/03, held on September 5, 2003, the Executive Committee approved the extension of the contract with Shoreplan Engineering Limited to undertake additional work related to public meetings and preparation of an environmental assessment for the project. Since that time, TRCA staff have submitted the environmental assessment for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park project and are in the process of negotiating approvals under the Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) and Fisheries Act. The current plan for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park project is conceptual and does not provide sufficient information to proceed with these approvals. In order that FOC staff may assess the project as it relates to these Acts, a geo- referenced plan of the project is required to determine the alterations that will occur to the existing shoreline profiles, substrates, vegetation and navigability of the shoreline. Shoreplan Engineering Limited has worked with TRCA staff since the project was initiated in 2000. Shoreplan Engineering Limited submitted a proposal for the Scope of Work identified in the Request for Proposal provided by TRCA. TRCA sought other agency and public input to determine the most appropriate concept for shoreline improvements. Since 2000, the preferred concept has evolved to include a number of variations in shoreline treatments. Additional public and technical meetings were attended and additional coastal anaylsis was required beyond the original Request for Proposal. 65 RATIONALE In order to facilitate NWPA and Fisheries Act approvals, additional modelling and coastal analysis is required. Shoreplan will make use of a Mike 21 wave modules analysis program that is currently being leased for other Shoreplan Engineering Limited projects. This would result in a potential cost savings to TRCA if the work is undertaken in February. In order to meet the information requirements to facilitate NWPA and Fisheries Act approval, Shoreplan Engineering Limited has submitted a proposal to: • carry out numerical wave analysis of wave penetration to determine wave diffraction and refraction patterns in the area currently known as Amos Waites Beach; • refine the various shore protection cross - sections and locate these accurately on the plan; • meet with staff to review prepared plans and sections; • refine the plan based on staff comments; and • prepare a geo- referenced site plan. This body of work will enable TRCA staff to begin to negotiate with FOC staff so that all project approvals may be obtained by fall of 2004, in keeping with the current schedule for implementation. FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of the described work is estimated to be $14,900 plus GST. An additional cost may be incurred for rental of the Mike 21 Wave Module, pending the timing of the work to be completed by the consultant. This additional cost is approximately $700 per month with a two month minimum rental fee. Funds are available to undertake this additional work. Report prepared by: Laura Stephenson, extension 5296 For Information contact: Nancy Gaffney, extension 5313 Date: January 28, 2004 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RES. #819/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT the Committee move into closed session to discuss item 8.8 - Pine Valley Drive Link. CARRIED 66 ARISE AND REPORT RES. #B20 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Suzan Hall THAT the Committee arise and report from closed session. CARRIED RES. #B21 /04 - PINE VALLEY DRIVE LINK - OPA 600 OMB APPEAL Status on the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) appeal of the Pine Valley Drive Link, and Official Plan Amendment (OPA) Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) process, and confirmation of new direction for the hearing and environmental assessment process. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Suzan Hall WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority does not concur with the findings of the Phase 2 component of the Pine Valley Drive Link Class Environmental Assessment; WHEREAS the TRCA has consistently requested that the City of Vaughan address the issue of the Pine Valley Drive Link through an Individual Environmental Assessment; WHEREAS the full Authority reconfirmed staff's direction to continue to participate on an Information only basis for the remainder of the Pine Valley Drive Link Environmental Assessment Process, and continue to prepare for the OMB hearing scheduled to commence on February 2, 2004 on the understanding that TRCA will be requesting that: 1. The Minister of the Environment issue a Part II (Section 16) Order so far as to alter the current Municipal Class Environmental Assessment to form a new Individual Environmental Assessment study process as soon as possible; and that 2. The Minister of the Environment also refer (pursuant to Section 7.2 (3)) the undertaking to the Environmental Review Board with a request for a joint OMB and Environmental Assessment Hearing, avoiding the duplication of effort and cost of two hearings over the same proposal and ensuring that the proposal can be comprehensively reviewed with the benefit of the appropriate environmental assessment methodology; AND WHEREAS at the OMB hearing convened on February 2, 2004, the legal counsel for the National Golf Course of Canada, and Quinto Annibale announced their withdrawal from the hearing proceedings; 67 THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff be directed to request a motion to end the hearing, and to continue to pursue the Individual Environmental Assessment Process request and Part 1I Order with the Minister of the Environment, to ensure that TRCA and provincial interests are addressed; . AND FURTHER THAT Counsel for TRCA be directed to seek costs on behalf of the Authority. CARRIED RES. #B22/04 - TORONTO REGION SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM: TRANSITION PHASE/ ENVIRONMENT CANADA The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been approached by Environment Canada to become the sponsor of the Toronto Region Sustainabilty Program which supports Ontario Region's activities relating to the development of voluntary instruments to advance the adoption of pollution prevention (P2) planning practices in small to medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Greater Toronto Area. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT approval be given for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff to develop a suitable agreement to enable TRCA to become an implementation agent for Environment Canada's Toronto Region Sustainability Program; AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to execute a contribution agreement between TRCA and Environment Canada for the Transition Phase of the Toronto and Region Sustainability Program, which is satisfactory to both parties involved. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto Region Sustainability Program provides small to medium sized manufacturing enterprises in the Toronto region with a 50% cost -share funding incentive (up to a maximum of $4,000) for pollution prevention planning. The objectives of the program are to create an action and results oriented program in Toronto to advance the performance of small and medium enterprise (SMEs) and manufacturing operations in the city in areas of sustainable development and environmental performance in line with Environment Canada's objectives. The program was initiated in February 2000, with funding from Environment Canada: Ontario Region and the City of Toronto. The Ontario Centre for Environmental Technology Advancement (OCETA) has been the delivery agent and funding manager for the program since its inception. The program is the only pollution prevention technical assistance program in Canada where participating organizations have a forum for systematically achieving environmental outcomes that all three orders of government - federal, province and municipal - identify as being important. Initially the program was developed to be applied in the City of Toronto proper, however OCETA was authorized to expand it into adjacent municipalities (Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan, Markham, Richmond Hill and Pickering). 68 Environment Canada - Ontario Region has proposed that the Toronto Region Sustainability Program's lead be transferred to the TRCA with OCETA continuing to operate as a delivery agent. Environment Canada have prepared a draft contribution agreement that outlines the technical and financial details of the Toronto Region Sustainability Program Transition Phase (2003/2004) . Report prepared by: Lisa Turnbull, extension 5325 For Information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Date: February 02, 2004 NEW BUSINESS RES. #B23/04 - ADMINISTRATION FEES FOR PLANNING SERVICES AND PERMITTING Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Frank Dale THAT staff report back on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's current fee structure, with a recommendation for a penalty for works commenced prior to issuance of a permit. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:18 a.m., on Friday, February 6, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks CARRIED Brian Denney Secretary- Treasurer 69 ‘.. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/04 March 5, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #2/04, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, March 5, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Rob Ford Member Dick O'Brien Chair Dave Ryan Member REGRETS Michael Di Biase Member Suzan Hall Member Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair RES. #B24 /04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Frank Dale THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/04, held on February 6, 2004, be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) A confidential letter dated February 25, 2004 from Joanne Appleyard of 27 Kingsbury Crescent, Scarborough, in regards to a proposal for acquisition of 27 Kingsbury Crescent. RES. #B25 /04 - CORRESPONDENCE 27 Kingsbury Crescent, Scarborough Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri David Barrow 70 THAT above -noted confidential correspondence (a) be received; AND FURTHER THAT the proposal from Mrs. Jo Anne Appleyard, on behalf of Mr. Peter C. Appleyard, for acquisition by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority of 27 Kingsbury Crescent, Scarborough, be refused. CARRIED SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES.#B26/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Don River Watershed and Rouge River Watershed Component Duke of Richmond Developments Inc., CFN 35039. Purchase of property located between Gamble Road and Jefferson Sideroad, east of Bathurst Street, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River watershed and Rouge River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 68.85 hectares (170.13 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Duke of Richmond Developments Inc., being Part of Lots 56, 57, 58, and 59, Concession 1 WYS and designated as Blocks 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144 and 1146 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Rady - Pentak & Edward Surveying Ltd., dated April 10, 2002, together with easements for storm water outfalls across' Blocks 1143, 1144 and 1146, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located between Gamble Road and Jefferson Sideroad, east of Bathurst Street; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED 71 BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Nicole Moxley of Evans Planning, the owner's consultant. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don River and Rouge River watersheds as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision 19T(R)- 99022, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands to include the top -of -bank of the Don and Rouge River headwater valley corridors found throughout this property. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: February 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 72 Attachment 1 , • An -'• NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION ANO ACOUISMON PROJECT 2001-2005 , , .• 'm I 5 . Flood Plain aro Conservation Comoonerni Don River Watershed and Ilmos Mier Waterer.ad Corrncesenr. ,••• k i •.: Woe ot Richmond Devolopintelt inc. , . CFN 35039 -••, .:" • - • 1, 1 L- -,0**4..• • 1 i ..., ' ' .- . I,. • . tt ...- • . • 1' sO, .: (..1 c...• _rz._ - . ' • ' - - - -T-'' .• ' ' 41:, : -,' t.. 4 ...... ''' •t'' 1/... i . - . • ... - ... , '-.....1. ...' ; ,.' . . - . . • , • . R - ". C . , .4 A 1 -- ,..• - ..\.. :.. \ . r 1 • i i„ - • ; - .' - . . ", •' - % 1 . ....- 0■ .- .: '•'••^ .,...7;,-•. 4 4 " '.• ';.' .''1-"' 1?• ,.. .i I.?i " :- 5F. -_., . 4 ;. . _ -.-L ,*e. . .7 .N i-o:., *.• ..., - ‘.P . -. 0 ,1 .0•: 1 6 , ‘ , . '. . .=.. t - , '• 1•'''..—ar • ''Si 0 ,... ' ...:,, -1 ' - ' - - 'AO° • 1 , • ' ti ',,--..,,..,* 4r 1.: _.....-..,,,, ...,. .4 .7..,..., ,:--.• • • 0... ‘---,1-.• .... • _ .„ ..i.. • , • . it .... • , - i . .• • • ...- - - - , ... , ■ % ....''' I • i .0 • . ..■ • , . :, % -4FFENUMI V.' is s....,%; o, :..---' . ,.,...,.. • `;.,:i .. .Ni..... . r - • ... .■17' ;..- 4 -.. ••• ...., .....- , : I I• \ ' . i ••'. • • • 4 441(41,. ',44- ' • I' , . • • 4 r * ••■•••• ,..•••:'•.' N 7 - .::,;,.. ._ --.- - . `-•• ... - -.' • . ; . - - -f‘- -) _- - ..-, Psi; ti% -- :,• • , :1i-1, . , --- .1:••- •,,i,,, _. . .. , - ::=. i V44.:' -..--- -• -• • ....4 . • . . ...r. — ggo .,'" 7.:7 %--.3 • "■•• i,.1. ''1,.?j* 0 . ':'-•"" ••• -i ••• 1 , _ , ' • I • • rgi... !I. ....•••"£-`;1. . , '...% • :•---. _ ... . 1 -c•v — -). • • „......„.. : . ,. ,,,,,,, • . -.--• -...‘ 't- • :.- •;,*„. ..„.: - • --,••-- „../ .,,,. . - .....-..-, , ,...• ..: _. ' _--,-.....--„.-2._.:., -._ •._•., -.•:.__, . , ! , , .k- s , .-. -.) .,,,,,,, .• . "4. . • r.. -, -• ‘r 1 #% .. -. . l - ,. „. ; ,. 4 IA2. ,4..„. .' ..,..0•) ,, 8 . !:1 ..t . .. 11O5.1, , • 7 , „ . %m — . • i • c , n . W .*A ;.....4, ,. .* .;... 4 . • '-'1•• : Tr4ittfdree • ,- - - I ‘ , .` ...:1 .• - i 1 ,. -.. , , A. \.•,,, -,-- ., ... • z..:00,..v.,-_, -- ..,,..,.. ,r, .,,... - • ,. , ...- —'•••• ...v.sa. • '. .1' . t _ts, 4./ ' f k - - --o-0--• ,....s.. 1, Ar ' ,.,,..lor•• . ...., -t .-..4 .. - — .• ' - --" - :1!..) 1)- - , : ..._. - s' n•O. ..■-•`-'-;•'-`r,•■'"--- • / , , ••Issl• t • • • • 1'4%4 TRCA LANDS • - - • ',' --Tian:Far PROPERTY •1•••••-- .„..... S o . . _1,:I.,.'I -.' \ • :‘ .. ,..,.i7-.,F*4:".-4.:, , ';- .... 4 .• • - - ---: - .'-, -' -.-• A, 4, , .• .k• . l _,:. -_..,. .. • --. - : , , c 0 `'''-...-' rI.. - -- -r - _.- ',),,.c, _ • 8 A • .• '• S.... ...I..' .. ) I '•,,,..... ' '. I • ' •A ‘ ..... ' , t... •• ‘ ga os-se•-li ( - s.... •••••• -. e. 4`. ...,..- . .- ',•••*--..' i - "'...... _. --?',/ •-..-( e ".44T.Z.------.` • ..,■-•` • • ./., .---V....,_...:•••-_,It--..,,...;c: -• • sk . J` --' ....... •,,,..4...,,,:-- ,,....,•‘•_:-.... ........... i '; -,- ... • -,„:, -.....;'-' --,,..,-- -, to ...V).. • -• _, ,•• Cs,..(/ • ....„, •oi. . . , ..._,,_____,..c.., 1-7.7- • • t ":, • - ..... ' S.,t,-. • . .-- . • • . -., . o- e' ,-- 1- ,..---- ' '-,■ --, - '-':--- . ,-,•_..4 Et.a.„ .IN, N.1.11:..„1S,..,_4..;..4..i\k*: „;-...... • ., . -N..- ■-•■ -`.- --*- '''' --- • • -...”1"Y,1,-- --A. !, • . •• •• ,-.."'",. t..-- • ... k. AO _ ...- • . .71, a ....• . 'I ' °:.•..'"'..1.'" . •• ....... ; I. , — ....... * a. ‘• .' • . 4 i---.-7. -,:•_._,A1-41.. : .,„„, , _ ... •-,.' , .5.4,,,, 1.;•,..$:914 \-%,_ . , . i __ .. •'. 1.' • , --.. st" ', % . • • . ••••••"1- ..... 4 . -- .;,... , ‘.. ' 4 . ' c : ' Kersehriiron d ' ..------.-, , . , .... - 1 for Me ilirtag coy ' ..-)x-r-- \ .=• a4) , • . 4• , i•5 0 • - • v • • - 73 RES. #B27/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Mimico Creek Watershed Jaroslaw and Olena Semotiuk, CFN 31809. Purchase of property at 55 Van Dusen Boulevard for erosion control and bank stabilization works located south of Bloor Street, west of Royal York Road, City of Toronto, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.0127 hectares (0.0313 acres), more or less, of vacant land together with a temporary working easement and restrictive covenant on 0.0154 hectares (0.038 acres), more or less, be purchased from Jaroslaw and Olena Semotiuk, being Part of Block B, Plan 2673 and Part of Block A, Plan 4064, City of Toronto, located south of Bloor Street, west of Royal York Road; THAT the purchase price be $2.00 together with carrying out erosion control and bank stabilization works by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA); THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Mr. and Mrs. Semotiuk's property has a steep slope adjacent to the Mimico Creek which is susceptible to erosion. Historically, to protect the property from the erosion, a concrete block retaining wall was constructed. This wall has now failed. It is proposed that TRCA undertake erosion control and bank stabilization works to protect the property. Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Murray Payne. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 74 RATIONALE The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Mimico Creek Watershed. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE This parcel of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing management agreement. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for expenses involved in completing this transaction are available from City of Toronto capital. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223, or Kristin Geater, extension 5667 Date: February 23, 2004 Attachments: 1 75 Attachment 1 NATURAL r4El vTAGE LANDS PROTECTION ARO ACQUISITION ;'fOJCCT?501 -2006 F wad Plain and Cmeei•etlon Cwnpanent/M'riao G'eok Watamod .araalaa and Olen' Sam&U CFR 31809 • N.` yy 11 /,N. f � // r: f/ . r ‹)",.\s„ Y ' ItaraiSearairon for TM. thing City • (/„f : ,ITRCALANDS 'SUBJECT PROPERTY r kocom r+woarwo Farm'. Ira C.wl Nr `A, cal .V b I // rr r • / 76 r RES. #B28/04 - CITY OF TORONTO Request for Permanent Easement for a 900 mm Diameter Storm Sewer Waterfront Watershed, City of Toronto, CFN 35156. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a 900 mm diameter storm sewer, on the west side of Meadowcliffe Drive, south of Balcarra Avenue in Cudia Park, in the City of Toronto (Toronto East Community Council Area). Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a 900 mm diameter storm sewer, on the west side of Meadowcliffe Drive, south of Balcarra Avenue in Cudia Park, in the City of Toronto (Toronto East Community Council Area); WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.085 hectares (0.21 acres), more or Tess, be granted to the City of Toronto for a 900 mm diameter storm sewer, said land being on the west side of Meadowcliffe Drive, south of Balcarra Avenue in Cudia Park, City of Toronto, as shown on a plan prepared by R. J. Burnside & Associates Ltd., Contract No. 03D4 -20WP, Drawing No. FIG 1, Sheet No. 1, revised February 20, 2004; THAT considerations be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the City of Toronto fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation is to be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Toronto; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; 77 THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto has formally requested a permanent easement for the construction of a 900 mm diameter storm sewer on the west side of Meadowcliffe Drive, south of Balcarra Avenue in Cudia Park. The proposed works have been designed as part of the Meadowcliffe Drive Area Storm Drainage Study to alleviate persistent localized drainage problems in the area. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff have been involved in the review of a previously submitted Environmental Assessment Act application for this project. A permit application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for the construction of a portion of the proposed works located within the Waterfront Fill Regulation Line will be submitted and be considered by the Executive Committee at a future meeting. The permanent easement site is owned by the TRCA and is managed by the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement will also be required. The submitted engineering drawing shows the location of both easements. The subject lands were acquired from the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on July 29, 1974 under the Waterfront Master Acquisition Project - Scarborough Sector. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submission under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent and temporary easement locations is attached. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: February 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 78 Attachment 1 i CITY OF TORONTO Keq r Porfronere Causal/1m or a SOO nrrs 0 *maw Swum Ser.IN \ Wate:sordisaWatershec, cl To-onto 0 -1 i)11 iePf■) L tv, 4,111„,,, 4,k4IN A k rlillr- Alk" , ..•,;' r ,..4 -ztif:Aliv, 6 11. • Able 11,-.4 1 *4 le \ 114, 04 \\LI to a Vkkk \,„ \ A 0 N' s:::,,k:,,,,, 41, .• N.1* N44 NkkIN . .11;■ ...4 % ' ‘ 142 \ . .. , , • „ \ .:, ,.. FINova--..rp.,„„red. '..;..........._. _. ....,...,..._....101k ,;;. ....„1,-...."„ .......„-4,----.4..... , , . NrcieforoZpottiarAtei"...-ZZAW, I I\ lfr'irr4icdg'IeIVVZZ'ZiP-1b111Poo""ZV-1.:"^■Sh■Ili, Pr WitiNirrkvell _.— LAKE ONTARIO SarirrtMit I:S=3TRCA LANDS EMI reammIONEWIRNT PROPOS= y$04647 for The Living City RES. #B29/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Request for Permanent Easement for a 750 mm Diameter Sanitary Sewer Rouge River Watershed, Town of Markham, CFN 35098. Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York to provide a permanent easement for a 750 mm diameter sanitary sewer, southwest of the intersection of Highway 7 and Markham Road in Milne Park, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Markham. David Barrow Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York to provide a permanent easement for a 750 mm diameter sanitary sewer, southwest of the intersection of Highway 7 and Markham Road in Milne Park, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Markham; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of York in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.77 hectares (1.90 acres), more or less, be granted to the Regional Municipality of York for a 750 mm diameter sanitary sewer, said land being Part of Lot 9, Concession 7, as shown on a plan prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, Contract No. T- 03 -55, Drawing No. G -1, Sheet No. 3 of 10, revised November 6, 2003; THAT considerations be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or Indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Regional Municipality of York; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the Town of Markham Parks & Recreation Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA; 80 THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Regional Municipality of York has formally requested a permanent easement for a new 750 mm diameter sanitary sewer, southwest of the intersection of Highway 7 and Markham Road in Milne Park. The proposed sewer is required to replace an existing sanitary sewer that runs through Milne Park, under the pond and beneath the Milne Park dam structure. The existing sanitary sewer has deteriorated and is inaccessible for maintenance. The deteriorated sewer will be abandoned after the new sanitary sewer has been commissioned and the existing easement will then be de- registered.' The western portion of the proposed 750 mm diameter sanitary sewer is situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River while approximately the eastern two- thirds of the new sewer line is not fill regulated. A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for construction of the proposed works located within the Fill Regulated Area is forthcoming and will be considered by the Executive Committee at a future meeting. The lands subject to the permanent easement are owned by TRCA and are managed by the Town of Markham Parks & Recreation Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement will also be required. The submitted engineering drawing shows the location of both easements. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from Kobel Realty Ltd. - Stanton Property - on December 27, 1961 under the Milne Dam and Reservoir Master Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submission under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent and temporary easement locations is attached. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Regional Municipality of York has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: February 23, 2004 Attachments: 1 81 Attachment 1 11'7•1.,....CI 1 11 1 11![ 1 31.1114 T 4. %. I * H'Y - F WW f i-&- 82 RES. #830/04 - GTA - METROQUEST Development of a MetroQUEST tool for the Greater Toronto Area. Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Envision Sustainability Tools be retained to develop a MetroQUEST tool for the Greater Toronto Area, at a cost not to exceed $100,000, plus GST; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) contribute $30,000 to the project; THAT participation by TRCA be subject to confirmation of $50,000 from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM); AND FURTHER THAT TRCA explore additional funding opportunities with the regions, municipalities and conservation authorities in the Greater Toronto Area for the remaining $20,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND Envision Sustainability Tools (hereafter "Envision ") has been developing the QUEST product over the past ten years in partnership with the Sustainability Development Research Institute at the University of British Columbia, and has been successfully implemented in several regions worldwide. The project has been completed in cities in England, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, the United States and Canada, and is in development in several other countries. QUEST is an innovative computer simulation tool that, if implemented in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), will allow audiences to create future scenarios for their region. The consequences of choices are evaluated using a wide range of sustainability indicators, from air quality to employment. RATIONALE It was determined the QUEST tool would be valuable to municipalities in developing "smart communities ", given that metropolitan areas in North America are facing the following challenges: • population growth and the resulting pressure on land, housing and services; • decreasing quality of life as environmental and social conditions deteriorate; • increasing demands for shrinking budgets; • mounting expectations for meaningful public involvement in planning; • pressure to address smart growth and sustainability in an integrated manner. The intention is that QUEST will facilitate more comprehensive and inclusive strategic planning, resulting in a vision that is supported by the region's decision makers, stakeholders and citizens. The three key activities that have been developed to benefit communities are: 83 1. Strategic Exploration - QUEST allows non - experts to construct and explore future scenarios in real time, either over the internet, individually or in interactive workshops. 2. Strategic Planning - QUEST provides decision makers with an easy framework to ask 'what if?' questions for their entire region and shows the consequences of these choices projected decades into the future. 3. Stakeholder Engagement - QUEST facilitates meaningful involvement and participation throughout the entire planning process, creating a strong sense of ownership over the results. The overall intention of QUEST is the development of a product which will result in integrated and strategic planning, meaningful community participation and a true spirit of partnership in a shared future. MetroQUEST is a computer simulation tool developed to meet the inherent challenges of metropolitan planning in incorporating smart growth and sustainability initiatives. Ultimately, it allows users to understand the trade -offs required to create a clean, prosperous and livable future for the region. A more detailed description of the MetroQUEST tool is available in Attachment 1. The QUEST model was a significant component within the winning submission by the Greater Vancouver Regional District in 2003, to an international competition concerning the future of cities called "cities plus ". FINANCIAL DETAILS The project cost for the GTA is $100,000, plus GST. Additional costs will be incurred later to make the model available over the internet, but the basic model can be developed now and access improved at a later date. TRCA will allocate $30,000 to the project out of The Living City general funds. An application will be made to FCM for $50,000 in funding. TRCA will not participate in the project unless the FCM funding can be obtained. TRCA will also approach the regions, municipalities and other conservation authorities in the GTA for the remaining $20,000. Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 For Information contact: Brian Denney, 416- 667 -6290 Date: March 3, 2004 Attachment 1 84 Attachment 1 QUEST envision tal MetroQUEST Can you imagine a tool that would make metropolitan planning so fun and engaging that dedsion makers, stakeholders and the public would flock to become Involved? Picture a computer game that would allow people to play out 40 -year future scenarios for your region. And imagine if this game was based on over a decade of university research in urban and regional planning and was calibrated with detailed data specific to the region. Introducing MetroQUEST — An innovation that's transforming the metropolitan planning landscape! The Challenges of Metropolitan Smart Growth The urgency to incorporate smart growth and sustainability initiatives has added significant complexity to regional planning. Specifically, regions are pressed to fulfill the following diverse needs: • Integrating planning across environmental, economic, social, and cultural sectors • Dealing seamlessly with different spatial scales and boundaries • Dealing with complexity surrounding choices and consequences • Educating, engaging and building consensus among stakeholders and the public • Considering tong -term plans that dont compromise short term needs • Developing innovative yet cost - effective regional solutions The Solution: MetroQUEST MetroQUEST is a powerful computer simulation tool that allows users to create and compare future scenarios of their region quiddy. The consequences of their choices are illustrated using colorful maps and graphs and a wide range of smart growth Indicators from alr quality to unemployment. MetroQUEST clearly demonstrates the complex Inter - relationships between choices and consequences. It allows users to understand the trade -offs required to create a clean, prosperous and livable future for the region. O : QUEST #.•k�li it l+.' `:'[,�t. =� vi .EDir}71 MetroQUEST challenges users to create future scenarios that balance a wide range of critical issues. MetroQUEST Is: • A scenario exploration too( capable of generating 44 -year future scenarios In seconds • A powerful education tool that teaches people about the key issues facing the region • A facilitation tool that stimulates dialogue and promotes collaboration among stakeholders • A decision sunuort tool that encourages Tong -range strategic thinking • An Innovative smart Growth simulator that illustrates the consequences of a wide range of choices 85 QUEST MetroQUEST Features: ✓ Create forty-year scenarios for your region in seconds ✓ Evaluate scenarios using a suite of maps, indicators, and graphs ✓ Create your own customized ranking of priorities ✓ Score scenarios against your own values ✓ Compare up to ten scenarios side by side ✓ Save important scenarios ✓ Create scenario reports How MetroQUEST will Benefit Your Region: ✓ Engages decision makers, stakeholders and the public in smart growth visioning • Fosters an open and transparent dialog on values, priorities, challenges and tradeoffs ✓ Educates people on complexities of metropolitan planning ✓ Clearly illustrates the cost and benefits of alternative development paths ✓ Encourages community members to work together to develop a shared vision ✓ Facilitates the collection of valuable feedback to make ✓ Creates a climate of support and cooperation How is Metro QUEST Unique? envision le Population Map - 2040 Population Map - 2040 MetroQUEST creates colorful maps showing the spatial implications of your choices. Here we see a compact development scenario (top) compared with a sprawl scenario (bottom). on desirable futures and the tradeoffs people are willing for smart growth' MetroQUEST Other Tools MetroQUEST is specifically designed for the metropolitan scale Most planning models are designed for local planning and bog down when dealing with metropolitan scale applications MetroQUEST creates 40 -year scenarios can be created in seconds Most tools can require weeks to generate scenarios making interactive 'what if' experimentation impossible MetroQUEST engages decision makers and stakeholders regardless of technical expertise Most tools are designed for planners and tend to be too detailed and technical for the engagement of non - experts MetroQUEST Integrates a broad range of smart growth issues (land use housing, transport, air quality, economy, employment, water, waste, etc.) Other tools tend to focus on land use and some of the more integrated ones include transportation MetroQUEST has been calibrated and validated through 10 years of research and practical applications Most tools are developed In the private sector; others have not benefited from numerous practical applications MetroQUEST is fun, engaging and interactive Most tools are useful for planners; too cumbersome, slow and technical for others 86 envision QUEST 10) MetroQUEST is all about making the connection between CHOICES and CONSEQUENCES MetroQUEST Scenario Choices MetroQUEST allows users to explore key choices including: ❑ Alternative population and economic growth projections ❑ Compact development vs, sprawl scenarios o Agricultural and green space conservation ❑ Alternate development pattems (conventional, nodal, Infill, mixed use, transit oriented development) ❑ Munldpal cooperation vs. munidpal competition scenarios (tax sharing) o Transportation options and alternatives o Resource Management and Conservation programs (solid and liquid waste, energy water an�nu ai rl Urh.n Grumlh r....Y.... p,esr *ONO a■... 2 / x' Mt Ivan, Simply click on options in housing, transportation, resource management, land use, etc. The choices combine to create a new future scenario that Is automatically and immediately analyzed. If you are not pleased with your scenario, simply go back and alter your choices! MetroQUEST Scenario Consequences MetroQUEST presents the impact of choices environmental, and sodal indicators, graphs and ❑ Demographic trends o Land use o Transportation (travel by mode, congestion, neighborhood waikability, Infrastructure costs) o Housing ❑ Energy use ❑ Pollution emissions a Local air quality and greenhouse gas emissions o Water o Waste generation and disposal o Infrastructure costs (roads, transit, water, sewage, etc.) o Housing distribution, types and density a Economic activity by sector ❑ Employment o Open space and agricultural land preservation a Economic diversity output ❑ Taxation over 40 -year future maps Including: scenarios using key economic, MetroQUEST summarizes the consequences of your choices using key performance indicators. The summary helps you evaluate your scenario quickly before looking at some of the more detailed results. 87 QUEST envision is MetroQUEST in Action Because of MetroQUEST's comprehensive scope, a wide range of consequences and tradeoffs can be explored. As an example, let's consider one of the choices in MetroQUEST: urban sprawl vs. compact development. MetroQUEST shows the consequences of these choices over 40 -year future scenarios using maps showing the changing urban form by density class and presents many of the most important consequences of housing development choices including: 3- The cost of road, transit, water and sewage infrastructure > The Toss of agricultural land and open space ➢ Water consumption Changing transportation modes, vehide miles, and traffic congestion • Neighborhood walkability '. Air quality and its associated health consequences Time Scale MetroQUEST creates 40 -year future scenarios in 10 -year time steps. It is calibrated and validated with local historical data. Spatial Scope MetroQUEST is designed to focus on urban centered regions with populations greater than 100,000. The outer boundary should be big enough to include all existing urban development and the surrounding open space and agricultural land that could become urbanized In a 40 -year sprawling scenario. Typical MetroQUEST Clients MetroQUEST is an extremely powerful tool for groups interested in promoting smart growth, sustainability, visioning, long term strategic planning, stakeholder and public engagement, collaboration and consensus building. Typical clients include: ✓ Progressive regional and metropolitan govemments and organizations (Regional Coundis, Metropolitan Planning Organizations, County Govemments) ✓ Forward thinking municipalities interested in regional visioning and fostering inter - municipal coordination and ✓ Smart Growth advocates (non- government organizations, environmental and conservation groups, business associations) FVV1110 M.N. {f MF1.1 ) VW: ^ 1rF r.` "i MetroQUEST allows you to look at the consequences of your choices In clear graphs and maps. 88 CIL QUEST envision 63 Applying MetroQUEST for your Region Envision develops MetroQUEST for regions using its comprehensive library of statistical data and maps of the region describing the region's transportation and land use patterns, its demographics, and many other characteristics. A version of MetroQUEST for your region can be developed in under six months. The project cost covers system integration, a license for unlimited non - commercial use of MetroQUEST and user training. How QUEST is Developed Step 1: Envision works with you to define the best regional boundaries for MetroQUEST. Step 2: Envision creates a simulation model for your region using an integrated metropolitan modeling framework (models indude demography, land use, housing, transportation, economy, energy use, air quality, water, infrastructure, and more...) and a library of statistical data and maps of your region. Step 3: The integrated models are calibrated using historical data and used to create a large database of scenarios covering all possible Input choice combinations (in the range of 150,000 possible scenarios). Step 4: A user Interface is customized for your region and connected to the database of possible scenarios. Step 5: MetroQUEST is delivered on a CD -ROM and Envision provides training. What You Need to Do 1. Help define the best regional boundaries for MetroQUEST. 2. Help plan how MetroQUEST will be used to complement your programs and achieve your goals. 3. Attend one day of training on the use of MetroQUEST. 3, 000 411* 1� •t ---► w.n.cme 00 s.. �r J --3 00 1 fArielre What's under the hood? Metr0QUEST has been developed, tested and calibrated over 10 years at the University of British Columbia's Sustainable Development Research Institute. Additional Project Options MetroQUEST is powerful and is immediately useful upon delivery and training. The following are a few examples of what can be done to extend its utility: • Customize workshops and town hall sessions • Deploy Metr0QUEST as an Internet application to engage the public • Calibrate MetroQUEST with new datasets • Customize the interface, scenario choices, and results • Add new models to the integrated framework • Develop high school and university level curriculum to accompany MetroQUEST 89 QUEST envision 00 The History of QUEST • Developed, tested and calibrated over 10 years at the University of British Columbia's Sustainable Development Research Institute • Models have benefited from the contributions of over 70 professors and researchers • Highly user friendly, game -like interface (now in version 4.0) • Successfully applied in cities and regions worldwide What Others are Savina About OUEST "At BC Hydro we see ourselves as a carnpany that is committed to the prindples of sustalnability. What goes along with that Is how do you get stakeholders to appreciate what the options are and what the trades? are. We think QUEST is a very valuable tool in helping to allow people to work through what becomes a very complicated set of problems. We need the public to understand this a lot better. QUEST would be invaluable because it gets you away from people just sitting around saying, 'Well 1 think we should do this and 1 think we should do that' You can then take your theories and assumptions and put it to the test" David Balser, Corporate Sustainability Group Manager BC Hydro, Vancouver 'QUEST is truly a rernarkab /e effort It is not surprising that QUEST has won accolades nor that other regions am exploring or developing QUEST applications for their regions The program is recommended to students of systems modeling, futures studies, and sustainable development research.' Futures Journal 34 (2002) 465-470 Dr. C. Jones Studies of the future Program, University of Houston 7th' a very engaging sort of thing. You get a very nke, comprehensive view of what matters to people and what they're willing to do." Quoted in the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce, Environment, 2 April 2003 Roger Anderson, Senior Program Manager, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Seattle. :4s urban development increasesy so does the pressure to find solutions to our challenges around transportation, urban growth, fisheries, waste management; air pollution and habitat for wildlife. Solutions to these complex challenges will only come through dialogue and partnerships [QUEST) is all about engaging decision makers, including local governments in making sustainable decisions for the future, and is pleased to be working in partnership with the QUEST project. "I think well very rapidly see QUEST become Dart of the social decision- making process all over the planet I think this is probably the greatest single tool to Improve governance on the planet in a generation. It will load to much better, much more informed, much more ecologically sound, and much more ecosystem - based decision making." Jim Fulton Executive Director of the David Suzuki Foundation "Wow! Imagine if we could take a tool like [MetroQUESTJ and Infuse It Into the capablktles of the young people of the city and of the decision makers of the city, both present and future, and allow people to be able to imagine and visualize the futures that current decision makers are producing, and therefore think long -term about the implications of what is being done. This (Toronto MetroQUESTJ project holds the possibilities for such a broad engagement In fact, that is how it Is unfolding ... In other cites." - video transcript from May 2002, speaking as Toronto city councilor Jade Layton, Leader New Democratic Party of Canada "While there is certainly nothing new about using systems dynamics modeling to aeate future scenarios, the ability to make the system comprehensible to non- experts, dynamically create scenarios in reaptime and catalogue stakeholder preferences combine to make a tool that is truly unique. Ultimately, what QUEST does Is foster community dialogue by employing the power of scenario building. The power of QUEST hes In Its ability to bring clarity to the complexity of regional planning by empowering the community to aeate and explore scenarios in real -time, and in turn capture these scenarios in a catalogue of preferred futures that can be used by decagon- makers at all levels and across all sectors." Dr. David V. J. Bell, Director York University Center for Applied Sustainability, Toronto Bruce Kay, Manager Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative, Environment Canada 90 RES. #B31 /04 - REPRESENTATIVES ON VARIOUS COMMITTEES Appointment of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff and members to various committees. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Chair Dick O'Brien and Mr. Brian Denney, Chief Administrative Officer, be appointed as Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) representative and alternate, respectively, to Conservation Ontario; THAT Chair O'Brien be appointed as TRCA's representative and Mr. Brian Denney, Chief Administrative Officer, Mr. Ron Dewell, Manager, Property /Asset Management, Ms. Adele Freeman, Acting Director, Watershed Management Division and Ms. Carolyn Woodland, Manager, Development Services Section be appointed as TRCA's alternates to the Rouge Park Alliance; THAT Councillor David Barrow, Mayor Gerri Lynn O'Connor and Councillor Maja Prentice be appointed to the Employee /Recognition Sub - Committee; AND FURTHER THAT the various organizations be so advised. AMENDMENT RES. #B32 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan David Barrow THAT the following be inserted before the last paragraph of the main motion: THAT Mr. Michael Thompson be appointed to The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto until May 30, 2005, or until his successor is appointed; THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND F TRCA is represented officially on three organizations namely: the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto, Conservation Ontario and the Rouge Park Alliance. Due to the recent municipal election, the Authority is requested to advise these organizations of its appointments for the next three year term. { 91 The Authority also creates a small committee known as the Employee /Recognition Sub - Committee which reviews and makes recommendations to the Authority on who should receive TRCA's annual conservation awards which are presented each spring at a special meeting or event. It is necessary to identify the members of this committee now in order to have it in place in time to make recommendations for this year's awards event. The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto The Authority can have a maximum of four appointees to the Conservation Foundation. By virtue of the foundation's bylaws, the Chair of the Authority is required to be one of the four appointments. The remaining three positions remain vacant at this time. Conservation Ontario Conservation Ontario is an umbrella organization representing all 36 conservation authorities which brings together over 800 members and 1,000 staff working together to achieve common goals. Conservation Ontario is governed by a council consisting of two representatives of each Authority. Council directs the activities of the staff and a variety of working groups, task forces and committees focusing on various areas of common interest to all conservation authorities. It has been the Authority's practice for many years to have the Chair designated as the Authority's voting representative and the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) as the alternate. It is recommended therefore that Chair O'Brien be appointed to Conservation Ontario and Mr. Brian Denney be identified as the alternate. Rouge Park Alliance The Authority is able to appoint one representative and an alternate to the Rouge Park Alliance. It is recommended that Chair O'Brien be appointed as the Authority's representative on the Rouge Park Alliance and that Mr. Brian Denney, Chief Administrative Officer, Mr. Ron Dewell, Manager, Property/Asset Management, Ms. Adele Freeman, Acting Director, Watershed Management Division and Ms. Carolyn Woodland, Manager, Development Services Section, be appointed as the alternates. Employee /Recognition Sub - Committee It is suggested that three members of the Authority be appointed to the Employee /Recognition Sub- Committee. It is also suggested that a non - member be approached to sit on this committee. The following members of the Authority have agreed to sit on this sub - committee: Councillor David Barrow, Mayor Gerri Lynn O'Connor and Councillor Maja Prentice. At this time the non - member position remains vacant. Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 Date: February 18, 2004 92 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES.#B33/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION ' 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan Maria Augimeri THAT permits be granted In accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 - 8.1.13, and 8.1.33 - 8.1.34, with the exception of Minor Works permits 8.1.6 - 8.1.8 and 8.1.10 - Carolyn Franke), which are listed below. RES. #B34 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan Maria Augimeri CARRIED THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications 8.1.6 - 8.1.8, inclusive and 8.1.10 - Carolyn Franke), which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.1 JULIAN MILAKOWSKI To place fill within a regulated area on Part 1, Lot 4, Plan M -1116, (49 Pine Ridge Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Julian Milakowski. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a two- storey single detached residential dwelling. 93 The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Page No. A -01, prepared by Suriano Design Consultants Inc., issued January 15, 2004, received by the TRCA on January 29, 2004. • Building Section, Page No. A -09, prepared by Suriano Design Consultants Inc., issued January 15, 2004, received by the TRCA on January 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located entirely within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a two- storey single detached residential dwelling. While the subject property is located at the toe of the valley slope, TRCA Geotechnical staff note that the location of the proposed development is approximately 60 metres from the toe of the slope. The subject property is also partially located within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area. However, TRCA Water Management staff have determined that there are no flooding concerns associated with the proposed development, as the proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposal is consistent with existing development in the area. Control of Flooding: The proposed residential dwelling will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the proposed residential dwelling is approximately 275 metres from the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project, as the location of the proposed development is approximately 60 metres from the toe of the valley slope. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 94 CFN: 35123 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: February 23, 2004 Application #: 037 /04/VAUG 8.1.2 MICHELE CAUTILLO, To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, Concession 7, Part Lot 5, Plan M -1115, (45 Birch Hill Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Michele Cautillo. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the replacement of an existing one - storey single detached residential dwelling with a new one - storey single detached residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. A -1, prepared by Architectural Design Co. Inc., dated October 2003, received by the TRCA on January 5, 2004. • Front and Right Side Elevations, Drawing No. A -4, prepared by Architectural Design Co. Inc., dated October 2003, received by the TRCA on January 5, 2004. • Left & Rear Elevation and Cross Section, Drawing No. A -5, prepared by Architectural Design Co. Inc., dated October2003, received by the TRCA on January 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located entirely within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the demolition and replacement of an existing one - storey single detached residential dwelling. The subject property is also located within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area. However, TRCA Water Management staff have determined that there are no flooding concerns associated with the proposed development, as the proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposal is consistent with existing development in the area. Control of Flooding: The proposed residential dwelling will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the proposed residential dwelling is approximately 110 metres from the watercourse. 95 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34991 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: February 23, 2004 Application #: 005 /04/VAUG 8.1.3 THE VITANOVA FOUNDATION To place fill within a regulated area on (6299 Rutherford Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Vitanova Foundation. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the replacement of an existing septic system. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Sketch of Site, prepared by Rural Development Consultants Limited, dated February 3, 2004, received by the TRCA on January 11, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing. Septic Design and Test Pit Logs Drawing, prepared by Rural Development Consultants Limited, dated February 3, 2004, received by the TRCA on January 11, 2004. • Cross - Section of Leaching Bed, prepared by Rural Development Consultants Limited, dated February 3, 2004, received by the TRCA on January 11, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 96 Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve the excavating and placing of fill to facilitate the replacement of an existing septic system. The proposed works will be located above top of bank and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented for the duration of construction. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. The proposed works will not have an impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35144 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: February 18, 2004 Application #: 048 /04/VAUG 8.1.4 HANK WASSENAAR To place fill within a regulated area on Concession 7 Lot 5, Plan 546, (192 Wallace Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hank Wassenaar. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the replacement of an existing two storey detached residential dwelling and retaining wall with a new three storey detached residential dwelling, retaining wall and deck. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing Al, prepared by Cityscape Design Innovations Inc., dated July 2003, received by the TRCA February 2, 2004. • Drawing A10, prepared by Cityscape Design Innovations Inc., dated July 2003, received by the TRCA February 2, 2004. 97 • Gravity Section Drawing, prepared by RisiStone, dated February 16, 2004, received by the TRCA February 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new three storey residential dwelling, retaining wall and deck. The existing dwelling and retaining wall will be demolished. The new house, retaining wall and deck will be sufficiently set back from the toe of slope and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The proposed works will be located more than 50 metres from the Humber River, with existing development located between the works and the watercourse. Therefore, sediment and erosion control measures will not be required for this project. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are confident that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the location of the proposed development. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing condition upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35138 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: February 16, 2004 Application #: 045 /04/VAUG CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.5 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (McNicoll Avenue Road Right -of -Way), in the Toronto East Community Council, Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. 98 The purpose is to construct a 1,650mm diameter watermain in tunnel under Highland Creek within the McNicoll Avenue right -of -way. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawings 276M -6, 276M -7 and 276M -10, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated March 2004 and received on February 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a 1,650mm watermain in a liner tunnel under Highland Creek within the McNicoll Avenue right -of -way using hand boring technique. Control of Flooding: The proposed watermain and liner will be installed beneath the watercourse. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed around the bore pits to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. A dewatering system will be in place if dewatering is necessary. Conservation of Land: There will be no instream works. The watermain and liner will be installed through the use of hand boring technique a minimum of 2 metres beneath the watercourse and the underground water table. There are no fisheries issues related to the proposed works. As per Ministry of Natural Resources new guidelines for boring under a watercourse, works will be limited to between July 1st and March 31st. Plantings The area of disturbance is currently manicured lawn. Native woody plantings and seeding will be provided adjacent to the watercourse to restore the site to better than existing conditions and provide a net gain in natural heritage resources. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Authorization from the City of Toronto has been received by staff. CFN: 35040 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 21, 2004 99 Application #: 017/04/TOR MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.6 ROBERT HARKIN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Plan 4072, (77 Fishleigh Drive), in the Toronto East Community Council, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Robert Harkin. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a side addition and a two- storey addition to the existing dwelling.. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, prepared by Maxine Shabsove Architect, dated January 19, 2004, received January 27, 2004. • Floor Plans, Drawings No. A2 -A5, prepared by Maxine Shabsove Architect, dated January 19, 2004, received January 27, 2004. • Elevation Plans, Drawings No. A6 -A9, prepared by Maxine Shabsove Architect, dated January 19, 2004, received January 27, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a side addition and a two- storey addition. The subject property is located west of Midland and south of Kingston Road, which is within the Scarborough Bluffs Community. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Flood plain of the Lake Ontario Waterfront and will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be installed between the work area and the edge of the bluff. Conservation of Land: The entire property is located within a developed community along this portion of the waterfront and consistent with the surrounding suburban development. The proposed works are setback more than 10 metres from the top of the bluff. There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant resource features or riparian vegetation. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions or better. 100 Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan and the Provincial Policy Statement for Natural Hazards on the Great Lakes Shoreline. CFN: 35057 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 27, 2004 Application #: 027/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.7 KURT AND JESSICA CHON To place fill within a regulated area on (11 Sifton Court), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Kurt and Jessica Chon. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a sun room addition at the rear of the dwelling.. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms, dated February 24, 2004, received February 24, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located adjacent to the Don River, north of Sheppard Avenue and east of Bayview Avenue. The proposed works involve the excavation and placement of fill to facilitate a sunroom addition at the rear of the dwelling. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of the bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. 101 Conservation of Land: All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35157 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 20, 2004 Application #: 051/04/TOR MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.8 JIM ASTON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, Plan M -1001, (1 Tanner Court), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jim Aston. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a ground floor addition near the front of the dwelling and a two- storey addition. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. 1, prepared by Bryant Renovations and Fine Carpentry, dated February 3, 2004, received February 24, 2004. • Floor Plans, Drawings No. 2 -4, prepared by Bryant Renovations and Fine Carpentry, dated February 3, 2004, received February 24, 2004. • Structural Notes, Drawing 6, prepared by Bryant Renovations and Fine Carpentry, dated February 3, 2004, received February 24, 2004. • Elevation Plans, Drawing No. 7 and 8, prepared by Bryant Renovations and Fine Carpentry, dated February 3, 2004, received February 24, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a ground floor addition and a two- storey addition. The proposed works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. The subject property is located west of Bayview Avenue and north of Finch Avenue. 102 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There will be no slope instability /geo- technical concerns associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features, or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35164 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 24, 2004 Application #: 058/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO SOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.9 HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area (Gerrard Street Transfer Station and the Mill Street Junction), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hydro One Networks Inc. The purpose is to remove and replace the existing high voltage underground cable between Gerrard Street Transformer Station and the Mill Street Junction located between the Bayview Extension and the west side of the Don River. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Cable Route Plan, Toronto Gerrard TS and Mill Jct. (Circuit H3L) Emergency 115kV Cable Replacement, including Cover Sheet, Pages 1 to 17, and Seed Mix, dated February 13, 2004 and prepared by Hydro One; and Environmental Specification, Toronto Gerrard TS and Mill Jct. (Circuit H3L) Emergency 115kV Cable Replacement, dated February 12, 2004 and prepared by Hydro One. 103 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to conduct emergency works to remove and replace 1,300 metres of an existing high voltage underground cable that runs between.the Gerrard Street Transformer Station and the Mill Street Junction located on the west side of the Lower Don River. The works will involve removal of the existing cable from an insulating oil lined steel pipe, and replacement with a new cable and insulating oil. Nine vertical excavations will be undertaken to release the existing cable and feed the new cable into the existing steel pipe. Excavated material will be tested, removed from the site and replaced with clean fill. The existing cable has failed numerous times and is currently out of commission. As the cable serves the downtown core, there is a likelihood of power failure during peak energy use unless it is immediately replaced. Staff have therefore authorized the works to proceed under the emergency protocol. Control of Flooding: The excavation and replacement of fill will not result in any grade changes. Therefore, the proposed works will have no impact on the conveyance or storage of flood waters. Pollution: Erosion control measures will be installed and maintained prior to and during construction to ensure that construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. In addition, the proponent has prepared an Environmental Specification to ensure that removal and replacement of insulating oil will be fully contained; the oil, cable, soil and any excavation pumpout water will be tested for contamination and properly disposed; and an emergency preparedness and response plan is in place. Conservation of Land: No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. All disturbed areas will be restored to better than existing conditions. Plantings A native seed mix will be used to restore disturbed areas. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35137 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 16, 2004 104 Application #: 044/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.10 CAROLYN FRANKE To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 255, Plan 1582, (69 Baby Point Crescent), in the Toronto West Community Council, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Carolyn Franke. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a two- storey addition that will be sitting on two piers at the rear of the subject property. ' The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. A000, prepared by Diamond and Schmidt, dated January 21, 2004, received February 5, 2004. • Floor Plans, Drawing No. A100 and A101, prepared by Diamond and Schmidt, dated January 21, 2004, received February 5, 2004. • West Elevation Plan, Drawing No. 200, prepared by Diamond and Schmidt, dated January 21, 2004, received February 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a two- storey addition which will be sitting on two piers. The subject property is located west of Jane Street and north of Bloor Street. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. 105 Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35124 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 11, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX Application #: 038/04/TOR 8.1.11 TOWN OF AJAX To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Carwin Crescent, in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Ajax. The purpose is to alter a waterway, construct in the floodplain and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek to facilitate repairs to an existing culvert at Carwin Crescent. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Carwin Crescent Culvert Repair, Drawing No. 2, prepared by TSH Engineers Architects Planners, dated October 2003, received February 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the alteration of a waterway, construction within a floodplain and the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Miller Creek, a tributary of Duffins Creek. The purpose of the proposed works is to conduct repairs to an existing culvert located on Carwin Crescent, between Jacwin Drive and Jalan Drive. The existing culvert is a two cell structure with an existing gabion mat located on the northwest side of Carwin Crescent. Repairs to the existing culvert involves the diversion of flows through one cell using a coffer dam. When the water flow has been diverted around the culvert cell, repair works will be undertaken. Once repairs have been conducted on one cell, the coffer dam will be removed and moved the other cell to finish the proposed works. During this work, the applicant also proposes to place new steel facing on the north end of the culvert, placing concrete on the existing groute rip -rap slope and reinforce cracked bolt holts on the culvert. Works will be staged from Carwin Crescent with temporary access from the adjacent northeast slope. Control of Flooding: Technical staff has reviewed submitted drawings relating to the coffer dam and is satisfied that it will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 106 Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the nearby watercourse channel. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this proposal. The proposed repairs involve in -water works, however, it is not considered to be harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) to fish habitat. As such, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for the proposed works. Furthermore, in -water works will be conducted during the coldwater window (July 1, 2004 to September 15, 2004). Plantings As riparian vegetation (approximately 5 metres along the banks and low quality) will be removed to accommodate access to the culvert structure, restoration plans have been submitted for the review of TRCA technical staff. Restoration plantings will consist of plantings of native dogwoods and a native seed mixture, in accordance with TRCA restoration guidelines. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34512 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: August 6, 2003 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 273 /03 /AJAX 8.1.12 BOX GROVE HILL DEVELOPMENTS INC. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 6, Concession 9, (9th Line and Fourteenth Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Box Grove Hill Developments Inc.. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Flood Plain of the Rouge River, in order to facilitate the construction of two temporary culvert crossings for Tributaries 'A' and 'B' to assist in the transportation of two on -site heritage homes. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 704, Temporary Culvert Crossings, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated January 2004, received by TRCA February 18, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 107 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Flood Plain of the Rouge River, in order to facilitate the construction of two temporary culvert crossings for Tributaries 'A' and 'B' to assist in the transportation of two on -site heritage homes. The relocation of the two homes, to a location west of Tributary 'A', and northwest of Fourteenth Avenue and the proposed Ninth Line By -Pass intersection, is part of the proposed Box Grove development. Due to the constraints of utility lines on Fourteenth Avenue, the transportation of the homes to their new location along Fourteenth Avenue will not be possible. The temporary culverts will be located to fit within the disturbance footprint of the ultimate creek crossings as part of the proposed Box Grove development. All disruption of vegetation in the areas of the proposed works will be adequately restored upon completion of the works. Control of Flooding: The works will occur within the Fill Extension Area and Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge' River. However, this is a temporary project, for which measurable impacts to the storage and conveyance of the stream and storm flood flows are not anticipated. TRCA engineering staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that the proposed culverts have been appropriately sized to convey the 2 year peak flow without overtopping the creek crossings. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Instream works for this project are required. Tributaries 'A' and 'B' are classified as warmwater fish habitat. To protect local fish populations during their spawning and nursery periods, no in -water works /activity will occur on Tributaries 'A' and 'B' between March 31 and July 1, as per the Ministry of Natural Resources' warmwater fisheries timing window. As such, the temporary culvert crossings, the transportation of the 2 heritage homes and the restoration of the affected area should be completed by March 31st, 2004. With sediment and erosion control measures in effect, the potential for a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be issued to the applicant, on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Furthermore, to minimize impact to the watercourse, the temporary culverts will be located to fit within the disturbance footprint of the ultimate creek crossings as part of the proposed Box Grove development. TRCA staff is satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored with native /non- invasive species upon completion of the work, resulting in no net loss of vegetated areas. 108 Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35051 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: February 24, 2004 Application #: 021 /04 /MARK 8.1.13 SANTINA DIGALAKIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 6230, (21 Rouge River Circle), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Santina Digalakis. The purpose is to place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a septic system behind the existing single family residence. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Sewage System Plan, Digalaski Sewage System, Drawing Number SS -2, prepared by Keewatin -Aski Ltd., dated January 5, 2004, received February 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate, place fill and construct within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River, to facilitate the installation of a septic system for a single family residence. The proposed septic system is located on the west side of the existing house and is approximately 60 metres from the watercourse and outside the Regional Storm Flood Plain. TRCA staff has determined that the proposed work is sufficiently set back from the top of bank. The grading of the site will be restored to its existing condition following the completion of the proposed works. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. TRCA staff is satisfied that the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected between the work site and the top of the slope and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. 109 Conservation of Land: TRCA staff has reviewed the application and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The installation of the septic system will not result in a change of the existing grade at the edge of the slope. There are no natural heritage features that may be negatively impacted by the proposed works. Plantings The existing trees at the top of bank will be protected. Following construction, the area affected by the works will be restored with native, non - invasive woody vegetation. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Stream and Valley Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35004 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: February 11, 2004 110 Application #: 013 /04 /MARK THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS: RES. #B35/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan Maria Augimeri THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.14 - 8.1.32, with the exception of 8.1.14, 8.1.16, 8.1.17, 8.1.25 and 8.1.30, which were withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received `and finalized as listed below. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.14 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Crossing C19F in the South East corner of Castlemore Road and Airport Road, at the location of the Future Humberwest Parkway), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. • Withdrawn 8.1.15 OAK VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Concession 9 NDS (Cottrelle Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area and construct in a floodplain associated with the Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a vehicular bridge structure and watermain crossing on the Gore Road in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Diarmuid Horgan, P.Eng, Candevcon Limited, dated March 2, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA engineering and ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 111 Proposal: The purpose of proposal is to construct in a floodplain and excavate and place fill within a regulated area in order to facilitate the construction of a bridge structure and watermain crossing along Cottrelle Boulevard - as it crosses over the Gore Road tributary of the Humber River between Gore Road and McVean Drive in the City of Brampton. The bridge structure will consist of a 18 metres single span, cast in place structure with an associated 3.0 metre pedestrian walkway. In addition, the watermain will be constructed using a directional bore method with boreholes located within the Regulated Area. The watermain line will cross the tributary at a minimum of 1.5 metres below the river bottom. The watermain will service the Bram East Area 'G' residential development. All works will take place outside of the watercourse and appropriate sediment and erosion control will be in place prior to construction or site alteration to ensure sedimentation of the watercourse does not occur. A meander belt width of 18 metres has been established in consultation with TRCA staff, based on an assessment completed by Aquafor Beech Limited and an analysis of other similar structures on this reach of the Gore Road tributary. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the predicted meander belt of the tributary associated with the Humber River. In addition, no excavated material will be stockpiled within the floodplain. This structure is sized to convey Regional Storm flows. As such, no impact to the safe passage and storage of floodwaters is expected. Pollution: Sedimentation and erosion control fencing will be installed prior to the commencement of any works taking place along the reach of the watercourse and at the borehole locations. As a result, no sedimentation or pollution to the watercourse is expected. Conservation of Land: There are no instream works and the watermain will be installed a minimum of 1.5 metres below the bottom of the watercourse. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this project. All disturbed areas will be restored and restabilized to original condition. Plantings All disturbed areas and those adjacent will be restored to pre- construction condition with native grasses and new plantings including maple and ash species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34942 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: February 25, 2004 112 Application #: 474/03/BRAM CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 8.1.16 CARTERM INTERMODAL LOGISTICS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 6 EHS Block F, G, Plan 875, (2700 Drew Road), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Carterm Intermodal Logistics Inc. • Withdrawn 8.1.17 RIO CAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT To construct in a flood plain on (3110 Dixie Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Rio Can Real Estate Investment. • Withdrawn CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.18 CITY OF PICKERING To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13, Concession 4 and 5, in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Pickering. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Duffins Creek in order to facilitate repair works and a minor platform expansion of the Bulmer Bridge. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Bulmer Bridge Repair, 5th Concession Road, Site Plan, Drawing S1, Sheet 2 of 6, dated February 2004, date received March 1, 2004. • Bulmer Bridge Repair, 5th Concession Road, General Arrangement, Drawing S2, Sheet 3 of 6, dated August 2003, date received January 13, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 113 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Duffins Creek in order to facilitate repair works and a minor platform expansion of the Bulmer Bridge. The existing bridge is located on the 5th Concession over the Duffins Creek, in the City of Pickering. The proposed works involve structural repairs and platform modifications to the existing structure. There will be no alterations to the existing abutments and the structural footprint will not be altered through this proposal. The staging area will be located outside of all vegetated areas and the majority of the surrounding vegetation will be conserved. The proposed works are sufficiently set back from the watercourse and there will be no impacts to the fisheries resources of the Duffins. Control of Flooding: The works will occur within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Flood Plain of Duffins Creek; however the works are minor in nature and the permanent alterations to the existing structure will not result in an increased structural footprint. As such, there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical concerns associated with this project. As the proposed works do not involve any in -water works, there will be no fisheries concerns related to the proposal. The majority of the vegetation adjacent to the work area will be conserved; vegetation removals will be required in one small area on the south side of the western bridge abutment, which will be adequately restored following construction. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native, non - invasive species, resulting in no net Toss of vegetated /treed areas. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34859 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: February 23, 2004 114 Application #: 443/03/PICK CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.19 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway on (Crossing 23TF- on Teston Road west of Keele Street), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to temporarily alter a tributary of the Don River Tributary during the warmwater timing window, July 1 to March 31, through a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry for the open cut crossing for the 1800mm feedermain installation. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Letter of undertaking for minor revisions to engineering plans, restoration plans and quantified vegetation loss /vegetation gains to the satisfaction of TRCA; dated February 19, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal is to install an 1800mm diameter feedermain. The crossing of the watercourse will be conducted via open cut with a dam and pump method in order to work in the dry. The watercourse does not have an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares, therefore a Regional Storm Flood Plain is not associated with this tributary of the Don River. The site is not located with a Fill Regulated Area. The York Peel Feedermain project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. The proposed York Peel Feedermain, an 1800mm watermain, will supply water from the future Airport Reservoir and Pumping Station to be located on Airport Road, south of Castlemore Road, in Peel Region to the Maple Reservoir, near Keele Street and Teston Road, in York Region. The feedermain works have been combined with the road widening works. In total there will be 19 permits associated with the feedermain installation and road reconstruction along the Airport Road, Castlemore Road, Rutherford Road, Weston Road and Teston Road route. Of the 8 remaining applications, four will be taken forward in March 2004 and it is anticipated that the remaining four will be taken forward in April. Control of Flooding: The location of the watercourse crossing is not within a Regional Storm Flood Plain, therefore, there will be no impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures of silt fence, coffer dam, pump, and filter bags will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. 115 Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be crossed via an open cut method. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34737 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: February 23, 2004 Application #: 385 /03NAUG 8.1.20 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway on (Crossing 20TF on Teston Road - 837m east of Jane Street), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to temporarily alter a tributary of the Don River Tributary during the warmwater timing window, July 1 to March 31, through a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry for the open cut crossing for the 1800mm feedermain installation. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to engineering plans, restoration plans and quantified vegetation loss /vegetation gains to the satisfaction of TRCA; dated February 19, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal is to install an 1800mm diameter feedermain. The crossing of the watercourse will be conducted via open cut with a dam and pump method in order to work in the dry. The watercourse does not have an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares, therefore a Regional Storm Floodplain is not associated with this tributary of the Don River. The site is not located with a Fill Regulated Area. The York Peel Feedermain project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. 116 The proposed York Peel Feedermain; an 1800mm watermain, will supply water from the future Airport Reservoir and Pumping Station, to be located on Airport Road, south of Castlemore Road in Peel Region to the Maple Reservoir, near Keele Street and Teston Road in York Region. The feedermain works have been combined with the road widening works. In total there will be 19 permits associated with the feedermain installation and road reconstruction along the Airport Road, Castlemore Road, Rutherford Road, Weston Road and Teston Road route. Of the eight remaining applications to take forward to the Executive Committee, four will be taken forward in March and it is anticipated that the remaining four will be taken forward in April. Control of Flooding: The location of the watercourse crossing will not be within a Regional Storm Flood Plain, therefore, there will be no impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures of silt fence, coffer dam, pump, and filter bags will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be crossed via an open cut method. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34735 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: February 23, 2004 Application #: 383 /03NAUG 8.1.21 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway on (Crossing 18TF- Teston Road - 213m east of Jane Street), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to temporarily alter a tributary of the Don River during the warmwater timing window, July 1 to March 31, through a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry for the open cut crossing. 117 The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to engineering plans, restoration plans and quantified vegetation loss /vegetation gains to the satisfaction of TRCA; dated February 19, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal consists of the installation of an 1800mm diameter feedermain and a 900mm watermain. The crossing of the watercourse for both feedermain and watermain will be conducted via open cut with a dam and pump method in order to work in the dry. The watercourse does not have an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares, therefore a Regional Storm Flood plain is not associated with this tributary of the Don River. The site is not located with a Fill Regulated Area. The York Peel Feedermain project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. The proposed York Peel Feedermain, an 1800mm watermain, will supply water from the future Airport Reservoir and Pumping Station to be located on Airport Road, south of Castlemore Road in Peel Region to the Maple Reservoir, near Keele Street and Teston Road in York Region. The feedermain works have been combined with the road widening works. In total there will be 19 permits associated with the feedermain installation and road reconstruction along the Airport Road, Castlemore Road, Rutherford Road, Weston Road and Teston Road route. Of the eight remaining applications to take forward to the Executive Committee, four will be taken forward in March and it is anticipated that the remaining four will be taken forward in April. Control of Flooding: The locations of the feedermain and watermain crossings are not within a Regional Storm Flood plain therefore, there will be no impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures of silt fence, coffer darn, pump, and filter bags will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be crossed via an open cut method. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. 118 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34733 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: February 23, 2004 Application #: 381 /03/VAUG 8.1.22 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To place fill within a regulated area on Islington Avenue (from Kiloran Avenue to Wycliffe Avenue /Arista Gate), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill for the road widening and a retaining wall in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the widening and reconstruction of Islington Road from Kiloran Avenue to Wycliffe Avenue /Arista Gate. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide any outstanding information and minor revisions to restoration plans; dated March 2, 2004; received March 2, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the widening and reconstruction of Islington Road from Kiloran Avenue to Wycliffe Avenue /Arista Gate. Works within the Fill Regulated Area involve the widening of Islington Road to 2 to 4 lanes and reconstruction to an urban cross section within the study area. An armourstone retaining wall will be constructed just south of Wycliffe Avenue on the east side of Islington Avenue within the Fill Regulation Area to reduce intrusion into the forest from fill for side slope grading.,. This will require a small relocation of an existing forest path. There are no works taking place within the Regional Storm Floodplain and there are no in- stream works. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. An existing grassed parking lot on TRCA property located north of the Boyd Conservation Area gate house will be stripped of sod, graded and top- dressed with gravel at the request of TRCA staff. This parking lot is located outside the Fill Regulation Area. Details of the parking lot are not included in this permit. A site plan for the proposed parking lot will be submitted to TRCA staff for review and approval. 119 Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore there will not be any impacts to flooding. Pollution: • No sedimentation is expected from these works as they will be located more than 100 metres from the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat Toss. Portions of this proposal are adjacent to TRCA property. A Forest Edge Management Plan has been provided to protect the existing /remaining vegetation adjacent to TRCA property and within the Fill Regulation Area. The project is located on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority lands, the permit will not be released until appropriate arrangements in the form of temporary easements have been made with TRCA Property/ Asset Management Services prior to construction. An archaeological investigation has been completed for the limits of this project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35012 Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: January 15, 2004 Application #: 014 /04/VAUG 8.1.23 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To construct in a flood plain on Rutherford Road (between Weston Road to east of Jane Street) and Jane Street (between Locke Street to north of Rutherford Road), in the City of Vaughan, Don River, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to widen Rutherford Road and construct a stormceptor within the Regional Storm Flood Plain between Weston Road to east of Jane Street and to widen Jane Street between Locke Street to north of Rutherford Road. The subject property is not regulated for fill placement at this time. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 120 • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings, restoration plans, quantified vegetation loss /vegetation gains and on the direction of TRCA's planning ecologist, a Forest Edge Management Plan; dated March 2, 2004; received March 2, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to widen Rutherford Road from 5 lanes to 7 lanes between Weston Road to east of Jane Street and to widen Jane Street between Locke Street to just north of Rutherford Road. The Rutherford Road widening will occur in the Flood Plain of the Don River. A stormceptor will be constructed within the Flood Plain of the Don River. The existing culverts crossing Rutherford Road that convey Black Creek, a tributary of the Humber River and a tributary of the West Don River do not need to be altered for this project. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with Toss of storage or conveyance. Stormwater management to improve water quality for the increased and existing impervious surface associated with the road widening will be addressed by installation of a stormceptor STC -2000 or approved equal oil /grit separator on the trunk sewer prior to discharge into the tributary of the West Don River on Jane Street. The portion of this project that takes place on Rutherford Road west of Highway 400 is within the Humber River Watershed. This portion of the project is not within a Fill Regulated Area or a Regional Storm Flood Plain and does not involve the alteration of a watercourse. The consultant will ensure that the existing and proposed downstream receiving storm water management infrastructure can accommodate the increased flows from the widened Rutherford Road. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures of a silt fence and rock check dam will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. There will be no slope stability issues related to the works. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. 121 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35163 Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: February 23, 2004 Application #: 055 /04/VAUG CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.24 MANUEL FERREIRA To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 47, Plan 2732, (24 Cedarview Drive), in the Toronto East Community Council, Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Manuel Ferreira. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Highland Creek to facilitate the construction of a new two- storey dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Drawing Al, Site Plan; Drawing A2, Basement Floor Plan; Drawing A3, Main Floor Plan; Drawing No. A4, Second Floor Plan, Roof Plan; Drawing No. A5, Exterior Elevations; Drawing No. A6, Exterior Elevations; Drawing No. A7, Cross Section, dated December 18, 2002, received January 9, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Highland Creek to facilitate the construction of a new two- storey dwelling, located east of Meadowvale Road and north of Lawson Road. The proposed works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Authority staff have previously reviewed and supported this proposal through the review of the associated severance and minor variance applications. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Flood plain of Highland Creek and therefore there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed to prevent the downstream migration of construction- generated sediments. 122 Conservation of Land: The new dwelling will be located 10 metres from the top of bank. The valley lands are protected under a conservation easement with the City of Toronto. There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant is proposing new plantings as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.1.1. - New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program CFN: 35001 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 12, 2004 Application #: 007 /04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.25 BELL CANADA To construct in a flood plain on (Duncan and Don Mills), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bell Canada. • Withdrawn CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO SOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on Lot 3, Plan 2699, (Moorehill Drive), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to alter a waterway within Moore Park Ravine in order to facilitate the removal and replacement of an existing concrete storm sewer pipe and the construction of a drop manhole structure.. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Drawing No. U- 258 -001, Moorehill Drive Easement Storm Outfall Rehabilitation Plan and Profile; Drawing No. U- 258 -002, Moorehill Drive Easement Storm Outfall Rehabilitation Details and Sections; Drawing No. U- 258 -003, Moorehill Drive Easement Storm Outfall Rehabilitation; Drawing No. U- 258 -004, Moorehill Drive Easement Site Access, Temporary Fencing and Tree Removals; and Drawing No. U- 258 -005, Moorehill Drive Easement Planting Plan, all prepared by JSW Consulting Engineers, dated February 23, 2004 and received on February 24, 2004. 123 • Seed Mix and Erosion Control Details, prepared by JSW Consulting Engineers, dated February 24, 2004 and received February 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to alter a waterway within Moore Park Ravine in order to facilitate the removal of a 54 metre section storm sewer pipe and a man hole located on the west slope of the ravine. The pipe has collapsed or become obstructed resulting in overflows which have been eroding the existing slope. The damaged pipe and manhole wouldbe replaced with a new pipe and drop manhole structure which will reduce the hydraulic energy. The eroded areas will be repaired. Bank stabilization works are also proposed for the watercourse edge. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are acceptable from a floodplain management perspective. Existing grades are to be maintained and most of the new structures are going to be placed underground, as such staff do not anticipate any increases in the Regional Storm Flood elevation. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings New plantings are proposed on the slope. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35003 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 20, 2004 Application #: 012/04/TOR 8.1.27 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on Plan 661Y, (Glen Road), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. 124 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a new manhole structure and storm sewer over flow. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Drawing No. U- 3511 -001, Glen Road Bridge Outfall Plan and Profile; Drawing No. U- 3511 -002, Glen Road Bridge Outfall Detail Plan; Drawing No. U- 3511 -003, Glen Road Bridge Outfall Details I; and Drawing No. U- 3511 -005, Glen Road Bridge Outfall Details III, all prepared by JSW Consulting Engineers, revised February 12, 2004 and received on February 24, 2004. • Seed Mix and Erosion Control Details, prepared by JSW Consulting Engineers, dated February 24, 2004 and received February 25, 2004. • Drawing No. U- 3511 -004, Glen Road Bridge Outfall Details 11, as prepared by JSW Consulting Engineers, dated November 24, 2003 and received on January 9, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area beneath Glen Road Bridge in order to facilitate the construction of a new manhole structure and storm sewer over flow. During a major storm event, the storm sewer surcharges and the tops of the existing manhole structures blow off. The situation is causing erosion to the existing toe of slope and walkway fronting the manholes. The new manhole chamber provides a drop and energy dissipation which will reduce the surcharges. The proposed structure also provides relief with an overflow to the existing watercourse during significant storm events. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The existing grades are to be maintained and most of the new structures are going to be placed underground. As such staff do not anticipate any increase in the Regional floodplain or decrease in storage capacity of the valley. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings The proposed works will not impact vegetation within the area of construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley Stream Corridor Management Program. 125 CFN: 35000 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 20, 2004 Application #: 011 /04/TOR 8.1.28 THE BOULEVARD CLUB To place fill within a regulated area on Part G L Block M, N, 0, P, 0, Plan D -1411, (1491 Lakeshore Boulevard West), in the Toronto South Community Council, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by The Boulevard Club. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Flood plain of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a side addition to the existing building and interior alterations.. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Drawing No. A001, Survey and Drawing List; Drawing No. A002, 1st and 2nd Floor Existing Key Plan; Drawing A005, Site Plan; Drawing No. A101, 1st Floor Plan East Wing; Drawing No. A505, Sections and Elev -South Porch; Drawing No. M101, Site Plan - Mechanical, prepared by Ian MacDonald Architect, dated August 27, 2003, received February 9, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Flood plain of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a side addition. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be above the Regional Storm Elevation. All excess material will be removed off site. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained before commencement of the work and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with the project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant proposes new plantings are part of the overall site development. 126 Policy Guidelines: This project complies with Section 4.2.2. Section (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and the Provincial Policy Statement for Natural Hazards on the Great Lakes Shoreline. CFN: 35078 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 3, 2004 Application #: 029/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.29 LESZEK ZIELINSKI To place fill within a regulated area on (14 Leland Avenue), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Leszek Zielinski. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a two- storey dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Site and Grading Plan; Drawing No. 1, Floor and Roof Plan Cross Section, Drawing 2, Floor Plans; Drawing 3, Elevations, prepared by Frank Osredkar Architect, dated September 3, 2003, received March 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a fill regulated area to facilitate demolition of the existing dwelling and the construction of a new two- storey dwelling. The proposed works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. The dwelling is adjacent to Mimico Creek. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are outside of the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. 127 Plantings The applicant proposes new plantings as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34825 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 3, 2003 Application #: 426/03/TOR 8.1.30 ERIC PASKEVICS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (42 Bonnyview Drive), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Eric Paskevics. • Withdrawn TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.31 YORK DOWNS GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB To construct in a flood plain on Lot 16, 17, Concession 5, (4143 16th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by York Downs Golf & Country Club. The purpose is to construct in the flood plain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of an auxiliary water supply system for the York Downs Golf & Country Club. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Red -line revised Auxiliary Water Supply System, Drawing 1, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated February 2004, date received January 11, 2004. • Auxiliary Water Supply System, Drawing 2, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated February 2004, date received January 11, 2004. • Auxiliary Water Supply System, Drawing 3, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated February 2004, date received January 11, 2004. • Auxiliary Water Supply System, Drawing 4, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated February 2004, date received January 11, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 128 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of an auxiliary water supply system on the York Downs Golf & Country Club lands. The auxiliary water supply system is proposed to supplement the existing irrigation pond near the pump house on York Downs by connecting it to the existing stormwater management pond on site. The stormwater management pond is located on the west side of the watercourse, while the irrigation pond is located on the east side, thereby requiring a watercourse, crossing to accommodate the installation of a 250mm PVC gravity drained pipe. The proposed construction methodology is directional drilling, therefore the bed and banks of the watercourse will remain undisturbed. While bore pits are required on both sides of the watercourse, only the bore pit on the west side will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. TRCA engineering staff has reviewed the proposal and is confident that the directional drilling methodology is an appropriate approach to the crossing, given the subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the watercourse. Hence, no negative impacts on the watercourse should result from the proposed works. Control of Flooding: The bore pits will be located outside of the riparian zone of the watercourse. There will be no fill placed within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River, hence no impacts to the conveyance or storage to flood waters will result. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing will be erected on both sides of the watercourse, isolating the work areas, in order to prevent any construction - generated sediments from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA technical staff has reviewed the geotechnical report submitted in support of this application and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with this project, given the existing soil conditions and small size of pipe being installed. There will be no impacts to the bed and banks of the watercourse and no vegetation removals are required. No other significant natural features will be impacted by the proposed works. TRCA staff has informed the proponent of the Ministry of Natural Resources' (MNR) cold water and red -side dace fisheries timing window of July 1- September 15, but defers the decision regarding a timing window exemption to MNR. Plantings There will be no vegetation removals required to accommodate the proposed works, hence no additional plantings will be required. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34871 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: February 20, 2004 129 Application #: 448/03 /MARK TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.32 CHRIS ZIMMERMAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 39 & 40, Plan 2027, 33 Walmer Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Chris Zimmerman. The purpose is to excavate and regrade within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a 2- storey addition to the existing single family residence. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006. • Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, prepared by John Shuki Lau Architect Inc., revised February 18, 2004, received February 18, 2004. • Basement Plan, Drawing No. A2, prepared by John Shuki Lau Architect Inc., revised February 18, 2004, received February 18, 2004. • Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. A3, prepared by John Shuki Lau Architect Inc., revised February 18, 2004, received February 18, 2004. • Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. A4, prepared by John Shuki Lau Architect Inc., revised February 18, 2004, received February 18, 2004. • Side Elevation, Drawing No. El, prepared by John Shuki Lau Architect Inc., revised February 18, 2004, received February 18, 2004. • Front and Rear Elevation, Drawing No. E2, prepared by John Shuki Lau Architect Inc., revised February 18, 2004, received February 18, 2004. • Letter of Indemnity, prepared by Chris Zimmerman, dated March 1, 2004, received March 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a two- storey addition to the east and north sides of the existing one - storey single family residence. Furthermore, a second - storey will be added to the current residence. The subject property is partially located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River. The existing one - storey home currently has a basement walk -out which will be retained with the proposed addition. Furthermore, there is an existing foundation wall located at the northeast corner, which extends 2.4 m from the east side of the residence. As part of this proposal, this wall will be reduced in size (approximately 0.6 m) and an additional foundation wall will be built on the southeast corner. The two- storey addition will be situated over these foundation walls. The proposed two- storey addition will not be located on ground level and will be cantileverd on the foundation walls. An additional two- storey structure will be constructed on the north side of the house. The proposed addition is setback from the Regional Storm Floodplain and will be beyond the 100 year erosion zone of the watercourse which bisects the property. 130 Control of Flooding: The existing masonry foundation wall located on the northeast corner of the residence is currently within the Regional Storm Floodplain. However, this structure will be reduced in size and will be located outside the floodplain. The new wall to be constructed at the southeast corner will be located outside the floodplain. Overall, the proposed two- storey addition on the east side will be located approximately 2 metres away from the Regional Storm Floodplain. Water Management Group staff has reviewed the proposed addition and is satisfied that it will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse channel which is located approximately 6 metres away from the proposed addition. Conservation of Land: Geotechnical staff has reviewed the proposed addition and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. Furthermore, there will be no impacts to other significant natural features. Plantings As part of this proposal, minor landscaping works on the manicured portion of the subject property will be carried out in accordance with TRCA requirements. Additional plantings will also be planted between the buffer and the watercourse. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35151 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: February 19, 2004 CITY OF BRAMPTON Application #: 049/04/RH 8.1.33 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Concession 1 EHS, Plan 2889VS (P- 2002 -59), (Intersection of Hurontario Street and Steeles Avenue), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the widening of Hurontario Street in conjunction with improvements to the Steeles Avenue /Hurontario Street intersection. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 131 • Letter of undertaking to provided provide cash -in -lieu to the City of Brampton's Stormwater Management Fee in Lieu Policy; dated February 20, 2004; prepared by SNC Lavalin on behalf of the Region of Peel. • Grading and Drainage Plans prepared by SNC Lavalin; drawing numbers 15 and 16 or 45; dated January 2003; received December 8, 2003. • Landscaping Plans prepared by SNC Lavalin; drawing numbers L4 and L5 of L13; dated revised February 16, 2004; received February 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to improve the intersection at Hurontario Street and Steeles Avenue as part of a road improvement project on Hurontario Street between Bartley Bull Parkway and Charolais Boulevard, in the City of Brampton. Portions of the widening of Hurontario Street will occur within the Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Etobicoke Creek and require that a 1:1 engineered slope be constructed. Due to site constraints, there is no opportunity for constructing an oil /grit separator as part of this project. The City of Brampton has assumed this project element on behalf of the Region of Peel. The City of Brampton has agreed to contribute $13,262.18 to the City's reserve dedicated to stormwater retrofit projects. This figure was calculated from an approved policy that is used to calculate the cash figure for commercial /industrial sites as there is no formula available for linear transportation routes. The project involves the addition of turning lanes at the intersection. During the Environmental Assessment phase of this project Region of Peel staff did not seek comments from TRCA. It was not until the detailed design phase of the project that Region of Peel staff became aware that the project would involve fill placement in a regulated area and a permit from TRCA under Ontario Regulation 158 was required. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures such as a silt fence will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The City of Brampton will contribute $13,262.18 to their cash -in -lieu program dedicated to stormwater retrofit projects as site constraints limit the opportunity to improve water quality through on -site stormwater management. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat Toss. 132 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native species immediately following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 33900 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: March 3, 2004 Application #: 009 /03 /BRAM CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO -WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.34 HULLMARK DEVELOPMENTS LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Block 1, Plan 66M -2257, (700 and 710 Humberwood Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Toronto -West Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hullmark Developments Inc. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of Phase 1 of a residential development which includes a 29 storey, 429 unit condominium apartment building (north tower) with an attached one storey recreation centre and three level underground parking garage. Also proposed is a storm sewer outfall structure. The permit will be issued for the period of March 5, 2004 to March 4, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. A1-2, revised March 2, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by Rafael and Bigauskas Architects. • Landscape Master Plan, Drawing No. L -1, revised March 2, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by the Nak Design Group. • Landscape Master Plan, Drawing No. L1a, revised March 2, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by the Nak Design Group. • Landscape Grading Plan, Drawing No. L2, revised March 2, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by the Nak Design Group. • Planting Plan, Drawing No. L3, revised March 2, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by the Nak Design Group. • Landscape Details, Drawing No. LD1, revised March 2, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by the Nak Design Group. • Excavation - Plan and Sections, Drawing No. SH1, revised February 20, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by Isherwood Associates. • Site Service Connections and Site Storm Sewer to Humber River, Drawing No. SS -1, revised February 27, 2004, received March 3, 2004, prepared by Trafalgar Engineering Ltd. 133 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 50 metres away. Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized /revegetated following construction. No significant resources features will be impacted by the proposed works. There will be no impacts on fisheries and there are no slope stability issues. Plantings The applicant is proposing planting of native trees and shrubs within the valley as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in general compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Temporary grading works proposed to facilitate development within the adjacent valley will be restored to the satisfaction of the TRCA and in accordance with detailed planting plans submitted by the applicant. CFN: 34835 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 4, 2004 Application #: 432/03/TOR RES. #B36/04 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND Southeast corner of the Canada Company and Islington Avenue intersection, CFN 35080. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Vaughan to explore the possibility of a sale of a fragment of TRCA -owned land located on the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection, City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the potential disposal of a fragment of land on the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection, City of Vaughan, be referred to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff for review and discussion in accordance with established TRCA policies; 135 • Revised Storm Drainage Report, Application TA SPC 2002 0028, The Mansions of Humberwood, 700 & 710 Humberwood Blvd., Block 1, R.P. 66M -2257, prepared by Trafalgar Engineering Ltd. dated February 27, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area in order to facilitate the construction of a 29 storey, 429 unit condominium apartment building (north tower) with an attached one storey recreation centre and three level underground parking garage. Also proposed is a storm sewer outfall structure. Phase 2 of the residential development includes a second 29 storey condominium apartment building (east) tower which is not part of the current permit application. The development site encompasses approximately 6.54 hectares of vacant land located on the north side of Humberwood Boulevard. Abutting the subject property to the north is the main Humber River Valley. The northerly limit of the subject property is presently located below top -of -bank while the easterly limit of the property is located at top -of -bank. The subject property was originally subdivided and rezoned during the late 1980's. The current development proposal is also subject to a concurrent site plan approval application. In August 2003, TRCA staff staked the top -of -bank along the northerly portion of the property in order to determine the development limits. The TRCA staked top -of -bank is now identified on the site plan drawing. The owner has agreed to place a restrictive covenant restricting use, to be registered on title with respect to the lands below the TRCA staked top -of -bank and a condition to this effect will be incorporated into the site plan agreement. The proposed residential development is sufficiently setback from the staked top -of -bank. In order to service the development, a storm water outlet structure and associated piping is required to be placed below top -of -bank. Furthermore, to facilitate the construction phase of the underground parking structure and storm sewer outfall, a temporary open cut is required within a small portion of the slope below top -of -bank. The portion of the slope to be opened is predominately grassed with no signficant vegetation. The applicant has agreed to restore the open cut portion of the slope to a natural condition as well as to significantly enhance the vegetation along the entire northern slope. The applicant has also agreed to work with the Authority on other restoration projects within the Humber Valley. In regards to the proposed storm water outlet, the applicant has been advised that a small segment of the spillway is presently encroaching onto TRCA land. The storm water outlet system must be contained entirely within the applicants property. To address this minor technical issue relating to the storm sewer, a letter of undertaking has been submitted in which the applicant agrees to resolve any outstanding technical issues to the satisfaction of the TRCA. 134 AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. CARRIED BACKGROUND This request is being brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #26, adopted by the Authority at Meeting #1 /91, held on February 22, 1991. The City of Vaughan Council has directed city staff to explore the availability of a joint fire /EMS site in the Rutherford Road and Islington Avenue area. A letter was received from the City of Vaughan requesting that TRCA explore the potential sale of a fragment of TRCA -owned land, situated at the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection for the construction of a Vaughan Fire Rescue/York EMS Paramedic Station Site. Regional staff are supportive of exploring the feasibility of this partnership subject to approval of Regional Council. The proposed Fire /EMS Station will take advantage of "green" technologies wherever possible. The total area required for the joint Fire /EMS station is 2 acres. Approximately .5 acre is proposed on York Region property and 1.5 acres on TRCA property. In accordance with established policies for the disposal of TRCA lands, technical and agency staff will be circulated and the public consulted for their review and comment. The proposed site is located adjacent to the entrance to the future TRCA Nursery facility, scheduled to be constructed in 2005. Under a separate process, the TRCA and Vaughan Parks are discussing the possibility of a joint Vaughan Parks/TRCA facility at this location. Some cost efficiencies related to servicing and the access improvements required for the TRCA Nursery Facility may be realized by locating the Fire /EMS Station at the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue site. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: February 16, 2004 Attachments:1 136 Attachment 1 MODEST FOR DISPOSAL OF 1ORON'D AND REGION CONSCRVATION ALM4011W1Y.OWNEO LAND Southeast comet al the Cereals Canpany r Ist van Aralue intorsocticf: CAN 360430 16t le Ina „ q-r tv' . o • ..' 1 ?�MURtERYf+1CIil1Y�.,.�,"Y' ~.� It REGION OF YORK PROPERTY JEcT RCPur • J '°nse non yonser a for The /Wig City �r1 —ice. r —i .__'L.ANDS MSUBJCCI PROPERTY:. • • 137 RES. #B37/04 - FEES CHARGED TO PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH A VIOLATION Permitting requirements often require remediation or restoration after a minor violation has been discovered on site, and require a special fee to cover administration costs associated with this permitting exercise "after the fact ". Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT an additional administrative fee be added to the Administration Fee Schedule for Permitting Services for minor violation situations where remediation of a negative impact is achievable through the development review and permitting process; AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to work with landowners in minor violation situations of the conservation authority permitting requirements to facilitate a positive site remediation solution, consistent with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) policy; CARRIED BACKGROUND At Executive Committee meeting #1/04, held on February 6, 2004, Resolution #B24/04 was approved as follows: THAT staff report back on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's current fee structure, with a recommendation for a penalty for works subject to Ontario Regulation 158 commenced prior to issuance of a permit. In as large a jurisdiction as the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, with its intense urbanization, there are many enforcement situations that are discovered by staff in their regular patrols or are reported by neighbours and concerned citizens. Excess dumping of fill, resulting in de- stabilization of slopes, building of retaining walls and structures to hold fill for backyard extensions and outdoor work yards are just a few of the common practices that are caught by our enforcement patrols. There is also the potential for structural works and watercourse alterations that may be initiated prior to, or without permission, yet still can be remediated via the permit process. Some offenses are definitely more serious than others and have greater impact on the general ecological health and hazard conditions of our valley corridors and stream courses. On occasion, private residential land owners make an honest mistake about their site alteration activities adjacent to or within the valleys. In other cases, the activities are blatantly disrespectful of our regulation requirements and the process of approvals for construction and alterations within regulated areas as per the Conservation Authorities Act. From time to time we have recurring offenders in an attempt to fast track the system. Ontario Regulation 158 requires the TRCA's permission to conduct: 1. the placement or dumping of fill including regrading within the fill lines; 2. the construction of buildings or structures within the Regional Storm floodplain; and 3. the straightening, changing, diverting or interfering in any way the existing channel or river, creek, stream, or watercourse. 138 Development Services and Enforcement staff have the choice of determining whether a violation of our fill and alterations to watercourse regulations are minor and can be remediated through constructive new site works and landscape restoration, or alternatively fall into a category of a clear violation requiring charges and judicial action. The latter requires the court to resolve a dispute, or upon conviction set penalty through fines or the inclusion of restoration works as provided for in law and stipulated by TRCA's solicitor as appropriate. However, it is not our preference to issue permits after the fact for works completed or underway. A few Southern Ontario conservation authorities have for some time operated with a form of additional fee or surcharge for permits that are processed after the violation. This practice makes sense since often these applications withrtheir associated violation requirements do take longer to assess, negotiate and administer. The Credit Valley Conservation Authority has operated with a modest additional fee of $200 for "permits associated with violations ". The Conservation Halton has a "surcharge of 25% of the applicable permit cost" that is processed on permits issued after the fact. Grand River Conservation Authority and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority do not have a separate charge for this type of permitting situation, but are currently undertaking major changes to their fee schedule and may be considering this option. Many municipalities are now imposing additional fees on their permits issued post violation in order to deter the continued avoidance of proper permitting processes and costs. CONCLUSIONS The number of applications for permits after the fact is not very high in TRCA's jurisdiction. However, consistent treatment of these applications is a prominent consideration when dealing with these minor offenses. Most applicants do follow the permitting system properly, however staff feel some deterrent is warranted for those that circumvent the process. In 2003, we received 476 permit applications and issued 365 new permits. We estimate that about 10 to 15 permits maximum per year fall into the post violation category. The remaining violations are dealt with through negotiation or via the judicial process. Staff recommend that we charge an additional fee for a permit associated with a violation. A minor site application (such as residential yard works) offense would be charged an additional 50% of the base permitting fee. A major site application (such as a subdivision or condominium) offense would be charged double the base permitting fee. This approach will alter the fee requirement to work in conjunction with the permit categories in our schedule. For example, a minor residential permit would be $250 dollars, with an additional $125 minor violation fee. A major subdivision project would be charged an extra fee based on the individual projects under violation and could include a stormwater management pond with a base fee of $2,800, and an additional minor violation fee of $2,800. Applicants with recurring offenses will be charged double the permitting fee on an exponential basis. For example, the applicant with a stormwater management pond violation would be charged $5,600 for a first offense, and the same applicant would be charged an additional $2,800 for the second offense. After the 3rd offense the violation will be addressed through the judicial process. 139 Example: Application Category Base Application Fee Additional Fee for Minor Violation Total Residential Property (minor) 1st offense $250 ( +50 %) $125 $375 2nd offense $500 3rd offense $625 Subdivision (i.e. SWM pond) 1st offense $2,800 ( +100% )$2,800 . $5,600 2nd offense $8,400 3rd offense $11,200 DETAILS WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff will add this fee requirement to the 2004 permitting fee schedule as approved in November, 2003. The existing 2004 permit fee schedule is attached for information purposes. Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Date: February 16, 2004 Attachments: 1 140 Attachment 1 TRCA Administrative Fees For Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation Services (Ontario Regulation 158) ONTARIO REGULATION 158 PERMIT APPLICATIONS FEE Works on Personal Residential Property *minor $250 *major $500 Municipal Projects (Regional /Local) $750 Municipal Projects (Regional /Local) related to an Environmental Assessment Application $1500 Utilities $2000 Projects on Subdivision Lands, Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Properties, Resource -based Recreation and Other Projects Projects Include: SWM ponds and associated outfalls Other outfalls Road Crossings Grading Channel Modification In- stream Works Minor Improvements $2800 per project $1500 per project Permit Revisions 25% of current fee Permit Renewals 25% of current fee Minimum $100 ONTARIO REGULATION 158 PROPERTY INFORMATION FEE Solicitor /Realtor /Property Inquiry $150 Municipal Building Permit Services - Property Clearances (not regulated) $200 *See Definitions Rates Effective December 1, 2003 141 TRCA Administrative Fees For Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation Services (Ontario Regulation 158) IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Notes 1. The permit fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to the TRCA. In the event that the permit fee is not paid at the time of filing an application, fees must be paid prior to issuing a permit. 2. The TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort. 3. All permits are issued for two years except for Subdivision projects which are issued for five years. 4. All permit renewals are issued for 1 year. Definitions Persona/ Resident/a / Property Minor - Applications on a personal residential property determined to be "minor" include ancillary structures such as decks, sheds, garages and pools; minor additions (less than 50% of the original ground floor area); and the placement of Tess than 30 cubic metres of fill. Major - Applications on a personal residential property determined to be "major" include major additions (greater than 50% of the original ground floor area), new structures or buildings; all works in the floodplain; and the placement of 30 cubic metres or more of fill. 142 RES.#B38/04 - THE CITY OF TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT (2002 - 2006) Claireville and G. Ross Lord Dam Reservoirs Consultant Selection for Subsurface Investigation. To retain the services of a consultant to complete a subsurface investigation of the Claireville and G. Ross Lord Dam Reservoirs in the City of Toronto. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the firm of Jacques Whitford Environment Limited be retained to complete the subsurface investigation for the Claireville and G. Ross Lord Dam Reservoirs, at a total cost not to exceed $24,140.00, excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND In the summer of 2003 the Ministry of Natural Resources announced a funding partnership with all conservation authorities (CAs)in Ontario to carry out repairs and studies on capital works infrastructure. On October 31, 2003 Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) received approval to carry out an assessment on the Claireville and G. Ross Lord Dam Reservoirs to determine whether maintenance dredging should be carried out to maintain storage capacity and prevent the silting in the spillway areas within the reservoirs. Following an internal review of existing reports and other documents related to the dams, TRCA staff recommended that a subsurface investigation be carried out to determine the amount of sediment that has accumulated in the reservoirs since construction. There is also a need to characterize and classify the sediment in order to determine the most appropriate method of removing the sediment and to identify potential disposal options for the dredged material. In February 2004, a Terms of Reference (ToR) was prepared by TRCA staff and distributed to the following Environmental /Geotechnical consultants: Geo- Canada Ltd. Shaheen & Peaker Ltd. Terraprobe Ltd. Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. Golder & Associates Ltd. These consultants were chosen because of their experience with investigations of this nature. RATIONALE Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. was the only firm to submit a proposal. Golder & Associates, Shaheen & Peaker Ltd. and Terraprobe Ltd. declined to submit a proposal due to the timing of the investigation in relation to working conditions in the reservoir (particularly ice cover), and Geo- Canada declined to bid on the project due to staffing commitments on another TRCA project. 143 The consultant was evaluated on the following criteria: • the written proposal; • experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • understanding of background information, the project, environmental concerns and the proposed approach; • time frames for completion of the investigation; and • cost. The professional services offered in the Jacques Whitford proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the ToR at a cost of $24,140.00 excluding GST. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this project will be shared equally by the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006 and by the Ministry of Natural Resources under the Capital Program for CA Dam Repairs and Studies. Report prepared by: Moranne Hagey, 416 - 392 -9690 For Information Contact: Moranne Hagey, 416 - 392 -9690 Date: February 23, 2004 RES. #B39/04 - CONTRACT FOR LOW LEVEL GATE REPAIRS AT G. ROSS LORD DAM To sole source the hiring of MTM Resoration and Construction Group to complete the repair work on the gate guides at G. Ross Lord Dam. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the contractor MTM Restoration and Construction Group be retained to complete the repair work on the southern low level gate guide at G. Ross Lord Dam at an upset cost not to exceed $15,000 (including G.S.T.) CARRIED BACKGROUND G. Ross Lord Dam was constructed in 1971 as a flood control structure on the Don River. The dam was designed with two large spillway radial gates and two low level control gates. G. Ross Lord has not undergone any major work on these gates or guides since it was constructed. Static water level is maintained through the low levels gates at G. Ross Lord Dam, undergoing constant flows through the outlet pipes. Generally, any flood control operations are also diverted through the low level control gates through the opening and closing of these gates. The low level gates are equipped with seals on the gate guides to prevent leakage through the outlet pipes when the gates are not being operated. 144 Through an annual maintenance review of the low level gate guides and seals, the rubber seals were found to be badly damaged and producing large streams of water spraying outwards from the cracks in the seals. New seals are required. RATIONALE Due to the nature of this work, the only known contractor in Southern Ontario is MTM Restoration and Construction Group (MTM). MTM provided a quote of $15,000 (including G.S.T.) to remove the southern existing failed seal and replace it with a new seal. TRCA staff reviewed MTM's quote and work plan and feel it is good value. FINANCIAL DETAILS In early summer of 2003, the Ministry of Natural Resources announced a capital works program of five million dollars which would be available for major maintenance works and to begin studies related to major maintenance. MNR will provide 50% of the total funding as part of this initiative with remaining funds available from TRCA's operating levy. The time lines and conditions set for receiving funds required that any works approved be completed by the end of the provincial fiscal year, March 31, 2004. With the availability of provincial funds for this repair, TRCA has moved forward to meet the time line requirements. Report prepared by: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 For Information contact: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 Date: February 23, 2004 RES. #840/04 - FUEL STORAGE TANK AT G. ROSS LORD DAM To retain Cannington Construction Ltd. to remove and replace the fuel storage tank at G. Ross Lord Dam. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the contractor Cannington Construction Ltd. be contracted to remove and replace the fuel tank at G. Ross Lord Dam at a cost not to exceed $10,220 (excluding GST). CARRIED BACKGROUND G. Ross Lord Dam was constructed in 1971 to control flooding on the Don River. The dam was designed with a back up diesel generator to facilitate flood operations should a power failure occur. When the dam was constructed, a 500 gallon underground storage tank (UST) was installed on the south side of the control building under the asphalt driveway. This tank was placed on top of a prefabricated concrete pad. 145 The Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) regulations require all UST's over the age of 25 years to be removed by October 1, 2006. Based on these new regulations the UST is required to be removed. There is a likelihood that the tank has corroded and may be leaking because of its age. RATIONALE Three contractors submitted quotes based on the following: • removal of the existing 500 gallon UST (including waste contents); • replacement of a 250 gallon double walled fuel storage tank; • installation of the new tank to be placed in the control buildings generator room and installed to current TSSA standards; • Phase 2 Environmental Report; • backfilling with unshrinkable fill and asphalt replacement on the driveway to its original grade. The following quotes were submitted: Cannington Construction Ltd. $ 10,220.00 Con -Tank Installations Ltd. $ 8,152.00 (no environmental consultant included) Claybar Contracting Inc. $ 10,890.00 *AII prices exclude applicable taxes. Con -Tank Installations Ltd. has been excluded as a potential contractor as they did not include a Phase 2 environmental report for verification of soil remediation, therefore not meeting Ministry of Environment regulations. The Cannington Construction Ltd. quotation was determined to best meet all the requirements at the best value. This work will be completed to TSSA standards and meet the Ministry of Environment regulations. FINANCIAL DETAILS In early summer of 2003, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) announced a capital works program of five million dollars which would be available for major maintenance works and to begin studies related to major maintenance. OMNR will provide 50% of the total funding as part of this initiative with remaining funds available from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) operating levy. The time lines and conditions set for receiving funds required that any works approved be completed by the end of the provincial fiscal year, March 31, 2004. With the availability of provincial funds for this repair, TRCA has moved forward to meet the time line requirements. Report prepared by: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 For Information contact: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 Date: February 20, 2004 146 RES. #B41/04 - CONTRACT FOR CLAIREVILLE DAM CONTROL ROOM REPAIRS To retain Facio Corporation to complete the control room repairs at Claireville Dam. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the contractor Facio Corporation be retained to complete the control room repairs at Claireville Dam at a cost not to exceed $30,000 (excluding G.S.T.) CARRIED BACKGROUND Claireville Dam was constructed in 1963 to control flooding on the Humber River. Claireville Dam has 5 radial gates used for flood control operations. Originally, the dam was designed to operate from the control room and manually from the main deck of the dam. Control room operations for Claireville have not been possible for approximately 6 years, therefore all present operations are completed by the deck switches. The original gate controls are extremely outdated and would require rewiring of the entire control system. Automating the controls is more cost effective than trying to re- establish the old system. RATIONALE Three contractors submitted quotes based on the following: • design of an automated system to operate the 5 gates through the use of a computer; • operations compatable with the existing automated Raco unit (water level recorder). The following quotes were submitted: Quote #1- Facio Corporation : $30,000 plus G.S.T. • Supply and install internet/intranet based monitoring and control system to allow remote and local monitoring of water level, including Modbus interface and individual gate operations; • PC based work station with web server software and Iicencing; • all necessary engineering, hardware ,software, custom enclosures, power supplies, program and system commissioning and training; • set up with alarm management routines to automatically send message to web enabled appliances (i.e. Email, pager, etc.). Quote #2 - Summa Engineering : $48,300 plus G.S.T. • AB SLC 5/05 processor (Pro Logic Controls) with ethernet communications; • PC based workstation with printer and UPS back up; • Scada software, 10 screen consisting of operation, trending, report and alarm screens; • all necessary engineering, documentation, testing and start up and all software Iicencing. 147 Quote #3 - Phoenix Electrical : $36,300 plus G.S.T. • Siemens Logo PLC controller and analog controlled proximity sensors for each gate individually; • alarming system which indicates audio signals or flashing light when the gates are being operated; • PC based workstation with web server software and licencing. The Facio Corporation quotation was determined to best meet the requirements at the best value. This work is consistant with industry standards and will enhance Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) operations through remote monitoring and controlling. FINANCIAL DETAILS In early summer of 2003, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) announced a capital works program of five million dollars which would be available for major maintenance works and to begin studies related to major maintenance. OMNR will provide 50% of the total funding as part of this initiative, with remaining funds available from TRCA's operating levy. The time lines and conditions set for receiving funds required that any works approved be completed by the end of the provincial fiscal year, March 31, 2004. With the availability of provincial funds for this repair, TRCA has moved forward to meet the time line requirements. Report prepared by: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 For Information contact: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 Date: February 20, 2004 RES. #B42/04 - URBAN STREAM CROSSING DESIGN GUIDE To sole source the preparation of an Urban Stream Crossing Design Guide to Parish Geomorphic Limited. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the consulting firm of Parish Geomorphic Limited be retained to undertake the preparation of an Urban Stream Crossing Design Guide;at a maximum upset limit of $40,000 excluding applicable taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND Historically, bridges or culverts at stream crossings have been sized using hydraulic criteria for flood conveyance, minimizing increases to upstream or downstream flood elevations. This achieved an acceptable level of flood protection for the roadway. More recently, it has been shown that structures designed according to hydraulic criteria alone are often incompatible with the natural erosion and migration processes of streams, the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems of stream corridors and public access needs. The potential consequences of such designs include failure of the crossing structures by erosion, creation of fish barriers and obstruction of the movement of terrestrial animals. 148 To address these above issues, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and other regulatory agencies such as Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC) and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) have developed additional criteria for the design of stream crossings. However, these criteria have not been standardized into comprehensive guidelines, and as a result they are often perceived by proponents of development and infrastructure projects as ambiguous and subjective. In many cases, this results in extensive debate between proponents, the TRCA and other regulatory agencies regarding the type and size of structures required at crossings. To address this issue, the TRCA and FOC intend to develop an Urban Stream Crossing Design Guide, which will set out standardized criteria to be applied to crossings in the TRCA jurisdiction. The resulting document will be a comprehensive, user - friendly guide that will outline a stream crossing design process to allow proponents to meet the requirements of the TRCA and other agencies, and to obtain the necessary approvals. RATIONALE The criteria in the Urban Stream Crossing Design Guide will be developed based on the following: • The current requirements of agencies that regulate watercourses within the TRCA jurisdiction; • TRCA Belt Width Delineation Procedures, a predictive tool developed by the TRCA to identify the potential future extent of channel migration and erosion; • Research by FOC regarding crossing size requirements to allow fish passage and maintain natural sediment transport; • A review of current scientific literature regarding the impact of stream crossings on physical stream processes and on the ecosystems of stream corridors. In Tight of the above, it is proposed to sole source this work to Parish Geomorphic Limited, rather than request proposals from a number of consultants. Parish Geomorphic was retained to develop the TRCA Belt Width Delineation Procedures, and also have develop guidelines and fact sheets on the relationships between stream processes and fish habitat with FOC. In addition, they have completed numerous studies and designs in the Greater Toronto Area related to stream processes, development impacts on streams and individual stream crossings. Their knowledge of stream processes and regulatory issues in the TRCA jurisdiction, as well as their technical expertise, will allow them to complete the project in an efficient and cost - effective manner. FINANCIAL DETAILS This project will be undertaken in conjunction with FOC. FOC has allocated $25,000 towards the project. Additional costs will be charged to TRCA's policy development accounts. Report prepared by: Ryan Ness, extension 5615 For Information contact: Ryan Ness, extension 5615 Date: April 23, 2004 149 RES.#B43/04 - TOPSOIL PLACEMENT - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA West of Gorewood Dr. and North of HWY 407, City of Brampton. Proposal to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) from Giampaolo Investments Limited requesting permission to place approximately 100,000 cubic metres of clean surplus topsoil on lands located within Claireville Conservation Area. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with Giampaolo Investments Limited to accept placement of clean surplus topsoil on lands within Claireville Conservation Area to create an environmental berm /buffer, subject to archaeological and municipal approvals; THAT the fee for accepting the topsoil will be $3.75/m3; THAT in addition to the tipping fee, Giampaolo Investments Limited will be responsible for all costs of sediment control, placing topsoil, fine grading and seeding the site with a basic cover crop; THAT the funds received as compensation for receiving the surplus topsoil be set aside exclusively for project costs, for future restoration and habitat enhancement of the property, and for general TRCA purposes; THAT TRCA staff work together with the Claireville Community Advisory Committee to develop conceptual plans for the restoration of the property; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all the necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Staff of TRCA received a request via Giampaolo Investments Limited to permanently place about 100,000 m3 of surplus topsoil on lands within Claireville Conservation Area (CA) (See Site 1 on attachment 1) in Brampton. To date, staff have had preliminary discussions with Giampaolo Investments Limited representatives to discuss issues such as: type, quantity and quality of topsoil; suitability of depositing additional topsoil on the site; site operations; quality monitoring; archaeology; grading and restoration plans; and fair compensation for depositing the topsoil. The compensation proposed by Giampaolo Investments Limited is slightly higher than compensation received for a similar project north of the Cornell development in the Town of Markham. Staff are of the opinion that the compensation provided by Giampaolo Investments Limited is the highest per metre rate that could be expected considering the proximity of the topsoil source to the placement location. Since transportation costs represent a significant portion of topsoil disposal costs, it is unlikely that any other developer could match the price paid by Giampaolo Investments Limited as the site they are developing is immediately adjacent to the proposed TRCA berm. 150 Based on these discussions, it is the opinion of staff that this is an opportunity to preserve a significant asset strategically and enhance the restoration potential of the proposed site in a manner that protects and buffers the nearby Humber River from an active industrial area, while creating the foundation for diverse habitat and public features. RATIONALE TRCA staff have negotiated similar agreements with developers and /or operated similar operations in other areas with considerable success. Examples of these successful projects include the berming along the new Markham by -pass east of the Ninth Line, berming along Highway 407 at Claireville CA and berming and wetland complex development at Boyd North (along Islington Avenue north of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan). Staff see this as a benefit to all involved as the surplus topsoil, along with the financial compensation, will create a foundation that will allow for the acceleration of habitat restoration opportunities on this property. Further, the community will also benefit from the environmental enhancements to the property, and from the reduction in potential truck traffic and its associated impacts. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff need to finalize the archaeological review of the site prior to completing restoration plans. FINANCIAL DETAILS The potential gross revenue from this project is $375,000. The direct project operating and restoration costs will be deducted from this revenue. Report prepared by: Nick Saccone, extension 5301 For Information contact: Nick Saccone, extension 5301 Date: February 26, 2004 Attachments: 2 151 Attachment 1 152 Attachment 2 153 RES.#B44/04 - MIMICO WATERFRONT LINEAR PARK Appraisal Services, CFN 29644. Approval to hire Larry Bedford & Associates Ltd. to undertake appraisals of the property requirements for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park in the City of Toronto. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT Larry Bedford & Associates Ltd. be retained to undertake the necessary appraisals of property requirements for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park in an amount not to exceed $26,450 plus G.S.T. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #9/03, held on November 28, 2003, resolution #A245/03 was approved as follows: :' WHEREAS the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) has requested that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a delivery agreement - with TWRC to undertake certain works for the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project ($16 million) and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project ($6.5 million), consistent with TWRC Development and Business Plan; AND WHEREAS it is in the interest of TRCA under its authority and mandate as set out in the Conservation Authorities Act (R.S.O. 1990, c. 27),to enter into such an agreement; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA enter into the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization - Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project Delivery Agreements, subject to all terms and conditions being finalized in a manner satisfactory to the Chair of the Authority, TRCA staff and solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP; THAT TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take all necessary actions as may be required, including the signing of documents, for the execution of the Delivery Agreements; AND FURTHER THAT the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation and the City of Toronto Waterfront Secretariat be so advised. At Authority Meeting #4/99, held on April 30, 1999, resolution #A119/99 was approved as follows: THAT the staff proceed with the 1999 work program for the Mimico Apartment Strip Waterfront Access /Trail in coordination with the City of Toronto representatives and the community. The Mimico Waterfront Linear Park (Mimico Apartment Strip) stretches from Humber Bay West Park in the east to Norris Crescent in the west along the Lake Ontario shoreline. 154 Through a public and agency evaluation process, a preferred concept for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park was developed. The preferred concept reflects the goals and objectives of the local community and once implemented, will be a significant public asset along the waterfront. A working group comprised of local residents, interest groups, the Humber Bay Boating Federation, property owners, local politicians and staff of the City of Toronto directed Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff through the public consultation process. The working group met eleven times to review the existing conditions of the shoreline, identify all project stakeholders and potential issues, review the public consultation process, assist with the public meetings and participate in discussions regarding the proposed Terms of Reference, range of shoreline treatments and Environmental Assessment (EA). An Environmental Assessment for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park has been prepared and was submitted to the Minister of Environment in 2003. The Minister's decision on the Environmental Assessment is expected in the late spring or early summer of this year. A primary objective of the preferred concept is to minimize the private lands required from each property owner. A majority of the required lands are considered hazard lands and therefore have minimal development potential. Current fence lines and parking lots will be maintained as the northern boundary of the linear park. A fence will be constructed along the boundary of the linear park. All property owners will have the opportunity to have a gate giving their tenants direct access to the park. It will be necessary to acquire either land, waterlots or riparian rights from 13 private properties in this area for the project to proceed. The province owns a number of waterlots along this stretch of shoreline and it will be necessary to acquire these waterlots from the province to allow the project to proceed and potentially facilitate land exchanges with some of the owners. It will be necessary to undertake appraisals and negotiate the acquisition of the necessary rights from each owner. In 1988, TRCA acquired a parcel of land adjacent to Norris Crescent Parkette from Mimico Co -op. TRCA also acquired a waterlot, together with a strip of land from Kilcooley Gardens Co- operative Inc. in 2000. The City of Toronto owns Norris Crescent Parkette, Superior Avenue Parkette and Amos Waites Park in this reach of the shoreline. On December 5, 2003 the Members of the Executive Committee approved resolution #B183/03 for the hiring of Johnston Donald Associates Inc. to provide property acquisition services in connection with the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. One of Johnston Donald Associates Inc. tasks was to prepare for review and approval, the Terms of Reference and a list of qualified appraisers, prepare quotation packages, request appraisal quotations, respond to questions, prepare recommendations to hire the appraiser, monitor appraiser's progress and review and resolve concerns relating to the appraisals. Johnston Donald Associates Inc. has prepared the Terms of Reference and sent them out to 3 qualified appraisers. The following quotes were received. 155 APPRAISER QUOTATION Larry Bedford & Associates Ltd. $26,450 plus GST Cornwall Property Consultants Ltd. $49,975 plus GST Wagner Andrews Kovacs Ltd. No quotation received A map of the area is attached. RATIONALE Johnston Donald Associates Inc. are recommending hiring Larry Bedford & Associates Ltd. as this is the lowest quote. Staff concur with this recommendation. FINANCIAL DETAILS Expenses for this work will be charged to account 206 -01 - Mimico Linear Waterfront Park account. The money for this has been provided by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Date: February 24, 2004 Attachments: 1 156 Attachment 1 157 RES. #B45/04 - SEWERSHED CHARACTERISTIC STUDY FOR THE GTAA - SUBCATCHMENT #219 To sole source the Sewershed Characteristic Study (Etobicoke Creek) — Subcatchment #219 to the consulting firm of EBNFLO Environmental. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Rob Ford THAT the consulting firm of EBNFLO Environmental be awarded the contract for the Sewershed Characteristic Study for the GTAA — Subcatchment #219, at a cost not to exceed $25,000, including GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND In December 2001, Toronto and Region Conservatio Authority (TRCA) and Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) developed "The Living City Project — Etobicoke Creek" and entered into a three -year partnership (2002- 2004). TRCA is currently completing the project and conducting studies in four project areas under the terms of reference: • Aquatic Ecosystems - development of fisheries management plans, development of concept sites and review of GTAA habitat restoration concept / feasibility study (Dillon). • Terrestrial Natural Heritage (TNH) - determination of terrestrial habitat through the application of the TNH modeling tools. • • Stormwater - fluvial geomorphology and stream assessment, off -site and on -site stormwater retrofit opportunities, sewershed characterization study, and a spills management study. • Business Stewardship — characterization of businesses within study area, prospect and relationship building. The GTAA agreed to provide $270,000 to fund the project with the TRCA providing in -kind matching funding. The sewershed characteristic study is being undertaken this year in order to complete the Stormwater project component. Results from previously completed studies (Spills Management Study, Fluvial Geomorphology Study and Erosion Assessment and off-site Stormwater Retrofit Studies) will be all summarized together, along with the Sewershed Characteristic Study, to pinpoint the areas of concern and future action along the Etobicoke Creek. The Sewershed Characteristic Study will be utilizing the Hydrologic Simulation Program- Fortran (HSP -F) model of Etobicoke Creek, originally developed for the City of Toronto's Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP). The WWFMMP provides considerable data and identifies various projects required to improve water quality and quantity within the City of Toronto. This presents an opportunity to use the recently updated land use data, catchment area delineation (catchment #219) and other statistics collected to support the HSP -F model of the Etobicoke Creek to complete the Sewershed Characteristic Study. 158 This project will provide a greater understanding of the current water quality conditions in the Etobicoke Creek and various measures (implementation of stormwater management practices (i.e. greenroofs, pond retrofits, oil and grit separators, etc.) that can be implemented in order to improve overall water quality. The results from this characteristic sewershed can then be applied to other similar sewersheds around the GTAA and within the watershed. RATIONALE It is proposed to sole source this work to EBNFLO Environmental. EBNFLO Environmental undertook and completed the HSP -F modelling for the Etobicoke Creek Watershed (WWFMMP). Given the consultant's previous experience with the City of Toronto's Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan modeling work, knowledge of the watershed /sewershed and HSP -F model will enable them to complete the Sewershed Characteristic Study in a cost effective manner. FINANCIAL DETAILS An upset limit of $25,000 including GST has been established by TRCA to complete the scope of work required. TRCA staff have conducted a meeting outlining the details of the project to EBNFLO Environmental and in return the consultant has submitted a detailed work plan. The funds are available within the GTAA TRCA Living City Etobicoke Creek project account (118 -81). Report prepared by: Alison Edwards, extension 5363 and Paul Willms, extension 5314 For information contact: Alison Edwards, extension 5363 Steve Hollingworth, extension 5278 Date: February 20, 2004 RES. #B46/04 - STORMWATER ASSESSMENT MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE (SWAMP) PROGRAM Synthesis Report of SWAMP Study Findings. Hiring of a consultant to prepare a report synthesizing the findings of stormwater monitoring studies conducted under the SWAMP program. Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan Frank Dale THAT the team Marshall Macklin Monaghan be retained to complete a synthesis report of Stormwater Assessment Monitoring and Performance (SWAMP) study findings at a total cost not to exceed $22,000 plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The SWAMP Program is an initiative of Environment Canada's Great Lakes Sustainability Fund, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and the Municipal Engineers Association, along with host municipalities and other owner /operators. The SWAMP Program began in 1995 with the following objectives: 159 to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of new or innovative stormwater management technologies; and to disseminate study results and recommendations within the stormwater management community. Within this first phase of the SWAMP Program, a number of different types of stormwater management facilities have been monitored and evaluated. These studies have included stormwater pond retrofits, constructed wetlands, perforated pipe exfiltration systems, oil grit separators, underground tanks and a Flow Balancing System. In addition to its findings regarding the performance of various technologies, the SWAMP Program has gained much experience in the development of monitoring and data analysis protocols. Mr. David Averill has prepared a paper summarizing data analysis and statistical evaluation methodologies used in the SWAMP studies and associated recommendations. As the first phase of the SWAMP Program nears completion, attention has been given to future study needs and mechanisms for addressing them. The Canadian Water Resources Association, on behalf of the SWAMP Program, convened a workshop with stormwater industry representatives in February, 2003 to seek input on stormwater monitoring and research needs and on various partnerships for advancing this work. Feedback received at the workshop was documented in a workshop summary. This report contains recommendations for a future role, mandate and priority work of a group such as the SWAMP Program. This project will review and synthesize findings and recommendations from the SWAMP Program studies. The summary report will be used to disseminate study findings to a broad audience and promote support for addressing further study needs through partnerships. RATIONALE Three consulting firms were invited to bid on the Synthesis Report of SWAMP study findings: XCG Consulting limited, Marshall Macklin Monaghan and Aquafor Beech Ltd. An upset limit of $22,000 + GST was set for the project. XCG Consulting Limited declined our invitation to submit a proposal. The remaining two teams submitted proposals, as follows: Company Cost Marshall, Macklin, Monaghan $22,000 +GST Aquafor Beech Limited $22,000 +GST The SWAMP Program Steering Committee reviewed the proposals, based on the following evaluation criteria: • relevant experience of team; • demonstrated previous work in stormwater literature review and knowledge of state -of- the -art stormwater management practices and performance; • proposed approach; • quality of proposal; 160 • ability to meet timelines; • cost. The steering committee recommended Marshall Macklin Monaghan (MMM) as the consultant that best met the evaluation criteria. The basis for selection of MMM included: • demonstrated experience with the design and evaluation of stormwater management technologies; • clear and comprehensive proposal with detailed cost breakdown by task; • strong prior knowledge with international literature on stormwater management best management practices. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE A detailed terms of reference has been prepared to guide this work. The final products will consist of: 1) a report, containing full documentation of any international literature referenced, tabulations and summaries drawn from the individual source reports, and an appropriate level of discussion to support the conclusions. The primary audience for this report will be stormwater management practitioners and related technical professionals (e.g. aquatic biologists, fluvial geomorphologists and watershed planners). 2) a summary brochure, providing an overview of the main conclusions and recommendations. This document will be geared to senior managers, decision - makers, politicians and community leaders. FINANCIAL DETAILS Financial contributions for this project are provided by the Government of Canada's Great Lakes Sustainability Fund ($10,000) and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment ($15,000). These funds will pay for the consultant hired to prepare the report and a portion of TRCA services associated with data synthesis. TRCA will also provide in -kind services for contract administration. Funding for this project is provided in account # 121 -30. Report prepared by: Tim Van Seters, extension 5337 For Information contact: Tim Van Seters, extension 5337 Date: February 23, 2004 161 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF ANOTHER BOARD RES.#B47/04 - REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (March, 1993) Status Report on Outstanding Expropriations and Other Litigation Matters, CFN 23218. Update on status of proceedings with respect to lands expropriated and other litigation matters in the Humber Bay Shores area (Etobicoke Motel Strip) of the City of Toronto. Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Maria Augimeri THAT the report dated February 23, 2004, regarding the current status of proceedings with respect to lands expropriated and other litigation matters in the Humber Bay Shores area (Etobicoke Motel Strip) of the City of Toronto be received. NEW BUSINESS RES. #B48 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Frank Dale CARRIED THAT the Chief Administrative Officer be given the authority to grant a permit in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application regarding dispersal of discharge volumes to Robinson Creek at 16th Avenue in the Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, subject to all TRCA requirements being met; AND FURTHER THAT the delegation of authority to the Chief Administrative Officer be without prejudice and not precedent setting. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:41 a.m., on March 5, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks CARRIED Brian Denney Secretary- Treasurer 162 ts. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/04 April 2, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #3/04, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, April 2, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m. PRESENT Maria Augimeri David Barrow Frank Dale Michael Di Biase Rob Ford Suzan Hall Dick O'Brien Gerri Lynn O'Connor REGRETS 'Dave Ryan RES. #B49 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the Minutes DELEGATIONS (a) MINUTES David Barrow Rob Ford of Meeting #2/04, held on March 5, 2004, be approved. Member Member Member Member Member Member Chair Vice Chair Member CARRIED Tom Halinski, Solicitor, Aird & Berlis LLP, speaking in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. RES. #B50 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: DELEGATIONS Suzan Hall Frank Dale 163 / THAT above -noted delegation (a) be heard and received. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) A letter dated March 25, 2004, from Richard Guttman and Susan J. Stamm in regards to permit application for landscaping project at 193 Hudson Drive, City of Toronto. (b) A letter dated April 1, 2004, from Tom Halinski, Aird & Berlis LLP in regards to item 7.1 Hearing Report, 3 Gibson Avenue. (c) An email dated April 1, 2004, from Madeleine McDowell, Chair, Humber Heritage Committee, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (d) A letter dated April 2, 2004, from Jo Anne Appleyard, in regards to item 4.1 - Delegations. RES. #B51 /04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Michael Di Biase THAT above -noted correspondence (a) - (c) be received. CARRIED RES. #B52 /04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Rob Ford THAT above -noted correspondence (d) be received. CARRIED 164 CORRESPONDENCE (A) Richard Guttman Susan J. Stamm 193 Hudson Drive Toronto, Ontario M4T 2K7 (416) 862 -4316 - Stamm work (416) 863 -3446 - Stamm work fax (416) 487 -9329 - home susan.stamm@gowlings.com rguttman(workbrain.com March 25, 2004 By Facsimile & Email Executive Committee Toronto & Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 To Whom It May Concern: Re: Permit Application for Landscaping Project —193 Hudson Drive, Toronto We are writing this letter to request an informal meeting with the Authority so the problem described below can be resolved without a lengthy hearing pursuant to s. 28(12) of the Conservation Authorities Act. Given the timelines described below, we request that this meeting take place during the month of April 2004. Our property borders the Moore Park Ravine. At some point after we purchased the property in 2001, we received a flyer providing notification that we needed a permit from the Toronto & Region Conservation Authority ( "Authority ") if we wished to do work on the ravine side of our property. We do not have the flyer anymore. Our backyard consists of a deck and a small portion of table land. There is a crumbling stone staircase going down into the ravine. A chain link fence runs down into the ravine enclosing the upper portion of the property. There are also remains of a concrete curb on the lip of the ravine. There are some old retaining structures beyond the fence. The property is very unsafe for our small children who will be 2 and 4 in the summer. Accordingly, we hired Keith Evans, a landscape designer, to provide the designs for landscaping that would make the property safe and attractive. In February, we provided Mr. Evans with authorization to apply for a permit to the Authority. Neither Mr. Evans nor us had any experience with the Authority so we decided it was best to check with you. 165 In February, Mr. Evans submitted in triplicate his plans, a survey and an application together with a letter. Mr. Evans did not keep a copy of the submitted application and accordingly, we do not know the Application file number. Mr. Evans' contact at the Authority was Ann Marie Sanchez whom we have copied with this letter. Ms. Sanchez reviewed the application with Mr. Evans and indicated than it appeared to her that the work we proposed to do, on the top of the ravine, fell outside the Authority's jurisdiction and that, therefore, no permit was required. As she was not certain of this, she advised Mr. Evans that she would check. Although in the application, Mr. Evans advised that the work was to be done in June of this year, he was able to find a landscaper who would do the work in May. Accordingly, while Mr. Evans was away on March break, we telephoned Ms. Sanchez to find out the status of our application as we were under pressure to put down a deposit with the landscaper. She advised that she needed to do a site visit. We urged her to do this, and she did it. Ms. Sanchez also asked for a list of plants that we proposed to put on the slope to stabilize it. advised her that we planned to put the slope planting work off until after the project was completed but would check with her before any planting occurred. Last week, Ms. Sanchez advised us that her geological engineer who attended with her at the property had prepared a report saying that our proposed retaining wall would put too much pressure on the slope, and, in any event, no retaining walls could be built within 10 meters of the edge of the ravine. She advised that there was a guideline which sets out this fact. She promised to fax this information (and the report) to us. To date, we have received nothing and have heard nothing from her. We were quite shocked to hear this information. Almost half (if not more) of the properties backing onto the Moore Park ravine (and other Toronto ravines we walk in regularly) have retaining walls at or very close to the edges of the ravine. We cannot understand why anyone would build a retaining wall 10 meters from the edge of the ravine. Some of the retaining walls on the Moore Park ravine were built in the last year or so. Our neighbours to the south have a retaining wall (similar to what we propose), and our neighbours to the north have a large addition which is on the ravine slope. As we are both lawyers, we decided to review the governing legislation to better understand the Authority's jurisdiction. We reviewed the Conservation Authority Act and the Regulations, especially Regulation 158. It appears that if our proposed work falls below the "fill regulation line" on certain maps filed with the Ministry of Natural Resources in Richmond Hill (a number of maps are referred to), we need a permit to build the retaining wall, as such appears to fit within the definition of fill — again we are uncertain about this. We have not yet attempted to obtain these maps and, even if we did, we are unsure if we would be able to understand how they match our property survey & plans vis a vis fill regulation lines. We are not expert at reading topographic maps. We reviewed the website but it was not able to answer our questions. 166 We have never received a decision from the Executive Committee as to whether our permit application, submitted in February, has been refused or granted or otherwise. Given the fact that we have paid a deposit to our landscaper to start the project in May, we would like to obtain the decision as soon as possible so we know where we stand. We care deeply about the ravine and wish to ensure that the work we do is appropriate and in its best interests. However, the information that we have obtained from the Authority thus far does not assist us in understanding the Authority's jurisdiction, what is permissible, what is not permissible and why. For example, why are retaining walls far in excess of the size we propose permitted on the ravine? Did the property owners never request permission or are the fill regulation lines different from ours? Or is there something special that they have proposed that would meet your requirements? If retaining walls are not permissible, what is permissible? In our view, a meeting with someone at the Authority who understands these issues and can answer our questions would greatly assist us in understanding whether and why our plans are suitable or,not. We would endeavour to involve Mr. Evans in the meeting so that if modifications are necessary to his plans, he can make them. Further, such a meeting may well prevent a lengthy and expensive hearing into this matter. We look forward to hearing from you. Please would you contact Susan Stamm at her office at Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP at 416 - 862 -4316 or susan.stamm(gowlings.com as soon as possible to set up a meeting. Yours very truly, Richard Guttman & Susan J. Stamm c. A. Sanchez - Development Services Technician for Toronto c. K. Evans TOR_LAW\ 5682434 \1 167 CORRESPONDENCE (B) APR 01 2004 1358 FR AtRD 3. BERLIS LLP 416 663 1515 TO 2130042230416667 P.02/02 AlRD & Boars LLP Banitors all Wilton rani and Ir.& UM& Ai Tan Nalinki Dbect OW:MTV E&inad: lharossideettltettlo.com April t, 2004 File No. 84223 VIA FACSIMILE (4184174271) Mr. Dick O'Brien, Chair Executive Committee The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario M3N 1S4 Dear Mr. O'Brien: Re: Meeting of ratecutive Committee • April 2.2004 Hearing Report 7.1 - Application No. 423/03/TOR 3431 Avenue, City of Toronto We have been retained to act on behalf of Mr. John Mario, the owner of the above- noted property. We are writing to advise the Committee that at tomorrow's meeting, we will be requesting an deferral of the consideration of our client's application to regret's and place al within a All Regulated Area. We have reviewed the staff report with respect to our clears application and wish to forresolvi g the app cation and to obtain tairs comments with respect k the proposal. proposal We will be in attendance at tomorrow's Committee meeting In order to make this Wens' request in person as well as to provide further intonation with respect to the proposal and to answer questions from the Committee. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to cones the undersigned. Yours very truly, RD = ERL)B LLP To Halinski dd C: L. Strezos J. DiSento 16 ::00MA, lPCDOCSSDOC811661224tt SCE Plant. Suit° 1000, Soot 754.181 Bey Street. Toronto. Me f, , Sande MOJ 2TO T: 416.963.1500 F: 416,853.t815 www aIrdbOAle.oam CORRESPONDENCE (C) "Madeleine McDowell" <m.mcdowell @sympatico.ca> on 04/01/2004 09:12:35 PM Please respond to "Madeleine McDowell" <m.mcdowell @sympatico.ca> To: Kathy Stranks /MTRCA @MTRCA cc: Subject: Agenda pages 11 -15 Chair and Members of the Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1 S4 Dear Chairman O'Brien: 1st April, 2004. On behalf of the Humber Heritage Committee, I commend today's Hearing Report and recommendation, which we urge you to support. Most particularly, the comments on cumulative impacts included, answer a concern which we have been raising with governments and the Authority for several years. The cumulative impact on natural heritage has been slow to be acknowledged, and its voice here and in other areas of the agenda is most reassuring to us. Thank you for your kind attention. Yours sincerely, Madeleine McDowell Chair, Humber Heritage Committee 169 CORRESPONDENCE (D) 04/02/2004 10:26 416 - 698 -9036 JO ANNE APPLEYARD PAGE 02 Jo Anne Appleyard 27 Kingsbury Crescent Scarborough, Ontario M11T lilt Friday, April 2, 2004 VIA FAX: (416) 661 -6898 and 661 -6610 To: Mr. James W. Dillane Director, Finance and Business Development The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive, Downeview, Ontario MIT 134 And To: The Chairman and Members of the Executive Committee The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Dear Mr. Dillane and Members of the Executive Committee: Et: proposal for Purchase of 27 Ki g bujy Crescent 1 am writing to advise you that I shall not be attending the meeting_ of the executive Committee which is taking place this morning. As a consequence of my spending close to two hours in a taxi on March 5, 2004 with a driver who could not find his way to Black Creek Pioneer Village and not arriving there until 10:55 a.m., and as a further consequence of the manner in which the pronoaal was dealt with in my absence, in spit. of my having spoken with Mr. Dillane at 8:00 a.m. that morning and there being no doubt that I would be attending, the final consequence of all these factors is that my eon has decided to list the property for sole. Regardless of the property now being listed for sale on the open market, I reserve the right to address the issues raised in the proposal at a future date. During my long association with tho Conservation Authority I became aware of many instances where staff of the Authority failed to adhere to provisions contained within the Authority's regulatory mandate. believe S have an obligation to draw the matters .to the attention of ever: member of the various TRCA boards. :jag Yours vary truly, 170 Moved by: Seconded by: HEARING REPORT Application #423/03/TOR to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area for the Humber River West Branch Mario Faraone 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto. Mario Faraone, agent for the owner, Mr. John DiSanto, has applied to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), under Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of an armorstone retaining wall on the valley slope, create additional table land for a rear yard and construct a stormwater outfall that drains directly to the valley slope. Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT the request to defer item 7.1 - Hearing Report, be denied. NOT CARRIED RES. #B53/04 - HEARING REPORT Application #423/03/TOR to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area for the Humber River West Branch Mario Faraone 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto. Mario Faraone, agent for the owner, Mr. John DiSanto, has applied to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), under Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of an armorstone retaining wall on the valley slope, create additional table land for a rear yard and construct a stormwater outfall that drains directly to the valley slope. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Rob Ford THAT item 7.1 - Hearing Report, be deferred until Executive Committee Meeting #4/04, to be held on May 7, 2004. CARRIED 171 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B54/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Humber River Watershed Ballymore Developments (Richmond Hill) Corp., CFN 35209. Purchase of property located south of Snowy Meadow Avenue, west of Yonge Street - Oak Ridges, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.27 hectares (3.12 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Ballymore Developments (Richmond Hill) Corp., being Part of Lot 64, Concession 1 WYS and designated as Block 24 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J. D. Barnes Surveying Ltd., under their Reference No. 97 -21- 946- 00 -P3, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Snowy Meadow Avenue, west of Yonge Street - Oak Ridges; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Sidney Lubelsky of Brown, Peck & Lubelsky, Barristers & Solicitors, the owner's lawyer. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 172 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. The lands to be acquired form a portion of the Provincial Class 3 Philips Lake Wetland Complex, designated as Environmental Protection Zone 1 in the Town of Richmond Hill Official Plan Amendment No. 129. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: March 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 173 Attachment 1 KAI ut4t_ t-tHI 1 Ardk tJW.US rHU I tc I ION AND FICOUISITt9 V PROJECT 207.1 •?OC6.• '' :. • kl : ) • flood 'tart cn u:nacnalen Comporort 1 H.gmber Rhn' watg'di.c C.rrp=nanl '1 - rf ' `r~ Oafy k e Ccv ropernr, IFtic,mto ^d HI b Corp. iwa. �• ^, . • , r • agar ','r �, t% ~t `+• •.b y i• Sr r t. 1 -,, j o S i_' ' / :u r , re... v. '�M. .: ,L Z r✓ -- 1 err . %-r.- �'-/ ii ' Y, ` ▪ ,"'` - - -ti • VI fi.' a• 1 .1. • • ;yip ,;(), AK RIOG;S •• • Y • rti • • :` • t . •� •1, • • • •I t �. • • • ccr t. • yonaervatsan ak 1 r tor the Living Chi • •a. ,r;ar ^ f . -y t ANIMOSUUJEC7 PJ CPERTY 4i 174 RES.#B55/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Humber River Watershed 1265571 Ontario Ltd., CFN 35107. Purchase of property located south of Bond Street, west of Yonge Street - Oak Ridges, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.23 hectares (0.57 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from 1265571 Ontario Ltd., being Part of Lot 65, Concession 1 WYS and designated as Blocks 22, 23, and 24 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Christian Stanciu, Ontario Land Surveyor, under his Job. No. 97002, Drawing No. DP1, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Bond Street, west of Yonge Street - Oak Ridges; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Ray Floyd of Centrehill Corporation, the agent on behalf of the owner. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 175 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. The lands to be acquired form a portion of the Provincial Class 3 Philips Lake Wetland Complex and are designated Environmental Protection Zone 1 and 2 in the Town of Richmond Hill Official Plan Amendment No. 129. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: March 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 176 Attachment 1 NATURAL HEPJTAGE LANUS PROTECTION AtitO ACCIUSI1 ION PROJECT 2001-2005-!1; r.Tr•nNis, Flood Plain and Conservikan C.ornment Hur.iber Rear Watershed Component • . • 1261471 Ontario Ltc. t • • • -X tr. ••• CFN S.5107 `s'= r - ' • • t •- r „•a-s. .11.r • K." ;44# # j • its - 1 . • : • Karam essercutAtionume ... •r.-"F"'. 4*. •.0rot" ,• c.,--') ..........------ • 109 ,,,•• •eisoatif „„ . fel.; 2 • ..."...:sr-.. •,..-.. .-- • . 0 .. .. ....,- • , rm. -.--14te$:.:::::'''`i,"."'-'..-te,',"-,..--:••• ISHEFeT- .mf- .-• • .41-- • -- • • 444•0° ssols**. • •• • • • • • : • . • •-s-o• •••• • • „ . •• • ' - , ••li .„ .... , \ 3 0 \ r? • .0 ; •• - - • * ''040$ \ . . • • .9.9"a• • „ • .,,,.0.0 . .....-- 4t • • .91.19$ ..• ** •,., • • •••I`sie,q, ir .101 •.• pli 1... . • .2 .....,...*-,_ . • • * 9.• . J •••••• SI ,-..,... ii. 11. : • •,‘„,, 4., • •-• ......e -'47.4. . ,,9.**'''T*.„....•,.... 9.,'":„...--"' • • I 9 - 'CI Y . I. ' WO A ..A ' /1 .. -e- .....' `... , .4.... . ,s ; : - - ./7 3. .. ,,.. ,...-j:: :s..::00%::::::.4,-,s.7.4:. .. ..r- 1 .,,..• .. 4..- •-- C ■ Vij. 4' :01.(0:-'04C•V‘ - 2,,• i 1. s.'d 1 gt••• .. . I 1 % .4 a24 \It • • • • , •tv- • • • • • • •• • * • *13 • • Ir#7 • • IA .-4* • •", • W.... • it% •• • 4...* . * ; • • •• •• ' ■•• 14.1 ., I 9143 1 , ...".• a I.0.90 • Itt. rt17(..,1•$.7....,-,. ■•■• CA: 0991. • t i • ./. • ''' • .1. ---_,..e 411. . lair* • ." % -• ''"••• / 7C:i4S. ko..!e'•• ' -*.; • 4.-- ..• • f ' WO ,90°°t1 •• : • • . 1,1.-^ 4. .• a -,)''''.. . . ••• ...."- r - , 1 • 0." „..t• • / ' : .,.. .... - • :Ow* • • . • • 4- . . • • 4,0 1 • 0.0%*0. \o, 01.,09•°` ■ 4 itriVi •-••• 19°•" 1••• 2•94 • t. ft- II ,cf • Ir._ • 91;itAt Sh, 30.4 • 4. $. • ••• .3C11* , SUBJECT PROPEmY .:*••••;:*, • Getm4;e341 ,..----s' , .... %,-,■,..,-.4-: • A.. 4. • -• • .1•no., , .1, ',.1.0`•9 • • •• ' I le' .. ' ....• • ,... ,„ • • • ,......-_---:11 . ,, . .., -t.:........." J N, t .......-0::7--.-1 7," '.........• • ....,7„.. ...... .,„ .,,, .......... „.... i ‘. . .- ' - is-'" ,...--e--f"''. ."'"'•- f,,,r. OAK RIDGES 0., 9S J-t• . • . ... o- 1 1 C. .....:. # • .****•.7.1,• ,,A.... .. • ...vr••• ,, •,, • • f"a • • • •:!••.:4P-'44..- • • 9. • -.41'-- 4-• ,, • •...• 7 • ,41:;14.../0.: • • •.. • ••• ...'; •.V.TZ.4 • • 4 • • ... • • • • • 41*. ;moo • • **I •-•*".st .• C.* 999t • • VN.q" ••;•.--*'-.•••#'11 .• • •„, •••„. • .14 .tur•:■ 1.--1 \L„.•••3' "e•Aa. 46. .11.42 4". 1- • ti„ e ' • s • **40190_,.......;;••••••"...---"ot 177 1 • • * .ose. .1..-• ---, I r,likV". v 1 . ,....,Arc• sok ,.. ....,.1 i, , ..:1 . - ... . • •• • , t - 11, ' .'• ?' •• • 0,:y -'-'4(.•,;. . „ ... \I :,...4..." • ..r.) r'' .■* ',..) -7,. •::•,;:.:1 s-,....,7. \lt---. t :-.t.Ot% I'd San,i I. aA . CoilrieliiVon , t for The tiring Citr 4/ . . ' '.1 '.. ; : r1,S2)TRCALANS * l MS UPRO PFRTY .--* - . , . . - "".- RES. #B56/04 - CITY OF BRAMPTON Request for Permanent Easement for a Storm Sewer Outfall Humber River Watershed, City of Brampton, CFN 35183. Receipt of a request from the City of Brampton to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer outfall, east of Goreway Drive, south of Castlemore Road, Humber River watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Brampton to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer outfall, east of Goreway Drive, south of Castlemore Road, Humber River watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Brampton in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.23 hectares (0.57 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Brampton for a storm sewer outfall, said land being Part of Lot 9, Concession 9 ND, City of Brampton and designated as Part 1 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by J. D. Barnes Surveying Ltd., under their Reference No. 02 -28- 731 -07 -H; THAT considerations be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the City of Brampton Is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Brampton; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; 178 AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Brampton has formally requested a permanent easement for a new storm sewer outfall across TRCA lands as part of the development of residential subdivision 21T- 99021(B)- Highspring Estates Inc. Phase I. The subdivision is located east of Goreway Drive and south of Castlemore Road. The southern end of the storm sewer outfall is located within the Fill Regulated Area of a tributary of the West Humber River. A permit application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 was approved at Executive Committee Meeting # 7/03 held on July 25, 2003, for the construction of the portion of the proposed outfall located within the Fill Regulation Line, pending receipt of additional technical information. Granting of the easement across TRCA lands is required to complete the proposed construction; a temporary working easement will not be required in order to complete the works. The subject lands were acquired from John A. and Ernest Parr on December 2, 1971 under the Ebenezer Dam and Reservoir Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared and submitted for TRCA staff review. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Brampton has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing the transaction Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: March 24, 2004 Attachments: 1 179 Attachment 1 180 RES. #B57/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CITY OF TORONTO Request for Permanent Easement for the Emery Creek Stormwater Quality Control Ponds Project Humber River Watershed, City of Toronto, CFN 32240. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the Emery Creek Stormwater Quality Control Ponds Project, north of St. Lucie Drive, west of Weston Road, in the City of Toronto (Toronto West Community Council Area). Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the Emery Creek Stormwater Quality Control Ponds Project, north of St. Lucie Drive, west of Weston Road, in the City of Toronto (Toronto West Community Council Area); WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 3.02 hectares (7.46 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for the Emery Creek Stormwater Quality Control Ponds Project, said land being north of St. Lucie Drive, west of Weston Road, City of Toronto, as shown on a plan prepared by the City of Toronto Works & Emergency Services Department - Technical Services Division, entitled: Property Information Sheet - Acquisition of Permanent Easements Emery Creek Stormwater Quality Control Ponds, Sketch No. PS- 2001 -092, dated January 2, 2002; THAT considerations be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the City of Toronto fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation is to be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Toronto; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; 181 THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto has formally requested a permanent easement for the construction of the Emery Creek Stormwater Quality Control Ponds Project, north of St. Lucie Drive, west of Weston Road. The proposed works have been designed to improve the water quality of the Emery Creek at this location. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff have been involved in the review of a previously submitted Environmental Assessment Act application for this project. A permit application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for the construction of a portion of the proposed works located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Emery Creek has been submitted and will be considered by the Executive Committee at this meeting. The subject site is owned by the TRCA and is managed by the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement will also be required. The submitted drawing shows the location of both easements. The subject lands were acquired from the Corporation of the Borough of North York on March 18, 1968 and Milton & Wagner Construction (Rivalda Heights Development) on July 26, 1963 under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submission under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent and temporary easement locations is attached. FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing the transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: March 24, 2004 Attachments: 1 182 Attachment 1 ti • r -4,*(-)0r3 r trn jam, t r L ; • i1L,r' 183 RES. #B58/04 - SALE OF SURPLUS TRCA -OWNED LANDS 3203 Mayfield Road, City of Brampton Etobicoke Creek Watershed, CFN 34049. Receipt of an Offer to Purchase from Daniel Deveaux, concerning the potential disposal of surplus TRCA land situated at 3203 Mayfield Road, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, Etobicoke Creek Watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of an offer from Daniel Deveaux, to purchase surplus TRCA -owned land municipally known as 3203 Mayfield Road, in the vicinity of Hurontario Street and Mayfield Road in the City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, Etobicoke Creek Watershed; AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the TRCA that it is in the best Interests of the TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to complete a sale to Daniel Deveaux in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA -owned tableland, Improved with a brick veneer bungalow, containing 0.266 acres, (0.11 hectares) more or less, said land being Part of Lot 17, Concession 1 E.H.S., designated as Parts 2 & 3 on Plan 43R- 28797, City of Brampton, in the Regional Municipality of Peel be sold to Daniel Deveaux subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) the sate price is to be the sum of $250,000.00; (b) the subject land is to be used for single family residential purposes in keeping with the character of the community and in compliance with the existing zoning; (c) the purchaser be permitted to continue to use at their expense the septic bed on the TRCA property and to maintain the septic system In good condition and in conformity with all relevant regulations until such time as sewer hook up is available on Valleyview Road; (d) completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be required; (e) the transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full to the TRCA in cash on closing; and (f) any additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the TRCA staff or solicitor; THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources, In accordance to Section 21 (2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be Instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid; 184 AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject land is part of a much larger parcel of land that was acquired by the TRCA on November 3, 1976, from John Dunn, under the TRCA's master plan for flood plain and valley land acquisition. At Authority Meeting #6/03 held on July 25, 2003, the TRCA adopted Resolution #A151/03, declaring that a parcel of TRCA -owned tableland, improved with a single family residential home be surplus to the future requirements of the TRCA and recommended that staff be directed to negotiate with the current tenant who has expressed interest in purchasing, until such time as an acceptable offer is at hand where upon any such offer will be referred to the Executive Committee for consideration. Negotiations have been conducted and an agreement has been reached with the tenant (Dan Deveaux) at 3203 Mayfield Road. The offer at hand is in accordance with the appraised value range of an independent evaluation obtained by the TRCA. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the sale of this property. A map showing the location of the subject property is appended. RATIONALE The subject land has been declared surplus by the TRCA. FINANCIAL DETAILS It is proposed that the proceeds from this sale be used in the funding of the purchase of priority properties within the TRCA's Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 Date: March 09, 2004 Attachments: 1 185 Attachment 1 HWY K. 10 c • ,_ Ts' 4-‘ • • • .4. .... .— v.....„...............-4/"*.s? .14‘.3._ ' C2 O ,y s+ r S N.,... ✓MT V.-•' • . :,:-= "• ill i� 441 DTI l� f�:�tl. j • :S -ED rt 1.. • rend, 131 • � � f i li •4> ' - t ...• -w" • j. � .. - . I ' • • • - —\\ f 1• h J' Oti • r.w 1 ?S . IStngSrl ` '* \ J1 4 .-z... yr . w • i h ),- r •r f.• - • • 186 H. • • t Si . ‘-yr• 1� 1 1'. M• . ,y ,` , • . f• • -r r- p • AT. RES. #B59/04 - STREAM FLOW MONITORING WITHIN THE AUTHORITY'S REGIONAL MONITORING NETWORK PROGRAM Approval to hire Ontario Hydrometric Services to construct, maintain, monitor and archive stream flow data as part of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Regional Monitoring Network. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with Ontario Hydrometric Services Limited for a period of one year to construct, maintain, monitor and archive stream flow data at 19 locations as part of TRCA's Regional Monitoring Program, at a maximum upset cost of $108,073.80 including taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND The TRCA, with the support of our member municipalities, has developed and implemented a regional monitoring network within our area of jurisdiction. The network has been designed to be a comprehensive, integrated and coordinated approach which fulfills the needs of the Remedial Action Plan (RAP), TRCA and those of the individual watershed and waterfront councils and alliances, while furthering the interests of municipal, provincial and federal partners. A number of areas requiring specific monitoring needs were included in the development of the network. These areas include aquatic habitat and species /fluvial geomorphology, Terrestrial Natural Heritage, Surface Water Quality, Surface Water Quantity (flow and precipitation), Groundwater and Air Quality. The surface water quantity component specifically builds upon existing stream gauge, rain gauge and snow coarse networks as these networks relate to the objectives of the water management activities. In 2004, four new stream gauge locations are proposed. In addition to the new gauges, the existing network of fifteen stream flow gauges will require continued maintenance and operation. RATIONALE Historically, the vast majority of gauging in the province has been carried out by Environment Canada, through their Water Survey Division or through Meteorologic Services Division. Today, the availability of private contractors who undertake water quantity work is very limited. While some consulting firms offer a service of flow gathering in storm and sanitary sewers, very few are able to monitor open channel flows to Environment Canada standards, as required at a number of sites. Ontario Hydrometric Services Limited (OHS) is the only local firm capable of this level of service. In addition OHS has worked for TRCA over the past seven years. They have been maintaining and operating our water quantity networks, during which time they have gained knowledge of our monitoring needs and objectives, location of our existing network stations, and have provided technical expertise regarding various types of monitoring equipment. 187 OHS has also worked with a number of other conservation authorities and local municipalities in Southern Ontario, including a few municipalities within the TRCA jurisdiction. This arrangement has facilitated the development of partnership opportunities and cost - sharing agreements. TRCA staff are in agreement that the contract being awarded to OHS will be excellent value for cost. FINANCIAL DETAILS Continued operation and maintenance of existing stream gauges: $53,921.40; implementation of new stream gauges, $54,151.80, totaling $108,073.20 (including taxes) Funding for the 2004 monitoring season is available within accounts 124 -20 and 122 -46 as part of the 2004 monitoring budget. Report prepared by: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 For Information contact: Nicole Langton, extension 5239 Date: March 18, 2004 RES. #B60/04 - CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE 1:2,000 SCALE DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING FOR THE PURPOSE OF FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING WITHIN THE ETOBICOKE CREEK WATERSHED, DON RIVER WATERSHED, HIGHLAND CREEK WATERSHED AND PETTICOAT CREEK WATERSHED Approval to retain J.D. Barnes to produce 1:2,000 scale flood plain mapping in digital format for selected areas within the Etobicoke Creek, Don River, Highland Creek and Petticoat Creek watersheds in order to facilitate the update and management of Flood and Regulation Line Mapping. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with J.D. Barnes to provide 1:2,000 scale digital base mapping within the Etobicoke Creek watershed, Don River watershed, Highland Creek watershed and the Petticoat Creek watershed. A maximum upset limit not to exceed $179,321 including applicable taxes, for a total of 81 map sheets. CARRIED 188 BACKGROUND One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by TRCA and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate flood plain management information, the Watershed Management Division has prepared a Flood Plain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update TRCA's current Flood and Regulation Line Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the work plan for 2004 include the Etobicoke Creek, Don River, Highland Creek and Petticoat Creek watersheds, given the extent of previous, current and future development activities. A visual screening process has been completed to compare topographic and planimetric features contained on TRCA's original analogue mapping with recent aerial photography, to determine where significant changes warrant the preparation of new base mapping. From this assessment, it was determined that approximately 81 analogue map sheets within the Etobicoke Creek, Don River, Highland Creek and Petticoat Creek watersheds have significantly changed due to development, subsequent to the original date of completion. It is proposed to produce new digital flood plain mapping for these analogue map sheets to comply with VSCMP objectives. A total of 81 map sheets are required within TRCA's jurisdiction of which 9 map sheets are required within the Etobicoke Creek watershed at a cost of $24,289; 34 map sheets are required within the Don River watershed at a cost of $88,275; 27 map sheets are required within the Highland Creek watershed at a cost of $48,032; and, 11 map sheets are required within the Petticoat Creek watershed at a cost of $ 18,725. The maximum upset limit for this project will not exceed $179,321 including applicable taxes. Furthermore, of the 81 map sheets, 2 new map sheets within the Etobicoke Creek watershed (Renforth Creek) and 5 new map sheets within Petticoat Creek watershed are proposed in areas that have not been previously mapped as part of the original TRCA flood plain mapping program. RATIONALE J.D. Barnes has recently created a stereo -pair air photo model for the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and completed the Greater Toronto Area General Partnership Organization (GTA -GPO) Mapping Project for the TRCA. As part of TRCA's agreement with J.D. Barnes, use of the stereo -pair information is limited to TRCA and cannot be provided directly to other mapping consultants for the preparation of digital topographic mapping. As such, a competitive bid process would require all other mapping consultants to obtain the stereo -pair information from J.D. Barnes in order to prepare a similar product resulting in a higher cost. Alternatively, new air photos and control survey information would be required to prepare digital topographic mapping which is not considered cost effective in comparison to the current information available through J.D. Barnes. In light of this, and given their extensive knowledge of TRCA mapping requirements through previously completed mapping projects in 2002 and 2003, it is proposed to retain J.D. Barnes Limited directly to complete this assignment. 189 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project are available within the approved 2004 flood plain management budget. A maximum upset limit of $179,321 including applicable taxes has been set for this project. Report prepared by: Alison Edwards, extension 5363 For Information contact: Glenn Farmer, extension 5351 or Alison Edwards Date: March 22, 2004 SECTION 1I - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #861/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.1 - 9.1.9, inclusive, and 9.1.32 - Regional Municipality of York), which are listed below. CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.1 BELL CANADA To construct in a flood plain on (Duncan and Don Mills), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bell Canada. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the placement of an underground conduit structure (duct) beneath the Don River using the directional bore method and the open trench method. 190 The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 403, Bell Canada, prepared by Plantec Consulting Engineers, revised March 5, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a fill regulated area to facilitate the placement of an underground conduit beneath the Don River using the directional bore method and the open trench method. This conduit will be located at a depth of 2.5 metres below the Don River. The location of the proposed works is west of Don Mills Road and north of Duncan Mills Road. Control of Flooding: No excavated material is to be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Flood plain and all existing grades are to be maintained. There will be no impacts from the works with regards to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The bore pit locations are sufficiently setback from the top of bank and encircled by sediment and erosion control fencing. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Conservation of Land: There are no instream works or impacts to riparian vegetation. The proposed conduit is located 2.5 metres below the Don River. There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. The works will take place within the warmwater fisheries timing window. There will be no impact on fisheries or significant natural features. Plantings The applicant proposes new plantings and will restore the site. Policy Guidelines: The works comply with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35126 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: February 11, 2004 191 Application #: 040 /04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.2 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 311, 370, Plan 164, Lot 7, Plan 83, (Legion Road), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to demolish all structures, place fill and regrade the site of the former Legion Road Dewatering Plant. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: ■ Site of Former Legion Road Dewatering Plant, prepared by City of Toronto Works and Emergency Services, received March 15, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to demolish all buildings, place fill and regrade within the Mimico Creek floodplain on the site of the former Legion Road Dewatering Plant, located north of Lakeshore Boulevard and West of Park Lawn Road. The works are the first phase of a larger project to construct a wetland /stormwater facility on the site. Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Resources staff have examined the impact of removing six buildings, placing additional fill and regrading of the site on flood storage capacity and impacts to flooding on adjacent upstream and downstream properties. Staff are satisfied that the proposed works will not have an impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters and that upstream and downstream properties will not be impacted. Pollution: Construction access will be taken from the existing Legion Road, and a sediment and siltation fence will be installed between the site and Mimico Creek. Conservation of Land: TRCA and the City of Toronto are working cooperatively on the future use of this site as a stormwater pond, wetland and extension of Legion Road, as outlined in TRCA's "Greening our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks." The proposed works are the first phase of this project. The demolition, placing of fill and regrading is designed to ensure public safety until further phases are designed and implemented. Therefore, there is no impact to the conservation of land. Plantings Additional native riparian plantings along Mimico Creek will be provided to TRCA's satisfaction, and result in a net gain to the City of Toronto's natural heritage inventory. 192 Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 5.4 - Corridor Rehabilitation Projects - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35238 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 16, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 086/04/TOR 9.1.3 DOMINIC & MARIA LUCIANI To place fill within a regulated area on Block 103, Plan 65M -2514, (28 Trevi Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Dominic & Maria Luciani. The purpose is to remove and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a deck at the rear of an existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Legal Survey showing deck location, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA March 8, 2004. • Deck Details, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA March 19, 2004. • Typical Cross Section, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA March 19, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located adjacent to a tributary of the Humber River and is partially within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve removing and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a deck at the rear of an existing dwelling. The deck will be setback in excess of 10 metres from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the proposed deck is approximately 60 metres from the watercourse. 193 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this project. The proposed works are not expected to impact any significant natural features. No fisheries issues or impacts on riparian vegetation are anticipated. Plantings This project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35264 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 18, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 090 /04/VAUG 9.1.4 HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (southwest of Warden Avenue and Highway 407), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hydro One Networks Inc.. The purpose is to alter two minor tributaries of the Beaver Creek and construct a temporary road crossing in order to construct a new transformer facility. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drainage Management Plan Drawing Nos 1 -11, Stage 1 Works prepared by Dillon Consulting Limited, as received on March 22nd, 2004. • East and West Tributary Corridor Alignment Plan Initial Stage Works Drawing Nos. 1 -3, prepared by Dillon Consulting Ltd. as received on January 26th, 2004. • Stormwater Management Drawing E -1, Landscape Plan Initial Stage Works, Prepared by Dillon Consulting Ltd., as received on January 26th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 194 Proposal: Hydro One proposes to alter two minor tributaries of the Beaver Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a new transformer facility. A temporary crossing of the western channel is also required to gain access to the construction site. The works are proposed on lands within an existing Hydro Corridor Right of Way which runs parallel to Highway 407 at Warden Avenue. The works are required to increase service to developing areas of York Region and are being conducted on an expedited schedule. In order to build a pad to house the transformers Hydro proposes to relocate the two tributaries. These tributaries originate on the site, as upstream areas have been historically piped and the tributaries now mainly convey runoff from an existing industrial area. Currently there is an on -line stormwater management facility on the western tributary which is a water quantity facility. With the realignment of flows Hydro proposes to upgrade the stormwater management facility on the western tributary and construct a new stormwater facility on the eastern tributary. The new facilities will significantly improve the quality of stormwater runoff entering the Rouge River and this improvement will offset the temporary impacts which will result from the realignment of the tributaries. In addition, the tributaries have been straightened in the past possibly as a result of farming activities. Hydro One proposes to incorporate natural channel design principles in the relocation of the tributaries downstream of the stormwater management facilities and conduct extensive planting of shrubs, and where possible trees, to improve the vegetation within the stream corridors. The works on the site will be staged. The first stage will be to relocate and reinstate the western tributary to begin construction of the pad. Detailed drawings have been provided for this component of the work. The eastern tributary will be relocated during the later stages of the project and it is anticipated that detailed design drawings of the stage will be provided shortly. TRCA staff will issue a single permit for the overall project and will issue revisions to the permit as the detailed drawings are provided. Approvals have been granted by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Ministry of Natural Resources on the same principle and preparatory works have begun on the site. Control of Flooding: With the realignment of the tributaries the associated corridor and floodplain will be relocated and reinstated. As a result there will be no measurable impacts on the conveyance of flood flows. Also, with the addition of new stormwater management facilities at the upstream end of the tributaries, there will be an improvement to the downstream flow regime which will significantly benefit the Rouge River system. Pollution: The applicant proposes to construct the works in the dry by first constructing and stabilizing the new channels and stormwater facilities prior to redirecting stream flows to the realigned channels. In addition, sediment fencing will be erected along the perimeter of the site and throughout the construction area as needed, to stop the flow of construction generated sediments. Erosion control matting will be placed to stabilize soil material prior to the redirection of flows to the new channels. Rock check dams will also be placed in the tributaries as required to curtail impacts to the downstream channel. 195 Conservation of Land: It is expected that the overall stream length will increase with the realignment of the tributaries using natural channel design principles. In addition, with the reinstatement of the stream corridors and the implementation of an extensive planting program to be developed with the applicant, staff are confident that the works will result in a significant improvement to the Rouge River Watershed. The longer term result will be a positive effect on the conservation of land. Plantings The applicant has provided initial drawings to indicate the areas which will be replanted as a result of the proposed works. Given the restrictions with overhead wires within the Hydro Corridor, tree plantings will be limited to areas where these plantings will not interfere with the Hydro operations. Where it is not possible to plant trees, shrub plantings will be conducted to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with the Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, which recognizes that in certain instances stream realignments can occur to accommodate modifications to existing facilities and when urban drainage requirements justify the need. In addition, the overall net benefit which will result from the proposed stormwater retrofit provides substantial justification for the works being undertaken. The overall result will be an improvement to the Rouge River Watershed which may not have been realized without this project. CFN: 35271 Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: March 22, 2004 Application #: 094 /04 /MARK 9.1.5 IRIS TAL To construct in a flood plain on Lot 11, Plan 65M -2090, (22 Alexis Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Iris Tal. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a 1- storey solarium at the rear of an existing dwelling, replacing a section of the existing elevated deck. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Redline revised Drawing No. 64604T A -1, prepared by Perma -Wood Solariums, dated February 13, 2004, received March 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 196 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a 1- storey solarium at the rear of an existing dwelling, replacing a section of the existing elevated deck. The proposed solarium is to be built on posts, above grade and setback approximately 9 metres from the top of bank. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. The subject property is located west of Leslie Avenue and south of Highway 407. Control of Flooding: The proposed solarium is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no'geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project, as the location of the proposed solarium is approximately 9 metres from the stable top of bank. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35221 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: March 22, 2004 Application #: 078 /04 /MARK 9.1.6 DIERK AND SANDY NEUGEBAUER To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, 4, Concession VIII Lot 18, Plan 6230, (7 Rouge River Circle), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed. as located on the property owned by Dierk and Sandy Neugebauer. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a pool shed, a greenhouse, potting shed, conservatory and dining room extension at the rear of an existing dwelling. 197 The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Location Plot Plan, prepared by the applicant, received March 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a pool shed, a greenhouse, potting shed, conservatory and dining room extension at the rear of an existing dwelling. An existing pool is already located at the rear of the dwelling and none of the proposed structures extended beyond the limit of the pool. The proposed works are setback a minimum of 15 metres from the top of bank and approximately 100 metres from the watercourse. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. The subject property is located east of 9th Line and south of 14th Avenue. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project as the works are located a minimum of 15 metres from the top of bank. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features and is located with a manicured rearyard; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35213 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: March 10, 2004 198 Application #: 072 /04 /MARK 9.1.7 CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MARKHAM To construct in a flood plain (Cricklewood Crescent - east of Yonge Street, south of Royal Orchard Boulevard), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Corporation of the Town of Markham. The purpose is to construct in a flood plain of the Don River, in order to facilitate the construction of sanitary sewer connection to the Region of York trunk sewer. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Drawing No. SP -1, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated January 30, 2004, received March 19, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in a flood plain of the Don River, in order to facilitate the construction of a 250mm diameter sanitary sewer connection to the Region of York trunk sewer. The location of the proposed works is east of Yonge Street and south of Cricklewwod Crescent. The proposed sanitary sewer will be constructed by directional bore method, with three boreholes in the Fill Regulated Area . A short section, parallel to Yonge Street, will be installed using an open cut method. The installation of the sewer, from Borehole 1 to Borehole 2, crosses a mature woodlot. Bore depths will be a minimum of 4 metres to protect the root structure of the woodlot and a minimum depth of 2 metres in all other areas. TRCA staff have reviewed Soil Investigation Report No. 01 TMH 429, prepared by Toronto Inspection Ltd., dated April 18, 2001 and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with the proposed works. Control of Flooding: No excavated materials will be stockpiled within the flood plain and all existing grades are to be maintained. No impact to the conveyance of storage and flood waters will results from the proposed works. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and appropriately maintained throughout construction between the boreholes and the woodlot to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley lands. The excavated material will be stockpiled a minimum of 30 metres from the watercourse, encircled with silt fencing, then placed back into the bore holes once construction is complete. All disturbed area will be restored with native /non- invasive species, to better than existing conditions. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff has reviewed the application and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no in stream works associated with this project and therefore no concerns related to fish habitat loss. No significant vegetation will be disrupted from the proposed works. 199 Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. A bore depth of 4 metres minimum will assure that the root structure of the trees in the woodlot is protected. All disturbed areas affected by the open cut portion of the works will be restored to better than existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35155 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: February 20, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Application #: 050 /04 /MARK 9.1.8 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on (Gamble Road from Bathurst Street to Yonge Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to install a new precast box culverts with imbedded riverrun stone at crossing 1 (German Mills Creek) and crossing 5 (Rouge 'B'), and a culvert extension of 12.5 metres at crossing 4 (Rouge 'A').. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Plans prepared by Mitchell, Pound and Braddock Limited, dated received by TRCA on February 23, 2004, Including Gamble Road Culvert sheet numbers 32, 33, 34 and 47; Detail sheet number 47; Landscape Plans sheet numbers L1 L2 and L3; and Landscape Details and notes sheet number L9. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The Region of York is reconstructing and widening Gamble Road between Bathurst Street and Leslie Street in the Town of Richmond Hill. In total, nine watercourse alterations through the installation of new culverts, span bridges or culvert extensions are required to facilitate the construction of this project. 200 This permit deals with crossing 1 in the Don River watershed at German Mills Creek, and crossings 4 and 5 in the Rouge River watershed. Crossings 1 and 5 involve the construction of new box culverts with imbedded riverrun stone inside. Crossing 4 involves the extension of the existing culvert by 12.5 metres on the south side of the road. Crossings 7, 8, 11 and 13 are part of Gamble Road Permit application 450/02/RH. Crossings 9 and 10, at the intersection of Gamble Road and Bayview Avenue, will be addressed at the permit stage for the Bayview Avenue road widening project. Control of Flooding: The structures will be able to withstand flood flows and velocities and will not impact the upstream flood plain limits. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34909 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: March 25, 2004 Application #: 464/03/RH 9.1.9 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Parts 1 Part 2 Part 3 Lot 88, 89, Plan 65R 10867, (205 Oxford Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Richmond Hill. The purpose is to construct park amenities including a pedestrian trail and playground within existing parklands which are partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 201 • Removals Site Preparation Plan, Drawing No R -1, Project No. 2001 -33, prepared by Landscape Planning Limited, revised as received on February 23rd, 2004. • Parkette Trail Master Plan Drawing No. MLP -1, Project No. 2001 -33, prepared by Landscape Planning Limited, revised as received on February 23rd, 2004. • Landscape Plans, Drawing Nos. L1 -L -6, Project No. 2001 -33, prepared by Landscape Planning Limited, revised as received on February 23rd, 2004. • Details, Karindon Park, Drawing Nos. D- 1 -D -4, Project No. 2001 -33, prepared by landscape Planning Limited, revised as received on February 23rd, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The Town of Richmond Hill proposes to conduct improvements to an existing park partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain adjacent to a tributary of the Don River. The works include regrading to accommodate a playground to meet the demands of the adjacent residents, and the creation of a trail system and crossing of the tributary to formalize an existing trail. In order to meet the safety requirements for locating the playground, the applicant proposes to regrade within the floodplain, beyond the riparian zone. The area of regrading is currently manicured and setback in excess of 10 metres from the watercourse. The riparian zone will be planted in accordance with detailed planting plans submitted by the applicant. The pedestrian bridge crossing is proposed in order to formalize an existing trail system. The bridge crossing has been designed to span the watercourse. The trail and bridge will help direct traffic along a designated route to lessen the environmental impact of multiple trails throughout the stream corridor. The trail will be located in excess of 10 metres from the tributary except at the location of the crossing. TRCA engineering staff are satisfied with the proposed location of the crossing and with the grading works. The lands were initially occupied by a dwelling which was susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm event. The Town of Richmond Hill purchased the property thereby eliminating the risk. With the grading scheme proposed the park and all amenities areas will not be affected by frequent flooding events. In addition the riparian zone of the watercourse will be restored. Control of Flooding: The works will not result in a measurable impact to the control of flooding as the proposed grading scheme has been balanced to ensure the conveyance of flood flows during both frequent and major storm events. In addition, the pedestrian bridge has been designed to withstand frequent storm events and to be displaced during a Regional Storm event which is the current practice. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the construction site and between the proposed works and the watercourse to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. In addition, there will be no interference with the watercourse as the bridge will span the low flow channel and the abutments will be setback from the watercourse. 202 Conservation of Land: Given that this area is currently manicured and was once occupied by a residence and a manicured rear yard, the works will result in an improvement to the site. The site will be restored in accordance with detailed restoration plans submitted by the applicant. Plantings The applicant proposes to conduct extensive native plantings within the riparian zone and at the location of any areas to be disturbed during construction. Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 4.1.2. Resource Based Uses of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program which permits park amenity uses subject to those uses not affecting the control of flooding. CFN: 33123 Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: March 25, 2003 203 Application #: 153/02/RH THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS: RES. #B62/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.10 - 9.1.31, with the exception of 9.1.11, 9.1.15, and 9.1.19 - 9.1.120, which were withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. CARRIED CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 9.1.10 ALI REAL ESTATE TRUST To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 1, Concession 4 EHS (5135 Creekbank Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ali Real Estate Trust The purpose is to place fill material within a Fill Regulated area associated with Etobicoke Creek outside of the Regulatory Floodplain, in order to facilitate the expansion of an existing parking facility at 5135 Creekbank Road, in the City of Mississauga. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking from Joe DeCicco, of Global Architect Inc., dated March 31, 2004 to provide landscape details to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill material within a Fill Regulated area, associated with Etobicoke Creek, in order to facilitate the expansion of an existing parking facility at 5135 Creekbank Road, in the City of Mississauga. The parking expansion is proposed to be constructed at the rear of the subject property, adjacent to the valley corridor. Based on discussions between TRCA staff and the applicant regarding geotechnical concerns in this area of the property, a 10 metre vegetated buffer is to be created between the proposed parking lot and the staked top of bank. This buffer is to be appropriately vegetated using native and non - invasive plantings to enhance the stability of the slope feature. The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As a result, the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. 204 Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to construction and maintained throughout construction of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The area of the property on which development is proposed is currently unvegetated. As such, no significant vegetation is to be disturbed by this proposal. The proposal involves the addition of native and non - invasive plantings along the edge of the valley feature to further stabilize the valley slope. The proposal is appropriately setback from the top of valley banks and all surface runoff will be directed away from the valley edge into existing on -site storm sewers. As such, no geotechnical or fisheries related problems will occur as result of this proposal. Plantings The proposal involves creating a 10 metre landscaped buffer adjacent the top of bank with native and non - invasive plantings at densities in accordance with TRCA's planting guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35192 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: March 24, 2004 Application #: 067 /04 /MISS 9.1.11 RIO CAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT To construct in a flood plain on (3110 Dixie Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Rio Can Real Estate Investment. • Withdrawn CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.12 MICHAEL & PAM STEIN To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 57, 64, Lot 58, Plan 2335 M0275, (335 Riverview Drive), in the City of Toronto (North Community), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Michael & Pam Stein. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a one - storey addition to the east side of the existing residence. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. 205 • Letter, Proposed Shoring For Support of Tableland, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., dated February 24, 2004. • Red Line Revised Site Plan, Drawing No. SH -0, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., revised March 22, 2004, received March 23, 2004. • Section of Proposed Shoring, Drawing Nos. SH -1 and SH -2, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., dated February 24, 2004. • Typical Section of Shoring, Drawing No. SH -3, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., dated February 24, 2004. • Rehabilitation Planting Plan, Drawing No. RP1, prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, dated February 25, 2004, received February 26, 2004. • Rehabilitation Details, Drawing No. DP1, prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, dated February 25, 2004, received February 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of one - storey addition to the east side of the existing residence. The subject property is located on the south side of Riverview Drive, south of the Rosedale Golf Club. The subject lands are partially located within the Fill Regulated Area, but outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River. The proposed one - storey addition will be located appropriately 2 metres away from the top of bank of a valley /gully feature which is situated to the east and south sides of the residence. Control of Flooding: As the proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, the storage or conveyance of floodwaters is not affected. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley lands and watercourse. The watercourse is located approximately 70 metres away. Conservation of Land: The existing residence is located just west of a valley /gully feature that has been experiencing erosion on the valley slope. This gully feature is located on lands owned by the City of Toronto. In order to ensure that the proposed works will not have a significant impact on the stability of the slope and exacerbate erosion in the gully feature, the applicant has proposed a two step approach. The first step involves the installation of a series of 10 metre deep solider pile units along the top of bank on the subject property. These units would extend from the north half of the property and wrap around the top of bank to the west. An existing concrete retaining wall located just south of the property will be retained. The soldier pile units will act as a stabilizing force for the slope and negate any potential impact on the slope from the proposed addition. Furthermore, a planting plan has been submitted for the proposed addition to further enhance stability on the slope. 206 Secondly, in conjunction with the above solider pile units, the City of Toronto will undertake erosion remedial works on the gully feature in the near future. Technical staff has had discussion with City of Toronto staff and is satisfied that these remedial works will be undertaken shortly. Given the factor of timing for the proposed remedial works, the installation of the solider pile units was required to precede the construction of the proposed addition. No other significant natural features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings Extensive native plantings including shrubs and trees will be planted on the top half of the slope in accordance with TRCA requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 32785 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: March 24, 2004 Application #: 014/02/TOR 9.1.13 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on, (Maxome Avenue north of Finch Avenue), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to replace an existing culvert over Newtonbrook Creek, under Maxome Avenue, north of Finch Avenue West, and replace the existing gabion retaining wall on the north side of the culvert with an armorstone retaining wall. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Drawing Nos. 733 -1, 733 -2 and 733 -3, Maxome Avenue Culvert Replacement, prepared by TSH Engineers, dated December 22, 2003 and received on March 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to replace an existing culvert over Newtonbrook Creek, under Maxome Avenue, north of Finch Avenue West, and replace the existing gabion retaining wall on the north side of the culvert with an armorstone retaining wall. 207 Control of Flooding: The proposed works include a direct replacement of an existing culvert and will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and sediment control fencing) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: The proposed works will result in a mitigable Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat and therefore Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) authorization is not required. A low flow channel will be constructed under the culvert where none existed, vegetation removed will be minimized and replaced, and landscaping will be enhanced. Construction will take place within the warm water fisheries timing window (no works between April 1 and July 1). A letter of advice will be issued for the proposed works. Plantings Woody vegetation will be planted to restore the site to better than existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34997 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 24, 2004 Application #: 010 /04/TOR 9.1.14 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on, (Finch Avenue East of Jane Street), in the Toronto North Community Council, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to repair an existing culvert and install a concrete collar on the downstream side of the culvert over Black Creek, under Finch Avenue West and east of Jane Street. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Drawing Nos. 399 -1 and 399 -2, Finch Avenue West Culvert Repair, prepared by TSH Engineers, dated December 22, 2003 and received March 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 208 Proposal: The proposal is to repair an existing culvert by welding in patches where the existing culvert has deteriorated, and to install a concrete collar on the downstream side of the culvert located over Black Creek, under Finch Avenue West and east of Jane Street. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and sediment control fencing) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Vegetation removed will be minimized and replaced, and landscaping will be enhanced. There will be no impacts to fish habitat. Construction will take place within the warm water fisheries timing window (no works between April 1 and July 1). A letter of advice will be issued for the proposed works. Plantings Woody vegetation will be planted to restore the site to better than existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34998 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 24, 2004 Application #: 009 /04/TOR 9.1.15 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on (Leslie Street north of Eglinton Avenue), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. • Withdrawn CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.16 ANTONIO AZEVEDO To construct in a flood plain on Lot 35, Plan 2234, (40 Bonnyview Drive), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Antonio Azevedo. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a new two- storey dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished 209 The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation Plans, prepared by Cunha Design Consultants Ltd., dated February 19, 2004, received March 30, 2004. • Letter of Opinion from AJW Engineering, dated March 25, 2004, received March 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new residence within the Regional Storm Flood plain of Mimico Creek. The works involve the construction of a new two- storey dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. Control of Flooding: The proposed residence will be flood proofed above the 350 year storm elevation. The applicant will be submitting a letter from a structural engineer stating that the new dwelling can withstand the depths and velocities expected during a flood event. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed before commencement of the work and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical /slope instability issues associated with this project. There will be no impacts on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings All disturbed areas of the site will be restored. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.D - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35204 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 9, 2004 210 Application #: 070 /04/TOR 9.1.17 BRIAN & LORI CURTIS To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 8, 9, Plan 66R- 10809, (5 Kevi Lane), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Brian & Lori Curtis. The purpose is to place and excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool at the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Concept Plan, prepared by Juergen Partridge Limited, revised on March 26, 2004, received March 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is the place and excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of an inground pool at the rear of the existing dwelling. The subject property is located east of Martin Grove Road and north of Rathburn Road. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of Mimico Creek. Therefore, there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed before the commencement of work and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: The proposed pool will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no geo- technical /slope instability issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant proposes plantings as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 34792 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 24, 2004 211 Application #: 401/03/TOR 9.1.18 CITY OF TORONTO To excavate and replace fill on Lot , Concession B Lot 27, Plan MA -2907, (Caulfield Road), in the Toronto West Community Council, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to excavate and replace an existing sanitary sewer between Caulfield Road and the Metro Trunk Sewer at the Humber River. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Drawing Nos. U- 1313 -1, U- 1313 -2, U- 1313 -3, U- 1313 -4, Sanitary Sewer Replacement, prepared by City of Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated March 05, 2004 and received March 15, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and replace an existing deteriorated sanitary sewer on an existing easement between the eastern end of Caulfield Road and the Metro Trunk Sewer at the Humber River. A portion of the works are within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works include excavation, replacement of an existing sanitary sewer, and direct replacement of fill, and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Excavated fill will not be stockpiled in the floodplain. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Vegetation removed will be minimized and replaced, and landscaping will be enhanced to better than existing conditions. There will be no impacts to fish habitat. Plantings Woody vegetation will be planted to restore the site to better than existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35181 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 1, 2004 212 Application #: 063/04/TOR 9.1.19 ERIC PASKEVICS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (42 Bonnyview Drive), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Eric Paskevics. • Withdrawn CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO SOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.20 CITY OF TORONTO (WORKS & EMERGENCY SERVICES) To place fill within a regulated area on Leaside Bridge (Millwood Road), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto (Works & Emergency Services). • Withdrawn 9.1.21 RON & TRACY HABIJANAC To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 16, Plan 66M -2374, (18 True Davidson Drive), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ron & Tracy Habijanac. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an inground pool at the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by Gib -san Pools, dated March 29, 2004, received March 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an inground pool at the rear of the existing dwelling. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located entirely above the Regional Storm Flood plain, therefore, there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. 213 Conservation of Land: The pool will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no slope instability /geo- technical concerns associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant is proposing new plantings are part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35276 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 25, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 100 /04/TOR 9.1.22 1119513 ONTARIO LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 4, (140 Planchet Road), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1119513 Ontario Ltd.. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a one - storey rear addition to an existing one - storey industrial building, including the expansion of the existing paved surface. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking from ARCA Design Inc., dated March 31, 2004, to fulfill minor revisions to the site /landscape plan to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a 446.5- square- metre, one - storey addition to an existing industrial building and the expansion of the existing parking lot. The proposal will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 214 Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The site will be planted with native trees and shrubs adjacent to the valley in accordance with the TRCA's Post - Construction Restoration Guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35273 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 22, 2004 Application #: 095 /04/VAUG 9.1.23 ANGELA PAGGIOSSI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13, Plan 65M -3470, (93 Noah Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Angela Paggiossi. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, storage shed, and retaining wall at the rear of an existing residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by A. Paggiossi, received by the TRCA March 31, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the exclusion of the retaining wall as part of the proposed works. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 215 Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, storage shed, and retaining wall within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The proposed works will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent top of bank and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent the sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the development, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no significant natural features on the property that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted in association with the proposed works to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, as the works are proposed within a manicured rear yard. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35274 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 23, 2004 Application #: 098 /04/VAUG 9.1.24 ARMANDO COLAFRANCESCHI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 32, Plan 65M -2604, (50 Modesto Gardens), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Armando Colafranceschi. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a two- storey single detached residential dwelling, with a deck and landscaping. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking from Infra Architect Inc., dated March 31, 2004, to fulfill minor revisions to the site plan to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. 216 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposed development involves excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a two- storey residence, deck and landscaping within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed development will be located on an existing lot of record within an approved plan of subdivision. Due to previous fill placement on the subject lot, a Soil Investigation and Slope Stability Study was provided for the proposed development at the request of TRCA staff. TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposal is consistent with the setbacks established by the TRCA through the subdivision approval process and is consistent with existing development in the subdivision. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Landscaping will be established within the rear yard of the subject property to prevent erosional stormwater effects. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 G) - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35120 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 22, 2004 Application #: 035 /04/VAUG 9.1.25 CONCORD STORAGE INC. To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Concession 3, (1889 Highway 7 West), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Concord Storage Inc.. 217 The purpose is to move /place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to construct a new self- storage facility, and to alter a waterway by constructing a stormwater outfall to the Don River. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Drawing No. S1, Grading and Drainage Plan, prepared by Gamsby and Mannerow Limited, date received by TRCA March 11, 2004. • Sheet No. L -1, Landscape Plan with Stormwater Pond, prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects, date received by TRCA March 25, 2004. • Sheet No. L -2, Landscape Details, prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects, date received by TRCA March 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to move and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a new self- storage facility, and to alter a waterway by constructing a storm water outfall to the Don River. Staff reviewed the site plan for the storage facility and found it acceptable on condition that a TRCA permit be obtained. The storage facility is a redevelopment of an existing commercial facility. The new 'development will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank and outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: No construction will take place within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and the proposed outlet is appropriately designed in order to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the valley will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and the work will not affect any significant natural heritage features. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings Following construction, the entire site, including the area around the outfall, will be landscaped with several hundred native trees and shrubs. This landscape plan was reviewed to the satisfaction of staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2, Existing Development, and Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 218 CFN: 33190 Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 25, 2004 Application #: 180 /02/VAUG 9.1.26 TONY MORELLI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 9831, (72 Bruce Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Tony Morelli. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a retaining wall within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Drawing No. S1, Grading and Drainage Plan, prepared by Gamsby and Mannerow Limited, date received by TRCA March 11, 2004. • Sheet No. L -1, Landscape Plan with Stormwater Pond, prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects, date received by TRCA March 25, 2004. • Sheet No. L -2, Landscape Details, prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects, date received by TRCA March 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The works involve excavating and placing fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a retaining wall within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The retaining wall was constructed to near completion prior to receipt of a permit application by the TRCA. The permit application was submitted to resolve violation V2071, issued July 15, 2003. The retaining wall is approximately 1.4 metres high at its highest point and tapers to 0.46 metres at its lowest point. The wall is approximately 19.28 metres in length and is located on a sloped portion of the subject property. TRCA Geotechnical staff are satisfied with the design of the retaining wall. There are no erosion /slope stability issues associated with the development. The development is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and no significant natural features were affected by the construction of the retaining wall. Control of Flooding: The development is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the retaining wall is approximately 205 metres from the watercourse. 219 Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the works. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34598 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 22, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX Application #: 333 /03NAUG 9.1.27 NUGGET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Broken Front Range 3 Block 139, Plan 40M -2046, southwest of Bayly Street and Shoal Point Road, in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Nugget Construction Company Limited. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area, alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer outfall to service an adjacent 139 -unit townhouse development. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2009. • Block 139 Site Grading Plan, Drawing No. S1, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised December 11, 2003, received December 16, 2003. • Block 139 Site Servicing Plan, Drawing No. S2, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised December 11, 2003, received December 16, 2003. • Block 139 Storm Drainage Area Plan, Drawing No. STM -1, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised December 11, 2003, received December 16, 2003. • Red Line Revised Sediment Erosion Control Plan, Drawing No. SEC 1, prepared by Cole Engineering Ltd., revised March 15, 2004, received March 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 220 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area, to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer outfall to service an adjacent 139 -unit townhouse development. The subject lands are located on the southwest corner of Bayly Street and Shoal Point Road and south of Carruthers Creek. The 139 -unit townhouse development is part of larger two block townhouse development. This first block (Block 139) is located to the south of Carruthers Creek, while the small block to the north (Block 144) consists of 14 townhouse units along with a stormwater pond and associated outfall. Given time constraints associated this the proposed works, this permit deals exclusively with the development proposed on Block 139 to the south while Block 144 will be subject to a future permit application. The proposed outfall is located approximately 15 metres away from the watercourse and is within the valleylands. Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed works and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and approved by staff, will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The proposed storm outfall is setback approximately 15 metres from Carruthers Creek. Ecological staff has determined that the storm outfall does not constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and as such, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). No other significant natural resources will be impacted by the proposed outfall. Plantings The disturbed area immediately surrounding the outfall will be planted with native woody species. Plantings around the proposed outfall structure will be carried out in accordance with TRCA requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and Section 4.1.1 New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34392 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: March 25, 2004. 221 Application #: 203 /03 /AJAX TOWN OF CALEDON 9.1.28 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Concession 12 WHS, (King Street West, West of Station Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to alter a watercourse, place fill and construct within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate slope stabilization works to King Street West in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Hugh Nelson, P.Eng, Trow Associates Inc. dated March 25, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application involves the enclosure of approximately 50 metres of a small tributary of the Humber River, located adjacent to King Street West in the Village of Bolton. This project is being completed to ensure the Tong -term stability of this section of King Street, as the road is located directly adjacent to a valley wall that is being eroded by the subject watercourse. A geotechnical analysis submitted in support of this application indicates that re- stabilization measures are required. Through enclosing this section of the watercourse, this valley wall (which also forms the road embankment) can be reconstructed at a lesser, more stable grade. The reach of this tributary in which this enclosure is to be completed, has been significantly altered both up and downstream, with on -line stormwater management ponds located to the north and south of this site, and previously enclosed sections of the watercourse to the north. In addition to all disturbed areas being restored using native, non - invasive plant species, additional compensatory plantings are proposed within riparian areas of this valley reach, as a component of this project. The applicant has submitted a Habitat Compensation Plan which provides details on the proposed plantings. Control of Flooding: The works will occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows have been considered in the design of this enclosure, and no significant impacts on the storage or conveyance of these flows is anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. 222 Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of the MNR fisheries timing window, and through the issuance of an Authorization (currently in process) from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. The proposed voluntary restoration plantings within this valley reach has been accepted by both DFO and TRCA staff as being adequate compensation for the proposed enclosure. Plantings Affected lands will be restored to pre- construction condition with native, non - invasive seed species. Additional plantings, including 61 trees and shrubs (consisting of aspen, spruce, cedar, dogwood and elder) are to be planted along riparian areas within this reach of the watercourse in accordance with the associated Habitat Compensation Plan. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34041 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: March 24, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 050 /03 /CAL 9.1.29 CORNELL ROUGE DEVELOPMENT CORP. To alter a waterway on Lot 10, Concession 9, (northwest of Highway 407 and Reesor Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1440102 Ontario Inc. The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary diversion channel for Tributary C in the Cornell community. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2009. • Tributary 'C' Cornell Area 5 Interim Diversion Channel, Drawing DC 1, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated March 2004, date received March 24, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 223 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary diversion channel for Tributary C within the Cornell community. The temporary diversion is proposed between Highways 7 and 407, east of the Markham By -Pass, where a new, realigned channel and stormwater management pond are being proposed. The TRCA is currently reviewing the design of the realigned channel and stormwater management pond, the subject of an upcoming permit application. In order to facilitate preliminary earthworks to be undertaken and to allow surplus materials to be used to construct the embankments for the adjacent Highway 407 /Markham By -Pass interchange, this temporary diversion channel is required. The diversion channel will be constructed and maintained for the duration of the earthworks, until the new channel and pond are constructed. Once the new channel and stormwater management pond are constructed, the temporary channel will be decommissioned and rehabilitated. The construction of the channel and pond is anticipated to be complete by summer /fall 2004. It should be noted that the loss of fish habitat within Tributaries A, B and C of the Little Rouge River and the construction of on -line stormwater management ponds within Cornell was authorized by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) as part of Fisheries Act Authorization #525 -1342 (1999). As compensation for the Toss of fish habitat, the construction of the Milne Reservoir Fishway was approved and undertaken. As a result, Tributary C has been identified by DFO as a watercourse without fish habitat and all construction works can therefore take place without any fisheries timing window restrictions. As part of the DFO Authorization, a number of terrestrial ecology objectives were identified and staff has confirmed that the overall proposal for the channel realignment and stormwater management pond is consistent with the authorization and will achieve the environmental objectives identified. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, hence there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A series of rock check dams are proposed to control sediment flow through the temporary channel. A temporary sediment control pond is also proposed at the south end of the channel diversion which will prevent any sedimentation of the downstream areas. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and the area will be extensively rehabilitated following the construction of the permanent channel and stormwater management pond. Plantings As there are additional works to be undertaken in the area in the immediate future, the restoration of the channel will be undertaken once the permanent channel and stormwater management pond are constructed. No additional plantings are required in the interim as the landscaping scheme will ensure that both the temporary and permanent channels are appropriately planted and restored, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. 224 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35275 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: March 24, 2004 Application #: 099 /04 /MARK 9.1.30 LINDVEST PROPERTIES (CORNELL) LTD. To construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, 10, Concession 9, (9th Line and Highway 407), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lindvest Properties (Cornell) Ltd. The purpose is to construct in the flood plain in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond 'A', within the Cornell community. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2009. • Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, Drawing 201, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Erosion and Sedimentation Construction Details, Drawing 202, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Plan View of Pond -A, dated January 2004, Drawing 620, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • 9th Line Ramp -Noise Barrier Cross - Sections A -A to D -D, Drawing 621, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Cross Sections Section E -E to Section H -H, Drawing 622, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Cross Sections Section I -1 to Section L -L, Drawing 623, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Cross Sections Section M -M to Section N -N, Drawing 622, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Outlet Details, Drawing 625, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Details of HW A4, Drawing 626, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Details of HW A5, Drawing 627, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. 225 • Pond A Details of HW A6, Drawing 628, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Details, Drawing 629, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Pond Details, Drawing 630, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. • Pond A Cross Section Through Outlet Culvert, Drawing 631, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated January 2004, date revised February 23, 2004, date received March 24, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves construction in the flood plain in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Tributary A of the Rouge River. The stormwater management pond is required to treat stormwater and control runoff from proposed upstream residential development within the Cornell community. The construction of this pond complies with the Cornell Community Master Storm Drainage and Stormwater Management Report and its construction is required in order to facilitate the construction of upstream draft plan of subdivision 19T- 02001, which has been drat approved by the Town of Markham. The pond will be located within the Stormwater Management Block 320 of 19T- 02001, the limits of which have been approved by TRCA staff. The outlet for this stormwater management pond will tie into the existing culvert under Highway 407 and will drain further downstream into Tributary A. There are a number of stormwater management ponds to be constructed in the Cornell community and the Master Storm Drainage and Stormwater Management Report identifies the proposed locations of those ponds and the general servicing scheme for the area. A related permit for the temporary diversion of Tributary C within Cornell, in order to facilitate earthworks in preparation for a second stormwater management pond in Cornell, is also being considered as part of this Executive Committee meeting. This permit and the Tributary C temporary diversion permit are the first in a series to allow for the construction of the various stormwater management ponds within this planning area. Staff notes these works are being undertaken in recognition of an approved environmental management plan for the Cornell area Control of Flooding: The stormwater management pond is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River and will contain the flood waters, without overtopping, in a Regional Storm event. As such, TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. 226 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical concerns related to this project and the fisheries resource concerns have been adequately addressed through the previous DFO Authorization. There are no other natural heritage features on, or adjacent to the subject property which may be negatively impacted by the development. All disturbed areas will be adequately stabilized and restored following construction. Plantings The stormwater management pond, outlet and all other disturbed areas will be restored with native, non - invasive woody species plantings, as per submitted landscaping drawings, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34801 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: March 25, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Application #: 406 /03 /MARK 9.1.31 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on (Gamble Road - Yonge Street to Leslie Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to replace existing culverts by installing a new box culvert with imbedded riverrun stone at crossing 7 (Rouge 'C'); a new CSP culvert at crossing 8 (Rouge 'CV); a new 4.88 metre wide span bridge at crossing 11 (Tributary 1); and a new 7.3 metre span bridge at crossing 13 (Tributary 2). The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to submit to the satisfaction of TRCA staff revisions to the hydraulic information and detailed design drawings regarding the crossing of tributary Rouge C. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The Region of York is reconstructing and widening Gamble Road between Bathurst Street and Leslie Street in the Town of Richmond Hill. In total, nine watercourse alterations through the replacement of existing culverts with new culverts, span bridges or culvert extensions are required to facilitate the construction of this project. 227 This permit deals with crossings 7, 8, 11 and 13 in the Rouge River watershed. Crossing 7 involves the installation of a new box culvert with imbedded riverrun stone, crossing 8 involves the construction of a new CSP culvert and crossings 11 and 13 involve the installation of span bridges. Crossings 1, 4 and 5 are part of Gamble Road Permit application 464/03/RH. Crossings 9 and 10, at the east and west sides of the intersection of Gamble Road and Bayview Avenue, will be addressed at the permit stage for the Bayview Avenue road widening project. Control of Flooding: The structures will be able to withstand flood flows and velocities and will not impact the upstream flood plain limits. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 33812 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: March 25, 2004 Application #: 450/02/RH 9.1.32 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on Leslie Street, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate emergency culvert repair works under Leslie Street, adjacent to Haynes Lake in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of April 2, 2004 to April 1, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 228 • Replacement of Damaged Culvert End, Leslie St. Approx. 600m North of Bethesda Sdrd., prepared by the applicant, dated March 30, 2004, date received March 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate emergency culvert repair works under Leslie Street, adjacent to Haynes Lake in the Town of Richmond Hill. Within the subject area, Leslie Street wraps around the eastern edge of Haynes Lake at a relatively low elevation, acting as a barrier between the lake and the downstream tributary of the Rouge River. Flows are passed between the lake and the watercourse via an existing CSP culvert. Currently, the eastern end of the culvert under Leslie Street is damaged, causing flows from the lake to backup and overtop Leslie Street. As a result, the regional road is consistently flooded and safe vehicular passage has been compromised. The Region of York will be seeking to implement a longer term solution for controlling flood flows in the near future, but is seeking approval for the replacement of the damaged end of the culvert in order to allow sufficient flows to pass through the culvert, thereby reducing the flood risk for the road during frequent storm events. The proposed works involve the replacement of the damaged end with a 3m culvert to be joined to the existing CSP under Leslie Street. The work is proposed on the east shoulder of Leslie Street, with a minor encroachment into the watercourse on the east side of the road. During construction, an artificial barrier may be installed on the west side of the culvert to restrict flows through the existing culvert for approximately 2 hours. The TRCA is working with Regional staff to develop a long term solution for the management of flood waters through this culvert linkage between Haynes Lake and the watercourse, and a future permit application for a more permanent solution is forthcoming in the near future. Control of Flooding: TRCA staff is satisfied that the addition of the 3m culvert will not impact the conveyance or storage of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. There will be no other natural heritage features impacted as a result of this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized with filter fabric and river run stone, following construction. Plantings There will be no loss of significant vegetation, hence additional plantings are not required. 229 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35299 Report Prepared by: Karsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: March 31, 2004 Application #: 108/04/RH RES. #B63/04 - ACQUISITION OF ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION (ORC) VALLEY CORRIDOR AND ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS Rouge River watershed, CFN 30746. Execution of conflict of interest declaration required as part of the conveyance of lands from ORC to Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) for Rouge Park purposes. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT as a condition of the conveyance of lands from the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Rouge Park purposes, Members of the Executive Committee be requested to advise the CAO by April 8, 2004, of a conflict or potential conflict of interest as set out in the Conflict of Interest Declaration attached to this communication dated March 23, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Members of the Authority at meeting #3/00 held on March 31, 2000 adopted Resolution #A63/00: THAT 1,369 hectares (3,383 acres) more or less, consisting of a number of parcels of land including residential, commercial and farm rentals be purchased from Ontario Realty Corporation for Rouge Park purposes, said land being situate in the City of Toronto, Town of Markham and City of Pickering and outlined approximately on the attached sketch; THAT the purchase price be $2.00 with the Ontario Realty Corporation being responsible for all costs associated with the transfer; THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid; THAT the Authority take over interim management of these lands including all rentals at the earliest possible date. 230 AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required including a Memorandum of Agreement with the Ontario Realty Corporation. In December of 2001, staff updated the Members of the Executive Committee on the status of the transfer and provided details relating to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between ORC and TRCA relating to the transfer of provincial lands to TRCA for Rouge Park purposes. One of the conditions of the MOA is that TRCA deliver to ORC a declaration of a senior officer of TRCA to the best of his knowledge and belief to the effect that TRCA, its Executive Committee, its Members and employees, (but with respect to the Members and employees, without individual inquiry), do not have a conflict of interest with the Chair of Management Board of Cabinet or with ORC and that none of Chair of Management Board of Cabinet, ORC or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives shall obtain any benefit whatsoever from the conveyance of the provincial lands to TRCA. Attached is a copy of the Conflict of Interest Declaration. A list of the names of the ORC directors and others listed above will be available at the April 2 meeting. At meeting #1/03 held on March 7, 2003, the Members of the Executive Committee adopted resolution 816/03. THAT the report dated February 26, 2003, on the conflict of interest declaration required as part of the conveyance of lands from the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Rouge Park purposes be received; AND FURTHER THAT Members of the Executive Committee be requested to advise the CAO by March 21, 2003 of a conflict or potential conflict of interest. This resolution was adopted in anticipation of the closing of the transfer in May of 2003. However, due to events beyond our control the transaction was not completed. It now appears that the transfer will be completed in the next few weeks. Since the membership of the Executive Committee has changed since the last resolution was adopted, the Members of the Executive Committee are again being requested to advise the CAO of a conflict or potential conflict of interest. The Members who are knowledgeable about the Municipal conflict of interest regulations should recognize that this declaration is similar in context. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Members are asked to advise TRCA's CAO if they have a conflict or a potential conflict of interest as defined above by April 8, 2004. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Date: March 23, 2004 Attachments: 1 231 Attachment 1 DECLARATION RE: Memorandum of Agreement ( "MOA ") between Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet ( "MBS ") and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ( "TRCA ") and in particular, Section 40 thereof 1. I, , am the of TRCA and do solemnly declare to the best of my knowledge and belief: (a) TRCA, its Executive Committee, its Members and employees, (but with respect to the Members and employees, without individual enquiry), do not have a conflict of interest with the MBS or with Ontario Realty Corporation ( "ORC ") and, (b) that none of MBS, ORC or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives shall obtain any benefit whatsoever from the sale of the Provincial Dedication Lands as defined in the MOA. 2. For the purposes of this Declaration a conflict of interest would arise if a person who is a Member of TRCA, or its Executive Committee or an employee of TRCA has a pecuniary interest in the MOA or would enjoy a benefit or suffer a loss as a result of or in any way connected with the MOA or if a parent, spouse, partner or child of such person or a corporation controlled by one or more of such person has such an interest or benefit, other than a benefit or interest accruing to all Members, Executive Committee or employees as a result of the TRCA entering into the MOA. DECLARED before me at City of Toronto, this day of , 2004. A Commissioner, etc. 232 RES.#B64/04 - INCORPORATION OF WATERSHED RECOMMENDATIONS INTO MUNICIPAL POLICY Hiring of consultants to work with municipal and Conservation Authority staff in the development of model policies to address watershed plan recommendations. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the consulting partnership of Ogilvie, Ogilvie & Company and Anthony Usher Planning Consultant be retained to provide facilitation and policy planning services to the partner agencies with an upset limit of $48,057.50 plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND Municipal planning documents have long been regarded as a primary means of implementing the recommendations of watershed plans. However, experience has shown that watershed plan recommendations do not easily translate into municipal official plan policies or zoning by -laws. The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) now requires watershed plans to be undertaken for all watersheds on the moraine and to incorporate by amendment into municipalities' official plans the objectives and requirements of each watershed plan. The current project is designed to formulate model policies that will accomplish this requirement in a consistent way for all municipalities and conservation authorities across the Oak Ridges Moraine. The current project seeks to build on the technical work that has been undertaken over the past few years in order to formulate policies for the management and protection of groundwater resources. In addition to formulating policies for groundwater, as per the intention of the original YPDT work, the scope of the project has been expanded to incorporate other topic areas commonly addressed in watershed plans. To meet the requirements of the ORMCP, other topic areas such as surface water and terrestrial and aquatic natural heritage are now incorporated into the study. The deliverables from the project will be a series of guidance documents that will discuss the environmental management issues brought out at a series of facilitated workshop meetings. These documents will establish the context for policy formulation, and prepare "model" policies to address each topic area at various scales such as: regional or local official plans; secondary plans or site - specific; on or off the ORM; watershed, subwatershed or catchment; implementation by policy, regulatory means or program; etc. In addition to the steering committee, a larger group of municipal and conservation authority staff with specific technical expertise in the various topic areas will be invited to the facilitated workshops dealing individually with each topic area, in order to provide discipline- specific input to the consultant team. RATIONALE Seven consultants were invited to submit proposals for the completion of this project, in response to a terms of reference. The consultants and their bids were as follows: 233 Consultant Cost # Days Allocated Hardy Stevenson & Associates $55, 918.75 61 Gartner Lee Limited declined Dillon Consulting $42,256.00 44 Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd. declined Marshall Macklin Monaghan $34,953.00 42 Ogilvie, Ogilvie & Company joint submission with Anthony Usher Planning Consultant $48,057.50 52 Interviews were conducted with all consultants who submitted bids. The project steering committee served as the selection committee and recommended the preferred consultant based on the following key selection criteria: qualifications of the firm and related experience; project design, organization and methodology; consultant team members, previous experience and past performance; and overall value for the cost proposed. The consulting partnership of Ogilvie, Ogilvie & Company and Anthony Usher Planning Consultant was selected by the steering committee as consultants for this project. While they were not the lowest bid of four consultants that submitted proposals, their proposal showed the best understanding of the project and the skills and experience of the team were well recognized by steering committee members who had worked with them on other projects. FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost for this project, as submitted by the consultant team, is $48,057.50 plus GST. The funding for this project is already secured and comes from the YPDT Groundwater Management study. Report prepared by: David Burnett, extension 5361 For Information contact: David Burnett, extension 5361 Date: March 16, 2004 RES. #B65/04 - FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING SCANNING AND VECTORIZATION PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE CREEK WATERSHED Approval to retain QSP Geographics Ltd. to convert TRCA Etobicoke Creek 1:2000 scale flood plain mapping to digital format in order to facilitate the update and management of Flood and Regulation Line Mapping. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor 234 THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with QSP Geographics Ltd. to complete the conversion of 31, 1:2000 scale analogue flood plain map sheets within the Etobicoke Creek Watershed at a cost of $19,153 including applicable taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by TRCA and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate flood plain management information, the Watershed Management Division has prepared a Flood Plain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update TRCA's current Flood and Regulation Line Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the work plan include the Etobicoke Creek, given the extent of previous, current and future development activities. A visual screening process has been completed to compare topographic and planimetric features contained on TRCA's original analogue mapping with recent aerial photography to determine where significant changes warrant the preparation of new base mapping. From this assessment, it was determined that approximately 31 analogue mapsheets within the Etobicoke Creek watershed have not significantly changed subsequent to the original date of completion. It is proposed to convert these 31 analogue mapsheets into digital format in order to permit TRCA staff to continue to update base mapping information as future changes occur and to facilitate integration with new digital mapping. For those mapsheets where significant changes have occurred, the preparation of new digital mapping is required. RATIONALE A review of available technologies concluded that the most cost effective method available to convert current TRCA mapping into digital format is through a scanning and vectorization process. The process, offered only through QSP Geographics Inc., involves scanning the hard copy mapsheets into the computer as raster images and vectorizing key features (i.e., contours, watercourses, culverts, bridges, etc.) into individual, unique lines through proprietary software developed specifically for this application. In addition, QSP Geographics Inc. has committed to deliver the final product within 9 weeks of project initiation. In light of the above, it is recommended that this work be sole sourced to QSP Geographics Ltd. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project are available within the approved 2004 flood plain management budget. A maximum upset limit of $19,153 including applicable taxes has been set for this project. Report prepared by: Alison Edwards, extension 5363 For Information contact: Alison Edwards Date: March 22, 2004 235 RES. #B66/04 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE Award of Contract for Communications /Media Relations Services. Award of contract to Holmes Creative Communications to create and deliver Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) communcations and media relations services for the 2004 season. Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT Holmes Creative Communications be awarded the contract for communcations and media relations services at Black Creek Pioneer Village for the 2004 season ending December 31, 2004, at an upset cost of $40,000 plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND BCPV has conducted a call for proposals for communications and media relations services for the 2004 season. For the past three years Black Creek Pioneer Village has contracted the services of the Coaston Group, which was the successful bidder in the previous review. To maintain fresh, creative ideas BCPV felt it was timely to retender this contract. BCPV sent terms of reference to five pre - qualified suppliers. Four suppliers submitted complete proposals. One company withdrew. Supplier Amount GST Total Amount Applause! Communications Inc. $37,800.00 $2,646.00 $40,446.00 Coaston Group $28,800.00 $2,016.00 $30,816.00 Dara Rowland & Associates $30,600.00 $2,142.00 $32,742.00 Holmes Creative Communications $40,000.00 $3,111.00 $43,111.00 Approval is requested to engage Homes Creative Communication for the 2004 season to an upset cost of $40,000 plus GST. Their proposal was substantially superior to the other proposals received in terms of creativity and innovation, experience in the tourism sector, potential for cross sector relationships within their stable of clients, as well as depth of experience of the creative team. Given BCPVs loss of market share in recent years, staff believe a strong, higher profile media relations group is a vital component to recapture and build audience post -SARS. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are currently available in the BCPV 2004 marketing budget for this activity. Report prepared by: Marty Brent, extension 5403 For Information contact: Marty Brent, extension 5403 Date: March 25, 2004 236 RES. #867/04 - PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSE Klemmer and Associates. Approval of a professional development course for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the proposal for a staff professional development course of 3 days, given by the firm of Klemmer and Associates be approved and staff be directed to implement the second session proposal in April of 2004, at a cost for 130 employees not to exceed $23,000 (US dollars). CARRIED BACKGROUND At Executive Committee Meeting #11/03, held on December 5, 2003, Resolution #B187/03 was approved as follows: THAT the proposal for a staff professional development course of 3 days, given by the firm of Klemmer and Associates be approved and staff be directed to implement the proposal in February of 2004, at a cost for 100 employees not to exceed $20,900 (US dollars) The Living City Strategic Plan is based on the concept of leveraging for greater impact. To achieve those much needed outcomes, employees must be fully engaged in the process and inspired to take on complex issues and successfully implement solutions. The Klemmer Seminars are based on the idea of personal mastery and the ability to enact change in an organization through taking greater personal responsibility. RATIONALE There are other courses available that address the same issues eg. Stephen Covey's "7 Habits of Highly Successful People ", MICA's "Effectiveness in Working with People" but at 2 or 3 times the price. The Klemmer and Associates proposal would provide a cost per student of $276 for 3 days of instruction, discounted from their individual fee of $800 per student. Other organizations have taken this course and have found that there were improvements in productivity and employee morale. Additionally, the first personal mastery course taken by staff was a great success and therefore staff would like to proceed with training the reminder of the full time employees. The concept is that organizational transformation begins with personal mastery. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available in the 2004 proposed preliminary budget. Due to the exchange rate, the Canadian dollar amount cannot be confirmed at this time, but based on a US- Canadian $1.3292 March 26, 2004 G & M the amount would be $29,500. Report prepared by: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5217 For Information contact: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5217 Date: March 29, 2004 237 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:37 a.m., on Friday, April 2, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair . /ks ,, Brian Denney Secretary- Treasurer c. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/04 May 7, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #4/04, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, May 7, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. PRESENT Frank Dale Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member REGRETS Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Michael Di Biase Member RES. #B68/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Dave Ryan THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/04, held on April 2, 2004, be approved. CORRESPONDENCE (a) CARRIED A letter dated May 3, 2004, from Geri Clever of 7 Beaumont Road, in regards to item 7.2 - Hearing Report. (b) A letter dated May 5, 2004, from Jane Pepino, Solicitor, Aird and Berlis LLP, in regards to item 7.2 - Hearing Report and her request to speak to this item. 239 RES.#B69/04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Frank Dale THAT above -noted correspondence (a) and (b) be received. CARRIED 240 CORRESPONDENCE (A) ••••■.Y .I• 99.013 16139 RECD E MAY 0 4 2004 DEVELOPME sittVIC SSECIis;N 1 TRC.A__, Z 4149292777 OL FAX 416 661 6898 Post-It` Fax Note 7871E o �//* s� TosT ,�►,,.1 From eielk e c° 41f r.QcR c°. Pflor* 0 "h"""414 - 94e -i5ts. faR lroz — Atf'le V ,Fag a 'S'S/Lt —9ZA. % Z77 7 Mr. Richard O'Brien Chairman Toronto and Regional Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Toronto ON 143N 1S4 Re: 15 BSAUMONT ROAD Hearing May 7, 2004 Dear Mr. O'Brien: As a resident of Beaumont Road, I wish to exprilt regard to, the construction of a house in the ravine at T would like to point out that during the coca adjacent property some years ago yrhen excavation began t lowered to a degree that a large sink hole appeared on t No. 15 Beaumont Road, and a•pine tree on my property fel It is my understanding that when you remove tre excavations you tend to lower the water table. In the c Road, the size of the house, some nearly 9,000 se feet, a number of trees to accommodate the house would cause t water table on the property. CLsuke PHONE: 40164 8565 1 FA7(: 25 2777 7 Beaumon Toronto' i 1V4 May 3, 2Q04 :` s my Concern s'a? . 15 Beaumont coast adjacent of the. Watar, tebla- 4 property over. as and -do lame! wee of No. 1 and the re be lowering a Having witnessed this problem previously, I wit to express lay concern with regard to construction at No. 15 Beaumont ad. sin�y- Geri Clever GC:gh cc: Steven H. Heuchert, MRTP1 Senior Planner Development Services Section 241 CORRESPONDENCE (B) AIRD & BERMS LAP tame= and be',htaa Meant sd : radc Mark Anna. N. Jane Papino, C$., Q.D. Dlad Dial : 416.855.7727 E-Mail: jpnpinolaairtiDOna.40111 May 4, 2004 VIA FAX #416.661.6898 Our File #84462 1"""ffilf Efcici`t eThICvr�imitte Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Oownsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Dear Committee Members: Re: Executive Committee Meeting #4/04 Application #457I03/TOR-15 Beaumont Road, City of Toronto We act on behalf of Jane and Eberhard Zeidler who reside at 11 Beaumont Road and Gaylord Linda' al 14 Beaumont, neighbours abutting 15 Beaumont to the west and to the east. Our clients have only recently been made aware of the fact that, since October, an application has been pending before the Conservation Authority, as well as before the Committee of Adjustment in the City of Toronto. Our clients wish to go on record in full support of the recommendation of your staff that this appfcafion be refused. The application impacts the conservation of land, contravenes the policies of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, tontYaVenes' the specific policy prohibiting Infilt development on a 'Malley wall", and does not conform to either the existing and approved City of Toronto Official Plan or the proposed new official plan. This application relies entirely on an anomalous zoning which does not conform to the Official Plan. Additionally, and as a preliminary matter. it is our position that the hearing of this application is premature, for at least three reasons: 1. Any access to this property must be obtained over a City -owned Right -Of -Way: no encroachment permit has been issued. 2, An application to the Committee of Adjustment is necessary for y scheme 'bridging" the City.owned Right -Of -Way, and even more variances are required to SCE Place, Suite 1800, 90x 754,151 Say Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada MS.! 2T9 7: 416.663.1500 F; 418,8611519 www.airdbarlia..eom ANiliatee with Owen, Dire / Vancouver 242 May 4. 2004 Page 2 permit the present design. Until the Committee of Adjustment application has been heard, and all appeals dealt with, the Conservation Authority has no certainty that what the fill permit is being applied for. is, in fact, permitted by the zoning, This Authority and the Mining and Lands Commissioner have held that the particular zoning on a piece of property is not determinative of a fill application under the Conservation Authorities Act. A zoning use entitlement does not equate to a fill permit entitlement. In any event, the zoning on this property cannot be uses, nor access gained to the subject property, without both an encroachment .ai1.is. applied for. 3. The whole issue of the propriety of conditions (or other mitigating controls such as Stewardship Plans, etc.), and the rights of third parties affected by those conditions (or controls) is before the Mining and Lands Commissioner by way of an appeal of the Executive Committee's decision with regard to 119R Glen Road. It is our respectful submission that until the legal standing of third parties is clarified, as well as the jurisdiction of the Conservation Authority to attach conditions, or to accept "agreed -to implerr<entation issues no decision can appropriately be made. In the absence of the necessary guidance from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and/or the Courts, it is submitted the Committee should not entertain any approval of this application. On me merits, we entirely support the analysis and statements of your staff that the development of this dwelling, over 9,000 ft= of GFA, will negatively impact on the conservation of land and particularly. habitat size, habitat shape, and habitat matrix Influence (the effect of surrounding land use). in this regard. your staff note that although modest negative impacts associated with urbanization (but not construction or use) have already occurred in this ravine, a proposed Ravine Stewardship Plan will not reduce the negative impacts of constructing a residence on the valley scope either in content, or in timing. Therefore, neither the imposition of a condition requiring (nor acceding to an offer to roaideL a Ravine Ste ardshi „Plari is sufficient to address th,,, seee,^c atj„vtfmnacts. Moreover, at least one third of forested ravine habitat on the subject property and the City- owned property will be removed, which is a dear and substantial impact on habitat size, and on an area not previously disturbed or used for human purpose (unlike 119R Glen Road). Additionally, habitat shape and matrix will be detrimentally impact given the extreme length of the proposed residence (150 ft plus), "launching" (the applicant's words) into the heart of the ravine habitat, reaching to areas that have been previously protected against such Impacts. Our clients concur with the inventory work undertaken by your staff that has identified a "significant number of flora and fauna species of conservation concern within this part of the Don River Valley System, of which nine separate types of flora species of concern and one fauna species of concern lie in the immediate vicinity of the subject property." We 4 Auto & Beaus ur 11V/ ▪ roil Tea 1t"taW.o t wuu?rwmn 243 concur with your staff's observat an tha; the Environmental Impact Study is not complete in its inventory and does not look at all impacted seasons. Finally. our staff notes that this appi'catlon could wet' establish a precedent Beading to similar proposals within tie broader aon Valley system, given the fact that (unlike 119R Glen Road which was effectively surrounded by private properly) this applfcattor constitutes an intrusion "into a well d lined forested valley/', and is a site which is a visible . o- arad .+obvaus,part.ol?.,a.xavine.. system,.. lire.^ilY,,att ttina.Public,.iPoierped -1, tea.•- 00.440141..a..K much appreciated and well used trail system exists. Approval of any development an this sit, given its topographical and forested qualities, and its important linkage lo a publicly used ravine system, would severely compromise the ability and authority of the Toronto Region Conservation Authority to enforce Its regu atlons and policies anywhere else within the Don Valley Corridor and beyond. I will be in attendance al this Friday's Executive Committee Meeting and would ask that I be listed as a deputation to speak to this matter, at which time I would also be prepared is answer any questions your Committee might have. Yours very truly, Al t & BERLI i N. Jane Pepino, C.M., O.C. NJPIdswhnn cc. Jane and Eberhard Zeidler 'Gaylord Linda' Councilor Kyle Rae John Inglis :QA MMPCOPC.S',000Sti ee t 58812 Ana 6& &Altus eu HOM 9 1 $ w0+wM 244 HEARINGS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 REVISED HEARING REPORT - 3 GIBSON AVENUE. CITY OF TORONTO RES. #870/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Dave Ryan THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board. CARRIED MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING Frank Dale Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member Following the roll call, a hearing was held re: Application #423/03/TOR for a permit under Ontario Regulation 158, by Mario Faraone, for permission to regrade within a well defined valley of the Humber River West Branch, described as 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto (Toronto West Community Council). The applicants propose to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of an armorstone retaining wall on the valley slope, create additional table land for a rear yard and construct a stormwater outfall that drains directly to the valley slope. The works were substantially completed prior to application for a permit. Staff do not support the application on the basis that it impacts the conservation of land and the control of pollution. A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Mr. Steven Heuchert, Senior Planner, Development Services Section. A presentation was made by Mr. Tom Halinski, Solicitor, Aird and Berlis LLP, representative for Mr. Mario Faraone, agent for the owner, Mr. John DiSanto. The Hearing Board asked questions of staff and the applicant/representative. RES. #B71 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session. CARRIED 245 RES. #B72 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Frank Dale THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session. DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES. #B73 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor CARRIED THAT Application #423/03/TOR to regrade within a well defined valley of the Humber River West Branch, described as 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto (Toronto West Community Council) be refused as it impacts the conservation of land and the control of pollution; AND FURTHER THAT this does not preclude the applicant from coming forward with a revised permit application. MOTION TO RECONVENE RES. #B74 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Dave Ryan THAT Executive Committee Meeting #4104 reconvene. MOTION TO RATIFY RES. #B75 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Dave Ryan CARRIED CARRIED THAT the Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that application #423/03/TOR to regrade within a well defined valley of the Humber River West Branch, described as 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto (Toronto West Community Council) be refused as it impacts the conservation of land and the control of pollution; AND FURTHER THAT this does not preclude the applicant from coming forward with a revised permit application. CARRIED 246 BACKGROUND The essence of the proposal, submitted for the approval of works after the fact, is for the construction of a substantial retaining wall. An inspection of the premises on August 20, 2003 by the Enforcement Officer on patrol in the community revealed the unauthorized work. The work on the construction of the wall was well underway at the time. As a result of the inspection, TRCA staff received a permit application on August 22, 2003 , with further information being received on November 13, 2003. However, between August 20th and August 27th, works continued on the project until the retaining wall reached the point of substantial completion. TRCA violation notice V -2094 was issued and received by the owner on September 4, 2003. The violation was issued in response to the placement of fill material at 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto, in the fill regulated area of the property without approval by permit from TRCA in accordance with the Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario Regulation 158. The proposal is also subject to a notice of infraction issued by the City of Toronto Urban Forestry Service on November 17, 2003, for the unauthorized tree injury in a ravine, subject to the city's Ravine Protection By -Law. In addition, the city issued an order to comply under the building code with respect to alterations to the residential structure undertaken in conjunction with this project. PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the east side of Gibson Avenue. Gibson Avenue is located in a residential area east of Islington Avenue and west of Albion Road, in Toronto West Community Council area. There is an existing single family dwelling and a rear deck on the property. The majority of the property to the east (rear) of the existing dwelling is located within the Fill Regulated area and is associated with the forested Humber River West Branch valley corridor. 247 TRCA JURISDICTION Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission is required from the TRCA to "place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places" (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 3(b)). "Fill" is defined as "...earth, sand, gravel, rubble, rubbish, garbage or any other material whether similar to or different from any of the aforementioned materials, whether originating on the site or elsewhere, used or capable of being used to raise, lower, or in any way affect the contours of the ground" (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 1). The areas described in the schedules (fill regulated areas) are areas in which, in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding or pollution or conservation of land may be affected by the placing or dumping of fill (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 2). Therefore, a permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the TRCA, any of these three concerns are affected. In the case of the proposal for approval of works after the fact for 3 Gibson Avenue, TRCA staff conclude that both the control of pollution and conservation of land has been affected. Before refusing permission, the TRCA must hold a Hearing to which the applicant and other interested persons are a party (Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27 - 28(12)). It should be noted that TRCA reviews all permitting requirements in concert with our Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) policies. VSCMP integrates TRCA's public safety responsibilities and reaffirms its commitment to ecosystem planning at a watershed level. VSCMP outlines policies for property improvements and ancillary structures within highly urbanized areas such the area surrounding and including the subject property. THE PROPOSAL The submission is for the prior placement/regrading of fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River West Branch valley corridor in connection with the construction of an approximately 40 metre long armorstone retaining wall on the valley slope, creation of additional table land for a rear yard, and construction of a stormwater outfall that drains directly to the valley slope. The armorstone retaining wall ranges in height from 0.79 metres to 2.76 metres above grade. All works are located within an area of mature vegetation associated with the valley corridor. The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain. STAFF REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL Conservation of Land The submission does not result in the conservation of land as it negatively impacts a portion of the valley corridor and degrades the habitat function of the valley system. Policy 3.2.1.0 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that "alterations of valley corridors through such activities as filling or enclosure shall not be permitted to create additional useable area and /or accommodate development." The construction of the retaining wall and the regrading of fill between the top of the retaining wall and the former rear yard was clearly designed to create additional rear yard area at the expense of negatively impacting a portion of the valley corridor. 248 Policy 4.2.2.E.5 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that " property improvements and ancillary structures that introduce greater potential for valleyland impacts such as...retaining walis...grade cutting and filling shall be prohibited... ". TRCA's natural heritage inventory work has shown that the West Humber River valley supports several flora and fauna species of concern. While these species may be common in more rural areas, they are of concern in urbanized areas as a result of negative impacts to their habitat associated with urban uses. These impacts include direct loss of habitat as well as light, noise and encroachment from human contact. TRCA's information shows that the area is functioning at a high level given its urban context. The proposal results in serious injury to eight (8) mature trees, lesser impacts to six (6) mature trees, the removal of ground cover, and pushes the urban edge further into the valley, all of which result in a loss to the overall habitat value. This could impact the overall ecological function of the valley and exacerbate conditions for invasive plant species to take hold. Further, any development on the valley slope on the subject property will not meet the TRCA's objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs. Pollution The proposal results in impacts to pollution within the valley corridor as stormwater is anticipated to cause surficial slope erosion from: 1) over the top of the wall, 2) through gaps in the wall and 3) through the outfall located on the valley slope. Policy 4.2.2.E.2 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that "property improvements and ancillary structures...may be permitted subject to and in compliance with the following :... if located on or adjacent to a valley wall: ... will not aggravate erosion or slope instability on adjacent upstream or downstream properties [and] will minimize property damage associated with erosion /slope instability to the extent technically possible...." The works include an outfall to drain the rear yard directly to the valley slope. During storm events, drainage from this outfall is anticipated to cause surficial erosion to the valley slope. In addition, during storm events, water draining directly from a saturated rear yard is anticipated to flow over the top of the wall, and between gaps in the wall, directly to the valley slope. Surficial erosion may also be exaggerated by any future loss of vegetative cover due to tree injury. NOTE ON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The submission is also not supported because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the Humber River West Branch valley system. Permitting this intrusion could establish a precedent which may potentially lead to similar proposals within the Humber River West Branch valley system, given the consistent pressure for more intensification. The retaining wall is an atypical manmade feature that is not consistent with the valley corridor in the immediate residential community. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, staff recommend that the application be denied for the following reasons: 249 1. The submission will affect the conservation of land as it: • results in negative impacts to a portion of the West Humber River valley corridor for the purpose of creating additional useable area for an expanded rear yard; • results in serious injury to eight (8) mature trees, impacts to six (6) mature trees and the removal of ground cover, and pushes the urban edge further into the valley, resulting in a Toss to overall habitat value; and • has a detrimental impact due to the cumulative loss of natural cover within the City of Toronto. 2. The submission will affect the control of pollution as it is anticipated to result in surficial erosion of the valley slope from stormwater discharge directly onto the valley slope. 3. The submission does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Specifically, it does not conform with Section 3.2.1.c, Policies and Procedures for Establishing Corridor Boundaries and Alterations; or Section 4.2.2.E.2 & 5, Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures. 4. The submission creates a precedent that may result in future consideration of similar proposals within the Humber River West Branch valley corridor. Report prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 250 Attachment 1 HEARING REPORT Application #e21103/TOR to regrade within the FM Regulated Area for the Humber River West Branch Mario Femme 3 Gibson Avenue, City otToronto JCA 45.04 • C I-Y fi E 7- 0,9 1 4 O C r�l 1 i` `� ,t y_- • •-.. - �: _ T _ yr' t.-�� �' 1 - C' 1..11 , t pit ii «t , Nat '4 di Its ,s -__, - E tfd•''L Sy 1l N, • I�., \ i -� / I ; a > {{' ti 4 1�,�I 41 S - i■ ' r,r. i t IN- 4 1 t .• a 111 t1� r T 1 1 , 1' • 1 .j•. � , 1 1 � I i 1 t 1 r ; L5 ..,. ; f� `! • 1n • d ` .y1 �. s` 1'!t 251 HEARING REPORT - 15 BEAUMONT ROAD, CITY OF TORONTO RES. #B76 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THAT the Executive Committee sit as a Hearing Board. CARRIED MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING Frank Dale Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Following the roll call, a hearing was held re: Application #457/03/TOR to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River (Park Drive Ravine), described as 15 Beaumont Road in the City of Toronto (Toronto South Community Council). The applicants propose to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling and swimming pool on the valley slope. Staff do not support the application on the basis that it impacts the conservation of land. A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Mr. Steven Heuchert, Senior Planner, Development Services Section. A presentation was made by Mr. John Inglis, Solicitor, McCarthy Tetrault, representative for Bousfields, Inc., agent for the owner, 133720 Ontario Inc. (R. V. Dickinson). Deputations were made by Mr. Pat Howe, President, North Rosedale Ratepayers Association and Ms. Jane Pepino, Solicitor, Aird and Berlis LLP. The Hearing Board asked questions of staff, the applicant/representative and the deputants. RES. #B77 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Fob Ford Suzan Hall THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session. RES. #B78 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Rob Ford 252 CARRIED THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session. DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES. #B79 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Frank Dale CARRIED THAT Application #457/03/TOR to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River (Park Drive Ravine), described as 15 Beaumont Road in the City of Toronto (Toronto South Community Council), be refused as it impacts the conservation of land. CARRIED MOTION TO RECONVENE RES. #680/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Executive Committee Meeting #4/04 reconvene. MOTION TO RATIFY RES. #B81 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Frank Dale CARRIED THAT the Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that Application #457/03/TOR to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River (Park Drive Ravine), described as 15 Beaumont Road in the City of Toronto (Toronto South Community Council), be refused as it impacts the conservation of land. CARRIED PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 15 Beaumont Road is located in the Rosedale residential area east of Glen Road and north of Bloor Street and Castle Frank Road, in Toronto South Community Council area. The subject property is located on the south side of Beaumont Road and is an undeveloped lot of record located entirely below the top of bank of the forested ravine. The entire property is located within a Fill Regulated area (see attached location plan). BACKGROUND Both the existing City of Toronto Official Plan (Cityplan, 1993) and the new City of Toronto Official Plan (2001) recognize the features of 15 Beaumont Road as being environmentally sensitive and worthy of protection. In 1997, City of Toronto Council passed By -law 1997 -0369 which prohibited all new construction on various lots of record located in ravines, including 15 Beaumont Road. The owner of 15 Beaumont Road appealed this By -law to the Ontario Municipal Board. The first panel of the OMB dismissed the appeal. The owner then requested a review of the OMB decision. The second panel of the OMB then reversed the first panel's decision and exempted 15 Beaumont Road from the Zoning By -law. A subsequent appeal of 253 the second panel's decision by adjacent property owners was dismissed. Therefore, the residential zoning on the subject property stands. TRCA JURISDICTION Notwithstanding the City of Toronto zoning issues, Ontario Regulation 158, requires written permission from the TRCA to "place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places" (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 3(b)). "Fill" is defined as "...earth, sand, gravel, rubble, rubbish, garbage or any other material whether similar to or different from any of the aforementioned materials, whether originating on the site or elsewhere, used or capable of being used to raise, lower, or in any way affect the contours of the ground" (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 1). The areas described in the schedules (fill regulated areas) are areas in which, in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding or pollution or conservation of land may be impacted by the placing or dumping of fill (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 2). Therefore, a permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the TRCA, any of these concerns are impacted. It should be noted that TRCA reviews all permitting requirements in concert with our "Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program" (VSCMP) policies. The Program integrates the Authority's public safety responsibilities and reaffirms its commitment to ecosystem planning at a watershed level. One of the overriding principles of the Program is to protect valley corridors and their habitat functions. The Program's policies are designed to prevent new development and /or lots from occurring within areas that may introduce a risk to life and property associated with flooding, erosion and slope stability or is not compatible with the protection or rehabilitation of these areas in their natural state. Specifically, Policy 4.2.2.G.1.i. of the VSCMP prohibits infill development on a "valley wall" for that purpose. THE PROPOSAL The proposal is to allow for the construction of a new residence and pool on a forested valley wall of the Park Drive Ravine on the existing, undeveloped lot of record at 15 Beaumont Road. The proposal includes a Ravine Stewardship Plan and the application includes an Environmental Impact Study. The subject property is 0.31 hectares in area, rectangular in shape, with a frontage of 30.5 metres and a depth of 103 metres. The proposed 868 square metre residence has three (3) levels, a length of 37 metres and a width of 15.5 metres (see attached elevations). Access is proposed from Beaumont Road via a driveway /bridge structure attached to the main residence over a portion of the Beaumont Road Right -of -Way. The lowest level of the proposed residence will be constructed directly on a relatively flat terraced portion of the valley wall. The driveway /bridge structure and lower level have a footprint of 450 square metres. The remainder of the proposed residence will be constructed over the lowest level, with approximately 250 square metres cantilevered over the valley wall on two beams mounted on anchors in the valley. 254 STAFF REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL Control of Flooding and Pollution. The proposal is not within the section of the subject property within the Regional Storm Floodplain and will have no impact on conveyance or storage of flood flows. The applicant has provided a preliminary geotechnical report and TRCA staff are of the opinion that the project can be designed in such a manner to satisfactorily reduce the impact on the control of pollution. Adequate sedimentation and erosion control and stormwater management can be provided, and the proposed cantilevered residence can be constructed in such a manner as not to affect the long term stability of the slope. Conservation of Land. However, staff are of the opinion that the conservation of land will be negatively impacted by the construction of the residence on the valley slope. In 2001, TRCA completed the City of Toronto Natural Heritage Study undertaken in partnership with the City to provide technical background for the new City of Toronto Official Plan's Natural Heritage Policies. The Natural Heritage Study incorporated a methodology based on the latest thinking in landscape analysis. This methodology utilizes three measures to analyze the health of individual habitat patches. The three measures include habitat size, habitat shape, and habitat matrix influence (the effect of surrounding land use). The Environmental Impact Study (EIS) provided by the applicant states that: "The Park Drive Ravine represents one of the last contiguous forested /treed landscape features within the urbanized portions of the Don River Watershed. Ravines represent some of the last remaining forested features within the City of Toronto, as most of the tablelands have been converted into urban uses. Due to the high level of urbanization and proximity of development to the edge of the ravine systems, most of the ravines in the City are highly impacted by anthropogenic influences." (Section 3.7, page 13) TRCA staff concur with this analysis. The EIS documents some of the negative impacts associated with urbanization that have, and are continuing to occur, in this ravine. These impacts include, dumping and filling, garbage, uncontrolled access and, most notably, the invasion of the natural forests by aggressive non - native plant species such as Norway Maple and garlic mustard. However, we do not concur that the Ravine Stewardship Plan will reduce the negative impacts of constructing a residence on the valley slope, for the following reasons: 255 • Impacts to Habitat Size. The proposed development will reduce the size of the habitat by approximately 450 square metres under the proposed driveway /bridge structure and the lowest floor of the residence. The proposal assumes that plantings provided as part of the landscape plan will take hold under the approximately 250 square metre cantilevered portion of the proposed residence. Based on experience with bridges and other large cantilevered structures, TRCA staff are of the opinion that such plantings in an almost permanently shaded and precipitation -free area will not take hold and that the proposal will have to incorporate an impervious approach at a later date. The proposed green roof lined with 15 cm of soil material and grasses, although laudable, will not re- create ravine forest habitat, and there is no guarantee that future homeowners will retain the green roof. Finally, construction will impact a minimum of 180 square metres of ravine forest habitat. Therefore, the proposal in total will eliminate a minimum of 880 square metres of ravine forest habitat. This translates to a 30% loss of forested ravine habitat on the subject property and a portion of the Beaumont Road Right -of -Way. • Impacts to Habitat Shape. The proposed 700 square metre physical intrusion into the existing forested ravine habitat will impair the habitat shape by creating a new and more convoluted edge into the heart of the valley. • Impacts to Habitat Matrix. As noted in the EIS (above), the areas most impacted occur at the edges of the ravine where urban development has occurred, and the more pristine and higher functioning areas occur further from the edge. The proposal is to site the residence in the area that has received the most impact and to retain the higher quality areas further down the slope. However, the footprint of the proposed residence will now introduce these impacts along the new edge and into the heart of the ravine habitat to areas that have been previously buffered against such impacts. • Overall Impacts. Impacts to habitat size, shape and matrix, and therefore quality, will negatively affect the species that occur here. The TRCA inventory work has identified a significant number of flora and fauna species of conservation concern within this part of the Don River Valley system, including nine separate types of flora species of concern and one fauna species of concern in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The EIS concentrates mainly on tree species with some late season surveys of other plants. TRCA staff are of the opinion that additional species of concern may be identified on the subject property if the inventory work is conducted in the appropriate season and include such species as breeding birds and amphibians. Therefore, impacts may be greater than those identified in the EIS. 256 The species of concern have been identified as such because of their habitat dependence, their area sensitivity and their sensitivity to development. Further degradation of the habitats will impact the identified species, and likely those that have not been identified. The Ravine Stewardship Plan is being used to rationalize the proposed development's intrusion into the natural habitat. While the plan is to be commended for its ambitious restoration activities to improve the floristic quality of the remaining habitat, it cannot offset the impairments to the size and shape and negative matrix influences of the development on the forest habitat. In addition, invasive species removal is proposed over a 20 year time period and therefore substantial benefits of the Ravine Stewardship Plan may not be functional until well into the future. In light of the above, TRCA staff conclude that the conservation of land objective of Ontario Regulation 158 has not been achieved. NOTE ON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The proposal is also not supported because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the Don Valley system. Permitting this intrusion into a well defined forested valley will establish a precedent which may potentially lead to similar proposals within the Don Valley system, given the consistent pressure for more intensification. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, staff recommend that the application be denied for the following reasons: 1. The proposal does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program which is to protect valley corridors and their habitat functions. Specifically, the proposal does not comply with Policy 4.2.2.G.1.i. which prohibits infill development on a "valley wall" in order to achieve the overall objective. 2. The proposal will affect the conservation of land as it results in negative impacts to valley forest habitat that currently sustains species of conservation concern. The impacts would be caused by reducing the size of the valley habitat, creating a new and convoluted habitat edge in the valley, and introducing a new urban edge further into the valley forest. 3. The proposal creates a precedent that may result in future consideration of similar proposals within the Don Valley corridor. Report prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 19, 2004 Attachments: 2 257 Attachment 1 1 258 Attachment 2 k y� M�vr1 tomenothigtiltiE eHoit32}'se aA fdta,n 2z.2LTsnJ 4cnxrrczT111 •]NK •i911_4. I1144o1.0 suorwr�iohs RaNbRn north and south elevations rco 4.3 !ci ello bo3se iierm C d lfY _l.•L4VL f:Y21t11 NOMrNIH11[4A]s 4•�:1fM�•ll SU6mlamora R vision La7 aIrro fm Ct�i a i1•.9 H�M3f 259 e SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #882/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed 1124371 Ontario Ltd. / Crestvale Holdings Inc., CFN 35303. Purchase of property located south of Elgin Mills Road East, west of Leslie Street, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.55 hectares (3.83 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from 1124371 Ontario Ltd. / Crestvale Holdings Inc., being Part of Lot 25, Concession 2 and designated as Blocks 126 and 127 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Dillon Consulting, Revision 3, dated May 21, 2003, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Elgin Mills Road, west of Leslie Street; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Art Saccoccia of Crestvale Holdings Inc. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 260 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision 19T(R)- 03001, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands which are comprised of stream corridors found along the headwaters of the Rouge River, located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: April 21, 2004 Attachments: 1 261 Attachment 1 re-- - • • . 1.01 • TO ISAYIAEW AVE - -* "..,1 ELGIN IIILLs • .rf. '14--,*..‘.• .•_ .' .... .- . . .._ -.1, ( _i. M..1% ;, ‘7" •2, '.. :, - :t.;0 'iMg:. ?t • ' 1'••• '. \ ''• ,..) . ; .%, 1 4-.1_,,`' -- -- ' :"4.\; .• — ; -7' ,.• ,,ii .... I, .1.4,• ---...• , : . :•. -4:.,,:— ..-1." ,: :- ),7 .. ..), .e.7-•-.....: of •-•_ a e. , 4.. ::.:' ..z.v__C..)...2) . ?I, , !.-..,;1?,..:5,, .,...."-:- • 7.,-,i • . _-1, A 1..,.,;:, ‘- ..\.. 1,...:*.,,--. -. CR.E.-1; 7VALE- NO. LI; IRO: - . * -I 0: .• ' , PROPERTY , . - - r .• ; • ; .111 • • h; - - ' • • • --- ,,, 1 - 1 .•-• - .../ ....• — •- ... , ' - • • • % sy • ''.■ !1%, , N • /- • -- -- - 1 1 • \`• ..."'-i• ;. 1 ( - -- -. _ ..• . • te.-1 - ...., : : .Y/. - . ' • I / ! i . ,-? ! - /r/ 1,'-% .:"I •••• I ( .` - - , ,.. .., . . I. -.t•-:, ! ' . • .. — • ---t,el` .-"- — -, \ •••••• - , - -. • " '' : ',.v- =`-..--. • .• 0-1.4..._90.4.77,--,--,- ., • . .- --,f ..". % .,.. , ; :,■ • ■ :11_•-1 '•,-- - - ---• s••• ' ,, - • • • • - '•Y:-..;-,•• 1 -- - ; , ,• • ' 1 • .• . :` _, - • - -‘ 1 --:-- , .....-. _ 4 •'2 . . -*.,. :x: ,-,i7 - " ,-..t! - - .. • . • : • - .--•-• . -r•• i . _ ‘ .._, • . .--: : ) ..,./, --- f ;,14-,;-..‘ - - , .,- .. . . • I .• \ •-_ ....-• ,' ,-,;.r." -; ,.. _ . --... •• ...)----.., ' - - • 0_ ., ..- 1 , II,. ,,L, , •,1) • ".. : _ • •:.fr--4C..-- • • - •••-•-•- / . , • ,, • - :::••••72--4. ••• ._ • / • , ...1•1: .... •. 144,....\ .:::litei.),.; . ... . ,.. ;:.:)1:...v;y.:1,..11...: ,..f.„0..1-1x..t.0... 0._ '..1.....00,....:3,......1..04.....r.. . .....,: ,. ... . .. • I • ' . • • '', .. V . • • '', % vb.% ' i .,..... . V • 1 . 1' • ' • • • ' • • p lt,onservation ' far 0,. Living 0,, • !.•■•-•• I • 1 • • ••'" 1 . • • NAI L:HAL 1EH AE LAUL7S PROTECTION AN) ACOLIISI I ION 2o1 2uot, • Pluuu F1iluI w Crnsrvation Component RoLEm Hi.i WutirsIssu 1124371 Crdis Ld.r..:restuale Holdings Ii . U+ 1253C _ ' 1*,(Critu.. iceri. 1 Pt ..4:11uLoi ei,ah 1. loud Pfau um' C...4-isarvaiiori Component RoLEL Hi WdllirsIssu ?it _-1TRCA LAWS 13.2-7:20 I:1J EC 1 PROPER"! v VTR. CA LANDS 262 RES. #B83/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Primont Homes, CFN 35344. Purchase of property located south of Elgin Mills Road East, west of Leslie Street, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.32 hectares (0.79 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Primont Homes, being Part of Lot 25, Concession 2 and designated as Block 39 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by P. Salna Company Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their File No. 59 -10A, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Elgin Mills Road, west of Leslie Street; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses Incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Joe Montesano of Primont Homes. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 263 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision 19T- 99005, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands which are comprised of a stream corridor found along the headwaters of the Rouge River, located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: April 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 264 Attachment 1 1 `' ELGIN MIL.L,51ROADz_ ,l. f •. • • • ", • / • w —, — , •{ice t �iyef • •� — R" .711.• t �! - e 1 \ • ; • !(:Z •:• iv } I • •• -3 cam. NATLRAL hERITAat 1 4ND3 'RC'ECTION MC ACOU:SITION NziC•IECT 2.7.01 -2OC8 1 JTRCA ANDS =food Plain and C. 1sF tiitior Camp :lerrt HC.+ge Rrrer Waterst' G g,/gJEC 1 FRbf EKIY ., .:.FA 35344 r // .4'.. I-iERITAaE L 4ND5•5'Rc 7,..L toN V ifA ;utJ:511 iu'+i�l•.tiL'•ICI'. c•v•- I ' INCA 0.1111.J., / = +np�.n nrd r "F Vvior,Com �en1 H;.ge Rr rs . ... -., I 1 _ J - +,,,,,, ,rr. Ca(oFH7Y 265 RES.#B84/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Tina and Paola Romano, CFN 35284. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located on the west side of Millwood Parkway, north of Major Mackenzie Drive (116 Millwood Parkway), City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Humber River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.25 hectares (0.62 acres), more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land, be purchased from Tina and Paola Romano, said land being Part of Lot 5, Plan M -1540 and designated as Parts 3 and 4 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Krcmar Surveyors Ltd., under their Job No. 02 -322, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, on the west side of Millwood Parkway, north of Major Mackenzie Drive (116 Millwood Parkway); THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the easement required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid. AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Tina and Paola Romano have received conditional approval from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) to sever this residential property in order to create an additional residential lot. One of the conditions imposed by the OMB requires a conservation easement over a significant environmental feature on the southern portion of the subject lands, as identified by TRCA staff through the review of the consent application. Negotiations have been conducted with the owners' lawyer, Mr. Jaikrishin Ambwani, Barrister and Solicitor. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 266 RATIONALE The portion of the property subject to the conservation easement is comprised entirely of a regional storm flood plain along a tributary of the East Humber River, and falls within lands identified in the TRCA's Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to this easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: April 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 267 -- �- • '_ :- . \,• i • ei I • •` . DR. • • \ v 6 yam••' f L i •' • • • • •�••7'~ � •fi\ `--"•"*"' �. ti • `b. Vex ti'` r•' �;' . .`� t ` yl •k- `• '� • v l • • .•..• .Ifs _ `\• \� \;S:' .c••'• '' s"ervation • `\`. ` \ ■ ' , . far 78r Living Cily r . RP'¢. , `. ~ b: _ ,_]71:0..1 ANDS pt14 „a '' .OB.IFCTPIIOPFliTY 1' > iii -}r far 7Lr Livinj Cilc n: • • „..r _ _ 1 • 268 • RES. #B85/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed The Corporation of the City of Vaughan, CFN 33280. Purchase of property located on the east side of Islington Avenue and Highway No. 27, north of Treelawn Boulevard, Village of Kleinburg, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 14.0 hectares (34.6 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from The Corporation of the City of Vaughan, being Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 8 and designated as Block 110 on Registered Plan 65M -3466, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located on the east side of Islington Avenue and Highway No. 27, north of Treelawn Boulevard in the Village of Kleinburg; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT a stewardship agreement be developed by the City of Vaughan, Kleinburg and Area Residents Association (KARA), and TRCA for the management of the subject lands; THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project. Negotiations have been conducted with Paul Gardner, Manager of Parks Development, City of Vaughan. At the City of Vaughan Council Meeting of February 25, 2002, a resolution was adopted, directing city staff to prepare a report regarding a request from KARA that the City of Vaughan convey approximately 14 hectares of Open Space lands adjacent to Islington Avenue in the Millview (Kleinburg North) Subdivision to the TRCA. It is proposed that the subject lands would be placed under TRCA stewardship in a similar manner that Foster Woods was conveyed to the TRCA in 1992. On March 29, 2004, Vaughan Council approved the conveyance of this Open Space land in north Kleinburg to the TRCA for regeneration purposes, in partnership with the City of Vaughan and KARA. 269 The Millview subdivision Open Space is a large tract of land, devoid of trees, and is located immediately'adjacent to Highway No. 27 / Islington Avenue in north Kleinburg. KARA requests that this vacant parcel of land be regenerated into a forested area. City of Vaughan Parks and Recreation staff feel that there is sufficient land to accommodate KARA's wishes. TRCA staff concur with this approach and will provide assistance in the reforestation of this area, as well as the development of a trail head linking the East Humber River valley corridor to the east. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. Plantings: The land to be conveyed to the TRCA will be extensively planted with native tree, shrub and herbaceous species. RATIONALE With its linkage to the East Humber River valley corridor, the subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed to place the subject parcel under management with the City of Vaughan. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: April 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 270 Attachment 1 F:001Plair and Coltn.rvnuor c.-:mponent I Humber River Wale: shed • 111 3 • %MIL RAL 11 ERI1AGF I ANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUIStrION PRII,IFCT 200- o2)35.1 T • - 1' o • • he Corporaion th0 City at Vaughar • • . • . • • ..f....•,.... .... . I. L 4..: '''' ' 'Mr -•• \..:-. '''. N., • I. s' . ' ) 11: • - .. -• •• - r CFN 3 C 1.13 1 : N..., 1 A.'4 ''' . .'• ■-_• I .. ( . e. .1, • r2. ...,, ; is:s s • ,,, - ,.... . . 11. : . - - • . . A. • .. ..6 ... ., ••••• .. • , --",:. -i . • .. . .••••••• ., ; 7.. ' s‘• . I '‘. .: .• -.• • __.„--.•_. 1 . . • . • • . : \ _..::%r . ... ..-•.•1, I 1' ,• ,1.. ■ ..\ " \• .. •.., .. ^ al.. 4, i , a ...;,, , . a` . il...l 1.. .' J 7 - .• .' 4 .. • . . . ...* I I % • • ••••7f. . 1r i . . ---- -- - - _ _ .•..% , . . 1 ‘ 1---"-Th ', • : %,.... : • '''., Ct. : . t I tr' 4 NI : , -:- • ; ..•"; 1 ...•-• _...,;00 E • 1 .... - - 0 „! - ■••_..-•p,. 2 •••• - s• -,......• % • . % • .-- . f 1••• et ..1„. .' ... l • % • .- . "'",1 1 lt,STtr4111) A: • ..-•d• :""""1,........ l. 4 'NI • ;*!?? 1%P0,-.."-••• , ......„*,-, - •••••• , CP •V.i.."..C•i-• 1.1 ::1• t .1 • je ...e.4••• ■ • • 41 • . . - • • • e • r •-• ••••'"-•.•7 • 1 • .v.0 4 .• .6 • ) :1,0 • .? ; -/Xvir• Y. • • •-• aft • / f•-• i'•••:•/ "i \ .. .0. . .. ••„...;;0.1 •• • .''/.1717";--4. •• .0;1; • • ...• C-11• • l 4L• • • - si -d• • V-, • N. t. • ••1:;:, , "it - -- -''-'t ..-.,••• • C ••••• .11 Ti - rl'.. r' ,_,• • •••!•••: a.e. ",.).•%sirtili erfr.:•it,7 ---- .t,:),-; ••1: g 1 E 11Ku`... * ' -,„ ■,.. --..:•.- / 1 . . s . ... ... . V, s •••••• y - • -. r •i-r,.'35:tly. •..... . • • • ..1 •••' 7-, I T a 1 -4.--z.:,•-. ',.•.•,,,sk), ,. :_....• ,•.,.... .1,...,1.. - ••;*:' ) cf.: -••'•i •:"■•••.), C%;; ,t . •••1' .• •:r.., ' I .q t : ' .• I :1•••.1.••A- •-. • • • -•-- . I . - - - , .. • r-j 1 ..11 .- - 9 : -•-.. , .1..' P • ' . -• - ' • , • ;•!1,1•• I 2. .,i- .. 1 -_-:: l'i's -. ; ,.. .1., . ' Ili' , ; I, • ... - .. .... - . ••- • • \___ - . .-- ....1 • • ) ..„:. 4, • ' q".;- r. • .i. . ) " • _. i ..1 NN. • . 1 ??..-. 7-1; • I 1/4.. 4. l' . ... .. ........ • • •:':•,Y/. • • • • • •y:)/.• ••• • -? . . . • "4 • • ...... • . •,.7). • • • • ▪ / .///' • • • t•- • ,• • / • ." .• . • ' • , .1' • •• o• -• .„ ■ • rtaNallt: OIL . . afg ra •,:l_aJOI'l ' ..,..=-.---.' • .6.,• 'd• . -_,6,e.,....•_ . • _._.■-■-■ •••-••••-'• ' -i. . • . ,...,;'-'-. J'Cla - ••••-•,1,15!V•.1'... . 4 • '•• V '... • •••• .. - ,":"*-1:.--::•'. 1. r 1 ; :4 • .. .-:-:-.42'': .- /.'r • .. . . ......•"`• r 1: . , . . •:•••••111.4••• .. ..".•••••••••• • ..,,..•... - . 7 - .-11'. . "8":!,`; • •.• :-•-...t.::1: j. _V-::::_-..-.;.•/- • ' ' • ' " ' - • / •1 mcAt A409 NEE= SUBJEC PROPERT, • .- TFCCP, t A NIOS 271 RES.#B86/04 - THE CITY OF TORONTO Request for Permanent Easement for a 400 mm Diameter Watermain Don River Watershed, City of Toronto, CFN 35333. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a 400 mm diameter watermain, west of Dawes Road in Taylor Creek Park, Don River watershed, City of Toronto. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a 400 mm diameter watermain, west of Dawes Road in Taylor Creek Park, Don River watershed, City of Toronto; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.48 hectares (1.19 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for a 400 mm diameter watermain, said land being west of Dawes Road in Taylor Creek Park, as shown on an easement plan prepared by Johnson Sustronk Weinstein + Associates, Job No. 03 -23, dated March 1, 2004; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the City of Toronto is to fully Indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Toronto; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA; 272 THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto has formally requested a permanent easement for a new 400 mm diameter watermain, west of Dawes Road in Taylor Creek Park. The proposed watermain is required to replace an existing watermain that runs through Taylor Creek Park. The existing watermain has deteriorated and is inaccessible for maintenance. The deteriorated watermain will be abandoned after the new watermain has been commissioned and the existing easement will then be de- registered. The watermain is situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Taylor / Massey Creek. A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for construction of the proposed works has been submitted and will be considered by the Executive Committee at a future meeting. The lands subject to the permanent easement are owned by TRCA and are managed by the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement will also be required. The submitted engineering drawings show the locations of both easements. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from the Township of East York on November 24, 1961 under the Don River Flood Plain Lands Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submission under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent and temporary easement locations is attached. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: April 21, 2004 Attachments: 1 273 Attachment 1 274 RES.#B87/04 - TEE IT UP PROPOSAL - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA CFN 34757. Proposal to lease approximately 9.8 hectares (24.2 acres) of land for up to twenty years at the Claireville Conservation Area to develop a year -round practice golf facility. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been requested by Tee It Up to enter into a long -term lease arrangement for lands situated within the Claireville Conservation Area; WHEREAS it Is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out In Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with Tee It Up in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a long -term lease of approximately 9.8 hectares (24.2 acres), more or less, with Tee it Up for the development of a year -round practice golf facility, said land being Part of Lot 15, Concession 9, East of Hurontario Street, designated as Parts 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 on Plan 43R- 22686, together with a shared access road with Wild Water Kingdom over Parts 2 and 26 on Plan 43R- 22686, subject to TRCA retaining a right -of -way over Parts 2, 6, 7, 8, and 26 on Plan 43R -22686 or equivalent access to the reservoir for management purposes, in the City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel; THAT the lease with Tee It Up be premised on the following: (a) the initial term of the lease will be for fifteen years with a renewal option for an additional five years; (b) the lease rate is to be as follows: (1) Base rent of $30,000 per year to be increased by the Consumer Price Index yearly; (ii) Percentage rent of 3% of gross revenue for years one through five inclusive; (iii) Percentage rent of 5% of gross revenue for the remainder of the term. (c) Tee It Up will be solely responsible for all costs associated with the construction of the driving range; (d) any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the TRCA's solicitor. THAT an archaeological review is to be completed at the expense of Tee It Up with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of the TRCA; THAT the granting of this lease be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended; 275 AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan, approved by the TRCA on February 28, 1997, identified parcels of land within Claireville Conservation Area, where opportunities may exist for the TRCA to enter into long -term lease development arrangements with the private sector or others. The subject parcel is one of three areas within Claireville that was identified for intensive use. A Claireville Committee was established to advise on the implementation of the Plan and will be advised of the Tee It Up proposal. The potential development site is at the southeast corner of Steeles and Finch Avenues, and directly north of Wild Water Kingdom as shown on the attached sketch. The total area is approximately 9.795 hectares (24.2 acres) in size. Access to the site is through a shared roadway at the Wild Water Kingdom entrance on Finch Avenue. A right -of -way currently exists through the site that allows the TRCA to access the reservoir and other lands for management purposes. This right -of -way or equivalent access will continue to be part of the proposed development. A Request for Proposal for lease and development of the subject lands was circulated in 1998. Through this process several proposals were considered, including a hotel and short hole golf course developments, however, after protracted negotiations the proponents withdrew. Tee It Up approached the TRCA earlier this year regarding the development of the subject property for a year -round practice facility designed to appeal to the avid golfer who is concerned with improving his /her game on a practice range that will simulate the conditions and experiences of a real golf course. The facility will feature state -of- the -art automated tee equipment, fully heated tee boxes, simulated sand and water hazards, chipping and putting greens built to PGA standards, professional instructors and a full service pro shop. RATIONALE Tee It Up has presented a sound business plan, and the proposed use conforms to the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan and is complementary to Wild Water Kingdom. The development will produce a Tong -term revenue stream to the TRCA and provide a unique golfing experience to the community. FINANCIAL DETAILS All planning and construction costs for the development is the responsibility of Tee It Up. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Ron Deweli, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Date: April 02, 2004 Attachments: 1 276 Attachment 1 ,., ' '7--• 4 *--.1-,--=- "-EL •- LP IT.C.PCSAL C..AIREVI.L CONSOIVA-ICN AREA • •• •*: -' ". • 40 11•CL•"" -- -- — 7 .." C5N 3z7;i7 •;,.. . _ N: - .--. - 9- -i - - ' 4L. ss IAM- - :: ::. ••:-=:. ze- ,f.,...,---t-- hv .. . • ,.... i•--, 7 , --•-:-......_ '/: •:i .. .....„ i . .1 liv20..,r7..,, , ,. .11 _ 7 7,..,7-.. --j:. . . \ y 4, - .e • - ri, '. _. -.4:..- ''' ... " - 'Z'Ite ''. .r .•:. 1 ••••4•efe- ,,,-... .. . '. ' • -IL,---r-e 3.---- .... • :•••;4.....,,.;.",.., : :... . or._ .....4 . . (f: -0;e7:-.x .., • r •-:' .:::: li ' ..--•••*: ,..•••*4 .. 57. ;0%," ..4- • - 4.,,1 ' .-*1 ' t i !...• .• I. -:-...?"..;., , ' -; ... ) • - •i :).l;i. ii:: .. • . ' •?:;.. • :' *,,a - ' ••• .q./.' '. . .... A . 4 • al. . •• • )1111 .• ... 4 • . • .• .' :'.::,../• ..j7.•";-n-e7.."'".4* •.---.-. •.'• .- • 7.- . ..; " . ' / • 4 ?■• ' .. -, . • : • 4) ,. .. : • • .i. - - „:.• .P.' , . •.%,• , • . , ' . i •' 1.• '• .• • ;17:•■••. • .. :-• ' ff.' • ••-ei , . - ' :1- " •• •• • \ L . / . igi'.•• . .: ; . .. 1"11 • ; . • :::' .._111. • ..1,:: •• • k 1 l -..‘k.:Cro..:t:7• 111;1:1::f..: • • ...44. VII • 1 ' It j..14111■'; .. **( • Ila:1) 'I • ''• . \ .4. .. • .;..'s•Xli i it. ; • •,..-e.: .....11$ II , • • */*//1%..7; • • • .1 • •• • •••' • • • ) • • *. • 'A /.)).?-*/ • • . - • • ' ';* • •••• • • • JJ ■1 • • • - - "i • .v0E11 it:itteDct • • • • )'•„••• • f • .-). ••••• / I .• • 4' k. • - -e- •••• • ..* ..• • --.••■•••■,-e===1' '2../C.T.1 A. *1:7 7.. ..41,..t----fr , • - .. .....• • . ... 414-"ra-=-7--"•2--7r.,- azz.1.41_,. ;./ . -1. , • , •;id.r. • •- ••. • r4"▪ ' - .." / .l7-;7••"''' ' . F .,l.• • - .. •-• • • • - ' g---,-.:•••.:41::\ i . 1)... -.- l'.. "="- -7 -.- •,;; - • • ...* ..* •• .,* ^1 - . -,?, ' . . .). 1.4., V • ' '-i -ris. s • • - • • . • . • . . • • k L • • . I .•• • = "AS - - • ,/ • ••:, • i1: . .., , : .. •. 4 I. lt- I • " • .... .': -.- ..C'.4.t1;:' . %, % --7,-_•••••:ro It. 4:t 1 --7'-- ' •-' • • a:. if: .. !'. if - .): . •=. ; .... •',.--.- .2' 2:-..o.„4.14yirn F I :;. ...f. I ': fl r• '‘•;71_..'•-•:' -- ■-4'''' .•P- .: • ..)'•41:.-_,•.''.ii: 7:- .11141 f 1.,:ri".. r R,.., r It - A 11 el'd , -f■-•L'---..A('- 'II' • . •tro .:: • • •-• •-v•- • rt .i.....1!, .1.. .D.;,••.f - 11. :ILI' .."1;r1)f.'f* • CLAIREVu_LE RESERVDIR A i....;‘, .1 -1 • 1 i?..1' ,1C1 %fr -';I'; ''' ■-.1; 1. A:-‘vf. k...y. 'f.f':4:;,.. i,:c-vr;,..'•.%-.. ."-_,‘.-,,.•t„--,:... • .-. R—..K - '1. ' •••:_.,..*;••••g. - - .- 0 • As uKE ..: •— • , i., w41:11 ....4:: A ',1' cAtAPGRO!IVI -! y • - i!' 'le r• " .. 7 *. 3.1'1 r .. ": • : •-• *:. ' • '. . • .i •"*, *.c .1 14- • •• • ) : • • —, •;;•" .411 , . . • t • • •• S' 11COnSgraragon ?; for The Uwe,: Cy • .441;47'.. • / TRCA1 ANDS • %;1-;:•••.-----7.7--- $%4<1. • 7 • • 277 RES. #888/04 - YORK PEEL DURHAM TORONTO/ CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES MORAINE COALITION GROUNDWATER STUDY - STATUS UPDATE AND 2004 PROGRAM Update on the status of the York Peel Durham Toronto and Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition (CAMC) groundwater initiatives and approval of initial YPDT 2004 budget components. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Earthfx Incorporated be awarded the contract to continue to provide ongoing database and website management services to the partner agencies at a cost not to exceed $50,000 excluding GST; THAT Earthfx Incorporated be awarded the contract to continue to provide ongoing numerical groundwater modeling services to the partner agencies at a cost not to exceed $100,000 excluding GST; THAT an agreement with Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) be negotiated to provide ongoing geoscience services in 2004 at a cost not to exceed $50,000; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #2/04, held on April 16, 2004, Resolution #D25/04 was recommended to the Authority for consideration at Authority Meeting #4/04, to be held on April 30, 2004, as follows: THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition (CAMC) staff be directed to implement the components of the 2004 work plan of the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) Groundwater Management Strategy Study; THAT an agreement be established with the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) to provide ongoing geoscience services in 2004; THAT an agreement be established with Earthfx Incorporated to continue to provide ongoing modeling, database and website management services to the partner agencies; AND FURTHER THAT staff extend an offer to the Planning and Public Works Committees at the Regions of York, Peel, Durham and the City of Toronto, as well as the boards of the partner conservation authorities, to make a formal presentation of the study progress. 278 RATIONALE Over the past few months the YPDT /CAMC Team has been assessing the progress of both the modeling study and the database project, both being undertaken by Earthfx Inc. Both the database management and numerical groundwater modeling projects are very specialized in nature with only a few firms in southern Ontario having the capability to provide the required services. Over 2003, the modeling project has received accolades from a number of key internationally known groundwater researchers including Dr. Frank Schwartz from the University of Ohio and Dr. Alfonso Rivera from the Geological Survey of Canada. Staff continue to be tremendously pleased with the quality and the cost effectiveness of the modeling services received from Earthfx. The model is of a world class status and will go a long way to assisting staff in making key water management decisions into the future. The database project has also proven to be a solid model for storing water related data for the project partners. The model is recognized by the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and the Ministry of Natural Resources as a provincially solid model. Peel and York Regions, as well as the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority in particular, continue to make extensive use of the database, utilizing Earthfx staff to build on the database and the associated utilities that have been assembled. As an example, during 2003 staff from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority worked with Earthfx staff to add surface water data management tools to the database, thus increasing its overall effectiveness as a water management tool. Key aspects of the database project that will be undertaken in the 2004 work plan include: • Migration of the YPDT website from Earthfx to a YPDT site; • Generation of a quality control table for querying out higher quality data (e.g. all wells with higher quality water levels; all wells that have a detailed geological description, etc.); • Incorporating an extensive borehole database from the Ontario Geological Survey; • Incorporating all of the data from the Geological Survey of Canada database; • Further enhancement to the surface water management graphing tools. Staff continue to be pleased with the deliverables and the cost effectiveness of Earthfx in assisting the partnership with moving forward. Given the successes that the partner agencies are having with both projects, staff are recommending that the modeling and the linked database project both be funded through 2004 to build on the successes that have been achieved to date. It is important that Earthfx continue to be the consultant to undertake the work since key aspects of the 2004 work program are tied to, and build on work that has already been undertaken by Earthfx. The successful completion of the 2004 work plan will depend on the cost efficiencies that will be achieved by continuing the projects using Earthfx. 279 From 2001 through 2003 the YPDT /CAMC team has fostered and established a close working partnership with the GSC. The GSC is nearing completion of their work on the Oak Ridges Moraine, however Dr. Dave Sharpe and his colleagues from the GSC continue to meet with the YPDT /CAMC team to provide their expertise pertaining to the geological and hydrogeological setting in the Oak Ridges Moraine area. There continues to be internal pressure within the GSC for having their staff focus on other areas across Canada, however in 2004 GSC remains willing to make some of Dr. Sharpe's time available to the YPDT /CAMC team provided there is some level of financial support. The YPDT steering committee has recommended that this be a priority for the study during 2004 and that $50,000 be reserved and directed to the GSC once an agreement is reached. In 2004, GSC staff will specifically provide expertise related to geophysical data in the YPDT area. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available in the 2004 budget for the YPDT study, account #115 -90. Report prepared by: Steve Holysh, 905 - 847 -7430, extension 246 For Information contact: Don Ford, extension 5369 Date: April 27, 2004 RES. #B89/04 - TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE TENDERS ESO4 -08 Tender for the supply and delivery of armour stone for Fishleigh Drive Project, City of Toronto. The award of contract ESO4 -08 for the supply and delivery of 2,500 tonnes of armour stone. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender ESO4 -08 for the supply and delivery of armour stone be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $100,200 excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND This tender was an open public tender and was advertised in the Daily Commercial News. Five stone suppliers submitted sealed bids, which were reviewed by staff as follows: 280 SUMMARY OF UNIT PRICES (EXCLUDING G.S.T.) FOR THE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF APPROXIMATELY 2,500 TONNES OF 4 -6 TONNES ARMOUR STONE BIDDERS ESO4 -08: ARMOUR STONE (4 -6 Tonne) Dufferin Aggregate $41.60 J.C. Rock Ltd. $40.08 Lafarge Construction Materials $49.00 Nelson Aggregate Co. $65.16 Dig -Con International $50.00 RATIONALE Sealed bids were received from 5 stone suppliers, which were opened Friday, April 16, 2004 at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee. Staff have reviewed the tender and recommend that the lowest quotation received from J.C. Rock Ltd. be accepted for the supply and delivery of armour stone at a unit cost of $40.08 per tonne, excluding GST. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are budgeted in the "Fishleigh Drive Project, City of Toronto" account, number 138 -03. Report prepared by: Joe DeIle Fave, 416- 392 -9724 For Information contact: Joe DeIle Fave, 416- 392 -9724 Date: April 22, 2004 RES. #B90/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TENDER OPENING SUB COMMITTEE TENDERS ESO4 -05 AND ESO4 -06 Tenders for the supply and delivery of 300 -600mm rip rap stone and 4 -6 tonne armour stone for the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project, City of Toronto. The award of contracts ESO4 -05 for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone and ESO4 -06 for the supply and delivery of armour stone. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender ESO4 -05 for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $128,760 excluding GST; AND FURTHER THAT Tender ESO4 -06 for the supply and delivery of armour stone also be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $400,800 excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND These tenders were open to the public and were advertised in the Daily Commercial News. 281 Five suppliers provided sealed bids, which were reviewed by staff as follows: SUMMARY OF UNIT PRICES (EXCLUDING G.S.T.) FOR THE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF APPROXIMATELY 6,000 TONNES OF 300mm to 600mm RIP RAP STONE 10,000 TONNES OF 4 TO 6 TONNE ARMOUR STONE BIDDERS ESO4 -05: RIP RAP (300 -600 mm) ESO4 -06: ARMOUR STONE (4 -6 Tonne) Dufferin Aggregates $27.96 $41.60 J.C. Rock Ltd. $21.46 $40.08 Lafarge Construction Materials $28.20 $49.00 Nelson Aggregates $24.27 $65.16 Dig -Con International $46.00 $50.00 RATIONALE Sealed bids were received from 5 quarry stone suppliers, which were opened Friday, April 16, 2004 at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee. Staff have reviewed the Tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received from J.C. Rock Ltd. be accepted for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone at a unit cost of $21.46 per tonne (excluding G.S.T.), and the lowest quotation received from J.C. Rock Ltd. be accepted for the supply and delivery of armour stone at a unit cost of $40.08 per tonne (excluding G.S.T.) FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are identified in the "Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project, City of Toronto" account, however funding is subject to confirmation of funding being available from the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Report prepared by: Joe Delle Fave, 416- 392 -9724 For Information contact: Joe DeIle Fave, 416- 392 -9724 Date: April 21, 2004 RES. #B91/04 - HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED HSPF MODEL: WATER QUALITY AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS Agreement with HCCL to develop and calibrate the Humber River Watershed HSPF model for water quality and hydrology under existing conditions and three future land use management scenarios. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall 282 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the team HCCL be retained to develop and calibrate the HSPF model for the Humber River watershed at a total cost not to exceed an approved budget of $135,000 plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), in partnership with its member municipalities and other stakeholders, is in the early stages of developing an integrated watershed plan for the Humber River watershed. Building upon the 1997 "Strategy for a Healthy Humber ", the plan will provide a technical basis for managing land and water resources in support of the overall goal of preserving and regenerating the cultural and natural heritage of the watershed. Existing and future scenarios will be evaluated in an integrated manner for a wide range of environmental, social and economic issues. Development of a watershed model that simulates water quality, hydrology and stormwater management under alternative land cover scenarios will help guide land and water use decisions in the Humber River watershed. The HSPF model, selected for this project, was initially developed by the City of Toronto in its Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP) in 2003, and later revised in the '905 area' (north of Steeles) as part of TRCA's Humber River Water Budget Model. The Toronto WWFMMP HSPF model was developed for existing conditions and various stormwater management scenarios, including a preferred strategy, representing the 25 -year implementation plan. A total of 103 unit response functions (URFs) were developed in the City of Toronto portion of the model to represent various combinations of land -use, soil type and internal drainage connectivity (e.g. roof areas discharging to lawns, roof areas directly connected to storm sewers, etc.). A more simplified approach was used to model the '905 area', based on Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping provided by TRCA. The Toronto WWFMMP '905 area' submodel was reconstructed in the TRCA Water Budget Model using the Unit Response Function (URF) methodology for existing conditions and one future build -out scenario. Twenty -eight URFs were selected for use in the '905 area' water budget submodel. The existing conditions model was calibrated to available flow gauge data. Water quality was not simulated and the revised water budget model contains only a small number of stormwater management ponds currently in the watershed. This model and the Toronto WWFMMP '416 submodel' form the basis for modeling work proposed in this project. The overall objective of this project is to model stream flow and water quality as a basis for assessing improvements under various alternative land cover and stormwater management scenarios in the Humber River watershed Model scenarios for the Humber watershed plan will include existing conditions and the following three future scenarios: 283 1. The Toronto WWFMMP 25 -year implementation plan, plus full buildout of approved Regional and Local Municipal Official Plans (OPs) in '905 area', with full implementation of the 'current management approach'. The 'current management approach' includes conformance with land use constraints, implementation of TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, and implementation of current stormwater best management practices (new ponds etc.). 2. The previous scenario, with full implementation of TRCA's stormwater pond retrofit strategy. 3. The Toronto WWFMMP 100 -year implementation plan, with additional buildout in the '905 area', and an 'enhanced management approach.' This enhanced approach includes everything in the current approach plus implementation of: (i) TRCA's Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy target (increase in natural cover from 22 to 38 %), (ii) the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (including buildout in settlement areas), (iii) selected on -farm best management practices (e.g. riparian buffers), and (iv) additional lot level, conveyance and end -of -pipe stormwater management approaches in urban areas (e.g. backyard soak away pits, greenroofs in commercial /industrial areas, infiltration systems), in addition to TRCA's pond retrofit strategy. RATIONALE Four consulting firms were invited to bid on the Humber River watershed HSPF modeling project: XCG Consulting limited, Marshall Macklin Monaghan, HCCL, and EBNFLO Environmental. An upset limit of $135,000 + GST was set for the project. Marshall Macklin Monaghan declined our invitation to submit a proposal. The remaining three teams submitted proposals, as follows: 1. XCG $98,950 2. HCCL $90,800 3. EBNFLO $113,900 The TRCA selection committee reviewed the proposals, based on the following evaluation criteria: • understanding of assignment and relevant experience of team; • demonstrated previous work in HSPF modeling; • proposed approach; • quality of proposal; • ability to meet timelines; • cost. The selection committee recommended HCCL as the consultant that best met the evaluation criteria. The basis for selection of HCCL included: • demonstrated experience with development and calibration of the HSPF model; • strong prior knowledge of HSPF modeling in the Humber River watershed; • comprehensive proposal with clear identification of potential problems and a detailed cost breakdown by task; • lower overall cost. 284 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE A detailed terms of reference has been prepared to guide this work. The allocated budget ($135,000) allows for expansion of the scope of work if model results reveal that re- calibration of the existing 416 and 905 submodels is required. The final products will consist of: 1. four copies of the final report, containing full documentation of model set -up and calibration procedures, and presentation /interpretation of results; 2. electronic copy of the HSPF model; 3. electronic copy of large colour graphics for use by the printer (.eps or JPEG format, minimum 125 dpi resolution); 4. electronic copy of all report documents and supporting files on CD -ROM. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding support for this project is provided from the York, Peel and Toronto capital budgets. Report prepared by: Tim Van Seters, extension 5337 For Information contact: Tim Van Seters, extension 5337 Date: April 23, 2004 RES.#B92/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed, 388270 Ontario Ltd., CFN 35386. Purchase of property located at the southeast corner of Bayly Street and Squires Beach Road, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 11.01 hectares (27.20 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from 388270 Ontario Ltd., being Part of Lots 15 and 16, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and designated as Blocks 11, 16, 19, and 21 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Donevan Fleischmann Petrich Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 2003 - 251 -3, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, located at the southeast corner of Bayly Street and Squires Beach Road; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; 285 THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Rodger B. Miller of 388270 Ontario Ltd. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Duffins Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Through the review of Consent Application LD 218/2003, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands which are comprised of a woodlot and wetland feature found along a tributary of the Duffins Creek. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent TRCA lands, it is estimated that the taxes for this property will be approximately $3,500. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: May 03, 2004 Attachments: 1 286 Attachment 1 7iiiTURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISi I ION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Ftaad Plain and Coriser aticii Cotnpo,ent, Di(firu Creek Ws;ershed 3E6270 Ontario Ltd. CFN 35356 14,40 II X U_ tic GAYLY ST_ SUBJECT PROPERTY r r '1 7 onservat n for The Living City .TRCA LANDS MEW SUBJECT PROPERTY 287 RES.#B93/04 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Lake Ontario Waterfront Watershed, City of Toronto Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, CFN 30730. Purchase of two Crown waterlots at the foot of Port Union Road, Lake Ontario shoreline, City of Toronto (formerly in the Geographic Townships of Scarborough and Pickering), in the Toronto East Community Council Area, to facilitate the construction of the Phase I Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan Project. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT two Crown waterlots comprising a total of 14.029 hectares (34.65) acres, more or less, be purchased from Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario to facilitate the construction of Phase I of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan, said lots being Part of Lots 1 & 2, Concession D, City of Toronto (formerly in the Geographic Township of Scarborough) and Part of Lot 35, Range 1, BFC, City of Toronto (formerly In the Geographic Township of Pickering) and further designated as Parts 1 & 2 on Registered Plan 66R- 20976; THAT the purchase price be $69,300.00, plus G.S.T.; THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Meeting #5/98, held on June 26, 1998, the Authority adopted Resolution #A126/98 as follows: THAT the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project Concept Plan be endorsed and submitted to the Minister of Environment for approval under the Environmental Assessment Act; THAT staff be directed to prepare a "Project" based on the Concept Plan and including a funding partnership for approval by the Authority and the City of Toronto; AND FURTHER THAT staff continue with acquisition efforts to achieve the objectives of the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project Concept Plan. 288 The Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan is being undertaken in two phases. Phase I involves construction between the Highland Creek and Chesterton Shores Road. Phase II will involve construction on the shoreline between Chesterton Shores Road and the Rouge River. The TRCA has been acquiring properties in the Chesterton Shores Road vicinity for a number of years under various Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration and Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Projects. However, key areas of the shoreline remained in private and provincial ownership. In order to implement Phase I of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan, a total of three private lots were acquired by the TRCA (Annis, Brown and Manson properties), together with approximately one kilometre of shoreline owned by CNR. Officials at the Ministry of Natural Resources advised they would be prepared to deal with the Crown land issue after the Environmental Assessment approval was received. The Minister of Environment's approval of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project under the Environmental Assessment Act was received on May 2, 2001, and negotiations for the acquisition of the Crown lands was initiated with officials at the Ministry of Natural Resources. In accordance with ministry policy, the disposal and sale of Crown land must be at market value. Similarly, TRCA property is generally sold to the province at market value. The purchase price is supported by an appraisal on hand. Construction on the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project began in September, 2002 and has been allowed to proceed on Crown land through a work permit under the Public Lands Act. The acquisition of the Crown lands will complete the property requirements for Phase I of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan. Six private properties, together with additional Crown lands, need to be acquired to implement Phase II of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the properties. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject properties fall within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition along the Lake Ontario shoreline. These properties are key to the regeneration of the Lake Ontario shoreline between the Highland Creek and Rouge River watersheds. The acquisition of the provincial waterlots will complete the TRCA's property acquisition requirements for Phase I of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE These parcels of land, upon completion of construction of the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Plan, will be turned over to the City of Toronto who will be responsible for taxes and maintenance under the terms of the existing management agreement. 289 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this acquisition are available through the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) project funding account and will be charged to account 223 -15. TRCA must seek approval from the TWRC for this expenditure. Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 Date: May 03, 2004 Attachments: 1 290 Attachment 1 291 RES. #B94/04 - 2004 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICES Award of contract for the Laboratory Analytical Services in support of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) 2004 environmental monitoring programs. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Entech Laboratories be awarded the contract for Items A through E as outlined in the 2004 Laboratory Analytical Services Contract Document ES 04 -02, at a cost not to exceed $123,697.35 (including GST). CARRIED BACKGROUND The Environmental Services and Resource Science Sections of TRCA require laboratory analytical services in support of three major programs which are outlined as follows: Waterfront Monitoring Program Since 1975, the TRCA has conducted environmental monitoring programs to describe biological, physical and chemical conditions in the vicinity of waterfront parks, habitat projects and in support of the Toronto Remedial Action Plan. Special studies have been conducted to examine the sediment quality, water quality, sediment deposition rates, bottom substrate documentation and biomonitoring surveys using fresh clams and water currents associated with these projects - (Item A). Regional Monitoring Program The second program requires laboratory analysis of water samples collected as part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. Water samples collected routinely or as part of specialized water quality monitoring through the Regional Monitoring Network will be used to report on surface and ground water quality conditions in the regions watersheds. Samples will be analysed for bacteria, metals, nutrients and conventional water quality parameters - (Item B, C, D). Lakefill Quality Control Program The Lakefill Quality Control Program (LFQCP) requires laboratory services to analyze soil samples taken at various lakefilling sites across the waterfront. The analytical results are used to verify that soil generated from various fill sources meet the Ministry of Environments lakefilling criteria. The Inland Fill Quality Control Program (IQCP) requires laboratory services to analyze soil samples taken at various landfilling sites located on TRCA -owned lands. The analytical results are used to verify that soil generated from various fill sources meet TRCA quality requirements. Site Decommissioning and Remediation: Laboratory services are required to undertake soil characterization and soil remediation work on various TRCA -owned lands - (Item E). RATIONALE The Tender Opening Sub - Committee opened tenders for contract ES 04 -02 for the 2004 laboratory analytical services. The results of the tender opening are as follows: 292 COMPANY ITEMIZED QUOTES TOTAL (Incl. GST) Entech Laboratories 6820 Kitimat Road, Unit 4 Mississauga, ON L5N 5M3 Item A: $26,402.25 $123,697.35 Item B: $23,507.90 Item C: $22,191.80 Item D: $37,738.90 Item E: $13,856.50 AMEC Earth & Environmental 160 Traders Boulevard, Unit 4 Mississauga, ON L4Z 3K7 Item A: $28,328.25 $147,649.30 Item B: $38,455.80 Item C: $36,380.00 Item D: $52,135.75 Item E: $17,762.00 Philip Environmental 5735 McAdam Road Mississauga, ON L4Z 1N9 Item A: $31,195.18 $127,035.75 Item B: $33,566.55 Item C: $28,649.25 Item D: $14,265.78 Item E: $19,367.00 Maxxam Analytics Inc. 6740 Campobello Road Mississauga, ON L4Z 1P1 Item A: $35,363.50 $182,553.77 Item B: $51,227.32 Item C: $44,747.40 Item D: $28,510.15 Item E: $22,705.40 Staff have reviewed the quotations and have determined that there were no errors or omissions with the exception of Item D from Philip Environmental which did not include full pricing. It is recommended that the lowest total cost quotation from Entech Laboratories be accepted for the 2004 laboratory analytical services as it meets TRCA's requirements and specifications. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to implement the projects are available in the 2004 capital budget in accounts 240 - 01,124 -15, and 210 -19. Report prepared by: Rick Portiss, extension 5302 For Information contact: Rick Portiss, extension 5302 Date: May 5, 2004 293 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B95 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Dave Ryan THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.1 - 9.1.15 and 9.1.43 - 9.1.50, with the exception of Minor Works permits 9.1.4 - 9.1.6, 9.1.8, 9.1.9, 9.1.11 and 9.1.13), which are listed below. RES. #B96 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Dave Ryan CARRIED THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications 9.1.4 - 9.1.6, 9.1.8, 9.1.9, 9.1.11 and 9.1.13, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF PICKERING 9.1.1 FAIRPORT FRENCHMANS BAY LIMITED To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 23, 24, Concession RANGE 3 BFC, (1295 Wharf Street), in the Pickering Town Of, Frenchman's Bay Watershed as located on the property owned by Fairport Frenchmans Bay Limited. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Frenchman's Bay and regrade within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the replacement of an existing dock facility and the construction of a new floating dock within Frenchman's Bay. 294 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009 in accordance with the . following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Dock 'A' Replacement Site Plan, Sheet No. 1, prepared by Shoreplan Engineering Limited, revised April 6, 2004, received April 27, 2004. • Layout, Sheet No. S -1, prepared by Poralu Marine, revised January 14, 2004, received February 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Frenchman's Bay and regrade within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the replacement of an existing dock facility and the construction of a new floating dock. The subject lands are located south of Wharf Street, at the end of Liverpool Road. The new floating dock facility will service the adjacent condominium townhouse development which is currently being developed (O.Reg. 158 Permit No. C- 03063). The existing dock is approximately 146 metres (480 feet) long. The new dock facility will extend 156 metres (512 feet) into Frenchman's Bay and accommodate up to 58 dock slips. These slips will be created as condominium units in the adjacent townhouse development are sold. A series of ten (10) piles will be driven from a barge in order to construct the new dock. Control of Flooding: Although the proposed new dock is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, it is a replacement of an older existing wooden dock that is in a current state of disrepair. As the new dock consists of floating polyethylene buoys, it will not impact the limits of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Technical staff has reviewed the proposed dock facility and notes that it will not adversely affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from the entering Frenchman's Bay. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Ecological staff has determined that the proposed dock facility does not constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) to fish habitat, and as such, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). No other significant natural resources will be affected by the proposed dock. Plantings As no vegetation will be removed, no plantings are required as part of this application. 295 Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35223 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 079 /04 /PICK 9.1.2 TRANS - NORTHERN PIPELINES INCORPORATED To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 19, Concession 4, (Taunton Road and Brock Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Trans - Northern Pipelines Incorporated. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek to facilitate in the replacement of a section of a pipeline owned by Trans - Northern Pipelines. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. A -1, Conceptual Sediment and Erosion Control: Site 176, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated April 2004, received April 16, 2004. • Drawing No. A -2, Typical Siltation Fencing Detail, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated April 2004, received April 16, 2004. • Drawing No. A -3, Typical Pipeline Construction in Old Field Meadow Habitat, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated April 2004, received April 16, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek to facilitate the replacement of a 30 metre section of pipeline owned by Trans - Northern Pipeline Incorporated (TNPI). The location of the proposed works is west of Brock Road on the north side of Taunton Road. TNPI has proposed the replacement works as part of a regular maintenance schedule for its network of pipelines. The pipeline replacement will involve the excavation of a 3 metre wide trench to expose the pipeline to a depth of 60 centimetres for a length of approximately 30 metres. Pipeline maintenance will take place within the TNPI right -of -way which is currently sodded. Approximately 5 metres of the excavation are proposed within the Fill Regulated Area, with the remaining 25 metres of excavation proposed outside of the Fill Regulated Area. The proposed excavation site is located approximately 50 metres from the watercourse and outside the Regional Storm Flood Plain. 296 Access to the excavation site will be from an existing quarry access road to the north of the site or directly from Taunton Road. TRCA staff has determined that the proposed work is sufficiently set back from the top of bank and that there are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with the proposed works. The grading and vegetation of the site will be restored to its existing condition following the completion of the proposed works. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and appropriately maintained throughout construction between the perimeter of the work site and the watercourse to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Additional silt fencing will be installed along the west and south limits of the maintenance site for a distance of 20m. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff has reviewed the application and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no in- stream works associated with this project and therefore no concerns related to fish habitat loss. No significant vegetation will be disrupted from the proposed works. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. All disturbed areas affected by the excavation of the pipeline will be restored to better than existing conditions following construction, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35338 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: April 16, 2004 Application #: 123/04/PICK CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.3 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on (Meadowcliffe Drive), in the Toronto East Community Council, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a fill regulated area to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer and ditch improvements. 297 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing P1, Plan and Profile; Drawing S -1, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan During Construction; and Drawing L -1, Tree Inventory and Landscape Restoration Planting Plan, all prepared by R. J. Burnside and Associates Limited, dated February 2004 and received on April 8, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area (Regulatory Shoreline) to facilitate the installation of a 900 mm concrete sewer pipe within the Meadowcliffe Drive right -of -way adjacent to Cudia Park. The sewer pipe is part of a larger stormwater management system for the Meadowcliffe Drive area. This stormwater management system was reviewed by TRCA staff during review of a Class Environmental Assessment. Most of the proposed system is outside of TRCA's Fill Regulated Area. The proposal includes a temporary access easement over TRCA property, approved at the March 5, 2004 Executive Committee meeting. The permit will not be released until all conditions of easement approval are satisfied. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The proposed works are located approximately 280 metres from Lake Ontario. A temporary erosion and sediment control fence will be installed between the works and the adjacent natural area of Cudia Park. Conservation of Land: The works will be carried out in the existing road right -of -way and adjacent parking lot. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Plantings Additional native plantings will be provided in an adjacent proposed stormwater facility (ditch improvements) associated with the stormwater system but not located within the Regulatory Shoreline. Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35332 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 13, 2004 298 Application #: 119/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.4 JASON JENKINS To place fill within a regulated area on (118 Three Valley Drive), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jason Jenkins. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a side addition to the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 1; Survey, Drawing No. 2; Foundation and Ground Floor Plan, Drawing 3; Roof Framing and Roof Plan; Drawing 4; Section 1 -2 and Section A -A, Drawing 5; North Side Elevation, Drawing No. 6; West Side Elevation, Drawing No. 7; South Side Elevation, Drawing 8; Typical Details, prepared by Branko Mladenov Architect, dated April 22, 2004, received April 22, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a side addition to the existing dwelling. The subject property is located west of Don Valley Parkway and North of Lawrence Avenue West. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical /slope instability issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural resources or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. 299 Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35364 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 22, 2004 Application #: 138/04/TOR 9.1.5 SILVANA PALOMBO To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 42, 43, Plan 602, (26 Arjay Crescent), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Silvana Palombo. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a new two- storey dwelling and patio. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The existing pool on the property will be filled in, the existing pool house will be removed and the existing deck will be replaced. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 0214; Site Plan, prepared by Queensgate Homes Inc., dated April 10, 2004, received April 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a new two storey dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The existing pool on the property will be filled in, the pool house will be removed and the existing deck will be replaced. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical /slope instability issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. 300 Plantings The applicant proposes new plantings as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Management Program. CFN: 35296 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 30, 2004 Application #: 106/04/TOR 9.1.6 VICKO VON STEDINGK To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 68, Plan 2343, (26 Donino Drive), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vicko Von Stedingk. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a one storey addition and deck onto the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan; Main Floor Plan; Basement Floor Plan; Second Floor Plan; Roof Plan; Front East Elevation; Rear West Elevation; Side South Elevation; and Side North Elevation, prepared by DC Designers Collaborative, received March 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a one storey addition and deck onto the rear of the existing dwelling. The property is located in a relatively flat area of Hoggs Hollow with no top -of -bank or toe -of -bank present. The one storey addition would have a total floor area of approximately 215 sq.ft. and is considered to be minor works. Control of Flooding: The property is located outside of the Regional Storm flood plain and the Hogg's Hollow SPA. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. 301 Conservation of Land: There are no significant resource features on the site and no slope issues. Plantings No new plantings are proposed. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it relates to Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions. CFN: 35305 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 26, 2004 Application #: 109/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO SOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.7 JOHN CALHOUN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13, Plan 66M -2374, (24 True Davidson Drive), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by John Calhoun. The purpose is to place fill in a fill regulated area to facilitate the construction of a rear deck. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Sketch, Model Type Rosedale, received April 22, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The minor works proposal is to construct a 28 foot x 13 foot rear deck attached to the rear of the existing house at 24 True Davidson Drive, located in the Governor's Bridge subdivision west of Bayview Avenue and south of Moore Avenue. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located in the Regional Storm Floodplain. Pollution: A temporary sediment control fence will be installed to prevent construction sediment from entering the valley. The proposed deck is sufficiently set back from the top of bank. 302 Conservation of Land: No environmental resources will be affected by the proposal. Plantings No plantings are required or included as part of the proposal. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35374 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 26, 2004 Application #: 140/04/TOR 9.1.8 ADAM VASSOS To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 2 Block A, Plan 2991, (12 Barbara Crescent), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Adam Vassos. The purpose is to place and excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a concrete patio at the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan - Ravine Permit Approval, Drawing No. 1, prepared by C.E. Dotterhill, dated March 24, 2004, received March 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place and excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The proposed works involve the construction of a french drain and a concrete patio at the rear manicured yard of the existing dwelling. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. 303 Conservation of Land: There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant is planting native shrubs and trees as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 34944 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 14, 2004 Application #: 472/03/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.9 ROSA DEPASQUALE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan 3955, (39 Valecrest Drive), in the Toronto West Community Council, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Rosa DePasquale. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the demolition of the existing home and construct a new two- storey dwelling.. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. A -1, Lower Level Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -2, First Level Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -3, Second Level Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -4, Roof Plan, Drawing No. A -5, Front Elevation, Drawing No. A -6, Rear Elevation, Drawing No. A -7, East Elevation, Drawing No. A -8, West Elevation, Drawing No. A -9, prepared by Peter Higgins Architect, dated January 19, 2004, received March 12, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill to facilitate the construction of a two storey dwelling within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The subject property is located east of Royal York Road and south of Eglinton Avenue West. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of the bank. 304 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation_ of Land: There are no geo- technical /slope instability issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural resources, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.2. - Existing Development of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35286 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 26, 2004 Application #: 103/04/TOR 9.1.10 MARIA MCLEAN To construct in a flood plain on Lot 99, Plan 66M -803, (7 Royal Palm Court), in the Toronto West Community Council, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Maria McLean. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a one storey addition onto the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. A1.0, Site Plan; Drawing No. A2.0, Basement & Ground Floor Plans; and Drawing No. A4.0, Exterior Elevations; prepared by Chris A. Montgomery Architect, prepared April 19, 2004, received April 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 305 Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a one storey addition without basement onto the rear of the existing dwelling. The addition will extend 6m (20') beyond the rear wall of the dwelling and will be setback 9.5m (31') from the adjacent valley. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: A slope stability assessment has been submitted by the applicant in support of the proposed works. This assessment has been reviewed and approved by TRCA technical staff. The proposed addition will maintain a setback of 9.5m (31') from the top -of -bank. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected to impact any significant resource features. Plantings Several new tree plantings are proposed on the property in order to compensate for the removal of one existing tree. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35354 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 23, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 135/04/TOR 9.1.11 MCMICHAEL CANADIAN ART COLLECTION To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, 23, Concession 8, (10365 Islington Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by McMichael Canadian Art Collection. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a wooden picnic structure at the rear of an existing building. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 306 • Drawing A2, Picnic Shelter Plans, prepared by S. Lee, dated March 2004, received by the TRCA April 8, 2004. • Drawing Al, Picnic Shelter Plans, prepared by S. Lee, dated March 2004, received by the TRCA April 8, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA April 8, 2004, redline revised to indicate installation of sediment control fencing. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill to facilitate the construction of a wooden picnic structure. The picnic structure will be built on an existing crushed gravel base and will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries, or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35337 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: April 16, 2004 307 Application #: 122 /04/VAUG 9.1.12 BEN PANICCIA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Plan 4005, (35 Broda Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ben Paniccia. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of garage and loft additions onto an existing single detached residential dwelling within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Basement Plan, prepared by Ark Design Concepts, dated June 13, 2003, received by the TRCA on July 10, 2003. • Ground Floor Plan, prepared by Ark Design Concepts, dated June 13, 2003, received by the TRCA on July 10, 2003, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing, the removal of excess fill material and that the porch is to remain open. • Second Floor Plan, prepared by Ark Design Concepts, dated June 13, 2003, received by the TRCA on July 10, 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposal is to construct the addition of a garage and a second storey loft onto an existing single detached residential dwelling. The applicant has submitted documentation from a professional engineer stating that the proposal can withstand the depths and velocities expected under a Regional Storm Event. The Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies permit an addition to an existing building within the Regional Storm Flood Plain that is up to 50 percent of the total area of the building based on existing conditions as of January 1, 1987. The current proposal does not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the residence as of the stipulated date. In May 2003, TRCA staff reviewed and supported the proposal through an application under the Planning Act (City of Vaughan Committee of Adjustment Application A138/03). Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. However, TRCA Water Management staff have determined that the proposed works will have no significant impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. There will be no change to existing grades and all excess fill will be removed from the site. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. 308 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 31524 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: April 27, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 242 /00/VAUG 9.1.13 IRIS TAL To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Plan 65M -2090, (22 Alexis Road), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Iris Tal. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation of a swimming pool at the rear of an existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Redline revised Drawing No. 04 -024, prepared by Solda Pools, dated March 23, 2004, received March 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation of an in- ground swimming pool and equipment shed at the rear of an existing dwelling. The subject property is located west of Leslie Avenue and south of Highway 407. The property is west of a gently sloping valley feature of which the top of bank forms the rear property line. The pool will be located a minimum of 6 metres from top of bank in a back yard that is currently sodded. TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied that the proposed pool is sufficiently set back from the top of bank. 309 Control of Flooding: The proposed swimming pool is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. Conservation of Land: A site visit to the subject property confirmed that there are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project, as the location of the proposed pool is a minimum of 6 metres from the stable top of bank. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The existing trees along the top of bank will be protected. Following construction, the area surrounding the pool will be restored to previous conditions and extensive planting of native, non - invasive woody vegetation along the top of bank will be undertaken. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Stream and Valley Corridor Management Program CFN: 35226 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For Information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: March 11, 2004 Application #: 080 /04 /MARK 9.1.14 TRAKS COMMUNICATIONS LTD. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 2196, (8220 Kennedy Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Traks Communications Ltd. The purpose is to construct in a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River, in order to facilitate the construction of a permanent pedestrian bridge. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. L1, Layout Plan, prepared by Quinn Design Associates Inc., dated January 2003, received April 8, 2003. 310 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct a permanent pedestrian bridge within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River. The subject property is located north of Highway 407 and west of Kennedy Road. The bridge will span a channelized portion of the Rouge River within an existing automobile dealership. This tributary of the Rouge River was channelized and realigned, as part of a previous permit application on the subject property. The prefabricated wood and steel bridge will be placed over the watercourse with no interference to the low flow channel. Control of Flooding: TRCA engineering staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The bridge will be constructed off -site and placed over the channelized watercourse with a crane. Access will be from the existing parking area, hence there will be no impacts on the control of pollution. As such, silt fencing is will not be required for the purpose of this project. Conservation of Land: TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns related to the project. There are no significant natural heritage features that will be negatively impacted by the proposed works and there will be no impacts on fisheries. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Stream and Valley Corridor Management Program CFN: 35339 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: April 16, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Application #: 124/04 /MARK 9.1.15 IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 55, Block K, Plan 65R- 23337, (10579 Yonge Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Imperial Oil Limited. 311 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing gar bar and commercial facility. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Proposed Site Plan, Sheet No. 1, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised March 1, 2004, received March 25, 2004. • Proposed Grading Plan, Sheet No. 2, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised March 1, 2004, received March 25, 2004. • Proposed Servicing Plan, Sheet No. 1, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised March 1, 2004, received March 25, 2004. • Proposed Erosion and Sedimentation Plan, Sheet No. 3, prepared by Imperial 011, dated April 16, 2004, received April 20, 2004. • Proposed Landscape Plan, Sheet No. 1, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised April 14, 2004, received April 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to regrade within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of German Mills Creek, a tributary of the Don River to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing gas bar and service station. The subject property is located on the east side of Yonge Street, south of Industrial Road. The existing service station consists of a retail kiosk approximately 20 square metres in size, gas pumps and canopy. The proposed redevelopment of the subject lands includes the construction of an enlarged convenience store measuring approximately 173 square metres (1861 square feet) and would also include auxiliary landscaping and decorative features. The expanded convenience store will also include a drive -thru use on the subject property. In addition to the enlargement of the retail kiosk on the site, the applicant proposes to replace existing aging single - walled storage tanks with double - walled, fibre glass tanks which are electronically monitored for possible leaks. This represents a significant upgrade and improvement on the existing tanks which have no system to monitor leaks. Furthermore, new filling valves, where the fuel is transferred from the tank truck to the storage tanks, will be equipped with security shut -off valves which provide control to the uploading process. The new shut -off valves will reduce the risks associated with spillage resulting from over - filling of the storage tanks. 312 Control of Flooding: Although the subject property is not located within a formally recognized Special Policy Area, it has been acknowledged by Authority staff that historical development in the area surrounding the subject lands has formed an integral part of the existing community. TRCA staff has worked in concert with Town of Richmond Hill staff to develop and implement a set of interim procedures to allow development to occur within the general area of this flood prone community in Richmond Hill. These guidelines would permit development to occur subject to technical criteria (i.e., flood proofing) and regulations of the TRCA being satisfactorily addressed. TRCA staff recognizes that there is an existing hazardous use on the subject lands and as such, allowances for the modification of this use can be considered subject to the extent of changes and potential improvements that would be made as a result of the proposed redevelopment. It is noted that the replacement of the aging storage tanks will result in a marked improvement in the safety and reliability of uploading of fuel and fuel containment. Water Management Group staff has also reviewed the proposal and notes that the expanded gas bar will be dry flood proofed to the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and approved by technical staff, will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Furthermore, there will be no impacts to fish habitat or any other natural resource features on the subject lands. No vegetation will be removed to accommodate the proposed expansion. Plantings A landscape plan has been submitted which includes decorative landscaping features throughout the site. These proposed plantings have been reviewed by technical staff to ensure that only native, non - invasive species are utilized. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35300 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: April 28, 2004 313 Application #: 107/04/RH THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS: RES. #B97 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Dave Ryan THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.16 - 9.1.42, with the exception of 9.1.18, 9.1.27 and 9.1.41 which were withdrawn, and Minor Works permits 9.1.21, 9.1.22, 9.1.26 - 9.1.28, 9.1.31, 9.1.32 and 9.1.38), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. RES. #B98 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Dave Ryan CARRIED THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications 9.1.21, 9.1.22, 9.1.26 - 9.1.28, 9.1.31, 9.1.32 and 9.1.38, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 9.1.16 A. MANTELLA & SONS LTD. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Block 10, Plan 43M -643, (8 Van Der Graff Court), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by A. Mantella & Sons Ltd. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of a one storey industrial building; and excavate and place fill within the Regulatory Floodplain of the Mimico Creek for a sanitary sewer connection. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009. • Survey Plan Part of Block 10 - Plan 43M -643 - City of Brampton, W.O. 2004034P1, prepared by Bennett Young Limited, last revised on 03/16/2004. • Site Construction Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, drawing no. 03165 SED -1, job no. 03- 165 -E, prepared by V.A. Piscione and Associates Inc., dated 04/12/2004. • Site Grading and Servicing Plan, drawing no. 03165 G -1, job no. 03- 165 -E, prepared by V.A. Piscione and Associates Inc., last revised on 03/25/2004. • Tree Inventory Plan, drawing no. L1 of 2, project no. 032664, prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd., last revised 04/16/2004. 314 • Landscape Plan, drawing no. L2 of 2, project no. 032664, prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd., last revised 04/30/2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill material within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek to accommodate the construction of a one storey industrial warehouse building, and supporting infrastructure. In addition, the proposal requires the excavation and placement of fill material within the Regional Floodplain of the Mimico Creek to connect to the existing sanitary sewer main. All grades within the Regulatory Floodplain will be maintained. The subject property is located in the former Bramalea 8 Industrial Park, at 8 Van Der Graaf Court, in the City of Brampton. Control of Flooding: A portion of proposed works are located within the Regulatory Floodplain of the Mimico Creek, but are located outside of the hydraulic floodway. In addition, no modifications to the Floodplain are proposed with this application. This development is not expected to negatively impact the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during all phases of construction. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this proposal. Plantings The applicant will plant a vegetated buffer on the subject property adjacent to the Mimico Creek valley corridor (currently sparsely vegetated) with only native and non - invasive species. In addition, all disturbed areas requiring revegetation and plantings needed to meet landscaping requirements will contain only native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Policy 4.1.1 (New Urban Development) and 4.3 (Infrastructure and Servicing) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35311 Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: April 6, 2004 315 Application #: 111 /04 /BRAM 9.1.17 CASA -NORTH INVESTMENTS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 14, 15, Concession 6 EHS, in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Casa -North Investments Inc. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond, and to construct within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regulatory Floodplain of the Humber River, to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management outfall to service a residential plan of subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009. • Letter of undertaking provided by Darren Steedman, Metrus Developments, dated May 4, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This permit is to permit the construction of an off -line stormwater management pond and associated outfall on the subject lands, adjacent to the H4 tributary of the Humber River. This project is located on the west -side of Airport Road, south of Countryside Drive in the City of Brampton. The subject pond and outfall are one component of the proposed stormwater management servicing for the adjacent subdivisions. The pond will service phase one of the adjacent subdivision, while an additional permit application will be made for a second pond (on an adjacent tributary of the Humber River) which will service the remainder of the development. Control of Flooding: The proposed works within the Regional Storm Floodplain will be limited to the construction phase only. As such, no significant permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. No in -water works are proposed with this application. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. Affected lands will be restored to pre- construction condition in accordance with TRCA's Planting Guidelines with a native, non - invasive seed mix. 316 Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section -4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35180 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 062 /04 /BRAM 9.1.18 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Crossing C19F in the South East corner of Castlemore Road and Airport Road, at the location of the Future Humberwest Parkway), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. • Withdrawn 9.1.19 MEDALLION DEVELOPMENTS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 91, 94, 96, Block B, Plan, Part Lot 95, Block 19, Plan BR -4, (173 Main Street North), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Medallion Developments Inc. The purpose is to construct in a floodplain, place fill within a Fill Regulated Area at 173 Main Street North, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 12 storey commercial /residential building. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Arnis Budrevics, Alexander Budrevics Associates Limited, dated April 5, 2004, to address outstanding ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct and place fill material within the Regional Storm Floodplain of a tributary to the Etobicoke Creek which is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works are necessary to accommodate the construction of a 12 storey commercial /residential building which has been supported by the TRCA in previous planning applications for the subject property. The subject property is partially located within the Brampton Special Policy Area (SPA) which allows for development within the floodplain provided the proposal meets the development guidelines for SPAs. The proposed works meets all applicable SPA criteria. 317 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are partially located within the Regulatory Floodplain but are located outside of the hydraulic floodway. The proposed development is adequately floodproofed and can withstand regional velocities. This development is not expected to negatively impact the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this proposal. Plantings The proposal involves the planting of only native and non - invasive vegetation. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with 4.2.1 (B) - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification with Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35041 Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: January 13, 2004 Application #: 018/04 /BRAM 9.1.20 MENKES INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, 15, Concession 7, 8, in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Menkes Industrial Holdings Inc. The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regional Storm Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of an industrial building, and associated stormwater management pond on lands adjacent to Mimico Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Dan Arts, Menkes Industrial Holdings, dated May 6, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 318 Proposal: This proposal involves two components - the first relating to the proposed industrial building, and the second to stormwater management. The first component (building) relates to the placement of fill within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regional Storm Floodplain, using a cut and fill balance, to provide for a viable developable area on the subject property. The subject property is located south of Steeles Avenue, west of Goreway Road in the City of Brampton. A number of previous human modifications which have been made to the floodplain in close proximity to this site which have altered the floodlines within this reach of Mimico Creek, and have significantly constrained development on the subject property. These include modifications made to the floodplain by an adjacent CN rail line, and an on -line stormwater management pond which was created on a portion of the property within the valley of Mimico Creek, directly adjacent to the area in which development is being proposed. As a result of these constraints, only a very small portion of the subject property which is currently outside of the Regulatory Floodplain could be developed. However, these lands are identified in the City of Brampton Official Plan for much needed Industrial uses. TRCA staff have worked extensively with the applicant to work towards a solution which will allow a viable industrial development to be completed on the property, while taking the opportunity to restore and enhance the condition of this reach of Mimico Creek. This application proposes a cut and fill balance, which will permit the filling of the low areas in the centre of the property (the majority of which is outside of the main channel of Mimico Creek). In exchange for filling within these areas, (which have been cleared for agricultural uses) restoration of the valleylands is to be completed with this proposal and a financial compensation plan is in place, which is intended to be used for valleyland restoration within this or other reaches of Mimico Creek that have been identified by the Authority for restoration. The applicant has similarly committed to utilizing a green building design, which will provide for enhanced energy efficiency, and be respective of the natural features to which it is adjacent. Through these significant commitments, it is anticipated that this project will provide a significant net environmental benefit for this site, and those adjacent within the Mimico Creek Watershed. The second component relates to the creation of a stormwater management pond and associated outfall, which will service the subject lands, and those directly to the north of this site. As with the first component of this project, TRCA staff have worked extensively with the applicant to develop a stormwater management strategy which considers the subject lands and those adjacent collectively, to reduce the number of outfalls into Mimico Creek. The proposed pond and outfall are to be located directly to the south of the proposed building. Control of Flooding: While modifications will be made to the Regional Storm Floodplain as a result of this development, the cut and fill proposal is as close as possible to being balanced, and no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated through either component of this proposal. 319 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Although no significant vegetation is to be removed through this project, a comprehensive restoration plan has been created. Plantings As a component of this project, a landscape restoration plan has been submitted and will form part of this permit. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35158 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 052 /04 /BRAM 9.1.21 SAJED RAHAMAN To place fill within a regulated area at 26 Martineau Road, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Sajed Rahaman. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with Etobicoke Creek on an existing residential lot at 26 Martineau Road, in the City of Brampton. The purpose of the application is to recognize the construction of an existing inground swimming pool and associated landscape features. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking from S. Rahaman, dated May 5, 2004, to address outstanding ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 320 Proposal: The proposal is to recognize the construction of an existing inground swimming pool and associated landscape plantings at 26 Martineau Road, in the City of Brampton. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As the works commenced prior to issuance of the necessary permit, this application is subject to an additional fee for the minor violation (Residential Property, 1st Offense + 50 %). Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the existing development. Pollution: The subject property is adequately buffered from the tributary watercourse corridor. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse did not occur as a result of this construction. Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the City of Brampton. The completed inground swimming pool does not impact an significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with the completed works. Plantings Native and non - invasive shrubs have been planted along the southern most and eastern most portions of the site. Policy Guidelines: The completed works are in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35289 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 28, 2004 Application #: 105 /04 /B RAM 9.1.22 TERRY CATTANI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 21, Plan 43M -1465, (8 Pali Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Terry Cattani. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing lot at 8 Pali Drive, in the City of Brampton, in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. 321 • Legal Survey, prepared by Rady - Pentek & Edward Surveying Limited, drawing no. 01 -076, dated January 15, 2002, stamped received by TRCA staff April 23, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by T. Cattani, dated April 23, 2004, redline revised May 5, 2004 to address ecology issues, stamped received by TRCA staff April 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the placement and excavation of fill material in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool at 8 Pali Drive, Brampton. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within a TRCA Fill Regulated Area, but located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: The subject property is located sufficiently away from the tributary associated with the Humber River. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur as a result of construction. Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision and will not impact any significant vegetation. A vegetative buffer incorporating native and non - invasive plant species will be planted along the top of the bank feature to further stabilize the slope. There are no fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings Only native and non - invasive plant species will be planted. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35369 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 28, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Application #: 139/04 /BRAM 9.1.23 CARTERM INTERMODAL LOGISTICS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 6 EHS Block F, G, Plan 875, (2700 Drew Road), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Carterm Intermodal Logistics Inc. 322 The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Mimico Creek, to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall, and paved container storage area on the subject property. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Bill Savillo, Skira and Associates, Dated May 6, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves grading and site alterations to reduce potential flood risk on the subject property and facilitate development on Tess flood -prone areas of the property. Construction of a stormwater outfall will also be required to convey stormwater from the site (which is approximately 2 hectares in size) into Mimico Creek. This property is one of the last remaining undeveloped properties within an existing industrial area. The property may be subject to flood risk in a Regional Storm event as a result of an undersized rail crossing directly downstream. TRCA Engineering staff have worked with the applicant to find a mutually agreeable solution which will remove a portion of the development from the Regional Storm Floodplain (through grading on the subject property), without exacerbating flood concerns on adjacent flood prone properties, or significantly altering the direction or conveyance of Regional Storm flows. The works proposed on this property may in fact, serve to reduce flood risk on a number of the adjacent properties. As a result of works to be completed on this property, Regional Storm flows will be conveyed through an area of the property at lower elevations, while development will occur on the higher, less flood -prone areas. The concrete headwall (associated with the stormwater outfall) will be placed within the south bank of the adjacent Mimico Creek, which is currently channelized and lined with gabion baskets in this area. This portion of the valley associated with Mimico Creek is not owned by the TRCA. Control of Flooding: A portion of the proposed works on the property are located within the Regulatory Floodplain. The works proposed under this permit are not expected to negatively impact upon the conveyance or storage of floodwaters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative, geotechnical or fisheries issues exist with respect to this project. 323 Plantings The applicant is proposing to plant a 125 square metre area on the subject property adjacent to Mimico Creek (which is currently not vegetated), with native, non - invasive plant species. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Policy 4.1.1 (New Urban Development) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34879 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 455/03/MISS 9.1.24 JAFINE DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot A, Plan 43R -5367, (2200 Dundas Street East), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Jafine Development Co. Ltd. The purpose is to construct a deck for an existing commercial building within a Fill Regulated Area and Regulatory Floodplain in the Dixie /Dundas Special Policy Area (SPA) at 2200 Dundas Street East, in the City of Mississauga. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Elevations, prepared by V. Genov, drawing no. A3, dated June 30, 2003, revised July 16, 2003, stamped received by TRCA staff April 20, 2004. • Floor Plan By Use, prepared by V. Genov, drawing no. Al, dated March 2004, revised March 22, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff May 5, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by V. Genov, drawing no. A1,,dated July 2003, revised March 22, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff April 20, 2004. • Patio Plan, prepared by V. Genov, drawing no. A2, dated June 30, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff April 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 324 Proposal: The proposal consists of constructing a temporary ancillary deck within the Regulatory Floodplain in the Dixie /Dundas Special Policy Area (SPA) at 2200 Dundas Street East, in the City of Mississauga. The entire property is located within the Regulatory Floodplain and within the Dixie /Dundas SPA. There is currently an existing commercial building on the subject property. The proposed deck is approximately 26.28 square metres (282.88 square feet) and is proposed to be located adjacent to the existing building outside of the hydraulic floodway. All existing grades will remain unchanged. The proposed works will be properly anchored to ensure that the structure will remain secure during the Regional Storm event. Control of Flooding: Due to the limited scale of this proposal, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be adversely affected. Pollution: No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected since the proposed works are located sufficiently away, with commercial development between the property and the watercourse. The proposed works are limited in nature and are located an adequate distance from the watercourse. As such, no sedimentation of the watercourse is expected. Conservation of Land: The subject property is located within an existing commercial area, and is void of significant vegetation. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings There is no significant vegetation on -site. As such, compensatory planting is not required for this proposal. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are in conformity with Section 4.2.1. (B) - Development/Redevelopment within Designated Special Policy Areas and Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvement and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35361 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For Information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 28, 2004 Application #: 137/04/MISS 9.1.25 RIO CAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT To construct in a flood plain on (3110 Dixie Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Rio Can Real Estate Investment. The purpose is to construct in a Regional Storm floodplain (flood spillway) and Fill Regulated area of Etobicoke Creek in order to permit the construction of a temporary garden centre in the parking lot of an existing commercial centre.. 325 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Site Plan, drawing no. Al, project no. 98A118, prepared by Stone McQuire Vogt Architects, dated May 6, 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in a floodplain (flood spillway) and Fill Regulated area of Etobicoke Creek in order to permit the construction of a temporary garden centre in the parking lot of an existing commercial centre. The lands subject to this application are identified as being a flood spillway, which is an unusual situation in which the physical topography of the land does not allow for the return of flood waters to the watercourse. Although the Authority has policies for development in spillway areas in the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan (VSCMP), due to site specific conditions, including the location of the garden centre in the parking lot of a developed commercial centre, existing surrounding uses, and the nature of the proposed temporary structure, this project is considered as minor development in a floodplain, and is in keeping with the intent of VSCMP policies. The proposed garden centre will be a temporary ancillary structure, located in the parking lot opposite the Price Chopper store. This project will not involve placing or removing fill, and will not involve the construction of any permanent structures. Control of Flooding: The proposed structure is temporary in nature, and will be constructed of tent awning material. No modifications to the existing grade are proposed with this application. Although the structure will be in the flood spillway, it is not expected that the proposed structure would not significantly impact upon the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The proposed structure is located more than 500 meters away from Etobicoke Creek in an existing paved commercial complex. As no fill will be added or removed, no silt or erosion control measures will be required. Conservation of Land: No significant features will be removed or affected as a result of this project. No geotechnical or fisheries concerns exist with this application. Plantings No significant vegetation exists on the subject property. As such, compensatory planting is not required for this project. 326 Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with section 4.2, Development and Redevelopment/ Intensification Within Non - Established Communities/ Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34369 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For Information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: March 25, 2004 Application #: 183/03 /MISS CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.26 THOMAS AND JENNIFER VAN To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 54, Plan 4351, (113 Sylvan Avenue), in the Toronto East Community Council, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Thomas and Jennifer Van. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the replacement of an existing deck. An inground pool will also be constructed and enclosed within the existing deck. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Site Plan, Rear Deck, received March 18, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the replacement of the existing deck at the rear of the property. An inground pool will be constructed within the deck which will be enclosed. The lot is located along the bluff area of the waterfront in the Toronto East Community. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain, therefore, there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: As the work does not involve any grading and only very minor excavation work, there will not be any impact to the surrounding land or lake. Sediment fencing will be installed between the work area and the edge of the bluff. All excavated material will be removed off the site. 327 Conservation of Land: The entire property is located within a developed community along this portion of the lakefront and is consistent with the surrounding suburban development. There are no geo- technical /slope instability issues associated with this site. Plantings There are no plantings associated with this project. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.2 - Existing Development of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and the works are in compliance with the Provincial Policy Statement for Natural Hazards on the Great Lakes Shoreline. CFN: 35373 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 26, 2004 Application #: 141/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.27 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on (Leslie Street north of Eglinton Avenue), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. • Withdrawn 9.1.28 DAVID MEYEROWITZ To place fill within a regulated area on (3 Hedgewood Road), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by David Meyerowitz. The purpose is to demolish an existing house and construct a new house partially in a fill regulated area. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Drawing A1.00, Demolition and Hoarding Plan, prepared by HPA, revised April 29, 2004. • Drawing A1.01, Site Plan, prepared by HPA, revised April 29, 2004. • Drawing A2.03, Ground Floor Plan, prepared by HPA, revised April 29, 2004. • Drawing L1.01, Grading Plan, prepared by NAK Design Group, revised April 29, 2004. • Drawing L1.02, Planting Plan, prepared by NAK Design Group, revised April 29, 2004. 328 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The minor works proposal is to demolish an existing house and construct a new house at 3 Hedgewood Road, located south of York Mills Road and east of Yonge Street. The proposal is sufficiently set back from the top of bank and there are no geotechnical issues. Only a small portion of the new house and minor amount of re- grading is to take place in the fill regulated area. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will have no effect on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A temporary sediment control and tree protection fence will be installed to keep construction sediment from entering the valley. Conservation of Land: All disturbed areas will be restored to better than existing conditions. There is no impact to significant natural resources. Plantings Native plantings and removal and replacement of invasive species is provided as part of the redevelopment. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.A - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34900 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: December 1, 2003 Application #: 462/03/TOR 9.1.29 THE CANADIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Rumsey Road in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Canadian National Institute for the Blind. The purpose is to alter a waterway, regrade within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate the replacement of an existing subtrunk sanitary pipe to service the Bloorview MacMillan Children's Centre, Canadian National Institute for the Blind lands and future tableland residential redevelopment. 329 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Plan and Profile of Existing Sanitary Sunnybrook Sub -Trunk Replacement, Drawing Nos. 9 & 10, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated January 2003, received February 3, 2004. • Siltation Control Plan - Part 2, Drawing No. 17, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated January 2003, received Feburary 3, 2004. • Restoration and Planting Plans, Drawing Nos. L103 & L106, prepared by Vertechs Design Inc., revised January 23, 2003, received February 3, 2004. • Clearing, Construction Access and Workspace Detail, Drawing No. 3, prepared by Gartner Lee, dated January 2004, received February 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway, regrade within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River to facilitate the replacement of the Sunnybrook subtrunk sanitary pipe located in Burke Brook Ravine. The subject lands are located on the northeast corner of Bayview Avenue and Eglinton Avenue, north of Rumsey Road and forms part of a larger institutional development used by both the Bloorview MacMillan Children's Centre (BMCC) and the Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB). The subject site is also within an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA # 64 - Burke Brooke Ravine). The sanitary servicing easement is located within the valley, north of the CNIB site, where there is an existing sanitary sewer which had serviced the old CNIB site. The CNIB /BMCC site is currently being redeveloped with new buildings both for BMCC and CNIB as well as a future residential development just west of the CNIB site. As part of this redevelopment, it was identified that there was a need for additional servicing capacity for the existing subtrunk sanitary system. As such, the replacement of the existing Sunnybrook sanitary pipe is required to service the redevelopment of the tableland portions of the site. Authority staff has issued two other permits to facilitate the BMCC /CNIB redevelopment including the construction of a sanitary outfall for the BMCC site (Permit No. C- 04074) and to modify an existing storm outfall for the CNIB site (Permit No. C- 03148). The replacement of the sanitary pipe will be conducted using trenchless technology, thereby minimizing disturbances within the valleylands. Control of Flooding: There will no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters as grades within the Regional Storm Flood Plain will not be altered as a result of the proposed works. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected around the work site to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Erosion and sediment controls will be maintained for the duration of construction. 330 Conservation of Land: Geotechnical staff has reviewed plans associated with the proposed works and notes that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues. The applicant has conducted an Environmental Impact Study to support the upgrade of the existing sanitary trunk. This report addresses impacts to vegetation, access to the valley floor and recommends restorative plantings to mitigate impacts. Valley works will be conducted under the supervision of a full -time project environmental consultant. Technical staff has reviewed the proposed works and notes that it will not result in a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat. As such, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Plantings A comprehensive restoration plan has been submitted for the review of TRCA ecological staff. This plan addresses restoring disturbed areas caused by construction access and works within portions of the valleylands. Staff is satisfied that all disturbed areas will be adequately stabilized and restored in accordance with TRCA guidelines. Policy Guidelines: This project complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34328 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: April 28, 2004 Application #: 160/03/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO SOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.30 CITY OF TORONTO (WORKS & EMERGENCY SERVICES) To place fill within a regulated area of the Don River, (Millwood Road), in the Toronto South Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto (Works & Emergency Services). The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate repairs to Leaside Bridge. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Leaside Bridge, General Arrangement (redlined), Drawing No. 105 -S- 223 -84, prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd. dated April 19, 2004, received April 26, 2004. • Leaside Bridge, Workzone Protection in Don Valley, Drawing No. 105 -S- 223 -85, prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd., dated April 19, 2004, received April 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 331 Proposal: The proposal consists of repairs to the existing bridge including removal and replacement of the bridge deck, sidewalks, approach slabs, asphalt and waterproofing. Also proposed are patch repairs to the concrete piers and abutments, including the pier caps. Control of Flooding: The proposed patch repairs are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A debris containment system will be installed beneath the bridge and sediment fencing will also be utilized around the construction site to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings New native plantings are proposed to enhance the site. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35159 Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 27, 2004 Application #: 053/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO WEST COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.31 BERNARD AND DWORSKA JAKUBOWSKI To construct in a flood plain on Lot 5, 6, Plan 2761, (47 Berl Avenue), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Bernard and Dworska Jakubowski. The purpose is to place and excavate fill to facilitate the construction of a 2 storey addition within a Fill Regulated area of Mimico Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Drawing A -01; Foundation Plan, Drawing A -02; Ground Floor Plan, Drawing A -03; Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -04; Proposed Addition of Residence, Drawing A -05; Elevations, Drawing A -06; Elevations, Drawing A -06; Sections, prepared by G.B.H Architectural Services, dated February 26, 2004, received March 8, 2004. 332 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a two storey addition at the rear of an existing residential dwelling. The subject property is located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Mimico Creek. The control and storage of flood waters will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: The proposed addition will not impact any significant resource features. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35199 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 8, 2004 Application #: 069/04/TOR 9.1.32 ERIC PASKEVICS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (42 Bonnyview Drive), in the Toronto West Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Eric Paskevics. The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a garage addition to the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. 333 • Building Location Survey, prepared by Dunning and Taylor Ltd., dated 1985, received May 5, 2004. • Drawing No. 1.00.4.69/1; Garage Details, Drawing No. 1.00.4.69/2; Site Statistics, Drawing No. 3; Roof Framing Details, Drawing No. 4; Elevations, prepared by Norman E. Ettinger, revised May 3, 2004, received May 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a garage addition to the existing property. The subject property is within a Fill Regulated Area and within a Flood plain in Mimico Creek. The property is located east of Royal York Road and north of The Queensway. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm elevation. All excess fill material will be removed off site. Pollution: A sediment control fence is to be erected before commencement of the work and remain in place until all works have been completed. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. The proposed works will not have an impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 34943 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 24, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 473/03/TOR 9.1.33 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on Lot 17, 18, 19, Concession 2, 3, (Dufferin Street - Rutherford Road northwards to Major Mackenzie Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Regional Municipality of York. 334 The purpose is to alter a watercourse (tributary of Don River) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) temporarily, through a dam and pump around method in order to install a 7 metre and an 8.5 metre culvert extension to an existing 1520 mm diameter culvert in the dry, and permanently, by 48 metres on the upstream end in order to facilitate the Dufferin Street Road widening. The site is not regulated for fill placement at this time, nor does it have a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated March 24, 2004; received March 29, 2004; prepared by the Region of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the widening of Dufferin Street from Rutherford Road northwards to Major Mackenzie Drive. This section of Dufferin Street is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain, or a Fill Regulated Area. The road widening will involve 3 culvert extensions, however, only the most northerly culvert, at Station 5 +500, has defined beds and banks and requires a permit from TRCA for the alteration of the waterway. The extensions by 7 metres on the west and 8.5 metres on the east will require a temporary alteration in order to work in the dry, and the watercourse will be permanently altered to accommodate the road widening. The permanent alteration will also require an authorization from the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: The watercourses do not have an upstream drainage basin greater than 125 hectares; therefore, they do not have a Regional Storm Floodplain associated with them. There will not be any impacts to flooding associated with this project. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (cofferdams, intake pumps, dewatering areas, silt fences) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with the culvert extensions at Station 5 +500 in the north end. A cofferdam method will be utilized temporarily in order to work in the dry for the culvert extensions. A 48 metre length of the upstream channel in the roadside ditch will be relocated westward by the road widening. 335 The permanent alteration will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption, destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The channel will be realigned using natural channel design principles. The Region of York has provided a Letter of Intent which describes the compensation measures. These measures include using oversized corrugated steel pipe (CSP) extensions (2100m) which will be embedded at least 10 percent below the channel invert; adding natural stream bed substrate inside the culvert, extensions and new channel; revegetating using native species to provide riparian cover; and eliminating the perched culvert situation downstream which presently constitutes a fish barrier. The Region has indicated in the Letter of Intent that the loss of 93.6m2 of fish habitat will be compensated with 153.8m2 of newly created fish habitat. When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. This section of Dufferin Street is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine within the "Settlement Area" designation. The northerly crossing has been identified as a hydrologically sensitive feature. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 33243 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: April 28, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX Application #: 202 /02/VAUG 9.1.34 HAMPTSTOCK DEVELOPMENTS INC. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3,4,5, Concession 3, (southwest of Taunton Road and Audley Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Hamptstock Developments Inc. The purpose is to alter a waterway, place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond and outfall. 336 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009. • Stormwater Management Pond (South East), Drawing 245, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated March 2003, date received April 28, 2004. • South East Stormwater Management Pond Details, Drawing 247, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received April 28, 2004. • Sediment Control Plan, Drawing 252, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received April 28, 2004. • Overall Storm Drainage Plan, Drawing STM, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated March 2004, date received March 16, 2004. • South East Stormwater Management Pond Details, Drawing 246, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • South East Stormwater Management Pond Details, Drawing 248, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan 1 -Phase 2, Drawing 211, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan 2 -Phase 2, Drawing 212, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan 3 -Phase 2, Drawing 213, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan 4 -Phase 2, Drawing 214, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan 5 -Phase 2, Drawing 215, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan 6 -Phase 2, Drawing 216, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., dated April 2003, date received March 16, 2004. • Block 196 Southwest Stormwater Management Pond Planting Plan, Drawing SP -la, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated November 2003, date received April 28, 2004. • Block 196 Southwest Stormwater Management Pond Seeding Plan, Drawing SP -1b, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated November 2003, date received April 28, 2004. • Plant List and Details, Drawing SP -3, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated November 2003, date received April 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of the proposal is to alter a watercourse, place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond and outfall. The stormwater management pond is required to service Phase 1I of draft approved plan of subdivision 18T -98016 and is proposed in order to satisfy conditions of draft approval for the plan of subdivision. The stormwater management pond is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, while the outfall channel is located entirely within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek. The proposed works are sufficiently setback from Carruthers Creek and the subdivision itself is located entirely on tableland. TRCA staff is satisfied that the proposed works will not negatively impact the valley corridor or Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek. 337 Control of Flooding: As the stormwater management pond is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, TRCA engineering staff has confirmed that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. A flow spreader will be installed between the pond outfall and the watercourse in order to prevent erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse once the pond is operational. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this project, nor are there fisheries concerns as the outfall is proposed to tie into the watercourse via a flow spreader. All disturbed areas are to be stabilized and restored with native tree and shrub plantings, including the area around the flow spreader, to the satisfaction of TRCA ecology staff. Plantings The stormwater management pond and outfall will be planted with native submergent, emergent and shoreline species. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored with native tree and shrub plantings and seed mixes. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34556 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For Information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 315/03 /AJAX 9.1.35 NUGGET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Concession Broken Front Range 3 Block 144, Plan 40M -2046, (Bayly Street and Shoal Point Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Nugget Construction Company Limited. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area, alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a twenty -one (21) unit townhouse development as well a stormwater pond and storm outfall which will service the aforementioned townhomes. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. 338 • Block 144, Site Grading Plan, Drawing No. S3, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised April 21, 2004, received April 23, 2004. • Block 144, Site Servicing Plan, Drawing No. S4, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised April 21, 2004, received April 23, 2004. • Sediment Erosion Control Plan, Drawing No. SEC 1, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised April 16, 2004, received April 23, 2004. • Block 144, Valley X- Sections Plan, Figure XS -1, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., dated April 2004, received April 23, 2004. • Block 144, Valley X- Sections, Figure XS -2, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., dated April 2004, received April 23, 2004. • Block 144, Storm Drainage Area Plan, Drawing No. STM -2, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised April 21, 2004, received April 23, 2004. • Block 144, Sanitary Drainage Plan, Drawing No. SAN -2, prepared by Cole Engineering Group Ltd., revised April 21, 2004, received April 23, 2004. • SWM Pond Plan, Drawing No. L1, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated June 26, 2003, received April 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area, to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Carruthers Creek to facilitate the construction of twenty -one (21) townhouse units, stormwater pond and storm outfall. The stormwater pond and storm outfall will service the adjacent residential townhome development. The proposed storm outfall is located approximately 7 metres from Carruthers Creek. The subject lands are located on the southwest corner of Bayly Street and Shoal Point Road, immediately north of Carruthers Creek. The 21 unit townhouse development (Block 144) forms part of a larger two block townhouse development. The first block (Block 139) was approved by the Executive Committee on April 2, 2004 (Permit No. C- 04090). Block 139 is located to the south of Carruthers Creek while Block 144 is located north of Carruthers Creek. Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Management staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed works and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. 339 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The proposed storm outfall is setback approximately 7 metres from Carruthers Creek. Ecological staff has determined that the storm outfall does not constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) to fish habitat and as such, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). No other significant natural resources will be impacted by the proposed outfall. Plantings The disturbed area immediately surrounding the proposed stormwater pond and outfall will be planted with native, non - invasive species. Ecological staff has reviewed a landscape plan to ensure that plantings are in accordance with TRCA requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35318 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: April 28, 2004 Application #: 114/04 /AJAX 9.1.36 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Taunton Road (Lot 4, Concession 3, 4), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Durham. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for culvert extensions on the south and north side of Taunton Road, wingwalls and bioengineered slope) in a Fill Regulated Area; and to construct a structure (14.1 metre culvert extension to the south and a 6.2 metre culvert extension with wingwalls to the north to an existing open foot concrete culvert 2.4 metres high, 6.1 metres wide and 2.8 metres long) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; and to alter a watercourse (Carruthers Creek) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) through a dam and pump around method in order to install the culvert extensions, wingwalls, two outfalls and a bioengineered slope in the dry. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to environmental, erosion and sediment control plan; dated May 5, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of Durham. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 340 Proposal: The proposal consists of two extensions to an existing culvert, the construction of wingwalls, two outfalls and bioengineered slope protection on Carruthers Creek within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and the Fill Regulation Area in order to accommodate the widening of Taunton Road. The existing culvert is an open foot concrete culvert 2.4 metres high, 6.1 metres wide and 2.8 metres long and is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The existing culvert will be extended by 6.2 metres on the north side of Taunton Road. Two wingwalls will be constructed on the east and west side of this culvert extension to the north. Two roadside ditches will be constructed with outfalls located just north of the wingwalls. 11.6 metres of bioengineered slope protection will be installed north of the this culvert extension. In addition the existing culvert will be extended 14.1 metres to the south. There is a small tributary at the northwest end of the culvert extension that contributes flow to the Carruthers Creek from a small cattail marsh. Bioengineering and rock protection work will be conducted to avoid disturbance to this feature and will be isolated with sediment fencing. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: The works are expected to create a minor increase in flooding upstream under the Regional Storm Flood event. The landowner acknowledges that as a result the proposed reconstruction of the Taunton Road culvert extensions, the Regional Storm Flood elevation will increase and has provided written permission to that effect. The maximum increase in the Regional Flood water levels caused by this project is 35cm. The increases are all confined to the golf course lands. This project is consistent with site history. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, rock check dam, pea gravel bag coffer dam) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. A dam and pump around method will be utilized in order to install the culvert extension in the dry. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant resource features. There will be no slope stability issues related to the works. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 341 CFN: 35093 Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: February 5, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON Application #: 031 /04 /AJAX 9.1.37 CLAUDIO CELLUCCI To place fill within a regulated area on South East Lot 19, Concession 2, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Claudio Cellucci. The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area to facilitate the construction of a residential dwelling within a Fill Regulated area, outside of the Regulatory Floodplain in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Claudio Celluccl, dated May 6, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This permit is to allow for the construction of a 7664 sq. ft. (712 sq. m), two storey residential dwelling, within a Fill Regulated area, outside the Regional Storm floodplain. The subject property is located west of Centreville Creek Road, between Boston Mills Road and Old Church Road, in the Town of Caledon. The subject property is traversed by a number of significant environmental features, including a Provincially Significant Wetland complex, and portions of an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) and Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI). The location proposed for the dwelling was selected based upon these constraints to development, and is located within a cleared area of the property, which will result in the least possible impact upon the adjacent natural features. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be completed outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. 342 No in -water works, or works within the Regional Storm Floodplain are proposed with this application. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. As such, no compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section - 4.1.1, New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35358 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 136/04 /CAL 9.1.38 STEPHEN OR JULIE KEELAN To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 25, Concession 2, (115 Haines Drive), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Stephen or Julie Keelan. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing lot at 115 Haines Drive, Bolton in order to construct an inground swimming pool. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Stephen Keelan, dated May 4, 2004, to address outstanding ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the placement and excavation of fill material in order to construct an inground swimming pool at 115 Haines Drive, Bolton. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. 343 Pollution: The subject property is located sufficiently away from the tributary associated with the Humber River. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur as a result of construction. Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision. As such, the proposed works will not impact any significant vegetation. The proposal is sufficiently setback to protect the top of valley bank feature. TRCA technical staff have conducted a site visit and ensure that all geotechnical concerns will be addressed through the design of a vegetative buffer along the top of valley slope. There are no fisheries related concerns associated with this development. Plantings A variety of Tight, deep rooted native and non - invasive plant species will be incorporated into the design of this proposal. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvement and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35343 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 28, 2004 Application #: 127/04/CAL 9.1.39 LISGAR CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on, (12131 Highway 50), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 2033666 Ontario Ltd. The purpose is to alter a watercourse and construct within the Regulatory Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management outfall. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009. • Bolton Toyota Highway 50 and Albion- Vaughan Road, Site Servicing and Grading Plan, drawing G -1, produced by Candevcon Ltd., dated December 21, 2003, revised to April 23, 2004. • Bolton Toyota Highway 50 and Albion- Vaughan Road, General Notes and Data Details, drawing G -1A, produced by Candevcon Ltd., dated December 21, 2003, revised to April 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 344 Proposal: This permit is to allow for the construction of a stormwater management outfall within an engineered drainage channel associated with a tributary of the Humber River, adjacent to Highway 50, at Albion- Vaughan Road, in the Town of Caledon. This outfall will service the adjacent lands to the east of Highway 50, just north of Albion- Vaughan Road, designated for Highway Commercial uses, which have a total area of less than 5 hectares. The proposed outfall and associated headwall will be constructed within the existing rip -rap lined bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be completed within the drainage channel of the watercourse and within the Regional Storm Floodplain. It is expected that all impacts will be temporary, as the channel has been designed to accommodate Regional Storm flows, for which this proposal will not pose a significant impediment. As a result of the above, no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. No in -water works are proposed with this project. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. Affected lands are currently seeded, and will be restored to pre- construction condition in accordance with TRCA's Planting Guidelines with a native, non - invasive seed mix. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section - 4.3 (Infrastructure and Servicing) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35336 Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 15, 2004 Application #: 121/04/CAL 9.1.40 GREGG AND MOORE MCKIBBON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 81, Plan 43R -9985, (48 John Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Gregg McKibbon and Ellie Moore. The purpose is to excavate fill material and construct an inground swimming pool within the Regulatory Floodplain of the Humber River at the rear of an existing dwelling at 48 John Street, Bolton. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006. 345 • Silt Fence Details, prepared by B. Paul, dated April 26, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff April 26, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by B. Paul, dated April 26, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff April 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of excavating fill material and constructing in the Regulatory Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to construct an inground swimming pool in the backyard of the subject property. The subject property is located within the Bolton Special Policy Area (SPA). All existing grades will remain unchanged. In addition, all applicable SPA criteria will be met. Control of Flooding: All existing grades are to be maintained. As such, the proposed works will not affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected from the proposed works. Appropriate sediment and erosion controls will be installed prior to any of the works taking place on the subject property. All excavated material will be removed from the property. Conservation of Land: The subject property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the Village of Bolton. The proposed pool will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this proposal. Plantings There is no significant vegetation on -site. As such, compensatory planting is not required for this proposal. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development/Redevelopment within Designated Special Policy Areas and Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35352 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: April 28, 2004 346 Application #: 130/04 /CAL 9.1.41 SCOTT SHAW To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 33, Plan BOL -7, (111 Willow Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Scott Shaw. • Withdrawn TOWN OF MARKHAM 9.1.42 LINDVEST PROPERTIES (CORNELL) LTD. To alter a waterway on Lot 9, 10, Concession 9, (east of 9th Line from Highway 7 to Highway 407), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lindvest Properties (Cornell) Ltd. The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary diversion channel for Tributary B in the Cornell community. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009. • Temp. Diversion Channel, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, Drawing ES1, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated February 2004, date received April 19, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers, dated April 27, 2004, date received April 27, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary diversion channel for Tributary B within the Cornell community. The temporary diversion is proposed between Highways 7 and 407, east of Ninth Line, where a stormwater management pond and redesigned channel are being proposed. The TRCA is awaiting the submission of the detailed design drawings for the stormwater management pond and redesigned channel, based on natural channel design principles, which will be the subject of an upcoming permit application. TRCA staff has been involved in discussions with the applicant regarding the location and size of the pond and channel and is satisfied, in principle, with the proposed works. In order to facilitate preliminary earthworks to be undertaken within the pond block, this temporary diversion channel is required. The diversion channel will be constructed and maintained for the duration of the earthworks, until the new channel and pond are constructed. Once the new channel and pond are constructed, the temporary channel will be decommissioned and rehabilitated. The construction of the channel and pond is anticipated to be completed by fall 2004. 347 It should be noted that the loss of fish habitat within Tributary B of the Little Rouge River and the construction of the on -line stormwater management pond within Cornell was authorized by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) as part of Fisheries Act Authorization #525 -1342 (1999). As compensation for the Toss of fish habitat, the construction of the Milne Reservoir Fishway was approved and undertaken. As a result, Tributary B has been identified by DFO as a watercourse without fish habitat and all construction works can therefore take place without any fisheries timing window restrictions. As part of the DFO Authorization, a number of terrestrial ecology objectives were identified and staff has confirmed that the overall proposal for the channel redesign and stormwater management pond is consistent with the authorization and will achieve the environmental objectives identified. Control of Flooding: The proposed channel will be designed to convey the 10 year storm event, in accordance with the Authority's Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Construction (April 1994). TRCA engineering staff has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The temporary channel will be lined with appropriate material to the 5 year storm elevation in order to prevent sedimentation of downstream areas. A series of rock check dams are also proposed to further control sediment flow through the channel. In addition, silt fencing is proposed around the perimeter of the channel and pond work area. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and the area will be extensively rehabilitated following the construction of the permanent channel and stormwater management pond. Plantings As there are additional works to be undertaken in the area in the immediate future, the restoration of the channel will be undertaken once the permanent channel and stormwater management pond are constructed. No additional plantings are required in the interim as the landscaping scheme will ensure that both the temporary and permanent channels are appropriately planted and restored, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35379 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: April 28, 2004 348 Application #: 143/04 /MARK CITY OF BRAMPTON 9.1.43 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 14, 15, 16, Concession 6 EHS, (Airport Road, at H4 -Sta. 12 +000 and H5 -Sta. 12 +225 between Brayden Boulevard in the south and Countryside Drive in the north), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to construct structures (at H4 -Sta. 12 +200 remove 19.3m length of existing box culvert and replace with 24.4m length x 4500 wide x 1200 high box culvert; at H5 -Sta. 12 +225 remove 18.5m length of existing box culvert and replace with 24.4m length x 3000 wide x 1250 high box culvert; manhole, and storm outfall) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; and to alter a watercourse (tributary of Humber River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) temporarily through a coffer dam method in order to work in the dry. The watercourses are not located with a Fill Regulated Area. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated April 21, 2004; received April 26, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the widening of Airport Road from Brayden Boulevard in the south to Countryside Drive in the north. There are two watercourse crossings of the Humber River in this section of Airport Road. H4, at Station 12 +000 is located within a Fill Extension Area and has a Regional Storm Flooplain. A 19.3 metre section of the existing box culvert will be removed and replaced with a 24.4 metre box culvert for an increase on the west side by 5.1 metres. Crossing H5, at Station 12 +225 is within a Fill Extension Area and a Regional Storm Floodplain. An 18.5 metre section of the existing box culvert will be removed and replaced with a 24.4 metre box culvert for an increase on the west side by 5.9 metres. A 1050mm watermain, by a tunnel method, and a 250mm, 375mm and 525mm storm sewers will also be installed as part of the road widening. The road widening project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Schedule C- Environmental Assessment process. The watermain component between Brayden Boulevard and Countryside Drive was conducted as a Schedule A, Environmental Assessment. Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics for the proposed structures and staff does not anticipate any concerns with impacts to flooding. The Region has provided a Letter of Undertaking to complete the minor modifications to the hydraulic analysis. 349 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, coffer dam, pump, filter bags) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The watercourse crossings by the 1050mm watermain will be conducted by jack and bore method and the pits will be encircled by a sediment fence. Water quality will be provided by oil grit separators. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. There is no defined channel at H4, however, there is a defined channel at H5. The watercourse at H5 will be altered temporarily while removing the old culvert and installing the new culvert in the dry. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34106 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: May 5, 2004 Application #: 068 /03 /BRAM 9.1.44 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 11, 12, Concession 6, (Crossings H2 at Sta. 10 +580 and H3 at Sta. 11+210 on Airport Road, between Bovaird Drive /Castlemore Road in the south and Brayden Boulevard in the north, south of Countryside Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for 1050mm watermain crossing by jack and bore (tunnel) method, 450mm storm sewer, 2 outfalls at H3; for replacement of existing 6.1 m wide x 1.29m high x 19.2 m long, open footed box culvert at H2 -Sta. 10 +580 with 15m wide x 1.95m high x 46.2m long, open footed rigid frame concrete bridge; for replacement of existing 9.1 m wide x 3m high x 17m long, open footed rigid frame concrete bridge at H3 -Sta. 11+210 with a 25m wide x 4.6m high x 34 m long bridge; and for road widening from 2 lane rural to 6 lane urban) in a Fill Regulated Area; to construct structures (15m span bridge, 25m span bridge , asphalt road, H2- outfall, H3 -2 outfalls, manhole 4) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; to alter a 350 watercourse (tributaries of Humber River) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) temporarily through a coffer dam method in order to work in the dry, and permanently by increasing the length of enclosures with both new bridges by 17m each, and by realigning 45m of watercourse upstream of H2 structure in order to widen Airport Road. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans) dated April 21, 2004; received April 26, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the widening of Airport Road from Bovaird Drive /Castlemore Road in the south to Brayden Boulevard in the north, which is south of Countryside Drive. There are two watercourse crossings of the Humber River in this section of Airport Road. H2, at Station 10 +580 is located within a Fill Extension Area and has a Regional Storm Flooplain. The existing 6m wide, open footed culvert will be replaced with a 15m wide concrete bridge. Crossing H3, at Station 11+580 is within a Fill Regulated Area and a Regional Storm Floodplain. The existing 9.1 m wide, open footed bridge will be replaced with a 25m wide bridge. A 45 metre section of the watercourse upstream of H2 will be re- aligned to accommodate the road widening from 2 to 6 lanes and this aspect of the project constitutes a harmful, alteration disruption, destruction of fish habitat (HADD) as well as the lengthening of the structures by 17 metres each. A 1050mm watermain, by a tunnel method, and a 450mm storm sewer will also be installed as part of the road widening. The road widening project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Schedule C- Environmental Assessment process. The watermain component between Bovaird Drive to Countryside Drive was conducted as a Schedule A, Environmental Assessment. Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics for the proposed structures and staff does not anticipate any concerns with impacts to flooding. The Region has provided a Letter of Undertaking to complete the minor modifications to the hydraulic analysis. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, flume, coffer dam, filter bags) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The watercourse crossings by the 1050mm watermain will be conducted by jack and bore method and the pits will be encircled by a sediment fence. Water quality will be provided by oil grit separators. 351 Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. All works will be conducted in the dry. The watercourse will be altered temporarily with a flume method while the new bridge and the channel are constructed at H2. A 45 metre section of the watercourse upstream of H2, at Sta 10 +580 will be altered permanently to allow the road widening and to length the H2 structure from 17m from 19 m to 46m. A coffer dam method will be utilized at H3 to temporarily alter the watercourse in order to work in the dry. At H3 the watercourse will be altered permanently when the structure will be lengthened 17 m from 17m to 34m. These permanent watercourse alterations works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The Region of Peel has provided a Letter of Intent that indicates the compensation measures at H2 and include: increasing the channel length by 10 m with curvatures, installing 3 pool structures , installing living revetment and root wads for bank stability, planting riparian trees and shrubs. At H3 the compensation measures include installing pools, boulder cobble structures, root wad revetment structures and planting riparian shrubs. When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34105 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: May 4, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING Application #: 069 /03 /BRAM 9.1.45 388270 ONTARIO LIMITED To alter a waterway on Lot 15, Concession RANGE 3, (Church Street), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 388270 Ontario Limited. The purpose is to regrade in order to construct a storm outlet and install a sanitary sewer connection pipe within the Fill Regulated Area for the Duffins Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Grading and Site Servicing Plans, Drawing Nos. SSG -1 and SSG -2, Jb No. 04055, prepared by Sernas and Associates, revised as received on April 30th, 2004. 352 • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing Nos. ER -1, Job No. 04055 prepared by Sernas and Associates, revised as received on April 30th, 2004. • Stormwater Management Pond and Details, Drawing No SWM -101, Job No 04055, received on April 30, 2004. • Survey Plan prepared by Donevan Fleishmann Petrich Ltd. as received on April 30th, 2004. Letter of Undertaking prepared by 388270 Ontario Limited with respect to the provision of planting plans dated May, 4th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct a storm outlet and a section of a sanitary sewer pipe connection within the Fill Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek. The works are required to service a proposed warehouse facility within an existing industrial area. The facility and the related stormwater management pond is on tableland and is not within an area regulated by the Authority. A storm pipe connection from the tableland stormwater pond to the outlet will traverse TRCA lands for a distance of approximately 350 metres before outletting to the Duffins Creek. The sanitary connection will also traverse TRCA lands before connecting to an existing off site pumping station. The outlet structure and a thirty metre section of the sanitary alignment are the only portions of the works which are within the Fill Regulated Area. A separate report has been forwarded to the Authority for permission to utilize TRCA lands for the storm outlet and sanitary installation. The works have been accepted in principle as part of the subdivision approval in 1977 and are now being undertaken to accommodate the proposed industrial facility. Both the sanitary and storm pipe will be constructed through the open trench method. Trenchless technology is not possible because of the depth of the pipe and the need to secure an access route for construction and maintenance. The impacts of the proposed installation will be temporary as the works will be buried and the site restored to original grade. Control of Flooding: The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain and as a result there will be no impact on the control of flooding. The outlet structure has been designed with a plunge pool in order to dissipate flows from the outlet pipe and minimize erosion. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the work area including the working easement and will remain in place until the installation is complete and the site is stabilized. The site will be stabilized through the use of native grasses and plantings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. 353 Conservation of Land: The location of the proposed storm outlet and sanitary pipe connection is within an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA). However, the ESA is not heavily vegetated given that the main reasons for it's designation relate to the size of the habitat block, the significance of the area as a migratory bird stopover, and the existence of a rare hawthorn species. Staff have walked the possible routings and have determined a routing for the underground pipes which minimizes vegetation removal and avoids the rare tree species. The applicant is finalizing detailed restoration plans for the proposed works to be completed to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. In addition, the City of Pickering staff have provided a written commitment to recommend closure of a road right of way, the extension of Church Street. The Church Street right of way forms part of the ESA and was originally intended to be part of the routing for the storm outlet and sewer connection, however given that it is heavily vegetated staff were not supportive of this routing. The applicant has also provided a commitment to contribute to TRCA projects within the watershed which along with the proposed restoration on site will result in a net environmental gain. Plantings The applicant proposes to conduct detailed plantings in the vicinity of the proposed works and at off -site areas to the satisfaction of TRCA staff and in accordance with detailed planting plans being finalized by the applicant. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as the works will have a temporary construction impact and the site will be restored to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. CFN: 35388 Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: May 3, 2004 Application #: 148/04/PICK CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO NORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 9.1.46 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (south of Finch Avenue, west of Weston Road), in the Toronto North Community Council, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City Of Toronto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill ( for: the creation of 3 stormwater management ponds; maintenance access, footpaths, fill behind retaining walls; 1800mm diameter storm sewer installation;) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (4 ponds; 4 headwalls; asphalt footpaths, asphalt maintenance road; inlet and outlet; weir; culvert installation; retaining walls) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse ( 200 metres of Emery Creek) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) via diverting flows to the Humber River. 354 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Sheets 1 -15; dated January 2002; received March 18, 2002; prepared by MacViro. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of 3 connected ponds (sedimentation pond Number 1, wetland pond Number 2 and finishing pond Number 3). The ponds will divert water from Emery Creek and provide treatment through settling and biological uptake prior to discharge to the Humber River. Ponds 1 and 2 will be connected by a 3 m x 1 m box culvert and Ponds 2 and 3 by a 1800 mm diameter storm sewer. The Humber River Water Quality Management Pond Report 1986 recommended the construction of a pilot stormwater management facility on Emery Creek in order to treat the flow from the creek and thereby improve the water quality of the Humber River. Emery Creek drains a fully developed mixed industrial /residential catchment. TRCA staff provided comments on the project during the Schedule C - Class Environmental Assessment process. Associated with the construction of the stormwater management ponds will be the construction of 4 headwalls, 1 inlet, 1 outlet 2 pedestrian and 1 maintenance bridges, footpaths, maintenance roads and storm sewer installation. The site is located within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm floodplain associated with the Humber River. Control of Flooding: Hydraulic analyses have been reviewed by TRCA staff for the proposed bridges and water quality ponds. Excavated material from the pond construction will be removed from the Regional Storm Floodplain. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. All proposed works will be constructed in the dry and tied in to the Humber River during the warmwater timing window. The goal of the ponds is to improve the water quality entering the Humber River. Conservation of Land: All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. There will be in- stream works associated with this project. Water will be diverted from Emery Creek to the Humber River via the storm ponds. The diversion will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and requires an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for the diversion. The applicant has provided a Letter of Intent which gives an indication of the compensation measures which will be undertaken. The DFO authorization has been received, and TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit when the Executive provides approval. 355 The works on TRCA lands required an easement and archaeological investigation. An archaeological investigation was completed for Pond 3 and a clearance has been received from TRCA's archaeologist. The Property Section submitted a report to the Executive Committee in March 2004. All property issues have been cleared. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 32093 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: July 11, 2002 Application #: 074/01/TOR 9.1.47 SANDRA PERFETTO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 5982, (32 York Valley Crescent), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sandra Perfetto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a new two- storey dwelling and pool within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. A -01; Site Plan, prepared by Gornik Build /Design Ltd., revised April 13, 2004, received April 22, 2004. • Drawing No. A -02; Basement Plan, Drawing No. 3; First Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -04; Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -05; Roof Plan, Drawing No. A -06; Cross Section A -06, Drawing A -07; West Elevation, Drawing No. A -08; North Elevation, Drawing No. A -09; South Elevation, Drawing No. A -10; East Elevation, Drawing No. A -11; Part South Elevation and Cross Section X2, Drawing No. A -12; Part North Elevation (X3) outline of Cross Section X2 and Typical Fireplace details, prepared by Gornik Build Design Ltd., dated December 2003, received March 19, 2004. • Drawing No.S1; Basement and Foundation Plan, Drawing No. S2; Ground Floor Framing Plan, Drawing No. S3; Second Floor Framing Plan, Drawing No. S4; Roof Framing Plan, prepared by Cathro Engineering Ltd., dated March 9, 2004, received March 18, 2004. 356 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new residence and pool within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The works include the removal of an existing residence and the construction of a new residence. All works will be sufficiently setback from the toe of the slope. Control of Flooding: The proposed residence will be flood proofed to the Regional Storm Elevation. A letter from a structural engineer will be submitted that indicates that the new dwelling will be able to withstand the depths and velocities in the event of a flood. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed before the commencement of work and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical /slope stability issues associated with this project. There will be no impacts on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Landscaping and plantings will be required as part of this project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1,8. - Development Guidelines for Development / Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34814 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 29, 2004 Application #: 420/03/TOR 9.1.48 LOUIE SANTAGUIDA To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 8, Plan 3955, (2 May Tree Road), in the Toronto North Community Council, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Louie Santaguida. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a new 2 storey and basement detached dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. 357 The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. A -1; Site Plan, Drawing No. A -2; Elevations, Drawing No. A -3; Elevations, prepared by Peter Higgins Architect Inc., dated March 18, 2004, received May 5, 2004. • Letter of Opinion, prepared by R. Kurkjiana, P. Eng., dated April 26, 2004, received May 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy area. to facilitate the construction of a new dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The subject property is located west of Bayview Avenue and south of York Mills Road. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be flood proofed to the Regional Storm elevation. All excess material will be removed from the site. The applicant has submitted a letter from a structural engineer stating that the proposed dwelling is able to withstand the depths and velocities in the event of a flood. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed before commencement of the work and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. The proposed works will not have an impact on fisheries, natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant proposes new plantings as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 35282 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 3, 2004 358 Application #: 102/04/TOR TOWN OF MARKHAM 9.1.49 PETER TONDL/KATHLEEN KAPOSI To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 29, Plan 401, (11 Eckardt Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Peter Tondl /Kathleen Kaposi. The purpose is to construct in the flood plain, and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a two storey addition at the rear of an existing dwelling and garage in the backyard. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Redline revised Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan, Prepared by R.G. McKibbon Ltd., dated April 8, 2004, received May 3, 2004. • Drawing A -1, Proposed renovations to the Tondl /Kaposi residence, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated January 2004, received May 4, 2004. • Drawing A -2, Proposed renovations to the Tondl /Kaposi residence, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated January 2004, received May 4, 2004. • Drawing A -3, Proposed renovations to the Tondl /Kaposi residence, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated January 2004, received May 3, 2004. • Drawing A -4, Proposed renovations to the Tondl /Kaposi residence, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated January 2004, received May 3, 2004. • Drawing A -1, Frame Garage, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated February 2004, received May 3, 2004. • Drawing A -2, Frame Garage, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated February 2004, received May 3, 2004. • Drawing A -6, Proposed renovations to the Tondl /Kaposi residence construction notes Frame Garage, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated April 2004, received May 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construction within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a two storey addition at the rear of an existing dwelling and a detached 3 -car garage. The property is located at 11 Eckardt Avenue, within the Unionville Special Policy Area of the Town of Markham. Control of Flooding: The proposed addition and garage will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm flood elevation of 174.21 metres, in accordance with SPA requirements. All excavated fill will be removed from the site. 359 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff has reviewed the application and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no in stream works associated with this project and therefore no concerns related to fish habitat loss. Plantings No significant vegetation will be disrupted from the proposed works. After construction, the site will be restored to its original condition with sod. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35215 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: March 10, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Application #: 073 /04 /MARK 9.1.50 FARIBORZ SAMIFANNI To construct in a flood plain on (200 Lakeland Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Fariborz Samifanni. The purpose is to construct in a floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling within the Lake Wilcox Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2004 to May 6, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Red -line revised Site Plan (for silt fencing and note re: removal of excavated material), prepared by Rowan - Stanciu Ltd, date received April 30, 2004. • Elevations, Drawing A4, prepared by DanMAR Design, dated April 2004, date received May 4, 2004. • Elevations, Drawing A5, prepared by DanMAR Design, dated April 2004, date received May 4, 2004. • Elevations, Drawing A6, prepared by DanMAR Design, dated April 2004, date received May 4, 2004. 360 • Letter from Samson Wong, Structural Engineer, dated May 3, 2004, date received May 4, 2004. Proposed Foundation and Basement Slab Flood Proofing, Drawing SSK, prepared by SWS Engineering Inc., dated May 2, 2004, date received May 4, 2004. • Pad Footings for Steel Posts, prepared by SWS Engineering Inc., date received May 4, 2004. Landscape Concept, Drawing L1 of 1, prepared by M & S Landscape Architects, dated May 4, 2004, date received May 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling in the Lake Wilcox Special Policy Area (SPA). The property is located on the north side of Lake Wilcox, within the Town of Richmond Hill. The proposal involves the demolition of an existing house and the construction of a new two- storey, single family detached dwelling. The house is located entirely within the SPA and will be appropriately floodproofed to the 350 year storm elevation, plus adequate freeboard, an acceptable standard under the SPA policies. The property is located over 40m from the shores of Lake Wilcox. Control of Flooding : TRCA engineering staff has confirmed that the house will be appropriately floodproofed to the 350 year storm elevation, plus freeboard. A structural engineer has confirmed that the house design will be able to withstand the depths and velocities of flooding in a Regional storm event. All excavated material is to be removed from site. TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the house. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries concerns related to this proposal. Further, there are no significant natural heritage features that will be impacted by the proposed development. All disturbed areas will be appropriately stabilized following construction. Plantings There will be no impacts to existing vegetation or other natural heritage features, hence no additional plantings are required. 361 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development / Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35383 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 5, 2004 Application #: 144/04/RH RES. #B99/04 - TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE TENDERS ESO4 -07 AND ESO4 -10 Tenders for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone and cobble stone for the Fishleigh Drive Project, City of Toronto.. Award of contracts ESO4 -07 for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone and ESO4 -10 for the supply and delivery of cobble stone. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Tender ESO4 -07 for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $42,920 excluding GST; AND FURTHER THAT Tender ESO4 -10 for the supply and delivery of cobbles to be awarded to Nelson Aggregate Co. at a total cost not to exceed $67,250 excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND These tenders were open to the public and were advertised in the Daily Commercial News. Six stone suppliers provided sealed bids, which were reviewed by staff as follows: SUMMARY OF UNIT PRICES (EXCLUDING G.S.T.) FOR THE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF APPROXIMATELY 2,000 TONNES OF 300 -600mm RIP RAP STONE 2,500 TONNES OF 75 -200mm COBBLES BIDDERS ESO4 -07: Rip Rap (300- 600mm) ESO4 -10: Cobbles (75- 200mm) Dufferin Aggregate $27.96 No Quote J.C. Rock Ltd. $21.46 $31.60 Lafarge Construction Materials $28.20 $35.00 Nelson Aggregate Co. $23.77 $26.90 Vicdom Sand & Gravel No Quote $43.00 Dig -Con International $46.00 $45.00 362 RATIONALE Sealed bids were received from 6 stone suppliers, which were opened Friday, April 16, 2004 at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee. Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received from J.C. Rock be accepted for the supply and delivery of rip rap stone at a unit price of $21.46 per tonne (excluding G.S.T.), and that the lowest quotation received from Nelson Aggregate Co. be accepted for the supply and delivery of cobble stone at a unit cost of $26.90 per tonne (excluding G.S.T.). FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are budgeted in the "Fishleigh Drive Project, City of Toronto ", account number 138 -03. Report prepared by: Joe Delle Fave, 416- 392 -9724 For Information contact: Joe DeIle Fave, 416- 392 -9724 Date: April 22, 2004 RES.#B100/04 - THE CITY OF TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT, 2002 - 2006 Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project (Phase 2) - Consultant Selection for Engineering Study and Final Design. To retain the services of a consultant to complete an engineering study and final design for the Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project in the City of Toronto. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the firm of Shoreplan Engineering Limited be retained to complete the engineering study and final design for the Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project (Phase 2), at a total cost not to exceed $32,000 excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1987, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA - formerly Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA)) retained Philpott Associates Coastal Engineers Limited (PACEL) to carry out an engineering study for the design of remedial measures for shoreline erosion control protection and slope stabilization along the Guildwood Parkway sector of the Scarborough Bluffs, east of the Guild Inn to Morningside Avenue, in the former City of Scarborough. The purpose of the study was to establish conditions at the site, review the need for protection measures and outline the possible course of action. The study concluded that erosion protection was required along this sector of shoreline, and that a revetment was the most appropriate remedial alternative. 363 Due to unresolved property issues, the revetment that was to extend east of Morningside Avenue was re- designed to end at 471 Guildwood Parkway, leaving seven properties to the east unprotected. The TRCA would now like to complete the erosion protection works along the sector of shoreline from 471 Guildwood Parkway to Morningside Avenue, and recently re- initiated the project under the Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood Erosion Control Projects (2002). In April 2004, a Terms of Reference (TOR) was prepared by TRCA staff and distributed to the following environmental /coastal engineering consultants: • W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Limited; • Shoreplan Engineering Limited; • Jacque Whitford Environment Limited; • Cumming Cockburn Limited; • Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited. These consultants were chosen because of their experience with studies of this nature. RATIONALE Proposals were received for the selected consultants on April 23, 2004, with the exception of Jacques Whitford Environment Limited who declined to bid due to staff commitments with other projects. The consultant were evaluated on the following criteria: • The written proposal; • Experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • Understanding of background information, project, environmental concerns and proposed approach; • Timeframes for completion of the investigation; and • Cost. The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project (Phase 2) Bidders Selection BIDDERS COST ESTIMATES (excluding G.S.T.) Jacques Whitford Environmental Ltd. No Bid Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. $129,690.00 W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. $87,366.00 Cumming Cockburn Ltd. $65,965.50 Shoreplan Engineering Ltd. $32,000.00 364 The professional services offered in the Shoreplan Engineering Ltd. proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the TOR and was the lowest bid at a cost not to exceed $32,000 excluding G.S.T.. FINANCIAL DETAILS This work will be carried out under Account No. 139 -15. Funding is provided by the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006. Report prepared by: Moranne Hagey, 416 - 392 -9690 For Information contact: Moranne Hagey, 416- 392 -9690 Date: April 26, 2004 RES. #8101/04 - THE CITY OF TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT, 2002 - 2006 Summerlea Park Erosion Control Project - Consultant Selection for Review of Stream Realignment Alternatives.. To retain the services of a consultant to review stream realignment alternatives for the Summerlea Park Erosion Control Project in the City of Toronto. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the firm of Greck and Associates Limited be retained to complete the review of stream realignment alternatives for the Summerlea Park Erosion Control Project, at a total cost not to exceed $21,945 excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND For the past several years, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has maintained a successful partnership with the City of Toronto in identifying and repairing erosion sites within parks. Each year the city identifies erosion sites, which require immediate remediation and The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) designs and constructs the proposed repairs. In the summer of 2003, the city identified two erosion sites on the Humber and West Humber Rivers within Summerlea Park, near the intersection of Albion Road and Weston Road in the City of Toronto. Erosion of the riverbanks has resulted in the loss of valuable tableland that is heavily used by local community soccer leagues, creating a safety hazard and threatening the closure of one or more pitches. Currently, the use of all the soccer pitches is maximized and the loss of one or more fields would be devastating to the Rexdale community. 365 Following an investigation of the site, TRCA staff recommended that a remedial erosion control project be carried out to prevent the further loss of property and protect public safety. The project was formally initiated under the Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects (2002) in August 2003, and several alternative options of bank stabilization were developed in- house. The options were then presented to the Community Liaison Committee (CLC) for review and comment. The preliminary alternative options were generally well received, however it was suggested that an additional option of stream realignment be given consideration. As this alternative is beyond the original scope of work, TRCA staff recommended that a consultant be retained to develop the stream realignment alternative and finalize the design of the preferred alternative, once selected. In April 2004, a Terms of Reference (TOR) was prepared by TRCA staff and distributed to the following environmental /geotechnical consultants: • Aquafor Beech Limited; • Jacques Whitford Environment Limited; • Golder & Associate Limited; • Greck and Associates Limited; • Schollen & Company Incorporated. These consultants were chosen because of their experience with investigations of this nature. RATIONALE Four proposals were received from the selected consultants on April 23, 2004, as Aquafor Beech Limited and Schollen & Company Incorporated submitted a joint proposal. The consultants were evaluated on the following criteria: • The written proposal; • Experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • Understanding of background information, project, environmental concerns and proposed approach; • Timeframes for completion of the investigation; and • Cost. The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: Summerlea Park Erosion Control Project Bidders Summary BIDDERS COST ESTIMATES (excluding G.S.T.) Aquafor Beech Ltd. /Schollen & Co. Inc. $49,645.00 Golder Associates Ltd. $39,149.00 Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. $23,900.00 Greck and Associates Ltd. $21,945.00 366 The professional services offered in the Greck and Associates proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the TOR and was the lowest bid at a cost not to exceed $21,945 excluding G.S.T.. The work will be lead by Greck and Associates Ltd., in association with Parish Geomorphic Ltd., Terraprobe and Roth & Associates, to provide the multi - disciplinary services required to carry out this undertaking. FINANCIAL DETAILS This work will be carried out under the Account No. 155 -01. Funding is provided by the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 -2006. Report prepared by: Moranne Hagey, 416- 392 -9690 For Information contact: Moranne Hagey, 416- 392 -9690 Date: April 26, 2004 RES. #B102/04 - "JUTURNA" - THE TRCA WEB -BASED MAP DATA SERVER - PHASE TWO Continuing a partnership with York University and the implementation of the JUTURNA project across Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's jurisdiction under the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) continue the partnership with York University and the implementation of the JUTURNA project across TRCA's jurisdiction under TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program; AND FURTHER THAT TRCA provide to York University a total of $35,000, inclusive of any applicable taxes, in order to support this work. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2001, the TRCA initiated a Regional Watershed Monitoring Program in order to provide a comprehensive, integrated and coordinated approach to environmental monitoring in the Greater Toronto Area. The program includes the establishment of a monitoring network that will endeavour to bring together a group of like- minded, cooperative agencies and organizations to collect, store, distribute and report on environmental monitoring data that furthers the interests of all involved parties. This monitoring network builds upon the existing local and project- specific monitoring efforts of its partners. Project Objectives • To develop a program that provides the necessary information to assess the health of the watersheds, subwatersheds, waterfront ecosystems and Remedial Action Plan (RAP) area, spatially and temporally. 367 • To identify a set of indicators that reflect ecosystem condition, integrate the monitoring requirements of the RAP with report cards for individual watersheds, and are compatible with municipal state of the environment reporting and other broad programs like State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference (SOLEC), for the Great Lakes basin, and the provincial policy performance indicators. • To develop an efficient program that builds upon existing monitoring activities, avoids duplication between agencies, municipalities, and organizations, is cost effective in allocating the best use of resources and informs management decisions. • To identify ways to engage and involve the public, interest and school groups in meaningful monitoring activities. • To develop and obtain agreement from stakeholders on a set of monitoring protocols for the collection, analysis, storage and distribution of data on the indicators that are identified. The JUTURNA project focuses on the development a web -based data assessment and reporting system to support TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. The project evolved out of a partnership initiated in 2001 between TRCA, York University and Citizens' Environment Watch, an environmental non - government organization housed at the University of Toronto. At that time, a similar but smaller scale data system called MapReflections was developed primarily for community monitoring data. The success of this initial project demonstrated the value of the partnership and the potential for expanding the work to more closely meet the objectives of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. Its purpose is to demonstrate how biological monitoring and abiotic data can be presented in a geographic context to facilitate the sharing of watershed monitoring data with civic, scientific and political stakeholders. This will allow for a better appreciation of potential physical factors in catchment areas that may influence findings from in- stream monitoring activities. The geographic scope for this pilot project is the Humber River watershed. In the first phase (pilot) of this project, four indicators of stream quality are provided, namely the Fish Index of Biotic Integrity, Benthic Invertebrate Aggregate Assessment, Thermal Stability and Basic Water Chemistry. All indicators use data collected under the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, with the first three using established TRCA data analysis and interpretation procedures. By using these data procedures, monitoring data can be rolled -up to provide a stream condition that can be readily understood. For example, the Benthic Invertebrate Aggregate Assessment uses a series of 10 common indices (e.g. Diversity, Hilsenhoff Biotic Index) with regionally- specific criteria in terms of the level of stream impairment. By comparing the criteria for each index (based on an unimpacted stream site) with the values from a stream site of interest, an aggregate assessment can be performed over all 10 indices with the designation of an appropriate stream condition. Sites can be designated as either impaired or potentially impaired under this procedure. While the results are not specific to the types of possible impacts, trends in the data may raise "red- flags ", and prompt more intensive investigation. Data provided through this website is also available in a raw format where users can conduct their own analyses. 368 Beyond data analysis and interpretation functions, the project also provides the opportunity for community stakeholders to become engaged in more meaningful ways when watershed monitoring information is being disseminated. Stakeholders will have the option of searching and visualizing watershed monitoring information with greater ease, but also to connect with existing community -based environmental organizations (e.g. Citizens' Environment Watch - CEW) to consider participating in data collection, assessment and sharing information. A key step towards better community engagement, which this project provides, is for users to be able to input their own data and generate analyzed reports for their monitoring sites. This provision is key to positioning TRCA as a leader in the support of community -based monitoring activities. Furthermore, the project provides a platform for the embodied energy of shared interests, identity and trust - what has been called "social capital" by harnessing and focusing support on the stewardship of the region's environment. This project represents an important step toward integrating and reinforcing a wide range and variety of different programs within TRCA's jurisdiction. The first phase of this project is set for completion June, 2004. The closing will be marked by the availability of this web -based data assessment and reporting system through the TRCA website. A communications plan and public training events are also planned to best promote the work done thus far on the pilot version. Previously, the work was presented and well received at the 10th A.D. Latornell Conservation Symposium in November, 2003. A presentation to key TRCA staff members was also made in December, 2003 for information, discussion and future opportunity purposes. It has also undergone a two week user - acceptance- testing period involving a group of TRCA staff members and external partners (e.g. CEW). RATIONALE One of the key elements of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program is the data collected for each of the indicators included in the program. The ability to analyze, interpret and report on the data to the program stakeholders, including provincial agencies, municipal partners and the general public, is critical to the overall success and effectiveness of the monitoring program. Web -based reporting is yet another opportunity to make data available and understandable in a watershed context. In its present pilot format, the system can only provide data for the Humber River watershed which does not represent the full extent of TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. JUTURNA will also help meet the recommendations and priority actions set out by the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan in many areas. These areas include monitoring program results reporting and integration, assessing progress in terms of watershed health, education and involvement of the public, and support for non - government organizations. This project directly addresses Result 2 listed in the draft Monitoring and Information Management Annex of COA of Scientific data and information shared among government, organizations and basin residents. 369 An on -going partnership with York University will not only facilitate the development of the web -based application required for the data analysis and reporting /sharing, but will provide the Web /GIS platform from which the application can be operated. This platform (ARCIMS) and the infrastructure required to operate it are currently beyond the TRCA's IT and web infrastructure capabilities. Further, this partnership and work with York University also provides another opportunity to further develop the monitoring "network" that has been identified under the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Upon funding approval, a meeting with York University partners will further detail the second phase of the project and outline the specific elements to be developed. The scope of the work will include the addition of three watersheds (Rouge, Don and Duffins) with at minimum the inclusion of all features available in the Humber pilot version. These features include the four aquatic health indicators, all reporting and data provision tools (mapping and numeric) and the community data/resource portal. Additional indicators of watershed health are also planned for inclusion in this second phase. The scope of this second development phase (i.e. watersheds, indicators) is subject to funding availability. Since the current content relates primarily to the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, development of new (or reworking of existing) content in the current pilot project will be carried out. Work will done to make the content better reflect the relationship of the environmental monitoring data to COA and the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. It is anticipated that the work will commence as early as June 1, 2004 with the final product completed and tested by March 1, 2005. This project will be a collaborative effort among partners and a private software developer, namely Seconsys Inc. This firm has close ties to York University through faculty membership and successfully completed the first phase of this project. The purpose in retaining Seconsys Inc. for this second phase is to maximize efficiency and thereby cost savings in further implementing this project. The website will continue to be hosted by York University as part of the Regional Monitoring Network, or until such a time as the TRCA GIS and web infrastructure could facilitate it. FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA agrees to provide support for this project at a total cost of $35,000, although additional funding partners are being sought in order to implement the full scope of the intended work ( i.e. watersheds, indicators). A funding proposal has been submitted to the Great Lakes Sustainability Fund requesting $20,000. Other potential funding sources include the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Canada to the amount of $20,000. York University will be contributing approximately $22,500 of in -kind contribution to the project related to software costs and the provision of graduate assistants. Other in -kind support is being provided by Citizens' Environment Watch to assist in the implementation of this project at the community level. In addition, York University will contribute (in -kind) approximately $2,000 /year related to the platform hosting costs as long as the infrastructure remains at the university. Funding to support TRCA's portion of this partnership is available through the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, Account No. 124 -30. 370 Report prepared by: Jeff Borisko, extension 5333 For Information contact: Jeff Borisko, extension 5333 Date: April 26, 2004 RES. #B103/04 - WETLAND IDENTIFICATION PROJECT: REGIONS OF PEEL AND YORK To retain a consultant to carry out the Wetland Identification Project for the Regions of Peel and York. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the consulting firm Gartner Lee Ltd. be retained to develop a methodology for the identification of suitable sites for wetland creation and enhancement and apply it to the Regions of York and Peel at a cost not to exceed $30,000 including GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The watersheds in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) were once almost entirely forested, with dense riparian vegetation, stable flow regimes and home to a wide diversity of terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna. On -line and isolated wetlands found in the headwater or mid -reach areas of the watersheds played an important role in attenuating flows, increasing infiltration and discharge, protecting water quality, introducing organic inputs and providing the necessary habitat conditions for many flora and fauna species. Across southern Ontario, these wetlands were of four types; bogs, fens, marshes and swamps. In the GTA, the predominant wetland types presently found are marshes and swamps. It has been estimated that approximately 80% of the historic wetlands in southern Ontario have been lost. The Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) watershed strategies, such as Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber, Greening our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks and Forty Steps to a New Don, and the York Region Greening Strategy, have all identified a need to conserve and enhance wetland habitats in order to maintain and restore their associated functions. Although some wetland creation and enhancement work is undertaken through strategically planned projects, a more comprehensive analysis of potential opportunities throughout TRCA's jurisdiction is required. With increased development pressure in the Regions of York and Peel, and associated potential impacts on the remaining wetlands, it is felt that in order to maintain or enhance the existing hydrologic functions and habitat availability within the watersheds, potential locations for the creation and enhancement of wetlands need to be identified. 371 The purpose of this project is to identify potential locations in the Regions of York and Peel where wetland creation is possible within a 15 -year time frame. These wetlands may be either on -line, off -line or wholly self- contained, depressional features. The project will include developing a set of criteria for assessing the suitability of a site for a potential wetland. This will include reviewing topography, surficial geology, soils, watercourses, groundwater, historic wetland information, TRCA's terrestrial natural heritage system and private /public land holdings. RATIONALE Seven consulting firms submitted proposals based on the Terms of Reference for this project. Consultant Bid Summary Consultants Projected Costs Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc. 29,699.00 Ecoplans Ltd. 29,860.00 Dillon Consulting 28,023.30 Gartner Lee Ltd. 29,633.00 LGL Environmental Research Associates 29,171.00 North South Environmental Inc. 29,968.56 Stantec 27,900.00 TRCA staff reviewed the proposals and it was determined that to best meet the objectives outlined in the Terms of Reference, Gartner Lee Ltd. be retained. Projected costs were considered secondary to the proposed methodology, qualifications and expertise of the project team members identified by each firm, due to the upset limit set for the project. The Gartner Lee Ltd. team has some of the most experienced staff in all facets of the project, including wetland specialists, hydrogeologists, spatial analysts and GIS specialists. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The consultant shall: 1. Collect and review relevant background information, where available, such as GIS data layers, literature and other relevant information; 2. Evaluate the results of the review and develop a rationale for choosing an appropriate methodology for delineating the locations of potential wetlands; 3. Identify any gaps or limitations in the methodology and any constraints in the implementation; 4. Apply the methodology to the TRCA jurisdiction in the Regions of Peel and York; 5. Provide information on each of the wetlands identified (e.g. potential type, size, on -line /off - line); 6. Prepare a report summarizing the methodology, analysis and results of the project; 7. Address the models ability to be calibrated for other regions; and 8. Address the level of field verification required to implement identified potential wetland creation sites. 372 The consultant shall provide: 1. Five (5) copies of a draft report by July 26, 2004; 2. Ten (10) copies of a final report by August 30, 2004; 3. A digital copy of the final report in WordPerfect and PDF format; and 4. Any spatial data associated with the analysis and results of the report in the format and projection as specified by TRCA (ESRI, shapefiles, NAD 27, UTM). FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds have been provided by the Regions of York and Peel to carry out this project. An upset limit of $30,000 including GST has been set for this project by TRCA. Funds to undertake this project are available in account 120 -60. Report prepared by: Natalie Iwanycki, extension 5298 For Information contact: Natalie Iwanycki, extension 5298 Date: April 21, 2004 RES. #8104/04 - HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODELLING SERVICES Award of Contract for Hydrogeologic Model Refinement, Humber, Etobicoke and Mimico watersheds. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor WHEREAS Earthfx Inc. has prepared a three dimensional geologic and numerical groundwater flow model for most of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) jurisdiction, including most of the Humber River watershed; WHEREAS Earthfx Inc. has been retained by the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition to further develop and enhance their geologic and hydrogeologic flow models; WHEREAS the TRCA has a specific need for refinement of Earthfx Inc. models in the western portion of our jurisdiction; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the firm of Earthfx Inc. be retained to undertake refinement of their hydrogeological analysis within the Humber and Upper Etobicoke watersheds program as part of the Humber watershed plan and the Upper Etobicoke subwatershed plan, at a cost not to exceed $25,000 plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The TRCA has committed to completing the hydrogeological components of the Humber watershed plan and the Upper Etobicoke subwatershed plan as part of our ongoing integrated watershed planning process. 373 Earthfx Inc. was retained by the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) groundwater management project to develop a groundwater model for TRCA's jurisdiction, which has now been completed. Since that time, Earthfx has been retained to further develop and enhance the models with additional data inputs. However, because of hydrogeological constraints at the time the model was completed, the model domain still does not include the Upper reaches of the Humber River or the Upper Etobicoke Creek subwatershed at a suitable level of detail to meet TRCA's analytical requirements. Therefore, the TRCA requires further refinement of the model in this specific area. This work that will not be completed without a financial contribution by the TRCA. RATIONALE The YPDT technical steering committee selected Earthfx as the preferred team to carry out the project largely because this team had more experience in the YPDT area, and incorporated more time for senior experienced modeling staff to provide key input to the study. TRCA wishes to build on the success of the YPDT model by incorporating refinements and additional functionality at the watershed and subwatershed scales in the Humber and Etobicoke watershed areas. Given Earthfx's previous knowledge of this project and their involvement in the creation of the first- generation groundwater flow model, it is staff's recommendation that they be awarded this follow -on funding to enhance the existing product. Use of another consultant for this work would result in significant duplication of previous efforts by Earthfx, since this firm has the working knowledge of the model framework and operation. FINANCIAL DETAILS The project cost will be $26,750, after the GST is added to the consultant's estimate. There are sufficient funds in the Humber watershed and Upper Etobicoke subwatershed groundwater model budgets (accounts #120 -21 and #122 -21) to cover the costs of the above project. Report prepared by: Don Ford, extension 5369 For Information contact: Don Ford, extension 5369 Date: April 22, 2004 RES. #B105/04 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE, CITY F TORONTO Tender ESO4 -01 - Events Pavilion 2004. Contact ESO4 -01 for the construction of the Events Pavilion 2004 at Black Creek Pioneer Village. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor 374 THAT staff conduct a review of the bids to be opened at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee on May 7, 2004 and based on this review prepare a recommendation for award of Contact ESO4 -01 for the construction of the Events Pavilion 2004 for consideration at Authority Meeting #5/04, to be held on May 28, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1999, the Authority approved the Future Directions Strategy for Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV). A major part of the strategy is the capital projects for restoration of buildings and new attractions infrastructure. These projects total $6 million over a five year period. This program has been ongoing since the year 2000. The Events Pavilion was initially tendered in December 2001 with a total cost of $2.6 million dollars, well in excess of the 1.2 million dollar budget. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff and the project architect undertook a redesign of the pavilion to provide a more basic structure within the established $1.2 million dollar budget while allowing for future development of the building at a later stage should growth and expansion warrant it. The new re- designed one - storey Events Pavilion is approximately a 7,000 thousand square foot steel truss and timber frame multi -use building with additional site support facilities. The Events Pavilion will accommodate new washrooms and a snack bar to enhance customer service. The new washroom facility incorporated into the Events Pavilion design was identified as a priority for BCPV in the capital plan. The snack bar will also increase the potential for revenue generation at BCPV. RATIONALE Staff will review the bids received and forward a recommendation to the Authority for award of Contract ESO4 -01 at Meeting #5/04, to be held on May 28, 2004. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this project is available in account 503 -10. Report prepared by: Mark Preston, 416- 392 -9722 For Information contact: Mark Preston, 416- 392 -9722 Date: April 22, 2004 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:32 p.m., on Friday, May 7, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 375 Brian Denney Secretary- Treasurer t.. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/04 June 4, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #5104, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, June 4, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick OBrien Chair REGRETS Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member RES.#B106/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Frank Dale THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/04, held on May 7, 2004, be approved. CARRIED 376 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B107/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed Maple Roofing Supplies Inc., CFN 35450. Purchase of property located west of Newkirk Road, north of Crosby Avenue (municipally known as 208 Newkirk Road), Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed. Rob Ford Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.023 hectares (0.057 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Maple Roofing Supplies Inc., being Part of Lot 22, Plan 4840, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, west of Newkirk Road, north of Crosby Avenue (municipally known as 208 Newkirk Road); THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's agent, Mr. Frank Bellini of ARCA Planning & Design. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 377 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of a Zoning By -law Amendment Application, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands which are comprised of a stream corridor and are situated entirely within the Regulatory Flood Plain of the German Mills Creek at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of. Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension For Information contact: George Leja, extension Date: May 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 378 Attachment 1 I: NATJRAL HFRITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 20D1 -20115 Floor Plain and Conserva7cn Comucnant, Don RIVer1Na!ersncd •' N Mso e Roofing Supplies Inc. CFN 95450 v_• trb 7J-�t r7 c'") ��=tY TI �'"'•� aea ,VC"' �.. TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL onservaf:on r for The Living City ITRCALANDS WNW SUBJECT PROPERTY 379 RES. #B108/04 - Moved by: Seconded by. NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Bethel Canadian Reformed Church, CFN 35353. Purchase of property located on the east side of Bayview Avenue, south of 19th Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed. Rob Ford Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.74 hectares (1.83 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Bethel Canadian Reformed Church, being Part of Lot 29, Concession 2 and designated as Parts 6, 8, and 11 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Bennett Young Ltd., Professional Land Surveyors under their Job No. 2004074R1, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located on the east side of Bayview Avenue, south of 19th Avenue; THAT a conservation easement for the protection and enhancement of the environmental features and functions containing 0.24 hectares (0.59 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Bethel Canadian Reformed Church, said land being situate on Part of Lot 29, Concession 2 and designated as Part 3 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Bennett Young Ltd., Professional Land Surveyors Ltd. under their Job No. 2004074R1, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located on the east side Bayview Avenue, south of 19th Avenue; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements and a right -of -way in favour of Bethel Canadian Reformed Church; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Quinto M. Annibale of Loopstra Nixon LLP, Barristers and Solicitors. 380 The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of a Site Plan Application, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands which are comprised of a stream corridor encompassing the Regional Storm flood plain along a headwater tributary of the Rouge River and located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan. A conservation easement was also established by TRCA staff which will act as a vegetated buffer between the church site development and the stream corridor; the Bethel Canadian Reformed Church has agreed to renaturalize the conservation easement with native plantings acceptable to TRCA staff. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: May 25, 2004 Attachments: 1 381 Attachment 1 NA CURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACO uIRITION PROJECT 2001 -2305 flood Plain and ConseNdon Component, Rouge River Watsrsned Bethel Canadian Returnee Church CI-N 39353 1 • • •4 _, M1M1 V • r 71 Tr PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT TOWN • NCHunND HLt �'� I►2,vtr i �� E- 382 poosry laon for The Living City ITRCA LANDS EMI SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSED CONSERvATION EASEMENT RES.#B109/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE CITY OF VAUGHAN Conveyance of Land for a Partial Cul -de -Sac for the Reconstruction of Canada Company Avenue Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, CFN 35263. Receipt of a request from the City of Vaughan for the conveyance of land for a partial cul -de -sac, north end and east side of Canada Company Avenue, east of Islington Avenue (north of the Boyd Field Centre entrance driveway), Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York. Rob Ford Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Vaughan to convey certain lands for the reconstruction of Canada Company Avenue, north end and east side of Canada Company Avenue, east of Islington Avenue (north of the Boyd Field Centre entrance driveway), Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Vaughan in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA -owned land containing 0.05 hectares (0.12 acres), more or less, be conveyed to the City of Vaughan for the reconstruction of Canada Company Avenue, said land being Part of Lot 19, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, designated as Part 1 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Rady - Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 99 -194, dated March 16, 2004; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs; THAT the City of Vaughan is to fully indemnify and absolve the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages, or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this sale or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Vaughan; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT in addition, the developer, Lakeview Homes Inc., the primary beneficiary of the servicing, agrees and undertakes, at its expense, to extend the municipal watermain to TRCA property and construct a valve chamber no later than November 11, 2005, for future connection to the Boyd Field Centre offices; 383 THAT said sale be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Vaughan has formally requested the conveyance of a small fragment of TRCA -owned land needed to create a cul -de -sac at the north end of Canada Company Avenue as part of the reconstruction of this roadway. As part of the on -going development of the Kortright Ravines subdivision (19T- 99V11) located between Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue, five (5) lots of these lands front onto Canada Company Avenue. The Kortright Ravines Subdivision Agreement includes an undeveloped block of land owned by Lakeview Homes Inc. and a 0.3 metre road reserve conveyed to the City of Vaughan that front onto Canada Company Avenue. Block 50 on Registered Plan 65M -3532, which contains the five residential lots, is restricted from development pending a resolution of municipal servicing which includes the reconstruction of Canada Company Avenue. Presently, Canada Company Avenue is a gravel road serving local traffic to three driveway entrances, including the Boyd Field Centre, with access onto Islington Avenue. The rural character of the road will be maintained and Lakeview Homes Inc. has provided a lump sum payment to the City of Vaughan for annual maintenance for a duration of 20 years after assumption of the road. Canada Company Avenue will be maintained with a "Double Stone Chip" surface treatment; all local soft spots will be excavated, refilled, and compacted as part of the road reconstruction. The increase in local traffic will require a turning circle (i.e. cul -de -sac) at the north end of Canada Company Avenue for garbage collection, snow ploughing, and emergency vehicle turn - around. The five residential lots within Block 50 will be serviced by the municipal watermain and sanitary sewer already in place within the developed portion of the Kortright Ravines subdivision. Lakeview Homes Inc. is the primary beneficiary of the road improvements and, as a result, TRCA staff has negotiated and entered into an agreement for Lakeview Homes Inc. to extend, entirely at its expense, the municipal watermain and valve chamber onto TRCA lands immediately adjacent to Canada Company Avenue which will be eventually connected to the Boyd Field Centre building. The Council of the City of Vaughan approved a staff recommendation to provide municipal services to Block 50 and to reconstruct Canada Company Avenue as outlined above at a meeting of the Committee of the Whole on September 22, 2003. In addition to the fee simple conveyance, temporary working easements are also likely required to complete the proposed works TRCA staff will be discussing this matter with the City of Vaughan and Lakeview Homes Inc. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. The subject lands were acquired from Thomson Groceries Ltd. on January 26, 1961 under the Boyd Conservation Area Project. A plan illustrating the fee simple conveyance location is attached. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The City of Vaughan and Lakeview Homes Inc. has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: May 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 385 Attachment 1 44, - PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC g . .„, prtoraosen WATER • METER Ct* MISER A • `,'1•• — - , .' : ,^..:."" "••• ta OE f . ••■■ ....‹,-....,..V.i, 'Z. ' '..‘I'Z 5* ,..1 .... '.. „, • ... , , • / BOYD FIELD CENTRE OFFICE ;f‘ / -- ••\;„;,,, THE CITY OF VAL131-1AN Conveyance crt Land for a Partial Cul-de-Sac for tie fief of Canada CDinpany Avenue Humber River Watershee, City of Vaag-lan CFN 352MS • WoRiagiciaion for the Living City L:1JTMDS 386 PROPOSED OULDE-SC PROPOSED WATER METER CHAMBER RES. #B110/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TORONTO GOLF CLUB Request for Permanent Easement for a 150 mm Diameter Irrigation Water Main, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, City of Toronto ( Etobicoke York Community Council Area), CFN 35460. Receipt of a request from the Toronto Golf Club to provide a permanent easement for a 150 mm diameter irrigation water main north and south of Lakeshore Boulevard, east of Etobicoke Creek in Enfield Park and Marie Curtis Park, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). Rob Ford Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Toronto Golf Club to provide a permanent easement for 150 mm diameter irrigation water main, north and south of Lakeshore Boulevard, east of Etobicoke Creek in Enfield Park and Marie Curtis Park, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area); WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the Toronto Golf Club in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.24 hectares (0.60 acres), more or less, be granted to the Toronto Golf Club for a 150 mm diameter irrigation water main, said land being north and south of Lakeshore Boulevard, east of Etobicoke Creek in Enfield Park and Marie Curtis Park, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area) and designated as Part 2 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by David B. Searles Surveying Ltd. under their File No. 71 -1 -04 and Paris 1, 2, and 3 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by David B. Searles Surveying Ltd. under their File No. 71 -0 -04; THAT the TRCA grant the easement across the subject land on the following terms and conditions: (a) the purchase price be $10,000.00; (b) Toronto Golf Club is to pay all TRCA legal, appraisal, survey, and other costs incurred to complete the transaction; (c) Toronto Golf Club is to fully indemnify and absolve the TRCA from any and all claims for injuries, damages, or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction; 387 (d) Toronto Golf Club agrees and undertakes, at its expense, to improve fish passage through the existing dam presently used to impound water for irrigation of the golf course within the Etobicoke Creek or remove the dam in its entirety within two (2) years of implementing the new water taking system from Lake Ontario; (e) any additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the TRCA solicitor; THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Toronto Golf Club; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto Golf Club is located on the east side of the Etobicoke Creek, north of Lakeshore Boulevard in the City of Mississauga. The golf club currently draws water from an on line pond located on the Etobicoke Creek just north of the CNR tracks, per their existing Permit -To- Take -Water from the Ministry of the Environment. The Club needs an alternate water supply for quantity and quality reasons. The TRCA has been encouraging golf clubs to reduce their dependency on surface water takings from watercourses. These takings have major impact on watercourses, particularly during low flow periods. As in this case, to create a large enough supply of water for irrigation on smaller creeks, a dam is required. These dams create barriers to fish passage. The Toronto Golf Club initiated discussions with TRCA technical staff to complete and extend an existing irrigation water main to Lake Ontario for the purpose of utilizing water from the lake for irrigation purposes. 388 An existing water main and easement in favour of Toronto Golf Club runs on the east side of Etobicoke Creek, south from the CNR tracks, approximately 200 meters through Enfield Park, (City of Toronto property), under Lakeshore Boulevard and then 450 meters through Marie Curtis Park to a point in the Etobicoke Creek 180 meters from Lake Ontario, (TRCA property), as shown on the attached sketch The section of water main under the CNR railway and the Etobicoke Creek to the golf course was never completed and the Toronto Golf Club has been irrigating from the on line pond on Etobicoke Creek The Toronto Golf Club is proposing to abandon a small section of water main and intake to the Etobicoke Creek and extend the main /intake and easement to Lake Ontario. In addition they are planning to complete the missing link in the water main under the CNR and Etobicoke Creek to the golf course which impacts a small parcel of TRCA property in Enfield Park north of the CNR. In order to address TRCA's fish passage concerns the Toronto Golf Club have agreed and undertaken, at its expense, to improve fish passage through the existing dam presently used to impound water for irrigation of the golf course within the Etobicoke Creek or remove the dam entirely. Whichever proposal is undertaken, it will be subject to TRCA approval, and done within two (2) years of implementing the new water taking system from Lake Ontario. The Toronto Golf Club has formally requested a permanent easement over certain TRCA lands through Enfield Park and Marie Curtis Park for the construction of a 150 mm diameter irrigation water main. Staff feel that a net environmental gain will be achieved by eliminating the water taking from the Etobicoke Creek together with the proposed fish barrier improvements and as a result are recommending the permanent easements. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required for construction access; staff is presently working with the project consultant to determine if a temporary easement is required. The subject property in Marie Curis Park was acquired from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on July 29, 1974 and February 21, 1990 and Her Majesty the Queen represented by the Ministry of Natural Resources on November 14, 1991 under the Waterfront Acquisition Project - Etobicoke Sector. The subject property in Enfield Park north of the CNR was acquired from the Toronto Golf Club on July 25, 1979 under the Etobicoke Creek Flood Plain Lands Acquisition Project, and reserved the rights in the transfer to construct a water main. The entire length of the easement is located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek. Development Services Section staff is reviewing a permit application submitted under Ontario Regulation 158 for all proposed works situated within the regulatory flood plain and regulated area. A report for the permit application submission is also included in this agenda. Plantings: Through the permit application review process, a landscape plan will be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. 389 FINANCIAL DETAILS The Toronto Golf Club will pay $10,000 as compensation for granting of this permanent easement and will assume all reasonable costs (i.e. legal, survey, landscaping, etc.) involved in completing this transaction. The Toronto Golf Club is also responsible for all costs associated with the fish passage or dam removal. Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: May 25, 2004 Attachments: 1 390 Attachment 1 i ' --• — TORONTO GOLF CLUB • EXISTTNA OAY .,� • .� • ` / . / C. FIELD PARK tr- t�yY TORONTO GOLF CLUB Request for Formant :-1 rawrnnnt br a 1 `uU trim Diameter lrr pdr n Water Man Etoolooke Creak Wat r f1oJ Gly of Toronto {Etoblcakc YorK •ommuitty Council Area) CFN Cl. ILD i. r{ lam r- ,,,II • 1 �.. '� I �l:..��ll _ 1 � IJ �� "sir. I4. b ' NLm WATER }LAIN - _ - �,`�1,,_' `i �' l'_"-'---• ,ice 1'3; - �• 1 ` v •T ., i i..0' —v ll.' _ 1�•,:y ' 7 I, ENfIt =LO PARK -_ .-i"� -7 art arrononialitoeffin. i -.9, I — r�r I 6lfBJECf 70 AN EASENENf IN — .�_; '' Q' Ir \ I �ti_`C j -� FAVOUP OF�ONfO GOLf CLLIa ,'I% ; i .... " \ L - -- -' % 1'I ♦ • . ,rL CL' i '1 .\ j `` -(`� ! I O� l Y' SH • .44 '1 I 11 ti 3* , Ir t I 11 t 7 _• I • f i EXISTING EASEMENT IN FAVOUR 1 OF TORONTO GOLF CLUIt 1f SUBJECT PROPERTY LAKE ONTA R 0 4 / 1�1 roc: RN'NOrrA \O with -'-- o»servafion L for )he living Clip V-L-fTRCALANDS '\ SUBJECT PROPERTY n 391 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #8111 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to. (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 - 8.1.18 and 8.1.47 - 8.1.50, with the exception of 8.1.3, 8.1.4, 8.1.7, 8.1.8 and 8.1.12, which are Minor Works permits) which are listed below. RES. #B112 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Suzan Hall David Barrow CARRIED THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications 8.1.3, 8.1.4, 8.1.7, 8.1.8 and 8.1.12, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.1 ASPEN RIDGES HOMES (ELLIOT CREEK) LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 14, Concession 6 EHS, (East Side of Torbram, South of Countryside Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Aspen Ridges Homes (Elliot Creek) Ltd. 392 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of a tributary to the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Torbram Road Condominium Townhomes Grading Plan, plan no. 2, prepared by RAND Engineering Corporation, last revised April 4, 2004. • Torbram Road Condominium Townhomes Storm Drainage Plan, plan no. 3, prepared by RAND Engineering Corporation, dated June 2003. • Torbram Road Condominium Townhomes Sediment Control Plan, plan no. 7, prepared by RAND Engineering Corporation, dated June 2003. • Landscape Plan (North), drawing no. L1, prepared by Brodie and Associates Inc., last revised April 23, 2004. • Landscape Plan (South), drawing no. L2, prepared by Brodie and Associates Inc., last revised April 23, 2004. • Fence and Column Details, drawing no. L3, prepared by Brodie and Associates Inc., last revised April 23, 2004. • Landscape Details, drawing no. L4, prepared by Brodie and Associates Inc., last revised April 23, 2004. • Future Fencing Plan, drawing no. L5, prepared by Brodie and Associates Inc., last revised April 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a residential townhouse community which is adjacent to a valley corridor associated with an unnamed tributary of the West Humber River. The subject property to which this application applies to is partially located within the TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located entirely outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer is proposed to be provided between the proposed works and the limits of the valley corridor. Control of Flooding: The proposed works associated with this application are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are proposed and will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. 393 Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer with compensatory plantings is being proposed to be located between the valley corridor adjacent to the subject property, and any proposed works. Furthermore, there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this proposal. Plantings The buffer between the valley corridor and the proposed works will be densely planted with only native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35439 Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 14, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 173/04 /BRAM 8.1.2 ANTHONY COX & ALISON SMITH To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 40M -2017, (373 Rouge Hill Court), in the City of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Anthony Cox & Alison Smith. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of Petticoat Creek, in order to facilitate the installation of a swimming pool at the rear of an existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Redline revised Location Plot Plan, prepared by the applicant, received May 17, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place within a Fill Regulated Area of Petticoat Creek in order to facilitate the installation of an in- ground swimming pool at the rear of an existing dwelling. The subject property is located east of Rougemount Drive and north of Highway 401. The property 394 is west of a gently sloping valley feature of which the top of bank forms the rear property line. The pool will be located approximately 2 metres from top of bank in a back yard that is currently sodded. TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied that there are no slope stability concerns related to the project Control of Flooding: The proposed swimming pool is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. Conservation of Land: A site visit to the subject property confirmed that there are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The area of proposed works is presently sodded. As such, the works will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Stream and Valley Corridor Management Program CFN: 35456 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: May 18, 2004 Application #: 185 /04 /PICK CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.3 MARIA MARQUES COSTA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Plan 4100, (17 Westbank Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Maria Marques Costa. The purpose is to place fill in a fill regulated area in order to demolish an existing one storey dwelling and construct a two storey house and deck. The proposal is considered minor works. 395 The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. L1, Landscape Plan, prepared by Coivic Contracting Ltd., dated April 26, 2004, received May 3, 2004. • Drawing A -1, Site Plan, prepared by Ilidio Coito, dated April 2004, received May 3, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The minor works proposal involves demolition of the existing house and construction of a new two storey dwelling and deck. Only the deck will be within the Regulated Area. The proposed minor works will be sufficiently set back from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent the sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings No new plantings are required for this project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35404 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 20, 2004 396 Application #: 159/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.4 BETTENCOURT HERMENEGILDO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 123, Plan 4439, (15 Buxton Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bettencourt Hermenegildo. The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area in order to construct a one storey addition with basement at the rear of the existing house. The proposal is considered minor works. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 1, Site Plan, Partial Floor Plans & Roof Plan; and Drawing No. 2, elevations, Cross Section A -A & Wall Section, prepared by GPS Management Corp., last revised on May 10, 2004 and received on May 11, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The minor works proposal involves excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a rear addition and basement to the existing house. The proposed works will be sufficiently set back from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation, or significant natural features. Plantings No plantings are required as part of the application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 397 CFN: 35449 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 18, 2004 Application #: 180/04/TOR 8.1.5 PAUL LAURSEN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, Plan 5665, (34 Crossburn Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Laursen. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a solarium, hot tub, garage extension and minor landscaping. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Figure 1, Site Plan; Figure 2, Forest Restoration Plan; Figure 3, Forest Restoration Plan with Trees as per Aborist report; prepared by Janet Laursen, revised April 12, 2004, received April 26, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the East Don River to facilitate the construction of a hot tub, solarium, garage extension and minor landscaping. All works are sufficiently set back from the top of bank The subject property is located east of Don Mills Road and North of Lawrence Avenue. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed landscaping includes the planting of native trees and shrubs. 398 Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 34609 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 21, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL) Application #: 338/03/TOR 8.1.6 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on (Colonel Danforth Drive), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to place and regrade fill within a fill regulated area to facilitate the reconstruction of Colonel Danforth Drive, replacement of a sanitary sewer line and installation of a stormwater collection system. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing Nos. 737G, 737H and 7371 (all drawings redlined to include sediment control fencing), Colonel Danforth Trail, Proposed Road Reconstruction, prepared by City of Toronto Works and Emergency Services RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to reconstruct Colonel Danforth Drive, located south of Kingston Road and east of Highland Creek. The existing roadway has a rural cross section and is located in many places near the top of the bank of the Highland Creek valley. The existing roadway design results in stormwater flows that are disturbing the valley slope. The reconstruction is designed to capture stormwater runoff to avoid negative impacts to the slope, and includes replacement of an existing sewer line. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the valley slope and ultimately the watercourse. 399 Conservation of Land: Through review of slope stability analysis, geotechnical report, and stormwater management plan, TRCA staff are satisfied that the proposal will enhance slope stability and reduce erosion. There are no construction related impacts to slope stability. Plantings The applicant has committed to work with TRCA staff to plant native woody vegetation between the paved roadway and a portion of unvegetated valley slope to restore the site to better than existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35350 Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: April 20, 2004 Application #: 131/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT 8.1.7 MARIA PETRAKIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Concession 2, (70 Hillside Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Maria Petrakis. The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area in order to construct a 357 sq. ft rear addition and a second storey addition to the existing house. The proposal is considered minor works.. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing Nos. Al, Site Plan; A2, Basement Floor Plans; A3, Ground Floor Plan; A4, Second Floor Plan; A5, North Elevation; A6, East Elevation; A7, South Elevation; prepared by Demetre Building Design, last revised March 15, 2004 and received on May 13, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 400 Proposal: The subject property is entirely located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The minor works proposal involves excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a rear addition and the construction of a second storey addition to the existing house. The proposal will be sufficiently set back from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent the sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no impact on significant natural resources, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings No plantings are required as part of the proposal. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35452 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 18, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 181/04/TOR 8.1.8 GUIDO PAPA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 95, Plan M -2023, (101 Rossmull Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the _ property owned by Guido Papa. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a concrete balcony to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 401 • Sketch Showing Topography for Site Development Purposes of Lot 95, Registered Plan M -2023, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, prepared by Guido Papa Surveying Ltd., revised to illustrate the proposed concrete balcony, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 1, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 30, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 2, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 30, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 3, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 30, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the replacement of an existing wooden balcony with a 26.75 square -metre concrete balcony to the rear of a single detached residential dwelling. The proposed works will be contained within the rear manicured yard. The concrete deck will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed concrete deck will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines. The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 402 CFN: 35467 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 25, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 189 /04NAUG 8.1.9 RALPH CICCIA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 99, Plan M -2023, (77 Rossmull Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ralph Ciccia. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a concrete balcony to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Plan of Lot 99, Registered Plan M -2023, City of Vaughan, revised to illustrate the proposed concrete balcony, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 1, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 31, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 2, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 31, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 3, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 31, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. • Proposed Conc. Balcony, Drawing No. 4, prepared by F.M. Faraone, dated March 31, 2004, received by the TRCA on April 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the replacement of an existing wooden balcony with a 20.11 square -metre concrete balcony to the rear of a single detached residential dwelling. The proposed works will be contained within the rear manicured yard. The concrete deck will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed concrete deck will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 403 Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35466 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 25, 2004 Application #: 188 /04/VAUG 8.1.10 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To place fill within a regulated area on Plan 3755, (30 Stegman's Mill Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the upgrade of an existing well that serves Kleinburg, Kleinburg Well No. 2. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Kleinburg Well No. 2, Drawing G1, prepared by KMK Consultants Limited, dated December 9, 2002, received by the TRCA March 9, 2004. • Landscaping Plan, Kleinburg Well No. 2, Drawing G1A, prepared by KMK Consultants, dated May 12, 2004, received by the TRCA May 19, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 404 Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the upgrade of an existing well that serves Kleinburg, Kleinburg Well No. 2. The proposed works include the installation of a buried concrete pressure pipe, new disinfection and chemical systems, and small pipework replacement and instrumentation. The existing well is located below top of bank, on the valley floor. There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project and there will be no work within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the valley corridor. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features that may be impacted by this project. Plantings Following construction, the area around the pump house will be landscaped with native trees. The landscaping was reviewed to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35218 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 10, 2004 Application #: 077 /04/VAUG 8.1.11 "YORK REGION" RAPID TRANSIT PROGRAM To construct in a flood plain on Islington Avenue and Highway 7, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by "York Region" Rapid Transit Program. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River in order to facilitate the widening of Highway No. 7 to accommodate a busway for the York Region Rapid Transit Program. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 405 • Removals and New Construction, Sheet No. 1, prepared by Delcan Corporation, dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Islington Avenue (Y.R. 17) Highway 7 Removals, Sheet No. 2, prepared by Delcan Corporation, dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Islington Avenue (Y.R. 17) Highway 7 New Construction, Sheet No. 3, prepared by Delcan Corporation, dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Islington Avenue (Y.R. 17) Highway 7 Typical Section, Sheet Nos. 4 & 5, prepared by Delcan Corporation, dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Islington Avenue (Y.R. 17) Highway 7 Details, Sheet No. 6, prepared by Delcan Corporation, dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River in order to facilitate the widening of Highway 7 to accommodate a busbay as part of the York Region Rapid Transit Program. The proposed works are located on the northwest and southwest corner of Islington Avenue and Highway 7. The subject site is located within the Authority's Fill Regulated Area and within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Works on the northwest corner consist of moving the street curb 0.6 metres north to accommodate a busbay. This busbay is required as part of York Region's Rapid Transit Program which seeks to increase public transit use along the Yonge Street and Highway 7 corridor. In addition to the work on the northwest corner, an existing bus shelter will be relocated on the southwest corner of the intersection. Minor removal of fill will take place in this area to site the relocated bus shelter. Furthermore, a transit ticket validation module will be placed here as well. Control of Flooding: Given the minor nature of the proposed works, impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters are not expected. Pollution: The proposed works are not expected to result in the production of sediment. Thus, sediment controls are not required. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed road widening. The proposed works will not encroach or impact the watercourse. There are no in -water works associated with the proposal and hence, will not impact fish habitat. Plantings As the proposed works will not impact any natural vegetation, plantings are not required as part of this application. 406 Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35481 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: May 26, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 199/04/VAUG 8.1.12 MARK AND SHARON CROWE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 43M -1134, (150 Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mark and Sharon Crowe. The purpose is to'place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 150 Old King Road, in the Town of Caledon. The purpose of the application is to construct an inground swimming pool. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc., dated May 20, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on May 21, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of an inground swimming pool at 150 Old King Road, in the Town of Caledon. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: The subject property is adequately setback from the nearest tributary of the Humber River. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur as a result of construction. 407 Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the Town of Bolton. The proposed inground swimming pool will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings No significant vegetation will be removed through this project. As such, no compensatory planting is required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35438 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 26, 2004 Application #: 174/04/CAL 8.1.13 RALF IANTORNO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 48, Plan C -12, (76 Connaught Crescent), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ralf lantorno. The purpose is to place fill material within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River at 76 Connaught Crescent in the town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Proposed One Storey Addition For Mr. Ralf lantorno - 76 Connaught Crescent - Bolton Ontario, Site Plan, drawing no. SP, prepared by Camillo Pietrangelo CET, last revised April 12, 2004. • Proposed One Storey Addition For Mr. Ralf lantorno - 76 Connaught Crescent - Bolton Ontario, Basement Floor Plan, drawing no. Al, prepared by Camillo Pietrangelo CET, last revised April 12, 2004. • Proposed One Storey Addition For Mr. Ralf lantorno - 76 Connaught Crescent - Bolton Ontario, Section A -A, drawing no. A3, prepared by Camillo Pietrangelo CET. • Proposed One Storey Addition For Mr. Ralf lantorno - 76 Connaught Crescent - Bolton Ontario, East Elevation, drawing no. A4, prepared by Camillo Pietrangelo CET. • Proposed One Storey Addition For Mr. Ralf lantorno - 76 Connaught Crescent - Bolton Ontario, South Elevation, drawing no. A5, prepared by Camillo Pietrangelo CET. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 408 Proposal: The proposal involves constructing an addition to an existing residence located at 76 Connaught Crescent in the town of Caledon. The addition involves constructing a new one storey mudroom, a basement addition (with external access), and a new wooden deck. The subject property to which this application applies to is entirely within the TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works associated with this application are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: The subject property is adequately setback from the nearest watercourse and /or valley corridor. As such, the proposed works will not result in erosion and /or sedimentation of the nearby watercourse and /or valley corridor. Conservation of Land: the property is located within an existing residential community in the Town of Caledon. As such, the proposed additions will not negatively impact any significant vegetation. In addition, there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of this project. As such, no additional landscaping and /or compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35405 Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: May 6, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 160 /04 /CAL 8.1.14 YASIN & RUKHASANA CHAUDHARY To place fill within a regulated area on (7682 9th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Yasin & Rukhasana Chaudhary. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River, in order to facilitate the construction of a proposed two storey addition at the front of an existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 409 • Drawing A -1, Site Plan and Specification, prepared by Henry W. Chiu Architect, dated April 16, 2004, received May 4, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information. Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a 2 storey addition at the front of an existing dwelling. The position of the existing house is approximately 2.5m from the top of bank and approximately 20m from the watercourse and outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River. The addition is to the front of the existing house and does not reduce the existing setback the top of bank. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. The subject property is located on 9th line, south of 14th Avenue, in the Town of Markham. Control of Flooding: The proposed 2 storey addition is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical staff have reviewed the proposed works and are satisfied that there are no slope stability concerns associated with this project. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The area of proposed works is presently sodded. As such, the works will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley & Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.2 - Minor Additions. CFN: 35396 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 4, 2004 410 Application #: 154 /04 /MARK TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.15 RACHEL USSHER To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 93, 94, Plan 1999, Q, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Rachel Ussher. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order to facilitate the construction of a two storey dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Redline revised Grading Plan, prepared by Ertl Surveyors, dated February 19, 2004, revised May 20, 2004, received May 21, 2004. • Drawing No 1. Proposed Front Elevation, prepared by Atlantic Homes Designs Limited, dated November 2003, received April 30, 2004. • Drawing No 2. Proposed Right Elevation, prepared by Atlantic Homes Designs Limited, dated November 2003, received April 30, 2004. • Drawing No 3. Proposed Left Elevation, prepared by Atlantic Homes Designs Limited, dated November 2003, received April 30, 2004. • Drawing No 4. Proposed Rear Elevation, prepared by Atlantic Homes Designs Limited, dated November 2003, received April 30, 2004. • Drawing No 5. Foundation Plan, prepared by Atlantic Homes Designs Limited, dated November 2003, received April 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located south of Elgin Mills Road and east of Bathurst Street, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order to facilitate the construction of a 2 storey dwelling. The property is currently occupied by a 2 storey dwelling which is to be demolished and replaced with the proposed building. The proposed dwelling is partially located in the Fill Regulated Area and outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposed works are setback a minimum of 40 metres from the top of bank and approximately 45 metres from the watercourse. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. Control of Flooding: The works are located outside the Regional Storm Flood Plain associated with the Don River and there will be no impacts to the control of flooding. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley feature. 411 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project as the works are located a minimum of 40 metres from the top of bank. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The area of proposed works is presently sodded. As such, the works will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.1 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies. CFN: 35385 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: April 30, 2004 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE Application #: 146/04/RH 8.1.16 KEITH ACTON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, 12, Plan 61, (82 Mill Street), in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Keith Acton. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Plan and Cross - Section, prepared by Hickling Pools & Spas, received by the TRCA on May 3, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the rear manicured yard of an existing residential lot. 412 Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but will not be located within the hydraulic floodway. All excavated fill material will be removed from the site. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35355 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 25, 2004 TOWNSHIP OF KING Application #: 134/04/WS 8.1.17 DENYA MASSEY CLARKE & ANDREW CLARKE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Concession 8, (12880 8th Concession), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Denya Massey Clarke & Andrew Clarke. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the renovation of the first floor of an existing residential dwelling and the addition of a second storey, sun porch and deck. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Grading Plan, prepared by A. Clarke, dated April 26, 2004, received by the TRCA April 29, 2004. • Site Plan, prepared by A. Clarke, dated March 10, 2004, received by the TRCA April 29, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing. • Legal Survey, prepared by D. Anschuetz, dated March 10, 2004, received by the TRCA April 29, 2004. 413 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of Fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the renovation of the first floor of an existing residential dwelling and the addition of a second storey, sun porch, and deck The proposed development will be sufficiently set back from the top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries issues associated with the proposed development. The project will not affect any significant natural features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2. - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35387 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 3, 2004 Application #: 147/04/KING 8.1.18 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To construct in a flood plain on Lot 7, Concession 4, (61 Manitou Drive), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. 414 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in a flood plain of the Humber River to facilitate the upgrade of two existing wells that serve King City, King City Wells No. 3 and No. 4. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, King City Wells No. 3 & 4, Drawing G1, prepared by KMK Consultants Limited, dated December 9, 2002, received by the TRCA March 9, 2004. • Silt Control Fence Detail, prepared by KMK Consultants Limited, dated February 19, 2004, received by the TRCA March 9, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in a flood plain of the Humber River to facilitate the upgrade of two existing wells that serve King City, King City Wells No. 3 and No. 4. The pump house for Well No. 3 is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, while the pump house for Well No. 4 is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposed works, common to both wells, include the installation of a buried concrete pressure pipe, new disinfection and chemicals systems, and small pipework replacement and instrumentation. The proposed works also include rebuilding the pump house for Well No. 3 on the existing footprint and extending the structure to the north. Control of Flooding: No new structures are proposed in the Regional Storm Flood Plain and all existing grades are to be maintained. Therefore, there will be no impacts from the proposed works on the storage and conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no in stream works associated with this project and therefore no fisheries concerns. There are no other significant natural features that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. 415 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35219 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 10, 2004 416 Application #: 076 /04 /KING THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS: RES. #B113 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.19 - 8.1.46, with the exception of 8.1.28 and 8.1.42 which were withdrawn, and Minor Works permits 8.1.22, 8.1.26, 8.1.27, 8.1.31, 8.1.34, 8.1.35, 8.1.39 and 8.1.42), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. RES.#B114/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Suzan Hall David Barrow CARRIED THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications 8.1.22, 8.1.26, 8.1.27, 8.1.31, 8.1.34, 8.1.35, 8.1.39 and 8.1.42, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.19 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 13, 14, Concession 4 EHS Part 3 4 Plan 43R- 23887, (407 and Dixie Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with Etobicoke Creek at the southeast quadrant of Dixie Road and Highway 407, in the City of Brampton. The purpose of the application is to facilitate the construction of various recreation and sports fields. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking from M. Toccalino of NAK Design Group, dated June 1, 2004 to address outstanding engineering details. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 417 Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of various recreation and sports fields at the southeast quadrant of Dixie Road and Highway 407, in the City of Brampton. This permit application deals specifically with the recreation and sports fields at the northeast portion of the property. The remaining works will be reviewed through a separate permit process. As such, the portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed development. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing shall be installed and maintained around the construction area during the construction of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this application Plantings The proposed sports and recreation fields will incorporate a seed mix composition that is native and non - invasive and is consistent with TRCA policy. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1.2. (B) - New Resource -Based Uses of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35349 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 26, 2004 Application #: 132 /04 /BRAM 8.1.20 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Crossing C19F in the South East corner of Castlemore Road and Airport Road, at the location of the Future Humberwest Parkway), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill for 1800mm feedermain installation in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a drainage chamber within a Regional Storm Floodplain; temporarily alter a tributary of the Humber West River during the coldwater timing window, July 1 to September 15, through a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry for the open cut crossing. 418 The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated February 19, 2004 ; received February 25, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal is to install an 1800mm diameter feedermain. The crossing of the watercourse will be conducted via open cut with a dam and pump method in order to work in the dry. The watercourse has an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares, therefore a Regional Storm Floodplain is associated with this tributary of the Humber West. The site is located with a Fill Regulated Area. The York Peel Feedermain project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. The proposed York Peel Feedermain, an 1800mm watermain, will supply water from the future Airport Reservoir and Pumping Station which will be located on Airport Road south of Castlemore Road in Peel Region, to the Maple Reservoir near Keele Street and Teston Road in York Region. In total there will be 19 permits associated with the feedermain installation and road reconstruction along the Airport Road, Castlemore Road, Rutherford Road, Weston Road and Teston Road route. Of the five remaining applications to take forward to the Executive Committee, two will be taken forward in May and it is anticipated that the remaining three will be taken forward in June. Control of Flooding. Fill placement over the proposed watermain in the Regional Storm Flood Plain will be minimized, therefore, there will be no impacts related to loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures of silt fence, coffer dam, pump, and filter bags will be implemented to ensure that the construction- generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be crossed via an open cut method. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. 419 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34722 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: April 28, 2004 Application #: 370 /03 /BRAM 8.1.21 TI AUTOMOTIVE To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Block A, Plan 43R- 11024, Plan 636, (316 Orenda Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by TI Automotive. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within the Regulatory Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing industrial lot at 316 Orenda Road, in the City of Brampton. The subject property is located within the Avondale Special Policy Area (SPA). The proposal involves minor regrading and repaving on the subject property. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009. • Site Plan, prepared by Reinders & Rieder Ltd., drawing no. 02048 -SP1, dated May 12, 2004, revised May 12, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on May 18, 2004. • Site Grading Plan, prepared by Reinders & Rieder Ltd., drawing no. 02048 -SP2, dated May 12, 2004, revised May 12, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on May 18, 2004. • Site Servicing Plan, prepared by Reinders & Rieder Ltd., drawing no. 02048 -SP3, dated May 12, 2004, revised May 12, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on May 18, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves minor regrading and repaving of an existing parking lot at 316 Orenda Road, in the City of Brampton. The subject property to which this application applies is entirely within the TRCA's Fill Regulated Area and is located partially within the Regulatory Floodplain. A portion of the subject property is located within the Avondale SPA and is subject to flooding during a Regional Storm event. Control of Flooding: All existing grades and elevations are to remain the same. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. 420 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing shall be installed and maintained between the construction area and the adjacent watercourse during the construction of the works. Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing industrial subdivision in the City of Brampton. As such, the proposed works will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings All landscaped areas will incorporate a variety of native and non - invasive plant species consistent with TRCA policy. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.1. (B) - Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas and Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures and Section of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35415 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 26, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 163 /04 /BRAM 8.1.22 VINCE GRECO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Plan 43M -1465, (22 Cosmo Court), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vince Greco. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 22 Cosmo Court in the City of Brampton in order to construct an ancillary deck at the rear of an existing residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by. V. Greco, drawing no. Plan A (195/04), dated May 28, 2004, revised May 28, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on June 1, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 421 Proposal: The proposal involves the placement and excavation of fill in order to facilitate the construction of an ancillary deck structure at the rear of an existing residential dwelling at 22 Cosmo Court, in the City of Brampton. The area to which this application applies is located within a Fill Regulated Area, but outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, there will be not impacts to the storage and conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: The subject property is adequately setback from the watercourse corridor feature. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur as a result of construction. Conservation of Land: The subject property is located in an existing residential subdivision and will not negatively impact any significant natural features. Technical staff have determined that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with this proposal. There are no fisheries related concerns associated with these works. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. As such, no compensatory planting is required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35475 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 26, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Application #: 195/04 /BRAM 8.1.23 TORONTO GOLF CLUB To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, BFC , (Dixie Road and Lake Shore Boulevard West), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Toronto Golf Club. The purpose is to place and excavate fill materials within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the extension of an existing irrigation pipe crossing the Etobicoke Creek at 1157 Dixie Road, north of Lakeshore Boulevard. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009. 422 • Letter of undertaking provided by T.J. Rule P.Eng., of R.J. Burnside and Associates Limited, dated June 1, 2004, to address outstanding property, engineering and ecology related matters. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves placing fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the extension of an existing irrigation pipe under the Etobicoke Creek that services the Toronto Golf Club. The works will be constructed using the directional boring method in order to minimize any negative impacts to the watercourse. In addition, a formal request has been submitted to the TRCA Property /Asset Management Division to obtain an easement over certain TRCA lands on the subject property. The easement request associated with this application is being negotiated in conjunction with this permit, as such, this permit will not be released until all TRCA property related issues have been resolved to our satisfaction. A report for the easement request is also included in this agenda. Control of Flooding: All existing grades are proposed to be maintained. As such, there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of floodwaters associated with this application. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are proposed and will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. In addition, all disturbed areas will be restored to pre- construction conditions. Conservation of Land: The pipe will be installed through the use of the directional boring method at a minimum depth of 1.5 metres beneath the watercourse. No significant impacts to existing vegetation is proposed, however, all disturbed areas are proposed to be renaturalized as per submitted restoration and planting plan. Plantings All proposed plantings associated with the proposed renaturalization plan are native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35442 Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 14, 2004 423 Application #: 176/04/MISS CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.24 TORONTO GOLF CLUB To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, BFC, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Toronto Golf Club. The purpose is to excavate and place fill materials to facilitate the construction of an intake pipe located in a Fill Regulated Area; and construct an intake structure for an irrigation pipe located within the Regional Storm Floodplain located at 1157 Dixie Road, south of Lakeshore Boulevard. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009. • Letter of undertaking provided by T.J. Rule P.Eng., of R.J. Burnside and Associates Limited, dated June 1, 2004, to address outstanding property, engineering and ecology related matters. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of constructing a new water intake pipe and intake structure located at the mouth of the Etobicoke Creek, extending into Lake Ontario. The intake pipe and structure will be attached to an existing weir structure, thus, it has been determined that there will be no disturbance of the creek bottom or banks. As such, no additional permits will be required from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and /or the Ministry of Natural Resources. However, all works associated with this proposal will conform to the warm water timing window (between July 1 to March 31). In addition, a formal request has been submitted to the TRCA Property /Asset Management Division to obtain an easement over certain TRCA lands on the subject property. The easement request associated with this application is being negotiated in conjunction with this permit, as such, this permit will not be released until all TRCA property related issues have been resolved to our satisfaction. A report for the easement request is also included in this agenda. Control of Flooding: No excavated materials are proposed to be placed within the floodplain. In addition, the proposed works associated with this application are not expected to result in any negative impacts to the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are proposed and will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. In addition, all areas proposed to be disturbed will be restored to pre- construction conditions. 424 Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, the works associated with this application will not result in the disturbance or alteration of the creek bottom or banks - the proposed intake pipe and structure will be attached to the existing weir structure. All proposed works will conform to the to the warm water timing window (between July 1 and March 31). Furthermore, there are no geotechnical related concerns with this proposal. Plantings All proposed plantings will be native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35443 Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 14, 2004 Application #: 177/04/TOR 8.1.25 ANDREW WOZNICZKA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 23, Plan 3648, (20 Beaucourt Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Andrew Wozniczka. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of a new two - storey single family dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Drawing No. A -SP; Site Plan, Construction Details, East Elevation Plan, South Elevation Plan, North Elevation Plan, Basement Plan, Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, prepared by Studio Classic, received May 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of a new two storey single family dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The subject property is located east of Royal York Road and South of The Queensway. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. 425 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural resources, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings No plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35480 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 25, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL) MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 198/04/TOR 8.1.26 ANGELA D'ORNELLAS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 44, Plan 6109, (16 Fulwell Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Angela D'Ornellas. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a ground floor addition and two - storey addition. The proposal is considered minor works. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Drawing No. Al; Site Plan, Drawing No. A2; Basement /Lower Floor Plan, Drawing No. A3; Main /Upper Floor Plan, Drawing No. A4; New Second Floor Plan, Drawing A5; North Elevation, West Elevation, Drawing No. A6; South Elevation, East Elevation, prepared by Renovation By Design, dated February 10, 2004, received May 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 426 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a ground floor addition and second floor addition. The subject property is located west of Keele Street and south of Finch Avenue West. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment fence will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed landscaping includes the planting of native shrubs. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35477 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 25, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 194/04/TOR 8.1.27 GORDON & LORI FORRESTER To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 148, (1 Craigmont Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Gordon & Lori Forrester. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and landscaping. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Site Plan - Backyard Overlay, prepared by Landscape Contractors, Glen Oaks, received May 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 427 Proposal: The subject property is located adjacent to the East Don River and is located partially within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an inground pool and minor landscaping. All works are sufficiently set back from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no slope instability /geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant resource features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The proposed landscaping involve the planting of native trees and shrubs. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 35193 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: March 4, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 066/04/TOR 8.1.28 AROOP AND SABHARWAL RASTOGI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 77, Plan 6311, (38 George Henry Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Aroop and Sabharwal Rastogi. • Withdrawn 428 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL) 8.1.29 SOMERSET HOMES LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Part of Lot 202, 203 and 204, Plan 105 and Lots 33, 34, 35 and A, Plan 406E (5 - 13 McGee Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Somerset Homes Ltd. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of 8 row town houses. The existing building will be demolished. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009. • Drawing No. 1; Plot Plan, Drawing No. 2; Basement Plan, Drawing No. 3; First Floor Plan, Drawing No. 4; Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. 5; Third Floor Plan, Drawing No. 6; Front Elevation, Drawing No. 7; Rear Elevation, Drawing No. 8; Side Elevation, prepared by Bettencourt Designs Ltd., dated August 2003, received April 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of 8 row town houses on the subject property. The existing building will be demolished. The subject property is located west of Carlaw Avenue and north of Eastern Avenue. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The subject property is well removed from the Don River and other natural resources. Sediment fencing is not required. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings No plantings are required as part of the proposal. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 429 CFN: 35314 Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: May 25, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 112/04/TOR 8.1.30 2038470 ONTARIO INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 21, Concession 8 Plan PART 2, PLAN 65R- 23013, 5728 Old Major MacKenzie Drive West, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 2038470 Ontario Inc. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of eleven (11) estate residential lots on the subject property. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009. • Grading Plan, Drawing No. 203165 -GR, prepared by EMC Group Limited, revised April 14, 2004, received April 15, 2004. • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. 203165 -ES, prepared by EMC Group Limited, dated August 2003, received February 26, 2004. • Retaining Wall Details, Drawing No. 203165 -RW, prepared by RisiStone Retaining Wall Systems, dated February 2004, received April 15, 2004. • Storm Drainage Brief, River View Estates Residential Subdivision, prepared by EMC Group Limited, dated February 2004, received February 26, 2004. • Storm Drainage Plan, Drawing No. 203165 -3, prepared by EMC Group Limited, dated August 2003, received February 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of eleven (11) residential estate lots for draft approved plan of subdivision 19T-01V02. The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River. The subject site is located on the north side of Old Major Mackenzie Drive, west of Islington Avenue. Through staff's review of the subdivision application, TRCA staff issued conditions of draft plan approval on February 20, 2003. This permit application for regrading on the subject site fulfills a condition of draft approval issued by TRCA staff. Technical staff has reviewed plans relating to 430 stormwater management for the site and is satisfied with stormwater controls. The proposed residences on the subject lots will be located from a minimum of 7.5 metres to 12.5 metres from the top of the valley slope. Geotechnical staff has reviewed the'proposed setbacks and has no outstanding concerns. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River and therefore, will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Technical staff has also reviewed a storm drainage brief for the site and has determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect the control of flooding. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Geotechnical staff has reviewed plans relating to the proposed residential development and is satisfied with the proposed setbacks from the valley corridor. To offset the removal of vegetation adjacent to the valley corridor, technical staff has requested extensive planting plans within the set back area between the slope and proposed lots. These plans will be provided by the applicant and reviewed by TRCA technical staff to our satisfaction, prior to the release of the permit. There will be no impacts to fish habitat and no other significant natural resource features will be impacted. Plantings Extensive plantings will be made in the set back area between the proposed residential lots and the top of the valley slope. Ecological staff will review the plans to ensure that plantings are in accordance with TRCA requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.1 New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35418 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: May 26, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 162 /04NAUG 8.1.31 CARMEN RAGNO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 23, Plan 65M- 28 -11, (46 Humberview Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Carmen Ragno. 431 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a second storey addition to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling, in conjunction with the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, gazebo, deck and landscaping. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Landscape Concept, Sheet No. L1 of 1, prepared by M +S Landscape Architects, dated February 18, 2004, received by the TRCA on May 4, 2004, redline revised to indicate that the proposed pool and deck will be a minimum of 3 metres from the rear property line, the proposed gazebo will be a minimum of 1.5 metres from the rear property line, the 30" ht. pisa stone retaining wall will not be constructed, sediment control fencing will be erected throughout the duration of construction and all excess fill material will be removed from the site. • Site Plan & Basement, Ground Floor & Roof Plans, Drawing A.1, prepared by Henno Sillaste Architect Inc., dated March 19, 2004, received by the TRCA on May 4, 2004. • Elevations, Drawing A.2, prepared by Henno Sillaste Architect Inc., dated March 19, 2004, received by the TRCA on May 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is entirely located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a second storey addition (approximately 18 square metres) to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling, in conjunction with the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, gazebo, deck and landscaping. The proposed works will be contained within the rear manicured yard of the subject property, which is delineated by a chain link fence. The proposal will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposal is consistent with existing development in the subdivision. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. 432 Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted in association with the proposed development to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35400 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 25, 2004 Application #: 156 /04NAUG 8.1.32 HUMBERPLEX DEVELOPMENTS INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 27, Concession 8, south of Kirby Road, east of Highway 27, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Humberplex Developments Inc. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to construct a stormwater management pond and associated access road to service the adjacent draft approved plan of subdivision (19T-01VO4). The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2009. • Stormwater Management Pond Plan, Drawing No. SWM -1, prepared by URS Canada Inc., dated May 2004, received May 17, 2004. • Stormwater Management Pond Details, Drawing No. SWM -2, SWM -3, SWM -4, prepared by URS Canada Inc., dated May 2004, received May 17, 2004. • Site, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. GP -2, prepared by URS Canada Inc., dated October 2003, received May 17, 2004. • Miscellaneous Details, Drawing No. D -1, prepared by URS Canada Inc., dated May 2004, received May 17, 2004. • Plan and Profile of Storm Outfall, Drawing Nos. PP -23 & PP -24, prepared by URS Canada Inc., dated May 24, received May 17, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking, Addressing Outstanding Minor Hydrogeological, Landscaping and Engineering Issues, prepared by Neville Morrison, URS Canada Inc., dated May 28, 2004, received June 1, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond (SWM) and associated access road for draft approved plan of subdivision 19T-01VO4. The proposed stormwater pond will service the adjacent subdivision, consisting of 170 residential lots. The proposed road into the valley is required to access and service the proposed stormwater pond. The subject property is 433 approximately 21.4 ha (52.9 acres) in size, while the stormwater pond will be located on a parcel approximately 1.6 ha (4.0 acres) in size. The subject property is located on the east side of Highway 27, south of Kirby Road. The proposed stormwater pond is located on the valley floor, but outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River. The pond is adjacent to an Environmentally Significant Area # 127 - East Humber River. There are also wetlands located on the north and south side of the proposed pond. The proposed location of the pond was accepted by TRCA staff after an extensive review of technical documents including the Wycliffe - Humberplex Development Master Environmental Servicing Plan and hydrogeological reports. After a lengthy negotiation process, TRCA technical staff was satisfied with the location of the proposed SWM pond and was confident that geotechnical, hydrogeological, ecological and engineering issues were satisfactorily addressed. As such, conditions of draft approval were issued by Authority staff on June 3, 2002. The proposed SWM pond is consistent with the approved MESP for the Wycliffe - Humberplex Development. This permit application for servicing fulfills a condition of draft approved issued by TRCA staff. Authority staff received and reviewed a Stormwater Management Plan - Design Brief, dated January 2004. received January 26, 2004 and has provided comments. The agent, URS Canada Inc., on behalf of the applicant has provided revisions and resubmissions in order to address TRCA staff comments. At this time, minor issues relating to stormwater management and landscape plans remain and TRCA technical staff is confident that these issues can be resolved. The permit will not be released until such time as these issues are resolved. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and approved by staff, will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the wetlands and watercourse. Conservation of Land: A construction /maintenance access road will be constructed on the valley slope to service the proposed stormwater pond. Technical staff has reviewed plans for the associated access road is generally satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues. The access road was accepted as part of the approved Wycliffe - Humberplex MESP. The residential lots for the adjacent subdivision are set back 10 metres from the staked top of bank. All valleylands including the 10 metre development setback will be recognized in an open space designation which will restrict future development within these lands. The valleylands are to be conveyed to the Authority while the City of Vaughan will assume maintenance of the SWM pond once completed. Planning ecology staff has also reviewed plans and associated reports and is satisfied that the pond will not adversely impact the function of the nearby wetlands. 434 There are no in -water works associated with the proposal, however, a Letter of Advice will be issued for the outlet from the stormwater pond to the wetland to the south. No other significant natural resource features will be impacted by the proposed development. Plantings As a condition of draft approval for the associated subdivision, a comprehensive open space masterplan is to be submitted to City of Vaughan and TRCA staff. The master plan is to include restoration plantings within the currently un- vegetated portions of the valley lands and setback areas. The masterplan will be required prior to the issuance of the above permit. Furthermore, restoration plantings for the proposed pond will be submitted and reviewed to TRCA staff's satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35125 Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: May 26, 2004 Application #: 039 /04/VAUG 8.1.33 PINEGROVE ON THE HUMBER INC. To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Plan M -1111, (245 Pinegrove Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Pinegrove On the Humber Inc. The purpose is to construct a three - storey condominium apartment building and associated stormwater outfall, partially within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River at 245 Pinegrove Road, in the City of Vaughan (site plan application DA.03.028). The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Drawing No. S -1, Site Servicing and Grading Plan, prepared by Masongsong Associates Engineering Limited, date last revised May 6, 2004. • Drawing No. S -2, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, prepared by Masongsong Associates Engineering Limited, date last revised May 6, 2004. • Drawing No. L -01, Landscape Plan, prepared by DWK Landscape Architect, date last revised May 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of the proposal is to construct a three - storey condominium apartment building located partially within the Fill Regulated Area, and to construct a storm water outfall to service this development. The development will be sufficiently set back from the top of the bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The City of Vaughan circulated the 435 rezoning and site plan application for this development to Authority staff, and staff have recommended approval of these planning applications, with the condition for this permit to be issued. The proposal includes a landscape plan to the satisfaction of Authority staff. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not in the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the valley and watercourse will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the proposal. Plantings A landscape plan, to the satisfaction of Authority staff, will be implemented on site. It consists of approximately 490 native, non - invasive trees, shrubs and perennials. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1, Development & Redevelopment /Intensification Within Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35140 Report Prepared by: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 25, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 046 /04/VAUG 8.1.34 PINO SCARMOZZINO To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 2, Concession 7 Lot 75, Plan M -1701, (26 Foreview Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Pino Scarmozzino. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a in- ground swimming pool and landscaping, within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking, prepared by P. Scarmozzino, dated May 31, 2004, agreeing to revise the site /landscape plans to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 436 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place in within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and landscaping, within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The proposed works will be contained within the manicured yard, which is delineated by a chain Zink fence. The proposed development will be sufficiently set back from the top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Therefore, there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as the proposed works are located approximately 35 metres (115 feet) from the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that the proposed works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the development, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no significant natural features on the property that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Landscaping will be conducted in association with the proposed pool construction to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35430 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 13, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 170 /04NAUG 8.1.35 VINCE CARUANA To place fill within a regulated area on, (117 Hedgerow Lane), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vince Caruana. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, retaining wall, cabana and fence within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. 437 • Pool Placement, Sheet No. One of One, prepared by Natural Landscape Design, dated March 2004, received by the TRCA on May 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, retaining wall, cabana and fence within the rear manicured yard of an existing residential lot. The proposed works will be sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the proposed works is over 100 metres from the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted in association with the proposed development. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35483 Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 26, 2004 438 Application #: 200 /04/VAUG TOWNSHIP OF KING, TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.36 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 68, Concession 1 WYS, Lot 8, Concession 2, (Bathurst Street, from King Side Road northward to north of Bloomington Side Road), in the Township of King, Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (to remove existing twin Corrugated Steel Pipe Arch (CSPA) culverts [at Sta. 13 +500] {39m length x 3.7m width x 2.2m height} and replace with twin box culverts {37m length x 3m width x 2.7m height} and {37m length x 3m width x 2.4m height }; to place fill behind 4 new retaining walls in 4 quadrants of box culverts; to install 375 and 400mm storm sewers; 2 storm outfall channels; oil grit separator all on east; to widen road from 2 lanes to 4 lanes; ) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures ( twin box culverts, 4 retaining walls, storm sewers and 2 storm sewer outlets, oil grit separator on east, asphalt paving) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; to alter a watercourse ( East Humber River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) via a coffer dam method in order to work in the dry. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated June 2, 2004; received June 2, 2004; prepared by the Region of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the widening of Bathurst Street from King Road in the south to just north of Bloomington Side Road in the north at The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority/ Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority watershed divide. The widening will involve the removal of the existing 39m twin Corrugated Steep Pipe Arch (CSPA) culverts and replacement with twin 37m box culverts along the same alignment. Although the roadway will need to be widened to accommodate 2 more lanes, the length of the proposed box culverts will be only 2 metres less than the existing culverts. In anticipation of the widening, the ultimate grading platform was established in 1981 with culvert installation at that time. The northern box culvert will be embedded and will become the wet cell with water flowing through this culvert under low flow conditions. The southern cell will become the dry cell and will be available to terrestrial wildlife for migration and will serve as an overflow route during heavier, less frequent storms. At present the culverts are heavily sedimented and the steel multi - plates are cracked. The installation of the new culverts will provide an opportunity to remove the sediments and alleviate the cracked situation. 439 The location of the culvert replacements is within a Fill Regulated Area and a Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River. Another recently submitted permit file associated with a watermain Environmental Assessment is CFN 34000, the Newmarket Aurora 1200mm watermain. This watermain has a route from Teston and Keele, northwards on Keele, eastwards on King- Vaughan Road, and northwards on Bathurst to the watershed divide north of Bloomington. This watermain will be installed prior to the roadworks and a report on the watermain will be prepared for the July Executive Committee. The road project (CFN 30039) and the watermain (CFN 34000) were reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: The profile of the road will remain approximately the same and the opening of the proposed culverts will be slightly larger than the existing culverts, therefore the hydraulic capacity will remain approximately the same. The Region of York has provided a Letter of Undertaking to complete the minor modifications to the hydraulic model. The storm outfalls will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, pea gravel bag coffer dam) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The east side of the road will be serviced by curb and gutter and the west side will maintain a rural cross section (grassed swales). Water quality will be addressed with an oil and grit separator. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be diverted temporarily by a coffer dam method (pea gravel filled sand bags) to the existing north and subsequently south culverts in order to remove the existing culverts 1 at a time from the 4 quadrants while maintaining traffic flow. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. This section of Bathurst Street from King Road in the south to Bloomington Side Road in the north is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine. On the west the area is designated as " Settlement Area" and on the east "Natural Linkage Area." All watercourses on the Oak Ridges Moraine have been identified as hydrologically sensitive features. There is one watercourse in this project. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. 440 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34565 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: May 25, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX Application #: 327/03/KING 8.1.37 STUART & CAROLYN CLAGUE To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 38, Plan 372, (2954 Seabreeze Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Stuart & Carolyn Clague. The purpose is to excavate within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of an at- grade, rear yard swimming pool at 2954 Seabreeze Road, in the Town of Ajax. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Swimming Pool Proposal, prepared by DCM Co. Landscape Designs +, dated February 27, 2004, date received March 12, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking for Restoration Plan, prepared by owner, dated June 1, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of an at- grade, rear yard swimming pool at 2954 Seabreeze Road, in the Town of Ajax. An open drainage channel, which connects to the main Carruthers Creek, traverses the rear yard of the property and has a relatively wide, shallow floodplain. A previous Ontario Regulation 158 permit (C- 98196) was issued in 1998 for the construction of a single family dwelling on the subject property. While the property was partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in 1998, the TRCA recognized that the existing lot of record was under a backwater effect from the main Carruthers Creek and that poor drainage resulting from improper piping of the existing drainage channel resulted in the property being located within the floodplain. Subsequently, the TRCA determined that a cut and fill balance could be undertaken across the site in order to create a development envelope for the house without impacting neighbouring properties. 441 The current proposal involves the construction of an at -grade pool and the restoration of the drainage channel through the planting of native, woody materials. TRCA staff has reviewed the current proposal and determined that the pool is consistent with TRCA policy and will not further aggravate the drainage problem. Through the restoration of the drainage channel, TRCA staff is satisfied that a net environmental gain will be achieved through the approval of this application. Control of Flooding: Though the proposed pool is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek, the pool will be constructed at- grade, with no fill placement required. TRCA water management staff has reviewed the engineering submission for this proposal and is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters as a result of the proposed development. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained between the construction area and the edge of the drainage channel in order to prevent any construction - generated sediment from entering the drainage channel and impacting downstream fisheries resources. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns related to this proposal as the pool is located on tableland approximately 3 m from the edge of the drainage feature. There are no significant natural heritage features that will be negatively impacted as a result of the proposed development. That said, TRCA staff has sought to achieve a net environmental benefit from the proposed works and as such, has reviewed and approved a restoration plan for the channel. The restoration plan includes the planting of woody (tree and shrub) native, non - invasive plant species along the length of the drainage feature, resulting in the re- creation of natural habitat associated with the open channel. The TRCA is satisfied that an overall net environmental gain will be achieved through the approval of this proposal. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored following construction. An extensive planting plan has been submitted for the restoration of the drainage channel which involves the planting of acceptable densities of native, non - invasive tree and shrub plant materials. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34995 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 25, 2004 442 Application #: 006 /04 /AJAX 8.1.38 CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF AJAX To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Miller Creek - south of Kingston Road to Jacwin Crescent), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Corporation of the Town of Ajax. The purpose is to construct in the floodplain and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail associated with the Pickering Village Greenbelt Trail. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Drawing L1, Trail Layout Plan, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated June 2, 2003, revised May 26, 2004, received May 26, 2004. • Drawing L2, Trail Layout Plan, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated June 2, 2003, revised May 26, 2004, received May 26, 2004. • Drawing D1, Trail Layout Plan, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated September 9, 2003, revised May 26, 2004, received May 26, 2004. • Drawing D2, Trail Layout Plan, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated April 15, 2004, revised May 26, 2004, received May 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the floodplain and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of Miller Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail through a residential neighbourhood. This section of trail is proposed south of Kingston Road, north of Jacwin Crescent, within the City of Pickering, and will be an extension of the existing Pickering Village Greenbelt Trail system. The trail extension is proposed to consist of a combination of limestone fines and asphalt sections with some minor grading and low retaining walls. The trail will be located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Miller Creek and is merely the formalization of an existing beaten path currently used by pedestrians. Minor tree removals will be required, but a comprehensive restoration plan has been submitted and approved by TRCA ecology staff. The trail will link to existing bridge crossings over the watercourse, which have been approved as part of a previous TRCA Ontario Regulation 158 permit. Control of Flooding: Though the proposed trail is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Miller Creek, the disturbances to the floodplain will be minimized such that there are no impacts on the conveyance or storage of floodwaters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained between the construction area and the watercourse in order to prevent any construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. 443 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns related to this proposal. There are some tree removals required to accommodate the trail extension, but a comprehensive restoration plan, including woody and herbaceous native, non - invasive species plantings, has been submitted and approved by TRCA ecology staff. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings The submitted restoration plan indicates that trees, shrubs and herbaceous plant materials are proposed along the trail extension. TRCA ecology staff is satisfied that the proposed planting plan more than offsets the vegetation removals required to accommodate the trail extension and will result in a net environmental benefit within this reach of Duffins Creek. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 - New Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35401 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: May 5, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 157 /04 /AJAX 8.1.39 TED AND JAN TILKER To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 39, Plan 43M -1346, (5 Bayfield Court), in the Town of Caledon, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ted and Jan Tilker. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with Etobicoke Creek on an existing residential lot at 5 Bayfield Court, in the Town of Caledon. The purpose of the application is to construct an inground swimming pool. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by R. Fortin, drawing no. 04 -218, dated April 25, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on May 31, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 444 Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of an inground swimming pool and associated landscape plantings at 5 Bayfield Court, in the Town of Caledon. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed development. Pollution: The subject property is adequately buffered from the tributary of Etobicoke Creek. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur as a result of construction. Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the Town of Caledon. The proposed inground swimming pool will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings Native and non - invasive shrubs will be planted along the rear of the property, between the location of the proposed works and the watercourse feature. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35441 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 26, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON Application #: 171 /04 /CAL 8.1.40 TOWN OF CALEDON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Nunnville Road and Old King Road, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Caledon. The purpose is to place and excavate fill (road widening, storm sewer, watermain, behind retaining walls) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (road widening, retaining walls) within a Regional Storm Flood Plain. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. 445 • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration drawings; dated May 26, 2004; prepared by the Town of Caledon. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the reconstruction of Old King Road and the reconstruction and de- commissioning of parts of Nunnville Road to an urban - local residential standard with retaining walls, concrete curbs and storm sewers. The existing Nunnville Road and Old King Road areas that are to be reconstructed are adjacent to a new urban subdivision to the south and west and the new AlbionNaughan arterial roadway to the east. Reconstruction of Nunnville Road will occur 200 metres north of Hubert Corless Drive to approximately 200m south of Old King Road where there will be a new cul -de -sac. Nunnville Road will close to thru traffic at this location but there will be pedestrian access via the existing road allowance between Nunnville Road and Old King Road. A 300 -450 mm dia. concrete storm sewer will be installed along this section of Nunnville Road and will outlet in the ditches adjacent to the pedestrian access. Reconstruction of Old King Road will occur 100 metres west of the existing Nunnville Road intersection to 80 metres west of AlbionNaughan Road. The existing Nunnville Road and Old King Road intersection will be closed to through traffic and new private entrances will be constructed to provide access to the residents of 13336 Nunnville Road and 184 Old King Road. A small portion of an existing watermain will be removed and relocated at a lower elevation on Old King Road as a result of the road works. A 525 -600 mm dia. concrete storm sewer will be installed from the old intersection of Nunnville Road and Old King Road to the east to connect with an existing 600 mm dia. storm sewer. The existing sewer outlets to the enhanced swale system constructed on the east side of the AlbionNaughan Road across from Old King Road. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Bolton Arterial Roadways Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. 446 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35391 Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: May 26, 2004 MINOR WORKS PERMIT Application #: 151/04/CAL 8.1.41 WILLIAM AND JESSICA MONDELLO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 27, Plan 43M -1159, (26 Deer Hollow Court), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by William and Jessica Mondello. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 26 Deer Hollow Court, in the Town of Caledon. The purpose of the application is to construct an inground swimming pool. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by J. Mondello, dated May 18, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on May 18, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of an inground swimming pool at 26 Deer Hollow Court, in the Town of Caledon. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed development. Pollution: The subject property is adequately buffered with existing development between the property and the valleyland corridor. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse feature will not occur as a result of construction. 447 Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the Town of Caledon. The proposed inground swimming pool will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings No significant vegetation will be affected by this proposal. As such, no compensatory planting is required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35479 Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 26, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 197 /04 /CAL 8.1.42 LARKIN MONARCH PARTNERSHIP To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 16, 17, Concession 6, (The Bridle Walk), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Larkin Monarch Partnership. • Withdrawn TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.43 MARK & LESLIE STREET To place fill within a regulated area on (492 Sunset Beach Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mark & Leslie Street. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order to facilitate the construction of a 2 storey dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Site and Grading Details, prepared by R.D. Tomlinson Limited, dated January 26, 2004, received May 14, 2003. • Redline Revised Tree Replacement Plan, prepared by applicant, dated January 26, 2004, received May 26, 2003. • Drawing No. 1, Basement Plan, prepared by P. Del Design Architectural Technologist, dated July 29, 2003, received May 14, 2004. 448 • Drawing No. 2, First Floor Plan, prepared by P. Del Design Architectural Technologist, dated July 29, 2003, received May 14, 2004. • Drawing No. 3, Second Floor Plan, prepared by P. Del Design Architectural Technologist, dated July 29, 2003, received May 14, 2004. • Drawing No. 4, Front and Rear Elevation, prepared by P. Del Design Architectural Technologist, dated July 29, 2003, received May 14, 2004. • Drawing No. 5, Left Side and Right Side Elevation, prepared by P. Del Design Architectural Technologist, dated July 29, 2003, received May 14, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order to facilitate the construction of a 2 storey dwelling. The property is located on the north side of Lake Wilcox, within the Town of Richmond Hill. The property is currently occupied by a 2 storey dwelling which is to be partially demolished and replaced with the proposed building. The proposed dwelling is partially located in the Fill Regulated Area and outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The proposed works are setback approximately 9 metres from the top of bank and approximately 55 metres from Lake Wilcox. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. Control of Flooding: The works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain associated with the Humber River and, as such, there will be no impacts to the control of flooding. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley feature. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project as the works are located a minimum of 9 metres from the top of bank. Lake Wilcox will not be impacted by this proposal and no fisheries concerns will result. Though 5 maple trees will be removed to facilitate the proposed construction, a comprehensive landscape plan has been proposed to offset the loss of vegetation and restore the disturbed area appropriately. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Following construction, the area affected by the works will be restored with native, non - invasive woody vegetation and compensatory planting will be provided for the removed trees, all to the satisfaction of TRCA ecology staff. 449 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.1 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies CFN: 35455 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 18, 2004 Application #: 184/04/RH 8.1.44 PETER BARNETT To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 37, Concession 1, (8755 Bathurst Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Peter Barnett. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary washroom facility at the Richmond Hill Golf Club. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Proposed Building and Service Connection Locations, Drawing 60675195 -1, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., date received May 26, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated and received June 2, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary washroom facility adjacent to the 14th tee at the Richmond Hill Golf Club. The proposed works involve the following: a) the placement of a small amount of fill in the floodplain to allow the washroom to be floodproofed to the Regional Storm surface water elevation; and b) excavation works required to install servicing connections to nearby existing sanitary sewer and water line services. The washroom facility, as well as the areas to be excavated, are located approximately 20 m from the edge of the watercourse. Once the service connections have been installed, the washroom facility can be installed on a temporary basis. The washroom is proposed to be a removable structure, in place annually from April 15th- November 1st. 450 Control of Flooding: The temporary washroom facility is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, but outside of the hydraulic floodway. The structure will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm surface water elevation of 171.68 metres above sea level, in accordance with TRCA policy. TRCA engineering staff has reviewed the proposal and has confirmed that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control structures will be erected and maintained throughout construction to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. There are no natural heritage features which may be negatively impacted by the proposed development. The areas in which the washroom and excavated areas are proposed are currently vegetated with manicured grass. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing manicured conditions, in accordance with the Richmond Hill Golf Club's landscaping standards. Plantings As no natural heritage features will be negatively impacted by the proposal, no additional plantings will be required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 H) - Existing Resource -based Uses - of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35393 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 25, 2004 Application #: 153/04/RH 8.1.45 PHIL CHRISTOPHER To construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, Plan 134, (504 Sunset Beach Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Phil Christopher. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River in order to facilitate the replacement of an existing boat house with an elevated boat house. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • Redline revised Site and Proposed Grading Plan, prepared by R.D. Tomlinson Ltd., dated June 29, 1987, received May 11, 2004. • Drawing No. Al, Floor Plans Foundation Plan and Building Section, prepared by Tacoma Steckley Engineers, dated June 2003, received May 26, 2004. • Drawing No. A2, Elevations Roof Framing and Notes, prepared by Tacoma Steckley Engineers, dated June 2003, received May 26, 2004. 451 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River in order to facilitate the replacement of an existing boat house with an elevated boat house. The property is located on the north side of Lake Wilcox, within the Town of Richmond Hill. The proposed boat house will be built on posts, in the place of an existing at -grade boat house. The boat house is located approximately 3.5m from Lake Wilcox, entirely in the flood plain but outside of the hydraulic floodway of the Humber River. The boat house will be flood proofed to 296.75 metres, plus free board, in accordance with TRCA policies for redevelopment in the flood plain. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. Control of Flooding: TRCA engineering staff has confirmed that the house will be appropriately flood proofed to the Regional Storm Flood Elevation, plus freeboard. A structural engineer has confirmed that the boat house design will be able to withstand the depths and velocities of flood waters in a Regional storm event. All excavated material is to be removed from site. TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the boat house. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering Lake Wilcox. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Furthermore, there will be no impacts to fish habitat or any other natural resource features on the subject lands. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. All disturbed areas affected by the construction of the boat house will be restored to existing conditions • following construction, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Sections 4.2.2 (D)- Replacement Structures -of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management program. CFN: 35423 Report Prepared by: Lorenzo Nicolet, extension 5314 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 11, 2004 452 Application #: 169/04/RH 8.1.46 CYNTHIA TAM To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 20, Concession 3, (9901 Leslie Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cynthia Tam. The purpose is to construct in the Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a septic bed and stormwater management swales at the rear of a day care center at 9901 Leslie Street, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006. • General Plan, Drawing G -1, Sheet 1 of 2, prepared by LGI Consulting Engineers Inc., dated December 2003, date revised June, 2004, received June 2, 2004. • Site Servicing and Grading Plan, Sheet 2 of 2, prepared by LGI Consulting Engineers Inc., dated May 2003, date revised June, 2004, received June 2, 2004. • Plan of Survey of Part of Lot 20, Concession 3 Town of Richmond Hill, prepared by Paul Kidd Surveying Ltd., date received May 13, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a septic bed and two stormwater management swales at the rear of 9901 Leslie Street, in the Town of Richmond Hill. An existing residence on the subject property is being converted to a day care centre, with a two storey addition being proposed at the rear of the existing building, as well as a new septic bed proposed to service the facility. The proposed building addition is located outside of the Fill Regulated Area. The septic bed is located partially within the Fill Regulated Area, as are two stormwater management swales proposed to convey stormwater runoff from the site. The septic bed is located on tableland, approximately 8 m from the stable top of bank. The conveyance swales are proposed in order to prevent flooding of the septic bed and will carry stormwater runoff to the rear of the property, ensuring sheet flow of runoff into the valley. All works are located over 35 m from the edge of the Rouge River, which is located within a well- defined valley to the east (rear) of the site. TRCA staff has staked the top of bank on the property and all lands below top of bank are being conveyed to the Town of Richmond Hill. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located on tableland, outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River, which is contained in the valley to the rear of the property. As a result, there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained between the construction area and the top of bank in order to prevent any construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. 453 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical concerns related to this proposal as the septic bed will be located approximately 8m from top of bank. The valley is stable and exhibits no visible signs of erosion. There are no fisheries concerns related to this application as all works are proposed on tableland, over 35 m from the edge of the watercourse. The proposed stormwater management swales will ensure that stormwater runoff from the site will sheet flow into the valley, protecting against point runoff and potential erosion of the valley wall. The top of the valley has been staked and all land below top of bank is being conveyed to the Town of Richmond Hill through the site plan application approval process. Plantings There will be no natural heritage features affected as part of this proposal, hence no additional plantings will be required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34662 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: May 25, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 363/03/RH 8.1.47 CITY OF VAUGHAN To alter a waterway on, (Rayette Road), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Vaughan. The purpose is to alter a waterway within a Fill Extension Area of the Don River by constructing a storm sewer outfall to facilitate the upgrade /urbanization of a number of minor roads in the Langstaff Road and Keele Street area for the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing of Storm Outfall for Rayette and Rivermede, prepared by SRM Associates, dated April 2004, received by the TRCA May 6, 2004. • Drawing P -13, Rayette Road, prepared by SRM Associates, dated January 2004, received by the TRCA May 6, 2004. • Drawing P -14, Rayette Road, prepared by SRM Associates, dated January 2004, received by the TRCA May 6, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 454 Proposal: The City of Vaughan proposes to alter a waterway within a Fill Extension Area of the Don River to facilitate the upgrade /urbanization of a number of minor roads in the Langstaff Road and Keele Street area. The proposed works include constructing an outlet to discharge the proposed Rayette Road storm sewer into an existing drainage ditch 10 metres south of its confluence with an unnamed tributary of the Don River. Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff has reviewed the plans related to the proposed works and has determined that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: An erosion control plan, reviewed and approved by TRCA staff, will be implemented and maintained for the duration of the project to prevent sedimentation of the stream corridor. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Ecological staff has determined that the proposed outlet does not constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and as such, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The proposed works will not affect any other significant natural features. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be sodded upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35409 Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 31, 2004 Application #: 161 /04NAUG 8.1.48 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (North East Quadrant of Highway 27 and Rutherford Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for 1800mm Concrete Pressure Pipe (CPP) feedermain installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure ( Chamber Y8 at Sta. 3 +440) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; temporarily alter a watercourse (Humber River) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) through a flume method in order to work in the dry for the open cut crossing. 455 The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated February 19, 2004; received February 20, 2004; prepared by the Region of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal consists of the installation of an 1800mm diameter feedermain to the north of Rutherford Road and east of Highway 27. The crossing of the watercourse will be conducted via open cut with a flume method in order to work in the dry. The watercourse does have an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares, therefore a Regional Storm Floodplain is associated with the Humber River. The site is located with a Fill Regulated Area. The York Peel Feedermain project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. The proposed York Peel Feedermain, an 1800mm watermain, will supply water from the future Airport Reservoir and Pumping Station (on Airport Road, south of Castlemore Road) in Peel Region to the Maple Reservoir (near Keele Street and Teston Road) in York Region. This permit is one of a total of 19 permits associated with the Feedermain Installation and Road Reconstruction along the Airport Road, Castlemore Road, Rutherford Road, Weston Road and Teston Road route. Fifteen reports have been taken through the Executive Committee to date for the York -Peel Feedermain. There are 4 culvert extension /replacement files remaining. Three will require a report to the Executive Committee and the fourth will require a revision. Control of Flooding: The proposed elevation over the feedermain within the Regional Storm Floodplain will match the existing elevation therefore; there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, coffer dam, flume, pump, filter bag) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse during the open cut crossing. Trench plugs have been identified on the profile and plan view to ensure that the proposed feedermain does not act as a conduit for contaminants to the watercourse. The distance from the invert of the creek to the obvert of the pipe has been reviewed by staff and is satisfactory. 456 Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be crossed via an open cut method. All works will be conducted in the dry with a flume method. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The Environmentally Significant Area is on the south side of Rutherford Road, therefore, the proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34591 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: June 2, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 329 /03NAUG 8.1.49 "YORK REGION" RAPID TRANSIT PROGRAM To construct in a flood plain at (Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue, Highway 7 and Allstate Parkway, Highway 7 and East Beaver Creek Road), in the Town of Markham and Town of Richmond Hill, Don River and Rouge River Watersheds as located on the property owned by "York Region" Rapid Transit Program. The purpose is to construct in the floodplain of the Don River and the Rouge River in order to facilitate road works within the Highway 7 right -of -way for the York Region Rapid Transit Plan - Quick Start Program. The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Removals and New Construction, Highway No. 7 East Beaver Creek /Commerce Valley Drive East, Sheet 1, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Removals (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 New Construction (3 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Pavement Elevations (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. 457 • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Typical Section, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Details (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Storm Drainage, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Removals (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • East Beaver Creek Road Highway 7 Construction Staging (3 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • Highway 7 & East Beaver Creek Westbound Plan, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 25, 2004. • Removals and New Construction Highway No. 7 and Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Intersection, Sheet 1, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 Removals, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 New Construction (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 Pavement Elevations, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 Typicals (3 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004, • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 Details (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 Typical Storm Drainage, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Woodbine Avenue (Y.R.8) Highway 7 Construction Staging (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue Westbound Plan, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue Eastbound Plan, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Removals and New Construction Highway No. 7 and Allstate Parkway /East Valhalla Drive Intersection, Sheet 1, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Allstate Pkwy. /East Valhalla Dr. Highway 7 Removals (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Allstate Pkwy. /East Valhalla Dr. Highway 7 New Construction (4 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Allstate Pkwy. /East Valhalla Dr. Highway 7 Pavement Elevations (2 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004 Allstate Pkwy. /East Valhalla Dr. Highway 7 Typicals, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Allstate Pkwy. /East Valhalla Dr. Highway 7 Details (3 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Allstate Pkwy. /East Valhalla Dr. Highway 7 Construction Staging (4 Drawings), prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. 458 • Highway 7 and Allstate Parkway Westbound Plan, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. • Highway 7 and Allstate Parkway Eastbound Plan, prepared by York Region Transportation and Works, date received May 27, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don and Rouge Rivers in order to facilitate road works related to the construction of the York Region Rapid Transit Plan - Quick Start Program along Highway 7. There are three intersections at which the work is proposed: Highway 7 and East Beaver Creek Road, Highway 7 and Allstate Parkway and Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue. The proposed road works include minor grading, paving, curbing, drainage works, the construction of two concrete platforms at two of the intersections, the erection of bus shelters and ticket vending machines. The road works are required in order to construct bus bays and turning lanes as part of the implementation of a rapid transit system along Highway 7. All proposed works will occur within the Highway 7 right -of -way and will be appropriately contained by silt fencing, wherever grading will occur. Control of Flooding: Given the minor nature of the proposed works, impacts to the storage or conveyance of floodwaters are not anticipated. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected and maintained around the work site throughout construction wherever grading works are proposed. Rock check dams will also be installed along the ditch adjacent to Highway 7 in order to further ensure that sedimentation of the downstream watercourse does not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns related to this proposal, nor are there fisheries concerns as no watercourses will be impacted by the proposed works. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings There will be no natural heritage features impacted by the proposed works, hence no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35496 Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: June 2, 2004 459 Application #: 207 /04 /MARK 8.1.50 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 30, Concession 7, (McCowan Road - Major MacKenzie Drive northwards to Stouffville Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (at approx. Sta. 4 +080 to install a 1050mm diameter watermain) in a Fill Regulated Area; to construct structures ( Valve Chamber No. 8 at approx. Sta. 4 +080 and No. 6 at Sta. 3 +255) within a Regional Storm Floodplain. Flows will be maintained within the existing culverts with the 3 open cut crossings (Sta. 4 +370, 3 +960,1 +275) and the 2 tunnel crossings (4 +060, 3 +280). The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering plans and restoration plans); dated June 2, 2004; received June 2, 2004; prepared by Region of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the installation of a 1050 mm diameter watermain along the west side of McCowan Road from Major Mackenzie Road in the south to Stouffville Road in the north. This application deals only with the watermain. A reservoir will be constructed on the south -east quadrant of McCowan and Stouffville Roads which does not require a permit from the TRCA. There are 5 watercourses along this section of McCowan Road. In all instances the watermain will be installed underneath the existing culverts and flows during installation of the watermain will be maintained by the existing culverts. Four of the five culverts are corrugated steel pipes and one at the Little Rouge is an open boxed culvert. The two largest crossings with Regional Storm Floodplains, at the Little Rouge, (Sta. 4 +060) and a tributary south (3 +280), will be conducted via a tunnel method. The other three crossings (Sta. 4 +370, 3 +960, and 1 +275) with less than 125 hectares of drainage upstream will be crossed via an open cut method. Only the Little Rouge crossing and Crossing 3 +960 are located within the Fill Regulated Area. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Three of the crossings (most northerly and southerly and in the middle) are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding. For the other two crossings, fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. 460 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures ( silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Borehole pits for tunnelling will be encircled with sediment fencing. The watercourse will be protected with sediment fencing during the open cut crossings. Trench plugs have been shown on the profile at either side of the watercourses to ensure that the watermain does not act as a conduit for contaminants to the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. With all five watercourses, the watermain will be installed underneath the existing culverts. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) to ensure that works are conducted during the coldwater window (July 1 to September 15). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. The provincially significant wetland in the south end will be protected with a sediment fence during construction. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35172 Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: June 1, 2004 Application #: 060 /04 /MARK 8.1.51 TOWN OF MARKHAM To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (Rodick Road and Highway 7, between Woodbine Avenue and Warden Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Markham. The purpose is to The purpose is to place fill (road, stormwater management pond) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (road, conspan and culvert) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (installation of conspan and culvert) during the cool water timing window (June 15 -March 31). The permit will be issued for the period of June 4, 2004 to June 3, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 461 • Letter of Undertaking to provide details related to liner requirements for the pond bottom; confirmation of the hydraulic capacity of the crossing structure and bypass culvert based on review of the calculations and modelling results; details crossing designs including alignment, skew and stone protection for the crossing structure; confirmation of the method of construction of the watermain via either tunneling or open cut, depending on the recommendations of the required geotechnical report, and associated construction details; confirmation of the site restoration details; confirmation that the EA for the stormwater management pond; confirmation of hydrogeology information regarding groundwater interference associated with the stormwater management pond; and details regarding dewatering requirements for bore pit, tunnels and any other excavations dated June 2, 2004; received June 2, 2004; prepared by the Town of Markham. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the extension of Rodick Road across he Rouge River, installation of storm sewers, installation of a watermain and a retrofit to an existing storm water management pond. Rodick Road will be extended by 800 metres from Miller Avenue to York Tech Drive. A four lane divided roadway is proposed currently which is planned to be expanded to 6 lanes in the future. A 17 metre (span) by 4.8 metre (rise) conspan and a 8 metre (span) by 4.8 metre (rise) elliptical culvert is proposed to be installed at the crossing of the Beaver Creek (Rouge River). A new section of a 400 mm watermain will be installed. The preferred method of construction is to tunnel under the watercourse. Pending review of the geotechnical report, staff are concerned that this may not be possible and that an open cut crossing may be required. The stormwater flows from Miller Avenue to the Highway 407 overpass will be conveyed within a new closed storm sewer system. Two stormceptors (STC -2000 and STC -750 will provide enhanced level of treatment to the storm runoff from the roadway. The stormwater flows from the Highway 407 overpass to York Tech Drive will be conveyed within a new closed storm sewer system and outlet to an existing 1200 mm diameter storm sewer from the existing section of Rodick Road section. A water quality retrofit of the existing flood control facility will be constructed with this project. The proposed retrofit will provide upstream industrial /commercial areas and the proposed four land extension north of Highway 407 with a Level 1 quality control and extended detention. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: A minor increase in flooding is expected under the Regional Storm Flood event as a result of the proposed culvert structures and the presence of the SWM quality pond. Flood elevations are estimated to increase by 0.01 metres at and upstream of York Tech Drive. This will be contained on property owned by the Town of Markham. 462 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, filter bags, biodegradable erosion control mats) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be revegetated / stabilized following construction. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34627 Report Prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: June 1, 2004 463 Application #: 349 /03 /MARK RES. #B115/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Adjacent to 1 Jennifer Court, CFN 25778. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore the possibility of the sale of a small fragment of land adjacent to 1 Jennifer Court, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed Maria Augimeri Rob Ford THAT the potential disposal of a small fragment of land at 1 Jennifer Court, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area) be referred to staff for review and discussion in accordance with established Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) policies; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. CARRIED BACKGROUND This request is being brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #26, adopted by the Members of the TRCA at the meeting held on February 22, 1991. The subject encroachment consists of a pie- shaped piece of swimming pool deck area and a small portion of the swimming pool at the rear of 1 Jennifer Court, measuring approximately 55 square metres (492 square feet). The present owners, Armando and Rafella Cosentino, have had a License of Occupation for this encroachment since 1993. The City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC) considered a request from the owner's son (Tony Consentino) for his parents to purchase the lands subject to the encroachment. On December 1, 2003, the ERC recommended approval of this request, as the sale would be of mutual benefit to the City and the property owners in resolving a long term, minor encroachment as well as eliminating the related on -going administration of the License of Occupation, without significantly affecting public access and enjoyment of parkland. The North York Community Council recommended to City of Toronto Council the resolution of this encroachment on the basis as set out above at its meeting of January 29, 2004, and the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting held on March 1, 2 , and 3, 2004, adopted, without amendment, the same recommendation from the ERC. The area of encroachment is located entirely on tableland and is situated outside the Fill Regulated Area of the Black Creek. However, Development Services staff will be circulated the land sale proposal for review and comment in relation to our Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies. 464 A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 and Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: May 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 465 Attachment 1 CVO REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Atl acart to 1 Jcnrifcr Court CFN 25778 MARYPORT RD. 47.11 von00114 G aVI a 60 no• i r! - r DENBIGH CRES. 466 �wtiwaaov�.- onservatron for Thy Living City / / ATRCA LANDS IMESUEIJECT PROPERTY RES. #8116/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY CONFERENCE Request to present the draft Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy (TNHSS) at the International Annual Conference for the Society of Conservation Biology. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT Dena Lewis and Natalie Iwanycki be authorized to present the Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy and the methods developed to design the Target Terrestrial Natural Heritage System at the 18th Annual Society for Conservation Biology Conference at Columbia University, New York, NY from July 30th to August 2, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) is an international professional organization of over 8000 individuals dedicated to promoting the scientific study, the maintenance, loss, and restoration of biological diversity. The Society's membership is comprised of a wide range of people interested in the conservation and study of biological diversity including: resource managers, educators, government and private conservation workers, and students (www.conservationbiology.org). SCB's 18th Annual meeting will be hosted by the Center for Environmental Research and Conservation (CERC) at the Earth Institute at Columbia University, New York, NY. This year's meeting theme is "Conservation in an Urbanizing World." The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in partnership with Kawartha Region and Ganaraska Region Conservation Authorities, have been awarded the opportunity to present the TNHSS and the research and methods employed to design the target terrrestrial natural heritage system as a poster at the conference being held from July 30th to August 2nd, 2004. RATIONALE At Authority Meeting #4/04, held on April 30, 2004, Resolution #A123/04 in regards to the Draft TNHSS was approved as follows: THAT the draft Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy (April 2004) be circulated to its member municipalities, the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs, Conservation Ontario, South - central Ontario Conservation Authorities Natural Heritage Discussion Group (SCOCA NHDG), non - governmental organizations, the Urban Development Institute, the Aggregate Producers Association of Ontario, watershed councils and task forces, and interested professionals for comment; THAT the draft Strategy be provided to the Greenbelt Advisory Panel and the Smart Growth Secretariat for consideration; THAT staff be directed to implement a consultation process to facilitate the review of the draft Strategy; 467 AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Authority on the comments received regarding the proposed strategy to enable finalization and adoption. As part of the consultation process currently being implemented by the TNHSS Team, TRCA staff will be holding consultation workshops and meetings for comment on the TNHSS. In addition to the consultation process, staff will be presenting the TNHSS at conferences and events in order to promote the Strategy and its contribution to The Living City. At the request of TRCA funding partners that supported the development of the TNHSS, it was agreed that the methodology and analytical techniques developed by the TRCA for the Strategy would be shared with interested professionals by conducting a rigourous promotion and consultation process. The theme of the SCB 2004 18th Annual International Meeting, "Conservation in an Urbanizing World ", and the topics and issues covered in the conference are most relevant to the current work and the mandate of the TRCA. The SCB Meeting will provide an ideal setting for the promotion of the techniques and methods developed by TRCA to design the Target TNHS as presented in the Strategy. A poster presentation of this work is a great opportunity to address the international SCB participants with an interest in conservation in urban landscapes such as the Greater Toronto Area, providing international exposure of TRCA's work. FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost for two staff to attend the four day conference is $1020 U.S. dollars. Funds to participate in this conference, including materials and resources needed to prepare a poster display, have been included within the budget allocated for the TNHSS. Report prepared by: Dena Lewis, extension 5225 For Information contact: Dena Lewis, extension 5225 Date: May 19, 2004 RES. #8117/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Acquisition of an Electronic Document and Records Management System (EDRMS) to manage paper and electronic documents and records. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT staff bring a recommendation for the purchase of an Electronic Document and Records Management System to Authority Meeting #6/04, to be held on June 25, 2004. CARRIED 468 BACKGROUND In 2002, staff sent out a Request for Information (RFI) for an EDRMS to determine whether there was a product in the market that would meet Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) needs. Staff looked at seven proposals and decided to do more research prior to considering this project. In 2003, TRCA staff, with assistance from outside consultants, approved an IT strategy setting out information technology and systems needs. One of the recommendations of the strategy identified the need for TRCA to improve management of electronic documents and convert paper records to the electronic realm. In April 2004, staff issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purchase of an Electronic Document and Records Management System. The top five vendors in the RFI process were included as well as some other vendors who are new to the EDRMS realm. Ten RFP's went out and seven responses were received. The seven vendors are: • Adapsys L.P. • Stellent Incorporated • Townsend, Merkis and Associates • Advanced Solutions Group • Microdea Incorporated • Ikon Office Systems • SixDion Information Management To assist staff in the evaluation process, a consultant has been retained. A staff team met with the consultant and short- listed the seven responses to four possible solutions. References will be checked and communication with municipal references, where appropriate, will take place. Staff will view demonstrations, complete matrix score charts and make a recommendation to the Authority at Meeting #6/04, to be held on June 25, 2004. TRCA will take a phased approach to implementation and purchasing of the product. The EDRMS is a comprehensive project and features the following elements: • Document Management • Records Management • Imaging • Forms Management • Workflow Management • Knowledge Management • Web Interfaces It is expected that the project will be phased in over three years. TRCA is seeking a user friendly, fully integrated and scalable solution. The phased approach that we follow will ensure effective implementation. 469 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for Phase 1, the implementation of scanning hardware, several software licenses and possible server acquisition, has been provided for in the 2004 budget. The estimated budget in 2004 is $50,000. Total value of the work will be provided in the report to the Authority when all proposals have been reviewed. Report prepared by: John Annunziello, extension 5272 For Information contact: John Annunziello, extension 5272 Date: May 25, 2004 RES. #B118/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION RETROFIT Green Building Platinum Certification. Green building registration under the Canada Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (CaGBC LEED) rating system requires engineering services above traditional building protocols. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale WHEREAS the engineering services required to register and coordinate a "Platinum rated green building" under the Canada Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (CaBGC LEED) rating system require additional actions and costs above traditional building design; WHEREAS architectsAlliance (aA) has been retained by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to design the new Kortright facility and aA has subsequently retained KEEN Engineering and RJC to plan, design and provide construction documents for the traditional mechanical and electrical system, and structural and envelope systems, respectively, for the building; WHEREAS KEEN and RJC are among a limited number of green building engineering resources in Ontario; WHEREAS it would be in the best interest of the project for the current design and engineering team to be awarded the contract for the tasks outlined under the green building design; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT KEEN and RJC be awarded the additional engineering work to meet TRCA's objectives for showcasing green building design, at a cost not to exceed $94,000 + GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #1/04, held on February 27, 2004, Res. #A44 /04 was approved, as follows: 470 THAT Phase 2 of architectsAlliance's consulting assignment to provide professional services for the sustainable building, site and infrastructure redesign for The Living City Centre at Kortright be revised to reflect the recommended options evaluated during the Phase 1 work by both the consulting team and staff; THAT Phase 2 of the previously approved work plan be sub - divided into detailed design, tendering and construction administration components, costing $146,425 (excluding GST) and $380,675 (excluding GST), respectively, to reflect a new construction limit of $5.4 million, based on a 7.5% architectural fee; THAT the design fees be allocated on a sliding scale basis, as contained in the architectsAlliance fee proposal, and be prorated accordingly, should the final construction costs be lower than the estimated $5.4 million; THAT staff proceed with the Phase 2 tendering and construction component of the project upon successful completion of a detailed design by architectsAlliance, and once capital funding is secured; THAT staff be authorized to approve additional unspecified expenditures to a maximum of fifteen percent of the total design fees as a contingency allowance to architectsAlliance, if deemed necessary; AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to provide updates to the Authority on the status of the project. architectsAlliance (aA) has entered into an agreement with TRCA to design the new Kortright facility. architectsAlliance has retained KEEN under the stated agreement to plan, design and provide construction documents for the mechanical and electrical system for the building and has retained RJC to plan, design and provide construction documents for the structural and envelope systems. Additional engineering services are required for the Kortright retrofit project beyond traditional building design as outlined by the Canada Green Building Council. TRCA wants to award the additional work associated with the LEED certification process to architectsAlliance and their sub - consultants directly. RATIONALE Due to the very limited green building engineering resources in Ontario (new processes and technologies), it has been determined that it would be in the best interests of the project for efficiency, communications and costs for the same design and engineering team to coordinate the traditional engineering tasks and the tasks outlined under green building design. KEEN and RJC are the engineers under contract and should be awarded the additional services needed to meet LEED certification. aA, KEEN and RJC have provided a comprehensive breakdown of costs including hourly rates for this work including: Commercial Building Incentive Program (CBIP) application for energy efficiency modelling, charette with the project team to review sustainable solutions and LEED credit assistance. architectsAlliance, the lead consultant, has confirmed that the price breakdown provided by the engineering design team is on par compared to traditional engineering services and supports their quote. 471 FINANCIAL DETAILS Working towards green building LEED Platinum requires that the new facility meet an annual energy saving of 60% greater than a traditional building based on energy "modelling." It is estimated, based on existing Kortright energy costs and the increased square footage of the new design, that an annual savings of approximately $24,000 would be achieved. architectsAlliance's price quote to meet LEED green building standards was submitted, and will not exceed $94,000 +GST. Payback for these additional green building energy services can be achieved based on energy savings alone in under 4 years. The CBIP funding program will provide additional financial support for design fees between $30,000 to $40,000, depending on the eventual energy savings. Other fundings sources are being pursued for further support. TRCA staff can complete a portion of the LEED documentation for a savings of approximately $25,000. Further financial details are provided by KEEN and are attached with this communication. Report prepared by: Andrew Bowerbank, extension 5343 For Information contact: Andrew Bowerbank, extension 5343 Date: May 25, 2004 RES. #B119/04 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE Award of Contract. Award of contract for supply of reproduction gas street lights, electronic igniters and cast posts for Black Creek Pioneer Village. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT Galaxy Gas Products be awarded the contract for supplying up to 20 reproduction gas street lights, electronic igniters and cast posts for Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) at a unit cost of $3,500 to an upset limit of $70,000, excluding GST, subject to contract conditions and arrangements satisfactory to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff. CARRIED BACKGROUND As part of the Black Creek Pioneer Village Future Directions Strategy approved in 1999, staff have been working toward installation of gas lines within the restored village. This is an important part of the village restoration and upgrade because it will enable significant energy use efficiencies. Also, it creates the opportunity for traditional gas lighting in the restored village, a feature that will add to the BCPV's marketing of special events and corporate functions. 472 RATIONALE Staff have been working with Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. for some time to determine the most cost effective way to introduce natural gas to the restored village. Negotiations with Enbridge have reached a stage where they have indicated an interest in assisting in the project by covering the costs of laying the lines, a substantial contribution to the overall project. The most efficient approach to the installation is to include the street Tight gas line connections during the initial pipe laying. BCPV staff have undertaken extensive research on the style and appearance of early gas street lighting appropriate for use on site and locating a source for accurate, safe reproduction gas lighting for use in the restored village. The production of period reproductions appears to be limited to the United States of America (USA) or England as no production was found in Canada. Mr. Clifford Clark, Manager, Sales and Delivery, Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. will be coordinating the main gas line installation at BCPV. He advised that the USA firm of Legendary Lighting creates the only Canadian Safety Association (CSA) approved period style gas street Tight fixtures available for public use in Canada. Local lighting companies dealing in Legendary Lighting were contacted for information on lamps, igniters and posts. In every case the dealers were limited to landscape style lighting and unable to provide any custom variations in the products or posts. Mr. Clark recommended that we contact Mr. Don Hindmarch, President, Galaxy Gas Products Inc. for advice and assistance in acquiring the appropriate reproduction lighting. Enbridge has dealt with Mr. Hindmarch on other lamp installations, including lamps at the Enbridge Head Office building in the east end of Toronto, and in fact, Mr. Hindmarch has the Canadian distribution rights for Legendary Lighting. Mr. Hindmarch has been to BCPV with Mr. Clark and has walked the grounds, discussed the needs and understands the installation requirements. He has undertaken a search to acquire appropriate lighting with custom variations while keeping in mind CSA ratings and cost limitations. He is able to deal directly with Legendary Lighting to effect some changes to the Tamp design and he has worked with metal post fabricators to meet the wishes of BCPV and the needs of modern gas installation. The posts, while retaining a period appearance need to accommodate an electronic igniter at the top and an accessible shut off valve inside the base. To meet the custom requirements for the lamps and posts it may take up to 12 weeks to deliver. The lamps will include electronic ignition for on demand use rather than be continuous burn, to enable BCPV to save on ongoing energy costs. Enbridge has estimated the current cost per lamp on continuous burn to be approximately $800 annually. The cost for igniters at approximately $400 per unit will be recovered in gas cost savings within one to two seasons. Electronic igniters also has the added security of automatically relighting burners extinguished by wind. The electronic igniters will enable the lamps to be turned on and off from a central location in the Visitors' Centre. 473 Approval is requested to engage Galaxy Gas Products to provide appropriate reproduction gas street lights, electronic igniters and cast posts to an upset limit of $70,000, excluding GST, and to begin the production of the components as soon as possible after approval is given. It is planned to launch the gas lights at the 2004 Fall Frolic fund raiser, Lighting the Way, on September 30th, 2004. FINANCIAL DETAILS The Friends of Black Creek Pioneer Village have raised $100,000 for the production and installation of gas street lights at Black Creek Pioneer Village. Provision has been made through funds held by The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto to transfer up to $100,000 to the BCPV 2004 budget to complete the lighting project. Report prepared by: Marty Brent, extension 5403 For Information contact: Marty Brent, extension 5403 Date: May 21, 2004 RES. #B120/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: BIOINDICATOR DATABASE OF BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES FOUND IN THE TORONTO REGION Award of contract for benthic invertebrate bioindicator database in support of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT Golder and Associates be retained to undertake the creation of a waterfront and watershed benthic invertebrate bioindicator database in support of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, at a total cost not to exceed $13,375.00, including GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) has developed a Regional Watershed Monitoring Program (RWMP), with City of Toronto and the Region of Peel, York and Durham. This ongoing initiative has been developed to provide a comprehensive, integrated and coordinated approach to environmental monitoring in the Greater Toronto Area. In addition to surface water quality, fisheries information, geofluvial information and flow /precipitation, benthic invertebrates are collected as part of the aquatic monitoring section of this initiative. Using the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) Stream Assessment Protocol, benthic invertebrates are collected at stream sites to assist in determining stream habitat and water quality. To assist report targets under the RWMP, TRCA requested proposals for the creation of a database on ecological /bioindicator information for benthic invertebrates collected at approximately 150 riverine (watershed) and 30 waterfront sites between 2001 and 2003. There currently exists approximately 510 taxa to be included in the database. 474 The database will be prepared in two parts and as such separate proposal requests were submitted to qualified consultants. The first part will include benthic invertebrate species found at watershed sites, while the second will include species found at waterfront sites. Both parts will share similar information associated with each benthic invertebrate species including: substrate preference, thermal regime, life cycle, emergence period, commonness, etc. RATIONALE TRCA staff have developed a standard method for assessing benthic invertebrate data collected under the RWMP. This method uses 10 commonly used indices, e.g. Hilsehhoff Biotic Index, Shannon - Weaver, % Dominance, etc., with empirically -based biocriteria to determine if a site in question is unimpaired (i.e. healthy). However, it is important to note that the use of simple indices can be misleading if not presented in an ecological context. For example, species composition can be heavily influenced by substrate type /composition, flow velocity, and water temperature. All in turn are influenced by local land use in the watershed. Urbanization, for example, can result in increased sedimentation due to urban runoff, extreme flows due to reduced infiltration and storm water retention, and increased water temperatures due to removal of stream bank vegetative cover. All can significantly affect the composition of benthic communities. Often an index will indicate possible impairment at a location where, upon more detailed consideration of the habitat parameters at the site and the species of invertebrates found, it becomes clear that this is not necessarily an impacted (i.e. unhealthy) benthic invertebrate community but a change in habitat. Therefore, by examining individual site species lists and combining this with established bioindices knowledge of and with species habitat and water quality preferences, it is possible to make a more informed evaluation of effects. The proposed bioindicator database will make this important ecological information available for TRCA reporting purposes. Often, this type of information is difficult to collect as it is only available in numerous scientific literature sources or by retaining the services of a highly qualified consultant. The benthic invertebrate bioindicator database will be prepared in such a way as to complement existing TRCA environmental databases making information access more timely and efficient. Four requests for proposals were sent out to qualified bidders: William B. Morton; Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services, Golder and Associates; and Henry Kowalyk (BII Consulting). Proposals and quotations were received as follows: * Costs include GST Henry Kowalyk (BII Consulting) was unable to submit a proposal at this time. 475 Cost for part one* Cost for part two* Total cost* William B. Morton $10,914 $4,280 $15,194 Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services $11,984 $2,996 $14,980 Golder and Associates $9,202 $4,173 $13,375 * Costs include GST Henry Kowalyk (BII Consulting) was unable to submit a proposal at this time. 475 Staff have reviewed the three proposals and recommend that Golder and Associates be awarded the contract for part one and part two of the bioindicator database. In addition to being lower in total cost and shorter in time required for project completion, TRCA has retained the services of Golder Associates in previous benthic invertebrate reporting projects with satisfactory results. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Once the successful proposal has been selected, an initial meeting will be arranged to discuss expectations for the work. A first draft of the database will be provided to TRCA within a month of the initial meeting. Following review and consultation with the selected consultant, a final copy of the database is expected to be provided to the TRCA within two weeks. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding has been identified within the 2004 Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, account number 124 -05. Report prepared by: Jeff Borisko, extension 5333 For Information contact: Jeff Borisko, extension 5333 Date: May 18, 2004 RES. #B121/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TENDER ESS 01/04 - GRANGER GREENWAY (EAST HUMBER) PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE Approval of tender by Rutherford Contracting Ltd. to supply and install concrete abutments and pedestrian footbridge over the East Humber River as part of the William Granger Greenway Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the contract for the supply and installation of the Granger Greenway pedestrian footbridge be awarded to Rutherford Contracting (in partnership with Eagle Bridge), being the overall lowest bid received at a total cost of $59,149.60, inclusive of all applicable taxes; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to execute the necessary contract documents to complete the works in accordance with the terms and conditions of the bid. CARRIED 476 BACKGROUND The TRCA and the City of Vaughan are involved in an ongoing partnership with respect to the planning and implementation of the William Granger Greenway trail, a section of the Humber interregional trail system, that passes through the East Humber River valley (Boyd North lands) from Rutherford Road in the south through to Bindertwine Park (Kleinburg) in the north. Staff have been working to complete sections of the trail subject to available budget in each year. Under the partnership arrangement, the City of Vaughan capital budget funds are used to support capital construction costs (e.g. trail construction, pedestrian bridges, etc.) and TRCA funds are used to support the environmental regeneration initiatives including riparian and reforestation plantings, structural habitat features (hibernacula, bird boxes, snags, etc. interpretive and directional signage elements, site rehabilitation and project design. In order to complete the greenway link south to Rutherford Road, staff invited quotations for the supply and installation of concrete abutments and pedestrian bridge. A total of five companies were invited to bid based on their experience with projects of this nature. Four sealed quotes were received. The results are summarized below: COMPANY QUOTE (including GST) Somerville Construction $83,460.00 RomNeg Construction Inc. $84,316.00 Civil Underground $69,550.00 Rutherford Contracting in partnership with Eagle Bridge $59,149.60 Based on a detailed review of the bids received, staff are satisfied that the lowest tender received represents good value. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this work are available in the Wm. Granger Greenway project account 111 -10. Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 Date: May 21, 2004 RES. #B122/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: POMONA MILLS PARK - CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR STEP CONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING PATHWAY Approval to retain services of Griffith Property Services to install new precast concrete steps down an existing asphalt trail. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale 477 THAT Griffith Property Services be retained to supply and install the required precast concrete steps and metal railing for a total cost of $25,145.00, inclusive of all applicable taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND The initial pathway work was completed by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Environmental Services staff in the fall of 2003. Through the subsequent use of the trail by the community, it was requested that the Town of Markham look into the possibility of altering the new pathway to include stairs in order to allow easier access up the slope by a larger number of users. This request was accepted by the town and the funds to do the alterations were included in Markham's 2004 budget. The Town of Markham subsequently requested that the TRCA remain the project managers and oversee the new construction of a pathway down the south embankment of the Don River into Pomona Mills Park. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Due to the nature of this work, the town's requested completion date and the current construction commitments of the Environmental Services section, it was decided to subcontract the work to a local contractor for construction, with TRCA acting as project manager. A request for prices was prepared by TRCA for the above noted work and sent to three contractors. These contractors were approved by the Town of Markham Parks Department. These contractors have all done, or are currently doing work for the town. Prices were received and reviewed as follows: Griffith Property Services Rutherford Contracting Pit Haulage Ltd. $23,500 (excluding GST) $36,180 (excluding GST) disqualified (bid was incomplete) Griffith Property Services was selected based on project understanding, proposed construction methodologies, previous experience and overall cost. Additional site restoration and plantings will be completed by TRCA after the completion and acceptance of the work done by the contractor. Plantings will be scheduled for fall 2004 installation. This additional site restoration work is expected to cost approximately $7,500. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project have been made available by the Town of Markham Parks Department. The maximum allowable is $40,000 inclusive of all site restoration and taxes. Report prepared by: Mark Lowe, extension 5388 For Information contact: Mark Lowe, extension 5388 Date: May 27, 2004 478 RES. #8123/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE DIGITAL FLOODLINE MAPPING FOR THE ETOBICOKE CREEK WATERSHED Approval to retain Greck and Associates Limited to produce updated digital floodline mapping for 58 map sheets for the Etobicoke Creek watershed. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with Greck and Associates Limited to complete the floodline mapping update for 11 scanned and vectorized map sheets and 47 new map sheets within the Etobicoke Creek watershed at a cost not to exceed $55,000 excluding GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND In the late 1970s the TRCA undertook an extensive program to prepare flood and fill line mapping for all watercourses under TRCA jurisdiction. The regulatory floodlines for each watercourse were established from water surface profiles generated by the HEC -2 hydraulic model. The floodlines, which were normally plotted on 1:2000 scale mapping, formed the basis of flood and fill line regulations. Currently, one of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by the TRCA and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information staff have prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update the TRCA's current flood and fill line regulation mapping. The focus of this assignment is to update 58 flood line map sheets for portions of the Etobicoke Creek watershed to create digital geo- referenced floodlines. The main tasks will entail the conversion of the existing HEC -2 model to HEC -RAS, the generation of updated flood levels and the plotting of updated regional storm floodlines on digital mapping. The new digital mapping will improve modelling and data management capabilities and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up -to -date floodplain information required for regulation purposes. RATIONALE Three engineering consultants were invited to submit proposals for the project based upon the Terms of Reference for the work. Proposals were reviewed based on technical expertise, proposed approach, previous experience relating to floodline mapping, related projects and cost (as indicated below). 479 • Golder and Associates Ltd. $54,825 • Greck and Associates Limited $55,000 • MacViro Consultants Inc. $54,985 * All prices exclude GST. Based on the review of the submissions, staff recommended that Greck and Associates Limited as the preferred consultant to complete the work. Their existing knowledge of TRCA floodline mapping and floodplain hydraulics will enable them to complete the update in a timely manner. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project are available within the approved 2004 Floodplain Management budget account #127 -07. A maximum upset limit not to exceed $55,000 excluding applicable taxes has been set for this project. Report prepared by: Alison Edwards, extension 5363 For Information contact: Alison Edwards or Glenn Farmer, extension 5351 Date: May 20, 2004 RES. #B124/04 - ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING OF THE TODMORDEN MILLS PAPERMILL THEATRE Award of contract for Archaeological Monitoring of the Todmorden Mills Papermill Theatre Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the contract dated May 31, 2004, with Historic Horizon Inc. for Archaeological Monitoring of the Todmorden Mills Papermill Theatre in an amount not to exceed $25,000 be confirmed, subject to City of Toronto funding confirmation. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto is planning to fund an addition to an historic mill structure on the Todmorden Mills property for the purpose of expanding the functionality of the building which currently serves as a local theatre. Owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), the city manages this property and is following TRCA procedures including fulfilling the requirements necessary for archaeological work to be conducted prior to or during construction activities. In December of 2003, the TRCA's Archaeological Resource Management Unit conducted an initial archaeological investigation within the proposed construction zone. Artifacts and fill material were encountered dating to the 19th and 20th centuries. Much of the project area could not be investigated by hand due to the depth of fill materials and the resulting safety concerns. In consultation with Ministry of Culture (MCL) staff, it was determined that a 480 monitoring strategy would be the best means of continuing the investigation. The monitoring strategy that was agreed upon by the MCL, the TRCA and the City of Toronto involves the presence of a licensed archaeologist during all construction excavation activities and the recording of any archaeological resources that are encountered during the construction by the archaeologist. For a number of reasons, the initial construction schedule as agreed upon in December of 2003 has been modified, and the city has agreed that Historic Horizon Inc. would be the preferred firm to complete the archaeological monitoring at the Papermill Theatre. RATIONALE Time is now of the essence to complete the construction programme /archaeological monitoring to allow for the construction of the addition to the historic mill structure. Due to unforeseen delays, the scheduling of the archaeological monitoring has changed significantly, and the Archaeological Resource Management Unit at the TRCA has been directed to several priority projects on other TRCA -owned properties. City staff and TRCA archaeological staff are in agreement that Historic Horizon Inc. is the preferred firm to complete the work, given their previous experience on other portions of the Papermill site. Even if time constraints had not been an issue, this firm is highly qualified and would have been among the primary choices to conduct archaeological monitoring work at this important historic site. Personnel at Historic Horizon Inc. have made themselves available for this project, and were able to comply to meet the needs of the altered construction schedule. Work commenced on May 31, 2004. FINANCIAL DETAILS The archaeological monitoring is not expected to exceed $25,000, and will be fully funded as per an agreement with the City of Toronto. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The TRCA's Archaeological Resource Management Unit will continue to assist in the administration of the archaeological monitoring at the Papermill Theatre. Historic Horizon Inc. will conduct the investigation according to TRCA archaeological procedures and will prepare the required report of the results for the Ministry of Culture to review. Report prepared by: Cathy Crinnion, extension 5323 For Information contact: Jim Dillane, extension 6292, Cathy Crinnion, extension 5323 Date: May 31, 2004 RES. #B125/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PINE VALLEY DRIVE LINK Environment Assessment. Current Process for the Pine Valley Drive Link Environmental Assessment (EA), and requests for an Individual EA. Suzan Hall Frank Dale 481 WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has consistently advised the City of Vaughan as to its position that any consideration of the opening of Pine Valley Drive through the Boyd Conservation Area should be studied through an individual Environmental Assessment; WHEREAS the TRCA staff in reviewing the Phase 2 of the Class EA for the Pine Valley Corridor identified numerous issues and did not concur with the findings; WHEREAS the Authority, at Meeting #10/03 directed staff to participate on an information only basis in further phases of the Class EA; WHEREAS the TRCA Chair, staff and legal counsel have been in discussions with the City of Vaughan staff, legal counsel and representatives of the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and the Friends of Boyd; WHEREAS the City of Vaughan Council on Tuesday May 25, passed a motion (in part) as follows: That the City requests the Minister of the Environment to issue an Order under Section 16 of the Environmental Assessment Act requiring that the Pine Valley Corridor between Langstaff Road and Teston Road undergo an individual environmental assessment in accordance with the Draft Order, and that the current Class Environmental Assessment be converted into the Individual Environmental Assessment; and ...That TRCA and MNR be requested to support the City's request; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA notify the City of Vaughan that the TRCA, as the city has been previously advised, concurs with the use of the Individual EA process to carry out a comprehensive review of the transportation issues; THAT the City of Vaughan be advised that the TRCA will approach this process within the context of The Living City vision and objectives for Healthy Rivers and Shorelines, Regional Biodiversity, Sustainable Communities and Business Excellence; THAT the TRCA request the Minister of the Environment to ensure within the provisions of the order that at least 60 days for review of the terms of reference is provided to gain meaningful public and agency input; THAT the TRCA staff and counsel work with the City of Vaughan, MNR, Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and others to address the issue of the scope of the EA; AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this communication be forwarded to the City of Vaughan, MNR, MOE, the Friends of Boyd and Humber Watershed Alliance. CARRIED 482 BACKGROUND Since the issuance of the draft Phase 2 environmental assessment for the Pine Valley Drive Link in May of 2003, TRCA and MNR have approached MOE, York Region and the City of Vaughan about the need to bump -up the Municipal Class EA to an Individual Environmental Assessment. TRCA's key issues evolve around the following points as reported on January 9, 2004: • development with impacts of this magnitude, are not permitted through areas of provincial interest (ANSI's) as per the Provincial Policy Statement; • the process for environmental assessment is incorrect for a project of such major environmental impact. The process should not be a Municipal Class EA but an Individual Environmental Assessment; and, • this link represents only a short portion of the full extent of road work planned for Pine Valley Drive. The environmental assessment process should be addressing the broader cumulative environmental impacts of the proposed link (a municipal project) and the section of Pine Valley Drive from Rutherford Road north to Major MacKenzie (a Region of York project). The Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Assessment Branch has received several requests for a bump -up for this project to an Individual EA, and in April 2004 requested the City of Vaughan to discuss all environmental and process concerns with the requestors of the Individual EA. TRCA and MNR were approached late in April by legal counsel and the EA team consultants to discuss our concerns related to the existing EA process, and to explore potential content and wording of a draft terms of reference for an Individual EA process. This new terms of reference would form the basis for a Minister's Order which would go from the City of Vaughan to the Ministry of the Environment requesting an Individual EA. TRCA retained the legal services of an environmental assessment specialist, John Wilims of Wilims & Shier, and worked with the city's counsel to develop a draft terms of reference that addresses our concerns. This work is ongoing. The Friends of Boyd have sent communications to TRCA summarizing their concerns and comments regarding the environmental process and proposals. On May 25, 2004 the City of Vaughan, at a Special Committee of the Whole, approved a recommendation to request the Minister of the Environment to issue an order under Section 16 of the Environmental Assessment Act to convert the existing EA into the Individual EA. In addition, the City of Vaughan is requesting TRCA and MNR's support in their request. The City of Vaughan will also be requesting York Region to support the request and to participate in the Individual EA process as co- proponent. The City of Vaughan has been planning to send a revised terms of reference to the Minister of the Environment by mid June, and put the terms of reference on MOE's Environmental Registry as soon as possible. The city wanted to conduct a statutory public meeting on the terms of reference on June 29th, prior to the summer period. TRCA has just been informed that the Region of York staff will not go to Council until June 24th, 2004 when Council will consider the City of Vaughan's request to participate in the Individual EA process. The city's legal counsel 483 has informed us that the schedule for the order and posting of the terms of reference will adjust to accommodate the Region of York deliberations. TRCA staff and counsel recognize the City of Vaughan's wish to expedite this process, however, are concerned that an adequate period of time be provided for public comment over the summer recess. The Friends of Boyd specifically requested that the Minister's Order require a review of 60 days (over the summer) from the time of posting. Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Date: June 03, 2004 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:17 a.m., on Friday, June 4, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 484 Brian Denney Secretary- Treasurer erTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/04 July 9, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #6104, was held in the South Theatre , Black Creek Pioneer Village , on Friday, July 9, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:07 a.m.. PRESENT David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Nancy Stewart Alternate Member REGRETS Maria Augimeri RES.#B126/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Frank Dale THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/04, held on June 4, 2004, be approved . DELEGATIONS Member CARRIED (a) A delegation by Jim Robb, Member, Friends of the Rouge Watershed, speaking in regards to permit applications 8.1.23 - 8.1.28, inclusive. (b) A delegation by Bruce Craig, President, King City Preserve the Village, and Gary Hunter, Environmental Consultant, Hunter & Associates, speaking in regards to permit applications 8.1.34 and 8.1.35. 485 RES.#B127/04 - DELEGATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT above -noted delegations (a) and (b) be heard and received . CARRIED PRESENTATIONS (a) A presentation by Beth Williston, Watershed Policy and Planning Specialist, TRCA, in regards to permit applications 8.1.23 - 8.1.28, inclusive. RES.#B128/04 - PRESENTATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT above -noted presentation (a) be heard and received . CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) A letter dated June 7, 2004, from Jane Beecroft, Chair, CHP Heritage Centre, in regards to item 7.9 - Request for Disposal and Sale of Surplus Authority -Owned Land. (b) A letter dated July 9, 2004, from Jim Robb, Friends of the Rouge Watershed, in regards to York Region's request for permtis for altering Rouge streams and constructing in floodplains. RES.#B129/04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT above -noted correspondence (a) be referred back to staff for a report . CARRIED 486 RES. #B130/04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT above -noted correspondence (b) be added to the agenda and received . CARRIED 487 CORRESPONDENCE (A) CHP Heritage Centre The Society of Heritage Associaoes La Societe des Assodim du Parrimoine Incorpotiteo Affiliate of the Ontario Historical Society June 7, 2004 Executive Committee,Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario, M3N 1 S4 via fax: 416- 661 -6898 Dear Committee Members, 2nd floor 719 Yongc Strret Toronto, Ontario Canada M4Y 285 (416) SIS•7544 Dr. Edmund Boyd was, at one time, head of otolaryngology at Sick Childrens Hospital and a co- inventor of Pablurn. His last office was a large, handsome house on Prince Arthur Avenue. Because he was naturally left- handed and had been forced as a child to switch to right- handed use, he struggled for the rest of his life to overcome the effects of the unsuccessful change, and developed the world's first research on laterality. To keep aligned with the real world, Dr. Boyd purchased a large piece of rolling land on the Humber River. He named his estate "Braeside ". There, he built a fine rambling house on a hilltop and began his project of "landscaping by the natural method ". On the property there were many aboriginal artifacts, springs, a host of natural features of interest, and a working farm - all of which he protected and treasured. To have access to al, he built a series of walking trails and a modest road, using his hands, a pickaxe, a shovel, and a wheelbarrow. His plan followed what nature indicated with the least disturbance from his digging and planting. For instance, just inside the gateway into his estate, he planted a stand of red pine because there were already a few at that location; His pines had attained 25 feet feet in height by the 1940s. Some information about his landscaping methods may be found in the archives of the Museum of the History of Medicine. When the Conservation Authority took over Braeside, the stand of pines were cut down, the hills bulldozed and levelled, swathes of grass planted where there had been meadows of wildflowers, the curving twisting roads were straightened and "improved ", and the estate was dramatically altered and not landscaped "by the natural method ". 'What had been unique was turned into something that looked like everything else. People who had known him and his property refused to visit there afterwards because so much of what he had done and held dear, had been destroyed. Because of the extent of destruction in the past, it is not appropriate for the Conservation Authority to sell off, urbanize, allow more modem roads, or permit further alteration of Braeside. 488 It is also inappropriate for any "Conservation Authority" to reduce properties it holds in trust for public benefit, especially at a point in time when the supply of green and open space is desperately needed, but shrinking due to overdevelopment. Instead, it would be more appropriate for the Authority to plan for archaeological investigation of the Boyd estate and plan to restore at least some of the charms it had when Dr. Boyd was its steward. Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY (Miss) Jane Beecroft, O.M.C., Chair 489 CORRESPONDENCE (B) ce odS or ea Jim Robb Friends of the Rouge Watershed 1 Braeburn Blvd. Scarborough Ontario M1J 2P9 July 9, 2004 Re: York Region 's Request for Permits for altering Rouge Streams and Constructing in Floodplains Dear TRCA Executive Committee : Please defer or deny the permits requested to alter waterways and /or construct in flood plains to facilitate York Region's disastrous sewer twinning proposal along 16th Avenue in Markham. If you grant approval, you could be party to serious breaches of the federal Fisheries Act, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Ontario Water Resources Act and other environmental legislation. This project has been poorly assessed and managed by York Region and it is heading for an environmental and legal train wreck. It would be a serious mistake for the TRCA to give this project a green or even amber Tight, particularly at this time. The currently proposed construction of the Phase n 16th Avenue York Durham sewer will result in harmful alteration and disruption of fish habitat in the Rouge River watershed , even with the complicated mitigation plan which has been developed. To construct Phase n of the 16th Avenue sewer, York Region plans to remove 30,000 to 50,000 litres /minute from aquifers which support sensitive fish and wildlife habitat within the Rouge River watershed and the Oak Ridges Moraine. This aquifer de- watering would fill a large in- ground swimming pool every one or two minutes. This de- watering would remove 43 to 72 million litres /day from important aquifers which are connected to the ORM. Over the construction period of 2.5 years for just the 16th A venue Phase n sewer segment, 40 to 66 Billion litres of water would be removed from groundwater aquifers which directly and indirectly support habitat for trout, nationally vulnerable redside dace, and dozens of other fish species. De- watering of an average of 11,000 litres /minute for the Phase I sewer construction has already created a de- watered cone (or crater) in the aquifer which is more than 65 square kilometres inarea and up to 40 metres (133 feet) deep. Some 70 rural wells have already gone dry in Markham. These serious impacts to streams, fish habitat, wetlands and wells will continue and increase, if the de- watering rate is allowed to triple or quadruple, as proposed for Phase n. The Rouge Park Alliance Chair (Ron Christie) and General Manager (Lewis Yeager) have significant knowledge and expertise in fish habitat and aquatic resource matters . On April 20, 2004 the Rouge Park Alliance wrote to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to express their serious concerns about the impacts to fish habitat from the 16Th Avenue sewer and to request a thorough environmental assessment. Page 1 of 2 490 The Rouge Park Alliance letter states: Both the reduced flows in our tributaries and the abnormal conditions in the discharge receiving stream are classic examp /es of harmful alteration, disruption, and damage to fish habitat (HADD) as defined in the Canada Fisheries Act. Considerable work has been done in an attempt to mitigate the impacts for Phase n , however, the aforementioned Rouge Park Alliance letter also states: There appear to be no other examp /es of such a mitigation p /an being attempted, let alone succeeding over a period of years, particularly at the scale anticipated. As well, the mitigation plan only targets what the consultants view to be 'important" watercourse reaches. Finally, background biological water quality and fisheries monitoring only began recent /y. There is insufficient background information to adequate /y design protection for the broad spectrum of aquatic species which occur, or to predict impacts with any certainty. The following statement is by the Chair of the Rouge Park Alliance in his April 20, 2004 letter to York Region Councillor Frank Scarpitti: Finally, if the mitigation proves ineffective, there is no effective fall -back position and serious harm wou /d result to the Rouge River's tributaries and aquatic and terrestrial communities. As alluded to in the Alliance's Apri120, 2004 letter, there are many Rouge streams with fish habitat within the impact area that will not receive flow augmentation under the proposed mitigation . These streams will suffer unmitigated harm to fish habitat due to aquifer de- watering. Under the circumstances, a comprehensive federal environmental assessment is required. A federal environmental assessment is needed to identify alternative ways to satisfy the purpose of the York Durham sewer twinning and extension without depleting important groundwater resources and without harming sensitive fish and wildlife habitat within the Rouge River watershed and the Oak Ridges Moraine. The TRCA should not attach its reputation and credibility to the seriously flawed York Region proposal until the federal environmental assessment is completed as requested by the Rouge Park Alliance and a number of federal MPs. Sincerely Jim Robb, for Friends of the Rouge Watershed cc. Hon. David Anderson, Minister of Environment Edwin R. Debruyn, Habitat Chief, Ontario Great Lakes Area, DFO John Mills, Regional Director General, Ontario Region, Environment Canada Kieth West, Director, Central Region, Ministry of the Environment Lewis Y eager, General Manager, Rouge Park Alliance Page 2 of 2 491 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B131/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Gareene Homes Limited, CFN 35326. Purchase of property located west of Leslie Street and south of Stouffville Road, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 7.12 hectares (17.59 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Gareene Homes Limited , being Part of Lots 33 and 34, Concession 2 and designated as Block 16 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J.D. Barnes Ltd . Surveying under their Reference No . 03 -21- 086 -00, dated March 2, 2004, Town of Richmond Hill , Regional Municipality of York , located west of Leslie Street and south of Stouffville Road ; THAT a conservation easement for the protection and enhancement of the environmental features and functions containing 0.64 hectares (1.58 acres), more or less , of vacant land be purchased from Gareene Homes Limited , said land being situate on Part of Lots 33 and 34, Concession 2, along the rear of Lots 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, and 11 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by J .D. Barnes Ltd . Surveying under their Reference No . 03 -21- 086 -00, dated March 2, 2004, Town of Richmond Hill , Regional Municipality of York , located west of Leslie Street and south of Stouffville Road ; THAT the purchase price of the said land and the conservation easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land and easement free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Marc S. Freedman, General Counsel for Gareene Homes Ltd. 492 The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of Subdivision 19T(R)- 98009, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 16) which are comprised of a valley corridor along a headwater tributary of the Rouge River and located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan area. A conservation easement was also established by TRCA staff which will act as a vegetated buffer between the residential development and the valley land TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 Date: June 14, 2004 Attachments : 1 493 Attachment 1 NATJR.R_ HERITAG LOADS MU -7=0100 1OI ANU Al..dlJl,,. I: I. PFIQJLCr F: is Flood Ila.r Ale G?rec ratior Com3Gnef;. rfuucn Niuxi W, b q •R:J salmxiI. li:xr4g Limited 494 ror Thei v;ng Cily ITRCALANDS SUBJECT PRC1P} fVY CONSERVATION EASEFtENT RES. #B132L04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Mary Borgo, CFN 35568. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located east of Islington Avenue, south of Langstaff Road (8477 Islington Avenue - Woodbridge), City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Humber River watershed. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.16 hectares (0.40 acres), more or less , consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land , be purchased from Mary Borgo, said land being Lot 6, Plan M -1113, designated as Part 3 on a Plan prepared by EMC Group Ltd ., entitled : SEVERANCE PLAN B /90/02, Drawing No . 91126 -SVR, dated April 2003, City of Vaughan , Regional Municipality of York , east of Islington Avenue , south of Langstaff Road (8477 Islington Avenue - Woodbridge ); THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the easement required free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers and Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid . AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Mary Borgo has received conditional approval from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) to sever this residential property in order to create an additional residential lot One of the conditions imposed by the OMB requires a conservation easement over a significant environmental feature on the eastern portion of the subject lands, as identified by TRCA staff through the review of the consent application. Negotiations have been conducted with the owners' lawyer, Mr. Gerald Warner of Baker Schneider Ruggiero LLP, Barristers & Solicitors. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 495 RATIONALE The portion of the property subject to the conservation easement is comprised entirely of a Regional Storm flood plain, including a 10 metre buffer from the regulatory flood line, along the East Humber River, and falls within lands identified as suitable for acquisition in the TRCA's Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to this easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: June 22, 2004 Attachments : 1 496 Attachment 1 • gym ri'r:_ r 1• 0- N t t 01 .,I, . L f I.,. SUBJECT PROPEFITY • NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PRO I ECFION AND ACOJISITICN ?ROJEC- 2001 -2008 Flozd Pir.ir and Cei rva6o^ Comp•.nan:, Hitribe - Hirer Wa:erSieri Mary 3orgo CFN 35568 497 • • • t - Lonservafion fvr The Living City 'TP. f LANDS - j5UAJECT PROI • t v RES. #B133/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Lake Ontario Waterfront /Pickering -Ajax Sector Cougs (Whites) Ltd., CFN 35553. Purchase of property located on the west side of Whites Road, north of Finch Avenue, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Lake Ontario Waterfront /Pickering -Ajax Sector. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 6.00 hectares (14.83 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Cougs (Whites) Ltd., being Part of Lot 29, Concession 2 and designated as Blocks 75 and 76 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by J.D. Barnes Ltd . Surveying under their Reference No . 01 -25- 086 -04, City of Pickering , Regional Municipality of Durham , located on the west side of Whites Road , north of Finch Avenue; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Ronald J. Hawkshaw of Polack, McKay & Hawkshaw, Barristers & Solicitors. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 498 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Lake Ontario Waterfront /Pickering -Ajax Sector as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision S -P- 2001 -06, TRCA staff established the limits of the Open Space lands which are comprised of a significant tableland woodlot. Although this property drains to Frenchman's Bay on the Lake Ontario waterfront, the woodlot is situated along the Rouge / Duffins Corridor. Staff promote the protection of the woodlot feature, as it provides a significant linkage and habitat function within the corridor. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent TRCA lands, it is estimated that the taxes for this property will be approximately $150. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: June 22, 2004 Attachments : 1 499 Attachment 1 NATURAL FERITACiE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2C0I.11-2ftCe.: Flooti Plain ar.d Corservatiort Gornprrieril, Water,ront L'itatershe:y1 Cug (Wh Ltd. cFris5f.63 SUBJECT PROPERTY • 500 kvt, moirrnihr,-- t!' onserva tion for Tbr Living riry — ITRCh:LATM rRoPERre RES. #B134/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Hullmark Developments Ltd., CFN 35571. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located north of Humberwood Boulevard, east of Highway No. 427 (710 Humberwood Boulevard), City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area, Humber River watershed. Suzan Hall Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.44 hectares (1.09 acres), more or Tess , consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land , be purchased from Hullmark Developments Ltd ., said land being Part of Block 1, Registered Plan 66M -2257 and designated as Parts 2, 3, and 4 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by I .M. Pastushak Ltd, Ontario Land Surveyors , under.their Reference No . PO4- 05(B), City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area , north of Humberwood Boulevard , east of Highway No . 427 (710 Humberwood Boulevard ); THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the easement required free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers and Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Salvatore Cavarretta of Tridel / The Mansions of Humberwood Inc. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 501 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of a site plan application for The Mansions of Humberwood residential condominium development, TRCA staff established the limits of the conservation easement lands which are comprised of the valley wall along the West Humber River valley corridor at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to this easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Dewell , extension 5245 Date: June 22, 2004 Attachments : 1 502 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LAND- PIROTECTlON AND ACQUISITION PRQJEC 2001 2005 Food Plain and Cnnseraatlon C:crnponen_. Humber Rive' Watsr thed Hullmark Deve;apniants Ltd, CFN 35571 503 w;r+wxuu+nry -- onservatiOf far Tho living City 1TRC:A LANDS ? SUBJEvT PROPERTY RES. #B135/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Petticoat Creek Watershed 1579348 Ontario Inc. (Robert Carriere), CFN 35325. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located south of Highway #401, west of Rosebank Road, (444 and 446 Toynevale Road), City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, Petticoat Creek watershed. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.417 hectares (1.030 acres), more or less , consisting of a rectangular shaped parcel of land , be purchased from 1579348 Ontario Inc . (Robert Carriere ), said land being Part of Lots 125 and 126, Registered Plan 350 and designated as Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 on Plan 40R- 22667, City of Pickering , Regional Municipality of Durham , located south of Highway #401, west of Rosebank Road , (444 and 446 Toynevale Road ); THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the easement required free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers and Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. 1579348 Ontario Inc. (Robert Carriere) has received approval from the Durham Land Division Committee to create 3 residential lots from 2 residential Tots. One of the conditions imposed by the Land Division Committee is that a conservation easement be granted over the rear portion of the property, as identified by TRCA staff through the review of the consent application. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's solicitor, Mr. Timothy C.R. Vanular. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 504 RATIONALE The portion of the property subject to the conservation easement is well vegetated and this vegetation is contiguous with the Petticoat Creek valley. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to this easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : Mike Fenning , extension 5223 For Information contact : Ron Dewell , extension 5245, Mike Fenning , extension 5223 Date: June 24, 2004 Attachments : 1 505 Attachment 1 NIATURA_ HERITAGE LANDS {'ROTE::I ION. AND ACQUBf ION PPICI.ECT 2001 2015 Pucci Pair and Conservatior Cr: nocnerm Pe :ii'nat : rtie4: \Nota•sh ?(1 1575348 Orilar.o Inc. (Robert Corrieral C —N 35325 0 • •� P1040 • '1 . _ Hwy. 119 2 RA4 ,: onservat +on 506 for the timing ,'fly t __1tj:ALANJS i 1 7: r t PROPERTl RES. # B136/04 Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Cynthia Tam, CFN 35605. Purchase of property located east of Leslie Street and south of Major Mackenzie Drive, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed. . Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.063 hectares (0.16 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Cynthia Tam , being Part of Lot 20, Concession 3 and designated as Part 5 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Paul Kidd Surveying Ltd under their Job No . 02- 126 -1, Town of Richmond Hill , Regional Municipality of York , located east of Leslie Street and south of Major Mackenzie Drive ; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Henry Chiu of Henry Chiu Architect, the owner's agent. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 507 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of a Site Plan Control Application, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 16) which are comprised of a portion of the west valley wall along the Rouge River valley corridor and are located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan area. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: June 28, 2004 Attachments : 1 508 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACUUISITION P'<),I.F.CT:->rm' 2005 Flood PIru and Ccisf.irvntion Component. Harce Hivpr Wate•sheri Gyn:l!ia Tarr CFN 356C5 509 RES. #B137/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE CITY OF TORONTO Request for Permanent Easements for a Storm Sewer / Outfall and Sanitary Sewer Don River Watershed, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area, CFN 34592. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide permanent easements for a storm sewer / outfall and a sanitary sewer, east of Bayview Avenue, north of Glenvale Boulevard, Don River watershed, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide permanent easements for a storm sewer / outfall and a sanitary sewer , east of Bayview Avenue, north of Glenvale Boulevard , Don River watershed , City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area ; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.095 hectares (0.23 acres), more or less , be granted to the City of Toronto for a storm sewer / outfall and a sanitary sewer , said land being east of Bayview Avenue , north of Glenvale Boulevard , City of Toronto , designated as Parts 1 to 7 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ontario Ltd ., Ontario Land Surveyors , Drawing No. 20.01.369 -10, dated June 2004; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal , survey, and other costs to be paid by the City of Toronto ; THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way , either directly or indirectly , from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction ; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed , with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff , at the expense of the City of Toronto ; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and , where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff , a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines ; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction ; 510 THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development , Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA ; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto has formally requested permanent easements for a new storm sewer and outfall as well as a sanitary sewer, east of Bayview Avenue and north of Glenvale Boulevard within the Burke Brook Ravine. The proposed storm sewer / outfall and sanitary sewer is needed to provide municipal services to the proposed new Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB) offices to be situated on the tableland to the south of the ravine. The new storm sewer has also been designed to accept storm drainage from a proposed residential development immediately to the east of the CNIB offices and main health care facility. The proposed storm sewer / outfall and sanitary sewer are situated entirely within the Fill Regulated Area and partially within the Regional Storm flood plain (i.e. outfall to the watercourse and sanitary connection to the trunk sewer located on the valley floor) of the Burke Brook Ravine tributary stream of the West Don River. A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for construction of the proposed works had been previously approved by the Executive Committee at meeting #5/03, held on June 6, 2003. Permit No. C -03148 has been held in abeyance pending easement approvals from TRCA, as well as various technical revisions to the proposed method of construction due to the sensitivity of the valley lands which form part of the Burke Brook Ravine Environmentally Significant Area The lands subject to the permanent easement are owned by the TRCA and are managed by the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required. Staff are presently discussing this matter with the project consultant. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from the Governing Council of the University of Toronto on December 12, 1978 under the Don River Flood Plain and Conservation Component of the Land Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan has been prepared and forms part of TRCA Permit C- 03148. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. 511 FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: June 23, 2004 Attachments : 1 512 Attachment 1 . , LC.1 NYON AV. 0 - myviev: AVE. " . , 4 ' , • ; s•. , i, • '.. ,-.. --'. •, .S.; IL s' , .1.."•;` '.:..4.-■ , • 1 .' .A.- ... , ' s''.- ''''''■•• ''' \ ' ...;\ \\ ',...",,SI. • .\.: " ,,, ., Ni <N, I s) .".' . ,.t. \ y'•',‘:■ \ \ 2,, V, V/ I s"'... • .v. 2 )' \l. ' ,.', ''''''.•kA.‘‘N,N ''.; '. - *‘ i. ''' A' i ...N ,7 i• Vi \ 's.'..1\'s $:.`'..74. ' . \,.... , I rn .,.... \•.,.. ! ''',1 "'''''),-'''‘'N'T's' •',/'4..\;..."*..::::<''''' 1 \!\*, ;:. — -4 .;".' ... , / ',.,•s,4.4,,,,,k ,..,,X 513 RES. #B138/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE CITY OF TORONTO Request for a Permanent Easement for a Sanitary Sewer Connection Don River Watershed, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area, CFN 32760. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a sanitary sewer connection, east of Bayview Avenue, north of Glenvale Boulevard, Don River watershed, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a sanitary sewer connection , east of Bayview Avenue , north of Glenvale Boulevard , Don River watershed , City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.068 hectares (0.17 acres), more or less , be granted to the City of Toronto for a sanitary sewer connection , said land being east of Bayview Avenue , north of Glenvale Boulevard , designated as Parts 3, 4, 15, 16, 17, and 18 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ontario Ltd ., Ontario Land Surveyors , Drawing No . 20.01.369 -9, dated June 2004; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal , survey, and other costs to be paid by the City of Toronto ; THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way , either directly or indirectly , from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction ; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed , with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff , at the expense of the City of Toronto ; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and , where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff , a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines ; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction ; 514 THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development , Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA ; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto has formally requested a permanent easement for a sanitary sewer connection, east of Bayview Avenue and north of Glenvale Boulevard within the Burke Brook Ravine. The proposed sanitary sewer pipe is needed for the proposed redevelopment of the Bloorview MacMillan Children's Centre (BMCC) Health Care Facility situated on the tableland to the south of the ravine. The proposed sanitary sewer pipe is situated entirely within the Fill Regulated Area and partially within the Regional Storm flood plain (i.e. approximately the eastern half of the pipe on the valley floor) of the Burke Brook Ravine tributary stream of the West Don River. A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for construction of the proposed works had been previously approved by the Executive Committee at meeting #11/03 on December 5, 2003. Permit No. C -04047 has been held in abeyance pending easement approvals from TRCA , as well as various technical revisions to the proposed method of construction due to the sensitivity of the valley lands which form part of the Burke Brook Ravine Environmentally Significant Area. The lands subject to the permanent easement are owned by the TRCA and are managed by the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required. Staff are presently discussing this matter with the project consultant. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from the Governing Council of the University of Toronto on December 12, 1978 under the Don River Flood Plain and Conservation Component of the Land Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan has been prepared and forms part of TRCA Permit C- 04074. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. 515 FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 Date: June 25, 2004 Attachments : 1 516 Attachment 1 517 RES. #6139/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL AND SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND Conveyance of Land for a Fire / EMS Station Southeast Corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue Intersection, CFN 35080. Staff report concerning the disposal of a fragment of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -owned land located on the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection, City of Vaughan, Humber River watershed and the receipt of an Offer to Purchase from officials at the City of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York for the sale of the potentially surplus TRCA land at this location. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS a fragment of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) land consisting of 0.75 hectares (1.84 acres), more or less , being Part of Lot 18, Concession 7, located on the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection , in the City of Vaughan , Regional Municipality of York , Humber River watershed be declared surplus to the requirements of the TRCA ; WHEREAS the TRCA is in receipt of an offer from officials at the City of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York to purchase the surplus land in this instance ; WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the TRCA that it is in the best interests of the TRCA in furthering its objectives , as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate and complete a sale to the City of Vaughan and /or The Regional Municipality of York in this instance ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA -owned tableland containing 0.75 hectares (1.84 acres), more or less , be sold to the City of Vaughan and /or The Regional Municipality of York for the construction of a Fire / EMS station , located on the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection , said land being Part of Lot 18, Concession 7, City of Vaughan , Regional Municipality of York as illustrated on the attached sketch ; THAT the TRCA request approval of the Minister of Natural Resources to complete the sale of the subject land on the following terms and conditions . (a) the sale price is to be the sum of $372,470 per acre based on the acreage of the property as certified by an Ontario Land Surveyor , (i.e. 1.84 acres x $372,470 = $685,345; (b) the subject land is to be used solely for a Fire /EMS Station ; (c) the Fire / EMS Station and landscaped area must take advantage of "green" technologies and native vegetation wherever possible ; 518 (d) completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be required ; (e) the transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full to the TRCA in cash on closing ; (f) (g) all legal , survey, and other costs are to be paid by the City of Vaughan and the Regional Municipality of York ; any additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the TRCA solicitor THAT an archaeological investigation is to be conducted by TRCA Cultural Heritage staff before any site disturbance with any mitigative measures to be carried out all at the expense of the City of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York ; THAT the City of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York are to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims for injuries , damages, or Toss of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly , from this sale or the carrying out of construction ; THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND At Executive Committee Meeting #2/04, held on March 5, 2004, Resolution #B36/04 was adopted as follows: THAT the potential disposal of a fragment of land on the southeast corner of the Canada Company and Islington Avenue intersection , City of Vaughan, be referred to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff for review and discussion in accordance with established TRCA policies. AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. The City of Vaughan Council has directed city staff to explore the availability of a joint Fire /EMS site in the Rutherford Road and Islington Avenue area. A letter was received from the City of Vaughan requesting that TRCA explore the potential sale of a fragment of TRCA -owned land, situated at the southeast corner of the Canada Company Avenue and Islington Avenue intersection, for the construction of a Vaughan Fire Rescue/York Region EMS Paramedic Station Site. The total area required for the joint Fire /EMS station is approximately 2.47 acres. Approximately .63 acres is proposed on York Region property and 1.84 acres on TRCA property. 519 The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired from Floyd W. Farr on October 1, 1964 under the Boyd Dam and Reservoir Project. In accordance with TRCA policy, the following action has been taken to date: • Notices of a scheduled Public Information Session were distributed to the City of Vaughan, The Regional Municipality of York, and the Boyd North Stewardship Group which is affiliated with the Humber Watershed Alliance; • A notice requesting public comment was placed in the Toronto Star on Saturday, May 22, 2004 and the Vaughan Citizen on Thursday, May 20, 2004; • A Public Information Session was held on Wednesday, May 26, 2004, at the Chancellor Community Centre, Community Room, from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m.; • Members of the public have been invited to attend the Executive Committee Meeting to make submissions or comments. One comment in favour of the proposed sale and use was received at the Public Information Session and only one letter of comment was received in response to the notice placed in the Toronto Star Newspaper. The letter received from Miss Jane Beecroft, dated June 7, 2004, as included with this agenda as item 6.1, opposed the sale of any of the former Dr. Edmund Boyd property. TRCA staff informed Miss Beecroft the TRCA land subject to this potential disposal was purchased from Floyd W. Farr and is not part of the former "Braeside" estate purchased by the TRCA from Dr. Boyd. Miss Beecroft declined an invitation to speak to the Executive Committee concerning this matter. No other written or verbal comments were received regarding the proposed sale of the subject TRCA land. City of Vaughan and Region of York officials are very supportive of the Fire Rescue /EMS Paramedic Station partnership at this site and have agreed to the terms and conditions of the proposed sale subject to the approval of their respective councils. The city and region officials are currently reviewing and assessing the model for the partnership including which municipality should hold title and purchase the TRCA property. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the sale of this property. A map showing the location of the subject property is attached. RATIONALE Staff have reviewed the subject property and feel it is not required for TRCA purposes and recommend it be declared surplus and be disposed of in accordance with TRCA policies. The subject site is located entirely on tableland and not within a Regional Storm flood plain or Fill Regulated Area. 520 Negotiations have been conducted and an agreement of sale has been reached with officials from the City of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York. The purchase price is based on market value and the offer at hand is in accordance with the appraised value range of an independent evaluation obtained jointly between the City of Vaughan, Region of York and the TRCA. FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York have agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. It is proposed that the proceeds of this sale be used to acquire priority lands approved under the TRCA's Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: June 23, 2004 Attachments : 1 521 Attachment 1 P•7•.3.t. C.11` Toitor4-o ANI) F.E310N ..; VASE : ' 4 S-::‘,11•ose: -1 anatrk, 2,;tt.1 tr Abe.-Le • 1tIUI t 3.em-x) .5 . ■:::. ■ ' . II I f , ■ I j ' •■•1 '4 ' / • i; .; -,..-' - - -,- - -2:: ::-- -''. - ' ' -'. . , 1 . . ' 1 ' a• l. - .. ' • '- - - "-. "N., .1 ;•:. • : 1 ' . i i ,'' , Z .1 1 j , 4,1 • ' ' ' . .-. . . . "Z. . ... .-7", „.. : 1 , „ , , LNt.... ..... ....„,... "' . , , ) ,'..-; ; t ' : :'' •"'?. /,' ' . :" i BOYD ,„,, ., .,-)., .•, ' ---... •-• \ .. a " - ., ( WU- 4 ...- ,,c.„ , icz____. . 0 4 , ,I, II'', . .F.1 1 J.,1i. , • - o 2 I i :: f . , , , -I' ...,- ,,,,,-..- -;•• , z.„.. - .7..._.......:;; ,..t. FO71.,4-rE MCA NONS FRY F.AolLify ........ , . 4 ,'. k, i ! '• .1:4 1 • : . - , REGION OF YORK PROPERTY 51._L311.„,•C T12...131)PERTY kC7( Wk. Am Art7US unservation for The ii•hrg Cary TRCh LAN D S SUEJE PR fiPER1 V ,_ 522 RES. #B140/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: 'CONSERVATION ONTARIO 'S REPORT ON PROVINCIAL RE- INVESTMENT IN CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES Request by Conservation Ontario (CO) for conservation authority and local municipal endorsement of its report to the Minister of Natural Resources for re- investment in Ontario conservation authorities. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Conservation Ontario report entitled, "Submission to the Minister of Natural Resources : Re- Investment in Ontario 's Conservation Authorities - Now and in the Future " be endorsed ; THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 's member municipalities be requested to endorse the above referenced report ; AND FURTHER THAT the Authority resolution together with member municipal resolutions in support of the report be forwarded to the province and Conservation Ontario . CARRIED BACKGROUND Last year, Conservation Ontario established a committee to develop a business case for increased provincial transfer payments, administered through the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), to Ontario conservation authorities (CAs). The committee presented and received endorsement of its report, "Submission to the Minister of Natural Resources: Re- Investment in Ontario's Conservation Authorities - Now and in the Future" at the CO Council meeting held on June 28, 2004. At that meeting CO Council also adopted the following the resolution, which reads in part: ...AND FURTHER THAT each Conservation Authority Board be requested to endorse this report prior to September 2004; AND FURTHER THAT each Conservation Authority seek endorsement of this report from its member municipalities prior to September2004;... RATIONALE Currently, transfer payments to the 36 Ontario conservation authorities amount to $7.6 million. This contrasts with the $59 million that was available in 1992. The report notes that reduced levels of transfer payment funding occurred abruptly (mostly in 1995), without consultation and has resulted in significantly higher costs to municipalities. The report also notes that conservation authorities have restructured and refocussed their policies and programs, sometimes at the expense of local priorities. 523 The report calls for increased transfer payment funding of approximately$13.0 million and presents three arguments for this new funding. Firstly, it argues that existing transfer payments do not fully fund eligible expenditures, generally elements of the flood and erosion control programs, as defined in the 1997 version of the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Policy and Procedures Manual (PPM). An analysis of eligible expenditures, taken from 2002 audited financial statements of Ontario conservation authorities, concludes that the shortfall in provincial funding is in excess of $9.1 million at a 50% grant rate. The report's second argument is that certain expenditure categories which are of provincial interest and integral to the delivery of an effective flood and erosion program should not have been excluded from the list of eligible expenditures as outlined in the 1997 PPM. The excluded categories are municipal plan review services, Section 28 regulation administration and shoreline management planning. Provincial funding for these expenditures, if eligible, would require a further increase in transfer payments of almost $3.75 million, at 50 %. The third and final point brought out in the report is that transfer payments to Ontario CAs have never been adjusted for inflation. The item accounts for about $.95 million, when applied on the original base plus the shortfall and additional items noted above since 2002. The report is also accompanied by an "advocacy strategy" which starts with the adoption of the report by CO Council on the June 28, 2004 and ends with press release reacting to the provincial budget measures in March 2005. An important aspect of the advocacy strategy is endorsement of the report by all 36 Ontario CAs and their member municipalities. Staff have reviewed the report and are recommending its adoption as well as seeking adoption from its member municipalities, including the Regions of Durham, Peel and York, the City of Toronto, the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio and the Town of Mono. Report prepared by : Rocco Sgambelluri , extension 5232 For Information contact : Rocco Sgambelluri , extension 5232 Date: June 29, 2004 RES. #8141/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CONTRACT ES 03 -10 EXTENSION Supply of Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks. Extension of contract ES03 -10, Supply of Rental Rates for Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks, for a further one year period. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall 524 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Contract ES 03 -10, Supply of Rental Rates for Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks , awarded to Sartor & Susin Ltd . be extended for a period of one year to August 4, 2005 subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #6/03, held on July 25, 2003, Resolution #A153/03 in regards to the award of contract ES03 -10 for the "Supply of Rental Rates for Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks ", to Sartor & Susin Ltd. was approved. The contract was in effect August 4, 2003 for a one year period. In the preparation of the original tender documents, staff included a provision whereby the successful bidder could request a one year extension to the contract at a specific maximum percent increase or decrease to the unit prices bid. Sartor & Susin Limited have requested, in writing, a one year extension to their contract with an overall year two increase, in the unit rates, of 3 percent. RATIONALE The TRCA and Sartor & Susin Ltd. have worked together on numerous successful projects over many years and through the tendering process, Sartor & Susin Ltd. have consistently provided the lowest unit rates with a broad spectrum of equipment and fully experienced operators. Staff have reviewed the proposed new rates structure, in conjunction with a performance review, and are satisfied that the requested 3 percent increase is indicative of overall industry operating cost increases and are warranted. Further, even with the increase, Sartor & Susin remains the low bidder relative to the other contractors who bid on this work. FINANCIAL DETAILS The value of this contract is estimated to be approximately $950,000, based upon a review of similar workloads in previous years. An increase or decrease in workload will have an impact on the value of this contract extension. The operated equipment is rented on an "as required" basis with no minimum or maximum rental hours guaranteed. Report prepared by : Jim Berry , 416 - 392 -9721 For Information contact : Jim Berry , 416 - 392 -9721 Date: June 17, 2004 525 RES. #8142/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TOWN OF CALEDON Request for a Permanent Easement for a Storm Sewer and Outfall Humber River Watershed, Town of Caledon, CFN 35640. Receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer and outfall, east side of Old King Road, south of King Street East - Bolton, Humber River watershed, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer and outfall , east side of Old King Road south of King Street East - Bolton, Humber River watershed , Town of Caledon , Regional Municipality of Peel ; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the Town of Caledon in this instance ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.006 hectares (0.02 acres), more or less , be granted to the Town of Caledon for a storm sewer and outfall , said land being on the east side of Old King Road , south of King Street East - Bolton, Town of Caledon , designated as Parts 1 and 2 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc ., Professional Land Surveyors , under their Project No . 04- B4872; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal , survey, and other costs to be paid by the Town of Caledon ; THAT the Town of Caledon is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way , either directly or indirectly , from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction ; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed , with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff , at the expense of the Town of Caledon ; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and , where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff , a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines ; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction ; 526 THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Town of Caledon has formally requested a permanent easement for a new storm sewer and outfall to the Humber River located on the east side of Old King Road, south of King Street East in the hamlet of Bolton. The proposed storm sewer and outfall will provide improved local and roadside drainage as part of the Old King Road reconstruction project. The proposed works are situated entirely within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for road reconstruction project has been submitted and will be considered at a future Executive Committee Meeting. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required. Staff are presently discussing this matter with Town of Caledon Public Works & Engineering Department staff. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from the Regional Municipality of Peel on December 12, 1978 under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the permit application submission under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. FINANCIAL DETAILS The Town of Caledon has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: July 06, 2004 Attachments : 1 527 Attachment 1 TOWN OF CAI FrION Rs.q a Permanent Easement for a St srrn &we' emd OA all ' Hum): Fl,fe-1V.-Atrshed, lc* Ca peon CFN 3o64 _ = tTh* . " • - - aTiat E 0 r-r lariaigirtitrion 111-1 528 I { for The tiring City EZ:22TRCA LANDS SUBJECT PROPERTY R l-5 \ SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B143 /04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 - 8.1.32, with the exception of 8.1.11- 8.1.15, inclusive , 8.1.18, 8.1.20 and 8.1.21, which are Minor Works permits , and 8.1.23 - 8.1.28 - Regional Municipality of York ), which are listed below . RES.#B144/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 8.1.23 - 8.1.28 - Regional Municipality of York Michael Di Biase Gerri Lynn O'Connor CARRIED THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.23 - 8.1.28, 8.1.34 and 8.1.35 - Regional Municipality of York ), which are listed below . CARRIED RES. #B145 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Minor Works Permits Michael Di Biase Gerri Lynn O'Connor 529 THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.11- 8.1.15, inclusive , 8.1.18, 8.1.20, 8.1.21 and 8.1.33), which are listed below , be received . CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.1 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain on (Chrysler Drive), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to facilitate the repair of an existing culvert located within the Regulatory Floodplain associated with the Mimico Creek at Chrysler Drive, north of Queen Street, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Chrysler Drive Culvert Over Mimico Creek - General Arrangement , drawing no . BR -43, sheet 1 of 4, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Chrysler Drive Culvert Over Mimico Creek - Ceiling and inside Walls , drawing no . BR -43, sheet 2 of 4, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Chrysler Drive Culvert Over Mimico Creek - Repairs and Details , drawing no . BR -43, sheet 3 of 4, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Chrysler Drive Culvert Over Mimico Creek - Temporary Traffic Control , drawing no . BR -43, sheet 4 of 4, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves minor earthworks and refurbish works to facilitate the repair of an existing culvert located at Chrysler Drive, north of Queen Street, in the City of Brampton. The subject property to which this application applies is entirely within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, and the works are located within the Regulatory Floodplain. Due to the timing and nature of the proposed works, TRCA staff do not foresee any significant negative impacts regarding floodplain, pollution and conservation management issues. However, all works associated with this proposal will conform to the warm water construction timing window (between July 1 to March 31). Control of Flooding: The proposed works are proposed to be located within the Regulatory Floodplain. However, due to the timing and minor nature of the proposed works, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed infrastructure repair works. 530 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control devices shall be installed and maintained around the construction area during all phases of the proposed works. As such, no adverse impacts regarding pollution will occur. Conservation of Lan d: This proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this application. Plantings No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of this project. As such, no additional landscaping and/or compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35240 Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 084 /04 /BRAM 8.1.2 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain on (Cloverdale Drive), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to facilitate the repair of an existing culvert located within the Regulatory Floodplain associated with a tributary to the Etobicoke Creek at Cloverdale Drive, east of Central Park Drive, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Cloverdale Drive Culvert Over Etobicoke Creek Tributary - General Arrangement , drawing no . BR -42, sheet 1 of 5, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Cloverdale Drive Culvert Over Etobicoke Creek Tributary - Ceiling and Inside Walls Repairs, drawing no. BR -42, sheet 2 of 5, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Cloverdale Drive Culvert Over Etobicoke Creek Tributary - Repairs and Details , drawing no. BR -42, sheet 3 of 5, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Cloverdale Drive Culvert Over Etobicoke Creek Tributary - Temporary Traffic Control , drawing no . BR -42, sheet 4 of 5, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. • Cloverdale Drive Culvert Over Etobicoke Creek Tributary - Environmental Protection , drawing no . BR -42, sheet 5 of 5, prepared by Planmac Inc ., dated February 23, 2004. 531 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves minor earthworks and refurbish works to facilitate the repair of an existing culvert located at Cloverdale Drive, east of Central Park Drive, in the City of Brampton. The subject property to which this application applies is entirely within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, and the works are located within the Regulatory Floodplain. Due to the timing and nature of the proposed works, TRCA staff do not foresee any significant negative impacts regarding floodplain, pollution and conservation management issues. However, all works associated with this proposal will conform to the warm water construction timing window (between July 1 to March 31). Control of Flooding: The proposed works are proposed to be located within the Regulatory Floodplain. However, due to the timing and minor nature of the proposed works, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed infrastructure repair works. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control devices shall be installed and maintained around the construction area during all phases of the proposed works. As such, no adverse impacts regarding pollution will occur. Conservation of Land: This proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this application. Plantings No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of this project. As such, no additional landscaping and /or compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35239 Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 085 /04 /BRAM 8.1.3 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, 4, Concession 10, (Queen Street from Station 19 +500 (east of Beaumaris) eastward to Station 20 +140 (west of Highway 50)), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Regional Municipality of Peel. 532 The purpose is to excavate place fill (for culvert extensions, road widening, storm sewer installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (culvert extensions) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (tributaries of the Humber River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a diversion to a temporary culvert via pea gravel bags in order to work in the dry and through three break -ins to the existing culverts by the proposed storm sewer. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking to submit revised engineering drawings and a satisfactory fish habitat compensation package dated June 25, 2004; received June 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the widening of Queen Street from approximately Beaumaris Road in the west to Highway 50 in the east. The widening will involve the extension of 2 culverts by 21 and 18 metres in total and the installation of a storm sewer. The western 1.8 x 1.8 metre concrete box culvert is not located within a Fill Regulated Area, nor Regional Storm Floodplain but will require a temporary alteration of the waterway in order to work in the dry to install the 8.5 metre extension upstream and the 12.5 metre extension downstream. The eastern 6.7 x 4.5 metre corrugated steel pipe culvert is located within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of a tributary of the Humber River. The extension by 12.5 metres on the upstream side and 5.5 metres on the downstream side will require a permanent alteration of the tributary. All works will be constructed in the dry by utilizing pea gravel bags to divert flows to a temporary culvert. The Queen Street widening was reviewed by staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: The western culvert is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding with this extension. The HEC -2 analysis for the eastern culvert extensions and associated fill placement has been reviewed and it has been determined that there will not be any impacts to flood storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (sandbags and silt fencing) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. 533 Conservation of Land: The extention of the eastern culvert will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 33971 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston , extension 5217 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING Application #: 034 /03 /BRAM 8.1.4 CITY OF PICKERING To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 25, Concession 1, (Dunbarton Road), in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Pickering. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate inspection and repair of a failed culvert on Dunbarton Creek at Dunbarton Road, in the City of Pickering. An emergency works approval has been issued for these works and the inspection and damage assessment has been completed. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Dunbarton Road , Culvert Failure at Dunbarton Creek , Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by the City of Pickering , dated June 2004, revised and received June 9, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the inspection and repair of a failed culvert on Dunbarton Creek at Dunbarton Road, in the City of Pickering. The failed culvert caused a portion of Dunbarton Road to collapse and an inspection was required to assess the extent of damage and repairs required. An emergency works approval has been issued for these works and the inspection and damage 534 assessment has been completed. City staff installed pea - gravel coffer dams upstream and downstream of the culvert in order to isolate the work area and TRCA ecology staff visited the site to ensure that the discharge area of pumped flows was appropriately located. Once the area was de- watered, City staff was able to conduct a full assessment of the damaged culvert and is currently in the process of determining and designing the appropriate repair works Staff is working with the City on the design of the repair works and will ensure that the works comply with current TRCA and Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) policies and practices. Control of Flooding: The coffer dams were in place for less than 48 hours and there were no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. TRCA technical staff will ensure that the repair works will result in an increase in hydraulic conveyance capacity of the culvert and that no negative impacts on neighbouring properties will result Pollution: In addition to the coffer dams themselves, silt fencing was erected at the downstream side of both dams in order to prevent any sedimentation of the watercourse. Appropriate sediment controls will be included as part of the repair design submission. Conservation of Land: There were no geotechnical /slope stability concerns related to the proposal. The Ministry of Natural Resources approved an exemption to the timing window guidelines in order for the works to be undertaken immediately. There were no other fisheries resources concerns with the inspection works. A Letter of Advice will be issued by the TRCA on behalf of DFO for the repair works. Plantings There was no loss of vegetative cover, hence no additional plantings are required. Any disturbed areas will be restored following the completion of the repair works, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35608 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 258/04/PICK CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ] 8.1.5 COVENANT REFORMED CHURCH OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 27, 28, FTH, (265 Albion Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Covenant Reformed Church of Toronto. 535 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River for the purpose of constructing a one storey addition to an existing church and to enlarge an existing parking lot. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . Al, Site Plan , prepared by George Robb Architect , revised May 31, 2004, received June 14, 2004; Drawing No . Al A, Site Plan , Miscellaneous Details , Planting Legend, prepared by George Robb Architect , revised May 11, 2004, received June 14, 2004; Drawing No . A3, Basement Floor Plan , Foundation Plan , prepared by George Robb Architect , revised May 11, 2004, received June 14, 2004; Drawing No . A4, Ground Floor Plan , Roof Plan , Celestorey Plan , Roof Juncture Detail , prepared by George Robb Architect , revised May 11, 2004, received June 14, 2004; Drawing No . A5, Elevations , prepared by George Robb Architect , revised May 11, 2004, received June 14, 2004; and Letter dated June 3, 2004, signed by Walter R .P. Blackwell, P. Eng of Blackwell Engineering Limited re : Additions and Alterations to Covenant reformed Church, 265 Albion Road - Our Project 03035. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construction within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River in order to facilitate a new one storey 530 sq.m. (5708 sq. ft.) addition with basement onto the south (east) side of the existing church. The existing gravel parking lot at the rear of the site will be slightly enlarged to accommodate additional parking. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will be flood proofed above the level of the Regional Storm Flood and is designed to withstand the flood depths and velocity associated with a Regional Storm Flood. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: The proposed works will not impact any significant natural features and no geotechnicaVslope instability or fisheries issues are associated with the project. Plantings New native plantings are proposed for the area between the parking lot and the Humber River. 536 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35557 Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 23, 2004 Application #: 241/04/TOR 8.1.6 PESTRIN GROUP To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 37, Concession 4 Plan 64R- 10660, (0 Clairville Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mario Pestrin. The purpose is to place fill and regrade within a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a parking lot associated with a commercial development The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing G -1, Site Servicing , Grading and Stormwater Management , prepared by Intra Architect and A . M. Candaras Associates , dated March 3, 2004, revised June 3, 2003, received on June 17, 2004; • Drawing L -1, Landscape Plan , prepared by Intra Architect and Landscape Planning Limited, dated March 2004, revised on June 9, 2004 and received on June 17, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill and regrade within a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a parking lot with concrete curb associated with a commercial development located on the west side of Clairville Drive, east of the 427 and north of Finch Avenue West. Twenty -Five parking spots are proposed within the fill regulated area and will be separated from the gently sloping valley by an adequate and renaturalized buffer. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and will have no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A temporary sediment control fence will be installed to keep construction sediment from entering the valley. 537 Conservation of Land: There are no significant natural resources on site. There are no geotechnical issues with the proposal. Stormwater will be controlled as per TRCA requirements. Plantings The required buffer and part of the valley slope will be renaturalized with extensive native plantings. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1 - New Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35287 Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 104/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ] 8.1.7 ROSEMARY & SOUREN AGEMIAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 127, Plan 1750, (65 Highland Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Rosemary & Souren Agemian. The purpose is to place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a new two storey dwelling and inground swimming pool. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . L1, Site Plan /Rear Yard Plan Bsmnt Lev ., Drawing No . L2, Master Landscape and Planting Plan ; and Drawing No . L3, Elevations /Sections , Planting Plan , all prepared by Egils J . Didrichsons , revised June 24, 2004, received June 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the removal of the existing dwelling and construction of a new two storey dwelling and inground swimming pool. The new dwelling will extend a maximum of 2m beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling at the westerly corner. The proposed swimming pool will be setback approximately 6m from the top -of -bank. 538 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley. Conservation of Land: A slope stability assessment has been submitted by the applicant in support of the proposed works. This assessment has been reviewed and approved by TRCA technical staff. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected to impact any significant resource features. Plantings The applicant will provide a planting buffer area between the proposed swimming pool and adjacent slope. The applicant is also proposing to remove debris on the adjacent slope and revegetate the slope with new native plant material. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34847 Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 23, 2004 Application #: 434/03/TOR 8.1.8 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Concession 3 FTB, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a concrete bunker at the Bermondsey Transfer Station. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . 1632 - 2003 -24, Bermondsey Transfer Station Proposed Fabric Cover Building New Bunker Area , dated June , 2004 and received on June 24, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 539 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a concrete bunker with a fabric cover to be used for the purpose of storing recycleable materials at the Bermondsey Transfer Station. A portion of the concrete retaining wall for the bunker is located within a fill regulated area. The existing use of this area is for paved parking, garbage storage and manicured lawn. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A temporary erosion and sediment control fence will be installed between the works and the adjacent valley corridor. Conservation of Land: The proposal does not impact any natural features and is sufficiently set back from the valley corridor. Plantings Additional native woody plantings will be provided to replace an area of asphalt and manicured lawn. Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35497 Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steven Heuchert , extension Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 208/04/TOR 8.1.9 KEN AND GAYLA LIPSON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 2405, (4 Donino Court), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ken and Gayla Lipson. The purpose is to construct a new dwelling and inground pool within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 540 • Drawing No . A -01, Site Plan , Zoning Data , Construction Notes ; Drawing No . A -02, Basement Plan ; Drawing No . A -03, Ground Floor Plan ; Drawing A -04, Second Floor Plan; Drawing No . A -06, Front Elevation ; Drawing No . A -07, Rear Elevation ; Drawing No. A -08, N -S Section , all prepared by Architrave Designs , dated June 3, 2004, received June 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new dwelling and pool within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located east of Yonge Street and south of York Mills Road. The existing dwelling will be demolished and the existing pool will be replaced. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed dwelling will be floodproofed above the 350 year storm elevation. The applicant has submitted a letter from a structural engineer stating that the proposed dwelling will withstand the depths and velocities expected under a Regional Storm. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained until all works have been completed Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. The applicant will be submitting a landscape plan which will meet the landscaping requirements of the TRCA and the City of Toronto Urban Forestry Services. Plantings All plantings will consist of native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35518 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 28, 2004 541 Application #: 224/04/TOR 8.1.10 PAUL MACDONALD To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 566, Plan M7621, (108 Ruscica Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Macdonald. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a sunroom addition at the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan ; Back Elevation Plan ; and Basement Plan , prepared by Four Season Sunrooms, received on June 22, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a sunroom addition at the rear of the existing dwelling. The subject property is located west of Victoria Park Avenue and south of Lawrence Avenue. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural resources, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings New native plantings will be provided along the top of bank. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35478 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 25, 2004 542 Application #: 196/04/TOR MINOR WORKS 8.1.11 AROOP AND SABHARWAL RASTOGI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 77, Plan 6311, (38 George Henry Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Aroop and Sabharwal Rastogi. The purpose is to excavate and place fill to within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a patio and landscaping at the rear of the existing dwelling. This proposal is considered minor works. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Landscape Drawing , prepared by Land Decor Inc ., dated January 2004, received June 2, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a patio and minor landscaping at the rear of the existing dwelling. The subject property is located west of Don Mills Road and south of Sheppard Avenue. All works are sufficiently set back from the top of the bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings This proposed landscaping includes native trees and shrubs. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 543 CFN: 35128 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 28, 2004 MINOR WORKS Application #: 041/04/TOR 8.1.12 WAYNE AND NICOLE SWADRON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 53, 54, Plan 1841, Part 3 Plan, (102 Sandringham Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Wayne and Nicole Swadron. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a pool pavilion on an existing slab. The proposal is considered minor works. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . A -2.0, Site Plan ; Drawing A.2.1, Grading Plan ; prepared by Wayne Swadron , dated June 2004, received June 17, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a pool pavilion on an existing concrete slab remaining from previous demolition work. A new single family residence will be constructed on the subject property but is not subject to fill regulation. The subject property is located east of Bathurst Street and north of Highway 401. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural resources, fisheries or riparian vegetation. 544 Plantings Plantings are not required for this proposal. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2.E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35574 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steven Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 21, 2004 Application #: 246/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO [TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ] MINOR WORKS 8.1.13 JIM HINDS AND SUE WEEDON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 388E, (40 Castlefrank Road), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jim Hinds and Sue Weedon. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a third storey addition above the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . Al, Site Plan and Data and Drawing No . A5, Third Floor Plan , both prepared by Pharoah Design Associates , dated February 15, 2004 and received on June 11, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a third floor addition above the existing two storey dwelling. The third floor addition would remain in line with the foundation walls of the existing dwelling The proposal is considered to be minor works. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 545 Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: A slope stability assessment has been submitted by the applicant in support of the proposed works. This assessment has been reviewed and approved by TRCA technical staff. The proposed works are consistent with the existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected to impact any significant resource features. Plantings No new plantings are proposed. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35551 Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 23, 2004 MINOR WORKS Application #: 238/04/TOR 8.1.14 KEITH TRAVIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan M -444, (29 Beechwood Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Keith Travis. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a fill regulated area in order to regrade in the Fill Regulated portion of a construction site. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . SS -1, Grading Plan , prepared by W .G. Notenboom , Consulting Engineer dated December 2003, and received on June 4, 2004 (redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material ) RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 546 Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The minor works proposal involves minor regrading within the front yards of a construction site. Two new single family dwellings will be constructed on the remainder of the subject property not located within the fill regulated area. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent the sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features Plantings No new plantings are required for this project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.4.2 - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35559 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 15, 2004 MINOR WORKS Application #: 243/04/TOR 8.1.15 HUNG -HAY LAU To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 19, Plan 66M -2374, (12 True Davidson Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hung -Hay Lau. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a fill regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the enlargement of the existing deck located at the rear of the dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 547 • Drawing 1 of 1, Site Plan , prepared by Viljoen Architect Inc ., dated July 3, 2002 and received on June 4, 2004; Floor Plan with additional footage , redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material ; Site Plan with proposed enlargement ; West Elevation ; South Elevation ; North Elevation , all prepared by the applicant and received on June 4th, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the enlargement of the existing deck at the rear of the dwelling. The proposed works will be sufficiently set back from the top of bank. The proposal is considered minor works. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent the sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features Plantings No new plantings are required for this project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.4.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35516 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 222/04/TOR 8.1.16 DENISE REID To construct in a flood plain on (773 Eastern Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Denise Reid. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a garage. 548 The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan and Elevations , prepared by Norman Ettinger , received May 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a garage within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Lower Don Special Policy Area. The subject property is located south of Eastern Avenue and west of Mosley Street. Control of Flooding: The proposed garage will be above the Regional Storm Elevation. All excess material will be removed from the site. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed during construction and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. Plantings Plantings are not required for this project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for the Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35490 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 28, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 204 /04 /BRAM 8.1.17 ANGELO BELLONE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 121, Plan M -2023, (799 Clarence Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Angelo Bellone. 549 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new two - storey residential dwelling. The subject property is currently vacant. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan , Drawing SP 1, prepared by Davenport Architectural Corp ., dated April 1, 2004, received by the TRCA June 25, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment fencing . • Cross Section , Drawing A 1.10, prepared by Davenport Architectural Corp ., dated April 1, 2004, received by the TRCA June 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new two - storey residential dwelling. TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnicaVslope stability issues associated with the proposal. The proposed works are sufficiently set back from the top of bank and are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are confident that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 550 CFN: 35575 Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 21, 2004 MINOR WORKS Application #: 247 /04NAUG 8.1.18 JAS MAHAL To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, Plan 65M -2299, (179 Charlton Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jas Mahal. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a solarium addition to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling located at 179 Charlton Avenue in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan , dated March 8, 2004, received by the TRCA on June 4, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is entirely located within a Fill Regulated Area The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a solarium addition to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling. The proposed solarium addition will be sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of -Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. 551 Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35542 Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: June 25, 2004 Application #: 230 /04NAUG 8.1.19 MAHSHID BAYAT - SARMADI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 95, Plan 3765, (8 Riverside Boulevard), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mahshid Bayat - Sarmadi. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the replacement of an existing two-storey single detached residential dwelling with a new two - storey single detached residential dwelling located at 8 Riverside Boulevard in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan , Dwg. No. 1 of 12, prepared by Interbuild Architectural Design , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA on June 8, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material . • Front Elevations , Dwg. No. 6 of 12, prepared by Interbuild Architectural Design , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA on June 8, 2004. • Rear Elevations , Dwg. No. 7 of 12, prepared by Interbuild Architectural Design , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA on June 8, 2004. • Side Elevation , Dwg. No. 8 of 12, prepared by Interbuild Architectural Design , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA on June 8, 2004. • Side Elevation , Dwg. No. 9 of 12, prepared by Interbuild Architectural Design , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA on June 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 552 Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the demolition and replacement of an existing single detached residential dwelling. The rear wall of the replacement dwelling will coincide with the location of the rear wall of the existing dwelling. The proposed works will be contained within the rear manicured yard of the subject property. The proposal will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35399 Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 25, 2004 MINOR WORKS Application #: 155/04NAUG 8.1.20 PATRICK CICCOLINI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Concession 7 Lot 48, Plan 65M -3231, (17 Humber Meadow Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Patrick Ciccolini. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and associated landscaping within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. 553 The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan , Drawing L 1, received by the TRCA June 28, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment fencing . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed development involves excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and associated landscaping, including a stone wall measuring less than 2 feet in height, within the rear yard of an existing residential lot The proposed works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposed works, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features that may be negatively impacted by the project Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35600 Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 25, 2004 554 Application #: 254 /04/VAUG TOWN OF CALEDON MINOR WORKS 8.1.21 ENZO AND STEFANIE CESARITTI To construct in a flood plain on Lot 24, Plan 43M -1159, (29 Deer Hollow Court), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Enzo and Stefanie Cesaritti. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 29 Deer Hollow Court, in the Town of Caledon. The purpose of the application is to construct an inground swimming pool on the subject property. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan , prepared by E . Cesaritti , dated June 1, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on June 1, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of an inground swimming pool at 29 Deer Hollow Court, in the Town of Caledon. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed development Pollution: The subject property is adequately buffered with existing development between the property and the valleyland corridor. As such, sedimentation of the watercourse feature will not occur as a result of construction. Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the Town of Caledon. The proposed inground swimming pool will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings No significant vegetation will be affected by this proposal. As such, no compensatory planting is required. 555 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35494 Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: June 28, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 205 /04 /CAL 8.1.22 BRAMBLEWELL DEVELOPMENTS LTD . To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Concession 6 Block 128, Plan 65M -2520, (Swansea Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bramblewell Developments Ltd.. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of 4 semi - detached dwellings within the Unionville Special Policy Area, in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan Showing House Siting on Lot 10 Con. 6 Block 128 Pt. 1 & 2, prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc ., dated March 29, 2004, received May 21, 2004. • Site Plan Showing House Siting on Lot 10 Con. 6 Block 128 Pt. 3 & 4, prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc ., dated March 29, 2004, received May 21, 2004. • Site Plan Showing House Siting on Lot 10 Con. 6 Block 128 Pt. 5, prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc ., dated March 29, 2004, received May 21, 2004. • Site Plan Showing House Siting on Lot 10 Con. 6 Block 128 Pt. 6, prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc ., dated March 29, 2004, received May 21, 2004. • Red -line Revised (with silt fence) Proposed House Sitings of Lots Pts 1 & 2, 3 & 4, 5 & 6, Street A, Chiavati Homes , prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc ., dated February 9, 2004, revised March 30, 2004, received May 21, 2004. • Sky Palace Inc . Grading Plan , prepared by Al Underhill Associates Ltd ., dated June 2003, received May 21, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 556 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of 4 semi - detached dwellings within the Unionville Special Policy Area, in the Town of Markham. The 4 semi - detached dwellings are located within Block 128 of draft plan of subdivision 19TM- 02004, for which a permit (C- 03208) has already been issued. The TRCA was involved in the review of the plan of subdivision and required that a permit for the development of this block be obtained from the Authority. A minimal amount of fill is to be placed on site and all four units are to be floodproofed to the Regional Storm flood elevation. Control of Flooding: Due to the small size of the site and the minimal amount of fill that will be placed on site, TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout the construction phase to ensure that no construction - generated sediment enters the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns related to this proposal, nor are there any fisheries resources concerns. Further, there are no natural heritage features on or adjacent to the site that will be negatively impacted by the proposed development Plantings As there will be no loss of natural cover or impacts to any natural heritage features, additional plantings will not be required. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35485 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 25, 2004 Application #: 201 /04 /MARK 8.1.23 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (16th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to place fill (regrade streambank and flood plain) in a Fill Regulated Area; alter a watercourse (using natural channel design techniques) during the coldwater timing window (June 15 to September 15). 557 The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking to provide revised restoration and engineering plans to the satisfaction of TRCA staff ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: As part of Phase I construction of the 16th Avenue York - Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS), dewatering was required for the tunnel boring machine (TBM) to complete the project. The Ministry of the Environment reviewed and approved the Permit to Take Water (PTTW) for Phase 1. Based on the anticipated dewatering rates and the discharge rates and locations, it was determined that no TRCA permit was required for Phase 1. As the TBM neared Robinson Creek at the western end of the Phase 1 contract (shaft C8), an unpredicted high permeability zone in the aquifer led to doubling of the dewatering rates, along with the associated discharge rates into Robinson Creek. Without the increased dewatering, it is likely that the TBM would have been disabled or destroyed. The results of this increased dewatering were erosion and deposition of iron precipitates on the banks and streambed of Robinson Creek both at the dewatering site and downstream. TRCA, Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), and Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) staff have all been on site to assess the situation. DFO is investigating the incident and charges under the Federal Fisheries Act may still occur. TRCA, MNR, DFO, and MOE were unwilling to approve the proposed tunneling for Phase 2, given the significant impacts from Phase 1 until a detailed environmental management plan could be submitted to our satisfaction. Therefore, the contractor requested an amendment to the Phase 1 PTTW to tunnel an additional 150 metres west of the C8 shaft. After extensive discussions, TRCA and Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) staff determined that the request for additional tunneling was reasonable, since it would allow the contractor to finish the sewer up to the C8 shaft, and use the sewer as a mechanism to disperse the dewatering discharge. Therefore, the MOE was advised that the request was reasonable, and the Phase 1 PTTW was amended accordingly. Since May, 2003, the TBM has been in the ground west of shaft C8, waiting for the Phase II Environmental Management Plan to be completed, and for agency permits and approvals of the construction of this section of the YDSS project to be issued. To ensure the integrity of the existing tunnel and shafts, dewatering at the C8 shaft has continued at a rate of approximately 12,000 L /m. Until the spring of 2004, the water has continued to be discharged into Robinson Creek. This spring, TRCA staff approved a dispersal plan for the discharge waters such that the waters now flow through the storm system into the York - Durham sanitary sewer; the Avenue sewer, before being discharged to Robinson Creek; and the Mint Leaf and Avida stormwater ponds, before being discharged into Exhibition Creek. MOE has also granted a one year extension to the Phase 1 PTTW. 558 At their own discretion, the Region of York has contracted Parish Geomorphic Ltd. to assess the current condition of Robinson Creek both at the discharge site, and downstream. This permit application deals solely with the discharge site. It is staff's understanding through correspondence from Parish Geomorphic Ltd. that a further application will be made for the downstream section of the watercourse where damage has also occurred. Control of Flooding: As all existing ground elevations throughout the Regional Storm Flood plain will be maintained or re- established and the control of flooding will not be implicated. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project to re- establish and stabilize the streambank. Because DFO is investigating the site, TRCA staff have been advised that approval under the Fisheries Act should not be granted, but that this would not preclude the issuance of our permit. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35269 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston and Don Ford , extension For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 096 /04 /MARK 8.1.24 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (Kennedy Road just north of Elgin Mills Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct a structure (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 559 • Letter of Undertaking to provide site restoration plans and an addendum report to the 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer Phase II Environmental Management Plan Report ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE . The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The York Region Official Plan has identified substantial growth in the Region, primarily around the existing urban centres of Aurora, Newmarket, Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham. To support this development, increased capacity in the York Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) is required. The master plan for this expansion has been approved. The 16th Avenue Phase II is a key phase of the master plan. The construction of 16th Avenue Phase II will complete the paralleling of the YDSS through the Town of Markham by connecting to the existing Highway 404 Trunk Sewer located just east of Woodbine Avenue to the existing Phase 1 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer, located just east of what is known as shaft C8 near Robinson Creek. The sewer system will be constructed via tunnelling. Construction of the tunnel and its associated shafts will require extensive dewatering of a major aquifer in the tunnel zone in order to create safe working conditions during construction. The dewatering has the potential to create adverse impacts on groundwater users, as well as the natural environment. The main issues concerning the natural environment are associated with: • Interference to existing water wells; • Loss of groundwater contributions to natural streams, wetlands and ESAs; and • Discharge of excess volume of water and its potential to change the natural regime of the receiving watercourses. To address the above issues, the Region has divided the environmental component of the project into two major parts: • A proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan to address adversely affected private wells and specialized groundwater uses, including golf courses and farms; • An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to manage stress to the natural functions of the ecosystem during the dewatering operation and associated recovery period of the aquifer. The proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan is being reviewed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) as part of the Region's Permit to Take Water (PTTW) application. The EMP is currently being reviewed by staff at TRCA for permits under Ontario Regulation 158; MOE for the PTTW; the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for permits under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act; and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for permits under the Federal Fisheries Act. Key considerations associated with the EMP include: 560 • Complexity of the natural ecosystem; • Deficiency in historic baseline information • Deficiency of documented effects from projects of this type and scale; and • Due to ecosystem complexity and stated deficiencies, incorporating flexibility into the EMP through an adaptive management approach. Adaptive management for the 16th Avenue Phase II project will be used to guide and revise the EMP. The impetus to use an adaptive management approach is so that the proponent or their agents are able to react in a timely manner to results from continuous monitoring of environmental trigger parameters and values, and operational rules. To assess the potential zone of impact (ZOI) associated with the water - takings during the dewatering operation, a three - dimensional groundwater flow model developed as part of the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) Groundwater Study was used. The results obtained from this modelling were used to define the area within the 0.5 metre drawdown in the shallow aquifer. This area was defined as the ZOl associated with the natural ecosystem dependant on groundwater. A conservative buffer zone to extend all monitoring by an additional two kilometres or more was added to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with the ZOI. The YPDT Study was also used to identify streams which will be impacted through anticipated reductions in groundwater contributions to baseflow. Within the ZOI and its buffer, all ESAs, wetlands and watercourses have been identified and an analysis of these ecosystem receptors has been carried out for fish and fish habitat; wetlands and ESAs; critical stream capacity; woodlots; and agriculture. The mitigation for these systems has been addressed in the EMP, as follows: Fish and Fish Habitat: • Piping dewatering discharge upstream to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Establishing holding tanks within the ZOI to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Dispersing dewatering discharge to alternate waterbodies; • Thermal regulation of dewatering discharge; and • An extensive temperature and flow monitoring system. The amount and temperature of supplementation will be regulated through the adaptive management process. Wetlands and ESAs • An extensive species and groundwater monitoring system in select areas; • Piping water to, or planting species, was required through the adaptive management process. Critical Stream Capacity • A fluvial geomorphicgal assessment of creeks that may be physically impacted was concluded to determine maximum discharge velocities. • These rates are reflected in the adaptive management process. 561 Woodlots • Soil moisture conditions and tree growth will be monitories in sample plots • Adaptive management techniques include making more water availably and planting to replace loss. Agriculture • It is expected that the dewatering of the deep aquifers will not negatively affect the soil moisture content in the surrounding agricultural soils. The adaptive management program will continue to be in effect for at least three years after the works are completed, or until the aquifer has rebounded to 90 per cent. Upon completion of the project, the supplementation waters will be reduced through consultation with agency staff depending on the results of the monitoring program. To coordinate the inter - agency review of the monitoring program, TRCA will hire a staff person on behalf of ourselves, MNR, DFO and MOE. Funding for this position has been committed by the Region of York. In order to implement the adaptive mitigation strategy of the EMP, five permits from TRCA in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 are required. Each of these permits is associated with the required piping of the dewatering discharge upstream to supplement the stream baseflows within the ZOI in order to reduce the potential impacts to fish and fish habitat. The five associated permit applications are: • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek at Kennedy Road , just north of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 213 /04 /MARK; CFN 35501. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Robinson Creek at Elgin Mills Road ; application # 214 /04 /MARK; CFN 35502. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek just north of Major Mackenzie Drive application # 215 /04 /MARK; CFN 35503. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Berczy Creek at the southwest corner of Major Mackenzie Drive and Warden Avenue ; application # 216/04 /MARK; CFN 35504. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Little Rouge Creek , just south of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 256 /04 /MARK; CFN 35602. Each permit application involves the construction of a piped system through the municipal road ditches to constructed riprap filtration ditch, riprap and grass ditch, and riverrun stone ditch within the flood plain and at the stream edge. The system is designed remove iron content and reduce flow velocities before the water reaches the streams. The discharge waters will be thermally regulated through a heating or cooling system. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: The outfall will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. 562 Conservation of Land: Erosion and sedimentation plans in effect will reduce impacts on the watercourse as the waters are discharged. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following completion of the adaptive management program. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35501 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston and Don Ford For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 213/04 /MARK 8.1.25 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (Elgin Mills Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct a structure (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking to provide site restoration plans and an addendum report to the 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer Phase II Environmental Management Plan Report ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The York Region Official Plan has identified substantial growth in the Region, primarily around the existing urban centres of Aurora, Newmarket, Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham. To support this development, increased capacity in the York Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) is required. The master plan for this expansion has been approved. The 16th Avenue Phase 11 is a key phase of the master plan. The construction of 16th Avenue Phase II will complete the paralleling of the YDSS through the Town of Markham by connecting to the existing Highway 404 Trunk Sewer located just east of Woodbine Avenue to the existing Phase 1 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer, located just east of what is known as shaft C8 near Robinson Creek. 563 The sewer system will be constructed via tunnelling. Construction of the tunnel and its associated shafts will require extensive dewatering of a major aquifer in the tunnel zone in order to create safe working conditions during construction. The dewatering has the potential to create adverse impacts on groundwater users, as well as the natural environment. The main issues concerning the natural environment are associated with: • Interference to existing water wells; • Loss of groundwater contributions to natural streams, wetlands and ESAs; and • Discharge of excess volume of water and its potential to change the natural regime of the receiving watercourses. To address the above issues, the Region has divided the environmental component of the project into two major parts: • A proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan to address adversely affected private wells and specialized groundwater uses, including golf courses and farms; • An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to manage stress to the natural functions of the ecosystem during the dewatering operation and associated recovery period of the aquifer. The proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan is being reviewed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) as part of the Region's Permit to Take Water (PTTW) application. The EMP is currently being reviewed by staff at TRCA for permits under Ontario Regulation 158; MOE for the PTTW; the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for permits under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act; and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for permits under the Federal Fisheries Act. Key considerations associated with the EMP include: • Complexity of the natural ecosystem; • Deficiency in historic baseline information • Deficiency of documented effects from projects of this type and scale; and • Due to ecosystem complexity and stated deficiencies, incorporating flexibility into the EMP through an adaptive management approach. Adaptive management for the 16th Avenue Phase II project will be used to guide and revise the EMP. The impetus to use an adaptive management approach is so that the proponent or their agents are able to react in a timely manner to results from continuous monitoring of environmental trigger parameters and values, and operational rules. 564 To assess the potential zone of impact (ZOI) associated with the water - takings during the dewatering operation, a three - dimensional groundwater flow model developed as part of the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) Groundwater Study was used. The results obtained from this modelling were used to define the area within the 0.5 metre drawdown in the shallow aquifer. This area was defined as the ZOI associated with the natural ecosystem dependant on groundwater. A conservative buffer zone to extend all monitoring by an additional two kilometres or more was added to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with the ZOI. The YPDT Study was also used to identify streams which will be impacted through anticipated reductions in groundwater contributions to baseflow. Within the ZOI and its buffer, all ESAs, wetlands and watercourses have been identified and an analysis of these ecosystem receptors has been carried out for fish and fish habitat; wetlands and ESAs; critical stream capacity; woodlots; and agriculture. The mitigation for these systems has been addressed in the EMP, as follows: Fish and Fish Habitat: • Piping dewatering discharge upstream to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Establishing holding tanks within the ZOI to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Dispersing dewatering discharge to alternate waterbodies; • Thermal regulation of dewatering discharge; and • An extensive temperature and flow monitoring system. The amount and temperature of supplementation will be regulated through the adaptive management process. Wetlands and ESAs • An extensive species and groundwater monitoring system in select areas; • Piping water to, or planting species, was required through the adaptive management process. Critical Stream Capacity • A fluvial geomorphicgal assessment of creeks that may be physically impacted was concluded to determine maximum discharge velocities. • These rates are reflected in the adaptive management process. Woodlots • Soil moisture conditions and tree growth will be monitories in sample plots • Adaptive management techniques include making more water available and planting to replace loss. Agriculture • It is expected that the dewatering of the deep aquifers will not negatively affect the soil moisture content in the surrounding agricultural soils. 565 The adaptive management program will continue to be in effect for at least three years after the works are completed, or until the aquifer has rebounded to 90 per cent. Upon completion of the project, the supplementation waters will be reduced through consultation with agency staff depending on the results of the monitoring program. To coordinate the inter - agency review of the monitoring program, TRCA will hire a staff person on behalf of ourselves, MNR, DFO and MOE. Funding for this position has been committed by the Region of York. In order to implement the adaptive mitigation strategy of the EMP, five permits from TRCA in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 are required. Each of these permits is associated with the required piping of the dewatering discharge upstream to supplement the stream baseflows within the ZOI in order to reduce the potential impacts to fish and fish habitat. The five associated permit applications are: • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek at Kennedy Road , just north of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 213 /04 /MARK; CFN 35501. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Robinson Creek at Elgin Mills Road ; application # 214 /04 /MARK; CFN 35502. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek just north of Major Mackenzie Drive application # 215 /04 /MARK; CFN 35503. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Berczy Creek at the southwest corner of Major Mackenzie Drive and Warden Avenue ; application # 216/04 /MARK; CFN 35504. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Little Rouge Creek , just south of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 256 /04 /MARK; CFN 35602. Each permit application involves the construction of a piped system through the municipal road ditches to constructed riprap filtration ditch, riprap and grass ditch, and riverrun stone ditch within the flood plain and at the stream edge. The system is designed remove iron content and reduce flow velocities before the water reaches the streams. The discharge waters will be thermally regulated through a heating or cooling system. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: The outfall will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Erosion and sedimentation plans in effect will reduce impacts on the watercourse as the waters are discharged. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. 566 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35502 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston and Don Ford For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 214 /04 /MARK 8.1.26 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (Major Mackenzie Drive - Bruce Creek, West of Kennedy Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct a structure (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking to provide site restoration plans and an addendum report to the 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer Phase II Environmental Management Plan Report ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The York Region Official Plan has identified substantial growth in the Region, primarily around the existing urban centres of Aurora, Newmarket, Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham. To support this development, increased capacity in the York Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) is required. The master plan for this expansion has been approved. The 16th Avenue Phase II is a key phase of the master plan. The construction of 16th Avenue Phase II will complete the paralleling of the YDSS through the Town of Markham by connecting to the existing Highway 404 Trunk Sewer located just east of Woodbine Avenue to the existing Phase 1 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer, located just east of what is known as shaft C8 near Robinson Creek. The sewer system will be constructed via tunnelling. Construction of the tunnel and its associated shafts will require extensive dewatering of a major aquifer in the tunnel zone in order to create safe working conditions during construction. The dewatering has the potential to create adverse impacts on groundwater users, as well as the natural environment. The main issues concerning the natural environment are associated with: 567 • Interference to existing water wells; • Loss of groundwater contributions to natural streams, wetlands and ESAs; and • Discharge of excess volume of water and its potential to change the natural regime of the receiving watercourses. To address the above issues, the Region has divided the environmental component of the project into two major parts: • A proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan to address adversely affected private wells and specialized groundwater uses, including golf courses and farms; • An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to manage stress to the natural functions of the ecosystem during the dewatering operation and associated recovery period of the aquifer. The proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan is being reviewed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) as part of the Region's Permit to Take Water (PTTW) application. The EMP is currently being reviewed by staff at TRCA for permits under Ontario Regulation 158; MOE for the PTTW; the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for permits under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act; and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for permits under the Federal Fisheries Act. Key considerations associated with the EMP include: • Complexity of the natural ecosystem; • Deficiency in historic baseline information • Deficiency of documented effects from projects of this type and scale; and • Due to ecosystem complexity and stated deficiencies, incorporating flexibility into the EMP through an adaptive management approach. Adaptive management for the 16th Avenue Phase II project will be used to guide and revise the EMP. The impetus to use an adaptive management approach is so that the proponent or their agents are able to react in a timely manner to results from continuous monitoring of environmental trigger parameters and values, and operational rules. To assess the potential zone of impact (ZOI) associated with the water - takings during the dewatering operation, a three - dimensional groundwater flow model developed as part of the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) Groundwater Study was used. The results obtained from this modelling were used to define the area within the 0.5 metre drawdown in the shallow aquifer. This area was defined as the ZOI associated with the natural ecosystem dependant on groundwater. A conservative buffer zone to extend all monitoring by an additional two kilometres or more was added to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with the ZOI. The YPDT Study was also used to identify streams which will be impacted through anticipated reductions in groundwater contributions to baseflow. Within the ZOI and its buffer, all ESAs, wetlands and watercourses have been identified and an analysis of these ecosystem receptors has been carried out for fish and fish habitat; wetlands and ESAs; critical stream capacity; woodlots; and agriculture. The mitigation for these systems has been addressed in the EMP, as follows: 568 Fish and Fish Habitat: • Piping dewatering discharge upstream to supplement stream baseflows within the ZO1; • Establishing holding tanks within the ZOI to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Dispersing dewatering discharge to alternate waterbodies; • Thermal regulation of dewatering discharge; and • An extensive temperature and flow monitoring system. The amount and temperature of supplementation will be regulated through the adaptive management process. Wetlands and ESAs • An extensive species and groundwater monitoring system in select areas; • Piping water to, or planting species, was required through the adaptive management process. Critical Stream Capacity • A fluvial geomorphicgal assessment of creeks that may be physically impacted was concluded to determine maximum discharge velocities. • These rates are reflected in the adaptive management process. Wood lots • Soil moisture conditions and tree growth will be monitories in sample plots • Adaptive management techniques include making more water available and planting to replace loss. Agriculture • It is expected that the dewatering of the deep aquifers will not negatively affect the soil moisture content in the surrounding agricultural soils. The adaptive management program will continue to be in effect for at least three years after the works are completed, or until the aquifer has rebounded to 90 per cent. Upon completion of the project, the supplementation waters will be reduced through consultation with agency staff depending on the results of the monitoring program. To coordinate the inter - agency review of the monitoring program, TRCA will hire a staff person on behalf of ourselves, MNR, DFO and MOE. Funding for this position has been committed by the Region of York. In order to implement the adaptive mitigation strategy of the EMP, five permits from TRCA in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 are required. Each of these permits is associated with the required piping of the dewatering discharge upstream to supplement the stream baseflows within the ZOI in order to reduce the potential impacts to fish and fish habitat. The five associated permit applications are: • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek at Kennedy Road , just north of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 213 /04 /MARK; CFN 35501. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Robinson Creek at Elgin Mills Road ; application # 214 /04 /MARK; CFN 35502. 569 • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek just north of Major Mackenzie Drive application # 215 /04 /MARK; CFN 35503. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Berczy Creek at the southwest corner of Major Mackenzie Drive and Warden Avenue ; application # 216/04 /MARK; CFN 35504. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Little Rouge Creek , just south of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 256 /04 /MARK; CFN 35602. Each permit application involves the construction of a piped system through the municipal road ditches to constructed riprap filtration ditch, riprap and grass ditch, and riverrun stone ditch within the flood plain and at the stream edge. The system is designed remove iron content and reduce flow velocities before the water reaches the streams. The discharge waters will be thermally regulated through a heating or cooling system. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: The outfall will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Erosion and sedimentation plans in effect will reduce impacts on the watercourse as the waters are discharged. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35503 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston and Don Ford For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 215 /04 /MARK 8.1.27 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (northeast corner of Major MacKenzie Drive and Warden Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. 570 The purpose is to construct a structure (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking to provide site restoration plans and an addendum report to the 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer Phase II Environmental Management Plan Report ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The York Region Official Plan has identified substantial growth in the Region, primarily around the existing urban centres of Aurora, Newmarket, Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham. To support this development, increased capacity in the York Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) is required. The master plan for this expansion has been approved. The 16th Avenue Phase II is a key phase of the master plan. The construction of 16th Avenue Phase II will complete the paralleling of the YDSS through the Town of Markham by connecting to the existing Highway 404 Trunk Sewer located just east of Woodbine Avenue to the existing Phase 1 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer, located just east of what is known as shaft C8 near Robinson Creek. The sewer system will be constructed via tunnelling. Construction of the tunnel and its associated shafts will require extensive dewatering of a major aquifer in the tunnel zone in order to create safe working conditions during construction. The dewatering has the potential to create adverse impacts on groundwater users, as well as the natural environment. The main issues concerning the natural environment are associated with: • Interference to existing water wells; • Loss of groundwater contributions to natural streams, wetlands and ESAs; and • Discharge of excess volume of water and its potential to change the natural regime of the receiving watercourses. To address the above issues, the Region has divided the environmental component of the project into two major parts: • A proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan to address adversely affected private wells and specialized groundwater uses, including golf courses and farms; • An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to manage stress to the natural functions of the ecosystem during the . dewatering operation and associated recovery period of the aquifer. 571 The proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan is being reviewed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) as part of the Region's Permit to Take Water (PTTW) application. The EMP is currently being reviewed by staff at TRCA for permits under Ontario Regulation 158; MOE for the PTTW; the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for permits under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act; and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for permits under the Federal Fisheries Act. Key considerations associated with the EMP include: • Complexity of the natural ecosystem; • Deficiency in historic baseline information • Deficiency of documented effects from projects of this type and scale; and • Due to ecosystem complexity and stated deficiencies, incorporating flexibility into the EMP through an adaptive management approach. Adaptive management for the 16th Avenue Phase II project will be used to guide and revise the EMP. The impetus to use an adaptive management approach is so that the proponent or their agents are able to react in a timely manner to results from continuous monitoring of environmental trigger parameters and values, and operational rules. To assess the potential zone of impact (ZOI) associated with the water - takings during the dewatering operation, a three - dimensional groundwater flow model developed as part of the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) Groundwater Study was used. The results obtained from this modelling were used to define the area within the 0.5 metre drawdown in the shallow aquifer. This area was defined as the ZOI associated with the natural ecosystem dependant on groundwater. A conservative buffer zone to extend all monitoring by an additional two kilometres or more was added to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with the ZOI. The YPDT Study was also used to identify streams which will be impacted through anticipated reductions in groundwater contributions to baseflow. Within the ZOI and its buffer, all ESAs, wetlands and watercourses have been identified and an analysis of these ecosystem receptors has been carried out for fish and fish habitat; wetlands and ESAs; critical stream capacity; woodlots; and agriculture. The mitigation for these systems has been addressed in the EMP, as follows: Fish and Fish Habitat: • Piping dewatering discharge upstream to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Establishing holding tanks within the ZOI to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Dispersing dewatering discharge to alternate waterbodies; • Thermal regulation of dewatering discharge; and • An extensive temperature and flow monitoring system. The amount and temperature of supplementation will be regulated through the adaptive management process. 572 Wetlands and ESAs • An extensive species and groundwater monitoring system in select areas; • Piping water to, or planting species, was required through the adaptive management process. Critical Stream Capacity • A fluvial geomorphicgal assessment of creeks that may be physically impacted was concluded to determine maximum discharge velocities. • These rates are reflected in the adaptive management process. Woodlots • Soil moisture conditions and tree growth will be monitories in sample plots • Adaptive management techniques include making more water availably and planting to replace loss. Agriculture • It is expected that the dewatering of the deep aquifers will not negatively affect the soil moisture content in the surrounding agricultural soils. The adaptive management program will continue to be in effect for at least three years after the works are completed, or until the aquifer has rebounded to 90 per cent. Upon completion of the project, the supplementation waters will be reduced through consultation with agency staff depending on the results of the monitoring program. To coordinate the inter - agency review of the monitoring program, TRCA will hire a staff person on behalf of ourselves, MNR, DFO and MOE. Funding for this position has been committed by the Region of York. In order to implement the adaptive mitigation strategy of the EMP, five permits from TRCA in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 are required. Each of these permits is associated with the required piping of the dewatering discharge upstream to supplement the stream baseflows within the ZOI in order to reduce the potential impacts to fish and fish habitat. The five associated permit applications are: • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek at Kennedy Road , just north of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 213 /04 /MARK; CFN 35501. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Robinson Creek at Elgin Mills Road ; application # 214/04 /MARK; CFN 35502. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek just north of Major Mackenzie Drive application # 215/04 /MARK; CFN 35503. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Berczy Creek at the southwest corner of Major Mackenzie Drive and Warden Avenue ; application # 216 /04 /MARK; CFN 35504. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Little Rouge Creek , just south of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 256 /04 /MARK; CFN 35602. Each permit application involves the construction of a piped system through the municipal road ditches to constructed riprap filtration ditch, riprap and grass ditch, and riverrun stone ditch within the flood plain and at the stream edge. The system is designed remove iron content and reduce flow velocities before the water reaches the streams. The discharge waters will be thermally regulated through a heating or cooling system. 573 The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: The outfall will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Erosion and sedimentation plans in effect will reduce impacts on the watercourse as the waters are discharged. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35504 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston and Don Ford For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 216/04 /MARK 8.1.28 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (Elgin Mills Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct a structure (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (dewatering discharge dispersal structure) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking to provide site restoration plans and an addendum report to the 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer Phase II Environmental Management Plan Report ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 574 Proposal: The York Region Official Plan has identified substantial growth in the Region, primarily around the existing urban centres of Aurora, Newmarket, Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham. To support this development, increased capacity in the York Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) is required. The master plan for this expansion has been approved. The 16th Avenue Phase II is a key phase of the master plan. The construction of 16th Avenue Phase II will complete the paralleling of the YDSS through the Town of Markham by connecting to the existing Highway 404 Trunk Sewer located just east of Woodbine Avenue to the existing Phase 1 16th Avenue Trunk Sewer, located just east of what is known as shaft C8 near Robinson Creek. The sewer system will be constructed via tunnelling. Construction of the tunnel and its associated shafts will require extensive dewatering of a major aquifer in the tunnel zone in order to create safe working conditions during construction. The dewatering has the potential to create adverse impacts on groundwater users, as well as the natural environment. The main issues concerning the natural environment are associated with: • Interference to existing water wells; • Loss of groundwater contributions to natural streams, wetlands and ESAs; and • Discharge of excess volume of water and its potential to change the natural regime of the receiving watercourses. To address the above issues, the Region has divided the environmental component of the project into two major parts: • A proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan to address adversely affected private wells and specialized groundwater uses, including golf courses and farms; • An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to manage stress to the natural functions of the ecosystem during the dewatering operation and associated recovery period of the aquifer. The proactive well mitigation and monitoring plan is being reviewed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) as part of the Region's Permit to Take Water (PTTW) application. The EMP is currently being reviewed by staff at TRCA for permits under Ontario Regulation 158; MOE for the PTTW; the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for permits under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act; and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for permits under the Federal Fisheries Act. Key considerations associated with the EMP include: • Complexity of the natural ecosystem; • Deficiency in historic baseline information • Deficiency of documented effects from projects of this type and scale; and • Due to ecosystem complexity and stated deficiencies, incorporating flexibility into the EMP through an adaptive management approach. 575 Adaptive management for the 16th Avenue Phase II project will be used to guide and revise the EMP. The impetus to use an adaptive management approach is so that the proponent or their agents are able to react in a timely manner to results from continuous monitoring of environmental trigger parameters and values, and operational rules. To assess the potential zone of impact (ZOI) associated with the water - takings during the dewatering operation, a three - dimensional groundwater flow model developed as part of the York -Peel- Durham - Toronto (YPDT) Groundwater Study was used. The results obtained from this modelling were used to define the area within the 0.5 metre drawdown in the shallow aquifer. This area was defined as the ZOI associated with the natural ecosystem dependant on groundwater. A conservative buffer zone to extend all monitoring by an additional two kilometres or more was added to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with the ZOI. The YPDT Study was also used to identify streams which will be impacted through anticipated reductions in groundwater contributions to baseflow. Within the ZOI and its buffer, all ESAs, wetlands and watercourses have been identified and an analysis of these ecosystem receptors has been carried out for fish and fish habitat; wetlands and ESAs; critical stream capacity; woodlots; and agriculture. The mitigation for these systems has been addressed in the EMP, as follows: Fish and Fish Habitat: • Piping dewatering discharge upstream to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Establishing holding tanks within the ZOI to supplement stream baseflows within the ZOI; • Dispersing dewatering discharge to alternate waterbodies; • Thermal regulation of dewatering discharge; and • An extensive temperature and flow monitoring system. The amount and temperature of supplementation will be regulated through the adaptive management process. Wetlands and ESAs • An extensive species and groundwater monitoring system in select areas; • Piping water to, or planting species, was required through the adaptive management process. Critical Stream Capacity • A fluvial geomorphicgal assessment of creeks that may be physically impacted was concluded to determine maximum discharge velocities. • These rates are reflected in the adaptive management process. Woodlots • Soil moisture conditions and tree growth will be monitories in sample plots • Adaptive management techniques include making more water available and planting to replace loss. Agriculture • It is expected that the dewatering of the deep aquifers will not negatively affect the soil moisture content in the surrounding agricultural soils. 576 The adaptive management program will continue to be in effect for at least three years after the works are completed, or until the aquifer has rebounded to 90 per cent. Upon completion of the project, the supplementation waters will be reduced through consultation with agency staff depending on the results of the monitoring program. To coordinate the inter - agency review of the monitoring program, TRCA will hire a staff person on behalf of ourselves, MNR, DFO and MOE. Funding for this position has been committed by the Region of York. In order to implement the adaptive mitigation strategy of the EMP, five permits from TRCA in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 are required. Each of these permits is associated with the required piping of the dewatering discharge upstream to supplement the stream baseflows within the ZOI in order to reduce the potential impacts to fish and fish habitat. The five associated permit applications are: • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek at Kennedy Road , just north of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 213 /04 /MARK; CFN 35501. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Robinson Creek at Elgin Mills Road ; application # 214 /04 /MARK; CFN 35502. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Bruce Creek just north of Major Mackenzie Drive application # 215 /04 /MARK; CFN 35503. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Berczy Creek at the southwest corner of Major Mackenzie Drive and Warden Avenue ; application # 216 /04 /MARK; CFN 35504. • Dewatering Discharge Dispersion to Little Rouge Creek , just south of Elgin Mills Road ; application # 256/04 /MARK; CFN 35602. Each permit application involves the construction of a piped system through the municipal road ditches to constructed riprap filtration ditch, riprap and grass ditch, and riverrun stone ditch within the flood plain and at the stream edge. The system is designed remove iron content and reduce flow velocities before the water reaches the streams. The discharge waters will be thermally regulated through a heating or cooling system. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: The outtall will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Erosion and sedimentation plans in effect will reduce impacts on the watercourse as the waters are discharged. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following completion of the adaptive management program. 577 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35602 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston and Don Ford For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 256 /04 /MARK 8.1.29 SUZANA WARNER To construct in a flood plain on Lot 71, Block K, Plan M -1325, (7 Park Brook Place), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Suzana Warner. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation of a swimming pool at the rear of an existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Redline revised Pool Location Plan , prepared by the applicant ,received June 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation of an in- ground swimming pool at the rear of an existing dwelling. The subject property is located west of Yonge Street and north of John Street, in the Town of Markham. The property is west of a gently sloping valley feature of which the top of bank forms the rear property line. The pool will be located a minimum of 5 metres from top of bank in a backyard that is currently sodded. TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied that there are no slope stability concerns related to the proposed location of the pool. Control of Flooding: The proposed swimming pool is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the work site and will be appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. 578 Conservation of Land: A site visit to the subject property confirmed that there are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this project. As the watercourse will not be impacted by this proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The area of proposed works is presently sodded. As such, the works will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Stream and Valley Corridor Management Program: CFN: 35541 Report Prepared by : Lorenzo Nicolet , extension 5314 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 11, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Application #: 228 /04 /MARK 8.1.30 GIUSEPPE GITTO To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 87, Plan 1923, (128 Weldrick Road West), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Giuseppe Gitto. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of single family dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Topographical Survey , prepared by Tom A . Senkus, dated June 2, 2004, received June 16, 2004. • Site Plan and Basement Plan , Drawing A -1, prepared by Array International Architects Inc., dated June 2004, received June 16, 2004. • Plans, Drawing A -2, prepared by Array International Architects Inc ., dated June 2004, received June 16, 2004. • South & West Elevations , Drawing A -3, prepared by Array International Architects Inc ., dated June 2004, received June 16, 2004. • North & East Elevations , Drawing A -4, prepared by Array International Architects Inc ., dated June 2004, received June 16, 2004. • Section A -A, Drawing A -5, prepared by Array International Architects Inc ., dated June 2004, received June 16, 2004. 579 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling. The property is located on the north side of Weldrick Road West, between Bathurst Street and Yonge Street, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The proposed single family dwelling will replace a demolished residential dwelling The Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies permit an addition to an existing building within the Regional Storm Flood Plain that is up to 50 percent of the total area of the building based on existing conditions as of January 1, 1987. The current proposal to replace the demolished house does not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the residence as of the stipulated date. Further, the proposed dwelling maintains the same footprint as the demolished dwelling and is therefore not closer to the watercourse. The proposed dwelling is located approximately 25m from the Don River, entirely in the flood plain but outside of the hydraulic floodway of the Don River. The single family dwelling will be floodproofed to Regional Storm Flood Elevation, plus free board, in accordance with TRCA policies for redevelopment in the flood plain. TRCA staff is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed works. Control of Flooding_ : TRCA engineering staff has confirmed that the house will be appropriately floodproofed to the Regional Storm Flood Elevation, plus freeboard. A structural engineer has confirmed that the single family dwelling is able to withstand the depths and velocities of flood waters in a Regional storm event. All excavated material is to be removed from site. TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the single family dwelling. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the Don River. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Furthermore, there will be no impacts to fish habitat or any other natural resource features on the subject lands. Plantings The area of proposed works is presently occupied by the foundations of a demolished single family dwelling. As such, the works will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Sections 4.2.2 (D)- Replacement Structures -of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management program. 580 CFN: 35521 Report Prepared by : Lorenzo Nicolet , extension 5314 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 8, 2004 Application #: 227/04/RH 8.1.31 YORK HARRIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 52, Plan 3806, (350 Red Maple Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by York Harris. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of 3 residential condominium buildings and recreation center, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Plan , Drawing Al, prepared by E .1. Richmond Architects Ltd ., dated June 12, 2003, revised may 6, 2004, received May 20, 2004. • Grading /Erosion Control Plan , Drawing 3, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd ., dated July 10, 2003, received May 20, 2004. • Site Servicing Plan , Drawing 4, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd ., dated July 10, 2003, received May 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of 3 residential condominium buildings and a recreation centre, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The subject property is currently used for industrial purposes. The site is currently occupied by two industrial buildings. Minimal grading of the site will be required. The subject site is located a significant distance from German Mills Creek and there are buildings located between the site and the watercourse. Though the subject site was once located within the stream corridor of German Mills Creek, alterations to the watercourse channel resulted in the reduction of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, thus removing the subject site from the stream corridor. However, as the Fill Regulated Area in this location has not changed, the site remains within the Fill Regulated Area. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain of German Mills Creek, hence there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 581 Pollution: The proposed works are located approximately 150m from the watercourse. Minimal grading of the site is required in order to construct the 3 residential condominium buildings and recreation centre. As a result, there will be no sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this proposal. As the proposed works are located approximately 150m away from the watercourse, there are no fisheries concerns related to the project. Further, there are no significant natural heritage features on, or adjacent to the subject property which will be negatively impacted by the proposed works. Plantings No vegetation removals are required as part of this project and no significant natural heritage features will be impacted. TRCA ecology staff has reviewed the landscaping plan submitted as part of site plan application D06 -03059 for the subject property and is satisfied that the design complies with current ecological design standards and practices. Policy Guidelines: Though the subject site was once located within the stream corridor of German Mills Creek, alterations to the watercourse channel resulted in the reduction of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, thus removing the subject site from the stream corridor. However, as the Fill Regulated Area in this location has not changed, the site remains within the Fill Regulated Area. Thus, the project is consistent with the intent of Section 4.2.2 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35505 Report Prepared by : Lorenzo Nicolet , extension 5314 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 3, 2004 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE Application #: 212/04/RH 8.1.32 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on Part Lot 34, Concession 9 Plan 65R- 24565, (9th Line), in the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to alter a Watercourse during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump around method to facilitate the construction of the 9th Line West Branch portion of the York - Durham Sanitary Sewer Extension to Stouffville. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 582 • Letter of Undertaking to provide a fisheries survey , detailed site , erosion and sediment control plans ; site restoration plans ; and confirmation of any groundwater dewatering requirements ; dated June 23, 2004; received June 25, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: As part of the construction of the York - Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS), a permit application is required for the open cut crossing of a tributary draining into the Little Rouge River. Permit C -02132 was issued on May 2002 for two downstream tunnel crossings associated with this section of the sewer construction. This tributary is severely degraded. As part of the mitigation plan, the garbage will be removed from the bed and banks of the stream, and the upstream and downstream sections of the tributary will be planted with native trees and shrubs. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence; check dam; pump and dam method) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35451 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston , extension 5217 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: May 18, 2004 583 Application #: 182/04/WS TOWNSHIP OF KING MINOR WORKS 8.1.33 FRANCES ANDREANA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 125 & 126, Part Block F, Plan 280 (160 Elmpine Trail), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Frances Andreana. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the side yard of an existing residential lot located at 160 Elmpine Trail in the Township of King. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006. • Proposed Site Plan , dated May 21, 2004, received by the TRCA on June 17, 2004, redline revised to indicate the removal of excess fill material . • Planting Plan , received by the TRCA on June 17, 2004, redline revised to indicate that woody species will be planted on the slope , starting approximately 1 metre from the proposed pool (the species will include one or more of the following : Choke Cherry , Service Berry , Sumac, Nanny Berry , Grey Dogwood , or any other species approved by the TRCA). RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area The works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the manicured side yard of an existing residential lot. The proposed pool will abut the existing residential dwelling. Both the existing residence and the proposed pool are located adjacent to a manicured slope. TRCA staff are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development, but requested that plantings be provided along the sloped portion of the site, adjacent to the proposed development, for storm water and erosion control. The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the proposed works is approximately 90 metres from the watercourse. 584 Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Plantings will be provided along the sloped portion of the site, adjacent to the proposed development, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35499 Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 25, 2004 Application #: 210 /04 /KING 8.1.34 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To construct in a flood plain on Lot 65, Concession 1 Plan R -S208, (King Road), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct a structure (through directional drilling) within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking to provide revised restoration and engineering plans ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the construction of a forcemain along the south side of king Road between the proposed pumping station (to be located on King Road approximately 375 metres west of Keel Street), and Yonge Street. The forcemain will connect to the existing York - Durham Sanitary Sewer that runs along the east side of Yonge Street. The forcemain is to be constructed by horizontal directional drilling which will reduce the excavation and disturbance All disturbed area will be restored to their original condition and there will be no change to the existing grading. 585 The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: As all existing ground elevations throughout the Regional Storm Floodplain will be maintained, therefore, the control of flooding will not be implicated Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. All watercourses on the Oak Ridges Moraine have been identified as hydrologically sensitive features. There is one watercourse in within the project limits. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program CFN: 35228 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston , extension 5217 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 16, 2004 Application #: 081/04/KING 8.1.35 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To construct in a flood plain on Lot 5, Concession 4 Plan 65R -1964, (King Road), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to construct a structure (through directional drilling) within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 586 • Letter of Undertaking to provide revised restoration and engineering plans ; dated June 28, 2004; received June 28, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the construction of a forcemain along the south side of king Road between the proposed pumping station (to be located on King Road approximately 375 metres west of Keel Street), and Yonge Street. The forcemain will connect to the existing York - Durham Sanitary Sewer that runs along the east side of Yonge Street. The forcemain is to be constructed by horizontal directional drilling which will reduce the excavation and disturbance All disturbed area will be restored to their original condition and there will be no change to the existing grading. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to our requirements. Control of Flooding: As all existing ground elevations throughout the Regional Storm Floodplain will be maintained, therefore, the control of flooding will not be implicated. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence...) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. All watercourses on the Oak Ridges Moraine have been identified as hydrologically sensitive features. There is one watercourse in within the project limits. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. 587 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program CFN: 35227 Report Prepared by : Beth Williston , extension 5217 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: June 15, 2004 588 Application #: 082 /04 /KING THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #B146/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.36 - 8.1.66, with the exception of 8.1.44 and 8.1.45, which were withdrawn ), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.36 MACEDIL HOLDINGS INC . To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Plan 43M -527, (Southwest Corner Ken Whillans Drive and Sproule Drive), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Macedil Holdings Inc. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area and to construct in a floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a retirement community complex. The proposed works will occur at the southwest corner of Ken Whillans Drive and Sproule Drive, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking from E . Gazendam, of Planning and Engineering Initiatives Ltd ., dated July 7, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and planning ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the placement and excavation of fill material within a Fill Regulated Area and construction within the floodplain associated with Etobicoke Creek. The purpose of the application is to facilitate the construction of a retirement community complex at the southwest corner of Ken Whillans Drive and Sproule Drive, in the City Brampton. All proposed development is located adjacent to a valley corridor and Regulatory floodplain associated with Etobicoke Creek. All proposed development is to be located outside of the valley corridor and Regulatory floodplain. However, the proposed access route will be partially located within the floodplain. Numerous site constraints were identified regarding access for the subject property through the Site Plan process with the City of Brampton. As such, access to the site can only be provided off of Ken Whillans Drive, which is located partially within the floodplain. However, in accordance with Provincial and Authority policies, an emergency 589 access route will be provided off of Sproule Drive, which is located entirely outside of the floodplain. All parking is proposed to be located on the tableland, and will not be permitted in the valley corridor and /or floodplain area. The applicant and the City of Brampton have agreed to the cash -in -lieu program to address stormwater management on the subject property. Control of Flooding: The majority of the proposed works will occur outside of the Regulatory floodplain. A portion of the proposed access route will be located in the floodplain. As such, an emergency access road will be located on Sproule Drive, located outside of the floodplain. TRCA technical staff have confirmed that there will no negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of floodwaters as a result of this proposal. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed prior to any works commencing on site and will be maintained and monitored throughout construction to ensure that sedimentation of the valleyland and watercourse feature does not occur. Conservation of Land: The proposal involves the restabilization of the slope feature on the subject property. The proposed regrading will result in a slope that is more stable and less prone to erosion and /or slope failure. In addition, the slope feature will be densely planted, incorporating only native and non - invasive plant species to further stabilize and naturalize the slope. There are no fisheries related concerns associated with this development Plantings All plantings and seed mixes will incorporate only native and non - invasive plant species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development and Section 5.2 - Erosion Control and Slope Stability Remedial Works of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35440 Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 172/04 /BRAM 8.1.37 MATTAMY (GOREWAY) LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 11, Concession 7, in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mattamy (Goreway) Limited. 590 The purpose is to excavate and place fill materials to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision partially located within a Fill Regulated Area; and to construct an outfall structure partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the West Humber River, on lands located at the northeast corner of Castlemore Road and Goreway Drive, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by David Schaeffer , of David Schaeffer Engineering Limited, dated June 29, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and planning ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill material to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision (Cottrelle subdivision Part 'D', 21T- 00011B) that is adjacent to a valley corridor associated with. the West Humber River, and is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. All development associated with the subdivision application are proposed to be located entirely outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer is proposed to be provide between the proposed development, and the limits of the valley corridor. Furthermore, this application proposes to construct a stormwater outfall partially located within the Regulatory Floodplain. TRCA staff have ensured that the design, location and extent of the proposed outfall will not negatively impact floodplain, pollution and conservation management issues. In addition, all inwater works will conform to the cold water construction timing window (between July 1 to September 15). Control of Flooding: No excavated materials are proposed to be placed within the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, the proposed works associated with this application are not expected to result in any negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: All appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer is being proposed to be located between the valley corridor, and the proposed development. Furthermore, the proposed stormwater outfall is accompanied by a compensatory landscape planting plan which proposes to renaturalize a significant portion of the valleylands. There are no significant geotechnical or fisheries related concerns. However, all inwater works will conform to the cold water construction timing window (between July 1 to September 15). 591 Plantings All proposed plant materials will be densely planted and will be native and non-invasive species. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is in conformity with Sections 4.1 - New Development and 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35121 Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 036 /04 /BRAM 8.1.38 MATTAMY (SPRINGPARK) LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, 10, Concession 7, (southeast of Castlemore Road and Airport Road), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mattamy (Springpark) Limited. The purpose is to excavate and place fill materials to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision partially located within a Fill Regulated Area and to construct an outfall structure partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the West Humber River, on lands located at the southeast corner of Castlemore Road and Airport Road, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking prepared by David Schaeffer , of David Schaeffer Engineering Limited, dated June 29, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and planning ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision (Cottrelle Subdivision Part 'A, 21T- 98015B and 21T- 98034B) that is adjacent to a valley corridor associated with the West Humber River, and is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. All development associated with the subdivision application are proposed to be located entirely outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, an 592 adequately sized vegetated buffer is proposed to be provide between the proposed development, and the limits of the valley corridor. Furthermore, this application proposes to construct a stormwater outfall partially located within the Regulatory Floodplain. TRCA staff have ensured that the design, location and extent of the proposed outfall will not negatively impact floodplain, pollution and conservation management issues. In addition, all inwater works will conform to the cold water construction timing window (between July 1 to September 15) Control of Flooding: No excavated materials are proposed to be placed within the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, the proposed works associated with this application are not expected to result in any negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: All appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer is being proposed to be located between the valley corridor, and the proposed development. Furthermore, the proposed stormwater outfall is accompanied by a compensatory landscape planting plan which proposes to renaturalize a significant portion of the valleylands. There are no significant geotechnical or fisheries related concerns. However, all inwater works will conform to the cold water construction timing window (between July 1 to September 15). Plantings All proposed plant materials will be densely planted and will be native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is in conformity with Sections 4.1 - New Development and 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35161 Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 056 /04 /BRAM 8.1.39 MATTAMY (WEST HUMBER) LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, 10, Concession 7, (southwest of Castlemore road and Goreway Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mattamy (West Humber) Limited. 593 The purpose is to excavate and place fill materials to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision partially located within a Fill Regulated Area; to construct an outfall structure partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the West Humber River; and to allow for the construction of a sanitary sewer crossing of the West Humber River, on lands located west of Goreway Drive on Castlemore Road, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking prepared by David Schaeffer , of David Schaeffer Engineering Limited, dated June 29, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and planning ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill materials to facilitate the construction of a residential subdivision (Cottrelle subdivision Part 'B', 21T- 98033B) that is adjacent to a valley corridor associated with the West Humber River, and is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area. All development associated with this subdivision application are proposed to be located entirely outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer is proposed to be provide between the proposed development, and the limits of the valley corridor. Furthermore, this application proposes to construct a stormwater outfall partially located within the Regulatory Floodplain. TRCA staff have ensured that the design, location and extent of the proposed outfall will not negatively impact floodplain, pollution and conservation management issues. This proposal also involves the construction of a sanitary sewer crossing of the West Humber River. To minimize the amount of disturbance, the sanitary sewer crossing will be constructed using the directional boring method. In addition, all inwater works will conform to the cold water construction timing window (between July 1 to September 15). Control of Flooding: No excavated materials are proposed to be placed within the Regulatory Floodplain. In addition, the proposed works associated with this application are not expected to result in any negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: All appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: It has been determined that the proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer is being proposed to be located between the valley corridor, and the proposed development. Furthermore, the proposed stormwater outfall is accompanied by a compensatory landscape planting plan which proposes to renaturalize a significant portion of the valleylands. In addition, all disturbance 594 related to the construction of the proposed sanitary sewer crossing will be returned to pre- construction conditions. There are no significant geotechnical or fisheries related concerns. However, all inwater works will conform to the cold water construction timing window (between July 1 to September 15). Plantings All proposed plant materials will be densely planted and will be native and non-invasive species. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is in conformity with Sections 4.1 - New Development and 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35162 Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 057 /04 /BRAM 8.1.40 MENKES INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS INC . To construct in a flood plain on Part Block 3, 4, Plan 43M -811, 43R- 25326, (3925 Steeles Avenue East), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Menkes Industrial Holdings Inc. The purpose is to construct and place fill within the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management outfall, and minor realignment of a flood control berm adjacent to Mimico Creek, in support of a proposed industrial development in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Dan Arts , Menkes Industrial Holdings Inc ., dated July 7, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This project involves the construction of an industrial building on lands adjacent to Mimico Creek, at the corner of Finch Avenue and Steeles Avenue, in the City of Brampton. This project requires the partial re- alignment of a flood control berm within the adjacent floodplain, and the construction of a stormwater outfall adjacent to Mimico Creek. Through past land use approvals, flood control berms were constructed along this reach of Mimico Creek to allow the development of adjacent industrial lands. The majority of the properties within this reach have been developed, with few undeveloped lots remaining. Development within this reach has been completed on this basis of a flood study completed in 595 1986, which identified Regional Storm flows within this area. At the end of the planning process for this proposal, through an analysis of the location of the berm in relation to the property line, the applicant discovered that the berm is not presently located on, or at the rear property line, but is located further within the subject property, posing a significant constraint to the proposed development. The applicant has completed a flood study which has provided more up to date data on storm flows within this area, and has assessed the potential impacts on the Floodplain of shifting the berm 1 -2 metres to bring it more in line with the property limits. The applicant also owns the adjacent flood -prone lands, onto which the berm would be shifted. The flood study has indicated that the proposed shifting of the berm would have very minimal impacts on the flood levels in this area, and as flood levels have slightly decreased in this area, the post development flood levels would be below that which was previously identified for this area. As compensation for this modification, the applicant has agreed to provide significant plantings on adjacent, currently disturbed, Floodplain lands. The proposed stormwater outfall has will be constructed using natural channel design, which has been reviewed and approved by TRCA staff. The area surrounding this outfall, in addition to those listed above, will be re- vegetated through this project. Control of Flooding: The works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however based upon the findings of the flood study submitted in support of this proposal, permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are not anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. Any surrounding vegetation disturbed during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. No in -water works are required, and thus MNR Fisheries Timing Window restrictions do not apply. Plantings The applicant has agreed to plant an area of approximately 1225 square metres along the western portion of the property, adjacent to and within the floodplain, with native non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35520 Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: June 28, 2004 596 Application #: 226/04/BRAM CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 8.1.41 637613 ONTARIO LTD . C/O WYNN FAMILY PROPERTIES To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, 4, Plan 43R- 15013, (1680 Mattawa Avenue), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 637613 Ontario Ltd. c/o Wynn Family Properties. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a Fill Regulated Area associated with Etobicoke Creek on an industrial lot at 1680 Mattawa Avenue, in the City of Mississauga. The proposal involves the construction of an industrial building and associated parking spaces. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking from D . Amadio, of Giffels Associates Ltd ., dated July 7, 2004, to address all outstanding planning ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of an industrial building and associated parking facility at 1680 Mattawa Avenue, in the City of Mississauga. The portion of the subject property to which this application applies is located within TRCA's Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. Grading on the subject property commenced prior to any issuance of the necessary permit. As such, this permit will not be released until such time that TRCA Enforcement staff are completely satisfied. Furthermore, this application is subject to an additional fee for the violation. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed works. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed prior to any works commencing on the subject property and will be maintained and monitored throughout construction. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of construction. In addition, an adequately sized vegetated buffer located between the proposed development and the limits of the valley corridor is being proposed. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings The area between the proposed development and the valley corridor will be densely vegetated with only native and non - invasive plant species. 597 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35437 Report Prepared by : Adam Miller , extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 175/04/MISS CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ] 8.1.42 RONAILDO PEIXOTO To construct in a flood plain on Lot 1, Plan 1956, Part Lot 1, Plan 1982, (56 Hilldale Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ronaildo Peixoto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the demolition of the existing dwelling and garage on Lot 1 and to construct a new 2 storey dwelling on Part 1 of Lot 1 (known as 56 Hilldale Road). The subject property is located within the Rockcliffe Special Policy Area. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006. • Drawing No . 1, Plot Plan ; Drawing No . 2A, Floor Plans ; Drawing 2B, Floor Plans ; Drawing No . 3, Front Elevation ; Drawing No . 4, Rear Elevation ; Drawing No . 5, Side Elevations ; prepared by Bettencourt Designs , received June 11, 2004. • Letter of Opinion regarding Flood proofing , prepared by Katakkar Engineering Associates Inc ., dated July 7, 2004, received July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is located east of Jane Street and south of Eglinton Avenue. The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition of the existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 2 storey dwelling on Part 1 of Lot 1 (known as 56 Hilldale Road). A separate permit application is also on this agenda to permit the construction of a new 2 storey dwelling on Part 2 of Lot 1 (known as 56A Hilldale Road). The proposed works will take place within the Rockcliffe Special Policy Area Control of Flooding: All openings of the proposed dwelling and garage will be above the 350 year storm elevation. The applicant has submitted a letter from a structural engineer stating that the proposed addition will withstand the depths and velocities expected under the 350 year storm. 598 Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained during construction. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings No plantings are required for this application. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35546 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 14, 2004 Application #: 236/04/TOR 8.1.43 RONAILDO PEIXOTO To construct in a flood plain on Lot 1, Plan 1956, Part Lot 1, Plan 1982, (56A Hilldale Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ronaildo Peixoto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the demolition of the existing dwelling and garage on the subject property and construct a new dwelling on Part 2 of Lot 1 (56A Hilldale Road). The subject property is located within the Rockcliffe Special Policy Area. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006. • Drawing No . 1, Plot Plan ; Drawing No . 2A, Floor Plans ; Drawing 2B, Floor Plans ; Drawing No . 3, Front Elevation ; Drawing No . 4, Rear Elevation ; Drawing No . 5, Side Elevations ; prepared by Bettencourt Designs , received June 11, 2004. • Letter of Opinion regarding Flood proofing , prepared by Katakkar Engineering Associates Inc ., dated July 7, 2004, received July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 599 Proposal: The subject property is located east of Jane Street and south of Eglinton Avenue. The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition of the existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 2 storey dwelling on Part 2 of Lot 1 (known as 56A Hilldale Road). A separate permit application is also on this agenda to permit the construction of a new 2 storey dwelling on Part 1 of Lot 1 (known as 56 Hilldale Road). The proposed works will take place within the Rockcliffe Special Policy Area. Control of Flooding: All openings of the proposed dwelling and garage will be above the 350 year storm elevation. The applicant has submitted a letter from a structural engineer stating that the proposed addition will withstand the depths and velocities expected under the 350 year storm. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained during construction. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings Plantings are not required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35547 Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 14, 2004 Application #: 237/04/TOR CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ] MINOR WORKS 8.1.44 PAUL BIGIONI To place fill within a regulated area on Part 1 Part Block J, Plan 1538, (25 Kingsbury Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Bigioni. • Withdrawn 600 CITY OF TORONTO [TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ] 8.1.45 BELL CANADA To place fill within a regulated area on (Cherry Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bell Canada. • Withdrawn CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.46 MARYANNE OSTELLO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 119, Plan 65M -3066, (270 Fletcher Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Maryanne Ostello. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, retaining wall and cabana within the rear yard of an existing residential lot located at 270 Fletcher Drive in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006. • Site Plan , Ostello Residence , prepared by Betz Pools , dated August 26, 2003, received by the TRCA on June 1, 2004. • Species List , Ostello Residence , prepared by Stonelane Landscaping , received by the TRCA on June 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area The works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool, retaining wall (approximately 0.6 metres high and 25 metres long) and cabana (approximately 5.5 square metres) within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The pool and retaining wall were constructed prior to receipt of a permit application by the TRCA. The cabana has yet to be constructed. TRCA staff are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the development. The development is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and no significant natural features will be affected by the project As the works commenced prior to the issuance of the necessary permit, this application is subject to an additional fee for the minor violation. Control of Flooding: The development is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 601 Pollution: Sediment control fencing was not installed during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Minor sedimentation did occur during the construction process immediately adjacent to the subject property, but did not impact the watercourse. The applicant will restore this area to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35540 Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 25, 2004 Application #: 229 /04/VAUG 8.1.47 NORTHWEST JANE RUTHERFORD REALTY CORPORATION LIMITED To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 16, 17, Concession 5, (northeast of Rutherford Road and Jane Street), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Northwest Jane Rutherford Realty Corporation Limited. The purpose is to alter a waterway and place /move fill within a Regulated Area, in order to construct a road crossing, a pedestrian bridges and a pedestrian trail system, that will service Phase 4 of a draft- approved commercial /industrial subdivision (19T- 95079) known as Vaughan Centre. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006. • Letter of undertaking from Northwest Jane Rutherford Realty Corporation Limited dated July 7, 2004, stating that all TRCA comments will be addressed . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 602 Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway and place /move fill within a Regulated Area, in order to construct a road crossing, a pedestrian bridge, and a pedestrian trail system, that will service Phase 4 of a draft- approved commercial /industrial subdivision (19T- 95079) known as Vaughan Centre. Authority staff reviewed this subdivision and provided the City of Vaughan with conditions of draft approval, including the requirement to obtain this permit Control of Flooding: Authority Water Management staff are satisfied that the design of the road crossing will be adequate to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. The pedestrian crossing and trail system will be designed appropriately so as not to negatively affect the control of flooding. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no fisheries or geotechnical issues associated with this project. The proposed crossings will be constructed within the Ministry of Natural Resources fisheries timing window for warm water streams, July 1 to March 31. Plantings The subdivision will be planted with hundreds of native trees and shrubs in accordance with a landscape plan reviewed to staffs satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, and Section 4.1.2, New Resource -based Uses, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34559 Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 28, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX Application #: 322 /03NAUG 8.1.48 JOHN BODDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD . To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, Concession 3 BFC Plan PART 1, PLAN 40R- 12352, (Carruthers Creek), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by John Boddy Developments Ltd. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sediment control pond and outfall to Warbler's Swamp, in the Town of Ajax. 603 The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Temporary Stormwater Management Pond , Drawing 138, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd ., dated March 2003, issued June 28, 2004, date received June 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sediment control pond and outfall to Warbler's Swamp, in the Town of Ajax. TRCA staff is currently reviewing a permit application for the construction of a permanent stormwater management pond, but has not yet finalized the review of the related application. The stormwater management facility will service the residential development adjacent to Warbler's Swamp within draft plan of subdivision 18T- 94026. The construction of the temporary pond will allow the applicant to begin earthworks for the extension of Audley Road, which will eventually provide access to the residential development. An edge management plan has also been submitted, as well as planting plans for the stormwater management pond and subdivision buffer, both of which back onto the wetland. Control of Flooding: The temporary sediment pond will be located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek and TRCA water management staff has ensured that flows from the pond will not impact flooding upstream or downstream of the site. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected around the perimeter of the construction area in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the wetland. The temporary sediment control pond will contain all sediment produced from the proposed earthworks and prevent sedimentation of the downstream wetland and watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or slope stability concerns related to this proposal, nor are there any fisheries resources concerns. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored following construction, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Plantings The edge management plan, stormwater management pond and buffer planting plans all include plantings along the edge of the wetland, as well as within and along the banks of the stormwater management pond. Until the ultimate pond is built, all disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. • 604 CFN: 35609 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 259 /04 /AJAX 8.1.49 MARIPOSA (AJAX) INC. To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Concession 3 BFC, Pickering Beach Road and Bayly Street, in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Mariposa (Ajax) Inc. The purpose is to alter a waterway and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Flood Fringe of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of twenty -seven (27) freehold townhouse units as well as a storm outfall which will service the aforementioned townhomes. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Site Plan - Mariposa , Drawing No . A100, prepared by Ying & Associates , dated January 10, 2003, June 14, 2004. • Stormwater Management Report - Forrest Group Acquisitions Inc ., prepared by RG Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd., dated May 2004, received June 14, 2004. • Pickering Beach Road Storm Drainage Area Plan , Drawing No . G -3, prepared by RG Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd., dated March 2004, received June 14, 2004. • Pickering Beach Road Erosion & Sediment Control & Area Rough Grading Plan , Drawing No . G -5, prepared by RG Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd., dated March 2004, received June 14, 2004. • Pickering Beach Road Grading Plan , Drawing No . GP -1, prepared by RG Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd., dated March 2004, received June 30, 2004. • Restoration Planting Plan , Drawing No . LR1, prepared by Paul Cosburn Associates Limited, dated March 8, 2004, received June 14, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking , stating that the applicant will submit revised details on the storm outfall and appropriate restoration planting plans , prepared by RG Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd., dated June 28, 2004, received June 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 605 Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Flood Fringe of Carruthers Creek to facilitate the construction of twenty -seven (27) freehold townhouse units and a storm outfall. The storm outfall will service the adjacent residential townhome development and is located approximately 200 metres east of Carruthers Creek. The subject lands are located on the southeast corner of Bayly Street and Pickering Beach Road, west of Carruthers Creek. The subject property is approximately 1.15 ha (2.84 acres) in size. Control of Flooding: The proposed development of the townhouses involves the placement of fill within the Flood Fringe of Carruthers Creek. Initially, the proposed development was located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. However, due to recent changes in the Authority's hydraulic modeling for Carruthers Creek, the Regional Storm Flood Plain has increased marginally, resulting in a portion of the subject property falling within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Hence, the placement of minor amounts of fill in the Flood Fringe. The associated subdivision application was approved prior to the update in the TRCA's hydraulic modeling for Carruthers Creek.TRCA Water Management staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed works and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters.The proposed townhouse development is located a minimum of 10 metres from the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from the entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The proposed storm outfall is located approximately 200 metres east of Carruthers Creek. Ecological staff has determined that the storm outfall does not constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption of Destruction (HADD) to fish habitat. No other significant natural resources will be impacted by the proposed outfall. Plantings A planting plan has been submitted by the applicant detailing restoration plantings within the development setback area for the proposed development These plantings will consist of native, non - invasive species. The applicant will be submitting planting plans for the disturbed area surrounding the proposed outfall. The permit will be held by Authority staff until the storm outfall planting plans have been submitted and are deemed to meet Authority requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 606 CFN: 35570 Report Prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: June 28, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON Application #: 244 /04 /AJAX 8.1.50 REGION OF PEEL To construct in a flood plain in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to construct within the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the repair of four existing culverts, and rehabilitation of one existing bridge over Salt Creek, and a tributary of the West Humber River in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Claudio Crespi , McCormick Rankin Corporation , dated July 7, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This project involves repairs to three existing culverts, and one existing bridge crossing which traverse tributaries of the Humber River. The proposed works are part of the Region of Peel's infrastructure maintenance program, and involve rehabilitating the existing structures. Works to be completed include concrete repairs to ends of the culverts, miscellaneous roadway repairs and stabilization of adjacent areas. Very limited in -water works may be required to facilitate the above noted repairs, and any in -water works will be completed in accordance with MNR Fishery Timing Window restrictions. Control of Flooding: The works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however the modifications will not alter the current hydraulic profile of the structures. Based on the above, no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are not anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. Any surrounding vegetation disturbed during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition using native plant and seed species. Appropriate containment measures will be used for any in -water works. 607 Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of MNR Fisheries Timing Window restrictions. Plantings Affected lands will be restored to pre - construction condition, however as the works proposed involve the repair of existing structures, no compensatory planting will be required. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34248 Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: June 28, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM Application #: 115/03/CAL 8.1.51 CORNELL ROUGE DEVELOPMENT CORP . To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Tributary C (Highway 7), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ministry of Transportation. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a triple cell culvert under Highway 7 on Tributary C, within the Cornell community of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Cornell Rouge Devt . Corp. Cornell Community Area 5 -PH1 Trunk Sewer STA . 0 +925 To STA. 1 +150, Drawing HP 1, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan , dated January 2004, date received June 24, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking , prepared by the applicant , dated July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a triple cell culvert under Highway 7 on Tributary C, within the Cornell community of Markham. The culvert is approximately 125m in length and extends from the south side of Highway 7 in a northwesterly direction, just past the location of the future Markham By -pass. On the south side of Highway 7, the culvert will tie into the proposed open 608 channel of Tributary C, which will then drain into a permanent stormwater management pond. The stormwater management pond and channel (part of a related permit application) along with the culvert under Highway 7, are required to service upstream residential development within the Cornell community, including draft plan of subdivision 19TM- 030006. The works are consistent with the The Cornell Community (Town of Markham) Master Storm Drainage and Stormwater Management Report (1996), prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan. It should be noted that the loss of fish habitat within Tributary C of the Little Rouge River and the construction of the on -line stormwater management pond within Cornell was authorized by the (then) Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) as part of Fisheries Act Authorization #525 -1342 (1999). Tributary C was identified by DFO as a highly altered agricultural watercourse, providing low quality fish habitat due to the lack of natural cover and straightened configuration. As compensation for the loss of fish habitat resulting from the construction of the on -line stormwater management pond, the construction of the Milne Reservoir Fishway was approved and undertaken, resulting in a net gain from a fisheries resources perspective. TRCA staff is currently reviewing the permit application for the open channel and stormwater management pond design, the details of which will likely be resolved in time for the permit to be considered at the next Executive Committee meeting. A permit has already been approved for a temporary diversion channel on Tributary C, south of Highway 7 (C- 04087), in preparation for the construction of the ultimate channel and pond. Due to the previous DFO authorization, the culvert under Highway 7 will be sized and configured appropriately from a hydraulic perspective only. Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff has confirmed that the triple cell culvert will provide the necessary hydraulic conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and the area will be extensively rehabilitated following the construction of the permanent channel and stormwater management pond. Plantings As there are additional works to be undertaken in the area in the immediate future, the restoration of the channel will be undertaken once the permanent channel and stormwater management pond are constructed. No additional plantings are required in the interim as the landscaping scheme will ensure that both the temporary and permanent channels are appropriately planted and restored, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. 609 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35599 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 25, 2004 Application #: 253 /04 /MARK 8.1.52 LINDVEST PROPERTIES (CORNELL) LTD. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, 10, Concession 9, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lindvest Properties (Cornell) Ltd. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sediment pond and outfall connecting to Tributary B in the Cornell community of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Red -line revised Topsoil Stripping & Pregrading Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, Drawing ES 2, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers , dated May 11, 2004, date revised June 30, 2004, date received June 30, 2004. • Red -line revised Erosion and Sedimentation Pond Construction Details , Drawing ES 3, prepared by Ecotech Consulting Engineers , dated May 11, 2004, date revised June 30, 2004, date received June 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sediment control pond and outfall connecting to Tributary B, in the Cornell community of Markham. TRCA staff is currently reviewing a permit application for the construction of a permanent stormwater management pond, open channel and outfall on Tributary B, but has not yet finalized the review of the related application. The TRCA has already approved a related permit for a temporary diversion channel on Tributary B (C- 04183) in preparation for the construction of the ultimate channel and stormwater management pond. Although the review of the ultimate channel and pond is not yet complete, the applicant has requested the consideration of this temporary sediment control pond permit in order to allow earthworks to be initiated on site. The temporary pond will be located within the ultimate stormwater management pond block and will tie into the existing culvert under Highway 407. 610 Control of Flooding: The temporary sediment pond will be located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River and TRCA water management staff has ensured that flows from the pond will not impact flooding upstream or downstream of the site. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected around the perimeter of the construction area in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. The temporary sediment control pond will contain all sediment produced from the proposed earthworks and prevent sedimentation of the downstream watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or slope stability concerns related to this proposal, nor are there any fisheries resources concerns. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored following construction, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Plantings A comprehensive restoration plan will be submitted as part of the open channel and ultimate stormwater management pond permit application. This plan will include plantings along the open channel and outfall, as well as within and along the banks of the stormwater management pond. In the meantime, all disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35601 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 28, 2004 Application #: 255 /04 /MARK 8.1.53 WISMER COMMONS DEV . GROUP CIO ANISON MANAGEMENT INC . To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 16, Concession 7, (northeast of McCowan Road and 16th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Wismer Commons Dev. Group c/o Anison Management Inc. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond outfall and sanitary servicing stream crossing of Robinson Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Wismer Commons Developments Pond 3 and Sanitary Outfall , prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , received May 25, 2004. 611 • Wismer Commons Developments Pond No . 3 and San . Outfall , General Plan , Drawing GP -1, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated March 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments Pond No . 3 and San . Outfall , Sanitary Tributary Areas, Drawing TA -1, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated April 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments Pond No . 3 and San. Outfall, External Sanitary Tributary Areas , Drawing TA -2, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , Plan and Profile Sanitary Sewer Outfall STA . 0 +000 To 0 +305.00, Drawing PP -1, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , Plan and Profile Sanitary Sewer Outfall STA . 0 +305.00 To 0 +432.198, Drawing PP -2, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated March 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , SWM Pond 3, Drawing SWM -1, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , SWM Pond 3, Sections 1 -1 to 3 -3, Drawing SWM -2, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , SWM Pond 3, Sections 4 -4 to 6 -6, Drawing SWM -3, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , SWM Pond 3, Sections 7 -7 to 9 -9, Drawing SWM -4, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , SWM Pond 3, Sections 10 -10 to 12 -12, Drawing SWM -5, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , SWM Pond 3, Control Flow Structure , Drawing SWM -6, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Wismer Commons Developments , Siltation Control Plan , Drawing SWM -7, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , dated May 2004, received May 25, 2004. • SWM Block 142, Drawing SWM -1, prepared by NAK Design Group , dated March 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Construction Details , Drawing D -1, prepared by NAK Design Groups , dated March 2004, received May 25, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking from the proponent to address outstanding minor ecology and engineering concerns , dated June 23, 2004, received June 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 612 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond outfall and sanitary servicing stream crossing of Robinson Creek. Both projects are required to service the residential development of draft plan of subdivision 19TM- 030008. The stormwater management pond is proposed on tableland, with the outfall connecting to the watercourse within the Robinson Creek valley. TRCA ecology staff has reviewed the outfall location and is satisfied with the proposed connection between the outfall and the valleylands. The sanitary sewer installation is proposed via directional drilling under the watercourse and the bore holes are proposed outside of the riparian zone; hence, there should be no impacts to Robinson Creek. Geotechnical information provided as part of this permit application shows that the soils in the vicinity of the crossing are capable of supporting the proposed tunneling methodology. However, the works will be carried out in accordance with the Ministry of Natural Resources' (MNR) timing window guidelines in order to prevent any negative impacts on the fisheries resources of the watercourse, should problems arise during the sewer installation. Control of Flooding: The stormwater management pond is located on tableland, with only the outfall proposed within the Regional Storm Floodplain. TRCA water management staff is satisfied that no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters will result from this proposal. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to isolate the work area and prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse.. Conservation of Land: The proponent has demonstrated that there should be no geotechnical concerns related to this proposal as the soils should support the proposed tunneling methodology. There are no slope stability concerns related to this proposal and the alteration of the watercourse (due to the construction of the stormwater management pond outfall) should have no impacts on the fish community of the area. A Letter of Advice will be issued by the TRCA on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for the outfall. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings The stormwater management pond and outfall will be restored and planted with nativq non - invasive vegetation following construction, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35487 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: June 28, 2004 613 Application #: 203 /04 /MARK CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.54 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (the area south of Castlemore Road, east of Airport Road at the future Williams Parkway crossing of the Humber River), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for bridge footings, road construction) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (bridge -30m clear span x 35m length) within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings , hydraulic analysis , and restoration plans ); dated July 5, 2004; received July 5, 2004; prepared by the City of Brampton . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal involves the construction of 1.7km extension of the Humberwest Parkway from Williams Parkway in the south to Castlemore Road in the north. The roadway will be built to facilitate four through lanes of traffic with provisions for the ultimate widening to six lanes. A key component of the project involves the crossing of a tributary of the West Humber River with an 30 metre open span x 35 metre length bridge. The span will accommodate 6 lanes. The location of the proposed bridge is within the Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process in 1997 and staff at that time worked with the municipality to locate the road outside the Fill Regulated Area on tableland. Control of Flooding: The City of Brampton has forwarded a Letter of Undertaking to provide the hydraulic analysis for the bridge structure. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. 614 Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). A Meander Belt Analysis was submitted to support the 30 metre clear span bridge. As recommended in the meander belt report, the bridge has been skewed across the watercourse in order that the bridge footings are placed parallel to the channel. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35191 Report Prepared by : June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 6, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Application #: 065 /04 /BRAM 8.1.55 REGION OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Region of Peel's easement in the Etobicoke Creek valley within the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) lands from Highway 401 in the south to just south of Derry Road in the north, between Dixie Road in the west and Bramalea in the East), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for trunk sewer installation for Sections S13A and S3; and for open cut crossings- Sheets 1 -23) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (manholes, bioengineering on restored banks) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (Etobicoke Creek at Crossings 8 -Sta.4 +560; 9 -Sta.4 +894; 10 -Sta. 5 +080; 11 -Sta. 5 +320; 12 -Sta. 0 +066; 13 -Sta. 0 +780; 14 -0 +955; 15 -Sta. 2 +230; 16 -Sta. 2 +483; and 17 -Sta. 2 +557) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through coffer dam /flume or coffer dam and pump methods to work in the dry. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated July 2, 2004; received July 2, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel . 615 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the twinning of the existing 1650 mm diameter trunk sewer with a 1950 mm diameter trunk sewer along the existing easement within the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) lands. Sections S13A and S3 run from Highway 401 in the south to just south of Derry road in the north, between Dixie Road in the west and Bramalea Road in the east. The trunk sewers that were constructed in the 1960s are nearing capacity and have the potential to surcharge or overflow during storm seasons. The installation of the trunk sewer in these sections will require 10 crossings of the Etobicoke Creek. The watercourse will be open cut in order to install the sewer. Coffer dams with flumes and pumps will be utilized in order to work in the dry. The project is located within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek. The entire Etobicoke Creek Sewer Twinning project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, cofferdam, pump, flume, wetland filter bag) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse during the open cuts. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The Etobicoke Creek will be open cut 10 times with either a dam and flume method or a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry. TRCA staff has been in consultation with Fisheries and Oceans staff (DFO) and it was agreed that this project would be handled as a mitigatable Harmful Alteration Disruption, Destruction of fish habitat. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34945 Report Prepared by : June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 6, 2004 616 Application #: 471/03/MISS CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.56 ONTARIO POWER GENERATION (PICKERING NUCLEAR ) To construct in a flood plain on Lot 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, Concession 1 BFC, (1675 Montgomery Park Road), in the City of Pickering, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Ontario Power Generation (Pickering Nuclear). The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront in order to facilitate the construction of a floating security barrier across the intake channel of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Figure 2, Layout of Barrier , prepared by the applicant , received June 28, 2004. • Figure 4, Barrier, prepared by the applicant , received June 28, 2004. • Magnified Plan View Showing the Piles , prepared by the applicant , received July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in Fill Regulated Area within the Lake Ontario Waterfront in order to facilitate the construction of a floating security barrier across the cooling water intake channel of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station. The purpose of the security barrier is to prevent unwanted watercraft from entering the channel and to act as a visual deterrent to the public. The Ontario Power Generation is concerned about preventing access to the intake channel and is confident that this structure will be sufficient in restricting access. A previous permit application for a floating seasonal ice barrier was approved by the Executive Committee in the fall of 2003, the construction and layout of which are similar to the proposal in question. The security barrier will be anchored at the same location as the seasonal ice barrier and will span the channel just inside the ice barrier. The security barrier is proposed to consist of a floating boom composed of a single aircraft cable and closed cell polystyrene sections spanning the intake channel and anchored above the water level on raised groins. Three additional aircraft cables, each approximately 3 feet higher than the last, will be strung across the channel, creating an access barrier approximately 10 feet in height. The barrier will be located greater than 85 m north of the mouth of the intake channel, hence protecting the floating barrier from the full effects of the lake waves and winds. No in -water construction works are proposed; construction access will be via barge. 617 Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff is satisfied that the floating security barrier will not cause any impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: TRCA technical staff is satisfied that there are there are minimal pollution concerns related to the project as no in -water works are proposed and that sediment and erosion control measures are neither practical nor required as part of the proposal. Conservation of Land: There are no significant natural features that will be negatively impacted by this project Further, there are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns related to the proposal. As the barrier will float on the surface of the intake channel, TRCA planning ecology staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts to fish passage. A Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of the Fisheries and Oceans Canada as the construction of the security barrier will not cause a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat. Plantings There are no natural features that will be negatively impacted by this proposal, hence additional compensatory plantings are not required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35607 Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 7, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN Application #: 257/04/PICK 8.1.57 BLOCK 11 PROPERTIES INC . To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lots 16 to 20, Concession 2, Planning Block 11 - bounded by Bathurst Street to the east, Dufferin Street on the west, Rutherford Road to the south and Major Mackenzie to the north, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1275621 Ontario Inc.; Venturon Development; Ankara Realty Ltd.; Woodvalley Developments; Nine -Ten West Limited; 1376018 Ontario Limited c/o UJA Federation of Greater Toronto; Senang Investments Ltd.; and Humbold Properties Ltd. The purpose is to alter a waterway and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to install temporary stormwater outlets and sediment ponds for the purposes of top soil stripping lands for the draft approved subdivisions within Planning Block 11, in the City of Vaughan. 618 The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking , prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , stating that the applicant will provide revised engineering drawings for TRCA , and will make necessary revisions of the plans , to the satisfaction of the TRCA , dated July 7, 2004, received July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate preliminary grading works associated with future subdivision developments within Planning Block 11 and to construct multiple temporary sediment control ponds and associated outfall structures. The subject lands are located within the area bounded by Bathurst Street to the east, Dufferin Street to the west, Rutherford Road to the south and Major Mackenzie Drive to the north. The temporary sediment ponds and outfall structures will capture storm and sediment runoff associated with preliminary grading works for the proposed subdivisions in Planning Block 11. For the most part, the temporary sediment ponds and their associated outfall structures will be located in the ultimate location of the stormwater ponds for the subdivisions. This will minimize the amount of disturbance to the lands as the temporary sediment ponds can then be converted into their permanent stormwater management pond counterparts at a later date. Furthermore, the applicant has attempted, where feasible, to locate the associated outfall structures within the location of the permanent outfall for the future stormwater ponds, in order to minimize disturbance to the valley corridor. It is also noted that smaller sediment ponds will be constructed on the site to capture runoff from a small drainage area. However, these ponds will be eventually decommissioned and the associated runoff from their respective drainage areas will be redirected to the permanent stormwater management ponds, in accordance with the Block 11 Master Environmental Servicing Plan. Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Management staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed regrading works and construction of the temporary sediment ponds and outfalls and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. 619 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The outfall structures for the temporary sediments ponds are located well away from the watercourse. As such, ecological staff has determined that the sediment pond outfalls will not impact fish habitat. To further minimize disturbance of natural features due to regrading works, the applicant has committed to the erection of permanent chain link and environment fencing throughout the site, in order to prevent machinery from disturbing and encroaching upon the valley corridor. Plantings At this time, only preliminary grading works are being conducted on the subject lands. Landscape plans will form part of the review for the associated permits that will be required for the construction of the permanent stormwater ponds and outfall structures. These plans will be reviewed by TRCA Ecological staff to ensure that they will conform to TRCA planting plan requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35617 Report Prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: July 7, 2004. Application #: 261 /04NAUG 8.1.58 BLOCK 12 PROPERTIES INC . C/O BRATTY & PARTNERS To alter a waterway on Lot 21 -25, Concession 2, (Block 12 - between Dufferin Street and Bathurst Street, and between Teston Road and Major MacKenzie Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Andridge Homes Ltd.; Midvale Estates Inc.; Major Bob Farms Inc.; Lindstone Development Corp.; Royal Garden Homes; Mayvon Investments; 371896 Ontario Ltd.. The purpose is to alter a waterway through the installation of temporary stormwater outlets and sediment ponds for the purposes of top soil stripping lands for the draft approved subdivisions within Block 12 in the City of Vaughan. Block 12 is bound by Major Mackenzie to the south, Teston Road to the north, Bathurst Street to the east, and Dufferin Street to the west. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking from Schaeffers Consulting , dated July 6, 2004, stating that the plans will be revised to TRCA 's satisfaction prior to the release of the permit . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 620 Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway through the installation of temporary stormwater outlets and sediment ponds for the purposes of top soil stripping lands for the draft approved subdivisions within Block 12 in the City of Vaughan. Block 12 is bound by Major Mackenzie to the south, Teston Road to the north, Bathurst Street to the east, and Dufferin Street to the west. Authority staff reviewed the draft plans of subdivision for Block 12 through the master environmental servicing plan and subdivision review processes, and recommended conditions of draft approval; the conditions stipulate that this permit be obtained. Another permit will be required for the permanent stormwater facilities at a later date. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place and maintained for the duration of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the proposal and no significant natural heritage features will be affected. Plantings At this time, only preliminary grading works are being conducted on the subject lands. Landscape plans, to staff's satisfaction, will form part of the review for the associated permits that will be required for the construction of the permanent storm water ponds and outfalls. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35637 Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: July 6, 2004 621 Application #: 272 /04/VAUG 8.1.59 BLOCK 18 PROPERTIES INC . To alter a waterway on Lot 16 - 20, Concession 3, Planning Block 18 - bounded by Dufferin Street to the east, a Canadian National Railway line to the west, Rutherford Road to the south and Major Mackenzie Drive to the north, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Great Gulf Holdings Inc.; Comenga Antonio & Rosetta; Senang Investments Ltd.; Fernbrook Homes (Major Mac) Ltd.; East Maple Creek Lands Ltd.; Ivy Glen Dev.; Firerose Investments; Arband Investments Ltd.; Block 18 Trees Inc.; Nine -Ten West Investments; 1275620 Ont. Inc.; Nino Betti. The purpose is to alter a waterway within the Don River Watershed in order to install temporary stormwater outlets and sediment ponds for the purposes of top soil stripping lands for the draft approved subdivisions within Planning Block 18, in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking , prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers , stating that the applicant will provide revised engineering drawings for the TRCA , and will make necessary revisions to the plans , to the satisfaction of the TRCA , dated July 6, 2004, received July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway within the Don River Watershed to facilitate preliminary grading works associated with future subdivision developments within Planning Block 11 and to construct multiple temporary sediment control ponds and associated outfall structures. The subject lands are located within the area bounded by Dufferin Street to the east, a Canadian National Railway line to the west, Rutherford Road to the south and Major Mackenzie Drive to the north. The temporary sediment ponds and outfall structures will capture storm and sediment runoff associated with preliminary grading works for the proposed subdivisions in Planning Block 18. For the most part, the temporary sediment ponds and their associated outfall structures will be located in the ultimate location of the stormwater ponds for the subdivisions. This will minimize the amount of disturbance to the lands as the temporary sediment ponds can then be converted into their permanent stormwater management pond counterparts at a later date. Furthermore, the applicant has attempted, where feasible, to locate the associated outfall structures within the location of the permanent outfall for the future stormwater ponds, in order to minimize disturbance to the valley corridor. 622 It is also noted that smaller sediment ponds will be constructed on the site to capture runoff from a small drainage area. However, these ponds will be eventually decommissioned and the associated runoff from their respective drainage areas will be redirected to the permanent stormwater management ponds, in accordance with the Block 18 Master Environmental Servicing Plan. Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Management staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed regrading works and construction of the temporary sediment ponds and outfalls and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The outfall structures for the temporary sediments ponds are located well away from the watercourse. As such, ecological staff has determined that the sediment pond outfalls will not impact fish habitat. To further minimize disturbance of natural features due to regrading works, the applicant has committed to the erection of permanent chain Zink and environment fencing throughout the site, in order to prevent machinery from disturbing and encroaching upon the valley corridor. Plantings At this time, only preliminary grading works are being conducted on the subject lands Landscape plans will form part of the review for the associated permits that will be required for the construction of the permanent stormwater ponds and outfall structures. These plans will be reviewed by TRCA Ecological staff to ensure that they will conform to TRCA planting plan requirements. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35618 Report Prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: July 7, 2004. Application #: 262 /04NAUG 8.1.60 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (King- Vaughan Road between Keele Street & Dufferin Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Vaughan. 623 The purpose is to construct structures (2 -900mm x 18m length culvert replacements; asphalt road; Valve Chamber No. 3) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse at Sta. 1 +760 (East Humber River Tributary) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) while working in the dry to remove 2- 600mm x 18m length culvert and replace with 2 -900mm x 18m length culverts. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated July 7, 2004; received July 7, 2004; prepared by the Region of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the installation of a 1200mm diameter watermain from the Maple Reservoir at the south -west quadrant of Keele Street and Teston Road, northwards along Keele Street, westwards along King- Vaughan Road and northwards along Bathurst Street. This permit application deals only with the section along King - Vaughan Road between Keele and Bathurst Streets. The proposal is to install a 1200mm diameter watermain, Valve Chamber Number 3, upgrade the road and replace the existing culverts. There are three culvert crossings along this stretch of King- Vaughan Road, however, only one at Station 1 +760 has defined beds and banks and it is also associated with a Regional Storm Floodplain of a tributary of the East Humber River. The entire stretch is not located within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed 1200mm diameter watermain will be installed below existing culvert at Station 1 +760, Station 2 +730 and 4 +500. The City of Vaughan has also proposed the removal and replacement of the existing twin 600mm diameter culverts with twin 900mm diameter culverts at Station 1 +760. This is the only culvert that is regulated. The other two culverts on King Vaughan Road (Sta. 2 +730, 4 +500) will be removed and replaced, however, those culverts are not within a Fill Regulated Area, do not have Regional Storm Floodplains, nor do they have defined beds or banks of a watercourse. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: The Region of York has forwarded a Letter of Undertaking to provide the hydraulic analysis. Staff does not anticipate a concern since the culverts at Station 1 +760 will be up- sized. Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. 624 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, dam and pump) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse during installation of the watermain and the culverts. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be altered temporarily in order to install the new culverts in the dry in the same location as the existing culverts. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. The Environmentally Significant Area, Provincially Significant Wetland, Area of Natural and Scientific Interest at Station 1 +760 and at Station 4 +500 will be protected with silt fence during construction. This section of King- Vaughan Road is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine within the "Natural Core Area" designation. The watercourse crossing has been identified as a hydrologically sensitive feature. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35331 Report Prepared by : June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 7, 2004 Application #: 116/04/VAUG 8.1.61 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Bathurst Street -from King- Vaughan Road northwards to TRCA's watershed divide at Bloomington Side Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. 625 The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for 1200mm watermain installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (Valve Chamber Number 4) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse temporarily at Station 13 +500 (East Humber River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) by either an open cut crossing through utilizing existing twin culverts as flumes in order to work in the dry, or by tunnel crossing, depending on the timing of the removal and replacement of existing culverts at Station 13 +500. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated July 7, 2004; received July 7, 2004; prepared by the Region of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the installation of a 1200mm diameter watermain from the Maple Reservoir at the south -west quadrant of Keele Street and Teston Road, northwards along Keele Street, westwards along King- Vaughan Road and northwards along Bathurst Street to the watershed divide at Bloomington Side Road. This permit application deals only with the section along Bathurst Street from King Vaughan Road in the south to the watershed divide at Bloomington Side Road in the north. The proposal is to install a 1200mm diameter watermain in a Fill Regulated Area and Valve Chamber Number 4 within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The watercourse at Station 13 +500 will be altered temporarily. The existing culverts will act as flumes in order to install the watermain in the dry in conjunction with the roadworks involving the culvert removals and replacements. Should the timing of the roadworks not coincide with the watermain, the watermain will be tunnelled underneath the culverts The roadworks will be conducted under another permit file, CFN 34565. There are five culvert crossings along this stretch of Bathurst Street, however, only two at Stations 13 +500 in the north and 12 +070 further south have defined beds or banks. The East Humber River at Station 13 +500 in the north is also associated with a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the East Humber River. The rest of the area along Bathurst Street is not located within a Fill Regulated Area nor a Regional Storm Floodplain. The proposed 1200mm diameter watermain will be installed below the existing culverts at Stations 13 +500, 13 +160, 12 +070 and 10 +760. At Station 10 +125 the watermain will be installed above the existing culvert. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. 626 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The East Humber River at Station 13 +500 will be diverted temporarily through the existing culverts in order to install the 1200mm watermain in the dry. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Alternatively, the watermain will be tunneled under the culvert if the timing of the roadworks does not coincide with the watermain. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. The wetlands in the south at Stations 12 +070 at 10 +760 will be protected by a silt fence during construction. This section of Bathurst Street is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine within the "Settlement Area" designation. The watercourse crossings have been identified as a hydrologically sensitive features. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35390 Report Prepared by : June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 7, 2004 Application #: 150 /04/VAUG 8.1.62 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on (Keefe Street - from Teston Road northwards to King- Vaughan Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to alter a watercourse temporarily at Station 4 +050 (East Humber River Tributary 1) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) by an open cut crossing utilizing a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 627 • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated July 7, 2004; received July 7, 2004; prepared by the Region of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the installation of a 1200mm diameter watermain from the Maple Reservoir at the south -west quadrant of Keele Street and Teston Road, northwards along Keele Street, westwards along King- Vaughan Road and northwards along Bathurst Street to the watershed divide at Bloomington Side Road. This permit application deals only with the section along Keele Street from Teston Road in the south to King Vaughan Road in the north. The proposal is to install a 1200mm diameter watermain. There are four crossings along this stretch of Keele Street, however, only two at Stations 2 +670 in the south and Station 4 +050 in the north have defined beds or banks. For the northerly area the crossing will be via an open cut. The consultant was unable to locate any existing culvert and the intermittent watercourse will need to be temporarily altered in order to work in the dry. For the southerly crossing the watermain will be installed above the existing culvert. This stretch of Keele Street is not located within a Fill Regulated Area or a Regional Storm Floodplain. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: This stretch of Keele Street is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The intermittent watercourse at Station 4 +050 will be temporarily altered in order to install the watermain in the dry. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. The Provincially Significant Wetland at 628 Station 4 +050 will be protected by a silt fence during construction. The northerly section of Keele Street is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine within the "Natural Linkage Area" designation. The watercourse crossings have been identified as a hydrologically sensitive features. Section 41 of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan indicates in Subsection 5 that transportation and infrastructure may be permitted to cross hydrologically sensitive features (i.e. watercourses) subject to the tests and best management practices described in section 41(5)(a to e). This project has been reviewed under the Environmental Assessment Act, Ontario Regulation 158 and under the Fisheries Act for the tests and best management practices. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35417 Report Prepared by : June Murphy , extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 7, 2004 Application #: 164/04/VAUG 8.1.63 VITO PAPASODARO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Plan 65M -3001, (106 Abbruzze Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vito Papasodaro. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a retaining wall and drainage pipe on an existing residential lot The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Cross - Section , prepared by V . Papasodaro , received by the TRCA June 30, 2004, redline revised to indicate the use of armourstone blocks . • Profile, prepared by V V. Papasodaro , dated June 21, 2004, received by the TRCA June 30, 2004. • Site Plan , prepared by V . Papasodaro , received by the TRCA July 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 629 Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a retaining wall and drainage pipe on an existing residential lot. The proposed retaining wall measures approximately 2.3 metres in height, and 21.3 metres in length. The drainage pipe will be installed to protect the stability of the retaining wall and eliminate the risk of groundwater /surface water interaction by collecting any seepage and directing it to a man -made swale . The retaining wall will be located between two existing residential lots and will not be located on the valley slope. The proposed works are sufficiently set back from the top of bank and are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA visited the subject property and are satisfied that there will be no geotechnicaVslope stability issues associated with the proposed works. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the development, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no significant natural features on the property that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E - Property Improvement and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35468 Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: July 7, 2004 Application #: 190 /04/VAUG 8.1.64 WINDLEIGH MILLENIUM INC . To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 8, 9, Concession 7 Lot 10, 10A, 11, 12, 12A, 12B, 13, 13A, 14, Plan M -1110, (northeast corner of Islington Avenue and Willis Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1593527 Ontario Inc.. The purpose is to construct a 148 -unit, 5- storey condominium apartment building and associated underground parking and surface parking lot, in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River watershed; the site is designated Special Policy Area by the City of Vaughan Official Plan. 630 The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking from 1593527 Ontario Inc ., dated July 6, 2004, stating that all TRCA comments will be addressed . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a 148 -unit, 5- storey condominium apartment building and associated underground parking and surface parking lot, within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River. The site is located within a Special Policy Area (SPA), as designated in the City of Vaughan Official Plan. The building and associated underground parking garage will be flood proofed to the Regional Storm Flood Elevation, in accordance with SPA criteria. No significant natural heritage features will be affected by the project Authority staff are also reviewing the proposed works through the site plan application review process as facilitated by the City of Vaughan. The proposed works commenced in advance of an Ontario Regulation 158 permit being issued. A violation notice has been issued. The approval of this permit will resolve the violation. Further, this application is subject to an additional fee for the violation. Control of Flooding: Authority Water Management staff are satisfied that the proposed works are designed appropriately so as not to negatively affect the control of flooding. A structural engineer has provided written confirmation, on behalf of the applicant, that the condominium structure will be able to withstand the depths and velocities of Regional Storm flood waters. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and no significant natural heritage features will be affected. Plantings A landscape plan will be implemented on site, upon completion of the project, to the satisfaction of Authority staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. • 631 CFN: 35515 Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: June 8, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX Application #: 221 /04/VAUG 8.1.65 RANDY EADIE To construct in a flood plain on Lot 6, 7, 8, Concession 3 Lot 4, 5, Plan 639, (114 Church Street), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Randy Eadie. The purpose is to construct in a floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling within the Pickering Village Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site and Grading Plan , prepared by Hunt Design Associates Inc ., dated April 2004, received June 23, 2004. • Front Elevation , prepared by Hunt Design Associates Inc ., dated April 2004, received June 23, 2004. • Right Side Elevation , prepared by Hunt Design Associates Inc ., dated April 2004, received June 23, 2004. • Left Side Elevation , prepared by Hunt Design Associates Inc ., dated April 2004, received June 23, 2004. • Rear Elevation , prepared by Hunt Design Associates Inc ., dated April 2004, received June 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct of a single family dwelling in the Pickering Village Special Policy Area (SPA). The property is located on the west side of Church Street, north of Highway 401, within the Town of Ajax. The proposal involves the demolition of an existing house and the construction of a new two- storey, single family detached dwelling. The house is located entirely within the SPA and will be appropriately floodproofed to the350 year storm elevation, plus adequate freeboard, an acceptable standard under the SPA policies. The property is located approximately 50 metres from the edge of Duffins Creek. 632 Control of Flooding: TRCA engineering staff has confirmed that the house will be appropriately floodproofed to the 350 year storm elevation, plus freeboard. A structural engineer has confirmed that the house design will be able to withstand the depths and velocities of flooding in a Regional storm event. All excavated material is to be removed from site. TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the house. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries concerns related to this proposal. Further, there are no significant natural heritage features that will be impacted by the proposed development. All disturbed areas will be appropriately stabilized following construction Plantings There will be no impacts to existing vegetation or other natural heritage features, hence no additional plantings are required Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35597 Report Prepared by : Lorenzo Nicolet , extension 5314 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: June 25, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Application #: 251 /04 /AJAX 8.1.66 BETHEL CANADIAN REFORMED CHURCH To alter a waterway on Part Lot 29, Concession 2, (11251 & 11265 Bayview Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bethel Canadian Reformed Church. The purpose is to alter a watercourse in order to construct a storm sewer outfall to facilitate the development of a new church building and parking lot partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of a tributary of the Rouge River. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 633 • Overall Site and Grading Plans , Drawing Nos . 02044 -SP101 and 02044- SP102, Revision No . 6, prepared by Reinder and Reinders Ltd . revised as received on June 30th, 2004. • Tree Preservation and Landscape Details , Drawing Nos . 02044 -LS1 and 02044 -LS2, Revision No . 4, prepared by Reinders and Reinders Ltd . revised as received on June 30th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct a storm sewer outfall in order to service a new church building and parking lot on the subject lands which are partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The site is not fill regulated. The proposal is the subject of a recent site planning process which included an Ontario Municipal Board Appeal which has now been resolved In order to construct the church building minor grading will occur at the flood fringe and at the location of the parking lot edge. The building and parking lot will be setback in excess of 30 metres from the watercourse and the riparian zone will be re- established to improve conditions on the site. The site is occupied by two residential dwellings which will continue to be utilized as part of the church use. These residential dwellings are located on either side of the tributary and one building is accessed via an existing laneway which crosses the tributary. However, the tributary its associated floodplian and buffer will be set aside in an open space designation and will be planted in accordance with detailed landscaping plans. An easement to protect the stream corridor has also been granted to the TRCA. Control of Flooding: The applicant proposes minor regrading at the fringe of the Regional Storm Floodplain in order to ensure that the parking lot facility will remain protected. The building and other existing structures are beyond the wide shallow floodplain on the subject lands. Given the wide and shallow nature of the floodplain, staff are satisfied that the proposed grading scheme will have no measurable impact on the control of flooding. Pollution: The storm sewer outfall will consist of a biofilter for water quality treatment in addition to a 2 metre rubble swale underlain with an infiltration trench and a perforated PVC subdrairt This will ensure treatment and cooling of stormwater prior to entering the adjacent tributary. Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the construction area to the satisfaction of the TRCA staff. As a result there should be no impact on the control of pollution during the construction of the facility. Conservation of Land: The riparian zone of the watercourse is currently manicured. As a requirement of the new use, the riparian zone will be re established with the planting of native plant material in accordance with a detailed landscape plan submitted by the applicant 634 Plantings The applicant proposes to restore the riparian zone of the watercourse through the planting of several native species to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 3.2.2 Stream Corridors, Wide Shallow Floodplains, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program which allows for minor grading at the flood fringe of wide shallow flood plains and the connection of storm outfalls where absolutely necessary. The works do not constitute a Harmful Alteration Disruption or Destruction (HADD) to fish habitat and therefore Fisheries and Oceans Canada approval is not required CFN: 35389 Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: July 7, 2004 635 Application #: 149/04/RH RES. #B147 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Adele Freeman. Appointment of Enforcement Officer to administer Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation (Ontario Regulation 158) . Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Adele Freeman be appointed as an Enforcement Officer for the purpose of enforcing Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterway Regulations (Ontario Regulation 158) made by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), pursuant to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Conservation Authorities Act provides for a conservation authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to enforce its regulations. There are several TRCA staff who currently have this designation, both for the purpose of enforcing TRCA's regulations and for authorizing the issuance of permits approved by the Executive Committee under the regulation. RATIONALE Adele Freeman has been fulfilling the role of Acting Director Watershed Management Division since May 19, 2004. In this position she is responsible for overseeing TRCA's regulation services associated with the review and approval of applications. The appointment as Enforcement Officer will enable her to authorize the issuance of approvals for work and will allow her to assist in the enforcement of the regulation as required. On occasion Emergency Permits are issued and the Director of the Watershed Management Division is required to issue these. Report prepared by : Brian Denney , extension 6290 For Information contact : Brian Denney , extension 6290 Date: June 21, 2004 RES. #B148 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: WEST DON RIVER WATERSHED FLOODLINE MAPPING UPDATE Approval to retain MacViro Consultants Inc. to complete the floodline mapping update of 16 map sheets for the portions of the West Don River watershed north of Steeles Avenue. Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor 636 THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with MacViro Consultants Inc . to complete the floodline mapping update for 16 new digital sheets within the Don River watershed as a maximum upset limit of $39,995 exclusive of applicable taxes . CARRIED BACKGROUND In the late 1970's, the TRCA undertook an extensive program to prepare flood and fill line mapping for all watercourses under TRCA jurisdiction. The Regulatory Floodlines for each watercourse were established from water surface profiles generated by the HEG2 hydraulic model. The floodlines, which were normally plotted on 1:2000 scale mapping, formed the basis of flood and fill line regulations. Currently, one of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by the TRCA staff and others and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management Group has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update TRCA's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation Mapping. The focus of this assignment is to update 16 floodline map sheets for the Don River watershed (West Branch, North of Steeles Ave.), and to create digital and geo- referenced floodlines. The main tasks will entail the conversion of the existing HEC -2 model to HEC -RAS (updated version of the hydraulic software package currently used by TRCA), the generation of updated flood levels and the plotting of updated Regional Storm floodlines on digital mapping. The new digital mapping will improve modelling and data management capabilities and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up -to -date floodplain information required for regulation purposes. RATIONALE Five (5) consultants, as listed below, were invited to submit proposals for the project based upon the Terms of Reference for the work. The criteria included the requirement to have previous experience in the area of floodline mapping and familiarity with state -of- the -art approaches. MacViro Consultants Inc. Marshall Macklin Monaghan Earth Tech Canada Inc. Environmental Water Resources Group Planning & Engineering Initiatives Ltd. $34,995 + GST $35,000 + GST $34,435 + GST (Did not submit due to workload and t /ming issues) $30,420 + GST *A contingency of $5,000 has been added to the consultant costs as an extra for field work, geodetic cross - section confirmation and /or low flow survey if required. 637 MacViro Consultants Inc. recently completed four (4) TRCA hydraulic floodplain peer review assignments and are nearing completion of the Digital Floodline Mapping Update for the Don River, south of Steeles Ave. Their existing knowledge of TRCA floodline mapping, extensive experience in floodplain hydraulics and resources will enable them to complete the update to our satisfaction. Staff are confident that the chosen consultant will conduct the required tasks in a timely and cost effective manner. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project are available within the approved 2004 Floodplain Management budget account #127 -10. A maximum upset limit of $39,995 exclusive of applicable taxes has been set for this project. Report prepared by : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 For Information contact : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 Date: June 25, 2004 RES. #B149/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: HIGHLAND CREEK FLOODLINE MAPPING UPDATE Approval to retain Earth Tech Canada Inc. to complete the floodline mapping update of 27 map sheets for the entire Highland Creek watershed. Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with Earth Tech Canada Inc . to complete the floodline mapping update for 27 new digital sheets within the Highland Creek watershed at a maximum upset limit of $44,275 exclusive of applicable taxes . CARRIED BACKGROUND In the late 1970's, the TRCA undertook an extensive program to prepare flood and fill line mapping for all watercourses under TRCA jurisdiction. The Regulatory Floodlines for each watercourse were established from water surface profiles generated by the HEG2 hydraulic model. The floodlines, which were normally plotted on 1:2000 scale mapping, formed the basis of flood and fill line regulations. Currently, one of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by the TRCA staff and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management Group has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update TRCA's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation Mapping. 638 The focus of this assignment is to update 27 floodline map sheets for the Highland Creek watershed, and to create digital and geo- referenced floodlines. The main tasks will entail the conversion of the existing HEC -2 model to HEC -RAS (updated version of the hydraulic software package currently used by TRCA), the generation of updated flood levels and the plotting of updated Regional Storm floodlines on digital mapping. The new digital mapping will improve modelling and data management capabilities and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up -to -date floodplain information required for regulation purposes. RATIONALE Five (5) consultants, as listed below, were invited to submit proposals for the project based upon the Terms of Reference for the work. The criteria included the requirement to have previous experience in the area of floodline mapping and familiarity with state -of- the -art approaches. MacViro Consultants Inc. Marshall Macklin Monaghan Earth Tech Canada Inc. Environmental Water Resources Group Planning & Engineering Initiatives Ltd. $39,985 + GST $40,000 + GST $39,275 + GST (Did not submit due to workload and timing issues) $34,260 + GST *A contingency of $5,000 has been added to the consultant costs as an extra for field work, geodetic cross - section confirmation and /or low flow survey if required. Earth Tech Canada Inc. recently completed similar floodplain mapping projects for the City of London and Lakehead Region Conservation Authority (LRCA). Their existing knowledge of TRCA flood line mapping, extensive experience in floodplain hydraulics and corporate resources will enable them to complete the update to our satisfaction. Staff are confident that the chosen consultant will conduct the required tasks in a timely and cost effective manner. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete this project are available within the approved 2004 Floodplain Management budget account #127 -12. A maximum upset limit of $44,275 exclusive of applicable taxes has been set for this project. Report prepared by : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 For Information contact : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 Date: June 25, 2004 RES. #8150/04 - PETTICOAT CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGY UPDATE To retain the consulting services of Greenland International Consulting Ltd. to prepare the Petticoat Creek Watershed Hydrology Update 639 Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Toronto and Region Authority (TRCA) retain Greenland International Consulting Ltd. to undertake the Petticoat Creek Watershed Hydrology Update at a maximum upset limit of $14,000 inclusive of GST . CARRIED BACKGROUND The TRCA has identified a need to develop a calibrated hydrologic model for the Petticoat Creek watershed. The hydrologic model for the Petticoat Creek watershed was originally formulated in 1979 by James F. MacLaren Ltd. In the 1990's, Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd. completed the "Hydrology & Hydraulics Update for Main Petticoat Creek" as part of the "Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the Altona Forest Area". In 2002, a portion of the model was updated by XCG Consultants Ltd. using the Visual OTTHYMO (Version 2.0) software in order to complete the "Environmental Master Servicing Plan for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood ". However, the XCG model was not calibrated or validated with measured flow data therefore is limited in utility for watershed planning purposes Due to recent developments in the Petticoat Creek watershed and a scheduled update of TRCA floodline and regulation line mapping for Petticoat Creek, a need has been identified to develop a new watershed hydrology model. Newly available streamflow and precipitation data for the watershed will allow calibration of the model to validate its use in predicting flows for the floodplain mapping update. RATIONALE Requests for proposals were sent to six (6) consulting firms that were know to have relevant experience in the field of hydrology: XCG Consults Ltd., Marshall Macklin Monaghan, Stantec Consulting Ltd., Earth Tech, Greenland International Consulting Ltd. and Schaeffers Consulting Engineers. An upset limit of $14,000 including GST has been established for the project. XCG Consults Ltd. and Earth Tech declined our invitation to submit a proposal. The remaining four (4) consultants submitted proposals, as follows (inclusive of GST): Marshall Macklin Monaghan $14,000 Stantec Consulting Ltd. $13,980 Greenland International Consulting Ltd. $11,000 Schaeffers Consulting Engineers $12,522 Based on the pre - established proposal criteria, Greenland International Consulting Ltd. was selected as the preferred consulting firm. The Greenland team is comprised of qualified staff with relevant and technical expertise in watershed modelling. In addition, Greenland submitted the lowest quote while still meeting the proposed project deadlines and deliverables FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding from the Region of Durham (account code 127 -85) is available to undertake the project. 640 Report prepared by : Grace Tesa , extension 5659 For Information contact : Grace Tesa , extension 5659 Date: June 22, 2004 RES. #B151/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE MIMICO CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGY UPDATE Approval to retain the consulting services of Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. to prepare the Mimico Creek Watershed Hydrology Update. Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Toronto and Region Authority (TRCA) retain Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd . to undertake the Mimico Creek Hydrology Update , at a cost not to exceed $30,000 exclusive of GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The current hydrologic model for the Mimico Creek watershed was originally developed in the late 1970's by MacLaren Limited and is based on the HYMO computer program. Since the original development of the model, the HYMO program has been updated and replaced by the Visual OTTHYMO (Version 2.0), which is a Windows based program capable of more accurately reflecting urban catchments. Additional issues have arisen, which contribute to the need for an update to the hydrologic model. Recent developments within the Mimico Creek watershed need to be incorporated into the model. Also, the completion of the City of Toronto's Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP) has provided new information that will contribute to more accurate model results, such as revised catchment area delineation, and updated land use information. New streamflow and precipitation data has also become available which may be used to further calibrate and verify the model's performance. For example, in May 2000 there was a critical storm event resulting in flooding at several locations throughout the Mimico Creek watershed. The data from this storm event can be used to further calibrate and verify the performance of the model. It is important to revise the existing model with new data to reflect current conditions. This project will provide a greater understanding of the current hydrology within the Mimico Creek watershed which will enable the TRCA to revise and improve various watershed management objectives. 641 RATIONALE Requests for proposals were sent to three (3) consulting firms that were known to have relevant experience in the field of hydrology. Proposals were reviewed based on technical expertise, proposed approach, previous experience relating to hydrology and cost (as indicated below). Based on the review criteria MMM was selected as the preferred consulting firm. The firm has extensive experience in the area of hydrologic modelling and with similar projects conducted within the TRCA's jurisdiction. Staff are of the opinion that this amount represents good value for the extent of work requested. Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. $30,000 Sernas Associates $27,288 Philips Engineering $29,810 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding from the Region of Peel and City of Toronto is available to undertake this project. Report prepared by : Laurian Farrell , extension 5601 For Information contact : Laurian Farrell , extension 5601 Date: June 25, 2004 RES.#B152/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: OFFICE SPACE LEASE - DOWNSVIEW PARK Contract confirmation. Update on lease of office space at Downsview Park and confirmation of the award of contracts for telecommunications and office equipment. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THAT the decision of staff to award contracts for telecommunications and office equipment for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) leased office space at Downsview Park be confirmed . CARRIED RATIONALE At its meeting held April 30, 2004, the Authority approved Resolution #A112/04 which directed staff to enter into a 5 -year lease of office space at Downsview Park, subject to agreement on terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA. Staff have successfully completed these negotiations and the lease has been signed. Office space for approximately 50 work stations has been established in an area over one and a half floors totalling about 10,000 square feet. This includes meeting rooms and common areas such as washrooms and storage areas. Parking is included in the lease. 642 The target date to begin moving staff into the new office space is July 14, 2004. Delays in finalizing the list of staff who are to relocate to Downsview resulted in staff having to proceed to award contracts for telecommunications and office equipment without Executive Committee approval. Staff have tendered for office equipment for the Downsview Park office in accordance with the TRCA Purchasing Policy. Three bids were received as follows: A & D Enterprises Blair's At Work Office Equipment Addmore Office Furniture $76,122 61,401 72,105 Staff have awarded the contract to Blair's At Work Office Equipment, it being the lowest bid which met or exceeded all of the TRCA specifications. Time is of the essence to meet the July 14th target date. The contract had to be awarded no later than June 18th to ensure delivery. Accordingly, the Director, Finance and Business Development authorized the contract. Staff considered several options with respect to provision of telecommunications equipment The most efficient solution is to connect the Downsview Park office to the TRCA private branch exchange service at head office (Norte) Option 11C switch with Meridien Mail). The head office PBX currently serves Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Boyd office. With a modest upgrade, the TRCA's PBX can provide needed service to Downsview. Service and maintenance of TRCA's PBX is through Telus. Under terms and conditions of the service contract and industry standards, it is not possible to get competitive bids for the Downsview office project. Staff solicited a bid from Telus for provision of the needed upgrades and new equipment. This bid was tested by staff against known industry pricing and was found to be competitive. The total cost of equipment including installation is about $79,000. Staff asked for and received quotations from Telus Financial Services for leasing of the equipment over the five years of the office lease. Staff considered several leasing options including fair market value (FMV) lease and various purchase options. After considering the changing nature of the technology, staff concluded that the FMV leasing option was the most cost effective solution. After 5 years, it is anticipated that the fair market value will be minimal and TRCA will have the option to buy the equipment at that time. More likely, the equipment will be obsolete and TRCA will be looking at different technology. Time is of the essence to have the equipment installed. The Director, Finance and Business Development approved the 5 -year lease with Telus at a monthly cost of $1,380.82 plus applicable taxes. This is a total obligation of $81,468.38 over 5 years. FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of the office equipment is part of the capital budget for the Downsview Office project. Funds are in the 2004 major facilities retrofit budget. The telecom leasing costs are included in the operating budget. 643 Report prepared by : Jim Dillane , extension 6292 For Information contact : Jim Dillane , extension 6292 Date: June 28, 2004 RES. #B153/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES CONFERENCE ON WATER GOVERNANCE AND MEETINGS WITH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN THE UK Permission to travel to Scotland to attend the American Water Resources Conference on Water Governance and to meet. with United Kingdom water management experts. Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Gary Bowen , Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watershed Specialist , Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and Dr. Douglas Dodge , a volunteer on the Duffins Creek Watershed Task Force , be authorized to attend the American Water Resources Conference on Water Governance and participate in technology transfer workshops with United Kingdom watershed experts between August 20, 2004 and September 2, 2004, at a cost of approximately $6,000, including applicable taxes . CARRIED BACKGROUND The American Water Resources Association (AWRA) is an internationally recognized water management organization with the specific mandate of transferring emerging technical knowledge in the area of water resources management, through conferences, magazines and technical journals. The AWRA is hosting in August 2004, an international conference in Dundee, Scotland entitled, "Good Water Governance for People and Nature: What Roles For Law, Institutions, Science & Finance ". The conference theme of governance was chosen by the AWRA to build upon environmental declarations and decisions made in Johannesburg, Bonn, and Kyoto, and to significantly enhance the global debate on critical water governance issues and to engage water professionals across interdisciplinary boundaries. Sessions at the conference will address water governance at the national and international level, and emerging integrated water resources management issues. Since many presenters on the AWRA program are from North and South America, Asia, Africa and Central Europe, attending the conference will serve to further expand on a global basis, the sphere of discussion and interaction concerning The Living City programs. The first conference paper describes how TRCA manages water resources in the Toronto region under The Living City sustainability initiative. Our second paper outlines the community -based approach for watershed management employed in the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds. Proceedings from the AWRA conference are distributed across the globe and are used extensively as resource material for water resources studies. 644 Dr. Doug Dodge, a retired Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources fisheries scientist who has been volunteering his time for the past four years in the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds, is attending the conference. Through his overseas contacts we are able to maximize the benefits of travelling to Scotland by adding a few days to meet with aquatic scientists and watershed managers from the nearby English borders and southern Scotland. Dr. Dodge has been planning this part of the trip and has arranged meetings with UK experts who prepared: the European Union Water Framework Directive; internationally renowned coordinators of the Rivers Trusts Association; and Directors of the Tweed River Foundation, a not - for - profit organization that funds and undertakes river restoration projects. At each of these meetings, TRCA staff and Dr. Dodge will present material on watershed planning in Ontario, including overviews of the Toronto Waterfront Aquatic Habitat Restoration Strategy and fisheries management strategies. Similar technical presentations by UK watershed experts are planned and will allow for technology transfer. Field visits are being arranged to see first hand the successful techniques that have been employed to manage these world class trout streams. FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of this trip including airfare, accommodations, car rental and the AWRA conference registration is estimated at approximately $6,000 which is available in the Watershed Management Division budget. Report prepared by : Gary Bowen , extension 5385 For Information contact : Gary Bowen , extension 5385 Date: June 28, 2004 RES. #B154/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (March, 1993) Status Report on Outstanding Expropriations and Other Litigation Matters, CFN 23218. Update on status of proceedings with respect to lands expropriated and other litigation matters in the Humber Bay Shores area (Etobicoke Motel Strip) of the City of Toronto. Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the report dated June 29, 2004, regarding the current status of proceedings with respect to lands expropriated and other litigation matters in the Humber Bay Shores area (Etobicoke Motel Strip ) of the City of Toronto be received . CARRIED 645 RES. #B155/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TOWARDS A GOLDEN HORSESHOE GREENBELT : GREENBELT TASK FORCE DISCUSSION PAPER Summarizing the contents of the Greenbelt Task Force Discussion Paper and outlining the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's comments for submission to the province. Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall WHEREAS the Greenbelt Task Force Discussion Paper is compatible with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 's (TRCA) draft Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy and The Living City in that they each recognize : 1) the importance of taking a systems approach to protecting natural heritage and biodiversity ; and, 2)each recognize the multiple benefits to be achieved from a healthy environment that contributes to a high quality of life for residents , such as clean air and water , recreational opportunities and fostering a sense of community ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA advise the Minister of Municipal Affairs that TRCA supports the general directions of the Greenbelt Task Force Discussion Paper, which will have major implications for the future quality of life for residents of southern Ontario ; THAT staff comments and recommendations on the Greenbelt Task Force Discussion Paper, as outlined in this report , be endorsed by the Authority and submitted to the province by the commenting deadline of July 16, 2004; THAT the province consider the inclusion of groundwater in the Natural Resources layer of the greenbelt plan and protection of significant areas based on the results of the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition /York Peel Durham Toronto groundwater studies ; THAT within TRCA watersheds , the Target System of the TNHS Strategy be protected as the minimum for the "Environmental Protection " layer of the greenbelt , and that staff append to the submission to the province the draft Toronto and Region Terrestrial Natural Heritage System (TNHS) Strategy; THAT the province make available , prior to any final decisions being made on a Greenbelt its proposals for comprehensive transportation and growth management plans for south - central Ontario , which recognise existing approved municipal growth management studies and planning documents ; and also that there should be a review of the environmental assessment process to ensure that the consideration of alternatives reflects emerging technologies , innovative designs and especially an appropriate balance of roads and transit ; THAT the TRCA supports the Task Force view that the Greenbelt not be intended as primarily a land reserve for a future transportation /utilities corridor and that stringent need /alternatives assessment provisions for these uses be included as part of the Greenbelt Plan ; 646 THAT the TRCA supports the Task Force recommendations on agricultural lands to be protected , with the caveat that the financial and infrastructure supports necessary to ensure the sustainability of near -urban agriculture must be included as part of the implementation of a Greenbelt Plan ; and that the GTA Agricultural Action Plan be used as the basis to develop and implement sustainable agricultural policies and practices . THAT in addition to the proposed review of the financial tools available to protect agricultural lands , the province also include in that review financial tools that serve other environmental purposes , including the natural heritage system and source water protection , and that a clear distinction be made between income tax incentives and property tax incentives ; THAT aggregate extraction be excluded as a permitted use in the "environmental protection " layer of the greenbelt ; that the higher threshold for tests required to permit aggregate extraction , as found in the ORMCP , be required for extraction within the greenbelt plan area ; and, that new stricter requirements for rehabilitation of older pits that pre -date the Aggregate Resources Act be considered ; THAT, as one example of lands to be included in the Culture , Recreation and Tourism layer of a Greenbelt Plan , the Humber River and associated lands including the Boyd Conservation Area , Kortright Centre for Conservation (future home of The Living City Centre) and the McMichael Gallery in Kleinburg be protected and designated as a special Greenbelt Area ; THAT the province finish the model site alteration and tree cutting by -laws that were being prepared for the ORM and require them for use in the greenbelt plan area as well ; THAT TRCA supports the task force recommendation that the greenbelt be implemented through provincial legislation that creates a Greenbelt Protection Plan and that extensive consultation be held with implementing agencies to determine the most effective means for achieving conformity in municipal official plans ; THAT TRCA staff be given the opportunity to make a presentation on the TNHS Strategy to the Greenbelt Task Force and appropriate provincial representatives ; AND FURTHER THAT this report be circulated for information to TRCA 's municipal partners, the members of the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition , Conservation Ontario and MPPs within TRCA watersheds . CARRIED BACKGROUND On December 16, 2003, Bill 27, an "Act to establish a greenbelt study area and to amend the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act" was introduced into the legislature by the provincial government. TRCA staff reported on this proposed Act at Authority Meeting #1/04, held on January 30, 2004, wherein Resolution #A22/04 was approved in part as follows: ...THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA advise the Minister of Municipal Affairs that TRCA, in principle, supports Bill 27, Greenbelt Protection Act 2003; 647 THAT staff be directed to assist in the deliberations on the establishment of a greenbelt by providing information and expert advise on terrestrial and aquatic resources and opportunities for protection; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to work with the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition to further this initiative and to report back as necessary. The province subsequently appointed a task force in February, 2004 to develop recommendations on how the province could most effectively establish a permanent Golden Horseshoe Greenbelt. Task force members with conservation authority affiliation include Russ Powell, Chief Administrative Officer of Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and Deborah Schulte, member of the Humber Watershed Alliance. On May 13, 2004 the task force released their discussion paper and began a series of consultation sessions, both public evening sessions and day -time sessions for invited stakeholders. TRCA staff attended several of the stakeholder sessions to provide input at the facilitated workshops. The discussion paper has been posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry for 60 days with comments due by mid -July. SUMMARY OF THE GREENBELT TASK FORCE DISCUSSION PAPER The paper sets out a broad vision and goals recommending that the greenbelt be a permanent and sustainable legacy that will enhance the quality of life for current and future residents by serving an array of functions, while recognizing the projected population increase of up to three million people within the region over the next thirty years. The task force considered five "layers" of functions for the proposed greenbelt: 1) environmental protection 2) agricultural protection 3) transportation and infrastructure 4) natural resources, especially mineral aggregates, and 5) culture, tourism and recreation. Two overarching themes are also noted as needing to be integrated into greenbelt considerations: a growth management plan for the central Ontario region, which is currently under development by the Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal; and, implementation and administration approaches, models and tools for establishing and administering a greenbelt Source Water Protection and Planning Reform (Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement review) are noted as other initiatives which could influence the proposed greenbelt The Five Layers of a Greenbelt The section on Environmental Protection seeks to protect and enhance core water and land areas and the linkages between them, including linkages to Lakes Ontario and Simcoe; to enhance biodiversity and connectivity; and, to contribute to clean air and water, scenic landscapes and outdoor recreation opportunities. The recommendations are similar to the format of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan in that a "systems" approach is proposed to include a natural heritage system, a water resources system, landform conservation and a network of open spaces. The discussion paper recommends that the greenbelt be integrated with the broader water resources system being developed through source water protection and watershed management Implementation tools proposed include planning controls, a parks and trail strategy, an acquisition and stewardship strategy, and tree conservation and site alteration by -laws. The proposed approaches to environmental protection would define a 648 system of natural and hydrological features and functions that "should" include provincially significant features, functions and connections between them and "could" include regionally significant features and functions. Additionally, a two -tier hierarchy of protection is proposed whereby very limited new uses (i.e. conservation uses) could occur in the most sensitive areas and a variety of compatible uses could occur in the less sensitive areas. The section on Agricultural Protection proposes to permanently protect critical areas such as specialty crop areas, including the Holland Marsh and the Niagara tender fruit and grape lands. Large areas of prime agricultural lands are also recommended for permanent protection in the greenbelt. A comprehensive review that assesses intensification and redevelopment opportunities in existing urban areas is proposed as a requirement prior to expanding urban boundaries into prime agricultural lands. The task force recognizes the issue of economic viability of agricultural lands and recommends a review of taxation policies and other financial tools to support agriculture. The section on Transportation and Infrastructure recommends that the greenbelt not be viewed as a land reserve for future infrastructure needs but that it be permitted where a demonstrated need exists, within the context of an improved environmental assessment process, the provincial growth management plan and with an appropriate balance of roads and transit The section on Natural Resources relates primarily to aggregate resources and the need for their protection for long term use as close to market as possible. A more rigorous approach to rehabilitation and a provincial review of the licensing process to facilitate new supply and ensure the integrity of hydrological and ecological systems are the basis of the proposed approach for natural resources in the greenbelt. The section on Culture, Tourism and Recreation notes the importance of cultural landscapes, public open spaces and conservation areas in promoting healthy lifestyles, greenbelt - compatible economic opportunities and community character. The task force recognizes that the close proximity of these amenities to existing urban areas contributes to residents' quality of life and that expanding urban areas to accommodate continuing population growth could degrade these amenities. The task force recommends promotion and marketing initiatives to support a network of public and private recreation, tourism and cultural heritage related activities and destinations. The final section of the discussion paper addresses greenbelt administration and implementation options, including a review of related Ontario situations such as the Niagara Escarpment Plan (NEP) and the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP), as well as other greenbelt models from other provinces and the United States. The approaches for administration and implementation proposed by the task force includes: legislation coordinated with the provincial growth management initiative to ensure permanence of the greenbelt through consistency in policy applidation, while having regard to regional differences; a Greenbelt Protection Plan that knits together the NEP, ORMCP and other appropriate lands to be administered by municipalities through consistent incorporation into their official plans; an appellate tribunal; involving a stakeholder working group to take task force recommendations to fruition; being subject to monitoring performance standards and a 10 -year review; and, fiscal measures concerning conservation and agricultural viability, including special incentives for landowners for restoration, protection and stewardship of their properties. 649 TRCA STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS ON THE GREENBELT DISCUSSION PAPER TRCA supports and commends the task force on the following specific points addressed in the Greenbelt Task Force Discussion Paper: • the need for a "systems" approach to protecting natural heritage and biodiversity; • the recognition that a healthy, functioning natural environment is an essential component to a high quality of life for area residents by providing additional benefits such as clean air and water, recreational and educational opportunities and fostering community pride through scenic landscapes and a sense of place; • the need to permanently protect high quality agricultural lands for agricultural use • that a permanent greenbelt should be implemented through a legislated Greenbelt Protection Plan which would be administered by municipalities through incorporation into municipal official plans; and, • that additional, necessary non - regulatory means of implementing a greenbelt plan are recommended such as financial and tax incentives for private land stewardship, agricultural land protection and urban intensification and brownfields redevelopment While TRCA supports the general directions of the discussion paper, it is a fairly broad document whose ultimate implementation can benefit from the specific work undertaken through TRCA's TNHS Strategy. The TNHS Strategy is based on four years of intensive ground - truthed field data, a peer- reviewed and scientifically defensible methodology and an approach that is compatible with similar work being undertaken by our sister conservation authorities. The key conclusions of the TNHS Strategy are that the current amount of natural cover within TRCA's jurisdiction, at 17 %, is continuing to decline in quality and native biodiversity. An increase in the terrestrial natural heritage system to 30% of the land base is required to withstand the pressures of the anticipated population growth of three million people. From this perspective, TRCA staff provide the following detailed comments on the Greenbelt Task Force Discussion Paper. Vision and Goals The vision for the Golden Horseshoe Greenbelt is that it will be a "permanent and sustainable legacy for current and future generations ". The TNHS Strategy clearly and scientifically shows that the current amount of natural cover within TRCA's jurisdiction is not sustainable even for the current population, let alone for the projected growth. Staff recommends that, within its watersheds, the Target System of the TNHS Strategy be protected as the minimum for the "Environmental Protection" layer of the greenbelt, and that staff append to the submission to the province the draft Toronto and Region Terrestrial Natural Heritage System (TNHS) Strategy. Background and Context This section notes that the Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal is developing a growth management plan that will target areas for intensification and transit investment in an effort to reduce the demand for new land. While TRCA supports this direction, which must address the potential "leapfrog" effect of a greenbelt on urban growth patterns, the current unavailability of this key document leads to the analysis of the greenbelt paper in a vacuum. Staff recommends that when the province releases its Greenbelt Protection Plan for consultation, based on the work of the Greenbelt Task Force, that it also make available the growth management plan so that informed analysis based on full knowledge of all relevant factors can be considered. 650 Environmental Protection The proposed approach of the task force to environmental protection is to define a system of natural and hydrological features and functions that "should" include provincially significant features and functions such as the Oak Ridges Moraine, Niagara Escarpment, Rouge Valley and the connections between them such as the major river valleys connecting to Lakes Ontario and Simcoe. They further recommend that the system "could" include regionally significant features and functions such as portions of the Lake Iroquois shoreline. In the opinion of staff, this recommendation is clearly inadequate for the TRCA jurisdiction, as it barely even meets the status quo for environmental protection. Staff recommends the Target System of the TNHS Strategy be protected as the appropriate natural heritage system for the TRCA jurisdiction. The task force recommends a hierarchy of environmental protection, similar to the ORMCP, where only conservation- related new uses would be permitted in "sensitive areas" while a variety of compatible uses could be permitted in less sensitive areas. There needs to be a clear distinction made between "greenspace" protected for ecological purposes relative to greenspace protected as "open space" for recreational and other similar uses. The TNHS Strategy shows that even if all current environmental features (17% of TRCA jurisdiction) are protected, the quality of that natural system will continue to decline as urban growth continues and the current natural system is subject to increasing use pressures. For the approach proposed by the task force to work, staff recommends that the "sensitive areas" where only conservation- related new uses are permitted be defined as the Target System of the TNHS Strategy. One of the goals of the greenbelt is to protect, sustain and restore the ecological features and functions of the natural environment. Only the concept of protection of existing features and functions is dealt with in the approaches proposed for environmental protection. To fulfill the goal of sustaining and restoring a healthy natural heritage system, the Target System of the TNHS Strategy needs to be achieved. The financial incentives proposed to protect agricultural lands such as easements, land trusts and changes to tax policies and the property value assessment system, also need to apply to lands designated for the environmental protection layer. Staff recommends implementation of the Target System of the TNHS Strategy in order to achieve the complete task force goal of protecting, SUSTAINING and RESTORING the natural heritage system. Staff further recommends that in addition to the proposed review of the financial tools available to protect agricultural lands, that the province also include in that review financial tools that serve other environmental purposes, including the natural heritage system and source water protection. Staff also recommends that a clear distinction be made between income tax incentives and property tax incentives. Agricultural Protection The proposed approach of the task force to agricultural protection is to permanently protect the entire Holland Marsh and the Niagara tender fruit and grape lands plus other prime agricultural lands that are sufficiently large in area to support a viable agricultural economy. This is similar in concept to the TNHS Strategy approach of protecting a defined and targeted land base of sufficient size and quality to adequately sustain the resource in perpetuity. In that regard, staff supports the inclusion of all designated prime agricultural lands within its jurisdiction for protection, with the caveat that the financial and infrastructure supports necessary to ensure the sustainability of near -urban agriculture must be included as part of the implementation of a Greenbelt Plan. 651 The task force recommends that a provincial task force on agriculture be created immediately to develop agricultural policies that will ensure a viable agricultural industry across the greenbelt and the rest of Ontario. While this may be beneficial for the remainder of the province, it is redundant for most of the greenbelt lands as a GTA Agricultural Action Plan has recently been developed by the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) regional municipalities, the City of Toronto, the GTA Federations of Agriculture and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Staff recommends that the GTA Agricultural Action Plan be used as the basis to develop and implement sustainable agricultural policies and practices rather than creating a new task force to do this. Transportation and Infrastructure The discussion paper recommends that development of a greenbelt should not weaken existing provisions of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan or the Niagara Escarpment Plan. Staff agrees and recommends that the higher thresholds of approval established in the ORMCP and NEP for transportation, infrastructure and mineral aggregate resource uses be incorporated into a Greenbelt Protection Plan. Staff also agrees that there should be a review of the environmental assessment process to ensure that the consideration of alternatives reflects emerging technologies, innovative designs and especially an appropriate balance of roads and transit. Natural Resources The discussion paper recommends that high potential aggregate areas should be included in the greenbelt and protected from incompatible land uses, and that a more rigorous approach to rehabilitation is needed. Aggregate resources often have adverse impacts on local communities (including cultural landscape and haul route traffic/access road impacts) which need to be addressed carefully in opening any new or expanded facilities. With respect to aggregate resources, staff recommends that aggregate extraction be excluded as a permitted use in the "environmental protection" layer of the greenbelt; that the higher threshold for tests required to permit aggregate extraction, as found in the ORMCP, be required for extraction within the greenbelt plan area; and, that new stricter requirements for rehabilitation of older pits that pre -date the Aggregate Resources Act be considered. 652 The task force report deals with aggregate resources only in this section, but welcomes comments on other natural resources as well. Conspicuous by its absence in this section is groundwater resources and the issue of water balance for the health of the watersheds, and ultimately the protection of the Great Lakes. While mentioned in the environmental protection layer for its ecological functions, groundwater also needs to be addressed in the Natural Resources section for its role in municipal water supply for domestic uses, as well as its use for agricultural and recreational purposes. Major groundwater studies are currently being undertaken by the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition (CAMC) and their municipal partners (York, Peel, Durham and Toronto within the TRCA jurisdiction). Staff recommends that groundwater be included in the Natural Resources layer of the greenbelt plan and significant areas (such as recharge areas) be protected based on the results of the CAMC/YPDT groundwater studies. Culture, Recreation and Tourism The task force report correctly points out that these amenities, including conservation areas, contribute to a high quality of life and that continued urban expansion would likely degrade these existing areas at precisely the time when more are needed to serve a rapidly growing population. As a major land owner of ecologically significant land and provider of outdoor recreational /educational services and facilities, TRCA has a direct stake in ensuring the wise management and viability of these operations. TRCA agrees that one of the functions of the greenbelt should be to provide opportunities for compatible economic activities such as tourism and outdoor recreation, in order to provide for the long term prosperity and sustainability of the rural lands within the greenbelt It is important that lands within the environmental protection layer be carefully integrated with protected cultural and heritage landscapes and resources to strengthen the vitality, integrity and profile of the greenbelt. As one example, staff recommends that the Humber River and associated lands including the Boyd Conservation Area, Kortright Centre for Conservation (future home of The Living City Centre) and the McMichael Gallery in Kleinburg be protected and designated as a special Greenbelt Area. Administration and Implementation The task force recognizes that the vast majority of lands in the greenbelt are privately -owned and that both regulatory and non - regulatory approaches will be required to implement a greenbelt plan. In particular, conservation authorities are recognized for their role in public education, land stewardship and land securement. The report notes that certain lands within the greenbelt may be eligible for various means of tax relief or incentives such as the federal Ecological Gifts Program or provincial initiatives such as the Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program, the Conservation Land Tax Incentive Program or the Farm Property Taxation Policy. The report also recommends that special incentives to landowners for restoration, protection and stewardship of lands designated in the greenbelt area is required. Staff agrees that incentives such as tax relief is warranted for owners of private lands that have their uses restricted to provide public benefits, and that this is a necessary component of implementing a greenbelt plan. 653 Site alteration and tree conservation by -laws are proposed as some of the regulatory means of implementing a greenbelt These were proposed as part of the ORMC Act but their implementation was not fully completed. Staff recommends that the province finish the model site alteration and tree cutting by -laws that were being prepared for the ORM and require them for use in the greenbelt plan area as well. TRCA agrees with the task force proposal for greenbelt legislation that creates a Greenbelt Protection Plan. Our experience in implementation of the ORMCP has shown that a provincial regulation backed by legislation is much more effective in the protection of environmental features and functions than reliance on the Provincial Policy Statement or municipal official plans. Recent studies undertaken for the Niagara Escarpment Commission have found that the NEP /NEC has been more successful than local planning controls in preventing the introduction of non -farm residential uses and other urban uses into agricultural areas. Similarly, related studies have shown that the amount of loss of forest cover inside NEP lands is significantly Tess than study control areas outside the plan area, and that there is also a much higher rate of reforestation on lands within the NEP than on lands outside the plan area. It is important to note, however, that TRCA does not support a new commission to implement a greenbelt plan. We believe that the ORMCP model of requiring municipalities to amend their official plans in conformity with the regulation is the most effective mechanism for implementation. We do believe, however, that the process can be designed to be less onerous than what was required for the ORMCP. We also believe that conservation authorities need to be recognized for their expected role in implementation of a greenbelt plan as conservation authorities in the Toronto region have expended significant staff efforts and costs in the review of ORM applications and defense of the ORMCP at OMB hearings. Further, we advise caution with respect to "knitting together" the greenbelt plan with the ORMCP and the NEP. In our view, it will be simpler to establish a greenbelt plan first and assess possibilities for streamlining/knitting together at some future date. Staff supports the task force recommendation that the greenbelt be implemented through provincial legislation that creates a Greenbelt Protection Plan and that extensive consultation be held with implementing agencies to determine the most effective means for achieving conformity in municipal official plans. Report prepared by : David Burnett , extension 5361 For information contact : David Burnett , extension 5361 Date: June 28, 2004 654 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:17 a.m., on Friday, July 9, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks c. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/04 August 6, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #7/04, was held in the South Theatre , Black Creek Pioneer Village , on Friday, August 6, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member Frank Dale Member Rob Ford Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair REGRETS David Barrow Member Michael Di Biase Member Suzan Hall Member Dave Ryan Member RES. #B156 /04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Rob Ford THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6/04, held on July 9, 2004, be approved . SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B157 /04 - CARRIED APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; 656 (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (7.1.1 - 7.1.10, inclusive , and 7.1.40 - Peter & Shelley Cormier ), which are listed below . CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.1 HOLY APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC C /0 ASSYRIAN CHURCH To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 19, Concession 3, (161 Skyway Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Holy Apostolic Catholic c/o Assyrian Church. The purpose is to construct within the Flood Plain in order to facilitate the modification of the existing storm sewer outfall into Mimico Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . 02001 SPO, Overall Site Plan , prepared by Reinders and Rieder Ltd ., prepared June 8, 2004, received July 6, 2004. • Drawing No . T- 219.130 -1, City Standard Silt Fence Detail , prepared by City of Toronto , dated June 2001, received July 19, 2004. • Drawing No . 02001 -SK1, Improvement Works at Outfall , prepared by Reinders and Rieder Ltd ., dated July 23, 2004, received July 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to conduct some localized excavation within the Flood Plain in order to place a gabion basket at the base of the existing storm sewer outfall into Mimico Creek. The modification to the existing outfall is required to provide some needed energy dissipation and prevent the formation of an erosion gully. 657 Control of Flooding: The placement of the gabion basket would remain at grade level and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent watercourse. Conservation of Land: The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected to impact any significant resource features. Plantings New native tree and shrub plantings are proposed along the top-of -bank as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3., Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35642 - Application #: 273/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 26, 2004 7.1.2 ROBERT AND ANNABEL STRICKLAND To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 196, Part Block D, Plan 1686, (35 The Kingsway), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Robert and Annabel Strickland. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the reconstruction of an existing deck and pool, and the construction of a new shed. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . P -1, Proposed Pool , remodeling and Landscape Revision Plan , prepared by Robert Packham , dated April 2004, revised July 13, 2004, received July 13, 2004; • Drawing No . D -2, Proposed Pool /Deck and Retaining Section , prepared by Robert Packham, dated April 2004, revised July 6, 2004, received July 13, 2004; • Drawing No . D -3, Proposed Shed , dated April 2004, prepared by Robert Packham , revised July 6, 2004, received July 13, 2004; • Drawing No . D -4, Proposed Shed - NW Elevation , dated April 2004, prepared by Robert Packham, revised July 6, 2004, received July 13, 2004; • Drawing No . D -5, Proposed Shed - SE Elevation , dated April 2004, prepared by Robert Packham, revised July 6, 2004, received July 13, 2004; 658 • Letter from Terraprobe to Robert Packham , Review of Design Drawings , 35 The Kingsway, dated July 12, 2004, received on July 13, 2004; • Figure 5, Typical Crib Wall Section , prepared by Terraprobe , received on July 13, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to reconstruct an existing pool and deck structure, and construct a new shed in the rear yard of 35 The Kingsway, located north of Bloor Street and on the east side of The Kingsway. The existing deck and retaining structure for the pool is located over the top of bank and is deteriorating. The proposal is to utilize deeper cassions and a crib wall in a location closer to the tableland in order to provide a stronger foundation for a reconstructed pool and deck. The existing retaining wall will be removed and the slope restored to a more natural grade with a flexible growth medium. The shed is located on tableland and is sufficiently set back from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located in the Regional Storm Floodplain and will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A temporary sediment control fence will be installed to prevent construction debris from traversing the valley lands or entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: No significant natural resources will be impacted. A geotechnical analysis has been reviewed and approved by TRCA technical staff. The proposal is certified to be in conformance with the geotechnical analysis and will have no impact on the stability of the slope. Plantings Significant new native plantings are proposed on both the slope and tableland. A detailed landscaping plan will be reviewed and approved by TRCA staff prior to releasing the permit. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.E., Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35670 - Application #: 280/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 16, 2004 659 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.3 ANATOLY AND GALINA LANGER To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, Plan M -485, Part Lot 67, Plan M -275, Part Lot J, Plan M -289, (340 Riverview Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Anatoly and Galina Langer. The purpose is to place and excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a garage extension and a side addition onto the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No . A -1, Site Plan ; Drawing No . A -2, Plans Floor Plan ; Drawing No . A -3, Basement and Floor Plans ; Drawing No . A -5, Garage Addition ; Drawing No . A -6, South and North Elevations ; Drawing No . A -7; Elevations , all prepared by Maskow Associates Architect Inc ., dated June , 2004, received July 13, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a garage extension and a side addition onto the existing dwelling. The subject property is located east of Yonge Street and south of York Mills Road. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent ravine. Conservation of Land: All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features. Therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. 660 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.E., Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35673 - Application #: 285/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 19, 2004 7.1.4 LAYNE WOODWORKS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, Concession 1 EYS, (59 Plymbridge Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hillcrest School. The purpose is to excavate and place fill to construct a canopy on concrete piers over an existing sand box play area within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The proposed works will take place at the rear of an existing day care facility. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing A-0, Site Plan , prepared by Arencon Inc ., received June 25, 2004. • Footing details , prepared by Layne Woodworks , received June 25, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is the excavate and place fill to construct a canopy on concrete piers over an existing sand box play area at the rear of a day care facility. The works will take place within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located east of Yonge Street and south of York Mills Road. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent ravine. 661 Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings There are no plantings associated with this application. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35631 - Application #: 267/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 6, 2004 7.1.5 TIE AND LEANNE DOMI To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 5078, (11 Oxbow Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Tie and Leanne Domi. The purpose is to place fill within the Fill Regulated Area and construct within the flood plain of Wilket Creek in order to facilitate the installation of a sports court. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Partial Site Plan , prepared by Steven Frustaglio , received June 29, 2004, redlined revised by TRCA July 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of Wilket Creek (Don River Watershed). The applicant wishes to install a sports court having dimensions of 7.6 m x 14 m (25 ft. x 46 ft.) in the rear yard. The works include removing approximately 7 inches of top soil and placing a gravel base approximately 5 inches thick. A 1 -2 inch rubber surface would be placed on top of the gravel base creating the sport court. The surface of the sport court would meet the existing grades around the court. Control of Flooding: The sport court would remain at grade level and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. All excavated material will be removed from the site. 662 Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent watercourse. Conservation of Land: The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected to impact any significant resource features. Plantings No new plantings are proposed. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.4.2.E., Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35632 - Application #: 268/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 26, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 7.1.6 ANGELO LAPOSTA To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, Lot 20, 21, Plan 11, (17 Napier Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Angelo Laposta. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a one and a half- storey residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Site Grading and Servicing Plan , prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., dated April 2004, received by the TRCA July 16, 2004, redline revised to indicate the planting of native shrubs . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 663 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new one and a half- storey residential dwelling. TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. The proposed works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank and are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction, and until native shrubs are planted at the rear of the property, to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Minor landscaping will be conducted to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35674 - Application #: 288 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: July 19, 2004 7.1.7 CONSTANTINE AFENTAKIS To place fill within a regulated area on Block 11, Plan 65M -2666, (5655 Kirby Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Constantine Afentakis. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate landscaping in the northwest corner of the property and the construction of an addition and deck to the side of an existing single detached residential dwelling at 5655 Kirby Road in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 664 • Part print of survey , revised to illustrate the location and dimensions of the proposed addition and deck , received by the TRCA on July 23, 2004. • Sketch of the proposed addition and deck , received by the TRCA on July 23, 2004. • Description of Work , signed by C . Afentakis , dated July 20, 2004, received by the TRCA on July 23, 2004. • Part print of survey , revised to illustrate the location and dimensions of fill placement , received by the TRCA on July 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate landscaping in the northwest corner of the property and the construction of an addition and deck to the side of an existing single detached residential dwelling. The landscaping and the construction of the addition /deck commenced prior to receipt of a permit application by the TRCA. The permit application was submitted to resolve violations V2063 & V2064, issued 28 May 2003, and violation V2141, issued 20 April 2004. As the works commenced prior to the issuance of the necessary permit, this application is subject to an additional fee for the minor violations. The addition and deck will replace a previous room, which was located in the same approximate location as the new addition. The proposed landscaping, addition and deck are sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank, and are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. No significant natural features were affected by the works. Control of Flooding: The development is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from this project, as the location of the proposed works is over 175 metres from the watercourse. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and area satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the proposed works that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The northwest corner of the property will be planted with native, non - invasive woody species and seeded with wildflowers. 665 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35702 - Application #: 305 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: July 26, 2004 7.1.8 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 20, 21, Concession 2 , (Major Mackenzie Drive (between Station 4 +124.54 at Dufferin Street eastwards to Station 2 +140 at Bathurst Street) and northwards on Bathurst Street (between Stations 10 +021.98 and 10 +198.49)), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (900mm diameter watermain installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (Flowmeter Chamber at Station 10 +200 on Bathurst Street) within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans) dated June 29, 2004; received July 6, 2004; prepared by the Region of York . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the installation of at total of 2,200 metres of 900mm diameter watermain along Major Mackenzie Drive from Dufferin Street in the west to Bathurst Street in the east, and northwards on Bathurst Street for the last 140 metres. There are 7 culvert crossings proposed by the watermain. In all instances the watermain will be installed via an open cut method over the existing culverts. There will be no inwater works since the existing culvert will act as a flume to carry the flows while installing the watermain. Only two of the crossings just west of Bathurst on Major Mackenzie at Station 2 +900 and just north of Major Mackenzie on Bathurst at Station 10 +070 are within Fill Regulated Areas and Regional Storm Floodplains of the Don River. A third culvert in the west at Station 4 +080 is located with a Fill Extension Area. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. 666 Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, catch basin covering) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The watermain will be installed above all 7 of the existing culverts. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat Toss. The project has been determined to be not a Harmful Alteration Disruption, Destruction of fish habitat, therefore, no Letter of Advice will be issued by the TRCA. The Ministry of Natural Resources has advised that timing restrictions will not be required for the open cut installation since there will be no inwater works. The proposed works will impact no significant resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35543 - Application #: 231/04NAUG Report Prepared by : June Murphy , extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 27, 2004 7.1.9 ROBERT FIGLIOMENI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 65M -2989, (166 Deerchase Circle), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Robert Figliomeni. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a two- storey residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Legal Survey , prepared by Rowan - Stanciu Ltd ., dated July 9, 2004, received by the TRCA July 15, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing . • Site Plan , Drawing No . A -1, prepared by Gorman Mazzon Limited , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA July 15, 2004. • Building Section , Drawing No . A -10, prepared by Gorman Mazzon Limited , dated March 2004, received by the TRCA July 15, 2004. 667 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new, two - storey residential dwelling. The subject property is part of an existing residential subdivision in the City of Vaughan. All works are sufficiently setback from the valley corridor and are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. Conservation of Land: All works are sufficiently setback from the valley corridor and are consistent with existing development within the corridor reach. TRCA staff is confident that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35672 - Application #: 289 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: July 19, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 7.1.10 JOE FERIOZZO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 36, Plan 3805, (102 Duncan Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Joe Feriozzo. 668 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to construct a single family dwelling, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Lot Grading and House Siting Plan , Drawing GS , prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Ltd, dated June 10, 2003, received July 02, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a two - storey single family dwelling, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The existing dwelling will be demolished and minimal grading will be required on site The subject property is located over 200m from the Don River and the associated valley /stream corridor. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, therefore there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The works are proposed over 200m from the watercourse and are separated from the valley /stream corridor by adjacent residential development Hence, there shall be no impacts to the watercourse and sediment and erosion control fencing is not required. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project. Further, there are no natural heritage features on or adjacent to the property that may be negatively impacted by the proposed works. Plantings As there will be no impacts to existing vegetation, no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35622 - Application #: 264/04/RH Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 27, 2004 669 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #B158/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (7.1.11 - 7.1.33, with the exception of 7.1.20 - Paul Bigioni , which was withdrawn ), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 7.1.11 CITY OF BRAMPTON To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 13, Concession 3 Plan 43M -1431, (Dixie Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to construct within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regulatory Floodplain, and alter a watercourse, to facilitate a construction of a culvert (pedestrian bridge) crossing of a tributary of Etobicoke Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Piotr Szponar , P.Eng., Rand Engineering , dated August 4, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application is to permit the construction of a culvert crossing (traversing a tributary of Etobicoke Creek) to provide pedestrian access from Dixie Road to proposed City of Brampton sports facilities and an existing public school located north of Sandalwood Parkway, west of Dixie Road, in the City of Brampton. This crossing has been identified by the City of Brampton as being of high importance to provide for a safe pedestrian link to these amenities on the west side of Dixie Road. Works associated with the sports facility, including regrading of lands within a Fill Regulated Area, and construction within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regulatory Floodplain will be addressed through a separate, future permit application. The proposed culvert will be designed to provide for a low flow channel and will be complimented by riparian plantings which will provide a component of the compensation for the works proposed. 670 Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) staff have visited the site with TRCA staff and have requested the opportunity to review this application. At this time it is not known whether DFO Authorization will be required for these works, and, should this be required, this TRCA permit will not be released until such time as DFO staff have provided their clearance. Control of Flooding: Based on the design of this culvert crossing, no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of the MNR fisheries timing window. Plantings Plantings of native, non - invasive riparian plant species are to be provided directly adjacent to the proposed crossing. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35507 - Application #: 217 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: July 26, 2004 7.1.12 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, 4, 5, Concession 4 EHS Part Lot 13, 14, Plan 43R- 23887, (407 and Dixie Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to excavate and place fill material within a Fill Regulated Area and partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a site access road and outfall channel at the southeast quadrant of Dixie Road and Highway 407, in the City of Brampton. The access road and outfall channel are to service associated recreation and sports fields on the subject lands. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. 671 • Letter of undertaking from M . Toccalino, of NAK Design Group , dated August 3, 2004 to address all outstanding TRCA Engineering issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a site access road and outfall channel partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with Etobicoke Creek. The proposed works are to service the associated sports and recreation fields on the subject property. Please note, that the works proposed with this application are associated with permit C- 04218, approved by the Executive Committee on July 9, 2004. Due to the number of site access constraints on the subject property, a minor cut and fill project within the Regional Storm Floodplain is required to facilitate the construction of the access road. Please note, that TRCA technical staff has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the proposed works will not adversely affect the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters within this reach of the watercourse affected by this project. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not impact the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters associated with Etobicoke Creek. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are proposed, and will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. In addition, all areas proposed to be disturbed will be restored to pre - construction conditions. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this application. Plantings As no significant vegetation will be removed and/or damaged through this project, no compensatory plantings are required. Vegetation affected by this project will be replaced with native and non - invasive plant species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1.2. (B) - New Resource -Based Uses and Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35687 - Application #: 297 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: July 28, 2004 672 7.1.13 REGION OF PEEL To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, 15, Concession 6 EHS, (7795 Torbram Road), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill material to facilitate the construction of a regional waste management facility partially located within a Fill Regulated Area excavate and place fill material to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond and its associated outfall partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain; and to undertake minor excavation and filling within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Mimico Creek, located at 7795 Torbram Road in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking from Rick Knight , P.Eng., from Marshall Macklin Monoghan , dated July 26, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and planning ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of constructing a regional waste management facility partially located in a TRCA Fill Regulated Area, as well as constructing a stormwater management pond, and its associated stormwater outfall, both located partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Mimico Creek. In addition, due to the challenges presented on the subject property which include lot configuration, required setbacks due to the location of public infrastructure (storm sewers, watermains, hydro facilities and roads), and the land area required to facilitate the proposed operations, a minor cut and fill project within the Regional Storm Floodplain is required. Please note that TRCA staff have determined that the proposed works will not adversely affect the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. In addition, compensation in the form of additional riparian zone plantings are proposed with this application. Control of Flooding: The proposed works associated with this application are not expected to adversely impact the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are proposed, and will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. In addition, all areas proposed to be disturbed will be restored to pre - construction conditions. 673 Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. Please note that a naturalized stormwater outlet design, including compensatory riparian zone plantings, are proposed with this application. The proposed outlet design and plantings will significantly add to the ecological function of the stream corridor on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this proposal. Plantings All proposed plantings will be native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Sections 4.1 (New Development) and 4.3 (Infrastructure and Servicing) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35486 - Application #: 202 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: July 23, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 7.1.14 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Block G, Plan 382, Part 3 Plan 43R -4497, (Darcel Avenue), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Mississauga. The purpose is to place fill material within a Fill Regulated Area and to construct in a floodplain associated with Mimico Creek, in order to repair an existing storm sewer outlet at 7230 Darcel Avenue, City of Mississauga. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Plan View , prepared by L . Kan, dated July 21, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on July 23, 2004. • Site Details , prepared by L . Kan, dated July 21, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff on July 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 674 Proposal: The proposal is to repair an existing storm sewer outlet, which conveys stormwater runoff at 7230 Darcel Avenue, in the City of Mississauga. The existing storm sewer outlet has recently collapsed and is presently impeding the conveyance of storm water flow from the an adjacent parking lot on the subject property. As a result, pooling of water is presently occurring in the parking lot and the subject property is susceptible to more significant flooding during frequent storm events. Therefore, an emergency works approval has been issued to the City of Mississauga to initiate the repairs in advance of the permit approval. Control of Flooding: This project involves the replacement of the existing outlet structure with a structure of equivalent size. As a result, TRCA technical staff are satisfied that the new storm sewer outlet will not result in any negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of water flow. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan forms part of this permit, and will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur. Conservation of Land: The proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this application. An Authorization from the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is not required for this proposal and TRCA staff will issue a Letter of Advice on behalf of DFO upon release of the permit. Plantings As no significant vegetation will be removed or damaged through this project, no compensatory plantings are required. Vegetation affected by this project will be replaced with native and non - invasive plant species. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35693 - Application #: 301/04/MISS Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: July 28, 2004 7.1.15 REGION OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, Concession 3, 4, 5 , (in the Region of Peel's existing easement from Highway 407 in the north to south of Tranmere Drive /Derry Road in the south, between Tomken Road in the west and just east of Dixie Road in the east), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. 675 The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for 1050mm diameter trunk sewer installation for Section S13B; and for open cut crossings -See Sheets 24 -34) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (manholes, bioengineering on restored banks) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (Etobicoke Creek at Crossings 18 -Sta. 2 +800; 19- Sta. 2 +900; 20 -Sta. 2 +940; 21 -Sta. 3 +620; 22 -Sta. 4 +320; 23 -Sta. 4 +660; 24 -Sta. 4 +840; 25 -Sta. 4 +880;) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) via an open cut method through coffer dam /flume; coffer dam /diversion; cofferdam /pump or coffer dam - 60/40 split method to work in the dry. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated July 28, 2004; received July 28, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the twining of the existing 1050 mm diameter trunk sewer with a 1050 mm diameter trunk sewer along the existing easement in Section 13B which runs from Highway 407 in the north to just south of Tranmere/ Derry Road in the south, between Tomken Road in the west and Dixie Road in the east. The trunk sewers that were constructed in the 1960s are nearing capacity and have the potential to surcharge or overflow during storm seasons. The installation of the trunk sewer in these sections will require 8 crossings of the Etobicoke Creek. The watercourse will be open cut in order to install the sewer. Either a cofferdam/ flume, cofferdam /diversion, cofferdam /pump or cofferdam /60 -40 -split will be utilized in order to work in the dry. The project is located within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek. The section of the Etobicoke Creek Sewer Twining project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, cofferdam, flume, diversion channel, pump, wetland filter bag) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse during the open cuts. 676 Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The Etobicoke Creek will be open cut 8 times with either a cofferdam /flume; cofferdam /diversion; cofferdam/ pump or coffer dam and 60 -40 split method in order to work in the dry. TRCA staff has been in consultation with Fisheries and Oceans Canada staff (DFO) and it was agreed that this project would be handled as a mitigatable Harmful Alteration Disruption, Destruction of fish habitat. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authoritys Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 32786 - Application #: 015 /02 /MISS Report Prepared by : June Murphy , extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: July 27, 2004 7.1.16 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To place fill within a regulated area on (1900 Sismet Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area to facilitate the construction of a Regional Odour Control Facility within a Fill Regulated area, outside of the Regulatory Floodplain in the City of Mississauga. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Arbinder Hundal , P.Eng., KMK Consultants , dated August 4, 2004 to address outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 677 Proposal: This project involves the construction of an odour control facility on the subject property, adjacent to Etobicoke Creek, in the City of Mississauga. This facility will provide odour treatment for the southern portion of the Region of Peel's sanitary sewer system, and will connect to an adjacent sanitary sewer line under Sismet Road, which is located within Etobicoke Creek valley. This project was subject to an environmental assessment, and due to the locational requirements of the facility (must be located in the correct area of the sewershed) this subject site was selected as being the preferred location. This site is directly adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek valley, and due to size constraints of the property, part of the proposed building will be located Tess than 10 metres from the established top of bank. TRCA staff have worked with the Region of Peel to establish the best possible siting of the building on the property, and TRCA staff are satisfied that geotechnical concerns have been adequately addressed. As compensation for the reduced setbacks, native vegetation will be planted adjacent to top of bank in currently disturbed areas. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain. As a result, no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. Any surrounding vegetation disturbed during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. Plantings Affected lands will be restored to pre - construction condition. Additional plantings, including more than 50 native trees and shrubs will be planted within an area of approximately 150 square metres between the building and the top of bank. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.- New Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35552 - Application #: 239/04/MISS Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: July 27, 2004 678 CITY OF PICKERING 7.1.17 REGION OF DURHAM To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 18, 19, Concession 3, 4 , (on Brock Road at CP Rail, south of Taunton Road; and at Urfe Creek on Old Taunton Road, east of Brock Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Durham. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (to construct grade separator under CP rail, for berms on both sides of Brock Road north of tracks, for temporary Brock Road detour to the east; for storm sewer outfall to Urfe Creek on Old Taunton Road; for construction of new east and west lanes of Brock Road north of tracks, for storm sewer installations on Brock and Old Taunton Roads) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures ( berms, asphalt paving on new Brock Road, headwalls for storm sewer outfalls) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse ( Urfe Creek) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) through connecting a storm sewer outfall. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated July 27, 2004; received July 28, 2004; prepared by the Region of Durham . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the construction of a subway -type grade separation (roadway approximately 5 metres depth maximum under existing railway) on Brock Road at the CP tracks south of new Taunton Road and north of old Taunton Road. Berms are to be constructed on both sides of Brock Road in the floodplain of Urfe Creek which are required to prevent spill from the creek entering into the depressed roadway beneath the railway during significant storm events. A temporary detour road will be required east of the grade separation while it is under construction. A temporary rail detour will also be required. To provide drainage for the underpass, an 825mm storm sewer is proposed to direct drainage easterly along Old Taunton Road in the south to a storm outlet on the west bank of Urfe Creek several hundred metres downstream of the Brock Road grade separator. The location of the grade separator 112 is within a Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area of Urfe Creek on Brock Road. The location of the outfall is also within a Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area of Urfe Creek on Old Taunton Road. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process for Taunton Road (28424) which received approval in 1989. Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics for the proposed structures and has determined that there will not be any negative impacts to flooding. 679 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, excavated sediment trap, trench plugs, rock flow check dams) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. A storm sewer outfall will be constructed to Urfe Creek. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 31952 - Application #: 015/01/PICK Report Prepared by : June Murphy , extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: July 27, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.18 AARON NEUFELD To construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, Plan 5982, (7 York Valley Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Aaron Neufeld. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a new dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Drawing No . 1, Elevations ; Drawing No . 2; Main Floor Plans ; Drawing No . 3, Basement Plans ; Drawing No . 4, Second Floor Plan ; Drawing No . 5, Sections and Elevations ; Drawing No . 6, Site Plan - Notes and Details ; prepared by Aaron Neufeld , received August 4, 2004. • Proposed Landscape Plan , prepared by Jonas Adda Landscape Planning Ltd ., dated August 3, 2004, received August 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 680 Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new dwelling and pool within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Flood plain area of the Don River. The subject property is located east of Yonge Street and south of York Mills Road. The existing dwelling will be demolished All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed dwelling and all openings will be situated the Regional Storm elevation. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained until all works have been completed Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. The applicant will be submitting a landscape plan which will meet the landscaping requirements of the TRCA and the City of Toronto Urban Forestry Services. Plantings All plantings will consist of native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. - Replacement Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35675 - Application #: 287/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 19, 2004 7.1.19 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on (Leslie Street north of Eglinton Avenue), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to repair an existing culvert over a tributary of Wilket Creek, under Leslie Street, south of Lawrence Avenue East. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Drawing Nos . 405 -1 and 405 -2, prepared by TSH , dated August 2004, received August 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 681 Proposal: The proposal is to repair an existing 2,400 mm culvert located over a tributary of Wilket Creek, under Leslie Street, south of Lawrence Avenue East and install a concrete invert slab with embedded river -run stone. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and sediment control fencing) will be implemented and maintained during construction to work in the dry and prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Vegetation removed will be minimized and replaced, and landscaping will be enhanced. There will be no impacts to fish habitat. Construction will take place within the fisheries timing window. A letter of advice will be issued for the proposed works. Plantings Woody vegetation will be planted to restore the site to better than existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3., Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34999 - Application #: 008 /04/TOR Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: March 24, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.20 PAUL BIGIONI To place fill within a regulated area on Part 1 Part Block J, Plan 1538, (25 Kingsbury Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Bigioni. • Withdrawn CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.21 BELL CANADA To place fill within a regulated area on (Cherry Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bell Canada. 682 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Floodplain of the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the placement of an underground conduit structure (duct) using the open trench method and the directional bore method. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Drawing No . 401 -403, Cross Sections , prepared by Plantec Consulting Engineers dated July 29, 2004, received August 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Floodplain of the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA). The proposed works involve the placement of an underground conduit structure (duct) using the open trench method and the directional bore method. The proposed works will take place at Cherry Street, south of Polson Street and under the shipping channel. Control of Flooding: No excavated material is to be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain and all existing grades are to be maintained. There will be no impact to the storage or conveyance to flood waters. Pollution: The bore pit locations and manholes are sufficiently set back from the top of bank and will be encircled by sediment and erosion control fencing during construction. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Conservation of Land: There are no instream works or impacts to riparian vegetation. The proposed conduit will be 2.5 metres below the shipping channel. There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. The works will take place within the warm water fisheries timing window. Plantings The applicant proposes new plantings and will restore the site. Policy Guidelines: The works comply with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35545 - Application #: 235/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 14, 2004 683 7.1.22 PAUL GOODRAM To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 41, Plan M -445, (15 Larchmount Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Goodram. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a cold storage room in the basement of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Drawing No . 1, Site Plan ; Drawing No . 2, Basement Plan ; Drawing No . 3, First Floor Plan; Drawing No . 4, Front Elevation ; Drawing No . 5, Sections ; Drawing No . 6, Existing Back Elevation ; Drawing 7, Side Elevation ; Drawing 8, Notes, prepared by Brad Liu , received August 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a cold storage room which will be located beneath the front porch of the existing dwelling. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters and will be floodproofed to above the 350 Year Storm Elevation. All excavated material will be removed from the site. Pollution: The subject property is well removed from the Don River. No sediment control is required. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings The proposed works will not affect existing natural features; therefore, plantings are not required as part of this project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1.B., Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 684 CFN: 35684 - Application #: 295/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 20, 2004 7.1.23 JEWEL VALLEY DEVELOPMENT INC . To place fill within a regulated area on (49 - 51 River Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jewel Valley Development Inc.. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a 30 unit town home condominium development and associated infrastructure including driveways. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009. • Drawing No . A- 202 -A -204, Typical Plans Unit Type 2; Drawing No . A- 205 -209, Elevations ; Drawing No . A -210, Cross Sections ; Drawing A- 211 -A -212, Wall Sections ; Drawing No . A -213, General Notes ; Drawing No . A -214- A -215, Typical Details , prepared by Venchiarutti Gagliardi Architect Inc ., dated April 5, 2004, received July 20, 2004. • Drawing No . L -1, Landscape Plan , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects , prepared January 2003, received July 20, 2004. • Drawing No . S3 -01, Schedules ; Drawing S 3- 02- S3 -04, Foundation Sections ; prepared by LorEng , prepared on April 2004, received July 20, 2004. • Drawing No.02- 4180 -SG1, Site Grading Plan ; Drawing NO. 02- 4180 -SS1, Site Servicing Plan, prepared by Burnside , received July 20, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a 30 unit town home condominium development on a 0.29 ha parcel of land. The subject property is located within a Fill Regulated Area, but outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The proposed works will occur entirely on tableland and are located in excess of 100 metres from the nearby watercourse. The works are being conducted in accordance with planning approvals granted by the City of Toronto. The subject property forms part of a severed lot and is the first phase of proposed development on the property. This residential condominium phase is the furthest from the watercourse and fronts on River Street. The second phase of development is for an automobile dealership to front on Bayview Avenue and is currently being reviewed by TRCA staff. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will 685 not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 135 metres away. Conservation of Land: The proposed development will be located entirely on tableland and will maintain a minimum 10 metres setback from the nearby watercourse. There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features and therefore no plantings are required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.1.1., New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35683 - Application #: 294/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 20, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 7.1.24 FILOMENA LOMUTO To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Concession 7 Lot 57, Plan 9831, (7710 Islington Avenue - Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Filomena Lomuto. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River and Woodbridge Special Policy Area, in order to facilitate the construction of a one - storey addition to the front of the existing auto body repair shop. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Site Servicing and Grading Plan , Drawing No . SSG -1, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc., revised February 7, 2003, received February 21, 2003. • Letter, Structural Engineering , prepared by John Crimi , Exsen Engineering Ltd ., dated November 28, 2002, received February 21, 2003. • Letter, Removal of Excess Fill Material , prepared by Vito Lomuto , Northview Auto Collision , dated February 11, 2003, received February 21, 2003. 686 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area, to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River and Woodbridge Special Policy Area, in order to facilitate the construction of a one - storey addition to the front of an existing auto body repair shop. Control of Flooding: All openings to the proposed addition to the repair shop will be dry floodproofed to the 350 -year flood level of 139.96 metres. Walls for the proposed addition have been designed to withstand loads and velocities resulting from a Regional Storm Event, as noted via written confirmation from the applicants structural engineer. All excess fill will be removed from the site in accordance with Special Policy Area requirements. Thus, TRCA Water Management staff is satisfied that the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 75 metres away. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. TRCA staff conducted a site visit to the subject property and noted that the proposed development is consistent with existing structures in the corridor reach and does not impact fish habitat. It is also noted that the proposed addition does not affect any significant natural features on site. Plantings No vegetation will be removed as part of the proposed work and given that the subject site is located over 75 metres from the Humber River, proposed plantings are not required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 32666 - Application #: 348/01 /VAUG Report Prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: July 26, 2004. 7.1.25 PARAMOUNT CANADA 'S WONDERLAND To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 15 -21, Concession 5, 9580 Jane Street, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Paramount Canada's Wonderland. 687 The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a new roller coaster at Paramount Canada's Wonderland for the upcoming 2005 season and a new maintenance access road and associated crossing. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009. • Red -Line Revised Proposed Grading and Servicing Plan , Drawing No. GR1, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan , dated July 2004, received August 4, 2004. • Notes and Details , Drawing No . NDX, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan , dated July 2004, received August 4, 2004. • Letter, Structural Engineer Confirmation , prepared by R .T. Richardson , R.V. Anderson Associates Limited , dated August 3, 2004, received August 4, 2004 - confirming that structures are able to withstand velocity of flows . • Flood Contingency /Emergency Evacuation Plan for Italian Job Roller Coaster at Paramount Canada 's Wonderland , prepared by Paramount Canada 's Wonderland , received August 4, 2004. • Release and Indemnity Agreement , prepared by Paramount Canada 's Wonderland , dated August 2, 2004, received August 4, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking , prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan , dated August 4, 2004, received August 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a new roller coaster for the 2005 season at Paramount Canada's Wonderland. The proposed works also involve the construction of a new maintenance access road and associated bridge crossing. The subject site is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but outside of the Authority's registered Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The proposed site is located at the south end of Paramount Canada's Wonderland, adjacent to an existing online stormwater pond, immediately east of the existing Minebuster roller coaster and west of the Kingswood Music Theatre. The subject site is currently occupied by an maintenance yard and an existing access road and bridge crossing. 688 Control of Flooding: The proposed roller coaster is located primarily in the Regional Storm Flood Plain. TRCA Water Management Staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed works and notes that the change in peak water levels, as a result of construction, would rise approximately 7 millimetres with no velocities associated with this increase. While staff would not consider this a significant increase in flood risk to adjacent properties, a cut and fill balance approach has been proposed to ensure that a loss in storage or conveyance of flood waters is not realized. The applicant has proposed to cut along the north shore of the existing stormwater pond to provide for an additional storage volume of 3,200 cubic metres under Regional Storm conditions. As such, the proposed roller coaster would be floodproofed as additional storage capacity will be provided along the north shore of the pond. It is also noted that the design of the bridge crossing will not affect the conveyance of flood waters. Furthermore, written confirmation from a structural engineer has been provided which confirms that the proposed roller coaster will be designed in such a manner as to withstand a Regional Storm event including all structural support columns and the loading dock platform. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The shoreline of the existing stormwater pond has experienced erosion since the pond's completion in the 1980s. As part of the proposed works, this shoreline will be rehabilitated and planted to improve habitat and stabilize the shoreline. TRCA Planning Ecology staff has determined that the works may be considered as a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat. However, staff considers the potential impact to be minimal and as such, a Letter of Authorization will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). No other significant natural features will be affected by the proposed development. Plantings As part of the site restoration, the applicant is proposing extensive native, non - invasive plantings along the shoreline of the existing stormwater pond. The riparian zone in the vicinity of the proposed works currently consists of a smoothly graded slope planting with grass which is manicured on a regular basis. Riparian plantings will be made along the north and southeast shorelines of the stormwater pond. 689 Policy Guidelines: This proposal generally meets the intent of Section 4.1.2 New Resource -Based Uses, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. It is noted that the proposal and applicant has provided the following mitigative measures in order to reduce the potential risk associated with the construction of the roller coaster in the Regional Storm Flood Plain, including the submission of a flood contingency evacuation plan, closure of the theme park during high rainfall events, confirmation from structural engineers on the proposed development, an indemnification agreement from the owner and an appropriate cut/fill balance proposal. CFN: 35699 - Application #: 303 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: July 27, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX 7.1.26 JOHN BODDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD . To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, RANGE 3 BROKEN FRONT Part 1 Plan 40R- 12352, (southwest of Bayly Street and Shoal Point Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by John Boddy Developments Ltd. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond and outfall to Warbler's Swamp, in the Town of Ajax. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009. • Storm Drainage Plan (North) & (South), Drawings 102 & 103, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd ., dated July & October 2002, respectively , date received June 23, 2004. • Stormwater Management Pond , Drawing 138, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd ., dated March 2002, date received June 23, 2004. • Stormwater Management Pond Details , Drawings 139, 140 & 141, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd ., dated April 2002, date received June 23, 2004. • Sediment & Erosion Control Plan , Drawing 142, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd ., dated February 2004, date received June 23, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan (North East ), (North West ), (East Central ), (West Central) (Southeast), & (Southwest), Drawings 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd ., dated July 2002, date received August 26, 2003. • Red -line revised Stormwater Management Pond Restoration Planting Plan , Drawing RP1, prepared by Cosburn Giberson Consultants Inc ., dated Oct. 7, 2003, revised April 26, 2004, date received April 28, 2004. • Details , Drawing RP 2, prepared by Cosburn Giberson Consultants Inc ., dated Oct . 31, 2003, revised April 26, 2004, date received April 28, 2004. 690 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond and outfall to Warbler's Swamp, in the Town of Ajax. The TRCA has already issued a permit for a temporary sediment pond and outfall, located within the same footprint as the ultimate facility. The stormwater management facility will service the residential development adjacent to Warbler's Swamp within draft plan of subdivision 18T- 94026. While the construction of the subdivision is not imminent, the construction of the stormwater management pond will allow the owner to begin earthworks for the extension of Audley Road, which will eventually provide access to the residential development An edge management plan has been submitted, as have planting plans for the stormwater management pond and subdivision buffer, both of which back onto the wetland. Control of Flooding: The stormwater management pond will be located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek and TRCA water management staff has ensured that flows from the pond will not impact flooding upstream or downstream of the site. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected around the perimeter of the construction area in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the wetland. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or slope stability concerns related to this proposal, nor are there any fisheries resources concerns. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored following construction, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. As part of the related subdivision development, some invasive species removals will be undertaken in coordination with the planting of the wetland buffer area, resulting in a net environmental gain. Plantings The edge management plan, stormwater management pond and buffer planting plans all include plantings along the edge of the wetland, as well as within and along the banks of the stormwater management pond. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34396 - Application #: 206 /03 /AJAX Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 27, 2004 691 TOWN OF MARKHAM 7.1.27 CORNELL ROUGE DEVELOPMENT CORP . To alter a waterway on Lot 10, 11, 12, 13, Concession 9, (between Highways 7 & 407, west of Reesor Road, east of Markham By- Pass), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cornell Rouge Development Corp. The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to construct a permanent channel and stormwater management pond on Tributary C in the Cornell community of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking committing the applicant to address the final remaining minor ecology and water management issues , dated and received August 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a permanent channel and stormwater management pond on Tributary C within the Cornell community of Markham. The channel and pond are proposed between Highways 7 and 407, east of the Markham By -Pass. The stormwater management pond is required to service lands within draft approved plans of subdivision located further upstream, north of Highway 7. The permanent channel is required to pass post - development flows from the upstream development as the existing watercourse is only capable of conveying pre - development flows. Further, the watercourse is being realigned slightly further from the Markham By -Pass (which is currently under construction) in order to create a 30m wide stream corridor that meets the TRCA's terrestrial habitat objectives. The stormwater management pond and reconstructed channel were approved in principle as part of the Cornell community master plan and through the approval of the secondary plan level functional servicing study. To date, the TRCA has issued related permits for the construction of a temporary diversion channel and a culvert under Highway 7 and the proposed Markham By -pass. It should be noted that the loss of fish habitat within Tributary C of the Little Rouge River and the construction of on -line stormwater management ponds within Cornell was authorized by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) as part of Fisheries Act Authorization #525 -1342 (1999). As compensation for the loss of fish habitat, the construction of the Milne Reservoir Fishway was approved and undertaken. As a result, Tributary C has been identified by DFO as a watercourse without fish habitat and all construction works can therefore take place without any fisheries timing window restrictions. As part of the DFO Authorization, a number of terrestrial ecology objectives were identified and staff has confirmed that the overall proposal for the channel realignment and stormwater management pond is consistent with the authorization and will achieve the environmental objectives identified. 692 Control of Flooding: The newly constructed channel will be sized to convey the Regional and 100 year storm event and the flows from the stormwater management pond will be controlled to the pre - development level. As such, there will be no upstream or downstream flooding impacts resulting from the proposed works. Pollution: A temporary diversion channel (approved April 2004 as part of permit C- 04087) will be constructed prior to the permanent channel and pond works being initiated. The diversion channel has a series of rock check dams to contain sediment flow and the entire work area will be surrounded by sediment and erosion control fencing to further safeguard against construction - generated sediment entering the downstream watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and the area will be extensively rehabilitated following the construction of the permanent channel and stormwater management pond, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. Plantings The length of the channel and the stormwater management pond will be extensively planted with native, non - invasives species to improve the terrestrial and aquatic habitat associated with the facility. As the area is currently agricultural in nature, staff is satisfied that a net environmental benefit will result from the proposed works. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35118 - Application #: 034 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 27, 2004 7.1.28 LARKIN MONARCH PARTNERSHIP To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 16, 17, Concession 6, (The Bridle Walk), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Larkin Monarch Partnership. The purpose is to construct in the floodplain and alter a watercourse in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond outlet to Burndenet Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking committing the applicant to address the final remaining minor ecology and water management issues , dated August 3, 2004, received August 4, 2004. 693 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the floodplain and alter a watercourse in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond outlet to Burndenet Creek. A stormwater management pond is proposed on tableland, within draft plan of subdivision 19T- 95009, and is required to service Phase V of the Larkin - Monarch plan of subdivision. The stormwater management pond outfall is proposed adjacent to The Bridle Walk crossing right -of -way, for which a previous permit application has been approved. By locating the outfall adjacent to the road right -of -way, additional vegetation disturbances have been minimized. TRCA ecology staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that the manner in which the outfall ties into the watercourse will mitigate any future erosion problems and eliminate the need for future erosion protection works. Control of Flooding: TRCA engineering staff has concluded that though the outfall is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Burndenet Creek, there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained between the construction area and the watercourse to prevent any construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical concerns related to this proposal. As the proposal constitutes a watercourse alteration, but not a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat (HADD), a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). All works will be undertaken within the Ministry of Natural Resources' (MNR) coldwater timing window of July 1- September 15, unless otherwise approved by MNR. All disturbed areas will be restored following construction with native, non - invasive plant species. Plantings The stormwater management pond outfall will be planted with woody and herbaceous vegetation, as will the stormwater management pond and subdivision tableland buffer adjacent to the valleyland, to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35189 - Application #: 064/04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 27, 2004 694 7.1.29 LINDVEST PROPERTIES (CORNELL) LTD. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, 10, Concession 9, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lindvest Properties (Cornell) Ltd. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sediment pond and outfall connecting to Tributary B in the Cornell community of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of July 9, 2004 to July 8, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking committing the applicant to address the final remaining minor water management issues , dated and received August 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of an open channel, stormwater management pond and outfall connecting to Tributary B, in the Cornell community of Markham. The channel and pond are proposed between Highways 7 and 407, east of Ninth Line. The stormwater management pond is required to service lands within an adjacent draft approved plan of subdivision, as well as future development lands located further upstream, north of Highway 7. The permanent channel is required to pass post - development flows from the upstream development as the existing watercourse is only capable of conveying pre - development flows. The stormwater management pond and reconstructed channel were approved in principle as part of the Cornell community master plan and through the approval of the secondary plan level functional servicing study. To date, the TRCA has issued related permits for the construction of a temporary diversion channel and a temporary sediment pond and outfall in the same general location as the proposed ultimate facility. Both the temporary pond and ultimate stormwater management pond outfall tie into the existing culvert under Highway 407. It should be noted that the loss of fish habitat within Tributary B of the Little Rouge River and the construction of on -line stormwater management ponds within Cornell was authorized by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) as part of Fisheries Act Authorization #525 -1342 (1999). As compensation for the Toss of fish habitat, the construction of the Milne Reservoir Fishway was approved and undertaken. As a result, Tributary B has been identified by DFO as a watercourse without fish habitat and all construction works can therefore take place without any fisheries timing window restrictions. As part of the DFO Authorization, a number of terrestrial ecology objectives were identified and staff has confirmed that the overall proposal for the channel realignment and stormwater management pond is consistent with the authorization and will achieve the environmental objectives identified. 695 Control of Flooding: The newly constructed channel will be sized to convey the Regional and 100 year storm event and the flows from the stormwater management pond will be controlled to the pre - development level. As such, there will be no upstream or downstream flooding impacts resulting from the proposed works. Pollution: A temporary diversion channel (approved July 2004 as part of permit C- 04224) will be constructed prior to the permanent channel and pond works being initiated. The diversion channel has a series of rock check dams to contain sediment flow and the entire work area will be surrounded by sediment and erosion control fencing to further safeguard against construction - generated sediment entering the downstream watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and the area will be extensively rehabilitated following the construction of the permanent channel and stormwater management pond, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. Plantings The length of the channel and the stormwater management pond will be extensively planted with native, non - invasives species to improve the terrestrial and aquatic habitat associated with the facility. As the area is currently agricultural in nature, staff is satisfied that a net environmental benefit will result from the proposed works. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35454 - Application #: 183/04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 27, 2004 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE 7.1.30 MADORI LTD . To alter a waterway on Lot 2, Concession 8, (west of 9th Line, north of Main Street), in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Madori Ltd. The purpose is to alter a waterway through the installation of a temporary stormwater outlet and sediment pond for the purposes of top soil stripping lands for a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (19T- 98003) in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009. 696 • Drawing Number 134A, Interim Sediment Control Plan , prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd ., dated July 2004, received by TRCA July 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway through the installation of a temporary stormwater outlet and sediment pond for the purposes of top soil stripping lands for a draft approved plan of residential subdivision in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville. Authority staff reviewed the draft plan of subdivision through the master environmental servicing plan and subdivision review processes, and recommended conditions of draft approval; the conditions stipulate that this permit be obtained. Another permit will be required for the permanent stormwater facility at a later date. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place and maintained for the duration of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the proposal and no significant natural heritage features will be affected. Plantings At this time, only preliminary grading works are being conducted on the subject lands. Landscape plans, to staff's satisfaction, will form part of the review for the associated permit that will be required for the construction of the permanent storm water pond and outfall. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35704 - Application #: 309/04/WS Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: July 27, 2004 697 TOWNSHIP OF KING 7.1.31 DAVID SCOTT To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, Concession 5, (15 Laskay Lane), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by David Scott. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The works will be contained within the rear yard of an existing residential lot located at 15 Laskay Lane in the Township of King. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Site Plan , Scott Residence , prepared by Betz Pools Limited , dated July 21, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 3, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material . • Cross - section, Scott residence , received by the TRCA on August 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is entirely located within a Fill Regulated Area The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the rear manicured yard of an existing residential lot The proposed works will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and the hydraulic floodway. The majority of the subject property is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain; therefore, there was no opportunity to locate the proposed in- ground pool outside of the flood plain or the hydraulic floodway. TRCA staff are satisfied that the proposed pool and associated landscaping have been appropriately designed such that they will not result in unacceptable impacts to flood storage and conveyance. TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. All excavated fill material will be removed from the site. TRCA staff are satisfied that the proposed pool and associated landscaping have been appropriately designed such that they will not result in unacceptable impacts to flood storage and conveyance. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent watercourse. 698 Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively affected by the project. Plantings Minor landscaping will be conducted to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35356 - Application #: 133/04/KING Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: July 26, 2004 7.1.32 TOWNSHIP OF KING To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 5, Concession 8, Block 15, Plan 65M3545, (between Farmcrest Court and the Nobleton Community Sports Park), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Township of King. The purpose is to construct in the flood plain and alter a waterway to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian bridge across a tributary of the Humber River in the Village of Nobleton, Township of King. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006. • Site Sketch and Key Plan , Drawing No . S1, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited, redline revised on July 28, 2004 to add notes regarding the proposed seed mixes and the installation and maintenance of a temporary silt fence , received by the TRCA on July 29, 2004, seed mix redline revised by the TRCA on August 3, 2004. • WalkwayTyp . Section and Bridge Elevation , Drawing No . S2, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , redline revised on July 28, 2004 to add notes regarding the proposed seed mixes and that no in - stream works are proposed /permitted , received by the TRCA on July 29, 2004, seed mix redline revised by the TRCA on August 3, 2004. • Bridge Framing Plan , Drawing No . S3, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , received by the TRCA on June 21, 2004. • Abutment Elevation , Drawing No . S4, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , received by the TRCA on June 21, 2004. • Bridge Section , Drawing No . S5, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , received by the TRCA on June 21, 2004. • Abutment Detail and Bridge Anchoring , Drawing No . S6, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , received by the TRCA on June 21, 2004. 699 • Guard Details , Drawing No . S7, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , received by the TRCA on June 21, 2004. • Guard Details , Drawing No . S8, prepared by R .J. Burnside & Associates Limited , received by the TRCA on June 21, 2004. • Light Duty Silt Fence Barrier , Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing 219.110, received by the TRCA on July 29, 2004. • Old Field Mix as noted in Table 1 - Permanent Seed Mixes and Seed Certificate Analysis Values , Ontario Provincial Standard Specification 572, Construction Specification for Seed and Cover , revised November 2003, received by the TRCA on July 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain and alter a waterway to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian bridge across a tributary of the Humber River in the Village of Nobleton. The pedestrian bridge will link Farmcrest Court to the Nobleton Community Sports Park. The pedestrian bridge crossing is proposed to formalize an existing grass trail that was created by the repeated use of local residents. The proposed wooden pedestrian bridge will measure approximately 3.6 metres long and 2.5 metres wide and will be supported by reinforced concrete piles. The proposed clear span bridge will be constructed at the narrowest point of the watercourse and will be accessed by a proposed 1.8 metre wide limestone walkway. TRCA staff are satisfied with the design and location of the proposed pedestrian bridge, abutments and walkway. Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Management staff have reviewed the proposal and are satisfied that there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no fisheries or geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the proposal. A letter of advice for working near water, on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), will be issued with the permit. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored upon completion of the project. The areas adjacent to the walkway will be seeded with a natural seed mix to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. 700 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35583 - Application #: 250 /04 /KING Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: July 26, 2004 TOWNSHIP OF UXBRIDGE 7.1.33 THE CHUD GROUP To alter a waterway on (Durham Golf Club), in the Township of Uxbridge, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by The Chud Group. The purpose is to alter a watercourse in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary crossing within the proposed Durham Golf Club. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking committing the applicant to address the final remaining minor water management concerns , dated and received August 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a watercourse in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary crossing of Duffins Creek within the proposed Durham Golf Club. The proposed golf course is located north of Webb Road, west of the 4th Concession, in the Township of Uxbridge. As there are a number of tributaries and wetlands within the property boundaries, TRCA staff has been working with the applicant in order to develop an appropriate design for the golf course that minimizes ecological impacts. At this point, the applicant, in concert with TRCA staff, has identified a number of natural 'areas of concern' within the site and is currently working towards gaining approval from the TRCA to initiate preliminary grading on the remainder of the site outside of these areas of concern. In order to access the southern portion of the site to carry out preliminary grading, one temporary crossing is required. The proposed crossing is approximately 11 m in length, is proposed in the same location as an existing farm crossing and will merely be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that there will be no flooding impacts resulting from the proposed crossing. 701 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing will isolate the crossing and associated staging area from the watercourse in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues related to this proposal. The works do not constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat, however, as the proposal is considered to be an alteration to a waterway, a Letter of Advice will be issued by the TRCA on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. Plantings There will be no vegetation removals required to accommodate the temporary crossing. As a result, no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2 - New Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35598 - Application #: 252/04/UXB Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: July 27, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE MINOR WORKS ITEMS . RES. #B159/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (7.1.34 - 7.1.39, inclusive) which are listed below , be received . CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.34 MYCHAYLO VOLOCHIY To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 3648, (24 Beaucourt Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Mychaylo Volochiy. CFN: 35671 - Application #: 290/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 Date: July 19, 2004 702 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.35 JOSH FRANKEL To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 25, Plan 4580, (37 Timberlane Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Josh Frankel. CFN: 35634 - Application #: 269/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 6, 2004 7.1.36 MICHAEL PIERNITZKI AND ELIZABETH WRIGHT To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, Concession 2 Lot 232, Plan M -677, (55 Hi Mount Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Michael Piernitzki and Elizabeth Wright CFN: 35678 - Application #: 282/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 Date: July 19, 2004 7.1.37 MINH NGOC TRAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan M -1952, (147 Benjamin Boake Trail), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Minh Ngoc Tran. CFN: 35630 - Application #: 266/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 6, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.38 MIKE AND SHARON BOWERING To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan 3167, (128 Centennial Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Mike and Sharon Bowering. 703 CFN: 35581 - Application #: 248/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 14, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 7.1.39 LYNN GROGAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 358E, (8 Beaumont Road), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lynn Grogan. CFN: 35651 - Application #: 275/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 7, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON 7.1.40 PETER & SHELLEY CORMIER To construct in a flood plain on Lot 11, Block 5, Plan BCL 7, (26 Mill Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Peter & Shelley Cormier. The purpose is to construct and place fill within the Regulatory Floodplain and a Fill Regulated Area associated with a Special Policy Area to facilitate additions to an existing residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of August 6, 2004 to August 5, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Flood Assessment for 26 Mill Street , Bolton, drawing Figure 2, produced by R .J. Burnside and Associates Limited , stamped received by TRCA Development Services Section July 30, 2004. • Flood Assessment letter provided by Tony Elias , P.Eng., R.J. Burnside and Associates , dated July 26, 2004, certifying that proposed additions do not increase flood risk for this structure . • Site Plan , Addition to Residence - Mr. and Mrs. Peter Cormier - 26 Mill Street , Bolton , drawing number 2408 -1, dated April , 2004, received by TRCA Development Services Section , July 30, 2004. • Plans, Addition to Residence - Mr. and Mrs. Peter Cormier - 26 Mill Street, Bolton, drawing number 2408 -2, dated April , 2004, received by TRCA Development Services Section , July 30, 2004. • Elevations and Section , Addition to Residence - Mr. and Mrs. Peter Cormier - 26 Mill Street, Bolton, drawing number 2408 -3, dated April , 2004, received by TRCA Development Services Section , July 30, 2004. 704 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application is to permit additions to an existing residential dwelling within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regulatory Floodplain within a. designated Special Policy Area associated with the Humber River, Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon. Additions proposed under this application will include a new ground -level mud room of approximately 77 square feet, and a second floor addition of approximately 362 square feet. As the subject dwelling is located within a designated Special Policy Area (SPA) TRCA requirements for this project include appropriate floodproofing of the structure to withstand, at a minimum, the flood depths and velocities associated with a 350 year storm. A flood assessment has been submitted by R.J. Burnside and Associates in support of this application, which identifies that the works proposed will not increase the flood risk for this structure. Due to the minor nature of this proposal, and the supporting materials provided by R.J. Burnside and Associates, TRCA staff are satisfied that this proposal will not create a significant increase in flood risk or pose a greater impediment to flood waters. Control of Flooding: The works will occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain in a designated Special Policy Area Due to the minor nature of the proposal, and the existing development within this area, no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated as a result of this project. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. The proposed works are being completed on a developed residential lot within an existing urban area. As the majority of the works being completed are on the second floor of the existing dwelling, no significant vegetation will be disturbed during the construction process and no compensatory plantings are required. Plantings No significant vegetation will be disturbed through this project and thus no compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Established Communities/ Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 705 CFN: 35711 - Application #: 312/04/CAL Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: August 4, 2004 RES. #B160/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PLANNING REFORM Provide comments to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on the documents entitled: Planning Act Reform and Implementation Tools; Provincial Policy Statement: Draft Policies; and, Ontario Municipal Board Reform. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Province of Ontario be advised that with respect to the proposed Planning Act reforms, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA): • supports the reforms that give municipal councils control over boundary expansions ; that increase the length of time for review of development applications ; and that would require that decisions be "consistent with " the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS); • recommends that further discussion regarding "declaration of provincial interest " provisions of the proposed legislation be undertaken to confirm the province 's approach to bringing plans into "consistency with " the PPS ; • supports additional consultation with stakeholders on the proposed ideas for further reform and implementation tools including : defining requirements of a complete application ; specifying the minimum contents of official plans ; requiring planning documents, especially zoning by -laws, to be kept up -to -date; requiring better integration and coordination of the planning process with the environmental assessment process ; requiring performance monitoring for land use planning ; and timely delivery by the province of implementation support materials and guidelines ; • recommends that guidelines be developed to assist municipalities and agencies in bringing applications into conformity if they have not been implemented after 10 years and do not meet current planning /technical standards for natural hazards and natural heritage ; THAT the Province of Ontario be advised that with respect to the proposed Draft Policies of the Provincial Policy Statement , TRCA: • commends and supports the province for incorporating several previous TRCA comments such as using wording that better balances economic , environmental and community issues ; significantly enhances the policies for water ; and, adds new policies requiring targets for intensification , redevelopment and minimum densities , and the undertaking of a comprehensive review prior to the alteration of settlement area boundaries ; 706 • recommends strengthening the language used in many of the policies from "should" to "will" or from "promote" to "require ", particularly in policies 1.3.3 (d), 2.1.1 and 2.1.2.1 and the last sentence of part IV ; • recommends that a new policy be added to section 2.1 - Natural Heritage , which recognizes the importance of locally significant natural heritage systems in supporting the ecological integrity of provincially significant features and areas , and which directs municipalities to plan for and protect a locally significant natural heritage system as an integral and sustainable component of a well - planned and complete community ; • recommends that policy 1.1.1.4 (b) be amended to incorporate the additional criteria of financial and ecological sustainability ; • recommends that policies 1.2.2 and 1.2.3 (b) #4 (v) be amended to incorporate the term "natural heritage system "; • recommends that in policy 2.2 - Water, the term "sensitive" be replaced with "significant "; • recommends that in part 4.0, that #5 be amended to "encourage" municipalities to go beyond the minimum standards of the PPS , and that #8 be amended to include the Conservation Authorities Act ; • recommends that policy and guidelines for Special Policy Areas (SPA) be refined to include clarity around increased intensification in these areas and requirements for risk management ; • recommends that policies be developed to encourage the use of green building technologies that reduce energy consumption and improve air quality , including provisions for renewable energy sources ; THAT the Province of Ontario be advised that with respect to the proposed Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) reforms, TRCA: • recognizes the need for a body , such as the OMB , to resolve disputes about land use planning, in the context of comprehensive environmental information associated with appeals; • recommends that effective means be established for the OMB and the province to monitor the results of OMB decisions vis a vis cumulative impacts to the ecology as a result of ongoing development ; THAT hearings "de novo" only be conducted where an approval authority has been found to have acted unreasonably from a planning perspective , or has failed to make a decision ; AND FURTHER THAT the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing , TRCA's watershed municipalities and Conservation Ontario be so advised . CARRIED 707 BACKGROUND On June 1, 2004, the Province of Ontario released three documents for public consultation on Planning Reform:1) Planning Act Reform and Implementation Tools; 2) Provincial Policy Statement: Draft Policies; and 3) Ontario Municipal Board Reform. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is holding public information sessions throughout the province and requires that comments be submitted to the province by August 31, 2004. The contents of this report have been developed in the context of our resource management mandate and broad planning experience within TRCA's diverse municipal and regional planning environment In addition to this report, TRCA staff are also providing input to a submission being developed for Conservation Ontario. 1) PLANNING ACT REFORM AND IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS This phase of planning reform began in December 2003 with the introduction of Bill 26, the Strong Communities Act, 2004. The highlights of this bill include provisions for municipalities to determine their own local boundaries, without recourse to the Ontario Municipal Board by developers proposing to expand community boundaries; giving municipalities more time to review planning applications; requiring that land -use planning decisions "be consistent with" the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS); and providing for the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MAH) to declare matters before the OMB to be of provincial interest. TRCA staff provided input to the Conservation Ontario submission to Bill 26, which expressed support for three of the four main provisions: restricting appeals to the OMB for private amendments to expand community boundaries which were not supported by municipal councils; the amendment to require decisions to "be consistent with" the PPS; and the increase in time for review of development applications. Conservation Ontario did not support the proposal for a declaration of provincial interest, whereby the Lieutenant Governor in Council may confirm, vary or rescind the decision of the OMB. It was felt that this amendment would politicize the existing technical and legal process, reduce openness and transparency in decision making and result in undue delays in rendering decisions. TRCA concurs with Conservation Ontario that the province already has the ability, through MAH and the one window planning system, to identify matters of provincial interest and pursue an appeal as a party to an OMB hearing. It is our opinion that provincial interest needs to be identified as early in the planning process as possible. However, there may be situations that arise where the overriding power of the Lieutenant Governor in Council is required. These should be used sparingly on an as needed basis only, to maintain the integrity of the PPS and the provincial regulatory planning framework for the GTA The discussion paper also outlines a number of ideas for further reform as well as several possible new planning /implementation tools. Staff are supportive of engaging in further discussions on a number of the topic areas outlined including: • specifying what constitutes a "complete application" to avoid duplication of effort in the review process; • specifying the minimum content to be contained in official plans, including policies for the identification and protection of natural heritage and water resource systems; • requiring that planning documents and, in particular, zoning by -laws, be kept more up -to -date to reduce uncertainty by reflecting current provincial policy, and, • amend the Planning Act to require performance monitoring for land use planning. 708 Better integration and coordination of the official plan process with the environmental assessment process is urgently needed, particularly transportation planning, to avoid approving major land use changes in advance of environmental assessments for the infrastructure necessary to service the development. Staff also support as new planning tools the timely delivery of provincial implementation support materials, including guidelines for the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, guidelines for natural hazard and natural heritage, or guidelines to help assess the balancing of competing interests of the PPS. Two other areas merit some discussion to ensure "provincial" leadership through Planning Act Reform: • reporting mechanisms to document the effectiveness of Provincial Policy Statement and • role of the province in regional planning to ensure consistency with the PPS and the appropriate provincial land use framework for major urban areas (i.e. the Greater Toronto Area) . The province should incorporate into the planning reform a mechanism to evaluate existing municipal planning documents relative to the new PPS (as a baseline assessment) and evaluate the effectiveness of the PPS on a two year basis which will also document the opportunities to adjust the PPS overtime. The province should also have a more active role in regional planning to ensure application of the "smart growth" principles, consistency with the PPS and to provide the land use framework for major urban areas (i.e. the Greater Toronto Area (GTA)). TRCA also recommends that the Planning Act should address difficulties associated with approved draft and secondary plans that have not been implemented within a 10 year period and more, and do not meet provincial, regional and municipal standards of the day. An updating requirement would be advantageous when dealing with issues of natural hazard and natural heritage requirements to bring plans into basic conformity. 2) PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT : DRAFT POLICIES This phase of planning reform began in summer 2001 with the province seeking advice on whether or not the PPS should be reviewed. TRCA staff participated in a response to the province coordinated by Conservation Ontario in addition to providing TRCA- specific comments endorsed by the Authority. Those comments stated that a review of the PPS was necessary and that the following main elements need to be incorporated into the PPS update: • provide for a balancing of environmental, economic and community interests, rather than giving priority to economic interests; • emphasize the importance of the environment as a finite resource, understanding the long term effects of planning decisions and cumulative effects; • require a watershed approach to planning decisions; • replace land consumptive policies with policies requiring intensification within the urban envelope prior to considering greenfield expansion; • require the protection of locally significant environmental features and functions as necessary to support provincially significant features and functions; 709 • incorporate the principles of no net environmental loss and the enhancement of degraded environmental systems; • establishment of a Greater Toronto Area Growth Management Strategy based on Smart Growth principles; and • provide a provincial vision for water quality and quantity which is implemented through land use decisions. Several of TRCA's comments have been addressed in the new draft PPS and the province should be commended and supported in these areas of proposed change, including: • Preamble wording that better balances economic, environmental and community issues, including a provincial goal that focuses on a high quality of life for citizens, now and into the future, through strong, liveable communities, a clean and healthy environment and a strong economy; • significantly expanding the PPS section on Water (2.2), including direction to utilize "the watershed as the ecologically meaningful scale for planning; and • adding new policies requiring municipalities to identify targets for intensification, redevelopment and minimum densities, and the undertaking of a comprehensive review prior to the alteration of settlement area boundaries. There are several general themes and some specific wording changes that staff feel could be improved upon in the draft PPS. The language used in the policies to direct planning authority actions needs to be strengthened in certain areas. Some policies provide that certain directions "will be" undertaken while other policies indicate only that the identified direction "should" be undertaken. Similarly, some policies strongly mandate the direction that is to be followed while other policies only "promote" certain actions. Specific examples where stronger language should be used include: • the last sentence in part IV which states that Tong -term prosperity, environmental health and social well -being "should" take precedence over short-term considerations; • policy 1.3.3 (d) which states that water conservation and water use efficiency is "promoted "; • policy 2.1.1 which states that the long -term ecological function of natural heritage systems "should" be maintained, restored or improved; and, • policy 2.1.2.1 which states that development will "generally" be directed away from (provincially significant) natural heritage features and areas. Section 2.1 - Natural Heritage provides a strong policy foundation for recognizing natural heritage "systems" and for the protection of provincially significant natural heritage features and areas. What is lacking in this section, however, is the recognition that these provincially significant features are linked to, and dependent upon, the regional and local natural heritage systems for their continued health and ecological integrity. The provincially significant features identified in policy 2.1.2.2 and 2.1.2.3 are the anchors of local natural heritage systems. Similarly, the locally significant features and functions provide the connectivity between and among the provincially significant features and allow them to continue to function as a system. As section 2.1 is currently written, an argument could be advanced that municipalities without any provincially significant features within their jurisdiction do not need to protect local natural heritage features and functions. TRCA's draft Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy clearly demonstrates that for TRCA's jurisdiction, given the projected population growth, even if the currently existing natural heritage system is maintained, it will continue to decline in quality as urban development occurs. In this context, simply maintaining the existing natural heritage system land base is inadequate. Provision needs to be made in the PPS for expansion and 710 regeneration of the natural heritage system, where necessary, to be able to function sustainably into the future. A natural heritage system, especially within a heavily urbanized area, must not be viewed as a "frill ", but rather as a necessary element of a complete community that must be planned for and protected in order to fulfill the provincial goal of an Ontario which provides a high quality of life for its citizens, now and in the future, through strong, liveable communities, a clean and healthy environment and a strong economy. There are a number of specific wording changes to policies that staff recommend in order to clarify terms or strengthen environmental protection, as follows: In policy 1.1.1.4 (b) dealing with infrastructure and public service facilities in relation to settlement area boundary alterations, additional criteria should be added such that these expanded infrastructure and facilities must be financially and ecologically sustainable In policy 1.2.2 which defines the range and mix of land uses that municipalities should plan for, the term "open space" is undefined and ambiguous and should not be used to mean ecologically significant areas. The term "natural heritage system" should either replace open space or added to the list of land uses that need to be planned for. It is our opinion that you need open space to provide for some of the community's recreational needs and the natural heritage system to compliment each other. Similarly in policy 1.2.3 (b) #4 (v), the term "vegetated areas" should be replaced with "natural heritage system ". In policy 2.2 - Water, the term "sensitive" used in describing surface and groundwater resources to be protected should be, for the sake of simplicity and consistency, replaced with "significant". The existing definition of sensitive in section 6.0 can then be moved as an additional subsection to the definition of significant. There are several subsections in part 4.0 - Implementation and Interpretation which could also benefit from minor changes. #5 states that nothing in the PPS prevents planning authorities from going beyond the minimum standards as set out in the PPS. The tone of this subsection should be amended to "encourage" municipalities to go beyond the minimum standards. In #8, a number of statutes are listed under which approvals may be required for infrastructure, in addition to land use approvals under the Planning Act. The Conservation Authorities Act should also be included in this list. The province needs to also clarify its intention related to Special Policy Areas where new intensification proposals raise issues related to flood emergency and risk management as well as liability. Improved guidelines for SPA risk and emergency studies are required as well as provincial direction on any potential guidelines on "threshold" intensification limits. 711 The proposed PPS policies under section 1.2 - Efficient Development and Land Use Patterns... include promotion of densities and mix of land use that contribute to improving air quality, mitigating impacts of climate change and promoting energy efficiency, with a list of sub - policies. This grouping of policies needs to include the important contribution that innovative site design and building technologies can provide to reduce energy consumption and improve air quality in the future as our urban areas are redeveloped. TRCA recommends that policies (and supporting guidelines) be developed to encourage the use of green building design technologies, including provisions for renewable energy sources and conservation. Rating systems such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) provide excellent examples of guidelines that promote improved standards in new building technology. 3) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD REFORM TRCA, through its solicitor Mr. Bruce Ketcheson, has made previous submissions to the GTA Task Force on OMB Reform. Those submissions recognized the need for a body such as the OMB while focussing on the need for a comprehensive approach to planning. In particular, stronger and clearer provincial level legislation and policy direction to address natural heritage strategies through the planning process is imperative. Those submissions have been reinforced by the specific comments provided above regarding the PPS. Two areas for OMB reform communicated previously on behalf of TRCA are worthy of additional discussion: hearings "de novo" and monitoring of the results of OMB decisions. Since hearings "de novo" (to start anew) are generally required by the Planning Act, evidence presented to the OMB or province is focussed on site specific issues arising from the individual appeals rather than considering the cumulative impacts associated with ongoing development There is currently no effective means for the OMB to monitor the results of its decisions. As an example, mitigation of environmental impacts are never subsequently verified from decision to decision. TRCA staff have experienced that developers sometimes file site - specific appeals in order to preserve their rights under existing official plan policies. This, together with the ability of public agencies to respond in short time- frames to complex issues potentially further undermines the comprehensive nature of the planning process where full examination of impacts on the natural environment can be assessed. Additionally, extensive costs for legal representation and staff time in preparation for and attendance at hearings reflect the need for OMB reform. Hearings "de novo" should only be permitted to be conducted where it is demonstrated that an approval authority has acted unreasonably from a planning perspective, such as approving an application significantly inconsistent with the official plan policies, or where the approval authority has failed to make a decision. Report prepared by : David Burnett , extension 5361 For Information contact : David Burnett , extension 5361 Carolyn Woodland , extension 5214 Larry Field , extension 5243 Laurie Nelson , extension 5281 Date: July 16, 2004 712 RES. #8161/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE LIVING CITY CENTRE AT KORTRIGHT Consultant Selection for Retrofit Building Commissioning. Award of commissioning contract to an engineer, working independent of the design team, for building retrofit through the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Enermodal Engineering Inc . be awarded the contract for the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) commissioning of The Living City Centre at Kotright , at a cost not to exceed $36,000, excluding GST ; AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to approve additional unspecified expenditures to a maximum of fifteen percent of the total commissioning fees , as a contingency allowance , to Enermodal Engineering Inc. if deemed necessary . CARRIED BACKGROUND Case studies have proven that projects that follow LEED commissioning processes dramatically reduce maintenance costs for new buildings over the lifecycle of the facility. LEED commissioning has also proven effective in identifying and correcting installation errors that can develop in relation to the integration of new technologies before building occupancy. Commissioning is a systematic process to ensure that all building systems perform interactively according to the contract documents, the design intent and the owner's operational needs. Ideally, commissioning activities are initiated in the pre - design phase to document the owner's requirements. Commissioning activities continue through construction document and build -out phases involving actual performance testing and conclude with acceptance by the owner and a warranty period that extends into occupancy. In most cases, commissioning activities also include training of building staff to properly operate building systems. When commissioning is properly executed, operational cost savings can be substantial, often increasing energy efficiency by 5 to 10 %. 713 While commissioning processes and procedures have been developed and applied to a variety of buildings for almost 20 years, the nearly instant popularity of the LEED rating system has created new interest in commissioning. Since the release of LEED version 1.0, commissioning has been re- introduced to the building community. Since it is a requirement for LEED version 2.0 certification, many commissioning authorities throughout the country have seen an increase in project volume. In addition to more work, commissioning authorities are also working on a greater variety of projects such as 20,000 square foot libraries, tilt -up office buildings and ski lodges, as well as "traditional" commissioning projects like medical and manufacturing facilities. The impact of LEED is also being felt in the sophistication of mechanical, electrical, plumbing and envelope systems for all types of buildings, affording commissioning authorities the opportunity to work on more complex building systems. Of course, the most important advantage of commissioning's sudden popularity is that more buildings are commissioned and, as a result, are more sustainable. In July 2004, a Term of Reference (TOR) was prepared by TRCA staff and distributed to the following engineering consultants: • Enermodal Engineering Inc. • Keen Engineering Co. Inc. • Gerald R. Genge Consultants Inc. • The Mitchell Partnership Inc. • CFMS Consultants Inc. These consultants were chosen because of their experience with commissioning of this nature. RATIONALE The consultants were evaluated on the following criteria: • The written proposal; • Experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • Understanding of background information, project, environmental concerns and proposed approach; • Ability to make project timelines; and, • Cost. The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: BIDDERS COST ESTIMATES (excluding G .S.T.) Enemodal Engineering Inc. $36,000.00 Keen Engineering Co. Inc. $66,500.00 Gerald R. Genge Consultants Inc. $132,500.00 The Mitchell Partnership Inc. $79,700.00 CFMS Consultants Inc. $38,000.00 714 The professional services offered in the Enemodal Engineering Inc. proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the TOR at a cost of $36,000.00, excluding G.S.T. Enermodal Engineering Inc. provided the initial building assessment for the Kortright centre and is familiar with our intentions to retrofit the facility. Steve Carpenter of Enermodal Engineering Inc. is the primary instructor for the LEED training workshops and the CBIP modelling /funding workshops in Ontario. His knowledge and expertise with LEED will offer good support to the Kortright project. Enermodal Engineering Inc. has a proven professional background in building and commissioning green buildings. They were the primary concept, mechanical and sustainability design engineers for the Earth Rangers facility at Kortright, providing energy modelling for the project and are currently compiling the LEED documentation for submission to the Canada Green Building Council. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost is $36,000, excluding GST, with possible unexpected expenditures of up to 15% of the commissioning fee. Funds from revenue are available in The Living City Centre budget, account #408 -22 -343. Report prepared by : Andrew Bowerbank , extension 5343 For Information contact : Andrew Bowerbank , extension 5343 Nick Saccone , extension 5301 Date: July 22, 2004 RES.#B162/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE DIGITAL FLOODLINE MAPPING FOR THE PETTICOAT CREEK WATERSHED Approval to retain Planning and Engineering Initiatives Ltd. to produce updated digital floodline mapping for 11 map sheets for the Petticoat Creek watershed. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with Planning and Engineering Initiatives Ltd . to complete the floodline mapping update for 11 new map sheets within the Petticoat Creek watershed at a cost not to exceed $18,190, including GST . CARRIED 715 BACKGROUND In the late 1970's the TRCA undertook an extensive program to prepare flood and fill line mapping for all watercourses under TRCA jurisdiction. The Regulatory Floodlines for each watercourse were established from water surface profiles generated by the HEG2 hydraulic model software. The floodlines, which were normally plotted in 1:2000 scale mapping, formed the basis of flood and fill line regulations. Currently, one of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and to provide current hydrologic, hydraulic, and mapped information for use by the TRCA and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management Group has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update the current Flood and Fill Line Regulation Mapping. The focus of this assignment is to update 11 floodline map sheets for the Petticoat Creek watershed to create digital, georeferenced floodlines. The main tasks will entail the preparation of a new HEC -RAS hydraulic model for the watershed, the generation of updated flood levels and the plotting of updated Regional Storm floodlines on digital mapping. The new digital mapping will improve modelling and data management capabilities and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up -to -date floodplain information required for regulation purposes. RATIONALE Four engineering consultants were invited to submit proposals for the project based upon the Terms of Reference for the work. Proposals were reviewed based on technical expertise, proposed approach, previous experience relating to flood line mapping, quality of proposal and cost (as indicated below). • • • • MacViro Consultants Inc. Planning and Engineering Initiatives Ltd. Acres and Associates Inc. Burnside and Associates Ltd. *AII prices include GST $19,250 $18,190 $19,260 $19,250 As Planning and Engineering Initiatives Ltd. is the lowest bidder meeting TRCA's specifications, staff are recommending them as the preferred consultant to complete the work. Their previous experience in floodline mapping and hydraulic modelling will allow them to complete the update in a thorough and cost - effective manner. Staff are confident that the chosen consultant will provide the TRCA with a high quality product within the specified time frame. 716 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds to complete this project are available within the approved 2004 Floodplain Management Budget account number 127 -07. A maximum upset limit not to exceed $18,190, including GST, has been set for this project. Report prepared by : Ryan Ness , extension 5615 For Information contact : Ryan Ness , extension 5615 Date: July 23, 2004 RES.#B163/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: AWARDING OF CONTRACT FOR THE STRATEGIC PLAN Award of contract to Pat Moffat to conduct research and final writing of the strategic plan. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Pat Moffat be contracted to conduct research and complete the final writing of The Living City , the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 's (TRCA) strategic plan , at a cost not to exceed $20,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA has been undergoing a strategic plan process since 2002. At Authority Meeting #4/03, held on May 16, 2003, Resolution #A103/03 was approved in part as follows: THAT the staff be directed to complete the Strategic Plan in accordance with the following outline and present it to the Authority for approval in the fall of 2003,.... Various iterations have been developed since that time, but a final version to the satisfaction of staff for submission to the Authority has not been developed. Although many of the strategic shifts and important new programs identified during the strategic planning process are already being implemented, The Living City represents such a significant turning point in the history of TRCA that a carefully researched and clearly written document is critical for organizational alignment and communication purposes. The external perspective of an experienced writer who is passionate about environmental issues and sustainable communities will help to challenge and clarify the direction of the organization. RATIONALE Pat Moffat was the principle writer of TRCA's Forty Steps to a New Don, a strategic plan for restoration of the Don River. She has extensive writing experience in other sectors as well. Staff have had discussions with Pat Moffat about expectations for the strategic plan, and she has provided a work plan which meets TRCA's requirements. The intention is to have the document submitted for final review by November 30, 2004. 717 Given the urgency of developing a final product, staff's previous working experience with Ms. Moffat and her experience with TRCA's work, staff are satisfied she can deliver the final strategic plan for launch by year's end. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost is $20,000, not subject to taxes. This aspect of the document development was not budgeted for in the 2004 approved budget, but can be allocated for during the variance process. For Information contact : Brian Denney , extension 6290 Date: July 27, 2004 RES.#B164/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: AWARDING OF CONTRACT FOR MEDIA SERVICES FOR CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS Selection of a media supplier for 2004 and 2005. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Brown and Cohen Communications and Public Affairs be awarded the contract for the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 's (TRCA) communications and media relations services from September 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005, at a cost not to exceed $82,000, plus GST ; AND FURTHER THAT staff conduct a review of the performance for TRCA of Brown and Cohen Communications and Public Affairs in December 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA's communications and media relations services have been with the Coaston Group for the last two years. Coaston Group successfully developed media contact lists and delivered a program of press kits, press releases, radio and television media coverage, media follow -up and tracking. This contract was to expire at the end of July, so staff conducted a review of the effectiveness of our media placement, coverage and costs, as well as future requirements. In an effort to ensure that our media dollars are well spent, a request for proposal was developed and issued to 5 suppliers. While the review of proposals was being conducted, Coaston Group agreed to continue carrying out our media services until the end of August for an additional month's reimbursement of $3,000. 718 RATIONALE Responses were received from all 5 suppliers as follows: Communications & Media Relations Bid Summary Supplier 2004 Amount (August - December) 2005 Amount (January - July) GST Total Applause! Communications $16,000.00 $74,400.00 $6,328.00 $96,728.00 Holmes Communications $16,000.00 $65,850.00 $5,729.50 $87,579.50 The Coaston Group $16,000.00 $60,000.00 $5,320.00 $81,320.00 GCI Group $16,000.00 $467,000.00 $33,810.00 $516,810.00 Brown and Cohen Communications and Public Relations $16,000.00 $66,000.00 $5,740.00 $87,740.00 Staff met with each supplier to further discuss their proposal. Staff are proposing that the contract be awarded to Brown and Cohen for the remainder of 2004 and until July 31, 2005 as they best meet TRCA's specifications, and due to the quality of their presentation and references from previous clients. Brown and Cohen has a strong reputation in both the public and private sector, including Parc Downsview Park and the province. They also have extensive connections with media services which they will leverage for TRCA purposes. FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost for the services with Brown and Cohen is $16,000 for 2004 and $66,000 for 2005, plus GST, at a total cost of $82,000, plus GST. As TRCA's media requirements are less for the latter part of the year, all firms agreed to provide 2004 services for $4,000 per month, with 2005 services costs being higher, as outlined in the 2004/2005 breakdown. Funds for 2004 are available in the approved 2004 operating budget for the communications department The 2005 expenditure will be included in the 2005 operating budget submission. Report prepared by : Catherine MacEwen , extension 5219 For Information contact : Catherine MacEwen , extension 5219 Date: July 23, 2004 RES.#B165/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE Tender for the replacement of the boiler at Albion Hills Field Centre, Albion Hills Conservation Area, 16500 Highway #50, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel. Award of a contract for the replacement of the boiler at Albion Hills Field Centre, Albion Hills Conservation Area. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor 719 THAT the contract for the replacement of the boiler at Albion Hills Field Centre , Albion Hills Conservation Area , 16500 Highway #50, Town of Caledon , Regional Municipality of Peel , be awarded to Best - Aurora Mechanical Services Inc . at a total cost not to exceed $25,443.76 plus GST . CARRIED BACKGROUND The existing boiler malfunctioned and needs to be replaced in order for there to be heat at the field centre in the fall. The tender for the removal of the existing boiler, and the supply, delivery and installation of a new boiler at the Albion Hills Field Centre in Albion Hills Conservation Area was sent to four mechanical firms. The four firms provided sealed bids, which were reviewed by staff as follows: Bidders KM Combustion Services Best Aurora Mechanical Services Inc. Johnston and Damery Limited Niagara Mechanical Services Cost to Replace Boiler $28,500.00 plus GST $25,443.76 plus GST $33,900.00 plus GST $28,562.00 plus GST RATIONALE Sealed bids were received from the four mechanical firms, which were opened on July 15, 2004, at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee. Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the contract be awarded to the lowest bidder, Best - Aurora Mechanical Services Inc., for the replacement of the boiler at the Albion Hills Field Centre. FINANCIAL DETAILS Total cost is $25,443.76 plus GST. Partial funds will be reallocated from the approved 2004 public use infrastructure budget, with the remainder from the approved 2004 field centres operating budget. Report prepared by : Ron Dewell , extension 5245 For Information contact : Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: July 21, 2004 RES. #B166/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PROPOSED RIVER FESTIVAL 2005 Feasibility Study. Feasibility of a concept to develop a river festival or The Living City Festival as an annual Greater Toronto Area wide celebration of sustainable community initiatives. Rob Ford Gerri Lynn O'Connor 720 THAT staff be directed to work with the staff of the Economic Development Culture and Tourism Department at the City of Toronto to submit a request to the Province of Ontario , and other potential supporters , for funding of a feasibility study to assess the viability of an annual festival with a sustainable communities theme in the Greater Toronto Area ; AND FURTHER THAT if funding can be obtained , staff be authorized to retain Hains Marketing to undertake the feasibility study at a cost not to exceed $30,000, including applicable taxes . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Heritage Rivers Section of Parks Canada commissioned a study earlier this year to explore ways to better communicate the importance of rivers in Canada. In the research done by Hains Marketing, the ongoing success of the River Festival in Brisbane Australia was noted. At the recent Heritage Rivers conference in Guelph, where the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) work on the Humber River was recognized, the idea to explore a similar type of festival in southern Ontario emerged. In the past few weeks, preliminary discussions about the potential content and viability of such a festival have been held with the following groups and individuals: • Parks Canada • Ontario Ministry of Tourism • The Honourable John Godfrey • The Honourable Joe Volpe • City of Toronto - Economic Development & Tourism • Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation • Tourism Toronto • Toronto City Summit Alliance • Canadian Yachting Association • Canadian Recreational Canoe Association • TRCA There is interest at various levels to explore the feasibility of such an event. It is estimated by Hains Marketing that it would cost approximately $30,000 to do a feasibility study and business plan for the festival. A request for funding has been made to Minister Volpe. The Province of Ontario also has funding for tourism recovery which might be made available for the feasibility study. Staff of the City of Toronto have offered to assist by preparing an application for provincial funding. RATIONALE The potential partners in the festival have all indicated that TRCA would be the preferred lead agency to coordinate initial dialogue and feasibility testing. Since Hains Marketing initially developed the concept, it would be appropriate to retain that firm to bring together the necessary expertise to expand the business plan, evaluate feasibility and make the case for the tourism benefits which such a festival might represent. 721 Report prepared by : Brian Denney , extension 6290 For Information contact : Brian Denney , extension 6290 Date: August 04, 2004 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:10 a.m., on Friday, August 6, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks c. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/04 September 10, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #8/04, was held in the South Theatre , Black Creek Pioneer Village , on Friday, September 10, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:10 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member REGRETS Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member RES. #B167 /04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Frank Dale THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/04, held on August 6, 2004, be approved . SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B168 /04 - CARRIED NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed City of Toronto, CFN 35792. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located south of Steeles Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Bathurst Street, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005." 723 Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement containing 0.017 hectares (0.042 acres), more or less , of vacant land be acquired from the City of Toronto , said land being Part of Block A , Plan M -994, designated as Part 3, on Plan R -2070, City of Toronto , (North York Community Council Area ), located south of Steeles Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Bathurst Street ; THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00; THAT Gardiner Roberts , Barristers and Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA staff sit on the City of Toronto's Technical Working Committee (TWC) and Property Management Committee (PMC) which review and make recommendations relating to potentially surplus City of Toronto lands. These committees also have representation from the city's other agencies, boards, commissions and departments. The subject property was reviewed by both the TWC and PMC in 2002. This site is located entirely within the valley corridor associated with Westminster Creek, with a portion of lands being comprised of floodplain. This parcel of land was originally part of a strip of land located behind a number of properties on Rockford Road and was owned by the former Borough of North York. North York at some time in the past divided up this strip and conveyed it to the owners on Rockford Road, which provided a straight rear lot line for these owners. In 1975 the Borough reacquired the subject property through the Municipal Tax Sale process. This is the only piece of the strip that was reacquired through the Municipal Tax Sale. The owner of 113 Rockford Road has continued to occupy the subject property since 1975. Given these facts, TRCA staff's comments to both the TWC and PMC were that TRCA staff had no objection to the sale of this property by the city to the owners of 113 Rockford Road subject to the City granting a conservation easement over the property to TRCA. Both TWC and PMC agreed with the TRCA staff comments. The city will grant the conservation easement to TRCA prior to selling the property to the owner of 113 Rockford Road. The owner of 113 Rockford Road will be subject to the terms and conditions of the conservation easement. Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. 724 The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this conservation easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to this easement will be in City of Toronto or private ownership; as such, the City of Toronto or the private owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : Mike Fenning , extension 5223 For Information contact : Ron Dewell , extension 5245, Mike Fenning , extension 5223 Date: August 25, 2004 Attachments : 1 725 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION (1/ PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed City of Toronto, CFN 35792 '• ■11. tburftA Usi - e-- 111 r. , SI \ \ ker ro 0-- • '•• .-suedEcr "PlOPE-Fin, '‘'N\ ‘tt's 4 --e for The Living city c;"77-Z5TRCA LANDS SUBJECT PROPERTY 5.7.1P0P.")y. 726 RES. #B169/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND West side of Northline Road, opposite Northdale Boulevard CFN 34865. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Helen Clemente to explore the possibility of the sale of a fragment of TRCA -owned land located on the west side of Northline Road, opposite Northdale Boulevard, City of Toronto - Toronto and East York Community Council Area, Don River watershed. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the full TRCA -owned land located on the west side of Northline Road , opposite Northdale Boulevard , City of Toronto - Toronto and East York Community Council Area , be retained for conservation and park purposes . CARRIED BACKGROUND A letter was received from Helen Clemente requesting the sale of a fragment of TRCA-owned land, situated at the eastern edge of the Charles Sauriol Conservation Reserve and fronting on Northline Road, for the construction of a single family dwelling. At Executive Committee Meeting #11/03, December 5, 2003, Resolution #B182/03 was approved as follows: THAT the potential disposal of a fragment of land on the west side of Northline Road, opposite Northdale Boulevard, City of Toronto (former Borough of East York) be referred to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff for review and discussion in accordance with established TRCA policies. AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. This request was circulated to TRCA technical staff and staff of the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. The following comments were received: • TRCA's Technical Staff According to a recent site visit that was conducted, it was noted that there is a steep ravine located at the rear of the property. There is also significant vegetation located at the top of the ravine. Given the policies outlined by this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP), a 10 metre setback from the greater of the stable slope or the significant vegetation is required for development on this property. A geotechnical report would be required to confirm the stability of the slope. However, applying a 10 metre buffer from the edge of the significant vegetation will not leave sufficient tableland on the subject property to accommodate a residential dwelling. Therefore, staff do not support the construction of a residential dwelling at this location and recommend that TRCA retain the ownership of this property. It is felt the subject tablelands provide an important connection to the valley corridor in this location and should be protected. There is potential to improve 727 the natural features and functions of this property through regeneration with native plant material; loss of this land would be contrary to the TRCA's Natural Heritage Strategy Program interests. • City of Toronto Economic Development , Culture & Tourism Staff As the subject lands are considered part of the City's green space system and are managed as parks by the City, staff would not support the disposal of these lands. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: August 25, 2004 Attachments : 1 728 729 RES. #B170/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND South side of St. Clair Avenue East, south of the Parkview Hill Crescent South intersection (northeast corner of Taylor Creek Park) CFN 34614. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Stan Sukunda to explore the possibility of the sale of a fragment of TRCA -owned land located on the south side of St. Clair Avenue East, south of the Parkview Hill Crescent South intersection (northeast corner of Taylor Creek Park), City of Toronto - Toronto and East York Community Council Area, Don River watershed. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) -owned land located on the south side of St . Clair Avenue East, south of the Parkview Hill Crescent South intersection (northeast corner of Taylor Creek Park ), City of Toronto - Toronto and East York Community Council Area , be retained for conservation and park purposes . CARRIED BACKGROUND A letter was received from Stan Sukunda requesting the sale of a fragment of TRCA -owned land, situated at the northern edge of Taylor Creek Park and fronting on St. Clair Avenue East, for the construction of a single family dwelling. At Executive Committee Meeting #9/03, October 3, 2003, Resolution #B142/03 was approved as follows: THAT the potential disposal of a fragment of land on the south side of St. Clair Avenue East, south of the Parkview Hill Crescent South intersection (northeast corner of Taylor Creek Park), City of Toronto (former Borough of East York) be referred to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff for review and discussion in accordance with established TRCA policies; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. This request was circulated to TRCA technical staff and staff of the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. The following comments were received: • TRCA's Technical Staff The site has a gentle slope and it appears that a few trees would have to be cut down to accommodate a dwelling. It is felt the subject tablelands provide an important connection to the valley corridor in this location and should be protected. There is potential to improve the natural features and functions of this property through regeneration with native plant material; loss of this land would be contrary to the TRCA's Natural Heritage Strategy Program interests. 730 • City of Toronto Economic Development , Culture & Tourism Staff As the subject lands are considered part of the City's green space system and are managed as parks by the City, staff would not support the disposal of these lands. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: August 26, 2004 Attachments : 1 731 Attachment 1 ua3doad 33fef S 732 RES. #B171/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR EXCHANGE OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND Adjacent to 60 Esther Lorrie Drive, CFN 34119. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore the possibility of a land exchange involving a small fragment of land adjacent to 60 Esther Lorrie Drive, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area, Humber River watershed. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC) for the TRCA to enter into an exchange of lands with The Mink Dynasty Ltd ., the owner of 60 Esther Lorrie Drive , City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area , in order to resolve an encroachment on the adjacent TRCA -owned lands ; AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the TRCA that it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives , as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act , to proceed with this land exchange ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA enter into an exchange of lands with The Mink Dynasty Ltd . on the following basis : 1. The Mink Dynasty Ltd . will convey to the TRCA a parcel of land containing 0.034 hectares (0.085 acres), more or Tess , being Part of Blocks A and C , Registered Plan 5473, City of Toronto (formerly City of Etobicoke ) and further described as Part 1 on a draft Reference Plan prepared by Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc ., Ontario Land Surveyors , under their Job No . 02 -1413; 2. The TRCA will convey to The Mink Dynasty Ltd . a parcel of land containing 0.034 hectares (0.085 acres), more or less , being Part of Block C , Registered Plan 5473 and Part of Block L , Registered Plan 7260, City of Toronto (formerly City of Etobicoke ) and further described as Part 2 on a draft Reference Plan prepared by Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc ., Ontario Land Surveyors , under Job No . 02 -1413 subject to : (a) a restrictive covenant over Part 2 prohibiting the existing hard surface to be increased ; (b) barriers be installed by The Mink Dynasty Ltd . to the satisfaction of Economic Development , Culture & Tourism, along the perimeter of the parking lot within 6 months of the exchange ; 3. The Mink Dynasty Ltd . be responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the exchange including survey , legal, registration , etc.; 733 4. Completion of this sale will be subject to any planning act approvals that may be required ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers and Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act C .27, as amended ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of any necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND At Executive Committee Meeting #8/03, September 5, 2003, Resolution #B125/03 was approved as follows: THAT the potential disposal of a small fragment of land at 60 Esther Lorrie Drive, City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area) be referred to Authority staff for review and discussion in accordance with established Authority policies; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. The subject encroachment involves the expansion of a paved parking lot onto the adjacent TRCA lands for the apartment complexes at this site which are owned by The Mink Dynasty Ltd.; this encroachment was identified in the early 1990's. The City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC), which includes a representative from TRCA staff, had initially considered a land exchange to resolve this encroachment at its meeting of September 30, 2002 and further discussed this matter at a subsequent meeting in mid November of 2002. The ERC recommended approval of the exchange of land, subject to the following conditions: • The applicant absorb all costs, survey, registration, etc. • The existing area of hard surface (currently asphalt) will not increase. • Barriers along the perimeter of the parking lot to deter inappropriate park use will be installed within 6 months of the land swap. Prior to installation, the design is subject to approval by the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture & Tourism. • The applicant is required to submit an application for variance of zoning with the Committee of Adjustment. The TRCA, as current landowner, will provide the necessary documentation so that this can proceed concurrently with the ERC process. 734 The Etobicoke Community Council recommended to City of Toronto Council the resolution of this encroachment on the basis as set out above at its meeting of May 21, 2003 and the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting held on June 24, 25, and 26, 2003, adopted, without amendment, the same recommendation from the ERC. TRCA's Development Services Section staff were circulated the proposed land exchange for review and comment and has confirmed that the proposal is in conformance with our Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies. The area of encroachment is located entirely on tableland. The lands to be received from The Mink Dynasty Ltd. are immediately adjacent to a densely vegetated area that is contiguous with the Humber River valley corridor and is considered to be of higher ecological value than the encroachment lands. In addition, TRCA geotechnical staff has confirmed that The Mink Dynasty lands are stable and the dense vegetation provides excellent protection against erosion. Negotiations have been conducted with The Mink Dynasty Ltd. lawyer, Mr. Leonard Rodness of Torken Manes Cohen Arbus LLP, Barristers & Solicitors. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. RATIONALE The lands being acquired fall within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. The acquisition of this property resolves a long standing encroachment and helps consolidate the TRCA holdings into a more meaningful and useful form which provides for the long -term protection of this reach of the West Humber River valley corridor. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The parcel being acquired will be turned over to the City of Toronto and is to be included in the management agreement between the city and the TRCA FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: August 24, 2004 Attachments : 1 735 Attachment 1 4 • • _t 0. • - 1_ • , a I t 1- s OF ENCROACHMENT 5 J. 736 RES. #B172/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A JEWISH WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING Earl Bales Park Agreement, CFN 24282. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) approval for construction of a Jewish War Veterans Memorial Building on TRCA owned lands under management agreement with the City of Toronto at Earl Bales Park. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS certain lands owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) situate in Earl Bales Park in the City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area have been turned over to the City of Toronto for management under the terms of an agreement between the City of Toronto and the TRCA ; WHEREAS the Council of the City of Toronto is supportive of the request by the Jewish War Veterans of Canada to construct and operate a Jewish War Veterans Memorial Building on the basis as set out in Clause No . 46 contained in Report No . 3 which was received, without amendment , by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on April 15 and 16, 2004; AND WHEREAS TRCA is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) approval for construction of a Jewish War Veterans Memorial Building on TRCA -owned lands under management agreement with the City of Toronto at Earl Bales Park ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA approve the city entering into a lease for the construction and operation of a Jewish War Veterans Memorial Building with the Jewish War Veterans of Canada as outlined in Clause No . 46 contained in Report No . 3, received by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting of April 15 and 16, 2004, subject to terms satisfactory to TRCA 's staff and solicitor ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents CARRIED BACKGROUND An agreement dated May 21, 1976 between the TRCA, the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (now the amalgamated City of Toronto), and the former City of North York (now the North York Community Council Area), permitted the City of North York to utilize certain TRCA -owned lands in Earl Bales Park previously operated by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for park and recreation purposes. Under the terms of the agreement the city is required to obtain written approval from TRCA for any park development and for subleasing. 737 TRCA is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to permit the Jewish War Veterans of Canada to construct and operate a Jewish War Veterans Memorial Building on TRCA property in Earl Bales Park. The proposed location of the Jewish War Veterans Memorial Building is in an area within Earl Bales Park identified for more active use. Staff have reviewed the proposal and are satisfied that TRCA policy and program interests will not be adversely impacted by the proposed works. The site of the proposed memorial building is situated immediately east of Bathurst Street, south of Sheppard Avenue, and is located entirely on tableland within Earl Bales Park, a far distance away from the West Don River valley corridor. Both TRCA and City of Toronto staff feel that the proposal will not compromise any future renaturalization plans for this portion of the park. RATIONALE The management of these lands is compatible with the TRCA's objectives. FINANCIAL DETAILS In accordance with the terms and conditions of the management agreement, no revenue or expense will be incurred in this instance by the TRCA Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: August 25, 2004 Attachments : 1 738 Attachment 1 REQUEST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A JEWISH WAN VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING, Earl Bales Park Agreement CFN 24282 SHEPPOID { 4' r= vw4cairer vvis, #400 , 4,44, 44,, V.4*,#■ 4 14.$474` ..4010" #.00-& etite" 0 AtO*4 Cr:4r Fir Wonservatron for The Living City -]TRCA LANDS PROPOSED BUILDING SITE 739 RES. #8173/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION Proposed Woodbine Beach Bus Loop at Lake Shore Boulevard East and Northern Dancer Boulevard, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), CFN 35691. Receipt of a request from the Toronto Transit Commission for licence of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) lands at Ashbridge's Bay Park for a Bus Loop located at Lake Shore Boulevard East and Northern Dancer Boulevard, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is the owner of lands in the vicinity of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Northern Dancer Boulevard , City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area) forming part of Ashbridge 's Bay Park ; WHEREAS the subject lands are managed by the City of Toronto in accordance with the terms and conditions of an agreement dated October 11, 1972; AND WHEREAS TRCA and the City of Toronto are in receipt of a request from the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to provide a licence of TRCA land for the proposed Woodbine Beach Bus Loop ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA approve of entering into a licence of 0.050 hectares (0.123 acres), more or less , for exclusive use by the TTC and 0.008 hectares (0.019 acres) more or less , for nonexclusive use by the TTC , said land being Part Block K, Registered Plan 520E, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area ); THAT the licence be premised on the following : (a) The initial term of the licence will be for ten years with a renewal option for an additional ten years ; (b) The licence fee is to be the nominal consideration of $1.00 per annum ; (c) TTC will be solely responsible for all costs associated with the construction of the bus loop; (d) TTC is to obtain agreement for this proposal from the City of Toronto 's Economic Development , Culture and Tourism department ; (e) Prior to commencing construction , an archaeological review is to be carried out if deemed necessary by TRCA , with any mitigative measures being carried out at the expense of TTC to the satisfaction of TRCA ; 740 THAT the granting of this licence be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C .27 as amended , if required ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Woodbine Beach bus loop is required by the TTC to replace the current on- street looping via Rainsford Road and Columbine Avenue, and to allow the extension of bus service to Ashbridge's Bay Park and the new Beaches West development on the former Greenwood Racetrack site. The current Rainsford /Columbine on- street looping has been problematic for some time with numerous complaints from local residents and a difficult south -to -west right turn from Woodbine Avenue to Queen Street. The Woodbine South bus route was approved in 1997 to be extended to the new Beaches West development, looping on- street via Lake Shore Boulevard East, Winners Circle, Boardwalk and Northern Dancer Blvd., once these new streets were open. However, as a result of consultations with new residents on these streets, the local councillor has requested that the TTC find an alternative, off - street loop location. The only alternative is to build an off - street loop on the south side of Lake Shore Blvd. East, opposite Northern Dancer Blvd. within the Ashbridge's Bay Park public parking lot. The amount of parking spaces to be lost as a result of the bus loop will not exceed twenty -five. The Economic, Development, Culture and Tourism department have reviewed this proposal and are in agreement with the proposal to construct a bus loop at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS In accordance with the terms and conditions of the management agreement with the City of Toronto, no revenues or expenses will be incurred by TRCA in this instance. Report prepared by : Mike Fenning , extension 5223 For Information contact : Ron Dewell , extension 5245, Mike Fenning , extension 5223 Date: August 27, 2004 Attachments : 2 741 Attachment 1 LAKE SHORE BLVD E. Q m i' EICCl11SIVE 316E t�f r``�.r j LAKE ONTARIu TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION Proposed Woodbine Beach Bus Loop at Lakeshore Boulevard East and Northern Dancer Boulevard. City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area) CFN 35691 • 742 rcnrvn.w,.new, --. onservaf�on for The living City JTRCALANDS 5 hgdent::::i9SUBJECI PROPERTY Attachment 2 a 4 km I akal t170.9 1.1041.k.ON Imes.] 37NAAN3 "*0 rrnatorawese• 1)1 a a owurrInt. VINW119[11 .1e01.1 MA', 4k 743 .112:1•11 L a 4 1 1 1 a n h thew-mem, arm RES. #B174[04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE EARTH RANGERS FOUNDATION LEASE WITH TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY CFN 31514. Receipt of requests by The Earth Rangers Foundation (Earth Rangers) for a six month extension to their lease payment and to assist them with respect to their Development Charges Deferral Agreement with the City of Vaughan. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Earth Rangers Foundation (Earth Rangers) entered into a lease of certain lands within the Kortright Centre for Conservation , City of Vaughan , with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for the construction and operation of a wildlife veterinary and rehabilitation centre ; AND WHEREAS TRCA is in receipt of requests from The Earth Rangers Foundation for a six month extension to their lease payment and to assist them with respect to their Development Charges Deferral Agreement ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA grant a six month extension to their lease payment, to January 31, 2005, subject to there being no other defaults occurring through this period ; THAT TRCA enter into an agreement with the City of Vaughan with respect to Development Charges Deferral Agreement with Earth Rangers ; THAT all reasonable costs related to the agreement be paid by Earth Rangers AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents and indemnities by Earth Rangers . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Earth Rangers Foundation entered into a lease, dated August 1, 2001, of certain lands within the Kortright Centre for Conservation, City of Vaughan for the construction and operation of a wildlife veterinary and rehabilitation centre. Construction of the Earth Rangers building has recently been completed, staff are in place and are beginning programming. Lease Payment Extension Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Earth Rangers requesting a six month extension to their lease payment due July 31, 2004. It is understood that they have had significant cost overruns on the building and this extension would reduce their borrowing requirements The lease payments outlined in the agreement are as follows: 744 • $50,000 on execution of the lease agreement • $350,000 by no later than July 31, 2003 • $400,000 by no later than July 31, 2004 • $400,000 by no later than July 31, 2005 The $50,000 and $350,000 payments were received when due. The majority of the lease revenue has been committed to The Living City Centre at Kortright. Funds received from Earth Rangers are being used for the existing building assessment and preliminary design work, the costs of which are more than covered by the lease revenue collected to date. As a result there would be minimal financial impact to the TRCA; and therefore staff are prepared to recommend granting the six month extension of the $400,000.00 lease payment due, from July 31, 2004, to January 31, 2005. Development Charges Deferral Agreement By agreements between Earth Rangers and the City of Vaughan, dated January 23, 2003 and June 23, 2003, the City of Vaughan agreed to defer payment of development charges in the amount of $78,792.00 and $7,555.00. In September of 2003, The City of Vaughan advised Earth Rangers that in order for the Development Charge Deferral Agreement to be registered on title the Earth Rangers must first obtain the landlords / TRCA signed consent. In effect, TRCA is being asked to charge its interest in land for costs. Unfortunately, there is no provision in the Conservation Authorities Act permitting a conservation authority to charge or encumber its properties and while there is provision for a conservation authority to sell or dispose of an interest in land with the consent of the Minister of Natural Resources; TRCA staff have been advised that the provision does not apply to mortgaging or charging the land. There is no provision for the city to exempt development charges, only to defer such charges. To resolve this issue, the option recommended is that should the City of Vaughan exercise its right to demand payment of the deferred development charges, TRCA will undertake to pay the outstanding development charges. TRCA will recover this payment of development charges from Earth Rangers as set out in the lease. The City of Vaughan has responded favourably to this option and has drafted an agreement to this effect. Report prepared by : Ron Dewell , extension 5245 For Information contact : Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: August 31, 2004 RES. #B175/04 - DREAM WORKS PROPERTY INC . AND CITY OF VAUGHAN ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING Authorization for party status before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on referrals related to a draft plan of subdivision and zoning by -law amendment to permit a residential draft plan of subdivision. 745 Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT authorization be given to staff to obtain party status before the Ontario Municipal Board , regarding a proposed draft plan of subdivision , and associated zoning by -law amendment application , that is not in conformity with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program or the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan ; THAT staff continue to work cooperatively with our municipal partners , provincial agencies and the appellants to ensure that the requirements of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan are met ; THAT staff be authorized to retain legal counsel to pursue this appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board ; AND FURTHER THAT the Ontario Municipal Board and all parties and participants to the hearing be so advised . CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject property is a 39.7- hectare (98.1 -acre) parcel on the east side of Keele Street between Kirby and Teston Roads in the City of Vaughan in the Don River watershed; the eastern half of the property is on the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM). The Planning Act application for the subject property is to amend the City of Vaughan's zoning by -law and to implement a draft plan of residential subdivision of approximately 409 lots. The application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) by the proponents of the application for the City of Vaughan's failure to render a decision on the application within the review period allotted by The Planning Act. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff have submitted written comments on the application to the City of Vaughan planning department and to the applicant. Staff comments explain that we do not support the application as submitted on the basis that it proposes to eliminate two of a number of natural heritage features on the subject property in favour of residential Tots and roads. One natural feature proposed for elimination is a portion of the Keele Wetland Complex, a locally significant wetland. The other natural feature is the headwater portion of a West Don River tributary. Both features have been altered by historical filling and grading activities, but have been identified as features requiring further study to determine their ecological value and to determine the impact that their elimination would have on the ecological integrity of the Oak Ridges Moraine. The two features proposed for elimination do not fall within the ORM portion of the property. However, the wetland portion proposed for elimination is connected to the portion of the wetland that is on the ORM; the latter is proposed for protection in the subdivision application. Given the limited information on the form and function of the natural features proposed for elimination, and on the subsequent potential impacts, our correspondence requested further ecological information in order to support the application as proposed, in accordance with TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and the province's Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. Through this correspondence, the City of Vaughan and the applicants have been made aware that TRCA staff are of the opinion that the environmental 746 impact study submitted by the applicants' consultant is not adequate, and that more information and a further site visit are requested in this regard. RATIONALE A pre- hearing for this appeal took place on August 18, 2004, prior to TRCA staff being able to bring a report forward to the Executive Committee. At the pre- hearing, staff submitted to the OMB a copy of our latest correspondence on the application. The applicants submitted orally at the pre- hearing that they intend to address TRCA comments and arrange a site visit with staff as requested. In the meantime, staff requested and were granted party status at the OMB hearing, ensuring that TRCA's concerns would be heard before the OMB at the upcoming hearing. Staff submitted a draft "issues list" to the OMB at the pre- hearing as follows: 1. What are the natural features on the property that merit protection? 2. Is there adequate hydrological and hydrogeological information to assure protection of the form and function of the natural features? 3. Does the proposal achieve conformity with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan with respect to maintaining the ecological integrity of the Moraine? The OMB scheduled a continuance of the pre - hearing (at the request of the City of Vaughan, who did not have a Council position on the application at the time of the pre- hearing) on October 22, 2004. The OMB also scheduled a two -week hearing on the matter, commencing December 6, 2004. DETAILS OF THE WORK TO BE DONE Staff are requesting the authorization of the Authority to retain legal counsel to argue the three, above -noted issues. Staff and retained legal counsel will continue to work with the parties and participants to the hearing to resolve the outstanding issues, and will continue to represent the interests of TRCA before the OMB. Report prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For Information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: August 31, 2004 RES. #B176/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PORT UNION WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT , CITY OF TORONTO Tenders ESO4 -23, ESO4 -24, ESO4 -25 and ESO4 -26 - Supply and Delivery of Quarry Stone and Round Stone. Award of Contracts ESO4 -23, ESO4 -24, ESO4 -25 and ESO4 -26 for supply and delivery of quarry stone and round stone. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan 747 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff conduct a review of the bids to be opened at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee on September 10, 2004 and based on this review prepare a recommendation for award of Contracts ES O4 -23, ESO4 -24, ESO4 -25 and ES O4 -26 for the supply and delivery of quarry stone and round stone for consideration at Authority Meeting #8/04, to be held on September 24, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority was unable to make major purchasing commitments until the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) committed funding to this project. Funding has now been secured and staff have tendered for the purchase of materials for the next phase of the shoreline protection works. In order to meet the projected budget expenditures and proposed works on time, we ask that these contracts go through to Authority Meeting #8104 for award. Staff have publicly tendered for the supply and delivery of quarry stone and round stone for the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project, shoreline protection works. Sealed bids will be opened by the Tender Opening Sub - Committee on September 10, 2004. Staff will review the bids received and forward a recommendation to the Authority for award of contracts at meeting #8/04, to be held on September 24, 2004. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this project is supplied from the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Funding is available in account 223 -70. Report prepared by : Joe DeIle Faye , 416 - 392 -9724 For Information contact : Joe Delle Faye , 416 - 392 -9724 Date: September 01, 2004 RES. #B177/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE LIVING CITY CENTRE AT KORTRIGHT Proposal for Consulting Services to Support the Realization of The Living City Centre. Retain Enerlife Consulting to support the development of The Living City Centre and management of ongoing programs. Michael Di Biase Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Enerlife Consulting be retained to complete project management services in accordance with Phase III of their proposal to support the realization of The Living City Centre , at a cost not to exceed $266,300, plus GST, in 2004, subject to available funding . CARRIED 748 BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), through The Living City vision, intends to take a leadership role in developing the Toronto region as one of the most sustainable and livable urban communities in the world. The Living City Centre at Kortright is to be the strategic heart of the vision, a window into The Living City, promoting the implementation of sustainable urban development and community living Over the past two years, TRCA has been working closely with Enerlife Consulting to make The Living City Centre, together with The Living City vision and new programs a tangible and measurable reality. The work with Enerlife Consulting was initiated in 2002 when they were retained to assist with The Living City Centre program, including the Kortright Building Assessment as part of Phase I. At Authority Meeting #8/02, held on September 27, 2002, resolution #A223/02, as follows, was approved: THAT Enerlife Consulting be hired to complete project management services /17 accordance with Phase l of the /r proposal within 2002 to support the realization of The Living City Centre, at the cost of $56, 610; AND FURTHER THAT Enerlife be contracted to complete the full proposal in 2003 at a total cost of approximately $135,000, subsequent to the satisfactory completion of Phase l and the availability of funding in 2003. The final total cost for Phase land II was $136,880 with a variance of $1,880 from the cost estimated at the start of the initiative. Activities completed by Enerlife Consulting for Phase I and Phase II are identified in Attachment 1 and are described in more detail below. In Phase I, Enerlife established a strong foundation on which the physical campus and outreach programs for The Living City Centre could be developed. A vision document for The Living City Centre was developed and tested with TRCA's Management Committee, key stakeholders from the community and TRCA staff. The overall program design and budget were created. The contact list for fundraising and partnership building was produced and contact with potential partners was initiated, including the first funding for the centre from BASF. Enerlife managed the contract with Enermodal for the visitor centre assessment, which was largely complete by the end of the year. A plan for communications and a case for support were designed in conjunction with TRCA staff. The campus plan development framework was prepared and Enerlife worked with TRCA to assess proposals from consultants to undertake the work. Enerlife met with the surrounding area school board and obtained commitment for a design meeting in January with the City of Vaughan and developers. The proposed pilot projects of the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge, Greening the Urban Village, Renewable Energy, Building Sustainable Communities, and the speaker series "In Conversation with..." were defined and work began. Governance of The Living City Centre was initiated with the planning of the first Advisory Committee meeting, which was to take place in May of 2003, and contacting potential committee members. 749 In Phase II, Enerlife built upon the foundation of Phase I to expand the development of programs and the scope of management activities, as well as build more partnerships for The Living City Centre. The program design and budget were updated to include a wider range of activities, including the speaker series, "In Conversation with... ", and the newsletter for stakeholders. A number of partnerships were developed with businesses, sustainable communities, similar- minded organizations, municipalities and federal and provincial governments. An improved plan for communications was developed between TRCA and Enerlife, including upgrades to The Living City website and greater communications with stakeholders. Two speaker events were held in June and November, bringing together international and local architects and green building design experts The campus plan was further developed, tendered and architectsAlliance was retained. In February, a Surrounding Area Design Charette was held with representatives from local, provincial and federal governments, regional planning departments, school boards, local utilities and developers to discuss sustainable design options for the area surrounding the Kortright Centre for Conservation. Work was also completed on renewable energy through a Renewable Energy Workshop that was held in February with industry, government and educators to identify technologies, opportunities and trends. Governance of The Living City Centre began with two advisory committee meetings throughout the year, which helped shape the vision and direction of the development of the programs and campus plan. Program development moved from design to initial execution during Phase II. The Mayors' Megawatt Challenge was presented to and approved by Mayor McCallion, who then took it to other mayors in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). By the end of the year, funding was in place and the first workshop had taken place. The design of the Greening Health Care program was completed, the idea was introduced to the executives of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and West Park Healthcare Centre, and an initial planning meeting took place in December. The two programs, Mayors' Megawatt Challenge and Greening Health Care that were initiated in 2003 and are ongoing in 2004 are described in more detail below. Mayors' Megawatt Challenge The Mayors' Megawatt Challenge brings municipalities together to share their energy management knowledge and experience. By working together, municipalities are able to benchmark their facilities against other similar facilities, giving them a clear picture of their performance. The program also provides a chance for them to benefit from group purchasing and to provide an example for other sectors and other communities. Community -wide benefits of the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge include reduced municipal operating costs, lower greenhouse gas emissions, cleaner local air, improved buildings and opportunities for local businesses. Adopted in the Toronto and Region 2003 Intergovernmental Declaration on Clean Air, the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge is sponsored by NRCan's Office of Energy Efficiency. Municipalities participating in the Mayors' Megawatt Challenge include Barrie Brampton, Burlington, Markham, Milton, Mississauga, Oakville, Oshawa, Richmond Hill, Toronto, Vaughan and Whitby. This group of municipalities includes a population of 5.3 million people. 750 Greening Health Care Many Toronto region hospitals have long been champions of energy efficiency and environmental management. Actions have included policy direction, facility retrofit projects, design standards, operational procedures, staff training and awareness campaigns. More than 40 Ontario hospitals have registered as Energy Innovators with the federal government program. Hospitals in Ontario have been among the finalists for Canada's Energy Efficiency Awards. To further their achievements, hospitals from across the region are working together under The Living City banner towards excellence in energy efficiency and environmental management The Greening Health Care initiative is helping hospitals work together to lower energy and operating costs, reduce environmental impact, share best practices for energy cost savings and emissions reductions, develop coordinated approaches for facility retrofit and new construction projects, attract greater federal and utility funding, increase staff satisfaction and build a stronger public image. This model will then be extended to hospitals and other sectors across Ontario. There are 14 hospital corporations participating in the program, representing 24 hospital sites. Based on the satisfactory completion of the work proposed in 2002 and 2003 and the level of progress made by Enerlife in articulating the vision, designing programs and initiating pilot projects, Enerlife Consulting was retained in 2004 to continue working on ongoing initiatives and to further develop The Living City concept. RATIONALE Over the past two years, Enerlife has been successful in helping to make The Living City vision more tangible and measurable and to initiate a number of new program areas. They have established successful programs in the municipal and health sectors and are in the process of developing programs for homeowners, as well as the education sector. The advisory committee is well established, drawing on a diverse group of experts in various sectors to help steer the agenda and set the goals for The Living City. The Enerlife team has strong connections with business as well as the federal and provincial governments. Enerlife has expertise in the areas of energy efficiency and green buildings two new areas of activity for TRCA through The Living City. Enerlife Consulting is integral to the delivery of programs initiated in Phase I and II and the completion of programs that are currently under development that will establish The Living City Centre as a centre of excellence in the sustainability of city regions. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE To follow is an outline of the scope of work for all three phases of the program. Phase III activities are identified as ongoing. Descriptions of new programs currently under development are described in item 11 Pilot Programs (ongoing). 751 1. Vision for The Living City Centre (completed in Phase I ) Based on previous vision statements, Enerlife drafted a vision statement document together with suggested implications, tentative roles and illustrative initiatives derived from the vision. This document was tested with the Management Committee, key players in the surrounding community, and TRCA staff to produce a final, approved vision document with broad internal and external support. 2. Program Design and Management (completed in Phase I ) Enerlife prepared and managed a work plan and budget for The Living City Centre development overall for a two-year period beginning September 2002. Communications, presentations and reports to senior management and TRCA boards were prepared and delivered as needed. As the scope of the work changed and expanded, many of these tasks were moved to ongoing Project Management (see item 12. Project Management). 3. Building Assessment (completed in Phase I ) The terms of reference for the assessment of the existing Kortright building were reviewed and adapted to reflect the approved vision. Initial development and management of the contract was provided. 4. Development Plan and Management (completed in Phase I ) The rationale, planning process, timelines and initial budget for the concept development of the centre and related projects were prepared. This included prior work done on market analysis and the business case. Enerlife managed the development of the program and the initial concept definition, as well as participated in the hiring and directing of consultants and reporting on progress. 5. Campus Design Brief (ongoing) Managing the preparation of the design brief of The Living City Centre by the selected design team who are implementing the program and concept plan. 6. Partnership Development (ongoing) Working with TRCA to develop and build on existing contacts to create a network of prospective partners from the surrounding community (including municipal governments, school boards, churches and developers), the Toronto region (including utility companies, businesses, universities, colleges, non - profit groups and organizations), provincial and federal governments, and other city regions. Assisting in presentations and partnership development activities. 7. Communications and Newsletter (ongoing) Enerlife has been focusing its communication initiatives for The Living City on helping develop a strong brand, develop an active virtual community on The Living City website, and increasing the knowledge and awareness of The Living City and its programs. Enerlife and The Living City Centre team produces a bi- annual newsletter, called Sustainable City, sent to everyone who has been involved with The Living City to date. This newsletter provides an update on the development of The Living City Centre at Kortright, all of The Living City programs, as well as interesting news items. 752 8. Surrounding Area (completed in Phase II ) Working with the TRCA to address development of the area surrounding Kortright, in consultation with local municipalities, local developers, community leaders and others. In February 2003, a Community Design Charette was held to determine appropriate principles of sustainability, for inclusion in current development around the Kortright Centre and the new City of Vaughan official plan, and to help determine how to bring them to reality. This program activity was essentially completed but has led directly to a project funded by Canada Mortgage and Housing (CMHC) to engage the municipal and development sectors in the creation of an action plan for increasing the adoption of green community design and green residential housing construction for the City of Vaughan. The CMHC project will be undertaken in 2004 and 2005. 9. Fundraising and Case for Support (completed in Phase I ) The initial case for support was developed to assist fundraising initiatives for The Living City Centre. On an ongoing basis, Enerlife actively participates in fundraising initiatives, including writing and presenting proposals. 10. Governance (ongoing) Develop and oversee the governance of The Living City until a permanent governance structure is implemented. The primary body of governance is the advisory committee for The Living City. Initiated in May 2003, it brings together a wide - ranging group of developers, business people, architects, academics, community planners and others. This group provides guidance on the direction for The Living City and its programs, along with assisting with partnership and new program development 11. Pilot Programs (ongoing) Working with The Living City team to develop the ongoing strategy and initiate development of individual pilot programs designed to realize The Living City vision. Four key programs under development are the Home Energy ClinicTM, Green Community Design and Residential Housing, Sustainable Communities Development and Sustainable Schools. Home Energy Clinic"' The Home Energy ClinicTM provides a complete solution for customers who wish to make energy efficiency improvements to their homes, but do not know where to start. The Home Energy Clinic TM provides them with what they need to find out about the energy efficiency of their house, book an energy audit, purchase and finance the products and services they need to implement improvements, learn how to perform the work and apply for incentive payments. The Home Energy Clinic TM can also help contractors working with homeowners to install energy efficiency projects. Initially the Home Energy ClinicTM web -based resource is being rolled out in partnership with Home Depot in Ontario towards the end of 2004. The program will be rolled out to the rest of the country following a test period of a couple of months. A pilot program testing at an in -store kiosk for access to the Home Energy Clinic TM is tentatively planned for early 2005. 753 Projected expenditures for this project are approximately $379,000. Home Depot has made a pledge of $230,000 and staff are actively pursuing funding sources for the remaining $149,000. Green Community Design and Residential Housing This is a research project that will be conducted in partnership with the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. The goal of the project is to develop an understanding of the marketplace for green community design and green residential housing construction in order to facilitate the creation of an action plan for increasing the application of best practices in a local municipality. In developing an action plan to accelerate market transformation towards best practices in green community design and green residential housing construction in the City of Vaughan, the project will: 1. Create a framework outlining best practices in green community design and green residential housing construction. 2. Benchmark the current state of best practices in green community design and green residential housing construction in the City of Vaughan. 3. Define the barriers to and levers for promoting more extensive market penetration of best practices. 4. Create a plan for accelerating and monitoring the use of best practices within the City of Vaughan. 5. Publish the results on TRCA's web -site and promote them to individual municipalities. The project will be undertaken in the City of Vaughan but the results will be applicable to other municipalities in the GTA and across Canada. Funding of $24,950 for this project will be provided by CMHC through their External Research Program once the terms of reference and contract have been prepared. Sustainable Communities Development The Sustainable Communities Development program brings together public- and private- sector leaders with project managers working on sustainable development projects to characterize and share best practices in sustainable design. The aim is to provide realistic solutions for implementing sustainability at the community levet The program will create a living web -based framework of best practices aimed at benchmarking and raising the bar for what can be achieved in sustainable community planning and design. The framework will be grounded in actual applications in use on the various projects and developed in consultation with corporate leaders from builders and developers, along with their counterparts from municipal and regional governments. Structured interviews will be conducted with leaders of these projects to better understand the state of current practices. The results of these interviews will be used to establish the web -based resource as a knowledge base for defining and monitoring practices, progress and outcomes. 754 A preliminary work plan and budget are being developed for this project Expenditures for this project are expected to be in the range of $150,000. The Remedial Action Plan (RAP) has made a commitment of $15,000 for this project and staff are actively pursuing other funding sources. Sustainable Schools The Toronto region is experiencing considerable growth. As urban development continues, schools are at the heart of both established and newly- formed communities. Sustainable school facilities can demonstrate and inspire the development of sustainable local communities, while contributing to the education of future generations of environmentally aware citizens. The Living City's sustainable schools program promotes and supports the construction and operation of exceptional schools through widespread adoption of the best in current green building design, technology and practices. The benefits of sustainable school facilities include: • Lower energy, operating and life -cycle costs; • Reduced greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact; • Healthy, productive working and learning environments; • Raised skill levels of design, construction and building operations professionals; and • Demonstration of green building and sustainable community design principles to other sectors. The sustainable schools program brings together owners and design teams of high schools which are under development for opening in 2006 -7, to work together on designing, building and operating exceptional educational facilities. In 2004, activities are focused on benchmarking the energy use in recently constructed schools in the GTA and from across Canada. Expenditures for Phase I in 2004 are projected to be between $25,000 and $45,000. The Ministry of Energy, Science and Technology has tentatively committed $24,500 for this phase of the project and is interested in funding subsequent phases. The estimated funding requirement for all four phases of this project is $265,000. 12. Project Management (ongoing) Ongoing preparation and delivery of communications, presentation and reports to management. Developing and updating plans for growth of The Living City programs, partnerships and vision. 13. Indicators and Reporting (ongoing) Working with other TRCA programs, outside experts and The Living City Advisory Committee to determine measurable, achievable indicators of sustainability that provide a gauge of the success of the programs and of the ongoing agenda for The Living City. 755 14. In Conversation with...Speaker Series (ongoing) Developing, planning and implementing an ongoing quarterly series that brings local and international experts to speak and facilitate discussions on a wide range of topics related to sustainability. The series focuses on real -life examples of what can be achieved and to provide practical solutions that can be implemented. 15. New Program Delivery (ongoing) Delivery of programs initiated by Enerlife and TRCA as part of Phase II activities. These two programs, Mayors' Megawatt Challenge and Greening Health Care are self funding and do not have financial implications for the TRCA. FINANCIAL DETAILS Total budget estimate of Phase III is a maximum of $266,800, plus GST, as outlined in Attachment 1. The table presents the tasks described above, the proposed cost for Phase III and the deliverables. The deliverables refer to either tasks completed in Phase I or II, as indicated, or ongoing activities. Report prepared by : Bernie McIntyre , extension 5326 For Information contact : Bernie McIntyre , extension 5326 Date: July 29, 2004 Attachments : 1 756 Attachment 1 Phase 111 Budget Task Phase III (2004) Deliverables 1. Vision Completed in Phase I Approved vision document. 2A. Program design Completed in Phase I Overall work plan and budget for The Living City Centre. 2B. Program management Completed in Phase I Meetings and reports to management . 3. Building assessment Completed in Phase 1 Completion of consultant report. 4A. Development plan Completed in Phase! Concept development plan and budget . 4B. Plan management Completed in Phase 1 Consultants hired and reports. 5. Campus Design Brief $2,000 Ongoing support as work progresses. 6. Partnership development $19,000 Ongoing partnership development. New partnership development to support fund - raising and programs. Maintain and build relationships with governments . 7. Communications $12,000 Maintaining and improving communications, including supporting website development, managing media relationships (as needed), developing communication as needed, and representing The Living City at conferences and other forums, as required. 7A. Newsletter $4,000 Update The Living City website content. Deliver two external newsletters throughout the year . 8. Surrounding area Completed in Phase!! Support for area surrounding The Living City Centre. 9A. Case for support Completed in Phase 1 Original document for fundraising and partnership support. 9B. Support fund - raising $18,000 Ongoing support for fundraising including strategy, networking, conferences, meetings, presentations. 10. Governance $6,000 Facilitating Advisory Committee meetings over the year. Ongoing 3 -year plan development. 11. Pilot Programs $18,000 Ongoing strategy and development of pilot programs designed to realize The Living City vision. 12. Project Management $9,800 Administration, program update reports, reporting to management. Implementing The Living City vision. 13. Indicators and Reporting $12,000 Development and GTA benchmarking of indicators for The Living City Centre project objectives. Reporting on measured improvements. 14. In Conversation with... $6,000 Four sessions of speaker series to be held quarterly. Sub -Total $106,800 15. New Program Delivery (Implementation of programs developed through the above expenditures ) - Mayors' Megawatt Challenge - Greening Health Care $27,000 $132,500 Ongoing delivery of Mayors' Megawatt Challenge and Greening Health Care. Activities include, program management, web site development, workshops, training, communications Sub -total $159,500 Total $266,300 757 RES. #B178/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: MAINTENANCE DREDGING ASHBRIDGE 'S BAY PARK, COATSWORTH CUT Award of Contract #ESO4 -15 to Ontario Construction Company Ltd. for the maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at Coatsworth Cut, Ashbridge's Bay Park, in the City of Toronto. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Contract #ESO4 -15 be awarded to Ontario Construction Company Ltd . for the maintenance dredging at Coatsworth Cut , Ashbridge's Bay Park , in the City of Toronto , for a total cost not to exceed $115,200, plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND Maintenance dredging of approximately 9,000 cubic metres of material was completed in 2003 by Soderholm Maritime Services. The material was removed off -site to Tommy Thompson Park and used in the construction of habitat projects within the park. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) performed a sounding survey of the Coatsworth Cut navigation channel in May of 2004. Results of this survey indicated that additional material had been deposited within portions of the channel. Due to the high water levels during the spring and summer seasons, sufficient water depths were maintained within the channel to allow for continued safe navigation. With lower water levels expected during the late summer and early fall, maintenance dredging was proposed to allow for continued navigation for the balance of the 2004 boating season and into 2005. RATIONALE Due to the redistribution of material within the channel and additional deposition, portions of the channel have become narrowed, limiting safe navigation for the local boaters for the remainder of the 2004 season and into 2005. As a result, TRCA proposes to remove approximately 4,000 cubic metres of material using a combination of water and land based equipment for dredging and off -site deposal. The dredgate is proposed for use in the construction of a number of habitat projects at Tommy Thompson Park, including the sediment capping project at Cell One. Bids were requested from three pre - qualified contractors for Contract #ESO4 -15 with the following bids received: BIDDERS NAME SUBTOTAL TOTAL TENDER PRICE (Including GST ) Ontario Construction Company $ 115,200.00 $ 123,264.00 Somerville Construction $ 188,900.00 $ 202,123.00 McKeil Marine NO BID NO BID 758 Based on previous experience with dredging projects at Coatsworth Cut, the price submitted by the lowest bidder, based on the total volume to be dredged, is within staff's projected cost estimate and therefore, it is recommended that Contract #ES04 -15 be awarded to Ontario Construction Company Ltd. in the amount of $115,200, plus GST. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available in account #211 -16. Report prepared by : Mark Preston , 416 - 392 -9722 For Information contact : Mark Preston , 416 - 392 -9722 Date: August 27, 2004 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES.#B179/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 - 8.1.9, inclusive , and 8.1.39 - 8.1.42, inclusive), which are listed below . CARRIED 759 CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.1 CITY OF BRAMPTON To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Torbram Road, in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to construct in a floodplain and alter a watercourse feature associated with Mimico Creek, in order to facilitate the repair of an existing culvert located at Torbram Road and Balmoral Drive, in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • General Arrangement , prepared by Planmac Inc ., drawing no . BR -41 (Sheet 1 of 5), dated February 23, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff March 1, 2004. • Ceiling & Inside Walls Repairs , prepared by Planmac Inc ., drawing no . BR -41 (Sheet 2 of 5), dated February 23, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff March 1, 2004. • Repairs & Details, prepared by Planmac Inc ., drawing no. BR -41 (Sheet 3 of 5), dated February 23, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff March 1, 2004. • Temporary Traffic Control , prepared by Planmac Inc ., drawing BR -41 (Sheet 4 of 5), dated February 23, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff March 1, 2004. • Environmental Protection , prepared by Planmac Inc ., drawing no . BR -41 (Sheet 6 of 6), dated August 19, 2004, revised August 19, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff August 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of the proposal is to construct within the Regional Storm Floodplain and alter a watercourse feature associated with Mimico Creek, in order to facilitate the repair of an existing culvert located at Torbram Road and Balmoral Drive, in the City of Brampton. The works proposed involve 'spot repairs' to a portion of the concrete -lined channel immediately upstream of the culvert. TRCA technical staff has determined that the proposed works are considered to be a mitigable Harmful Alteration, Disruption and Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat. The HADD can be mitigated through the issuance of a Letter of Advice (LOA) given that the works occur within the required warm water construction timing window and during low flow periods Control of Flooding: As the works only involve 'spot repairs' to the existing culvert, there will be no impacts to the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. 760 Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to any works commencing on the subject property and will be maintained throughout construction. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation will be adversely impacted as a result of construction. There are no geotechnical issues involved with the proposed works. All fisheries related issues will be addressed through the issuance of a Letter of Advice. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to original condition with a native and non - invasive seed mix. Policy Guidelines: The works are in conformity with Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). CFN: 35241 - Application #: 083 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Adam Miller , extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: September 1, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.2 THE TDL GROUP CORP . To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 18, Concession 1, (1725 Kingston Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by The TDL Group Corp. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a Tim Hortons restaurant and drive thru within the Pickering Town Centre Special Policy Area The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Red -line revised Site Plan , Drawing SP , prepared by R .V. Anderson Associates Limited dated Jan 2004, date received August 6, 2004 • Red -line revised Grading Plan , Drawing SG 1, prepared by R .V. Anderson Associates Limited, dated Jan 2004, date received August 6, 2004 • Sediment Control , Drawing SC , prepared by the applicant , date received August 6, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 761 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek and excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a Tim Hortons restaurant and drive thru within the Pickering Town Centre Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Bainbridge Drive and Kingston Road, within the Brockington Plaza. The plaza consists of existing retail buildings and a parking lot; the Tim Hortons is being proposed at the northeast corner of the existing parking lot. The site is entirely within the SPA, but is located over 300m from Duffins Creek and is separated from the watercourse by Kingston Road, as well as existing commercial and residential development. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek, but TRCA water management staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A silt fence will be erected around the work site in order to contain all construction - generated sediment. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. As the Tim Hortons is proposed within an existing parking lot, there are no natural heritage features on the site which may be negatively impacted by the proposed development Plantings As no vegetation removals are required to accommodate the proposed development, no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35728 - Application #: 319/04/PICK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 9, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.3 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC . To place fill within a regulated area of, (Lawrence Avenue East), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. 762 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area for the purposes of installing a new gas pipeline under the bed of Highland Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . 1, Bank Reinstatement and Erosion Protection Plan , Highland Creek , dated July 23, 2004, received August 5, 2004, prepared by Enbridge . • Drawing No . 2, Bank Reinstatement and Erosion Protection Plan , Highland Creek , dated July 26, 2004, received August 5, 2004, prepared by Enbridge . • Drawing No . 3, Bank Reinstatement and Erosion Protection Plan , Highland Creek , dated July 26, 2004, received August 5, 2004, prepared by Enbridge . • Drawing No . 4 (Redlined), Bank Reinstatement and Erosion Protection Plan , Highland Creek, dated July 26, 2004, received August 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Highland Creek in order to facilitate the removal of an existing exposed gas pipeline within the watercourse and the installation of a new gas pipeline approximately 2.5 metres below the bed of the stream. The proposed works will include the construction of a temporary dam across Highland Creek which will allow the proponent to open cut a trench for a length of 90 metres. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A siltation fence will be secured around the perimeter of the creek for the full limit of the project works. A temporary creek dam and pump will be installed to prevent the migration of construction generated sediment into the watercourse. Conservation of Land: All filled areas and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. There will be no impact to fisheries. A Letter of Advise dated August 18, 2004 has been issued by Fisheries and Ocean Canada. The applicant has been advised that this project is subject to the Ministry of Natural Resource's (MNR) warm water timing window and that all works must be completed between July 1 and March 31 of any given year, unless otherwise directed by MNR. The applicant has agreed to the MNR timing window. Plantings The banks of the creek will be planted with new native plant material to enhance the riparian zone. 763 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35732 - Application #: 322/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 31, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.4 DOMENIC MESITI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, Plan 65M -3747, (Ava Place), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Domenic Mesiti. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single detached residential dwelling, septic system, retaining walls and swimming pool on Lot 3, Plan 65M -3747 in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Sewage System and Grading Plan , prepared by Rural Development Consultants Limited, plotted July 30, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 5, 2004, redline revised to indicate the removal of excess fill material . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a single detached residential dwelling, septic system, retaining walls (approximately 2 metres or 6 feet in height maximum) and swimming pool within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed development will be located on an existing lot of record within a registered plan of subdivision. The subdivision was approved in 1986, before the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program was in place. The subject property contains a portion of the valley corridor of a Humber River tributary. The building envelope on the subject lot was established through the subdivision's implementing zoning by -law, so that only a portion of the lot can be developed. The envelope was staked by TRCA staff in 1986, and facilitates the protection of the majority of the vegetation in the riparian zone of the tributary. The proposed development is restricted to the approved building envelope. Further, the tributary is intermittent, and is not subject to flooding under a Regional Storm. TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. 764 Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing has been installed and will be maintained throughout construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The vegetated north -east corner of the subject property is zoned open space and will remain untouched. All disturbed areas will be restored upon completion of the project Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35731 - Application #: 320 /04/VAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: August 30, 2004 8.1.5 ROCCO & CARMELA MESITI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 65M -3747, (Ava Place), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Rocco & Carmela Mesiti. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single detached residential dwelling, septic system, retaining walls and swimming pool on Lot 2, Plan 65M -3747 in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Sewage System and Grading Plan , prepared by Rural Development Consultants Limited, issued July 10, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 9, 2004, redline revised to indicate the removal of excess fill material . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 765 Proposal: The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a single detached residential dwelling, septic system, retaining walls (approximately 2 metres or 6 feet in height maximum) and swimming pool within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed development will be located on an existing lot of record within a registered plan of subdivision. The subdivision was approved in 1986, before the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program was in place. The building envelopes on the lots within the subdivision were staked by TRCA staff in 1986, and facilitate the protection of the majority of the vegetation in the riparian zone of the tributary. The proposed development is consistent with the plan of subdivision. There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing has been installed and will be maintained throughout construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored upon completion of the proposed works. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35735 - Application #: 324 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: August 30, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL ) 8.1.6 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area (400 Martingrove Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to construct within the flood plain and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek in order to facilitate improvements to West Deane Park. 766 The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing 1 of 11, West Demolition and Removals , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood . • Drawing 2 of 11, West Layout , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood • Drawing 3 of 11, West Grading and Drainage , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood . • Drawing 4 of 11, West Planting , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood • Drawing 5 of 11, East Demolition and Removals , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood . • Drawing 6 of 11, East Layout , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood • Drawing 7 of 11, East Grading and Drainage , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood . • Drawing 8 of 11, East Planting , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood . • Drawing 9 of 11, Electrical , dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood. Drawing 10 of 11, Details 1, dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood. • Drawing 11 of 11, Details 2, dated July 26, 2004, received August 3, 2004, prepared by northwood. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the following general improvements to West Deane Park. • remove existing asphalt on parking lot and repave. • remove existing catch basins and storm sewer pipe in parking lot and replace with new catch basins and storm sewer pipe. • resurface and reconfigure portions of the existing asphalt walkway. • remove two existing playgrounds and replace with new equipment and surfacing • two existing ball diamonds will be reconstructed and improved. • upgrades to the existing electrical system for the upgraded ball diamonds. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed along the Mimico Creek to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. 767 Conservation of Land: There are no significant resource features on the site. Plantings New native trees and shrubs are proposed as part of the improvements to the park. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35266 - Application #: 091/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 31, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX 8.1.7 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM To construct in a flood plain on Lot 14, 15, Concession 1, (Church Street), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Durham. The purpose is to conduct repairs to an existing bridge crossing at Church Street south of Kingston Road within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain for the Duffins Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Church Street Bridge over the Duffins Creek Drawing Nos . 1,2,3, Contract No . D02004 -036, prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki , as received on June 16th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to rehabilitate an existing bridge crossing over the Duffins Creek which is partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area The works include removing and disposing of the existing asphalt surface, replacing the bearings over the abutments, constructing new concrete parapet walls, modifying the abutments and removing unsound sections of concrete and bridge materials. The footprint of the bridge will not change and there will be no measurable impacts to adjacent lands, the conveyance of flood flows, and the watercourse. 768 Control of Flooding: There will be no impacts to the conveyance of flood flows as the dimensions of the existing bridge structure remain generally unchanged Pollution: The applicant proposes to install coffer dams within the Duffins to demarcate the work area and stop the flow of construction generated sediment to the creek. Scaffolding and a tarp will be erected to capture sediments from works on the bridge structure. In light of this sufficient precautions have been taken to ensure that the control of pollution will not be affected. Conservation of Land: The works will not impact on the conservation of land as the bridge is existing and the footprint will remain generally unchanged Access to the site is in place and any areas at the fringes of the construction activity will be restored in accordance with the plans provided by the applicants. Plantings A seed mix will be applied in areas that may be disturbed adjacent to the bridge abutments. Plantings are not required within the road right of way and along the access route as the area is devoid of tree cover and tree cover would impact the continued maintenance within the existing road right of way and access route. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 "Infrastructure and Servicing" of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. A letter of advice will be issued on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. CFN: 35681 - Application #: 293 /04 /AJAX Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: July 20, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.8 ROBERT J . SMITH To construct in a flood plain on Lot 17, Plan RP 6230, (9 Rouge River Circle), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Robert J. Smith. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the installation of a new leaching bed at 9 Rouge River Circle, in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Sewage System Evaluation , prepared by the applicant , received August 23, 2004 769 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the installation of a new leaching bed at 9 Rouge River Circle, in the Town of Markham. The current leaching bed, located in the rear yard of the residential property, is currently failing, resulting in potential contamination of the surface water and groundwater resources of the area. As such, an emergency authorization has been granted by TRCA staff in order to ensure that contamination risks are minimized and the functionality of the septic system can be restored. The existing septic tank and pump chamber are to remain in their current location and will drain via gravity to the new leaching bed, located within a vegetated area to the west of the existing leaching bed location. The proposed leaching bed location has been designed to protect the maximum number of trees with only 4 live trees being removed. The leaching bed will be located approximately 111m from the Rouge River. Control of Flooding: The leaching bed will be located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, but as the construction of the leaching bed consists of excavation and replacement of native materials with sand and gravel, there will be no change in the final grade of the area. As a result, there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. All excavated materials will be removed from site. Pollution: A silt fence will be erected around the work site and will be maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse, located 111m away. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or slope stability issues, nor are there any fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. While the leaching bed will be constructed within a vegetated area, there is a wide open area with no understorey in which the bed can be excavated. Only 4 small trees will need to be removed to accommodate the leaching bed. The applicant has made every effort possible to ensure that the maximum number of trees will be protected. Plantings As the area is well vegetated, there is little to no benefit in requiring that additional species be planted to offset the Toss of the four small trees. As such, no additional plantings are required as part of this proposal. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 770 CFN: 35783 - Application #: 334 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 20, 2004 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE 8.1.9 NITIN BADHWAR AND JUDY MCDOUGALL To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 65M -2946, (120 Mill Street), in the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Nitin Badhwar and Judy McDougall. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the Regional Storm Flood Plain at 120 Mill Street in the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Part print of survey , revised to illustrate the location of the proposed pool , received by the TRCA on August 13, 2004. • Site Plan , received by the TRCA on August 13, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Duffins Creek. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool within the rear manicured yard of an existing residential lot. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but will not be located within the hydraulic floodway. All excavated fill material will be removed from the site. TRCA Water Management staff have reviewed the proposal and note that there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. 771 Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35751 - Application #: 327/04/WS Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: August 30, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #B180/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.10 - 8.1.31, with the exception of 8.1.21, 8.1.29 and 8.1.30 which were withdrawn ), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED TOWN OF CALEDON 8.1.10 BOLTON MEDICAL CENTRE LTD . To alter a waterway at 12295 Highway 50 in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bolton Medical Centre Ltd. The purpose is to alter a watercourse identified in TRCA's Fill Line Extension area, to facilitate the construction of a culvert crossing of a tributary of the Humber River in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by John Bifolchi , Bolton Medical Centre , dated September 8, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues 772 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this application is to alter a watercourse identified in TRCA's Fill Line Extension area, to facilitate the construction of a culvert crossing of a tributary of the Humber River adjacent to Highway 50, in the Town of Caledon. This crossing is being completed as the subject property has recently been severed, and a new access road is required off of Highway 50 to provide access to the rear of the lot. As a entrance to this property was previously located in the same area, little modification is required to the existing grades. Control of Flooding: The portion of the watercourse in which the works will be completed does not possess a sufficient upstream drainage area to have a defined floodplain. The culvert has, however been sized to accommodate Regional Storm events. Based on this design, no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre - construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of MNR fisheries timing window restrictions. Plantings The watercourse affected by this application is located within a grassed area maintained by the Town of Caledon. No significant vegetation will be disturbed by this project, and thus no compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35796 - Application #: 340 /04 /CAL Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: August 31, 2004 CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.11 CASA -NORTH INVESTMENTS INC . To place fill within a regulated area in the City of Brampton, Lots 14 & 15, Concession 6, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Casa -North Investments Inc. 773 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area outside of the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer, and complete grading and bank stabilization works adjacent to the top of bank associated with the H3 tributary of the Humber River. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Piotr Szponar , Rand Engineering , dated September 8, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application involves placing fill within a Fill Regulated Area, outside of the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of stormwater management and road infrastructure. All works are required to service adjacent residential developments. Works to be completed include: the addition of a new municipal storm sewer on the east side of the valley, the creation of an armourstone retaining wall on the east side of the valley, and minor grading works above top of bank on the west side of the valley, which are required to provide stability to a proposed (adjacent) cul -de -sac. The new storm sewer on the east side of the valley will be located within an existing storm sewer easement that is above the established top of bank. Two small armourstone retaining walls are proposed to the south of this easement, where insufficient space exists between the designated road right of way, and top of bank to provide for the margins of safety required by the City of Brampton. Impacts associated with the creation of the retaining wall will be minimized as much as possible, and the surrounding areas will be restored to pre - construction condition. The minor grading works required on the west side of the valley will be completed above the established top of bank to provide a level grade for the adjacent cul -de -sac. The subject property is located east of Torbram Road, south of Countryside Drive, in the City of Brampton. Control of Flooding: The works will not occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain. No modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows will result from this project. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre - construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. As no in -water works are proposed, Fishery Timing Window restrictions do not apply. 774 Plantings Works associated with this project will occur within an area that is presently non - vegetated. Through this project, a 2.5 metre buffer along top of bank (approximately 500 square metres) will be re- vegetated using native, non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35676 - Application #: 281/04/BRAM Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: July 19, 2004 8.1.12 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Eastbourne Park over Mimico Creek South of Ellerslie Road), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian bridge crossing over a tributary of Mimico Creek in Eastbourne Park, City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Bill Guy , City of Brampton , dated September 8, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regulatory floodplain to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian bridge crossing over a tributary of Mimico Creek in Eastbourne Park, City of Brampton. This bridge is being constructed to provide a link between existing trail networks currently in place on both sides of the bridge. The proposed bridge will span the width of the watercourse, and has been designed to meet TRCA's requirements. TRCA staff have visited the site and are confident that the proposed bridge location is appropriate. All adjacent areas disturbed through this project will be restored to pre- construction condition. No in -water works are proposed with this application. 775 Control of Flooding: The works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however based on the bridge design proposed, no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of the MNR Warm Water Fisheries Timing Window restrictions. Plantings The proposed bridge is to be located within a manicured municipal park Areas affected by, and adjacent to this project are currently grassed, and no significant vegetation currently exists in proximity to the proposed bridge location. As such, no compensatory plantings are required, and disturbed areas will be restored to pre - construction condition. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.2 - New Resource -based Uses, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35717 - Application #: 316 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: August 4, 2004 8.1.13 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Bovaird Drive (between Sunforest Drive and Highway 410) in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (road widening 5 to 7 lanes and storm sewers) in a Fill Regulated Area and to construct a structure (Bovaird Drive and Kennedy Road reconstruction and stormceptor) in a Regional Storm Flood Plain in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • w Letter of Undertaking to provide details of the cash -in -lieu agreement with the Region of Peel /City of Brampton in regards to the water quality control /pond retrofit pond program and to provide minor revisions to engineering , sediment and erosion control details and restoration /planting drawings ; dated September 7, 2004; received September 8, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel . 776 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire project will involve the widening of Bovaird Drive between Highway410 to McLauglin Road. The project has been divided into two phases. This permit application is for the first phase of the project which involves the widening of Bovaird Drive from Highway 410 to Sunforest Drive. For phase one Bovaird Drive will be widened from 5 lanes to 7 lanes. The installation of storm sewers and a stormceptor will be included in these works. The stormceptor will address the drainage area between Kennedy Road and Etobicoke Creek. There is one crossing of the Etobicoke Creek as part of the project. There will be no in -water works as the bridge works will be limited to the bridge deck only. As part of these works the Region of Peel will be reconstructing Kennedy Road for a distance of 350 meters north and 330 meters south of Bovaird Drive. Due to site constraints along Bovaird Drive from just west of Kennedy Road to Highway 410, there is no opportunity for drainage swales or other BMP's. The City of Brampton has agreed to assume this project element on behalf of the Region of Peel. The Region of Peel has agreed to contribute to the City's reserve dedicated to stormwater retrofit projects. This figure will be calculated from an approved policy that is used to calculate the cash figure for commercial /industrial sites as there is no formula available for linear transportation routes. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams and silt fences) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. A stormceptor will be installed within the storm sewer system to enhance post development water quality prior to run -off entering the watercourse. The Region of Peel will contribute to the City of Brampton's cash -in -lieu program dedicated to stormwater retrofit projects as site constraints limit the opportunity to improve water quality through on -site stormwater management. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. As a portion of the works will occur over the Etobicoke Creek the warm - window timing window will apply as a precaution. 777 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35689 - Application #: 298/04/BRAM Report Prepared by : Suzanne Bevan , extension 5374 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: August 30, 2004 8.1.14 THE GREAT -WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO . & LONDON LIFE INSURANCE CO. (GWL REALTY ADVISORS INC .) To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 15, Concession 7 Part 2 Plan 43R- 18224, (South west corner of Steeles avenue and Goreway Drive), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by The Great -West Life Assurance Co. & London Life Insurance Co.. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area, outside of the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a paved loading area, and landscaping buffer associated with a new industrial building. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Robert Ramsay , GWL Realty Advisors , dated September 8, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this application is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area, outside of the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a paved loading area, and landscaping buffer associated with a new industrial building. These works will be completed outside of the valley system, within a Fill Regulated tableland area above the defined top of bank. As the paved surfaces associated with the loading docks of this industrial building are within the 10 metre setback from top of bank required by the TRCA, TRCA staff have negotiated compensatory plantings within a disturbed area of the adjacent valley system. This area has been identified in the Mimico Creek Habitat Implementation Plan as an area for restoration, and the applicant has committed to provide compensation in accordance with the objectives of the Plan. The proposed industrial building is not located within a Fill Regulated area, and meets TRCA setback requirements. 778 Control of Flooding: The works will not occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, no modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows will result from the works permitted under this permit. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All adjacent vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre - construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. As no in -water works are proposed, Fishery Timing Window restrictions do not apply. Plantings This project will include valleyland plantings within a currently disturbed un- vegetated area. All plantings will be completed in accordance with the recommendations of the Mimico Creek Habitat Implementation Plan. Approximately 300 square metres of native, non - invasive plant species will be provided. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1 - New urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35719 - Application #: 317 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: August 4, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.15 CITY OF PICKERING To place fill within a regulated area on broken front and part of Dyson Road Dedication, Lot 1 -10, Block B, Plan 233, Lot 16, 17, 18, 31, Plan 274, (Dyson Road), in the City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Pickering. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail associated with the Western Gateway Project, in the City of Pickering. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Red -line revised Construction Management and Trail Access Plan , Drawing CMP -1, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. 779 • Red -line revised Existing Conditions Plan , Drawing L -1, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. • North + South of CN Tracks Planting Plan , Drawing L -4, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. • North of CN Tracks Removals + Layout Plan , Drawing L -5, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. • North of CN Tracks Grading , Drainage + Surface Treatment Plan , Drawing L -6, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. • Red -line revised Details , Drawing L -7, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. • Red -line revised Details , Drawing L -8, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received July 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail associated with the Western Gateway Project, in the City of Pickering. The City of Pickering is undertaking this project in two phases in order to improve the trail conditions and increase accessibility to the municipal trail system at the mouth of the Rouge. The pedestrian trail is proposed along the same general alignment as an existing trail located along the eastern bank of the Rouge River where the watercourse empties into Lake Ontario. Phase One of the project consists of upgrades to the northern section of the trail to provide wheelchair access, while Phase Two involves the construction of a new elevated lookout over the mouth of the Rouge and a suspended walkway joining the trail to the elevated lookout. The City is expecting to construct Phase One of the project this fall, while the works related to Phase Two of the project may be undertaken next spring, or the following year, depending on funding. The first phase of work, which comprises this permit application, involves the reconstruction of the pedestrian trail on the north side of the CN rail tracks. This reconstruction involves changes to the grades and a small realignment of the existing trail, thus requiring the installation of low retaining walls in order to accommodate a decrease in grade for wheelchair accessibility. Geotechnical work has been completed in support of the installation of these retaining walls. Control of Flooding: The section of the pedestrian trail within Phase One of the project is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River. Hence, there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected around the perimeter of the work area in order to contain construction - generated sediment and prevent any sedimentation of the watercourse. 780 Conservation of Land: A geotechnical analysis was undertaken in order to support the construction of the retaining walls. TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied that the soils are capable of supporting the weight of the retaining walls and is confident that the design approach is suitable, given the subsurface conditions. There are no fisheries concerns as there are no in -water works proposed. Vegetation removals will be required in order to accommodate the construction of the new trail alignment, but the City is committed to preserving any significant species identified by TRCA staff. Further, the area is covered with Japanese Knotweed, a highly invasive and dominant species and the proposal involves the removal of much of this invasive vegetation. A satisfactory restoration plan has been received for the first phase of this project, which includes the addition of native woody and herbaceous vegetation between the trail and the watercourse. TRCA staff is satisfied that a net environmental gain will result from the implementation of this proposal. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. For the first phase of the project, additional native woody and herbaceous plantings are proposed between the new trail alignment and the eastern bank of the watercourse in order to bolster the buffer between the trail and the natural area. A comprehensive restoration plan for the second phase of the project will be prepared to the satisfaction of the TRCA and will include the re- planting of all significant vegetation removed during construction, compensatory plantings along the slope and the removal of invasive species in the vicinity of the work area. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2 - New Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35469 - Application #: 191/04/PICK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 31, 2004 8.1.16 CITY OF PICKERING To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 16, 17, 18, 31, Plan 274, Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Plan 233, in the City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Pickering. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail associated with the Western Gateway Project, in the City of Pickering. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Red -line revised Construction Management and Trail Access Plan , Drawing CMP -1, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. 781 • Red -line revised Existing Conditions Plan , Drawing L -1, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • South of CN Tracks Removals + Layout Plan , Drawing L -2, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • South of CN Tracks Grading , Drainage + Surface Treatment Plan , Drawing L -3, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • North + South of CN Tracks Planting Plan , Drawing L -4, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • Red -line revised Details , Drawing L -7, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • Red -line revised Details , Drawing L -8, prepared by JSW + Associates , dated February 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • Western Gateway Bridge General Arrangement Alternative 1, Drawing 1, prepared by prepared by JSW + Associates , dated January 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • Western Gateway Bridge Superstructure Details Alternative 1, Drawing 2, prepared by prepared by JSW + Associates , dated November 2003, date received September 8, 2004. • Western Gateway Bridge Foundation Details Alternative 1, Drawing 3, prepared by prepared by JSW + Associates , dated November 2003, date received September 8, 2004. • Western Gateway Bridge General Arrangement Alternative 2, Drawing 1, prepared by prepared by JSW + Associates , dated January 2004, date received September 8, 2004. • Western Gateway Bridge Superstructure Details Alternative 2, Drawing 2, prepared by prepared by JSW + Associates , dated November 2003, date received September 8, 2004. • Western Gateway Bridge Foundation Details Alternative 2, Drawing 3, prepared by prepared by JSW + Associates , dated November 2003, date received September 8, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking committing the City to prepare a Comprehensive Restoration Plan and an Invasive Species Removals Plan for Phase Two of the Western Gateway project, dated and received September 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail associated with the Western Gateway Project, in the City of Pickering. The City of Pickering is undertaking this project in two phases in order to improve the trail conditions and increase accessibility to the municipal trail system at the mouth of the Rouge. The pedestrian trail is proposed along the same general alignment as an existing trail located along the eastern bank of the Rouge River where the watercourse empties into Lake Ontario. Phase One of the project consists of upgrades to the northern section of the trail to provide wheelchair access, while Phase Two involves the construction of a new elevated lookout over the mouth of the Rouge and a suspended walkway joining the trail to the elevated lookout. The City is expecting to construct Phase One of the project this fall, while the works 782 related to Phase Two of the project may be undertaken next spring, or the following year, depending on funding. The second phase of work, which comprises this permit application, involves the construction of an elevated lookout, a suspended walkway connecting the lookout to the pedestrian trail and the extension of the trail eastwards to connect the trail to a residential street. The construction of the elevated lookout will require that access down the slope be provided for a single construction machine to reach the toe of the slope in order to install the supportive caissons for the lookout structure. TRCA ecology and geotechnical staff is satisfied with the proposed access and is confident that a net environmental gain will result from the restoration of the slope and the removal of invasive species which have taken over a large portion of the slope in this area. Control of Flooding: Only the base of the elevated lookout will be constructed in the Regional Storm Floodplain and it will be designed to withstand the flows and velocities of a Regional storm event. There will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected around the perimeter of the work area in order to contain construction - generated sediment and prevent any sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: A geotechnical analysis was undertaken in order to support the construction of the elevated lookout. TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied that the soils are capable of supporting the weight of the elevated lookout and suspended walkway and is confident that the design approach is suitable, given the subsurface conditions. There are no fisheries concerns as there are no in -water works proposed. Vegetation removals will be required in order to accommodate the construction of the lookout and walkway, but the City is committed to preserving any significant species identified by TRCA staff. Further, the area is covered with Japanese Knotweed, a highly invasive and dominant species and the proposal involves the removal of much of this invasive vegetation. A satisfactory restoration plan has been received for the first phase of this project and a comprehensive invasive species removals plan and restoration plan will be prepared for the second phase of this project, to the satisfaction of the TRCA. TRCA staff is satisfied that a net environmental gain will result from the implementation of this proposal. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction For the first phase of the project, additional native woody and herbaceous plantings are proposed between the new trail alignment and the eastern bank of the watercourse in order to bolster the buffer between the trail and the natural area A comprehensive restoration plan for the second phase of the project will be prepared to the satisfaction of the TRCA and will include the re- planting of all significant vegetation removed during construction, compensatory plantings along the slope and the removal of invasive species in the vicinity of the work area. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2 - New Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's 783 Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35797 - Application #: 341/04/PICK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: September 1, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.17 MARCY MIHALCHEON To place fill within a regulated area on (24 Brookfield Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Marcy Mihalcheon. The purpose is to construct a new inground pool within a Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Site Plan prepared by Todd Pools , received September 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct an inground pool within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located east of Yonge Street, south of York Mills. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant proposes native and non - invasive plantings as part of this application. 784 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 35519 - Application #: 225/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 8, 2004 8.1.18 URBANCORP DEVELOPMENTS INC . To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 1 EYS, Lot 14, 15, Plan 3510, Part Lot 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, Plan 246, 45 York Mills Road, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Urbancorp Developments Inc. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to develop eighty -one (81) townhouse units on the subject property. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Site Plan , Drawing No . REZ -01, prepared by Kirkor Architects & Planners , revised April 1, 2004, received July 9, 2004. • P2, P1 Level Plan & Partial Ground Floor , Drawing No . REZ -02, prepared by Kirkor Architects & Planners, revised April 1, 2004, received July 9, 2004. • Building Sections , Drawing No . REZ -03, prepared by Kirkor Architects & Planners , revised April 1, 2004, received July 9, 2004. • Sediment and Erosion Control , Drawing No . EC, prepared by Al Underhill & Associates Ltd., dated August 2002, received March 3, 2004. • Edge Management Plan , 45 York Mills Road , prepared by Philip van Wassenaer , Urban Forest Innovations Inc ., dated June 21, 2004, received June 23, 2004. • Landscape Layout Plan , Drawing No . L -1, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. • Landscape Grading Plan , Drawing No . L -2, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. • Landscape Planting and Lighting Plan , Drawing No . L -3, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. • Landscape Details , Drawing No . L -4.1, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. • Landscape Details , Drawing No . L -4.2, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. • Landscape Sections , Drawing No . L -5, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. • Landscape Sections , Drawing No . L -6, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc ., revised August 24, 2004, received August 26, 2004. 785 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, to facilitate the construction of eighty -one (81) townhouse units on the subject lands. The proposed residential development consists of five (5) townhouse blocks, ranging from two -three (2 -3) storeys in height with two underground parking levels. The subject property is located east of Yonge Street, at the southeast corner of Campbell Crescent and York Mills Road. The lands are partially located within the Authoritys Fill Regulated Area and are outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River. The eastern half of the property is located on tableland while the west half of the property is lower than the rest of the site. There is a manicured slope on the western portion of the site with an existing parking lot located at the bottom of this slope, on the valley floor. To the south of the subject site is a vegetated slope (toe of slope) with homes located at the top of this slope (Old Yonge Street). Until recently, the subject site was occupied by a one - storey administrative building for the Toronto District School Board. This building which was partially located over and on the manicured slope has been demolished. The parking lot on the west portion of the lands is to be demolished in the near future. An existing condominium apartment building is located to the east of the subject property, and single family residences situated to the south. An associated site plan application was circulated from City of Toronto planning staff in late 2002. From late 2002 to mid -2003, TRCA staff reviewed and assessed the proposed site plan for potential concerns regarding slope stability, stormwater management, edge management, and the limits of the proposed development. Subsequent to the successful resolution of these issues and given that the limits of the development were considered appropriate, Authority staff provided conditional approval of the site plan on September 15, 2003. On October 30, 2003, the Ontario Municipal Board (Decision No. 1462) allowed an appeal by the Toronto District School Board to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By -law in order to change the designation from minor institutional to medium density residential on the subject lands. Furthermore, the OMB noted that the site plan agreement was to be finalized with appropriate conditions. It is noted that through the OMB appeals process, the principle of use on the subject property has been established and that the proposed development is essentially approved, subject to conditions. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River. TRCA Water Management staff has reviewed plans related to the proposed works and has determined that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 170 metres away. 786 Conservation of Land: Authority technical staff has reviewed multiple geotechnical submissions from the applicant and has determined that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. The proposed development is located approximately 4 metres from the manicured slope and toe of slope. This setback is consistent with existing development along the corridor reach and is considered appropriate for the existing conditions on site. As the proposed development is situated well away from the watercourse, there are no impacts to fish habitat. TRCA technical staff has also reviewed hydrogeological reports for the subject property that assess potential issues regarding groundwater. At this time, staff has provided comments to the applicant and a resubmission is expected shortly. It should be noted that technical staff considers the outstanding hydrogeological comments to be minor in nature and can be resolved prior to the issuance of the permit. The permit will be held until the satisfactory resolution of the minor hydrogeological comments. Plantings TRCA Planning Ecology staff has reviewed an Edge Management Plan and Landscape Plans submitted in support of the proposed development. Plantings of native, non - invasive species will be made within the development setback area and throughout the site. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2. G) - Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35257 - Application #: 088/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: August 31, 2004. CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.19 VINCE AND JOANNE GALIFI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Plan 65M -2192, (130 Greenbrooke Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vince and Joanne Galifi. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new one and a half- storey, 74 square metre, detached garage. There is an existing residential dwelling on the property. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Site Plan , Sheet No . A01, prepared by McCasey Group , dated June 11, 2004, received by the TRCA August 23, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment fencing . • Elevations , Sheet No . A06, prepared by McCasey Group , dated June 11, 2004, received by the TRCA August 23, 2004. 787 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new one and a half- storey, 74 square metre, detached garage on the southwest portion of the property. There is an existing residential dwelling on the property. The proposed works are consistent with the existing development on the property and within the valley corridor reach, and are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the site that will be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. As such, plantings will not be required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35785 - Application #: 337 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: August 24, 2004 8.1.20 VILLA CHARITIES INC . /DIPOCE CAMPUS To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (10443 Highway 27), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Villa Charities Inc. /Dipoce Campus. 788 The purpose is to move and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to install a water main and a sanitary force main under a watercourse, and to alter a watercourse by installing a stormwater outfall. This will service the already approved seniors' health care facility, known as Villa Columbo, Dipoce Campus. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Drawing GN -1, General Notes , prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 2004. • Drawing GP -1, General Layout of Services , prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 2004. • Drawing LG -1, Grading Plan , prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 2004. • Drawing LG -2, Grading Plan , prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 2004. • Drawing P -1, Sanitary Forcemain Along York Region Road No . 27, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 28, 2004. • Drawing P -2, Sanitary Forcemain Along York Region Road No . 27, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 28, 2004. • Drawing P -3, 300mm Watermain Along York Region Road No . 27, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 28, 2004. • Drawing P -4, 300mm Watermain Along York Region Road No . 27, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 28, 2004. • Drawing MD -1, Miscellaneous Details , prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc ., date last revised July 28, 2004. • Drawing L -1, Layout and Dimension Plan , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc., date last revised August 13, 2004. • Drawing L -2, Detailed Dimension Plan , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc., date last revised August 13, 2004. • Drawing L -3, Planting Plan , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc ., date last revised August 13, 2004. • Drawing L -4, Landscape Plan , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc ., date last revised August 13, 2004. • Drawing L -5, Landscape Details , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc ., date last revised August 13, 2004. • Drawing No . TS -1, Tree Preservation Plan , prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc., date last revised August 13, 2004, red -line revised to show additional locations for tree protection fencing . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 789 Proposal: The proposal is to move and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to install two crossings under the watercourse, a water main and a sanitary force main, and to alter a watercourse through the installation of a storm water outfall. These will service the already approved seniors' health care facility to be constructed on the subject property, known as Villa Columbo DiPoce Campus. The facility was approved at the Executive Committee's meeting of February 7, 2003, meeting #13/02. Control of Flooding: No structures are being constructed in the Regional Storm Flood Plain and following excavation, grades will be restored to match those existing. Further, the stormwater outlet will be designed to convey storm flows up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur. Conservation of Land: Any geotechnical or fisheries issues related to this proposal have been resolved. Any in- stream work will take place within the Ministry of Natural Resources' fisheries timing window for cold water streams, July 1 to September 15. Further, a Letter of Advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) will be issued to the applicant along with their permit from the Authority. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored, and the entire site will be landscaped with native trees, shrubs, perennials and a native seed mix, reviewed to staff's satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3., Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35458 - Application #: 186 /04/VAUG Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: May 18, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON 8.1.21 DAVID BUCHANAN To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Block 1, Part Lot 12, Plan 973, (145 Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by David Buchanan. • Withdrawn 790 8.1.22 I.O. INVESTMENTS LIMITED To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 18, Concession 8, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by I.O. Investments Limited. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regulatory Floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Landscape Layout , drawing L 1, produced by Marius Ois and Associates Inc ., revised to June 28, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Landscape Layout Pond and Plant List , drawing L 2, produced by Marius Ois and Associates Inc ., revised to June 28, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Landscape Layout and Details , drawing L 3, produced by Marius Ois and Associates Inc ., revised to June 28, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Landscape Layout Details and Specifications , drawing L 4, produced by Marius Ois and Associates Inc ., revised to June 28, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , SWM Pond Details , drawing G 7, produced by Cansult Engineers and Project Managers , revised to July 24, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Stormwater Management Pond , drawing G 6, produced by Cansult Engineers and Project Managers , revised to July 24, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Temporary Construction Sediment Pond , drawing SED , produced by Cansult Engineers and Project Managers , revised to June 16, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, drawing G5, produced by Cansult Engineers and Project Managers , dated February, 2003. • 1.0 Investments Inc . Tullamore Industrial Subdivision , Storm Drainage Area Plan , drawing G 3, produced by Cansult Engineers and Project Managers , dated February , 2003. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application involves construction and fill placement within a Fill Regulated area, and the Regulatory Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management outfall northwest of Mayfield Road and Airport Road in the Town of Caledon. TRCA staff reviewed this permit application in the Summer of 2003, and TRCA Ecology and Engineering staff were satisfied from this review that the design met TRCA's technical requirements. Staff level endorsement of the application was provided on September 25, 2003, subject to the approval of the Executive Committee. Although Executive Committee approval had not as of yet been attained, this outfall was constructed in the Spring of 2004 without a 791 TRCA permit being issued due to a misunderstanding between the applicant and the contractor. The applicant is now requesting TRCA Executive approval of this application to correct this error, and finally attain the requisite approvals. Upon issuance of this permit, TRCA Enforcement staff will inspect this project to ensure that it has been completed in accordance with the drawings endorsed by TRCA staff. Control of Flooding: The works will occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated as a result of this project. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures were identified on the associated drawings to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process is to be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Plantings Plans associated with this application indicate that an area of approximately 60 square metres, which was unvegetated prior to construction of the stormwater management outfall and pond, was to be planted with native, non - invasive plant species after construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34240 - Application #: 110 /03 /CAL Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: August 31, 2004 8.1.23 TOWN OF CALEDON To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Caledon -King Townline Road (King Street north approximately 1000 meters) in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Caledon. The purpose is to place fill (to facilitate the road widening, retaining walls) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (road widening, retaining walls, wingwalls, culvert extensions) within a Regional Storm Flood Plain; alter a watercourse (4 culvert extensions on Cold Creek, Humber River) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) through dam and pump around method in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. 792 • Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to engineering , sediment /erosion control , restoration , compensation and planting plans to the satisfaction of TRCA ; dated September 8, 2004; received September 8, 2004; prepared by the Town of Caledon . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the widening of Caledon -King Townline Road on the west side from King Street north approximately 1000 meters. The road cross - section will consist of 2 lanes of pavement at 3.5 meter wide, with 1.25 meter shoulders and an additional 3.25 meter left turn lane at the King Road. There are four structures that cross Cold Creek, Humber River that are to be extended to the west side. Works on these four structures must adhere to the coldwater fisheries timing window. The remainder of works not associated with in -water works will be part of permit application 179/04/CAL. The existing structure at station 2 +393 is open footed. The structure is approximately 11.3 meters long, 11 meters wide and 3.25 meters above the invert of the stream bed. An open footed extension of 6.9 meters with wingwalls will be constructed. The existing structure at station 2 +926 is open footed. The structure is approximately 12.5 meters long (the north abutment is 14.5 meters long), 7.6 meters wide and 3.8 meters above the invert of the stream bed. At this location, the south abutment requires an extension of 6 meters and the north abutment requires and extension of 3.74 meters to accommodate the road widening. Concrete wingwalls (8.3 meters on the south side and 6 meters on the north side) will be constructed. The existing structure at station 3 +020 is open footed. The structure is approximately 9 meters long, 7.6 meters wide and 3 meters above the invert of the stream. An open footed extension of 3.5 meters is proposed on the west side of the structure. Concrete retaining walls 5 meters long on both sides, angled from the stream channel will be constructed. The existing structure at station 3 +174 is open footed. The structure is approximately 11 meters long, 9.3 meters wide and 3.8 meters above the invert of the stream. An open footed extension of 4.5 meters on the west side is proposed. Concrete retaining walls (15 meters south side and 5 meters north side) angled out from the stream channel will be constructed. The existing wingwalls on the east side will be maintained. Deck and curb rehabilitation is required but no structure work is proposed in the creek on the east side. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. 793 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, coffer dams, dewatering trap) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: The in stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34968 - Application #: 004 /04 /CAL Report Prepared by : Suzanne Bevan , extension 5374 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: August 30, 2004 8.1.24 TOWN OF CALEDON To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Concession 7, (Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Caledon. The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regulatory Floodplain, and alter a waterway, to facilitate the construction of three new stormwater outfalls associated with the re- construction of Old King Road in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Bruno Knoepfli , Town of Caledon , dated September 8, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 794 Proposal: This application is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regulatory Floodplain, and alter a waterway, to facilitate the construction of three new stormwater outfalls associated with the re- construction of Old King Road in the Town of Caledon. The Town of Caledon is proposing to reconstruct Old King Road from King Street East to approximately 0.4 kilometres south of King Street East in the Village of Bolton, to address safety concerns regarding visibility and to correct deficiencies in surface drainage Presently, surface drainage from Old King Road and adjacent properties flows overland, untreated into the Humber River system. This permit involves the creation of storm sewer outfalls, which will provide water quality control. Two of the outfalls will outlet into an existing stormwater detention pond adjacent to Bond Street. The third outfall will outlet directly into the Humber River adjacent to King Street East, through an easement on TRCA lands. An oil -grit separator is proposed with this outfall to provide water quality control. The associated easement was approved by the TRCA Executive Committee and Authority Board at their July 9, 2004 and July 23, 2004 meetings respectively. Control of Flooding: Works associated with the outfall into the Humber will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however no significant modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated as a result of this project. The other two outfalls which outlet into the stormwater management pond are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of the MNR Cold Water Fishery Timing Window. Plantings Affected lands will be restored to pre- construction condition using native, non - invasive plant species, in accordance with TRCA's Planting Guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35421 - Application #: 167/04/CAL Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: August 31, 2004 795 8.1.25 TOWN OF CALEDON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area Caledon -King Townline (from of King Street north approximately 1000 meters) in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Caledon. The purpose is to place fill (road widening, retaining wall) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (road widening, retaining wall) within a Regional Storm Flood Plain to facilitate the widening of Caledon -King Townline Road, in the Town of Caledon. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to engineering and sediment /erosion control plans to the satisfaction of TRCA ; dated September 8, 2004; received September 8, 2004; prepared by the Town of Caledon . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the widening of Caledon -King Townline Road on the west side from King Street north approximately 1000 meters. The road cross - section will consist of 2 lanes of pavement at 3.5 meter wide, with 1.25 meter shoulders and an additional 3.25 meter left turn lane at the King Road. This permit involves the parts of the project that do not involve in -water works. This permit application is for the widening of Caledon -King Townline Road from Sta. 2 +500 to Sta.2 +880 and Sta. 3 +200 to Sta. 3 +620 within a Fill Regulated Area and within a Regional Storm Flood Plain. There are four structures that cross Cold Creek, Humber River that are to be extended to the west side that will be part of permit application 004 /04 /CAL. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the portion of the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. 796 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35448 - Application #: 179/04/CAL Report Prepared by : Suzanne Bevan , extension 5374 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: August 30, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.26 OLEG & IRINA BOUNEEZA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan 66R -9558, (7 Bronte Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Oleg & Irina Bouneeza. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a rear yard pool at 7 Bronte Road, in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Red -line revised site plan , prepared by Sparkle Pool & Spa, dated July 30, 2004, received September 8, 2004. • Details, prepared by Exsen Engineering Ltd ., dated August 11, 2004, date received September 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the construction of a rear yard pool at 7 Bronte Road, in the Town of Markham. The subject property backs onto a well- vegetated valley associated with the Rouge River and an existing deck and retaining wall are located at top of bank. The deck and retaining wall were constructed when the house was built, approximately a decade ago. This proposal involves the reconstruction of the failing retaining wall and the installation of a pool between the retaining wall and the existing single family dwelling The development limit established through the construction of the original retaining wall and deck will be maintained No encroachments into the valley feature will be permitted. The development limit of this property is consistent with the limit on the neighbouring property to the north, for which the TRCA approved a permit for a similar retaining wall and pool proposal. The current proposal maintains all existing vegetation and will not result in any further impacts to the valley feature. 797 The rear yard is located over 35m from the Rouge River, which is contained within a well- defined valley. Control of Flooding: The proposal is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River, hence there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control fence will be erected around the perimeter of the work area in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. Conservation of Land: A geotechnical analysis was undertaken in order to support the replacement retaining wall design and TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied with the findings of the report. As such, there are no geotechnical concerns with the proposal as the soils have been found to be capable of withstanding the weight of the retaining wall and the wall design itself is satisfactory. There are no fisheries concerns related to this proposal as the watercourse is located over 35m away. Plantings There are no vegetation removals required to accommodate the proposed development and all existing trees will be protected. As the valley feature is well- vegetated, there are no additional plantings required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35764 - Application #: 329 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 31, 2004 8.1.27 LARKIN- MONARCH PARTNERSHIP To alter a waterway on Part Lot 17, Concession 5, (west of Kennedy Road, north of 16th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Larkin - Monarch Partnership. The purpose is to alter a waterway by removing a fish migration barrier, the Glenburn Dam, from Berczy Creek, a tributary of the Rouge River, in order to restore and enhance fish habitat. This is to compensate for a Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) authorization for realigning another tributary of the Rouge River (Burndenett Creek) for the Bridlewalk road crossing. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking from Stantec Consulting dated September 7, 2004, stating that all TRCA comments will be addressed to our satisfaction . 798 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to remove a fish migration barrier at the Glenburn Dam on Berzy Creek, a tributary of the Rouge River. Specifically, the proposed work is to remove the existing concrete side walls, stop Togs, and spillway, and to restore this section of the creek to natural conditions. The proposed works constitute "Compensation ", as required by an authorization by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for realigning another tributary of the Rouge River, Burndenett Creek, to construct the Bridlewalk road crossing. The Authority approved a permit for the realignment and the crossing, at its July 25, 2003 Executive Committee meeting #7103. DFO authorized the crossing and realignment, contingent on this compensation of restoring and enhancing fish habitat. Control of Flooding: Authority Water Management are satisfied that the proposed work is appropriately designed so as not to affect the control of flooding. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be installed and maintained for the duration of the work, to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues associated with this project. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored. All in- stream work will take place "in the dry" and within the Ministry of Natural Resources' cold water timing window of July 1 to September 15. An amendment to DFO's authorization for the Bridlewalk road crossing and stream realignment is required for this proposal. Therefore, the Authority's permit will not be released until the authorization is amended by DFO. Plantings The site will be restored, stabilized and enhanced with several natives trees, shrubs, live fascines and a native seed mix. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 3.3, Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses and Alterations, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35384 - Application #: 145 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: August 31, 2004 799 8.1.28 PAUL NEWDICK To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 33, Plan M -1324, (8 Brooklet Court), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Newdick. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the replacement of a failing retaining wall at the rear of 8 Brooklet Court, in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006. • Survey of Lot 33, Plan —1324 showing location of retaining wall , prepared by Anton Kikas Limited and the applicant , date received August 30, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking , prepared by the applicant , outlining the applicant 's commitment to address the outstanding ecology and geotechnical issues related to this application date received September 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the replacement of a failing retaining wall at the rear of 8 Brooklet Court, in the Town of Markham. The subject property backs onto Pomona Mills Park and the existing retaining wall is in extremely poor condition; the wall is threatening to fail, which would result in the rear yard of the property collapsing down the slope. The current proposal involves the replacement of the existing wall with one appropriately designed to withstand the weight of the rear yard materials. Construction access will be gained via a pedestrian pathway within Pomona Mills Park and the Town of Markham has provided authorization for the required access. The applicant is proposing to clear a 6m pathway up the side of the slope, located within a fairly poorly vegetated area, in order for the construction machinery to gain access to the rear yard. Most of the mature and all of the significant vegetation will be protected through this proposal. A comprehensive restoration plan has been provided for the disturbed area, resulting in a net environmental gain from the implementation of the proposal. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, therefore there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A silt fence will be erected around the perimeter of the work site in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley. Tree protection fencing will be erected around all significant vegetation in order to further protect the mature vegetation from construction - related impacts. 800 Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical staff has visited the site and reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that the proposed works are appropriately designed to withstand the weight of the rear yard materials. Further, both geotechnical and ecology staff members are supportive of the replacement of the failing wall and are satisfied that the proposed methodology is most appropriate, given the existing conditions. There will be no in -water works associated with this proposal, hence there are no fisheries resources concerns. Some vegetation removals will be required for construction access, but most mature and all significant vegetation will be protected. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings A comprehensive restoration plan is proposed for the valley slope in order to stabilize and restore the slope following construction. Proposed plantings include the replacement of every tree removed, along with additional native woody and herbaceous vegetation. TRCA staff is satisfied that a net environmental gain will result from the proposed restoration of the disturbed area. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35690 - Application #: 299 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 31, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.29 GIACOMO MONCADA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 103, Plan 240, (246 Lakeland Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Giacomo Moncada. • Withdrawn 8.1.30 MONARCH RENAISSANCE WOODS LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 67, 68, Concession 1 WYS Part Lot 67, 68, Plan 19T- 94002, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Monarch Renaissance Woods Limited. • Withdrawn 801 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE 8.1.31 MADORI LTD . To alter a waterway on Lot 2, Concession 8, (west of 9th Line and north of Main Street), in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Madori Ltd.. The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to install a stormwater management outfall that will outlet to the a tributary of the Rouge River. This will service a draft approved plan of subdivision, known as the Madori Subdivision (Town file No. 19T- 98003) within the Northwest Functional Servicing Study area of the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking from Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd ., dated September 1, 2004, stating that all TRCA comments will be addressed for the pond and outfall . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway by installing a stormwater management outfall for a new stormwater management pond that will outlet to a tributary of the Rouge River, the Little Rouge River. This storm water management pond and outfall will service a draft approved plan of subdivision known as the Madori Subdivision (Town file No. 19T- 98003). One of the conditions of draft approval for this subdivision was that the owner obtain all permits necessary under Ontario Regulation 158. Staff reviewed the development limits and stormwater management criteria for this subdivision through the review of the Master Environmental Servicing Plan for this area, in which the subdivision is located, i.e. the Northwest Functional Servicing Study area. Control of Flooding: The stormwater outlet will be designed to convey storm flows up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical issues related to this proposal. Any fisheries issues related to this proposal have been resolved. Any in- stream work will take place within the Ministry of Natural Resources' fisheries timing window for cold water streams, July 1 to September 15. Further, a Letter of Advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) will be issued to the applicant along with their permit from the Authority. 802 Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored with native trees, shrubs, perennials and a native seed mix, reviewed to staffs satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3., Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35050 - Application #: 020 /04/WS Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: August 30, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE MINOR WORKS ITEMS : RES. #B181/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff , in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.32 - 8.1.38, inclusive), which are listed below , be received . CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.32 MARK SAMUEL To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 207, 208, Plan M -356, (3 Riverside Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mark Samuel. CFN: 35616 - Application #: 260/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: June 29, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.33 JOHN PANAGAKOS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 435, Plan 4758, (96 Banbury Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by John Panagakos. 803 CFN: 35695 - Application #: 296/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 4, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.34 PAUL BIGIONI To place fill within a regulated area on Part 1 Part Block J, Plan 1538, (25 Kingsbury Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul Bigioni. CFN: 35092 - Application #: 030 /04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 13, 2004 8.1.35 MARIO AND LINDA FORTE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 20, Plan M -1841, (34 Stonemanse Court), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Mario and Linda Forte. CFN: 35679 - Application #: 284/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 31, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.36 SAM TEDESCO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 19, Concession 8 Lot 15, Plan 65M -3470, (85 Noah Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sam Tedesco. CFN: 35730 - Application #: 321/04NAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: August 30, 2004 804 TOWN OF AJAX 8.1.37 RICK OLTEANU To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 78, Plan 40M -1766, (458 Delaney Drive), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Rick Olteanu. CFN: 35706 - Application #: 311/04 /AJAX Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 13, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.38 DAVID AND JOANNE MORRIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 76, Plan 2063, (14 Northumberland Terrace), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by David and Joanne Morris. CFN: 35748 - Application #: 325 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 13, 2004 CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.39 REGION OF PEEL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Drew Road (between Bramalea Road in the west and Torbram Road in the east) and Torbram Road (between Drew Road in the south and Highway 407 in the north)), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for 1475mm x 2310 elliptical concrete sanitary sewer, 1800mm concrete sanitary sewer, 375mm sanitary sewer) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (manholes) within a Regional Storm Floodplain and alter watercourses temporarily (Spring Creek and tributaries of Etobicoke Creek) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) to complete open cut crossings of the watercourses in the dry at Stations 0 +020, 1 +720, 1 +840 and 2 +440. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated August 18, 2004; received August 25, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel. 805 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the twinning of an existing sanitary sewer which is located north of Derry Road, and runs eastbound along Drew Road to Torbram Road, northbound on Torbram to the CN, eastbound to the Etobicoke Creek and northbound to Highway 407. Originally the Region of Peel proposed to cross all the watercourses via a tunneling method. In August 2004 the proponent came forward with further geotechnical information that indicated the tunneling method was not feasible. This subsequent permit application deals only with the four open cut crossings at Stations 1 +020, 1 +720, 1 +840 and 2 +440. The first three crossings will open cut the watercourses and the fourth crossing will be 6.5 metres deep under an existing 300mm culvert. The original permit file (CFN 34507) will focus on the remainder of the project within the Fill Regulated Areas. Spring Creek, a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek, in the extreme west of the project will be crossed by an open cut, as well as tributaries of Etobicoke Creek on Torbram Road. Spring Creek has a Regional Storm Flood Plain associated with it as well as Fill Regulation Lines. The three other tributaries of Etobicoke Creek are not within a Fill Regulated Area, and do not have Regional Storm Floodplains associated with them. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (flumes, coffer dams, rock check dams, silt fence, dewatering trap) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourses will be altered temporarily in order to complete the open cuts. The channels will be restored post- construction. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. 806 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35784 - Application #: 336/04/BRAM Report Prepared by : June Murphy , extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: September 8, 2004 8.1.40 REGION OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Steeles Avenue West (west of Highway 50) in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (associated with the sanitary sewer installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; alter a watercourse (West Humber River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump around method to complete the open cut crossing. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to engineering drawings , restoration plans and quantified vegetation loss /vegetation gains to the satisfaction of TRCA ; dated September 7, 2004; received September 7, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The project involves the installation of twin 900mm sanitary sewer forcemains along the north side of Steeles Avenue from Islington Avenue to Torbram Road. There are a total of ten watercourse crossings involved within the Mimico and Humber watersheds. This permit application is for the crossing of the Humber River in Fill Regulated Area and a Regional Storm Flood Plain on Steeles Avenue west of Highway 50 in the City of Brampton. This crossing was originally proposed to be tunneled as part of permit application 047 /02 /BRAM. Through the course of construction it was discovered that substantial dewatering would be required to facilitate the tunnelling operations. Through discussions with TRCA staff it was agreed that an open cut crossing of the West Humber is preferred. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process in 1999. This "Peel Diversion Project" was identified in the York Durham Sewage System Master Plan as a priority. 807 Control of Flooding: Final grades will match existing within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, coffer dam, rock flow check, catchbasin silt trap, dewatering trap, mud mat, erosion control blankets) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The distances from the inverts of the watercourses to the obverts of the sanitary sewer pipes have been reviewed and it has been determined that there will not be future erosion problems. Conservation of Land: With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35811 - Application #: 347 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Beth Williston , extension 5217 For information contact : Beth Williston , extension 5217 Date: September 7, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.41 WHITEVALE GOLF CLUB To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 29, 30, Concession 4, (Golf Club Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the . property owned by Whitevale Golf Club. The purpose is to regrade in order to facilitate minor revisions to the existing Whitevale Golf Course partially within the Fill Regulated Area for the Duffins Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Renovation Drawing for Holes 1 -10, Drawing Nos G 1 -G3, prepared by Thomas McBroom Associates Ltd , as received on September 7th, 2004. • Layout Drawing L 1, prepared by Thomas Mcbroom Associates , as received on September 7th, 2004. 808 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: As part of an overall improvement program the applicant proposes to conduct minor changes to holes 1 to 10 of the Whitevale Golf Course. The holes are mainly on tableland, however, portions of the holes and the proposed changes are within the Fill Regulated Area for the Duffins Creek. The changes consist of modifications to the size of bunkers,tees and greens, the addition of new bunkers and tees, reshaping of fairways, and the relocation of existing cart paths. A tableland pond on hole four is also being enlarged. The works are generally within the same footprint of the existing golf course hole alignments and will not result in the removal of significant vegetation which abuts the course facility. The applicant plans to conduct similar improvements to the remaining golf course holes (Holes11 -18) which are within the valley and on lands owned by the TRCA. A separate permit will be submitted for works within the valley once the details are finalized. This permit is for the Holes 1 -10 only. Control of Flooding: The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain and as a result, there will be no impact on the control of flooding. Pollution: Sediment Fencing will be erected where necessary, at the perimeter of the work site and will remain in place until the area of construction is stabilized. The pond enlargement will not impact the adjacent valley lands as there is no direct outlet from the pond to the valley. The pond will be drained and the enlargement will be conducted in the dry. All water from the pond will be directed via sheet flow across the existing fairways. Conservation of Land: The works will occur within the general footprint of the existing golf course and as a result, there will be no impact to the adjacent vegetation communities and the Duffins Creek. There will be some removal and relocation of trees on the tableland. Plantings Transplanting of existing trees will occur where possible and new trees will be planted within areas that are out of play such as the edge of fairways. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2, Existing Resource Based Uses, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35817 - Application #: 350 /04 /PICK Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: September 7, 2004 809 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.42 CITY OF VAUGHAN To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (Langstaff Road - between Highway 27 and Vaughan Mills Road /Kipling Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Vaughan. The purpose is to excavate and place fill ( for bridge removal /replacement, storm sewer installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (bridge, 2 manholes, 2 outfalls ) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse ( Robinson Creek, a tributary of Humber River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through isolation methods in order to work in the dry. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans); dated September 7, 2004; received September 7, 2004; prepared by the City of Vaughan. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the reconstruction of Langstaff Road in the City of Vaughan from Highway 27 in the west to Vaughan Mills Road /Kipling Avenue in the east. The existing bridge over Robinson Creek is proposed to be replaced with a bridge with a wider span. The existing abutment on the east will be removed from the watercourse and shifted further east. This will improve the existing situation. As well there will be manholes, storm sewers and outfalls constructed. The road reconstruction will retain two through lanes, with additional turning lanes at the intersections. The area surrounding Robinson Creek is located within a Fill Regulated Area and a Regional Storm Floodplain. This project proceeded through a Schedule B- Environmental Assessment (CFN 32859). Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics for the proposed bridge and has determined that there will not be any negative impacts to flooding. Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Floodplain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (sheet piling, pea gravel bag coffer dams, erosion and sediment control fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. All works will be conducted in the dry. 810 Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The watercourse will be altered temporarily in order to work in the dry for bridge re- construction. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35782 - Application #: 335 /04/VAUG Report Prepared by : June Murphy , extension 5304 For information contact : June Murphy , extension 5304 Date: September 8, 2004 RES. #8182/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: GIBRALTAR POINT EROSION CONTROL PROJECT To retain the services of a consulting engineer to carry out a shoreline stability and sedimentation study, and to design remedial erosion control works for the Gibraltar Point shoreline at the Toronto Islands, City of Toronto, under the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the firm of Shoreplan Engineering Limited be retained to complete the shoreline stability and sedimentation study , and design remedial erosion control works for the Gibraltar Point shoreline , at a total cost not to exceed $35,000.00, plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND Erosion has been a dominant trend along the south facing shore of Gibraltar Point for more than 125 years, however it has only been in the last 30 years that stabilization works have been given any serious consideration. Following a severe storm in 1972 when several trees and water supply pipes were damaged, a reclamation and feasibility study was prepared by the Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) recommending various methods of stabilizing the shoreline. Unfortunately none were adopted due to lack of funding. 811 Several studies have been completed for the Gibraltar Point area since 1972, all of which have recommended that remedial works be undertaken. The most recent study, a comprehensive Shoreline Management Study done by W.F. Baird and Associates Ltd. (Baird) in 1994, investigated coastal and morphodynamic processes from both a short term and long term perspective to predict possible future trends and outcomes. The study estimated that by the year 2043 there will be a net loss of 990,740 m3 of material, concluding that the rate of erosion will continue, and possibly accelerate, if stabilization works are not implemented. In the winter of 2004, a severe storm ravaged the Gibraltar Point shoreline, leaving the foundation of the nearby washroom building and its sewage chamber exposed. Although emergency remedial works were carried out the following spring, a long -term solution is needed for this sector of shoreline to reduce the risk to public safety and prevent further damage to property and infrastructure. In this regard, at Authority Meeting #6/04, held on June 25, 2004, Resolution #A194/04 was approved as follows: THAT staff be directed to proceed with the emergency shoreline protection works at Gibraltar Point, Toronto Islands as part of the "City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006", at a total cost not to exceed $100,000; AND FURTHER THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Author /ty (TRCA) in conjunction with the C /ty of Toronto commence a design study including required Class Env /ronmentalAssessment (Class EA) to develop a more permanent solution to stabilizing the shoreline. A Terms of Reference (TOR) was prepared by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff in August 2004 and distributed to the following EnvironmentaVCoastal Engineering firms: W.F. Baird and Associates Limited Shoreplan Engineering Limited Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited Cumming Cockburn Limited These consultants were chosen because of their experience with projects of this nature. RATIONALE Proposals from the selected consultants were received by TRCA on August 27, 2004, with the exception of Cumming Cockburn Limited who declined to bid on the project. The consultants were evaluated on the following criteria: • The written proposal; • Experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • Understanding of background information, project, concerns, and proposed approach; • Familiarity with the Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) process; • Time frames for completion of the study; and • Cost. 812 The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: BIDDER COST ESTIMATE (PLUS GST) W.F. Baird and Associates Limited $75,619.00 Shoreplan Engineering Limited $35,000.00 Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited (in association with HCCL) $35,000.00 The professional services offered in the Shoreplan proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the TOR and was tied for the lowest bid at a cost not to exceed $35,000.00, plus GST. This amount is within the budget estimated by TRCA staff. Shoreplan was selected over Marshall Macklin Monaghan / HCCL because of this firm's extensive knowledge of the site and their recognition of possible project constraints and proposed solutions to overcome them. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The study will review and expand on the factual information into the causes, effects, extent and hazards associated with the erosion of the Gibraltar Point shoreline. The key issues that will be addressed in this study are as follows: • Erosion of the landbase along the Gibraltar Point shoreline and the implication to existing structures and public safety; • The processes affecting sediment transport in the Gibraltar Point area, from approximately Centre Island in the east to the Western Channel in the west; and • The inclusion of aquatic and terrestrial habitat features into the final shoreline treatment wherever possible. The main objectives of the study are as follows: • To assess shoreline stability; • To develop three or four remedial options for long -term shoreline stability and recommend a preferred option which is consistent with the Class Environmental Assessment process; and • To develop a final design for shoreline protection that is cost effective and incorporates opportunities for aquatic and terrestrial habitat enhancements. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is available through the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006, and will be administered under Account No. 151 -01. 813 Report prepared by : Moranne Burnet , 416 - 392 -9690 For Information contact : Moranne Burnet , 416 - 392 -9690 Date: August 30, 2004 RES. #B183/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: 1220 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST EROSION CONTROL PROJECT To retain the services of a consulting engineer to design remedial erosion control and slope stabilization works adjacent to 1220 Sheppard Avenue East in the City of Toronto, East Don River watershed, under the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the firm of Jacques Whitford Environment Limited be retained to complete the final design of remedial erosion control and slope stabilization works for the 1220 Sheppard Avenue East Erosion Control Project , at a total cost not to exceed $15,900.00, plus GST . CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1993 an erosion problem was identified along a section of the East Don River where riverbank erosion created a safety hazard for a commercial building located at 1220 Sheppard Avenue East in the City of Toronto. The site was added to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Erosion Monitoring Priority List that same year and has continued to be monitored on an annual basis. In recent years the erosion has progressed to the point where remedial erosion control and slope stabilization works are required to prevent damage to the building and to protect public safety. The erosion appears to be the result of several contributing factors, although an over - steepened slope with minimal vegetative cover appears to be the primary considerations. In addition, the continued impact of higher and more frequent flows on the Don River has exacerbated the erosion problem, resulting in scouring at the toe and undercutting during moderate to severe storm events. At Authority Meeting #7/04, held on July 23, 2004, Resolution #A227/04 was approved as follows: THAT staff be directed to commence a Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) for the 1220 Sheppard Avenue East Erosion Control Project, City of Toronto, under the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006. In August 2004 a Terms of Reference (TOR) was prepared by TRCA staff and distributed to the following Water Resource /Environmental consultants: 814 Schollen & Company Inc. Greck and Associates Ltd. Aquafor Beech Ltd. Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. Terraprobe Ltd. These consultants were chosen because of their experience with remedial works of this nature. RATIONALE Three (3) proposals were received by TRCA on August 27, 2004: one from Jacques Whitford; one from Greck and Associates and Terraprobe (in association with Parish Geomorphic and Roth & Associates); and one from Aquafor Beech and Terraprobe. A response was not received from Schollen & Company. The consultants were evaluated on the following criteria: • The written proposal; • Experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • Understanding of background information, project, concerns and proposed approach; • Familiarity with the Class Environmental Assessment process; • Time frames for completion of the study; and • Cost. The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: BIDDER COST ESTIMATE (PLUS GST) Jacques Whitford Environment Limited $15,900.00 Aquafor Beech Limited (with Terraprobe Limited) $18,158.00 Greck and Associates (with Terraprobe Limited) $23,504.00 The professional services offered in the Jacques Whitford proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the TOR and was the lowest bid at a cost not to exceed $15,900.00, plus GST. This amount is within the budget estimated by TRCA staff. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is available through the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006, and will be administered under Account No. 148 -01. Report prepared by : Moranne Burnet , 416 - 392 -9690 For Information contact : Moranne Burnet , 416 - 392 -9690 Date: August 30, 2004 RES. #8184/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: MANITOBA STREET TO BEAVERDALE ROAD EROSION CONTROL PROJECT To retain the services of a consulting engineer to complete the final design of remedial erosion control and slope stabilization works along the western bank of Mimico Creek from Manitoba Street to Beaverdale Road in the City of Toronto, under the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the firm of Aquafor Beech Limited , in association with Terraprobe Limited and Schollen & Company, be retained to complete the final design of remedial erosion control and slope stabilization works for the Manitoba Street to Beaverdale Road Erosion Control Project at a total cost not to exceed $42,884.00, plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1995 it was recognized that riverbank erosion had created a safety risk to private homes and existing structures along a section of Mimico Creek between Manitoba Street and Beaverdale Road in the City of Toronto. The site was added to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Erosion Monitoring Priority List that same year and has continued to be monitored on an annual basis. In recent years the erosion has progressed to the point where remedial erosion control and slope stabilization works are required to protect private property and public safety. As a result, at Authority Meeting #7/04, held on July 23, 2004, Resolution #A226/04 was approved as follows: THAT staff be directed to commence a Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) for the Manitoba Street - Beaverdale Road Erosion Control Project, City of Toronto, under the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006. In August 2004 a Terms of Reference (TOR) was prepared by TRCA staff and distributed to the following Water Resource /Environmental consultants: Schollen & Company Inc. Greck and Associates Ltd. Aquafor Beech Ltd. Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. Terraprobe Ltd. These consultants were chosen because of their experience with remedial works of this nature. RATIONALE Three (3) proposals were received by TRCA on August 27, 2004: one from Jacques Whitford; one from Aquafor Beech with Terraprobe and Schollen & Company; and one from Greck and Associates with Terraprobe, Parish Geomorphic and Roth & Associates. 816 The consultants were evaluated on the following criteria: • The written proposal; • Experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • Understanding of background information, project, concerns and proposed approach; • Familiarity with the Class Environmental Assessment process; • Time frames for the completion of work; and • Cost. The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: BIDDER COST ESTIMATE (PLUS GST) Aquafor Beech (with Terraprobe and Schollen & Company) $42,884.00 Greck and Associates (with Terraprobe, Parish Geomorphic and Roth & Associates) $44,988.00 Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. $50,240.00 The professional services offered in the Aquafor Beech proposal met all terms and conditions specified in the TOR at a cost not to exceed $42,884.00, excluding GST. This amount is within the budget estimated by TRCA staff. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is available through the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project, 2002 - 2006, and will be administered under Account No. 149 -01. Report prepared by : Moranne Burnet , 416 - 392 -9690 For Information contact : Moranne Burnet , 416 - 392 -9690 Date: August 30, 2004 RES. #B185/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE Extension of employment. Extension of employment of a staff member for 3 months beyond retirement age, to provide basic services to the end of the season. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT an extension of employment of Maharanidai Ramdin beyond the retirement age of 65 on September 18, 2004 to the end of the season on December 31, 2004, be approved . CARRIED 817 BACKGROUND The building cleaners at Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) are hired for 9 months, April through December, at which time they are laid off for 3 months. Mrs. Ramdin is a member of a team of four cleaners, who share the responsibility seven days a week, for cleaning all of the heritage buildings, the public washrooms and staff facilities. She has been a member of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff since 1999. She turns 65 on September 18, 2004. At this work location, October through December is a peak period for building cleaning, due to weather and volume of visitors, and high volume of meetings and corporate events. It has proven extremely difficult for BCPV to hire or retain qualified cleaning staff for a 3 month period just prior to a 3 month layoff. In this instance staff request permission to bring Mrs. Ramdin back on contract for the remainder of the year. The employment contract would stipulate that she be paid at her present hourly rate and would continue on the same or similar schedule as she currently works. The building cleaner position would be advertised and filled in April 2005 for the 2005 season, with proper time for training and staff orientation in the spring before the site reopens. FINANCIAL DETAILS BCPV budgeted to fill all cleaning positions for the season in the BCPV 2004 Maintenance budget. There is no additional cost to this action. Report prepared by : Marty Brent , extension 5403 For Information contact : Marty Brent , extension 5403 Date: July 28, 2004 RES. #B186/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR A PERSONAL LEAVE OF ABSENCE Request from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority employee, Michelle Chamberlain, for an unpaid leave of absence for a 12 month period. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT Michelle Chamberlain , Technical Administrative Clerk in the Resource Science Section , be granted an unpaid leave of absence from her position for a twelve month period commencing September 1, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND In accordance with Personnel Policy #6, Leaves of Absence, a request for a leave that exceeds six months must be approved by the Executive Committee. RATIONALE Michelle Chamberlain has requested a personal leave of absence to pursue an international teaching opportunity in China from September 2004 to September 2005. This is a great opportunity for Michelle to increase her skills in an international venue. 818 FINANCIAL DETAILS No savings anticipated as the position will be replaced with an employee on a one year contract. Report prepared by : Catherine MacEwen , extension 5219 For Information contact : Catherine MacEwen , extension 5219 Date: August 27, 2004 RES. #B187/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: GEO- TECHNICAL /GEO- ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY OF KINGSTON AND BALA RAILWAY LINES FOR LOWER DON RIVER WEST REMEDIAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT To retain the services of a geo- technical engineering firm to carry out a series of geo- technical and geo - environmental investigations to determine the the sub - surface conditions: 1) Under the CN Railway Kingston Line, west of the Don River as a component of the Environmental Assessment for the Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project; and 2) Under the CN Railway Bala Line, west of the Don River on behalf of the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT the firm of Terrapex Environmental Ltd . be retained to complete borehole investigations under CN's Kingston and Bala Lines , west of the Don River , to determine the geo - technical and geo - environmental conditions at a total cost of $36,405.00 (plus GST). CARRIED BACKGROUND Kingston Line Geo- technical and Geo - Environmental Study As part of the Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project, additional hydraulic capacity is required through the existing embankment of the CN Rail crossing over the Don River (Kingston Line). The additional capacity is needed to offset the potential for higher flood levels along the upstream reaches of the river due to the implementation of a flood protection landform on the west bank. It is intended to achieve the increased flow capacity by installing four to six culvert structures through the embankment on the west bank of the river. The culverts will be installed in stages within open cut excavations with track protection. The track protection will be installed during night closures while the culvert installations will be carried out during weekend closures. 819 Based on available information, no site - specific geotechnical data is available at the location for the proposed culverts. A review of background reports and information in the general vicinity of the site suggests that the overburden soils are anticipated to consist of surficial fill materials overlying inter - layered deposits consisting of silt, silty sand /sandy silt, sand, organic silt, and /or peat. In some areas, these soils may be underlain by glacial till. The available information also indicates that the site of the proposed culvert works is likely located above a buried valley within the surface of the bedrock. Bedrock is anticipated to be encountered at depths of approximately 20 m to 25 m below ground surface. During discussions with staff of GO Transit, Toronto Terminals Railway, and the Canadian National Railway (CNR), comments were expressed regarding constructability issues, including construction methods, the geotechnical characteristics of the native materials, potential dewatering requirements, and the nature of the geo- environmental conditions at the site. Following discussions, it was concluded that the agencies supported the proposed concept for gaining additional hydraulic capacity at the crossing, but also felt strongly that additional information on site conditions should be obtained to advance the design beyond a functional phase. This would enable a more detailed assessment of the design and construction requirements and thereby, address the concerns of the three parties. Bala Line Geo- technical and Geo - Environmental Study At a recent meeting attended by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC), the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), Urban Strategies, Joe Lobko and Dillon Consulting, it was agreed that a functional design for a pedestrian underpass under the Bala Line immediately upstream of the mainline CNR crossing of the Don River should be developed by Dillon Consulting. This pedestrian tunnel has been identified in the West Don Lands Precinct Planning process as a desirable feature for this area to increase connectivity between the Don watershed and the Toronto waterfront. It is anticipated that a single concrete box culvert, approximately 3 m wide by 3 m high, or similar structure, will be required to facilitate pedestrian access through the Bala subdivision. In order to develop a functional design for this tunnel, field investigations are required to provide recommendations on geotechnical conditions, and to assess soil /groundwater quality aspects under the Bala Line in the proposed location for the tunnel. Given that TRCA and Dillon Consulting (on behalf of the TWRC) will be undertaking similar investigations for the proposed culvert structures at the CNR's Kingston Line crossing, the TWRC agreed that it would be prudent and cost - effective to expand the original scope of work for the field investigations along the Kingston Line to also include the pedestrian underpass location. A Terms of Reference (TOR) was prepared and distributed by Dillon Consulting on September 2, 2004 to the following Geo - technical Engineering firms: • Terrapex Environmental Limited • Golder Associates Limited • Shaheen & Peaker Limited 820 These consultants were chosen because of their experience with projects of this nature and that they have been identified as being eligible to receive contracts from the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. TRCA and Dillon Consulting will co- manage the retained geo- technical engineering firm for both study locations. RATIONALE Proposals from the selected consultants were received by Dillon Consulting, on behalf of TRCA on September 9, 2004. The consultants were evaluated on the following criteria: • written proposal; • experience and expertise of key members of the consulting team; • understanding of background information, project, environmental concerns and proposed approach; • time frames for completion of the study; and, • cost. The following table presents a summary of cost estimates submitted by the invited bidders: BIDDER COST ESTIMATE (plus GST) Terrapex Environmental Limited $ 36,405.00 Golder Associates Limited $ 34,450.00 (partial proposal) ($44,450.00 full proposal) Shaheen & Peaker Limited $ 19,300.00 The professional services offered in the Terrapex Environmental Limited proposal represented the only proposal to meet all terms and conditions specified in the TOR and did not exceed the authorized upset costs of $72,309.00 (plus GST), as indicated by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. The proposed budget submitted by Golder Associates Limited at $34,450.00 did not include two angled boreholes as specified in the TOR, as Golder Associates recommended that these boreholes be removed from the study. An additional unit cost of $5,000.00 per borehole was specified in their proposal to include these two angled boreholes. As such, the proposal submitted by Golder Associates is $10,000.00 greater than presented in their project budget. A number of terms and conditions of the TOR were not met in the proposal submitted by Shaheen and Peaker Limited. The proposal scheduling was also deemed to be unrealistic given the scope of work. Overall, the proposal submitted by Terrapex Environmental Limited offers the best combination of service and value of all three proposals. 821 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Work Scope A geo- technical /geo - environmental investigation is required to identify the subsurface conditions at both sites and their effects on the design and construction of the proposed culvert and tunnel works. The details of the required field program, laboratory analyses and reporting are as follows. CN Mainline Crossing (Kingston Line) Four boreholes are required; two on either side of the railway embankment. The specific requirements include: • the two boreholes immediately adjacent to the embankment should be angle drilled to the surface of the bedrock, and 3 m of coring should be carried out to confirm the presence and nature of the bedrock; • the remaining two boreholes should be drilled to a depth of approximately 10 m below the base of the proposed culverts; • fifty millimeter diameter monitoring wells should be installed in the two boreholes to depths of approximately 3 m below the base of the proposed culverts; • standard penetration testing and sampling shall be carried out at regular intervals in each borehole and select geotechnical laboratory testing should be conducted on the collected samples. If soft /highly compressible clayey soils are encountered, in -situ shear vane testing should be carried out and relatively undisturbed Shelby Tube samples will be collected; • the geotechnical laboratory program shall include grain size analysis, moisture and organic content, and unit weight of the fill and native soils. An allowance for consolidation testing and Atterberg limits shall also included as part of the analyses; • rock cores recovered from the one borehole shall be boxed, and stored Rock identification and quality shall be evaluated by a qualified geologist • an allowance for testing the rock strength by uniaxial compression testing should be included in the cost estimate; • a suite of soil and groundwater analyses to evaluate the level of contamination in the fill and native soils should be carried out and should, at a minimum, include metals, volatile and semi - volatile organic compounds (including chlorinated solvents and PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons, and PCBs. To evaluate the possibility of aggressive environment for the reinforced concrete culverts soil and groundwater pH, and chloride and sulphate concentrations shall be measured; and, • samples of soil shall also be tested with respect to Ontario Regulation 558. This will allow for the evaluation of disposal options for the auger cutting from this investigation as well as for the excavated material from the culvert construction. CN Bala Line The geo- technical /geo - environmental investigation at this location should involve one borehole on either side of the railway line. One borehole shall be extended to bedrock; the other shall be taken to 12 m below existing ground. The same geotechnical and geo - environmental analyses as discussed above for the mainline crossing shall be undertaken at this location. 822 Reporting Following completion of the field work and laboratory testing, a geo- technical /geo - environmental report shall be prepared that discusses foundation requirements for the culverts, geo- technical design aspects related to the temporary track protection and methods to control groundwater. FINANCIAL DETAILS A budget of $62,200.00 (including GST) has been approved by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation to conduct the geo - technical and geo - environmental investigations on the Kingston Line ($51,809.00), and to cover TRCA project management expenses, ($7,428.66) (Project # 4650). An additional $2,962 was approved to cover any variances under this project. These authorizations are a component of the TWRC's Berm and Culvert Implementation Budget Additional project management expenses incurred by Dillon Consulting under the Kingston Line geo - technical study are anticipated to be $11,800.00 (including GST) and will be covered under the contingency fund of their existing contract with TRCA for the Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project. A new project account (190 -05) called the Berm and Culvert Implementation Account has been established for this study component ($62,200.00). Account #190 -01 will be used to cover Dillon's expenses. A budget of $39,930.00 has also been approved by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation to conduct the geo - technical and geo - environmental investigations on the Bala Line ($20,050.00), and to cover Dillon's costs to develop a functional design for the pedestrian underpass ($17,980.00) (Project # 4650). Additional funds of $1,900.00 to cover any project variance has also been included in the approved budget These authorizations are a component of the TWRC's West Don Lands Precinct Plan Implementation Budget. Account #192 -01 has been established to manage this study component. Report prepared by : Ken Dion , extension 5230 For Information contact : Ken Dion , extension 5230 Date: September 09, 2004 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:20 a.m., on Friday, September 10, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 823 THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/04 October 1, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #9/04, was held in the South Theatre , Black Creek Pioneer Village , on Friday, October 1, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:01 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair REGRETS Dave Ryan RES. #B188/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THAT the Minutes of Meeting #8104, held on September 10, 2004, be approved . CORRESPONDENCE Member CARRIED (a) A letter dated September 22, 2004 from Mr. Jafar Amini of 44 Saintfield Road, City of Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. 824 RES. #8189/04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT above -noted correspondence (a) be received . CARRIED 825 CORRESPONDENCE 6.1 By Fax #(416) 661-6898 The Hearing Board or The TRCA Executive Committee, The Toronto Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 September 22, 2004 Attention: Ms. Kathy Stranks, Supervisor Board Member Services, TRCA Subject: Retaining Wall at 44 Saintfield Avenue, Toronto, Application No. 443 /02/IOR Dear Ms. Stranks: We thank TRCA for the opportunity to meet with Hearing Board of the Executive Committee an October 1, 2004, wbich we will attend. We have already submitted mast of the documents related to the above application to the TRCA's office, and if required we will submit additional documents at the hearing. Attached please find the following documents for the TRCA's Hearing Board of TRCA's Executive Committee with regard to the permit application No. 443/02/TOR. (1) Report dated September 15, 2004 by Premier Environmental Services, Inc. (2) Amended report dated September 13, 2004 by Pazin Geotechnical Services Ltd. for Clarification of their Previous Report dated December 9, 2004. Respectfully Su 9, Jafar Amini miffed levc 44 Saintfield Avenue Toronto (North York), Ontario MSC 2M6 Hamc Telephone No. (416) 447 -4044 Mobile Telephone No. (416) 871 -0222 Please Note: you can reach me at any time 826 September 15. 2004 Mr, & Mrs. J. Amini 44 Saintfield Avenue Toronto, Ontario MSC 2M6 O.% PREMIER EwVIagw4¢►4TAL 5 &Vt I5. tWC AMOURSTONE Rt_TMMING WALL 44 SAINTFIELD AVENUE, TORONTO, ONTARIO • Dear Mr. & Mrs. Amini, On August 9, 2004 Mr. David Wade, P.Geo. of Premier Environmental Services Inc. (Premier) inspected the Armourstone retaining wall (retaining wall) in the backyard of your residential property at 44 Saintfiekd Avenue, Toronto, Ontario (subject property). The purpose 01 the inspection was to determine if the retaining wall is stable and to determine 11 the wall has a significant efts an the Wicket Creek regional storm ftoodine which generally bisects the subject property. Mr. Amin( escorted Mr. Wade while inspecting the retaining wall and subject property. Following the subject property inspection. Mr. Amini provided Mr. Wade with the following documents: ▪ Rear Yard Retaining Walt, Summary of Conversation with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, prepared by Mr. Mark Scholten of Scholar) & Company Inc.. dated June 12, 2002; ▪ Retaining Wau/Slope Stability Assessn1ent, 44 Saintfield Avenue, Toronto, prepared by Mr. Mike Palxen, M.A.SC., P.Eng., of Paizen Geotet finical Sorvtoes Ltd., dated December 9, 2002: • Amiourstorre Retaining Wall, 44 Saintfield Avenue, North Yore. Letter of Substantial Completion, prepared by Mr. Bata Jovanovski, P.Eng.. of URBIS Engineering Ltd., dated January. 2003; and • Retaining Wail/Slope Stability Assessment, 44 Saintfiefd Avenue, Toronto, prepared by Mr. Mike Patten, M.A.Se., P.Eng., of Paizen Geotechn+Cal Services Ltd., dated September 13, 2004. Premier Environmental Services Inc. 1o/ Main Street, Cambridge. Ontario, NIR 1W1 Phone (519) 6234206 Fax (619) 623.6689 Armourslone Retaining Wall 44 Saint/18k/ Avenue, Toronto. Ontario base is cut too steep. These conditions are presently not evident or the site, however, their occurrence in the past cannot be ruled out.' In conclusion, Paizen notes The deep seated slope failure (base failure) below the wall is very unlikely to occur. Also. conditions for other modes of slope failure i.e. surface erosion or toppling are negligent. Construction of the wall will likely prevent future erosion* of surrounding areas.": • The retaining wall is not likely to be impacted by a flood in Wilket Creek. Premier also considered the location of the retaining wall in relation to the regional storm floodhne which generally bisects the property. The retaining wall is located within the regional storm floodline which is shown on the fax sent to Premier by TRCA. The general location of the property line was drawn on the map by TRCA and indicates that the retaining wail is located on or dose to an elevation of 132 mast and Wilket Creek is at an elevation of approximately 119 mast. The floodline map also shows that there is a Floodtine Revision Pending. Once a decision has been made by TRCA, it wilt likely result in the lowering of the regional storm floodline to an elevation of close to 120 mast. With recent flood control measures Implemented by TRCA since Hurricane Hazel in the 1950's. it is unlikely that the subject property will be prone to flooding, if it ever was; and • From an aesthetic perspective, the retaining wall blends into the surrounding environment. Premier observed property conditions by looking north from Saintflled Avenue. The top of the retaining wall was covered in grass and could not be seen from the road. If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact the undersigned. For proper interpretation of this letter report, the reader's attention is drawn to the attached statement of limitations. Yours truly, Premier Environmental Services Inc. David Wade, P.Geo. Senior Geosclentist Page 3of3 Premier Environmental ic Inc. 1W1 107 Main Street, Cambridge, Ontario. Phone (519) 6239208 Fax (519)6236689 828 ATTACHMENT A STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS 829 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIQN$ The conclusions made in the Premier Environmental Services Inc. fetter report pertaining to the Armourstone retaining wall at the north side (bads yard) of 44 Saintfietd Avenue, Toronto, Ontario are based on information presented by Mr. Jeff Amini (owner of 44 Saintfaekt Avenue) and observations made during a visual inspection of the Armourstone retaining watt on August 9, 2004. No sampling or testing of any kind was carried out at this property to confirm soil structural, physical or chemical properties. Conditions observed on the property or noted in documents regar ding the property may differ from time to time and- may become apparent during future investigations Or on -site work. These conditions may not have been detected or anticipated at the time of the reported work. As such, Premier Environmental Services Inc_ Cannot be held responsible for any environmental, geotschnical or structural conditions associated with the Armourstone retaining watt at 44 Saintfield Avenue, or any other properties in connection with this work. The opinions made by Premier Environmental Sorvices Inc. are based on a best effort judgment of ttte property inspector and not an engineering knowledge. Except as set forth in this report, Premier Environmental Services inc. made no Independent investigation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived from secondary ovum and personal interviews, and assumed that such Information was accurate and complete and no relevant information was withheld. No audits, engineering or scientific calculations, technical investigations or laboratory analysis were made or intended to be apart of this report. The scope of this report is Limited to the matters expressly covered_ This report is prepared for the soles benefit of Mr. Jeff Arnini, and may not he relied upon by any other person or entity without the written authorization of Premier Environmental Services inc. Any use or reuse of this document (or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations represented herein), by parties other than Mr. Jeff Amini is at the sole risk of those parties. This report is not intended to replace the efforts of Mr. Jeff Amini to conduct investigations and take its own measures to control environmental, geotechnical or structural herds and comply with applicable law. Premier offers no warranty as to the performance, stability or structural integrity of the Arrnourstone retaining wall noted herein. 830 UNIT 8, 2�3? LAWRENCE AVENUE WEST OKO'iTO, ONTARIO M3N 3V1 TEL (4 -.6) 240-0084 FAX (416) 240.0085 PAZIN GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES LTD. CONS1. flNG ENGINEERS September 13, 2004 Ref. No. 02.1482 Mr. & Mrs. Amini 44 Sauntheld Avenue Toronto, OMatio M3C 2M6 Dear Sir: RE: Retaining Wall/Slope Stability Assessment 44 Saindreld Ayggio, Toronto This letter report includes amendments to our origbtal report dated December 9, 2002, in order to provide further Ciariftc*tions. This report supersedes the previous report. M requested, we visited the above noted site on December 5, and again on December 6, 2002. The purpose of our visits wee to inspect the retaining wall constructed recently at the rear of the house and to assess the existing scope stability. The approximate wall vocation is shown on the appended Plot Plan, Plate 1. The details of the wall design are presented on Plebe 2. Although we were not present during the wall construction to inspect the wall subgrade conditions (the ground was Rouen and could not be cbeckcd at the time . of our site visits), it is our understanding from the discussion with the contractor's representative, that the wall was subsitntially completed oa November 29, 2002, as shown on the drawing, A levelling layer of 2-inch limestone was placed below the topsoil layer over "dry ", undisturbed native soil. Behind the armour stones rip- rap till visible a provided he To nd surface- The armour stone wall appears to lave which was visihlez tm the !'� been cansuwtotd well. The exisdng slope stability assessment is based on the detailed site reconnaissance and review of the available geateciwical information. Review of the Pleistocene Geology and Ground Water Resources of the North York Map No,1955 -6 (by A.K. Wat, 1957) indicated that the site is located within the tilt plain deposited there during the Wisconsistan glaciation. It is expected that the site is underlain by compact silt till deposits which with increased depth are underlain by older and more dense tills and interglacial dcposiit$. <3rourui wader loved is expected to be somewhat higher than the water level of Wilket Creek which Tuns east of the site 831 CONSUL IN' hiCalAtAi :R VAIiA •2- September 13, 2004 Ref. No. 02 -1482 Reconnaissance of the site indicated that the slope in front of the retaining wall is approximately 2.5 to 3.5 m high and it appears that the existing slope is inclined at angles varying between 20° and 25° w the horizontal (generally less than 2 horizontal on 1 vortical). The slope is cry (there are no springs and marshy areas at the base of the slope or wet spots on the slope) and overgrown by mature trees. Inspection of the area at the base of the retaining wall and beyond did not indicate any signs of previous slope instability. The slope base is located far away from the Wilket Creek and there is no slope base erosion problem. The trees beyond the wall, of which the biggest is judged to be over 40 years old, arc straight and do not show any signs of slope creep or instability. However, signs of surface erosion are evident at the north easterly corner of house where no wall exist_ Also, sign of past erosion along the north side of 44 Saintficld was evident in the photos taken before the construction of the wall. The geotechnical properties of the site soils are such that deep stated slope failure is very unlikely. The instability in the silt till is caused mainly by surface erosion, or by toppling and sliding of thin soil sheet when the slope base is cut too steep. These Conditions are presently not evident on the site, however, their occurrence in the past cannot be ruled out. In conclusion, the retaining wall constructed in November of 2002, at the tear of the house appears to have been well constructed and current condition of the existing slope upon which the wall. is constructed is in a stable condition and does not show any signs of instability. The deep seated slope failure (base failure) below the wall is very unlikely to occur. Also, conditions for other modes of slope failure i.e. surface erosion or toppling are negligent Constnucdon of the wall will likely prevent future erosion of surrounding areas. We believe this is the information you require at this time. 10 we can be further assistance, please do not hesitate to Contact this office. Yours very truly, PAZIN GEO ECHNICAL SE&VICBS LTD. Mike Parini, M.A.SC., P.Eng. MP/moc mpltrs\ 44saintfield.482 � K W M. PAZIN 832 HEARINGS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 HEARING REPORT - 44 SAINTFIELD AVENUE , CITY OF TORONTO RES. #B190 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board . CARRIED MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Following the roll call, a hearing was held re: Application #443/02/TOR to regrade and place fill within a well defined valley of the Don River (Wilket Creek ), described as 44 Saintfield Avenue , City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area ). The applicants propose to place fill within the Fill Regulated Area within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of an armourstone retaining wall on the valley slope and place fill for the purpose of creating additional table land for a larger rear yard. The works commenced prior to application for a permit and continued after a Notice of Violation was issued. Additional fill was placed at a later date and a second Notice of Violation was issued for the additional works. Staff do not support the application on the basis that it impacts the conservation of land and the control of pollution. A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Mr. Steven Heuchert, Senior Planner, Development Services Section, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Correspondence (A) noted above was received and a presentation was made by Mr. Nicholas Macos, Solicitor, Heenan Blaikie, representative for the owners, Jafar and Firouzeh Amini, and by Mr. Jafar Amini. The Hearing Board asked questions of staff and the applicant/representative. RES.#B191/04 Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Suzan Hall 833 THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session RES. #B192 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES. #B193 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow CARRIED CARRIED THAT Application #443/02/TOR to regrade and place fill within a well defined valley of the Don River (Wilket Creek ), described as 44 Saintfield Avenue , City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area ) be refused as it impacts the conservation of land and the control of pollution . MOTION TO RECONVENE RES. #B194 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT Executive Committee Meeting #9/04 reconvene . MOTION TO RATIFY RES. #B195 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Frank Dale CARRIED CARRIED THAT the Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that Application #443/02/TOR to regrade and place fill within a well defined valley of the Don River ( Wilket Creek), described as 44 Saintfield Avenue , City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area) be refused as it impacts the conservation of land and the control of pollution . CARRIED 834 BACKGROUND This proposal was submitted for the approval of works after they were constructed. The proposal asks for permission to, in effect, "regularize" the construction of a substantial retaining wall and placement of fill over the top of bank to establish a larger rear yard. In May 2001, October 2001 and again in May 2002, TRCA staff met with the applicant prior to construction on site to review the proposal and stated that the works would require a TRCA permit and that a large retaining structure over top of bank and placement of fill is not supported. An inspection of the premises took place on November 27, 2002. The Enforcement Officer on patrol in the community found that construction of the wall had begun and the applicant was advised to cease work. As a result of the inspection, TRCA staff met with the applicant and received a permit application on November 27, 2002. However, between November 27, 2002 and November 29, 2002, works continued on the project until the retaining wall was completed. TRCA violation notices were issued to the applicants in December, 2002. In April 2003, the applicant placed additional fill over top of bank and a second set of TRCA violation notices were issued. Both sets of violations were issued in response to the placement of fill material at 44 Saintfield Road, City of Toronto, in the fill regulated area of the property without approval by permit from TRCA in accordance with the Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario Regulation 158. In summary, the applicant proceeded with the works despite the knowledge that the works would not be supported and without a permit, continued with the works after being advised to cease works, and then proceeded with additional unsupported works. The proposal was originally issued a building permit by the City of Toronto in 2002, but the building permit was revoked after city staff became aware that a permit was required under Ontario Regulation 158 and that such a permit was not forthcoming. PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the north side of Saintfield Avenue. Saintfield Avenue is located in the Bridle Path residential area west of Leslie Street and south of Lawrence Avenue, in the City of Toronto's North York Community Council Area. There is an existing single family dwelling on the property. All of the property to the north (rear) of the existing dwelling is located within the Fill Regulated Area and is associated with the forested Don River (Wilket Creek) valley corridor and the Wilket Creek Forest Environmentally Sensitive Area. Lawrence Ave. E. "°'"i', raw ;-. n �'� Edw Nard 4"' cY,.. -,1 1—. [. • & y ronievr Gardens ' C"`"" ! i i .. t . I I , ■ Park Lane Cir. st as .a,,, �i Cr. Saintteeld �°6 si a Mayas Oak br.6;°' }� �� o TY Salunica Rd.1% cr Pant la',! Sunsrest Or. %I t.ea Au Laws 835 TRCA JURISDICTION Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission is required from the TRCA to "place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places" (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 3(b)). "Fill" is defined as "...earth, sand, gravel, rubble, rubbish, garbage or any other material whether similar to or different from any of the aforementioned materials, whether originating on the site or elsewhere, used or capable of being used to raise, lower, or in any way affect the contours of the ground" (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 1). The areas described in the schedules (fill regulated areas) are areas in which, in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding or pollution or conservation of land may be affected by the placing or dumping of fill (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 2). Therefore, a permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the TRCA, any of these three concerns are affected. In the case of the proposal for approval of works after the fact for 44 Saintfield Avenue, TRCA staff conclude that both the control of pollution and conservation of land have been affected. Before refusing permission, the TRCA must hold a Hearing to which the applicant and other interested persons are a party (Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27 - 28(12)). It should be noted that TRCA reviews all permitting requirements in concert with our Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) policies. VSCMP integrates TRCA's public safety responsibilities and reaffirms its commitment to ecosystem planning at a watershed level. VSCMP outlines policies for property improvements and ancillary structures within highly urbanized areas such as the area surrounding and including the subject property. THE PROPOSAL The submission is for the prior placement/regrading of fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River (Wilket Creek) valley corridor in connection with the construction of an approximately 92 foot long armourstone retaining wall on the valley slope and placement of fill on the valley slope for the purposes of the creation of additional table land for a larger rear yard. The armourstone retaining wall ranges in height from 7 feet to 9 feet -6 inches above grade. All works are located within an area of mature vegetation associated with the valley corridor. The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain. STAFF REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL Conservation of Land The submission does not result in the conservation of land as it negatively impacts a portion of the valley corridor, degrades the habitat function of the valley system and is anticipated to impact slope stability in the long term. Policy 3.2.1.0 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that 'alterations of valley corridors through such activities as filling or enclosure shall not be permitted to create additional useable area and /or accommodate development" The construction of the retaining wall and the placement of fill between the top of the retaining wall and the former rear yard was clearly designed to create additional rear yard area at the expense of negatively impacting a portion of the valley corridor. 836 Policy 4.2.2.E.5 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that "property improvements and ancillary structures that introduce greater potential for valley /and impacts such as...retaining walls...grade cutting and filling shall be prohibited...". The property is in close proximity to the Wilket Creek Forest which is an Environmentally Sensitive Area ( #63) (ESA) and an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. TRCA's natural heritage inventory work and ESA documentation has shown that the Wilket Creek Forest is a high quality, relatively undisturbed, mature forest and supports at least three documented regionally rare fauna species of concern, and a high diversity of plant species. These species are of concern in urbanized areas as a result of negative impacts to their habitat associated with urban uses. These impacts include direct loss of habitat as well as light, noise and encroachment from human contact. TRCA's information shows that the area is functioning at a very high level given its urban context. The proposal resulted in the removal of vegetation, the hardening of the valley slope and it pushes the urban edge further into the valley, all of which result in a loss to the overall habitat value. This could impact the overall ecological function of the valley and exacerbate conditions for invasive plant species to take hold. Indeed, the proliferation of non - native and invasive Bittersweet Nightshade (solanum dulcamara) was apparent on the wall at a recent site visit. Further, any development on the valley slope on the subject property will not meet the TRCA's objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions, which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs. Policy 4.2.2.E.2 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that 'property improvements and ancillary structures .. may be permitted subject to and in compliance with the following :... if located on or adjacent to a valley wall : ... will minimize property damage associated with erosion /slope instability to the extent technica //y possible...." The proposal results in impacts to pollution within the valley corridor as the extensive retaining wall adds considerable load to the slope and is anticipated to impact slope stability in the long term. The existing slope on 44 Saintfield Avenue and the neighbouring property to the north exhibited some surficial erosion prior to the works taking place. TRCA geotechnical staff are of the opinion that the surficial erosion could have been alleviated on the 44 Saintfield Avenue property using a more natural treatment that would enhance the valley corridor. A permit was issued on July 6, 2001 for placement of a small amount of fill and a geotextile mat, and renaturalization of the slope on the neighbouring property to the east for just this purpose. In addition, the City of Toronto has corrected stormwater run -off issues with Saintfield Avenue. The applicant's retaining wall proposal may simply exacerbate the situation at the expense of the ecological function and safety of the valley slope. Pollution Also, relative to Policy 4.2.2.E.2 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (see above), the works do not include any stormwater controls beyond a filter cloth. During storm events, stormwater is anticipated to sheet flow over the top of the wall and result in surficial erosion of the valley slope. Surficial erosion may also be exaggerated by any future loss of vegetative cover due to removal of tree canopy. 837 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND THE PRECEDENT The submission is also not supported because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the Don River (Wilket Creek) valley system, and indeed within the City of Toronto and other urban areas in the TRCA' s jurisdiction. Permitting this intrusion could be argued by future applicants to have established a precedent which will lead to similar proposals within the TRCA's jurisdiction, given the constant pressure for more land use intensification. Development Services Section staff receive inquiries for similar works (structures and /or fill within the valley corridor where none existed before) on a frequent, regular basis. Most inquiries for such works do not progress beyond the inquiry stage in part because staff can fall back on the precedent of TRCA not having permitted similar works in the past. An analysis of the TRCA's development services database indicates that approximately 11 such proposals actually proceeded to the application stage (concept, permit or planning applications) in the last four years, but none of these were recommended for approval by staff. In addition, the Hearing Board has refused three applications in the last four years for construction over top of bank that were determined to have impacted the conservation of land. If this application is approved, then staff will have difficulty opposing approval of other applications for structures and /or fill within the valley corridors, which will result in additional negative impacts to our more urbanized watersheds. Even if refused, the TRCA's position before the Mining and Lands Commissioner on an appeal will become less defensible. This is not to say that in clearly meritorious situations other applications should not be permitted. Such applications by virtue of their merits and unique circumstances are distinguishable. This application, in the view of staff, does not have merit and potentially, if approved, could be argued by future applicants to have created a significant and negative precedent for the TRCA and undermine the legitimacy of TRCA's policies. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, staff recommend that the application be denied for the following reasons: 1. The submission will affect the conservation of land as it: • results in negative impacts to a portion of the Wilket Creek Forest valley corridor for the purpose of creating additional useable area for an expanded rear yard; • results in the removal of vegetation, and pushes the urban edge further into the valley, resulting in a loss to overall habitat value of the adjacent Environmentally Sensitive Area; and • has a detrimental impact due to the cumulative loss of natural cover within the City of Toronto; • results in possible long term stability impacts due to additional load on the valley slope; and • is not an appropriate solution to surficial erosion on the property. 2. The submission will affect the control of pollution as it is anticipated to result in surficial erosion of the valley slope from stormwater discharge directly over the wall onto the valley slope. 838 3. The submission does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Specifically, it does not conform with Section 3.2.1.c, Policies and Procedures for Establishing Corridor Boundaries and Alterations or Section 4.2.2.E.2 & 5, Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures 4. The submission could be argued by future applicants to have created a precedent that will: • result in future consideration of similar proposals within the City of Toronto and other urbanized areas within TRCA's jurisdiction; • undermine TRCA's policies; and • reduce TRCA's ability to defend such policies at the Mining and Lands Commission. Report prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For Information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: September 13, 2004 Attachments : 1 839 Attachment 1 840 HEARING REPORT - 3 GIBSON AVENUE , CITY OF TORONTO RES. #B196 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase Suzan Hall THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board . CARRIED MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Following the roll call, a hearing was held re: Application #351 /04/TOR to regrade and place fill within a well defined valley of the Humber River West Branch , described as 3 Gibson Avenue , City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area ). The applicants propose to regrade and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of an armourstone retaining wall on the valley slope, create additional table land for a rear yard and construct a stormwater outtall that drains directly to the valley slope. The works were substantially completed prior to application for a permit and are essentially the same as those included in Permit Application #423/03/TOR refused by the Hearing Board on May 7, 2004. Staff do not support the application on the basis that it impacts the conservation of land. A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Mr. Steven Heuchert, Senior Planner, Development Services Section, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. A presentation was made by Mr. Tom Halinski, Solicitor, Aird and Berlis, LLP, representative for the owner, Mr. John DiSanto. A presentation was made by Mrs. Poynter of 5 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto. The Hearing Board asked questions of staff and the applicant/representative. RES. #B197 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Michael Di Biase THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session CARRIED 841 RES. #8198/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES. #B199 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Michael Di Biase CARRIED THAT Application #351 /04/TOR to regrade and place fill within a well defined valley of the Humber River West Branch , described as 3 Gibson Avenue , City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area ) be refused as it impacts the conservation of land . CARRIED MOTION TO RECONVENE RES. #B200 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Executive Committee Meeting #9/04 reconvene . MOTION TO RATIFY RES. #8201 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Maria Augimeri CARRIED THAT The Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that Application #351 /04/TOR to regrade and place fill within a well defined valley of the Humber River West Branch , described as 3 Gibson Avenue , City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area) be refused as it impacts the conservation of land . CARRIED 842 BACKGROUND This proposal was submitted for the approval of works after they were constructed. The proposals asks for permission to, in effect, "regularize" the construction of a substantial retaining wall and placement of a large amount of fill over the top of bank. An inspection of the premises took place on August 20, 2003. The Enforcement Officer on patrol in the community identified the unauthorized work. The construction of the wall was well underway at the time. As a result of the inspection, TRCA staff received a permit application on August 22, 2003. However, between August 20th and August 27th, works continued on the project until the retaining wall reached the point of substantial completion. TRCA violation notice V -2094 was issued to the applicant on September 4, 2003. The violation was issued in response to the placement of fill material at 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto, in the fill regulated area of the property without approval by permit from TRCA in accordance with the Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario Regulation 158. The original permit application received on August 22, 2003 was refused by the Hearing Board on May 7, 2004. The new permit application received on August 12, 2004, which is the subject of this hearing, is essentially the same as the August 22, 2003 application with the exception of the addition of plantings and a stormwater swale. The proposal is also subject to a notice of infraction issued by the City of Toronto Urban Forestry Service on November 17, 2003, for unauthorized tree injury in a ravine, subject to the city's Ravine Protection By -Law. In addition, the city issued an order to comply under the building code with respect to alterations to the residential structure (walk -out basement) undertaken in conjunction with this project. PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the east side of Gibson Avenue. Gibson Avenue is located in a residential area east of Islington Avenue and west of Albion Road, in the City of Toronto's Etobicoke York Community Council Area. There is an existing single family dwelling and a rear deck on the property. The majority of the property to the east (rear) of the existing dwelling is located within the Fill Regulated Area and is associated with the forested Humber River West Branch valley corridor. 1 '."a2u g 4 'Tt ='a el :A !v a" , guff =i f l Pf llwl:AY, t,,, M'' Y . y / %3 1 tt i0rii L S `' er A,,,, . v ii a', ii . V 4 ', WOO Ja+w< 4'1 L' Park t ra rrttur 1 l , . 843 TRCA JURISDICTION Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission is required from the TRCA to "place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place orp /aces "(R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 3(b)). "F///"is defined as `...earth, sand, gravel, rubb /e, rubbish, garbage or any other material whether similar to or different from any of the aforementioned materials, whether originating on the site or elsewhere, used or capable of being used to raise, lower, or in any way affect the contours of the ground" (R. R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 1). The areas described in the schedules (fill regulated areas) are areas in which, in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding or pollution or conservation of land may be affected by the placing or dumping of fill (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 158, s. 2). Therefore, a permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the TRCA, any of these three concerns are affected. In the case of the proposal for approval of works after the fact for 3 Gibson Avenue, TRCA staff conclude that the conservation of land has been affected. Before refusing permission, the TRCA must hold a Hearing to which the applicant and other interested persons are a party (Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27 - 28(12)). It should be noted that TRCA reviews all permitting requirements in concert with our Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) policies. VSCMP integrates TRCA's public safety responsibilities and reaffirms its commitment to ecosystem planning at a watershed level. VSCMP outlines policies for property improvements and ancillary structures within highly urbanized areas such as the area surrounding and including the subject property. THE PROPOSAL The submission is for the prior placement/regrading of fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River West Branch valley corridor in connection with the construction of an approximately 130 foot long armourstone retaining wall on the valley slope, creation of additional table land for a rear yard, and construction of a stormwater outfall and swale. The armourstone retaining wall ranges in height from 2.60 feet to 9.05 feet above grade. All works are located within an area of mature vegetation associated with the valley corridor. The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain. STAFF REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL Conservation of Land The submission does not result in the conservation of land as it negatively impacts a portion of the valley corridor and degrades the habitat function of the valley system. Policy 3.2.1.0 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that "alterations of valley corridors through such activities as filling or enclosure shall not be permitted to create additional useable area and/or accommodate development" The construction of the retaining wall and the regrading of fill between the top of the retaining wall and the former rear yard were clearly designed to create extensive additional rear yard area at the expense of negatively impacting a portion of the valley corridor. 844 Policy 4.2.2.E.5 of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program states that " property improvements and ancillary structures that introduce greater potential for valleyland impacts such as... retaining walls ..grade cutting and filling shall be prohibited... ". TRCA's natural heritage inventory work has shown that the Humber River West Branch valley supports several flora and fauna species of concern. While these species may be common in more rural areas, they are of concern in urbanized areas as a result of negative impacts to their habitat associated with urban uses. These impacts include direct loss of habitat as well as light, noise and encroachment from human contact. TRCA's information shows that the area is functioning at a high level given its urban context. The proposal results in serious injury to eight (8) mature trees, lesser impacts to six (6) mature trees, the removal of approximately 5,380 square feet of vegetation and pushes the urban edge further into the valley, all of which result in a loss to the overall habitat value. This could impact the overall ecological function of the valley and exacerbate conditions for invasive plant species to take hold. The applicants revised proposal includes replanting of 1,500 square feet of this area with the remainder to be utilized for rear yard. 860 square feet of this planting is proposed below the wall on the valley slope, and the remaining 640 square feet is proposed above the wall. Although the new plantings proposed are native, TRCA staff are of the opinion that the applicant's proposal is deficient and impacts the conservation of land for the following reasons: • The proposed new plantings are not sufficient compensation for the loss of 5,380 square feet of vegetation as only 28% of formerly existing valley vegetation would be replaced. • 42% of the proposed new plantings are above the wall (in the newly created rear yard) and there is no guarantee that such plantings will not be impacted by human activity nor entirely removed by homeowners in the future, and the aggregate fill placed above the wall does not appear conducive to sustaining native plantings. • Any development of the valley slope on the subject property will not meet the TRCA's objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs. Specifically, it is TRCA's mandate to retain all remnant slopes / linkages in the valley corridors, especially those (as on the subject property) that are directly connected to a wider river valley feature like the Humber River West Branch. The applicants submission states that the area is already disturbed due to the proximity of Albion Road and adjacent disturbance on neighbouring properties, and argues that it is acceptable to impact remnant valley features because they are already disturbed. If this were the case, then it follows that it would be acceptable to destroy most of the valley features in the City of Toronto because they are already remnant/disturbed features. • The retaining wall is an atypical man -made feature that is not consistent with the valley corridor in this residential community. Neighbouring properties do not exhibit the extensive mass of the retaining wall nor the amount of filling that has taken place on the subject property. Where walls are visible on neighbouring properties, they are generally 1 or 2 foot high wooden garden or terrace walls as opposed to the applicant's wall that is 7 to 8 feet higher along much of its length. 845 • TRCA staff do not concur that the extensive wall and fill is an appropriate solution to modifying the valley at 3 Gibson Avenue. There are many opportunities for more natural enhancements to enable the applicant to retain his walk -out basement while restoring / enhancing the valley corridor. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND THE PRECEDENT The submission is also not supported because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the West Humber River valley system, and indeed within the City of Toronto and other urban areas in the TRCA's jurisdiction. Permitting this intrusion could be argued by future applicants to have established a precedent which will lead to similar proposals within the TRCA's jurisdiction, given the constant pressure for more land use intensification. Development Services Section staff received inquiries for similar works (structures and /or fill within the valley corridor where none existed before) on a frequent, regular basis. Most inquiries for such works do not progress beyond the inquiry stage in part because staff can fall back on the precedent of TRCA not having permitted similar works in the past. An analysis of the TRCA's development services database indicates that approximately 11 such proposals actually proceeded to the application stage (concept, permit or planning applications) in the last four years, but none of these were recommended for approval by staff. In addition, the Hearing Board has refused three applications in the last four years for construction over top of bank that were determined to have impacted the conservation of land. If this application is approved, then staff will have difficulty in opposing other applications for structures and /or fill within the valley corridors, which will result in additional negative impacts to our more urbanized watersheds. Indeed, the TRCA's position before the Mining and Lands Commissioner on future appeals will become less defensible. This is not to say that in clearly meritorious situations other applications should not be permitted. Such applications by virtue of their merits and unique circumstances are distinguishable. This application, in the view of staff, does not have merit and potentially, if approved, could be argued by future applicants to have created a significant and negative precedent for the TRCA and undermine the legitimacy of the TRCA's policies. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, staff recommend that the application be denied for the following reasons: 1. The submission will affect the conservation of land as it: • results in negative impacts to a portion of the Humber River West Branch valley corridor for the purpose of creating additional useable area for an expanded rear yard; • results in serious injury to eight (8) mature trees, impacts to six (6) mature trees and the removal of ground cover, does not propose a sufficient compensation plan, and pushes the urban edge further into the valley, resulting in a loss to overall habitat value; • is not an appropriate solution to retaining the applicant's partially constructed walk -out basement, and 846 • has a detrimental impact due to the cumulative Toss of natural cover within the City of Toronto. 2. The submission does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Specifically, it does not conform with Section 3.2.1.c, Policies and Procedures for Establishing Corr /dor Boundaries and Alterations, or Section 4.2.2.E.5., Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures 4. The submission could be argued by future applicants to have created a precedent that will: • result in future consideration of similar proposals within the City of Toronto and other urbanized areas of the TRCA's jurisdiction; • undermine TRCA's policies; and • reduce TRCA's ability to defend such policies at the Mining and Lands Commission. Report prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For Information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: September 13, 2004 Attachments : 1 847 Attachment 1 HEARING REPORT Application #423:03,,TOR to regrade wR l'hi the Fall Regulated Area for the Humber River West Stanch Marto Faraort e 3 Gibson Avenue, City of Toronto _i I yI Els 1,4x.1 k•M` C \ 1l __,....L.__,....L..„ ,, ____ , .,,,, -,, i= c1. + 1. 4 i l,_ Il .J I d 11 ! I j l r'`• S "O �`: "� ill i It Ll. ,�'. �f. \ I 1--��_, I-I. .., - II. 'LT ' :I �' 4_ ti t , , 't l ,i �.•+._ i Y , `4-1-7-' • i ----'-'-...,,Ii. i L�� � J 45.04 C , T y C'F: Y • f ../ r' J ' f 848 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B202/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed Don -Parr Development Inc., CFN 35830. Purchase of property located at the rear of 223 and 225 Maxwell Avenue, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River watershed. Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.078 hectares (0.193 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Don -Parr Development Inc ., being Part of Lot 19, Concession 2 WYS and designated as Parts 2 and 4 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Guido Papa Surveying Ltd . under their Reference No . 04 -386, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area , located at the rear of 223 and 225 Maxwell Avenue ; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Don Parravano of Don -Parr Development Inc.. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 849 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of minor variance applications to allow for the construction of single family dwellings on each lot, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Part 2 and 4 on survey) which are comprised of a portion of the valley wall along the West Don River valley corridor at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the City of Toronto for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 or Ron Dewell at extension 5245 Date: September 20, 2004 Attachments : 1 Attachment 1 850 0 0 0 0 Z 4 TO BATHURST ST. mow.," l'4 SUBJECT PROPERTY ' NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACOUISmON .. IBM PROJECT 2001.2005 Rood Plaln and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed' 851 onsery #a ron for The Living City TRCA LANDS SUBJECT PROPERTY I LIT ..rhJllllllll11111 WINN Don -Pan D•v&Opment Inc. CFN 35830 111 ---, 1 , UT W1111011111/ SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B203/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.1 - 9.1.3, inclusive , and 9.1.21 - City of Pickering ), which are listed below . CARRIED CITY OF VAUGHAN 9.1.1 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To place fill within a regulated area on, (28 Ashbridge Circle), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Vaughan. The purpose is to move /place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to construct a wood and yard waste processing site for woody materials, within the area regulated by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, for the Asian Long- Horned Beetle (ALHB). This facility is being established in response to the Federal Ministerial Order to prevent the spread of the ALHB. York Region is rapidly accumulating wood and yard waste within this area at present, and therefore, these works will begin in advance of permit issuance as "emergency works ". The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . 1, Site Plan , prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited , date last revised September 15, 2004, received by TRCA , September 20, 2004 852 • Drawing No . 2, Grading and Servicing Plan , prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, date last revised September 15, 2004, received by TRCA , September 20, 2004 • Drawing No . 3, Notes and Detail Plan , prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited , date last revised September 7, 2004, received by TRCA , September 20, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to move /place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a wood and yard waste processing facility. This publicly owned facility will process wood and yard waste material from the area regulated by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for the Asian Long- Horned Beetle (ALHB). The facility will be sufficiently set back from top of bank and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Further, there are no natural heritage features to be removed to construct the facility. Because of the wood and yard waste currently being accumulated by York Region, this permit was released as an "emergency works" permit to York Region. Staff recognized the emergency nature of this work, given that it addresses the Federal Ministerial Order to prevent the spread of the ALHB. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore, will not affect the control of flooding. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction. Conservation of Land: There are no fisheries or geotechnical issues related to this proposal. Further, there are no natural heritage features that will be impacted by the proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored to original condition. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to original condition upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.1, New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35828 - Application #: 356 /04/VAUG Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: September 14, 2004 853 TOWN OF CALEDON 9.1.2 DAVID BUCHANAN To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Block 1, Plan , Part Lot 12, Plan 973, (145 Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by David Buchanan. The purpose is to construct a minor addition to an existing residential dwelling in a non - established, flood -prone community. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Addition & Alterations to Residence , Site Plan , drawing no . 1, prepared by J . D. Battaglia, dated February 3, 2004, revised September 8, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 15, 2004. • Addition & Alterations to Residence , Ground Flood Plan , drawing no . 2, prepared by J . D. Battaglia, dated February 3, 2004, revised May 5, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 15, 2004. • Addition & Alterations to Residence , Second Floor Plan & Roof Plan , drawing no . 3, prepared by J . D. Battaglia, dated February 3, 2004, revised September 5, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 15, 2004. • Addition & Alterations to Residence , Elevations , drawing no . 4, prepared by J . D. Battaglia, dated December 29, 2003, revised May 5, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 15, 2004. Addition & Alterations to Residence , Cross Section , drawing no . 5, prepared by J . D. Battaglia, dated February 9, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 15, 2004. • Addition & Alterations to Residence , Basement Plan , drawing no . 6, prepared by J . D. Battaglia, dated February 3, 2004, revised May 5, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 15, 2004. • Elevation Drawings , prepared by R . Kurkjian , dated August 25, 2004, stamped received by TRCA August 27, 2004. • Letter from Structural Engineer , verifying that the structure meets Regional Storm Flood velocity requirements , prepared by R . Kurkjian , dated August 25, 2004, received by TRCA staff August 27, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of an addition to an existing residential dwelling located within a Fill Regulated area and Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Humber River at 145 Old King Road, in the Town of Caledon. As this development is within a non - established flood -prone area, the proposed addition may not exceed 50% of the existing total area of the building. Plans submitted with this proposal identify that a 50% expansion is proposed. Please note that adequate floodproofing measures have been incorporated into the design of the proposal. 854 Please be advised that grading on the subject property commenced prior to the issuance of the required permit. As such, a violation notice has been issued to the applicant and is currently being resolved through TRCA Enforcement staff. This permit will not be issued until such time that TRCA Enforcement staff is satisfied with the proposed resolution. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. However, TRCA staff has determined that the proposed works will not adversely impact the storage and/or conveyance of flood waters. In addition, the proposed addition will be adequately floodproofed to the satisfaction of TRCA Engineering staff. Please note that the structure is certified by a Professional Engineer to withstand the flows and velocities associated with floodwaters during a Regional Storm event. Pollution: A temporary sediment control fence will be installed between the construction area and the watercourse feature to keep sediment and construction debris from entering the adjacent Humber River. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of construction. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings As no significant vegetation will be impacted by this proposal, compensatory plantings are not required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal conforms with Section 4.2.1. - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). CFN: 35517 - Application #: 223/04/CAL Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: September 21, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 9.1.3 JIM BARONE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 26, Plan 3805, (105 Duncan Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jim Barone. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to construct a single family dwelling at 105 Duncan Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit 855 • Site & Grading Plan , prepared by Gunnell Engineering , dated May 19, 2004, revised September 17, 2004, received September 21, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a two - storey single family dwelling, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The existing dwelling will be demolished and minimal grading will be required on site The subject property is located over 200m from the Don River and the associated valley /stream corridor. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, therefore there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The works are proposed over 200m from the watercourse and are separated from the valley /stream corridor by adjacent residential development Hence, there shall be no impacts to the watercourse and sediment and erosion control fencing is not required. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project. Further, there are no natural heritage features on or adjacent to the property that may be negatively impacted by the proposed works. Plantings As there will be no impacts to existing vegetation, no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35843 - Application #: 363/04/RH Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: September 20, 2004 856 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #B204/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.4 - 9.1.17, with the exception of 9.1.14 - Giacomo Moncada which was withdrawn ), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 9.1.4 BRAMPTON PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC . /PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT To alter a waterway on Part Lot 7, Concession 7 Part 2 Plan 43R- 21695, (Airport Road), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Brampton Property Investments Inc. The purpose is to alter a watercourse which is not identified in TRCA mapping and with which a floodplain is not associated, to facilitate the construction of an industrial building. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009. • Letter of undertaking provided by Glenn Piotrowski Architect , September 29, 2004 to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This application involves the enclosure of a small remnant water feature on the subject property (located southeast of Airport Road and Ward Road) to facilitate the construction of a new industrial building. Although portions of this feature currently possess defined bed and banks, this water feature will no longer function as a "watercourse ", as the upstream drainage area of this feature has been previously truncated by development (upstream) on the west side of Airport Road. Currently this water feature does not extend north of the subject property. This feature is not recognized in TRCA's Fill Line or Fill Line Extension mapping. Given the above, TRCA staff do not object to the enclosure of this feature, and have worked with the applicant to identify appropriate compensation for the enclosure, which will result in a net ecological gain for this section of Mimico Creek. Compensation for this project includes the creation of a wetland feature directly to the south of the proposed building, and additional stream restoration directly to the south of the subject property (at the point at which this feature continues to function as a watercourse). These compensation measures are expected to provide improvements to downstream fisheries habitat 857 This project and the associated proposed compensation is subject to DFO approval, and a TRCA permit will not be issued until such time as DFO's interests have been satisfied. This restoration project will form one component of larger restoration efforts on this branch of Mimico Creek. Control of Flooding: Due to the size of the upstream drainage area, there is no Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the water feature at the location of this site. Stream flows will be maintained through stormwater management measures proposed. As a result, no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows will result from this project. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this project. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of MNR Fisheries Timing Window restrictions. Plantings As a component of this application, riparian plantings will be completed with native, non - invasive species directly downstream of this property, to the satisfaction of TRCA and DFO staff. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1 - New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35850 - Application #: 369 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: September 21, 2004 9.1.5 CITY OF BRAMPTON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area within Maitland Park, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to repair and replace a pedestrian bridge located at Maitland Park, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek watershed. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. 858 • Letter of undertaking prepared by William Guy , City of Brampton , dated September 20, 2004 to address outstanding engineering and ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the repair and replacement of an existing pedestrian bridge which crosses the West Branch of the Etobicoke Creek at Maitland Park, in the City of Brampton. The works are required to address safety concerns, and will result in the relocation of the bridge abutments further from the creek banks (increased bridge span). Please note that the works associated with this application are considered to be a mitigatable harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat (HADD) and will be treated through the issuance of a Letter of Advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Control of Flooding: No excavated materials will be stockpiled adjacent to the watercourse and all existing grades are to be maintained. As such, the works associated with this application will not adversely impact the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during all phases of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and do not raise any significant geotechnical concerns. Please note that the proposed works will result in the relocation of the existing bridge abutments further inland, increasing the span of the bridge over the creek. The relocation of the bridge abutments will result in an increase bridge span from 6 metres to approximately 9.5 metres. In addition, it has been determined that the proposed works may be considered a mitigatable harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat (HADD) and will be treated through the issuance of a Letter of Advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The proposed works are required to adhere to the warmwater construction timing guidelines (July 1 to March 31). Plantings This proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation. As such, no compensatory plantings are required. All disturbed areas will be re- vegetated with native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 859 CFN: 35713 - Application #: 318 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: September 21, 2004 9.1.6 HYDRO ONE BRAMPTON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, Concession 1 WHS, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a TRCA Fill Regulated area in order to facilitate the installation of underground hydro cables by directional bore method. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. • 27.6KV Feeder Installation , Mill Street South to Main Street South , Drawing No . F4- 84 -16, prepared by R . Evangelista , Hydro One Brampton , dated July 14, 2003, revised September 14, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff September 17, 2004. • Legal Survey , prepared by Gordon S . Good, dated August 3, 1978, stamped received by TRCA staff September 17, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of underground hydro cables within a TRCA Fill Regulated area associated with Etobicoke Creek at the northwest corner of Main Street and Elgin Drive, in the City of Brampton. The underground hydro cables will be installed by directional bore method. The hydro cables will be constructed at minimum 2.0 metres below the watercourse bottom. The entry and exit locations will be appropriately setback from the valley corridor feature. Control of Flooding: No excavated material is to be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain and all existing grades are to be maintained. As such, there will be no impacts to the storage and /or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction, surrounding the bore pit locations to impede the overland migration of construction generated sediments. 860 Conservation of Land: There are no in- stream works associated with the proposed application. The proposed hydro cable crossings will be installed 2.0 metres below the watercourse. The bore pit locations are setback from the top of bank and surrounded by sediment and erosion control fencing. There are no fisheries related concerns, geo- technical issues or impacts on natural features related to these works. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. All disturbed areas will be restored to original condition with native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authoritys Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34653 - Application #: 359 /03 /BRAM Report Prepared by : Adam Miller , extension 5244 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: September 21, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 9.1.7 SREIT (MALTON) LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block E, F, Plan 841, (2620 Slough Street), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Sreit (Malton) Ltd. The purpose is to construct an addition to an existing industrial building on the subject property, outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking prepared by Dan Amadio , Giffels Design - Build, dated September 30, 2004, to address outstanding planning ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill material within a Fill Regulated area associated with Mimico Creek, in order to construct an addition to an existing industrial building at 2620 Slough Street, in the City of Mississauga. The proposed addition will be constructed at the rear of the subject property, adjacent to the valley corridor. Minor reductions to TRCA's setback requirements are proposed in exchange for the planting of additional native, non - invasive species adjacent to and within the valley corridor on the subject property. The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. 861 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion controls will be installed prior to construction and maintained throughout construction of the proposed works. Conservation of Land: The area of the property on which development is proposed is unvegetated. As such, no significant vegetation is to be disturbed as a result of construction. TRCA staff are satisfied with the proposed setbacks from the top of bank, based upon proposed compensation and the nature of surrounding development. All surface runoff will be directed away from the valley edge into existing on -site storm sewers. As such, no geotechnical or fisheries related problems will occur as a result of construction. Plantings All plantings will incorporate native and non - invasive plant species at densities in accordance with TRCA's planting guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities,/Highly Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). CFN: 35851 - Application #: 370/04/MISS Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Joshua Campbell , extension 5386 Date: September 21, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING 9.1.8 KIM WALTHER To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 42, Plan 283, (364 Dyson Road), in the City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Kim Walther. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a new one and a half- storey residential dwelling. The existing residential dwelling is to be demolished. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. • Legal Survey indicating location of proposed dwelling , prepared by the applicant , received by the TRCA September 28, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing . • Cross- Section Drawing , prepared by the applicant , received by the TRCA September 28, 2004. 862 • Front Elevation Drawing , prepared by Irene Leach , dated September 3, 2004, received by the TRCA September 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a new one and a half- storey, 3500 square foot, residential dwelling. There is an existing residential dwelling on the site that is to be demolished. The proposed house is located more than 10 metres from the top of bank, further inland than the existing dwelling, and the Regional Storm Flood Plain is contained within the well- defined valley. Control of Flooding: The proposed development is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff is satisfied that there will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35840 - Application #: 360 /04 /PICK Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: September 20, 2004 863 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 9.1.9 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TORONTO INC . To construct in a flood plain on Lot 3, 4, 5, Plan 108, (38 St. Lawrence Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River to construct 2 blocks of 5 residential townhouse development The subject property is within the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009. • Drawing No . A -101, Site Plan ; Drawing A -201, Basement Plan Block 1 and 2; Drawing A -300, Elevations Block 1 and 2, prepared by Arsenault Architect Inc ., revised September 29, 2004, received September 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Regional Storm Floodplain to construct 2 blocks of 5 residential townhouse development. The subject property is within the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA) and is located east of Bayview Avenue and south of King Street East. This project is sponsored by Habitat for Humanity. The property is subject to very minimal levels of flooding during a regional storm. Control of Flooding: All openings, which include windows and doors of the proposed townhouse development will be situated above the Regional Storm elevation. The applicant will be submitting a letter which will state that the proposed development will withstand the depths and velocities in the event of a flood. All excavated material will be removed off site. Pollution: The subject property is well removed from the Don River, therefore a sediment fence is not required. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings Plantings are not required as part of this application. 864 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with 4.2.1 B) Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35854 - Application #: 373/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: September 21, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 9.1.10 HENRY N .R. JACKMAN To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 1, Concession 8; Part 3, Plan 65R -5224, (part of 5730 King- Vaughan Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Henry N.R. Jackman. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single detached residential dwelling, driveway, patio and septic system on Part 3, Plan 65R -5224 in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. • East -West Section , prepared by AMS Architects , dated August 25, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • Cross Section of Leaching Bed , received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • Site Plan , Drawing No . A -1, prepared by Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd., dated August 26, 2004, revised September 21, 2004. • Basement Floor Plan , Drawing No . A -2, prepared by Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd ., printed August 25, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • First Floor Plan , Drawing No . A -3, prepared by Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd ., printed August 25, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • West Elevation , Drawing No . A -7, prepared by Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd ., printed August 25, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • East Elevation , Drawing No . A -8, prepared by Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd ., printed August 25, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • North & South Elevation , Drawing No . A -9, prepared by Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd ., printed August 25, 2004, received by the TRCA on August 26, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking indicating that additional natural non - invasive vegetation will be planted below the top of slope , signed by Christopher R . Shepherd of Armstrong Molesworth Shepherd Architects Ltd ., dated September 28, 2004, received by the TRCA on September 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 865 Proposal: The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a two - storey single detached residential dwelling, driveway, patio and septic system within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. TRCA staff requested, as conditions of approval on an application received under the Planning Act, that the applicant apply for a permit under Ontario Regulation 158 for the proposed development and that the applicant register a conservation easement on title over the valley corridor in favour of the TRCA. TRCA staff visited the subject property on May 31, 2004 to define the limit of the valley corridor. A report with respect to the conservation easement will be brought forward to the Authority Meeting on September 24, 2004. The proposed development will be appropriately set back from the top of bank staked on -site. There will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. The proposed works will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will riot be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. The eastern portion of the valley corridor on the subject property is located within an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) known as the King Creek Forest; however, the proposed development will not impact this feature as it is approximately 300 metres from the proposed development site. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35794 - Application #: 339 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: September 21, 2004 866 9.1.11 TONY ASPRO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, Concession 8, (10165 Highway 27), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Tony Aspro. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an addition to an existing single detached residential dwelling located at 10165 Highway 27 in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. • Foundation /Basement Plan , Drawing No . A -2, prepared by Intra Architect Inc ., dated September 2004, received by the TRCA on September 24, 2004. • Elevations , Drawing No . A -5.0, prepared by Intra Architect Inc ., dated September 2004, received by the TRCA on September 24, 2004. • Elevations , Drawing No . A -5.1, prepared by Intra Architect Inc ., dated September 2004, received by the TRCA on September 24, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking detailing the final edits /notes that will be added to the Site Plan as discussed with TRCA staff on September 28, 2004, signed by Tony Aspro , dated September 28, 2004, received by the TRCA on September 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a two - storey addition to an existing single detached residential dwelling. The subject property is entirely located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River and partially located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There is no development proposed within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Historically, there was extensive illegal fill placement on the subject property by the previous landowner. The current landowner (the applicant) was informed in 1999 that the TRCA does not condone the illegal placement of fill, or recognize as valid, the impact of the altered slope topography. As such, the landowner was informed that the TRCA does not recognize the current physical top of bank as valid with respect to the application of its policies. However, it was recognized that the TRCA did support a 1.5 -metre setback from the previous top of bank referred to in a geotechnical investigation conducted on the subject property in 1991. The current development proposal has been relocated so that it is 1.5 metres from the 1991 top of bank. There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed addition. Control of Flooding: The proposed development will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 867 Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff reassessed the geotechnical investigation prepared in 1991 and are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35265 - Application #: 092 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: September 21, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON 9.1.12 VIVIAN ROCCA To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 6, Concession 2 ALBION, (156 Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vivian Rocca. The purpose is to relocate an existing residential dwelling and construct a driveway on the subject property. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. • Site Plan , 156 Old King Road , drawing No . SP1, prepared by Beech Engineering Limited, dated June 2004, revised September 27, 2004, redline revised September 29, 2004 to address grading details , stamped received by TRCA staff September 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 868 Proposal: The subject property has recently been severed into two lots which remain in common ownership. The proposal involves the relocation of an existing residential dwelling onto the newly created eastern lot. Please be advised that this permit only applies to works on the eastern lot and those associated with moving the existing dwelling. The applicant has brought forward a proposal for the construction of a new dwelling on the western lot, which does not (as submitted) meet TRCA's requirements. As such, development on this lot will be addressed through a separate permit application. Control of Flooding: All works will be located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: The subject property is located within an existing residential subdivision which has existing development between the watercourse and the construction area. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place while construction and site alterations are being completed. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of construction. There are no fisheries or geotechnical related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings As no significant vegetation will be impacted as a result of construction and this proposal is located a significant distance away from the watercourse, compensatory plantings are not required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). CFN: 35680 - Application #: 291/04/CAL Report Prepared by : Adam Miller , extension 5244 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: September 21, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 9.1.13 BOX GROVE NORTH INC . To alter a waterway on Lot 7, 8, Concession 9 , (Ninth Line south of Highway 407), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Box Grove North Inc and, the Ministry of Transportation. 869 The purpose is to realign the upper end of an intermittent tributary of the Rouge River in order to facilitate the servicing and development of the Boxgrove Community within the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009. • Box Grove North Development Inc . Ninth Line Tributary Relocation , Drawing Nos . 601,602,603, Project No . 60620803, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd . revised as received on September 27, 2004. • Box Grove North Development Inc . Landscape Planting Plans Drawing Nos . L1, L2, L3, Project No . 60620803 prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd . revised as received on September 27th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to realign a portion of an intermittent tributary of the Rouge River in order to facilitate servicing and development of the Boxgrove Community. The tributary is within an ill defined corridor and is devoid of woody vegetation as a result of past farming practices.The tributary drains less than 125 hectares and is currently located within an agricultural field and was previously realigned This previous realignment was the subject of a violation which was resolved with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and TRCA Enforcement. The section of channel to be realigned is approximately 500 metres and was initially envisioned to be enclosed through the Boxgrove Secondary Plan process initiated in the early 1990's. Through discussions with the applicant and the Town of Markham, the Secondary Plan was revised to include wording which would secure the protection of an open corridor at later stages of the planning process. Subsequently, TRCA staff agreed to a realignment and restoration of the tributary given its degraded condition. This permit approval will support a suitable realignment and restoration program which would help in securing the tributary, its hydrologic function and its support to downstream habitat functions, as the surrounding area develops. The tributary is intermittent and is less than 1 metre wide and in many areas there is no defined low flow channel. It is considered to be contributing to fish habitat and not direct fish habitat. The realignment and restoration will result in an improved environmental benefit in the longer term given the current condition of the intermittent tributary. A 138 metre portion of the tributary is also proposed to be placed in a culvert in order to allow for the construction of a realigned ninth line roadway intersection which will serve as the west entrance to the Boxgrove Community. The applicant has agreed to compensate for the enclosure by undertaking restoration within the downstream and better defined section of the tributary. This work constitutes a Harmful Alteration Disruption and Destruction (HADD) to fisheries habitat and as a result Department of Fisheries and Oceans approval is underway. TRCA's permit will not be issued until all issues with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans are resolved. 870 All works are consistent with the approved Secondary Plan for the Boxgrove Community and draft plans of subdivision which were approved by the Town of Markham within the Secondary Plan area. Control of Flooding: The watercourse has a drainage area of less than 125 hectares and as a result there are no defined floodlines associated with the tributary. The culvert crossing of the tributary has been sized to convey flows from the drainage area. As a result there will be no impact on the control of flooding. Pollution: The realignment works will be conducted in the dry as the new channel will be constructed and stabilized prior to the redirection of any flows. Sediment fencing will be placed at the perimeter of the work site and will remain in place during construction. Conservation of Land: The overall length of the intermittent tributary will remain the same with the realignment and the ecological integrity of the system will be maintained. The tributary will be placed within an open space block albeit closer to the ninth line roadway, which will allow for the undertaking of an aggressive planting program to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Sections of the channel downstream of the proposed works and which are devoid of cover will also be planted and restored in accordance with detailed planting plans to be submitted by the applicant Plantings Extensive plantings will be conducted along the realigned channel length and within downstream sections of the stream corridor which are currently devoid of vegetation as a result of past agricultural practices. Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 3.3 " Policies for identifying Watercourses and Alterations" of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program which recognize that watercourse alterations can occur on occasion if urban drainage requirements justify the need. The works constitute a Harmful Alteration Disruption and Destruction (HADD) to fish habitat. As a result approval for the Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) is required and is underway. TRCA staff will not issue the permit until DFO approval is obtained. CFN: 35658 - Application #: 278 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: September 23, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 9.1.14 GIACOMO MONCADA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 103, Plan 240, (246 Lakeland Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Giacomo Moncada. 871 • Withdrawn 9.1.15 MONARCH RENAISSANCE WOODS LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 67, 68, Concession 1 WYS Part Lot 67, 68, Plan 19T- 94002, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Monarch Renaissance Woods Limited. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the East Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management facility associated with draft plan of subdivision 19T- 94002. The permit will be issued for the period of September 10, 2004 to September 9, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking to address minor ecology and stormwater management issues prepared by R .V. Anderson on behalf of the applicant , dated September 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill material within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Floodplain of the East Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management facility for the Elmway Developments Ltd. residential draft plan of subdivision 19T- 94002. A permit was issued by the TRCA for a two - celled stormwater management facility in 1999 (C- 99280), but only the west cell of the facility was constructed. Since then, the Town of Richmond Hill has determined that the previously approved east cell of the facility is oversized and is requiring the current owner to revise the sizing of the east cell. Due to a change in ownership, a new permit is therefore required for the construction of the revised east cell of the stormwater management facility. The facility is required in order to service the residential lands within 19T -94002 and is a condition of draft plan approval. There is no defined valley corridor through this reach of the East Humber River. The proposed water quantity /quality control facility will be bermed to correspond with the final grade of the adjacent lots within the subdivision. As a result, the berm on the north side of the facility will extend into the Regional Storm Floodplain of the East Humber River, but will be located outside of the 100 year floodline. Control of Flooding: As part of staffs comments on the circulated draft plan of subdivision, the project consultant prepared a hydraulic impact analysis for the portion of berm that extends into the Regional Storm Floodplain. Subsequently, staff reviewed the analysis and is satisfied that the proposed fill placement will not affect the control of flooding on upstream or adjacent lands. 872 Pollution: A combination of silt fencing, rock check dams, and half bulk heads within the storm sewer system will be used to control sedimentation during construction. Post - development water quality will be controlled by maintaining a permanent pool in the stormwater management facility for treatment of suspended solids contained in stormwater runoff. Aquatic vegetation will be planted in the permanent pool, in addition to woody and herbaceous plants on the banks above the water line to enhance water quality prior to outletting. Conservation of Land: During the review of the draft plan of subdivision, Authority and Town of Richmond Hill staff ensured that the existing Environmental Protection Areas (EPA), as designated under Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 129, were appropriately delineated on site and protected through the residential development proposal. A 10 metre buffer has been established between the stormwater management facility and the EPAs. The treated stormwater leaving the ponds will dissipate across the buffer area and no outfall will be required. While there will be no impacts on fish habitat, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) in order to provide direction regarding proper construction practices adjacent to the watercourse. Plantings The stormwater management pond will be planted with native woody, herbaceous, and aquatic vegetation in order to stabilize all areas following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, as well as the Functional Servicing Report for this portion of the OPA 129 lands. CFN: 35685 - Application #: 286/04/RH Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: August 31, 2004 9.1.16 RICHMOND HILL SQUASH CLUB To construct in a flood plain on 377 Ohio Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Richmond Hill Squash Club. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to allow for a small addition to an existing building, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009. • Red -lined site plan , prepared by the applicant , received September 7, 2004. 873 • Letter of undertaking , submitted by the applicant , dated September 29, 2004, acknowledging permit will not be issued until letter from Structural Engineer is received confirming proposed addition can withstand the depth and velocity of a Regional Storm. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to allow for a small addition to an existing building, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The subject property is located on the north side of Ohio Road, south of Elgin Mills Road East. This area is known as the Enford Industrial District, and is considered to be a spill zone which has a wide shallow floodplain. The existing building houses the Richmond Hill Squash Club and the proposed addition is comprised of an extension to an existing sauna. The proposed work constitutes a minor addition (less than 50% of the gross square footage of the existing building) and will not result in an increased flood risk. There are no natural heritage features which may be negatively impacted by the proposed addition. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, but due to the small scale of the addition TRCA water management staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A silt fence will be erected around the work site in order to contain all construction - generated sediment. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical slope stability or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. As there are no natural features on the subject property, or surrounding lands, no natural features will be negatively impacted by this proposal. Plantings As no vegetation removals are required to accommodate the proposed development, no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35842 - Application #: 362/04/RH Report Prepared by : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 For information contact : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 Date: September 20, 2004 874 TOWNSHIP OF KING 9.1.17 MICHAEL AND DARLENE KEHOE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Concession 12, (13435 Caledon -King Townline), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Michael and Darlene Kehoe. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an addition to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling located at 13435 Caledon -King Townline in the Township of King. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. • Addition to Kehoe Residence , received by revised to indicate sediment control fencing • Addition to Kehoe Res ., Drawing No . 041, 2004, received by the TRCA on September • Addition to Kehoe Res ., Drawing No . 042, 2004, received by the TRCA on September the TRCA on September 15, 2004, redline prepared by Trecan Limited , issued July 22, 2004. prepared by Trecan Limited , issued July 22, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is entirely located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a two-storey addition (approximately 93 square- metres or 1000 square -feet) to the rear of an existing single detached residential dwelling. TRCA staff are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposal. The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and no significant natural features will be affected by the project. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. 875 Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. The proposed development will occur within the manicured portion of the subject property. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.- Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35839 - Application #: 359/04/KING Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: September 21, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE MINOR WORKS ITEMS RES. #B205/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff , in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.18 - 9.1.20, inclusive), which are listed below , be received . CARRIED TOWN OF CALEDON 9.1.18 JOHN DINARD To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 36, Plan M -1134, (37 Sunkist Valley Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by John DiNardo. CFN: 35806 - Application #: 345/04/CAL Report Prepared by : Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact : Quentin Hanchard , extension 5324 Date: September 9, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 9.1.19 MARK STEVE To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 59, Plan 5197, (11 Sedgebrook Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Mark Steven. 876 CFN: 35798 - Application #: 342/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: September 2, 2004 9.1.20 JINE GARRARD ANTHONY To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 67, Plan 528, (61 Bin -scarth Road), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jine Garrard Anthony. CFN: 35714 - Application #: 314/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 3, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING 9.1.21 CITY OF PICKERING To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, 18, Concession 1, (Kingston Road - between Brock Road and Southview Drive), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Pickering. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain and Special Policy Area of the Duffins Creek and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a new sidewalk, by the City of Pickering. The permit will be issued for the period of October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Kingston Road Sidewalk , Sheet 1 of 2, prepared by Operations & Emergency Services Department , City of Pickering , dated August 24, 2004 • Kingston Road Sidewalk (Detail Sheet ), Sheet 2 of 2, prepared by Operations & Emergency Services Department , City of Pickering , dated August 24, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain and Special Policy Area of Duffins Creek and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a new sidewalk. The property on which the sidewalk is to be constructed is located along the south side of Kingston Road, east of Notion Road. The site is located entirely within the SPA, and is separated from the watercourse by Kingston Road. 877 Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek, but given that the works are at existing grade and no fill is being imported, TRCA staff is satisfied there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A silt fence will be erected along the north side of the work site in order to contain all construction - generated sediment. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. Plantings As no vegetation removals are required to accommodate the proposed construction, no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas, and Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing -of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35868 - Application #: 381/04/PICK Report Prepared by : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 For information contact : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 Date: September 29, 2004 RES. #B206/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: LAKE ONTARIO BIOREGIONAL MODELING INITIATIVE Consultant contract to provide data analysis and scientific support to the Lake Ontario Bioregional Modeling Initiative. Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Dr. Bruce Kilgour be hired by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to provide expert analysis and scientific support to staff who are involved in the Lake Ontario Bioregional Modeling Initiative for cost not to exceed $31,000, plus applicable taxes . CARRIED 878 BACKGROUND The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has been leading a coalition of partners from along the north shore of Lake Ontario, that includes Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada, the City of Toronto and conservation authorities (TRCA, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority and Conservation Halton), to assist in the development of a set of models to aid in characterizing streams and fish and benthic communities in southern Ontario, and to assess changes in the aquatic community following land -use change. TRCA has been active in this coalition through the provision of monitoring data and technical support, and through the administration of the funding and work contracts related to the project. Phase 1 of this project involved the compilation of aquatic data from more than 700 stations from tributaries draining the north shore of Lake Ontario and analysis of the data. To facilitate this, at Executive Committee Meeting #9/02, held on October 4, 2002, Res. #B126 /02 was approved as follows: THAT Dr. Bruce Kilgour be hired by the Authority for an upset amount of $25,000.00 plus taxes to provide expert analysis and scientific support to staff who are involved in the Regional Reference Sites project. A draft report entitled "Imperviousness Effects on Fish and Benthic Communities and In- Stream Habitats in Lake Ontario Tributaries" has been prepared and will be submitted to the American Fisheries Society for publication. As well, this report was presented at the American Fisheries Society's Annual General Meeting in August. This paper demonstrates the effects of percent imperviousness on biophysical properties of tributary streams of Lake Ontario. The principle outcome of this project will be models that determine the biophysical condition of a stream relative to expected (reference) conditions, and to develop models that predict the impact of future land use change on biophysical properties of streams. Although the geographical context of this project is the streams flowing from the Oak Ridges Moraine to Lake Ontario, the resulting models are expected to have wide application. A more detailed report on the preliminary results of the project will be brought forward to the Watershed Management Advisory Board at a future date. A workplan has been developed for Phase 2 of this project that involves a number of key steps which include evaluating the relationships between predicted and observed spotflow'baseflow, evaluating the effect of imperviousness on baseflow, determining the influence of valleylands on in- stream conditions, evaluating proximity effects on the attributes of stream health, use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to illustrate the predicted condition for each stream attribute for which landscape models are available and initiating efforts to develop improved measures of disturbance on the landscape. The specific objectives for 2004/05 are: 1. revise technical report on imperviousness for submission to American Fisheries Society; 2. develop a state of the resource manuscript for submission to American Fisheries Society; 3. develop a landscape model for Wilmot Creek with management implications; 4. evaluate the relationships between predicted and observed spotflow /baseflow; 879 5. evaluate the effect of imperviousness on baseflow; 6. determine the influence of valleylands on instream conditions; 7. evaluate proximity effects on the attributes of stream health; 8. develop a GIS to illustrate the predicted condition for each stream attribute for which landscape models are available; 9. compare benthic sampling methods; 10. initiate efforts to develop improved measures of disturbance on the landscape; and, 11. initiate a field program to evaluate flashiness in upper reaches of tributaries within the study area. In order to achieve these objectives, the project partners would like Dr. Kilgour to continue his role as statistical expert and wish to again retain him for additional data analysis tasks. His contribution towards the activities listed above will be overseen and reviewed by the Regional Reference Sites Project Group before approval to proceed is given. A total budget of approximately $95,000 has been identified for this project, of which, $31,000 has been identified for statistical data analysis, and reporting. RATIONALE Dr. Bruce W. Kilgour, Ph. D., Aquatic Biology, is a Senior Consultant in the Environmental Sciences Division of Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (JWEL), Ottawa. Dr. Kilgour has 16 years of experience in aquatic environmental assessment including environmental effects monitoring, risk assessments and faunal inventories. Dr. Kilgour's familiarity is probably greatest with aquatic environments in southern Ontario, including areas within the bounds of the Grand River, Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and Halton Region Conservation Authorities, and the Regional Municipality of Ottawa - Carleton (City of Ottawa). In these areas he has conducted subwatershed studies, general aquatic inventories, impact assessments, environmental effects monitoring programs and risk assessments, as well as developed environmental monitoring programs. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the project has been committed by MNR (research - $35,000), Environment Canada ($25,000) and TRCA ($35,000) through capital funding provided by York, Peel and Toronto. Funds required to complete this component of the project are available in accounts 120 -55 (Evaluating the Conditions of Aquatic Communities) and 120 -50 (Development of Predictive Models of Land -Use Impacts). Report prepared by : Scott Jarvie , extension 5312 For Information contact : Scott Jarvie , extension 5312 Date: September 17, 2004 880 RES. #B207/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: DETAILED URF -BASED WATER BUDGET ASSESSMENT FOR THE DON RIVER WATERSHED (905 AREA) To retain the consulting firm of Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. through sole source appointment to complete a detailed water budget assessment for the 905 area within the Don River watershed. Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Marshall Macklin Monaghan (MMM) be retained to undertake the Don River Water Budget Assessment at a cost not exceed $15,000, plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is currently in the process of developing tools and guidelines to address groundwater recharge rates for all watersheds under its jurisdiction. Groundwater recharge is a key component of the hydrologic cycle and is therefore a critical water management parameter. Urbanization has led to reduced overall groundwater recharge as rural lands are converted to impervious surfaces comprised of buildings and roadways connected directly to storm sewers. Reduced groundwater recharge can lead to reduced baseflow in our rivers, leading to the impairment of aquatic habitats, as well as water available for domestic, agricultural, or other uses. The adverse impacts associated with increased urbanization within the Don River watershed has led the City of Toronto to recently complete a Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan ( WWFMMP). Marshall Macklin Monaghan was retained by the City of Toronto to complete the WWFMMP for the Don River watershed and develop an HSP -F (Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran) hydrologic model to analyse and model stormwater best management practices that could be implemented to improve the quality of surface water runoff within the City of Toronto. Although the model was set up on a watershed basis, the calibration and analysis focussed primarily on the 416 area within the City of Toronto. Given the availability of additional land use, rain gauge, precipitation and stream -flow data, it is proposed through this project that the HSP -F model be refined and used to complete a detailed water budget assessment for the remaining 905 area within the Don River watershed. The water budget assessment will include the development of an HSP -F water budget model, digital maps in ARCVIEW format, URF (Unit Response Function) distribution tables and existing recharge estimates. This information will enable staff and the development community to more precisely predict the effect of urban development on the hydrologic.cycle and estimate recharge spatially for existing and proposed land uses within the entire Don River watershed. This work will also be used to evaluate alternative mitigation techniques to maintain groundwater recharge in the development process. The Don River water budget assessment will provide a greater understanding of the current hydrological cycle within the Don River watershed and will also be used to implement and improve TRCA policies designed to maintain ground water recharge in our jurisdiction. It is also an important step in satisfying the requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Act. 881 RATIONALE Rather than request proposals from a number of consultants, it is proposed to award the project directly to Marshall Macklin Monaghan. Marshall Macklin Monaghan recently completed the Don River Hydrology update and developed the Don River watershed HSP -F model as part of the City of Toronto's Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan. Given that the HSP -F modelling is a major component of this project, MMM will be able to complete this project in a cost effective manner over approximately 4 to 6 weeks from project initiation. FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA staff have provided a task list to Marshall Macklin Monaghan for which they have provided a detailed work plan and cost estimate of $15,000, plus GST. Staff are of the opinion that this amount represents good value for the extent of work requested. Funding for the project is available through 2004 YPDT capital funding. Report prepared by : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 For Information contact : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 Date: September 23, 2004 RES. #B208/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: DETAILED URF -BASED WATER BUDGET FOR DUFFINS AND PETTICOAT CREEK WATERSHEDS To retain the consulting firm of Clarifica Inc. to prepare a detailed URF -based water budget for the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds. Suzan Hall Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Clarifica Inc . be retained to prepare a URF -based water budget for the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds at a cost not to exceed $29,000, plus GST. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is currently in the process of developing tools and guidelines to address groundwater recharge rates for all watersheds under its jurisdiction. Groundwater recharge is a key component of the hydrologic cycle and is therefore a critical water management parameter. Urbanization has led to reduced overall groundwater recharge as rural lands are converted to impervious surfaces comprised of buildings and roadways connected directly to storm sewers. Reduced groundwater recharge can lead to reduced baseflow in our rivers, leading to the impairment of aquatic habitats, as well as water available for domestic, agricultural, or other uses. 882 It is proposed to retain Clarifica Inc. to develop a detailed URF -based water budget for the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds using the existing Water Balance Assessment System (WABAS) computer simulation program previously prepared as part of the Duffins watershed plan using a lumped or catchment based approach. The detailed URF -based water budget will enable staff and the development community to more precisely predict the effect of urban development on the hydrologic cycle and estimate groundwater recharge spatially for existing and proposed land uses within the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds. This work will also be used to evaluate alternative mitigation techniques to maintain groundwater recharge in the development process. TRCA has previously completed similar studies for the Rouge, Highland and Humber River watersheds using the HSP -F hydrologic model. The HSP -F model was originally developed as part of the City of Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP). Since this model was not developed for the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds, it is proposed to utilize the WABAS computer simulation program. Refining the existing lumped or catchment based WABAS model will require significantly less effort and cost than creating a new HSP -F model, and will also produce results that are compatible to the other watersheds permitting a consistent jurisdiction wide guideline and analysis tool. The following is a list of tasks to be undertaken as part of the proposal to develop a detailed URF -based water budget for the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds: 1. Review the water balance analysis completed with HSP -F in other watersheds and develop a WABAS routine. 2. Prepare input for running WABAS. Parameters will include basin area, land use, soil and vegetation data and hummocky terrain. 3. Obtain stream flow and climate data and process for additional calibration. 4. Conduct baseflow separation. 5. Model calibration /verification. 6. Develop URF model output tables and recharge mapping. Once completed, this project will provide a greater understanding of the current hydrological cycle within the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds and will be used to implement and improve TRCA policies designed to maintain water balance in our jurisdiction. RATIONALE Rather than request proposals from a number of consultants, it is proposed to award the project directly to Clarifica Inc. Clarifica Inc. is intimately familiar with the Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds through previous hydrology and hydraulics studies completed for the TRCA Clarifica Inc. also developed the existing WABAS model for both Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds as part of the watershed plan which will enable completion of the work in a cost effective manner over a period of eight weeks upon initial start-up. FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA staff have provided a task list to Clarifica Inc. for which they have provided a detailed work plan, schedule and cost estimate of $29,000, plus GST. Staff are of the opinion that this amount represents good value for the extent of work requested. Funding for this project is available through the 2004 YPDT capital funding. 883 Report prepared by : Sameer Dhalla , extension 5350 For Information contact : Glenn Farmer , extension 5351 Date: September 23, 2004 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:55 a.m., on Friday, October 1, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/04 November 5, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #10/04, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, November 5, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member RES. #B209 /04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9/04, held on October 1, 2004, be approved. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B210 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CARRIED NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed Anjuman -E- Anwarul Islam of Malton, CFN 35884. Purchase of property located at the rear of 7099 Airport Road - Malton, City of Mississauga, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001- 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek watershed. Frank Dale Suzan Hall 885 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.19 hectares (0.47 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Anjuman -E- Anwarul Islam of Malton, being Part of Lot 11, Concession 7 SD and designated as Parts 1 to 6 on Plan 43R- 29428, City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel located at the rear of 7099 Airport Road - Malton; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Co -Fat Chu of Norshelco Associates, the owner's agent. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Mimico Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of Zoning By -law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to allow for the construction of a religious facility, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Paris 1 to 6, inclusive) which are comprised of a portion of the valley wall and Regional Storm flood plain along the Mimico Creek valley corridor at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the City of Mississauga for management. 886 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: October 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 887 Attachment 1 l ,l II js C • II NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimics Creek Watershec Anjuman- E- Anwarul Islam of Malton CFN 35884 avE _ SUBJECT PROPERTY '5.112 ,iJrl� 'uj;_: —2. • — — ZIEBRY RoAB - - onservatson for The Living City I•'.'`.' TRCAL4NOS 888 Sl1fiJEU F PROPERTY RES. #B211/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed 554056 Ontario Ltd., CFN 35927. Purchase of property located west of Staines Road, south of Steeles Avenue, City Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed. Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 5.75 hectares (14.21 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from 554056 Ontario Ltd., designated as Blocks 608, 609, and 615, Registered Plan 66M -2406, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area located west of Staines Road, south of Steeles Avenue; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Gary Siskind of Owens, Wright, Barristers & Solicitors. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the Rouge Park and the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision SC- T19990006, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (Le. Blocks 608, 609, and 615) which are comprised of significant woodlots and a portion of the valley corridor of the Morningside Tributary Branch of the Rouge River. 889 TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the City of Toronto for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: October 25, 2004 Attachments: 1 890 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001.2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed 654056 Ontario Ltd. CFN 35927 BM US AYE. J 2 P.ASSMORE AYEik :1 ` \mow • ti t.".3 eg- p. • 'r ! 1 t f 1 1 r ii k' ' SWUM' P1ROPHRTY i -.1' -r... 1. . 1 ' /d r y f�_ , 5' i I',< t f - --- I r ! ,, eo Jr,,,, —,`, —�,I it: ly • r -r 'Yr. i • VT; rZZA'4411i1rAt 891 RES. #B212/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed 1097467 Ontario Inc. (Olde Park Construction Company Ltd.), CFN 35453. Purchase of property located east of Pickering Beach Road, south of Bayly Street, Town of Ajax, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek watershed. Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 4.46 hectares (11.02 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from 1097467 Ontario Inc. (Olde Park Construction Company Ltd.), being Part of Lot 6, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and designated as Block 20 on Registered Plan 40M -1985, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham located east of Pickering Beach Road , south of Bayly Street; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Sydney Gangbar, Q.C., Barrister & Solicitor. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 892 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Carruthers Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision 18T- 89104, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 20) which are comprised of a portion of the Regional Storm flood plain of the Carruthers Creek and the Carruthers Creek Forest Environmentally Significant Area. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent TRCA lands, it is estimated that the taxes will be approximately $1,100.00. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension For Information contact: George Leja, extension Date: October 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 893 Attachment 1 4. Li r.Itt' 4 .,1 f: 1i 111 �i4-'y _ --�1 Jr: N r, te• f'. ❑' V. f. .1/, irk rf yrs roromoMaJ 1 Y• onserva:t :on for The Living C1ry F` �I TRCA LANDS SUBJECT PROPERTY NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed 1097467 Ontario Inc. (Olde Park Construction Company Ltd.) CFN 35453 894 RES. #B213/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED HSP -F MODEL UPDATE AND FUTURE SCENARIOS MODELLING Approval to retain the consultant team of EBNFLow Environmental and Aquafor Beech Limited to conduct an update to the Rouge River HSP -F model and future conditions scenarios modelling. Frank Dale Suzan Hall THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority enter into an agreement with EBNFLow Environmental and Aquafor Beech Limited to undertake an update and future conditions modelling of the Rouge River watershed HSP -F model, at a cost not to $114,880, plus applicable taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), in partnership with its member municipalities and other stakeholders, is currently undertaking a watershed planning process to develop an integrated strategic plan for the Rouge River watershed. To develop an effective integrated plan, potential issues and opportunities associated with future watershed activities are being defined as a set of future land use and management scenarios. Once quantified, these scenarios will be used as a basis for modelling /prediction and evaluation of watershed response to these potential future conditions using a variety of predictive tools. Preferred management strategies will then be determined based on comparing modelling results with the values and objectives that have been identified for the Rouge River watershed. The predictive tool selected to model and evaluate potential future changes to watershed hydrology and water quality for the strategic plan is the Hydrologic Simulation Program- Fortran (HSP -F) computer software package. An HSP -F model of the Rouge River watershed was originally developed by the City of Toronto in the preparation of the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan ( WWFMMP), which was completed in 2003. The model was used to perform detailed simulations of hydrology and water quality in the portion of the Rouge watershed to evaluate alternative stormwater management scenarios in the WWFMMP and to select the long term preferred strategy and the 25 -year implementation plan. The HSP -F model has since been updated to simulate the entire watershed to an equivalent level of detail, which makes it ideal for simulation and evaluation of various watershed -wide scenarios. As part of the 2004 Capital Budget Process, the City of Toronto and the Region of York have provided additional funding for use of the Rouge watershed HSP -F model to determine the potential hydrologic and water quality benefits of stormwater management pond retrofits within York Region. As these retrofits represent one of the future management strategies to be considered in the watershed plan, there is an opportunity to combine the modelling for both studies to avoid redundancy and to ensure consistency in the modelling approach. In addition, thermal modelling for the Rouge River watershed will be conducted to examine the existing instream temperature regime of the watershed and to evaluate the effects of future development and alternative management strategies. 895 The scope of the work for the modelling study will include an update of the Rouge River HSP -F model to 2002 conditions, so that the base existing conditions simulation represents the most up -to -date land use information currently available. Subsequent work will include the modification of the model to reflect York Region stormwater retrofits as well the future conditions scenarios of the watershed plan, followed by analysis of the results in the context of impacts to hydrology, water quality and water temperature in both the Region of York and the City of Toronto. The future conditions scenarios for the watershed plan include eight combinations of future land use and watershed management strategies, all of which will be modelled in this study using HSP -F. Future land uses considered include both build -out of currently approved official plans in the watershed, and full build -out of the watershed to the Oak Ridges Moraine boundary. Management strategies considered include current stormwater management practice in new development, stormwater retrofits, implementation of the TRCA targeted Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy, agricultural best management practices and sustainable community design. In addition, the implementation of the Rouge Park on public lands and federal greenspace strategy are assumed. A scenario has also been included to assess the potential impacts of climate change. RATIONALE Three engineering consultants were invited to submit proposals for the project based on a request for proposal that included a terms of reference for the work. Proposals were evaluated based on understanding of large -scale HSP -F modelling, technical expertise, project approach, corporate experience, quality of proposal and cost (as indicated below). • Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited • EBNFIow Environmental and Aquafor Beech Limited • HCCL *prices do not include GST $111,642 $114,880 $134,490 Based on the evaluation, the team of EBNFIow Environmental and Aquafor Beech Limited was selected as the preferred consultant to complete the work. The team has extensive experience in the use of HSP -F modelling both within the Rouge River watershed and elsewhere. Aquafor Beech was responsible for developing the original Rouge River HSP -F model for the City of Toronto WWFMMP, and also worked with EBNFIow in the previous update to the model to increase resolution over the remainder of the watershed. Staff are confident that their methodology, expertise and experience best meets the needs set out in the terms of reference, and will allow them to provide the TRCA with the highest quality product within the specified time frame. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this project has been provided by the Region of York and the City of Toronto and is available in account #120 -44. 896 Report prepared by: Ryan Ness, extension 5615 For Information contact: Ryan Ness, extension 5615 Date: October 26, 2004 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B214/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 - 8.1.13 and 8.1.35 - 8.1.37, inclusive) which are listed below. CARRIED CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.1 BROOKFIELD HOMES (ONTARIO) LIMITED /2016508 ONTARIO LIMITED To construct in a flood plain on Lot 16, Concession 1 Lot 1, Plan 469, (Kingston Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Limited /2016508 Ontario Limited. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Special Policy Area of the Duffins Creek and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sales trailer and associated gravel parking area. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Sales Office Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. SP -2, prepared by 897 Sernas Associates, dated June, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Special Policy Area (SPA) of Duffins Creek and to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary sales trailer and associated temporary gravel parking lot for Brookfield Homes. The property on which the sales trailer and parking area are to be constructed is located on the south side of Kingston Road, west of Bainbridge Drive. The site is located entirely within the SPA, and is separated from the Duffins Creek watercourse by Kingston Road. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Duffins Creek. The existing 350 year elevation, plus 0.3 metres of freeboard, for this area is 83.16 metres. The proposed floor elevation of the sales trailer is 83.10 metres. Although the sales trailer elevation is 0.06 metres below the 350 year, due to the temporary nature of the use, and given that the trailer is non habitable, the proposal is considered to be acceptable. A 500 year berm has recently been constructed along Duffins Creek across the road from the subject property, which will help reduce flooding in the area, and therefore reduce the impacts of flooding on the proposed trailer. Given this, the 0.06 metre elevation below the 350 year elevation is considered negligible. Pollution: A combination of silt fencing and rockfill check dams will be used in order to contain all construction - generated sediment. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. Plantings As no vegetation removals are required to accommodate the proposal, no additional plantings are required, and the site of the trailer will be manicured at the end of its use. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 35907 - Application #: 397/04/PICK Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 Date: October 18, 2004 898 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.2 SAM GUIDO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 264, Plan M -946, (8 Pipestone Place), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sam Guido. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to replace an existing retaining wall, located at the top of the slope. The proposed works involve the construction of a new two tier timber crib retaining wall.. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Figure 4, Retaining Wall (Redlined on October 26, 2004); prepared by Terraprobe Limited , Figure 5, Typical Retaining Wall Detail Isometric View ; prepared by Terraprobe Limited , received August 4, 2004, Figure 6, Retaining Wall - Typical Section (Redlined on October 26, 2004) prepared by Terraprobe Limited RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to replace an existing retaining wall, located at the top of slope. The subject property is located north of Highway 401 and west of Albion Road. The proposed works involve the construction of a new two tier timber crib retaining wall. The length of the wall will be approximately 25 metres for each tier and each timber crib will be approximately 1.5 metres in height. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent ravine system. Conservation of Land: TRCA Geo- technical staff have reviewed the geo- technical report and are satisfied that the slope is stable and can support the proposed retaining wall. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings The applicant is proposing native trees and shrubs as part of the overall site development. 899 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Management Program. CFN: 35677 - Application #: 283/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 25, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.3 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on East Half Lot 22, Concession 2 EYS, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the construction of a 1,650 mm trunk ,.itermain along a hydro corridor north of Finch Avenue from Bayview Avenue easterly to Brookshire Boulevard in the City of Toronto. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 287M -5 and 287M -20, 1650mm Watermain on Hydro Corridor R .O.W. from Bayview Avenue to Brookshire Blvd ., prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates, dated September 2004, revised October 16, 2004, received October 19, 2004; • Drawing No. 287M -20, 1650mm Watermain on Hydro Corridor R R.O.W. from Bayview Avenue to Brookshire Blvd., prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates, dated September 2004, revised January 12, 2004, received October 19, 2004; • Drawing No. 1, Habitat Compensation Areas, prepared by LGL, dated October, 2004, received on October 19, 2004; • Drawing No. 2, Planting Plan, prepared by LGL, dated October, 2004, received on October 19, 2004; • Drawing No. 3, Living Revetement Details, prepared by LGL, dated September, 2004, received on September 7, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 900 Proposal: The proposal is to alter a the East Don River to facilitate the installation of a new 1,650 mm diametre trunk watermain in the hydro corridor located north of Finch Avenue and west of Leslie Street. The installation of the watermain will take place through the open cut method as the soils in the immediate area are not conducive to safe tunnelling. The proposal includes significant restoration of the creek banks and adjacent floodplain lands with native plantings. Control of Flooding: The floodplain grade will be restored and therefore the proposal will have no impact on the conveyance or storage of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed during construction. A temporary coffer dam will be installed. Discharge from temporary dewatering will be filtered and dispersed to an adjacent vegetated area. Therefore, there are no pollution impacts. Conservation of Land: The watercourse will be restored using a bioengineered living revetment to provide stream shading and slope stability. TRCA Geotechnical staff are satisfied that the restoration work will have no impact on slope stability. Cobble substrate will provide fish habitat. The proposal is considered a mitigable Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of Fish Habitat. A DFO letter of advice will be issued for the works. There are no impacts to the conservation of land. Plantings Additional native species will be planted for a net gain of 515 square metres of terrestrial habitat. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35283 - Application #: 101 /04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 26, 2004 8.1.4 HARRY AND CORI DONENFELD To construct in a flood plain on Lot 14, Plan 2478, (25 Plymbridge Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Harry and Cori Donenfeld. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a new two- storey dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: 901 • Drawing No. A -1, Site Plan; Drawing No. A -2, Foundation and Basement Plan; Drawing No. A -3, Ground Floor Plan; Drawing No. A -6, Cross Section; Drawing No. A -7, Front (West) Elevation; Drawing No. A -8, Right (South) Elevation; Drawing No. A -9, Left (North) Elevation; Drawing No. A -10, Rear (East) Elevation, prepared by Peter Higgins Architect Inc, dated September 2004, received September 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a new two- storey dwelling in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located south of York Mills Rd and West of Bayview Avenue. The existing dwelling will be demolished. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The proposed dwelling will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm Elevation. The applicant has submitted a letter from a structural engineer which indicates that the dwelling is able to withstand the flows and velocities in the event of a flood. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and will remain in place until the works have been completed. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings The applicant is proposing native plantings as part of the overall site development. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35910 - Application #: 400 /04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 18, 2004 902 8.1.5 ONTARIO SCIENCE CENTRE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 9, 10, Concession 3 Part 4, 6 Lot 1, Plan RS -882, (770 Don Mills Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ontario Science Centre. The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of two additions to the Ontario Science Centre. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. A001, Level C, Kidspark Tunnel and Landscape, and Drawing No. A002, Challenge Zone and Landscape (redlined with Tree Protection Hoarding ), both prepared by Diamond and Schmitt Architects , dated October 12, 2004, issued for TRCA Permit on October 13, 2004, received by TRCA on October 13, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct two additions to the Ontario Science Centre. The first addition is on the eastern side of Building C (southwest building in the valley) in an area occupied by existing hard surface. The second addition is on the western side of Building B (northwest building, also in the valley, but raised on fill) in an area occupied by existing structural foundation. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will have no impact on the conveyance or storage of floodwaters. Pollution: All works are to take place in areas of existing impervious surface and structural foundation. There are no geotechnical issues with the proposal. The sites are well removed from the Don River. Conservation of Land: There are no significant natural resources in the area of the proposal. Temporary tree protection hoarding will be installed during construction. Plantings Additional native plantings will be provided to TRCA satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Policy 4.2.2.C., Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 903 CFN: 35913 - Application #: 403/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 18, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.6 250623 PROPERTY LTD. C/O RICE DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD. To alter a waterway on Lot 6, Concession 7, (4650 Highway #7), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 250623 Property Ltd.. The purpose is to alter a watercourse by constructing a stormwater outfall that will outlet to a tributary of the Humber River, in order to service a draft approved 4- storey, 81 -unit condominium apartment building, known as Ambria Country Estates. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 4886 -U1, Utilities, Stormwater Management and Grading Plan, prepared by MacViro Consultants Inc., date last revised, August 2004 • Drawing No. 4886 -U2, Utilities, Stormwater Management and Grading Plan , prepared by MacViro Consultants Inc., date last revised, August 2004 • Drawing L1 of 4, Landscape Plan, prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd ., date last revised August 27, 2004 • Drawing L2 of 4, Layout & Hard Landscape Plan, prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd ., date last revised August 27, 2004 • Drawing L3 of 4, Construction Details, prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd ., date last revised August 27, 2004 • Drawing L3 of 4, Construction Details, prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd ., date last revised August 27, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway by constructing a stormwater outfall to a tributary of the Humber River, that will service a draft approved 4- storey, 81 -unit condominium apartment building, known as Ambria Country Estates. Staff reviewed the Planning Act applications for this development, as circulated by the City of Vaughan, and found them to be acceptable, conditional on obtaining any necessary Ontario Regulation 158 permits. Control of Flooding: The proposed outfall is appropriately designed in order to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. 904 Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the tributary will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and the work will not affect any significant natural heritage features. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings Following construction, the disturbed area will be restored with native plantings. The landscape plan for the entire site plan was reviewed to staffs satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35841 - Application #: 361 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: September 20, 2004 8.1.7 EDEN OAK HOMES (IVORY HOMES INC.) To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Concession 7, (20 Wallace Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Eden Oak Homes (Ivory Homes Inc.). The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a fill regulated area of the Humber River, to facilitate the construction of six three storey house units on the subject lands. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan /Grading Plan, dwg no. Al R2, prepared by Nino Rico Inc. Architect, dated August 10, 2000, received on October 5, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, to facilitate the construction of six townhouse units on the subject lands. The proposed residential development consists of six three - storey units. 905 The subject property is located at 20 Wallace Street, south of Woodbridge Avenue, between Islington Avenue and Kipling Avenue. The lands are located within the Authority's Fill Regulated Area and outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain for the Humber River. An associated Site Plan Control and Rezoning Application was circulated from the City of Vaughan in 1995. TRCA staff reviewed and assessed the proposed site plan and commented no objection to the applications subject to obtaining all necessary permits under O.Reg. 158. A violation notice has been issued. The approval of this permit will resolve the violation fee. The application is subject to an additional fee for the violation. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain for the Humber River. TRCA Water Management staff have reviewed the plans and determined there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be implemented for the proposed works. Silt fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sedimentation from entering the watercourse which is buffered by existing development and approximately 400 meters away. Conservation of Land: All disturbed areas will be restored following construction. Plantings Landscaping to be implemented on site has been reviewed to staffs satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2. G) - Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35912 - Application #: 401 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Lisa Prime, extension 5250 For information contact: Lisa Prime, extension 5250 Date: October 25, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.8 GINO VARONE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Concession 7; Lot 74, Plan M -1701, (30 Foreview Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Gino Varone. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an addition and terrace to an existing single detached residential dwelling located at 30 Foreview Court in the City of Vaughan. 906 The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. A -1, prepared by Intra Architect Inc., dated June 2, 2004, received by the TRCA on October 6, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and the removal of excess fill material . • Wallsections, Drawing No. A -11, prepared by Intra Architect Inc., dated August 27, 2004, received by the TRCA on October 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The subject property is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of an addition and terrace (196.9 square- metres or 2119.52 square -feet) to an existing single detached residential dwelling. There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and no significant natural features will be affected by the project. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The proposed works will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35886 - Application #: 389 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Bums, extension 5267 Date: October 26, 2004 907 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.9 SHERRY PICKETT & OWEN SYMINGTON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 65M -3495, (23 Circle Court), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sherry Pickett & Owen Symington. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a new deck to the rear of the existing detached dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Survey, received October 7, 2004, redlined October 18, 2004 to indicate required silt fence . • Deck detail and design drawings , received October 7, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a new deck at the rear of the existing detached dwelling. The proposed works will be contained within the rear yard, which is delineated by a chain link fence. The deck will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain, as a result no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters is expected. Pollution: A silt fence will be erected around the work site in order to contain all construction - generated sediment. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries resources concerns related to this project. There are no natural features on the site which may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The works are within a manicured portion of the rear yard and as a result no vegetation removals are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements & Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. 908 CFN: 35901 - Application #: 394 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 Date: October 13, 2004 8.1.10 J.R. AND ILONA SMITH To construct in a flood plain on Lot 152, Plan 7566, (49 Fonthill Boulevard), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by J.R. and Ilona Smith. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a two storey addition onto an existing residential dwelling. The subject property is partially located within the Unionville Special Policy Area (SPA) in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing No. A -1, prepared by Gregory Design Group, dated July 2004, received by the TRCA October 5, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing . • Drawing No. A -2, prepared by Gregory Design Group , dated June 2004, received by the TRCA October 5, 2004. • Drawing No. A -3, prepared by Gregory Design Group , dated July 2004, received by the TRCA October 5, 2004. • Drawing No. A -4, prepared by Gregory Design Group , dated June 2004, received by the TRCA October 5, 2004. • Construction Notes, Drawing No. A -5, prepared by Gregory Design Group , received by the TRCA October 5, 2004. • Foundation Section, Drawing No. S1, prepared by Quaile Engineering Ltd ., dated October 15, 2004, received by the TRCA October 15, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a two storey addition onto an existing residential dwelling in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River. The subject property is partially located within the designated Unionville Special Policy Area (SPA) in the Town of Markham. The Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies permit additions to existing buildings within SPAs provided the technical requirements of the TRCA are satisfied. The current proposal satisfies the technical requirements, as the addition will be located outside of the hydraulic floodway and will be adequately flood proofed to above the 350 year storm elevation. 909 Control of Flooding: The proposed addition will be flood proofed above the 350 year storm elevation. The applicant has submitted a letter from a structural engineer stating that the proposed structure will withstand the depths and velocities expected under a Regional Storm event. TRCA staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the addition. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained until all works have been completed. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development.' As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposed works, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the property that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35883 - Application #: 388 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 19, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.11 SEAN ASSARI To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 65, Concession 1, (638 Sunset Beach Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sean Assari. The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling on an existing lot of record. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan - Landscaping, Site Services, Grading, Drawing Number A -1(2), dated July 4, 2004, received October 18, 2004 910 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling on the subject property. This proposal also includes the alteration of a small watercourse through a pathway crossing. The watercourse does not provide direct fish habitat, and rather functions to convey flows between an off site wetland and a wetland located on this property and the adjacent property. The subject property is an existing lot of record, and a permit for the construction of a dwelling on the property was previously issued by the TRCA in May 2003, but the dwelling was never constructed. The lot has since been sold, and now the new owners of the property are proposing similar development of the property. Control of Flooding: The small watercourse traversing the property has a drainage area less than 10 hectares, and is therefore not managed as a Regional Flood Plain. TRCA engineering staff confirmed that all of the proposed works are located outside of the flood plain limits associated with Lake Wilcox. The proposal will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed prior to any site works commencing and will be maintained throughout the construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse or lake. Conservation of Land: The proposed siting of the dwelling and amenity area minimizes impacts on the natural features and functions of the site. Through the previous permit application, staff determined that the small watercourse on site provides a water conveyance function and does not constitute in situ fish habitat. Therefore, with the sediment and erosion controls in place, there will not be a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat (HADD). Plantings All disturbed areas, outside of the proposed amenity space, will be rehabilitated with native, non - invasive vegetation. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 G) - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35911 - Application #: 402/04/RH Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 Date: October 18, 2004 911 8.1.12 ANTHONY GOODHOOFD To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, Plan 4908, (337 Sugar Maple Lane), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Anthony Goodhoofd. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the restoration of the slope adjacent to the residential dwelling at 337 Sugar Maple Lane, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • 337 Sugar Maple Lane, Richmond Hill, Planting Plan for Back Garden, prepared by Marsh -Mode, date revised October 2004, received October 20, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the restoration of the slope adjacent to the residential dwelling at 337 Sugar Maple Lane, in the Town of Richmond Hill. A previous permit application was approved on the subject property for the construction of a single storey addition to the existing house (C- 01161) and the addition was completed in 2001. Subsequently, the slope adjacent to the new addition was altered as a result of landscaping efforts initiated by the owner within a Fill Regulated Area without an Ontario Regulation 158 permit. The purpose of this permit application is to resolve the violation issued by TRCA enforcement staff for the works undertaken without a permit and restore the slope to better than existing conditions. TRCA staff has worked closely with the owner's consultant on the planting /restoration plan for the slope and is satisfied that a net environmental gain will result from the extensive plantings proposed as part of this permit application. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, hence no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters will result. Pollution: Only plantings are proposed down the slope, hence there are no pollution concerns related to the subject works. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns related to this proposal as the slope is of a gentle grade and leads down to Mill Pond, not the watercourse proper. As there are no in -water works proposed, there will be no impacts on fisheries resources. The slope is proposed to be restored with primarily native, woody species plantings. 912 Plantings As stated above, extensive plantings are proposed on the slope of primarily native, woody species. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Development Guidelines for Development and Redevelopment /Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35920 - Application #: 408/04/RH Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 25, 2004 8.1.13 TRI -RIDGE HOLDINGS INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, 2, 3, Plan 65M -2921, (12, 14, 16 Magistrale Court), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Tri -Ridge Holdings Inc.. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of three new residential dwellings. The properties are located within an approved plan of subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site and Grading Plan, prepared by Rady - Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., dated March 25, 2004, received by the TRCA September 21, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment fencing. • Surveyor's Real Property Report, prepared by Rady - Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., dated September 29, 2004, received by the TRCA October 21, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of three new residential dwellings. The properties are located within an approved plan of subdivision, approved in January 1988, and the proposed dwellings are located more than 10 metres from the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The Regional Storm Flood Plain was used to establish the rear limits of the residential lots in lieu of a top of bank, as the valley system in this area was determined to be ill- defined. A chain link fence is being erected to separate the residential Tots from the defined stream corridor in accordance with the requirements of the subdivision agreement. 913 Control of Flooding: The proposed development is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the stream corridor. Conservation of Land: There will be no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development as the valley wall in this vicinity is ill- defined. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35897 - Application #: 393/04/RH Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 18, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #8215/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.14 - 8.1.27, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.14 1359443 ONTARIO LIMITED To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Concession 9, (4299 Queen Street East), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1359443 Ontario Limited. 914 The purpose is to construct and place fill within a Fill Regulated area to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall in an existing easement on lands within the Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009. • Letter of undertaking provided by Ron Mauti Architect , agent for the applicant, dated November 3, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Ecology , Engineering and Property issues prior to the issuance of this permit . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves two components. The first relates to the removal of an existing stormwater outfall which was placed in error on TRCA lands without the requisite approvals being provided by TRCA staff. The applicant previously applied for a permit from this Authority for the existing works, and proceeded with the works in advance of TRCA permit approval, due to confusion stemming from the issuance of municipal fill permits for these works. The applicant is now seeking to rectify the situation through removing the headwall of the existing outfall, and capping the existing pipe underground to minimize any additional disturbance in this area. The outfall will then be realigned to be located within an adjacent existing City of Brampton easement to the south of its current location. Restoration will be completed within the area disturbed by the existing outfall, and in all areas disturbed through construction of the new outfall. Both locations are located a significant distance from the tributary of the Humber River which traverses Claireville Conservation Area, allowing for dispersal of flows associated with he outfall. Consequently no significant alterations to the watercourse will result through this project. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, no significant stream and storm flows will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. As no in -water works are proposed, Fisheries Timing Window restrictions do not apply to this project. 915 Plantings Lands in both locations affected by this project will be restored to pre- construction condition in accordance with TRCA's planting guidelines . The density and volume of species will be maximized in these areas to enhance existing conditions. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35936 - Application #: 416 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: October 27, 2004 8.1.15 1520981 ONTARIO LTD. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 14, Concession 2 EHS, (150 Westcreek Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 1520981 Ontario Ltd. The purpose is to construct within the Regional Storm Floodplain and alter a watercourse feature in order to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall structure associated with a new commercial building. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009. • Site Services & Grading Plan, Marquee Hotels Ltd., Drawing No. G -1, prepared by R. Santos, Candevcon Ltd., dated May 26, 2003, last revised September 13, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff October 8, 2004. • Landscape Plan, Fairfield Inn & Suites, Sheet No. L -1, prepared by S. Popovich, Stephen Popovich Associates Inc., dated June 2004, last revised October 4, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff October 8, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a stormwater outfall and naturalized outfall channel, located at 150 Westcreek Boulevard, in the City of Brampton. The proposed works are to service a proposed commercial building on the subject property. TRCA technical staff has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the proposed outfall will not adversely affect the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters within this reach of the noted watercourse. A TRCA permit is not required for the associated commercial building. 916 Please be advised that TRCA Enforcement staff has identified that the proposed works on the subject property have already commenced prior to this application being brought forward to the Executive Committee for endorsement. Additionally, these works were not completed in accordance with TRCA requirements. As such, this permit will not be issued until such time as TRCA Enforcement staff is satisfied with the measures proposed for resolving this issue. TRCA Enforcement staff will then ensure that the situation is rectified in accordance with TRCA's requirements and the permit issued. Please note that this application is subject to additional fees for the noted violation ($2800 + 100% - Projects on Commercial Properties). Control of Flooding: The proposal will not adversely impact the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters associated with Etobicoke Creek. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be maintained during all phases of construction. Conservation of Land: The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and all disturbed areas will be re- vegetated incorporating native and non - invasive plant species - consistent with TRCA's guidelines. There are no in- stream works associated with the proposed application. As such, all fisheries related concerns can be addressed through the issuance of a Letter of Advice to ensure conformity with Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) construction guidelines. There are no geotechnical related issues associated with the proposed development. Plantings The area between the proposed works and the watercourse will be planted with a variety of native and non - invasive plant species. In addition, the proposed outtall channel will be designed and planted in accordance with TRCA's guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35544 - Application #: 232 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: October 26, 2004 8.1.16 CASA -NORTH INVESTMENTS INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13, Concession 6, (Mountainash Road Crossing of H2 Watercourse), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Casa -North Investments Inc. 917 The purpose is to place and remove fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a vehicular bridge crossing and a watermain crossing of the H2 tributary of the Humber River. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Letter of undertaking provided by Darren Steedman , Metrus Developments, Dated November 3, 2004 to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues prior to the issuance of this permit. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This project incorporates a revised proposal for a vehicular crossing of the H2 tributary of the Humber River in the City of Brampton. The TRCA Executive Committee previously reviewed and approved a different crossing proposal at this location (at the January 17, 2003 Executive Committee meeting) which involved the use of an 11 metre Conspan culvert, and required the realignment of the watercourse to facilitate this crossing. Due to challenges in meeting the requirements of all of the agencies involved in the approval of this crossing (including DFO and MNR) the applicant is now bringing forward a revised proposal for a bridge in this location which will require significantly less modification to the watercourse and disturbance to the surrounding areas, and in turn expedite the review and approvals process. The current proposal involves the construction of a clear -span 32 metre vehicular bridge structure, which is the largest feasible clear -span available. TRCA staff are of the opinion that this revision represents a significant improvement over the previous proposal, which substantially reduces the impact of this crossing on the associated valley system. The H2 tributary is a warm water system extending from a point just southwest of Bramalea Road and Countryside Drive to a point of convergence with another Humber tributary just southeast of Williams Parkway and Goreway Drive. This tributary has been subject to several previous disturbances including an on -line pond and many culvert crossings as a result of previous residential developments in this general area. This proposed vehicular crossing will facilitate the connection of Mountainash Road, north and south of Sandalwood Parkway. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain, however based on this revised design, no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during the construction phase and the work environment will be isolated to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. 918 Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. As no in -water works are proposed with this application, Fisheries Timing Window restrictions do not apply. Plantings All areas disturbed through the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition in accordance with TRCA's planting guidelines, and the approved restoration /planting plans. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies in part with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35935 - Application #: 415 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: October 26, 2004 8.1.17 DOLOMITI ESTATES INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Concession 10 , in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Dolomiti Estates Inc. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area outside of the Regulatory Floodplain to facilitate grading works associated with a residential subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009. • Letter of undertaking provided by Diarmuid Horgan , Candevcon Limited, dated November 3, 2004 to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This proposal involves the placement and removal of fill on a (tableland) Fill Regulated area outside of the Regulatory Floodplain that is adjacent to a tributary of the West Humber River, to facilitate grading works associated with a residential subdivision. Grading works will not extend beyond the established top of bank, and appropriate sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed between the areas in which grading is to occur and the adjacent valley. 919 Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, no modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows will result from this project. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place during the construction phase. Any valleyland areas disturbed through construction will be restored to pre- construction condition. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. As no works within the valley, or in -water works are proposed, Fisheries Timing Window restrictions are not required. Plantings Through the plan of subdivision, a 2.5 metre buffer was secured adjacent to the valley corridor which will be planted with native, non - invasive species. As a result, over 400 square metres of new vegetation will be added within this area adjacent to the valley. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1- New Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35893 - Application #: 395 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: October 26, 2004 8.1.18 NANAK HOLDINGS LTD. To place fill within a regulated area at 7405 Goreway Drive, in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Nanak Holdings Ltd.. The purpose is to construct a condominium complex and a religious assembly building within a Fill Regulated area. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking prepared by Dave Arora , P.Eng., of Delta Engineering Services , dated October 21, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and landscaping issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 920 Proposal: The proposal is to construct a condominium complex and a religious assembly building which is partially located within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Mimico Creek, at 7405 Goreway Drive, in the City of Mississauga. Please be advised that the subject property is located adjacent to a portion of a stream corridor owned by the TRCA (lands associated with the Malton Greenway Municipal Park). Please note that TRCA staff are satisfied that all works associated with this application are adequately set back from the stream corridor, and are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. In addition, the applicant has proposed a riparian corridor planting plan to enhance the functions of the noted natural feature. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As a result, the TRCA technical staff have determined that the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to the commencement of any works, and will be maintained throughout all phases of construction. Conservation of Land: The subject property is located adjacent to a stream corridor associated with the Mimico Creek. Please note that TRCA staff are satisfied that an adequate buffer between the proposed works and the stream corridor has been proposed. In addition, the applicant has proposed a riparian corridor planting plan to further enhance the functions of the noted natural feature. Furthermore, there are no fisheries or geotechnical concerns related to this project. Plantings This proposal involves the planting of only appropriate native and non - invasive species along the stream corridor adjacent to the subject lands in accordance with TRCA's Planting Guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 - New Urban Development, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35861 - Application #: 377 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: October 20, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 8.1.19 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on the Etobicoke Creek, east of Palisades Lane (upstream of Rathburn Road) in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Mississauga. 921 The purpose is to excavate and place fill (to create a new creek bed, install erosion control works) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (rip rap buttress wall, live crib wall, bioengineering works) within a Regional Storm Flood Plain; alter a watercourse (Etobicoke Creek) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31 or as extended in writing by the Ministry of Natural Resources) through a temporary culvert crossing installation, through a dam and pump around method in order to work in the dry and modifying the centre line of the creek. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to engineering , sediment and erosion control details and restoration /planting drawings to the satisfaction of TRCA ; dated October 28, 2004; prepared by the City of Mississauga . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the installation of erosion control works at one site along the Etobicoke Creek, near Palisades Lane in the City of Mississauga. The works will involve the installation of a live crib wall (20 metres long) and a rip rap vegetated buttress wall (approximately 100 metres long by 2.7 metres high) to address the existing erosion situation. The opposite bank will be cut to compensate for filling the rip rap buttress. The centre line of the creek will be moved and the material cut from the opposite bank will be salvaged and placed on top of the buttress wall. The opposite bank will planted with native non - invasive species where appropriate. The works will be located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Etobicoke Creek. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements. Control of Flooding: The limited amount of proposed fill will be balanced by a corresponding cut location to eliminate any negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of storm flows. It is anticipated by staff that the erosion control works and the fill associated with the works will not have any implications to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, dam and pump) will be installed and maintained during the construction period to ensure that no sediment enters the watercourse. In addition, all in stream works will be completed in the dry with the stream flow directed around the work area. 922 Conservation of Land: The in stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The City of Mississauga has provide a Letter of Intent to implement compensation for the HADD. The proposed compensation will involve natural channel design principles in the reshaping of the creek, bioengineering techniques (bundles of live facines and a live timber crib wall) and riparian plantings throughout the entire length of the project. When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. Plant /rigs All disturbed areas other than the new creek bed will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. In addition, live cuttings will be installed within the crib walls and the rip rap buttress wall. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 3.3 B)1)- Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses and Alterations of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program CFN: 35781 - Application #: 333/04/MISS Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: October 26, 2004 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 8.1.20 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA To alter a waterway on Lancaster Avenue in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Mississauga. The purpose is to alter a watercourse and construct within the Regulatory Floodplain to facilitate the restoration of an area disturbed during emergency utility repairs.. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Letter of undertaking provided by Chuck Reaney , Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., dated November 3, 2004, to address outstanding TRCA Engineering and Ecology issues prior to the release of this permit. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 923 Proposal: This purpose of this project is project is to restore a small portion of the bed and banks of a tributary of Mimico Creek which were disturbed through excavation works associated with emergency repairs of an Enbridge Gas pipeline. The bed and banks of this watercourse are currently gabion lined in this location. The emergency repair works completed by Enbridge Gas involved the removal of gabions from both the bed and banks to gain access to the pipeline that traverses underneath the watercourse, and the placement of rock and fill materials in these locations once the repair works were completed. This proposal involves the restoration of these areas to pre- construction condition or better, with armourstone and vegetated riverstone, and the restoration of vegetated areas. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will occur in the Regional Storm Floodplain and affect the bed and banks of the watercourse, however all works proposed are for the purposes of restoration, and are temporary in nature. As such, no permanent modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during this and the restoration and previous emergency repair process will be restored to pre- construction condition. Fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of the MNR fisheries timing window. Conservation of Land: This permit is to restore a small disturbed area which includes restoration of vegetated areas, and slope stabilization. No significant vegetative or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this proposal. Plantings A disturbed area of approximately 25 square metres will be restored using native, non - invasive plant species to pre- construction, or better condition Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35864 - Application #: 380 /04 /MISS Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: October 26, 2004 924 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.21 WHITEVALE GOLF CLUB To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 29, 30, Concession 4, (2985 Golf Club Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Whitevale Golf Club. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the construction of an irrigation reservoir within the Whitevale Golf Club, in the City of Pickering. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Proposed Reservoir for Whitevale Golf Club , Figure 1, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Cross Section Locations, Figure 2, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc ., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Cross Section A, Figure 3, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc ., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Cross Section B, Figure 4, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc ., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Cross Section C, Figure 5, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc ., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Cross Section D, Figure 6, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc ., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Silt Control Plan, Figure 7, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc ., dated September 2004, received September 21, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking to provide detailed Restoration Plan , prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc., dated and received November 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to excavate and place fill within a regulated area of the Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the construction of an irrigation reservoir within the Whitevale Golf Club, in the City of Pickering. The irrigation reservoir is proposed to be located on tableland adjacent to the Duffins Creek valley, capturing water inputs from a drainage feature that conveys overland flows through the area. TRCA staff has visited the site and staked top of bank adjacent to the proposed works and has reviewed the drainage feature located in the headwaters of Duffins Creek. The feature does not constitute a watercourse and the proposal to capture inputs from the drainage feature eliminates the need for the golf course operation to draw water for irrigation purposes directly from the Duffins Creek during summer low flow periods. TRCA ecology staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the downstream watercourse as a result of the proposed works and is supportive of this water - taking approach. The reservoir will be setback between 6 -10m from top of bank and will be extensively vegetated with aquatic, emergent and upland vegetation. 925 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, hence there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing will be erected between the edge of the construction area and the top of bank in order to ensure that construction - generated sediment is contained within the work area. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability concerns associated with this proposal as the works are setback between 6 -10m from the staked top of bank. As no in -water works are proposed, there will be no impacts on the fisheries resources of the Duffins Creek. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction and the irrigation reservoir planted with native, non - invasive species plantings. Plantings A planting plan that includes aquatic fringe /shallow water and upland buffer plantings, as well as a herbaceous seed mix, has been prepared to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (H) - Existing Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35857 - Application #: 375/04/PICK Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: October 26, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.22 LYNN GROGAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 358E, (8 Beaumont Road), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lynn Grogan. The purpose is to construct a new garage, construct a new gazebo, replace existing retaining structures and construct minor additions to an existing single family dwelling at 8 Beaumont Road. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Drawing A -2.0, Site Plan, prepared by Wayne Swadron Architect, dated August 2004, received October 1, 2004. 926 • Letter of Undertaking to submit a planting plan and tree protection plan to TRCA satisfaction, prepared by Holbrook and Associates, Landscaping Architects, dated October 27, 2004, faxed by Wayne Swadron Architect on October 29, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill to construct the following: a new garage in the location of an existing disturbed patio and retaining structures; a new gazebo in the location of an existing garage (to be demolished); retaining structures approximately coincident with existing retaining structures; minor regrading and naturalization of an area of an existing driveway; and a minor infill addition to the existing single family dwelling at 8 Beaumont Road. The subject property is located on the north side of Beaumont Road, east of Glen Road and is entirely within a fill regulated area. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed around the subject property to keep construction debris from entering the valley side slopes. Conservation of Land: The subject property is already developed. The proposed works are in a similar location to existing structures and retaining walls. The proposal results in less impervious surface and more private open space than existing and will not impact significant vegetation. Appropriate temporary tree protection measures and landscaping will be provided to TRCA satisfaction. Plantings New native plantings to TRCA satisfaction are proposed. Policy Guidelines: The proposal conforms with Section 4.2.2.C, Minor Additions and Section 4.2.2.D, Replacement Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35855 - Application #: 374/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 22, 2004 927 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.23 MARIANNE LEO & JILL MEDLEY To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 24, Concession 8; Lot 48, 49, Plan 275, (77 Napier Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Marianne Leo & Jill Medley. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a detached garage at 77 Napier Street in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Site Plan, received by the TRCA on October 26, 2004, redline revised to indicate the removal of excess fill material . • Concrete Floating Slab for Garage, prepared by Shedman Inc. Wooden Sheds, dated August 27, 2003, received by the TRCA on October 06, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a detached garage (616 square -feet or approximately 57 square- metres) within the manicured rear yard of an existing residential lot. TRCA geotechnical staff have determined that the proposed garage will be sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank. The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and no significant natural features will be affected by the project. Control of Flooding: The proposal will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The garage will be constructed on a concrete slab. There will be minimal fill placement and grading associated with the proposed development. Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff visited the subject property and are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Native, non - invasive species of shrubs will be planted to the east and north of the proposed garage to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. 928 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35922 - Application #: 410 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: October 25, 2004 TOWN OF AJAX 8.1.24 BALLYMORE DEVELOPMENT (SHOAL POINT) CORP. To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 4, Concession RANGE 3 BFC, (Shoal Point Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ballymore Development (Shoal Point) Corp. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of two stormwater management outfalls conveying stormwater from a new residential development to the Warbler's Swamp wetland. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009. • General Plan of Services, Drawing 1, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated April 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Storm Drainage Plan, Drawing 2, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated April 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan (West), Drawing 4, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated April 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Lot Grading Plan (East), Drawing 5, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated April 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Storm Water Management Facility Detail , Drawing 12, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated April 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing PLN, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing XS1, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing XS2, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing XS3, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing XS4, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing XS5, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. • Fill In Existing Regional Floodplain Cross Sections , Drawing XS6, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd., dated October 2004, received October 19, 2004. 929 • Letter of Undertaking to address minor outstanding technical comments , prepared by the applicant, dated and received November 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Carruthers Creek in order to facilitate the construction of two stormwater management outfalls conveying stormwater from a new residential development to the Warbler's Swamp wetland. The stormwater management outfalls are required as a condition of draft plan approval for subdivision S -A- 2003 -07 and have been designed to dissipate flows to the wetland, thus maintaining the water inputs that currently maintain the wetland feature and function. Some minor filling will also be required along the flood fringe as a hydrology update undertaken by TRCA staff has identified 8 lots of the residential subdivision being subject to shallow depths of flooding in a Regional Storm event. Due to the marginal depths of flooding and passive storage function in this area, TRCA water management staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on upstream or downstream sites due to the minor amount of filling proposed. Further, a buffer ranging in width from 25m -50m has been secured between the rear lot line and the wetland proper, thus creating a wide open space adjacent to the wetland that will contribute to the preservation of the wetland feature and function. Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the stormwater management outfalls or minor filling proposed. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected around the perimeter of the work site, between the rear lot line and the wetland buffer, thus containing any construction - generated sediment. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues related to this proposal as the site is currently a flat agricultural field. There are no in -water works proposed and there will be no impacts on fisheries resources of Carruthers Creek as a result. A wetland buffer ranging in width from 25m -50m has been secured through the subdivision approval process, thus enhancing the open space system across the site. Plantings No vegetation removals will be required to accommodate any of the works proposed as part of this permit and the buffer secured through the subdivision process will result in an enhanced open space system that incorporates the wetland and surrounding areas. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 930 CFN: 35931 - Application #: 414 /04 /AJAX Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 26, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.25 CORNELL ROUGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION To alter a waterway on Lot 11, 12, 13, Concession 9, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cornell Rouge Development Corporation. The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a channel capable of conveying post - development flows from upstream residential development to a downstream stormwater management pond, in the Cornell community of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking, prepared by the owner, stating the owner's commitment to address the minor outstanding technical engineering comments related to the channel design , prepared by the owner, dated November 2, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to alter a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of a channel capable of conveying post - development flows from upstream residential development to a downstream stormwater management pond, in the Cornell community of Markham. The existing Tributary C channel is a highly altered drainage feature, similar to a ditch flowing through agricultural fields. The channel is not capable of conveying post - development flows and the channel will therefore be upgraded, in accordance with the approved report entitled The Cornell Community (Town of Markham) Master Storm Drainage and Stormwater Management Report (1996), prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan. This master storm drainage report identified watercourses in Cornell, including Tributary C, that could be upgraded from both a hydraulic and ecological perspective in the post - development scenario. The newly designed channel is proposed to closely follow the current alignment of Tributary C and will cross under the proposed Markham By -Pass in an appropriately sized culvert. The watercourse will remain an open channel downstream of the culvert until entering into another culvert located under Highway 7, approved as part of a previous permit application. The location and alignment of these two culverts and open sections of watercourse are consistent with the previous master drainage and environmental plans for the Cornell community. 931 It should be noted that the loss of fish habitat within Tributary C of the Little Rouge River within Cornell was authorized by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) as part of Fisheries Act Authorization #525 -1342 (1999). As compensation for the loss of fish habitat, the construction of the Milne Reservoir Fishway was approved and undertaken. As a result, Tributary C has been identified by DFO as a watercourse without fish habitat and all construction works can therefore take place without any fisheries timing window restrictions. As part of the DFO Authorization, a number of terrestrial ecology objectives were identified and staff has confirmed that the overall proposal for the channel upgrade and culvert installation is consistent with the authorization and will achieve the environmental objectives identified. Control of Flooding: The channel is proposed to convey post - development flows from upstream residential development and has been designed to improve hydraulics along this reach of Tributary C. TRCA water management staff is satisfied that no negative impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters will result. Pollution: Two temporary diversion swales will be constructed prior to the permanent channel works being initiated. The diversion swales have a series of rock check dams to contain sediment flow and the entire work area will be surrounded by silt fencing to further safeguard against construction - generated sediment entering the downstream watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries resources concerns related to this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and the channel will be extensively rehabilitated following the construction of the permanent channel. Plantings Landscaping plans have been reviewed by TRCA ecology staff and propose native, non - invasive, woody species plantings along the banks of the new channel, resulting in increased vegetative cover along the length of the channel. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35846 - Application #: 365 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Klrsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 26, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL i 8.1.26 ROGERS CABLE INC. To construct in a flood plain on Lot 19, Plan 4840, (264 Newkirk Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Rogers Cable Inc. 932 The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate erosion control works adjacent to an existing stormwater management outfall. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to address minor engineering comments with regards to the erosion protection works, prepared by Trow Associates Inc ., dated November 2, 2004, received November 3, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate erosion control works adjacent to an existing stormwater management outfall. The owners of 264 Newkirk Avenue are proposing a parking lot expansion on their site which will require internal improvements to an existing stormwater management pond. As part of those works, the proponent has agreed to improve the existing stormwater management pond outlet and resolve an existing erosion problem at the mouth of the outlet. The subject erosion protection works involve pulling the existing outfall further back from the watercourse and adding river run stone to stabilize the outfall area. The works are well setback from the watercourse itself and will not impact fisheries resources of the area. Control of Flooding: Only a small amount of river run stone is proposed to be placed in the Regional Storm Floodplain, hence TRCA water management staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be erected between the work area and the watercourse, thus preventing any construction - generated sediment from entering the Don River. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues related to this proposal for minor erosion protection works, nor are there any fisheries resources issues. There are no other natural heritage features that will be impacted by the proposed works and the condition of the area will only be improved through the stabilization efforts proposed. Plantings There are no vegetation removals required as part of this project, hence no additional plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 933 CFN: 35773 - Application #: 331/04/RH Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 27, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.27 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 38, Concession 1 WYS, (South East of Bathurst Street and Birch Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Richmond Hill. The purpose is to alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian bridge within the Town of Richmond Hill's Webster Park. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006. • Existing Conditions & Site Preparation Plan, Drawing L -1, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated June 2004, revised October 25, 2004, received October 28, 2004. • Planting Plan and Details, Drawing L -2, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan , dated June 2004, revised October 25, 2004, received October 28, 2004. • Planting Plan and Details, Drawing L -3, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan , dated June 2004, revised October 25, 2004, received October 28, 2004. • Plan and Details I, Drawing S -1, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated April 2004, received October 28, 2004. • Plan and Details II, Drawing S -2, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan, dated April 2004, received October 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian bridge within the Town of Richmond Hill's Webster Park. The existing pedestrian bridge over the watercourse is in poor to hazardous condition and is in need of replacement. The Town of Richmond Hill is proposing to replace the existing wooden bridge with a galvanized steel structure with concrete footings, located between 5.8m -6.8m beyond the banks of the watercourse. Though the structure will be located entirely within the floodplain, it has been designed to over -top in Regional Storm conditions and will not result in perceptible hydraulic impacts. All disturbed areas are proposed to be restored with live stakings and native, non - invasive species plantings, resulting in increased vegetative cover both upstream and downstream of the bridge. 934 Control of Flooding: TRCA water management staff is satisfied that the bridge will over -top in a Regional Storm event, thus allowing flood waters to pass unobstructed through the area; no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters will result. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be erected around the work site thus isolating the construction area from the watercourse and preventing construction - generated sediment from entering the river. Conservation of Land: A geotechnical report was reviewed by TRCA geotechnical staff and there are no slope stability /geotechnical concerns with the proposal. As the works are proposed in close proximity to the watercourse, a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) providing guidelines for construction adjacent to waterways. As the watercourse has been identified as intermediate coldwater habitat, the works should be undertaken within the Ministry of Natural Resources' (MNR) coldwater timing window of July 1- September 15, unless otherwise approved by MNR. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings A comprehensive restoration plan has been submitted that includes live stakings and other native, non - invasive species plantings around the work site and both upstream and downstream of the bridge abutments. TRCA ecology staff is satisfied that a net environmental gain will result from the proposed works. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (H) - Existing Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 32956 - Application #: 071/02/RH Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 25, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE MINOR WORKS ITEMS : RES. #B216/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan David Barrow THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff , in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.28 - 8.1.34, inclusive), which are listed below, be received. CARRIED 935 TOWN OF CALEDON 8.1.28 CLAUDIO AND ANNA FERRANTI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 96, Block 1, Plan BOL -7, (140 Victoria Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Claudio and Anna Ferranti. CFN: 35878 - Application #: 385/04/CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: October 4, 2004 8.1.29 DAN PETTELLA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 30, Plan 43M -1134, (13 Sunkist Valley Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Dan Pettella. CFN: 35862 - Application #: 378/04/CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: October 4, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.30 DAVID AND WANDA MCPAKE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 21, Plan M -1841, (32 Stonemanse Court), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by David and Wanda McPake. CFN: 35820 - Application #: 353/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 8, 2004 8.1.31 TIMOTHY WEBSTER To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 148, 149, Plan M -440, Part Lot 146, Plan, (5 Meadowcliffe Drive), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront watershed as located on the property owned by Timothy Webster. CFN: 35778 - Application #: 332/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 28, 2004 936 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.32 PATRICIA LANGLEY To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 66M -2472 , (26 True Davidson Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Patricia Langley. CFN: 35908 - Application #: 398/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 18, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.33 MAURO TONIETTO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 65M -2863, (276 Westridge Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mauro Tonietto. CFN: 35859 - Application #: 376 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: September 24, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.34 VALERY TARASSOV AND LADA TARASSOVA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Concession 5 Lot 55, Plan 65M -2256, (33 Millstone Court), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Valery Tarassov and Lada Tarassova. CFN: 35853 - Application #: 372 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: September 21, 2004 CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.35 REGION OF PEEL To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Ebenezer Road (west of McVean Drive) in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. 937 The purpose is to place fill (to facilitate the expansion of an existing berm, the construction of a new pumping station building and retaining wall) in a Fill Regulated Area and construct a structure (berm around lagoon) within a Regional Storm Flood Plain. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking to address the TRCA 's outstanding comments in correspondence dated October 28, 2004 and provide revisions to the necessary engineering , sediment and erosion control details and restoration /planting drawings to TRCA's satisfaction ; dated November 2, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of Peel RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the expansion of an existing pumping station located on Ebenezer Road, west of McVean Drive. The expansion consists of the demolition of existing pumping station and the construction of a new larger sewage pumping station in a Fill Regulated Area. In addition, a new retaining wall ranging from approximately 1.2 metres to 3.7 metres will be built on the north east side of the property adjacent to TRCA property in a Fill Regulated Area. As part of the expansion the existing berm that surrounds the emergency overflow storage lagoon will be expanded by approximately 18 metres in width and 15 metres in length. As per updated Humber River flood plain mapping, the existing lagoon and proposed expanded lagoon are located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The minium top berm elevation surrounding the lagoon will be 173.5 metres which is higher than the Regional Storm Flood elevation of 171.8 metres at this location. The proposed watermain and forcemain within the study area of this project will connect to the existing watermain and forcemain service. This permit will only be released upon issuance of "permission to enter" and a temporary working easement from TRCA's Property Section. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements Control of Flooding: Fill placement will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain with this infrastructure project and staff does not anticipate concerns with loss of storage or conveyance. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. 938 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35770 - Application #: 330 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: November 2, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.36 CITY OF TORONTO - WORKS & EMERGENCY SERVICES To alter a waterway on (VanDusen Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto - Works & Emergency Services. The purpose is to alter a waterway to facilitate the reconstruction of a pedestrian bridge pier. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing Nos. S1 and S2, prepared by Ha!sail, dated October 30, 2004, received November 2, 2004; • VanDusen Pedestrian Bridge Repairs , drawing notes, pages 1 to 5, received on November 2, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway to facilitate the reconstruction of the eastern pier of the VanDusen Boulevard pedestrian bridge. The footing of the pier has been undermined by erosion and works are necessary to repair it before the bridge becomes unsuitable for use. The works consist of removing loose shale and replacement with a concrete footing adjacent to and under the existing footing. Control of Flooding_ : The works include only minimal additional footing material above the creek bed and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A coffer dam will be utilized to isolate the works to work in the dry. Sediment will not enter the watercourse during construction. 939 Conservation of Land: Construction access and staging will be from VanDusen Boulevard. There will be no impact to significant natural resources. A letter of advice on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans will be issued. Plantings No new plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The works comply with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35951 - Application #: 421/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 2, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.37 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on Lot 12, Concession 7, (Emergency Overflow into a culvert on Pine Valley Drive, north of Langstaff Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to alter a watercourse (tributary of the Humber River) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) by breaking into an existing culvert on Pine Valley Drive to create an emergency sanitary overflow to receive a peak flow of 330 litres /second under emergency situations only. The location of the emergency overflow is not within a "Fill Regulated Area" or a "Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of November 5, 2004 to November 4, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Letter of Undertaking; dated November 2, 2004; received November 2, 2004; prepared by the Region of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 940 Proposal: Background: As part of York Region's Master Plan for providing sanitary sewer capacity, a Pumping Station will be constructed in an open field on the west side of Pine Valley Drive, north of Langstaff, on lands now owned by the City of Vaughan which formerly were owned by TRCA in the Boyd Conservation Area. A sanitary sewer will run down the west side of Pine Valley Drive. The footprint of this "building location" is not within a Fill Regulated Area, Regional Storm Floodplain, nor is there any watercourse on site. There is one small triangle in the north west of the "building site" that is located within a Fill Regulated Area, and required a TRCA permit prior to grading. In 2003 when TRCA staff reviewed the building location, the consultant did not mention the need for any dewatering, the need for any sewer storage area, nor the need for the emergency overflow. After clearing all Archaeological issues and TRCA's Property issues, a permit was issued under Central File Number 34502 in April 2004 for the grading of the north west section of site for the Pumping Station. York Region will eventually take possession of the Pumping Station. The sanitary sewer line will be owned by the City of Vaughan in the Pine Valley Drive right of way, and the emergency overflow will be owned by York Region within a permanent easement in Vaughan's right of way. The location of the sewer pipe in the Pine Valley Road right of way will not be within a Fill Regulated Area or Regional Storm Floodplain. The Pumping Station and sewer line locations were reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment stage (CFN 32733). There is an existing pumping station on the east side of Pine Valley Drive, north of Langstaff Road which is very old and is Iodated within the Right of Way. A larger site was required to facilitate the sewage requirements of a larger population. In August 2004, York Region submitted to the TRCA the Permit To Take Water Application (PTTW) as requested by the Ministry of Environment (MOE). The MOE requested York Region to obtain a sign off from the TRCA. The PTTW application and accompanying documents submitted to TRCA in August 2004 and October 2004 indicated that there will be "dewatering" associated with the wet well construction of the pumping station as well as "unwatering" associated with the sewer trench construction. The total water taking for both "dewatering" and "unwatering" will be 15 Litres /second (200 imperial gallons per minute (igpm)) for an overall duration of 4 to 6 months. It was determined by TRCA staff that the "dewatering" and the "unwatering" will not constitute an "alteration of a watercourse ", since the flow in the magnitude of 15 Litres /second will be first dissipated down the ditch of Pine Valley Drive, through several rock check dams, then will disperse through the ground rather than discharge directly into the Humber River. Staff has reviewed the reports and it has been determined that the "dewatering" will not impact baseflows. As a precautionary measure, piezometers have been installed to monitor the Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) and Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) to the north in the Boyd Conservation Area. 941 MOE also requested York Region to obtain a sign off from TRCA on the construction of an emergency overflow, which will be located at the culvert on Pine Valley Drive, just north of Langstaff Road. MOE requires that all pumping stations have an emergency overflow, otherwise the sewage would pump into the basements of the neighbouring homes. There are a number of contingencies that would have to fail in this instance before the emergency overflow would be required and these were detailed in the submission by KMK. For example, there would need to be a power failure, then a diesel generator failure, pump.failures (two duty, one standby), diesel fuel run -out, a back -up battery for the control panel failure, then a storage truck failure, prior to the emergency overflow at the culvert being utilized. A key component of ensuring the contingencies are successful remains with the maintenance plan of the pumps and back -up systems. In the event of these failures and the emergency overflow being utilized, the sewage will be dispersed through the culvert, and flow westward to the Humber River. The emergency overflow can accommodate a maximum of 330 Litres /second. The proponent has submitted details on the clean up plan in the event of an emergency. Ideally, the MOE prefers that up to two hours of emergency storage be provided on site. The consultant has advised that this is not feasible and MOE is satisfied with this approach for this project. No request to TRCA for the use of additional Authority lands for such a facility was made. As well, oversizing the sewer pipe would lead to less scouring, according to KMK, and increase the risk of the sanitary sewer becoming plugged. Present Proposal: The proposal in this file that is regulated for a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit consists of the construction of the emergency sewer overflow outfall at a culvert located on the Pine Valley Drive, north of Langstaff Drive. The outfall construction has been classified as an "alteration of a watercourse ". The outfall proper is not located within a "Fill Regulated Area ", nor a " Regional Storm Floodplain ", however, the tributary does have defined beds or banks and is classified as a "watercourse." Any alteration of the beds or banks of a watercourse requires a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit prior to any works. Control of Flooding: The location of the emergency overflow is not within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard sediment and erosion control measures (cofferdams) will be installed to ensure sediments do not enter the watercourse during the break -in to the existing culvert for the emergency overflow. Conservation of Land: There is the potential for in stream works associated with this project. The concrete from the culvert break -in could disperse into the watercourse. TRCA staff discussed this situation with DFO staff. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). If a sewage discharge should occur, it will be considered a spill and the appropriate agencies will be contacted. MOE, DFO or Environment Canada may investigate any future spills when they occur and potentially lay charges if deemed appropriate. 942 The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Piezometers have been installed on TRCA's property north of the pumping station to monitor groundwater levels in the Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) and the Environmentally Significant Area (ESA). The ANSI and ESA will be monitored for impacts by 5 - 1.5 m long drive -point piezometers. Prior to construction, the piezometers will be monitored bi- weekly to determine baseline data, then daily as construction commences for three weeks, then twice weekly for the remainder of the construction period. The discharge of water will be conducted on lands owned by the TRCA in the Boyd Conservation Area. TRCA's Archaeologist advised that there are no concerns provided proper erosion and sediment controls are followed. TRCA's Property Section has advised that there are no property requirements for the dispersal of the water nor the emergency overflow. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35887 - Application #: 390 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: November 2, 2004 RES.#B217/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Lisa Prime and Quentin Hanchard. Appointment of enforcement officers to administer Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation (Ontario Regulation 158). Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Lisa Prime and Quentin Hanchard be appointed as enforcement officers for the purpose of enforcing Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterway Regulations (Ontario Regulation 158) made by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), pursuant to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Conservation Authorities Act provides for a conservation authority to appoint enforcement officers to enforce its regulations. There are several TRCA staff who currently have this designation, both for the purpose of enforcing TRCA's regulation and for authorizing the issuance of permits approved by the Executive Committee under the regulation. 943 RATIONALE Ms. Lisa Prime and Mr. Quentin Hanchard have recently been appointed to the positions of senior planner, respectively, within the Development Services Section. In these positions, they have the responsibility for supervising TRCA's regulation services associated with the review and approval of applications. Their appointment as enforcement officers will enable them to authorize the issuance of approvals for the work that they supervise and will allow them to assist with the enforcement of the regulation as required. Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Date: October 25, 2004 RES. #B218/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Adjacent to 3 Broadmead Avenue, CFN 34117. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore the possibility of a sale involving a small fragment of TRCA -owned land adjacent to 3 Broadmead Avenue, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, Lake Ontario Waterfront to resolve an encroachment. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor WHEREAS the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC) has recommended that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) sell parkland related to the encroachment adjacent to 3 Broadmead Avenue; WHEREAS the City of Toronto Council at its meeting held on September 22, 23 & 24, adopted without amendment, the same recommendation from ERC ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA concur with both the recommendation of the ERC and City of Toronto Council ; THAT staff be directed to negotiate a suitable arrangement for the sale of the subject property ; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending the sale. CARRIED BACKGROUND This request is being brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #A289/94 in regards to the process to be undertaken for disposal of TRCA -owned land, adopted by the Members of the Authority at the meeting held on January 27, 1995. 944 The present owner of 3 Broadmead Avenue purchased this property in 1972 and apparently there was an encroachment in existence at that time.The encroachment involves a rectangular piece of property adjacent to the rear and side of 3 Broadmead Avenue which consists of a concrete walkway next to the existing single, detached dwelling, a stairway, retaining wall, and a grassed area, measuring approximately 950 square feet.The City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC), which includes a representative from TRCA staff, had initially considered a sale to resolve this encroachment at its meeting of September 30, 2002 and further discussed this matter at a subsequent meeting in February of 2003. The ERC has recommended approval of the sale of land, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Encroachment Review Committee recommends that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority sell parkland related to the encroachment at 3 Broadmead Avenue subject to conditions and approvals outlined in the Parkland Encroachment Policy and Procedure and Protocol for resolving Parkland Encroachments and upon the following conditions set by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority: (a) the owner be responsible for all related costs including survey, registration, etc.; (b) restrictive covenant be registered on title defining the use of the purchased land; and 2. The appropriate city officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. The Scarborough Community Council recommended to City of Toronto Council the resolution of this encroachment on the basis as set out above at its meeting of August 18, 2003 and the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting held on September 22, 23, and 24, 2003, adopted, without amendment, the same recommendation from the ERC. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: October 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 945 Attachment 1 REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Adlacent to 3 Broadmead Avenue CFN 34117 onsery to ion for TM' Living city y JTRCAowns M/ SUBJECT PROPERTY /G /Y///! , • • 946 RES. #B219/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Adjacent to 5 Eldorado Court, CFN 34115. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore the possibility of a sale involving a small fragment of TRCA -owned land adjacent to 5 Eldorado Court, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area, Humber River Watershed, to resolve an encroachment. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor WHEREAS the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC) has recommended that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) sell parkland related to the encroachment adjacent to 5 Eldorado Court; WHEREAS the City of Toronto Council at its meeting held on September 22, 23 & 24, adopted without amendment, the same recommendation from ERC ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA concur with both the recommendation of the ERC and City of Toronto Council ; THAT staff be directed to negotiate a suitable arrangement for the sale of the subject property ; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending the sale. CARRIED BACKGROUND This request is being brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #A289/94 in regards to the process to be undertaken for disposal of TRCA -owned land, adopted by the Members of the Authority at the meeting held on January 27, 1995. The subject encroachment involves a narrow strip of TRCA -owned land containing a section of a gabion basket retaining wall 75 feet long and occupying an area of approximately 263 square feet. The present owner of 5 Eldorado Court has had a License of Occupation for this encroachment since 1992. The City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC), which includes a representative from TRCA staff, had initially considered a sale to resolve this encroachment at its meeting of September 30, 2002 and further discussed this matter at a subsequent meeting in February of 2003. The ERC has recommended approval of the sale of land, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Encroachment Review Committee recommends that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority sell parkland related to the encroachment at 5 Eldorado Court subject to conditions and approvals outlined in the Parkland Encroachment Policy and Procedure and Protocol for resolving Parkland Encroachments and upon the following conditions set by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority: 947 (a) the owner be responsible for all related costs including survey, registration, etc.; (b) restrictive covenant be registered on title defining the use of the purchased land; and 2. The appropriate city officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. The North York Community Council recommended to City of Toronto Council the resolution of this encroachment on the basis as set out above at its meeting of August 18, 2003 and the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting held on September 22, 23, and 24, 2003, adopted, without amendment, the same recommendation from the ERC. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: October 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 948 Attachment 1 REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA-OWNED LAND Adjacent to 5 Eldorado Court CFN 34116 47222 , r"" Tr. . , S/1 ; IL/ 51..i..1)01.4D0 I , 501.10_1, PROPTSt PS-221 949 11 for The Ilvirig—City LANDS , OMEg SE11.17CT PRON.' icl Y 1 RES. #B220/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Adjacent to 2 Pineway Boulevard, CFN 34118. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore the possibility of a sale involving a small fragment of TRCA -owned land adjacent to 2 Pineway Boulevard, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area, Don River Watershed, to resolve an encroachment. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor WHEREAS the City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC) has recommended that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) sell parkland related to the encroachment land adjacent to 2 Pineway Boulevard; WHEREAS the City of Toronto Council at its meeting held on September 22, 23 & 24, adopted without amendment, the same recommendation from ERC ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA concur with both the recommendation of the ERC and City of Toronto Council ; THAT staff be directed to negotiate a suitable arrangement for the sale of the subject property ; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending the sale. CARRIED BACKGROUND This request is being brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #A289/94 in regards to the process to be undertaken for disposal of TRCA -owned land, adopted by the Members of the Authority at the meeting held on January 27, 1995. The subject encroachment involves a pie shaped piece of TRCA -owned land at the rear of 2 Pineway Boulevard, covering an area of approximately 871 square feet. The present owner of 2 Pineway Boulevard has had a License of Occupation for this encroachment since 1992. The City of Toronto Encroachment Review Committee (ERC), which includes a representative from TRCA staff, had initially considered a sale to resolve this encroachment at its meeting of September 30, 2002 and further discussed this matter at a subsequent meeting on May 6, 2003. The ERC has recommended approval of the sale of land, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Encroachment Review Committee recommends that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority sell parkland related to the encroachment at 2 Pineway Boulevard subject to conditions and approvals outlined in the Parkland Encroachment Policy and Procedure and Protocol for resolving Parkland Encroachments and upon the following conditions set by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority: 950 (a) the owner be responsible for all related costs including survey, registration, etc.; (b) restrictive covenant be registered on title defining the use of the purchased land; and 2. The appropriate city officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. The North York Community Council recommended to City of Toronto Council the resolution of this encroachment on the basis as set out above at its meeting of August 18, 2003 and the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting held on September 22, 23, and 24, 2003, adopted, without amendment, the same recommendation from the ERC. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: October 21, 2004 Attachments: 1 951 Attachment 1 niEs i PS 343 \-13533T FINE MAN' BLVD, �� - _ _ •fie ^ -. —;� �_ . c''' uS.cr ST. MOO. f M f AVE 1' ST 74)hM RV:iUY�. -� onservatron for The Living Ci[y \ \ 1TRCALANUs SUEJECT 'r PFRTY REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TRCA -OWNED LAND Adjacent to 2 Pineway Boulevard CFN 34118 952 RES. #B221/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: ETOBICOKE - MIMICO CREEK WATERSHEDS LAND USE STUDY IN SUPPORT OF THE 2005 WATERSHED REPORT CARD Hiring of a consultant to undertake a land use study in support of the 2005 Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the firm of Macaulay Shiomi Howson Limited (MSH) in association with Totten Sims Hubicki Associates (TSH), be retained to undertake a land use study for the Etobicoke - Mimico Creek Watersheds at a total cost not to exceed $25,000.00, plus applicable taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 2002, the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force released Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks which established a vision, objectives and targets for healthier and more sustainable watersheds by the year 2025. Greening Our Watersheds provides a detailed description of the current ecological and cultural conditions within the watershed, outlines strategies to improve the health of the watershed as described by 31 indicators of watershed health and provides targets that are required for achieving various strategies. The management strategy also includes the first Etobicoke - Mimico Creek Watersheds Report Card, which assesses data and rates progress toward achieving the targets. In some cases, baseline data was not available and further study was required. The second Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card, scheduled to be published in 2005, will address the information gaps identified in the first report card. The proposed land use study is being undertaken to: • update and refine existing land use information in order to develop targets for the Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card; • apply Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Terrestrial Natural Heritage Systems Strategy (TNHSS) and other studies to provide direction for future development and land use planning in the context of watershed sustainability; and • profile policy action and innovation including municipal and private sector best management practices. This study presents an excellent opportunity to apply TRCA's Terrestrial Natural Systems Study (TNHSS) as a framework to provide strategic direction for future development and planning in the two watersheds. The updated land use information will also be used for the Etobicoke Headwaters Subwatershed study currently underway. A review of study results will be carried out with key policy planners in each municipality within the watershed to confirm conclusions. 953 RATIONALE Five consultants were invited to submit proposals for the project, based on a request for proposal (RFP) which detailed the scope of work, deliverables and project schedule. Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd., in association with Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, submitted a proposal. Others expressed their inability to submit a proposal due to their work load. One company declined to bid due to the low upset limit identified in the RFP. The proposal was reviewed by TRCA staff and the Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card Working Group for the following criteria: • demonstrates a clear understanding of watershed management issues, best management practices, and implementation mechanisms in both rural and urban environments; • demonstrates a clear understanding of existing land use planning policies and requirements; • the proposed approach to completing the scope of work in a timely manner; • past experience and qualifications of team members; and • cost. Subsequently, a meeting was held with the consultant team and TRCA staff to clarify the scope of work and deliverables. The consultant team was also asked to bring examples of prior work that they have done which is relevant to the proposed study. Based on the proposal review and meeting with the consultant team, the report card working group and staff recommended that the team of MSH and TSH be retained to undertake the land use study. This decision was supported by the following rationale: 1. The consultant team has a good understanding of the issues and deliverables; 2. The consultant team is well - balanced with an appropriate range of expertise; 3. The consultant team has the most recent relevant experience applicable to this study. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the Etobicoke - Mimico Land Use Planning and Development Study has been granted through the 2004 Region of Peel Capital Budget. Report prepared by: Chandra Sharma , extension 5237 For Information contact: Chandra Sharma , extension 5237 Date: October 28, 2004 RES. #B222/04 - ACQUISITION OF VEHICLES Acquisition of 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab with Hydraulic Dump Box, 4X4 Chassis Cab with Hydraulic Dump Box, 4X4 Extended Cab Pick Up Truck. 954 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the tender FM2004 -01 for 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab with Hydraulic Dump Box vehicle be awarded to Dixie Ford Sales Ltd . for the sum of $62,220.75, including applicable taxes, it being the lowest price that meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications; THAT the tender FM 2004 -02 for 4X4 Chassis Cab Truck with Hydraulic Dump Box be awarded to Humberview GMC Truck Centre for the sum of $39,309.30, including applicable taxes, it being the lowest price that meets TRCA specifications ; AND FURTHER THAT the tender FM 2004 -03 4X4 for Extended Cab Pick Up be awarded to Alex Irvine Motors Ltd. for the sum of $33,29825, including applicable taxes, it being the lowest price that meets TRCA specifications . CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA's Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services and Disposal of Equipment requires Executive Committee approval for the selection of successful tenders for acquisitions between $25,000 and $100,000. Tenders were issued for the 3 vehicles to replace existing vehicles within TRCA's Vehicle and Equipment Pool. Tenders were opened by the Tender Opening Sub - Committee on September 17, 2004. The tenders were referred to staff for their review and report to the Executive Committee. Tender Opening Sub Committee Report FM 2004 -01 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab with Hydraulic Dump Box COMPANY QUOTE Dixie Ford Sales Ltd. $62,220.75 Northtown Ford Sales Ltd. $62,777.35 Summitt Ford $63,239.65 Tender Opening Sub Committee Report FM 2004 -02 4X4 Chassis Cab with Hydraulic Dump Box COMPANY QUOTE Alex Irvine Motors Ltd. $39,366.80 Foster Pontiac Buick GMC Inc. $39,797.15 Golden Mile $39,886.60 Humberview GMC Truck Centre $39,309.30 King City Motors $39,481.80 955 Tender FM2004 -03 4X4 Extended Cab Pick Up Truck COMPANY QUOTE Alex Irvine Motors Ltd. $33,298.25 Foster Pontiac Buick GMC Inc. $34,305.65 Golden Mile $33,327.00 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this acquisition are available in the Vehicle and Equipment budget. Report prepared by: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 For Information contact: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 Date: October 25, 2004 RES. #B223/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR PERSONAL LEAVE OF ABSENCE Request from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority employee, Kate Hayes, for an unpaid leave of absence for a 12 month period. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Kate Hayes, Planning Ecologist in the Resource Science Section , be granted an unpaid leave of absence from her position for a twelve month period commencing October 21, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND In accordance with Personnel Policy #6, Leaves of Absence, a request for a leave that exceeds beyond 6 months must be approved by the Executive Committee RATIONALE Kate Hayes has requested a personal leave of absence to pursue an opportunity with one of our strategic partners, Environment Canada from October 2004 to October 2005. This is a great opportunity for Ms. Hayes to expand her network of contacts as well as increase her technical skill levels. FINANCIAL DETAILS No savings anticipated as the position will be replaced with an employee on a one year contract. Report prepared by: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5219 For Information contact: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5219 Date: October 20, 2004 956 RES. #B224/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE STATUS REPORT October 25, 2004. Staff report on Accounts Receivable, as of October 25, 2004. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the report on accounts receivable , as of October 25, 2004, be received; AND FURTHER THAT upon receipt of a further payment of approximately $9,437 from Choirs Ontario the outstanding balance of approximately $13,481 be written off. CARRIED RATIONALE The schedule below summarizes the status of receivables, including aging and classification. The schedule excludes $17,222 in accumulated interest arrears on invoices outstanding for more than 30 days. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AGING, BY CATEGORY Excluding Municipal Levy and MNR Grant - As at October 25, 2004 957 CURRENT 31 TO 60 DAYS 61 TO 90 DAYS 90 PLUS DAYS TOTAL % SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL BOARDS 106,405 22,104 2,995 131,504 11.7% GOVERNMENT 188,314 240,128 88,783 89,966 607,191 53.9% CORPORATE, INDIVIDUAL AND COMMUNITY GROUPS 94,922 146,441 59,114 87,930 388,407 34.4% TOTAL 389,641 408,673 147,897 180,891 1,127,102 100.0% % OF TOTAL 39.3% 35.0% 4.3% 21.4% 100.0% 957 Items in excess of $1,000.00 included in the 90- plus -days column, are as follows: CLIENT NAME AMOUNT $ ARREARS INTEREST $ AGE (DAYS) NOTES Choirs Ontario 15,839.69 7,078.10 4,260.64 1,640.42 486 423 Amounts owed re: summer music camps at Albion Hills and Lake St. George Field Centres. Choirs paid 15% ($4,044) of outstanding amount in June '04 and has now put forward a proposal that would pay a final amount of $9,437 or 35% of original debt. City of Toronto 51,184.06 n \a 306 Contract for ravine restoration services with the City. City staff has indicated payment will be recommended for payment. City of Toronto 36,796.55 n \a 237 Contract work for wetland construction. Invoice has now been approved for payment. Basciano Parkin Ltd. 2,000.00 91.36 95 Planning fees for residential site plan. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. 7,000.00 319.75 95 Outstanding amount for planning fees. Weston Consulting 15,000.00 15,000.00 1,897.40 1,401.66 204 248 Outstanding amounts for planning fees. Canada Green Building Council 1,344.94 82.53 148 Billing for May 20th meeting. Payment is expected. Toronto Professional Firefighters 1,642.25 75.01 94 For special event at Petticoat Creek Conservation Area. Group has indicated payment will be processed shortly. KLM Planning 2,000.00 154.57 164 For subdivision permit. Company has indicated invoice will be paid. Steve's Auctioneering 1,104.84 85.38 153 For corporate function at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area. Cheque dated Oct. 30, '04 now received. Bombardier 1,398.49 108.08 151 For corporate function at Black Creek Pioneer Village. Company waiting for approval from Montreal Head Office Robertson Gaze Associates Inc. 4,621.56 1,243.12 500 For planting materials. Company has advised that it is insolvent and cannot make payment. Account sent for collection. TOTALS 162,010.48 11,359.92 The amount due from Robertson Gaze Associates Inc. of $4,621.56 is very doubtful. The company has indicated, in writing, that it is insolvent and has discontinued operations. This account has been sent for collection. 958 Choirs Ontario made a payment of $4,044. in June representing 15% of the outstanding amount. Recently, its volunteer Treasurer proposed a further payment of $9,437 representing a further 35% of the original debt and in return it has asked that TRCA forgive the balance, an amount of $13,461. It is staff's opinion that to pursue the matter would not produce better results and thus are recommending the acceptance of the offer. Further, Choirs Ontario has indicated a willingness to promote amongst its members a "joint venture" concert or other opportunity at Black Creek Pioneer Village or another Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) venue in future. All other amounts noted above are considered collectible at this time. Receivable balances, as reported on each of the previous reports to the advisory board, after 1999, are presented as follows: DATE Total $ 90 -Plus $ October 25, 2004 1,127,102 180,891 September 28, 2004 876,800 187,754 September 3, 2004 936,923 197,539 May 17, 2004 1,018,188 129,505 February 17, 2004 1,386,809 178,370 January 7, 2004 1,064,464 45,382 November 2, 2003 951,999 101,194 August 24, 2003 768,825 125,803 May 25, 2003 445,116 168,327 March 2, 2003 709,807 141,313 October 20, 2002 774,831 46,237 August 25, 2002 326,529 109,560 May 26, 2002 658,514 201,158 January 31, 2002 585,736 64,259 December 30, 2001 1,078,071 38,666 October 23, 2001 350,385 106,343 August 27, 2001 371,985 17,153 May 25, 2001 1,132,443 44,810 March 26, 2001 621,560 167,094 December 30, 2000 1,014,021 67,981 September 06, 2000 596,536 47,728 March 19, 2000 869,266 100,758 February 15, 2000 1,007,850 42,952 Report prepared by: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 Date: October 27, 2004 959 NEW BUSINESS RES.#B225/04 - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THAT the Committee move into closed session to discuss Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. CARRIED ARISE AND REPORT RES. #B226 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Michael Di Biase David Barrow THAT the Committee arise and report from closed session . CARRIED RES. #B227 /04 - PRESENTATIONS Moved by: Dave Ryan Seconded by: Suzan Hall THAT the in- camera presentation by Jonathan Wigley , Solicitor, Baker & MacKenzie, in regards to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, be received. CARRIED TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:15 a.m., on Friday, November 5, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 960 erTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/04 December 3, 2004 The Executive Committee Meeting #11/04, was held Humber Room, Head Office, on Friday, December 3, 2004. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:09 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Rob Ford Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member REGRETS Suzan Hall RES. #B228/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan David Barrow THAT the Minutes of Meeting #10/04, held on November 5, 2004, be approved. DELEGATIONS Member CARRIED (a) Kim Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, speaking in regards to Site Plan Application to Construct a Residence at 119R Glen Road, Toronto. (b) Pat Howe, President, North Rosedale Ratepayers Association, speaking in regards to Correspondence 6.1 - Russell Residence, 119R Glen Road, Toronto. (c) Jeff Davies, Partner, Davies Howe Partners, in regards to correspondence 6.5 - Application to TRCA, 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto. 961 RES. #B229 /04 - DELEGATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale David Barrow THAT Jeff Davies be added to the list of delegants ; AND FURTHER THAT above -noted deputations (a) - (c) be heard and received. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) A letter dated September 20, 2004, from Graham Smith, Altius Architecture Inc. in regards to Russell Residence, 119R Glen Road, Toronto. (b) A letter dated November 29, 2004, from N. Jane Pepino, Solicitor, Aird & Berlis LLP, in regards to Site Plan Application to Construct a Residence at 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto. (c) A letter dated November 26, 2004, from Harold Hough, President, The Pickering Harbour Company Ltd., in regards to Pickering harbour waterfront regeneration project. (d) A letter dated November 26, 2004, from Harold Hough, President, The Pickering Harbour Company Ltd., in regards to East Spit transaction and land exchange transaction. (e) A letter dated December 1, 2004, from David Cherepacha, Solicitor, Davies Howe Partners, in regards to Application to TRCA, 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto. RES. #B230 /04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Dave Ryan THAT above -noted correspondence (c) and (d) be received. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RES. #B231 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Dave Ryan CARRIED THAT the Committee move into closed session to discuss above -noted correspondence (a), (b) and (e). CARRIED 962 ARISE AND REPORT RES. #B232 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri David Barrow THAT the Committee arise and report from closed session . CARRIED RES. #B233 /04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT above -noted correspondence (a), (b) and (e) be received; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to process the application for 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto, for a hearing to be held on January 14, 2005. CARRIED 963 CORRESPONDENCE (A) AItis• September 20, 2004 Toronto & Region Conservation Authority attn: Mr. Brian Denney 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 184 Request for Amendment to Approved Fill Permit : Application #029 /03/Tor Project: Russell Residence, 119R Glen Road, Toronto Dear Mr. Denney, I am writing on behalf of Derek and Tina Russell to request that the TRCA approve an amendment to the approved fill permit (Application #029 /03/Tor) for 119R Glen Road and to request that the TRCA proceed with the issuance of the permit pursuant to the Decision rendered by the Commissioner of Mining & Lands on the 25th of June, 2004. Reason for the Amendment The design for the Russell's home which the Board approved in 'unique' application #029 /03/Tor is by all development standards a good solution for a good site. However this is an exceptional site and Derek and Tina realize that it requires an exceptional solution. The Russells have had a lot of time to ponder the design which they commissioned in 1995. Furthermore they have had the opportunity to consider the numerous opinions that have been expressed by design professionals, City and TRCA staff and neighbours over the last ten years. While recognizing that their original design was perfectly good Derek and Tina have decided that they could do better. The Revised Design: A Commitment to Responsible Development The primary consideration when revising the design was to adopt a sustainable design strategy with the fundamentals of the existing siting and the required setbacks guiding the redesign. The goals set out for the redesign were: To be proactive in the area of responsible development and land stewardship To minimize the impact on the overall site both by construction and by the completed residence. To restore the highly degraded.ravine to an exceptional standard that is representative of the regions natural forests and to maximize this potential on the site. Minimize the impact of vehicle usage along the private driveway. Minimize the usage of heavy equipment during construction and adopt construction methods suitable to the site. Redesign the footings to minimize excavation and fill requirements and to promote positive drainage and control erosion. Adopt a high performance building envelop and a passive solar strategy. Incorporate a low consumption mechanical system to optimize usage of electricity, natural gas and water One Atlantic Avenue, Suite 120, Toronto, M6K 3E7, t: 4165167772, f: 4165167774, www.altiusdesign.com 964 Incorporate a greening strategy including green roofs and green facades. Incorporate a storm run -off collection system and integral irrigation strategy. Consider the impact to neighbouring views and privacy. Protect existing healthy stands of native trees and exceptional non - invasive ornamental trees and to ensure their continued health. Optimize the scale of the residence given the Russell's requirements and the relative scale of neighbouring houses. In short our office was presented with the enviable task of reinterpreting and redefining a design to produce an 'environmentally friendly' home for North Rosedale with the benefit of the intensive studies that have been conducted over the last decade. The Revised Design The revised design is truly superior to the one that the Board approved and represents nine months of work and fourteen different schemes to optimize the design. The following synopsis highlights specific aspects of the design that will be of particular interest to the TRCA: -We have achieved a 27% reduction (1464 sq.ft.) in the total coverage of the house. This calculation includes the house and garage footprint, all hard landscaping elements including the driveway, and includes all overhangs, eaves and cantilevers. -We have designed the house to work with the existing grades. The result is that the house is cut into the slope, requiring virtually no alteration to the surrounding natural grades. The footings have been redesigned to be conventional footings eliminating the need for caissons and the large equipment required to install them. The foundation has been designed to minimize excavation and associated haulage and to eliminate shoring requirements. -The house is setback from the neighbours further than the previous design; an increase of 18' from the Roffey residence at 43 Binscarth. Meanwhile the extent of the foundations has been pulled up the site by approximately 21'. The total coverage of the foundations is reduced by 13 %. -The sloped driveway has been removed from the design thus providing the opportunity to manage storm run -off from the driveway by means of an engineered porous paving system. Furthermore this simplifies drainage requirements and reduces the size of infiltration trenches which are similarly moved further up the slope. - Cantilevered living spaces and roof overhangs that would normally have a negative impact on foliage below have been designed to be in excess of 20' above the adjacent natural grade and have been oriented to allow sunlight to reach all areas of the ground. Drip edges will be carefully designed to avoid damage to areas below and irrigation will be provided where normal rainfall can not reach. -The finished house will have no less than 1500 sq.ft. of green roofing (potentially 2700 sq.ft.) which will provide storm water retention and controlled run off. The finished height of the roof is at the same level as the finished first floors of neighbouring houses ( +1- 2' ). The green roofs will camouflage the house as neighbours look right over it to their existing views. The southerly view from #43 Binscarth is completely unobstructed. -Two 30' wide by 100' deep' fingers' have been established up either side of the house. These 'fingers', each about the size of a typical residential lot provided the opportunity to naturalize the ravine right up to the existing driveway. Of the roughly sixty trees that exist in this area (including the house footprint) only twelve are native; of those only three will be lost, two of which would have been removed in any case due to their poor condition. 965 -The Russells have signed a letter of undertaking with the City to commit to a comprehensive ravine restoration. With the assistance of the Urban Forestry Department, who have issued a ravine permit, the restoration commenced this summer and is well underway. This is only the second private ravine restoration undertaken in North Rosedale, the first was undertaken by our office in the late 90's and is now widely acclaimed to be the healthiest section of ravine in the GTA. -The Russells have surveyed a generous portion of their property consisting of 36,266 ft2 (63% of the total lot area, Part 1 on the enclosed survey) over which a conservation easement will be registered as was agreed as part of the Board's approval. Conclusion It is apparent by both a quantitative and qualitative comparison that the revised design represents a significant improvement over that which was approved by the Board. Furthermore we submit that since the revised design exist almost entirely within the envelope of the approved design and that the revised design requires less excavation, less fill and less overall disruption to the site that it be considered an amendment to the approved permit. In our opinion the latest litigation initiated by the Neighbours (Roffey, McFadyen, Triggs, Shanahan) has no bearing on the issuance of the fill permit. The Neighbours sought the right to appeal the TRCA Board however the Commissioner of Mining & Lands issued a decision that they did not in fact have this right. The Neighbours are now appealing the Commissioner's decision to the Attorney General. It is our opinion that the Neighbours do not have the right of appeal, this opinion is supported by the Commissioner, Counsel for the Russells and the TRCA's Counsel. Because the Neighbours litigation does not represent a stay of the Boards approval and until such time as the Neighbours gain the right of appeal, let alone grounds for an appeal, it is our opinion that the issuance of the fill permit should not be further delayed. Please contact our office should you require further explanation or presentation of the Russell's plans. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Graham Smith BFA BES B.ARCH MRAIC cc: Derek & Tina Russell Russell White Carolyn Woodland 966 CORRESPONDENCE (B) November 29, 2004 BY FACSIMILE AIRD & BERLIS up Barristers end Solicitors Patmt and Trade Matte Agents N. Jane Pepino, G.M., O.G. Direct: 416.895 7727 E mall; Jpepino @airdberlin.com Ms. Kathy Stranks Supervisor, Board Member Services Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Dear Ms. Stranks: Our File No.: 83254 Re: Site Plan Application to Construct a Residence at 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto As you are aware, we are counsel for John and Nancy McFadyen, David Roffey and Karen Walsh, Sean Shanahan, and Katherine Shanahan, all of whom are owners of property adjacent to or in the vicinity of 119R Glen Road. On behalf of our clients, we made written submissions to, and attended at, the Executive Committee on November 14, 2003, at which time approval was granted in respect of Fill Permit Application No. 029 /03/TOR (the "Application"). We understand that in September of this year, Mr. Graham Smith of Altius Architecture Inc., on behalf of the Russells, submitted an amendment to Application No. 029 /03/TOR, which amendment was comprised of a substantially revised site plan for the subject property. We further understand from a review of TRCA staff correspondence to Mr. Smith, dated November 9, 2004, that while staff view this new application as an improvement upon the previous design, it remains staffs position that the prospect of a_ny development on the subject property is in contravention of the TRCA Guidelines. As you are aware, on behalf of our clients, we have sought a judicial review of the November 14, 2003 decision to approve the Application and have also appealed an interim decision of the Mining and Lands Commissioner with respect to the proper interpretation of the TRCA's governing legislation and, in particular, the role afforded to members of the public who are directly affected by proposals to comment and participate in the approval process for fill and grading permits by the TRCA. In our opinion, the matters currently before the court are substantive issues which go to the heart of the TRCA's jurisdiction and the legitimacy of the process by which the TRCA and the Executive Committee consider applications for till and grading permits. As a BCE Place. Suite 1100, Box 754, 181 Bray Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2T9 T' 416.893 1500 F: 418.883,1515 www. a i rd b erl ts.corrr A1Nated wlln Owen. Bird / Vancouver 967 • November 29, 2004 Page 2 result, proceeding with the processing of the new application for 119R Glen Road at this time, in advance of there being any resolution of the important framework issues to be addresser) by the court would, in our opinion, be both premature and inefficient, as any decision made by the TRCA at this time could be the subject of further Court challenges depending on the results of the judicial review and appeal currently underway. Instead, we recommend that the TRCA defer any decision with respect to the processing of the new application until following the release of the court decisions. We believe that such a deferral is in the best interests of all parties involved, as it would ensure that any decision made In respect of 119R Glen Road is the result of a court sanctioned and approved process. As indicated in our previous correspondence to you, dated November 25, 2004, Ms. Kim M. Kovar of this office will attend at the Executive Committee meeting on December 3, 2004 to make a deputation on this matter. We would appreciate if a copy of this letter could be forwarded to the members of the Committee in advance of the December 3, 2004 meeting. Yours very truly, AIRD & BERLIS LLP N. Jane Pepino, C.M., D.C. NJP /EPCllen cc. John Wigley, Baker Mackenzie Michael Melling, Davies Howe Partners Councillor Kyle Rae Nancy and John McFadyen David Roffey and Karen Walsh Sean Shanahan Katherine Shanahan William Chalmers Kim Kovar Eileen Costello .:O0MAIPCDOCSIDOCSt1801191 @ AND & Saws ui 968 CORRESPONDENCE (C) ItaBO UR coal " ► � ©U.nora & of ronoA t n'. Bag ,Sinop 1953 etze Associate Compony FRENCHMAN'S BAY HARBOUR & MARINE SERVICE CO. LIMITED November 26, 2004 Mr. Brian Denney, Peng. Chief Administrative Officer The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 1 S4 Dear Mr. Denney: Re: Waterfront Regeneration Project Executive Offices 591 LIVERPOOL ROAD PICKERING, ONTARIO L1 W 1R1 Telephone (905) 839 -5036 Fax 839 -4380 E mail: info@frenchmansbaymarina.com Further to our letter to the Authority dated January 22,2004, and other discussions on August 24, 2004 with TRCA staff, we wish to clarify our position regarding the Authority's proposal to prepare a Pickering Harbour Waterfront Regeneration Project. The Pickering Harbour Company Limited is in favour of said project and is prepared to partnership with the TRCA, and others in this endeavour; subject to certain conditions. It is our understanding that TRCA would develop a "project" based on the following key components: -seek support and approval from a broad partnership group (i.e., federal, provincial, municipal, and other private interests such as Swans Marina, Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club, Pickering Harbour Company, etc. ) -major improvements to the harbour entrance which would include preparation of the site, new breakwaters, dredging of the channel and future maintenance of same - rationalization of land ownership -a cost sharing formula that recognizes the PHC's potential contribution of the land base and its preparation of a new harbour entrance design - implementation and phasing strategy 969 The Harbour Company would consider the transfer of its 32 -acre water lot, the channel entrance and a significant portion of Frenchman's Bay to the Authority if there was suitable quid pro quo or financial remuneration provided by the Authority as part of the Project. This would have to be tied to the implementation of harbour entrance approval and /or other matters to be recited in the Project. All the above - referenced matters must, of course, be approved by the Harbour Company Board and the other partners, in due course. In the interim, the Harbour Company is prepared and is outlined under separate letter, to enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with the TRCA to transfer certain PHC lands on the east spit in order to allow for a park on the east spit. The Pickering Harbour Company looks forward to working with the other public /private partners on enhancing Frenchman's Bay for future generations. Yours very truly, THE PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY LIMITED ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Harold Hough, President :kg C'\KAREN \TRCA PHC Waterftont Regeneration Project to Brian Denney 970 CORRESPONDENCE (D) (Donors & Oporalors of A tan's Bay Since 1853 Associate Company FRENCHMAN'S BAY HARBOUR & MARINE SERVICE CO. LIMITED November 26, 2004 Mr. Brian Denney, Peng. Chief Administrative Officer The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N IS4 , Dear Mr. Denney: Executive Offices 591 LIVERPOOL ROAD PICKERING, ONTARIO L1W 1 R I Telephone (905) 839 -5036 Fox (9055839 -4380 E-mail: lnfo@ en sbaymarina.com Re: East Suit Transaction and Land Exchange Transaction East Suit Transaction The Harbour Company is, at this time, prepared to enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with the TRCA to transfer certain PHC lands on the East Spit in order to allow for a park on the East Spit, provided there is agreement on suitable remuneration. The Agreement of Purchase and Sale would be based on the following framework and others conditions deemed appropriate during the negotiations. 1. Transfer of title on the East Spit would include the following lands: • The road (Block B) from the Millennium Square to a line dividing the east and west halves of Lot 289 and Lot 218; • The western half of lots 204, 208, 299, 214, 293 ; The eastern half of Lots 206,210 and 297 • All of lots 292 and 215: 2. The transfer of lands would be for suitable remuneration which based on TRCA's letter of opinion on hand would be a minimum of $200,000.00, subject to completion of an appraisal by the TRCA at its cost. Upon completion of the first appraisal, TRCA would assume the costs for an appraisal by PHC if requested subject to TRCA's concurrence with the selected appraiser. 971 Pickering Harbour Company Page 2 November 26, 2004 3. Before the Harbour Company could transfer title to the road and other lands on the east spit, it would have to retain unrestricted access over the road (Block B from the Millennium Square to a line dividing the east and west halves of Lots 289 and 218) for its staff, tenants, boat owners, customers, agents and assignees, contractors and their equipment, and any joint venturers or partners of the Harbour Company to the lands adjacent to the channel entrance remaining in PHC ownership, in perpetuity. 4. It is our understanding that the Authority would be prepared to allow the Harbour Company exclusive use of its block of land adjacent to the land PHC is retaining adjacent to the channel entrance after the transfer of the lands is effected, This is of material importance to the Harbour Company in that the occupation terms (length of tenure and uses allowed) must be defined and agreed to by TRCA and the City in order to proceed with the transaction. The Harbour Company will require the other parties to recognize its entitlement to use the western end of the east spit in a manner that is consistent with its Charter in addition to any other uses that are agreed to between the parties subject to the provisions of the Planning Act. 5. The lands TRCA would put under agreement for nominal consideration for PHC's exclusive use would include the following: • The western half of Lots 292,215; The eastern half of lots 289,218; All of lots 291,290,217 and 216. Block B from the centerline of Lots 289/218 to the centre line of Lots 292/215, if not covered under the unrestricted access conditions of the agreement of purchase and sale. • The length of this agreement tied to when PHC no longer has a requirement to use lands in association with the retained lands at the end of the east spit. 6. TRCA to erect a fence and appropriate gate between the TRCA lands and lands under agreement with PHC, along a line dividing the eastern and western halves of Lots 292 and 215, and terminate in the lake and the bay at an elevation of 74.5 metres above sea level to prevent the public from easily stepping around the fence. 7. TRCA would undertake to draft the Purchase and Sale Agreement based on this letter and appropriate conditions to be subject to PHC approval including TRCA. 8. TRCA will assume all reasonable costs related to the transfer on the East Spit. 9. As per our discussion, the closing date subject to signing the Purchase and Sale Agreement would be in the early part of 2005. 972 Pickering Harbour Company Page 3 November 26, 2004 Land Exchange Transaction The Pickering Harbour Company requests the TRCA to enter into a land exchange involving TRCA's Wharf Street lot and PHC's Lot 233 Plan 345 (Part 5) on the west side of Frenchman's Bay south of Sunrise. It is our understanding that TRCA will assume all reasonable costs related to the proposed land exchange. PHC requires that the East Spit transaction and this transaction would proceed in parallel. Outside the East Spit and Land Exchange proposed transactions, and possibly more related to the multi- partner project, the Authority would assist PHC with alternative disposal options for the clean sand from the existing channel entrance. We look forward to meeting with the Authority on the finalization of the East Spit Purchase and Sale Agreement. Yours very truly, THE PICKERING HABOUR COMPANY LIMITED ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Harold G. Hough, President :kg C: \KAREN \TRCA PHC East Spit Transaction and Land Exchange Transaction 973 CORRESPONDENCE (E) 1 11111 Davies Howe Partners Lawyers The Fifth Floor 99 Spadtna Ave Toronto, Ontario M5V 3P8 T 416.977.7068 F 416.977.5931 davleshawe.com December 1, 2004 By Facsimile Transmission Ms. Kathy Stranks Supetvisor, Board Member Services Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Dear Ms. Stranks: Re: Application to TRCA 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto Please refer to: David S. Cherepacho ¢ -mail: dauidc @daieshoWe.com We act for Derek and Tina Russell, who have submitted a new application for the above -noted property. We wish to respond to a letter from Ms. Jane Pepino of Aird & Berlis LLP to yourself dated November 29, 2004. Ms. Pepin seeks to have the TRCA defer a decision with respect to our clients' new application until after the outcome of two court proceedings before the Divisional Court are completed, namely, an Application for Judicial Review of the Executive Committee's Resolution No. 8154/03 of November 14, 2003 approving Fill Permit Application No. 029/03/TOR, and an appeal of a Declaratory Order of the Mining and Lands Commissioner dated June 25, 2004. The new application is intended to substantially improve upon the site plan already approved by the Executive Committee by Resolution No. B154/03. The TRCA has recognized that this new plan is a substantial improvement to the already approved design. Given that our clients wish to proceed with a new application - rather than the original- it makes little sense to delay the processing of the new application pending the outcome of judicial proceedings relating to the original plan. By way of Application for Judicial Review, Ms. Pepino's client is seeking to quash the Executive Committee's decision of November 23, 2003 on the basis of the specific reasoning and language set out in the Executive Committee's Resolution No. B154/03. By way of Notice of Appeal, Ms. Pepino's client is seeking to overturn an Order of the Mining and Lands Commissioner dismissing an appeal under subsection 28(15} of the Conservation Authorities Act on the basis that this subsection does not provide a right of appeal to parties who are not the original applicants to the TRCA. 974 Davies Howe Partners Page 2 These court applications made by Ms. Pepino's clients dearly have no specific relevance to merits of the new application that has been submitted by our clients for consideration by the TRCA. The application before the Executive Committee is a new application. As such, the outcome of the current legal proceedings has no substantive effect on the Executive Committee's decision- making process and its evaluation of the new application. In the event that the new plan is approved by the TRCA, this plan would supercede the plan that is the subject matter of the two legal proceedings currently before the Divisional Court. Our clients are entitled to have their new application considered by the TRCA without unnecessary delay. I understand that this matter will be considered at the Executive Committee meeting on December 3, 2004. We would appreciate a copy of this letter being provided to members of the Executive Committee in advance of the December 3, 2004 meeting. Yours truly, DAVIES HOWE PARTNERS 4 David S. Cherepacha DSC:dsc c. Ms. N. Jane Pepino Mr. John Wigley Councillor Kyle Rae 975 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES.#B234/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed John Skendars, CFN 35958. Purchase of property located at 86 Snively Street, west of Bayview Avenue - Oak Ridges, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed. Rob Ford Michael Di Biase THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.67 hectares (1.66 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from John Skendars , being Part of Lot 4, Registered Plan 200 and designated as Part 2 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by E . W. Bowyer Inc., Ontario Land Surveyors, dated November 16, 2004, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located at 86 Snively Street, west of Bayview Avenue - Oak Ridges; THAT the purchase price be $2.00, plus reasonable legal costs and partial survey cost ; THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's agent, Mr. Ray Abraham. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Through the review of Zoning By -law Amendment Application D02- 04033, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands which have been designated as Environmental Protection (EPA) 1 and EPA 2 in the Town of Richmond Hill 976 Official Plan Amendment No. 129. The EPA 1 portion of the site forms a part of the Class 3 Provincially Significant Snively Street Wetland Complex. The EPA 2 lands act as a 10 metre vegetated buffer zone between the developable area of the property to the south (i.e. portion fronting on Snively Street) and the EPA 1 lands to the north. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: November 19, 2004 Attachments: 1 977 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION : PROJECT 2001-2035 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watersheds ! 30. John Skendars CFN 35958 • ., -• • ii;••• !:13 `.! • •!' / 344c. : — trot I i . i ' • .41 ,, , I % --`'.-31-' • . 1 ' -,.----1" - - - ; ' i --1. ?"--' -..a.- .- .: • .1 '''' ' pticri \--:-""" ELI ri.0 s • Etioornipglan SIderdod , • 1 ••• = r ; • • ...;1••• - _ \ '261. •••:: ••• • , • a ( BrilVFLYT' ,,trAtig, • --' . kt) r ; ".7• . . .,. • (r• J i , , , j ...—•77, • '1/4.- 1 ...- I ..._-, ..:- . • ..,.. , r 7 2 V • —,!•,•----1 • r,, 40.• •••i•••• )-srej \:) 1 • • I va4 04-1 • . .• ; • : • • • •••• • A. • ; W(LCOX • . • • .•_.•••••• .• • • .0 •jlex/ • WoliaieWitron 6,7The Living city L - .._PRCALANDs •• SUBJECT PROPERTY " • • . , , 978 • • RES. #B235/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT, 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed Edgar Walker Richardson and Lillian Elizabeth Richardson, CFN 35047. Purchase of a conservation easement, located west of Concession Road 6, on the north side of the Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line, Township of Uxbridge, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection & Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005 ", floodplain and conservation component, Duffin Creek watershed. Rob Ford Michael Di Biase THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing approximately 4.09 hectares (10.10 acres), of vacant land be purchased from Edgar Walker Richardson and Lillian Elizabeth Richardson, said land being Part of Lot 1, Concession 5, Township of Uxbridge, in the Regional Municipality of Durham , west of Concession Road 6, on the north side of the Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line; THAT the acquisition of the conservation easement is to be on the following basis ; (a) the purchase price be $2.00; (b) an income tax receipt is to be made available to Edgar Walker Richardson and Lillian Elizabeth Richardson for the appraised value of the easement in accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs and Revenue Agency ; (c) the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is responsible for appraisal and reasonable legal fees. THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. 979 Edgar Walker Richardson and Lillian Elizabeth Richardson have been excellent environmental stewards of their property and have indicated to the TRCA their desire to provide long term protection for the environmental features but at the same time retain ownership. The property is improved with a detached wood frame single family dwelling, a barn and sheds. It was felt that a conservation easement would be the best tool to provide long term protection to the resource while permitting the owners to enjoy their property. The negotiated conservation easement will restrict the owner of the property from creating severances, placing fill, constructing golf courses, altering watercourses, and will permit the TRCA to carry out compliance monitoring and remove and dispose of unapproved development. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property is located on the north side of the Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line, west of Concession Road 6, in the Township of Uxbridge, on the Oak Ridges Moraine. It is improved with a detached wood frame single family dwelling, a barn and sheds, and the property is adjacent to the TRCA's holdings in the Glen Major area. The property is within a significant headwater area in the Duffins Creek watershed, contains spectacular Oak Ridges Moraine topography and is a candidate Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) site. The acquisition of a conservation easement will provide long -term protection from development and this property will help consolidate the protection of the resource features provided by the TRCA holdings in the area. FINANCIAL DETAILS All costs including appraisals and legal fees are to be charged to the 2004 Land Acquisition Capital Budget. Property maintenance and property taxes are the responsibility of the registered owner. There will be some minor costs to the TRCA associated with administering the easement. Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 For Information contact: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 Date: November 16, 2004 Attachments: 1 980 Attachment 1 2. < cli rn vs oe c.) 6_5 FE o 0 4E. CO — a FL 1CorlirelVStion for The iivIng City 7.TITRC' LANDS SUBJECT PROPERTY 0 *Or4 981 RES. #B236/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT, 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed Grant and Maureen Nuttall, CFN 34931. Purchase of a conservation easement, located on the west side of Sideline 8, north of the Eighth Concession Road, City of Pickering, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection & Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek watershed. Rob Ford Michael Di Biase THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing approximately 9.00 hectares (22.24 acres), of vacant land be purchased from Grant and Maureen Nuttall , said land being Part of Lot 9, Concession 8, City of Pickering in the Regional Municipality of Durham , on the west side of Sideline 8, north of the Eighth Concession Road ; THAT the acquisition of the conservation easement is to be on the following basis ; (a) the purchase price be $2.00; (b) an income tax receipt is to be made available to Grant and Maureen Nuttall for the appraised value of the easement in accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs and Revenue Agency; (c) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is responsible for appraisal and reasonable legal fees; THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. 982 Grant and Maureen Nuttall have been excellent environmental stewards of their property and have indicated to the TRCA their desire to provide long term protection for the environmental features but at the same time retain ownership. The property is improved with a detached single storey dwelling with attached garage and detached barn. It was felt that a conservation easement would be the best tool to provide long term protection to the resource while permitting the owners to enjoy their property. The negotiated conservation easement will restrict the owner of the property from creating severances, placing fill, constructing golf courses, altering watercourses, and will permit the TRCA to carry out compliance monitoring and remove and dispose of unapproved development. The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property is located on the west side of Sideline 8, north of the Eighth Concession Road, in the City of Pickering. It is improved with a detached single family dwelling with attached garage and a detached barn. The property is in the vicinity of the TRCA's holdings in the Glen Major area and is located on the East Duffins Creek at the confluence of a small tributary. These are high quality cold water streams. The property is forested and forms part of the Pugh - Holden Area Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) #105. The acquisition of a conservation easement will provide long -term protection from development and this property will help consolidate the protection of the resource features provided by the TRCA holdings in the area. FINANCIAL DETAILS All costs including appraisals and legal fees are to be charged to the 2004 Land Acquisition Capital Budget. Property maintenance and property taxes are the responsibility of the registered owner. There will be some minor costs to the TRCA associated with administering the easement. Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 For Information contact: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335 Date: November 16, 2004 Attachments: 1 983 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT, 2001 -2005 Hood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffirl Creek Watershed Grant and Maureen Nuttall + jrG Y CFN 34931 1. 5 \1 1': 69 984 for The livinjj City _ _.. 1117CA LANDS — — SUBJECT PI7OPEIkT}' RES. #B237/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: RENEWAL OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND THE CANADIAN PEREGRINE FOUNDATION Approval of the request from the Canadian Peregrine Foundation to renew the partnership agreement with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to house their birds of prey at the Kortright Centre for Conservation and provide a permanent exhibit for public viewing and interpretive programming. Rob Ford Michael Di Biase THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Canadian Peregrine Foundation (Foundation) to renew the partnership agreement with TRCA to house their birds of prey at Kortright Centre for Conservation , for a further five year period ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the partnership agreement with the Canadian Peregrine Foundation be renewed for 5 years on the following basis : a) rent in Year 1 and 2, to be waived to provide a credit for the extensive costs the Foundation incurred to renovate a portion of the barn ; b) rent in Years 3, 4 and 5 to be $3,000, $4,000 and $5,000 /year respectively; c) the Canadian Peregrine Foundation shall provide birds for TRCA demonstrations at Kortright Centre for Conservation on a minimum of 40 occasions per year; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever acton necessary to finalize a licence agreement between the Canadian Peregrine Foundation and TRCA, and give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any approvals and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Canadian Peregrine Foundation is a Canadian registered charity dedicated to facilitating the recovery of endangered and threatened raptor species in Canada. To carry out this mandate, the foundation is undertaking several projects to raise public awareness of the environmental issues affecting Canada's endangered and threatened raptors, and is supporting projects involving the recovery, restoration and rehabilitation of these species. In addition, the Foundation is documenting the statues of the Peregrine Falcon and other endangered and threatened raptors and making this information available to the public and in particular to educational institutions. 985 At Meeting #9100, the Authority approved this partnership agreement between the Foundation and the Kortright Centre for Conservation, under Resolution #A221/00. Accordingly, TRCA entered into a three year agreement with the Canadian Peregrine Foundation which expired January 14, 2004. As part of the agreement the Foundation was given one of the buildings at Kortright for the construction of holding pens for the birds. During the three year lease, TRCA also gave the Foundation the use of the North Wing of the New Barn and granted permission to the Foundation to renovate this section of the barn to allow for a study area and bird flight arena. All costs to renovate this section of the barn were borne by the Foundation. The Foundation will be responsible for their share of the utilities. TRCA and the Foundation have had a good working relationship during the last three years and both parties are interested in entering into a five year agreement, similar to the terms and conditions of the expired agreement. The term of agreement is to be for five years to commence January 15, 2004 and to expire January 14, 2009. FINANCIAL DETAILS During the first two years of the agreement the rent is to be waived to provide a credit for the extensive costs the Foundation had to incur to renovate the North Wing of the New Barn, and for the remaining three years of the agreement the rent is to be as follows: Year 3 $3,000 /year, Year 4 $4,000 /year and Year 5 $5,000 /year. In return, the Kortright Centre for Conservation will have use of the birds for TRCA demonstrations for a minimum of 40 occasions per year, together with a fully renovated barn. Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 Alex Waters, 905 - 832 -2289 extension 227 Date: November 16, 2004 RES.#B238/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: RENEWAL OF LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TORONTO AND THE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR THE RIDING FOR THE DISABLED 4801 Dufferin Street, G. Ross Lord Park, CFN 24311. Approval of a request from the City of Toronto for renewal of an existing license agreement. Rob Ford Michael Di Biase 986 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS certain lands owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) situate in G. Ross Lord Park in the City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area, have been turned over to the City of Toronto for management under the terms of an agreement between the City of Toronto and the TRCA ; WHEREAS the Council of the City of Toronto is supportive of the request by the Community Association for the Riding for the Disabled (C.A.R.D.), to enter into a license agreement for a 20 year period, on the basis as set out in Clause 25 contained in Report No. 6 which was adopted, with amendment, by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on July 20, 21 and 22, 2004; AND WHEREAS TRCA is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for TRCA approval for the renewal of the license agreement between the City of Toronto and C .A.R.D. located at G. Ross Lord Park; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA approve the City of Toronto entering into a license agreement with C.A.R.D., as outlined in Clause 25, contained in Report No. 6, adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting of July 20, 21 and 22, 2004, subject to terms satisfactory to TRCA's staff and solicitor; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give affect thereto ,including obtaining necessary approvals and execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1981 the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, (now the City of Toronto) and the former Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (now the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority), entered into a license agreement with C.A.R.D. for the right to use land located in G. Ross Lord Park to construct, establish and operate, at their own expense, a riding facility to provide therapeutic riding lessons to disabled members of the community. At Executive Committee Meeting #24/77, the members of the board approved this agreement under Resolution #494, to be effective in 1981 for a term of 21 years, less a day, which expired on August 31, 2000. C.A.R.D. is a nonprofit, charitable organization incorporated in 1969 under the Canada Corporation Act whose objective is to promote therapy and quality of life for physically and developmentally challenged people through horseback riding. Under the supervision of specially trained physiotherapists and skilled equestrian staff, individuals with disabilities experience numerous benefits of equestrian therapy and the joy of horseback riding. C.A.R.D. has requested that the City of Toronto enter into a new license agreement for the existing land area plus a minor trail extension and an interest in expansion of its paddocks and renovations to the existing facility. All costs associated with the extension of the trails and renovations to the facilities are to be at the sole expense of C.A.R.D. and must meet approval of the TRCA and the City of Toronto. The request was adopted by Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting of July 20, 21 and 22, 2004, as outlined in Clause 25, contained in Report No. 6. 987 The term for the new license period is to be for twenty years, commencing from the 1st day of September 2000 and ending on August 31, 2020. the License fee shall be two dollars per year plus the payment of any and all taxes and utilities. FINANCIAL DETAILS No revenue or expense will be incurred in this instance by the TRCA. Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 Date: November 15, 2004 RES. #B239J04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PROPOSALS FOR SECURITY SERVICES Head Office and Black Creek Pioneer Village. To review the opportunities within the industry for cost effective and suitable contracted security services upon the expiration of the current three year service contract. Rob Ford Michael Di Biase THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Reilly 's Security Services be awarded the three -year contract to provide security services to Head Office and Black Creek Pioneer Village, at a cost not to exceed $338,972.16, plus taxes where applicable, it being the lowest bid that met Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 's (TRCA) specifications. CARRIED BACKGROUND The factors to be considered with respect to the type and level of service required were stipulated in the request for proposals; specifically, the following areas of interest were identified: 1) Hours of Service Security services will be supplied 365 days per year, 16 hours per day, from 1600 hours to 0800 hours. The services will be shared between Head Office and Black Creek Pioneer Village. 2) K -9 (Guard Dog) Unit Required The guards employed at our facilities will be properly trained in the handling of a K -9 Unit. The service provider will ensure that the guards are provided with a K -9 Unit from mid April to mid October; 16 hours per day, 7 days per week, 26 weeks per year. The use of a K -9 Unit has proven to be a significant deterrent to unauthorized activity during the warmer months of the year, which is the peak period for after hours undesirable activity and the associated risk from a security perspective. 988 3) Insurance and Licensing Security firm licensing, insurance, WSIB and compliance with the Occupational Health and Safety Act are required. 4) Quality of Service Training and educational background is a concern. All officers will be required to be physically fit, experienced, seasoned officers, preferably with a community college law and security background. All officers will be bonded and licensed under the Private Investigators and Security Guards Act. 5) Other Required Services The proposal will include at no additional charge: • the provision of a computerized guard tour system; and • alarm response to both named facilities and components thereof, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. 6) Value Added Services Proponents were given the opportunity to identify "value added services" which they wish to add at no additional cost beyond the stipulated requirements. 7) Price and Period of Service The successful security provider shall enter into a contractual relationship with TRCA acceptable to staff for a period of three years. The TRCA has reserved the right to accept or not accept any and all proposals. The lowest or any proposal will not necessarily be accepted. The contract shall contain a standard clause that will allow for termination of service on 30 days notice should circumstances dictate. RATIONALE The opportunity to submit proposals for the three year contract, including 8 statutory holidays annually, was given to five security firms. The firms and their bids for the term of service are: Reilly's Security Services Knights on Guard Protective Services Intercon Security Limited lntertec Security Limited Group 4 Falck ( Canada) Ltd. $338,972.16 $378,940.51 $381,683.52 No submission Declined to submit by written notice. Please note that all applicable taxes must be added to the above noted proposed service fees. All submissions have been assessed based upon demonstrated interest and compliance with the specifications within the request for proposals. 989 FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost is $338,972.16, plus taxes where applicable. Funds for the 2005 expenditure are allocated for Head Office and Black Creek Pioneer Village in the 2005 Preliminary Operating and Capital Budget. The remaining two years will be included in future budgets. Report prepared by: Al Willison, extension 5285 For Information contact: Al Willison, extension 5285 Date: November 11, 2004 RES.#B240/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT, 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Lake Ontario Waterfront Anne Zid Property, CFN 12069. Purchase of property municipally known as 520 Marksbury Road and 509 Park Crescent, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation Component Lake Ontario Waterfront. Dave Ryan Frank Dale THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.179 hectares (0.44 acres)more or less of an irregular shaped parcel improved with two cottage style residences be purchased from Anne Zid, said land being Part of Lots 31, 32 and 33, Plan 270, in the City of Pickering , Regional Municipality of Durham , municipally known as 520 Marksbury Road and 509 Park Crescent; THAT the purchase price be $590,000.00 plus reasonable costs related to the transaction ; THAT the total acquisition cost include the costs for the demolition of the two cottages ; THAT the purchase be subject to the City of Pickering contributing 50% of the total acquisition costs; THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT staff be directed to pursue the sale of a portion of the subject property , as a single family development lot, subject to obtaining the necessary approvals , in order to fund all or a portion of the outstanding balance of the purchase price ; THAT a further report be brought forward to the Executive Committee regarding the details of the disposal; 990 THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required; AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering be so advised . AMENDMENT RES. #B241/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Dave Ryan Frank Dale THAT the fourth paragraph of the main motion be amended to read : THAT the purchase be subject to the City of Pickering contributing a net of $200,000 towards the total acquisition costs; THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. TRCA had been trying for a number of years to purchase 520 Marksbury Road and 509 Park Crescent, City of Pickering, as it is a very strategic and important waterfront park property, from the trustees of the former Barry Johnston Estate. Barry Johnston owned adjacent properties 520 Marksbury Road and 509 Park Crescent, and when Plan 270 was de- registered the properties merged under the one ownership resulting in the two cottages and two addresses on the one property. A right -of -way attached to 509 Park Crescent exists across TRCA property located immediately to west of the site. The trustee of the property listed it for sale in 2002 and Anne Zid was successful in purchasing 520 Marksbury Road and 509 Park Crescent, on January 31, 2003. In February of 2003, TRCA and City of Pickering officials contacted Anne Zid to see if she would be interested in selling the portion of the 520 Marksbury Road and 505 Park Crescent that was essential for the waterfront trail, as set out in the City of Pickering's vision for its waterfront and endorsed by City Council through this reach of the Pickering waterfront. After protracted negotiations Anne Zid has agreed to sell the entire property to the TRCA. 991 Staff are recommending the acquisition of the entire lot with the intent that the portion not required for park /trail purposes be sold as a building lot, in order to help finance the purchase. A fragment of existing TRCA lands adjacent to the subject property may be added to the parcel proposed to be sold to make it a more marketable and valuable lot consistent with the existing neighbourhood lot structure. City of Pickering officials have confirmed that the lot proposed to be created would meet their zoning requirements and support the sale of the surplus parcel to help finance the acquisition. The offer on hand is supported by an appraised value based on an independent valuation. Negotiations have been conducted with Mike Fourcaudot, real estate agent for the owner. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property. Attached is a sketch showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The subject property falls within TRCA's approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005 and its acquisition is essential in order that the waterfront trail can be constructed through this reach of the Pickering waterfront. The acquisition would be strategic and move towards realizing the City of Pickering's vision for its waterfront as set out in the Mayor's Task Force report and endorsed by City Council. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The taxes and maintenance on this small fragment of land will be minimal. A portion of these lands will be turned over to the City of Pickering under the Waterfront Management Agreement. FINANCIAL DETAILS It is proposed that the City of Pickering fund 50% of the acquisition costs. Council has already approved $200,000 for the securement of the subject lands. It is proposed the balance be funded primarily through the proposed sale of the surplus lot. Other pending TRCA land sales will be used to cover any difference. All costs including appraisals, survey, environmental and legal fees are to be charged to 004 -12. Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Larry Field, extension 5243 Date: October 14, 2004 Attachments: 1 992 Attachment 1 993 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES.#B242/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Frank Dale THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 - 8.1.3, inclusive) which are listed below. RES.#B243/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CARRIED APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Gerri Lynn O'Connor David Barrow THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.26 and 8.1.27) which are listed below. CARRIED TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA 8.1.1 KATHERINE PAQUETTE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Plan 66M -2472, (38 True Davidson Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Katherine Paquette. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of an inground pool and underground storage area at the rear of the existing dwelling. 994 The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 483 -1 Betz - Paquet Sheet 1 of 2, Bunker Structural Plan, revised 22 October 04, received on November 4, 2004; • Drawing No. 483 -1 Betz - Paquet Sheet 2 of 2, Bunker Structural Section, revised 28 October 2004, received on November 4, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of an inground pool and underground storage area at the rear of the existing dwelling at 38 True Davidson Drive, in the recently constructed Governor's Bridge Subdivision. The proposed pool and underground storage area will be located in excess of 10 metres from the top of the natural valley bank, on the tableland portion of an artificial reinforced slope developed as part of the approved subdivision. The proposed works are designed in such a manner as to be tied into this reinforced slope, thereby ensuring the slope's stability and protecting native plantings to be installed by the subdivision developer. The proposed works are located at existing grade and will not be visible from across the ravine. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained approximately 6 metres from the top of the natural valley bank to impede the overland migration of construction generated sediments. Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical staff, along with an outside consultant associated with the subdivision approval, are satisfied that the proposal will not have an impact on slope stability. The proposed works will not have an impact on fisheries, significant natural features, or riparian vegetation. Plantings No new plantings are required. The artificial slope will be planted as part of the subdivision approval. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 34526 - Application #: 291/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: August 14, 2003 995 8.1.2 TENTRO HOLDINGS INC. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 15, Concession 1 BFC, (625 Queen Street East), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Tentro Holdings Inc. The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a mixed use freehold townhouse development. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing C -2, Site Grading Plan, prepared by John Towle Associates Limited , dated 03/07/18, revised 03/11/19, received by TRCA on October 28, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a mixed use infill townhouse development. The southern portion of the subject property is fill regulated but is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The entire subject property is within a highly urbanized area and is cleared. Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and is therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: The subject property is surrounded by urban development and is well removed from the Don River. No sediment control is required. Conservation of Land: The subject property is cleared and contains no natural resources. Plantings The proposal is for an urban development with 100% lot coverage and there are no opportunities for planting. Policy Guidelines: The proposal conforms with Policy 4.1.1., New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35949 - Application #: 419/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 1, 2004 996 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.3 TOWN OF MARKHAM To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Block A, Plan 65R- 15433, (East of McCowan Road between CN Rail and Heritage Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Markham. The purpose is to alter a watercourse in order to restore a degraded and channelized section of the Upper Milne Creek. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Upper Milne Creek Restoration, Grading and Restoration Plans, Drawing Nos. L1 -L4, Project No. 03 -14, prepared by Harrington and Hoyle Limited , revised as received on November 24th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to restore a degraded section of the Upper Milne Creek between the CNR Line and Heritage Road. This section of the creek was historically channelized as part of the development of adjacent tableland industrial development. The proposal is the second phase of a Town of Markham initiative to restore the Milne Creek which has been subject to erosion and is in generally poor condition. The first phase, to restore a downstream section of the channel, was approved by the Executive Committee and the works have been implemented. This second and final phase is a logical step in improving the tributary. The works will incorporate natural channel design principles through the creation of a sinuous watercourse within the corridor and also includes the construction of wetland features and the establishment of native riparian plantings. The proposal will significantly improve the Milne Creek by improving water quality, moderating flows, reducing excess erosion downstream and providing improved fish habitat. Control of Flooding: The works will not impact the control of flooding as the capacity of the channel to convey existing flows will not change. Pollution: Erosion and sediment controls will remain in place for the duration of the works in accordance with detailed plans and notes submitted by the applicant. Included is a requirement to dam and pump sections of the channel while the works are being implemented, integrate silt fencing, and use straw mulch and seeding where appropriate once sections of the channel have been naturalized. 997 Conservation of Land: The works will result in a significant improvement to the Milne Creek by improving the terrestrial and aquatic habitat values on site and within the Rouge Watershed on the whole. Therefore, there will be an overall benefit to the conservation of land. Plantings The applicant proposes to conduct aggressive plantings of native species as part of the overall restoration of the channel to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program which promotes as a general objective, the restoration and enhancement of degraded watercourses within the TRCA jurisdiction. Approval has been granted by the Ministry of Natural Resources. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) considers the works to be a self compensating Harmful Alteration Disruption or Destruction (HADD) and therefore, is supportive of the project. TRCA staff will not issue the final permit until the DFO approval has been obtained. CFN: 36001 - Application #: 439/04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Diana Li, extension 5221 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 24, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #8244/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Dave Ryan THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.4 - 8.1.18, with the exception of 8.1.7 - Shawn Mark and 8.1.13 - Solmar Development Corporation, which were withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 8.1.4 BELL CANADA To place fill within a regulated area along Mayfield Road, west of Summer Valley Drive, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by The Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a TRCA Fill Regulated area in order to facilitate the installation of an underground Bell Canada utility corridor by directional bore method. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. 998 • Letter of Undertaking, prepared by K. McCauley, of Bell Canada, dated November 23, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the installation of an underground utility corridor within a TRCA Fill Regulated area associated with Etobicoke Creek along Mayfield Road, west of Summer Valley Drive, in the City of Brampton. The underground utility corridor will be installed by directional bore method. The proposed works will be constructed at minimum 2.5 metres below the watercourse bottom. The entry and exit locations will be appropriately setback from the valley corridor feature. Control of Flooding: No excavated material is to be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain and all existing grades are to be maintained. As such, there will be no impacts to the storage and /or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction, surrounding the bore pit locations to impede the overland migration of construction generated sediments. Conservation of Land: The proposed works are considered to be a mitigatable harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat (HADD). As such, a letter of advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) will be issued with this permit. Please note that there are no- instream works associated with this proposal. There are no geotechnical concerns regarding the proposed works. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. All disturbed areas will be restored to original condition with native and non - invasive species. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35914 - Application #: 404 /04 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: November 24, 2004 999 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 8.1.5 ANJUMAN -E- ANWARUL ISLAM OF MALTON To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 11, Concession 7 EHS Part Lot 41, Part Block A, Plan 316, (7099 Airport Road), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Anjuman -E- Anwarul Islam of Malton. The purpose is to construct a religious assembly facility partially located within a Fill Regulated Area and to rehabilitate an existing outfall structure located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009. • Letter of undertaking prepared by C .F.Chu, P.Eng., of Norshelco Associates, dated November 23, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a religious assembly facility partially located within a Fill Regulated Area; and to rehabilitate an existing outfall structure located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Mimico Creek, at 7099 Airport Road, in the City of Mississauga. Please be advised that the subject property is located adjacent to a portion of a stream corridor owned by the TRCA (lands associated with the Derry Greenway Municipal Park). As such, the applicant has proposed an adequately sized buffer between the proposed development and the stream corridor, as well as a compensatory landscaping plan to enhance the form and functions of the noted natural feature. Control of Flooding: The works associated with the construction of the building are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact upon the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. The works associated with the rehabilitation of the existing outfall structure are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The TRCA technical staff have reviewed the proposed works associated with the outfall structure and have determined that the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be adversely affected. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to the commencement of any works, and will be maintained throughout all phases of construction. Conservation of Land: The subject property is located adjacent to a stream corridor associated with the Mimico Creek. Please note that TRCA staff are satisfied that an adequate buffer between the proposed works and the stream corridor has been proposed. In addition, the applicant has proposed a compensatory landscaping plan to further enhance the form and functions of the noted natural feature. Furthermore, there are no fisheries or geotechnical concerns related to this project. 1000 Plantings This proposal involves the planting of only appropriate native and non - invasive species along the stream corridor adjacent to the subject lands in accordance with the TRCA's guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 - New Urban Development, and Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35871 - Application #: 383/04/MISS Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: November 20, 2004 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.6 BROOKFIELD HOMES (ONTARIO) LIMITED /2016508 ONTARIO LIMITED To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, 18, Concession 2, Finch Avenue and Kingston Road, in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property owned by Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Limited /2016508 Ontario Limited. The purpose is to construct a multiple unit residential freehold townhouse complex within the Duffins Creek Special Policy Area and Regional Storm Floodplain in the Town of Pickering. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009. • Brookfield Watermark, General Plan Drawing No 102, Project No. 03092, prepared by G.M. Sernas as received on November 19th, 2004. • Brookfield Watermark, Cross Section Details, Drawing No. TRCA 1, Project No. 03092, prepared by G.M. Sernas as received on November 19th, 2004. • Brookfield Watermark, Site Servicing Plan, Drawing No. SS1 and SS2, Project No. 03092, prepared by G.M. Sernas as received on September 27th, 2004. • Brookfield Watermark, Unit Grading Plan, Drawing No. GR1 and GR2, Project No. 03092, prepared by G.M. Sernas as received on September 27th, 2004. • Brookfield Watermark, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. ERS1, Project No. 03092, prepared by G.M. Sernas as received on September 27th, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking with respect to minor changes related to outfall construction and planting details as provided by G .M. Sernas dated Dec 1st, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1001 Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct a multiple unit freehold townhouse development and a new stormwater outlet within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Special Policy Area for the Duffins Creek. The lands have been the subject of a lengthy planning process where an official plan amendment and rezoning were approved for the multiple residential use in 1995, by TRCA staff and the City of Pickering. At that time TRCA staff defined the limits of development to protect an adjacent Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) and excluded approximately half of the property and lands adjacent to the Duffins Creek from development. The ESA is being transferred to public ownership as a condition of development. The remaining lands which front onto Kingston Road and Finch Avenue were designated for residential development. More recently, staff have been working with Brookfield Homes to ensure that the grading scheme respects the adjacent ESA, that the site can be properly serviced and that the residential complex can be floodproofed to the standards prescribed by the Province, the TRCA policies and within the City's Official Plan. TRCA engineering staff and the municipality are now satisfied with the grading scheme and floodproofing details. This permit is a condition of final approval, and is being sought to implement the project in the coming months. Control of Flooding: The applicant proposes to floodproof the development in accordance with the requirements of the Special Policy Area policies as embedded in the City's Official Plan, the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and Provincial Policy requirements. Essentially, the development will be floodproofed to the minimum 350 year floodplain elevation and will have no measurable impact on the control of flooding on off -site properties within the Special Policy Area. The Authority also constructed a flood control berm structure in the 1980's which provides an increased level of protection to this site and the neighboring properties in the Special Policy Area. The storm outlet will be constructed with a flap gate which will impede the surcharge of water through the storm system during periods of high flows and has also been designed to maintain the integrity of the berm structure. Staff is also satisfied that the development has been designed to withstand depths and velocities associated with a Regional Storm Flood event. Pollution: Sediment Fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the work area and will remain in place during construction. The applicant also proposes to incorporate stormwater quality measures which will not only benefit this development but adjacent existing development which currently has no stormwater quality controls. The site is in excess of 50 metres from the Duffins Creek and should have no impact on the control of pollution given the sediment and erosion control measurements being incorporated. Conservation of Land: The significant portions of the lands designated as Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) adjacent to the Duffins Creek are being protected from development. These lands are to be transferred to public ownership as a condition of approval. The applicant has also provided an edge management plan which incorporates the planting of native species at the edge of the development and adjacent to the ESA. The required storm outlet has been carefully sited in the field to ensure that the integrity of the adjacent Environmentally Significant Area is maintained. Native planting will also occur along the outlet route to bolster the ESA and minimize impacts. 1002 Plantings The planting of native planting material will be conducted in accordance with detailed planting plans and an edge management plan provided by the applicant to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.1(A) - Special Policy Area designations, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Approvals are not required from DFO for this project as the site is removed from the Duffins Creek. CFN: 35880 - Application #: 387/04/PICK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 25, 2004. CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.7 SHAWN MARK To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 46, Plan 2142, (78 Humber Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Shawn Mark. • Withdrawn 8.1.8 NORTHLAND PROPERTIES CORP. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 22, Concession 3 Part 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Plan 66R- 20654, (55 Reading Court), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Northland Properties Corp.. The purpose is to place and regrade fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of a multi- storey hotel and associated parking at 55 Reading Court. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009. • Drawing No. SS -1, Site Services and Grading Plan, prepared by W. G. Mills and Associates Engineers, dated July 6, 2004, revised November 2, 2004, and received by TRCA on November 15, 2004. • Drawing No. T -1, Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by Ron Koudys Landscape Architect, dated October 2004, revised October 26, 2004, and received by TRCA on November 15, 2004. • Drawing L -1, Landscape Plan, prepared by Ron Koudys Landscape Architect , dated October 2004, revised October 26, 2004, and received by TRCA on November 15, 2004. 1003 • Letter of Commitment from Northland Properties , dated December 1, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill and regrade within the Fill Regulated Area of Mimico Creek to facilitate the construction of a multi- storey hotel and associated parking at 55 Reading Court in the City of Toronto. The subject property is currently undeveloped and located north -east of Dixon Road and Carlingview Drive on the east side of Mimico Creek. Through the site plan approval process, TRCA staff established the limits of development based on a 10 metre buffer from the stable slope line, which is located further on the tableland from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A combination temporary tree protection and silt control fencing will be installed to prevent construction debris from entering the watercourse. Pervious paving will be used in the parking lot along the edge of the 10 metre buffer to facilitate stormwater infiltration. Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical staff are satisfied that the proposal will not have an impact on slope stability. The proposed works will not have an impact on fisheries, significant natural features, or riparian vegetation. Plantings The ten metre buffer will be extensively planted with native woody vegetation and the applicant has committed to providing 2,500 square meters of off-site native plantings in the Mimico Creek valley corridor, per the draft Mimico Creek Habitat Implementation Plan. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.1.1 - New Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35980 - Application #: 431 /04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 16, 2004 1004 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.9 TIMOTHY MAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 99, Plan 6311, (12 Manorpark Court), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Timothy Man. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an inground pool and the replacement of a retaining wall located at the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. • Site Plan, prepared by Betz Pools, dated November 10, 2004, received November 15, 2004. Red -lined revised by TRCA staff on December 1, 2004. • Retaining Wall Detailed Drawings A and B , prepared by V.A. Woods Associates Limited, received December 1, 2004. Redlined by TRCA staff on December 1, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an inground pool and the replacement of an existing retaining wall located at the rear of the existing dwelling. The subject property is located west of Leslie Street and south of Sheppard Avenue. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed to prevent construction debris from entering the adjacent ravine. Conservation of Land: TRCA geo- technical staff have reviewed the geo - technical report submitted by the applicant and is satisfied that there are no slope instability concerns. There will be no impact on fisheries, riparian vegetation or significant natural features. Plantings The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan that includes native and non - invasive plantings. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.E - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Management Program. 1005 CFN: 35950 - Application #: 420/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 18, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.10 TRIFIOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD . To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 8, Concession 5, Part Lot 2, Plan 65R- 22295, (520 Applewood Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Trifior Property Management Ltd.. The purpose is to construct a two- storey industrial building and associated parking /loading area in the flood plain of Black Creek, Humber River Watershed, at 520 Applewood Crescent in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking indicating that additional details will be provided as requested in the TRCA's letter dated November 26, 2004, signed by Nino Rico of Nino Rico Inc . Architect, dated November 30, 2004, received by fax on November 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct a two- storey industrial building and associated parking /loading area in the flood plain along a channelized portion of Black Creek. The subject property is located within an industrial subdivision, two lots south of the channelized watercourse. The subject lot was created in 2001, through a consent application, on the basis that the channelized watercourse would convey the Regional Storm Event. Based on recent data for the watercourse, TRCA Water Management staff have determined that the majority of the subject property now lies within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies do not support new development within the Regional Storm Flood Plain due to the potential risk to life and property. However, as this is an existing lot of record, staff requested that the applicant apply for a permit under Ontario Regulation 158 and that the proposed industrial development be flood proofed. TRCA Water Management staff have reviewed the plans submitted in support of the permit application and are satisfied that the site is adequately flood proofed. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but will not be located within the hydraulic floodway. TRCA staff are satisfied that the proposed industrial development will have minimal impacts on the storage and conveyance of flood waters. 1006 Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from the proposed industrial development, as the location of the property is approximately 80 metres from the watercourse. Further, there is an existing industrial development situated between the proposed industrial development and the watercourse. A storm ceptor will also be installed to address water quality control. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings The proposed industrial development will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: The proposal would have been consistent with Section 4.2.2 G) - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program at the time the subject lot was created. Recent data indicates that the lot is now within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. In recognition of previous planning commitments and having regard for the new flood plain data, the applicant has flood proofed the proposed development to manage the flood risk. Thus, while the proposal does not meet all of the requirements of Section 4.2.2 G) (i.e. new development should not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain), the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the flood risk. CFN: 35930 - Application #: 413 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Lisa Prime, extension 5250 Date: November 22, 2004 TOWN OF CALEDON 8.1.11 REGION OF PEEL To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area at Well No. 3 (31 - 33 Chapel Street) and Well No. 4 (65A Mill Street) in the Town of Caledon (Bolton), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (pavement and topsoil) within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Flood Plain and Bolton Special Policy Area (SPA) in the Town of Caledon (Bolton) in order to facilitate the abandonment of two wells. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. 1007 • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to the restoration plans , sediment and erosion controls related to the abandonment of Wells Nos . 3 and 4 and demolition of pumphouses to the satisfaction of TRCA staff ; dated November 29, 2004; received November 29, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The Region of Peel is proposing to retire water supply facilities in Bolton (Wells No. 3, 4, 5, 6A and 6B). This permit application involves the abandonment of two of those facilities, Well No. 3 and Well No. 4. Both Well No. 3 and Well No. 4 are located within a Fill Regulated Area, a Regional Flood Plain and the Bolton Special Policy Area. Well No. 3 will be abandoned and the existing pumphouse and foundation will be removed. The area will be restored with asphalt pavement to match existing surrounding pavement. There are no curbs or fences proposed as part of these works. Buried fuel tank and fuel lines will also be removed. Well No. 4 will be abandoned and the existing pumphouse and foundation will be removed. The area will be restored with topsoil and sod to match adjoining lawn. The monitoring well at Well No. 4 will remain in use. Wells No. 6A and Well No. 6B are part of permit application #437/04/CAL, CFN 35993. Well No. 5 will be included under a separate permit application to be submitted for staff review at a later date. This project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements. Control of Flooding: The existing buildings located within the Flood Plain will be removed. Fill placement associated with the new pavement and new sod will be minimized within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The final grades of the new pavement and sod will match the adjacent properties. As such, staff does not have any concerns related to loss of storage or conveyance of flood flows with this project. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. The proposed works will impact no significant (terrestrial) resource features. 1008 Plantings The disturbed area (approximately 20 ft by 25 ft) resulting from the removal of the pumphouse at Well No. 4 will be restored with topsoil and sod to match surrounding residential properties. The disturbed area (approximately 24 ft by 35 ft) resulting from the removal of the pumphouse at Well No. 3 will be replaced with asphalt to match surrounding pavement. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1B) - Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas and Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35956 - Application #: 423/04/CAL Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: November 22, 2004 8.1.12 REGION OF PEEL To place fill within a regulated area on Glasgow Road, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel. The purpose is to excavate and place fill (topsoil, removal of concrete chamber) within a Fill Regulated Area in the Town of Caledon (Bolton) in order to facilitate the abandonment of two wells in Bolton. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking to provide minor revisions to the restoration plans , sediment and erosion control related to the abandonment of Wells Nos . 6A and 6B to the satisfaction of TRCA staff; dated November 29, 2004; received November 29, 2004; prepared by the Region of Peel. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The Region of Peel is proposing to retire water supply facilities in Bolton (Wells No. 3, 4, 5, 6A and 6B). This permit application involves the abandonment of Wells 6A and 6B which are both located with a Fill Regulated Area and adjacent to TRCA property. The retirement of Wells 6A and 6B will involve the demolition and removal of the existing concrete chamber and restoration of the disturbed area to match existing surrounding grade. Wells No. 3 and Well No. 4 are part of permit application #423/04/CAL, CFN 35956. Well No.5 will be included under a separate permit application to be submitted for staff review at a later date. This project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process and conforms to TRCA requirements. 1009 Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding. Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from these works as they will be located more than 80 metres from the watercourse. However, as these works are taking place adjacent to TRCA property standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter TRCA property or the watercourse. Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35993 - Application #: 437/04/CAL Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5374 For information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 Date: November 23, 2004 8.1.13 SOLMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (Regional Road 50 and Parr Boulevard), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Solmar Development Corporation. • Withdrawn TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.14 BOX GROVE HILL DEVELOPMENT INC. To alter a waterway on a tributary of the Rouge River, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Box Grove Hill Development Inc. The purpose is to construct three road crossings of a tributary of the Rouge River within the developing Box Grove Community in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009. 1010 • Copper Creek Drive, Oakborough Drive and Rizal Avenue, Crossings of Tributary A- Design Brief, prepared by Stantec Consulting Limited , revised as received on November 22nd, 2004. • Boxgrove North Culvert and Creek Crossing Drawings Tributary A , Drawing Nos. 601, 601 -2, 602, 602 -2, 603 and 604, prepared by Stantec Consulting Limited , revised as received on November 22nd, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking regarding minor modifications to the planting details prepared by Stantec Consulting Limited, as received on Dec 1st, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct three road crossings of a tributary of the Rouge River. The crossings are required to service the developing Box Grove Community at the eastern limit of the urban area of the Town of Markham. The works are in accordance with the approved Boxgrove Community Secondary Plan and are located within a draft approved plan of subdivision. The tributary flows through an ill- defined corridor and as a result, the crossings do not involve a significant manipulation of the corridor. Instead, the applicant proposes to span the corridor at all locations with a minimum 8.5 metre open footed precast span structure. This opening width is satisfactory given that the tributary is minor and ill defined. Furthermore, two of the crossings are being located along existing farm crossings which will be removed and restored. The tributary does not extend beyond the site and has its origins at a storm water management facility which is being constructed through the Cornell Development to the north. Control of Flooding: The works will not impact the control of flooding as the crossings have been designed to convey Regional Storm flood flows with no off -site impacts. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be erected between the watercourse and the span structures and will remain until the works are complete. In addition the existing crossings will be utilized to convey machinery to avoid impacts to the tributary. Proper sediment controls will also be utilized with the removal of the existing crossings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Conservation of Land: It is recognized through policy that crossings of corridors must occur to service new development. In this instance the crossings have been located to minimize impacts to the corridor by utilizing existing farm crossing sites and less vegetated areas. In addition, the low flow channel of the watercourse will be maintained and enhanced where required. Plantings The applicant proposes to restore all disturbed areas with native plant material and in accordance with detailed landscaping plans submitted by NAK Design and approved TRCA staff. 1011 Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. DFO approval is not required for this project. CFN: 35847 - Application #: 366 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 25, 2004. 8.1.15 REMO RESTAURANT & MOTEL INC./2054158 ONT. LTD. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 31, Concession 7, 124 Dickson Hill Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Remo Restaurant & Motel Inc./2054158 Ont. Ltd. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River to facilitate the replacement of an existing septic system that has failed. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009. • Site Plain, Drawing S1, prepared by E -7 Engineering, dated November 2004, received by the TRCA November 23, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing . • Detail /Section - Biofilter, Drawing S8, prepared by E -7 Engineering, dated November 2004, received by the TRCA November 23, 2004. • PVC Drain, Drawing S6, prepared by E -7 Engineering, dated November 2004, received by the TRCA November 23, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River to facilitate the replacement of a septic system for a restaurant and motel. The current septic system, located in the side yard of the existing restaurant and motel, has failed, resulting in potential contamination of the surface water and groundwater resources of the area. As such, an emergency authorization has been granted by TRCA staff in order to ensure that contamination risks are minimized and the functionality of the septic system can be restored. The proposed septic system is located approximately 70 metres from the watercourse, within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River. Excavated material will be removed from the site, and the project will result in minimal regrading. As the entire side yard of the subject property is located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, there is no opportunity to move the septic system outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. 1012 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. TRCA is satisfied that the project will not result in unacceptable impacts to the storage and conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and appropriately maintained throughout the construction period to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposed works, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on the property that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35909 - Application #: 399 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 23, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.16 LEELA DOOGCHI To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on 128 Weldrick Road West, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Leela Doogchi. The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate the replacement of a single family dwelling at 128 Weldrick Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. • Red -line revised Site Plan & Basement Plan, Drawing A -1, prepared by Array International Architects Inc., dated June 2004, date received November 5, 2004. • First & 2nd Floor Plan, South & North Elevation, Drawing A -2, prepared by Array International Architects Inc., dated June 2004, date received November 5, 2004. • East & West Elevation Section B, Drawing A -3, prepared by Array International Architects Inc., dated June 2004, date received November 5, 2004. 1013 • Structural Engineering Sign -off, provided by Mina Design Group Inc ., dated November 30, 2004, date received November 30, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River in order to facilitate the replacement of a single family dwelling at 128 Weldrick Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The TRCA Executive Committee approved an identical application in July 2004 (permit C- 04229), but the property has since changed hands and, as TRCA permits are non - transferrable, the new owner is now applying to construct the previously approved structure. TRCA's policies permit the replacement of an existing building within the Regional Storm Floodplain; the size of the replacement structure can be equal to that of the previous structure, plus an additional 50 percent of the total area of the building based on existing conditions as of January 1, 1987. The current proposal to replace the demolished house is consistent with these policies. Further, the proposed dwelling maintains the same footprint as the demolished dwelling, is not closer to the watercourse and is therefore not considered to be at any increased flood risk. The proposed dwelling is located approximately 25m from the Don River, outside of the hydraulic floodway. The single family dwelling will be appropriately floodproofed, in accordance with TRCA policies for redevelopment in the floodplain. Control of Flooding: The proposed dwelling will be located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, outside of the hydraulic floodway, and will be appropriately floodproofed. A structural engineer has confirmed that the single family dwelling will be able to withstand the depths and velocities of flood waters of a Regional storm event. All excavated material is to be removed from site. TRCA engineering staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the dwelling. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the Don River. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. Furthermore, there will be no impacts to fish habitat or any other natural resource features on the subject lands as the proposed dwelling will be located within the same footprint as the previous structure. Plantings The area of proposed works is presently occupied by the foundations of a demolished single family dwelling. As such, the works will not affect any significant natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application. 1014 Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35970 - Application #: 425/04/RH Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 23, 2004 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE 8.1.17 433405 ONTARIO LTD. To alter a waterway on Part Lot 3, Concession 9, (east of 9th Line and north of Millard Street), in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Duffins Creek, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by 433405 Ontario Ltd.. The purpose is to alter a waterway by constructing a temporary stormwater management outlet that will facilitate preliminary grading for a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (19T- 01003), within the Northwest Functional Servicing Study area of the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006. • Letter of Undertaking dated November 30, 2004, stating that all plans will be revised to TRCA's satisfaction, prior to the release of the permit . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway by constructing a temporary storm water outfall that will facilitate preliminary grading for a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (Town File No. 19T- 01003). This subdivision is located within the Northwest Functional Servicing Study area of the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville. Obtaining any necessary Ontario Regulation 158 permits was a TRCA condition of draft plan approval that staff issued through our subdivision review. The applicants will seek a subsequent permit at a later date, prior to constructing the permanent storm water management outlet. The temporary outlet channel is located partially on TRCA -owned lands and therefore the applicant will obtain approval from the Authority's Property Section, prior to the issuance of this permit. Control of Flooding: The storm water outlet will be designed to convey storm flows up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. 1015 Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and accepted by staff, will be implemented and maintained on site for the duration of construction, in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issued associated with this proposal; there will be no in -water works. A letter of advice on behalf of the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for working near water, will be issued with the TRCA permit. No significant natural heritage features will be affected by the proposal and all disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored. Once a permit application for the permanent storm water management outlet is received, staff will require that a landscape restoration plan be reviewed to our satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35036 - Application #: 015/04/WS Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: January 20, 2004 8.1.18 MATTAMY HOMES To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 33, 34, Concession 8, (South of Stouffville Road, west of 9th Line), in the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mattamy Homes. The purpose is to alter a waterway by constructing a temporary storm water outfall that will facilitate preliminary grading for a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (19T- 01002) known as "Wheler's Mill ", within the Northwest Functional Servicing Study area of the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville.. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009. • Letter of Undertaking dated November 30, 2004, stating that plans will be revised to TRCA's satisfaction, prior to release of permit. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1016 Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway by constructing a temporary storm water outfall that will facilitate preliminary grading for a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (Town File No. 19T- 01002), known as "Wheler's Mill ". This subdivision is located within the Northwest Functional Servicing Study area of the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville. Obtaining any necessary Ontario Regulation 158 permits was a TRCA condition of draft plan approval that staff issued through our subdivision review. The applicants will seek a subsequent permit at a later date, prior to constructing the permanent storm water management outlet. Control of Flooding: The storm water outlet will be designed to convey storm flows up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and accepted by staff, will be implemented and maintained on site for the duration of construction, in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issued associated with this proposal; there will be no in -water works. A letter of advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for working near water, will be issued with the TRCA permit. No significant natural heritage features will be affected by the proposal and all disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored. Once a permit application for the permanent storm water management outlet is received, staff will require that a landscape restoration plan be reviewed to our satisfaction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35712 - Application #: 313/04/WS Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: August 3, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE MINOR WORKS ITEMS RES. #B245/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Dave Ryan 1017 THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff , in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.19 - 8.1.25, inclusive), which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.19 ALDO FORGIONE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 53, 54, 55, 56, Plan 1841, (104 Sandringham Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Aldo Forgione. CFN: 35973 - Application #: 428/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 12, 2004 8.1.20 MARINA MERANGOULIAN To place fill within a regulated area on, (75 Highland Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Marina Merangoulian. CFN: 35852 - Application #: 371/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 18, 2004 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8.1.21 Y &HKIM To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 16, (15 Samson Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Y & H Kim. CFN: 35918 - Application #: 406/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 20, 2004 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.22 CESARE FERRARA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 65M -2604, (70 Cromdale Ridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cesare Ferrara. 1018 CFN: 35919 - Application #: 407 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: November 12, 2004 8.1.23 JOANNE GALIFI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Plan 65M -2192, (130 Greenbrooke Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Joanne Galifi. CFN: 35879 - Application #: 386 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: October 25, 2004 8.1.24 MICHAEL HARRIS To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 13, Plan 65M -2604, (62 Cromdale Ridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Michael Harris. CFN: 35915 - Application #: 405 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension 5269 For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 Date: October 26, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.25 SHELDON LIBFELD To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 27, Plan M -1739, (17 Jenkins Drive), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sheldon Libfeld. CFN: 35954 - Application #: 422/04/RH Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 Date: November 4, 2004 1019 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.26 CITY OF PICKERING To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Concession 5, (south of 6th Concession Road, east of Greenwood Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Pickering. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the installation of a culvert and construction of a new driveway entrance. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2006 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Pickering Museum Village Proposed Driveway, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Operations & Emergency Services Department, dated November 2004, received November 29, 2004. • Letter of Undertaking prepared by Darrell Selsky , City of Pickering, dated December 1, 2004, to address outstanding engineering and ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the installation of a culvert for a new driveway entrance to the Pickering Museum Village, in the City of Pickering. The proposed driveway entrance is to be located on the south side of the Sixth Concession Road, west of Greenwood Road, and is required in order to accommodate the addition of large buildings being considered for the museum site. The proposed works are located approximately 18 metres from the top of bank for the Duffins Creek valley and stream corridor, and the works are to be completed by the City of Pickering. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not result in an increase of flooding as the culvert is sized appropriately to convey stormflows. Pollution: Silt fencing and erosion control measures will be used to prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the valley and watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no slope stability /geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with the project. Plantings Planting are proposed to off -set the loss of vegetation, and restore any disturbed areas. 1020 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36019 - Application #: 445/04/PICK Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 Date: December 1, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.27 FELGI INVESTMENTS LTD. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Redstone Road - west of Princeton Avenue intersection), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Felgi Investments Ltd.. The purpose is to conduct repairs to the existing Redstone Road bridge crossing over the Rouge River which is within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area. The permit will be issued for the period of December 3, 2004 to December 2, 2009 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Existing Conditions & Site Preparation, Dwg. No. L -1, prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated October 2004, revised November 26, 2004. • Restoration Plan, Dwg. No. L -2, prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated October 2004, revised November 26, 2004, red -lined November 29, 2004. • Details, Dwg. No. LD -1, prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated October 2004, revised November 26, 2004, red -lined December 1, 2004. • Details, Dwg. No. LD -2, prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated October 2004, revised November 26, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to repair an existing bridge crossing over the Rouge River which is within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area. A permit was issued by the TRCA in 1996 (C- 96180) to permit the construction of the bridge in order to provide road access between two draft approved plans of subdivision located west of Leslie Street, north of Major Mackenzie in the Town of Richmond Hill. A breach has occurred in the watercourse, just west of the bridge, which has resulted in a new channel. This has caused scouring below the bridge, which in -turn has exposed the top of the footings on the bridge. Repair works which include new riverstone protection along the central bridge abutment and exposed footings, reinforcing the existing revetments, and the installation of additional plantings are proposed to help provide protection, mitigate erosion, and assist in stabilizing the site. 1021 Control of Flooding: A temporary culvert crossing of the new channel is required to provide access to the work sites. The proposed culvert is appropriately sized to convey stormflows. Therefore, there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: A sediment control fence will be erected around the work areas and construction access route to contain any sediment flow and prevent any sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with this project. Access to the site will be through a temporary construction access route over the new channel. The channel crossing will include a temporary culvert with filter cloth and granular infill. The temporary culvert and access route are to be removed, and the site is to be restored to its original condition when the proposed works are complete. A letter of advise will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Plantings A restoration plan has been prepared by the applicant which includes plantings around the exposed footings and on the banks of the new channel in order to help mitigate erosion and stabilize the site. All disturbed areas are to be restored. The temporary construction access route is to be restored through the application of a seed mix and an eromat biodegradable soil stabilization mat, and additional plantings. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35947 - Application #: 418/04/RH Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 Date: November 1, 2004 RES.#B246/04 - PROVINCIAL SOURCE PROTECTION FUNDING Overview of provincial funding contributions to conservation authorities and municipalities for source protection. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the province be congratulated on their work in furthering source protection ; 1022 AND FURTHER THAT staff prepare a detailed report for Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #7/04, to be held on December 10, 2004. CARRIED BACKGROUND On Wednesday, November 17, 2004, the provincial government announced that it is investing more than $12.5 million to enable conservation authorities (CA) and municipalities across the province to undertake the preparatory work and technical studies needed to support the development of drinking water source protection plans. This 2004 -2005 funding will likely be transferred to CAs, under agreements with the Ministry of Natural Resources. It is expected that additional funds will be available in future years to support the further development and implementation of plans. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is expected to receive approximately $700,000 of this provincial funding, to be directed to start-up activities within our source protection planning region. This region includes the jurisdictions of the Credit Valley Conservation Authority, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, and of course that of the TRCA. TRCA will act as the lead CA within this region. This start-up funding is generally intended to be used to support the following activities: capacity building and communications; preliminary watershed characterization; water budgets; and, work plan development. A memorandum of agreement between the three conservation authorities is being developed, which will outline the administrative arrangements and the relative roles of each CA. Discussions are underway with some of our key partners regarding the role and membership of the source protection committee, that will be required by the new legislation. A technical workplan is also being prepared, with consideration for the extensive watershed planning and groundwater studies that have already been completed by the CAs and the municipalities. This workplan will provide a basis for identifying start-up priorities and developing a budget. Source protection planning is a component of watershed planning. It is concerned with protection of the quality and quantity of current and future sources of drinking water. Source protection is an important first step in a multi- barrier approach to drinking water management. A more detailed report will be taken to the December, 2004 Watershed Management Advisory Board. More information about the provincial announcement can be found on the Ministry of the Environment web site at www.ene.gov.on.ca Report prepared by: Sonya Meek, extension 5235 For Information contact: Sonya Meek, extension 5235 Date: November 19, 2004 1023 RES. #B247/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PORT UNION WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Highland Creek to Rouge River Property Acquisition Services CFN 12127. Approval to hire Johnston Donald Associates Inc. to undertake property acquisition services for the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council). Dave Ryan David Barrow THAT Johnston Donald Associates Inc. be retained to undertake the necessary property acquisition services required for the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project in an amount not to exceed $11,500 plus taxes and disbursements where applicable . CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #5/98, held on June 26, 1998, the Resolution #A126/98 was approved as follows: THAT the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project Concept Plan be endorsed and submitted to the Minister of Environment for approval under the Environmental Assessment Act; THAT staff be directed to prepare a `Project" based on the Concept Plan and including a funding partnership for approval by the Authority and the City of Toronto; AND FURTHER THAT staff continue with acquisition efforts to achieve the objectives. On May 2, 2001, the Minister of the Environment issued a Notice of Approval to proceed with the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project. At Authority Meeting #9/03, held on November 28, 2003, the Resolution #A245/03 was approved as follows: WHEREAS the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) has requested that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a delivery agreement with TWRC to undertake certain works for the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project ($16 million) and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project ($6.5 million), consistent with TWRC Development and Business Plan; AND WHEREAS it is in the interest of TRCA under its authority and mandate as set out in the Conservation Authorities Act (R. S.O. 1990, c. 27) to enter into such an agreement. THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA enter into the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization - Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project and the M /m /co Waterfront Linear Park Project Delivery Agreements, subject to all terms and conditions being finalized in a manner satisfactory to the Chair of the Authority, TRCA staff and solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP; 1024 THAT TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take all necessary actions as may be required, including the signing of documents, for the execution of the Delivery Agreements; AND FURTHER THAT the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation and the City of Toronto Waterfront Secretariat be so advised. The Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project is being undertaken in two phases: Phase I involves construction between Highland Creek and Chesterton Shores (Rouge Hills Go- Station) and Phase 2 will involve construction between Chesterton Road and the Rouge River. In order to implement Phase I of the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project, a total of three private properties, together with approximately one kilometre of shoreline owned by the Canadian National Railway (CNR) and Crown land had to be acquired by the TRCA. All the private property requirements have been acquired at the foot of Port Union Road on the shoreline of Lake Ontario. This included the expropriation of two properties. The matter of compensation for the expropriations is still outstanding. TRCA's application for transfer of the Crown lands required for Phase 1 has been submitted to the Ministry of Natural Resources and is being processed. It will be necessary to acquire either land, waterlots or riparian rights from the following owners for Phase 2: • 5 private properties with dwellings; • 1 private vacant lot; • 1 private strip of land containing a right -of -way for access to the private dwellings; • a number of small parcels owned by the Public Trustee (these parcels were originally owned by a developer. The company was dissolved in 1988 and the property was forfeited to the Public Trustee); • City of Toronto lands; and • provincially -owned Crown lands. It will be necessary to undertake appraisals and negotiate the acquisition of the necessary rights from each owner required for Phase 2. To deliver the necessary property requirement to allow this project to proceed to the construction phase in a timely manner, staff are recommending the hiring of a firm to deliver the property acquisition services for the private properties and the lands held by the Public Trustee. The following are the tasks that we propose the property acquisition services firm undertake: • meet with staff, review the project and the nature and timing of the property requirements; • meet with the affected owners to explain the project, timing and identify any concerns or issues relating to the project; • prepare for review and approval, the terms of reference and a list of qualified appraisers, prepare quotation packages, request appraisal quotations, respond to questions, prepare recommendations to hire the appraiser, monitor appraiser's progress and review and resolve concerns relating to the appraisals; 1025 • prepare standard form agreements of purchase and sale for review, and obtain approval by TRCA and TRCA's solicitor; • coordinate and attend negotiation meetings, prepare and negotiate agreements of purchase and sale, facilitate issue resolution, prepare a final recommendation letter, and maintain a project status spreadsheet on a monthly basis or as required. RATIONALE Given the complexity and scope of appraisal and negotiation work required, staff is of the opinion that Johnston Donald Associates Inc. is the one firm in the Greater Toronto Area best equipped in terms of staffing and expertise to undertake this project. Johnston Donald Associates Inc. has successfully carried out projects of a similar nature in the past for TRCA, other government agencies and are presently working on the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council) for TRCA. Staff has evaluated the proposal cost based on experience with the Etobicoke Motel Strip and is satisfied that the cost is reasonable for the special expertise required in this matter. The cost works out to less than $1,500 per property. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this work are available in the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project budget. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Mike Fenning, extension 5223 Date: November 18, 2004 RES.#B248/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: SOURCE PROTECTION & WATER CONSERVATION PLANNING Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watersheds. Award of Contract for Consultant Services. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has directed staff to pursue the development of a pilot source protection plan in the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds ; WHEREAS TRCA staff has reviewed proposals from four consultants short - listed from twenty -eight firms across Ontario ; AND WHEREAS Dillon Consulting Limited was both the lowest bidder who met TRCA specifications and was the unanimous technical choice of the consultant selection team ; 1026 THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the firm of Dillon Consulting Limited be retained to develop a source protection plan for the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds , at a cost not to exceed $92,710, plus taxes where applicable. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #3/04, held on March 26, 2004, Resolution #A67/04 was approved in part as follows: AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff continue to pursue the development of a pilot source protection plan in the Duffins and Carruthers Creeks watersheds. Environmental agencies across Canada and around the world are assessing threats to drinking water sources. The government of Ontario realizes the importance of managing drinking water systems, beginning with source protection. Public opinion also shows strong support of these programs. For some, source protection is the sole means of acquiring safe drinking water and reducing health risks. In rural areas in the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds residents use private wells. Source protection is in most cases the only barrier to keep pathogens out of their drinking water systems. On February 12, 2004, the provincial government released the White Paper on Watershed -Based Source Protection Planning for public comment by April 12, 2004. The White Paper builds on the report of the Provincial Advisory Committee on Watershed -Based Source Protection, issued in May, 2003. It responds to a recommendation of that report, which called for additional stakeholder consultation, and proposes a framework for the proposed source water protection legislation, including additional details around local stakeholder and public involvement in the source protection planning process and an approval process for plans. The White Paper also outlines ways to enhance Ontario's management of water takings and the concept of water taking charges. The Province of Ontario has established several working groups and committees to develop additional technical guidelines and standards for the preparation of source protection plans (SPP). On June 23, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) issued the proposed Drinking Water Protection Act. In addition, working groups are reviewing implementation and funding mechanisms and will be developing the technical guidelines over the course of 2004. On November 17, 2004, the provincial government announced that it is investing more than $12.5 million to enable conservation authorities (CA) and municipalities across the province to undertake the preparatory work and technical studies needed to support the development of drinking water source protection plans. This 2004 -2005 funding will likely be transferred to CAs, under agreements with the Ministry of Natural Resources. It is expected that additional funds will be available in future years to support the further development and implementation of plans. 1027 The Duffins and Carruthers Creek SPP will comply with the directions coming forward from the Province of Ontario. However, this project will be more than a drinking water source protection study; it will also deal with water conservation, and the assessment of permits to take water, as outlined in the provincial White Paper on source protection and the water conservation requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. Key aspects of this source protection plan will include: • identification of point and non -point threats; • maps indicating vulnerability of the watershed to threats; • information regarding how the watershed reacts to contamination; and • specific action that can be taken to protect the quality of water supplies. The purpose of this study will be to develop: • planning methodologies and protection strategies; • a technical process for completion of a SPP that is integrated with the watershed and municipal planning processes; • a review of SPPs in other jurisdictions in terms of their relevance to safe provision of drinking water in the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds and lake -based water supplies for Durham Region; • protocols for reviewing and assessing Permits to Take Water (PTTW); • opportunities and targets for water conservation; • budget estimates for various SPP components, including characterization and development of management options; and • an implementation and funding framework for the SPP. Compiling data regarding threats and vulnerability will allow decisions to be made concerning risk management and what type of land use restrictions are required to mitigate threats to drinking water sources. The principal drinking water quality and quantity issues in the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds are: • rural private wells; • municipal wells in Whitchurch- Stouffville and Uxbridge; and • safe Lake Ontario water supplies for Durham Region. The integrated Duffins Carruthers Watershed Resource Group which is responsible for implementation of the watershed plan will have the lead role in guiding the public /stakeholder input to the SPP. RATIONALE The consultant selection process was completed in two stages. Twenty -eight firms were invited to submit letters of interest that documented their corporate experience and outlined their proposed project team. The consultant selection team chose four firms to submit detailed proposals. These proposals were evaluated based on the consultants' corporate and team qualifications, their understanding of source protection principles, proposed methodology, quality of proposal and cost. The bids received (plus taxes where applicable) were as follows: 1028 Dillon Consulting Limited $92,710 Golder Associates $92,955 W.B. Beatty & Associates $93,450 Waterloo Hydrogeologic $93,570 Dillon Consulting Limited was the unanimous technical choice of the consultant selection team. They proposed a comprehensive multidisiplinary team and demonstrated local knowledge and solid understanding of source protection planning principles. FINANCIAL DETAILS The project cost will be $92,710, plus GST. Funds for this project are available through Account Code 122 -42, with funding supplied by the City Pickering and Regional Municipality of Durham. The funding from these sources will be sufficient to cover TRCA staff costs as well as the consultant costs for this project. Report prepared by: Donald Ford, extension 5369 For Information contact: Donald Ford, extension 5369 or Gary Bowen, extension 5385 Date: November 22, 2004 RES. #B249/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE INSPECTION OF STRUCTURES ON FORMER ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION To hire a house inspector to inspect all of the structures located on the former Ontario Realty Corporation lands to establish a 5 year maintenance schedule. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Michael Di Biase THAT the contract for the inspection of all of the structures on the former Ontario Realty Corporation lands be awarded to Guardian Home Inspectors' Inc., for an estimated amount of $20,544, including taxes where applicable . CARRIED BACKGROUND On March 31, 2004 the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) transferred to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) 1,315 hectares (3,249 acres) of land for Rouge Park purposes. Included in this transfer were a number of leases, consisting of residential, farmland and commercial leases. The TRCA is currently managing the leases and as part of preparing a five year maintenance plan for budget purposes, is proposing to carry out an inspection of every structure. Quotations were received from three qualified home inspectors. The estimated quotations received, including taxes applicable, based on 68 dwellings and 59 garages /barns /drivesheds /sheds, were as follows: 1029 These 4 Walls Inspections All Maintenance Contractors Guardian Home Inspectors $17,334.00 $17,467.75 $20,554.00 Guardian Home Inspectors Inc. provided an enhanced quotation which included providing the TRCA with all of the information in an electronic format for each individual property, together with a consolidated spreadsheet for all properties for each tracking of repairs. Even though Guardian Home Inspectors Inc., was not the lowest bidder, in reviewing the proposals received it would be in the best interest of the TRCA to award the contract to Guardian Home Inspectors Inc.. They would be providing the TRCA with a more detailed package of information which the TRCA in turn could utilize in tracking repairs. It would also save time for staff in compiling the information for budget preparation. The other two bidders advised that they do not have the software to provide the enhanced package. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the hiring of the house inspector are available in the ORC rental budget. Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 Date: November 24, 2004 RES. #B250/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PARTNERSHIP WITH DUCKS UNLIMITED CANADA Engineering Services - Tommy Thompson Park - Embayment D. Approval of a contract with the Engineering Services Section of Ducks Unlimited Canada to develop and design a wetland management structure for the Tommy Thompson Park - Embayment D. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Engineering Services Section of Ducks Unlimited Canada be contracted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), to develop and design a wetland management structure for Tommy Thompson Park - Embayment D, at a cost not to exceed $15,000, including taxed where applicable . CARRIED 1030 BACKGROUND The historical loss of wetland habitat within the Toronto Harbour was significant. Major alterations to the Toronto Islands and the Ashbridge's Bay area resulted in the elimination of over 1,500 acres of lacustrine marsh. In addition, a combination of high water levels, abundance of carp, localized area of poor water clarity and the colonization of purple loosestrife have all accounted for the substantial degradation of waterfront wetland vegetation. As part of the Tommy Thompson Park Master Plan implementation, staff are in the process of implementing a work plan for the design and build of park features and habitats within the park. The design and development of a wetland management structure within Embayment D is a valuable component of this plan. The restoration of Embayment D will improve the biodiversity, habitat health and ecosystem function of Tommy Thompson Park and the surrounding area. Coastal /lacustrine wetlands and their adjacent riparian areas are extremely productive systems which support a great diversity of fish and wildlife habitats. Coastal wetlands play a vital role in mitigating the erosive effects of lake and river fluctuations, improving water quality, and providing excellent recreation and educational opportunities. Coastal wetlands have steadily been lost and degrading within the Greater Toronto Area, and the Embayment D wetland represents one of the best opportunities to improve this significant type of waterfront habitat. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Overall, our goal for the Tommy Thompson Park - Embayment D area includes the restoration and expansion of wetland area, creation of critical fish and wildlife habitat structures, and improving and managing public access. This contract will help TRCA develop and design a wetland management structure that will: • isolate the backwater areas from the detrimental conditions within Lake Ontario; • potentially control or moderate water levels; • control carp access but provide passage of other fish species; and • dramatically increase the extent and quality of emergent wetland vegetation. To achieve these objectives Ducks Unlimited Canada will develop a design option for a wetland management structure within Embayment D. This design will be developed based on thorough investigations into soil conditions, seed bank viability, topographic survey (terrestrial and aquatic) and detailed engineering assessments. RATIONALE Ducks Unlimited Canada is a conservation organization with more than 60 years experience in wetland conservation, education and research. Their efforts not only provide a benefit to North American waterfowl, but have also successfully targeted habitat for hundreds of wildlife species, improved quality of drinking water, enhanced flood protection and contributed to nation -wide recreational economic activity. 1031 For the past five years TRCA has worked toward developing a partnership with Ducks Unlimited Canada through a variety of education, project implementation and staff training programs. Recently, Ducks Unlimited Canada provided their expertise at our Wetlands, Woodlands and Wood Ducks Conservation Seminar; provided staff resources and display material for a stewardship forum at the Kortright Centre for Conservation; assisted with the duck banding program at Tommy Thompson Park; and, provided extensive print materials and posters for TRCA's Stewardship Resource Centre. The trademark of Ducks Unlimited is their record of wetland conservation and improvement through the construction of wetland control structures within degraded wetlands. Ducks Unlimited Canada staff will provide TRCA with a detailed set of design drawing and operational guidance for a wetland control structure at Tommy Thompson Park - Embayment D. This project is an exceptional opportunity to utilize the many years of hands -on experience of Ducks Unlimited Canada . FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available in the Tommy Thompson Park Implementation budget, account #210 -50. Report prepared by: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246 For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246 Date: November 10, 2004 RES. #B251/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: DEVELOPMENT OF A WEB MAP BROWSER FOR DISPLAYING LOW LEVEL OBLIQUE PHOTOGRAPHY OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY (TRCA) WATERSHEDS AND WATERFRONT To sole source development of a web map browser for viewing oblique photograph to Gartner Lee Limited. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) retain the services of Gartner Lee Limited to complete development of a web map browser for viewing photographs of the Rouge River, Humber River, Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds and the TRCA waterfront, at a cost not to exceed $14,432.50, including taxes where applicable . CARRIED BACKGROUND At Executive Committee #8/03, held on September 5, 2003, Resolution #B129/03 was approved as follows: 1032 THAT the Authority retain the services of AEROGRAPHIC (Mr. Lou Wise) to photograph from a fixed wing aircraft the main branches and tributaries of the Humber River, Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek at a cost not to exceed $12,900 (no tax). A total of 1,100 photographs were taken of the assigned watersheds in 2004 by AEROGRAPHIC (Mr. Lou Wise). Prior to that time Mr. Wise had photographed the Don River, Highland River, Rouge River and Petticoat Creek including Frenchman's Bay, Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds. Recognizing the value of the oblique photographic images to the delivery of TRCA programs, a pilot project was setup with Gartner Lee Limited to develop software that would allow staff to readily access these photographs. Also at Executive Committee #8/03, Resolution #B130/03 was approved as follows: THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) retain the services of Gartner Lee Limited to develop a map browser for viewing photographs of the Carruthers Creek, Duffins Creek, Petticoat Creek, Highland Creek and Don River watersheds at a cost not to exceed $14.500. The Rouge River had 1,256 photographic images scanned, however the interface was not developed for this watershed due to Rouge River watershed budget constraints. At Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #6/04, held on October 15, 2004, staff gave a presentation on the web interface developed by Gartner Lee Limited. In order to further utilize the interface it must be developed for the watersheds and waterfront recently photographed by Mr. Lou Wise. Cost Estimate By Watershed Watershed Photos Cost Rouge 1,256 $5,297.26 Humber 1,757 $7,410.26 Waterfront 209 $881.47 Etobicoke 200 $843.51 Total 3,422 $14,432.50 RATIONALE Given Gartner Lee Limited's involvement in developing the previous watersheds web browser interface and the excellent results achieved, staff agree this firm should complete the web map browser interface for the remaining TRCA watersheds and waterfront in a timely and cost effective manner. 1033 FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA staff have provided Gartner Lee Limited with a set of photographs for each watershed to develop their cost estimates. Staff are of the opinion that this cost estimate represents a good value for the extent of work offered. This work has been budgeted for in various watershed and waterfront 2004 budgets. It is hoped that the work will be completed within the 2004 budget year. If not, provisions are included in the preliminary 2005 budget to pay for any remaining work. Report prepared by: Gary Bowen, extension 5385 For Information contact: Gary Bowen, extension 5385 Date: November 16, 2004 RES. #B252/04 - ACQUISITION OF VEHICLES Acquisition of two 4X4 Extended Cab Pick Up Trucks and one 4X4 Crew Cab Pick Up Truck. Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT tender FM2004 -04 for two (2) 4X4 Extended Cab Pick Up Trucks be awarded to King City Motors for the sum of $66,658.60, including applicable taxes, it being the lowest price that meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications; AND FURTHER THAT tender FM 2004 -05 for one (1) 4X4 Crew Cab Pick Up Truck be awarded to King City Motors for the sum of $36,005.35, including applicable taxes , it being the lowest price that meets TRCA specifications . CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services and Disposal of Equipment requires Executive Committee approval for the award of tenders for purchases which exceed $25,000 and are less than $100,000. Tenders were issued for the 3 vehicles to replace existing vehicles within TRCA's vehicle and equipment pool. Tenders were opened by the Tender Opening Sub - Committee on November 5, 2004. The tenders were referred to staff for review and a report to the Executive Committee. The tender submitted by Golden Mile Motors Limited for Tender FM2004 -05 does not meet TRCA specifications and therefore has been disqualified. The following is a summary of the tenders received: 1034 Tender Opening Sub Committee Report FM 2004 -04 4X4 Two (2) Extended Cab Pick Up Trucks Company Quote King City Motors $66,658.60 Golden Mile Motors Limited $67,500.40 Humberview GMC Truck Centre $67,672.90 Alex Irvine Motors Ltd. $67,902.90 Ernie Dean Pontiac Buick GMC $67,960.40 Foster Pontiac Buick GMC Inc. $68,144.40 Tender Opening Sub Committee Report FM 2004 -05 One (1) 4X4 Crew Cab Pick Up Truck Company Quote Golden Mile Motors Limited $35,207.25 King City Motors $36,005.35 Alex Irvine Motors Ltd. $36,630.95 Foster Pontiac Buick GMC Inc. $36,752.85 Humberview GMC Truck Centre $37,040.35 Ernie Dean Pontiac Buick GMC $37,184.10 FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA maintains a Vehicle and Equipment Reserve to replace both fleet vehicles and major pieces of equipment. Funds for these purchases are available in the Vehicle and Equipment budget. Report prepared by: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 For Information contact: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 Date: November 15, 2004 RES. #B253[04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PURCHASE OF CROSS COUNTRY SKI TRAIL GROOMER EQUIPMENT Direction to purchase cross country ski trail groomer equipment from a sole supplier. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT a contract for the purchase a Centaur XC Groomer be awarded to The Shop Industrial in the amount of $69,345, including applicable taxes, it being the proposal that meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications at a cost acceptable to TRCA . CARRIED 1035 BACKGROUND TRCA's Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services and Disposal of Equipment requires Executive Committee approval for the award of contracts for purchases which exceed $25,000 and are less than $100,000. RATIONALE The cross country skiing program operated at Albion Hills Conservation Area in the past three years has had over 20,000 skiers and generated over $185,000 in revenue to cover the operating costs of the program. TRCA staff maintain approximately 27 kilometres of groomed trails within Albion Hills Conservation Area. The existing equipment, a Bombardier Bombi snowmobile, used to draw the cross country ski track groomer is almost 20 years old. Reliability and safety have become significant issues with respect to this equipment. Also, because of the age of the equipment, it is difficult to obtain parts to carry -out any repairs. Staff have concluded that the equipment has reached the end of its functional life. Staff carried out an investigation of the types of equipment that could draw the track groomer on the cross country ski trails in an efficient and safe manner. There are only a few manufactures of this type of specialized equipment. Most types of groomers are designed for downhill conditions, not the narrow, winding terrain of Albion Hills trails. The Centaur Model V5531XT XC Groomer is the least expensive piece of equipment available that meets the requirements of TRCA. Staff have had two demonstrations of the Centaur Model EX Groomer and are confident that this equipment will perform to their satisfaction. The Centaur Grooming equipment is manufactured by Ontario Drive and Gear in New Hamburg, Ontario. The Shop Industrial is the only distributor in Ontario. The existing Bombardier Bombi snowmobile will be disposed of through a public auction. FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA maintains a Vehicle and Equipment Reserve to replace both fleet vehicles and major pieces of equipment. Funds for purchase of the groomer are provide for in the Vehicle and Equipment budget. Report prepared by: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 For Information contact: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 Date: November 19, 2004 RES. #B254/04 - CONTRACT FOR MOULD REMEDIATION AT THE CLAIREVILLE FIELD CENTRE STORAGE AREA Award of contract to Terra Restoration Steamatic Hamilton to carry out the mould remediation of the documents, building, fixtures and heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) system at the Claireville Field Centre. 1036 Moved by: Seconded by: Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT a contract for the mould remediation of the documents , building, fixtures and HVAC system at the Claireville Field Centre by awarded to Terra Restoration Steamatic Hamilton , at a cost not to exceed $36,329.86, including applicable taxes . CARRIED RATIONALE Mapping, air - photos, survey plans and engineering /project drawings that were previously stored at the Claireville Dam were transferred to the basement of the Claireville Field Centre. After the transfer, it was discovered that these documents were found to be contaminated with mould. The basement of the field centre was then secured and the HVAC system in the basement was isolated from the rest of the building. The firm of T. Harris Environmental Management Inc. was engaged to do an assessment of the mould contamination of the building. Certain recommendations made by T. Harris Environment Management Inc. were implemented soon after their report was received. They included the securing of the site to contain and isolate the mould spores so that no contamination would spread to the rest of the building. Also, the removal and safe disposal of contaminated and non - essential materials presently stored on the site was completed. Other recommendations included removal to the contractor's facilities and decontamination of contaminated survey documents and contaminated regulation line mapping mylars and chemical decontamination of the site including the HVAC system of the entire building. Upon completion of the decontamination of building, fixtures and HVAC systems, it is recommended that the T. Harris Environmental Management Inc. be retained to do an air quality assessment. In order to find a suitable firm to carry out the complete mould remediation of the Claireville Field Centre, a number of firms were contacted. Staff have determined that the firm of Terra Restoration is the only firm that is qualified to deal with all of the mould remediation requirements as set out by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) consultant. Other firms were able to meet only certain aspects of the work. The firm of Terra Restoration provides a comprehensive service for site remediation and contaminated materials for disposal, document decontamination in a laboratory environment and most importantly, the cleaning and sterilization of the HVAC system. It is critical that this remediation work get underway as soon as possible. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this contract are provided for in the major facilities retrofit capital project. Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 Date: November 29, 2004 1037 RES. #8255/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: MAPLE SYRUP TENDERS CA04 -006, CA04 -007 and CA04 -008 Award of tenders for the supply of bulk maple syrup, maple syrup confectionery and prepackaged maple syrup. Frank Dale Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT tender CA04 -006 for the supply of bulk maple syrup be awarded to Smokey Kettle Maple Company Limited at a cost not to exceed $7,500.00; THAT tender CA04 -007 for the supply of maple syrup confectionery be awarded to Smokey Kettle Maple Company Limited at a cost not to exceed $16,900.75, plus GST; AND FURTHER THAT tender CA04 -008 for the supply of prepackaged maple syrup be awarded to Voison's Maple Products Limited at a cost not to exceed $45,730.00. CARRIED BACKGROUND Invitations for tender were sent to fifteen maple syrup producers. A summary of the total costs for bulk maple syrup, maple syrup confectionery and prepackaged maple syrup received are as follows: COMPANY Tender CA04 -006: BULK MAPLE SYRUP Tender CA04 -007: MAPLE SYRUP CONFECTIONERY Tender CA04 -008: PREPACKAGED MAPLE SYRUP Voison's Maple Products Ltd. $45,730.00 Robinson Maple Products $7,761.60 $49,150.00 Smokey Kettle Maple Company Limited $7,500.00 $16,900.75 plus GST $50,977.50 Trillium Ridge Sugarworks $50,975.00 Thompsons Maple Products $57,614.00 RATIONALE Sealed tenders were received on November 8, 2004. Two quotes were received for bulk maple syrup, one quote was received for maple syrup confectionery and five quotes were received for prepackaged maple syrup. The tender packages were opened November 26, 2004. FINANCIAL DETAILS The tender committee reviewed the quotes and recommends that: a) tender CA04 -006 be awarded to Smokey Kettle Maple Company exceed $7,500.00; b) tender CA04 -007 be awarded to Smokey Kettle Maple Company exceed $16,900.75, plus GST; c) tender CA04 -008 be awarded to Voison's Maple Products Ltd. at $45,730.00. 1038 Limited at a cost not to Limited at a cost not to a cost not to exceed These were the lowest bids meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's specifications. The funds are allocated in the 2005 Preliminary Operating and Capital budget. Report prepared by: Derek Edwards, Extension 5672 For Information contact: Derek Edwards, Extension 5672 Date: November 30, 2004 RES. #B256/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: GREENBELT DRAFT PLAN - DETAILED COMMENTS Providing detailed comments to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on the Greenbelt Draft Plan. Dave Ryan Michael Di Biase THAT item #8.12 - Greenbelt Draft Plan - Detailed Comments, be deferred to Authority Meeting #11/04, scheduled to be held on January 7, 2005, as the Executive Committee did not have adequate time to review the staff report given the tight time constraints placed on the review period; AND FURTHER THAT the Chair send a letter to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to indicate support for an extension of the review period . CARRIED TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:14 a.m., on Friday, December 3, 2004. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 1039 c. PlirTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/04 January 14, 2005 The Executive Committee Meeting #12/04, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, January 14, 2005. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:09 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member David Barrow Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Nancy Stewart Member, Authority REGRETS Frank Dale Member Michael Di Biase Member Dave Ryan Member RES. #B257/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/04, held on December 3, 2004, be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (1) A letter dated December 29, 2004, from Elizabeth Bottos of 178 Charmaine Road, Woodbridge, in regards to the Humber Alliance. (2) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Geoff Cape, Executive Director, Evergreen, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. 1040 (3) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Penny Pepperell of 21 Douglas Crescent, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (4) An email dated January 12, 2005, from John Adams of 77 Cottingham Street, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report (5) A letter dated January 9, 2005, from Angela Gransden of 75 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (Received an additional 28 copies of this sample letter, from those listed as Correspondence 37 - 64) (6) A letter dated January 10, 2005, from Brenda and Chris Twee! of 34 Old Bridle Path, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (7) A letter dated January 10, 2005, from June McLean of 32 Whitney Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (8) A letter dated January 10, 2005, from Geri Clever of 7 Beaumont Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (9) A letter dated January 10, 2005, from Edward B. Harvey and Lorna R. Marsden of 206 Roxborough Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (10) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from A.R. Deanne Nesbitt of 70 Bin - Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (11) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Alexander K. and Mary Alice Stuart of 52 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (12) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from June and Eberhard Zeidler of 11 Beaumont Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (13) An undated letter from K. Shanahan of 119 Glen Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (14) An email dated January 11, 2005, from Walter Bowen of 25 Chestnut Park Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (15) An email dated January 11, 2005, from Sue Matthew of 139 Roxborough Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (16) An email dated January 10, 2005, from Michael de Pencier, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (17) An email dated January 11, 2004 from John Turner of 11 Harper Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (18) An email dated January 11, 2005, from Morden Yolles of 67 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. 1041 (19) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Peter and Camilla Dalgish of 35 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (20) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from David Harrison of 30 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (21) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Richard and Mary Gossag of 48 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (22) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Jill Hermant of 45 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (23) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from John lskra of 319 Seaton Street, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (24) An email dated January 12, 2005, from Amy Hayhoe of 125 Glen Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (25) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Honor de Pencier of 87 Woodlawn Avenue West, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (26) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from C.J. Pigott of 15 Melbourne Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (27) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from John T. Band of 60 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (28) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from M.P. Fischer of 88 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (29) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Kyle Rae, City of Toronto Councillor, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (30) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from residents of 120 Rosedale Valley Road and 4 Nesbitt Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (31) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Sheila K. and John Shaw of 10 Delisle Avenue, Suite 1405, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (32) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Sara and Eric Jackman of 9 Drumsnab Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (33) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Harvey Kalles of 6 Beaumont Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (34) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Nan Shuttleworth of 48 Cluny Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. 1042 (35) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from William R. Herridge of 20 Edgar Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (36) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Nancy and John McFadyen of 47 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (Correspondence 37 - 64 same as sample letter in Correspondence 5) (37) A letter dated January 10, 2005, from D. Thompson of 66 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (38) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Ray Heard and Jillian Cosgrove of 92 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (39) An email dated January 11, 2005, from Kathryn McCain of 126 Balmoral Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (40) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from D. Speters of 2278 Weston Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (41) A letter dated January 9, 2005, from Lucia Molnar Wing of 16 Highland Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (42) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Mark Bailey of 29 Northern Heights Drive, Richmond Hill, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (43) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Taylor Thomson of 4 Beaumont Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (44) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Lisa McHiln of 60 Harbour Street, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (45) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Elizabeth Heintzman of 18 Whitney Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (46) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Kim Heintzman of 18 Whitney Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (47) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Annabelle Heintzman of 18 Whitney Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (48) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Mrs. Llewellyn Smith of 117 Glen Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (49) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from M. Marshall of 286 Carlton Street, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. 1043 (50) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Kathryn Qurik of 106 Dunedin Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (51) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from a resident of Mississauga, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (52) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Amy Kung - Oliver of 142 Gillard Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (53) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from as resident of 354 Annette Street, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (54) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from John Lindsay of 22 Bin -Scarth Road, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (55) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from L.E. Cox of 6 Inglewood Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (56) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from Michael Hawke of 21 Whitney Avenue, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (57) An undated letter from Sherry Drew of 179 Roxborough Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (58) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from S. Weteillis of 204 Douglas Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (59) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Julia MacDonald of 204 Douglas Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (60) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Doone Estey of 202 Roxborough Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (61) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from Melody Sangreuf of 15 St. Andrews Gardens, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (62) A letter dated January 11, 2005, from W.M. Duron of 15 St. Andrews Gardens, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (63) A letter dated January 12, 2005, from a resident of 130 Rosedale Valley Road #602, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (64) A letter dated January 13, 2005, from a resident of 146 South Drive, Toronto, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. (65) A letter dated Janaury 12, 2005, from Michael Melling, Solicitor, Davies Howe Partners, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. 1044 (66) A letter dated Janaury 12, 2005, from Graham Smith, Architect, Altius Architecture Inc., in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report. RES. #B258/04 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall David Barrow THAT above -noted correspondence (1) - (66) be received. CARRIED 1045 CORRESPONDENCE (1) ELIZABETH BOTTOS 178 CHARMAINE ROAD, WOODBRIDGE, ONTARIO L4L 1K2 PHONE 905- 851 -3671 (home) 905- 850 -0155 (office) EMAIL - liz @piccinbottos.com FAX - 905- 850 -0498 (office) December 29, 2004. BYFAX- 416- 661 -6898 14 pages Toronto Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Attention: Dick O'Brien, Chair Dear Sir: Re: Humber Alliance Thank you for your letter of November 26, 2004. I assume that letter was in response to a letter sent to you by Mr. Angelantoni dated October 4,2004. My letter of July 21, 2004, to which I have not received a response, was addressed to Adele Freeman. I enclose a copy of my July 21, 20041 etter. However, 1 wish to comment on the portion of your letter dealing with the Humber Watershed Alliance. I did attend the Water Management Advisory Board meeting of October 15,2004 wherein the letter from Leo Angelantoni was tabelled as Item 6.1. As Mr. Angelantoni was out of town, he asked me to attend on his behalf. When the item was brought up for a very brief discussion, I noted that one of the members who had actually conducted the interview with not only Mr. Angelantoni but myself (I do not know her name but she has blond hair and I believe she is a councillor from Caledon) asserted that some applicants to the Humber Alliance misunderstood the mandate of the Humber Alliance which she stated is to plant trees and not to become involved in policy. As one of the applicants, I must correct her assertion for the following reasons: 1. Iain Craig (a Humber Alliance volunteer member for Vaughan) is quoted in the Toronto Star on Thursday, February 17, 2004 as stating, "lain Craig of Humber Alliance says the environmental group is mobilizing opponents to stop a proposed 1.5- kilometre road link that would pass through the Boyd Conservation Area, connecting two separated sections of Pine Valley Rd. "; 2. Joanne Nonnekes (another Humber Alliance volunteer member for Vaughan) wrote a letter to the Ministry of the Environment dated March 15, 2004 requesting a bump -up of the environmental assessment; 1046 3. Lois Griffin, Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance, sent a Letter to the Minister of the Environment dated March 10, 2004 opposing the Phase 2 Report on the Environmental Assessment of the Pine Valley Link that was underway, and a letter dated February 24, 2004 to Cansult Limited (the consultant on the Environmental Assessment) again expressing her opposition; 4. Debi Schulte (a third Humber Alliance volunteer member for Vaughan) is quoted in the Vaughan Citizen on Thursday, September 23,2004 while attending a rally to oppose the Pine Valley Link as, "She reminded the audience she was part of a similar group which eventually won its fight to stop a road through a conservation area in Brampton." On the basis of the above, I have a hard time believing that the Humber Watershed Alliance members plant trees and don't get involved in policy. In fact, of the four volunteer members chosen to represent Vaughan, three of them are publicly on record as opposing the Pine Valley Link, not to mention that the Humber Alliance was represented on the Community Working Group for the first Environmental Assessment for the Pine Valley Link -1 cannot think of a more obvious attempt to influence "policy." I also noted that when I was in attendance at the October 15 Humber Watershed Management Advisory Board meeting, one of the members (a male sitting on the same side of the table as the blond member to whom I previously referred, and again I am unaware of the person's name) stated categorically that he just plain didn't believe that there was any possibility that the discrimination suggested in the letter by Mr. Angelantoni existed. I would have expected him to have approached this with a more open mind and to have made some inquiries before drawing a conclusion. I am of the view that the Humber Alliance, an organization created by a government agency (the TRCA) and funded by various levels of government, with a mandate to include and , represent all citizens, has failed to honour this mandate for the following reasons: 1. Vaughan is composed of the communities of Kleinburg, Maple, Woodbridge, Concord and Thornhill. At least 3 of the 4 representatives reside north of Rutherford Road either in Kleinburg or in close proximity to Kleinburg -there were no members from Woodbridge chosen residing south of Rutherford in the area that surrounds the Humber River nor any members for Maple, Thornhill and Concord; 2. One of the members of the Humber Alliance has publicly stated that the mandate of the Humber Alliance is to mobilize opposition to the Pine Valley Link and in fact, 3 of the 4 members chosen are publicly on record and have actively taken steps to oppose the Pine Valley Link; 3. I reiterate my comments in my letter to Adele Freeman dated July 21,2004 wherein I stated that, "The City of Vaughan has the largest Italian population in Canada. As an Italian, I am very disappointed to see that the TRCA was unable to find any Italians in Woodbridge with qualifications that would allow them to be accepted as volunteers on the Humber Alliance given that 2 of the eleven members from the City of Toronto share the same last name (Mittennaier) and 2 of the 3 members from Richmond Hill share the same last name (Bradley)." 1047 The facts speak for themselves. I have concerns about your selection process and the real mandate of the government- financed Humber Alliance. Since dictating this letter, further evidence of the real mandate of the Humber Alliance has surfaced -the Friends of Boyd. Park have made submissions to the Provincial Planning & Environmental Services Branch in support of extending the "Greenbelt" to include Boyd Park and they clearly state in their recent (undated) letter that the "Humber Alliance" is one of the members of the Friends of Boyd Park. In light of all of this, can you maintain that the Humber Alliance is anything but a vehicle used by the TRCA to influence government policy? Very truly yours, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Elizabeth Bottos cc: Leona Dombrowsky , Minister of Environment Bill Fisch, Regional Chairman, York Region, by fax. 1- 905- 895 -1238 Greg Sorbara, MPP Vaughan- King- Aurora, by fax. 905- 851 -0210 Michael DiBiase and Members of Vaughan Council All TRCA Members All TRCA Humber Alliance Members Leo Angelantoni Enclosures: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. Toronto Star article, Tuesday February 17, 2004 letter from Joanne Nonnekes to Leona Dombrowsky dated March 15, 2004 letter from Lois Griffen to Leona Dombrowsky dated March 10, 2004 letter from Lois Griffen to Dick Gordon dated February 24, 2004 Vaughan Citizen article, Thursday September 23, 2004 Humber Watershed Alliance mandate -from interne my letter to Adele Freeman dated July 21, 2004 1048 kt Joan Love arkayA bird.watden P4yrft-cinurvitrticgt Ark& ttt Vaughan, Shit att titt ohl4 a 1"4.17.4 4 01*ati?Vl Ltt 041i!±.1tWM4e4ttil Lind w t,ie • Goff ,-', e 4 ,. :t v,t Van , tIoniata are L 'j t, 1i) •::ett.t.c. ,..1= il:.c. Ora 6mhtra11-ettin!:coaci.thil ..,- 1-1-tat th1.se.4-4 euri-, ' ' 4)4 er4eAt with Vail an to build Ifni{ 2,4 41- ror ti-u1.?keop.servati6it hofilelais norAT,tii- The inayor s97,iporta tilt as the 'Ma lifirterti &1h hid magi neelet2t t ar,- ed ritpetleted calb miarnocinte te.na thattaanda' thcy cle±orpett 4 new reatienti who" .A11.1 he ro the rfloit crawing lo Viugbin I mining r littraehael yr.art tg.' sirgimg tat-tie:sr that-the' diviitto4 , itithet*tit.1 ilitat. arid aiAmet •• 4r 'Yk1i ea'ii' -thW Naito y k;-,tvilirn.4.11114 the link is it won't have an al td immirte again noith ti th Ith2.IQWLI soL. upon tit:ewe:me. erford 114.. The thik• itkthlJthmnhjh According to the mayor, the the two segmcniawc.uldbe built 23001 Lansermtihn .Aret cOri- chili, was. cmtcerned the road' through the litFydeiumervation ly_ta se ated sections would cut throup,11 rtomber of Area aociemtviiiielgast /lumber helots and. ifequi ire art eqMpirent Itiyer VJ1 StX.ti44141 eoltiels The road? 3 opponents ti.id snrage tobe dismantled. hw bti deeignated }IA envi- hope tt the project wot,6•ci be. 7rne club aunt that to_ nonatentally serktive and arena ,ttop* A. at an Cinta6t itfurnei- hailp-e.A4 aLr f natura3 at4 scientific, intet'- pul Pre:A.N1 ll&aritg slitees to bit- irticominruknowlettgetheeluit est • .... • • •• 0/le1rner Mg_ morth, ha.,i a Ismg-terrn kiln.. with the The PPM wetkande: aud Area resident QuiataArthibaie eity inr its right he way, A cont.ii- majnr aquifer or underground 2 rid this Natinmi. Golf Chito; ctrs tin -is that if the city needs it 2t*er, emainmentalttsts say. =,:ir.e Valley je.4 smith of pro- b ack for rang, the etAl.) Vaughan owns-aright et tTwiycf ?osed 1fmk-were set to argro e must give it ur. t1n 7 end Vi Y. ttctv --gad should b c4.:4Arki from the "'„4s I untie:I-411nd it. WO were titifyi Fes thepstk that la current- y`c Mel•al 1,11.* 1).,eperted1y. aitte tr shotv that them mut/16r lynneinginerathannfoatpath parret-he rim!: lane c.c.n.uc.Mon out Iva uny impact (on the Knitting the Lk WIEUld Itnean twnitl Lt lauflt on a eity-ow arse).and that tht ink CI.P$34 ellopiring +.101,Ln 1 wuJ of old- nt$11- af tt'ay being leraLtki 'by the be huitt WiLlim the 1 dtmg growtti f-t and wnstrut.---dng eluh. But at the I lth hour; . road:Di Binso%ii• a hridge war they-alley, tppos'.2-jori was withdrawn atter lie noted that. :itce-:3T1 ilToPcrti 'Theft fo,1-°17-4 711°1" Thculd he dab rearhed ugcentent matters irvohing city land, the ha ve deterred the City of with city council behind elti,ed isstio. was dealt with behind Vaughan from puahing ahead s:oortt. closed doors. ith the proposed link,' Craig --T-Dary,41 , , 17 Q1-0 1049 said dming a trail Mitt throng: the are,a, He. tlifft, once the bulicioz.era do titer damage and habitats are de- tio..iyett isacItle h la is one efthe Teut h e auti- Eli and natural arg4a iett in the City of Vailghaml!Nlie said, 9yer ttii anow-cgWeNti cirte-apii. "it doesn't require a 1 hihry trained bioIorlat In tint- derstand th e mrendous. thi pact on the Boyd park environ- ment if tllis liuk goes througit Pleal.e.sees Read, *It Joanne Nonnekes 4673 Rutherford Road R.R. #2 Woodbridge, ON L4L 1A6 March 15, 2004 The Honourable Leona Dombrowsky Minister of the Environment 12th Floor, 135 St. Clair Avenue West Toronto, Ontario M4V 1P5 Re: Protection of the Pine Valley Forest Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) Dear Honourable Minister, 1 am writing to express my concern that a very special natual area, that I had assumed was protected by the Provincial Government through Provincial Policy Statement on Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) program, is coming under threat of development for a roadway. The Pine Valley Forest was designated as an ANSI for its representative and ecological features. It is part of the larger Boyd, Glasco complex that creates a natural corridor south from the Oak Ridges Morraine into the heart of Woodbridge. It provides core habitat for a number of species that are not found any further south of the GTA, it provides extensive forest cover for regeneration of air and water quality, and it provides much needed (and increasingly endangered) natural space in the fast - growing City of Vaughan. The fact that there is a road allowance that runs through the heart of the Pine Valley Forest has allowed this very special forest only the protection of a "Class Environmental Assessment." Given the nature of this ecosystem, its linkage to the Oak Ridges Morraine, and its designation as an ANSI, this is not adequate protection. As I have discoverd in attending numerous information sessions and meetings on this issue, the natural environment gets very little attention in the overall assessment in the Class EA. In fact, the summary reports make it look like there is little to no impact of putting a major, four -lane roadway through the middle of the forest; it is only by delving into the reports and reading substance that one discovers that the ANSI will essentially be destroyed. What will be left will be some very nice forest fragments, but certainly not an ANSI or the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) designated by the Toronto & Region Conservation Authority that currently exists. Thus, I implore the Minister to insist that the process be "bumped up" to a full Environmental Assessment, where the natural environment issues would be given adequate hearing. I understand that you, as Minister of the Environment, can issue a Part Two Order to move this environmental assessment to a full Environmental Assessment. 1050 As a twelve -year resident of the area I had always assumed I was living next to a "protected" area. I would like to see this area continue to be fully protected, as was intended in its designation as an ANSI. Our natural heritage must be protected; our health, our community enjoyment of nature, and our sense of who we are as Canadians depends on it. The legacy we leave our children and grandchildren should not be a concrete wasteland in the City of Vaughan. And while I will continue to try to convince my City Councillors and my Region Councillors of this fact, some help from the Province of Ontario would be greatly appreciated. I have met with my local City Councillor, Toni Carella, and with my local Member of Parliament, Greg Sorbara, to express my concern. I have also attended numerous meetings on the issue and will continue to advocate for the Pine Valley Forest in any way I can. If you have any further suggestions, I would be most pleased to here them. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Joanne Nonnekes Local resident Member of: Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association, President Humber Watershed Alliance West Humber Naturalists Federation of Ontario Naturalists Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (Ontario Chapter: Wildlands League) Volunteer for: Bird Studies Canada Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas Canadian Wildlife Service 1051 Eruvra3itolc-0111#— 117't bar HUMBER WA1ER9HED ALLIANCE wren to, axis The Hon. Lowr1e Danutstuwtky tenhtsr at the trMrornrnerd 135 3t. Clear Avenue Waat 18" met Toronto, ON AA4V 1P2 User BIr. Rs: Request tar a Rill individual Ern7vnmerntei Assisernernt, Proposed Pine Valley Otto 4tk Atte had it *letter expressing otrr oppose* tt711* Phasf R Report on Ewlution of Marna** S otutiona, the Propaeed Pk» VPlay Drive Link Ciese Erveraimtmtel Aeseeemerx. As our letter Indicates. not only we we apposed to the proposed altemathe merging from the Phase 2 Report,'wa are coscenied that the Gees Environmental Aeetsement hen not atonal for propu evaluation and *sighting d ertilionfilelllei concern surrounding Mb project is proposed, as poled will have prctound environrne+nt& impede to the Interior bred located Li the Boyd Connervittttn Atei. It also negatively impacts the provincially eigni lcent.ANSI. tt would rppeer that there to na imitation for these impacts. We are requesting SW you order IOW Indhdduel Eralronmenti i Aeseesmant of thin prolata, in order Seel al aearnetNee to the project can be fully explored and avalueled. M hidMldtnel eeaeeelrfenl would aka ensure that ell of the environmental traps* ars fully studied, evaluated and glen proper welettig In eveltnatinp the overall project and be sliernestres. Thle hes not been done Info Masi Emilio/twat Asataertnent Thank you for your consider an of Ns matter. Yours troy, oftAV- LoisGrWln, Chair Humber Watershed Alliance L&:L - Enc. 5 Shoreham Divs. Dover evtaw. ON 1U13N 1 S4 4111 sin JRI(V1 1052 Ur- Dick Oardcn • .FRerdree grlye .. ,L4ROEf • -mar Bar. t am.wrftlrtt j tan b ihitf of VI, Fiuniber Wstarskted Alliance to IMarrtt you a cxfr aicerr►z r '$ the Miele R eport an Evalued= 0Alternative 8olUticte Prapbied PInM-Vtilley , rh+i Urtk. Class FinitrottmerAd A 6 ie9i: • 1 • . illalteitsheditiihinc01.1 cotrrrtintt baod toforts of epprabdniiinly► M ntemberi Ir e: uding resident., iriteiest droupe, eget3dos, acedemlc tttatitutlofiri and'etictesd ' r ►eeer!trttves: 'The 1'T!snael'4 Tit t^ wort! w th otti!t±'t'_rtT. °r± fp sRd hple h'.ntR+ the Humber River end Its wstiirshbd, ,: • • We fietni pi uety► *tire— '',� the Clty"bf Vniiphori exp. a ►reel r ovr app o ttion t i tfte Prvpoeed • PineVallgyr.Drivi Ectonelon through tttd'Bort t onw veion 0611. ' • • 'We remein aani irned ibout -the Exterietion: rind eepec* ea eirioehekrkig Oberi. hiarmed b4: the rimilet•oftlts Awe* 2•Rspat. 'Wib&iR6ue,1hattti row l'honk profatireir VIVIafe0ts' an the farm tusdi function of the +ucWlr enviniiettint enei tvsoriiitlonot soexerhtta of tho Boyd Cornervetliwi'Ares artd,irt•gonprnllid th#t thit Class ,r�rwi rmndl;Aettsssmont lie not prop ty br thorou f 'wasted envltonnientipmpecki.otyorur propaeecialtemative or Weil proper xatigteing tgto, a onylic rruiptdtlmpt icts.In edam tree Olen Assnanientls only taokirp Et a por6iait of the iitlre ro d MVark pIartried tot Pkte VaJI y' Dt firs' imd does notaonsldet thkirapacts at roost ottahges pionned neat: of Rtrotertord Rded.. . • . . • Our' 004% hsg w�orlc*d kia�d jttoUret art!# mpriwp lt}at H ittiher V rif'i . k our �tr't • �progrOsi NOM on the Humber RiverrIhli report notes ifi*i, rot only' fire no[ mi •• .. • proareae Weirdo: out:figs:0Irtoritieed lomfeaver; eai ire irti fact toning grouid.'Your . • proposed. road tr►41 add to the Otte d forget comer 'eh w111 ottd right Mr:ma:ten eree pt interior • fareet-et Soya, end sI(ntRaahily *we the ftetatua1►ellty of this tweet Wi oenhat;eittnrd to let • tltlr tttipri , • .. We, the a , be vMI tr;. art t ecard ss nppaestt.to lhs oenctuelane of ttui lases 2 Report: We - • cane, atm" tourUMthat• - - • • t) • M. 'aiternicthie •adLxtiaaibefoundthat not lmpli otihsBays!Careen/elan:Arenehd• Ito arnreonmeatelly eipniifaarl Interior forget. . • . 5 Bhoarham DdVU. Dblrrdviw, 47458141536- MAN 494 AFR-22-E004 04 :57PM FAX:905470E060 1053 • IO: 1 IL BOXES ETC 14B PAGE :004 R =95 Mr, olok Gordan cartsuat Unit.d • A MI errhrestti Easeeshnet'd cf thbapioJ5 t �a tmdartalcen so th.st all attemattvres cane MO* rotated and Mat levirromshtst caverns can kie tioh • *Pelt eVaualed aAroPsn t ac rad Ine a re aral process. We Beth va taCass Er►Irgnmaotal Aaae.iaent His, riot donD ihfe.:: La* Ortffloitliett H01ber Vi tarofied MLitt* . • • • • ao' L • . • The 1 tew.lehti , tJli><iir ' :The Hart Liana Dtrnbrowaky. ANtietet Otto t:i Aionhien# • :� Hon DA M FlrNyiN rieet R sowiss Mr. ea* woo* lar1a .a tliturat . . Rp4ourcei This!•.fort.Qreylw UPP : ' hk. Pair(Roblruron, ReCdoif *York .. . Mr: Ant teen Pew gf•Yrtgt en • • Mt. Fr wet. Gartgar L.e_tJrtglird • CoMmirrrt1 Vlfafldrw etatip e; Cararyn Woodland 11:41n • • • APR-22-20O4 04:5 7PM FFlX:9C1547O2.06O ID:MAIL BOXES ETC 148 PAGE:005 R=05% 1054 • Author, 1.1.101u.r v . tu1a, out try p,` 3ts+t rrard i ar)uat St.yg ;1 r unit 'lUe leg bttt e get the Pine Wiley auk heirs hin Win- ir,bua 1 ie�j+ traafla� o .' . rot,. it at the Palk �, 'Get sn Bela an b 4 . L,ct �7fitn inorst hew wu ihnrt-` tiered, orging the c at.KCtinc�(4a, city rnu6Citm ding they protect the Wu& iatvintrtJ nitterttl ghafatrr ?.lr -"'• V i }u't�n pproposes to rnal Dtayrs h Cw u iii ord Fi7I,t csF7' , sliap. fnrt' J po+i did' fo_ cult t?w ,tie 'is4t _ 'rurfurd .. dd 4 taxa-a-toed. at tlarJi35€sa . c_aresltitny ;aititt T± 1Aritkt Estigii ng, afin: '.tank w g t;3c i,3rS large it fio eK. 4 Fte4tnn wankod ". l can., I'ute6� :: 2 1�%y���y pexri petit hero yy r3 ec of laws Phio . tiitruld bts. W ter 10 huiTxl t1 lead, bfkxtenIr'Wanastea, a n about Boyd,. li eans4:iva- 14411 seta, whim he'oir t i first;: iiI tilt' wo.ncipoien ciL tiie add RICK siiml sliza2 with, his rhruby. . it title rem (Fk .l +1a heroree t 61a kainas convenience or itsPtvfi thing Iitilte `e,'r at nuts' cxr hetL Let tircrr: k7tow member- ofof a gain _ • ^• i g t? pawl F on the greenbelt, rrxa hdid the 1rxd+�l[ . <i Y s7nrr mYra�i` riAi e • zat; =rim_ Yrers Brs tax crowd of &out 8014iLO turned nut site Aatt}tnr t ety E • ttAa ,- e 4.1410J9114; Grx an e+i tt at sd,park Sunday 10 Ftigma fire pInnned Pine Vel- nuuutrra tcyliub.. - how You feel: duri arty ki 33 Mohawk new.s.t David t;iey = F f,• a,anfo ti anti lariu Crniv, cD danirpetvop of icilds of liarfd Puri., charged the city with vio- lating he fttvirenuteutat Ruessrntnt Act in lay: They, want tilt valley haeludeil itt the provinces Gulden Horseshoe F;nt alts. the city 4.'rct 1 to conduct s triare thor 1gti euvi• retenentai tt '' y aE lift= pro}eCt, mil; and liter vimnrtxu- liil rkt'rnce group clrupprs3 their rarkt "'Yew made CAW pua t," tiU Craig said Sunday. But fir, Sanford, who Luck a ptrn'ircr1 Itand agcan^y to court and wvu a a'ntivictiun wider the Set this year by IR-mitng:3tnrigi- nal. groups weren't aliequauty consulie't before a Markham land sale; said he w lli fi; it'nit Err u }t gn-tng to let it ; said Mr. ' mferd= who (naturals an aboriginal village Is in the .17S/ 1.'" b ! The Management Plan will provide guidance to local and regional and provincial governments, and the 1055 TRCA in making landuse decisions that ensure the long-term health and integrity of this natural system is maintained. Implementation of the proposed management recommendations will be initiated this year with the assistance of a community -based stewardship committee. If you would like to join the stewardship committee click here to obtain an application form. A Report Card on the Health of the Humber River Watershed Prepared by The Humber Watershed Alliance • • Table of Contents - 367K • Chapter 1: Introduction - 1,338K • Chapter 2: Developing the Management Plan - 544KD • Chapter 3: Background Studies, Strategies, Policies & Legislation [part 11 - 384K • Chapter 3: Background Studies, Strategies, Policies & Legislation [part 21 - 1,922K • Chapter 4: Resource Inventory and Analysis [part 11 - 1,202KD • Chapter 4: Resource Inventory and Analysis [part 21 - 1,836K • Chapter 4: Resource Inventory and Analysis [part 31 - 1,550K • Chapter 5: Management Zones [part 11 - 705K • Chapter 5: Management Zones [part 11- 1,657K9 • Chapter 6: Management Recommendations - 349K • Chapter 7: Future Management of Cold Creek Conservation Area & Appendix - 238K BACK TO TOP Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan [whole document] - 21, 656K EEi El El Ei E2 El El E El El The Humber Watershed Alliance The Humber Watershed Management Strategy, Legacy, A Strategy for a Healthy Humber, published in the spring of 1997, included 30 objectives for the management of the watershed, one of which was the creation of a Humber Watershed Alliance to facilitate the implementation of Legacy. The Alliance was established by TRCA in October 1997. Its membership of 73 people includes residents, interest groups, business associations, elected representatives from the local and regional municipalities in the watershed, agency staff and the Chair of the TRCA. Community empowerment is a fundamental principle behind each and every TRCA Watershed Management Strategy. Under the TRCA approach, a watershed's communities become the driving force for protecting and regenerating the watershed. The diverse and inclusive nature of the Humber Alliance and its membership ensure that the Humber Watershed Management Strategy is implemented according to this first principle. BACK TO TOP Major Accomplishments of the Alliance First established in 1997, the Humber Alliance has already contributed to an impressive list of accomplishments including • release of the first Humber Report Card • designation of the Humber as a Canadian Heritage River 1056 • mitigation of six weirs to allow for fish passage • holding more than 20 community events to celebrate stewardship and educate people on Humber issues • creation of wetlands, establishment of forests, and construction of pedestrian trails • Development of one exciting Humber Discovery Walk, with plans for two more! BACK TO TOP Places of Interest • Black Creek Pioneer Village Toronto Carrying -Place Trail • McMichael Canadian Art Collection Kortright Centre for Conservation • Glenn Haffy, Albion Hills, Claireville and Boyd Conservation Areas • Caledon Trailway /Trans Canada Trail • Humber Arboretum • Humber Heritage Trail • High Park • The Old Mill • Humber Pedestrian Bridge - Toronto • Seneca College • Granger Greenway Trail BACK TO TOP Humber Links • Canadian Heritage Rivers System • Humber Arboretum BACK TO TOP Regeneration Projects • Raymore Park Fishway, Toronto • Palgrave Mill Pond Rehabilitation Project • Caledon East Wetland and Boardwalk • Doctors McLean Park Fishway, Woodbridge • Granger Greenway Trail, Vaughan • Bolton Community Action Site Contact Us If you have questions about the Humber watershed, e -mail Gary Wilkins, at gwilkins @trca.on.ca or call http: / /www.trca.on.ca /water protection /strategies /humber /ENGLISH.content.drop 1057 ELIZABETH BOTTOS 178 CHARMAINE ROAD, WOODBRIDGE, ONTARIO, L4L 1K2. PHONE 905- 851 -3671 (home) 905- 850 -0155 (office) EMAIL - liz(a,piccinbottos.com F AX - 905- 850 -0498 (office) July 21,2004. BY FAX - 416 -661 -6898 TRCA, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3M I S4. Attention: Adele Freeman Dear Madam: Re: Elizabeth Bottos - Humber Alliance Volunteer Application I am in receipt of your letter dated Apri 130, 2004, POSTMARKED JULY 19,2004, and received by me on July 20, 2004 advising that I was not accepted as a volunteer member of the Humber Alliance. (My application was in response to your advertised request for volunteers and you will recall that my interview took place on March 30,2004.) Perhaps you could let me know which of the 4 criterion I did not meet and what qualifications the 4 volunteers that where chosen have? The City ofVaughan has the largest Italian population in Canada. As an Italian, I am very disappointed to see that the TRCA was unable to find any Italians in Woodbridge with qualifications that would allow them to be accepted as volunteers on the Humber Alliance given that 2 of the eleven members from the City of Toronto share the same last name (Mittermaier) and two of the three members from Richmond Hill share the same last name (Bradley). I can only assume that if you received so many applications from Woodbridge residents (as Mr. Wilkins indicated in his letter of May 31,2004) a significant number of those applications must have been from the Italian population ofWoodbridge. I would have expected that an agency, funded by the Ontario Government and the Region of York, whose stated purpose is to promote community empowerment, would seek volunteers that are representative of the community. 1058 In any event, I am happy to see that you have so many volunteers that you have to turn people away and in light of this there is no need to send me newsletters to inform me of opportunities where I may participate as I assume you have sufficient volunteers. Very truly yours, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Elizabeth Bottos cc Gary Wilkins, TRCA, by fax: 416 - 661 -6898 Bill Fisch, Regional Chairman, York Region, by fax: 1- 905- 895 -1238 Linda Jackson, Regional Councillor, by fax: 905- 832 -8538 Tony Carella, Ward 2 Councillor, City of Vaughan, by fax: 905- 832 -8538 Greg Sorbara, MPP Vaughan -King- Aurora, by fax: 905- 851 -0210 Leo Angelantoni, by fax 905- 851 -3670 1059 CORRESPONDENCE (2) 4 EVERGREEN 8n !g Noturt Balk to Your Co January 12, 2005 TRCA Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Toronto ON M3N 1S4 Fax: 416-661-6898 1 am writing on behalf of Evergreen with respect to 119R Glen Road. I urge you to adopt the recommendations contained within the Staff Report of December 15, 2004. Evergreen, in partnership with The Task Force to Bring Back the Don, Toronto Parks and Recreation and the Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), has been involved in reforestation and stewardship activities in the Lower Don Watershed since 1992. Currently, we are working with the TRCA and others on the restoration and re -use of the buildings at the Don Valley Brick Works. The TRCA, the City of Toronto and numerous citizen groups have been working diligently for decades to protect Toronto's river valleys and ravines from development. Much has been accomplished. However, to allow a building at 119R Glen Road would be a step in the wrong direction. Development would impact wildlife habitat and biodiversity, and set a precedent useful to proponents of future development projects. Please accept the advice of staff and deny the Land Fill Permit application before you. Do not hesitate to contact me at 416 -596 -1495 x 29 or with respect to the above matter. Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Geoff Cape, Executive Director Evergreen 1060 CORRESPONDENCE (3) January 12, 2005 Penny Pepperell 21 Douglas Crescent Toronto, Ontario M4W 2E6 416 - 968 -0178 pennypepperell(asympatico.ca To the Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority info@trca.on.ca Re: the land fill permit application for 119R Glen Road made by Derek Russell I am opposed to the application as described above. As a long time Toronto resident and someone who walks daily in the ravine system, I am greatly concerned about the preserving our urban wilderness. The ravine system is Toronto's Central Park. It draws users from all of Toronto's neighbours — young families, day campers, birders, bikers, runners, dog walkers, and individuals taking a few moments respite from the cares of city life. It is an important wildlife corridor for snakes, coyotes, deer (I saw a buck and a doe near the Brickworks this week), foxes, and of course birds. It provides a crucial stopover for migrating fowl. All attempts to develop Toronto's park system and especially its ravines must be strongly resisted. Our ravines are under increasing stress as evidenced by the condition of the trees, which provide the crucial canopy for all manner of critters. Of course Rosedale residents are the primary beneficiaries of the ravine system. As such it is their particular responsibility to be the stewards of this natural resource that provides a benefit to all those who live in Toronto. Sincerely, Penny Pepperell Governor's Bridge Resident 1061 CORRESPONDENCE (4) To: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Fax: (416) 661 -6898 Email: Kstranks@trca.on.ca As a former member of the TRCA Executive Committee, I am proud of the work of TRCA staff and the board in furthering our shared, community interestsin preserving and safeguarding scarce, precious and irreplaceable ravine lands across this region and its watersheds. In particular I am concerned about the possibility of construction and building at 119R Glen Road in the heart of the urban City of Toornto. Please carefully consider your staff's recommendation to refuse this application for landfilling on this ravine. This proposal would reduce the land area available for conservation objectives and purposes, including regeneration and enhancement and therefore would be a most unfortunate precedent. This proposal is contrary to the TRCA's valley and stream corridor program and, in my opinion, would have a negative effect on the conservation of land. I ask that you not allow any building at 119R Glen Road and therefore deny this application for a land fill permit. Signature John Adams Address: 77 Cottingham Street Toronto, ON M4V 1B9 January 12, 2005 1062 CORRESPONDENCE (5) Sample letter to the TRCA We strongly urge you to contact the Conservation Authority and express your opposition to the proposal for 119R Glen Road. We provide a sample letter below that you can adapt and send by fax or e -mail. Thank you for your support! To: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Please continue to help the conservation of land in the Toronto Region by refusing to allow building in our region's ravines. In particular we are concerned about the possibility of building at 119R Glen Road. Please carefully review and follow your own professional staff's recommendation and deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road. This proposal would definitely reduce the land area available for your many positive objectives including regeneration and enhancement and would set an unfortunate precedent. The proposal would be against TRCA's valley and stream corridor programme and would have an overall very negative effect on the conservation of land. Please do not allow any building at 119R Glen Road and deny the application for the Land Fill Permit. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Signature Address Angela Gransden 75 Binscarth Road Date January 9th 2005 1063 CORRESPONDENCE (6) 34 Old Bridle Path Toronto, Ontario M4T 1A7 January 10, 2005 The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Attn. Brian E. Denney Chief Administrative Officer/ Secretazy Treasurer Dear Sir; Re: 119 R Glen Road By Facsimile to (416) 661 -6898 We are concerned about the future of the site at 119R Glen Road and understand a land Fill Permit Application is currently being reviewed by the TRCA. Approval of the application would set an unfortunate precedent that would encourage applications for other marginal sites in the fragile ravine ecosystem. If the application is approved we believe the authority of the TRCA will be undermined in future applications and also in the appeal process where other less sensitive authorities may have decision making powers. Approval of this proposal would also undermine public perception and support for the good work of the TRCA . Please review and follow the recommendations of the professional staff of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119 R Glen Road. We strongly object to construction of any type at 119 R Glen Road and ask you deny this and any future application. Yours truly, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Brenda and Chris Tweel 1064 CORRESPONDENCE (7) TO: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority FAX NUMBER: 416- 661 -6898 FROM: June Mclean DATE: January 10, 2005 RE: Building at 119R Glen Road NO. OF PAGES 2 MESSAGE As a resident of North Rosedale for most of my life and having lived in my house at 32 Whitney Avenue for 55 years, I am very concerned about the possibility of building at 119R Glen Road. This proposal would reduce the land area available for your many positive objectives, including regeneration and enhancement, and would set an unfortunate precedent. It would be against T.R.C.A.'s Valley and Stream Corridor Programme and would have an overall very negative effect on the conservation of land. Please do not allow any building at 119R Glen Road and deny the application for the Land Fill Permit. June Mclean 32 Whitney Avenue Toronto, ON M4W 2AR January 10, 2005 1065 CORRESPONDENCE (8) 7 Beaumont Road Toronto Ontario M4W 1V4 Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 Gentlemen: Once again, I write in support of the protection of our invaluable ravine system. Despite a Ravine By -Law that was implemented to protect the ravines of Toronto, there is an application to build a 4,000 sq. foot house in the ravine at 119R Glen Road. This ravine is unique in that access to it is difficult, thus providing a safe home to fauna such as foxes, deer, ducks, etc. as well as wildflowers. It also contains white pine and plane trees, which usually do not thrive in our urban atmosphere. The application for 119R Glen Road calls for not only a large structure, but also for the cutting down of trees, and land filling. The house itself would be set well down in the ravine. The ravines of Toronto are the lungs of the city, and should be left as an inheritance for future generations. Each time we allow construction in a ravine, we take away something that makes Toronto unique. I quote from Fodor's Travel Guide of Toronto... "Already, the City's only claims to beauty are endangered. Its ravines are shrinking to housing divisions and its lakeshore is polluted. The City's odd spirit of creative conservation could vanish under a gung -ho, pro - development City government. Whether Toronto has the wisdom or the luck to remain an enviable City remains to be seen." GC:gh ask the Committee to consider whether this application should pass. Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Geri Clever 1066 CORRESPONDENCE (9) 206 ROXBOROUGH DRIVE TORONTO M4W IXB January 10, 2005 The Executive Committee Toronto and Regional Conservation Authority BY FACSIMILE The ravines of the Toronto region are a significant and irreplaceable resource. They give our region a distinctive character and provide a habitat for a wide range of plant and animal life. The proposal to build a dwelling at 119R Glen Road would directly undermine this invaluable resource. The land area available for continued ravine enhancement would be reduced and an unfortunate precedent would be set. Indeed, the professional staff of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority have already expressed strong negative views with respect to the proposed development. Among other things, the development would directly contravene the objectives of the TRCA valley and stream corridor program. We urge you not to permit any building at 119R Glen Road and deny the application for a Land Fill Permit. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Edward B. Harvey Lorna R. Marsden 1067 CORRESPONDENCE (10) A. R. DEANE NESBITT 70 BINSCARTH ROAD TORONTO, ONTARIO M4W IY4 2005 -01 -11 BY FAX 416- 661 -6898 The Executive Committee The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Re: Application by Derek Russell to reqrade within a fill regulated area on 119R Glen Road As owner of the property at 70 Binscarth Road, Toronto, I am concerned about proposed building in the nearby ravine, namely at 119R Glen Road. Toronto's most distinctive natural characteristic is its network of ravines. These, in turn, benefit all of us by keeping the city far 'greener with both vegetation and wildlife than a city this size would typically be. I urge you to follow the recommendation of your professional staff and not permit the land fill permit application in connection with 119R Glen Road. Residents of Toronto need to know that policies for the conservation of land are firmly established and consistent. Respectfully submitted, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY A.R. Deane Nesbitt (Telephone: 416- 924 -0912) 1068 CORRESPONDENCE (11) Alexander K. Stuart 52 Binscarth Road Toronto, Ontario Canada Date - January 11, 2004 To: The Executive Comittee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Fax: 416-661-6898 Subject: 119R Glen Road- Land Fill Permit Application Dear Sirs: My wife. Mary Alice Stuart, and I join in urging that the above Application be denied. Among others, we offer the following principal reasons: 1. The natural ravines of Toronto are an extraordinary asset of the city, contributing to the quality of life at a time of increasing "densification ". They provide the lungs, the green relief for the eyes and the opportunity for exercise for citizens of all ages and all incomes. Their preservation is vital to the onward good development of a great city as it matures. There is enormous and growing public support for this view. 2. We have resided for decades in our present family home. The adjacent ravine in question has always been a natural habitat for birds and animals contributing (even the coons!) to the quality of our life, that of our neighbours and of the city. 3. Since the 1950's, in North Rosedale and neighbouring districts we have fought to understand, value and preserve our ravines, including specifically this one, for our good and the general good. 4. It is our view that the proposed fill, and subsequent development, would irrevocably damage the qualities we describe above and, of even greater importance. provide a precedent which will make future valley developments more difficult to oppose. The TRCA, with the strong support of citizens, has done a remarkable job indeed to protect our valley heritage. The case tor continued protection is clear and valid in this instance and we urge the Executive Committee to sustain its outstanding record by denying the permit. Thank you for this opportunity to make known our strongly held view. Yours sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Alexander K. Stuart, CM Mary Alice Stuart, CM, O.Ont. 1069 CORRESPONDENCE (12) To: 416- 661 -6898 To: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Toronto's ravine's are the jewel in the crown of this city and, indeed, its region. Any intrusion demonstrates a profound disinterest in the city's most valuable asset. Making the destruction of at least one hundred trees, displacement of the land and its consequences into a trivial violation begins a slippery slope that can be a downhill slide used as an example for the approval of other and more extensive devestation. Please consider your actions in the matter of a Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road carefully. It may have enormours consequences that do not seem obvious now. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Jane and Eberhard Zeidler 11 Beaumont Road Toronto M4W 1V4 (Rosedale) 1070 CORRESPONDENCE (13) To: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Fax: 416- 661 -6898 Toronto is a city that has always preserved our heritage and protected our greenspace. Please do not allow building at 119R Glen Rd. It will set a dangerous precedent for future development in our city. I am proud of our city and proud of an organization that strives to protect the ravines for future generations to enjoy. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY K. Shanahan 119 Glen Rd 1071 CORRESPONDENCE (14) "Walter Bowen" 01/10/05 11:20 AM To: <info @trca.on.ca> cc: Subject: Re: 119R Glen Road To: The Executive Committee of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority My wife Lisa Balfour Bowen and I who reside at 25 Chestnut Park Road, Toronto M4W 1W4 are very appalled that your Authority would consider permitting the landfill application and the subsequent building of a house in the ravine between Beaumont Road and Bins - Scarth Road. This is very inappropriate and extremely significant in and of itself and in addition, will, If you permit this one to proceed, permit others to follow and Toronto's treasured ravines will be seriously negatively impacted. We expect your Authority to respect the ravines of Toronto at all times and not to permit development therein. Walter M. Bowen, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Suite 2100, 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3C2 Tel: (416) 869 -5326 Fax: (416) 350 -6922 email: wbowen @casselsbrock.com ******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** This message, including any attachments, is privileged and may contain confidential information intended only for the person(s) named above. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. Communication by email is not a secure medium and, as part of the transmission process, this message may be copied to servers operated by third parties while in transit. Unless you advise us to the contrary, by accepting communications that may contain your personal information from us via email, you are deemed to provide your consent to our transmission of the contents of this message in this manner. If you do not want to communicate with us via email, please reply to this message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email and permanently delete the original transmission from us, including any attachments, without making a copy. ******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1072 CORRESPONDENCE (15) "Sue Matthews" 01/11/05 07:44 PM To: <info @trca.on.ca> cc: Subject: 119R Glen Road To: The Executive Committee, Toronto and Regional Conservation Authority understand that there is to be a hearing with respect to the application by Derek Russell to regrade and later build on 119R Glen Road in the City of Toronto. I am very concerned about any further encroachment on ravine lands, and urge you to review this application thoroughly. As I understand it, your professional staff has recommended that this application should be denied. Like all of us, they have grave concerns about setting an unfortunate precedent, as well as reducing the land area available for regeneration and enhancement. This proposal is totally contrary to the objectives of the TRCA's valley and stream corridor programme, and it would have a very negative effect on the conservation of land. Surely by now we have learned from our earlier unfortunate mistakes just how damaging development can be, and how destructive it is to the surrounding ecosystems. I am a resident in this neighbourhood and one of the things that makes it so special, is the wonderful ravine land. Please help us preserve it. urge you to follow your own staffs advice and to deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road. Susan Osler Matthews 139 Roxborough Drive Toronto January 10, 2005 1073 CORRESPONDENCE (16) "Michael de Pencier" 01/10/05 09:56 PM To: <info @trca.on.ca> cc: Subject: 119R Glen Road Dear Executives of TRCA Consider these thoughts please: Toronto's ravines are one of our most valuable and precious features. Paris is one of the world's most beautiful cities, because they always resist the endless zoning temptations to let personal desires tamper with the long term public good. In Toronto, a little transgression here, an exception somewhere else, a small deviation today, a large one tomorrow — and goodbye wonderful city and its glorious untrammeled ravines, and hello mediocre commercial town. Think big; reject 119Rancide Glen Road. Yours truly Michael de Pencier Chairman, Key Publishers Co Ltd 1074 CORRESPONDENCE (17) 'Turner, John" 01/11/05 10:39 AM To: <info @trca.on.ca> cc: Subject: Land Fill Application for 119R Glen Road Dear Staff: I am a resident of 11 Harper Avenue, Toronto, M4T 2L1. I am writing to ask that Staff of the TRCA deny the land fill application for 119R Glen Road which I understand will be heard on January 14th. I am a daily user of the ravine near 119R Glen Road. I jog there every morning (at about 5.30 am) with our family dog. I also have a special needs son and he loves to go in the ravine with his therapists after school. I am concerned with any development which would diminish the beauty and isolation of the ravine. We lived in London, England for many years and we have frequently commented that it is a shame that Toronto does not have a urban park system like London. In places like Hampstead Heath you would never know you were in the middle of a large city. In our neighbourhood the only thing that comes remotely close to such peace and tranquility is our ravine system and we must protect it for future generations. I have some concerns as well that if there is construction going on in or near the ravine that there may be safety issues as I generally (certainly @ this time of year) run in the dark. The ravine is not well lit. If there are any ruminants of the construction left on or near the path I or the other early morning users of the ravine (and there are many regulars) could be injured. I would be pleased to answer any questions you may have. Respectfully submitted, John S. M. Turner 11 Harper Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4T 2L1 Tel: +1- 416 - 865 -4380 Cel: +1- 416 - 722 -8484 E -mail: jturner @tor.fasken.com Fax: +1- 416 - 364 -7813 1075 CORRESPONDENCE (18) "Morden Yolles" 01/11/05 11:57 AM Please continue to help the conservation of land in the Toronto Region by refusing to allow building in our region's ravines. In particular we are concerned about the possibility of building at 119R Glen Road. Please carefully review and follow your own professional staff's recommendation and deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road. The price for which the present owner purchased this land was so low, it is clear that the likelihood of being able to build a residence on it was nil and that should confirmed by the Conservation Authority. I and all the other residents of Rosedale treasure this ravine land and it must not be intruded upon by a building such as proposed. This proposal would definitely reduce the land area available for your many positive objectives including regeneration and enhancement and would set an unfortunate precedent. The proposal would be against TRCA's valley and stream corridor programme and would have an overall very negative effect on the - conservation of land. Please do not allow any building at 119R Glen Road and deny the application for the Land Fill Permit. Morden Yolles 67 Binscarth Road Toronto, Ontario M4W 1Y3 Tel: 416- 920 -3107 1076 CORRESPONDENCE (19) PETER & CAMILLA DALGLISH 35 Binscarth Road, Toronto, ON M4W 1Y3 Phone #: (416) 923 -8628 January 11, 2005 To The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority It is with great concern that I learn that an application for a Landfill Permit is being requested for 119R Glen Road. This contravenes the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor program which was set up to protect the ravines of Toronto, the most unique natural feature of our great city, the best ravine system in North America. The MRTCA has an excellent reputation. It is managed by thoughtful, knowledgeable staff and guided by a caring Chairman and Executive Committee. I fear for the future of MRTCA if it does not fill it's mandate. It will become increasingly difficult for the Conservation Foundation to raise funds as the public, corporations and foundations become disillusioned. This issue has become very public over the past few years. Many citizens of Toronto are concerned about the decision to be made on Friday, January 14th. We all care about our ravines -- please don't let us down. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Camilla Dalglish 35 Binscarth Road Toronto M4W 1Y3 Jan 9/04 1077 Peter Dalglish 35 Binscarth Road Toronto M4W 1Y3 Jan 9/04 CORRESPONDENCE (20) Date: January 11, 2005 To: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority From: David Harrison 30 Bin - Scarth Road, Toronto, M4W IY1 Re: Application #029 /03 /Tor - 119R Glen Road, Toronto As a long term resident of Bin -Scarth Road in North Rosedale I wish to register my objection to the proposed house construction in the ravine lot described as 119R Glen Road. This matter has been subject to review and discussion for almost ten years. The strong objections by so many residents have been registered over this time but the approval process has become a matter of legal cat and mouse designed to wear down the residents into finally acquiescing to the changing plans of Mr. and Mrs. Russell. No doubt Mr. and Mrs. Russell will posit economic hardship and claim private property rights are central to their application and supporting arguments. However, I understand that Mr. and Mrs. Russell have been offered financial arrangements, over the years, that would have made them whole. They appear hell -bent to ensure their objective remains supreme over the general desire of all those who so strongly object to this plan. Clearly, the TRCA staff has put together a first -rate review and recommendation for consideration by the Executive Committee. I urge that their recommendation be adopted. One need only go to the proposed building site to understand the difficulties in construction and destruction of the natural environment that would result from actually going ahead with this proposal. Further, the ability of any large emergency vehicles to reach this proposed house, particularly in winter, seems impossible given the extremely narrow laneway that gives access from Glen Road Our ravines are natural assets that are invaluable to Toronto. It appears that we, the citizens, must be forever vigilant as to their protection. I urge the TRCA to defend our greater good, reject application #029 /03 /Tor and to also ensure that no development be allowed at 119R Glen Road either now or in the future. 1078 CORRESPONDENCE (21) January 12, 2005 The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Fax: 416 661 -6898 Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Rd. We wish to register our strong objections to building in any of Toronto's ravines and request that you deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road. The ravine system is one of Toronto's prime assets. Our ravines contribute greatly to the beauty and character of the city allowing forests, birds and wild life to exist in an urban setting. They improve air and water quality and allow residents to enjoy the natural environment. This application to regrade land within the Beaumont - Binscarth ravine is in direct contradiction to the TRCA's valley and stream corridor program. It is invasive and destructive to the natural flora and fauna and could set a dangerous precedent leading to more development and further ravine losses. We strongly oppose this development and request that you deny the application. Yours truly, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Richard and Mary Lou Gossage 48 Binscarth Rd. Toronto, M4W 1Y4 1079 CORRESPONDENCE (22) 45 Binscarth Road, Toronto, Ontario M4W 1Y3 January 11, 2005 By Fax : 416 661 6898 The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Dear Sirs, Re : 119R Glen Road, Toronto I would like to express my serious concern regarding the proposal to build on the property at 119R Glen Road and the Land Fill Permit Application currently under review. It seems that this proposal significantly contravenes the Authority's intent to preserve the natural environment in ravine areas, providing the opportunity to remove the very trees that we are all so concerned about protecting, and threatening the natural habitat of the wildlife that exist in this domain. With the increase of the redevelopment of properties in Toronto's communities, it is a challenge to balance the value of the natural and historic environment with the modern conveniences of a city in the 21st Century. However, one of Toronto's most appealing features is the appreciation and conservation of its green, treed and ravine areas, and surely one worth preserving. Please consider this proposal with significant gravity, weighing not only the impact of today's request, but the precedent that your judgement may set to be followed for future proposals and abuse of the city's remaining ravines. Respectfully requested, I remain, Yours truly, Jill Hermant Jill Hermant 1080 CORRESPONDENCE (23) 319 Seaton Street Toronto, ON M5A 2T6 January 12, 2005 The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 154 Fax: 416- 661 -6898 E -mail: info @trca.on.ca RE: Application of Derek Russell regarding 119R Glen Road, Toronto Dear Members of the Executive Committee: I am writing to urge you to deny the application of Derek Russell for development on the regulated land at 119R Glen Road, Toronto. As the saying goes, "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." Similarly, the gradual destruction of our city's ravines begins with single projects like these. I have been a resident of downtown Toronto for more than 30 years and had many opportunities to compare our ravine lands with those in other urban areas. There is simply no question that exceptions to conservation policies inexorably lead to the deterioration of the environment and a host of other issues. Your decision will establish a high - profile example and serve as a precedent for years to come. Please vote to conserve our ravine lands and deny Mr. Russell's application for 119R Glen Road. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY John Iskra (416) 884 -8416 1081 CORRESPONDENCE (24) "Caleb Hayhoe" 01/12/05 02:24 PM To: The Executive Committee of the Toronto Region Conservation Authority Attention: Brian E. Denney, Chief Administration Officer Re: Application of Derek Russell 119R Glen Road, Toronto Dear Members of the Executive Committee: I am writing in connection with your public hearing in the matter of the application of Mr. Derek Russell to regrade and fill an area located at 119R Glen Road, in Toronto. I am the owner of 125 Glen Road and I am completely opposed to your authority permitting any change in the present state of the ravine area which constitutes this property. The vision and mandate of your Authority, as published by it, includes the creation and preservation of the Living City by the protecting and restoring the natural resources of its watersheds. As you know, the purpose of this application is to facilitate the construction of a 4,000 square foot private residence within these watershed lands which have remained undisturbed ever since this area was developed in the 1920's. There is no possibility that the construction of such a building will protect or restore the natural resources of this area of the Don Valley ravine system. I would strongly urge your committee to adopt and follow the recommendations of your professional staff and preserve this pristine area for the enhancement of our city. Your authority is also a body created by the Ontario Legislature for the carrying out of its purposes for all the citizens of Ontario. This application is not a case of the consideration of reasonable restrictions upon development which could possibly affect lands under your jurisdiction, but is rather the case of whether an untouched ravine area in the centre of Toronto will be despoiled for the benefit of one speculative land owner. Every landowner in the area of this ravine has made an investment in the preservation of this ravine for the purposes for which your Authority was created. I, together with my neighbours, would please ask you not to permit any change to this pristine area. Yours very truly Amy Hayhoe 125 Glen Road Toronto, M4W2W1 1082 CORRESPONDENCE (25) Honor de Pencier 87 Woodlawn Avenue West Toronto, Ontario, M4V 106 Tel: 416 -515- 7101 Fax; 416 -515 -9815 honordep @sympatico.ca Fax to: Executive Committee Jan. 11, 2005 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Fax no: 426 - 661 -6898 No. of pages: 1 Re: Proposal for building at 119R Glen Road I am strongly opposed to any plans to build any more in any of Toronto's ravines. The natural ecological systems of our city cannot recover from any more assaults than they already suffer from (roads, and other forms of development). They are our best source of cleaning the air that we breathe, particularly in the summer: it is the trees that save us from even worse air pollution, and any more development in these important and fragile areas MUST be CURTAILED. Please do not let the selfishness of one person or family have their way at the expense of all the rest of the citizens needing better air. I can't believe this proposal is even being considered by the Conservation Authority. It is our duty to protect the last vestiges of natural forest and undisturbed land in this city, which is special largely because of its physical assets : the waterfront and the wonderful ravine and river system. We have now lost the natural grandeur and beauty of the waterfront due to over - development. Let us at least stand up and protect the ravines that remain for the future generations of our city. Once they are gone, they are gone forever. Thank you for your attention. PLEASE BE STRONG FOR CONSERVATION where it is needed, and support building and /or landfill where we've already got roads and subways, rather than damaging the few remaining forests or natural areas. Yours truly, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Honor de Pencier 1083 CORRESPONDENCE (26) C.J. Pigott 15 Melbourne Ave. Toronto, Ontario Jan. 11/05 Dear Executive Committee, Toronto Region Conservation Authority Sent by fax 416 - 661 -6898 , email: info @trca.on.ca Re: Derek Russell Application to regrade within a fill regulated area at 119 R Glen Road, Toronto, Meeting 10 am, Jan. 14th/05 I am writing this letter to support the Toronto Region Conservation Authority to stop the permit for fill to be allowed at 119 R Glen Road. The ravines make Toronto a great city, as the trees purify the area and provide habitat for animals, birds and creatures. The TRCA is fighting to preserve our ravine by -laws. They must be supported If the ravine is filled with landfill, the ravine will be destroyed . this is a bad precedent to start to develop ravines, when the by -laws are against development. The policy is clearly in favour of stopping ravine development throughout Toronto. We must stop here, or the ravines will be under constant threat of development, erosion and elimination of wildlife habitate. Land Fill Permit at 119R Glen Road must be denied. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C.J. Pigott 1084 CORRESPONDENCE (27) John T. Band, 60 Bin -Scarth Road Toronto, Ontario M4W 1Y4 416- 923 -9250 Jan. 11/05 Dear Executive Committee, Toronto Region Conservation Authority Sent by fax 416 -66 1 -6898 , email: info(itrca.on.ca Re: Derek Russell Application to regrade within a fill regulated area at 119 R Glen Road, Toronto Meeting 10 am, Jan. 14th /05, Black Creek Pioneer Village, 1000 Murray Ross Parkway Please accept this letter as a letter to conserve the ravines in our region. If this fill permit is allowed, there is no way to anticipate and predict the destruction of ravine flora and fauna. This is a below grade ravine that will be filled in. We don't' know the damage that will be caused. The policy is clear. This meeting should be transparent in its support of the TRCA's recommendations. I understand the staff of TRCA recommends that the permit be denied, so why would their recommendation not be accepted. This opportunity to follow your own recommendations, will strengthen the protection of the ravines in Toronto. Please deny this application for a Land Fill Permit at 1198 Glen Road. Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY John T. Band 1085 CORRESPONDENCE (28) M. P. Fischer 88 Bin - Scarth Road Toronto, Ontario M4W 1Y4 416 -972 -6434 Jan. 11/05 Dear Executive Committee, Toronto Region Conservation Authority Sent by fax 416 -661 -6898 , email: infotrca. on. ca Re: Derek Russell Application to regrade within a fill regulated area at 119 R. Glen Road, Toronto, Meeting 10 am, Jan. 14th/05, Black Creek Pioneer Village, 1000 Murray Ross Parkway / moved to Toronto some 12 years ago from a ravine rich city l chose Toronto because of the ravines and since I've been here, there is always someone trying to build in the ravines, by circumventing the laws. Again, / am writing this letter to support the Toronto Region Conservation Authority to stop the permit for fill to be allowed at 119 R. Glen Road. As a former member of the Hamilton Conservation Authority, by allowing a below grade fill and subsequently a house on this fill, the ravine Is permanently altered and under future threat from development. The professionals who protect our ravines must be supported. The TRCA is against this permit for numerous reasons that they have and will outline. We as concerned citizens should not have to write and fight constantly to keep by - laws up held. The policy is clearly in favour of stopping ravine development throughout Toronto. We must stop here, or the ravines will be under constant threat of development, erosion and elimination of wildlife habitate. Land Fill Permit at 119R Glen Road must be denied. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY M. P. Fischer 1086 CORRESPONDENCE (29) TORONTO Ward 27 Kyle Rae, Councillor Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Toronto, ON M3N 2S4 Dear Committee Members: C Nit ;I. lad f:,,x S:reet T. nt .int.: iv1 H7N.'? fax a1Ufl4�4 VDU "C Iii' -ac:b'trcr to :9 January 12, 2005 Re: Hearing Report 7.1, Application #029/03 — 119R Glen Road I am writing to you today to strongly urge your committee to reject this application to re -grade within a Fill Regulated Area for the Don River. As your own staff have reported, this application reduces that land area that is available for the ongoing regeneration and enhancement objections; has a detrimental impact due to cumulative loss of natural cover; creates a negative precedent for future consideration of similar proposals; does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan and "has an overall negative effect on the conservation of the land ". As the local City Councillor for this address and this community, I strongly urge the Executive Committee to adopt your own staff recommendations and deny this application. I remain, Kyle Rae City Councillor 1087 CORRESPONDENCE (30) January 12/05 To: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Fax: 416- 661 -6898 This fax is to register concern as to building permits issued to allow building structures into ravine areas of north and south Rosedale or elsewhere in the GTA area. In the 1960's it is our understanding that building into or on the edge of ravines was disallowed; building permits were not issued. The reason was the instability of this land. To-days land slide in California, the Indian Ocean devastation reveals that we must be aware of how vital it is to understand the fragile sub - structure of our area. Conservation is one issue, but if we have rain storms of unusual duration as are now occurring in the United States and Britain, we will have mudslides. This is also where, old streams, uncharted, have been filled in. The case in point, is Cluny and Rosedale Road where at this time three additions are being built onto existing houses; and where a pool has been cantilevered from the edge of this ravine area. Glen Road is another problem area with owners in the region expressing concern of in -fill at 119R Glen Road. Then we have the huge development at the north end of Governors Road perched on a brow when earlier that same site was protected from over building. We urge no building permits should be issued until a full examination of our lands can be undertaken. The ravines are already endangered by unmistakeable loss of trees from drought. Fewer trees in ravine areas only means instability of land; the road at the cross -roads of Cluny Road and Cluny Avenue is sinking across from a new house built onto the ravine edge. Thank you Residents of 120 Rosedale Valley Road ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Barbara Chipman Shirley Sanders Margaret Couch Sandra Waque Agnes Fraser Vivian Saunderson Aleida MacDonald Hal Rowan Diane Hawkins 1088 CORRESPONDENCE (31) 10 Delisle Ave., Suite 1405 Toronto, Ontario M4V3C6 To: The Executive Committee Toronto Region Conservation Authority Fax: 416- 661 -6898 Please continue to help the conservation of land in the Toronto Region by refusing to allow building in our ravines. In particular we are concerned about the possibility of building at 119R Glen Rd. We strongly support the TRCA professional staff in their opposition to this development. The proposal is rejected by them for many reason including the following: 1. It creates a precedent for further ravine losses as this would be the only structure within this ravine corridor which is entirely within a valley. It would be partially on a valley wall and on a sloping valley floor! 2. It reduces land available for regeneration and enhancement. The destruction of trees leads to erosion and water run off in increased amounts. 3. It is detrimental in the loss of natural cover below the tree tops. 4. It is also detrimental to fauna, including forest bird species at risk, deer, ducks, foxes and coyotes. The house will bring artificial light, noise and garbage that leads to disorientation of the birds and animals that live in this protected ravine. 5. The Executive Committee of TRCA has denied a proposal for the disputed south Beaumont ravine where houses already exist. This proposal was less invasive than 119R Glen Road which is in the same area. We ask you to review and follow the recommendation of your professional staff: Deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road! ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Sheila K. Shaw John Shaw 1089 CORRESPONDENCE (32) Sara and Eric Jackman NINE DRUMSNAB ROAD TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M4W 3A4 January 12, 2005 The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 Dear Executive Committee, We have been informed, once again, of someone's wish to destroy our natural ravines. Please stop this from happening. In particular we are concerned about the possibility of building at 119R Glen Road. Please carefully review and follow your own professional staffs recommendation and deny the Land Fill Permit Application for 119R Glen Road. This proposal would definitely reduce the land area available for your many positive objectives including regeneration and enhancement and would set an unfortunate precedent. The proposal would be against TRCA's valley and stream corridor programme and would have an overall very negative effect on the conservation of land. Please do not allow any building at 119R Glen Road and deny the application for the Land Fill Permit. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Sara and Eric Jackman 1090 CORRESPONDENCE (33) tiK HARVEY KALLES 6 Beaumort Road Toronto, ON M4W 1V4 January 12, 2005 Attention: The Executive Committee Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Re: 119 Rear Glenn Road This proposal would definitely cause traffic problems on a public street such as Glenn Road where ingress and egress would be from a very narrow laneway. This could have a negative effect on the T.T.C. buses, which have a stop very close to this laneway. Let alone for the northerly traffic flow on Glenn Road. I was of mind that the T.R.C.A. staff is strongly against any development and are in favour of protecting our ravines and open space. We firmly ask you to deny this application for any landfill permit or building permit at 119 Rear of Glenn Road. The applicant, Derek Russell, purchased this land for about $50,000.00 knowing full well that this was not a building lot. I might add that the applicant is firmly entrenched in a formidable luxury home in Forest Hill and this whole exercise is purely speculative to make a fast buck. As a taxpayer and neighbouring owner of the subject ravine, I feel this project could set a precedent. Please inform me of the decision, as I will be unable to attend in person. Yours truly, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY HArvey Kalles 1091 CORRESPONDENCE (34) From: Nan Shuttleworth 48 Cluny Drive Toronto ON M4W 2P7 January 12, 2005 Re: Hearing before the Executive Committee of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority at 1000 Murray Ross Parkway, Toronto at loam, January 14, 2005 To Whom it may concern: I write today in support of stewardship of natural areas and to comment on the need to preserve the integrity of ravines in the City of Toronto. In recent years the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has committed substantial resources toward the development of a Toronto and Region Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy. In a 55 -page document, the "Strategy reflects best practice in contemporary ecological science" to address "incremental losses of habitat" and prior failure "to adequately conserve the ecological integrity and biodiversity of natural systems" throughout natural areas of the urban landscape. To build privately in sensitive ravine and valley lands is counter to the Natural Heritage System Strategy and it is not in the public interest. In February 2000 the City of Toronto's Environmental Task Force published its Environmental Plan, a I36 -page report highlighting the 'natural' capital of the city and the need to preserve and restore it as part of a long -terns planning /conservation process. To build privately in a ravine /valley land is counter to the science and intent of the Environmental Plan (2000). Mayor David Miller intends to see a cleaner and greener Toronto on his watch and has called for planning strategics to enhance existing green space and to capitalize on Toronto's parks, ravines, valleys and other natural areas: branding Toronto as "a City within a Park ". The Toronto Community Foundation has convened a group of interested parties to work in tandem with the Mayor's initiatives. Today's land -use planning promotes stewardship of natural resources and natural areas on urban borders and within urban landscapes. To build privately in sensitive ravine /valley land is counter to these values. Introducing unrelated fill into a ravine for private building purposes is not consistent with the recommendations, principles, strategies or policies articulated in the Toronto and Region Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy nor in the Environmental Plan (2000) nor likely in the current City Administration's environment plans. This letter does not attempt to address site alteration, the significant degree of digging and consequent negative impacts on the ravine's hydrological cycle and groundwater systems which are part of the Don watershed. 1092 CORRESPONDENCE (35) WILLIAM R. HERRIDGE 20 Edgar Avenue Toronto, Canada, M4W 2A9 Chair and Members of the Executiver Committee, The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, DOWNSVIEW, ON. M3N 1 S4 Dear Mr. Chair and Members of the Executive, Re: 119R Glen Road, Toronto, Application #029 /03Tor Tel No. (416) 962 -8680 Fax No. (416) 962 -8287 E -mail: wherridg(a)allstream.nct January 12th, 2005 I am writing to submit that the Executive should accept the conclusions of the Staff Report with respect to this Application, and deny the requested permit. I am a Iong -term resident of the North Rosedale area, and believe myself to be a friend of Conservation. As such, 1 believe that the protection of ilie Toronto Ravine System is a matter of vital public importance. I am a past - president of the North Rosedale Ratepayers' Association, and am currently a Director Emeritus of this Association. I do, however wish to state that the views expressed in this submission are my own, and that the views of the Association will be formally presented by our President, Mr. Pat Howe, who will attend the hearing on Friday, in person. The staff report has, in my view, been carefully prepared and is well reasoned. In my submission, the Report's conclusions and recommendations should be adopted. At the outset, I refer to Attachment 1 to the Staff Report (Agenda p. 31) which clearly indicates the intrusion of the proposed development into the area below the Fill Regulation Line. I submit that such a development below the Fill Regulation Line should be permitted, if at all, only in the most extraordinary circumstances, and where it is clear that the development will not result in any detriment to the ravine system. I submit that the Staff report clearly indicates that such circumstances do not exist in the present case. In particular, I urge acceptance of the conclusions of the Staff Report (Agenda p. 26) that the proceedings before the OMB and the Courts have no bearing on TRCA' s right to issue or deny the permits applicable to this property. In this connection, I would emphasize that the Planning Act and the Conservation Authorities Act are two very different statutes enacted by the Legislature as solutions to very different social problems. A single example of this difference would be that while the Planning Act operates on a municipality by municipality basis, the Conservation Authorities Act operates on a Watershed basis. 1093 I also urge acceptance of the Staff Report's conclusion (Agenda p.28) that the Subject land does not qualify as an "infill property ". I submit that this conclusion becomes apparent on an examination of Attachment 1, (Agenda page 31). This attachment certainly supports the conclusion of the Staff Report (Agenda p. 28) that the subject property "is the only property within this corridor where development would be located entirely within the valley." As the Report further indicates, the proposed dwelling "'will be constructed entirely below the top of bank. On these facts, I submit that the following statement in the Report (Agenda p. 28) reflects the only conclusion possible on these facts: Further, any development of this lot will not meet the TRCA' s objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs. I further submit that the concern of the Report (Agenda p. 30) that allowing this application might establish a dangerous precedent, is extremely well justified. Such a precedent would be of very great concern to all those interested in the well -being of the Toronto Ravine System. I submit that it is a fundamental objective of TRCA to prevent ravine land, such as this property from development. Accordingly, I urge adoption of the Staff Report and the report's recommendations. In particular, I submit the Executive should approve the conclusions of the report (Agenda p. 30) that: The land available for regeneration will change forever once the house is constructed, Regeneration of valleys through the loss of overall area for regeneration area is not consistent with the TRCA policy objectives and does not meet the test of conservation of land. and also that the proposed development "'does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCAs Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program..." Accordingly, I urge the adoption of the Staff Report's recommendation (Agenda p. 30) that the Executive Committee "refuse this application as it will affect the conservation of land..." Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY William R. Herridge 1094 CORRESPONDENCE (36) 47 BINSCARTH ROAD TORONTO, ONTARIO M4W 1Y3 The Executive Committee Attn: Mr. Brian E. Denney Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario M3N 1S4 Dear Mr. Denny: RE: 119R Glen Road Fax: 416- 661 -6898 January 12, 2005 Please advise the Executive Committee of our strong opposition to and concern for the possible consequences of granting a land fill permit for this property. In fact, we are, as are most citizens, strongly opposed to any building in any of the Toronto ravines or indeed any other area's ravines. Reasons for our opposition to a permit include: • The proposed development would be totally below the top of the bank. • This would be the only property within this corridor which is entirely located within the valley . This is not an infill property. • The proposal for the use of land for the residence and garage is not a measure of enhancement promoted through TRCA's programmes. • The builder does not have an environmental impact assessment. • The proposal to remove trees will cause damage to and opening of the forest canopy which will most likely adversely affect the several already threatened forest bird species present. These species include those common mainly to rural areas and are unique to a urban setting. • The negative influence of these buildings would affect not only this 1.2 acres but also be felt further into adjoining forest areas in the ravine networks. • Approval would be a dangerous precedent and would lead to further proposals which would create further loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within TRCA's jurisdiction. • Please follow the professional staffs recommendation and do not grant a land fill or any permit for 119R Glen Road. Thank you. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Nancy & John McFadyen 1095 CORRESPONDENCE (65) Davies Howe Partners Lawyers The Fifth Floor 99 Spadina Ave Toronto, Ontario M5V 3P8 T 416.977.7088 F 416.977.8931 davieshowe.com Please refer to: Michael Melling e -mail: michaelrn @davieshowe.com January 12, 2005 By Facsimile Transmission Only to 416 - 661 -6898 Ms. Kathy Stranks Supervisor, Board Member Services Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 Dear Ms. Stranks: Re: Application by Derek and Tina Russell 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto Executive Committee Meeting of January 14,2004 Further to the Notice of Hearing issued on January 5th, please distribute this letter and the enclosed correspondence from Mr. Smith to the members of Executive, for their consideration. At the Hearing, Mr. Smith, Ms. Russell and I will be making a brief presentation in support of the application, and will be available for questions. I believe that Mr. Smith's letter more than adequately demonstrates the merits of the application, and for that reason I will not repeat them here. However, since we are in receipt of a copy of the staff's report, I do wish to make a number of points in response to it. I must preface my comments by saying that my clients, Mr. Smith and I have the greatest respect for staff, and appreciate the time and effort they have put into their review of this application, including a very productive meeting with Mr. Smith. We recognize that they likely feel an obligation to take a position on this application which is consistent with the one they took on my clients' previous application, even though that application was approved by the Executive. However, we do not agree with staff. Their view of the previous application was wrong, and the Executive was right not to accept their recommendation. And, for the reasons set out below, staffs view is even more wrong with respect to this application. 1. The most important point in the staff report is the acknowledgment that this application is better from an environmental perspective than the one previously approved. 1096 2. Staffs recommendation says that the application should be refused because it "affects the conservation of land ". It certainly does; but in precisely the opposite way that staff alleges. This application will have a profoundly positive impact on the conservation if land; it presents, as Mr. Smith's letter details, a rare and important opportunity to actually improve the health of a ravine, rather than just talk about it. The conservation easement and approved ravine restoration program will be powerful examples for future improvement of this ravine, and others. 3. We agree with staff that the governing provision of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program ( "VSCMP) is s. 4.2.2 G). Within that policy, staff identifies four reasons for opposing the application, which I will address in turn: (a) Staff alleges that this is not an "infill" lot. This position is based on'their conclusion that it is not "between existing developed (urban) lots ", as required by the preamble to s. 4.2.2 G). That conclusion is in turn based on staffs observation that this "is the only property within this corridor where development would be located entirely within the valley" . First, the plain fact is that this lot is between two existing, developed urban lots, not to mention that it is completely surrounded by exsting, developed urban lots (none of the ravine in this area is in public hands - all of it is within contiguous private lots ). There is a developed lot to the south of our client's frontage (119 Glen Road) and one to the north (123 Glen Road). My clients' lot is between them. In fact, no matter what direction you look in, my clients' property is "between" two existing, developed urban lots of record. And it is worth nothing that, by staffs logic, 43 Binscarth Road would also not be between two existing, developed urban lots, since it is a flag- shaped lot with a "flagpole" access that runs between 41 and 45 Binscarth. However, the ultimate proof of my clients' position is that the City of Toronto recognizes my clients' property as a legal lot of record which does not require zoning relief in order to permit the construction of a dwelling. If this were not a legal infill lot and was, for example, a "house behind a house ", it would need a variance or rezoning. It doesn't. Perhaps most important, however, is that the definition in the VSCMP does not say that in determining whether a lot is "between existing developed (urban) lots ", one is supposed to decide whether development would be "located entirely within the valley" .That test is simply not in the policy. In fact, applying staffs test would be nonsensical, since s. 4.2.2 G) is, after all, part of s. 4.2.2, which says that: The following policies, criteria and implementation procedures apply to areas of existing development within valley and stream corridors... (emphasis added) The whole point of s. 4.2.2 G) is to provide for development, subject to specified criteria, that is "within" a valley, and if staffs interpretation of s. 4.2.2 is correct, s. 4.2.2 G) would be meaningless. There would never be a situation in which it would apply. 1097 (b) Staff alleges that the application does not meet s. 4.2.2 G) i), which requires consistency with existing primary building setbacks within the corridor reach. It is important to note that nowhere in the staff report is there any documentation to support this statement. In fact, the report does not even demarcate what the corridor reach is. (c) The facts are that (1) there are over 170 linear feet of mass gravity retaining walls on this property, which are integral to and inseparable, from the buildings they support: 121 Glen Road, 41 Binscarth Road and 43 Binscarth Road; and (2) contrary to staffs assertion, there are numerous properties in this area, including 121 Glen Road, with lesser or equal setbacks, and none of the adjacent properties immediately surrounding my client's lot comply with the setback requirements in the VSCMP. This is apparent even from the aerial photograph attached to staffs report. Staff claims that the application does not comply with s. 4.2.2 G) iii), which prohibits development that is "located on a valley wall" .The fact is that the proposed development is not "located on a valley wall "; it is located on a sloping valley floor, and is set back 15 metres from the dominant valley wall to the south east. The "valley wall" staff is referring to is a three metre, human made, filled embankment that supports the existing driveway. Its topography, geology and vegetative character have nothing to do with what a "valley wall" is. (d) Staffs final criticism based on s. 4.2.2 G) is very difficult to understand. First, staff misquotes s. 4.2.2 G) vii), which actually refers to impacts on a "Significant Area ", by saying that it concerns impacts on "the riparian habitat ". This policy has nothing to do with riparian habitat, which is separately addressed in s. 4.2.2 G) viii). If staffs concern is about riparian habitat, the concern is misplaced; based on the definition in the VSCMP (cf. Glossary), there is no riparian habitat on this property or anywhere near it ( the most proximate riparian habitat would be beyond eleven or twelve Lots to the cast, over the Park Drive Trail, across the Bayview Avenue extension, and over the CN rail tracks). 4. There is a lengthy discussion in the staff report about floral and faunal habitat, some of which is impliedly if not explicitly critical of the ravine restoration program. Regarding that discussion, I' d ask the Executive to consider the following. (a) With the greatest of respect, it is not for staff to question the merits of the restoration program, which has been approved by Urban Forestry. That is the authority with the expertise and jurisdiction to ensure the health of the City's trees and forests. (b) Staffs discussion of "forest bird species of concern " is utterly devoid of detail: no specific species are mentioned, and no analysis of potential impacts is provided. In fact, a close reading of the report reveals that staff are not even committing to the suggestion that such species would be found in this part of the ravine: their reference is to "this ravine, in concert with the ravine to the south and the main valley of the Don River ". This problem infects much of the discussion in this section of the report; it is all generic and speculative. 1098 (c) Staff's report completely ignores the actual context of this part of the ravine, which is entirely surrounded by existing homes and their accessory structures. It is a locus of human activity, not a remote oasis of nature. As the photographs included with Mr. Smith's letter amply demonstrate, the ecosystem in this ravine is a far cry from what one would assume from reading the staff report. 5. Finally, it concerns my clients, and ought to concern the Executive, that the section of the report which addresses the rationale for staffs position (p. 27 ff.), begins with a claim that the "overallobjective of the VSCMP policies is to prevent development" in certain areas. Although it is not acknowledged in the report, this sentence is a direct quote from s. 4.1 of the VSCMP, except that the quote is incomplete, because the beginning of that policy has been left out: The main thrust of the Authority's policies and procedures for undeveloped valley and stream corridors is... (emphasis added) What has happened here is that staff have taken a policy that deals with undeveloped corridors, truncated it, and given it pride of place in their description of the objectives of the VSCMP in respect of an application for a developed corridor. That, simply put, is not right. The key principles with respect to areas of "existing development" are not in s. 4.1; they are in s. 4.2, where the following policies are to be found: The Program recognizes that where development has occurred within valley and strewn corridors, increased flexibility for valleyland management is required....Inherent in these policies is the objective to...achieve environmental protection and rehabilitation to the fullest extent possible. The application of these policies will also have regard to the characteristics of the adjacent corridor reach; therefore, opportunities for development... of any site will be considered with, and dependent upon, the extent and nature of existing development on the subject site and with development patterns within the corridor reach as a whole. So, the direction in the VSCMP is not to "prevent development" , as staff allege, but rather to permit development that is consistent with the existing development pattern in the area, and ensure that environmental protection and rehabilitation are achieved as much as possible. This application meets both of these tests: it will fit right in with the existing development fabric, and the conservation easement, restoration plan, and green design will provide for maximum environmental protection, as well as tangible rehabilitation. 1099 My clients are grateful for the Executive's kind attention to these submissions, and look forward to the Hearing. Yours sincerely, DAVIES HOWE PARTNERS ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Michael Melling encl. Correspondence (Smith to O'Brien) copy: Ms. K. Kovar Mr. G. Smith Clients 1100 CORRESPONDENCE (66) Altius January 12, 2005 Mr. Dick O'Brien, Chair Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 1 S4 Re: Application by Derek and Tina Russell 119R Glen Road, Toronto Executive Committee Meeting of January 14, 2005. Introduction A new application has been made by our clients, Tina and Derek Russell, for a fill permit that is required in order for them to construct a single family home on an existing, zoned residential lot at 119R Glen Road, Toronto. An earlier design prepared by the late Andrew Volgyesi was approved in 2003 by the TRCA Executive in what it referred to as 'unique' application (ref. #029 /03/Tor). The primary reasons for the new application are that since the first design was commissioned in 1995 the Russells needs have changed and they have become increasingly aware of the nature of their property and of the major advancements that have been made in the field of green design and sustainable development In December of 2003 the Russells retained our firm to conduct an extensive review of the previously approved proposal and to propose ways to "green" the design. It became evident that the old design, while good, would have to be fundamentally changed in order to achieve the maximum benefit of a sustainable design approach. The following submission highlights some of these changes and demonstrates that the proposal is in compliance with TRCA policies as established by the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Property's Physical Description • 119R Glen Road is a 12 acre existing legal residential lot of record with an R1 zoning. It has been bought, sold, assessed and taxed as a residential lot since 1957. • 119R Glen Road is an infill lot having frontage on Glen Road, located between two other lots of record: 119 Glen Road and 123 Glen Road. Furthermore, the property is surrounded on all sides by privately owned residential lots of record (fig .1) .The classification of the lot as existing infill is supported by City of Toronto Urban Development Services and Planning. • The private driveway, which forms 119R Glen Roads frontage and which is entirely the Russells property is itself the size of a typical Toronto residential lot over 18' wide and 260' in length. • There is no public access to the property. • The property forms the most westerly tip of a tributary ravine of the Don River. The Bayview Extension, the CN rail lines and no fewer than twelve privately owned residential lots lie between the property and the Don River. • While there is intermittent storm and seasonal run -off, there is not an active watercourse on the property and no portion of the property is within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The property is properly considered a 'Valley Corridor' , not a "Stream Corridor". • The natural top of bank, typical of other ravine properties in this area, is non - existent, having been replaced by over 170 linear feet of concrete retaining walls to the rear of #121 Glen Road and #41 and #43 Binscarth Road, as well as a human -made embankment that supports the existing driveway and part of the rear yard of#41 Binscarth (fig. 5). • Below the driveway embankment and directly between 121 Glen Road and 41 Binscarth there is a broad plateau (valley floor) measuring approximately 125' square, below this to the southeast there is a well define top of bank (fig.6) 1101 • Historically, the property has been extensively altered by fill and formal landscaping The northeasterly portion of the property, where the house is to be sited, is native soil, but is virtually surrounded by extensive historic fill up to 10' (3m) deep. The entire northern slope of the property was once a terraced formal garden. • Despite extensive historic alterations to the property, the slopes are stable and show no signs of active erosion. • In the immediate area, and in the broader region of the TRCA's jurisdiction, 119R Glen Road is a highly unique property with distinctive characteristics and conditions. Ravine Habitat & Biodiversitv • In 1988 the City of Toronto Parks and Recreation Department stated in the Park Drive Ravine Forest Working Plan: A number of introduced species that are widely planted on Toronto's streets have invaded Park Drive Ravine to the detriment of native species regeneration and the ability of the ravine to be representative of the region's natural forest. Eighteen years later this situation has worsened and 119R Glen Road is exemplary of a highly degraded property which, if left unattended, will continue to decline. • Because of the extensive historic use of the property and the absence of land stewardship, invasive species have taken hold in significant concentrations, and native species have lost the ability to naturally regenerate. The east and north portions of the property that have been regraded and filled have been particularly devastates, and invasive species dominate the canopy in these areas. • The existing biodiversity of the site is poor, and provides only sparse wildlife habitat Of the 60 species of plants found on the site, only 25 are native and are in much lower concentrations than their invasive counterparts. As Staff notes typically we would expect to find a 70% concentration of native species, however on this site it is only 42% and outside the proposed conservation easement it is only 15 %. Invasive species represent virtually 100% of existing groundcover over the entire site. • The City of Toronto Forestry Department, which is responsible for "promoting the management, protection and conservation of ravines and associated natural woodland areas.." under the City's Ravine Protection By -law, has conducted an extensive review of the property and has approved a comprehensive restoration and management plan. The ravine restoration which commenced in October of 2004 covers 47,000 square feet, or 94% of the property below the existing driveway. Forestry has approved the removal of 61 of the 93 invasive trees and the complete removal of all non - native ground covers while authorizing the planting of no less than 5000 individual specimens representing 80 native species of trees, shrubs, groundcovers and wildflowers. The plan represents a quadrupling of species diversity and a fifty -fold increase in the number of individual plants in the first few years. The project represents the largest and most comprehensive private ravine restoration in the GTA and only the second in within North Rosedale. The first restoration was commenced in 1996 by our office in partnership with Urban Forest Associates and is widely regarded today as the healthiest section of ravine in the City. The City of Toronto's Forestry Department has commented, "we recognize the notable enhancements to the ravine system that will be complete in the upcoming years, in the form of native species plantings and alien species management, in the City approved Ravine Stewardship Plan for 119R Glen Road Toronto ". • The new house design proposal increases the building setbacks from the neighbouring properties, thus creating two 35' wide by 100' deep 'fingers' up either side of the house. These 'fingers', each about the size of a typical residential lot, provide the opportunity to naturalize the ravine right up to the existing driveway. Of the roughly sixty trees that exist in this area (including the house footprint) only twelve are native; of those only three will be lost, two of which have been targeted for removal by Forestry due to disease. • The new proposal offers the opportunity for a significant improvement to the health of the ravine and a dramatic increase in the biodiversity of the site, even with the construction of a new home. • The site will be restored to properly represent this region's historic native ravines. • Loss of existing habitat is negligible compared to the high quality native habitat that will be introduced • Reintroduction of native ground cover and understory growth will greatly improve slope stability, soil regeneration and the ability of the site to filter contaminants. • Our clients' new application includes a 36,000 square foot conservation easement over the sensitive portion of the site, while the scope of the restoration now underway is over 47,000 square feet. General Design & Planning • The siting of the house is the same as the previously approved proposal (fig.3). • The area beneath the foundations has been reduced by 13 %. • The general area of influence, including foundations, hard landscaping, decks, eaves and cantilevers has been reduced by 27% (fig.3) • The coverage and GFA are both considerably smaller than those of all of the immediate neighbours. 1102 • The foundations have been pulled back 10' from the valley floor. • The foundations have been pulled back 20 feet from the lot line with 121 Glen Road and 18 feet from the lot line with 41 Binscarth, thereby creating two large parcels on either side of the north and south of the building, which have been added to the scope of ravine restoration. • The building will not cause or promote erosion and will improve slope stability. • Optimizing the foundation footprint has resulted in over47,000 square feet or roughly 94% of the ravine being available for restoration. • The shape of the foundation has been designed to simplify excavation, follow the contours of the site and promote positive drainage. • The foundations have been redesigned to utilize conventional spread footings, which will greatly reduce site impact during construction and permit the utilization of much smaller equipment • The requirements for backfilling have been isolated to the north side of the building in order to promote drainage. Overall requirements for backfilling have been greatly reduced. • All excavated material will be removed from the site. • Building techniques and methods have been adopted that will minimize the size and impact of the construction area. Storm Water Management and Run -off • The foundations have been designed to promote positive drainage and minimize the interruption of surface drainage and run -off. • The ramped driveway has been eliminated, and driveway run -off will be contained and managed. • Storm water retention methods have been added to the design, including engineered paving, green roofs, sediment chambers and storage tanks. • Supplemental irrigation utilizing stored rain water has been added to vegetation areas that may be affected by the building. Sustainable Design Principles and Strategies • The design is being executed as a 'green' home and could LEED certified if the LEED Home program becomes available. • Specifications are being written with a focus on life cycle costing • The construction of the house will utilize reclaimed and recycled materials, as well as materials with a high recycled content. • The design employs extensive day lighting techniques and correct solar geometry. • The design employs a passive solar strategy and high performance, orientation - specific glazing. • Thermal mass and stack ventilation strategies are incorporated into the design. • Dual flush toilets and low consumption appliances will be specified. • The design includes extensive green roofing and roof decks, eliminating the need for at grade decks or formal landscaping. • High IAQ levels are being achieved by utilizing in -floor radiant heating, low VOC finishes, dedicated ventilation equipped with scrubbers and passive natural ventilation strategies. • All materials, finishes, coatings, membranes and non - structural assemblies will carry minimum 50 year performance ratings. The lifespan of structural assemblies will be indefinite. Compliance with the Valley & Stream Corridor Management Program • We note that the V &SCMP makes a clear distinction between undeveloped and developed corridors and that is does not recommend the prevention of development in the latter but rather recognizes "opportunities for development and redevelopment" and "...recognizes that where development has occurred within valley and stream corridors, increased flexibility for valley land management is required." (section 4.2 paragraph 3 & 4). • The proposal complies with the requirements governing infill development on existing lots (section 4.2.2- G Infilling ): • The property is a vacant, single - family, residential, existing lot of record which is between existing, developed urban lots. Contrary to the suggestion of the staff report the V &SCMP does not provide for exclusion of properties located within valleys: "The following policies...apply to areas of existing development within valley and stream corridors..." (4.2.2 paragraph 1 ) • This property has been the subject of both development (retaining wall, driveway, embankment)and substantial site alteration (grading, filling, landscaping). The V &SCMP does not define 'historic' development in such a way as to exclude this level and type of development and site alteration. 1103 • The proposal is consistent with primary building setbacks within the corridor. There are over 170' linear feet of mass gravity retaining walls on the property, which are integral to and inseparable from the buildings they support. Standardized methods for calculating setbacks clearly demonstrate that the proposal complies with policy 4.2.2 G) i). 121 Glen Road is below the top of bank and extends further into the valley corridor then does the Russells proposal (fig.5 & 6). • The proposal is, as staff notes in their report, located entirely below the top of bank "partially on • a valley wall and partially on a sloping valley floor" .However, the design is predominantly on the 'sloping valley floor' and is setback over 50' (15m) from the dominant valley wall to the south east. The valley wall to which the staff report refers is a stable 3 metre, human -made filled embankment that supports the existing driveway. Its flora and geology is not native nor is it representative of a'valley wall' and as such, the valley wall does not merit extraordinary conservation measures. It is, as staff noted in their report on the previous application, properly classified as an 'embankment'. The driveway embankment interferes with what would otherwise be a gentle slope extending all the way to Glen Road (fig. 2). • Requirement iii) of 4.2.2 G. states that a new building may be permitted providing it is "not located on a valley wall." This explicitly infers that a building may be located on a valley floor. The proposed house could theoretically be located entirely on the valley floor, although it would make no sense to do so particularly not from a conservation perspective. • The proposal is in compliance, without need for clarification, with policy items 4.2.2 G ii & iv -x. Conclusion It is clear from their report that TRCA staff agree that the new proposal represents a considerable improvement over the design previously approved by the Executive. We also believe that it is in compliance with the Valley & Stream Corridor Management Program, and in particular, section 4.2.2 G, which governs this proposal. As staff notes in their report, the new proposal is essentially the same as the proposal previously approved by the Executive, except that it is a more sustainable design, that is smaller, has greatly increased setbacks from the corridor and neighbours, has as comprehensive storm water management system, a reduced construction impact, minimal fill requirements and broad erosion and sedimentation controls measures. The Russells fully respect the unique nature of their property, which is why, as part of their application, they are proposing to register a conservation easement over the sensitive portion of the property in favour of the TRCA It is also why they have entered into a long term private land / stewardship agreement in the form of a letter of undertaking with City's Forestry department, and have commenced an ambitious ravine restoration project The Russells proposal achieves a sensitive balance between development and environmental protection while being exemplary of the VSCMP's core principle of achieving rehabilitation to the fullest extent possible. Furthermore the Russell's project is serving as a catalyst for the broader rehabilitation of ravines in the area. In closing, I would ask the members of the Executive to recognize that the new design has all of the benefits of the previous design, while at the same time incorporating numerous additional positive features. We are before the Executive to ask for approval to do a better project than that which the Executive already deemed appropriate for approval. Sincerely ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Graham Smith BFA BEX B.ARCH MRAIC CaGBC ATTACHMENTS TO CORRESPONDENCE (66) NOT INCLUDED SINCE ILLEGIBLE IN THE SMALLER PAGE FORMAT REQUIRED FOR MINUTES . FILED WITH APPLICATION #029 /03/Tor 1104 HEARINGS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 HEARING REPORT - 119R GLEN ROAD, CITY OF TORONTO RES. #B259/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THAT the Executive Committee sit as a Hearing Board . CARRIED MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING David Barrow Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Nancy Stewart Member, Authority Following the roll call, a hearing was held re: Application #029 /03/Tor by Derek Russell pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley of the Don River , described as 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto. Derek Russell has reapplied to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), under Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within a Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling. Staff do not support the application on the basis that it affects the conservation of land. A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Mr. Russel White, Senior Planner - Durham Region (York - Markham, Richmond Hill), Development Services Division. A presentation was made by Ms. Tina Russell, applicant, Mr. Graham Smith, Architect, Altius Architecture Inc. and Mr. Michael Melling, Solicitor, Davies Howe Partners. Deputations were made from the following: (a) Ms. Kim Kovar, Solicitor, Aird & Berlis LLP. (b) Mr. Pat Howe, President, North Rosedale Ratepayers Association. (c) Ms. Tanny Wells, Past Chair, Task Force to Bring Back the Don. (d) Mr. Geoff Cape, Executive Director, Evergreen. (e) Mr. David Crombie of 81 Glencairn Avenue, Toronto. 1105 (f) Ms. Penny Pepperell of 21 Douglas Crescent, Toronto. (g) Mr. John Adams of 77 Cottingham Street, Toronto. (h) Mr. Michael Roberts, Executive Assistant to Kyle Rae, Councillor, City of Toronto, Ward 27 - Toronto Centre - Rosedale. Mr. Michael Melling spoke in rebuttal. The Hearing Board had no questions of the staff or the applicant/representatives. RES.#B260/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Suzan Hall THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session . RES. #B261 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford David Barrow THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session . DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES. #B262 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart CARRIED CARRIED THAT Application #029 /03/Tor by Derek Russell pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley of the Don River , described as 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto, be refused as it affects the conservation of land. MOTION TO RECONVENE RES. #B263 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Rob Ford CARRIED THAT Executive Committee Meeting #12/04 reconvene. CARRIED 1106 MOTION TO RATIFY RES. #B264/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Stewart Suzan Hall THAT the Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that Application #029 /03/Tor by Derek Russell pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley of the Don River , described as 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto, be refused as it affects the conservation of land . CARRIED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject of this hearing report is property described as 119R Glen Road within the City of Toronto. 119R Glen Road is an existing lot of record within the Binscarth Ravine, a tributary ravine of the Don River. The property is accessed via a laneway between two existing lots on Glen Road, hence the description as 119R or Rear of 119 Glen Road. The site is within the Rosedale Community. 119R is mainly located on lands below the top of bank of the Binscarth Ravine with the exception of the laneway entrance. The ravine has a well defined top of bank and for the most part is heavily vegetated with a mix of native and non native species. The mix of native and non native species is similar to all ravine systems in the City of Toronto. In most instances 70% of existing vegetation within valleys in the GTA is comprised of native species. The Binscarth Ravine is part of an Environmentally Significant Area. Biological inventory work conducted as part of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program has identified a number of forest birds and plants of concern within the larger ravine system. BACKGROUND TRCA staff have received a new proposal by Derek and Tina Russell for grading in order to construct a residential dwelling on 119R Glen Road in the City of Toronto. Following the Executive Committee's approval of a permit application by Derek and Tina Russell on November 14, 2003, to permit the construction of a residential dwelling on the subject lands, the Russell's revisited the proposal through a new architect and advised TRCA staff that the initial approved plans were no longer desirable. Graham Smith of Altius Design Group advised that although the permit approved by the Executive Committee provided for the construction of a residence, the approved residence provided some construction design challenges and site grading impacts which could be better addressed with a new residential design and grading scheme. He also indicated that the design could be much improved to reduce the impacts on the valley as a result of the construction. The TRCA staff position at the time of the initial application was that the proposal was contrary to TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) policies which does not support the construction of residential dwellings within valley features and below the existing top of bank. In this respect please refer to the attached report which was presented to the Executive Committee, labelled Attachment 2. It was the staff opinion that the application would negatively affect the conservation of land and did not satisfy this test under the Conservation Authority's Act. At the time, the applicant's submission was that the proposal should be classified as an "infill" development as the site is surrounded by existing lots of record. However, it was staff's opinion that although the Binscarth Ravine is held in private ownership, this proposal was not "infill" for the following reasons: 1107 • The definition of Infill within the VSCMP states that a lot must be between two existing lots of record to be classified as infill. This existing lot is not between but below existing lots of record which are mainly on tableland but whose ownership extends to the valley floor. • There are no dwellings on any other adjacent lot below the existing top of bank in this area and all dwellings are setback from the valley slope. In addition, the applicant indicated that certain property rights to develop have been established through the Ontario Municipal Board and Superior Court decision which struck down the City of Toronto's Ravine Bylaw as it relates to the development and allowed for development under the Planning Act. It is staffs position that: • OMB and subsequent Court decisions did not have any bearing on the TRCA's right to issue or deny permits under Ontario Regulation 158, applicable to the property. These court decisions dealt with the Ravine By -law and property rights related to the Planning Act and are silent on the Conservation Authority's Act requirements. • TRCA's Executive Committee has the ability to approve or deny the applications independent of Planning Act approvals. • There is an appeal mechanism for the applicant to the Mining and Lands Commissioner from any decision to deny a permit under the Conservation Authority's Act. • The Executive Committee directed staff to process the application for 119R Glen Road, City of Toronto, for a hearing to be held on January 14, 2005. PROPOSAL The applicants, Derek and Tina Russell, have submitted a new site plan to the City of Toronto and a new permit application to the TRCA on the subject lands described as 119R Glen Road. The applicant seeks TRCA approval of a redesigned dwelling on essentially the same location as the dwelling previously approved by the Executive Committee. The square footage of the initial and approved dwelling is approximately 4,000 square feet (371 m) with a site coverage of approximately 7.75% of the 1.2 acre (4795.19m) site. The footprint of the new dwelling is smaller by 13% and with the surrounding landscape features the footprint of the construction is reduced by 27 %. The new dwelling uses sustainable or "green" building technology, by incorporating such elements as roof gardens and solar energy. The design also seeks to maintain existing grade by cutting into the slope rather than grading or filling beyond the desired footprint. The footings have been redesigned to be conventional footings eliminating the need for caissons and the use of large equipment. According to the applicant, the foundation has been redesigned to minimize excavation and associated haulage and eliminate shoring requirements. Other highlights that the applicant has noted, include: • portions of the building are cantilevered and the cantilevered portions have been oriented to allow sunlight to reach all areas of the ground; • the new house will have no less than 1,500 sq. ft. of green roofing which will provide stormwater retention and controlled runoff; • the proposed driveway will use porous paving; • two 30 feet wide by 100 feet deep areas have been provided on either side of the residence to provide opportunity to naturalize the ravine on either side of the lot; 1108 • the Russell's have signed a letter of undertaking with the city to commit to comprehensive restoration of the ravine in their ownership. The City has issued a ravine permit and restoration work on the site has commenced; • the Russell's are prepared to provide a conservation easement over 63% of the site in favour of TRCA; and • the applicant plans to showcase this property as an example of an innovative and state -of- the -art green building design. RATIONALE While the architectural improvements to the building are commendable, it is the opinion of staff that the proposal is not in compliance with TRCA policies for the reasons as outlined in the previous hearing report and as summarized as follows: Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program The VSCMP establishes development guidelines for properties affected by valley corridors. The overall objective of the VSCMP policies is to prevent development from occurring within areas which may introduce risk to life and property associated with flooding and erosion, and slope instability or that is not compatible with the protection of these areas in a natural state. The boundaries of valley and stream corridors are determined as follows: • If the Valley slope is stable a minimum of ten metres from the top of valley bank. or • If the valley slope is not stable a minimum of 10 metres from the predicted long term stable slope projected from the existing stable /stabilized toe of slope, or the predicted location of the toe of slope as shifted as a result of stream erosion over a 100 year period. The building footprint is below the stable top of bank and the applicant has provided a geotechnical report which finds that the proposed dwelling can be designed not to have an impact on slope stability. The applicant has indicated that the subject property should be classified as an infill property and therefore development should be permissible based on the VSMCP requirements. The following is stated in the policies: VSCMP notes under Section 4.2.2 - Development and Redevelopment Intensification within Highly Urbanized Areas that: New lot development including all buildings and structures and associated private servicing, or comparable intensification shall not be permitted within valley corridors that have not been designated as Special Policy Area . Section 4.2.2. (G) states that where there is an existing lot of record small lot only, eg. Single family residential is vacant and is between existing developed urban lots, a new structure or building may be permitted provided the new development, its construction, and any associated private servicing requirements: 1109 i) are consistent with existing primary building setbacks within the corridor reach ; ii) are not located within the Regulatory Floodplain; iii) are not located on a valley wall ; iv) are not located within the active erosion zone of an unstable valley slope; v) will not create or aggravate erosion or slope instability on adjacent upstream and downstream properties; vi) are not located within the active erosion zone of a watercourse determined to be within ten metres of a stable river bank(measured from the top of the river bank) within 20m of an unstable river bank. An unstable river bank may be permitted to be stabilized provided the proposed stabilization works are consistent with Section 3- Watercourses; vii) minimize any impacts on the vegetation communities or functions of a significant area and does not result in the Toss of its significant features ; viii) minimize potential impacts on the function or structure of riparian habitat; ix) include sediment and erosion control during construction and subsequent phases until such time as erodible areas have been vegetated /stabilized; x) are consistent with municipal policies and standards including setbacks and grading while achieving all of the above. The applicant argues that 119R Glen Road is an infill property and should be developed for this reason. TRCA staff are of the opinion that this property is not an infill property as it is not between two lots of record as the policy definition states, but is the only property within this corridor where development would be located entirely within the valley. Further, if the property were to be considered "infill ", the tests for development on infill properties (as noted above) exclude this proposal as a proposed dwelling because it will be constructed entirely below the top of bank (partially on a valley wall and partially on a sloping valley floor) and the setbacks from the valley will not be consistent with existing established development. Further, any development of this lot will not meet the TRCA's objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs. The applicant argues that this project has the benefit of enhancing a degraded condition on the slope and within the valleylands caused by historical changes to grade and the existence of non native vegetation. This condition exists in most, if not all, valleys within the City of Toronto. Historically, valley systems were used for garbage disposal, for private gardens and other obtrusive activities which are inconsistent with the objective of protecting and enhancing the features and their functions. Current environmental practices as envisioned in TRCA and City of Toronto documents (ie. Forty Steps to a New Don) focus on enhancing the valleyland conditions through vegetation management programs which exclude the construction of structures. The proposed footprint of a residence and garage is not offset by various enhancement programs in the ravine. 1110 The applicant provided an environmental report to support the proposal. This initial report is now supported by a ravine restoration plan which is being implemented. This restoration includes the removal of non native species which will allow for native species to propagate and dominate the property. An extensive planting program is also planned. The initial environmental report was not an environmental impact assessment and the recommendations are based on the assumption that development within the forested lands and the upper end of the ravine is a given. It describes the vegetation communities but does not address fauna or specific wildlife habitat values. The report stresses the negative influences that have occurred with previous development activities (ie. garden sheds, gazebos) and promotes that this development will be different. TRCA's natural heritage inventory work has shown that this ravine, in concert with the ravine to the south and the main valley of the Don River, support several forest bird species of concern. While these species may be common in more rural areas, they are of concern in urbanized areas as a result of negative influences to their habitat associated with urban areas. These impacts include direct losses as well as light, noise and encroachment from human contact. TRCA's information shows that the area is functioning at a high level given its urban context. The applicant has commenced a restoration program by removing non native vegetation on the site with the intent of establishing more natural cover on portions of the site not being developed. Staff are of the opinion that the existing values are not easily replaced and such programs, while well intended, can occur on a more comprehensive basis and not as an offering associated with proposed development within valleys, the land base which is intended to be protected for future restoration. The stewardship of the remaining forested areas of the ravine does not address the overall losses to the functioning of the ravine ecosystem. It would be expected that the negative influences of a new residence due to the closer proximity would be felt further into the forested ravine, even with the implementation of a stewardship plan. The application of stewardship recommendations for portions of the forest while potentially beneficial does not justify the removal of the upper part of the valley and forest to construct the residence. In assessing cumulative impacts, the proposal is not supported by policy because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative Toss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the City of Toronto and TRCA jurisdiction. The allowance of this intrusion could be argued to have established a precedent which may potentially lead to similar proposals within the City of Toronto and elsewhere within TRCA's jurisdiction given the conditions of some of the valley corridors and the general and constant pressure for more intensification. It is to be noted that following the initial approval of this site for a permit, the owner of 15 Beaumont Road argued that precedent had been set and that she was entitled therefore to a permit also. The applicants have worked with TRCA staff to understand our perspective in an effort to address our concerns. However, the proposal will result in additional intrusions into a regenerating valley system using historical circumstances as the reason for this new and additional intrusion and citing the possibility of environmental improvements. Environmental improvement would not occur through the reduction in the amount of natural area which could be available in the longer term. The makeup of the vegetation community within this valley can change over time with proper management on and beyond this property boundary. The land available for regeneration will change forever once the house is constructed. Regeneration of valleys through Toss of overall area for regeneration is not consistent with the TRCA policy objectives and does not meet the test of conservation of land. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the Executive Committee reconsider its prior position and refuse this application as it will affect the conservation of land in the following ways: • it reduces the land area that is available for the ongoing regeneration and enhancement objectives; • it has a detrimental impact due to the cumulative loss of natural cover within the City of Toronto and creates a negative precedent for future consideration of similar proposals within TRCA's area of jurisdiction; • it does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, and in particular, does not recognize Section 3 - Valleyland definitions for protection and Section 4.2.1 - Development within Established Urban Areas; and • it has an overall negative effect on the conservation of land. Report prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306 For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: December 15, 2004 Attachments: 2 1112 Attachment 1 1113 Attachment 2 RES. #B154/03 Moved by: Seconded by: Irene Jones Jim McMaster THAT the unique Application #029 /03/Tor by Derek Russell pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley of the Don River , described as 119R Glenn Road, City of Toronto, be approved; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to ensure that the conservation easement which forms part of the application and submissions today by the applicant be registered on title and that it contain provisions to ensure that no additions or additional buildings are to be constructed on the property and that the vegetation management plan be implemented to the satisfaction of the TRCA. CARRIED BACKGROUND Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission is required from the TRCA to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a regional storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change or divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek stream or watercourse. A permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the TRCA, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Before refusing permission, the TRCA must hold a Hearing to which the applicant and other interested persons are a party. In this instance, TRCA staff are of the opinion that the conservation of land will be affected. This proposal was the subject of a lengthy Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. The initial decision of the Board dismissed the applicant's appeal. Part of the consideration which resulted in this dismissal included testimony from Barry Knox of the TRCA. The Board in this initial written decision, recognized that an application to the TRCA had not been made at the time of the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. The Board dealt with the matter of concurrent jurisdictions (OMB and Mining and Lands Commissioner) and noted "that TRCA's approval constitutes applicable law, in that a fill Regulation 158 is a possible barrier to obtaining a building permit ". The applicants did not choose to submit an application under Ontario Regulation 158 until matters before the Ontario Municipal Board were finalized. 1114 The initial Ontario Municipal Board decision was the subject of a rehearing. The rehearing decision allowed the appeals and rescinded the original decision of denial on the application. This decision of the Ontario Municipal Board was also upheld by the Court of Appeal. Part of the consideration for this decision and the only reference to TRCA in the reversal cited that "it was submitted that the panel member (in the original board decision) speculated on whether a fill permit could be had pursuant to the authority." The final decision of the Board supports the applicant's proposal, however it is staff opinion that both decisions of the Ontario Municipal Board recognize the TRCA's total independence to deal with a permit made under Ontario Regulation 158, the subject of this report. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the east side of Glenn Road, north of Bloor Street in the City of Toronto and is accessed via a narrow laneway between occupied residential tableland lots. The existing narrow laneway leads to a detached garage and coach house on the neighboring tableland properties. The laneway abuts the head of a tributary ravine of the Don River. At that location the laneway is supported by a 3 metre filled embankment. The embankment is at a 1:1 slope. The valley continues at the bottom of the embankment gradually dropping in elevation to the main Don River. Within this valley and just downstream of the proposed development is a well defined watercourse. The watercourse and tributary valley have been altered historically, as is evident through the laneway embankment, retaining wall supports from the adjacent coach house and through existing remnants of past garden uses (ie. historical rock garden and standpipe) within the valley. These encroachments are historical as the valley floor and laneway embankment is now heavily vegetated with a variety of mature woody species, some of which are non native. The site is not within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The forested ravine forms a continuum of natural cover with the main valley and other tributary ravines (especially to the south). Biological inventory work conducted as part of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program has identified a number of forest birds and plants of concern within this larger context. PROPOSAL The proposal is to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within this tributary valley of the Don River in order to construct a detached single family residential dwelling with a detached garage. The square footage of the proposed dwelling is approximately 4000 sq ft (371 m2). The garage is approximately 200 sq ft. The building footprint will cover approximately 7.75% of the 1.2 acre (4795.19m2 ) lot of record. The building will be built on cassions. The location of the garage will be filled to match grade with the existing laneway. Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program The TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSMCP) establishes development guidelines for properties affected by valley corridors. The overall objective of the VSMCP policies is to prevent development from occurring within areas which may introduce risk to life and property associated with flooding and erosion, and slope instability or that is not compatible with the protection of these areas in a natural state. The boundaries of a valley corridor are determined as follows: * If the valley slope is stable a minimum of 10 metres from the top of the valley bank. or 1115 * If the valley slope is not stable, a minimum of 10 metres from the predicted long term stable slope projected from the existing stable /stabilized toe (base) of slope, or the predicted location of the toe of slope as shifted as a result of stream erosion over a 100 year period. The applicant has provided a geotechnical report and it is confirmed through the report that the proposed dwelling can be designed not to have an impact on slope stability. However, the existing landform would be altered through regrading and the placement of fill material. The applicant's proposal is to construct a garage immediately adjacent to the laneway with a proposed stairway to a dwelling to be located on a sloping valley floor. The applicant is proposing to remove as little vegetation as possible and presents this as an opportunity to conduct a stewardship effort which would result in the elimination of some non native vegetation with the possibility of a longer term net gain to the natural system. The applicant also promotes this development as an infill development and argues that the proposal should be allowed as it is consistent with TRCA policies. The TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program notes under Section 4.2.2 Development and Redevelopment Intensification within Highly Urbanized Areas that: New Lot development including all buildings and structures and associated private servicing, or comparable intensification shall not be permitted within valley corridors that have not been designated as a Special Policy Area . Section 4.2.2 (G) states that where there is an existing lot of record small lot only, eg. single family residential is vacant and is between existing developed urban Tots, a new structure or building may be permitted provided the new development, its construction and any associated private servicing requirements: i) are consistent with existing primary building setback within the corridor reach; ii) are not located within the Regulatory Floodplain; iii) are not located on a valley wall; iv) are not located within the active erosion zone of an unstable valley slope; v) will not create or aggravate erosion or slope instability on adjacent upstream and downstream properties; vi) are not located within an active erosion zone of a watercourse determined to be: within 10m of a stable river bank(measured from the top of the river bank) within 20m of an unstable river bank. An unstable river bank may be permitted to stabilized provided the proposed stabilization works are consistent with section 3- Watercourses; vii) minimize any impacts on the vegetation communities or functions or structure of the riparian habitat; viii) minimize potential impacts on the function or structure of the riparian habitat; 1116 ix) include sediment and erosion control during construction and subsequent phases until such time as erodible areas have been vegetated /stabilized; x) are consistent with municipal policies and standards including setbacks and grading, while achieving all of the above. TRCA staff are of the opinion that this property is not an infill property as it is not between two lots of record as the policy definition states, but is the only property within this corridor which is entirely located within the valley. Further, if the property were to be considered infill the tests for development on infill properties (as noted above) exclude this proposal as a proposed dwelling would be constructed entirely below the top of bank (partially on a valley wall and partially on a sloping valley floor) and the setbacks from the valley will not be consistent with existing established development. Further, any development of this lot will not meet the TRCA's objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs. The applicant promotes that this project has the benefit of enhancing a degraded condition on the slope and within the valleylands caused by historical changes to grade and the existence of non native vegetation. This condition exists in most, if not all, valleys within the City of Toronto. Historically, valley systems were used for garbage disposal, for private gardens and other obtrusive activities which are inconsistent with the objective of protecting and enhancing the features and their functions. Current environmental practices as envisioned in TRCA and City of Toronto documents (ie. Forty Steps to a New Don) focus on enhancing the valleyland conditions through vegetation management programs which exclude the construction of structures. The proposed footprint of a residence and garage is not a measure of enhancement promoted through the various enhancement programs. Specifically, the applicant has provided an environmental report to support the proposal. In staff's opinion the report is not an environmental impact assessment and the recommendations are based on the assumption that development within the forested lands and upper end of the ravine is a given. It describes the vegetation communities but does not address fauna or specific wildlife habitat values. The report stresses the negative influences that have occurred with previous development activities (ie. garden sheds, gazebos) and promotes that this development will be different. TRCA's natural heritage inventory work has shown that this ravine, in concert with the ravine to the south and the main valley of the Don River, support several forest bird species of concern. While these species may be common in more rural areas, they are of concern in urbanized areas as a result of negative influences to their habitat associated with urban areas. These impacts include direct losses as well as light, noise and encroachment from human contact. TRCA's information shows that the area is functioning at a high level given its urban context. The proposal calls for the removal of many non native overstorey species and non native ground cover which is a loss to the overall habitat value of the area. While TRCA staff support the principle of conversion to native forest species, in this instance, the actual removals will cause damage and openings in the forest canopy and thus could impact on the species of concern and could provide conditions for other invasive plant species to take hold. The existing values are not easily replaced. 1117 The stewardship of the remaining forested areas of the ravine does not address the overall losses to the functioning of the ravine ecosystem. It would be expected that the negative influences of a new residence due to the closer proximity would be felt further into the forested ravine, even with the implementation of a stewardship plan. The application of stewardship recommendations for portions of the forest while potentially beneficial does not justify the removal of the upper part of the valley and forest to construct the residence. In assessing cumulative impacts, the proposal is not supported by policy because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the City of Toronto and TRCA jurisdiction. The allowance of this intrusion could establish a precedent which may potentially lead to similar proposals within the City of Toronto and elsewhere within the Authority's jurisdiction given the conditions of some of the valley corridors and the general and constant pressure for more intensification. SUMMARY The applicants have worked with TRCA staff to understand our perspective and in an effort to address our concerns. However, the proposal will result in additional intrusions into a regenerating valley system using past practices as the reason for this additional intrusion and citing the possibility of environmental improvements. Environmental improvement would not occur through the reduction in the amount of natural area which could be available in the longer term. The makeup of the vegetation community within this valley can change over time with proper management on and beyond this property boundary. The land available for regeneration will change forever once the house is constructed. Regeneration of valleys through loss of overall area for regeneration is not consistent with the TRCA policy objectives and does not meet the test of conservation of land. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the application be refused as it will affect the conservation of land in the following ways: • it reduces the land area that is available for the ongoing regeneration and enhancement objectives; • it has a detrimental impact due to the cumulative loss of natural cover within the City of Toronto and creates a precedent for future consideration of similar proposals within TRCA's area of jurisdiction; • it does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, and in particular, does not recognize Section 3 Valleyland definitions for protection and Section 4.2.1 Development within Established Urban Areas; • it has an overall negative effect on the conservation of land. Report prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306 For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 1, 2003 1118 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES. #B265/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed Mariposa (Ajax) Inc., CFN 36057. Purchase of property located east of Pickering Beach Road, south of Bayly Street, Town of Ajax, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek watershed. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.41 hectares (1.01 acres), more or Tess, of vacant land be purchased from 1097467 Mariposa (Ajax) Inc., being Part of Lot 6, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and designated as Block 6 on a Plan of Survey prepared by Krcmar, Ontario Land Surveyors Ltd . under their Job No. 03 -128, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, located east of Pickering Beach Road , south of Bayly Street; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Ms. Tatiana Di Giacinto, Development Coordinator, of Mariposa (Ajax) Inc.. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 1119 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Carruthers Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision S -A- 2003 -05, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 6) which are comprised of a portion of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Carruthers Creek and the Carruthers Creek Forest Environmentally Significant Area. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent TRCA lands, it is estimated that the taxes will be approximately $1,100.00. On December 10, 2004, the Ontario government announced a regulation that expands the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption for the 2005 taxation year. Based on a preliminary review of the new criteria, it would appear that these lands will be eligible for the exemption. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 1120 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001.2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed Mariposa (Ajax) Inc. CFN 36057 d =_ _ 1 El -4 1 dx. onserat an for The tivhij city ITRCALANDS SUBJEC r PROPS RTY 1121 -4! RES. #B266/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed 1122270 Ontario Inc., CFN 36060. Acquisition of a conservation easement located at 19 Leonard Street (north of Elgin Mills Road and west of Yonge Street), Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, Don River watershed. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.21 hectares (0.52 acres), more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land , be purchased from 1122270 Ontario Inc., said land being Part of Lot 51, Concession 1 WYS and designated as Part 1 on Plan 65R- 27519, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located at 19 Leonard Street (north of Elgin Mills Road and west of Yonge Street ); THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the easement required free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Through the review of Site Plan Control application D06- 96023, TRCA staff staked the German Mills Creek stream corridor through the subject lands (I.e. Part 1). As part of the design being reviewed by staff, armourstone retaining walls are proposed to form the west and east limits of the stream corridor / conservation easement. In discussion with Town of Richmond Hill staff, it was agreed that the stream corridor would be acquired as a conservation easement at this time rather than purchased outright for a nominal sum. Both town and TRCA staff will monitor the structural integrity of the retaining walls over the long term and the conservation easement document will contain a provision which will allow for possession of the Part 1 lands at any time in the future if the walls are deemed to be stable by our respective geotechnical engineering staff. In the meantime, the owner will be responsible for the maintenance of the retaining walls. Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's agent, Mr. W.G. Notenboom, Consulting Engineer. 1122 The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the taking of this easement. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The portion of the property subject to the conservation easement is comprised entirely of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the German Mills Creek and falls within lands identified as suitable for acquisition in the TRCA's Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001- 2005. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands subject to this easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the owner will be responsible for taxes and maintenance. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 21, 2004 Attachments: 1 1123 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACGIUISI I IVh1 PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed `. 1122270 Ontario Inc. CFN 36060 I!Y «'aRh ti1•, SI'i1,I1:CTPROPERFY e�¢wv,vrrna's. Y onservation for The Living City ( 72TRCALANns • �,:y SUBJECT PROPER! Y 1124 RES. #B267/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd., CFN 36002. Purchase of property located north of Kingston Road and the east end of Finch Avenue, east of Brock Road, City of Pickering, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek watershed. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.42 hectares (3.51 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd., being Part of Lot 17, Concession 2 and designated as Block 2 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by Krcmar , Ontario Land Surveyors Ltd . under their Job No. 03 -043 dated August 8, 2003, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham , located north of Kingston Road and the east end of Finch Avenue, east of Brock Road; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Peter Schut, Vice President, Acquisitions and Development, of Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd.. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 1125 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Duffins Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision S -P- 2003 -04, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 2) which are comprised of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Duffins Creek and the Major - Spinks Environmentally Significant Area. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent TRCA lands, it is estimated that the taxes will be approximately $250.00. On December 10, 2004, the Ontario government announced a regulation that expands the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption for the 2005 taxation year. Based on a preliminary review of the new criteria, it would appear that these lands will be eligible for the exemption. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 21, 2004 Attachments: 1 1126 Attachment 1 i UHAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACOUISMON t PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Dutfins Creek Watershed Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd. CFN 36002 • 1•, • + • • • suiact vRopr.Riri -/C.1, -7 f;' i'''''" r. .. 1 .-kk.,.Y.s - „-;-::., ..-- --sv-',...:.• --sky. i-. ' • ..-1 ,,,.:=. _.(, •".' '\r- ..,)1 , V', ......1k •,'•,, e \ •■<,, i AY/ /:, _,-' 1, ',..\ \ ':.. _...,`" r:„.---"3 \A,.$‘ V, 7:"'C''.... \•.; .. \ 'r'---' ,,::i.,.?' ... y.'••,•': , . ''''' \it;"*-..■-)$;1,.. L'-'■. \\ \''', et -..;....-,'ll',,..., .-.±) ..., - -. ' i'''' . • ' ) , / . .., ._ '1 .' c, V. s+ . ) , `'• ) t ‘, • Nt 1. 5' " '• % 1,...3 ' . 1, fi ...' \ /V . :<:,/ •.. .•'' .-- - v ••••''-. y.,,-k ; - •• !. k _ „ el. , , c•-'1\ r •:'24(.: '',C,' . ''. „ il N..- ' .,:.'''.._'• I ' s 1/4 ' A - k•-) L':.;•;'. - 1\ . . '...• _.... ,k. \ i'.7./../'' '.... •1 4 • . , ',L 1 .... .... 1. 1 ts....C131CM112.44tI.MINL,,,••• \ ,f .■ '.. `, ,. ... 0 onservatton _ ' d 44. TAO iiVillg C:ii.; Z.-7 TRCA LANDS' r 7 c 1,:•7,1--::. 1 ( j v ,, 1 t _...„. _ . \ 1, ,--. ec-••• • .......„../ 7 ' . ''' gliiez„NISIJRJECT PROPERTY 1/: I: 1127 RES. #B268/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed Queenscorp (Dalesford) Inc., CFN 34477. Purchase of property located at the east end of Dalesford Road (east of Grand Avenue and north of the Queen Elizabeth Way), City of Toronto, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek watershed. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.13 hectares (0.32 acres), more or Tess, of vacant land be purchased from Queenscorp (Dalesford) Inc., designated as Parts 3, 5, 7, 13, 14 and 15 on Plan 66R- 19524, City of Toronto, located at the east end of Dalesford Road (east of Grand Avenue and north of the Queen Elizabeth Way ); THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. David Spencer of Baker Schneider Ruggiero LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, the owner's agent. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 1128 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Mimico Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. Through the review of Site Plan Control and Condominium applications to allow for row -house residential development, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Parts 3, 5, 7, 13, 14 and 15) which are comprised of a portion of the valley wall and Regional Storm Flood Plain along the Mimico Creek valley corridor at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the City of Toronto for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 20, 2004 Attachments: 1 1129 Attachment 1 NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conserve lion Component, Mimic() Creek Watershed Queenscorp (Dalesfond) Inc. CFN 34477 • .7-1 • . —, • • -7,1! ;'• a , / r '13 RUIJECT IltilpERTY —t- — --0 _2- I 19 „ f;i;A•nk- 0 PA, , t „1!.. 4r.tir flt.ttt vpqr42,51..f. t I , onservaton ; for Tiry living City j77.77/7.1TRCA LANDS R r— ."- - L SUBJECT PROPERTY 1130 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RES. #B269 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Suzan Hall THAT the Committee move into closed session to discuss items 8.5 and 8.6 - Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. CARRIED ARISE AND REPORT RES. #B270 /04 Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Stewart Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT the Committee arise and report from closed session . RES. #B271 /04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CARRIED NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Waterfront Component, Mimico Waterfront Linear Park City of Toronto, One Superior Avenue Inc., CFN 32436. Acquisition of a partial taking from a property located at 1 Superior Avenue, City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area) required for construction of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a partial taking containing 0.2193 hectares (0.5419 acres), more or less, of vacant land be acquired from One Superior Avenue Inc., said land being Part of Lots 7 and 7A, Plan M -386, designated as Part 2, on a draft reference plan prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ontario Limited under their drawing no. 20.00.568 -18, City of Toronto, (Etobicoke Community Council Area), located at the rear of 1 Superior Avenue, subject to approval of the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation ; THAT the purchase price be $150,511.00 together with the vendor's reasonable legal costs and the cost of construction of a fence and gate on the new property line ; THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED 1131 BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #9/03, held on November 28, 2003, Resolution #A245/03 was approved as follows: WHEREAS the Toronto Waterfront Revital /nation Corporation (TWRC) has requested that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a delivery agreement with TWRC to undertake certa /n works for the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project ($16 mill /on) and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project ($6.5 million), consistent with TWRC Development and Business Plan,. AND WHEREAS it is in the interest of TRCA under its authority and mandate as set out in the Conservation Authorities Act (R. S.O. 1990, c. 27) to enter into such an agreement; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA enter into the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization - Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project Delivery Agreements, subject to all terms and conditions being finalized in a manner satisfactory to the Chair of the Authority, TRCA staff and solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP; THAT TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take all necessary actions as may be required, including the signing of documents, for the execution of the Delivery Agreements; AND FURTHER THAT the Toronto Waterfront Revital /nation Corporation and the City of Toronto Waterfront Secretariat be so advised. At Authority Meeting #4/99, held on April 30, 1999, Resolution #A119/99 was approved as follows: THAT the staff proceed with the 1999 work program for the Mimico Apartment Strip Waterfront Access/Tra /l in coordination with the City of Toronto representatives and the community. The Mimico Waterfront Linear Park (Mimico Apartment Strip) stretches from Humber Bay West Park in the east to Norris Crescent in the west along the Lake Ontario shoreline. Through a public and agency evaluation process, a preferred concept for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park was developed. The preferred concept reflects the goals and objectives of the local community and once implemented, will be a significant public asset along the waterfront. A working group comprised of local residents, interest groups, the Humber Bay Boating Federation, property owners, local politicians and staff of the City of Toronto advised TRCA staff through the public consultation process. The working group met eleven times to review the existing conditions of the shoreline, identify all project stakeholders and potential issues, review the public consultation process, assist with the public meetings and participate in discussions regarding the proposed terms of reference, range of shoreline treatments and Environmental Assessment (EA). 1132 The Environmental Assessment for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park was approved by the Minister of the Environment on August 12, 2004. On December 12, 2004 Human Resources and Skills Development Canada also approved the project. A primary objective of the preferred concept is to minimize the private lands required from each property owner. Current fence lines and parking lots will be maintained as the northern boundary of the linear park. A fence will be constructed along the boundary of the linear park. All property owners will have the opportunity to have a gate giving their tenants direct access to the park. It will be necessary to acquire either land, waterlots or riparian rights from 13 private properties in this area for the project to proceed. The province owns a number of waterlots along this stretch of shoreline and it will be necessary to acquire these waterlots from the province to allow the project to proceed and potentially facilitate land exchanges with some of the owners. In 1988, TRCA acquired a parcel of land adjacent to Norris Crescent Parkette from Mimico Co -op. TRCA also acquired a waterlot, together with a strip of land from Kilcooley Gardens Co- operative Inc. in 2000. The City of Toronto owns Norris Crescent Parkette, Superior Avenue Parkette and Amos Waites Park in this reach of the shoreline. On December 5, 2003 the members of the Executive Committee approved Resolution #8183/03 for the hiring of Johnston Donald Associates Inc. to provide property acquisition services in connection with the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. One of Johnston Donald Associates Inc. tasks was to coordinate and attend negotiation meetings, prepare and negotiate Agreements of Purchase and Sale, facilitate issue resolution, prepare final recommendation letter for property required for this project. Johnston Donald Associates Inc. has now obtained a signed Agreement of Purchase and Sale from One Superior Avenue Inc. Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. A map of the area is attached. RATIONALE The subject property is required for the construction of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE This parcel of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing management agreement. 1133 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the Mimico Linear Waterfront Park capital account. The money for this purchase has been provided by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: December 22, 2004 Attachments: 1 1134 Attachment 1 rgfil 4m ///w� zR2 1135 RES. #B272/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Waterfront Component, Mimico Waterfront Linear Park City of Toronto, Preview Technologies Inc, CFN 32437. Acquisition of a partial taking from a property located at 3 Superior Avenue, City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area) required for construction of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a partial taking containing 0.4360 hectares (1.0662 acres), more or less, of vacant land be acquired from Preview Technologies Inc., said land being Part of Lots 3 and 4, Plan M -205, Part of Lot 5, Plan M -386, and Part of Water Lots 9 and 10, in front of Lot C, Broken Concession, designated as Part 4, on a draft reference plan prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ontario Limited under their drawing no. 20.00.568 -17, City of Toronto, (Etobicoke Community Council Area), located at the rear of 3 Superior Avenue, subject to approval of the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation ; THAT the purchase price is to be $351,786.00 together with the vendor's reasonable legal costs and the cost of construction of a fence and gate on the new property line ; THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #9/03, held on November 28, 2003, Resolution #A245/03 was approved as follows: WHEREAS the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) has requested that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a delivery agreement with TWRC to undertake certain works for the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project ($16 million) and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project ($6.5 million), cons /stent with TWRC Development and Business Plan; AND WHEREAS it is in the interest of TRCA under its authority and mandate as set out in the Conservation Author /ties Act (R. S.O. 1990, c. 27) to enter into such an agreement; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA enter into the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization - Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project and the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project Delivery Agreements, subject to all terms and conditions being finalized in a manner satisfactory to the Chair of the Authority, TRCA staff and solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP; 1136 THAT TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take all necessary actions as may be required, including the signing of documents, for the execution of the Delivery Agreements; AND FURTHER THAT the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation and the City of Toronto Waterfront Secretariat be so advised. At Authority Meeting #4/99, held on April 30, 1999, Resolution #A119/99 was approved as follows: THAT the staff proceed with the 1999 work program for the Mimico Apartment Strip WaterfrontAccess/Tra /l in coordination with the City of Toronto representatives and the community. The Mimico Waterfront Linear Park (Mimico Apartment Strip) stretches from Humber Bay West Park in the east to Norris Crescent in the west along the Lake Ontario shoreline. Through a public and agency evaluation process, a preferred concept for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park was developed. The preferred concept reflects the goals and objectives of the local community and once implemented, will be a significant public asset along the waterfront. A working group comprised of local residents, interest groups, the Humber Bay Boating Federation, property owners, local politicians and staff of the City of Toronto advised TRCA staff through the public consultation process. The working group met eleven times to review the existing conditions of the shoreline, identify all project stakeholders and potential issues, review the public consultation process, assist with the public meetings and participate in discussions regarding the proposed terms of reference, range of shoreline treatments and Environmental Assessment (EA). The Environmental Assessment for the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park was approved by the Minister of the Environment on August 12, 2004. On December 12, 2004 Human Resources and Skills Development Canada also approved the project. A primary objective of the preferred concept is to minimize the private lands required from each property owner. Current fence lines and parking lots will be maintained as the northern boundary of the linear park. A fence will be constructed along the boundary of the linear park. All property owners will have the opportunity to have a gate giving their tenants direct access to the park. It will be necessary to acquire either land, waterlots or riparian rights from 13 private properties in this area for the project to proceed. The province owns a number of waterlots along this stretch of shoreline and it will be necessary to acquire these waterlots from the province to allow the project to proceed and potentially facilitate land exchanges with some of the owners. In 1988, TRCA acquired a parcel of land adjacent to Norris Crescent Parkette from Mimico Co -op. TRCA also acquired a waterlot, together with a strip of land from Kilcooley Gardens Co- operative Inc. in 2000. The City of Toronto owns Norris Crescent Parkette, Superior Avenue Parkette and Amos Waites Park in this reach of the shoreline. 1137 On December 5, 2003 the members of the Executive Committee approved Resolution #8183/03 for the hiring of Johnston Donald Associates Inc. to provide property acquisition services in connection with the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. One of Johnston Donald Associates Inc. tasks was to coordinate and attend negotiation meetings, prepare and negotiate Agreements of Purchase and Sale, facilitate issue resolution, prepare final recommendation letter for property required for this project. Johnston Donald Associates Inc. has now obtained a signed Agreement of Purchase and Sale from Preview Technologies Inc.. Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project, 2001 -2005. A map of the area is attached. RATIONALE The subject property is required for the construction of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE This parcel of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing management agreement. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the Mimico Linear Waterfront Park capital account. The money for this purchase has been provided by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223, or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: December 22, 2004 Attachments: 1 1138 Attachment 1 z 0 � Y o �i pa c' . a N � A � QuL o t U C 0 W N 4 7 O �to a 0a' a c • 2 w MI c N 0 o c c eX a 0 N 0.0 LL 0 O = N • V 0 < 0 Q - a w = .A1 o • M y z a. 'S U 1139 RES. #B273/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF NATURAL AREAS WITHIN THE ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED Faro Sodding and Landscaping Limited, CFN 35302. Purchase of property owned by Faro Sodding and Landscaping Limited, located on the north side of Finch Avenue East between Beare Road and Scarborough /Pickering Townline, in the City of Toronto, (Scarborough Community Council Area). Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.356 hectares (3.373 acres) more or less, consisting of a rectangular shaped parcel of land , be purchased from Faro Sodding and Landscaping Limited, said lands being Part of Lot 1, Concession 4, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), located on the north side of Finch Avenue East between Beare Road and Scarborough /Pickering Townline; THAT the purchase price be $250,000; THAT the Province of Ontario be requested to assist with the funding of this transaction ; THAT acquisition by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is conditional on the availability of all necessary funding ; THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements; THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Rouge Park Alliance at meeting #4/04, held on June 18, 2004, adopted the following resolution: THAT the Faro Sodding and Landscaping Ltd property, located on the north side of Finch Avenue, east of Beare Road, City of Toronto (East Community) be added to the Pool of Priority Land Acquisition List; THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority be requested to arrange for an appraisal of the subject property. AND THAT FURTHER THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority be so advised. 1140 A further report relating to the purchase of the Faro Sodding and Landscaping Limited property will be considered by the Rouge Park Alliance on Friday, January 21, 2005. Resolution #A52/99, Authority Meeting #2/99, held on February 26,1999, approved the "Project for the Acquisition of Natural Areas within the Rouge River Watershed." Negotiations have been conducted with representatives of the owner. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE This property is located in between two environmentally sensitive areas: Townline Swamp Complex and the Rouge River ANSI which are both provincially significant. The swamp complex supports regionally rare birds, acts as a migration resting area, and provides high quality waterfowl habitat. Acquiring the parcel of land to the west of the swamp complex would create a link between the wetland area and the protected lands around the Little Rouge River. In addition, ensuring that this land becomes a part of the natural system would create a protective buffer area to the south and west of the swamp. Acquiring this land adjacent to the wetlands would also be beneficial for multi- habitat species by increasing the variety of habitat types that are protected in this location. Acquisition of this site would complete one of the last pieces of the east west linkage between the Rouge River watershed and Duffins Creek watershed within the Rouge Duffins Wildlife Corridor as well as secure the continue support to the adjacent meadow lands and provincially significant wetland. This property is on the Pool of Priority Acquisition Sites for the Rouge Park approved by the Rouge Park Alliance. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The lands will be turned over to the City of Toronto under our management agreement Lands under this agreement are exempt from taxation. FINANCIAL DETAILS It is proposed that the Province of Ontario be requested to fund 50% of this transaction. There is funding available for the remaining 50% in land acquisition capital account secured through the City of Toronto. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: December 24, 2004 Attachments: 1 1141 Attachment 1 PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF NATURAL AREAS WITHIN THE ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED Faro Sodding and Landscaping Limited CF N 25302 — • - • • X. • :• •\\,, , • - • / ;;" . • • '(,.;,' -.- •' '''' -',/ ..\•k r •.'`;.,'-,\ ....v.,,,t0.\. ..„....-• • _,,....„.:: •, -IAN S - , • ,.,..":44, .....ts , /„.. , . . ,.4.,. -...„.. . .„ N.,...,,,r;--;','6. ' 1,. • - . - • /— • -,e ' /- '. • ,-\\'''-".'••••• -T,', - .,.,' . : -,, . ‘'.., ,.... , . . ,, N.::• '..C.‘"■:‘,. ' .' '" II .S''• 1 ',, " ,..41,:', ., -,,----A-' ' .')-■.' N i * 1 — I 0 : C., 2 „.,.. ,,,, • :.:4-t... '1-,- , 4 ' .' A \ . - •,. • • .."`.- ./.., ":",..., /7* ,. , ', ..,, .., -:" - . . .,.■"..:",,•-• .'',. ,' ; • ■17. - .• '.... - :., 11%. .',"•,y.` ,... . v...,...,..: r ,...,.. -I ., ,..77., c.•' • • , _ • • • 'I.. - • . •• • , - 11. -01 • . / . / .•• ' • %. • N..' , Al 67 .'".•! „'' • /..,../,/,`:',%4V of-i'r- 41'1 u,„tiV) op.0 St • PIN*CtL r • " „ 'I 0 • If. • i":7;74/' !V.-7 0 • '.0 0 • •• • ,.../.."./""/21'.X.." •;42-7- • - , , - s,' • . • • .7 , \ • : • ,'' -.".." s, , - , / . r 4' f. / •'. / \`' ,r t,,,D 77 -.;."'•-r , .„, • ..... .e. .... • ,,. . - % • / '' 7 ' .•Yc...,, .. . ‘47:-73-: ,Lotiggitiffern . • ., _ _ . . fur ihe tiring Ca, TRCA LANDS UBJEC7 PROFT:RI Y - • - - 1142 RES. #B274/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CITY OF TORONTO Request for a Permanent Easement for a Storm Sewer Don River Watershed, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), CFN 34592. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer, east of Bayview Avenue, north of Glenvale Boulevard, Don River watershed, City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer, east of Bayview Avenue, north of Glenvale Boulevard, Don River watershed, City of Toronto - North York Community Council Area; WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.015 hectares (0.037 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for a storm sewer , said land being east of Bayview Avenue, north of Glenvale Boulevard, City of Toronto, designated as Parts 1 and 2 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ontario Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, Drawing No. 20.01.369 -11, dated December 2004; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs to be paid by the City of Toronto; THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries , damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way , either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction ; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed , with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff , at the expense of the City of Toronto ; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff , a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines ; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; 1143 THAT the granting of this easement is subject to receipt of written approval from the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department who manage these lands on behalf of the TRCA; THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Toronto has formally requested a permanent easement for a new storm sewer, east of Bayview Avenue and north of Glenvale Boulevard within the Burke Brook Ravine. The proposed storm sewer is needed to provide this municipal service to the proposed new Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB) offices to be situated on the tableland to the south of the ravine. The new storm sewer has also been designed to accept storm drainage from a proposed residential development immediately to the east of the CNIB offices and main health care facility. The proposed storm sewer is situated entirely within the Fill Regulated Area but located outside the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Burke Brook Ravine tributary stream of the West Don River. A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for construction of the proposed works had been previously approved by the Executive Committee at meeting #5/03, held on June 6, 2003. Permit No. C -03148 has been held in abeyance pending easement approvals from TRCA, as well as various technical revisions to the proposed method of construction due to the sensitivity of the valley lands which form part of the Burke Brook Ravine Environmentally Significant Area (ESA). At meeting #7/04 held on July 23, 2004, the Authority approved a similar request by the City of Toronto for twin, side -by -side storm sewers (within the same permanent easement), with a combined outfall to the watercourse, and a sanitary sewer connection (within an adjacent, parallel permanent easement) to the Burke Brook Ravine Sanitary Trunk Sewer at the bottom of the valley corridor. Directional drilling was chosen for the installation of the sewer pipes to avoid disturbance of the vegetation along the steep valley wall at this location. The sanitary sewer was successfully installed by the directional drilling method. However, the contractor encountered great difficulty while drilling to install one of the two adjacent storm sewer pipes due to the presence of large subsurface boulders. The sanitary sewer was installed at a greater depth and avoided the boulders; the storm sewer could not be buried deeper since it would not be possible to meet the invert grade of a new, rebuilt headwall at the outlet to the watercourse. 1144 It was decided that the second storm sewer pipe would need to be relocated to avoid the installation problems which were encountered with the first pipe. The revised location is further to the west, closer to Bayview Avenue, where the new pipe will intersect an existing storm sewer that carries roadway runoff and outlets at the rebuilt headwall. The pipe will be installed by open cut since this site is situated on tableland outside the Burke Brook Ravine ESA, yet still within the Fill Regulated Area. A permanent easement across TRCA property is required for the new location of the second storm sewer. The lands subject to the permanent easement are owned by the TRCA and are managed by the City of Toronto Economic Development, Culture & Tourism Department. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required. Staff are presently discussing this matter with the project consultant. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from the Governing Council of the University of Toronto on December 12, 1978 under the Don River Flood Plain and Conservation Component of the Land Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan has been prepared and forms part of revised TRCA Permit C- 03148. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 22, 2004 Attachments: 1 1145 Attachment 1 3. • • , • EG LI PITON AVE. , • RAYViEW AVE. ._ _...... -• • --.• - i ' '7, :- —-,..... - - • :1-:'''';'1_1;1. .r,,,, I , 1,-- -11, ' . 1.,:x.... ' .6:- . „ , _,_ .. ,.., - .‘„ •,•„ 1 ! •., ,. _, 1.,... ,i .'-'J'"•••ril,,,•'_•:II ../,,`Z--,i- _..,,,—'..--k'f'5;. - - ,r1) ''s I L HI I ,‘t2 .y.:,k; ..• N . .. 1 r 4 • , i I 1, , n'," iN - 1'. t• ''' --' -N,-,.- 'I ';'. L._...1. 1 , s: ').i .--\„ \ • . :••:: ,.. •‘''. ^ -7, ... . Thi • •• .• , ' , 2_.,...„).„,,,,,,s ‘, , ,......• A..,,, , .„,....,,, .--7-- • 'V,•'.- . , ,...- 7-,:4 " ‘---:. ‘‘''''.\:.. ' \-, ,‘, iir.,\ \ s‘c.,.....-'4":"-■ -: ' -. '- \ \ •-: •-- • s'; .% s. N ,,%- •.1‘' $ I .,- '' % 1 i.,- x ',. • .'.., '•• .•••.N. ., S.,•,.--.. ...`;.-••-.-:':„, \ ss., 1,1% I %Y.; •-■ ,*1'• ' \'`•••1/42:: . ' k ''- ..+ 1 `,'‘ • '''. -: k,:•,-:,:i-f,I, ,--- .--:,?,, .i,,...‘•?‘ .7,/, ' ,_ 9, :„... • d • ..,, ; • ..-. .' N., l ?,,' r- — 1-:,,,•":•..‘, • '•‘4,i4-:-:‘ ,s,' :‘,/ ■W (4 1-;1 --j'i .f;c9 -"c 1,—...kr-c.---. •:-. ,:,-‘ :.1 i 4-71. _ 1 - ‘,„ ) ) 4, 7' • , ; 41-/• .\ .'4• • 1 17111 \ ,,N .. __ -- • - -, . .:, -"e• ( , . \ . •. , ! '._- --,.'.--c.:.•\.. -:....1:,..-• ,..-_...:-.-. -14-. .' ‘'.- ...IN'\....c " , ,..., • • „ _,I --- -- , , J.,...,./J. \ , , . .,S.1.4„.r, • rr -, :V , 1 1. , ',.1, r: r ' 1 ..., • . :. ' ',' 111 ''' I • • I I):I.III'7:7741.1i .!'' 1.1,„. \ ' ' I E:i• • ; i -1' '. • 2 I.,:: ,. •,, c;.,•: ' -7 , . 1 -,.\ . ''-1-)\''''.1;.1 „ L,v,,„ ,,r- .). /1..,, .,', ) ' ,i', ''....--.* • i,...-.„,v '.. ,'1,14•1',:'1,1 ., , , 1 • ' , „ ..„...,,,. , , ,;1,,„.1c,,,.0,,,..-‘..). , .. I ■ ■ , f . • , L-. '. . \ r / '('/P''',71L./.1 -',-:...,_14__: :.,1'4,21't,;‘k,' ' . ■._ . . 'I ., ---„. .. I, qi: V: ...- r•..'(1‘-. ''l l'IgT7.1 \ 2' ■ , •-• '■ -t. ” • ;is,' ,e, . ' - ,.. -•-kak • \ • ' ,• • .i. I ' t .- , ,.94*. : , A, ., .. . ....,-.. .: 1.. '. \Iiik ''' N.' N,..'i•.;!.. ''','‘.,‘-';:‘■."::‘;'' \:..:-* N's II'. z • IN "4„;\ 1vlldSOH xO011aANrins ;• ri • 1_1 •-.1-::...17•• t_f•-7 1146 RES. #B275/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: HYDRO ONE BRAMPTON Request for a Permanent Easement for an Underground Hydro Duct Structure Humber River Watershed, City of Brampton, CFN 35829. Receipt of a request from Hydro One Brampton to provide a permanent easement for an underground hydro duct structure, east and west of Goreway Drive, north of Regional Road #107 (Highway No. 7), Humber River watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Hydro One Brampton to provide a permanent easement for an underground hydro duct structure , east and west of Goreway Drive, north of Regional Road #107 (Highway No. 7), Humber River watershed, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with Hydro One Brampton in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.38 hectares (0.95 acres), more or Tess, be granted to Hydro One Brampton for an underground hydro duct structure, said land being Part of Lot 8, Concession 7 and 8 EHS, designated as Parts 3 to 12 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Duncan Ashworth Surveying Ltd ., under their Job No. 973 -2004, dated October 29, 2004; THAT consideration is to be the sum of $38,000.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs to be paid by Hydro One Brampton ; THAT Hydro One Brampton is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way , either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction ; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed , with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff , at the expense of Hydro One Brampton ; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff , a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines ; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; 1147 THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1997, the TRCA granted a permanent easement to the Brampton Hydro - Electric Commission (now Hydro One Brampton) for the construction of a duct structure on the west side of Goreway Drive, north of Regional Road #107 (Highway No. 7). This duct structure connected to the transformer station located on the east side of Goreway Drive at this location. A further request for a permanent easement was approved by the TRCA in 2002 for an additional duct structure and manhole on the east side of Goreway Drive; however, the easement was not registered at that time, nor was the duct and manhole constructed at this site. Hydro One Brampton has now formally requested a permanent easement for an underground hydro duct structure, east and west of Goreway Drive, which includes the easement for the duct structure and manhole not constructed in 2002. The additional hydro duct structure is needed in order to meet increasing demand for power services from the expanding residential and industrial community immediately west of the transformer station on Goreway Drive. The proposed duct structure is situated within the Fill Regulated Area and partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain (i.e. portion west of Goreway Drive only) of a tributary of the West Humber River. The new duct structure west of Goreway Drive will be installed by directional drilling beneath the ground to limit disturbance of the West Humber River valley corridor. A permit application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for construction of the proposed works is included in a separate report on this agenda. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required. Staff are presently discussing this matter with Hydro One Brampton staff. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from the Estate of John T. Hodgson on December 17, 1965, under the Ebenezer Dam and Reservoir Project and the Rice Development Company, et al, on July 23, 1982 under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submitted under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. 1148 FINANCIAL DETAILS Hydro One Brampton will pay compensation in the amount of $40,000.00 per acre as was previously negotiated for the 2002 permanent easement request. In addition, Hydro One Brampton has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 23, 2004 Attachments: 1 1149 Attachment 1 Hydro One Brampton Requeat for a Permanent Easement for an Underground Hydro Duct Structure Humber River Watershed, City of Brampton 411,111 CFN 35829 I, * • .1 1 A I • 4 41'.Ct' • .11,t y \ , . ;:s - • 'I. .--11! ,,,...,...,.. ., 1\s. ' ,•:,•,•'•,.. - CON.TwAy ,r;s. e • st.oruer RIMPLIZTV • 4 / ZL: i r 1.; for Tht Lit;ng Cit—y YA. burSF r 1,5.6 n I- . -st A • 1.7 TWA LANDS ' MOSUBJECTPROPERr( 1150 RES. #B276/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: CITY OF PICKERING Request for a Permanent Easement for a Storm Sewer and Outfall Duffins Creek Watershed, City of Pickering, CFN 36003. Receipt of a request from the City of Pickering to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer and outfall, north of Kingston Road and the east end of Finch Avenue, east of Brock Road, Duffins Creek watershed, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Pickering to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer and outfall , north of Kingston Road and the east end of Finch Avenue, east of Brock Road, Duffins Creek watershed, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Pickering in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.024 hectares (0.059 acres), more or Tess, be granted to the City of Pickering for a storm sewer and outfall, said land being north of Kingston Road and the east end of Finch Avenue , east of Brock Road, Duffins Creek watershed, City of Pickering, designated as Part 3 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by Krcmar, Ontario Land Surveyor, under their Project No. 03 -043; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other costs to be paid by the City of Pickering ; THAT the City of Pickering is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims from injuries , damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way , either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction ; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed , with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff , at the expense of the City of Pickering ; THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated / stabilized following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff , a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines ; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to commencement of construction; 1151 THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect hereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Pickering has formally requested a permanent easement for a new storm sewer and outfall to the Duffins Creek located north of Kingston Road and the east end of Finch Avenue, east of Brock Road. The proposed storm sewer and outfall will provide improved local and roadside drainage at the east end of Finch Avenue and will also form part of the internal storm drainage system for the proposed Brookfield Homes residential subdivision (S -P- 2003 -04) which is the subject of a separate acquisition report on this agenda. Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd. will construct the storm sewer and outfall on behalf of the City of Pickering. The proposed works are situated entirely within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek, as well as within the Major - Spinks Environmentally Significant Area. A permit application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for the storm sewer and outfall was approved at Executive Committee Meeting #11/04 held on December 3, 2004. A portion of the storm sewer will be constructed through an existing flood control berm by the open cut method. TRCA geotechnical staff is satisfied with the design of the proposed works through the flood control berm and confirmed that the stability of the berm will not be compromised by the storm sewer. The permit for the proposed storm sewer works will be held in abeyance until the permanent easement transaction has been completed. In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required. Staff are presently discussing this matter with Brookfield Homes staff. The subject TRCA -owned lands were acquired from Florence Simons and Catherine Hindson on February 20, 1967 under the Duffins Creek Flood Plain Lands Acquisition Project. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the permit application submission under Ontario Regulation 158. A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached. 1152 FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Pickering has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 Date: December 22, 2004 Attachments:1 1153 Attachment 1 City of Pickering Request for a Permanent Easement for a Storm Sewer and °WWI DUffins Creek Watershed, City of Pickering CFR 36003 / • ,;(77"--j '1! Li L. suf.41. vitor IX- • t3 .;t,IT CA rs V. ", ...... .'>.' '1$1,N °,,,:.- •-'4.` 4' ----_,.;\ \ ./,'''\ ••:,, I i 4,,l'i, :: ,,,. ,,,, ,\ C.. \ts'' i \*7% ■ , 4 .•-• ''' ,•-•-• , s".7- —.V•k ' „ OAVGI uranv-1,—. onservatron for The Living City . 4 C7(?) AS ILLZ71,TRCA LANDS / relAWISDR.11...OT PROPERTY • 1154 RES. #B277/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Conveyance of Land for the Markham By -Pass, Town of Markham Rouge River Watershed, CFN 35870. Receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality of York for conveyance of land for the Markham By -Pass, Town of Markham. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality of York to convey certain lands for the Markham By -Pass in the Town of Markham ; AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with The Regional Municipality of York in this instance ; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA -owned land containing 1.4491 hectares, more or less, (0.3581 acres) be conveyed to The Regional Municipality of York for the Markham By -Pass, said land being Part of Lots 14 and 15, Concession 9, Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Parts 11 to 16 inclusive on Plan 65R- 23340; THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs; An archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of The Regional Municipality of York; THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan , subject to the approval of TRCA staff; THAT The Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify and save harmless the TRCA from any and all claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either directly or indirectly from this sale or the carrying out of construction ; THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto , including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents . CARRIED 1155 BACKGROUND The Environmental Assessment for the Markham By -Pass was completed in the late 1990s. The Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) conveyed its holdings west of the by -pass including the by -pass for the Cornell development. In turn, the lands required for the by -pass would be transferred by the developer to the region. The lands east of the by -pass were part of the 1,315 hectares (3,249 aces) of lands conveyed in March of 2004 from ORC to TRCA for Rouge Park purposes. Unfortunately ORC utilized the wrong alignment for the by -pass when completing these conveyances. Therefore, part of the conveyance from ORC to TRCA included an approximately 10 metre wide stripe of the by -pass lands. The Region of York is now requesting that TRCA convey these lands to the region. These lands are subject to a Conservation Easement and Option to Purchase agreement in favour of ORC. ORC has advised that they will require a sign off from the Rouge Park Alliance, the Town of Markham and TRCA prior to providing the necessary releases to the region relating to the Conservation Easement and Option to Purchase agreement. The region has agreed to obtain the sign off from the Town of Markham. The Rouge Park Alliance at its meeting #6/04, held on December 17, 2004, adopted the following resolution: THAT WHEREAS the Rouge Park Alliance is in receipt of a request for comments relating to the potential conveyance of land to the Regional Municipality of York (Region) for the Markham By -Pass; AND WHEREAS the subject lands were recently transfer by the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Rouge Park Purposes; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Rouge Park Alliance has no objection to the conveyance of land required by the Region for the Markham By -Pass; THAT TRCA be requested to proceed with the transfer to the Region in accordance with the /r normal procedures; THAT the Region be thanked for its support of the Rouge Park and its land acquisitions program and the Alliance looks forward to a continued partnership with the Region; AND FURTHER THAT the Region, ORC, ministry of Natural Resources and TRCA be so advised. The region has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for the nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that these lands be conveyed for the nominal consideration of $2.00. 1156 FINANCIAL DETAILS The region has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction and the region will contribute $20,000 to the Rouge Park for restoration works. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: December 24, 2004 Attachments: 1 1157 Attachment 1 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Conveyance oI Land for the Markham By -Pass, Town of Markham Rouye River Watershed CPN 35870 onser va tion for The Livfns Cif ;. :INCA LANDS SUFI I PROPERTY ' 1 1158 RES. #B278/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: ESTATE OF POMPEA ZAERA FERZOCO AND CITY OF TORONTO ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING Authorization for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff to act in the capacity of expert witness for the City of Toronto before the Ontario Municipal Board on referrals related to a zoning by -law amendment, and any other associated applications under the Planning Act, to permit a residential development. Suzan Hall Nancy Stewart THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT authorization be given to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff to act in the capacity of expert witness for the City of Toronto before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), regarding a proposed zoning by -law amendment application and any other associated applications under the Planning Act , that are not in conformity with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP); THAT staff continue to work cooperatively with the City of Toronto and the appellants to ensure that the requirements of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program are met; AND FURTHER THAT the OMB and all parties and participants to the hearing be so advised . CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject property (56 Grovetree Road) is a 1.6 acre parcel on the northern extent of the Grovetree Road cul -de -sac in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area) in the Humber River watershed. Grovetree Road is located south -west of Islington Avenue and Albion Road. The subject property is a large single family residential lot in the Grovetree Road / Sandhill Drive subdivision developed in the 1960's, and contains a single family dwelling and shed. It is surrounded on three sides by publicly owned valley corridor and forms a narrow peninsula between the West Humber River, Albion Creek and an intermittent stream draining towards the Thistletown neighborhood. A significant portion of the lot also includes valley corridor. The western portion of the lot is regulated by Ontario Regulation 158. The Planning Act application is to amend the former City of Etobicoke's Zoning By -law to allow for seven single family lots fronting a private road. The existing house and shed would be demolished. The application has been appealed to the OMB by the proponents of the application for the City of Toronto's failure to render a decision on the application within the review period allotted by the Planning Act. TRCA staff have submitted written comments on the application to the City of Toronto's City Planning Division and to the applicant. Staff comments explain that we do not support the application as submitted on the basis that it proposes to eliminate or negatively impact a portion of the valley corridor and associated natural heritage features in favour of residential lots and a private road. TRCA staff are of the opinion that this portion of the West Humber River valley represents significant habitat. 1159 Our correspondence states that the proposal as submitted does not meet certain fundamental policies of the VSCMP as it does not provide adequate buffers from either top of bank or the edge of significant vegetation. The applicant has not provided an environmental impact study as required by TRCA or the City of Toronto. Through our correspondence, the City of Toronto and the applicants have been made aware that TRCA staff are of the opinion that the environmental review report submitted by the applicants' consultant is not adequate, and that more information and a significant redesign of the proposal is required. RATIONALE A pre- hearing date has not been set by the OMB. City of Toronto legal staff are preparing a report to Council recommending that city staff be directed to retain the necessary expert witnesses to oppose the proposed zoning by -law amendment at the OMB. City of Toronto Urban Development Services and Legal staff have requested TRCA assistance in preparing for, and defending, the natural heritage aspects of their position. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff are requesting the authorization of the Authority to provide expert advice to the City of Toronto in order to defend the policies of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program at a future OMB hearing. Staff will continue to work with the parties and participants to the hearing to resolve the issues, and will represent TRCA interests before the OMB. Report prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: December 22, 2004 RES. #B279/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD LANDS Wanita Road School Site, CFN 36039. Surplus Toronto District School Board property located on the south side of Wanita Road, east of Meadowvale Road, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council) Suzan Hall Maria Augimeri THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) property located on the south side of Wanita Road , City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area) has been declared surplus to the TDSB's educational needs and TDSB is in the process of disposing of the property ; WHEREAS TRCA has previously determined that the surplus TDSB property is not affected directly by any existing Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) policies; 1160 AND WHEREAS TRCA has identified a potential opportunity to renaturalize the TDSB property to expand the natural heritage system and increase the tree canopy in the City of Toronto thereby maintaining and enhancing passive storm water management attributes of the property (Le. infiltration); THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA supports retaining the TDSB property in public ownership; THAT if the site is retained in public ownership , TRCA staff be directed to work with the City of Toronto staff to develop a renaturalization plan for the TDSB property ; AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto and the TDSB be so advised . AMENDMENT RES. #8280/04 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Maria Augimeri THAT the following be inserted before the last paragraph of the main motion : THAT the Authority request the City of Toronto to designate the property as part of the City of Toronto's natural heritage system as incorporated within the City of Toronto 's Official Plan. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND At Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #7/04, held on December 10, 2004, Resolution D95/04 was approved in part as follows: ...AND FURTHER THAT staff report back on the status of, and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's interest in, the surplus Toronto District School Board property located on the south side of Wanita Road The Wanita Road School site is owned by the Toronto District School Board and is approximately 8.10 acres in size. The site is located northeast of the Meadowvale Road /Lawrence Avenue East intersection in the Scarborough Community Council Area of the City of Toronto. The site is primarily grass and maintained by TDSB with some forest cover of planted red pine windrows and several orchard trees remaining from the original farm. The north east corner of the site contains some vegetation associated with a valley corridor east of the site. This corridor is a tributary of the Centennial Creek, owned by the City of Toronto and was piped at some time in the past. The city also owns Wanita Park which is located south west of the site. 1161 The Wanita Road school site was acquired in 1956 by the former Scarborough Board of Education. This vacant site provided the former Scarborough board with the option to construct a new Junior Public School if required to accommodate students from the local community. In February of 2002, TDSB retained a consultant to prepare a demographic study of the area for the period of 1991 to 2021. The demographic study concluded that there is no long -term need for a school at this site. Therefore, on December 2, 2002 the TDSB declared the site surplus to their educational needs. TDSB circulated the City of Toronto in July, 2003 to determine if there was any city interest in acquiring the site. The city's Real Estate Department forwarded this information to the city's agencies, boards, commissions and departments. TRCA was included in this circulation and staff advised the city that the property was not affected by any TRCA policies, however the northeast corner of the school site was within the limits of the city's Ravine Protection By -Law. It is staff's understanding that there was no other interest in the site and TRCA's comments were forwarded to TDSB. Zoning and Official Plan The current zoning of the site is Single Family Residential. The Centennial Community Secondary Plan in the existing Scarborough Official Plan identifies the site as Junior Public School. There is an Open Space component to the site, for a park to be developed as part of the school, and a portion of the east part is designated as Environmental Impact Zone. The exact boundaries of the school, park and environmental impact zone are not defined, and would be determined as part of any development application. The new Toronto Official Plan has the site designated as Neighborhoods, except for vegetation associated with the valley corridor to the east, which is designated Natural Areas. There is also a Natural Heritage overlay on the vegetation associated with the valley corridor to the east. Toronto's Private Tree By -Law There are a number of trees on the site that are protected under Toronto's Private Tree By -Law. The majority of the trees are located in hedgerows on the west portion of the site, and are predominantly white pine, red pine and Norway spruce. There are additional trees located in the rear yards of existing residential dwellings around the site that are also protected under the private tree by -law. The city's Urban Forestry Department expect that there are 30 or more trees in total that are protected. Toronto's Ravine Protection By -Law The northeast corner of the school site is located within the limits of Toronto's Ravine Protection By -Law. Toronto's Our Common Grounds; Toronto Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan Our Common Grounds; Toronto Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan was approved by the City of Toronto Council in July of 2004. One of the three main goals that will form the basis of the priorities and service plans for this strategic plan is Environmental Stewardship. One of the key targets identified to achieve the Environmental Stewardship goal is extending the city's tree canopy from its current 17% to 30 -40% of the city's total area. If the site is retained in public ownership and renaturalized it would assist in meeting this target. 1162 Terrestrial Natural Heritage Only the vegetation associated with the valley corridor east of the site was identified in the City of Toronto Natural Heritage Study, Final Report, December 2001. The Natural Heritage Study was a partnership between TRCA and the City of Toronto and was conducted to provide a preliminary framework in support of the natural heritage policies in the new City of Toronto Official Plan, adopted by Council on November 28, 2002. The Natural Heritage Study used a comprehensive evaluation system to analyze existing habitat conditions and model a potential future habitat scenario. Sites designated for future school construction, although they may contribute to the open space system, were not considered natural habitat. Therefore, because TDSB targeted the site for future development it was not considered natural habitat for the purpose of the Natural Heritage Study, or the new official plan. If the site is retained in public ownership and renaturalized over a period of time, the property would provide a net gain to the city's terrestrial natural heritage system. This site, along with the city's stream corridor lands to the east and Wanita Park to the west, provides a natural connection between the Centennial Creek valley and Colonel Danforth Park in the Highland Creek valley. Ontario Regulation 158 The site is not regulated by TRCA under Ontario Regulation 158. Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) The site is entirely outside of the Fill Extension Line covering much of the valley corridor to the east. There is some vegetation associated with this valley corridor on the far eastern portion of the Wanita Road school site. Therefore, in any future development proposal, TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) requires a 10 metre renaturalized buffer from the edge of the vegetation. Further investigation as to the type and health of this vegetation, as well as possible geotechnical analysis of the slope would be required and could reduce the developable area of the site. Program Objective 2.2.3.0 of VSCMP supports the acquisition and renaturalization of the site. This objective is as follows: "To enhance and re- establish self- sustaining terrestrial and aquatic biological communities which will be characterized by a variety of habitats, a diversity of species and a complex community structure." Storm Water Management According to information we have received from the city, overland flow of storm water from approximately 10 acres crosses the site. A storm water management pond cannot be justified for treating this local site drainage. The city's Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP) identifies a storage tank on the city -owned property directly adjacent to the Wanita Road site to deal with storm water from a 60 acre drainage area. This facility is scheduled to be built in the period following the first 25 years of the implementation of the WWFMMP. Should the site be developed in the future, storm water management measures to achieve water quality and quantity requirements consistent with the WWFMMP and TRCA criteria would have to be addressed at that time. 1163 RATIONALE As part of the preparation of this report, staff also considered other potential opportunities for the property that would provide an environmental benefit to the city, if the property is retained in public ownership. Staff recognize that this site has little immediate use for a storm water management facility, however, this piece of land adjacent to the valley system represents an opportunity to renaturalize this parcel of and and in so doing expand the natural heritage system and assist in achieving the city's newly adopted targets for 30% to 40% tree canopy. This would in turn assist in a small way to attenuate run off. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: December 15, 2004 Attachments: 1 1164 Attachment 1 TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD LANDS Motto Road School Site CFN 36039 ��r w•a sir, tnvern a • T€niGf,T + L.lt _ itcciAc vim' i ai l .6 XJ F r SartMn V r tt.en y r V:;.an uYrIIT r Df ? "GIr i -_.4r iiy _Lawrcice :ii) , -a = • i�ti.,l .f lu r 1165 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B281/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Maria Augimeri THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.1 - 9.1.4, inclusive), which are listed below. CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 9.1.1 1502989 ONTARIO LIMITED To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession C FTH, (4192 - 4196 Dundas Street West), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1502989 Ontario Limited. The purpose is to place fill and regrade in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a multi- storey residential structure and associated landscaping. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2010 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing M101, Servicing Plan, prepared by Jain and Associates Ltd ., dated October 25, 2004, received by TRCA on December 13, 2004; • Drawing L -00, Landscape, Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by DWK, dated October 18, 2004, received by TRCA on December 13, 2004; • Drawing L -01, Landscape Plan, prepared by DWK, dated October 18, 2004, received by TRCA on December 13, 2004; • Drawing L -02, Landscape, Construction Details and Notes, prepared by DWK, dated October 18, 2004, received by TRCA on December 13, 2004; 1166 • Ravine Rehabilitation Plan , prepared by Urban Forest Associates , dated January 2004, received by TRCA on December 13, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill and regrade within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River valley to facilitate the construction of a multi- storey residential building and associated landscaping. The subject property is located on the north side of Dundas Street, east of Royal York Road and backs onto the Humber River. TRCA staff approved the development limits from the stable top of bank during the Site Plan approval. The development proposal includes native planting within the buffer zone and a Ravine Stewardship Plan for the remainder of the private property within the valley for the purpose of enhancing slope stability and the health of the valley. Control of Flooding: The proposal is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will have no impact on the control of flooding. Pollution: A temporary sediment control fence will be installed to prevent construction sediment from entering the Humber River valley system. Conservation of Land: The proposal results in a net environmental gain as an area of existing paved parking will be restored to open space. The proposed multi- storey residential building is sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank. Plantings Extensive native plantings will be provided in the buffer zone and a Ravine Stewardship Plan will be implemented for the slope. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Policy 4.2.2., Development and Redevelopment /Intensification within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36062 - Application #: 457/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 5, 2004 1167 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 9.1.2 MOUNT PLEASANT GROUP OF CEMETERIES To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 29, 30, Concession C, (625 Birchmount Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area for purposes of regrading a burial area of the existing cemetery. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2010 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. L1, Site Landscape Plan, Pine Hills Cemetery, prepared by Nak Group, dated November 9, 2004 and received on November 12, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Massey Creek to facilitate the construction of a retaining wall and levelling a portion of the Pine Hills Cemetery to be utilized for human burial. The retaining wall ranges in height from 0.35m to 0.68m. The owner has indicated that prior to the fill placement, the subject area was too steep and unsafe for winter burial activity. The works were completed prior to obtaining a permit under Ontario Regulation 158. Control of Flooding: The works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Silt fencing was installed and maintained during the construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: No significant natural resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings New native plantings are proposed adjacent to the watercourse. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2.(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 1168 CFN: 35890 - Application #: 392/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 3, 2005 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 9.1.3 1111517 ONTARIO LIMITED To construct in a flood plain on Part Block F, Plan 544E, (805 Lakeshore Boulevard East), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Annette Mincer. The purpose is to construct in a floodplain within the Lower Don Special Policy Area in order to facilitate the construction of a gas station, convenience store and car wash facility. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing No. 88009449 -02P, Site Plan, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised April 13, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 88009449 -03P, Grading Plan, prepared by Imperial Oil , revised September 2, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 88009449 -07P, Canopy Elevations, prepared by Imperial Oil , revised August 27, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 88009449 -08P, SheetA -05, Exterior Elevations, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised August 27, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 88009449 -02P, Sheet A -06, Exterior Elevations, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised August 27, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 88009449 -09P, Building Elevations, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised August 27, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 04767N, Tank Slab Section and Details, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised September 26, 2004, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004; • Drawing No. 04755N, Automatic Tank Gauge Vapour Recovery Riser & Fill Pipe Details, prepared by Imperial Oil, revised September 3, 2003, received by TRCA on November 25, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1169 Proposal: The proposal is to construct within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Lower Don Special Policy Area in order to facilitate the construction of a gas station, convenience store and car wash facility. The subject property is located on the south west corner of Lakeshore Boulevard East and Carlaw Avenue. The proposal includes partially excavating and remediating the site, and installing sealed and secured underground fuel storage tanks. Dewatering during construction is subject to Ministry of the Environment approval. Control of Flooding: The proposed buildings and underground storage tanks will be floodproofed to above the 350 year flood event. Underground storage tanks will be sealed and strapped down to prevent any flood water entering or exiting the tanks and to prevent the tanks from shifting under increased groundwater loading. Pollution: The subject property is well removed from the Don River and Lake Ontario. Sediment control fencing is not required for the purpose of preventing sediment from entering a watercourse. A permit from the Ministry of the Environment is required for dewatering and monitoring of discharge contamination during construction. Conservation of Land: The subject property consists of an indoor and outdoor industrial storage facility and there are no natural heritage resources on this or any adjacent sites. Plantings No plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Policy 4.2..1.B., Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35315 - Application #: 113/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 5, 2005 CITY OF VAUGHAN 9.1.4 FRANCA ZEPPA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan M -1115, (105 Riverside Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Franca Zeppa. 1170 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a second storey addition and a two - storey rear yard addition to a single family dwelling. The subject property is located within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA) in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Site Plan, Drawing SP -1, dated May 2004, last revised November 22, 2004, received by the TRCA December 16, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing . • Letter, dated December 23, 2004, signed by Paul Caravaggio, received by the TRCA December 23, 2004, confirming that there will be no building openings below the elevation of the Regional Storm Flood Plain . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a second storey addition and a two- storey rear yard addition to a single family dwelling. The subject property is located within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA) in the City of Vaughan. The Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies permit additions to existing buildings within SPAs provided the technical requirements of the TRCA are satisfied. The current proposal satisfied the technical requirements, as the additions will be located out side of the hydraulic floodway and will be adequately flood proofed to the Regional Storm Flood elevation. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Control of Flooding: The proposed dwelling will be flood proofed to the Regional Storm Flood elevation. TRCA staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters due to the construction of the proposed additions. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained until all works have been completed. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposed works, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural heritage features on the property that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project. 1171 Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36050 - Application #: 454 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: December 16, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS : RES. #B282/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: David Barrow Maria Augimeri THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.5 - 9.1.23, with the exception of 9.1.10, 9.1.11 and 9.1.22, which were withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON 9.1.5 HIGHWAY 7 & THE GORE ROAD LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Concession 9 NDS, in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Highway 7 & The Gore Road Limited. The purpose is to construct a stormwater management facility to be located within a Fill Regulated Area, and partially within the Regulatory Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2010. • Letter of undertaking provided by Diarmuid Horgan , P.Eng. of Candevcon Limited, dated January 12, 2005, to address all outstanding ecology issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1172 Proposal: The proposal is to construct a stormwater management facility, and associated outfall structures, to be located within a Fill Regulated Area and partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the West Humber River, on the Claireville Residential Subdivision lands, in the City of Brampton. Please note that a compensatory planting plan for the proposed alteration to the floodplain has been submitted with this application. In addition, TRCA technical staff have determined that the proposed works will not adversely affect the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. Please be advised that this application is being managed in conjunction with TRCA Enforcement staff for a violation - placement of fill in a Fill Regulated Area without a permit. As such, no permit for this application will be issued until the violation has been remedied to the satisfaction of TRCA enforcement staff. Due to the noted violation, this application is also subject to additional fees ($2,800 minor violation fee - subdivision stormwater management pond). Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be partially located with the Regional Storm Floodplain. However, TRCA technical staff have reviewed the proposed works and have determined that the works will not result in any adverse impacts to the storage and conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to the commencement of any works, and will be maintained throughout all phases of construction Conservation of Land: To mitigate for the proposed works within the Regional Storm Floodplain, a compensatory planting plan has been submitted with this application. The compensatory plantings include additional landscaping around the proposed outfall structures, as well as plantings along the valley walls and riparian area to enhance the existing conditions. Please note that there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this application. Plantings This proposal involves the planting of only appropriate native and non - invasive species in accordance with the TRCA's guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 33968 - Application #: 031/03/BRAM Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: January 5, 2005 9.1.6 HYDRO ONE BRAMPTON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Concession 7, 8, (Goreway Drive and Humberwest Parkway North of Highway #7 and South of Castlemore Road), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 1173 The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated area, to facilitate the construction of underground hydro ducts by directional bore method, through Claireville Conservation Area lands in the City of Brampton. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking provided by Miro Della Rossa / A Kuchowicz, Hydro One Brampton, dated January 12, 2005, to address minor outstanding TRCA Ecology and Engineering issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This project involves the installation of underground hydro lines by directional bore method between Goreway Drive and Humberwest Parkway, through TRCA Claireville lands in the City of Brampton. Four bore hole lines containing 8 ducts each are presently proposed. One future additional bore is also being considered. The proposed underground lines will complement Brampton Hydro's existing lines (which are adjacent to those proposed), and will provide additional power capacity required for development on the west side of Humberwest Parkway. Although the proposed lines will traverse Claireville Conservation Area lands, all infrastructure and proposed works will be underground, and no impacts are expected to the valley system or the associated tributary of the Humber River as a result. All bore pits will be located outside of the valley system on lands in private ownership, which do not currently posses significant vegetation. The proposed directional bore will be located a minimum of 3 metres below the invert of the watercourse. This project does not require works within the valley system. An associated application for a permanent easement on TRCA lands (of approximately 17 metres in width) is also being brought forward to this Executive Committee meeting for endorsement. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, no modifications to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place, and the work environment will be isolated during construction to reduce the impact on surrounding features. All vegetation affected during the construction process will be restored to pre- construction condition. 1174 Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation or geotechnical concerns exist with respect to this application. Although no in -water works are proposed, in accordance with MNR guidelines, fisheries concerns will be addressed through the application of the MNR fisheries timing window restrictions. Plantings No vegetation within the valleylands will be removed through, or affected by this project. Similarly, no significant vegetation currently exists in the tableland areas in which the bore holes will be located. All disturbed areas will be restored to pre- construction condition or better. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36077 - Application #: 002 /05 /BRAM Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: January 4, 2005 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 9.1.7 YOGVEDANT SEVA SAMITI CENTRE OF CANADA To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Block D, Plan 919, (6915 Goreway Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Yogvedant Seva Samiti Centre of Canada. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a TRCA Fill Regulated area and construct within a floodplain associated with Mimico Creek in order to facilitate the construction of a building to be used as a place of worship at 6915 Goreway Drive, in the City of Mississauga. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2010. • Letter of Undertaking, prepared by D. Arora, of Delta Engineering Services, dated January 11, 2005, to address all outstanding engineering issues . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1175 Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a new building to be used as a place of worship within a Fill Regulated area and Regional Storm Floodplain associated with Mimico Creek at 6915 Goreway Drive, in the City of Mississauga. Please note that TRCA's Executive Committee previously approved a similar proposal to construct an industrial building on the subject property at the July 26, 2002 Executive Committee meeting. The subject property is an existing lot of record located on the fringe of the floodplain. The proposed works are considered to be infill as properties surrounding the subject lands have been fully developed. The applicant in consultation with TRCA Engineering staff have determined that fill may be placed, and regrading completed to bring the proposed structure out of the floodplain without adversely affecting flood storage and conveyance capacity. As such, the proposed works will be adequately floodproofed to the Regional Storm Flood elevation and will be in- keeping with the previous decisions and approvals provided for the subject property. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. However, TRCA staff are satisfied that the proposed works will not adversely impact the storage and /or conveyance of flood waters as the proposed development is located on the fringe of the floodplain. In addition, the proposed development is proposed to be adequately floodproofed. Please note that the structure is certified by a Professional Engineer to withstand the flows and velocities associated with floodwaters during a Regional Storm event. Pollution: Appropriate stormwater management and sediment and erosion controls will be installed and maintained on the subject lands during construction. Conservation of Land: No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of construction. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal. Plantings As no significant vegetation will be impacted by this proposal, compensatory plantings are not required. Policy Guidelines: The proposal conforms with Section 3.2.2. (C) - Stream Corridors & Section 4.2.2. (G) - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). CFN: 35495 - Application #: 206 /04 /MISS Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: January 4, 2005 1176 CITY OF PICKERING 9.1.8 MONTCLARE INVESTMENTS LTD. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 19, Concession 9 Block 25, Plan 40M -1482, (Brock Road and William Street), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Montclare Investments Ltd.. The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place fill within a Fill Regulated area, to facilitate the construction of a new bridge crossing and storm sewer outfall on a tributary of the Duffins Creek to service an approved Draft Plan of Subdivision, in the City Pickering. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking pertaining to Restoration Planting Details , prepared by Don Benett, received January 12, 2005 • Waiver, signed by the legal owners of Lot 12, Plan 40M -1482, dated January 11, 2005, received January 12, 2005 • Lot Grading Plan, Dwg. No. 3, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., received January 12, 2005 • Storm Sewer Outfall 1, Dwg. No. 7, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., received January 12, 2005 • Storm Sewer Outfall 2, Dwg. No. 8, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., received January 12, 2005 • Siltation Control Plan, Dwg. No. 9, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., received January 12, 2005 • Outfall And Stream Crossing Landscape Restoration Plan , Sheet L1, dated June 2004, revised January 11, 2005, prepared by NAK Design Group, received January 12, 2005 • Lot Grading Plan, Dwg. No. 1, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., received November 25, 2004 • Lot Grading Plan, Dwg. No. 2, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., received November 25, 2004 • Plan and Profile of Tom Thompson Court , Dwg. No. 4, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd ., received November 25, 2004 • Plan and Profile of Tom Thompson Court , Dwg. No. 5, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd . received November 25, 2004 • Plan and Profile of Tom Thompson Court , Dwg. No. 6, dated August 2004, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd ., received November 25, 2004 • General Arrangement, Dwg. No. S -1, dated September 9, 2004, revised November 24, 2004, prepared by G.D. Jewell Engineering Inc., received November 25, 2004 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1177 Proposal: The applicant proposes to alter a watercourse and place fill within a Fill Regulated area in order to facilitate the construction of a new bridge crossing, and storm sewer outfall, of Mitchell Creek, a tributary of Duffins Creek, in the City of Pickering. The crossing is required to connect an existing roadway which currently terminates at the valley corridor, to a 16 lot draft approved plan of subdivision in the Hamlet of Claremont. The proposed crossing of Mitchell Creek in this location was previously approved through the draft plan of subdivision and is identified in the City's Official Plan. TRCA staff have advocated for a single span bridge which spans the meander belt of the watercourse at this location. Through related discussions, TRCA staff and the applicant have agreed upon a span width of approximately 10.9 metres for the bridge, which represents the maximum feasible span width for this development. While this is not the ideal span width, staff are confident that the span provided will be sufficient to allow for the movement of habitat and the conveyance of flood flows. In addition, the applicant proposes an expansive planting program to reduce future migration of the watercourse, and to protect the creek banks and bridge footings. The applicant is also proposing an armoured stone wall to be placed below the invert of the creek as a secondary measure to provide additional protection. As no in -water works are proposed, no fisheries concerns are related to this proposal. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will occur within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however TRCA engineering staff are satisfied that the proposed works will not significantly impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Erosion and sediment control measures will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or slope stability concerns related to this proposal. There are also no fisheries concerns as in -water works are not required. An expansive planting program is proposed to reduce the future migration of the watercourse and to provide protection to the footings of the bridge. Armoured stone protection on the bridge footings and valley wall is also proposed as a secondary measure to help protect the proposed works. Plantings Detailed landscape restoration plans have been prepared, and all disturbed areas will be restored to pre- construction condition. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35131 - Application #: 043/04 /PICK Report Prepared by: Carla Pierini, extension 5314 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: January 5, 2005 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 1178 9.1.9 AL STRATIGACOS To construct in a flood plain on (43 Bonnyview Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Al Stratigacos. The purpose is to place and excavate fill within a Regional Floodplain of Mimico Creek located in the Draft South Etobicoke Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a two storey addition onto the rear of the existing dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Drawing No. A -1, Floor Plans; Drawing No. A -2, Elevation Plans; Drawing No. A -3, Sections; Drawing No. A -4, Site Plan, prepared by GPF Designs Inc., received January 10, 2005 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place and excavate fill within a Regional Storm Floodplain of Mimico Creek located in the Draft South Etobicoke Special Policy Area (SPA) to facilitate the construction of a two storey addition. The subject property is located east of Royal York Road and north of The Queensway. All works will be sufficiently setback from the toe of the slope. Control of Flooding: Development within this area is subject to the interim approval procedures of the draft South Etobicoke Special Policy Area, approved by Executive Committee by Res #D39/98. Under these policies, Regulatory Flood protection will be sought for all new development. Where it is not technically feasible and /or impractical to flood protect to this standard, then a lower level of flood protection, not less than the 350 year flood event, may be allowed. The proposed addition will be flood proofed to be above the Regional Storm Elevation. The applicant will submit a letter from a structural engineer which states that the new addition can withstand the depths and velocities expected during a flood event. There will be no impact on flood storage. All excess fill material will be removed from the site. Pollution: Sediment fencing is not required as the proposed addition is sufficiently removed from the watercourse. Conservation of Land: The proposed works will take place on Bonnyview Drive, which is within a developed residential community recognized in the Draft South Etobicoke SPA. There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation. 1179 Plantings Plantings are not required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with the Interim Approval Procedures for the draft South Etobicoke Special Policy Area and Section 4.2.1- Development and Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Area - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36081 - Application #: 006 /05/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 4, 2005 9.1.10 SHAWN MARK To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 46, Plan 2142, (78 Humber Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Shawn Mark. • Withdrawn CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 9.1.11 JASON DEZWIREK To construct in a flood plain on Lot 15, Plan M -453, (18 Brookfield Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jason Dezwirek. • Withdrawn 9.1.12 MARTHA FUSCA AND KITSON VINCENT To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 21, Plan 3464, (37 Knightswood Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Martha Fusca and Kitson Vincent. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area, and construct within a Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a new two storey dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Drawing No. A1.1, Site Plan; Drawing No. A2.0, Proposed Basement Floor Plan; 1180 • Drawing No. A2.1, Proposed Ground Floor Plan; Drawing No. A3.2, Proposed South Elevation; Drawing No. A3.3, Proposed East Elevation prepared by Lynn Appleby Designs , dated November 30, 2004, prepared by Lynn Appleby Designs , received November 30, 2004. • Drawing No. A3.1, Proposed North Elevation and Drawing No. A3.4, Proposed West Elevation, prepared by Lynn Appleby Designs revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new two - storey dwelling. The entire property is located within a Fill Regulated Area. A majority of the new dwelling will be located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. A small portion of the dwelling is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area. The existing dwelling will be demolished. The subject property located east of Yonge Street and south of York Mills Road. All works will be sufficiently setback from the top of bank. Control of Flooding: A portion of the subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area. The proposed dwelling will be flood - proofed to above the Regional Storm Flood elevation. A letter from a structural engineer will be submitted by the applicant which will state that the small portion of the new dwelling within the Floodplain will be able to withstand the flows and velocities in the event of a flood. Pollution: A temporary sediment control fence will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent debris from entering the adjacent ravine system. Conservation of Land: TRCA geo- technical staff have reviewed the geo - technical report that was submitted by the applicant and are satisfied that there are no slope instability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings Native and non - invasive species will be planted. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with both Section 4.2.1.(B), Development Guidelines for Development /Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas, and Section 4.2.2.(D)., Development Guidelines for Development and Redevelopment /Intensification within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urban Areas, of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 1181 CFN: 36020 - Application #: 446/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 5, 2005 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 9.1.13 CITY OF TORONTO To place fill within a regulated area on (Ellesmere Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Highland Creek in order to facilitate repairs to Ellesmere Road bridge.. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Drawing No. 355- S705 -11, Ellesmere Road Bridge Over Highland Creek , Structure Rehabilitation, General Arrangement, dated December 22, 2004, received January 3, 2005, prepared by McCormick Rankin Corporation . • Drawing No. 355- S705 -22, Ellesmere Road Bridge Over Highland Creek , Structure Rehabilitation, Temporary Bridge, dated December 24, 2004, received January 3, 2005, prepared by McCormick Rankin Corporation . • Drawing No. 355- S705 -27, Ellesmere Road Bridge Over Highland Creek , Structure Rehabilitation, Landscape Restoration, dated December 24, 2004, received January 3, 2005, prepared by ecoplans. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of repairs to the existing bridge include removal and replacement of bridge deck, sidewalks, asphalt, waterproofing and repairs to the existing girders. Also proposed are patch repairs to the concrete piers, abutments and wingwalls. A temporary crossing will be installed to allow access to the work area. No in -water works are proposed. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: A debris containment system will be installed beneath the bridge and sediment fencing will also be utilized around the construction site to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. 1182 Conservation of Land: No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. Plantings New native plantings are proposed to enhance the site. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35982 - Application #: 433/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: January 3, 2005 CITY OF VAUGHAN 9.1.14 AL & PINA LICATA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 41, Plan 65M -3377, (133 Treelawn Boulevard), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Al & Pina Licata. The purpose is to place and excavate fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and retaining wall, with associated landscaping, within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Site Plan, dated November 9, 2004, prepared by Betz Pools, received by the TRCA November 30, 2004, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing . • Cross - Section, dated December 1, 2004, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA December 16, 2004. • Cross- Section, indicating location of proposed plantings , dated December 1, 2004, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA January 10, 2005, redline revised to indicate the planting of native, non - invasive species. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and retaining wall, with associated landscaping, within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain and will be sufficiently setback from top of bank. The project will result in minimal regrading and all excess fill material will be removed from the site. 1183 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley system. Conservation of Land: TRCA staff are satisfied that there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. As that watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural heritage features on the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings Landscaping will be conducted to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36017 - Application #: 442 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: Robyn McMullen, extension 5687 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: January 4, 2005 9.1.15 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, Concession 5, 6 Plan 65R, 26357, 65R- 25880, 64R -5096, 65R- 26401, (Teston Road - from Weston Road to Highway 400), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area (for Teston Road widening from 2 lanes to 5 lanes, for 6m span culvert removal with 18m span arch replacement, watermain installation, storm sewer installation, four Reinforced Soil Slope Wall constructions); to construct structures within a Regional Storm Floodplain (18m span x 5.4m H arch ); to alter a watercourse ( Cold Creek) during the coldwater time period (July 1 to September 15) with the removal of the existing culvert, reinstatement of the banks, and through the construction of an outfall. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans ), dated December 24, 2004; received December 24, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. 1184 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the upgrading and widening of Teston Road from 2 to 4 lanes with turning lanes at intersections from west of Weston Road in the west to east of Highway 400 in the east. The existing 6m span culvert underneath Teston Road will need to be removed and replaced with a 18m techspan. Four Reinforced Soil Slope walls will be constructed to avoid impacts to Cold Creek north and south of Teston Road. The majority of the project is located within a Fill Regulated Area. Cold Creek has a Regional Storm Floodplain associated with it. The Teston Road project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics for the proposed culvert replacement and has determined that there will not be any negative impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, sheet piling, pumps, sediment basins) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The culvert replacement will be constructed in the dry via a sheet piling method for isolation purposes. The banks will be reinstated post construction. Conservation of Land: There will moderate inwater works associated with the culvert removal and replacement. The works will be isolated by sheet piling, however, the sheet piling will be very close to the western bank. The banks will also be reinstated post construction. The construction of the outfall beside cold creek constitutes a minor alteration of the watercourse. The works will constitute a mitigatable harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (mit. HADD) of fish habitat. TRCA staff will be able to issue the Letter of Advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) when the TRCA's permit has been issued. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features such as Environmentally Significant Areas (ESAs), Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs), Provincially or Locally Significant Wetlands (PSWs or LSWs), however, there will be vegetation removals for the road widening works. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35174 - Application #: 061 /04NAUG Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: January 4, 2005 1185 9.1.16 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22 to 26, Concession 5, 6 Plan 65R- 26357, 65R- 25880, 64R -5096, 65R- 26401, (Highway 400 and Teston Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ministry of Transportation. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area (to construct a 175 metre length retaining wall on the west side of Highway 400, north of Teston Road, to accommodate the ultimate 10 -lane configuration from present 6 lane); to alter a watercourse (tributary of Cold Creek) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) through a 34 metre culvert extension to an existing concrete box culvert which includes a 70 metre upstream realignment on the east side of Highway 400, north of Teston Road, to accommodate the proposed north bound ramp and ultimate 10- lane configuration. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans ), dated December 24, 2004; received December 24, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the Highway 400 works from just south of Teston Road to just north of Teston Road. The existing culvert underneath Highway 400 will need to be extended on the east side, just north of Teston Road by 34 metres in order to accommodate the new northbound ramp. Seventy metres of the existing watercourse will need to be altered on the east side. This watercourse on the east side of Highway 400 is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain or a Fill Regulated Area. On the west side a retaining wall will be constructed in order to widening Highway 400 to the ultimate 10 lane configuration. The proposed retaining wall for the widening on the west side of the Highway 400 is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain, but is located within a Fill Regulated Area. Only works conducted by Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) on MTO lands are exempted from Ontario Regulation 158. In this instance it is the Region of York that will be conducting works on MTO lands on behalf of the MTO, therefore, a permit is required. The Highway 400 project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics that were submitted for the existing culvert conditions. The Region has forwarded a Letter of Undertaking to provide the hydraulics for the east extension. The upstream drainage basin is approximately 110 hectares, therefore there is no Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the watercourse. The retaining wall on the west side of the Highway 400 will be constructed in the Fill Regulated Area only, not the Regional Storm Floodplain. There will be no works within the Regional Storm Floodplain 1186 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The new channel and the culvert installation on the east side of the Highway 400 will be constructed in the dry during the summer months when there is no flow. A contingency plan for the intermittent stream in the event that there will be flows. The retaining wall works on the west will be isolated with heavy duty silt fence. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. The existing culvert under Highway 400 will be extended on the east side by 34 metres and a total of 70 metres of the existing watercourse will be relocated. There will be a loss of open channel length of approximately 20m. The in stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The Region of York has provided a Letter of Intent and it identifies the compensation measures which include the improvement of water and habitat quality through: naturalizing the channel design; vegetating the swale section to provide shallow wetland pockets for water quality filtration; providing erosion blankets and riparian plantings in the open and eroding sections; and by stabilizing the outtall to avoid sedimentation. When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35419 - Application #: 165 /04/VAUG Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: January 4, 2005 9.1.17 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22 to 26, Concession 5, 6, (Weston Road - north and south of Teston Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area (for Weston Road widening from 2 lanes to 5 lanes, for culvert extension, for sheet pile wall installation, storm sewer installation); to construct structures within a Regional Storm Floodplain (3m length 5850 dia. mm Structural Plate Corrugated Steel Pipe (SPCSP) extension, 2 sheet pile walls, outfalls); to temporarily alter a watercourse (Cold Creek) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15) through a dam and pump around method in order to construct the culvert extension in the dry. 1187 The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans ), dated December 24, 2004; received December 24, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal consists of the widening of Weston Road from just south of Teston Road to just north of Teston Road from 2 to 5 lanes with a turning lane at the intersection. The existing culvert underneath Weston Road will need to be extended on the east side, just south of Teston Road, by 3 metres in order to accommodate the widening to 5 lanes. As well, two sheet pile walls will be required either side of the extension to accommodate the fill. Three metres of the existing watercourse will be enclosed. The watercourse is located within a Regional Storm Floodplain and a Fill Regulated Area. The centre line of road will be shifted 8 metres to the east in order to extend the culvert only on the east side. The road will be upgraded with curbs, gutters and storm sewers. The Weston Road project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: Staff has reviewed the hydraulics for the proposed culvert extension and has determined that there will not be any negative impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence, pea gravel bag coffer dams, pumps, sediment basins) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The culvert extension will be constructed in the dry via a dam and pump around method. Conservation of Land: There will be temporary in stream works associated with this project. The existing culvert under Weston Road will be extended on the east side by 3 metres. The works will be conducted in the dry with a dam and pump around method. The in stream works will constitute a mitigatable harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (mit. HADD) of fish habitat. TRCA staff will be able to issue the Letter of Advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) when the TRCA's permit has been issued. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. 1188 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35420 - Application #: 166 /04/VAUG Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: January 4, 2005 TOWN OF AJAX 9.1.18 TOWN OF AJAX To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area adjacent to Duffins Creek (Kingston Road and Westney Road South), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Ajax. The purpose is to alter a waterway, place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the extension of a pedestrian trail adjacent to Duffins Creek, in the Town of Ajax. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking to address outstanding ecology comments , received January 12, 2005, prepared by the Town of Ajax. • Landscape Layout Plan, Dwg. No. L -1, dated September 30, 2003, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. • Landscape Layout Plan, Dwg. No. L -2, dated September 30, 2003, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. • Landscape Layout Plan, Dwg. No. L -3, dated September 30, 2003, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. • Planting Plan, Dwg. No. L -4, dated September 30, 2003, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. • Details, Dwg. No. D -1, dated September 30, 2003, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. • Pedestrian Bridge Details & Elevations, Dwg. No. D -4, dated June 24, 2004, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised January 10, 2005, received January 11, 2005. • Kingston Road Underpass Plan and Details , Dwg. No. D -4A, dated September 24, 2004, prepared by The MBTW Group, revised September 30, 2004, received January 11, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1189 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway, place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the extension of a pedestrian trail adjacent to Duffins Creek, on the west side of Westney Road South. The proposed trail will ultimately connect two existing sections of trail, one of which is located north of Kingston Road and the other of which extends north a short distance from Rotary Park at Lake Ontario. The trail extension that will connect these two sections of trail is proposed as a 3.0m wide limestone pathway, with one bridge crossing of a small tributary. The crossing will be a clear span of the tributary, so as not to disrupt fish habitat within the stream. A second small bridge crossing is required over an oxbow, but there is no fish habitat provided by this feature. As the ultimate trail will need to cross the main Duffins at more than one location, a future permit will be required for additional crossings of Duffins Creek, but the purpose of this permit is just to construct the tableland trail sections and small crossings of the tributary and oxbow. All disturbed areas will be restored in accordance with an approved planting plan, following construction. Control of Flooding: The pedestrian trail will be constructed at grade and will not result in any impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. The small structure spanning the tributary will overtop in significant storm events and is not considered to be an impediment to the passage of storm flows. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected between the trail works and the watercourse in order to prevent any construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse. Conservation of Land: Some tree removals will be required to accommodate the proposed trail alignment, but all removals will be offset by the planting of woody, native species that will enhance the Duffins Creek corridor. There are no geotechnical issues related to this proposal. A Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for the construction of the clear span structure over the tributary. Plantings All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. All tree removals will be offset by the implementation of a comprehensive planting plan, prepared to the satisfaction of TRCA ecology staff. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.1 (H) - Existing Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35921 - Application #: 409 /04 /AJAX Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: January 4, 2005 1190 TOWN OF CALEDON 9.1.19 JAMES VITALE To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 110, 111, 146, Block 1, Plan BOL -7, (206 Victoria Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by James Vitale. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a TRCA Fill Regulated area in order to facilitate the construction of a new residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Site Plan, Drawing No. A -1, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Basement Plan, Drawing No. A -2, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. A -3, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Roof Plan, Drawing No. A -4, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Front Elevation, Drawing No. A -5, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Right Side Elevation, Drawing No. A -6, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Rear Elevation, Drawing No. A -7, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Left Side Elevation, Drawing No. A -8, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Building Section, Drawing No. A -9, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. • Typical Wall Section, Drawing No. A -10, prepared by D.M.D. Incorporated, dated October 2004, revised November 16, 2004, stamped received by TRCA staff December 16, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1191 Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a new one storey residential dwelling at 206 Victoria Street, in the Town of Caledon. Currently, there is an existing residential dwelling on the subject lands. The existing structure is to be demolished and replaced with the proposed dwelling. The subject property and existing development are located at the toe of the valley slope. Retaining walls are not proposed and will not be permitted with this development. Please note that there are no geotechnical related concerns associated with the proposed development. Control of Flooding: The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As a result, the proposed works will not impact the storage and /or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: The subject property is located within an established residential subdivision and is surrounded by existing residential development. As such, no significant sediment and /or erosion related matters are of concern. Conservation of Land: The subject property does not contain any significant natural vegetation and no trees are proposed to be removed and /or disturbed during construction. There are no geotechnical and /or fisheries related issues associated with this development proposal. Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed. As such, compensatory plantings are not required. Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2. (E) - Existing Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan (VSCMP). CFN: 36063 - Application #: 461 /04 /CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: January 4, 2005 9.1.20 LIDIA SKARBEK To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 25, Plan 43M -507, (7 Cosdale Place), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Lidia Skarbek. The purpose is to place and excavate fill material within a TRCA Fill Regulated area in order to facilitate the construction of a new residential dwelling. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. 1192 • Site Plan, Walter Kubiak Residence, Drawing No. S -1, prepared by Farrugia Associates Incorporated Architects, dated November 5, 2004, redline revised January 12, 2005 to address silt fence details, stamped received by TRCA staff on November 15, 2004. • Silt Fence Details, prepared by L. Skarbek, dated January 12, 2005, stamped received by TRCA staff on January 15, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the construction of a 641 square metre (2104 square foot) residential dwelling at 7 Cosdale Place, in the Town of Caledon. The subject property is located within a TRCA Fill Regulated area, but is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The rear of the subject property is adjacent to a valley land feature. However, the proposed development is sufficiently setback from the top of valley bank. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will be completed outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As such, no impacts to the storage and conveyance of stream and storm flows are anticipated. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be put in place prior to any construction. Silt fencing will remain until construction is complete. Conservation of Land: The proposed works will not adversely impact any significant natural vegetation on the subject property or adjacent valley lands. There are geotechnical or fisheries related issues associated with the proposed development. Plantings No significant vegetation will be impacted. As a result, no compensatory plantings are required. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section - 4.1.1, New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36006 - Application #: 440 /04 /CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: December 24, 2004 1193 9.1.21 SOLMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on (Regional Road 50 and Parr Boulevard), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Solmar Development Corporation. The purpose is to alter a tributary associated with the Humber River to facilitate the relocation of an existing culvert. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2010. • Letter of Undertaking prepared by A .M.Candaras, P.Eng. of A.M. Candaras Associates Incorporated, dated November 24, 2004, to address all outstanding engineering and ecology issues. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to relocate an existing culvert that conveys the flows associated with a tributary to the Humber River, on the Cruise Canada lands, in the Town of Caledon. The proposed works are required to allow for the relocation of an existing driveway in order to facilitate continued access to and from the subject property. The driveway relocation is required due to the placement of a new median along Regional Road #50. Please be advised that the proposed works will not adversely affect the flow or conveyance of floodwaters. In addition, please note that the proposed works are considered to be a mitigatable harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat. Control of Flooding: The existing culvert will be removed, and the replacement structure will be constructed approximately 30 metres downstream. TRCA technical staff have reviewed the proposed works and have determined that the flows and conveyance of floodwaters will not be adversely affected by this proposal. Pollution: Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to the commencement of any works, and will be maintained throughout all phases of construction. Conservation of Land: The applicant proposes to rehabilitate a small portion of the watercourse, and restore all disturbed vegetated areas back to their natural state. In addition, the proposed works are considered to be a mitigatable HADD, as such, a letter of advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada will be issued with this permit. Please note that the proposed works will conform to the appropriate fisheries timing window. Their are no geotechnical concerns regarding the proposed works. 1194 Plantings This proposal involves the planting of only appropriate native and non - invasive species in accordance with the TRCA's guidelines. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35992 - Application #: 436/04/CAL Report Prepared by: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 For information contact: Joshua Campbell, extension 5386 Date: November 23, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 9.1.22 BORDEAUX DEVELOPMENTS To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 23, 24, 25, Concession 3, (Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bordeaux Developments. • Withdrawn 9.1.23 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway on (between Highway 7 in south and 16th Avenue in north, and 9th Line in west and 10th Line (Reesor Road) in east), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to alter a watercourse (tributary of Rouge River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump around method in order to relocate and regrade a very small section of a headwater tributary and remove and relocate a culvert in the farmer's lane. The watercourse is not within a Fill Regulated Area nor is it within a Regional Storm Floodplain. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration plans ), dated December 22, 2004; received December 23, 2004; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1195 Proposal: The entire proposal consists of the construction of Markham Bypass from just north of Highway 7 in the south to just north of 16th Avenue in the north to the immediate west of Reesor Road. The works will involve the removal, replacement and lowering of an existing culvert under Reesor Road in Lot 14, Concession 10 as well as the existing farm lane culvert to the east of Reesor Road. A new culvert, under the proposed Markham Bypass, will also be installed due west of the existing Reesor Road culvert. Because all of the proposed culverts will be lowered to meet the grading of proposed Markham Bypass, the invert of the existing watercourse east of the Reesor Road culvert will need to be lowered in order to tie into the existing watercourse. The only portion of these works that requires a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit is the alteration of the watercourse component through the lowering and regrading and the removal /replacement of the culvert in the farmer's lane. The watercourse, with defined beds and banks, initiates due east of the existing Reesor Road culvert. This watercourse, as well as the 3 proposed culverts, are not located within a Fill Regulated Area or a Regional Storm Floodplain. The Markham Bypass Project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process. Control of Flooding: The project is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding. Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (pea gravel coffer dam, pump, conduit, splash pad, rock check dams) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse downstream. Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. Approximately 35m of the existing watercourse will be regraded and lowered. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. The works will be conducted on lands owned by the TRCA. Certain lands in the vicinity of the Rouge River changed ownership March 31, 2004 from the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) to the TRCA for Rouge Park purposes. An archaeological investigation is required for any works on lands owned by the TRCA. The archaeological investigation is underway. When the clearance has been received from TRCA's Archaeologist, the Development Services Section (DSS) staff will be in a position to issue the "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit, provided the Property Section has been satisfied. There is a report by the Property Section before this January 14, 2005 Executive Committee regarding the land acquisition from the Region of York for the Markham Bypass. When a sign off also has been received from the Property Section, DSS staff will be in a position to issue a permit. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. 1196 Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35844 - Application #: 364 /04 /MARK Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: November 22, 2004 ITEMS 9.1.24 - 9.1.29 ARE MINOR WORKS PERMITS: RES. #B283/04 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Rob Ford THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff , in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158, for items 9.1.24 - 9.1.29 inclusive, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 9.1.24 ANTE MANDARIC To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 32 (58 Ravenscrest Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ante Mandaric. CFN: 35979 - Application #: 430/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: December 1, 2004 9.1.25 BRIAN RENNIE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 69, Plan 5071, (58 Antioch Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Brian Rennie. CFN: 35978 - Application #: 429/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 30, 2004 1197 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 9.1.26 DAYA FLORA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 93, Plan D -135, Part Lot 92, 94, Plan D -135, (70, 72 and 74 Lewis Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Daya Flora. CFN: 36071 - Application #: 465/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: December 24, 2004 9.1.27 DONNETTE JAMES To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 37, Plan M -597, (22 Rykert Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Donnette James. CFN: 36045 - Application #: 450/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: December 14, 2004 9.1.28 CATHY KNOSTENBERGS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 65, Plan 2477, (53 Don Valley Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cathy Knostenbergs. CFN: 36047 - Application #: 453/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: December 14, 2004 9.1.29 SCOTT GRIFFITH To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 66M -2472, (36 True Davidson Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Scott Griffith. CFN: 35994 - Application #: 438/04/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: November 23, 2004 1198 RES.#B284/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND South side of Wharf Street west of Liverpool Road, CFN 36056. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Pickering Harbour Company (PHC) to explore the possibility of a sale of a TRCA -owned lot located on the south side of Wharf Street, west of Liverpool Road, City of Pickering, Lake Ontario Waterfront. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the potential disposal of a lot located on the south side of Wharf Street , west of Liverpool Road, City of Pickering be referred to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff for review and discussion in accordance with established TRCA policies ; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action . CARRIED BACKGROUND This request is being brought to the attention of the Executive Committee in accordance with Resolution #26, adopted by the Authority at Meeting #1/91, held on February 22, 1991, pertaining to the disposal of TRCA -owned lands. A letter was received from the PHC requesting the TRCA enter into a land exchange involving TRCA's lot on Wharf Street on the east side of Frenchman's Bay and a parcel of PHC land located on the west side of Frenchman's Bay south of Sunrise Avenue. Under the same letter the PHC advised that they are prepared to consider the sale of a number of small parcels they own on the east spit of Frenchman's Bay, to TRCA, subject to negotiating satisfactory compensation and subject to the two potential transactions proceeding in parallel. The TRCA owns a significant portion of the east spit and the consolidation ownership will finally create opportunities for increased public use at the foot of Liverpool Road beyond the Millennium Square. Under a separate letter dated November 26, 2004, the PHC, confirmed they are prepared to partner with TRCA, the City of Pickering and others to develop a Pickering Harbour Waterfront Regeneration Project. This project will likely take several years to prepare and implement, and PHC has agreed to proceed with the proposal East Spit and the Wharf Street land exchange transactions independent of the broader project. In accordance with established policies for the disposal of TRCA lands, technical and agency staff will be circulated for their review and comment. Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Larry Field, extension 5243 Date: December 15, 2004 Attachments:1 1199 Attachment 1 z 0 tU w • o 0 CL ZO_ z o O 3 o. Z ❑ i O W Z O 6 J Q N O O w ❑ z ti ¢ O s • 4 w w i D m w • o liUNU 1200 RES. #B285/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: TOMMY THOMPSON PARK - INTEGRATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT STUDY AND RESEARCH University of Guelph - Landscape Research Group Contract - Masters Student. Working with the University of Guelph - Landscape Research Group, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is partially supporting a Masters student to study and research the integration of fish and wildlife habitats into the Tommy Thompson Park landscape. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the University of Guelph - Landscape Research Group be retained to undertake a scientific study /thesis by a Masters student to integrate fish and wildlife habitats into the Tommy Thompson Park landscape to maximize its contribution to the "ecological integrity of the Toronto waterfront "; AND FURTHER THAT $25,000, plus applicable taxes, be allocated for this contract within the 2005 Tommy Thompson Park implementation budget . CARRIED BACKGROUND Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has managed Tommy Thompson Park (TTP) since the early 1970's as a "public urban wilderness" park. Because of the close proximity to the urban core and the unique ecological attributes, Tommy Thompson Park is recognized as one of the best areas for fish and wildlife habitat improvement along the Toronto waterfront. The potential for increased habitat will be realized by the implementation of habitat works associated with the extensive master planning process undertaken by TRCA (TTP Master Plan and Environmental Assessment, MTRCA, 1989; and TTP Master Plan and Environmental Assessment Addendum, MTRCA, 1992). These planning processes involved an ecological approach to park development and remain the core planning direction for the park. The main objectives of the master plan for TTP are to: • preserve significant species; • protect environmentally significant areas; • enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat; and • enhance public recreational opportunities. In 2001, the TTP Master Plan was revisited through a cooperative project between TRCA and the Landscape Research Group, School of Landscape Architecture, University of Guelph. The result was the TTP Master Plan Design Project that had five specific objectives: 1. Update Master Plan presentation drawings. 2. Develop preliminary concepts for an interpretive centre. 3. Outline Park gateway and trail design standards. 4. Develop a habitat design option for Cell Two. 5. Undertake cooperative research on the biophysical resources of the site. 1201 While the rationale and main objectives of the original master plan were not changed, this cooperative project recognized that TTP's landscape and its public use have evolved over time. Completion of the TTP Master Plan Design Project provided TRCA with documents and drawings to guide the initial implementation. This updated perspective for the park during the early planning stages for the revitalization of the central waterfront was critical to the City of Toronto and the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation. Tommy Thompson Park represents a critical link in the connection between the waterfront, the City of Toronto and its valley systems. Tommy Thompson Park is the essential foundation of physical and biological connectivity and an important keystone site within the Lake Ontario Park context and adjacent areas like the Don River corridor. The TRCA anticipates that the design and construction of the Tommy Thompson Park Master Plan will be a catalyst for further waterfront revitalization and will be integral to the success of the proposed Lake Ontario Park. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE As part of the existing Memorandum of Understanding with the University of Guelph, TRCA had identified a need to integrate fish and wildlife habitats with landscape designs for Tommy Thompson Park. To this end it was requested that a proposal be developed for a student to do this. The University of Guelph responded that the student interested is doing this work would be able to meet our project timelines. The student will conduct a masters thesis study including: • independent project and literature research; • actively assisting the TRCA with the development of habitat designs and plans for Tommy Thompson Park; and • development of an academic peer reviewed paper suitable for publication. The scope, content and timing of this study will parallel and assist with the habitat planning processes associated with the TRCA Tommy Thompson Park Work Plan. The products will include detailed habitat drawings, designs and illustrations, participation in the Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan and the Shoreline /Embayment Habitat Plan, and a peer reviewed thesis paper suitable for publication. Natural Area Enhancement P/an The framework for the habitat work at TTP has been designed through the master plan process. The funding provided by the former Great Lakes 2000 Cleanup Fund (now Great Lakes Sustainability Fund) and the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan has realized this component of the master plan. The biological significance of TTP is well established through its designation as an Important Bird Area of global significance and as a significant component to the North Shore Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) #130. The habitat works completed to date include some of the best examples of Great Lakes coastal habitat restoration and are being used as a template for additional work outside the Greater Toronto Area. 1202 The ecological approach to TTP development has been guided by the principles of "Conservation by Design ". These are defined as the purposeful act of designing for a variety of wildlife habitats to assist in the restoration of rare, endangered or significant plant and animal communities. Natural succession is the key concept behind the philosophy of conservation design. The natural area restoration projects will be designed to facilitate the growth and natural development of indigenous plant and animal communities. Planting and seeding will be done to inundate areas with vegetation adapted to the specific environment. These areas will then be left to grow, reproduce and spread naturally and unhindered as much as possible. Minimal human intervention will be required to maintain these areas. The natural area restoration and development component can be broken down into four main categories: wetland development, embayment habitat enhancement, terrestrial habitat creation and enhancement, and essential habitat creation. Embayment Habitat Enhancement There are a total of five embayments (A, B, C, D and the East Cove) forming TTP. To date, habitat improvements have been incorporated into three embayments. Approximately 20% of the embayment areas have been regenerated or are being naturally regenerated. This work has included major planting nodes to establish vegetation along the shoreline, as well as the creation of essential habitat features such as reproductive, juvenile /nursery, resting /loafing and overwintering areas for resident fish and wildlife species. Structural fish habitat has also been created in the form of shoals, brush bundles and log cribs within the embayments. The goal of future work in the embayments will be to incorporate further enhancements based upon the success of TRCA's previous work and to create a diverse shoreline consisting of coastal marsh, shrub thickets, mudflats, cobble beaches, sand dunes as well as wet meadows. The University of Guelph student will undertake studies and research to complete the following deliverables: • Develop peer reviewed academic research into the design of fish and wildlife habitat components and plans for Tommy Thompson Park, in line with a post graduate masters degree course of study. • Research, develop design and illustrate a range of terrestrial and aquatic habitat restoration techniques that are applicable to Tommy Thompson Park. Provide habitat recommendations, and evaluation of suitable techniques with TRCA staff. • With TRCA staff, develop a compendium of habitat descriptions and illustrations suitable for Tommy Thompson Park. • Research local, regional and global examples of the integration of fish and wildlife habitats within urban and non urban parks. FINANCIAL DETAILS A detailed terms of reference has been developed and a proposal has been obtained from the University of Guelph. Work will commence upon Authority approval (in January, 2005), and a total of $25,000, plus applicable taxes, has been made available in account code 210 -50 for the 2005 budget year. Report prepared by: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246 For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246 Date: November 11, 2004 1203 RES. #B286/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION Regeneration Project, Pine Valley Drive, Woodbridge. Proposal to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority from Anpro Environmental Group Incorporated requesting permission to place approximately 70,000 cubic metres of clean surplus soil on lands located within the Kortright Centre for Conservation lands. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with Anpro Environmental Group Incorporated to accept placement of clean surplus soil on lands within the Kortright Centre for Conservation lands to create and enhance wetland interpretive habitat features , subject to archeological and municipal approvals ; THAT the fee for accepting the soil be $1.80 per cubic metre; THAT in addition to the tipping fee , Anpro Environmental Group Incorporated be responsible for all costs associated with site access , sediment control, placing soil, fine grading and seeding the site with a basic cover crop ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all the necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Staff of TRCA have identified lands at the Kortright Centre for Conservation that will be enhanced by strategically placing approximately 140,000 cubic metres of clean soil. The project will be completed in two phases. Phase I of the regeneration project is scheduled to commence as early as January 2005, and involves the placement of approximately 70,000 cubic metres of clean soil. Phase II of the regeneration project also requires 70,000 cubic metres of clean soil and is tentatively scheduled to begin in the fall of 2005 pending archeological approval. TRCA staff requested proposals from contractors to undertake work associated with Phase I of the regeneration project. Proposals were received by the following contractors: COMPANY NAME Anpro Environmental Group Incorporated B. Gottardo Construction Ltd. Gentile Contracting Ltd United Soil Management Ltd. COMPENSATION OFFERED (per cubic metre) $1.80 $1.77 $1.25 $0.55 Staff reviewed all proposals and determined that the submission by Anpro Environmental Group Incorporated met all TRCA requirements for proposal content and included the highest price per cubic metre compensation of the four proposals received. In addition, Anpro will be responsible for the supply, placement and grading of soil as well as seeding the structure with a basic cover crop. 1204 It is the opinion of staff that the regeneration project is an opportunity to strategically preserve a significant asset and enhance the restoration potential of the proposed site while creating the foundation for diverse habitat and public features. RATIONALE TRCA staff have negotiated similar agreements and operated similar operations in other areas with considerable success. Examples of these successful projects include the berming along the new Town of Markham by -pass east of the Ninth Line, berming along Highway 407 at the Claireville Conservation Area and berming and wetland complex development at Boyd North (along Islington Avenue north of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan). Staff see this regeneration project as a benefit to all involved as the surplus soil, along with the financial compensation, will create a foundation that will allow for the acceleration of habitat development opportunities on the Kortright property. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff need to obtain various municipal permits prior to beginning fill placement. FINANCIAL DETAILS The potential gross revenue from this project is $126,000. The direct project operating and restoration costs will be deducted from this revenue. Report prepared by: David Hatton, 416 - 392 -9725 For Information contact: David Hatton, 416 - 392 -9725 or Nick Saccone, extension 5301 Date: January 04, 2005 RES. #B287/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: HMT SALES TAX CONSULTANTS INC. Tax Recovery Contract Approval. Approval to enter into a contract with HMT Sales Tax Consultants for the recovery of sales taxes. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into an agreement with HMT Sales Tax Consultants for the recovery of taxes paid in 2004 and prior years; AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to take such action as is necessary to implement the agreement, including the signing of documents . CARRIED 1205 BACKGROUND Ontario sales tax legislation allows charities to claim back sales tax under special circumstances, in addition to general claims for taxes paid in error. The majority of amounts recovered from the province consist of sales tax paid by charities, such as the TRCA, on real property improvements (generally, land and buildings). RATIONALE Over the years the TRCA has engaged several tax recovery firms for the purpose of recovering sales tax and various other federal and provincial taxes. Staff have also interviewed many other firms seeking to do business with TRCA. Most tax recovery firms work on a contingency basis and will quote fees that approach 50% of taxes recovered, although some will discount fees when pressed. HMT Sales Tax Consultants has been retained by the TRCA since 1998. Staff are recommending the renewal of the HMT contract for the recovery of taxes paid in 2004 and prior years for the following reasons: • The individual tax specialist assigned to TRCA is extremely knowledgeable and experienced in the various sales tax statutes and regulations that apply to charities. • The "file by file" review approach utilized by HMT is in staff's opinion the best way to maximize the amount of the refund; • The individual assigned to TRCA is available to staff throughout the year for consultation on various tax issues at no additional cost to TRCA; and • The contingency fees quoted are extremely competitive. HMT has asked that the fees quoted not be made public. Staff will provide information on fees at the meeting. FINANCIAL DETAILS For 2003, claims were submitted and approved for approximately $138,000 ($112,000 in 2002.) Claims for 2004 are expected to exceed the $100,000 level again. Report prepared by: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232 Date: January 3, 2005 RES. #B288/04 - AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF STANDING TIMBER AT WALKER WOODS, LOT 10, CONCESSION 6, TOWNSHIP OF UXBRIDGE Tender ESO4 -03. To award the contract for the sale of standing timber at the Walker Woods on the basis of quotations received under Tender ESO4 -30. 1206 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT the contract for the sale of standing timber offered under tender ES O4 -30 be awarded to Conifer Farms Ltd., on the basis of it being the highest acceptable bid received ; AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to execute the required contract documents to allow for the sale and tending works to proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the tender. CARRIED BACKGROUND As part of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Managed Forest Program, staff annually review and prescribe management works which include woodlot and plantation thinning projects. Over the past five years, staff have advertised thinning contracts and entered into contractual agreements with reputable forestry contractors to assist with the timely completion of the prescribed works. Tender ESO4 -30 was called to accept bids for the sale of standing timber at the Walker Woods property in the Township of Uxbridge, Region of Durham. A key map of the location of the stands is outlined in Attachment 1. A total of four prospective bidders were circulated with information packages outlining the scope of work, terms and conditions of the sale, anticipated products and estimated volumes pertaining to each of the three sale lots identified. The tender bid period closed December 10, 2004. In accordance with instruction from the Director, Finance and Business Development, a bid committee consisting of a section manager and two forestry program staff opened and recorded the bids received on December 13, 2004, at the Boyd Office. A total of two bids were received, both of which were complete and acceptable. The committee recorded the bids as follows: TENDER ESO4 -30 Bidder Company Name Lot No. Bid Price Total Bid Price Conifer Farms Ltd. 1 $18,339.75 2 $5,623.25 3 $8,362.05 TOTAL $32,325.05 Moogie Valley Timber Inc. 1 $17,100.00 2 $5,100.00 3 $9,200.00 TOTAL $31,400.00 Miller Lumber no bid received Breens Lumber & Planing Mills no bid received Staff have analyzed the bids received and recommend that the contract be awarded to Conifer Farms Ltd., it being the highest acceptable bid received. 1207 Contract signing is proposed to be completed not later than January 21, 2005. A deposit of twenty percent (20 %) of the total bid is to accompany the signed contract. The balance of the total bid price (80 %) is due prior to the TRCA providing the contractor access to our lands for the purposes of completion of the works. The work is to be implemented within the contract periods of January- March, 2005, and continue from June - December, 2005, with completion no later than December 16, 2005. The work must be completed within these time frames to protect the physical and ecological integrity of the site(s) and timed so as not to conflict with known bird breeding periods. Staff will be completing the required notifications to the Township of Uxbridge in accordance with the municipal tree by -law and regulatory statutes. RATIONALE The TRCA Managed Forest Program calls for the annual completion of management operations to maintain the high quality, health and integrity of our forested tracts. Through the application of proven and sustainable silvicultural systems and practices, management operations are designed to improve the health and integrity of the stands, and at the same time, promote greater species diversity, more efficient water and nutrient cycling, minimize mortality and disease, and maximize carbon sequestration by promoting growth and vigour of residual trees. Plantation thinnings, carried out on scheduled intervals over a period of time, allow the residual canopy with room to grow and promote the establishment and eventual dominance of a mixed coniferous - deciduous forest. These activities are implemented in ways to enhance our commitments to natural heritage, water quality, recreation and environmental protection. Based on a large number of hectares of forested lands in our holdings, staff have engaged the use of reputable private sector contractors to support the implementation of a portion of the annual work schedule. This allows staff flexibility in achieving workplan targets, in maintaining the TRCA's forested property tax reduction status and in producing a revenue stream that will enable the support of forest management works that are non - revenue generating. It also frees program staff to address other priority activities, while state -of- the -art equipment is employed efficiently and effectively to complete otherwise labour- intensive management operations. Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378 For Information contact: Tom Hildebrand, extension 5379 Date: December 13, 2004 Attachments: 1 1208 Attachment 1 Location of Forest Management Operations Tender ESO4 -30 Walker Woods /Glen Major RMT Lot 10, Concession 6, Uxbridge 1209 RES. #B289[04 - Moved by: Seconded by: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES WORKSHOP BUILDING Consulting Services. Awarding of contract for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Fundamental Commissioning consulting services for the new Resource Management Services Workshop at Boyd North. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Maria Augimeri THAT Enermodal Engineering Limited be retained to provide Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Fundamental Commissioning consulting services for Toronto and Region Conservation Area's (TRCA) Resource Management Services Workshop design and construction at a cost not to exceed $15,000, plus applicable taxes. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1995, the TRCA Nursery ten -year operating plan identified inadequacies in the current workshop facility and ancillary buildings related to program needs and growth projections. Further program decision - making processes resulted in a hold being placed on all major maintenance and renovation to existing facilities in lieu of relocating and constructing a new facility that could service the needs of the Resource Management Services Group for a planning horizon of 20 years. In early 2002, the need and rationale for relocation of the nursery were presented to and supported by management staff and the Authority. The proposed location for the new facility was selected based on its proximity to current propagation and production base (Thompson property) located in the East Humber River valley and its ability to be closely tied to the Environmental Services Section (ESS) base at the Boyd Office. Further, the selected location affords the land area required to reconstruct and allow opportunity for expansion and growth, should the need arise, and is an allowable use under the landuse designations as set out in the Boyd North Management Plan. In keeping with The Living City vision, TRCA is targeting LEED certification for its new Resource Management Services Workshop. LEED is the industry standard for green buildings. TRCA is currently following the LEED standards in its design process for The Living City Centre at Kortright and endeavours to follow LEED for the Resource Management Services Workshop. LEED Fundamental Commissioning is a mandatory prerequisite for LEED certification. LEED Fundamental Commissioning is the process whereby a LEED qualified consultant independent of the primary design team verifies and ensures that building elements and systems are designed, installed and calibrated to operate as intended. As mentioned, the undertaking of this commissioning is a prerequisite under LEED and is therefore mandatory for meeting TRCA's goal of achieving LEED certification for this facility. Staff of TRCA requested proposals from consultants to undertake the LEED Fundamental Commissioning consulting services for the new Resource Management Services Workshop. Proposals were received from the following consultants: • Keen Engineering • Enermodal Engineering Limited • TMP Consulting Engineers 1210 $35,000 (plus GST) $15,000 (plus GST) $43,000 (plus GST). Staff received 3 proposals in response to the request for proposals issued in December of 2004. Enermodal Engineering Limited's low bid of $15,000, plus GST was approximately 50% of the next lowest total. RATIONALE In addition to being the most financially attractive proposal, Enermodal Engineering Limited's submission was presented in a manner indicating a true understanding of TRCA's goals and objectives. In addition, Enermodal has committed to a sound team of LEED professionals with significant experience in the LEED process. Taken in totality, these factors have lead staff to recommend their retention. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this project are allocated for in the 2005 Preliminary Operating and Capital Budget. Report prepared by: Brian Dundas , extension 5262 For Information contact: Brian Dundas , extension 5262 Nick Saccone, extension 5301 Date: January 03, 2005 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:21 p.m., on Friday, January 14, 2005. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 1211 ts. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/04 February 4, 2005 The Executive Committee Meeting #13/04, was held in the South Theatre , Black Creek Pioneer Village , on Friday, February 4, 2005. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:12 a.m.. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member Frank Dale Member Rob Ford Member Suzan Hall Member Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair Dave Ryan Member REGRETS David Barrow Member Michael Di Biase Member RES. #B290/04 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Rob Ford Maria Augimeri THAT the Minutes of Meeting #12/04, held on January 14, 2005, be approved . CARRIED 1213 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES.#B291/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek Watershed Brydale Developments (Scarborough) Inc., CFN 36155. Purchase of property located west of Galloway Road, north of Lawrence Avenue (232 -234 Galloway Road), City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Highland Creek watershed. Suzan Hall Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.07 hectares (0.17 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Brydale Developments (Scarborough) Inc., Part of Lot 13, Concession 1 and designated as Valley and Buffer Zone Block on a Plan of Survey prepared by William J . Plaxton Ltd ., Ontario Land Surveyors , their Project No . 0267, dated December 11, 2002, City of Toronto - Scarborough Community Council Area , located west of Galloway Road , north of Lawrence Avenue (232 -234 Galloway Road ); THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Julius De Ruyter of PMG Planning Consultants, the owner's agent. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 1214 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Highland Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of Site Plan Control and Zoning Amendment applications to allow for townhouse condominium residential development TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands valley and buffer zone block which are comprised of a portion of the valley wall along the Highland Creek valley corridor at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the City of Toronto for management. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase have been identified in the 2005 Preliminary Operating and Capital budget in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : George Leja , extension 5342 For Information contact : George Leja , extension 5342 Date: January 21, 2005 Attachments : 1 1215 Attachment 1 • q1/7//,'.. /1 • /71.1' • r a • • • : • l'„,,,,, ■1". " ,%. „ Jr' :--',-, - - / : • C.''•,..'-' 1 / .2‘'.. - - '( • •,,),71', K,, 'fi...;.• • . -•• .). ' ' f fe i• ' If ) "••• . ../ ••••11/ t) „.. . i .• ,,,. 7 .,, ,S;..%:`•,:‘7 .._.." „ _- • 'N, . ....:41;.4•:ttf. • .. , ;.:1 •,. r" ..•*.••:;=---. .3 ;if i . .7,4fr--';"7.:•-•..-_-_-..--- :, , V _--"Z,1. C:s•-•.--.""./-</- -il-I'Aj'Il\-;:: . •\-. ''''.7.7- • • • I\ ,_i,', , e . ' -1,-,::.,;;.,.: \__ .. 0)1' • / • ' • .41-. ....‘IcYl•_•• • ' - V; • 5'1 SLK.rE• r VR OF RUT.? _ 1;1- ---- 1. - C 10 rt 1 -) — — N z 0 P. Ca 2 4 0 w 1.3 x • 0 c O 52 5 wLl t!) u • cs s- -1 7i LI, CC LW • Q. cn se 03 0 4+ Z g IX 0 •Z U. Cla C.) 0 0. 011ir.W70,00krtlas -'- for The living City 7 7-4 I HCALANDS M.771,,t, SUBJECT PR DP E RTY 1216 RES. #B292L04 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001 -2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed Ballymore Development (Shoal Point Corp.), CFN 36167. Purchase of property located east of Shoal Point Road and north of Warwick Avenue, City of Ajax, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek watershed. Suzan Hall Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 2.33 hectares (5.42 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Ballymore Development (Shoal Point Corp .), being Part of Lot 2, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and designated as Block 63, 64 & 65 on a Draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Donevan Fleischmann Petrich Ltd ., Ontario Land Surveyors Ltd .dated August 13, 2003, City of Ajax , Regional Municipality of Durham , located east of Shoal Point Road and north of Warwick Avenue ; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance , subject to existing service easements ; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP , Barristers & Solicitors , be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date . All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax , legal costs , and disbursements are to be paid ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required . CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00 at Authority Meeting #9/00, held on October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Larry Dekkema of Ballymore Homes. The Director, Watershed Management has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of this property. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. 1217 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Carruthers Creek watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005. Through the review of residential subdivision S -A- 2003 -07, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 63, 64 & 65) which are comprised of the Provincially Significant Warbler Swamp Wetlands which is part of the Carruthers Creek Wetland Complex. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent TRCA lands, it is estimated that the taxes will be approximately $1,100.00. On December 10, 2004, the Ontario government announced a regulation that expands the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption for the 2005 taxation year. Based on a preliminary review of the new criteria, it would appear that these lands will be eligible for the exemption. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase have been identified in the 2005 Preliminary Operating and Capital budget in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by : Edlyn Wong , extension 5711 For Information contact : Edlyn Wong , extension 5711, Ron Dewell , extension 5245 Date: January 24, 2005 Attachments :1 1218 Attachment 1 I. , \`.• / • • ,, . . • II gli■ . • • ; • , . . • T., ,, j • , --, •-. ..' ' • I : ' I. .. • ...) ....'s: i 'Itv, „,. OP: 1 ' ; J . .1:1 / 1 i I' / ''.-.. ,..i, .' • ', 1 rc.1:. I '- . . ,, 1 ',_ 1i , I 1 • . r--! :._ ...L ... y.' , _. 1..• - ., , 1219 t ... ,,i.-.-.),,-1. 7 • . • .. .,• •-..._-.----: ....) ._ -_-_•- , ,, ///,/.//1 ` e ,/•,e / r, .■ - „. HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 11 r Flood Plain and Conservation Component. Carruthers Creek f I; ‘: 4,11... Sallymore Development (Shoal Point Corp.) 31ColiTerVaTen liviog City 77.1"111,1AILANDS IYROPER : .1 RES. #B293/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: DAVID & HONORA REA AND CITY OF VAUGHAN ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING Authorization for party status before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on referrals related to a zoning amendment application to permit the development of eight (8) storage buildings on the subject property. Suzan Hall Dave Ryan THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT authorization be given to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff to obtain party status before the Ontario Municipal Board regarding a proposed zoning amendment application that is not in conformity with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program ; THAT staff continue to work cooperatively with our municipal partners and appellants to ensure that the requirements of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program are met; THAT staff be authorized to retain legal counsel to pursue this appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board ; AND FURTHER THAT the Ontario Municipal Board and all parties and participants to the hearing be so advised . CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject property is approximately 2.24 ha (5.54 acres) in size and is located on the north side of Regional Road 7, southwest of Centre Street, east of Keele Street, in the City of Vaughan. The northeast portion of the property is located within the TRCA's Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The property abuts a portion of a valley feature with some significant vegetation extending beyond the top of bank, on the tableland portions of the subject site. The Planning Act application for the subject property is to amend the City of Vaughan's Zoning Bylaw (Bylaw 1 -88) in order to facilitate the development of eight (8) storage buildings on the subject lands. The subject lands are designated Prestige Area under Official Plan Amendment (OPA) #450 (Employment Area Plan) and zoned 'A' Agricultural Zone. The application proposes to rezone the lands to 'EMI Prestige Employment Area Zone. The application has been appealed to the OMB by the proponents of the application for the City of Vaughan's failure to render a decision on the application within the review period allotted by the Planning Act. TRCA staff have submitted written comments on the application to the City of Vaughan Community Planning Department and to the applicant At the initial circulation of the application, staff provided comments stating that the application was considered premature as the limits of the valley features and significant vegetation on the property were yet to be delineated. As such, TRCA staff requested that a site visit be conducted with the applicant to stake the limits of the natural features on the property, thereby, helping to identify the limits of development. 1220 TRCA staff had a site meeting with the applicant on May 27, 2004. At that time, TRCA staff had staked the limits of the natural features on the property (significant vegetation and physical top of bank). Upon completion of the staking, TRCA staff forwarded supplementary comments to the applicant and City of Vaughan Community Planning staff outlining TRCA requirements to formally establish the limits of development on the property, including the need for a geotechnical investigation (slope stability) and a topographic survey illustrating the staked line. As of the date of this report, no technical documents, plans or surveys have been submitted by the applicant. RATIONALE The OMB hearing is scheduled for February 23, 2005. No pre- hearing is scheduled for this application. Upon discussions with City of Vaughan Planning staff, it is the understanding of staff that a decision has not been made on the subject application as there is information outstanding on the proposed site plan. Furthermore, the Regional Municipality of York is currently conducting a transit feasibility study for the Regional Road 7 corridor. The subject property is currently within the scope of this study. Given that this study has yet to be completed, City of Vaughan staff has not rendered a decision on the subject application. At this time, the proposed rezoning application has not been amended nor revised to reflect the staked limits that were identified by TRCA staff in May 2004. The original site plan associated with the subject application does not reflect our concerns and appears to encroach within the identified limits of the natural features on site. As such, TRCA staff will request party status at the OMB to ensure that TRCA concerns, including the protection of the form and function of the natural features on site, are heard at the upcoming hearing. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff is requesting the Authority authorization to retain legal counsel to ensure that TRCA interests are protected and addressed at the hearing. Staff and retained legal counsel will continue to work with the parties and participants to the hearing to resolve any outstanding issues, and will continue to represent the interests of the TRCA before the OMB. Report prepared by : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 For Information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: January 25, 2005 Attachments : 2 1221 Attachment 1 r i �+ I t R� f S O 7 SUBJECT LANDS 40c elm E ✓ • 4.6. 4 u. u.a Dcxember 17. sL O3 A I //r \ \ -.(1 o\ 1 _ .` -r_ti ,\ �w� AIL Cis 1j 1 M _ %,. _— c. i� --_�/ - Ti- --r� �-^ y l � I —`,- - °,�- , s,1 5 -r \ i a 11 1222 1 0 Attachment 2 2 • dill;.1!:1-1.17r111\ : : ,••,- . P,41:1C ..4.4.0111 I 1 ij r 1 " Li "T 1 I • ; 1.1 • 1223 C=ommunity Planning Department SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION RES. #B294/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.1 and 8.1.13 - 8.1.15), which are listed below . CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.1 1405768 ONTARIO LIMITED To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, 16, 17, Plan D -117, Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Plan E313, Part Lot 14, Plan , Part Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Plan 108, (310 Bayview Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1405768 Ontario Limited. The purpose is to construct a new automobile dealership on the west side of Bayview Avenue at Labatt Avenue in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the proposed Lower Don Special Policy Area. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2007 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing A -1.0, Site Plan , prepared by Plaston Architect Limited , dated November 14, 2002, revised January 12, 2005, received January 14, 2005; • Drawing L 1, Landscape Plan , prepared by INSITE Landscape Architects Inc ., dated November 14, 2002, revised September 7, 2004, received January 14, 2005; 1224 • Drawing A -5.0, Elevations , prepared by Plaston Architect Limited , dated November 17, 2003, revised January 12, 2005, received January 14, 2005; • Drawing A -5.1, Elevation , prepared by Plaston Architect Limited , dated November 17, 2003, revised January 12, 2005, received January 14, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new automobile dealership on the west side of Bayview Avenue at Labatt Avenue to replace former buildings on site. The proposed dealership will be floodproofed to above the Regional Storm Flood elevation and will have safe access from Labatt Avenue, which is located above the Don Valley floodplain. Control of Flooding: The subject property is partially located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. A portion of the building to be used for automobile storage is to be located in the floodplain. Floodproofing is provided to above the Regional Storm Flood Elevation. A letter from a structural Engineer stating that the structure can withstand flood flows to the Regional Storm Elevation has been provided. As Bayview Avenue floods during a Regional Storm event, secondary access to the site will be provided from Labatt Avenue in order to provide safe ingress and egress. The proposal will not impact flood storage. Pollution: Temporary sediment control fencing will be provided along Bayview Avenue to keep construction debris from entering the Don River. Conservation of Land: The subject property is a former industrial site and there are no existing natural resources on site. Plantings New native plantings will be provided between the dealership and Bayview Avenue for a net environmental gain. Policy Guidelines: The proposal conforms with Section 4.2.2.C. and D., Development and Redevelopment within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urban Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The portion of the replacement structure located in the floodplain (but floodproofed to the Regional Storm Elevation) does not exceed a 50% increase in the total area of the recently demolished building (Policy 4.2.2.C.12). CFN: 32074 - Application #: 060/01/TOR Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: July 12, 2004 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS 1225 RES. #B295/04 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (8.1.2 - 8.1.8, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below . CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.2 CITY OF TORONTO - WORKS AND EMERGENCY SERVICES To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Part of Original Road Allowance between Concession 2nd Meridian and Lot 4 Range 1 Kings Mill Reserve), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto - Works and Emergency Services. The purpose is to alter a waterway and place /excavate fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek in order to facilitate the repair of an existing watermain. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2007. • Drawing No . 1, Mimico Creek , Watermain Repair , dated Oct . 2004, received January 31, 2005, prepared by JSW ; • Drawing No . R -1, Mimico Creek , Restoration Plan , dated Dec . 2004, received January 31, 2005, prepared by JSW. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway and place /excavate fill within Mimico Creek in order to facilitate the repair of an existing watermain. The existing watermain has a break in a section below the creek. Prior to the installation of a liner in the existing main, the contractor must excavate down to the damaged main in the creek and install a repair clamp over the damaged main. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. 1226 Pollution: A siltation fence will be secured around the permiter of the excavation pits. A temporary coffer dam and pump will be installed to prevent the migration of construction generated sediment into the watercourse. Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. There will be no impact to fisheries. The applicant has been advised that this project is subject to the Ministry of Natural Resource's (MNR) warm water timing window and that all works must be completed between July 1 and March 31 of any given year, unless otherwise directed by MNR. The applicant has agreed to the MNR timing window. A Letter of Advice will be issued by the TRCA for the proposed works. Plantings The disturbed areas will be restored with new native trees and shrubs. Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36054 - Application #: 456/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Mark Rapus , extension 5259 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: January 25, 2005 8.1.3 WESTON ESTATES MANAGEMENT INC . (EELCO LENTING ) To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 47, 48, Plan 1320, (2336 Weston Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Weston Estates Management Inc. (Eelco Lenting). The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a gabion wall, stabilizing a slope and reconstructing an existing outfall at the rear of an existing apartment building at 2336 Weston Road. The permit will be issued for the period of January 14, 2005 to January 13, 2007. • Drawing 1, Plan and Existing Sections , prepared by Trow Associates Inc ., revised January 27, 2005, received January 31, 2005; • Drawing 2, Sections , prepared by Trow Associates Inc., revised January 27, 2005, received January 31, 2005; • Drawing 3, Landscaping Details , prepared by Trow Associates Inc ., revised January 27, 2005, received January 31, 2005. 1227 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to place fill within a fill regulated area to facilitate the construction of a gabion retaining wall, stabilize an eroded slope with geogrid material, reconstruct an existing deteriorated outfall, and place fill to restore the slope at the rear of the existing apartment building at 2336 Weston Road. The subject property is located on the west side of Weston Road, south of Highway 401 and backs onto the Humber River. The apartment building and underground parking garage was constructed in the 1960's over top of bank. The building is consistent with other apartment buildings along this stretch of Weston Road. In addition, the stormwater drainage from the site is inadequate and, as a result, the slope to the rear of the building and an existing outfall have deteriorated to the point where a combination of retaining structure, geogrid material, new outfall with splash pad and fill placement is the only viable solution to restore the slope and prevent further erosion. The solution combines both hardening of a portion of the slope, restoration of the grades and renaturalization. The gabion wall was originally constructed without first obtaining a permit under Ontario Regulation 158. The proposal was submitted by the new owners of the apartment building in response to a violation notice issued for works conducted by the former owners of the apartment building. Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Temporary sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent construction debris from entering the remainder of the Humber River valley corridor. Garbage and other debris placed during the construction of the gabion wall will be removed off site. Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical staff are satisfied that the proposal will enhance slope stability. The proposed works will not have an impact on fisheries, significant natural features, or riparian vegetation. Plantings New native plantings will be provided on a portion of the restored slope where grades allow for such renaturalization. Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35734 - Application #: 323/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: August 10, 2004 1228 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.4 THE NATIONAL GOLF COURSE OF CANADA To alter a waterway on Part Lot 11, 12, 13, Concession 6, (134 Club House Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by The National Golf Course of Canada. The purpose is to alter a watercourse by dredging and reshaping two, existing on -line ponds and to replace an existing crossing within National Golf Course in Kleinburg. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2010. • Letter of Undertaking from R .J. Burnside, dated January 20, 2005, stating that all TRCA comments will be addressed prior to permit issuance . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to alter a watercourse by dredging and reshaping two existing on -line ponds, and to replace an existing crossing, all within the grounds of an existing golf course. The two ponds are connected to tributaries of the East Humber River. Both ponds will be dredged of silt, and will be cut on one side and filled on another to reconfigure adjacent golf course "tee off" areas; the surface area of the ponds will not be increased. In addition, the existing weir structure that maintains one of the ponds is in need of repair and will be reinforced. Both ponds will be enhanced with native plants. Currently, a golf cart path, internal to the golf course, crosses one of the tributaries consisting of a CSP (corrugated steel pipe) culvert. The proposal includes the removal of this culvert and replacement with a span bridge. The crossing is located at the top end of the tributary and its replacement does not constitute a "HADD" (Harmful Alteration Disruption or Destruction) of fish habitat, under the Federal Fisheries Act, and therefore does not require a DFO Authorization. Control of Flooding: Authority Water Management staff have reviewed the proposal and determined that there will be no net loss of flood storage, and therefore that the control of flooding will not be affected. Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be in place for the duration of construction that will prevent any sedimentation of the watercourse. Conservation of Land: In accordance with our agreement with Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), staff have determined that the proposal does not constitute a HADD under the federal Fisheries Act and therefore does not require authorization from DFO. All in- stream work will be taking place "in the dry" and within the appropriate Ministry of Natural Resources fisheries timing window. A letter of advice on behalf of DFO will be issued to the applicant with this permit. 1229 Plantings A planting plan that will restore and enhance all disturbed areas has been reviewed by staff to our satisfaction and will be implemented upon completion of construction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (H), Existing Resource -based Uses, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35875 - Application #: 384 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: September 30, 2004 8.1.5 VELLORE PARK COMMUNITY LANDOWNERS GROUP To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (area bounded by Weston Road, Major MacKenzie Drive, Highway 400 and Teston Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Vellore Park Community Landowners Group. The purpose is to place fill in a Regulated Area and alter a watercourse in order to construct a storm water management pond and outfall to a tributary of the Humber River. The facility will service draft approved plans of subdivision known as Red Shelf (19T- 00V05) and Keystar (19T- 00V07) within Block 33. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2010. • Letter of Undertaking from URS Canada Inc ., dated January 26, 2005, stating that all TRCA comments will be addressed prior to permit issuance . RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a storm water management pond and associated outfall that will outlet to a tributary of the Humber River, Purpleville Creek. This pond will service draft approved plans of subdivision known as the Red Shelf (19T- 00V05) and Keystar (19T- 00V07) lands, within the Block 33 planning area of the City of Vaughan. Staff reviewed the Planning Act applications for this development, as circulated by the City, and found them to be acceptable, conditional on obtaining any necessary Ontario Regulation 158 permits. Control of Flooding: The proposed outfall is appropriately designed in order to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected. 1230 Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of the tributary will not occur. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and the work will not affect any significant natural heritage features. Staff will issue a letter of advice on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) with this permit as a DFO Authorization was not required. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction. Plantings Following construction, all disturbed areas will be restored and enhanced with native plantings. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35746 - Application #: 326 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: August 12, 2004 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.6 BORDEAUX DEVELOPMENTS To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 23, 24, 25, Concession 3, (Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bordeaux Developments. The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate: a) the construction of a stormwater management pond and outfall and; b) the installation of a watermain and storm sewer under the watercourse in order to service a draft approved residential subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2010. • Phase 1 Development , King David , Stormwater Management Plan Design Brief , Project No . 33015120, revised as received in January 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: 1231 Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to alter a waterway and construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River in order to facilitate: a) the construction of a stormwater management pond and outfall and; b) the installation of a watermain and storm sewer under the watercourse in order to service a draft approved residential subdivision. The proposed works are located within the West Cathedraltown secondary plan area and are required in order to service Phase I of draft approved plan of subdivision 19TM- 01001. The stormwater management pond will be located on tableland with the outfall connecting to a tributary of the Rouge River. The TRCA issued a permit previously for 2 temporary storm outfalls on the site and a temporary culvert crossing in order for preliminary earth works to be undertaken (C- 03360). The works proposed as part of this permit are permanent in nature and will service the upstream development. The two utility crossings (watermain and storm sewer) are proposed in the general location of a future road crossing, which will be dealt with through a separate permit application. Open cut construction methodology will be used to install the two pipes beneath the watercourse and Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) will be issuing an authorization for the works. The applicant installed a sanitary sewer crossing without the necessary approvals in place (i.e., TRCA permit or DFO authorization) and the works proposed as part of this permit will contribute to the resolution of the ongoing DFO investigation. The proposed work and stormwater management design is consistent with the overall servicing scheme outlined in the Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) for the area, which is still under review. Part of the overall design of the development includes the protection of a 55m wide corridor with enhancements to the Rouge River tributary, which currently resembles a grassed swale through part of this area. This proposal is consistent with the overall environmental protection objectives of the MESP which will be further achieved through future permit applications. Control of Flooding: The outlet of the stormwater management pond will control flows entering the watercourse so that there will be no downstream impacts to flood flows or erosion rates. While the watercourse will be disturbed during the installation of the two utility crossings, this disturbance will be short-term and no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters will result. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures implemented as part of the previous permit (C- 03360) will remain in place until the construction proposed as part of this permit is complete. Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that there are no geotechnical concerns related to the works. DFO is currently reviewing the proposed utility crossings and will be issuing an authorization for those works; the TRCA's permit will not be released until this authorization is obtained. The tributary is considered to be a cold water fisheries resource and as such, the works are limited to the Ministry of Natural Resources' (MNR) cold water timing window (July 1- September 15), unless otherwise approved by MNR. The proposed works will contribute to the protection of a 55m wide natural corridor through the residential subdivision and should contribute to an overall net environmental gain. 1232 Plantings As future works, including the road crossing, are forthcoming in the immediate area of the subject works, some of the disturbed areas will merely be stabilized through this permit and fully restored once the ultimate works are complete. The stormwater management pond will be restored with native, woody species plantings in order to enhance the edge of the natural corridor, as part of this permit application. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 35077 - Application #: 028/04/MARK Report Prepared by : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 For information contact : Kirsten Kontor , extension 5370 Date: January 5, 2005 8.1.7 BOX GROVE HILL DEVELOPMENT INC . To alter a waterway on Lot 6, 7, 8, Concession 9, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Box Grove Hill Development Inc.. The purpose is to alter a watercourse through the construction of two storm outlets to service two new tableland stormwater management ponds within the developing Box Grove Community in the Town of Markham. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2010. • Stormwater Management Ponds 3 and 4 Design Brief , prepared for Box Grove Hill Developments Inc . prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd . dated August 2004 and revised as received on January 13th, 2005; • Landscape Planting Details Drawing Nos SWM -1, SWM -2 and SWM -3 prepared by NAK Design revised as received on December 24th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to allow for the construction of two storm pond outlets, partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain, of a tributary of the Rouge River. The outlets are required to allow for the development of two new tableland stormwater management ponds. The works are required to service draft approved plans of subdivision within the developing Box Grove Community in the Town of Markham. The pond locations are not Fill Regulated, are in areas which are devoid of woody vegetation and previously utilized for agricultural purposes The outlets are setback beyond the erosion impact zone of the tributary. The ponds and outlets will be integrated into the landscape through the use of plantings and will not impact the conservation of land. 1233 Control of Flooding: The stormwater ponds are beyond the Regional Storm Floodplain and the pond outlets will be constructed at grade. There will be no impact to the control of flooding as a result of the proposed works. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be erected between the proposed works and the watercourse and will remain in place until the regrading is complete and the areas stabilized. Conservation of Land: The works, with the exception of the pond outlets, are on tableland portions of the site and do not impact the adjacent valley feature. Extensive plantings will be conducted in all disturbed areas in accordance with detailed planting plans submitted by the applicant and accepted by TRCA staff. Plantings The works include the planting of native species at the location of the tableland ponds and at the proposed outlets in accordance with detailed planting plans submitted by the applicant. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authoritys Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Approval from the Fisheries and Oceans Canada is not required for this project as there will be no interference with the low flow channel. CFN: 35849 - Application #: 368/04 /MARK Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: September 21, 2004 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL 8.1.8 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL To place fill within a regulated area on, ( Weldrick Road East and Weldrick Road West), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Richmond Hill. The purpose is to excavate and replace fill within a Fill Regulated area to facilitate the construction of a 450 mm sanitary relief sewer on Weldrick Road, on the east and west side of Yonge Street, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2007. • Sanitary Relief Sewer , Plan And Profile , Sheet No . 3 of 7,dated January 2005, received January 18, 2005; 1234 • Sanitary Relief Sewer , Plan And Profile , Sheet No . 6 of 7, dated January 2005, received January 18, 2005; • Sanitary Relief Sewer , Sections And Details , Sheet No . 7 of 7, dated January 2005, received January 18, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and replacement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of a 450mm sanitary relief sewer and related appurtenances, by the Town of Richmond Hill. The sanitary relief sewer will be constructed beneath Weldrick Road from the York - Durham Trunk Sanitary Sewer on Weldrick Road East to the North Don Trunk Sanitary Sewer on Weldrick Road West. The proposed works are at the edge of two valley systems and do not involve the crossing of the tributaries. Control of Flooding: The proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourses. Conservation of Land: The proposed works involve the construction of the sanitary relief sewer beneath Weldrick Road, are partially located within the Fill Regulated area of two tributaries of the Don River, and do not involve the crossing of the tributaries. As such, no impact to any natural features are expected. There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries resources concerns related to this project. Plantings As the proposed works are located beneath the existing road corridor, no vegetation removals are required. Any disturbed areas will be restored. Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: 36177 - Application #: 027/05/RH Report Prepared by : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 For information contact : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 Date: January 25, 2005 1235 ITEMS 8.1.9 - 8.1.12 ARE MINOR WORKS PERMITS : RES. #B296/04 - MINOR WORKS PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Gerri Lynn O'Connor THAT Minor Works permits granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff , in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158, for items (8.1.9 - 8.1.12, inclusive), which are listed below , be received . CARRIED CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.9 PARK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC . To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block G, Plan M1234, (340 Mill Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Park Property Management Inc.. CFN: 36052 - Application #: 458/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: December 17, 200 CITY OF VAUGHAN 8.1.10 STEPHEN P . LUCESCU To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 19, Plan 65M -2928, (163 Old Humber Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Stephen P. Lucescu. CFN: 36068 - Application #: 463 /04NAUG Report Prepared by : Coreena Smith , extension 5269 For information contact : Kevin Huang , extension 5307 Date: January 24, 2005 8.1.11 SANDRA TONIETTO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 65M -2863, (276 Westridge Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sandra Tonietto. CFN: 36139 - Application #: 022 /05NAUG Report Prepared by : Robyn McMullen , extension 5687 For information contact : Mary-Ann Burns , extension 5267 Date: January 18, 2005 1236 TOWN OF MARKHAM 8.1.12 ADA AND VINCENT CORVESE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan M -1324, (14 Dell Glen Court), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ada and Vincent Corvese. CFN.: 36171 - Application #: 026 /05 /MARK Report Prepared by : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 For information contact : Carla Pierini , extension 5314 Date: January 24, 2005 TOWN OF AJAX 8.1.13 TOWN OF AJAX /PICOV DOWNS To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1, 2, Concession 2 , (Highway 2 at Carruthers Creek), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Picov Downs. The purpose is to construct a stormwater management facility and outlet within the Regional Storm Floodplain for the Carruthers Creek in the Town of Ajax. The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2007 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Kingston Road East and Carruthers Creek Stormwater Management Pond Details Drawing Nos . P -201, P -202, ER -202, ER -203, SWM -201, SWM 202, Project No . 03055, prepared by G .M. Sernas as received on January 21st, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct an interim stormwater management pond and outlet within the Regional Storm Floodplain for the Carruthers Creek in the Town of Ajax. The stormwater management pond is proposed in the centre of the existing Picov Downs horse racetrack facility which is an existing historical use within the floodplain. The existing track and proposed pond is within an ill defined stream corridor and beyond the erosion impact zone of the watercourse.The pond is required as part of the servicing scheme for a new north south roadway which is outside of the regulated area. The roadway is required to service a future casino operation on the Picov Downs Lands. The applicant requires the construction of the stormwater management facility in the next month in order to meet commitments by Picov Downs to have the existing racetrack operational by April 1st, 2005. A future site plan is anticipated for the casino operation and associated parking. At that time TRCA staff will review a proposal for the ultimate pond facility and the relocation of the racetrack. As part of the future site plan, the racetrack is planned to be located beyond the floodplain and the Carruthers Creek stream corridor will be restored. 1237 Control of Flooding: The pond will be located beyond the hydraulic floodway for the Carruthers Creek and is designed to not impact the control of flooding. The pond will exclude the creation of berms or above grade impediments to flood flows. As a result TRCA staff are satisfied that the works will not impact the control of flooding. Pollution: Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the work site and between the watercourse and the proposed facility and remain in place for the duration of the works. The outlet will be sufficiently setback from the watercourse and flows from the pond will be allowed to sheet flow to the low flow channel. Sediment fencing will also be placed at the outlet location during the construction period. Conservation of Land: The works are within an existing racetrack facility and on a portion of a wide stream corridor which is currently manicured. A part of the continued development of the casino and race track operations the stream corridor will be enhanced and additional setbacks will be provided from the watercourse. The existing race track operation and all associated uses (ie. horse preparation areas) will be removed form the floodplain and the area will be allowed to regenerate. Plantings The applicant has provided a restoration plan for the interim works and a concept plan for the future regeneration of the valley which includes the planting of native riparian vegetation. A separate permit will be required for the ultimate facility and at that time, staff will ensure that extensive planting of the valley will be conducted. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The works do not require Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) approval as the works do not constitute a HADD. CFN: 34896 - Application #: 461 /03 /AJAX Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: February 2, 2005 CITY OF PICKERING 8.1.14 711053 ONTARIO INC ./562503 ONTARIO LIMITED To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Balsam Road), in the City of Pickering, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 711053 Ontario Inc./562503 Ontario Limited. The purpose is to alter and restore watercourse in order to allow for the construction of an executive lot residential subdivision on a closed gravel pit in the City of Pickering. 1238 The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2010 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Channel Recreation Details Drawing Nos . D1, D2, D3 ,D4,D5,D6,D7,D8,D9,D10,D11,D12 and D13, Project No . 022074, prepared by Henry Kortikaas and Associates and Parish Geomorphic , revised as received on November 19th, 2004; • Site Conditions Floodplain Mapping and related details Drawing Nos . FP -1, FP- 2,FP -3, and FP -4, Project No . 101010, prepared by D .G. Biddle and Associates Limited , revised as received on November 19th, 2004; • Lot Grading and Servicing Details Drawing Nos . D1,D2,D3,D4,D5, LG -1, LG -2, LG -3, LG -4, LG -5, LG -6 C1, C2, C3, Project No 101010, prepared by D .G. Biddle and Associates Limited revised as received on November 19th, 2004. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The applicant proposes to alter and restore a watercourse as part of the construction of an executive lot residential subdivision on a closed gravel pit in the City of Pickering. As part of the works there will also be an improvement to an existing culvert crossing at Balsam Road and the construction of a crossing of the recreated watercourse block. The works are associated with a draft approved plan of subdivision within the rural area of Pickering at Balsam Road south of Highway 7. The site was originally utilized for gravel extraction and as part of the extraction operations, the watercourse was reconfigured several times. The proposal will result in the recreation of the watercourse feature within an open space block within the plan of subdivision. The open space block will be turned over to public ownership once the works are completed to the satisfaction of the Town and TRCA staff. The watercourse is being restored in accordance with natural channel design principles and the open space block has been designed to allow for the conveyance of flood flows during a Regional Storm event. The works will vastly improve the current condition of the watercourse and will allow for the creation of a vegetated riparian zone. Control of Flooding: The watercourse and open space block has been designed to convey the flood flows during a Regional Storm event with no off -site impacts. As a result there will be no impacts to the control of flooding. Pollution: The new watercourse will be constructed and stabilized prior to the transfer of flows from the current channel alignment This will allow for the works to be constructed in the dry and reduce the possibility for sediment transport downstream. In addition rock check dams will be placed at strategic locations along the project, a temporary sediment basin will be constructed and silt fencing will be placed at the perimeter of the work site. The culvert replacement at Balsam Road will also be conducted in the dry. 1239 Conservation of Land: The reconfigured watercourse will have a positive impact on the conservation of land as the existing watercourse is in a degraded condition with little riparian cover. The new channel will be constructed using natural channel design principles. A vegetated riparian zone will be established in accordance with detailed planting plans provided by the applicant and accepted by TRCA staff. The works will also allow for improvements to fisheries habitat within this tributary reach. Plantings The applicant proposes to conduct extensive planting of native species along the reach of the remedial works including the planting of the entire open space block to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. Policy Guidelines: The works are in compliance with Section 5, "Policies and Criteria for TRCA Valley Regeneration Projects" which promote remedial works for flood control, erosion protection and corridor rehabilitation. The works also constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption, and Destruction to Fish Habitat (HADD) and as a result, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) approval is required. Approval is also required from the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act. TRCA staff have coordinated several meetings with all agencies and are satisfied that the approval of this permit is consistent with the pending approvals by DFO and MNR. CFN: 35306 - Application #: 110 /04 /PICK Report Prepared by : Russel White , extension 5306 For information contact : Russel White , extension 5306 Date: February 2, 2005 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA ) 8.1.15 SHAWN MARK To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 46, Plan 2142, (78 Humber Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Shawn Mark. The purpose is to construct a two- storey addition onto the existing dwelling. The subject property is within a Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River which is located within the Rockcliffe Special Policy Area (SPA). The permit will be issued for the period of February 4, 2005 to February 3, 2007 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit • Drawing No . 1, Site Plan ; Drawing No . 4, 2nd Storey Floor Plan ; Drawing No . 5, Section Plans ; Drawing No . 5A, Elevation Plan ; Drawing No . 6, West Elevation Plan ; Drawing No . 7, East Elevation Plans , prepared by Art Design and Construction Ltd ., received October 22, 2004; 1240 • Letter of Opinion which states that the proposed dwelling and new addition will withstand depths and velocities in the event of a flood , prepared by Ray Kurkjian , Eng., dated January 5, 2005, received January 31, 2005. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new two storey addition onto the existing dwelling. The subject property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River, in the Rockcliffe Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is west of Black Creek Drive and south of Eglinton Avenue West. Control of Flooding: The proposed two - storey addition will meet flood proofing requirements as recommended by TRCA engineering staff. Pollution: The subject property is not located adjacent to a valley or ravine and therefore sediment controls are not necessary for this project. Conservation of Land: There are no geo- technical issues associated with this project. There will be no impact on fisheries, significant natural features or riparian vegetation. Plantings Plantings are not required as part of this application. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1.(B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. CFN: 35926 - Application #: 412/04/TOR Report Prepared by : Annemarie Sanchez , extension 5284 For information contact : Steve Heuchert , extension 5311 Date: January 5, 2005 RES. #B297/04 - CONTRACT FOR LOW LEVEL GATE AND GATE GUIDE REPAIRS AT G. ROSS LORD DAM To sole source the hiring of MTM Restoration and Construction Group to complete the repair work on the low level gates and gate guides at G. Ross Lord Dam. 1241 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Frank Dale THAT the contractor , MTM Restoration and Construction Group (MTM) be retained to complete the repair work on the north low level gate and the gate guides at G . Ross Lord Dam at a cost not to exceed $46,120.00, including G .S.T.. CARRIED BACKGROUND G. Ross Lord Dam was constructed in 1973 to provide flood control for portions of the West Don River. The dam was designed with two large, radial spillway gates and two low level gates. The normal water surface elevation of the reservoir is 172.5 meters (566 feet). Reservoir levels following normal and small flood events are regulated through the operation of the low level gates only. Since construction of the dam in 1973, there have been no storm events large enough to necessitate the use of the two radial gates. During the annual maintenance review in 2003, it was discovered that the metal seals on the bottom of the low level gates were leaking and in need of repair. These seals are required to prevent leakage through the outlet pipes when the gates are not being operated. At Executive Committee Meeting #2/04, held on March 5, 2004, Resolution #B39/04 was approved as follows: THAT the contractor MTM Restoration and Construction Group be retained to complete the repair work on the southern low level gate guide at G. Ross Lord Dam at an upset cost not to exceed $15, 000 (including G. S. T). Works completed in 2004 included repairs to the seal face and side seals on the south gate to prevent further corrosion and leaking. The proposed work to be carried out in 2005 includes repairs to the seal face and side seals on the north gate and additional repairs to the gate guides, including sandblasting and epoxy tar coating to stop corrosion of the gate guides. RATIONALE It is recommended that this contract be sole sourced to MTM given that they have already completed the repair work on the south low level gate. Moreover, due to the specialized nature of this work, MTM is the only known contractor in Southern Ontario that is capable of carrying out these repairs. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff have reviewed MTM's quote and work plan and are of the opinion that it is of good value. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this project were allocated in the 2004 budget and are available to complete the work in 2005. Report prepared by : Patricia Lewis , extension 5218 For Information contact : Glenn Farmer , extension 5351, Patricia Lewis , extension 5218 Date: January 19, 2005 1242 RES. #8298/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR SOURCE PROTECTION PLANNING Sole source hiring of consultant for hydrogeological consultant services for Source Protection Planning. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Frank Dale WHEREAS Dr . Rick Gerber , Geologist , Gerber Geosciences Inc ., has extensive local expertise in groundwater modelling , regional hydrogeological interpretation and the preparation of water budgets ; WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has a specific need for updating and expanding the existing geologic and three dimensional groundwater flow models to meet the province 's requirements for Source Protection Planning ; AND WHEREAS the province has committed to funding Source Protection Planning in the CTC (Credit Valley Conservation Authority , Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority ) Watershed Region to July 31, 2005; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the firm of Gerber Geosciences Inc . be retained to provide hydrogeological consulting services until July 31, 2005 at a rate of $135 per hour with an upset limit of $70,000, including GST . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Province of Ontario has committed to funding conservation authorities for the preparation of Source Protection Plans (SPPs). In particular, the conservation authorities that comprise the CTC Watershed Region (Credit Valley Conservation Authority, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority) will receive approximately $682,000 in start-up funding for "coordination and administration of partnership capacity building projects ", which will include the following activities: • preparation of preliminary water budgets; • capacity building and communications; • preliminary watershed characterization; and • workplan development. To meet the province's requirements by July 31, 2005, TRCA requires a hydrogeological expert to: • Create a preliminary water budget estimate and guiding principles for CTC region watersheds. • Create a preliminary watershed characterization including identification of immediate threats, any data gaps, existing water use, etc.. • Create a detailed workplan and budget for 2005 and 2006. • Lead the Source Protection Technical Committee with respect to provincial regulation compliance in the development of SPP workplans and budgets for the CTC region watersheds. 1243 The CTC project manager will be responsible for the capacity building and communications accountabilities, including the establishment of the committee structure, public consultation, project management activities and the workshops, etc., and will work closely with Dr. Gerber on all issues. For the past twelve years, Dr. Gerber has been conducting research on groundwater in the Greater Toronto Area, and he is a recognized expert in the field of hydrogeology. His knowledge and objectivity cannot be matched by other private sector consultants at equivalent rates. The TRCA also has limited time to meet the province's requirements. Therefore, we have a need to continue our relationship with Dr. Gerber to complete the above tasks. FINANCIAL DETAILS The upset limit for this contract will be $70,000, including GST. This amount will be covered through the provincial funding for source protection planning in the CTC Watershed Region. Report prepared by : Catherine MacEwen , extension 5219 For Information contact : Catherine MacEwen , extension 5219 Brian Denney , extension 6290 Date: January 31, 2005 RES. #B299/04 - Moved by: Seconded by: SHOREPLAN ENGINEERING LIMITED - CONTRACT EXTENSION Compensation of additional works to complete Phase 2: Final Design Drawings and Phase 2A: Additional Work - Boardwalk at East Sector of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project to address requirements of approval agencies. Gerri Lynn O'Connor Frank Dale THAT Shoreplan Engineering Limited be compensated for additional expenses in the amount of $18,600.00 exclusive of GST to complete Phase 2: Final Design Drawings and Phase 2A: Additional Work - Boardwalk at East Sector of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project; AND FURTHER THAT this communication be forwarded to the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation for approval further to conditions of the Delivery Agreement for major contracts . CARRIED 1244 BACKGROUND In 2001,through a competitive process, Shoreplan Engineering Limited was retained to complete a detailed coastal analysis and detailed design for shoreline improvements along the Mimico waterfront from Grand Harbour to Norris Crescent Parkette. The Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project is funded by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation as a Strategic Project. In April, 2001, Shoreplan Engineering Limited initiated Phase 1: Study Design of the Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Study. Approval for this work was received at Executive Committee Meeting #14/00, held on February 2, 2001, with the adoption of Resolution #B214/00 (Phase 1- $52,000 and Phase 2- $14,000) and Executive Committee Meeting #8/03, held on September 5, 2003, with the adoption of Resolution #B128/03 ($4,500). In June 2003, Shoreplan Engineering Limited submitted the final report for Phase 1, Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Study - Coastal Components. An additional piece of work was undertaken to address federal requirements including coastal modeling and viability of fish habitat design. Approval for this work was received at Executive Committee Meeting #1/04 held on February 6, 2004, with the adoption of Resolution #B18/04 ($20,000). The modeling and subsequent preliminary design drawings produced were included in the federal screening report under section 20(1) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA). On December 12, 2004, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) received approval under the CEAA to proceed with implementation of the project. The combined value for Phase 1 and the additional work was $64,768.60. RATIONALE Shoreplan Engineering Limited submitted a proposal for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Mimico project in 2001. Phase 1 of the project was completed in April, 2001. Phase 2 activities include the preparation of detailed drawings and specifications based on the final design concept These detailed drawings are required to implement the project and will be used in the submission of applications for approval under the federal Fisheries Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Act. The cost to complete the Phase 2: Final Design Drawings was approved at Executive Committee Meeting #14/00, held on February 2, 2001, with the adoption of Resolution #B214/00 (Phase 2- $14,000). Following the receipt of federal environmental assessment approval in December, 2004, Shoreplan Engineering Limited submitted a revised Phase 2 - Detailed Design Drawings. The proposal included a revised budget detailing the increased rate for services reflective of the number of years which have elapsed from the date of the proposal to the date of execution of the work -- a period of four years. The revised cost estimate to complete Phase 2 is $18,500 exclusive of GST. Based on the final shoreline design, TRCA staff identified the need for additional construction drawings related to the shoreline configuration, specifically, the boardwalk section of the east sector of the project. As Shoreplan Engineering Limited would be preparing the balance of the shoreline construction drawings, TRCA staff requested that Shoreplan Engineering Limited provide a cost estimate to complete the additional works. The cost estimate to complete Phase 2A: Additional Work, Boardwalk at East Sector is $14,100 excluding GST. 1245 FINANCIAL DETAILS The Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project is funded by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation as a Strategic Project. The budget for the project is $6.5 million. The necessary funding for this expenditure is available under Account #206 -10. Report prepared by : Connie Pinto , extension 5387 For Information contact : Nancy Gaffney , extension 5313 Date: February 01, 2005 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:15 a.m., on Friday, February 4, 2005. Dick O'Brien Chair /ks 1246