HomeMy WebLinkAboutBudget/Audit Advisory Board 2010ts.
«THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE BUDGET /AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD #1/10
April 9, 2010
The Budget /Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/10, was held in the Humber Room, Head
Office, on Friday, April 9, 2010. The Vice Chair of the Authority Maria Augimeri, called the
meeting to order at 10:03 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair, Authority
Bonnie Litt ley Member
Ron Moeser Member
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
David Barrow Member
ABSENT
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
Maja Prentice Member
RES. #C1 /10 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
David Barrow
Ron Moeser
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/09, held on January 8, 2010, be approved.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by Jim Dillane, Director, Finance and Business Services, in regard to
item BAAB7.1 - 2010 Operating and Capital Budget.
RES. #C2 /10 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Bonnie Litt ley
THAT above -noted presentation (a) be heard and received.
CARRIED
1
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #C3 /10 - 2010 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET
2010 Operating and Capital Budget is recommended for approval.
Moved by: Ron Moeser
Seconded by: Bonnie Litt ley
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT WHEREAS the Conservation
Authorities Act (CA Act) provides that a conservation authority, in establishing its annual
levy, shall have the power to determine the proportion of total benefit of any project
afforded to all participating municipalities that is afforded to each of them;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, subject to such regulations under the
Conservation Authorities Act as may be approved by the Lieutenant - Governor -in- Council:
(I)
all participating municipalities be designated as benefiting for all projects included
in the 2010 Operating Budget;
(ii) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) share of the cost of the
programs included in the 2010 Operating Budget shall be raised from all
participating municipalities as part of the General Levy;
(iii) the 2010 General Levy be apportioned to the participating municipalities in the
proportion that the modified current value assessment of the whole is under the
jurisdiction of TRCA, unless otherwise provided in the levy or a project;
(iv) the appropriate TRCA officials be directed to advise the participating municipalities,
pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act and the regulations made thereunder,
and to levy the said municipalities the amount of the General Levy set forth in the
2010 Operating Budget, and to levy the said municipalities the amount of the Capital
Levy set forth in the 2010 Capital Budget and in the approved projects of TRCA;
THAT, subject to finalization of the participating municipalities' apportioned levy amounts,
the 2010 Operating and Capital Budget, and all projects therein, be adopted;
THAT staff be authorized to amend the 2010 Operating and Capital Budget to reflect
actual 2010 provincial grant allocations in order to determine the amount of matching levy
governed by regulation;
THAT, except where statutory or regulatory requirements provide otherwise, staff be
authorized to enter into agreements with private sector organizations or government
agencies for the undertaking of projects which are of benefit to TRCA and funded by the
sponsoring organization or agency;
THAT, as required by Ontario Regulations 139/96 and 231/97, this recommendation and
the accompanying budget document, including the schedule of matching and
non - matching levies, be approved by recorded vote;
2
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as may be
necessary to implement the foregoing, including obtaining needed approvals and the
signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
Enclosed is the draft 2010 Budget, Operating and Capital. Staff is still "fine tuning" the budget
which may result in minor variation in the numbers after the meeting of the Budget /Audit
Advisory Board scheduled to be held on April 9, 2010. This will not materially affect the
municipal levy numbers as presented to the funding partners. The budget in final form will be
presented to the Authority at its meeting scheduled to be held on Friday, April 30, 2010. The
2010 budget is presented on a "cash basis ". Changes to the accounting rules relating to
treatment of tangible capital assets may result in the restatement of the budget in relation to the
financial statements.
Municipal Approval Status
As the members are aware, staff prepare preliminary estimates in the summer and fall of each
year for submission to TRCA's municipal funding partners. Staff meet with municipal staff as
required by the budget processes followed by each major participating municipality.
Presentations are made to municipal finance staff and the committees and councils of the
funding partners as required. In the case of Peel Region, TRCA works closely with staff at
Credit Valley and Halton conservation authorities to align budget information and requirements.
A similar process occurs with York Region where TRCA works closely with the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority. In Durham Region, the process is more complicated because
five conservation authorities work to align budgets and financial submissions to meet the
Region of Durham budget requirements. TRCA's submissions to the City of Toronto for capital
and operating levy are reviewed with senior Corporate Finance and Toronto Water staff.
The 2010 Preliminary Estimates were approved by the Authority in November, 2009, as the
basis for submissions to TRCA's municipal funding partners. The funding identified in the
apportionment of the levy reflects the amounts that the municipal funding partners have
approved in their 2010 budgets for capital and operating. r
The following summarizes the status of the discussions and submissions as of April 1, 2010:
City of Toronto
The capital ,funding included in the TRCA budget has been approved by City Council. The
operating funding has been approved by the City of Toronto Budget Committee and
recommended to Council. Staff anticipates approval of the operating funding request prior to
consideration of the TRCA budget by the Authority on April 30, 2010.
Regional Municipality of Peel
The capital and operating funding included in the TRCA budget has been approved by
Regional Council.
Regional Municipality of York
The capital and operating funding included in the TRCA budget has been approved by
Regional Council.
3
Regional Municipality of Durham
The capital and operating funding included in the TRCA budget has been approved by
Regional Council.
Township of Adjala- Tosorontio
The Township has been advised of TRCA's levy request. Approval of the TRCA levy is
anticipated.
Town of Mono
The Town has been advised of TRCA's levy request. Approval of the TRCA levy is anticipated.
MNR Transfer Payments
The provincial funding which is matched with levy has not been confirmed but is unlikely to
change in any material way.
Provincial Legislation
By regulation, TRCA has provided 30 days written notice to its member municipalities of the
date of the meeting at which the Authority will approve the municipal levy. At the April 30, 2010,
Authority meeting, a recorded vote on the budget recommendation including the non - matching
municipal levy is required. The weighted voting procedure prescribed by regulation will be
used.
Operating Budget - Overview of Key Issues
Operating Revenue
The downturn in the economy since the fall of 2008 has had an impact on some aspects of
TRCA operations: the work TRCA does with the development industry in terms of placing of
clean fill and corporate events at Black Creek Pioneer Village and conservation parks are two
examples. Planning and development fee revenue has increased significantly over the last six
years from about $700,000 annually to the 2010 budget of $3.133 million. In 2009, development
fee revenues met the budget target. Interest rates remain low resulting in a reduction in interest
rate revenue of $40,000 in 2010 as compared to the 2009 budget (interest revenue is $240,000
less than 2008). Overall, revenues are projected to decrease by $666,400, about 3.0% in 2010.
2% Salary/Wage Adjustment
The largest segment of the operating budget is salaries, wages and benefits, about 73% of
gross operating expenditures. The Authority was advised in November of 2009 when the
preliminary estimates were considered that staff was considering a cost of living adjustment
(COLA) in the order of 2 %. Members will recall the difficult decision to have no COLA increase
in 2009. Given that many of the TRCA's municipal comparators are implementing pay
increases in the 3% range in 2009, 2010 and 2011 as a result of negotiated settlements, 2% for
TRCA staff over three years seems modest and necessary.
Recent provincial budget measures require some public agencies to "freeze" salaries and
wages for two years. As of this date, it is not clear if conservation authorities are covered by the
proposed legislation. TRCA receives only $846,000 in provincial transfer payments. Also, in
2009 TRCA had no COLA adjustment so the two year "freeze" requirement could be met by
implementing no COLA adjustment in 2011.
4
Expenditures
The 2010 operating budget is $686,800 less than 2009, a decrease of 2 %. This has been
achieved by imposing constraints to all programs and reducing staffing. Total 2010 Full Time
Equivalents (FTE's) have been reduced by 8.4 over 2009. Most of the reductions have occurred
in the Parks and Culture division. Increases in staffing in other areas relates to programs for
which new, conditional funding is available.
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto
In the preliminary estimates, staff reported that although The Conservation Foundation of
Greater Toronto (CFGT) continues to enjoy success in attracting funding and donations for
many capital projects, the portion of funding targeted to TRCA for unrestricted use in 2009 was
not achieved, due in part to the downturn in the economy. In 2010, the proposed target has
been reduced to $250,000. CFGT and TRCA staff have reviewed this and believe that although
the 2009 target for unrestricted funding was not achieved, the reduced 2010 target of $250,000
is realistic. TRCA staff is making appropriate efforts to assist CFGT in achieving this target
including lending support for new initiatives such as the individual donor campaign.
Deficit Management
The 2009 financial statements will not be available until the June meeting of the board. The
projected cumulative deficit for the end of 2009 is anticipated to be in the range of about $3.3
million, an increase of about $770,000 from about $2.5 million at the end of 2008. The increase
in the deficit at the end of 2009 relates to poor revenue performance due to weather and
economic conditions.
In 2009, there was provision for a $600,000 surplus as a result of a non - recurring opportunity to
use land sale proceeds for operating purposes. TRCA is closing on a $1.2 million land sale,
approved by the Authority in 2009. 50% of the proceeds are considered to be provincial funds
and must be used for purchases of conservation lands under the provincial revenue sharing
policy. Because TRCA will have other municipal land acquisition funds, it will be possible to
match the provincial funds and enable up to $600,000 to be applied to the deficit. This was
intended to be a 2009 deficit reduction method, but economic conditions have delayed the
closing of the land sale. The 2010 capital budget provides for a capital surplus of $600,000 to
reduce the deficit in 2010, assuming the land sale closes in 2010.
Of the projected, cumulative deficit totalling $3.3 million, about $500,000 relates to the
remaining financing of the $3 million Restoration Services Centre. This is being repaid
successfully over time.
At this time, staff is recommending only the $600,000 surplus in land sale funds be applied to
the deficit. The 2010 operating budget as recommended is a balanced budget.
Operating Budget Summary
Total gross operating expenditures in 2010 are estimated to be $34,053,000. This is a decrease
of 2.0% over comparable 2009 budget. Revenues are budgeted to be $21,355,600, a decrease
of 3.0 %. 2010 net expenditures of $12,697,600 are to be funded by: municipal levy -
$11,566,000; CFGT - $250,000; and Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) transfers - $846,000.
5
Pages 5 and 6 of the operating budget include brief notes about the reasons for
increases /decreases in the various programs. The program descriptions include additional
information.
Capital Budget Summary
Capital projects are funded by the municipal partners on a benefiting municipality basis. That
is, with few exceptions, capital projects funded by a municipality are within that municipality.
These include:
• erosion control projects;
• Remedial Action Plan program in Toronto;
• natural heritage regeneration projects in Peel and York;
• regional watershed monitoring;
• Black Creek Pioneer Village restoration program (City of Toronto);
• flood control works and flood plain mapping;
• watershed management projects;
• Peel Region Climate Change Project - Peel Region recognized in 2007 the need to make
significant investment in climate change adaptation and mitigation and this was significantly
enhanced in 2008;
• Peel conservation land care and Peel conservation area infrastructure; projects include
matching federal /provincial infrastructure funding for Heart Lake pool and Albion Hills trails
Some capital programs are generally benefiting. These include:
• public use infrastructure - levy based on Current Value Assessment (CVA), used to fund
infrastructure needs of parks and education field centres;
• information technology - levy based on CVA, used to fund common capital IT /IS needs
across the organization;
• major maintenance - levy based on CVA, used for major capital expenditures for office
buildings and accommodation;
• groundwater strategies and management - costs shared by Peel, York, Durham and the City
with some provincial support.
Certain capital programs are uniquely funded:
• land acquisition - major acquisitions leverage funding available from regions of Peel, York
and Durham, City of Toronto, local municipalities, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation, CFGT
and other sources;
• Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) - funded directly by TWRC through
delivery agreements, waterfront projects include Port Union, Mimico and the Lower Don
River;
• Humber Bay Shores (Etobicoke Motel Strip) - legacy project for which the City of Toronto
and Province of Ontario have continuing commitment;
• The Living City Campus at Kortright - includes a number of major projects with varying
sources of funds; ie. Kortright Centre retrofit includes $1.25 million from York Region and
matching amount shared among Peel, Durham and the City of Toronto; ie. Archetype
Sustainable House is fully funded by Business, Industry and Land Development Association
(BILD) and other donations;
• In 2009, the Authority approved the Petticoat Creek Pool Project of $3 million of which 2/3 is
federal /provincial infrastructure funding.
6
Special Project Funding:
• TRCA works with its municipal partners to undertake special projects wherein TRCA has
significant, specialized expertise. These special projects include erosion work, construction
of trails, bridges and wetlands and tree planting. This funding varies from year to year and
is completely separate from the municipal operating and capital levy funding. Funding for
this category of work is included in the budget only if there is a signed agreement.
Capital expenditures can vary significantly from year to year as funding is made available. The
budget provides for continuing commitment to capital projects under existing categories.
However, in 2011 and beyond, the Conservation.Centre for Climate Change Response (new
head office) is contemplated.
Staff will do a presentation summarizing the 2010 operating and capital budgets.
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, 416- 661 -6292; Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: jdillane @trca.on.ca; rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Jim Dillane, 416- 661 -6292; Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: jdillane @trca.on.ca; rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
Date: March 30, 2010
Attachments: 1
7
"i"o rser vation
for The Living City
2010 BUDGET
OPERATING AND CAPITAL
As submitted to Budget and Audit Advisory Board, April 9, 2010
8
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages
Section 1: Apportionment of Levy
2010 Apportionment of Levy - Summary 1
2010 Apportionment of Levy - Matching /Non- Matching Format 2
Basis of Apportionment - Municipal Levy 2010 3 - 4
Section 2: Operating Budget
Operating Budget Summary 5 - 6
Full -Time Equivalents of Staffing 7
2010 Operating Budget - Detailed " 8 - 26
Finance and Business Services 8
Watershed Management 12
Planning and Development 15
Ecology 17
Restoration Services 19
Parks and Culture 20
Office of the CAO 26
9
SECTION 1
2010 APPORTIONMENT OF LEVY
10
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
APPORTIONMENT OF 2010 OPERATING BUDGET LEVY
2010 GENERAL LEVY
LEVY TOTAL
EXCLUDING TAX GENERAL ROUGE
TAX ADJ. ADJUST. LEVY PARK
$ $ $
Page 1
2009 Operating
OPERATING Change
LEVY * 10/09
ADJALA - TOSORONTIO 874 874
DURHAM 335,059 102,600 437,659
TORONTO 7,389,126 300 7,389,426
MONO 991 100 1,091
PEEL 1,289,171 85,400 1,374,571
YORK 2,208,779 153,600 2,362,379
11,224,000 342,000 11,566,000
LEVY ON HAND / SPECIAL
* excludes Rouge Park levy
11,224,000 342,000
10
3,940
86,901
5,161
25,976
132,000
1,886 (1,012) -53.7%
450,379 (12,720) -2.8%
7,213,291 176,135 2.4%
1,137 (46) -4.0%
1,344,616 29,955 2.2%
2,360,691 1,688 0.1%
11,372,000
194,000 1.7%
1,566,000 132,000
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
APPORTIONMENT OF 2010 LEVIES
ADJALA - TOSORONTIO
DURHAM
TORONTO
MONO
PEEL
YORK
OPERATING LEVY
MATCHING* NON - MATCHING
TOTAL
$
$
$
66
808
874
25,255
412,404
437,659
556,949
6,832,477
7,389,426
75
1,016
1,091
97,170
1,277,401
1,374,571
166,485
2,195,894
2,362,379
846,000
10,720,000
11,566,000
* Based on preliminary estimates of provincial funding.
Page 2
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT - MUNICIPAL LEVY
(BASED ON 2008 MODIFIED CURRENT VALUE ASSESSMENT FIGURES *)
% OF CURRENT
CURRENT MUNICIP- VALUE POPULATION
VALUE ALITY IN ASSESSMENT TOTAL IN
MUNICIPALITY ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY IN WATERSHED POPULATION AUTHORITY
$(000's) $(000's)
Township of Adjala - Tosorontio 1,589,195 4 63,568 9,842 394
Durham, Regional Municipality of 29,696,878 * 24,364,480 197,407 164,539
City of Toronto 537,314,751 100 537,314,751 2,099,756 2,099,756
Town of Mono 1,440,801 5 72,040 6,713 336
Peel, Regional Municipality of 215,595,826 * 93,744,589 1,015,658 458,708
York, Regional Municipality of 175,897,202 * 160,615,707 694,346 626,705
961,534,653 816,175,134
ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES *
4,023,722 3,350,438
Durham, Regional Municipality of -
Ajax, Town of 12,634,566 86 10,865,727 93,370 80,298
Pickering, Town of 13,495,939 95 12,821,142 84,834 80,592
Uxbridge Township 3,566,373 19 677,611 19,203 3,649
29,696,878 - 24,364,480 197,407 164,539
Peel, Regional Municipality of -
Brampton, City 66,546,281 63 41,924,157 373,235 235,138
Mississauga, City of 137,076,443 33 45,235,226 589,833 194,645
Caledon, Town of 11,973,102 55 6,585,206 52,590 28,925
215,595,826 93,744,589 1,015,658 458,708
York, Regional Municipality of -
Aurora, Town of 9,285,410 4 371,416 42,764 1,711
Markham, Town of 55,140,060 100 55,140,060 234,487 234,487
Richmond Hill, Town of 33,986,466 99 33,646,601 146,116 144,655
Vaughan, Town of 66,755,212 100 66,755,212 226,262 226,262
Whitchurch- Stouffville, Town of 6,305,373 43 2,711,310 26,616 11,445
King Township 4,424,681 45 1,991,107 18,101 8,145
175,897,202 - 160,615,707 694,346 626,705
* As provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources
Page 3
13
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MUNICIPALITY
2010 LEVY APPORTIONMENT
MODIFIED
CURRENT VALUE
ASSESSMENT
IN WATERSHED
2010 GENERAL
LEVY
PROPORTIONATE
FACTOR
2009 GENERAL
LEVY
PROPORTIONATE
FACTOR
ADJALA-TOSORONTIO
DURHAM, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF
Ajax
Pickering
Uxbridge
10,865,727
12,821,142
677,611
CITY OF TORONTO
TOWN OF MONO
PEEL, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF
Brampton
Mississauga
Caledon
41,924,157
45,235,226
6,585,206
YORK, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF
Aurora
Markham
Richmond
Vaughan
Whitchurch - Stouffville
King
371,416
55,140,060
33,646,601
66,755,212
2,711,310
1,991,107
$(000's)
63,568
24,364,480
537,314,751
72,040
93,744,589
160,615,707
816,175,134
0.00779%
2.98520%
65.83327%
0.00883%
11.48584%
19.67907%
0.00807%
3.15272%
65.72344%
0.00854%
11.54471%
19.56252%
100.00000%
100.00000%
Page 4
14
SECTION 2
2010 OPERATING BUDGET
15
Page 5
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 Final Operating Estimates - Expenditures
Gross Expenditures (by functional Unit)
Finance and Business Services Division
Administration
Rental Properties
Property Services
Vehicle & Equipment Reserve
Watershed Management Division
WM Divisional Management
Watershed Strategies
Conservation Field Centres
Planning & Development Division
Planning & Development
Enforcement
Epplogv Division
ogy
a)
Restoration Services Division
Restoration Services
Parks and Culture Division
Parks & Culture Divisional Management
Conservation Areas
Kortright Centre for Conservation
Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Black Creek Pioneer Village
Food Services
Office of the CAO
Corporate Management
Corporate Secretariat
Human Resources
Corporate Communications
Professional Access Program
Expenditure Total
Page
Reference
Page 8
-Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 26
Page 26
Page 26
Page 26
2009 2009
Budget Actual
$ $
2,168,000 2,085,813
1,804,000 1,958,816
1,755,000 1.715,357
0
5,727,000 5,759,987
232,000 246,573
1,636,000 1,602,783
2,764,000 2.697,953
4,632,000 4,547,309
3,325,000 3,379,141
592,000 544,364
3,917,000 3,923,505
2,686,000 2,570,017
2,686,000 2,570,017
1,819,000 1,160,173
2010 10 / 09 10 / 09
Budget % Chq. $ Chg. 2010 over 2009 Change
$ Intro: all budgets affected
by COLA and market adjustments.
2.016,000 -7.0% (152,000) Project surcharge higher due to volume of projects ($264,000) Higher rent at PDP ($80,000) as more space is leased,
1,869,000 3.6% 65,000 $48k for tradesperson no longer funded from provincial capital and fill revenue$34k in savings for retirement of
tradesperson$14K in additional cost for pager overtime for maintenance statf$30K in reduction of net relates to loss of
1,672,000 -4.7% (83,000) $28K in taxes savings as a result of additional lands being added to the CLTIP. $20k reduction to consultant costs
associated with the TCA project
Similar amount of equipment /vehicle replacements
5,557,000 -3 0% (170,000)
296,000 27.6% 64,000 Director and Financial Analysts reallocation of time to this account.Admin. Assist added - accommodation requirement
1,579.000 -3 5% (57,000) Greater reliance on Revenue. Funding reallocated from Don to Highland and reduced costs for Watershed Committees
2,852.000 3.2% 88,000 Cost of staff reclassifications in mid -2009 fully realized in 201 OBooking pressure at Lake St. George resulting from
economy
4,727,000 2.1% 95,000
3,458,000 - 4.0% 133,000 Expenditures projected 4% higher in 2010 due to staff costs associated with EA team restructuring
579,000 -2 2% (13,000) Reduced the legal budget by $15K
4,037,000 31 % 120,000
2,592,000 -3.5% (94,000) 2010 service levels will be lower than those in 2009 due to a maternity leave and an engineer position that will not be filled
2,592,000 -3.5% (94,000)
1,350,000 -25 8% (469,000) Inland fill rev. down to economic downturn (- 9185K), Nursery expenditures lower due to internal revenues netted out,
Archaeology - more projects get funding
839,000
3,586,000
1,593,000
733,420
3,473,175
1,712.382
1,461,000 1,447,731
4,289,000 4.327,640
1,034,000 1,048,568
814,000 -3 0% (25,000) Weekend Receptionist position transferred to Black Creek $12,100, Eliminated partial year Customer Service Position
3,254,000
1,701,000
-9.3% (332,000) Reduced two full time positions. , Petticoat Creek revenue and expditures reduced to reflect pool closure., Utilities and
V &E increased 4%
6.8% 108,000 Superintendent position 100% in Kortright Budget from 50% in Boyd. , Energy & V &E increased 4 %. , Revenue &
expenditures adjustments to Education, Coroporate. Energy and Wedding programs in line with 2009 actuais.
1,470,000 0 6% 9,000 Same service level in 2010
4,349,000 1.4% 60,000 Downsized operation (6 positions) with minimum reduction of service level, Revised education program to increase
audience, extend season, and market more aggressively, Addition of March Break & Brewery within existing budget
870,000 -15 9% (164,000) Corporate revenue & expenditures budget reduced in line with actuals Cook & wart staff reduced to expected volume
12,802,000 12,742,915 12,458,000
-2.7% (344,000)
503,000 501,171
416,000 470,506
556,000 529,213
1,316,000 1,224,582
366,000 337,197
587,000
437,000
489,000
1,335,000
16.7%
5.0%
-12.1%
1.4%
84,000
21,000
(67,000)
19,000
450,000 23.0% 84,000
3,157,000 3,062,669 3,298,000 4.5% 141,000
34,740,000 33,766,575 34,019,000 -2.1% (721,000)
Events budget moved from Corporate Communications to Corporate Management.
Increase in HR and Corporate Communications FTE's to support growth in programs.
Events budget moved from Corporate Communications to Corporate Management.
Page 6
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 Final Operating Estimates - Funding Sources
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees.
Rental Properties
Interest Earnings
Black Creek Pioneer Village
Food Services
Development Services
Restoration Services
Conservation Areas
Kortnght Centre for Conservation
Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Conservation Field Centres
All Other Program /User fees
Reserves
_ CFrT- Flowthrough
Other Municipal
Provincial
Federal
Donations /Fundraising
Non - Government Grants
CFGT - Living City
Provincial Transfer Payments
Revenue total
Net Expenditures
Net Expenditures funded by
Municipal Levy
Deficit / (Surplus)
Staffing: Full -time
Non -Full -time
Total
2009 2009
Budget Actual
2010 10 / 09 10 / 09
Budget %Chq. $ Chq.
2010 over 2009 Change
2,314,000 2,300,525 2,345,000 1.3% 31,000
300.000 260,146 260,000 -13.3% (40,000) Interest down $40,000 to $260,000 due to lower rates.
2,203,000 1,982,469 2,305,000 4.6% 102,000 Addition of March Break & Brewery within existing budget envelope
1,081,000 942,270 964,000 -10.8% (117,000) Additonal Revenue & Expenditures for Halfway House / Brew Pub
3.025,000 3,014,689
2,056,000 800,270
3,616,000 3,099,819
1,444,000 1,480,416
1,290,000 1,259,833
1,806,000 1,442,061
115,000 142,405
(514,000)
403,000 702,116
3,133,000 3.6% 108,000 Revenues projected 7.2% higher in 2010 due to increased planning fees, service level agreements with
1,280,000 -37.7% (776,000) Lower Inland Fill revenues to slower building activity
3,271,000 -9.5% (345,000) Same revenues 'projected in 2010
1,537,000 6.4% 93,000 Revenue & expenditures adjustments to Education, Coroporate, Energy and Wedding programs in line with
2009 actuals.
1,290,000 Same service level in 2010
1,829,400 1.3% 23,400
108.000
(330,000)
415,600
-6.1%
-35.8%
3.1%
(7,000)
184,000 Less Inland Fill going to reserve in 2010
12,600
1,149,000 1,103,739 1,189,000 3.5% 40,000 Ecology Sp. Projects, Plant propagation, Enviro. Assessments
842,700
104,300
483.000
846,576
161.709
437,088
1,090,000
85,000
483.000
29.3% 247,300 Tax Rebate from Non - Govt.shifted here
-18.5% (19,300)
304,000 791,806 102,000 -66.4% (202,000) Tax Rebate shifted to Provincial
-50.0%
500,000
846,000 845,753
250,000
846,000
(250,000) 2010 target reduced
23,368,000 21,613,691 22,453,000 -3.9% (915,000)
11,372,000 12,152,884 11,566,000 1.7% 194,000
11,372,000 11,382,338 11,566,000 1.7% 194,000
770,546
242.9
140.7
383.60
239.9
135.2
375.0
-1.2%
-4.0%
-2.2%
(3.0)
(5.6)
(8.6)
0
Finance & Business Services
Watershed Management / Planning /
Ecology / Restoration Services
Page 7
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Full -time Equivalent Employees (FTEs)
Seasonal, Part-Time
FULL -TIME Contract TOTAL FTE's
2009 2010 2009 2010 ' 2009 2010
49.8 50.7 5.1 2.9 54.9 53.7 (1.2) FTE Change: -1for GIS vacancySome EMS /CTP moved to regular Ecolgy
111.9 114.2 25.4 27.6 137.4 141.8 4.4 FTE Change: +.3 Admin.Assist, +.4 Director & Analyst allocated hereFTE Change: -.9 YDDS ends &
to EAs + extra = +.4,-.4 Iess Planner staff in regular = OEcology portion FTE Change:+.6
Hydrog.York EMP, +.8 misc. re:Peel EA activityFTE Changes: +1 PAIEE Intern, +.5 EMS staff, -1
Parks and Culture 55.9 52.2 108.3 99.0 164.2 151.2 (13.0) FTE Cahnge:-1 BM Labourer, -5 for PC Pool closing =- 5.9 +.4 Weekend Reception, +.4 Ed
Program. -2.4 Interpreters, -1.2 Gift Shop = - 2.9Cook & wait staff reduced to expected volume
Office of the CAO 25.2 22.7 1.9 5.5 27.1 28.3 1.2 + .6 HR mat leave returns,.4 HR Associate added, -.7 PAIEE= + 1.3CC: 1 FTE to Corp
Secreatariat, +.3 Production Manager, +.7 of Annualizations = 0
TOTAL OPERATING 242.9 239.9 140.7 135.1 383.6 375.0 (8.7)
Finance & Business Services 4.4 4.7 5.1 6.2 9.5 10.9 1.4 +1.9 FTEs for new York Land Care -.5 Maint stafff to Operating
Watershed Management 13.1 13.9 10.8 10.9 23.8 24.7 0.9 -.2 less WM staff to Rural Clean Water +.8 Climate Science Coord
TWRC 15.6 13.1 3.8 4.2 19.3 17.4 (2.0) Smaller projects in 2010
Ecology 36.7 36.6 18.1 23.7 54.8 60.3 5.5 1.1 Field staff added +.5 Sust tech annualize Techs+.25 Water Res technical staff +. 3.4 Ecol
technical staff for larger 2010 Peel Climate project
Restoration Services 46.9 49.8 23.8 21.3 70.7 71.1 0.5 -.8 RSS Less Asian Longhorn Beetle +.6 RSS Enviro Techs
Parks & Culture 4.1 3.6 4.1 3.6 (0.5) -.6 less F &BS Maint.Staff & Man. Plan
All Other
TOTAL CAPITAL 120.7 121.7 61.5 66.3 182.2 188.0 5.8 Most of Change is better 2009 FTE tracking
TOTAL STAFFING 363.6 361.6 202.2 201.4 565.8 563.0 (2.9)
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Finance and Business Services
ACTIVITY: Administration
Page 8
2009 2009
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
Budget,
% Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $
$
Expenditures:
Financial Services 1,112,000 1,135,792
1,172,000
5.4%
60,000
Office Services 1,277,000 1,254,747
1,366,000
7.0%
89,000
Information Technology 685,000 685,521
710,000
3.6%
25,000
GIS 540,000 480,861
478,000
-11.5%
(62,000)
Project Surcharge (1,446,000) (1,529,147)
(1,710,000)
18.3%
(264,000)
For 2010 Moved to
Ecology:Environmental Management 58,039
-
Systems
Expenditure Total 2,168,000 2,085,813
2,016,000
22.8%
(152,000)
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees 66,000 79,763
59,000
- 10.6%
(7,000)
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings 300,000 259,809
260,000
- 13.3% .
(40,000)
CFGT - Flowthrough
-
Municipal
-
Provincial
190,000
-
190,000
Federal
-
Donations/Fundraising
-
Non- Government Grants 135,000 228,323
- 100.0%
(135,000)
Revenue Total 501,000 567,895
509,000
- 123.9%
8,000
Net Expenditures 1,667,000 1,517,918
1,507,000
146.7%
(160,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 35.2
33.6
-4.4%
-1.6
Non -F/T 0.4
0.5
24.7%
0.1
Facilities: # Buildings 4.0 4
4.0
Sq. Footage 54,000 54,000
54,000
$ / Sq. Footage 23.6 23
25.3
7.0%
1.6
# Purchase Card Transactions 12,000 12,114
13,000
8.3%
1,000
# Supplier Invoices processed 15,000 15,668
16,000
6.7%
1,000
# Paycheques issued 17,600 17,716
17,800
1.1%
200
# Phones & Desktop/laptop Computer 1,300 1,307
1,310
0.8%
10
# GIS jobs for clients 850 846
850
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Interest down $40,000 to $260,000 due to lower rates.
Project surcharge higher due to volume of projects ($264,000).
Higher rent at PDP ($80,000) as more space is leased.
PST Rebates expected higher by $55,000 at $190,000 .
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Interest below budget by $40,000 due to lower rates.
PST Rebates exceeded budget by $85,000
Project surcharge higher due to volume of projects.
19
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Finance and Business Services
ACTIVITY: Rental Properties
Page 9
2009 ( 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget % Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Basic Rentals 532,000 579,784 531,000
ORC Rentals 813,000 894,287 855,000
Special Agreements 108,000 91,619 103,000
Central Services 351,000 393,126 380,000
-0.2%
5.2%
-4.6%
8.3%
(1,000)
42,000
(5,000)
29,000
Expenditure Total 1,804,000 1,958,816 1,869,000
3.6%
65,000
Funding Sources:
Basic Rentals 761,000 781,707 784,000
ORC Rentals 938,000 947,989 950,000
Special Agreements 615,000 570,829 , 611,000
3.0%
1.3%
-0.7%
23,000
12,000
(4,000)
Program /User fees totals 2,314,000 2,300,525 2,345,000
1.3%
31,000
Reserves
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Municipal
Provincial 150
Federal
Donations /Fundraising
Non - Government Grants 38,221
Revenue total 2,314,000 2,338,896 2,345,000
1.3%
31,000
Net Expenditures (510,000) (380,080) (476,000)
-6.7%
34,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
-1.2%
81.8%
.
3.0%
2.1%
(0.1)
0.5
$ 164
$ 140
Staff FTEs- Full -time 5.7 5.7
Non -F/T 0.6 1.0
Facilities: # Buildings Rented 250 250 250
Occupancy % 95% 91% 95%
# acres Land under lease 200 200 200
Operations: Days of 365 365 365
Cost /Rentals $ 5,380 $ 5,896 $ 5,544
Revenue /Rental 6,796 $ 6,919 $ 6,936
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
$48k for tradesperson no longer funded from provincial capital and fill revenue
$34k in savings for retirement of tradesperson
$30K in reduction of net relates to loss of provincial capital for ORC rentals
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
$25k in increased tax cost for rental properties relating to OHT lands
20
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Finance and Business Services
ACTIVITY: Property & Taxes
Page 10
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget
% Chg.
$ Chq. '
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Property Services 959,000 1,034,919 961,000
Conservation Lands- Insurance 247,000 199,744 216,000
- Recoverable Taxes 398,000 325,977 342,000
0.2%
-12.6%
-14.1%
-
2,000
(31,000)
(56,000)
Expenditure Total 1,7,55,000 1,715,357 1,672,000
-4.7%
(83,000)
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees
Reserves 15,000
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough 70,000 92,660 70,000
Municipal
Provincial
Federal
Donations /Fundraising
Non- Government Grants 65,000 326,823 30,000
-
- 100.0%
-
-
-
-
-
- 53.8%
-
(15,000)
-
-
-
-
-
-
(35,000)
Revenue Total 150,000 419,484 100,000
-33.3%
(50,000)
Net Expenditures 1,605,000 1,295,874 1,572,000
-2.1%
(33,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
-3.3%
42.0%
0.7%
-5.4%
(0.4)
0.4
300
(2)
Staff FTEs- Full -time ' • 11.2 10.85
Non -F/T 1.0 1.42
# ACRES Land in ownership 41,000 41,079 41,300
Cost /acre in ownership $ 42.80 $ 41.76 $ 40.48
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
$28K in taxes savings as a result of additional lands being added to the CLTIP.
$20k reduction in consultant costs associated with the TCA project.
$23K reduction in consultant costs
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
•
$321 K in tax savings resulting from settlement of the CLTIP appeals.
$25K in additional legal fees for Mi
21
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Finance and Business Services
ACTIVITY: Vehicle & Equipment
Page 11
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget
% Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Fuel, Maintenance & Repairs 728,000 1,225,153 676,000
Vehicle Purchases - New 555,703
Vehicle Purchases - Replacement 270,000 301,000
Equipment Purchases - New
Equipment Purchases- Replacement 220,000 228,000
Equipment Disposal Proceeds (18,000) (15,000)
Internal Recoveries (1,200,000) (1,290,152) (1,190,000)
-7.1%
-
11.5%
-
3.6%
-16.7%
-0.8%
(52,000)
31,000
8,000
3,000
10,000
Expenditure Total 876
-
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees
Reserves see above
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Municipal
Provincial
Federal
Donations/Fundraising
Private 876
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revenue Total 876
-
Net Expenditures 0
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
- 16.7%
-
-0.2
Staff FTEs- Full -time 0.9 0.8
Non -F/T
No. of vehicles 65 65
# of kms driven 975,000 975,000
Number of pieces of equipment 230 230
# hours equipment used 230,000 230,000
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Similar amount of equipment /vehicle replacements
FBS FTE Change:no changeCA's:no changeRSS portion FTE Changes: less to V &E
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Fuel Costs lowerDisposals deferred
22
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Watershed Management
ACTIVITY: WM Divisional Management
Page 12
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget
% Chq.
$ Chg.
$ $
Expenditures:
Divisional Management 217,000 230,240
Downsview Offices - Corporate 15,000 16,333
$
263,000
33,000
21%
120%
46,000
18,000
Expenditure Total 232,000 246,573
296,000
28%
64,000
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees
Reserves
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Municipal
Provincial 5,000 16,250
Federal 5,000 16,250
Donations /Fundraising
Private 4,000
10,000
10,000
-
-
-
-
-
100%
100%
-
-100%
5,000
5,000
(4,000)
Revenue Total 14,000 32,500
20,000
43%
6,000
Net Expenditures 218,000 214,073
276,000
27%
58,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
2.1 8% 0.2
0.6 - 0.6
45.2 1% 0
1.0
18,000
2,700 .
10000%
12
- -
- -
Staff FTEs- Full -time 2.0 80
Non -F/T
Total Divisional Employees managed 45.0
Facilities: # Buildings 1.0 1.00
Sq. Office area 18,000 18,000
Sq. Storage area 2,700 2,700
Sq. Roof top rental 10000% 10000%
#of different departments at Downsview 12 12
#meeting rooms - -
$ serviced ($millions) by Budgeting /accounting -
FTE Change: +.3 Admin.Assist, +.4 Director & Analyst allocated here
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA1
- accommodation requirement
Director and Financial Analysts reallocation of time to this account.Admin. Assist added
FTE Change: +.3 Admin.Assist, +.4 Director & Analyst allocated here
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
No material variances
23
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Watershed Management
ACTIVITY: Watershed Strategies
Page 13
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget
% Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Don River 213,000 267,182 183,000
-14.1%
(30,000)
Humber River 234,000 254,109 203,000
-13.2%
(31,000)
Rouge River 475,000 425,000 475,000
Highland Creek 50,000 28,759 51,000
2.0%
1,000
Etobicoke - Mimico Creek 200,000 197,604 199,000
-0.5%
(1,000)
Duffins Creek 238,000 212,118 249,000
4.6%
11,000
Oak Ridges Moraine 166,000 138,434 155,000
-6.6%
(11,000)
Waterfront Strategy 75,000 79,578 79,000
5.3%
4,000
Portion funded from Capital (15,000) (15,000)
Expenditure Total 1,636,000 1,602,783 1,579,000
-3.5%
(57,000)
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees 7,655
-
Reserves
-
CFGT - Living City
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 53,243
-
Other - Municipal
-
Other - Provincial 45,000 41,250 55,000
22.2%
10,000
Other - Federal 45,000 41,250 40,000
-11.1%
(5,000)
Other - Donations /Fundraising 475,000 425,027 475,000
Other - Private 30,000 66,786 50,000
66.7%
20,000
Revenue Total 595,000 635,212 620,000
4.2%
25,000
Net Expenditures 1,041,000 967,571 959,000
-7.9%
(82,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 9.1 xxx 8.4
-7.4%
(0.7)
Non -F/T 0.2 xxx 0.7
251.2%
0.5
# public meetings hosted 15 15 5
- 66.7%
(10)
# stakeholder /advisory meetings 9 9 24
166.7%
15
# public events hosted 4 4 27
575%
23
# technical studies 6 6 7
16.7%
1
# plans implemented 3 3 4
33.3%
1
# advisory members engaged 135 135 150
11.1%
15
# of projects underway 8 8 14
75.0%
6
# participants at public events 2,760 2,760 3760
36.2%
1,000
# ha restored .
# training days
FTE Change: -.2 Maternity leave
Malor 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Greater reliance on Revenue. Funding reallocated from Don to Highland and reduced costs
for Watershed Committees
FTE Change: -.2 Maternity leave
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Reduced Spending to address corporate operations issues. Raised Funds to offset projects
ALL
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Watershed Management
ACTIVITY: Conservation Field Centres
Page 14
2009 2009
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
Budget
% Chg.
$ Chg.
$
$
$
Expenditures:
CFC Program Management 184,000
137,167
169,000
-8.2%
(15,000)
Education Support Services 223,000
189,397
223,000
Mar. 3/08 capital moved to own page
Albion Hills 707,000
611,066
731,000
3.4%
24,000
Claremont 701,000
707,840
741,000
5.7%
40,000
Lake St. George 930,000
1,001,753
968,000
4.1%
38,000
Education Special Projects 19,000
30,056
20,000
5.3%
1,000
Food Equipment
20,675
-
Expenditure Total 2,764,000
2,697,953
2,852,000
3.2%
88,000
Funding Sources:
User Fees- Albion Hills 469,000
364,775
485,000
3.4%
16,000
Claremont 547,000
438,428
532,400
-2.7%
(14,600)
Lake St. George 790,000
638,742
812,000
2.8%
22,000
All other
116
-
Program/User fees total 1,806,000
1,442,061
1,829,400
1.3%
23,400
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 295,000
324,000
340,600
15.5%
45,600
Municipal 5,000
6,286
5,000
Provincial
19,000
-
Federal
-
Donations /Fundraising
1,200
-
Non-Government Grants
26,210
-
Revenue Total 2,106,000
1,818,758
2,175,000
3.3%
69,000
Net Expenditures 658,000
879,195
677,000
2.9%
19,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 24.4
25.7
5.1%
1.3
Non -FIT 9.7
9.9
2.6%
0.2
Facilities: # Buildings 13
20
20
53.8%
7.0
Sq. Footage 23,713
23,713
23,713
Number of Days Sold (includes weekends and summer) 697
574
651
-6.6%
(46)
Number of Student Participants 7,407
7,407
Number of Student Days Sold (Average 34.3 students /day) 23,907
19,695
22,329
-6.6%
(1,578)
Number of Teacher P. D. Participants (External) 2,000
1,920
Number of Teacher P. D. Sessions (Internal)
790
Cost /Student Day 115.6
137
127.7
10.5%
12.1
Revenue /Student Day 75.5
73
81.9
8.5%
6.4
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Cost of staff reclassifications in mid -2009 fully realized in 2010
Booking pressure at Lake St. George resulting from economy
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Reduced revenue but somewhat offset through expense savings
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Planning & Development Page 15
ACTIVITY: Development Services
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget % Chq. $ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Planning Services 941,000 881,013 916,000 -2.7% (25,000)
Planning Services- MESPs 8,739
Regulation Services 743,000 765,787 802,000 7.9% 59,000
Solicitor Realty Inquiries 17,000 38,122 - 100.0% (17,000)
Policy, Research and Special Projects
(NO CAPITAL PROJECTS NEREII) 20,000 11,659 15,000 - 25.0% (5,000)
Hearings 125,000 112,725 125,000
Environ. Assessments -Core 417,000 467,526 497,000 19.2% 80,000
York EA 621,000 654,454 606,000 -2.4% (15,000)
York Durham Sewer 90,000 61,248 69,000 -23.3% (21,000)
Expenditure Total 3,325,000 3,379,141 3,458,000 4.0% 133,000
Funding Sources:
Fees - Planning 1,417,000 1,441,006 1,514,000 6.8% 97,000
Fees - Planning MESPs 99,000 80,000 100,000 1.0% 1,000
Fees - Regulation Services 866,000 819,179 884,000 • 2.1% 18,000
Fees - Solicitor 150,000 143,440 153,000 2.0% 3,000
Fees: Core E.A. 469,000 314,305 458,000 -2.3% (11,000)
York EA 12,000 133,660 12,000
Peel EA 8,000 52,060 8,000
Brampton EA 4,000 31,040 4,000
Fees -Other (i.e. York Sewer)
MESP:BOLTON SOUTH ALBION
Program /User fees total 3,025,000 3,014,689 3,133,000 3.6% 108,000
Reserves
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Municipal 1,038,000 1,054,017 1,079,000 25.4% 41,000
Provincial
Federal
Donations /Fundraising
Non - Government Grants
Revenue Total 4,063,000 4,068,706 4,212,000 3.7% 149,000
Net Expenditures
(738,000) (689,565) (754,000) 2.2% (16,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 33.03 34.00 3.0% 1.0
Non -F/T 1.79 2.15 20.1% 0.4
Mandated Activity: - Conservation Authorities Act, Planning Act, Environmental Assessment Act
# Planning Applications new processed 450 550 22.2% 100
# Development Permit Applications receive 600 1,000 66.7% 400
# Development Applications Issured 925 850 -8.1% (75)
# Permissions for Minor Works Issued 225 - 225
# Renewals and Revisions 90 - 90
# Environment Assessments 180 75 -58.3% (105)
# Permissions for Routine Infrastructure $60 60
# Solicitor /Realty Enquiries $380 26 $550 44.7% 170
# Concept Development Inquiries $130 - 130
# Active OMB /Mining & Lands Commission $9 $10 11.1% 1
# Master Environmental Servicing Plans (CI $5 $14 180.0% 9
# Special Planning Committees $30 $30
# Official Plan Exercises $6 $5 -16.7% ($1)
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Revenues projected 7.2% higher in 2010 due to increased planning fees, service level agreements with municipalities and TTC
Expenditures projected 4% higher in 2010 due to staff costs associated with EA team restructuring
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Net expenditures were better than budget
Planning fees and Permit revenues were higher than budget
Higher expenditures in York Eas but recoverable from York Region revenues
Higher expenditures in solicitor realtors
27
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Planning & Development
ACTIVITY: Enforcement
Page 16
2009 2009
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget
2010
% Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $
Expenditures:
Enforcement 542,000 522,672
Legal 50,000 21,692
$
544,000
35,000
0.4%
- 30.0%
2,000
(15,000)
Expenditure Total 592,000 544,364
579,000
-2.2%
(13,000)
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees
Reserves
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Municipal
Provincial
Federal
Donations /Fundraising
Revenue Total
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Net Expenditures 592,000 544,364
579,000
-2.2%
# # ##
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
60
Staff FTEs- Full -time 5.0
- Non -F/T
# vehicles 4
# of permits issued 900
# Active, open permits requirin 1,500
# of violations issued 30
5.0
4
900
1,500
90
•
200.0%
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Reduced the legal budget by $15K -
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Lower legal & vehicle chargeback expenditures
28
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Ecology Page 17
ACTIVITY : Divisional Summary
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget % Chq. $ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Program Management 368,000 379,814 374,000 1.6% 6,000
Natural Heritage Management -Core 600,000 617,846 541,000 -9.8% (59,000)
NHM- Development Serv.support
Water Resources -Core 893,000 743,536 848,000 -5.0% (45,000)
58,000 64,000 10.3% 6,000
Flood Forecasting & Warning 348,000 367,128 346,000 -0.6% (2,000)
Op. & Maintenance of Dams, Channels and Water 319,000 289,802 319,000
Special Projects ' 100,000 171,891 100,000
Expenditure Total 2,686,000 2,570,017 2,592,000 -3.5% (94,000)
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees 25,000 32,805 25,000_
Reserves -
CFGT - Living City -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Municipal 25,000 25,000
Provincial 50,000 4,365 50,000
Federal 25,000 25,000
Donations /Fundraising -
Non-Government Grants -
Revenue Total 125,000 37,170 125,000
Net Expenditures 2,561,000 2,532,847 2,467,000 -3.7% (94,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 22.9 22.2 -2.9% (0.7)
Non -F/T 1.5 1.0 -30.7% (0.5)
Facilities: Sq. Footage -
# FTE's Divisional Employees managed 81.7 88.9 8.8% 7.2
Mandated Activity: Conservation Authorities Act - -
# of External Training Days Offered 30 30 -
# of Flood Warning Messages Issued 20 20 -
# of Number on high alert days ( >10mm rainfall) 40 40 -
# of of Municipal Training.Days 2 2 -
# of Media Requests 30 30 - i
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
2010 service levels will be lower than those in 2009 due to a maternity leave and an engineer position that will not be filled.
FTE Changes +1 PAIEE Intern, +.5 EMS staff, -1 Plan Eco, -2.5 Water Resources Tech, -.2 HydroG
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Savings result from charge back of staff salary to projects.
Next Page.... 19
29
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Restoration Services
ACTIVITY: Divisional Summary
Page 19
2009 2009
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
Budget
% Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $
$
Expenditures:
Program Management 377,000 379,505
359,000
-4.8%
(18,000)
Inland Fill 254,000 287,630
316,000
24.4%
62,000
Plant Propagation 508,000 (226,838)
(75,000)
- 114.8%
(583,000)
Planting Projects 495,000 329,582
500,000
1.0%
5,000
Archaeology 185,000 390,295
250,000
35.1%
65,000
Expenditure Total 1,819,000 1,160,173-
1,350,000
-25.8%
(469,000)
Funding Sources:
Inland Fill 1,088,000
836,000
- 23.2%
(252,000)
Plant Propagation 608,000
25,000
- 95.9%
(583,000)
Planting Projects 238,000
219,000
-8.0%
(19,000)
Archaeology 42,000
120,000
185.7%
78,000
Other 80,000
80,000
Program /User fees Total ' 2,056,000 800,270
1,280,000
- 37.7%
(776,000)
Reserves (534,000)
(335,000)
-37.3%
199,000
CFGT - Living City
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 16,000 29,161
5,000
-68.8%
(11,000)
Municipal 81,000 42,400
80,000
-1.2%
(1,000)
Provincial 12,000 11,111
5,000
-58.3%
(7,000)
Federal 2,000 6,351
6,000
200.0%
4,000
Donations /Fundraising •
-
Non- Government Grants 55,000 16,194
20,000
-63.6%
(35,000)
Revenue Total 1,688,000 905,488
1,061,000
-37.1%
(627,000)
Net Expenditures 131,000 254,685
289,000
120.6%
158,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 15.7
16.7
6.4%
1.0
Non -F/T 12.2
13.6
11.3%
1.4
Facilities: # Buildings 7 7
7
-
Sq. Footage 47,000 47,000
50,000
6.4%
3,000
# FTE's Divisional Employees managed 105 -
104
-1.7%
(2)
# Plants Produced 230,000 249,710
230,000
-
# Plants Planted 330,000 260,149
350,000
6.1%
20,000
# Cubic Meters of Fill 310,000 143,000
300,000
-3.2%
(10,000)
# Archaeological Project Areas 50 35
50
-
# Boyd Arch. Field School Students 21 34
40
90.5%
19
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Inland fill rev. down to economic downturn (- $185K)
Nursery expenditures lower due to internal revenues netted out
Archaeology - more projects get funding
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Lower Inland Fill revenues to slower building activity
Planting propagation activity above budget but more showing as internal
Planting activity above budget but more showing as internal
30
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY •
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Parks and Culture
ACTIVITY: Divisional Management
Page 20
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals BUDGET % CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
7,900
1,000
(33,900)
PARKS & CULTURE ADMIN. 378,100 386,000 2.1%
PARKS & CULTURE SPONSORSHIP 67 -
PARKS & CULTURE SALES 44,000 45,261 • 45,000 2.3%
PARKS & CULTURE CUSTOMER SEI 416,900 389,478 383,000 -8.1%
839,000 733,420 814,000 -3.0%
(25,000)
FUNDING SOURCES: .
User fees: 24,000 20,100 24,000
Reserves -
CFGT - Living City -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal -
Other - Provincial -
Other - Federal -
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other - Private -
24,000 20,100 24,000
NET EXPENDITURES 815,000 713,320 790,000 -3.1%
(25,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
(0.8)
(0.3)
(9.9)
(243,000)
$ (0.05)
$ (0.49)
Staff FTEs- Full -time 9.0 8.2 -9.0%
Non -F/T 0.3 - 100.0%
Total Division Employee FTE's' 165.5 155.6 (0.1)
Total Division Visitors 740,000 200,000 500,000
Total Division Revenue 6,545,000 6,110,532 6,302,000 -3.7%
Total Division CostNisitor $ 1.68 $ 3.67 $ 1.63 -3.0%
Total Division RevenueNisitor $ 13.09 $ 30.55 $ 12.60 -3.7%
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Weekend Receptionist position transferred to Black Creek $12,100
Eliminated partial year Customer Service Position
FTE Cahnge: -.3 Weekend Reception moved to BCPV, -.8 mist = -1.1
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Customer Service FT wage saving from leave of absence $10,900 and staff utilized in other programs.
31
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET- FINAL
DIVISION: Parks & Culture Division
ACTIVITY: Conservation Areas
Page 21
2009 2009
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
Budget
% Chg.
$ Chg.
$ $
$
Expenditures: _
General Operations 100,000
85,489
100,000
West Zone
-
West Zone Administration 88,000
76,255
89,000
1.1%
1,000
Albion Hills 813,900
777,312
802,000
-1.5%
(11,900)
Glen Haffy 197,000
195,063
204,000
3.6%
7,000
Indian Line 504,000
464,532
462,000
-8.3%
(42,000)
Boyd 252,000
247,373
247,000
-2.0%
(5,000)
Heart Lake 338,000
302,358
353,000
4.4%
15,000
East Zone
-
East Zone Administration 88,000
55,344
90,000
2.3%
2,000
Bruce's Mill 412,000
. 523,746
385,000
-6.6%
(27,000)
Petticoat Creek 459,100
493,695
199,000
-56.7%
(260,100)
Land Management
-
East Zone' 127,000
106,886
124,000
-2.4%
(3,000)
West Zone. 182,000
56,633
174,000
-4.4%
(8,000)
63,490
-
Major Maintenance 25,000
25,000
25,000
Expenditure Total 3,586,000
3,473,175
3,254,000
-9.3%
(332,000)
Funding Sources:
User Fees - Bruce's Mill 453,800
521,767
501,000
10.4%
47,200
User Fees - Petticoat Creek 533,000
423,289
141,000
-73.5%
(392,000)
User Fees -Heart Lake 400,400
301,958
400,000
-0.1%
(400)
User Fees - Albion Hills 1,005,000
794,101
1,005,000
User Fees -Glen Haffy 175,500
147,270
176,000
0.3%
500
User Fees - Indian Line 728,200
628,135
728,000
0.0%
(200)
User Fees -Boyd 320,100
261,111
320,000
0.0%
(100)
User Fees - Rentals /Other
22,190
-
User Fees Total 3,616,000
3,099,819
3,271,000
-9.5%
(345,000)
Reserves' 5,000 , ,
5,000
CFGT - Living City
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
40,177
-
Municipal
-
Provincial
-
Federal
36,331
-
Donations/Fundraising
2,607
-
Private
66,687
-
Revenue Total 3,621,000 r
-
Net Expenditures (35,000)
227,554
(22,000)
-37.1 %
13,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
•
Staff FTEs- Full -time 12.9
10.86
-15.6%
(2.0)
Non -F/T 32.3
27.155
-15.9%
(5.1)
Facilities: # Buildings 20
20
20
-
Acres Managed 12,000
12,000
12,000
-
Operations' Days of 240
240
240
-
Number of Visitors 500,000
411,641
500,000
-
CostNisitor $ 7.17 $
8.44
$ 6.51
-9.3%
(1)
RevenueNisitor $ 7.23 $
7.53
$ 6.54
-9.5%
(1)
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economi
Petticoat Creek revenue and expditures reduced to reflect pool closure.
Reduced two full time positions.
Utilities and V &E increased 4%
Same revenues projected in 2010
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Expenditures'
Numerous cost constraints to deal with revenue shortfall.
Revenue.
Attendance and revenue below budget due to poor weather
Maple Syrup program revenue up.
Unrealized swimming revenue for Albion Hills.
A
Education revenue down. ri -J
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET- FINAL
DIVISION: Parks and Culture
ACTIVITY: Kortright Centre for Conservation
Page 22
- 2009 2009 2010
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals BUDGET
%CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
ADMINISTRATION 86,100 67,128 83,000
-3.6%
(3,100)
GROUNDS 115,100 136,837 123,000
6.9%
7,900
BUILDINGS 177,000 191,173 187,000
5 6%
10,000
LIVING MACHINE 7,200 - 3,219 9,000
25.0%
1,800
GENERAL PROGRAM 52,300 47,267 61,000
16.6%
8,700
DAY USE 94,900 63,125 107,000
12.8%
12,100
PUBLIC PROGRAMS 34,600 15,810 37,000
6.9%
2,400
EDUCATION PROGRAMS 322,400 297,943 333,000
3 3%
10,600
KCC EDUCATION PROG.DEVELOPMENT 1,294
-
CAFE 70,300 101,852 72,000
24%
1,700
GIFT SHOP 104,600 116,093 107,000
2.3%
2,400
CAFE - MAPLE SYRUP 39,900 57,853 41,000
2.8%
1,100
CORPORATE FUNCTIONS 25,700 91,587 58,000
125.7%
GIFT SHOP - MAPLE SYRUP 75,000 95,001 76,000
1 3%
SUSTAINABLE HOUSE OP /PROGRAM 13,635
PUBLIC MAPLE SYRUP 67,900 82,493 74,000
9 0%
MAPLE SYRUP EDUCATION 56,400 56,102 52,000
-7.8%
ENERGY WORKSHOPS 22,800 42,091 23,000
0.9%
200
CORPORATE PROGRAMS 267
COMMERCIAL FILMING 3,500 4,000
14.3%
KITE FESTIVAL (229)
-
WEDDINGS 167,000 175,075 182,000
9.0%
DAY CAMPS 33,000 - 26,374 34,000
3.0%
KORTRIGHT FOOD RESRVE ACTIVITY (11,846)
-
Marketing 37,300 42,239 38,000
1.9%
700
Expenditure Total 1,593,000 1,712,382 1,701,000
6.8%
108,000
Funding Sources:
User fees by program Component:
PUBLIC PROGRAMS 53,300 30,289 53,000
-0 6%
(300)
EDUCATION PROGRAMS 441,400 300,989 332,000
-24.8%
(109,400)
CAFE 33,500 38,931 33,000
-1 5%
(500)
GIFT SHOP 87,000 66,091 87,000
ALL MAPLE SYRUP 340,400 410,990 341,000
. 0.2%
600
WEDDINGS 250,000 282,729 350,000
400%
100,000
CORPORATE FUNCTIONS 60,000 90,899 104,000
73 3%
44,000
ENERGY WORKSHOPS 45,500 137,941 71,000
56.0%
25,500
SUSTAINABLE HOUSE OP /PROGRAM 4,777 33,000
-
33,000
DAY CAMPS 50,000 41,750 50,000
ALL OTHER USER FEES 11,600 8,522 12,000
3.4%
400
Total User Fees 1,444,000 1,480,416 1,537,000
145.7%
93,000
Reserves
-
CFGT - Living City
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 55,708
-
Municipal
-
Provincial
-
Federal 5,339
-
Donations/Fundraising 11,131
-
Private
-
Revenue Total 1,444,000 1,552,594 1,537,000
6 4%
93,000
Net Expenditures 149,000 159,787 164,000
10.1%
15,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA/VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 6 0 7.1
17 2%
1 0
Non -F/T 14 2 13 6
-4 2%
(0 6)
Facilities # Buildings 20 20 20
Acres Managed 20,000 20,000 20,000
Operations Days of - 240 240 240
Number of Public Program Visitors 45,000 45,000 45,000
Number of Education Visitors 130,000 79,022 130,000
Cost/Visitor $ 12 25 $ 21,67 $ 13.08
6 8%
$ 0 83
RevenueNisitor $ 11 11 $ 19.65 $ 11.82
6 4%
$ 0 72
Malor 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Superintendent position 100% in Kortright Budget from 50% in Boyd.
Energy & V &E increased 4%
Revenue & expenditures adjustments to Education, Coroporate, Energy and Wedding programs in line with 2009 actuais
FTE Change + 3 of Boyd Super moved to KCC, + 4 Corporate Events Food staff, - 4 Energy Prog = +.4
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
•
Expenditures
Increase revenue & expenditures for Corporate and Energy programs
Reduced education expeditures to offset lower revenue
Revenue
Increase revenue & expenditures for Corporate and Energy programs.
Unrealized education revenue due to lower attendance
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Parks and Culture
ACTIVITY: Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Page 23
2009 2009
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
BUDGET
% CHG. $ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
490,000
363,000
148,000
111,000
61,000
297,000
1.6%
-0.7%
-2.9%
2.6%
9.7%
-0.1%
7,800
(2,400)
(4,400)
2,800
5,400
(200)
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE -
ADMINISTRATION 482,200 495,613
Oak Ridges Corridor Park 365,400 366,977
Golf Course:General
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE - PRO SHOP 152,400 149,614
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE - SNACK BAR 108,200 106,861
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE - DRIVING 55,600 56,290
OAK RIDGES PARK 297,200 272,377
1,461,000 1,447,731
1,470,000
0.6%
9,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
User fees by program Component: (0)
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE - PRO SHOP 940,000 935,131
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE - SNACK BAR 110,000 108,329
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE - DRIVING RANGE 240,000 216,373 •
OAK RIDGES PARK
940,000
110,000
240,000
User fees Total 1,290,000 1,259,833
1,290,000
Reserves
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial 171,000 171,000
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Private 7,186
180,000
5.3%
9,000
1,461,000 1,438,019
1,470,000
0.6%
9,000
NET EXPENDITURES • 9,713
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
5.0
11.5
5
20,000
240
55,000
$21.33
$23.45
-9.5%
0.6%
0.8%
(1)
0
-
-
-
-
$0.17
Staff FTEs- Full -time 5.6
Non -F/T 11.4
Facilities: # Buildings 5 5
Acres Managed 20,000 20,000
Operations: Days of 240 240
Number of Visitors 55,000 22,983
CostNisitor excluding Park) $21.16 $51.14
RevenueNisitor $23.45 $54.82
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to ecoi
Same service level in 2010
Increased green fees and rental fees.
FTE Change: -.5 Proj Manager not filled '
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Expenditures reduced to offset revenue shortfall.
34
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Parks and Culture
ACTIVITY: Black Creek Pioneer Village
Page 24
2009 2009 2010
Budget ec.YTD Actua Budqet % Chq.
$ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Program Management 254,200 213,302 247,000 -2.8%
(7,200)
Curatorial 265,400 356,472 272,000 2.5%
6,600
Photography -
Interpretative Programming 1,392,300 1,334,251 1,304,000 -6.3%
(88,300)
Special Events 111,800 ' 60,409 88,000 -21.3%
(23,800)
Heritage Education 272,900 277,170 330,000 20.9%
57,100
Building Maintenance 1,191,000 1,086,168 1,213,000 1.8%
22,000
Admissions 188,300 185,614 191,000 1.4%
2,700
Giftshop 410,300 411,113 384,000 -6.4%
(26,300)
Marketing and Sponsorships 202,800 165,311 203,000 0.1%
200
New: Brewery Operations 237,377 117,000 -
117,000
Expenditure Total 4,289,000 4,327,640 4,349,000 1.4%
60,000
Funding Sources:
Curatorial 5,000 16,103 5,000
Photography 50,000 63,645 50,000
Interpretative Programming 2,600 51,758 17,000 553.8%
14,400
Special Events 90,000 80,901 90,000
Heritage Education 526,000 487,131 526,000
Admissions 644,400 516,970 654,000 1.5%
9,600
Parking 420,000 308,556 420,000
Giftshop 465,000 435,344 470,000 1.1%
5,000
New: Brewery Operations 21,325 73,000 -
73,000
Other 736 -
Program /User fees Total 2,203,000 1,982,469 2,305,000 4.6%
102,000
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough 82,166 -
Municipal 1,036 -
Provincial 221,000 263,091 221,000
Federal 39,422
Donations /Fundraising 8,000 (2,878) 8,000
Private 15,000 14,376 - 100.0%
(15,000)
Revenue Total 2,447,000 2,379,681 2,534,000 3.6%
87,000
Net Expenditures 1,842,000 1,947,959 1,815,000 -1.5%
(27,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 17.5 n/a 17.4 -0.9%
-0.2
Non -F/T 42.2 n/a 39.5 -6.4%
-2.7
Facilities: # Buildings 50 50 50
-
Sq. Footage 170,000 170,000 170,000
-
Site Hectares 31 31 31
-
Operations: Days of 250 250 246 -1.6%
(4)
Number of Non - paying Visitors 30,000 32,000 6.7%
2,000
Total number of visitors 110,000 87,744 145,000 31.8%
35,000
Cost /visitor $ 38.99 $ 49.32 $ 29.99 - 23.1%
$ (9.00)
Revenue per visitor $ 20.03 $ 22.59 $ 15.90 -20.6%
$ (4.13)
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Downsized operation (6 positions) with minimum reduction of service level
+.4 Weekend Reception, +.4 Ed Program. -2.4 Interpreters, -1.2 Gift Shop = -2.9
Revised education program to increase audience, extend season, and market more aggressively
Addition of March Break & Brewery within existing budget envelope
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Revenue shortfalls in parking, education, brewery, closure Dec. 24 - 31 .
Expenditure increases in brewery lease, and unanticipated educatitiaff reclassification
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Parks and Culture
ACTIVITY: Food Services
Page 25
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals • Budget
% Chg.
$ Chq.
$ $ $
Weddrngs: Sales Costs & Revenue 229,200 168,407 196,000
-14.5%
(33,200)
Corporate Events: Sales Costs /Revenue 552,000 456,476 455,000
-17.6%
(97,000)
Banquet Costs & Internal Functions 155,000 140,406 141,000
-9.0%
(14,000)
Visitor Services 143,000 176,098 153,000
7.0%
10,000
Equipment 31,988
Marketing 40,000 37,595 40,000
Adjust for Internal charges (85,200) (115,000)
35.0%
(29,800)
FOOD: CENTRAL PURCHASING 37,598 -
Internal Revenue
Expenditure Total 1,034,000 1,048,568 870,000
-15.9%
(164,000)
Funding Sources:
Weddings 232,700 173,342 253,000
8.7%
20,300
Corporate Events 719,600 416,979 530,100
-26.3%
(189,500)
Internal 2,100 128,554 2,900
38.1%
800
Visitor Services- Brew Pub 53,000 130,200 117,000
120.8%
64,000
Pavillion BBQ 73,600 53,893 61,000
-17.1%
(12,600)
March Break Maple Syrup 16,789
Mothers Day 2,517
Brewery Events 641
Thanksgiving 1,264
Other (Rides etc) 18,090
Total Program /User fees 1,081,000 942,270 964,000
-10.8%
(117,000)
Reserves
CFGT - Living City
CFGT - Flowthrough
Municipal
Provincial
Federal
Donations /Fundraising
Non - Government Grants 1,000
Revenue Total 1,081,000 943,270 964,000
-10.8%
(117,000)
Net Expenditures (47,000) 105,297 (94,000)
100.0%
(47,000)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 4.6 3.7
-20.7%
(1.0)
Non -F/T 8.3 7.3
-11.5%
(1.0)
Facilities: Sq. Footage 3 3 3
-
Operations: Days of 240 240 240
-
Number of Clients- Weddings 93,000 45,000 93,000
-
Number of Clients- Corporate / Internal 93,000 45,000 93,000
-
Number of Clients- Visitor Service 93,000 45,000 93,000
-
Cost/Visitor $ 11.12 $ 23.30 $ 9.35
-15.9%
$ (1.76)
RevenueNisitor $ 11.62 $ 20.94 $ 10.37
-10.8%
$ (1.26)
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
Corporate revenue & expenditures budget reduced in line with actuals.
Cook & wait staff reduced to expected volume
Additonal Revenue & Expenditures for Halfway House / Brew Pub
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Expenditure constraints to offset reduced revenue in corporate and wedding programs.
Increased revenue & expenditures for brewery operation.
36
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 OPERATING BUDGET - FINAL
DIVISION: Office of the CAO Page 26
ACTIVITY: CAO Programs
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget % Chq. $ Chq.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Corporate Management 503,000 501,171 587,000 16.7% 84,000
Corporate Secretariat 416,000 470,506 437,000 5.0% 21,000
Human Resources 556,000 529,213 489,000 - 12.1% (67,000)
Corporate Communications 1,316,000 1,224,582 1,335,000 1.4% 19,000
Professional Access 366,000 337,197 450,000 23.0% 84,000
Expenditure Total 3,157,000 3,062,669 3,298,000 4.5% 141,000
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees 2,083 - . •
Reserves -
Interest Earnings 337 -
CFGT - Flowthrough 22,000 25,000 - 100.0% (22,000)
Municipal -
Provincial 338,700 320,359 379,000 11.9% 40,300
Federal 27,300 16,766 4,000 - 85.3% (23,300)
Donations /Fundraising -
Non-Government Grants 2,000 - 2,000
Revenue Total 388,000 364,544 385,000 -0.8% (3,000)
Net Expenditures 2,769,000 2,698,125 2,913,000 5.2% 144,000
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time, 22.1 - 22.7 3.1% 0.7
Non -F/T 5.0 - 5.5 9.8% 0.5
Authority Members 28.0 - 28.0 -
HR: # of employees (ft & pt) support 1,000 1,094 1,100 10.0% 100
Staff Turnover (Regrettable Losses) 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% - -
Average Sick Days 5.13 5.13 5.13 - -
Monthly Website Visits 55,000 54,486 55,000 -
PAIE Participants 45 , 45 45 -
Environmental Volunteer Network 2,000 2,000 2,000 -
Mentors 8 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 -
Comments:
Major 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors2:
Events budget moved from Corporate Communications to Corporate Management.
Increase in HR and Corporate Communications FTE's to support growth in programs.
+ .6 HR mat leave returns,.4 HR
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCES
Legal fees will exceed budget by at least $81,000, which is partially recovered by lower than expected member remuneration costs.
HR and Communications budgets expected to have savings due to curtailing costs in the last quarter.
37
SECTION 3
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
38
Page 28
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 FINAL CAPITAL BUDGET - SUMMARY
MONITORING AND REPORTING
WATERSHED PLANNING
Peel Water Management
York Water Management
Durham Water Management
Water Management only portion of Toronto Remedial Action
Plan Project
Water Cost Centres
Source Protection Planning
Floodplain Mapping Program
York /Peel /Durham /Toronto Groundwater
Terrestrial Natural Heritage
REGENERATION
Toronto Remedial Action Plan Project- Regeneration items
Peel Natural Heritage Project
York Natural Heritage Project
Durham Natural Heritage Project
Regeneration Cost Centres
Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Projects
Other Erosion Control Projects
City of Toronto Waterfront Project
Region Of Durham Waterfront Project
Waterfront Revitilization Corporation Projects -
Humber Bay Shores Waterfront Park
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
Stewardship
Education
Sustainable Technologies
PEEL CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION PROJECT
Page 2009 2009 2010 10 / 09 10 / 09
# BUDGET* Actuals BUDGET % Chg. $ Chg.
Page 31 1,174,000 1,243,328 1,368,000 16.5%
2010 over 2009 Notes
Additional funding in 2010 is required to support the update and
194,000 maintenance of monitoring equipment and to facilitate additional
Page 32 326,000 280,625 255,500 -21.6% (70,500)
Page 33 485,000 338,406 518,000 6.8% 33,000
Page 34 255,000 170,816 270,000 5 9% 15,000
Page 34b 393,000 217,202 448,000 14.0% 55,000
Page 35 403,000 587,001 474,700 17 8% 71,700
Page 35b 1,677.000 2,918,370 2,082,000 24 2% 405,000
Page 36 307,000 223,391 375,000 22.1% 68,000
Page 37 776,000 564,061 712,000 -8.2% (64,000)
Less Watershed Plan Intergration work because nearing
completion.2010 revenues and level of service will be the same as
The increase in the 2010 budget is due to anticipated completion
of the 3 Assessment Reports and the corresponding public
2010 revenues and level of service same as 2009. Carry over from
2009 to complete mapping in 2010.
Page 38 497,000 452,230 644,000 29.6% 147,000 2010 funding is at the same level as 2009, service levels will also
remain the same as in 2010.
Page 39 720,000 493,971 721,000 0.1% 1,000 Lower Toronto Capital funds for projects
Page 40 1,259,000 988,209 1,259,000
Page 41 597,000 605,579 646,000 8 2%
Page 42 221,000 432,283 760,000 243.9%
Page 42b 1,597,000 3,173,406 2,463,000 54.2% 866,000
Page43 3,110,000 2,414,751 4,024,000 29.4% 914,000
Page44 239,000 245,756 265,000 10.9% 26,000
- Lower Peel funding
49,000 Maintained 2009 level of York funding
539,000
Page 45 1,970,000 1,179,246 2,783,000 41.3% 813,000
Maintained same level of funding in 2010 from York and Peel
Regions$2k increase in funding from Durham RegionPotential
partnership protect in York Region at the Toronto Ladies Golf Club
Pursuing more non levy funding eg DFO
Page 46 252,000 434,675 299,000 18.7% 47,000 Maintained 2009 level of funding from Region of Durham
Page 47 12,649,000 3,940.348 11,884,300 -6.0% (764,700)
Page 48 3,000,000 1,250,435 100,000 -96.7%
Page49 818,000 835,871 1,158,000 41.6% 340,000
Page 49b 298,000 453,395 337,000 13 1% 39,000
Page 50 1,061,000 787,164 1,436,000 35.3% 375,000
Page 51 6,908,000 5,961,243 6,898,300 -0 1% (9,700)
Community Transformation Partnerships Page 49c 1,130,000 812,057 2,168,000 91.9% 1,038,000
Continued mediation and expropriation costs
New in 2010 is Peel Climate Change program of $90K for Humber
StewardshipNew MOE funding for Early Actions Projects of
Slightly lower funding requested in 2009 and no carryforward.We
are in the process of submitting grant funding proposals to
2010 service levels should be the same as 2009. 2010 revenues
will be on par with 2009.Additional funding for 2010 Evaluation of
Peel approves more 2010 $ New projects are West Humber
Stewardship and Kennedy Valley Restoration
Page 29
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
2010 FINAL CAPITAL BUDGET - SUMMARY
FLOOD PROTECTION
Lower Don
Other Flood Control Projects
INFRASTRUCTURE
Public Use Infrastructure
Other Facilities Retrofits
Heart Lake & Petticoat Crekk Pools
Living City Centre Design /Build
Nursery Relocation / Boyd Workshop
Kortright Archetype House
Oak Ridges Moraine Corridor Park
BCPV Retrofit and Attraction Development
Information Technology Project
Major Facilities Retrofits
REGIONAL OPEN SPACE
Waterfront Open Space
Acquisition - Greenspace Strategy
Natural Areas Protection
Peel, York Land Care Projs.& ORC Repairs
Expenditure total
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Non - Government Grants
Lease Revenue
Land Sale Proceeds
Revenue total
Net Expenditures
Provincial Transfer Payments
Municipal Levy:
Peel
York
Durham
I oronto
Adjala/Tos
sub -total Current Year Approved
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/Tos
sub -total Carryforward
Levy Total
Page
Page 52
Page 53
2,009
BUDGET
$
1,714,000
1,450,000
Page 54 449,000
Page 55 981,000
Page 57
Page 57 933,600
Page 57
Page 57 46,400
Page 59 669,000
Page 60 361,000
Page 61 400,000
Page 62 1,220,000
Page 63
Page 63
Page 63
Page 63
2,009 2,010 10 / 09 10 / 09
Actuals BUDGET % Chq. $ Chq.
$ $
1,175,233 1,490,000 -13.1%
418,484 1,860,000 28.3%
2010 over2009 Notes
(224,000)
410,000 2009 carry over due to lack of staff to complete works Level of
service will increase in 2010 due to new technician position.
398,315 409,000 -8 9% (40,000)
1,171.719 457,200 -53.4% (523,800) Peel Campground Budget & Carryforward - AH Aquatic Facility No
New project for 2010 with Federal and other revenue
126.366 1,204,000 29.0% 270,400 Proceeding slowly as funding permits.
148,893
254,262 -100 0% (46,400) Finished Project
263,035 453,000 -32 3% (216,000) Continue to implement park development plans
331,179 632,000 751% 271,000
409,601 605,000 51.3%
234,878 1,893.000 55.2% 673,000
500,000 5,917 500,000
4,750,000 2,565,361 4,750,000
1,489,000 1,374,670 2,222,000 49 2% 733,000
57,235,000 39,967,720 65,449,000 14.4% 8.214,000
1,512,000 3,640,740
250,000 190,679
30.651
495,500 658.554
6,663,500 2,975,665
4,942,300 5.476.362
1,057,200 1,438,033
540,000 173,016
16,553,500 6,665,335
850.000 25,000
4,299,000
1,659,000
406,000
5,063,783
5,513,000
2,733,000
500,000
17,178,300
850,000
184.3% 2,787,000
563.6% 1,409,000
-18.1% (89,500)
-24.0% (1,599,717)
11 5% 570.700
158.5% 1,675,800
-7.4% (40,000)
3.8% 624,800
32,864,000 21,274,034 38,202,083 16.2% 5,338,083
24,371,000 18,693,687 27,246,917 11.8% 2,875,917
10,214,780
2,424,832
878,800
6,304,305
283
19,823,000
2,520,199
809,702
271.805
1,546,243
51
5,148,000
24,971,000
10,169.166
2,391,826
878.806
6,268,000
282
19,708,080
684,460
(281,462)
(70,136)
(1,163,765)
(93)
(830,996)
18,877,084
10,678,000
3,178,085
896,369
6,506,000
303
21,258,757
2,170,321
1,131,988
342,541
2,943,147
163
6,588,160
27,846,917
(Surplus) / Deficit (600,000) (183,397) (600,000)
4.5% 463,220
31.1% 753,253
2.0% 17,569
3 2% 201,695
7.1% 20
7.2% 1,435,757
-13 9% (349,878)
39.8% 322,286
26.0% 70,736
90.3% 1,396,904
219.6% 112
28.0% 1,440,160
11.5% 2,875,917
Some Special Projects moved from Operating to Capital in 2009
Pool Construction funded internally
Some Special Projects moved from Operating to Capital in 2009
Provincial Infrastructure $ for pool construction
Federal Infrastructure $ for pool construction
Less land acquisition funded from donations.
TWRC projects & Toronto Parks
PROJECT &
- MUNICIPAUTY
GREENSPACE LAND ACO. / LAND CAFIE
APPORTIONMENT
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
OF 2009 CAPITAL AND PROJECT LEVIES
ADJALA- TOTAL
TOSO- LEVY
RONTIO DURHAM TORONTO MONO PEEL YORK INVOICED
6 $ & $ $ 6 6
LEVIES
ON
HAND
TOTAL
LEVY
BUDGET
6
OTHER
FUNDING
6
Page 30
' TOTAL
COST
6
9
3,582 80,000
11
1,684,000
441,015
2,209,217
53,000
2,262,217
5,809,783
8,072,000
WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECTS
171,000 1,454,000
_
1,625,000
527,000
2,152,000
930,000
3,082,000
13,374,300 .
T.W.R.C. PROJECTS
13,374,300
HUMBER BAY PARK
100,000
100,000
VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION / EROSION
12,000 1,480,000
130,000
130,000
1,752,000
246,000
1,998,000
2,291,000
4,289,000
PEEL CUMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
NATURAL HERITAGE / RA.P.
158,000 423,000
5,325,000
5,325,000
1,208,000
650,000
6,593,000
2,587,000
365,300
6,898,300
929,000
427,000
1,937,000
3262,000
5,849,000
WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
162,000 280,000
175,000
368,000
985,000
431,000
506,500
1,491,500
477,000
2,556,700
4,048,200
STEWARDSHIP
40,000 157,000
159,000
75,000
46,000
681,000
1,158,000
EDUCATION
5,000 85,000
148,000
55,000
293,000
18,000
309,000
28,000
337,000
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNTRES / TECH./CTP
331,000
301,000
158,000
790,000
265,000
1,055,000
2,549,000
3,604,000
FLOOD WARNING / WORKS
'
43,000 180,000
225,000
175,000
603,000
873,000
1,476,000
384,000
' 1,880,000
INMOODPLAIN MAPPING
20,000 50,000
165,000
80,000
295,000
80,000
375,000
375,000
"#GIONAL MONITORING
65,000 300,000
355,000
315,000
1,035,000
43,000
1,078,000
290,000
1,368,000
GROUNDWATER STRATEGIES
125,000 125,000
125,000
125,000
5043,000
212,000
712,000
712,000
TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE
50,000 100,000 ,
190,000
127,000
467,000
467,000
177,000
644,000
PUBLIC USE INFRASTRUCTURE
24
8,950 198,000
26
41,000
59,000
307,000
1,000
308,000
101,000
409,000
UVING CRY CENTRE
24
207,000
26
250,000
457,050
746,950
1,204,000
1,204,000
OTHER PUBUC USE RETRO.
600,000
600,000
-142,800-
_ 457,200
5,078,000
5,535,200
INFO. TECHNOLOGY ACC).
31
11,941 264,000
35
46,000
78,716
400,723
204,277
665,000
605,000
MAJOR FACILITIES RETROFIT
55
20,896 462,000
62
80,000
333,754
896,767
996,233
1,893,000
1,893,000
BCPV DEVELOPMENT & RETROFIT
2010 TOTAL
2009 TOTAL
350,000
350,000
57,000
407,000
225,000
632,000
143
896,369 6 506 000
160
10,678 000
3 178 085
21 58 757
6,588,160.
2 846 917
38,202,083
6 04 000
148
878,800 6,264,305
135
10,183,780
2,391,832
19,719,000
5,135,000
24,854,000
32,881,000
57,735,000
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION:
. GROUP:
ACTIVITY:
Watershed Management
Capital
Regional Monitoring Program
Page 31
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
.
$ CHG.
$ $
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Project Management
143,000 120,180
248,000
73%
105,000
Aquatic
413,000 399,265
414,000
0%
1,000
Terrestrial
125,000 124,375
137,000
10%
12,000
Water Quality
173,000 152,138
175,000
1%
2,000
Flow & Precipitation
139,000 130,849
143,000
3%
4,000
GIS & Database
15,000 20,706
20,000
33%
5,000
West Nile Virus Monitoring
70,000 43,673
58,000
-17%
(12,000)
New: Fixed Plot Monitoring
No activity
40,000
40,000
Other related Special Projects
-
-
SEATON MONITORING (OLD 118 -41)
-
-
Groundwater / Well Installations
35,000 34,458
39,000
11%
4,000
SP:NETWORK PLANNING WORKSHOP
-
-
RAP MOU:SHOREBIRDS HABITAT
723
-
-
Moe West Nile Virus Monitoring
59,008
8,000
8,000
SP:MNR - Stream Training
15,124
-
-
SP. MOE Bethic Algal Assessment
61,000 71,869
69,000
13%
8,000
SP: Duffins Heights Monitoring
-
-
SP: Nobleton Phosphorous Offset
15,607
29,000
•
29,000
SP:CALEDON EAST WATER TAKING
12,457
1,174,000 1,243,328
-
-
-
FUNDING SOURCES:
-
-
Program/User fees
3,000 51,218
2,500
-17%
(500)
Reserves
-
-
Interest Earnings
-
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
500 3,200
-
-100%
(500)
Other - Municipal
2,500
9,000
260%
6,500
Other - Provincial
134,800 233,188
164,500
22%
29,700
Other - Federal •
78,700 59,414
53,000
-33%
(25,700)
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
-
Other - Non - Government Grants
10,500 (3,089)
61,000
481 %
50,500
230,000 343,931
290,000
26%
60,000
Capital levy
-
-
Peel
300,000 300,000
355,000
-
York
300,000 300,000
315,000
-
Durham
60,000 60,000
65,000
-
Toronto
284,000 284,000
300,000
-
Adjala / Mono
-
-
Carryforward levy -Peel
(8,875)
15,000
-
York
(8,875)
15,000
-
Durham
(8,875)
4,000
-
Toronto
(8,875)
9,000
-
Adjala / Mono
-
-
Deficit / (Surplus)
(9,102)
-
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time
10 xxx
8
-
-
Non-F/T
# of WNV Sites Monitored
45
45
-
-
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Additional funding in 2010 is required to support the update and maintenance of monitoring equipment
and to facilitate additional monitoring sites. Tr
NOTES: .2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Substantial difference in projected year end expenses
due to the addition of several large projects /partnerships with MOE ( WNV and Sportfish Contan
42
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Peel Water Management
Page 32
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
2009
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$
186,000
48,000
(3,000)
95,000
$
157,034
34,000
89,591
$
81,000
(24,500)
51,000
148,000
-56%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6%
-
-100%
-
-
56%
-
-
-
(105,000)
(24,500)
3,000
3,000
53,000
Planning/ Integration Project Management - Subwatersheds
Planning/ Integration Humber proj.Management
Water Budget Peel
Water Budget Low Flow
Water Budget Permits to take Water
Water Budget. Humber
Surface Flow: Regulation,Lines SEE FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROJECT
Surface Flow. Hydrology Model
Other Watershed Erosion Monitoring & Maintenance
Other Natural Channel Design (from Peel under Monitor ask)
Aquatic Subwaterhed Planning
Aquatic Ripanan Zone
Aquatic Thermal Conditions
Aquatic Fish Plan
Aquatic Evaluating Conditions
Surface Flow. Fluvial Geomorphology -DUPLICATE SEE LINE 940 BELOW
Aquatic - Modelling & Evaluation
Aquatic: Aquatic Systems Prionty Planning
Terrestnal: Component
Clmate Change
Clmate Change
Genenc Template re. source protection
Source Protection
Regulation Line mapping Update Funding (120- 12,14,19)
Unreconciled
Groundwater Groundwater Quality Assessment
Internal contributions
326,000
280,625
255,500
-22%
(70,500)
FUNDING SOURCES:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Program/User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Govemment Grants
Internal
TBD 2
Capital levy
255,000
71,000
255,000
29,625
175,000
80,500
-31%
-
-
-
13%
-
(80,000)
9,500
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adlala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
(4,000)
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
xxx
132
557%
41%
132
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
# of Reg Maps under review
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
l
43
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: - Watershed Management Page 33
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: York Water Management
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Clmate Change Adaptation /Research 25,000.00 19,975 59 52,000
Planning/ Integration Protect Management 76,000 67,943 39,000 -0.49 (37,000)
Aquatic Resource Study Report Preparation -
Other Report Cards -
Other Report Cards -
Groundwater Flow Model Deveolpment 13,000 13,806 -1 00 (13,000)
Groundwater Quality Assessment -
Surface WO* Natural Channel Design -
Surface WO Natural Channel Design -
Surface Water Surface Water Quality - Don -
Surface Water - Stormwater Retrofit - Don -
Surface Flow Regulation Lines 110,000 101,554 144,000 0 31 34,000
Headwaters Drainage Study 10,000 10,000 40,000
Water Budget Permits to take Water -
Aquatic Land Use impact Model -
Aquatic Fish Plan -
Sustainable Neighbourhood. Retrofit 135,000 71,651 194,000 0.44 59,000
Sustainable Greenfields Development 50,000 -1 00 (50,000)
Surface Water Cr Rural Water 0 13,000 113 13,000
Terrestrial Historical Wetlands -
Terrestrial Component
Planning/ Integration. Humber prot.Management -
Groundwater 04 Humber -
Surtace Water Humber Study -
Surface Water 0 Rouge SW Retrofit Opprtunites -
Surface Water 0 Humber SW Retrofit Opportunities -
Duplicate Aquatic Watershed Planning -
Aquatic All 53,000 53,363 36,000 -0.32 (17,000)
Aquatic Riparian Zone -
Aquatic. Fish Habitat Survey -
Aquatic: Modelling & Evaluation -
YRK SUST COMM/TECHFUNDS c41604 -
485,000 338,406 518,000 0.07 33,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees -
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal -
Other - Provincial -
Other - Federal -
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other - Non - Government Grants -
TBD 1 . -
TBD 2 -
Capital levy
Peel -
York 295,000 295,000 368,000 0.25 73,000
Durham -
Toronto -
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel -
York 190,000 43,406 150,000 -0.21 (40,000)
Durham - -
Toronto -
Adjala / Mono -
Deficit / (Surplus) -
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time •
Non -F/T xxx
MAIN DELIVERABLE #1 i.e. Base Monitoring Points 240 • 240 240 240
Completion 1 1 1 1
MAIN DELIVERABLE #2' i.e. Expand West Nile points 100 80 240 240
Completion 1 1 1 1
MAIN DELIVERABLE #3 i.e Base Monitoring Points 240 240 240 240
Completion 1 1 00
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Headwaters - Increase in funding for 2010 plus additional funding from other sources will be used to undertake additional research and the monitoring of more sites
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
The majority of the major over expenditures is offset by additional funding received during the year.
Anticipated net expenditures will balance, with some CF's into 2010 for continuing deliverables
44
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Durham Water Management
Page 34
2009
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
95
24,362
52,934
19,034
76,993
37,398
(40,000)
$
15,000
30,000
40,000
12,000
7,000
86,000
30,000
50,000
-
-
-
-44%
-22%
20%
-
-
-
-
-
-17%
-
-
100%
-
-
-
(24,000)
(11,000)
2,000
(17,000)
15,000
50,000
Groundwater: Durham Integrated Groundwater PI,122 -40
Groundwater. Durham Study
Source Protection (including Integrated Plan) 122 -42
Surface Flow Sediment = Fluvial Geomorphology 122-43
Surface Water Q. SW Retrofit Opprtunites (THERE 15122-44 15,000
Report Cards & other projects 122 -45 54,000
Surface Flow Stream Gauges 122 -46 51,000
Aquatic Durham Fish Plan 122 -47 10,000
Water Budget Carruthers 122 -48
Surface Flow Hydrology Model 122 -49
Water Budget Low Flow Measurements 122 -52
Water Budget Permits to take Water 122 -53
Planning/ Integrations Duff /Carr Generic Reg Policy
Flood Warning Systems & Flood Control Capital 122 -55 7,000
Regulation Line Mapping Update 122 -56 103,000
Surface•Natural Channel Design 122 -57
Fr Bay Stormw - Master Plan 122 -58
Durham Waterfront & Watershed Water Quality Studie 122 -59 15,000
Sp All- Research Aqua/Terr. Study 122 -70
Cimate Change 122 -60
Other 122 -XX
1
-
Costs covered by Water management Programs
255,000 '
170,816
270,000
6%
15,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
27,243
10,155
-
-
-
-
-100%
-
-
-
-
-
-
(15,000)
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal 15,000
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations/Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2
T5,000
Capital levy
37,398
170,000
(36,581)
162,000
108,000
-100%
-
-
-5%
-
- -
-
54%
-
(15,000)
(8,000)
38,000
Peel
York
Durham 170,000
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham 70,000
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
132
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
# of Reg Maps under review 132
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Funding will be CF to pay for consultant for Surface Water
45
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 34b
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Water Management only portion of Toronto Remedial Action Plan Project
2009
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
h CHG.
$ CHG.
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
51,011
37,803
7,491
67,247
34,000
19,650
$
14,000
22,000
139,000
105,000
112,000
26,000
30,000
-77%
-
46%
-100%
18%
-
29%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-24%
-
-
-
20%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(46,000)
22,000
44,000
(3,000)
16,000
25,000
(8,000)
5,000
WMan.: Planning & Integration 113 -91 60,000
Water Balance
Sust Neighbourhoods Retrofit Plan
WMan- Water Budgets
Highland Creek Valley & Stream Greening Program 89,000
WMan Assessment & Analysis for Permits To Take Water
RAP WOW /OUTR ED FUNDS(113 -22)
RAP STEWARDSHIP FUNDS (113 -24)
Reg Line Mapping, Growth Management 87,000
WMan All Groundwater
WMan Don/ Highland Groundwater Model
Water Mngt - Groundwater Quality Assessment
WMan Stormwater Retrofit Opportunities Assessments t
WMan Rural Water Quality Mgt - Humber
Water Mngt Don Surface Water Quality Study
Water Mngt, ALL Aquatic Items
WMan Aquatic Report Preparation
WMan- Aquatic Resource Study - Watershed Planning
WMan. Ripanan Zone Survey /Aquatic Pnonties 34,000
WMan Highland Fish Management Plan
WMan. Don Natural Cover & Land Use Mapping
Public Use Opportunity Inventory
TO.WATER HUMAN HERITAGE(C12880
WMan. Climate Change 25,000
TOWATER PLAN /INTEGRATN(12001,2
WATER BALANCE
SUST NEIGHBOURHD RETROFIT PLAN
TO REG LINE /POLICY T0120-12/14
TO AQ RIP ZONE /AQ PRIOR(12053
RAP DON COMMUNITY ENVIR(C12656
Covered from other Programs
393,000
217,202
448,000
14%
55,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
1,169,300
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other- Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal -
Other- Donations /Fundraising
Other- Non - Govemment Grants .
TBD 1
TBD 2
Capital levy
315,000
(97,798)
280,000
168,000
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto 315,000
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto 78,000
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
-
(0)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
xxx
xxx
3
3
2
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
# of Protects Initiated - SNAP
Completion
4 of Projects Complete - SNAP
Completion
Completion
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
The majonty of the major over expenditures is offset by additional funding received dunng the year
Anticipated net expenditures will balance
4h
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Water Cost Centres
Page 35
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Planning / Integration: Humber Project Management 21,000 21,149 (500) -102% - 21,500
Humber Water Budget
Rouge Water Budget
Planning/ Integration Watershed Plan Followup Studies /Implemer 97,000 115,494 37,000 -62% (60,000)
Water Management Guidelines 145,000 93,108 165,000 14% 20,000
Planning/ Integration Rouge Project Management -
Planning/ Integration Don Project Management 57,000 117,548 2,000 -96% (55,000)
Planning/ Integration Duffins Carruthers Project Management 8,000 -100% (8,000)
Planning/ Integration Etob - Mimico Project Management 214,000 139,197 75,000 -65% (139,000)
Planning & Regulation Policy Updates 111,000 76,607 128,000 15% 17,000
Watershed Policy Followup Studies -
Regulation Line Mapping Technical Updates 226,000 154,073 231,700 3% 5,700
Generic Regs Updates
Rouge Watershed Policy
Don Watershed Policy 2,882
Growth Management & Specialized Planning Studies 110,000 104,706 108,000 -2% (2,000)
Groundwater Watershed Plans 74,000 31,236 10,000 -86% (64,000)
Low Flow Management 2,000 2,485 -100% (2,000)
Surface Flow- Fluvial Geomorphic Assessment 6,180 13,000 - 13,000
Toronto Wet Weather Sampling 51,000 152,351 129,000 153% 78,000
SP T.O.WET WEATHER #2 - REPAIRS 127,419 45,000 45,000 .
Petticoat Creek Watershed Plan 19,000 7,985 10,000
Assessment & Analysis For Permits to Take Water
SP Water Quality - Don Monitoring -
Erosion & Sediment (is 115 -46 26,000 105,399 53,000 104% 27,000
Surface Water Q Humber SW Retrofit Opportunities
Surface Water Q Rouge SW Retrofit Opprtunites
Surface Water Q Don Stormwater Retrofit
Surface Water - Don Surface Water Quality (0)
Surface Water Humber Study
Surface - Natural Channel Realignment
Predictive Models of Land Use Impacts of Aquatic Resources 2,000 3,000 50% 1,000
Aq•Watershed Planning -
Aq Thermal Conditions 13,000 4,436 -100% (13,000)
Aq: Modelling & Evaluation
Aq.Don Fish Plan 13,000 42,638 11,000 -15% (2,000)
Aq:Humber Fish Plan 2,000 15,218 -100% (2,000)
Identifying Historical Wetlands
Aq:GLSF Headwaters Drainage 6,000 -100% (6,000)
Aquatic Systems Priority Planning 112,000 114,707 118,000 5% 6,000
Aq- ASPP:Fish Database Mgt. 6,833
SP Etobicoke Fish Plan Implementation 8,000 1,289 18,000 125% 10,000
Rouge Fish Plan 6,000 56,864 5,000 ` -17% (1,000)
Terr 04 Humber Natural cover
Terr.04 Don Natural cover
Climate Change Research & Adaptation 50,000 45,457 50,000
SP: Climate Change - IDF Curve Pilot Study 19,000 1,240 19,000
Aq -TBD
Flood Risk Assessment & Emergency Planning 90,000 90,000
Other Demand/ Interest Survey (from12881,12212
Other. Evaluation of Impacts (from 12882,12213 •
Other. Trail Plans (from 12883,12214 (10,000) (10,000)
Human Heritage - Watersheds
Human Heritage - Subwatersheds
Other - Archaelogical Investigation (From 128- 84,122 -15) 16,000 -100% (16,000)
Other: Cultural Heritage Master Plan 39,000 40,963 52,000 33% 13,000
403,000 587,001 474,700 18% 71,700
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION' AUTHORITY
2009 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 35a
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Water Cost Centres
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 66,000 272,002 209,500 217% 143,500
Reserves - -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough 6,000 (1,250) 4,000 -33% (2,000)
Other - Municipal 91,000 50,694 36,000 -60% (55,000)
Other - Provincial 64,500 63,043 65,500 2% 1,000
Other - Federal 162,500 141,646 75,000 -54% (87,500)
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other- Non - Government Grants 13,000 71,101 84,700 552% 71,700
TBD1 -
TBD 2 -
403,000 597,236 474,700 18% 71,700
Capital levy
Peel -
York -
Durham -
Toronto -
Adlala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel -
York -
Durham -
Toronto (10,032) -
Adlala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus) (203) -
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEA
Staff FTEs- Full -time 8 xxx 6
Non -F/T 5 xxx 3
# of Watershed Plans Complete
% Completion
# of Water Management Guidelines /Studies in Progress 4 4
% Completion
# of Water Management Guidelines /Studies Complete 3
% Completion
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Less Watershed Plan Intergration work because nearing completion
2010 revenues and level of service will be the same as 2009. Carry forwards from 2009 are to complete projects in 2010
Aquatics - The municipal funding in 2010 is at 2009 levels, but other funding sources will be less and thus there will be 2 less staff and the 2010 deliverable
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
120 -07 Expect to be overspent, but will offset deficit with revenue from other watershed account:
The majority of the major over expenditures is offset by additional funding received during the year
Anticipated net expenditures will balance
120 -17 - There are $13K projected actual expenditures offset by intemal billinc
48
s will be sc
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: CTC Source Water Protection 1
Page 35b
2009
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
%CHG.
$CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
SOURCE PROT MNR/CO BASE FUNDS
140,863
112.000
-
112,000
SOURCE PP MNR/CO CONTINGENCY '
-
CTC - GIS Mapping
24,000
-44,224
17,000
-29%
(7,000)
CTC TERMS OF REFERENCE
-
CTC Assessment Report
75,000
76,496
18,000
-76%
(57,000)
CTC SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN
122,000
-
122,000
CTC TIER 3 HALTON WATER BUDGET
900,000
-
CTC,CVC Transfer
517,655
212,000
-
212,000
CTC CLOCA Transfer
275,466
289,000
-
289,000
CTC Communicahons(Was 121 -70 changed May 11/07)
334,000
42%
99,000
Water Budget Peer Review (Was 121 -52 changed May 11/07)
250,000
44,455
-100%
(250,000)
Source Protection Committee (Was 121 -28 changed May11 /07)
67,000
69.226
111,000
66%
44,000
SPP L Ontano Collaboration(Was 121 -63 changed May 11/07)
129,000
111,856
18,000
-86%
(111,000)
CTC Project Management
203,000
129,550
165,000
-19%
(38,000)
SPP TRCA PROJ MANGMENT(C121 -91
55
-
CTCTechnicalSupport
91,000
77.692
123,000
35%
32,000
CTC Admin Support
75,000
64,384
65,000
-13%
(10,000)
SPP TRCA ADMIN SUPPORT
21,025
-
SPP TRCA ADMIN SUPPORT
xxxxxx
424
-
-
Work Directly carried out by TRCA
-
TRCA Project Management
SP WATER Q- SWAMP TO 115-39
393,000,
134,625
121,000
-69%
-
(272,000)
SPP PRELIM WATERSH CHARACTERZN
-
Durham Integrated Plan
27,000
27,035
27,000
Durham Integrated Plan
35,000
39,334
46,000
31%
11,000
SPP Preliminary Water Budget
78,048
150,000
-
150,000
SPP CTC COMMUNICATIONS C12114
SPP.TRCA PROJ MANGMENT(C121 -91
55
-
CTC Technical Support -
91000
77,692
123000
35%
32,000
CTC Admin Support
75000
64,384
65000
-13%
(10,000)
SPP TRCA ADMIN SUPPORT
21,025
-
SPP.TRCA ADMIN SUPPORT
xxxxxx
424
-
-
Work Directly tamed out by TRCA
-
TRCA Project Management -
393000
134,625
121000
-69%
(272,000)
SP WATER Q- SWAMP TO 115-39
-
SPP PRELIM WATERSH CHARACTERZN
-
Durham Integrated Plan
27000
27.035
27000
Durham Integrated Plan
35000
39.334
46000
31%
11,000
SPP Preliminary Water Budget
78,048
150000
-
150,000
SPP CTC COMMUNICATIONS C12114
-
TRCA Technical Support (121 -23)
48000
39,367
23000
-52%
(25,000)
GIS Mapping
60000
-
60,000
TRCA Admin Support
25000
69000
176%
44,000
SPP.WATER BUDGET FIELDWORK
-
FUNDING SOURCES.
Program /User fees
-
Reserves
Interest Earnings
26,678
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
-
-
,
Other - Provincial
1677000
2,891,692
2082000
24%
405000
Other- Federal
-
Other- Donations /Fundraising
-
Other- Pnvate
-
•
1677000
2,918,370
2082000
24%
405000
Capital levy
Peel
York
-
Durham
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
-
Carryforward levy- Peel
-
York
Durham
Toronto
-
Adjala / Mono
Deficit I (Surplus)
0
-
IN PROGRESS' NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 2
2
2
Non -F/T 4
4
4
MAIN DELIVERABLE #1 SPC meeting 10
10
10
% Completion
1
1
1
MAIN DELIVERABLE #2 Public Consulting Meetings
10
10
10
% Completion
1
1
1
MAIN DELIVERABLE #3 Assessment Report
3
3
3
% Completion
1
0
1
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding InflationICOLAI
The increase in the 2010 budget is due to anticipated completion of the 3 Assessment
Reports and the corresponding public consultation In addition Source Protection Plai
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Surplus in budget due to outstanding obligations in 04 (to be completed in 2010)
$900,000 for Halton Tier 3 Water Budget work not included in original budget/revenue e
Gross Expenditure
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 36
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Floodplain Mapping Program
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET %CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Project Management -
xxxxx -
Etobicoke - Mimico Flood Plain Mapping 15,000 15,377 -100% (15,000)
xxxxx -
xxxxx
xxxxx -
xxxxx -
xxxxx -
xxxx -
xxxxx -
xxxxx -
Mimico: Hydraulics /Floodline Update 24,000 25,000 4% 1,000
xxxxx -
Frenchmans B Hydrology Update -
xx -
xxx
Core Flood Plain Mapping Program 268,000 208,014 350,000 31% 82,000
307,000 223,391 375,000 22% 68,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees -
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal -
Other - Provincial -
Other - Federal -
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other - Non - Government Grants -
Capital levy
Peel 60,000 60,000 165,000 175% 105,000
York 60,000 60,000 60,000
Durham 20,000 20,000 20,000
Toronto 60,000 60,000 50,000 -17% (10,000)
Adjala / Mono -
Carryforward levy -Peel 62,000 23,750 40,000 -35% (22,000)
York 20,000 4,637 18,000 -10% (2,000)
Durham 9,000 (6,022) 7,000 -22% (2,000)
Toronto 16,000 1,028 15,000 -6% -1,000
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus) (2)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE M_ EASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time xxx 0
Non -F/T xxx
# of Flood Plain Maps Maintained 679 754
% Completion
# of Flood Plain Map Updates Complete 2 75
% Completion
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
2010 revenues and level of service same as 2009. Carry over from 2009 to complete mapping in 2010.
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
CF needed for projects that have deliverables carrying into 2010, Updated hydrologic / hydraulic models and flood line mapping, including all
supporting documentation for site specific areas within all TRCA watersheds.
50
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 37
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: York /Peel /Durham/Toronto Groundwater
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Groundwater Studies 776,000 564,061 712,000 -8% (64,000)
xxxx -
xxxx -
xxxx -
xxxx -
xxxx -
xxxx -
xxx -
776,000 564,061 712,000 -8% (64,000)
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees -
Reserves -
Interest Eamings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other- Municipal -
Other - Provincial -
Other- Federal -
Other- Donations /Fundraising -
Other- Non - Government Grants -
Capital Ievv
Peel 125,000 125,000 125,000
York 125,000 125,000 125,000
Durham 125,000 125,000 125,000
Toronto 125,000 125,000 125,000
Adjala / Mono -
Carryforward levy-Peel 69,000 16,015 53,000 (0) (16,000)
York 69,000 16,015 53,000 (0) (16,000)
Durham 69,000 16,015 53,000 (0) (16,000)
Toronto 69,000 16,015 53,000 (0) (16,000)
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus) (0) -
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time xxx
Non -F/T xxx
# of Water Resource Management Reports 4
Completion •
# of Technical Papers at Conferences 1 2
% Completion
MAIN DELIVERABLE #3 i.e. Base Monitoring Points
Completion
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflationlCOLAI
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Consultant contracts will not be complete in 2009 - 232k to CF to 2010 for deliverables attached to model applications and peer review
51
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Ecology
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Terrestrial Natural Heritage
Page 38
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
582,000
12,000
50,000
20%
-
-8%
-
-
98,000
(1,000)
50,000
Terrestrial Natural Hentage Program 484,000 451,838
Pickering Terrestrial Natural Hentage
Sp•Research Aqua/Terr. Study 13,000 391
xxxx
New. Roads 8, Wildlife Analysis
497,000 452,230
644,000
30%
147,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
60,000
40,000
28,000
28,000
21,000
-
-
-
-
75%
75%
-
62%
40,000
12,000
12,000
8,000
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough 60,000 30,000
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial 16,000 18,895
Other - Federal 16,000 10,944
Other- Donations/Fundraising
Other- Non - Govemment Grants 13,000 391
105,000 60,230
Capital levy
177,000
190,000
127,000
50,000
100,000
69%
72,000
Peel 121,000 121,000
York 121,000 121,000
Durham 50,000 50,000
Toronto 100,000 100,000
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplusl 0
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASUF
3
3
n/a
1,000
Staff FTEs- Full -time 3 xxx
Non -F/T 2 xxx
Facilities # Buildings /Sq. footage n/a n/a
# of Reports Completed 8
% Completion
# of Reports in Progress 7
% Completion
% Completion
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
2010 funding is at the same level as 2009, service levels will also remain the same as in 2010
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
52
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Toronto Remedial Action Plan Project- Regeneration items
Page 39
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2,010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Etobicoke. Etobicoke Mimico HP 28,000
28,000
29,000
4%
1,000
AU Toronto Plant Projs 6,000
35,000
25,000
317%
19,000
WF Toronto Bay Community Outreach
-
Don Don HIP Funds 55,000
76,791
66,000
20%
11,000
Etobicoke: Reid Manor's Woodland Park
4,409
89,000
-
89,000
Humber Eglinton Flats Pond 7,000
3,116
4,000
-43%
(3,000)
Humber Community Env Projects 28,000
26,711
36,000
29%
8,000
Etobicoke. South Mimico Bamer Mitigation 68,000
3,056
75,000
10%
7,000
Highland Community Environmental Projects
-
WF Toronto Islands Beach Restoration Projects 15,000
8,151
7,000
-53%
(8,000)
Humber Marshes Pike Habitat 6,000
6,426
-100%
(6,000)
Rouge Watershed Plan Implementation 49,000
84,372
43,000
-12%
(6,000)
Project Management 112,000
21,000
-81%
(91,000)
Canada Goose Management 25,000
24,790
30,000
20%
5,000
WF Waterfront ORM Migratory Bird /Waterfowl 30,000
23,226
20,000
-33%
(10,000)
Waterfront Habitat Implementation 113 -51 75,000
78,213
82,000
9%
7,000
WF TTP Embayment C Habitat 113 -54
-
Etobicoke Altered Creek Study 113-57
-
Humber Habitat Implementation Plan 113-66 46,000
46,000
48,000
4%
2,000
Regeneration Greenroofs 113 -72
-
Etobicoke South Mimico Community Action Site 113-74 10,000
3,543
17,000
70%
7,000
Humber Humberwood Park Naturalization 113 -75
-
Etobicoke Toronto Golf Club Barrier Mitigation 113 -77 30,000
1,152
29,000
-3%
(1,000)
Humber ILC /Clairevi le Reservoir 113 -78 13,000
4,463
9,000
-31 %
(4,000)
Etobicoke Etobicoke Mimico Community Env Projects 113-80 20,000
20,000
20,000
RAP MIMICO HEALTHY YARDS /PARKS 113-81
Etobicoke Ripanan Zone Restoration Strategy 113 -82 23,000
10,322
23,000
Humber Lower Humber Weir Mitigation 113 -83 54,000
6,232
48,000
-11%
(6,000)
T 0 WATER SUST NEIGHBOUR(12805 11395
Moved to 126 -56, Don Community Environmental Proj. 113-96 20,000
-100%
(20,000)
Obsolete -moved to Water FileWMan Climate Change 128-92
Amounts combined under other projects (Monitonng /Fioodmapping etc Different presentation in 2007)
720,000
493,971
721,000
0%
1,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
-
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Ftowthrough 15,000
8,226
-100%
(15,000)
Other - Municipal 21,000
22,577
7,000
-67%
(14,000)
Other - Provincial
-
Other - Federal
1,283
-
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other- Non - Govemment Grants
20,704
-
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
Intemal recovenes from other projects
-
36,000
52,790
7,000
-81%
(29,000)
Capital levy
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto 486,000
476,000
423,000
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto 198,000
(34,819)
291,000
Adjala / Mono
(0)
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time 24
xxx
18
Non -F/T 2
xxx
8
MAIN DELIVERABLE #1 i.e Base Monitoring Points 240
240
240
240
% Completion 1
1
1
1
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation/COLAt
Lower Toronto Capital funds for projects
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Don HIP, Toronto Golf Club 8 Lower Humber Bamer Mitigation will have carry forwards due to approval delays
w
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Peel Natural Heritage Project
Page 40
•
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
BUDGET
CHG.
BUDGET
CHG.
$ $
$
%
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Regeneration:
Project Management
Humber West Humber Valley & Stream Regeneration
56,000 33,060
123,000
119 6%
67,000
Humber Peel Community Enviro Enhancement Proj
26,000 25,232
42,000
61.5%
16,000
Humber Claireville Restoration
59,000 32,584
63,000
6.8%
4,000
Humber Indian Line Claireville Reservoir Naturalization
27,000 18,119
9,000
-66 7%
(18,000)
Humber Bolton Action Site
10,000 14,647
-100.0%
(10,000)
Humber Caledon East Community Action Site
50,000 40,531
9,000
-82.0%
(41,000)
Humber Taylor Pond
-
Humber Albion Hills Centreville Pond
-
Humber Claireville Stewardship
-
Humber Palgrave Fishway Plantings
-
Humber Peel Forest Mngt P 112 -26
-
Humber HIP Funds
76,000 76,000
79,000
3.9%
3,000
Etobicoke Pratt & Whitney Renaturalizabon
4,000 7,778
-100.0%
(4,000)
Etobicoke Heart Lake Naturalization
23,000 22,822
10,000
-56.5%
(13,000)
Etobicoke Habitat Implementation Funds
54,000 23,185
86,000
593%
32,000
Etobicoke Mimico Conservation Forests
30,000 33,090
34,000
13 3%
4,000
Etobicoke Mimico Ripanan Zone Restoration Strategy Funds
23,000 10,331
20,000
-13 0%
(3,000)
Etobicoke Snelgrove master Plan
15,000 6,253
8,000
-46 7%
(7,000)
Multi- Watershed Children's groundwater
/
-
Etobicoke Stormwater
-
Arsenal Lands Park Development
132,000 38,394
95,000
-28 0%
(37,000)
Mimico Maitland Park
-
Etobicoke West Etobicoke Creek Regeneration
94,000 22,202
132,000
40 4%
38,000
Etobicoke Valleywood Restoration
3,000 3,452
-100 0%
(3,000)
Etobicoke Etob. /Mimico Commun Env. Proj
20,000 20,000
20,000
Etobicoke Peel Village GC Ripanan Restoration
21,000 16,101
25,000
19 0%
4,000
PEEL MIM- MALTON COMM AC inacty
Etobicoke Melton ESP
40,000 52,307
26,000
-35.0%
(14,000)
Mimico Upper Mimico Crk Habitat Restoration
47,000 47,391
70,000
48 9%
23,000
Humber Goulding Property Restoration
-
Humber Centreville Crk Stewardship -
-
Humber Oak Ridges Moraine CPA2
237,000 238,685
156,000
-34 2%
(81,000)
Multi W Canada Goose Mngt
19,000 18,200
39,000
105 3%
20,000
Multi W Managing Hazard Trees - Peel
20,000 2.145
28,000
40 0%
8,000
Multi W West Nile Virus
-
Multi W Peel Pnvate Land Tree Planting Program
-
Regeneration BioRegional Seed Crops
-
Stewardship' Pnvate Land Stewardship
-
Regen. Projects Database Mngt
5,000 5,000
-100.0%
(5,000)
Peel All Plant Projs Funding
168,000 181,879
185,000
10.1%
17,000
Less reovenes fronm Other programs
(1,181)
-
1,259,000 988,209
1,259,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
784
1,000
-
1,000
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
4,000 15,819
10,000
1500%
6,000
Other - Municipal
-
Other - Provincial
-
Other - Federal
2,000 (1,000)
3,000
50 0%
1,000
Other - Donations/Fundraising
500
-
Other- Non - Government Grants
22,000 19,507
(1,000)
-104.5%
(23,000)
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
28,000 35,609
13,000
-53.6%
(15,000)
Capital levy
Peel
985,000 985,000
929,000
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
'
Carryforward levy -Peel
246,000 (32,087)
317,000
York
Durham
oronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
(313)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
-
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Lower Peel funding
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Sept 22/09 West Etob Creek generously providing a large surplus
Chandra Sep22/09 For account 112 -54, wqe are partnenng with the City of Missisuaga on this project
TRCA is designing and
constructing a trail near Courtney Park, the city is supplying the funds in 2010 (approx $170,00(t tr
construction and TRCA is contnbuting funds towards restoration work associated with the Trail
v
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION. AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
' ACTIVITY: York Natural Heritage Project
Page 41
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Regeneration:
Project Management
-
Obsolete See 126 -52, York. All Education Projs Funding 4,000
-100%
(4,000)
Canada Goose Management Funding 7,000
7,000
14,000
100%
7,000
Humber Granger Greenway 10,000
175,372
15,000
50%
5,000
Humber Lake Wilcox CAS 77,000
94,883
17,000
-78%
(60,000)
YORK.LAKE WILCOX AQUATIC(GLSF)
-
Humber York Community Environmental Enhancement Projects 25,000
20,581
59,000
136%
34,000
Humber East Humber Riparian Planting
-
Humber Humber HIP 38,000
38,000
40,000
5%
2,000
Humber Eaton Hall Wetland 11,000
6,563
10,000
-9%
(1,000)
Humber: Nashville Plan Implemenation
-
Humber. Woodbridge Expansion Area 25,000
6,566
18,000
-28%
(7,000)
Don B. Smith Greenway Outreach TR:111 -37 16,000
6,848
24,000
50%
8,000
Don: Richmond Hill Riparian 111 -53 11,000
16,480
22,000
100%
11,000
Don. Don HIP 111 -56 27,000
27,000
28,000
4%
1,000
SP: Rouge Park/Bob Clay Support 111 -63
70,000
-
70,000
Rouge: Milne Park Restoration 111 -66 10,000
-100%
(10,000)
Rouge Rouge Watershed Plan Implen 111 -65 50,000
72,349
42,000
-16%
(8,000)
Rouge Bruce's Mill Barner Mitigation 111 -69
-
Rouge: R. Hill Riparian Planting 111 -73 11,000
11,577
26,000
136%
15,000
Rouge: Rouge Implementation Coordir111 -78
-
Duffins Stouffville Greenways 111 -80 121,000
1,965
103,000
-15%
(18,000)
Reforestation /Plant Propagation 111 -82 113,000
85,862
87,000
-23%
(26,000)
Managing Hazard Trees - York 111 -83 8,000
3,608
33,000
313%
25,000
Rouge York Children's Water Festival 111 -84 33,000
30,924
38,000
15%
5,000
Regeneration. BioRegional Seed Crop:111 -85
- -
Duffins Community Stewardship 111 -93
Less reovenes fronm Other programs
-
597,000
605,579
646,000
8%
49,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
141,162
5,000
-
5,000
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 6,000
1,563
5,000
-17%
(1,000)
Other - Municipal 75,000
3,153
97,000
29%
22,000
Other- Provincial
2,125
-
Other - Federal
2,125
-
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other- Non - Govemment Grants 10,000
4,232
70,000
600%
60,000
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
91,000
154,360
177,000
95%
86,000
Capital levy
Peel
York 458,000
458,000
427,000
Durham
Toronto
•
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York 48,000
(6,671)
42,000
Durham
,
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
(110)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
xxx
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLAI
Maintained 2009 level of York funding
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Higher revenues for Granger Greenway due to funding by City of Vaughan for trail work
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
(VISION: Watershed Management
GROUP:Capital
3TIVITY:Durham Natural Heritage Project
Page 42
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Watershed Trail Planning 109 -05
-
Watershed Trail Implementation 60,000
78,089
55,000
-8%
(5,000)
Duffins Fish Plan Implementation 51,000
67,032
36,000
-29%
(15,000)
TNH Implementation 46,000
47,112
42,000
-9%
(4,000)
Durham - Managing Hazard Trees 58,000
18,678
20,000
-66%
(38,000)
Durham Goose Management 6,000
6,000
7,000
17%
1,000
SP•SPECIES @RISK -GLEN MAJOR/WLK
30,497
-
Seaton Trail #1:Planning
53,812
22,000
-
22,000
Seaton - Green River Trailhead 109 -51
34,043
6,000
-
6,000
Seaton Trail - Forestream Rd Trailhead 109 -52
52,972
7,000
-
7,000
Seaton Trail - Whitevale Trailhead 109 -53
4,000
-
4,000
Seaton Trail #5:Improvements 109 -54
32,864
159,000
-
159,000
Seaton Trail #6:Site Securement 109 -55
3,585
30,000
-
30,000
Seaton Trail #7:Nat. Heritage Regeneration 109 -56
226,000
-
225,000
Seaton Trail - Signage 109 -57
79
17,000
-
17,000
Seaton Trail - Community Outreach
28,000
-
28,000
Seaton Trail #10 Proj. Management 109 -59
7,520
102,000
-
102,000
Less Recoveries from Other Projects
-
221,000
432,283
760,000
244%
539,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
1,126
2,000
-
2,000
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
24,089
-
Other- Municipal
-
Other- Provincial
204,717
600,000
-
600,000
Other- Federal
4,000
-
Other- Donations /Fundraising
-
Other- Non - Govemment Grants 14,000
28,922
-100%
(14,000)
TBD 1
TBD 2
14,000
262,854
602,000
4200%
588,000
Capital levy
Peel
York
Durham 165,000
165,000
158,000
-4%
(7,000)
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Carryforwardlevy -Peel
-
York
Durham 42,000
3,796
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
632
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and 6n
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
xxx
xxx
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA1
Provincial funds approved for the Seaton Trails Project
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
56
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Regeneration Cost Centres
Page 42b
2007
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
%CHG.
$ CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Geese Management 70,000
78,760
91,000
30%
21,000
Habitat For Wildlife 15,000
16,048
18,000
20%
3,000
Etobicoke Mimico HIP 82,000
51,185
116,000
40%
33,000
Don River Watershed HIP 116,000
, 103,791
94,000
-19%
(22,000)
Etob Mimico Ripanan Zone Restoration Strategy 52,000
25,900
56,000
8%
4,000
Etobicoke Mimico Community Environmental Projects 35,000
63,134
46,000
31%
11,000
Humber River HIP 178,000
183,297
168,000
-6%
(10,000)
Indian Line Campground Claireville Reservoir Naturalization 40,000
22,193
18,000
-55%
(22,000)
Private #2 Planting Projects Recovenes to 116/126 -65 Cost Centres 54,000
82,668
91,000
69%
37,000
Reforestation - TRCA Lands 34,000
34,469
38,000
12%
4,000
Plant Propagation to 125s Cost Centre 112,000
86,922
77,000
-31 %
(35,000)
Obsolete Managing Hazard Trees in York Region
-
Planting # 3 Pnvate Land Tree /Shrubs 44,000
-100%
(44,000)
Peel Forest Management 114-55 23,000
22,979
24,000
4%
1,000
Propagation of Aquatic Plants 114-56
-
Pnvate Land #1.Stewardship 114-65 45,000
45,515
50,000
11%
5,000
Project Database Mngt 114-70 52,000
21,228
(6,000)
-112%
(58,000)
CPSWM (Gary W) 104-57
114,251
265,000
-
265,000
RAP MOU 102s
736,775
-
Intemal items used by staff to manage costs
-
Capital Staff 114-20
-
Capital Staff Pool 2 114-23
-
Eastville Equipment Recoveries 114-90
-
Habitat Monitoring Equipment Recovenes 114-92
0
-
Habitat Monitoring Cell Phone Recovenes 114-93
-
Density Bonus Program
79,000
-
79,000
Environmental Services- Municipal 279,000
210,000
-25%
(69,000)
Environmental Services- Other 755,000
1,919,207
Asian Longhorn Beetle Program 542,000
328,816
1c) Internal Municipal
(776,508)
Covered by other Capital projects (940,000)
(878,000)
-7%
62,000
1,597,000
3,173,406
2,463,000
54%
866,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 658,000
1,565,825
1,443,000
119%
785,000
Reserves
2,228
-
Interest Earnings
277
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 137,000
163,268
143,000
4%
6,000
Other - Municipal 222,000
186,696
481,000
117%
259,000
Other- Provincial 12,000
455,949
12,000
Other - Federal 568,000
770,940
321,000
-43%
(247,000)
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other - Non - Govemment Grants
161,355
63,000
-
63,000
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
1,597,000
3,306,540
2,463,000
54%
866,000
Capital levy
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
-
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
-
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
(133,134)
-
NEW DATA/PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time 2 17
xxx
2 114
Non -F/T 1 30
1 3
MAIN DELIVERABLE #1 1 e Base Monitoring Points 240 00
240
240
%Completion 100
0.5
1
% Completion 1 00
0 65
1
MAIN DELIVERABLE #3 i e Base Monitonng Points 240 00
240
240
% Completion 1 00
0 4
1
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Increase in non capital levy funding for Environmental Special Projects
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
W Etobicoke Crk will have carry forward funds to match City of Missisauga funds in 2010
Lower Humber Mitigation to carry forwards due to project delays in design & approvals
57
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Projects
Page 43
2009
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG,
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Erosion ' Planning & Design 103,000
98,283
115,000
12%
12,000
Eastville Office 30,000
38,030
30,000
Erosion Control Planning 33,000
26,405
40,000
21%
7,000
Erosion Control
-
Guildwood Parkway 110,000
122,086
-100%
(110,000)
Monitoring & Maintenance. WF 337,000
303,095
266,000
-21%
(71,000)
Don Mills York Mills Channel Repairs
471
Wilket Creek Restoration
81,299
288,000
-
288,000
Guild Morningside Shoreline Protection 402,000
242,652
-100%
(402,000)
Chas Sauriol - Concrete Repair 120,000
278,385
-100%
(120,000)
1900 Bayview Ave Slope Stabilization 1,000
1,776
-100%
(1,000)
Leslie & Steeles Retaining Wall Replacement
23,207
Charles Saunol - CN Rail
-
Meadowcliffe Dnve 370,000
154,417
508,000
37%
138.000
Springbank Ave. 4,000
2,118
2,000
-50%
(2,000)
Wicksteed Ave
-
Toronto Islands - Gllbraltor Point 7,000
52,233
380,000
5329%
373,000
Birkdale Ravine 9,000
9,000
Toronto Parks Sites 190,000
93,549
180,000
-5%
(10,000)
E/C.BLUFFERS SIDEWALK
-
E/C.PARKS- CENTRE ISLAND NORTH
-
4 -8 Atwood Place
37,348
-
TORONTO PARKS.MORNINGSIDE PARK
25,041
-
Mud Creek Erosion
13,496
-
Toronto Parks Sites
-
Toronto Emergency - 345 Riverview 10,000
484
8,000
-20%
(2,000)
T 0 Emergncy:Momingside Bridge
989
-
Guild Inn Shoreline 215,000
249.991
-100%
(215,000)
Highland CN Bridge Revetment 24,000
24,000
Colonel Danforth 121 -129 32,000
-100%
(32,000)
16-18 Hardwood Gate 2,000
-100%
(2,000)
345 Beechgrove
-
221 Martingrove Rd
-
Military Trail 21,000
21,000
Toronto Parks Storm Damage Program 441,000
21,573
263,000
-40%
(178,000)
No activity
TO Parks.Edwards Garden 105,000
18,206
-100%
(105,000)
DUPLICATE.185 -05 Edwards Gardens Stream Restoration
-
T.O Storm'City -Wide Budges
211,093
-
T 0 Storm North City Trails
12,076
-
T O Storm South City Trails
6,177
-
T 0. Storm East City Trails
7,093
-
T 0 STORM•WEST CITY TRAILS
-
T 0 Storm 9 -11 Copeland Ave
25,562
42,000
-
42,000
Toronto Islands Manna Seawall Repairs
7,864
593,000
Toronto Nursery Relocation
300,000
T 0 PARKS GLEN STEWART RAVINE
4,134
Chesteron Shores Outfall
122,000
Toronto Parks - Additional Sites 347,000
18,824
238,000
-31%
(109,000)
TO PRKS EC #2•WOODSWORTH RAVINE
72,979
-
SPECIAL T O EC -21 SUNNYBRAE CR
13,706
T O Parks
-
3,110,000
2,414,751
4,024,000
29%
914,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 750,000
890,403
2,227,000
197%
1,477.000
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
-
Other - Municipal 576,000
4,378
19,000
-97%
(557,000)
Other - Provincial 152,000
187,771
-100%
(152,000)
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other - Non-Govemment Grants 47,000
45,000
-4%
(2,000)
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
1,525,000
1,082,552
2,291,000
50%
766,000
Capital levy
Peel
-
York
-
Durham
-
Toronto 1,446.000
1,446,000
1,480,000
2%
34,000
Adlala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
-
York
Durham
Toronto 139,000
(113.891)
253,000
82%
114,000
Adlala / Mono
-
Deficit / (Surplus)
90
-
NEW DATA/PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTE5- Full -time 13
13
Non -F/T 5
5
Facilities' # Buildings /Sq footage n/a
n/a
n/a
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
More special non -levy funded erosion work for Toronto Works & Parks anticipated
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
There have been additional special projects funded by the City of Toronto a itnybrae
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Other Erosion Control Projects
Page 44
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
131,000
122,000
12,000
24%
2%
-
-8%
25,000
2,000
(1,000)
York Region Erosion Monitoring & Maintenance 106,000 103,834
Peel Region Erosion Monitoring & Maintenance 120,000 128,929
SP: Ladies Golf Club (Markham)
Durham Region Erosion Monitoring & Maintenance 13,000 12,993
239,000 245,756
265,000'
11%
26,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough,
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2
Capital levy
130,000
130,000
12,000
(8,000)
1,000
8%
. 20%
-
-
-
-
10,000
2,000
(8,000)
Peel 120,000 120,000
York 130,000 130,000
Durham 10,000 10,000
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel 8,929
York (24,000) (26,166)
Durham 3,000 2,993
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
•
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
Facilities' # Buildings /Sq. footage
MAIN DELIVERABLE #1 i.e. Base Monitoring Points
% Completion
MAIN DELIVERABLE #2• i.e. Expand West Nile points
% Completion
MAIN DELIVERABLE #3 i.e. Base Monitoring Points
% Completion
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Maintained same level of funding in 2010 from York and Peel Regions
$2k increase in funding from Durham Region ,
Potential partnership project in York Region at the Toronto Ladies Golf Club
$20K MNR WECI funding approved for 2 erosion control studies in York Region
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
$1,700 carry forward in York Region allocated for plantings in spring of 2010
59
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: City of Toronto Waterfront Project
Page 45
2009 2009
2010
BUDGET ACTUALS
BUDGET
% CHG.
$CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Waterfront Administration 65,000
62,770
95,000
46 2%
30,000
Eastville Office 20,000
26,483
16,000
-20.0%
(4,000)
Ashbrdge's Bay Dredging 228,000
27,846
363,000
59 2%
135,000
Scarborough Shoreline Protection & Public Access
51,000
-
51,000
Long Range Waterfront Planning 150,000
167,623
174,000
16.0%
24,000
Humber Bay Shores Habitat Enhancements
-
Colonel Sam Smith Park
-
Keating Channel Dredging 291,000
308,764
270,000
-7.2%
(21,000)
Keating Channel #1 Env Monitonng 43,000
45,518
36,000
-16 3%
(7,000)
Keating Channel #2 Auditing
2,283
5,000
-
5,000
Keating Channel
-
TTP - Cell 1 Capping 60,000
34,771
200,000
233.3%
140,000
Tommy Thompson - Int. Mgt. 183,000
197,211
218,000
19 1%
35,000
TTP - Cormorant Mngt
8,335
-
TTP - TBD
-
Arsenal Lands Park Development 674,000
3,656
1,078,000
59.9%
404,000
Arsenal Long Term Monitoring 30,000
11,099
20,000
-33.3%
. (10,000)
East Point Park
-
Environmental Monitoring
207,000
15 0%
27,000
MNR - Fish Community Toronto AOC 7,000
- 100.0%
(7,000)
Waterfront G I S 25,000
25,000
25,000
Apr 9/08 Moved to TWRC budget T 0. WF. AQ. Habitat Restoration
-
SP HABT ALTERATION ASSESS TOOL
6,674
SP•INTEGRITY INDEX/TO TRAWLING
15,000
-
SP SHORELINE LAND USE SURVEY
13,226
SP Electro -fish Subcontracts 5,000
4,176
-100 0%
(5,000)
SP' DFO Sea Lamprey Control Proj. 9,000
11,386
25,000
177 8%
16,000
Toronto Waterfront - TBD
-
SP CAN ENV.ASSES.AG SECONDMENT 251 -80
-
Covered from other Capital Projects
(1,215)
1,970,000
1,179,246
2,783,000
41.3%
813,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 12,000
135,892
25,000
108 3%
13,000
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
1,633
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
-
Other - Municipal
(85,000)
-
Other - Provincial 7,000
24,786
- 100.0%
(7,000)
Other - Federal 9,000
19,709
25,000
177 8%
16,000
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other - Non-Government Grants 458,000
125,145
752,000
64.2%
294,000
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
486,000
222,166
802,000
65.0%
316,000
Capital levy
Peel
-
York
-
Durham
_
Toronto 1,283,000
1,283,000
1,454,000
13%
171,000
Adiala/ Mono
Carryforward levy-Peel
-
York
Durham
Toronto 201,000
(325,919)
527,000
162%
326,000
Adjala/Tos
-
Deficit / (Surplus)
(1)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 6.6
6.8
Non -F/T 3 7
3.8
Facilities # Buildings /Sq. footage 1 0
Keating Channel Dredging cubic metres 39,500
39,400
35,000
Ashbndges Bay Dredging cubic metres
tbd
TTP Event attendance
2,400
2,400
TTP Cleanup cubic metres
500
500
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Capital levy projects ongoing
Pursuing more non levy funding eg DFO
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Decision not to dredge at Ashbridge's Bay Coatsworth Cut in 2009 - carry forward funds to 2010
Environmental Monitoring was over spent; less funds in 2010
Tommy Thompson Park Cell 1 &2 underspent but used in 2010 for continued monitoring and implementation
There were several non levy special projects in 2010 eg Sea Lamprey work wi
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION, AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Region Of Durham Waterfront Project
Page 46
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Rouge Gateway
OPG Naturalization 50,000 17,819 30,000 (0) (20,000)
OPG FRENCHMAN'S BAY MONITORING
Frenchman's Bay Restoration Management Plan 10,000 3,451 10,000
Frenchman's Bay Rotary Park West
SP:AJAX ROTARY PRK:DRAINAGE 18,389
252,000 434,675 299,000 0 47,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 224,197 48,000 48,000
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal 50,000 35,315 40,000 (0) (10,000)
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other - Non- Government Grants 60,000 61,756 40,000 (0) (20,000)
TBD 1
TBD 2
110,000 321,268 128,000 0 18,000
Capital levy
Peel
York
Durham 145,000 145,000 171,000 0 26,000
Toronto
Adjala/ Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham (3,000) (2,558)
Toronto
Adjala/Tos
Deficit / (Surplus) (29,035)
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
# of Waterfront monitoring sites
# of active projects
# of completed projects
xxx
12 12
1 4
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Maintained 2009 level of funding from Region of Durham
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Additional funding received from the City of Pickering for Shoreline Improvements and EA/Consultants for the Pickering Harbor Entrance
OPG Naturalization, an OPG funded project will have carry forward funds due to shortfall in overall funding to commence the proposed project.
61
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Waterfront Revitilization Corporation Projects
Page 47
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
(1,071,000)
430,300
(115,000)
(65,000)
(10,000)
Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project 4,182,000 2,420,101 3,111,000 -25.6%
Mimico Waterfront Linear Park 4,343,000 138,913 4,773,300 9.9%
Tommy Thompson Park Master Plan Implementation 3,863,000 1,345,520 3,748,000 -3 0%
Westem Beaches Watercourse Facility 161,000 35,814 96,000 -40 4%
T.O. Waterfront Aquatic Habitat Restoration (WAS 251 -22) 100,000 90,000 -10.0%
Covered from other Capital Projects -
. 12,649,000 3,940,348 11,884,300 -6.0%
(764,700)
FUNDING SOURCES:
(764,700)
Program /User fees -
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal 1,870 -
Other - Provincial -
Other - Federal -
Other- Donations /Fundraising -
Other - Non - Government Grants 12,649,000 3,944,402 11,884,300 -6.0%
TBD 1 -
TBD 2 -
12,649,000 3,946,272 11,884,300 -6.0%
Capital Ievv
(764,700)
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/ Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/Tos
• -
Deficit / (Surplus) (5,923)
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time 13 9
Non -F/T 4 6
% Completion 1 0 1
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Projects proceeding on schedule
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
2010
Westem Beaches - Project substantially complete, only monitoring and fish compensation activities remain - Complete Mar 31,
Tommy Thompson Park - Project schedule delayed - project completion now March 2011
Mimico Park - Phase 1 - Phase 2 construction is expected to begin in July 2010 (acquisition already underway)
Port Union - Phase 2 in progress
62
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Humber Bay Shores Waterfront Park
Page 48
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
100,000
-100%
-
-
-
(3,000,000)
100,000
Humber Bay Shores 3,000,000
ETOB.MOTEL EXPROP./MEDIATION 1,250,435
Etobicoke Motel Stnp Expropriation / Mediation
xxxxxxxx
Covered from other Capital Projects
3,000,000 1,250,435
100,000
-97%
(2,900,000)
FUNDING SOURCES:
50,000
50,000
-
-
-
-
-97%
-97%
-
-
-
-
-
(1,450,000)
(1,450,000)
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal 1,500,000 625,217
Other - Provincial 1,500,000 625,217
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2
3,000,000 1,250,435
Capital levy
100,000
-97%
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2,900,000)
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/ Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adlala/Tos
Deficit / (Surplus)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time xxx
Non -F/T xxx
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Continued mediation and expropriation costs
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
63
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Stewardship
Page 49
2009
BUDGET
2009
ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG,
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Regeneration:
Project Management
-
Family Nature Events 44,000
44,820
37,000
-16%
(7,000)
Waterfront Community Outreach 17,000
10,521
29,000
71%
12,000
Stew Highland Community Outreach 56,000
63,022
52,000
-7%
(4,000)
Community Outreach Stewardship Program (Formerly Multicultural Envu 105,000
111,757
74,000
-30%
(31,000)
Don Watershed Community Stewardship Projects 10,000
17,033
13,000
30%
3,000
Obsolete Habitat For Wildlife goes to 114s -
-
Port Union Stewardship 17,000
16,153
15,000
-12%
(2,000)
Port Union Eco Action 29,000
27,652
-100%
(29,000)
STEW.WETLANDS FOR WILDLIFE
Stewardship Resource Centre
-
Stewardship Forum 2,000
5,330
2,000
Stew SP- Ecoaction Don R Waterwise
4,197
14,000
-
14,000'
Stewardship Tnihum- Highland
-
Move to Other Regen Pnvate Land Stewardship
-
ORM Community Development Ecologist 1,000
2.657
7,000
600%
6,000
ORM #7 -CPA 2 & 11 Land Ownership 22,000
13,763
-100%
(22,000)
Rouge Park Watershed Stewardship Program
-
Rural Clean Water Program 126,000
183,485
145,000
15%
19,000
CURB 8,000
8,180
-100%
(8,000)
Stew /Rural Healthy Farm/Horses
7,616
6,000
-
6,000
Source Protection - Early Action 244,000
155,936
587,000
141%
343,000
Agncuitural Non Point Source
-
Stew Petticoat HW - Eco Action 3,000
23,180
(5,000)
-267%
(8,000)
Stew Petticoat Headwaters 1,000
10,289
-100%
(1,000)
Healthy Yards 88,000
90,549
85,000
-3%
(3,000)
Duffins Stewardship 53,000
38,480
57,000
8%
4,000
EcoAction Ajax Community Greening 2,000
2,000
Obsolete Malton Environmental Stewardship Program
-
Obsolete Markham Urban Ecological Backyard Naturalization
-
Obsolete Centreville Creek Stewardship
Obsolete Peel Business Outreach
-
Obsolete SP Tnllium Claireville Stewardship
-
Obsolete Stewardship Management
1,251
-
Obsolete Peel Stewardship funding 154,000
-100%
(154,000)
Obsolete Toronto Stewardship Funding 137,000
-100%
(137,000)
Obsolete Stewardship York Funding 66,000
-100%
(66,000)
Obsolete Durham Stewardship funding 45,000
40,000
-11%
(5,000)
Portion covered by transfers from funding sources (412,000)
(2,000)
-100%
410,000
818,000
835,871
1,158,000
42%
340,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 4,000
4,362
-100%
(4,000)
Reserves
.
Interest Earnings
•
CFGT - Flowthrough 75,000
86,283
36,000
-52%
(39,000)
Other - Municipal 9,000
9,205
-100%
(9,000)
Other- Provincial 276,000
202,548
136,500
-51%
(139,500)
Other - Federal 52,000
68,018
508,500
878%
456,500
Other - Donations /Fundraising
2,514
-
Non- Govemment Grants
47,079
-
TBD 1
-
Other Internal
-
416,000
420,009
681,000
64%
265,000
Capital Ievv
Peel 154,000
154,000
159,000
3%
5,000
York 66,000
66,000
75,000
14%
9,000
Durham 45,000
40,000
40,000
-11%
(5,000)
Toronto 137,000
147,000
157,000
15%
20,000
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
(1,678)
(6,000)
•
(6,000)
York
Durham
(4,191)
45,000
Toronto
14,852
7,000
Adjala / Mono
Deficit I (Surplus)
(120)
-
NEW DATA/PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
# workshops hosted 23
23
23
# volunteers involved 2,500
2,500
2,500
# restoration sites 9
9
9
# brochures and advertisements 23
23
23
NOTES. 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
New in 2010 is Peel Climate Change program of $90K for Humber Stewardship
New MOE funding for Early Actions Projects of 5580K
New OTF4 year project ($260K) is 566K in 2010
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
64
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Education
Page 49b
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Regeneration:
Project Management 5,000 8,086
6,000
20 0%
1,000
Peel Education funding 139,000 (430)
-100 0%
(139,000)
Toronto Education Outreach funding 81,000
-100 0%
(81,000)
Yellow Fish Road 49,000 60,776
62,000
26 5%
13,000
Peel Children's Water Festival 48,000 47,161
43,000
-10 4%
(5,000)
ORM Foundation Tool Kil 5,000
6,000
Education Source Protection Outreach Educ 8,000 55,640
4,000
-50 0%
(4,000)
Feb 19/09 RK removes 126-40 should be 365 -10 in CI
-
Feb 19/09 RK fixes 126 -41, 08 error should be in CFC
CFC PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT(365 -1C (625)
CFC VOLUNTEER NETW.COSTS(36516 40
EcoSchool Water Conservation Guide was 365 -2C 20,000 16,974
8,000
-60.0%
(12,000)
Education Knowing Nature, Staying Safer was 365 -21 29,000 32,587
-100.0%
(29,000)
Education' Educational Exploration of the Living City w 10,000 8,240
2,000
-80 0%
(8,000)
Eden? Waterfront Community OUtreach
-
WatershedonWheels 135,783
154,000
10.8%
15,000
Aquatic Plants Program 55,000 89,163
54,000
-1.8%
(1,000)
York Education Funding 52,000
-100.0%
(52,000)
Portion covered by transfers from funding sources (342,000)
(2,000)
-99 4%
340,000
298,000 453,395
337,000
13.1%
39,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 18,379
-
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough 9,000 19,927
-100 0%
(9,000)
Other - Municipal
-
Other - Provincial 10,000 58,422
11,500
15 0%
1,500
Other - Federal 2,000 16,809
6,500
225 0%
4,500
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other - Non - Government Grant 5,000
10,000
100 0%
5,000
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
-
26,000 113,536
28,000
77%
2,000
Capital levy
Peel 139,000 138,377
148,000
6 5%
9,000
York 52,000 52,000
55,000
5 8%
3,000
Durham 5,000
5,000
-
5,000
Toronto 81,000 81,000
85,000
4 9%
4,000
Adjala / Mono
-
Carryforward levy -Peel 52,409
2,000
-
2,000
York 10,911
5,000
-
5,000
Durham
-
Toronto 584
9,000
-
9,000
Adjala / Mono
-
Deficit / (Surplus) (422)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
# workshops hosted 18 18
22
# students involved 27,000 27,000
32,400
# restoration sites 17 17
20
# brochures and advertisement 10,000 10,000
12,000
# Citizenship ceremonies hosts 2 2
2
# people involved in ceremonies 1,200 1,200
1,440
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Slightly lower funding requested in 2009 and no carryforward
# students involved 27.000 27,000
32,400
# restoration sites 17 17
20
# brochures and advertisement 10,000 10,000
12,000
# Citizenship ceremonies hosts 2 2
2
# people involved in ceremonie 1,200 1,200
1,440
•
NO rES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding mflabon /COLAI
Slightly lower funding requested in 2009 and no carryforward
We are in the process of submitting grant funding proposals to increase 2010 revenue for education
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
65
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
.
DIVISION: Ecology
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Community Transformation Partnerships
Page 49c
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals BUDGET % CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
Expenditures:
Energy Projects
Sustainable Prod. Commercialization 5,000 5,000
MMC Union Gas Funds No activity 15,000 -
15,000
TRCA ENERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN 5,000
Development, Management & Communications 90,000 62,028 100,000 11%
10,000
Mayors' Megawatt Challenge 91,000 72,646 68,000 -25%
(23000)
GREENING RETAIL GUIDELINES AND CERTIFICATION 157,000 -
157,000
Greening Health Care 249,000 223,741 193,000 -22%
(56,000)
Greening Retail 77,000 15,777 144,000 87%
67,000
CSR 5,000
Renewables Bus Case (Formerly Enerlife) 3,000 -
3,000
Geothermal Energy Storage 10,000 4 15,000 50%
5,000
RENEWABLE ENERGY ROADMAP 5,000 -
5,000
BLACK CREEK SOLAR AND LEED EB 10,000
XXXXXX 24,000 -
24,000
XXXXXX -
XXXXXX -
XXXXXX -
XXXXXX -
xxxxxx -
xxxxxx -
xxxxxx -
sub -total Energy Projects 523,000 375,148 749,000 0%
206,000
Expenditure Total 1,130,000 812,057 2,168,000 92%
1,038,000
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees 124,641 54,000 -
54,000
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough 129,000 100,574 14,000 -89%
(115,000)
Other - Municipal 167,000 38,432 100,000 -40%
(67,000)
Other - Provincial 4,389 39,000 -
39,000
Other - Federal 136,237 -
Other - Donations /Fundraising 40,000 16,000 -100%
(40,000)
Other - Non-Government Grants 677,000 259,940 1,800,000 166%
1,123,000
Revenue Total 1,013,000 680,214 2,007,000 98%
994,000
Capital levy -
Peel 30,000 10,000 12,000 -60%
(18,000)
York 33,000 27,000 41,000 24%
8,000
Durham -
Toronto 40,000 75,000 108,000 170%
68,000
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel 14,000 14,896 -100%
(14,000)
Carryforward levy -York
Carryforward levy- Durham -
Carryforward levy -T.0. 5,000 -
Adjala / Mono -
Deficit / (Surplus) (52) -
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
Maior 2010 over 2009 Changes (in addition to economic factors):
A number of research projects are planned for 2010 that will require significant external funding hence the increase in projected budget
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Lower than anticipated funding for the Mayor's Megawatt Challenge and Greening Health Care
Staff time has been reallocated to other projects
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 50
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Sustainable Technologies
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals BUDGET q °CHG, S CHG.
5 $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit in Peel Region 416-10 200,000 81,601 218,000 9% 18,000
Living City Report Card 416-40 50,000 175,000 250% 125,000
Natural Channel Design 416-49 41,000 34,044 96,000 134% 55,000
Black Creek Urban Farm 416-70 20,000 6,119 17,000 -15% (3,000)
Urban Agriculture - Growing Local Food 416-72 68,000 71,063 50,000 -26% (18,000)
Spills Database Program 416-76 25,000 701 47,000 88% 22,000
Can. River System Publications 416-80 35,000 34,969, -100% (35,000)
Humber 10th Anniversary 416-81 5,000 4,616 -100% (5,000)
SP:INFILTRATION LITERATURE REV 41689 19,920
Terraview Filtration 416-90 3,000 -100% (3,000)
STEP Roof Infiltration Tank 416-91 44,000 77,849 70,000 59% 26,000
S.T.E.P. Air Quality Items 416-92 124,000 141,963 163,000 31% 39,000
CSO Workshop 416-93 -
SUSTAINABLE COMM COSTS(120 -94) 41694 19
Permeable Pavement 416-95 23,000 160,364 90,000 291% 67,000
Sustainable Technology Evaluation Program 416-96 318,000 67,576 351,000 10% 33,000
S.T.E.P..Ram Water Harvesting 416-97 53,000 20,321 60,000 13% 7,000
GREENROOF COSTS (120-98) 416-98 18,381 10,000 - 10,000
Education' Web Based Learning 416-99 - 15,000 - 15,000 -100% 15,000
SUSTNBLE COMMUNITS/TECH.SERIES
Peel Sustainable Comm Funding 416-04 285,000 -100% (285,000)
York Sust Tech /Community Funds 416-07 149,000 3,726 8,000 -96% (143,000)
Toronto Sustainable Community/ Technology Funds 416-09 249,000 72,228 83,000 -67% (166,000)
Peel Funding for Sustainable Tech and extra Monitoring items 416-17 -
lc) Internal Municipal - 616,000 - 13,296 -100% 616,000
1,061,000 787,164 1,436,000 35% 375.000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 19,000 84,894 15,000 -21% (4,000)
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal 3,000 20,000 567% 17,000
Other - Provincial 11,000 81,170 42,000 282% 31,000
Other - Federal 147,000 78,039 118,000 -21% (31,000)
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other- Non - Government Grants 198,000 92,626 349,000 76% 151,000
378,000 336,730 642,000 43% 164,000
Capital levy
Peel 285,000 275,000 289,000
York 134,000 107,000 117,000
Durham
Toronto 249,000 174,000 223,000
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel - 26,171 173,000
York 15,000 - 38,402 38,000
Durham
Toronto - 41,631 54,000
Adjala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus) 638.17 -
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T 2 20
•
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding Inflation /COLA)
2010 service levels should be the same as 2009, 2010 reyenues will be on par with 2009.Additional funding for 2010 Evaluation of Soak Aways and Soil Ammendments and Bioretention.
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
CF needed for deliverables carried over to 2010, 140 -160k will be committed to two consulting contracts but possibly only 20-30k may be invoiced by year end. CF for 2010 deirverabtesDifference is du
More York,Toronto and special funding in 2009 for new Technologies and Living City Report Card.
CF needed for deliverables carried over to 2010, 140-160k will be committed to two consulting contracts but possibly only 20-30k may be invoiced by year end.
Many accounts did not account for additional funding, when budget wa
Green Roofs - not budget funding from RAP and UofWaterloo project engineered media for phosphourus removal
New project for 2009 completed - Infiltration Literature review - one year only
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2009 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Peel Climate Change Mitigation
Page 51
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET
$ S S
%HGG
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Peel Climate Change Mitigation (Overall)
Ecology Division Items
WM Water Response Plan (ECOL) 60,000 46258 14,000 -77% (46,000)
WM Water Balance Guidelines (ECOL) 39,000 23595 . 15,000 -62% (24,000)
WM Headwaters/Small Tributary Guidelines (ECOL) 87,000 93,688 75,000 -14% (12,000)
Flood Remedial Works (ECOL) 75,000 275,000 287% 200,000
WM Hydrometncs /Gauges (ECOL) 13,000 12,761 -100% (13,000)
WM Claireville Wingwall (ECOL) 25,000 10,393 15,000 -40% (10,000)
WM Brampton SWM Pond (ECOL) 58,000 11,482 23,000 -80% (35,000)
Stormwater Management Pond Retrofits (ECOL) 675,000 11597 883,000 -2% (12,000)
WM Claireville Reservoir Mtce Study (ECOL) 8,000 8,341 2,000 -75% (6,000)
PCCM -TNH TERR RECOVERY PLANS
Nat Her.Urban Canopy (ECOL) 101,000 86,798 191,000 89% 90,000
WM. Flood Channel Restoration & Remedial Works (ECOL) 289,000 94,512 195,000 -33% (94,000)
Geothermal Energy (ECOL) 4,127 30,000 - 30,000
Renewable Energy Bus Case (ECOL) see 129-87 9,738 15,000 15,000
Renewable Energy Roadmap (ECOL) see 129-87 49,573 44,000 44,000
Greening Retail (ECOL) see 129-87 118,338 64,000 - 64,000
Sust Comm #1 Green Building Councils /Secretanat (ECOL) 55,000 34,337 58,000 2% 1,000
PC/BM.Mun Carbon Neutral Guide (ECOL) 32,498 36,000 - 38,000
#3 World Green Building Secretariat (ECOL) 25,400 30,000 30,000
CTP Green Retail Guidelines sea 129 -87 18,149 175,000 - 175,000
CTP. Solar Roof at Black Creek ' see 129 -87 25,401 10,000 - 10,000
Sust Comm Community Transformation (ECOL) 301,000 74,000 -75% (227,000)
PEEL OCETA
Climate Change Science, Application & Training (ECOL) 203,000 188,930 193,000 -5% (10,000)
Sust Neightbourhood Retrofits (ECOL) 159,000 158,705 200,000 26% 41,000
Sust Comm Sustainable Tech Evaluation Projects - Air (ECOL) 110,000 71,519 149,000 35% 39,000
Sust Comm Sustainable Tech Evaluation Projects - Water (ECOL) 50,000 39,198 80,000 20% 10,000
Sust Communities Design Tool (ECOL) 30,000 - 30,000
TRCA Energy Management Plan 15,000 - 15,000
xxxxx -_
xxxxx
xxxxx _
xxxxx _
xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxx
Restoration Services Division items
PCC Erosion - Mallon Greenway Stream Restoration 45,617
PCC Erosion - Wexford Park Structure Replacement 107,948 -
PCC Erosion - Wexford Trail 26,517
Nat Her Natural Channel Habitat Restoration Projects 220,000 - 220,000
PCC A Kuehne Natural Channel Restoration 5,300 - 5,300
PCC Erosion - Diwe/Bntannia Rd RES SERVICES 2,753 -
PCC Erosion - Fleetwodd Park 30,870 -
PCC Erosion - Meadowland Park RES SERVICES 4,442 -
PCC Erosion - 180 Mill St Geotech RES SERVICES 2,039 -
Willowbank Trail Channel Renaturalizabon -
PCC Erosion - Conservation Park RES SERVICES 181,415
PCC Erosion - CNR /Lakeshore Pipe Repair (RS)
PCC Erosion - Centennial Park 144
PCC Erosion - Wrenwood Bank RES SERVICES 1,015 -
PCC Erosion - Melton Greenway Park
PCC Erosion - 138 King St Structure 899
PCC - Erosion & Remedial Capital Works (RS) 129 -35 558,000 158,851 513,000 -8% (43,000)
Nat Her Wetland Management (RS) 129-36 99,000 95,072 105,000 - 6% 8,000
Nat Her Riparian Planting (RS) 129-37 103,000 101528 102,000 -1% (1,000)
Nat Her Enhancements Existing Habitat Improvement Plans (RS) 129-38 99,000 91,054 208,000 110% 109,000
Nat Her Enhancement Existing ORM (RS) 129 -39 114,000 105,735 109,000 -4% (5,000)
Nat Her Indigenous Plant Propagation (RS) 129 -50 88,000 182,355 75,000 10% 7,000
Nat Her. Reforestation (Pnvate Land) (RS) 129 -51 115,000 100,530 100,000 -13% (15,000)
Nat Her Forest Management - TRCA Lands (RS) 129 -52 75,000 91,834 90,000 20% 15,000
Nat Her. Forest Management - Pnvate Lands (RS) 129 -53 78,000 97,301 83,000 8% 5,000
Nat Her Centreville Creek HIP (RS) 129 -58 126,000 102,338 , 124,000 -2% (2,000)
Nat Her. Upper Mimico Aquatic Restoration (RS) 129 -57 100,000 255,695 -100% (100,000)
Nat Her Claireville Eco- system Improvements (RS) 129 -58 238,000 238,094 175,000 -26% (83,000)
Watershed Management Division items
West Humber Stewardship 128 -74 90,000 90,000
Kennedy Valley Restoration 128 -85 20,000 - 20,000
WM Spills Prevention & Response (WM) 129 -12 85,000 15,079 187,000 96% 82,000
Channel Naturalization - Elobicoke Mimico (WM) 129-08 50,000 42,795 57,000 14% 7,000
Nat Her Watershed Communication for Transformation - Changing Behaviours (WA 129-27 30,000 3,303 27,000 -10% (3,000)
Nat HerStewardship Partnership Services (WM) 129 -54 147,000 156,426 147,000
Nat Her Etobwoke- MImico Stewardship (WM) 93,000 93,245 158,000 70% 85,000
Nat Her Elobicoke Headwaters Subwatershed Regeneration (WM) 45,000 44,483 10,000 -78% (35,000)
Education Albion CFC Renovations (WM) 843,000 1,229,428 (111,000) -113% (954,000)
Education Albion Hills Environmental Weeks (WM) 58,000 77,087 89,000 35% 23,000
Education EcoSchools Water Guide pm) 10,000 7,077 3,000 -70% (7,000)
Education Knowing Nature, Staying Safer Ed Program (WM) (5,000) 7,834 12,000 -340% 17,000
Sust Comm. EcoSchools Program Expansion (WM) 129 -80 325,000 141,718 483,000 49% 158,000
Web Based Learning, Carbon Calculator (WM) 1,000 2,238 (4,000) -500% (5,000)
6,909,000 5,961,243 6,898,300 0% (9,700)
68
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2009 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION : Watershed Management Page 51a
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Peel Climate Change Mitigation
2009 2009 2010 BUDGET BUDGET
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET CHANGE CHANGET
$ $ $ % $
f UNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees 74,358 84,000 - 84,000
Reserves 80,000 -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough 86,000 - 88,000
Other - Municipal 34,692 43,000 65% 17,000
Other - Provincial 1,000 11,000 - 11,000
Other - Federal 20,000 20,180 11,000 -45% (9,000)
Other - Donations/Fundraising -
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1 -
TBD 2 -
299,188 365,300 694% 319,300
Capital levy
Peel - 5,430,000 5,325,000 -2% (108,000)
York
Durham -
Toronto •
Ad(ala/Tos -
Carryforward levy -Peal 230,097 1,208,000 -18% (223,000)
York -
Durham -
Toronto -
Ad(ala/Tos -
Deficit / (Surplus) 1,961 -
NEW DATA/PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non-F/1
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding Inflation /COLA)
Peel approves more 2010 $ New projects are West Humber Stewardship and Kennedy Valley Restoration
See note below re. carryforwards
Albion Hills Environmental Weeks: Growth of program (75K to 1o0k)
Albion Hills Retrofit: Smaller works projected •
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
129 -90/91 Web Site /Social marketing both seem to expect same revenue
Flood Remedial Works - Transfer 100k for project deliverables, funding Is In account 129 -30 was ok'd by Directors
ALBION HILLS RETROFIT VARIANCE. The expense variance Is due to asbestos abatement costs that were unanticipated.° Upon commencement of work additional abatement was necessary. Additionally, major e
Centreville HIP, Erosion Control, Enhanced HIP, Enhanced HIP all have carry forward funds for continued work on sites In 2010
69
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 52
GROUP: Flood Control
ACTIVITY: Lower Don
2009 2009 2010 BUDGET BUDGET
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET CHG. CHG.
$ $ $ % $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Lower Don Env. Assessment
Lower Don Berm & Culvert Implementation
Don Mouth Naturalization & Port Lands Protection EA
Don Mouth: TRCA Proj. Man. -E.A. 192,000 169,361 173,000 -10% (19,000)
Don Mouth Design Workshop - External -
Don Mouth.Extemal /Public Cons. 1,000 21,000 2000% 20,000
Don MouthFacihtator 30,000 9,600 18,000 -40% (12,000)
Don Mouth-Gartner Lee 959,000 534,965 842,000 -12% (117,000)
Don Mouth Gardiner Roberts 8,000 2,047 4,000 -50% (4,000)
Don Mouth:IDC - GLL -
Don Mouth:DCS Technical Oversight 23,000 27,390
Don Mouth:Subsurface Investigations 110,000 55,195
DON MOUTH RESTOR:VAC /HOLIDAYS 18,313
Bala Line Pedestnan Tunnel
Lower Don EA to Implementation
Lower Don Imp Detail Design 50,000 - 50,000
LDRW Phase 2 TRCA Internal 40,000 36,799 63,000 58% 23,000
Lower Don Imp ORC /FPL Coordination 40,000 18,650 41,000 3% 1,000
LDRW PH 2-Peer Review of Flood Landform 15,000 20,049 15,000
Lower Don Imp. TWRC /Park Coordination 16,000 15,607 20,000 25% 4,000
LDRW PH 2 Gardiner Roberts 40,000 47,735 12,000 -70% (28,000)
LDRW PH 2 TSH -
LDRW PH 2 Hydro One 30,000 31,000 3% 1,000
LDRW PH 2:CN -
LDRW PHI195 -24 -
LDRW PH 2-LIMA Engineering 10,000
LDRW PH 2:Acquisition /Agreement 200,000 32,533 200,000
LDRW PH 2:USL -
TWRC:ASHBRIDGES EA- ARCHAEOLOGY 2,500
LOWER DON:VAC /HOLIDAY TIME 10,191 -
LDRW Enbridge Detail Design -
Ashbndge's Bay TRCA PM 82,976
Ashbndge's Bay Coastal Engineering 90,277
Ashbridhe's Bay Vac/Holiday Time 1,044
Covered from other Capital Projects
1,714,000 1,175,233 1,490,000 -13% (224,000)
Program /User fees
Reserves -
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal -
Other - Provincial -
Other - Federal -
Other - Donations /Fundraising -
Other - Non - Govemment Grants 1,714,000 1,172,765 1,490,000 -13% (224,000)
TBD 1 -
TBD 2 -
1,714,000 1,172,765 1,490,000 -13% (224,000)
Capital levy
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adlala / Mono
Deficit / (Surplus) 2,469
NEW DATA/PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
# public meetings hosted 1 1
# stakeholder /advisory meetings 61 61
# technical studies 4 4
# plans implemented
# advisory members engaged > 200 > 200
# of projects underway 4 4
# of Projects Involved with Project Partners 15 15
# participants at public events 153 153
# on distribution lists (including WT distnbutions) 11,000 11,000
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
For 191-04 - Dropped 2010 budget to $21,000 from $24,000 due to remaining funds in account following submission of invoice #62772 for Year End Expenses
For 191 -07 - Again these values should be shown under 191 -08 which is the real account for Gardiner Roberts
For 195-21 - Moved 20,000 back to 2010 unspent in 2009 - to resolve outstanding easement issues
For 195 -25 - Dropped expenses to $0 from $10,000.00 - do not expect their involvement in 2010 now
For 195 -26 - Expenses moved back to 2010 for GO Transit and HONI land transfer /easements
For 195x -xx - Enbndge project cancelled so $0 instead of $890K w
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Don Mouth EA - 2009 Dec. YTD Actuals appear to be lower than billed - Last invoice package to Waterfront Toronto in February 2010 - covered remaining expenses in 20
For 191 -06 - the YTD Actuals are $180,635.85 higher.
For 191 -04 - the YTD Actuals are $2,731.17 higher.
For 191 -09 - the YTD Actuals are $1,898.75 higher
For 191 -02 - Budget vs Actuals variance was $34,156 - due to more than 1 year delay in approvals of final Delivery Agreement Amendment (submitted in Nov. 2008) - wor
For 191 -04 - Budget vs Actuals variance was $1,000.00 - consultation costs were entirely covered by WT for the 1 event in 2009
For 191 -06 - Budget vs Actuals variance was $243,399 (based on final billing in invoice 62772) - Again delays in Delivery Agreement sign -off slowed down progress on EA
Again Account 191 -07 remains incorrectly tabled. Gardiner Roberts is 191 -08 not 191 -07. The 191 -07 is GLL hydraulics. The 191 -07 is now disused.
For 191 -08 - Budget vs Actuals variance is $5,953 - again budget had anticipated increased involvement of lawyers towards completion of EA process which was delayed
For 191 -15 - Budget vs Aduals variance is - $6,300 - (DCS was asked to do much more than originally budgeted throughout their involvement)
For 191 -20 - Budget vs Actuals variance is $52, 906 - (SLR completed the assignment with cash remaining on the table in the contingency, and due to some action items it
For 195-10 - Budget vs Actuals variance is — $21,000 - (reduced TRCA involvement on FPL oversight than anticipated
For 195-12 - Peer review $5,000 higher due to continuing costs beyond the anticipated construction date for the FPL. These additional costs
Unbudgeted Ashbndges Bay projects commenced
For 195-20 - Budget vs Actuals variance is - $7,000 (legal fees on FPL easements with ORCICity/TRCAM/T much more involved than anticipated
71
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION:
GROUP:
ACTIVITY:
Watershed Management
Capital
Other Flood Control Projects
Page 53
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Flood Warning Equipment & Models
226,000 88,844 317,000
40%
91,000
Flood Protection & Remedial Capital Works
507,000 138,299 593,000
17%
86,000
Small Dams & Flood Control Facilities Capital Works
134,000 44,125 168,000
25%
34,000
Large Dams Capital Works
169,000 48,615 181,000
7%
12,000
Black Creek Channel Maintenance
243,000 44,109 394,000
151,000
York Stormwater Management Program
100,000
-
100,000
Stouffville Dam - Safety Repairs
-
Stouffville Dam - Structural Study
-
Claireville Dam - Mechanical Repairs
-
Claireville Dam - Safety Repairs
-
Claireville Dam - OMS Review
30,000 1,326 14,000
-53%
(16,000)
WECI09 ALBION DAM SAFETY BOOMS
4,641
-
WECI 09•Secord Dam DSR
-
G. Ross Lord Dam - Study to Review OMS Manual
-
G. Ross Lord Dam - Safety Boom & Signage
10,000 5,761
-100%
(10,000)
G. Ross Lord Dam - Electrical Repairs
6,000 2,981
-100%
(6,000)
WECI 08 - Milne Dam OMS Manual
30,000 365 14,000
-53%
(16,000)
WECI 08 - Claireville Dam Wngwall Repair - Phase 2
30,000 15,000
-50%
(15,000)
WECI 08 - Pickering Ajax Flood Control Dyke Repair
130,000 9,397 40,000
-69%
(90,000)
WECI 08 - Secord Dam Culvert Repair
16,000 5,305 4,000
-75%
(12,000)
WECI 08 - Stouffville Dam OMS Manual
30,000 15,000
-50%
(15,000)
1,450,000 418,484 1,860,000
28%
410,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
7,177 195,000
-
195,000
Reserves
-
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
-
Other - Municipal
-
Other - Provincial
275,000 130,679 189,000
-31%
(86,000)
Other - Federal
17,297
-
Other - Donations /Fundraising
-
Other - Non - Government Grants
-
275,000 155,153 384,000
40%
109,000
Capital levy .
Peel
190,000 190,000 225,000
18%
35,000
York
125,000 125,000 175,000
40%
50,000
Durham
35,000 35,000 43,000
23%
8,000
Toronto
214,000 214,000 160,000
-25%
(54,000)
Adjala / Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
108,000 (107,107) 217,000
101%
109,000
York
148,000 (49,314) 199,000
Durham
62,000 (2,757) 66,000
Toronto
293,000 (95,171) 391,000
33%
98,000
Adjala / Mono
-
Deficit / (Surplus)
(46,319)
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T 0 xxx 2
# of Sudies in Progress
4 7
# of Sutdies Complete
1 5
# New Stream and Precipitation Gauges
2 1
% Completion
# Low Flood Indicator sites monitored
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
2009 carry over due to lack of staff to complete works. Level of service will increase in 2010 due to new
technician position.
79
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION:
GROUP:
ACTIVITY:
Watershed Management
Capital
Public Use Infrastructure
Page 54
2009
2009
2010
BUDGET
Dec.YTD Actuals
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$
$
$
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Retrofits /Construction
226,000
10,582
246,000
9%
20,000
GEN DEV PICNIC TABLE MATERIALS
KORTRIGHT.GLASS HOUSE REPAIRS
KCC: FIRE CODE COMPLIANCE
KORTRIGHT POWER TRIP REPAIRS
LAKE ST.GEORGE CFC•DAVIES HALL
LK.ST GRG:FIRE CODE COMPLIANCE
LK.ST. GEORGE UPGRADES
HEART LK PICNIC ROOF- BRCHVW 2
-
BM CHALET REPAIR /SUGAR SHACK
20,531
BM WORKSHOP ROOF
19,714
BM PICNIC SHELTERS
CAMPGROUND - INDIAN NON -42059 $
AH WATERPLAY & BEACH CENTRE
99,702
INDIAN L:CAMPGROUND SERVICING
INDIAN L.SERVICING /LANDSCAPING
PETTICT:PICNIC SHELTER UPGRADE
PETTICOAT WASHROOM UPGRADES
PETTICOAT POOL
84,951
PETTICOAT SUGAR SHACK
LK.ST.GEORGE GEOTHERMAL INSTAL
52,000
CA Planning
123,000
55,267
62,000
-50%
(61,000)
SP:RICHMOND H.LAND MNGMNT.PLAN
7,416
-
CA PLANNING - ALTONA PLAN IMPLE.
19,893
1,000
CA PLAN BRUCE'S MILL MAN PLAN
506
PEL LAND.HEART L PLAN To419 -49
CLMT:FLOOR RESURFACE /CARPETS
CA PLAN.GLEN MAJOR MNGMNT PLAN
29,153
NURSERY RELOCATION PROJECT
39,954
Move to Other Buildings Page
(39,954)
CA Planning- Altona Forest
-
Humber Arboretum
100,000
100,000
Covered from Other Programs
(1,400)
-
449,000
398,315
409,000
-9%
(40,000)
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
833
-
Reserves
100,000
100,000
Interest Earnings
-
CFGT - Flowthrough
54,000
36,589
-100%
- 54,000
Other - Municipal
1,000
-
1,000
Other - Provincial
-
Other - Federal
6,403
-
Other - Donations /Fun,
2,980
-
Other - Non - Government Grants
10,000
65,723
-100%
- 10,000
TBD 1
-
TBD 2
_
164,000
112,528
101,000
-38%
- 63,000
Capital levy
Peel
34,634
34,634
41,000
18%
6,366
York
58,688
58,688
59,000
1%
312
Durham
9,458
9,450
8,950
-5%
-508
Toronto
197,170
198,000
198,000
0%
830
Adiala /Mono
50
50
50
Carryforward levy -Peel
-
York
-
Durham
- 15,000
(14,137)
-100%
15,000
Toronto
(865)
1,000
-
1,000
Adiala /Mono
-
Deficit / (Surplus)
(33)
-
IN PROGRESS:,NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time
1
xxx
1
Non -F/T
xxx
•
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA]
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
73
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management Page 55
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Other Facilities Retrofits
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET % CHG. $ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Peel Campgrounds 555,000 353,427 63,200 -89% (491,800)
ALBION CAMPGROUND (OLD 408 -60
PEEL CAMPGR ALBION HILL(40863) 359,894
Peel Washroom Upgrades 109,000 102,140 100,000 -8% (9,000)
PEEL WASHROOM HEART L (4083) 5,920
PEL WASHROOM ALBION HILL(40865
Peel Conservation Land Planning (3) -
Archaeology Portion of Peel Conservation Plan
PEEL PLAN•CON LAND STRAT(40841
PEEL PLAN BOLTON MANPLAN(40851
PEL PLN PALGRAVE TR PLAN(40852 0
CLAIREVILLE TRAIL PLAN
CA IMPROVEMENT SERIES
Heart Lake Water Play Facility -
Just Get Active 53,350 -
Peel High Ropes & Playgrounds -
BAY ST.GOLF PLAYGROUND DONATIN
Peel Energy Efficiency Retorfittmg 100,000 99,910 100,000
Peel KCC Campus /Energy Trail 217,000 197,081 194,000 -11% (23,000)
Covered from Other Programs -
981,000 1,171,719 457,200 -53% (523,800)
•
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees (1,056)
Reserves
Interest Earnings -
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other- Municipal
Other- Provincial -
Other - Federal -
Other- Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD1
TBD2
(1,056)
Capital levy
Peel 593,000 593,000 600,000 1% 7,000
York
Durham -
Toronto -
Adjala /Mono
Carryforward levy-Peel 388,000 580,138 (142,800) -137% (530,800)
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala /Mono
Deficit 1 (Surplus) (363)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTIC
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Peel Campground Budget & Carryforward - AH Aquatic Facility
No 2009 budget for Just Get Active & Heart Lake Water Play - completed in 2008.
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
2009 budget over spent to complete Albion Hills Aquatic Facility. Over expenditures to be covered in 2010 capital budget.
2009 budget over spent to construct barrier -free washroom to meet Building Code. Over expenditures to be covered by 2010 capital budget
Next Page 57
74
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Drinking Water System Upgrades
Page 56
2009 2009
BUDGET ACTUALS
2010
BUDGET
BUDGET
CHG.
BUDGET
CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
%
$
Water System Engineer Analysis
Peel water System Upgrades
York Drinking Water. Boyd
York Drinking Water Bruce's Mill
York' Kortnght Centre
Durham Claremont
xxxxxxxx
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2
Capital levy
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala /Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
Deficit / (Surplus)
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
240
1
240
1
240
1
113 0%
n/a
24000.0%
100 0%
24000.0%
100.0%
24000.0%
100.0%
n/a
240
1
240
1
240
1
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
Facilities' # Buildings /Sq. footage n/a
MAIN DELIVERABLE #1 i.e. Base Monitoring Points
Completion
MAIN DELIVERABLE #2: i.e. Expand West Nile points
% Completion
MAIN DELIVERABLE #3 i.e. Base Monitonng Points
Completion
NO MS: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding mtlation /COLAI
1401 ES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANA1 IONS
75
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Other Building Projects
Page 57
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET ACTUALS BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
•
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
0.29
-
(1.00)
(1.00)
-
-
-
-
(1.00)
-
-
270,400.00
(39,500 00)
(6,900.00)
3,000,000.00
1,600,000.00
25,000.00
(150,000.00)
Kortright Retrofit 933,600.00 214,594 88 1,204,000.00
KCC RETRO #2 URBAN AGRICULTURE 9,619.35
KCC Sustainable House Construction 39,500.00 162,668 10
KCC Sustainable House Landscaping 6,900.00 56,473.19
KORTRIGHT ENTRANCE LANDSCAPING 35,121.19
Petticoat Pool 29,758.36 3,000,000.00
Heart Lake Pool 56,228.85 1,600,000.00
Nursery Relocation RSC Construction 39,953.60 25,000.00
Boyd Centre Workshop /Storage Construction 150,000.00 108,089.50
BOYD WRKSHP NON - CONSTRN.COSTS 850.13
Covered from Other Programs (97,847.79)
1,130,000.00 615,509.36 5,829,000.00 -
4.16
4,699,000.00
FUNDING SOURCES:
-
9.39
-
-,
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,409,000.00
1,533,000 00
1,533,000 00
Program /User fees 17,300.00
Reserves 150,000 00 1,559,000.00
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough 5.99
Other - Municipal
Other- Provincial 1,533,000.00
Other - Federal 85,987.21 1,533,000.00
Other- Donations /Fundraising 6,021.53
Other- Non - Government Grants 234,169.43
Lease revenue
150,000.00 343,484.16 4,625,000.00
Capital levy
29.83
-
(1.00)
(0.00)
0.02
(0 24)
4,475,000.00
(9,347.00)
(604.00)
1.00
(9,899.00)
Peel
York 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00
Durham 9,347.00 9,347.00
Toronto 207,604.00 207,000.00 207,000.00
Adjala/Mono 49.00 49.00 50.00
Carryforward levy -Peel 40,899.00 9,691 11 31,000.00
York 247,302.00 (132,155.89) 379,000.00
Durham 19,105.00 (2,605 16) 21,950.00
Toronto 205,643.00 (109,223.05) 315,000.00
Adjala/Mono 51.00 (25.42)
Deficit / (Surplus) 39,947.61
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
Staff FTEs- Full -time 1
Non -F/T
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Sustainable House essentially complete
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Next Page
59
Carryforward to 2010 to continue on Kortright Retofit projects.
76
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Oak Ridges Moraine Corridor P
Page 59
2009 2009
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
BUDGET % CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
3,000 (1)
(1)
(1)
-
20,000 (1)
-
301,000 ' (0)
129,000 5
-
(13,000)
(21,000)
(20,000)
(246,000)
(24,000)
108,000
Park Management Plan (GW) 16,000 12,819
Terrestrial Field Inventories (SH) 21,000 20,530
Trail Construction (ML) 20,000 60,122
Park Legal Fees (MF) 2,013
Habitat Restoration (ML) 266,000 5,666
Park Reforestation (TH) 104,924
Developers Contribution Agreement (JC 325,000
Park Restoration ORMF (GW) 21,000 56,961
x0000(
669,000 263,035
453,000 (0)
(216,000)
FUNDING SOURCES:
8,000 -
-
-
68,000 -
18,000 0
-
20,000 -
-
339,000 0
-
-
8,000
68,000
2,000
20,000
- 314,000
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Eamings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other- Municipal 16,000 •12,819
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other- Non - Govemment Grants 653,000 250,216
TBD 1
TBD 2
669,000 263,035
Capital levy
453,000 0
- 216,000
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto ,
Adjala/Tos
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto •
Adjala/Tos
Deficit / (Surplus)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCEMEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
0
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
Carry forward funds from developer's agreement for future park development
Continue to implement park development plans
Continue to receive developers funds as per agreemnt
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
granted and schedule determined
Carry forward any unused funds from developer's agreement for future works
Restoration funds in 406 -06 to be deferred until agreed plans are developed, approvals
77
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Watershed Management
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: BCPV Retrofit and Attraction
Page 60
2009 2009
'BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
225,000
407,000
-
-
12.74%
225,000
46,000
BCPV RETROF.CAP VISITOR CENTRE 13,782
BCPV Attrac 2,015
BCPV ATTRACTION.SITE SERVICING
EVENTS PAVILLION
BCPV North OPA 6210 MP _
BCPV Retrofit 361,000 117,168
BCPV - DALZIEL BARN WORK 25,311
BCPV JOHN DALZIEL /HELEN HOUSE
BCPV JAMES DALZIEL(AGNEW)WORK 141
FALL FROLIC FUNDED PROJECTS 3,125
BC RETRO. ROOF PROJECTS 35,540
BC RETRO. MILL REPAIRS
CHURCH DRIVESHED 44,011
09 BREWERY RETROFIT 30,785
09.RESTAURANT RETROFIT 48,264
BURWICK #2-CONSTRUCTION 193
361,000 331,179
632,000
75%
271,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
225,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
225,000
Program/User fees
Reserves
Interest Eamings
CFGT - Flowthrough 13,140
Other - Municipal 14,355
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2 s
27,495
Capital levy
225,000
350,000
57,000
-
-
-
225,000
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto 350,000 350,000
Adjala/Mono
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto 11,000 (46,316)
Adjala/Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
-
IN PROGRESS: NEW DATA / VOLUME / PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION
0
Staff FTEs- Full -time 0
Non -F/T
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
78
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Finance and Business Development
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Information Technology Project
Page 61
2009 2009
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals
2010
BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
$
605,000
51%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
205,000
IT Project 400,000 409,601
xxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
400,000 409,601
605,000
51%
205,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Program /User fees
Reserves ,
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provtncial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Government Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2
Capital levy
Peel 46,179 46,971
York 78,250 78,250
Durham 12,611 12,611
Toronto 262,894 264,000
Adjala/Mono 66 66
Carryforward levy -Peel 495
York 1,077
Durham 225
Toronto 5,892
Adjala /Mono 14
46,000
78,716
11,941
264,000
66
23,722
39,645
6,415
134,495
0%
1%
-50/0
0%
-
(179)
466
(670)
1,106
23,722
Deficit / (Surplus) (0)
-
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
1
380
270
340
310
450
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non -F/T
# of Desktop Computers
# of Laptop Computers
# of Landline phones
# of Cellphones
# of Lotus Notes Users
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Some funds held for replacing Accounting System in 2009+
79
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Finance and Business Development
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Major Facilities Retrofits
Page 62
2009 2009 2010
BUDGET Dec.YTD Actuals BUDGET
% CHG.
$ CHG.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
17%
97%
-
-
-
70%
-
-
55%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-57%
184%
10%
17%
17%
99%
-
100,767
491,233
81,000
Administrative Office Retrofits 600,000 70,117 700,767
Funds carted forward for New builc 505,000 996,233
Relocation To Boyd ' 70,887
Downsview Office 93,351
RES.SERVICE-FUF
New Administrative Office Design /I 115,000 522 196,000
Swan Lake Manage No activity
Asbestos Assessme No activity
1,220,000 234,878 1,893,000
673,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough -
Other - Municipal 8,825
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non - Govemment Grants
TBD 1
TBD 2
8,81b
Capital levy
(104,268)
216,379
1,980
67,659
17
56,599
Peel 184,268 184,268 80,000
York 117,375 117,375 333,754
Durham 18,916 18,916 20,896
Toronto 394,341 396,000 462,000
Adiala /Mono 100 99 117
Carryforward levy -Peel 57,300 (56,565) 113,899
Carryforward levy -York 96,400 (95,924) 192,343
Carryforward levy- Durham 15,700 (15,439) 31,176
Carryforward levy- Toronto 335,600 (322,596) 658,652
Carryforward levy- Adiala /Mono (81) 163
Deficit / (Surplu!
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010
-
-
0
2
Staff FTEs- Full -time
Non-F/T
Facilities # Buildings 4
Sq. Footage 54,000
$ Retrofit / Sq. Footage 13
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Only York approves 10 funding for new Administrative Office Design /Build
80
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERCATION AUTHORITY
2010 CAPITAL BUDGET
DIVISION: Finance and Business Development
GROUP: Capital
ACTIVITY: Land Acquisition
Page 63
2009 2009 2010
Budget Dec.YTD Actuals Budget % Chq. $ Chg.
$ $ $
GROSS EXPENDITURES:
Waterfront Open Space 500,000 5,917 500,000
Acquisition - Greenspace Strategy 4,750,000 2,565,361 • 4,750,000
Natural Areas Protection
ORC Repairs 307,000 290,772 16,000 -95% (291,000)
Peel Land Care 1,182,000 1,083,898 1,788,000 51% 606,000
York Land Care 418,000 418,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Program /User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Other - Non- Government Grants
Other - Internal
Land Sales proceeds
6,739,000 3,945,948 7,472,000 11% 733,000
128,451
2,063
156,554
3,890,000 2,002,282
807,000 290,772
500,000 145,000
3,877,783 0% (12,217)
549,000 -32% (258,000)
33,000 33,000
500,000
850,000 25,000 850,000
6,047,000 2,750,121 5,809,783 -4% (237,217)
Capital levy
Peel 1,161,699 1,146,915 1,684,000 45% 522,301
York 21,519 21,513 441,615 1952% 420,096
Durham 3,468 3,482 3,582 3% 114
Toronto 72,296 73,000 80,000 11% 7,704
Adjala/Mono 18 18 20 11% 2
Carryforward levy -Peel 33,000 (49,102) 53,000 61% 20,000
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/ Mono
Deficit / (Surplus)
(600,000)
0 (600,000)
NEW DATA /PERFORMANCE MEASURES SECTION For 2009 to 2010 and on
Staff FTEs- Full -time 5
Non -F/T 6
# Hecatares Land in ownership 41,300
41,300
NOTES: 2010 BUDGET CHANGE COMMENTS (excluding inflation /COLA)
NOTES: 2009 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
No note
81
RES. #C4 /10 - MEMBERS REMUNERATION
Proposed Cost of Living Adjustment. Changes to the member's per diem
and chair's honorarium for members of the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority require approval of the Ontario Municipal Board.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
David Barrow
Bonnie Litt ley
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT subject to Ontario Municipal
Board (OMB) approval pursuant to s. 37 of the Conservation Authorities Act, the
member's per diem and chair's honorarium be increased by 2% effective January 1, 2010;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
officials be directed to make the necessary application to the Ontario Municipal Board.
AMENDMENT
RES. #C5 /10
Moved by:
Seconded by:
David Barrow
Bonnie Litt ley
THAT the following replace the main motion:
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the member's per diem and
chair's honorarium be not increased in 2010.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Section 37 of the Conservation Authorities Act provides that "no salaries, expenses or
allowances of any kind shall be paid to any of the members of the authority without the
approval of the Ontario Municipal Board."
At Authority Meeting #3108, held on April 25, 2008, Resolution #A77/08 was approved as
follows:
THAT subject to Ontario Municipal Board Approval pursuant to s. 37 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, the member's per diem and chair's honorarium be increased by the
consumer price index effective January 1, 2008;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to make the necessary
application to the Ontario Municipal Board.
The OMB approved the 2008 request to increase the member's per diem and chair's
honorarium. Consistent with the Authority approval of the 2009 budget which provided for no
COLA adjustment to the salary and wage schedule in 2009, the Authority did not seek any
change in per diem or honorarium in 2009.
82
RATIONALE
The inflation rate in March 2010 was 1.9% (from March 2009). TRCA staff advised the Authority
in November, 2009, when the 2010 Preliminary Estimates, Operating and Capital, were
approved, that the estimates included a 2% COLA adjustment to the salary and wage schedule
effective the pay period nearest April 1, 2010.
The current per diem rate is $86.62 and the new rate would be $88.35. The Vice Chair receives
two times the regular per diem when acting in place of the Chair. The members received 50%
per diem when participating in meetings via conference call.
If a citizen appointee is the Chair, the Chair receives an honorarium of $38,027 annually. This
would increase to $38,788. If the Chair is an elected official, the Chair receives two times per
diem for attendance at TRCA meetings and official functions.
The OMB has agreed to reimburse the Chair and members for travel to TRCA meetings at the
same rate established for TRCA employee travel reimbursement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The impact will be marginal (e.g. less than $1,500) and has been included in TRCA's 2010
Budget.
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Email: jdillane @trca.on.ca
For Information contact:Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Email: jdillane @trca.on.ca
Date: March 25, 2010
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES. #C6/10 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
2009 YEAR END FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT
Provides information on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's
financial performance to December 31, 2009, in relation to the 2009
budget.
Ron Moeser
Bonnie Litt ley
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA)
Financial Progress Report dated December 31, 2009, be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As part of TRCA's financial management process, staff provide to the Budget /Audit Advisory
Board (BAAB) financial progress reports which compare actual financial performance to the
annual budget.
83
RATIONALE
Staff has included in the 2010 Operating and Capital Budget communication 2009 actuals and
budget information for comparison with 2010 budget. The members should be aware that the
2009 actuals are subject to change. Staff is working with the Auditors on the 2009 Financial
Statements which will be presented to BAAB at its meeting scheduled to be held on June 4,
2010. In finalizing the 2010 financial Statements, the 2009 actuals may change.
Attached are summary pages for the operating and capital budgets with notes on reasons for
significant variances. The 2009 operating budget includes a deficit of $770,000. Many factors
contributed to this as described in the notes but the key factors were:
• poor weather reduced revenues for conservation parks -and Black Creek Pioneer Village;
• inland fill revenue in Restoration Services was less than budgeted as development slowed
due to the economic downturn;
• education field centre revenue was lower as a result of cancellation of a school board
contract;
• The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto failed to achieve any of the $500,000 in
unrestricted fundraising revenue;
• interest revenue was less than budgeted due to lower interest rates;
• expenditures across many programs were constrained but not sufficiently to offset revenue
losses.
The 2009 capital budget produced a modest surplus of about $100,000. Explanations are
offered in the notes included in the attached summary. There are many capital projects for
which expenditures varied from budget. Reasons include such factors as delays in obtaining
various approvals and matching funding, need for additional communication or public
meetings, project completion schedules which can be spread over more than one year and
weather conditions which cause delays for inground work. Provision is made for carry over of
funding for capital works that are delayed. Capital funding is for the most part project specific
meaning that there is less opportunity for surplus funds to accumulate for unrestricted use.
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, 416- 661 -6292; Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: jdillane @trca.on.ca; rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Jim Dillane, 416- 661 -6292; Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: jdillane @trca.on.ca; rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
Date: April 1, 2010
Attachments: 1
84
Page 5
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2009 Financial Progress Report / Operating ( Draft )
2009 2009 Dif.
Gross Expenditures (by functional Unit) Bin_ get Actual Actuals Variance Notes
$ $ $
Finance and Business Services Division
Administration 2,168,000 2,085,813 (82,187) Project surcharge higher due to volume of projects
Rental Properties 1,804,000 1,958,816 154,816 $25k in increased tax cost for rental properties relating to OHT lands
Property Services 1,755,000 1,715,357 (39,643)
$321K in tax savings resulting from settlement of the CLTIP appeals.$25K in additional legal fees for Mining & Land Commission appeal of CLTIP properties
Vehicle & Equipment Reserve 0 0 Fuel Costs IowerDisposets deterred
5,727,000 5,759,987 32,987
Watershed Management Division
WM Divisional Management 232,000 246,573 14,573 No matenal variances
Watershed Strategies 1,636,000 1,602,783 (33,217)
Reduced Spending to address corporate operations issues. Raised Funds to offset projects
Conservation Field Centres 2,764,000 2,697,953 (66,047) Reduced revenue but somewhat offset through expense sevingsVARIANCE NOTE TCDSB cancelled bookings at Claremont and Albion Hilts - 80 days for
Sept 2009 to June 2016VARIANCE NOTE Economy and funding impacting participation in field trips and smaller groupsVARIANCE NOTE. TCDSB
cancelled bookings at Claremont and Albion Hills - 80 days for Sept 2009 to June 201OVARIANCE NOTE. Gapping of staff resulted in some savings
4,632,000 4,547,309 (84,691)
Planning & Development Division
Planning & Development 3.325,000 3.379,141 54,141
Higher expenditures in York Eas but recoverable from York Region revenuesHigher expenditures in sollcnor realtors
Enforcement 592,000 544,364 (47,636) Lower legal & vehicle chargeback expenditures
00 3,917,000 3,923,505 6,505
Ai vrif ologv Division
ISElbology 2,686,000 2,570,017 (115,983)
Savings result from charge back of staff salary to projects
2,686,000 2,570,017 (115,983)
Restoration Services Division
Restoration Services 1,819,000 1,160,173 (658,827)
Parks and Culture Division
Parks & Culture Divisional Management
Conservation Areas
Kortright Centre for Conservation
Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Black Creek Pioneer Village
Food Services
Office of the CAO
Corporate Management
Corporate Secretanat
Human Resources
Corporate Communications
Professional Access Program
Expenditure Total
Planting activity above budget but more showing as internal, Archaeology more projects, more revenues & expensesPlanting propagation activity above
budget but more showing as internal
839,000 733,420 (105,580)
Customer Service FT wage saving from leave of absence $10,900 and staff utilized in other programs
3,586,000 3,473,175 (112,825)
Numerous cost constraints to deal with revenue shortfall.
1.593,000 1,712,382 119,382
1,461,000 1,447,731
4,289 000 4,327,640
1,034,000 1,048,568
Increase revenue & expenditures for Corporate and Energy programs. Reduced education expedrtures to offset lower revenue.
(13,269) Expenditures reduced to offset revenue shortfall.
38,640
Expenditure increases in brewery lease. and unanticipated education staff reclassification
14,568 Expenditure constraints to offset reduced revenue in corporate and wedding progmms.lncreased revenue & expenditures for brewery operation.
12,802,000 12,742,915
(59,085)
503,000 501,171 (1,829) Legal fees will exceed budget by at least $81,000, which is partially recovered by lower than expected member remuneration costs.
416,000 470,506 54,506
556,000 529,213 (26,787) HR and Communications budgets expected to have savings due to curtailing costs in the last quarter.
1.316,000 1,224,582 (91,418)
Communications expected to have savings due to curtailing expenses in lest quarter
366,000 337,197 (28,803)
3,157,000 3,062.669 (94,331)
34,740,000 33,766,575 (973,425)
1)
Page 6
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2010 Final Operating Estimates - Funding Sources
2009
Budget
2009 Diff.
Actual Actuals Variance Notes
Funding Sources:
Program /User fees:
Rental Properties 2,314,000 2,300,525 (13,475)
Interest Earnings 300,000 260,146 (39.854)
Interest below budget by $40.000 due to lower rates.
Black Creek Pioneer Village 2,203,000 1,982,469 (220,531)
Revenue shortfalls in parking, education, brewery, closure Dec. 24 - 31
Food Services 1,081,000 942,270 (138,730)
Expenditure constraints to offset reduced revenue in corporate and wedding programs., Increased revenue & expenditures for brewery operation.
Development Services 3.025,000 3,014,689 (10,311) Planning fees and Permit revenues were higher than budget
Restoration Services 2,056,000 800,270 (1,255,730) Lower Inland Fill revenues to slower building activity, Planting activity above budget but more showing as internalArchaeology more projects, more revenues
& expenses
Conservation Areas 3,616,000 3,099,819 (516,181) Education revenue down. • Attendance and revenue below budget due to poor weather, Maple Syrup program revenue up , Unrealized swimming revenue
for Albion Hills
Kortright Centre for Conservation 1,444,000 1,480,416 36,416
Increase revenue & expendrtures for Corporate and Energy programs. Unrealized education revenue due to lower attendance.
Oak Ridges Corridor Park 1,290,000 1,259,833 (30,167)
Expenditures reduced to offset revenue shortfall.
Conservation Field Centres 1,806,000 1,442,061 (363,939) VARIANCE NOTE TCDSB cancelled bookings at Claremont and Albion Hills • 80 days for Sept 2009 to June 2010VARIANCE NOTE. Economy and funding
impacting participation in field tnps and smaller groups r
All Other Program /User fees 115,000 142,405 27,405
ajeserves (514,000) 514,000 Less Inland Fill earned & needing to be put in reserve
Qv)FGT- Flowthrough 403,000 702,116 299,116
+ Unbudgeted and /or higher than budget rev Property, Restoration Services, Stategies, CA's, KCC, BCPV, CFCs
Other Municipal
1,149,000 1,103,739 (45,261) Restoration Services Contracts categonzed as user fees
Provincial 842,700 846,576 3,876
Federal 104,300 161,709 57.409 CA's & BCPV unbudgeted rev re Employment programs & digitization program
Donations /Fundraising 483,000 437,088 (45,912)
Rouge Perk less than budgeted
Non - Government Grants 304,000 791,806 487,806
PST Rebates exceeded budget by $85,000, Propery tax rebate from litigation, Restoration Services Projects
CFGT - Living City
500,000 (500,000) Fundraising goals not met
Provincial Transfer Payments 846,000 845,753 (247)
Revenue total 23,368,000 21,613,691 (1,754,309)
Net Expenditures 11,372,000 12,152,884 780,884
Net Expenditures funded by
Municipal Levy 11,372,000 11,382,338 10,338
Deficit / (Surplus) 770,546 770,500
Staffing: Full -time 242.9 Some positions unfilled
Non -Full -time 140.7
- Total 383.60
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
2009 FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT / CAPITAL (DRAFT)
Gross Expenditures:
MONITORING AND REPORTING
WATERSHED PLANNING
Peel Water Management
York Water Management
Durham Water Management
Water Management only portion of Toronto Remedial Action
Plan Project
Water Cost Centres
Source Protection Planning
Floodplain Mapping Program
York/Peel /Durham/Toronto Groundwater
Terrestrial Natural Heritage
REGENERATION
Toronto Remedial Action Plan Project- Regeneration items
Peel Natural Heritage Project
York Natural Heritage Project
Durham Natural Heritage Project
Regeneration Cost Centres
Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Projects
Other Erosion Control Projects
City of Toronto Waterfront Project
Region Of Durham Waterfront Project
Waterfront Revitilization Corporation Projects „
Humber Bay Shores Waterfront Park
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
Stewardship
Education
Sustainable Technologies
PEEL CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION PROJECT
Community Transformation Partnerships
2009
BUDGET*
2009
Actuals
1
Dlff.
Actuals
1
Variance
Notes
1,174,000 1,252,430 78,430 Substantial difference in projected year end expenses due to the addition of several large projects /partnerships with MOE (WNV and
Sportfish Contaminant Research) Some CF to support work extension into 2010 (data analysis, sample preparation and reporting actmrtes)
326,000 280,625 (45,375)
485,000 338,406 (146,594)
255,000 170,816 (84,184)
393,000 217,202 (175,798)
403,000 587,001 184,001
1,677,000 2,918,370 1,241,370
307,000 223,391 (83,609)
776,000 564,061 (211,939)
497,000 452,230 (44,770)
The majority of the major over expenditures is offset by additional funding received during the year.
Funding will be CF to pay for consultant for Surface Water
The majority of the major over expenditures is offset by additional funding received during the year.Antiapated net expenditures will
balance.0
120-07 Expect to be overspent, but will offset deficit with revenue from other watershed accountsThe majority of the major over
expenditures Is offset by additional funding received during the year.Anticipated net expenditures will balance.120 -17 - There are $13K
projected actual expenditures offset by internal billing
Surplus in budget due to outstanding obligations in Q4 (to be completed In 2010).
$900,000 for Halton Tier 3 Water Budget work not Included in original budgeVrevenue estimates..
Surcharge of $140,000 transferred to TRCA.
CF needed for projects that have deliverables carrying into 2010, Updated hydrologic / hydraulic models and flood line mapping, including
all supporting documentation for site specific areas within all TRCA watersheds.
Consultant contracts will not be complete in 2009 - 232k to CF to 2010 for deliverables attached to model applications and peer review
720 000 493,971 (226,030) Don HP, Toronto Golf Club & Lower Humber Barrier Mitigation will have carry forwards due to approval delays
1,259,000 988,209 - (270,791)
597,000 605,579 8,579
221,000 432,283 211,283
1.597,000 3,173,406 1,576,406
3,110,000 2,414,751 (695,249)
239.000 245,756 6,756
1,970,000 1,179,246 (790,754)
252,000 434,675 182,675
12,649,000 3,940,348 (8,708,652)
3,000.000 1,250,435 (1,749,565)
818,000 835,871 17,871
298,000 453,395 155,395
1 061.000 787,164 (273,836)
6,908,000 5,961,243
1,013,000 812,057
Chandra Sep22/09 For account 112 -54, wqe are partnering with the City of Missisuaga on this project. TRCA is designing and constructing
a trail near Courtney Park, the city is supplying the funds in 2010 (approx $170,000) for trail construction and TRCA is contnbuting funds
towards restoration work associated with the Trail.
Higher revenues for Granger Greenway due to funding by City of Vaughan for trail work
W. Etobicoke Crk will have carry forward funds to match City of Missisauga funds in 2010
There have been additional special projects funded by the City of Toronto eg 21 Sunnybrae
Arsenal Project in Mississauga delayed.
Additional funding received from the City of Pickering for Shoreline Improvements and EA/Consultants for the Pickering Harbor
Entrance0PG Naturalization, an OPG funded project will have carry forward funds due to shortfall in overall funding to commence the
proposed project.
Western Beaches - Project substantially complete, only monitoring and fish compensation activities remain - Complete Mar 31, 2010Tommy
Thompson Park - Project schedule delayed - project completion now March 2011 Mimico Park - Phase 1 - Phase 2 construction is expected
to begin in July 2010 (acquisition already underway)Port Union - Phase 2 in progress
CF needed for deliverables carried over to 2010, 140 -160k will be committed to two consulting contracts but possibly only 20 -30k may be
Invoiced by year end CF for 2010 deliverablesDifference is due to unbudgeted revenue - which will be spentMore York,Toronto and special
funding in 2009 for new Technologies and Living City Report Card CF needed for deliverables carried over to 2010, 140 -160k will be
committed to two consulting contracts but possibly only 20-30k may be invoiced by year end. Many accounts did not account for additional
funding, when budget was done.Green Roofs - not budget funding from RAP and UofWaterloo project engineered media for phosphourus
removalNew project for 2009 completed - Infiltration Literature review - one year only
(946,757) 129 -90/91 Web Site /Social marketing both seem to expect same revenueFlood Remedial Works - Transfer 100k for project deliverables,
funding is in account 129-30 was ok'd by DirectorsALBION HILLS RETROFIT VARIANCE The expense variance is due to asbestos
abatement costs that were unanticipated.
Upon commencement of work additional abatement was necessary Additionally, major electrical work is required to comply with code -
when remoCentreville HIP Erosion Control, Enhanced HIP, Enhanced HP all have carry forward funds for continued work on sites in 2010
129 -90/91 Web Site /Social marketing both seem to expect same revenueFlood Remedial Works - Transfer 100k for project deliverables,
funding is in account 129-30 was ok'd by DirectorsALBION HILLS RETROFIT VARIANCE The expense variance is due to asbestos
abatement costs that were unanticipated -
Upon commencement of work additional abatement was necessary. Additionally, major electrical work is required to comply with code -
when remoCentreville HIP, Erosion Control, Enhanced HIP, Enhanced HIP all have carry forward funds for continued work on sites in 2010
(200,943)
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
2009 FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT / CAPITAL (DRAFT)
FLOOD PROTECTION
Lower Don
Other Flood Control Projects
INFRASTRUCTURE
Public Use Infrastructure
Other Facilites Retrofits
Heart Lake & Petticoat Crekk Pools
Living City Centre Design /Build
Nursery Relocation / Boyd Workshop
Kortright Archetype House
Oak Ridges Moraine Corridor Park
BCPV Retrofit and Attraction Development
Information Technology Project
Major Facilities Retrofits
REGIONAL OPEN SPACE
Waterfront Open Space
Acquisition - Greenspace Strategy
Natural Areas Protection
Peel, York Land Care Projs.& ORC Repairs
Expenditure total
Funding Sources:
Program/User fees
Reserves
Interest Earnings
CFGT - Flowthrough
Other - Municipal
Other - Provincial
Other - Federal
Other - Donations /Fundraising
Non - Government Grants
Lease Revenue
Land Sale Proceeds
Revenue total
Net Expenditures
Provincial Transfer Payments
Municipal Levy:
Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/Tos
sub -total Current Year Approved
Carryforward levy -Peel
York
Durham
Toronto
Adjala/Tos
sub -total Carryforward
Levy Total
(Surplus) / Deficit
2,099
BUDGET
2,009 DH1.
Actuals Actuals
$
$
Variance
Notes
1,714,000 1,175,233 (538,767) For 195x -xx - Enbndge project cancelled so $0 instead of $890K
1,450,000 418,484 (1,031,516) Projects delayed due to staffing and funding
449,000 398,315
981,000 1,171,719
933,600
46,400
669,000
126,366
148,893
254,262
263,035
(50,685)
190,719
(607,234)
(1,107)
207,862
(405,965)
Carryforward to 2010 to continue on Kortright Retofit projects.
Sustainable House essentially complete
Carry forward any unused funds from developer's agreement for future worksRestoration funds in 406-06 to be deferred until agreed plans
are developed, approvals granted and schedule determined
361,000 331,179 (29821)
400,000 409,601 9,601 Some funds held for replacing Accounting System in 2009+
1,220,000 234,878 (985,122) Only York approves 10 funding for new Administrative Office Design /Build
500,000 5,917 (494,083) No note
4,750,000 2,565.361 (2,184,639) Acquisitions delayed due to lack of funding
1,489,000 1,374,670 (114,330)
57,118,000 39,976,822 (17,141,178)
1,512,000 3,640,740 2,128,740 Additional contract revenues to pay for municipal work
250,000 190,679 (59,321)
30,651 30,651
495,500 658,554 163,054
6,663,500 2,975,665 (3,687,835) Mostly related to acquisitions deferrals
4,942,300 5,476,362 534,062
1,057,200 1,438,033 380,833
540,000 173,016 (366,984)
16,553,500 6,665,335 (9,888,165) Mostly associated with TWRC projects not proceeding
850,000 25,000 (825,000) Land sale postponed to 2010
32,864,000 21,274,034 (11,589,966)
24,254,000 18,702,788 (5,551,212)
10,184,780
2,391,832
878,800
6,264,305
283
19,720,000
2,506,199
809,702
271,805
1,546,243
51
5,134,000
24,854,000
10,169,166
2,391,826
878,806
6,268,000
282
19,708,080
684,460
(281,462)
(70,136)
(1,163,765)
(93)
(830,996)
18,877,084
(15,614)
(6)
6
3,695
(1)
(11,920)
(1,821,739)
(1,091,164)
(341,941)
(2,710,008)
(144)
(5,964,996)
(5,976,916)
(600,000) (174,295) 425,706
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:00 a.m., on Friday, April 9, 2010.
Maria Augimeri
Vice Chair, Authority
/ks
89
Brian Denney
Secretary- Treasurer
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE BUDGET /AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD #2/10
September 10, 2010
Budget /Audit Advisory Board Meeting #2/10, to be held on Friday, September 10, 2010, was
cancelled due to a lack of quorum. The items scheduled to be dealt with at this Meeting will go
directly to Authority at Meeting #7/10, scheduled to be held on September 17, 2010.
PRESENT
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
Ron Moeser Member
ABSENT
David Barrow Member
Bonnie Litt ley Member
Maja Prentice Member
90