HomeMy WebLinkAboutRouge Park Alliance 2010R1
" "" ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES - MEETING #1/10 - February 5, 2010
Rouge Park
The Rouge Park Alliance met in the Main Boardroom of the Toronto Zoo. Alan Wells, Chair, welcomed everyone and
thanked Peter Evans, Toronto Zoo, for hosting the meeting. The Chair called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m.
PRESENT
Members:
Alan Wells, Chair
Councillor Paul Ainslie, City of Toronto
Hon. Pauline Browes, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp
Hon. Michael Chong, MP, Government of Canada
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc
Peter Evans, Toronto Zoo
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York
Dr. Helena Jaczek, MPP, Province of Ontario
Regional Councillor Bonnie Littley, Region of Durham
Councillor Ron Moeser, City of Toronto
Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City of Pickering
Gerri Lynn O'Connor, Toronto & Region C. A.
Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham
Councillor Clyde Smith, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
ABSENT
Members:
Councillor David Cohen, Town -of Richmond Hill
Staff:
Bob Clay, Manager, Habitat Restoration
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy & Administration
Michelle Holmes, Manager, Visitor Experience
Doreen McCarty, Administrative Coordinator
Observers:
Mike Adler, Scarborough Mirror
Cat Beattie, Public Participant
Alternates:
Ian Buchanan, Region of York
Nestor Chornobay, Region of Durham
• Brian Denney, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Ron Dewell, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Councillor Chin Lee, City of Toronto
Jim Robb, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Tracey Steele, Town of Richmond Hill
Carolyn Woodland, Toronto & Region C. A.
Alternates:
Wayne Arthurs, MPP, Province of Ontario
Councillor Raymond Cho, City of Toronto
Ron Dewell, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Mayor Wayne Emmerson, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
Adele Freeman, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Mark Graham, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Sue Gunton, Toronto Zoo
Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Town of Markham
Keith Laushway, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Tom Melymuk, City of Pickering
Staff (Continued...)
Vicki MacDonald, Biologist
Maria Papoulias, Manager, Natural Heritage
Sheryl Santos, Stewardship Coordinator
Diana Smyth, Trail Coordinator
Observers (Continued...)
Tom Boudreault, City of Toronto Parks
Brian Buckles, Green Door Alliance
R2
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 2 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
Observers (Continued...)
Gail Crossman, Transport Canada
Gurjeet Dhillon, City of Toronto
Jim'Dillane, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Lilli Duoba, Town of Markham
Evan Ferrari, CPAWS Wildlands League
David Harvey, Consultant
John Hughes, Hemson Consulting
John Kay, Resident
Sheila Lathe, Resident
John Livey, Town of Markham
Marvin Macaraig, U. Of T. Dept. Of Geography
John Matheson, StrategyCorp
David McCleary, StrategyCorp
Beth McEwen, City of Toronto
Andy McKinnon, "Rouge Watch"
Brent Mersey, Markham EAC
Colin O'Neill, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
Debbie Pella Keen, Province of Ontario
Barbara Tang, Markham Resident
Reuben Tang, Markham Resident
Tupper Wheatley, Milne Park Conservation Assocn.
R3
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 3 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
CHAIR'S REMARKS
Alan Wells, Chair, welcomed back Barb Davies from maternity leave, and introduced David Harvey, who is on
contract as Policy Advisor for Rouge Park, and Lewis Yeager, who is visiting today's meeting. The Chair also
introduced the Governance 'Review Steering Committee members who were present (Pauline Browes, Ian
Buchanan, Nestor Chornobay, Brian Denney, John Livey, Beth McEwen, Debbie Pella Keen), the consultants of
the report: John Matheson, David McCleary, StrategyCorp, and John Hughes, Hemson Consulting.
In the Chair's remarks regarding the Governance Report, he talked about the assigned task the consultants
were given in the terms of reference, the decision - makers, the purpose of the consultant's report. He
remarked on the Alliance's position, which will emerge from the collective positions taken by its member
organizations, further discussions with the Federal and Provincial Ministers, staff and key stakeholders. He also
mentioned the next steps once a position was established.
The Chair referred the Alliance members to the handouts in front of them which deal with agenda item #1: the
consultant's Governance Review Report and the Chair's report, and the presentation to follow by John
Matheson.
MINUTES OF MEETING #7/09, December 4, 2009
MOTION:
Res. #1/10
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: Clyde Smith
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the minutes of Meeting #7/09 held on December 4, 2009.
CARRIED
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
None
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None
1A. Presentation by Consultant - Governance Review Report
John Matheson, StrategyCorp
John Matheson made a presentation on the Governance Review Report. The report can be viewed on the
Rouge Park website: www.rougepark.com.
MOTION: Moved by: Pauline Browes
Res. #2/10 Seconded by: Paul Ainslie
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the presentation by John Matheson, StrategyCorp, on the
Governance Review Report.
CARRIED
R4
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 4 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
1 B. Chair's Report - Rouge Park Governance Review Report
KEY ISSUE
Receipt and Circulation of the Governance Review Report.
MOTION:
Res. #3/10
Moved by: Pauline Browes
Seconded by: Clyde Smith
1. THAT the Rouge Park Governance Review Final Report, under separate cover, be received.
2. THAT the recommendations of the Rouge Park Governance Review Steering Committee be received
as follows:
a. The Steering Committee advises the Rouge Park Alliance that the Governance Review Report,
prepared by the consulting team of StrategyCorp and Hemson Consulting, is a competent and
professional report on the options for governance and financing for Rouge Park
b. That the Rouge Park Governance Review Final Report be forwarded to the Rouge Park Alliance
for consideration
c. That the Steering Committee recommends to the Alliance the Rouge Park Governance Review
Final Report be circulated to the constituent member organizations of the Alliance for
comments within 60 days
AMENDMENT
Moved: Chin Lee
Seconded by: Michael Chong
That the following point (d) be added:
d. That the Rouge Park Governance Review Final Report be forwarded to the Federal and Provincial
political party leaders for their information.
3. THAT the Chairman formally request the heads of the constituent member organizations to
consider the following:
a. The recommendations of the Rouge Park Governance Review Report
b. The concept of a Founding Deal and elements as they relate to their specific organization
c. Participation with the Alliance to engage the Federal and Provincial governments in the
creation of the proposed Federal Park governance structure and creation of a joint
interpretive /educational centre for Rouge Park.
4. THAT the Chairman of the Rouge Park Alliance appear before the constituent member
organizations to answer questions and receive comments pertaining to the Governance Review
Report.
5. THAT the Chairman provides briefings to the appropriate Federal and Provincial officials and
elected representatives on the recommendations of the Governance Review Report and the process
underway to receive input and comments from the constituent members of the Alliance.
6. THAT the Chairman be authorized to undertake briefings of key stakeholders on the
recommendations of the Governance Review Report and the process underway to receive input and
comments.
R5
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 5 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
7. THAT the Chairman report back to the Alliance regarding the following matters:
a. Response of the Rouge Park Alliance constituent member organizations to the Governance
Review Report recommendations and any related matter
b. The results of the briefings with Federal and Provincial officials, elected representative and key
stakeholders
c. Recommended Alliance Governance Model and advocacy position
d. A strategy and work program necessary to engage the Federal and Provincial Governments in
the implementation.
8. THAT the Chair upon receipt of the responses from the member organizations (Recommendation 7)
organize and host a workshop with the constituent members of the Alliance to develop a draft
"Founding Deal" as recommended by the Governance Review Report.
AMENDMENT CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
BACKGROUND
In August 2009, the Rouge Park Alliance issued a call for proposals from qualified consultants to undertake a
review, develop and recommend an appropriate governance model for the Rouge Park. In September 2009,
the consultant consortium of StrategyCorp and Hemson Consulting were retained for the purposes of this
study.
The purpose and objectives of the study as set out in the Terms of Reference consisted of five specific tasks
s:immarized below:
Governance Options:
Identify, develop and evaluate potential governance models which could be implemented for the
Rouge Park. The scope of this review would include existing park governance models within Canada
as well as internationally and related type organizations.
Funding Strategy:
Document and assess the adequacy of existing operating and capital funding for the Park.
Park Operation, Management and Organization Structure:
Develop a management and organization structure with help from the Steering Committee to
manage the Park. As part of this plan, a five -year budget forecast would be developed which would
Zink the discussions between funding and governance.
Rouge Park Land Reconciliation:
Research /document the impact of the addition of these lands and recommend a balance of uses for
the lands.
Engaging Rouge Park Alliance Membership:
Develop and implement an engagement strategy for the project. Workshops developed on the
subject of governance and funding are expected to be efficient and comprehensive.
R6
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 6 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
STUDY PROCESS
As the Alliance is aware, a Steering Committee consisting of senior staff representatives from each of the
constituent member organizations was established to work directly with the consulting team. The overall ,
direction and management of the study was the responsibility of the Alliance Chairman. The existing funding
of the Alliance is provided through multiple sources for both operating and capital expenditures. The
complexity of the existing funding framework and the need to identify future operating and capital needs
required the creation of a separate Financial Working Group to work with the consulting team.
The study process consisted of four main phases as follows:
1. Data and information collection
2. Identification of the Governance Interest, Issues and Opportunities
3. Identification of Governance Principles, Concepts, Areas of Agreement and Disagreement, Evaluation
Criteria and Assessment
4. Evaluation and Recommendation of a Preferred Model and Implementation Platform
The Terms of Reference provided a clear direction on the overall objectives of the review.
Public administration never occurs in a vacuum; it is always embedded in the overarching political context of
the time. This study and the Rouge Park are no exception. The consulting team approached this study with a
keen awareness that the Park is not in need of an academic study about what "might be "; much more
important, is a model that could be implemented.
Thus, in addition to the objective realities of the Park, the study process also sought to understand, as fully as
possible, the subjective political dimensions of the Park, with a view to defining the key political enablers and
the barriers to success.
Accordingly, the study had to change to reflect the underlying conditions.
The two greatest considerations were the presence of existing advocacy positions among Alliance members
and the backdrop of the current economic downturn and its impact on the ability to secure funding from all
levels of government.
The Governance Review study has provided an excellent opportunity for a broad -based dialogue between the
constituent members of the Rouge Park Alliance (staff and representatives levels), its needs, limitations and
opportunities. Between late August (2009) and the end of January there were 3 Steering Committee
Workshops, 2 working sessions for the Finance Working Group and one Alliance Workshop. In addition, the
consulting team held over 12 individual meetings with representatives (Alliance and Steering Committee) of
the constituent member organizations and a large number of conference calls.
A draft of the consultant's report was presented to the Steering Committee on January 13, 2010 at which time
they were asked to undertake their own internal review and provide comments by January 22, 2010. Detailed
submissions were received from the MNR, Parks Canada, City of Toronto, TRCA, York Region, Durham Region
and the Town of Markham. The consultants undertook a detailed review of comments (in the order of 150
individual corrections and clarifications or elaborations), which have been incorporated into the final version.
R7
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 7 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
THE NEED FOR CHANGE
The work undertaken by the consulting team found, regardless of a recommended or preferred governance
model, the Alliance is facing a number of serious challenges and limitations.
The overarching conclusion reached by the consultant team is that the Park and Alliance have reached a
critical juncture in their evolution. Based upon the SWOT analysis, the opportunities, tensions and issues are
indicative of the Alliance and entity (Park) transitioning from the conceptual stage to the reality of a
functioning park and organization.
The Rouge Park was borne out of activism and a political response to a compelling concept and opportunity.
Since its creation, the efforts of the Alliance have further defined and consolidated the opportunity.
This study process has confirmed that even today, the basic discussion about what the Rouge Park could or
should be, remains unresolved. There is still no universal shared definition of the "Rouge Park" — even among
Alliance Members.
Because of its legal limitations, the Alliance is not a true decision- making board. Rather it is an advisory body.
In practice, decisions of the Alliance (which does not have a legal status) are treated as binding decisions, and
implemented. In fact, however, they are merely stakeholder advice which is then implemented by one of the
parties.
One of the attributes of a board of directors is that board members have a duty to act in the best interests of
the organization. If a board member is in a conflict of interest between the interests of the organization, and
some other organization to which he or she belongs, then it is necessary to deal with the conflict. Depending
on the norms and by -laws of the board, this might require disclosure of the conflict, recusal or abstention form
the decision, as may be appropriate in the case.
The Rouge Park Alliance is not a board in this sense. Alliance members are there to represent the organization
that appointed them. Accordingly, it does not function as a board. It is more of a structured meeting of the
Park stakeholders.
Alliance members are therefore in the ambiguous situation of trying to govern the Rouge Park in the best
interests of the Rouge Park, while trying to protect the interests of the organizations they represent.
Further, the consultants have recommended, even if a new governance structure and funding relationship is
not secured for the Park, the Alliance should not be left in its current state. The current Rouge Park should be
replaced with an incorporated entity, capable of carrying on business in its own name, and of owning land.
The redesign should replace the current stakeholder Alliance with a Board of Directors for the Rouge Park.
Board members should be mandated to:
• provide leadership to the Park
• be accountable for ensuring that the Rouge Park fulfills its mandate
• oversee the Park's management
• act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation
• exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances
R8
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 8 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
Attached to this report as Schedule A is the Executive Summary from the main study report.
WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY
As mentioned earlier in this report, there has been a renewed dialogue and engagement, particularly at the
senior staff levels (Steering Committee) among the Alliance member organizations. This positive energy has
created a sense of common purpose, opportunity and momentum to move forward with securing a new
governance structure and funding model for the Rouge Park.
It is also very unique to have secured political support from a cross - section of elected representatives from all
three levels of government who are championing Rouge Park. Further, both the Federal and Provincial
members have indicated interest in receiving the report from the Governance Review.
Public and political interest continues to focus on environmental issues, the most recent example being the
climate change conference in Copenhagen. At the same time, Canada and Ontario will continue to be a focus
of international attention with the G8 and G20 conferences this June followed by the Pam American Games,
which will be hosted in the GTA in 2015. Lastly, there is the reality of elections for the municipal, provincial
and federal governments over the next 2 years.
The Rouge Park has always been defined as a landscape of National and Provincial significance and an
opportunity to protect a unique and important natural and cultural heritage resource. There is a very real
opportunity for the Alliance, working with its constituent members, to "harness" the momentum that has
resulted from the Governance Review. and the emergence of the political champions and to capitalize on the
public, institutional, media and political attention that will materialize over the 12 -18 months.
CHAIRMAN'S RECOMMENDATIONS — MOVING FORWARD
It is important to engage the senior levels of government, the public, and media with a single voice and a very
clear set of recommendations that need to be implemented to secure the opportunity that is the Rouge Park.
With that in mind, the recommendations contained in this report are intended to put into motion the
necessary actions to obtain support from the constituent members of the Alliance to move forward with the
implementation of the consultants report.
First, and most important, a draft of the report has undergone an extensive review by members of the
Steering Committee, who have concluded it has successfully identified, considered, and evaluated a full range
of governance options for the Rouge Park. Second, they are recommending that the consultants report be
circulated to the respective agencies /boards and ministries for formal consideration. They have further
recommended that this review be completed in 60 days, having regard for the window of opportunity
outlined earlier.
In keeping with the advice of the Steering Committee, it is recommended that each of the organizations be
requested to address the consultant's recommendations, the details and concept of a "founding deal ", and to
work jointly with the Alliance in approaching the federal and provincial governments.
It is important to continue with the dialogue that has been initiated through the Governance Review.
Therefore it is recommended that the Chairman of the Alliance appear before each of the constituent member
organizations, at the time they consider the consultant's report, to make a presentation and respond to
questions. In a parallel manner, briefings should be sought with the respective Ministers and senior staff.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
R9
Page 9 of 21
Lastly, it is recommended that given the importance of a "Founding Deal" to the creation of a new governance
model and financing structure for the Rouge Park, a workshop be held to begin the process of developing a
detailed MOU and the process for its acceptance.
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: February 3, 2010
ACTION
Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance
Alan Wells, 9905 - 713 -7426, email: awells @rougepark.com
- Chair and Staff to take appropriate actions and report back to the Alliance.
2. Rouge Park Funding Program - 2010 Recommended Allocations
KEY ISSUE
The Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee has reviewed the 2010 project submissions and made
recom mendations.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #4/10 Seconded by: Bonnie Littley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the allocation of project funding as recommended by the Rouge
Park Natural Heritage Committee in Table 1;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance staff be directed to release the letters of confirmation of funding to
the organizations whose projects have been ap proved for the 2010 Natural and Cultural Heritage
Funds;
AND THAT projects approved for funding at the February 5, 2010 Rouge Park Alliance meeting be
eligible for release of the initial funding;
AND THAT Rouge Park Alliance staff be directed to maintain contact with organizations which are not
recommended for funding to assist with improving their proposals so that they may resubmit for
funding;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance funding for each project be subject to the Natural and
Cultural Heritage Funding Policies and Reporting Requirements; the submission of proof of liability
insurance; and any conditions as required by the Natural Heritage Committee.
AMENDMENT Moved: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #4A/10 Seconded by: Bonnie Littley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve projects #8 (Richmond Hill Headwaters Rehabilitation - Ontario
Streams) and #10 (Wetland Restoration Workshop & Blanding Turtle Habitat Use - Toronto Zoo),
($10,000 each), subject to the General Manager finding appropriate funding.
AMENDMENT CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
R10
Page 10 of 21
BACKGROUND
Historical Context - A Past to be Proud Of!!
Records from 1992 -2009 show that a total of approximately 322 ha (795 ac) of upland related habitats have
been restored. Early reports did not track numbers of trees planted, but, assuming a density of 1200 trees /ha
the total would be approximately 386,000 trees. In addition to the area already restored, there are 237 ha
remaining to be restored, meaning that 58% of the total 559 ha of restoration area has been completed. We
have restored an average of 18 ha per year, with a trending increase over the last 5 years. In addition, there
have been significant riparian and marsh areas restored in the Park.
Figure 1: Locations of Projects Undertaken by the Rouge Park Alliance, 1995 -2009
Legend
o Herliag Protect Locations
•■MUnklpal Boundary
= HlghwayfFreewa'y
Major Roads
Local Road
Watercourse
OWatershed Boundary
Bob HUrtter Park
Federal RP Ueslgnatlon
Rouge P ark
ri
o O a
0
R11
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 11 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
2010 Proposals
In early October 2009, Rouge Park Alliance (RPA) staff notified potential project proponents that the Alliance
would be accepting proposals for the 2010 fiscal year. In addition to direct notification of past participants,
information on the Alliance website was updated. The Natural Heritage Committee asked proponents to use a
standardized report form that had been previously discussed with proponents and required that the
proposals be submitted by email. The deadline of November 6, 2009 was set and proponents were notified
that priority would be given to projects that directly restored habitats on Rouge Park Alliance -owned property
or in the Rouge or Little Rouge Rivers.
RPA staff received 10 proposals seeking a total of $254,889.20 (see Table 1) and circulated the proposals to the
Natural Heritage Committee members by email. The Alliance's Natural Heritage Committee met on December
1, 2009 to review and evaluate the proposals and recommend funding levels to the RPA. The established
process for review, ranking and recommending allocations was used, as in past years. Each proponent was
given 10 minutes per project to outline the proposal and an additional 5 minutes to answer questions. No
individuals or agencies that made proposals were involved in ranking, evaluation or allocation decisions.
Once all proponents had been heard, the Committee met in- camera to discuss the proposals and to make the
recommendation to the RPA based on a budget of $206,000.
Of the projects proposed, seven ranked high enough to be considered as priorities.' Subsequent to the
project review meeting, conditions related to two projects changed, resulting in the need to review the
recommendation flowing from the December 1, 2009 meeting. In one case, the Rouge Park Alliance Chair
requested the Committee defer restoration projects north of Highway 7 for at least one year to allow
continued dialogue with York Region and the Town of Markham. In the second case, technical review of the
project raised concerns about safety and potential future problems and resulted in withdrawal of the project
proposed for the vicinity of Glen Rouge and the Riverside Trail. The Natural Heritage Committee considered
these events at their meeting on January 20, 2010.
The Committee recommended that 6 proposals receive funding for a total of $192,749.60 (Table 1) covering a
restoration area of 29 ha. With the exception of the projects proposed by the Friends of the Rouge Watershed
(FRW) and Ontario Streams (OS), the Committee recommended full funding. For the former project
approximately 4 ha (9.9 ac) of the area allocated to FRW was north of Highway 7 so funding was reduced by
$15,000 to accommodate the request for deferral. The Glen Rouge project proposed by OS was withdrawn for
technical reasons.
Rouge Park Alliance staff is presently working out a native grass and tree /shrub habitat restoration program
for the Bob Hunter Memorial Park area involving York Region, TRCA and NGOs. The remaining balance
($13,250.40) of the project budget ($206,000) will be used in 2010 for that program.
'Under the project approval process projects that rank 200 or greater are considered priorities and are allocated
funding before any projects with a rank of less than 200.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
R12
Page 12 of 21
Table 1: Projects Proposed for 2010
TOTAL
SCORE
RANK
PROJECT NUMBER & NAME
RECOMMEND
REQUEST
280.00
1
#1. Rouge Stream and Habitat Monitoring
Project - Citizen Scientists
6,807.60 (3.5)
6,807.60
280.00
1
#2. Little Rouge Woodland Restoration
and Diversification Project - RVN
30,000.00 (15.6)
30,000.00
270.00
2
#3. Riparian Forest and Meadow - 10K
Trees
29,000.00 (15.0)
29,000.00
260.00
3
#4. Glen Rouge, Lower Rouge River Rehab
- O5
withdrawn
12,139.60
250.00
4
#5. Restoration of RP Priority Sites 2010 -
FRW
105,000.00 (54.5)
120,000.00
240.00
5
#6. Restoration, Roads and Wildlife -
Toronto Zoo
10,000.00 (5.2)
10,000.00
230.00
6
#7. Little Rouge Creek Stream Rehab and
Monitoring - OS
11,942.00 (6.2)
11,942.00
TOTALS
192,749.60
219,889.20
170.00
7
#8. Richmond Hill Headwaters Rehab - 05
10,000.00
160.00
8
#9. TC lands, Little Rouge Corridor
Wetland Restoration - OS
10,000.00
130.00
9
#10. Wetland Restoration Workshop &
Blandinq Turtle Habitat Use - Toronto Zoo
15,000.00
TOTALS
_ 192,749.60
254,889.20
Note that the % of total recommended allocation by project is presented in parentheses.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February S, 2010
R13
Page 13 of 21
Figure 2: Locations of Projects Proposed and Recommended for Rouge Park in 2010
OS - Llttle Rouge Creek Rehab 8 Mtintonng
OS Trenspon Canada Wetland Restoration \
10K ;rheas - Riparian Forest and Meaday •
OS Lille Rouge Creek Rehab 8 MLrli°nag,
Legend
.
ION Trees
♦F.
+ Onlano Streams
0 Henn a ProjectlocaoOns_Pon1
■MUnI[Ipal Boundary
Hlghe'ay/Freew ay
Or
IougoPirL
!Leal Read
Watercourse
Oy2renned Boumary
Bob Hunter Park
17;' Federal RP Oealgnallen
Rouge Park
1.5
LIMO Rooge \Mledand Resbration -
FRW Restoret on of pnonly Sites
` `FRW to etIM161 Pnonly St 5701^
OS- 11111e Rnu la Creek Rehab & Monitonn9
FRW F 'n.rIty ites :COO
a Fr W`Fes`
�8. R
6
7011:
6
Kilometers
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
R14
Page 14 of 21
Table 2: Funding Allocated in Past 2 Years
Organization
Rouge Valley Naturalists
Toronto Zoo
Friends Rouge Watershed
Citizen Scientists
Ontario Streams
10000 Trees
Total
Project
Restoration
Turtle Habitat Research
Road research
Restoration
Seed harvest
Reesor wetland
Stream Monitoring
R Hill Headwaters
Wetland Creation
Little Rouge Habitat
Restoration
Restoration
2008 K$ ( %)
28.4 (19)
15.6 (10)
No request
40.0 (27)
5.0 (3)
20.0 (13)
6.3 (4)
None
None
2009 K$ ( %)
34.2 (17)
No request
No request
105.0 (51)
6.4 (3)
12.0 (6)
10.0 (7) 13.6
25.0 (17) 32.5
150.3 203.7
(7)
(16)
Note that the % of total RPA allocation by project is presented in parentheses.
Recommended Projects (in order of priority)
1. Rouge Stream and Habitat Monitoring - Citizen Scientists - previous cooperator (Project #1). This
project is in the 8th year of 10 years and has the same protocol and reporting as past years. The project
will continue the water quality monitoring at the same 7 sites as previous years and data are made
available to agencies for use. The group is composed entirely of volunteers and the Rouge Park funding
provides for equipment, materials and volunteer training and some field support. Reports are provided to
Rouge Park via newsletters, websites and final reports. Recommend full requested funding of $6,807.
Deliverables include:
a. Collect, analyze and store water quality, fish and benthos data for the 7 sites on the Little Rouge Creek
as described in the proposal received at Rouge Park on November 6, 2009.
b. Make data available to MNR, TRCA and ensure data are available to RP.
c. Provide annual report summarizing data with recommendations and observations that may need
action.
Conditions:
a.
b.
c.
Adhere to all conditions required by TRCA, Town of Markham, Region of York and MNR.
Ensure that data collected are consistent with TRCA and MNR protocols.
Notify Rouge Park (S. Santos) two weeks - before commencing implementation activities or media
contacts.
R15
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 15 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
2. Little Rouge Woodland Restoration and Diversification Project — Rouge Valley Naturalists —
previous cooperator (Project #2). This project continues in the cooperative nature of the 2009 project
and is in the priority zone within 100 m of the Little Rouge River. RVN will cooperate with TRCA, York
Region, Trees Ontario and RPA to restore a suite of habitats north of 14`h Avenue in the Little Rouge
Corridor. RVF has proposed planting riparian areas as well upland areas in the existing agricultural field.
All plantings are integrated with the Regional /TRCA plantings and are consistent with the RPA Action Plan.
Recommend full requested funding of $30,000.
Deliverables include:
a. Plant a mixture of 7500 conifer and deciduous trees and shrubs on approximately 2.4 ha (6 ac.) at the
14`h Avenue site according to the proposal dated November 6, 2009
Conditions:
a. Adhere to all conditions required by TRCA, Town of Markham, Region of York and MNR.
b. Coordinate and cooperate with York region, TRCA and RPA volunteers who will also be planting on the
site.
c. Variances from approved design require written approval from RPA.
d. Notify Rouge Park (S. Santos) two weeks before commencing implementation activities or media
contacts.
e. Permanent signage must be approved by RPA.
3. Riparian Forest and Meadow - 10000 Trees for the Rouge Valley — previous cooperator (Project #3).
In 2009, 10K Trees proposed a site preparation and wetland restoration for an area of invasive introduced
reed canary grass meadow in the floodplain area across the Little Rouge River from the areas they have
focused on in the past few years. Site preparations have been done to minimized grass competition and
10K Trees is prepared to implement their customary project. They have been cooperating with TRCA and
RPA staffs in re- design of the wetland they proposed in 2009 and that will be implemented in summer
2010. Recommend full funding request of $29,000.
Deliverables include:
a. Plant at least 6500 trees and shrubs as well as a diversified meadow mix on 2.7 ha. (6.7 ac) as outlined
in the proposal dated November 6, 2009.
b. Provide 3 years follow up maintenance and continue maintenance on previous years sites as
previously agreed.
Conditions
a. Adhere to all conditions required by TRCA, Town of Markham and Region of York.
b. Ensure that any TRCA, Town of Markham permits, insurance, etc. are in place before putting the
temporary bridge in place.
c. Variances from approved design require written approval from RPA.
d. Notify Rouge Park (5. Santos) two weeks before commencing implementation activities or media
contacts.
e. Permanent signage must be approved by RPA.
4. Restoration of Priority Rouge Park Sites 2009 - Friends of the Rouge Watershed — previous
cooperator (Project #5). FRW proposed reforestation and wetland creation projects at 6 sites including
areas in the Little Rouge Corridor (2 sites), Bob Hunter Memorial Park (1 site) and Toronto (3 sites). The
decision to defer restoration on agricultural areas north of Highway 7 resulted in the deferral of one LRC
site and reduced the area proposed by FRW to 24 ha (60 ac). All plantings are consistent with the RPA
Action Plan and are consistent with the high quality of work FRW has provided Rouge Park. FRW will work
R16
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 16 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
closely with TRCA and RPA staff in the design and implementation of the wetland elements of the
proposal. Recommend providing $105,000 which is the same level as 2009.
In addition fo the community outreach described in the proposal dated November 6, 2009, specific habitat
improvement deliverables include:
a. On the areas covering 24 ha (60 ac) outlined in the proposal plant according to the design included in
the proposal:
i. trees and shrubs, native wildflowers, riparian areas, native tree and wildflower seed, native grass
seed
Conditions:
a. Adhere to all conditions required by TRCA, Town of Markham, Region of York and City of Toronto.
b. Provide final species estimates for proposed plantings by site with initial invoice.
c. Adhere completely to planting designs and species composition provided by Rouge Park and TRCA for
the area along 14th Avenue in Bob Hunter Memorial Park.
d. Variances from approved design require written approval from RPA.
e. Notify Rouge Park (S. Santos) two weeks before commencing implementation activities or media
contacts.
f. Permanent signage must be approved by RPA.
5. Restoration, Roads and Wildlife - Ontario Road Ecology Group - Toronto Zoo. New proponent
(Project #6). The Ontario Road Ecology Group has proposed a multi -year project designed to evaluate
numbers and types of wildlife that are killed by motor vehicles at selected sites in Rouge Park. While the
study will provide information related to potential road design, the purpose for the study in Rouge Park is
to provide information about design and placement of habitat provided by RPA's habitat restoration
program. The study will look to see whether there are any relationships between the spatial distribution
or mix of restoration habitats and wildlife mortality caused by motor vehicles. If there are, restoration staff
will be able to design habitat restoration to minimize collisions. Recommend full requested funding of
$10,000.
6. Little Rouge Creek Stream Rehab and Monitoring - Ontario Streams - previous cooperator (Project
#7). This project proposes to continue the stream -side and in- stream habitat restoration that Ontario
Streams performed in sections of Little Rouge Creek near 16th Avenue and just north of Steeles Avenue.
The project will provide valuable information about in- stream habitats that Park staff currently do not
have as well as provide restoration and improvement of fish habitat in the stream. The proposed work is
consistent with the RPA Action Plan and Rouge Watershed Plan and RP staff has assurances from the MNR
that actions will be consistent with the pending fisheries management plan. Recommend full funding
request of $11,942.
Deliverables include:
a. Little Rouge Creek
i. Debris clearing and in- stream rehabilitation along 500 m of Little Rouge Creek near Ninth Line
and Donald Cousens Parkway
ii. Riparian shrub planting along 500 m of both sides of the Little Rouge Creek near Ninth Line and
Donald Cousens Parkway
iii. Riparian planting along 400 m of Little Rouge Creek just south of 16th Avenue
Iv. Planting of 1000 native shrubs
v. Placement of up to 5 structures in the streams
vi. Monitor stream temperature and benthos
R17
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 17 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
Vii. Mapping of habitats in a 400 m reach of stream just south of 16`h Avenue and a 2 km long reach of
stream just north of Steeles Avenue
Conditions:
a. Consult with TRCA fluvio - geomorphologist (R. Ness) for final design of in- stream structures to ensure
no increased erosion or flooding.
b. Consult with TRCA aquatic staff (C. Tu) for final design.
c. Submit final design to RP for approval before 2010 implementation.
d. Adhere to all conditions required by TRCA, Town of Markham. Ensure appropriate approvals from
MNR and DFO.
e. Variances from approved design require written approval from RPA.
f. Notify Rouge Park (S. Santos) two weeks before commencing implementation activities or media
contacts.
g. Permanent signage must be approved by RPA.
Projects Withdrawn by Proponent or Not Recommended
A. Glen Rouge, Lower Rouge River Rehab - Ontario Streams (Project #4). This project was proposed to
remove trees and other debris that have redirected flows that were causing erosion and threatening the
Riverside Trail. At the time the proposal was submitted, it appeared that the tree removal would be a
simple operation; however, subsequent discussions suggested that there may be significant risk of
downstream erosion. OS in consultation with RPA and TRCA staffs decided to withdraw and postpone the
project until a clearer understanding of potential up- and down - stream impacts can be developed.
B. Richmond Hill Headwaters Rehab - Ontario Streams (Project #8). This project had been supported in
past years and, while the work being proposed is appropriate and environmentally sound, the project is
not on lands owned directly by RPA.
C. TC lands, Little Rouge Corridor Wetland Restoration - Ontario Streams (Project #9). This project
proposed re- engineering of a small stream that had previously been channelized and straightened to
allow drainage for farming. There was considerable concern that the design of the re- stored stream would
result in significant erosion especially during storm events.
D. Wetland Restoration Workshop & Blanding Turtle Habitat Use - Toronto Zoo (Project #10). This
proposal involved a workshop for landowners interested in creating turtle habitats and additional research
habitat use by Blandings and Map turtles. The committee felt that other projects were higher priority.
Report Prepared by:
For Information contact:
Date: January 27, 2010
ACTION
Bob Clay, Manager, Habitat Restoration, Rouge Park
Bob Clay, 905.713.6022 - email: bob_clay @rougepark.com
- Staff to take appropriate action.
3. Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes - November 17, 2009
KEY ISSUE
Present the actions, recommendations and outcomes of the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee meeting
held on November 17, 2009.
R18
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 18 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
MOTION: Moved by: Pauline Browes
Res. #5/10 Seconded by: Bonnie Littley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the minutes of the November 17, 2009 Rouge Park Natural
Heritage Committee meeting.
CARRIED
4. Rouge Park Alliance Meeting Schedule for 2010/2011
KEY ISSUE
Rouge Park Alliance Meeting Schedule for 2010/2011.
MOTION: Moved by: Paul Ainslie
Res. #6/10 Seconded by: Clyde Smith
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the following meeting dates for 2010/2011:
Friday, March 12, 2010 Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361 A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
Friday, April 16, 2010 Committee Room 1, 1st Floor, 225 East Beaver Creek Rd., Richmond Hill
*Friday, June 11, 2010 Cedar Brae Golf & Country Club, 6431 Steeles Ave. East, Scarborough
Friday, September 24, 2010 .... Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
Friday, November 5, 2010 Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361 A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
Friday, December 10, 2010 Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361 A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
Friday, February 4, 2011 Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361 A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
NOTE:
It was discussed that the scheduled April 16, 2010 meeting was too early to accommodate for the 60 -day
response to the Governance Review Report. It was requested that another time or a date in May be scheduled.
It is not possible to schedule a meeting date in May, but the April 16th meeting could be rescheduled to April
23, 2010. Also, because of the Municipal Election on October 25, 2010, it was decided to not schedule
meetings on November 5, and December 10, 2010.
AMENDMENT Moved: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Res._ #6A /10 Seconded by: Pauline Browes
THAT the April 16, 2010 meeting date be rescheduled and that the November 5, and December 10,
2010 meetings be removed from the schedule.
AMENDED MAIN MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following meeting dates for 2010/11:
Friday, March 12, 2010 Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361 A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
Friday, April23, 2010 Committee Room 2, 1" Floor, 225 East Beaver Creek Rd., Richmond Hill
*Friday, June 11, 2010 Cedar Brae Golf & Country Club, 6431 Steeles Ave. East, Scarborough
Friday, September 24, 2010 .... Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
Friday, February 4, 2011 Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361A Old Finch Ave., Scarborough
AMENDMENT
MAIN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND AS AMENDED
CARRIED
CARRIED
R19
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 19 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
DETAILS
Rouge Park Alliance meetings will commence at 9:00 a.m., at the locations indicated beside each date.
* On June 11, 2010, at 9:60 a.m., there will be a brief regular Rouge Park Alliance meeting at the Cedar Brae
Golf and Country Club, 6431 Steeles Avenue East, Scarborough. Immediately following (at approximately
10:15 a.m.) the Rouge Park Alliance Annual General Meeting will commence.
Report prepared by: Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance
For information contact: Alan Wells, 905 - 713 -7426; email: awells @rougepark.com
Date: January 25, 2010
5. Correspondence
MOTION:
Res. #7/10
Moved by: Clyde Smith
Seconded by: Helena Jaczek
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following correspondence:
1. Letter dated November 25, 2009 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Denis Kelly,
Regional Clerk, Region of York, re: Transportation Master Plan Update Final Report.
2. Letter dated December 1, 2009 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Bryan Tuckey,
Commissioner of Planning & Development Services, Region of York, re: 14`h Avenue Issue -
Transportation Master Plan Update.
3. Letter dated December 1, 2009 to Lewis Yeager, General Manager, Rouge Park, from Martin W.
Scott, McCormick Rankin Corporation, re: Transportation Improvements in the Donald Cousens
Parkway/ Morningside Avenue Link Corridor Amendment to the Environmental Assessment.
4. Copy of Letter dated December 2, 2009 to The Regional Municipality of York, Planning and
Development Services Dept., from Jim Robb, Rouge Duffins Greenspace Coalition Volunteer and
General Manager, Friends of the Rouge Watershed, re: York Official Plan Amendment: Planning for
Tomorrow, Submission to York Region Planning Committee.
5. Letter dated December 7, 2009 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Kathy Stranks,
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, re: Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2006 -2010 -
Flood Plan and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Purchase of Land - Canadian
National Railway Co.
6. Copy of Letter dated December 16, 2009 to Rosemary and Jonathan Oliver, Pickering, from Minister
Jim Watson, Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing, re: Rouge Park Issues (National Park and
Enforcement).
7. E -mail dated January 20, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Cat Beattie, re: Andy
McKinnon - Rouge Park Issues.
8. Letter dated January 26, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, and Members of the Rouge Park Alliance, from
Tupper Wheatley, Milne Park Conservation Association, re: Markham Rouge Park Implementation
Task Force Report.
9. E -mail dated January 26, 2010 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from Wayne Owen, re: Rouge
Park.
CARRIED
. ACTION
- Correspondence 5.7.1 - Councillor Jennifer O'Connell would like to receive protocol on
deputations to the Alliance.
- Correspondence 5.8.1 and 5.9.1 - Hon. Pauline Browes would like to refer these
correspondence to the "Founding Deal ", and forwarded to Markham Council.
R20
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 20 of 21
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
PRESENTATION /DELEGATIONS
Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham
Councillor Shapero made a presentation on the Markham Foodbelt Proposal. A copy of the presentation can
be found online at www.protectourmarkham .wordpress.com.
MOTION:
Res. #8110
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Bonnie Littley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance endorse the Markham Foodbelt Proposal as outlined in the December 1,
2009 proposal and request and encourage the Town of Markham, Region of York, and the Province of
Ontario to adopt the Markham Foodbelt Proposal, including the proposal to protect all Class 1
agricultural lands within the Town of Markham and to expand the Provincial Greenbelt to protect these
lands in perpetuity.
Glenn De Baeremaeker requested a recorded vote.
YEA NAY ABSTAINED
Hon. Michael Chong, Government of Canada X
Regiongal Councillor Bonnie Littley, Durham Region X
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York X
Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham X
Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City of Pickering X
Tracey Steele, Richmond Hill X
Glenn DeBaeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc. X
Peter Evans, Toronto Zoo X
Gerri Lynn O'Connor, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority X
Hon. Pauline Browes, Waterfront Regeneration Trust X
Councillor Clyde Smith, Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville X
9 1 1
9 YEAs, 1 NAY and 1 Abstained - Motion Carried.
ACTION
- Staff to take appropriate action.
CARRIED
John Kay, Markham Farmer /Resident
Mr. Kay talked about his concerns regarding Rouge Park issues (proposed national park, agriculture and
restoration, etc.). He thinks "the national park will push out the local community" and said that "you can't
have a viable agricultural community with wilderness, they are incompatible."
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #9/10 Seconded by: Erin Shapero
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the deputation by John Kay.
CARRIED
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #1/10, February 5, 2010
R21
Page 21 of 21
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #10/10 Seconded by: Erin Shapero
THAT' the Rouge Park Alliance permit Andy McKinnon to make a deputation.
CARRIED
Andy McKinnon, "Rouge Watch"
Andy McKinnon spoke about a variety of concerns related to human impact on wildlife and gave an example
of birds being tangled with kite strings. He raised the issue of the policy review relating to deer poaching and
other trespassing issues.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #11 /10 Seconded by: Jennifer O'Connell
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to work with Andy McKinnon to develop a "Watch Program ".
CARRIED
ACTION
New Business
- Staff to meet with Andy McKinnon and report back to the Alliance.
Alan Wells, Chair, spoke about ongoing issues in Rouge Park, such as farmers with leases in Bob Hunter
Memorial Park; potential changes of Bob Hunter Memorial Park- realigning lands from Bob Hunter Memorial
Park to the Little Rouge Corridor.
Deputy Mayor Jack Heath talked about water crossing signs in Rouge Park and that he would like to see them
in place as soon as possible.
Glenn De Baeremaeker announced the purchase of the Runnymede lands by the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority with funding from the City of Toronto.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:55 p.m., on February 5, 2010.
Alan Wells
Chair, Rouge Park Alliance and Acting General Manager, Rouge Park
R22
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES - MEETING #2/10 - March 12, 2010
Rouge Park
The Rouge Park Alliance met in the Main Boardroom of the Toronto Zoo. Alan Wells, Chair, welcomed everyone and
called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Members:
Alan Wells, Chair
Councillor David Cohen, Town of Richmond Hill
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York
Councillor Ron Moeser, City of Toronto
Gerri Lynn O'Connor, Toronto & Region C. A.
ABSENT
Members:
Councillor Paul Ainslie, City of Toronto
Hon. Pauline Browes, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Hon. Michael Chong, MP, Government of Canada
Peter Evans, Toronto Zoo
Dr. Helena Jaczek, MPP, Province of Ontario
Regional Councillor Bonnie Littley, Region of Durham
Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City of Pickering
Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham
Councillor Clyde Smith, Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville
Staff:
Bob Clay, Manager, Habitat Restoration
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy & Administration
Michelle Holmes, Manager, Visitor Experience
Doreen McCarty, Administrative Coordinator
Observers:
Cat Beattie, Public Participant
Tom Boudreault, City of Toronto Parks
Rodger Cummins, Ontario Farmland Trust
Jim Dillane, TRCA
David Harvey, Consultant
Alternates:
Brian Denney, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Ron Dewell, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Paul Harpley, Toronto Zoo
Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Town of Markham
Councillor Chin Lee, City of Toronto
Debbie Pella Keen, Province of Ontario
Jim Robb, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Carolyn Woodland, Toronto & Region C. A.
Alternates:
Wayne Arthurs, MPP, Province of Ontario
Ian Buchanan, Region of York
Councillor Raymond Cho, City of Toronto
Nestor Chornobay, Region of Durham
Mayor Wayne Emmerson, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
Adele Freeman, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Mark Graham, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Sue Gunton, Toronto Zoo
Keith Laushway, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Tom Melymuk, City of Pickering
Tracey Steele, Town of Richmond Hill
Staff (Continued.:.)
Vicki MacDonald, Biologist
Maria Papoulias, Manager, Natural Heritage
Observers (Continued...)
'Sarah Henophy, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
John Kay, Resident
Sheila Lathe, Resident
Andy McKinnon, "Rouge Watch"
Colin O'Neill, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
R23
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 2 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
CHAIR'S REMARKS
Alan Wells, Chair, announced that Ron Dewell will be the new Acting General Manager on March 29, 2010 and
that David Harvey's contract would be extended to assist with government relations.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #12/10 Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the minutes of Meeting #1/10 held on February 5, 2010.
CARRIED
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
None
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None
PRESENTATION /DELEGATIONS
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #13/10 Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance hear the delegation by John Kay.
John Kay, Markham Farmer /Resident
CARRIED
John Kay talked about several Rouge Park issues such as: farm leases, farm insurance, trespassers on private
property, ATVs in the Park, trails, easements on residential portions of the Park, etc. Also, he would like to see
some compensation given to tenant - farmers for upgrades they have done over the years on buildings, when
their leases are up and the properties are taken over for restoration.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #14/10 Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the presentation by John Kay.
1. Rouge Park Plans Update (and Presentation by Alan Wells, Chair and Acting General Manager)
Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, and Acting General Manager
CARRIED
In his presentation, Alan Wells talked about Rouge Park planned land uses, objectives, role of agriculture in the
Park, consultation with the agricultural community, resulting actions from meetings with farmers in the Little
Rouge Corridor, Bob Hunter Memorial Park and City of Toronto. In the update, various other topics were
discussed, such as: length of leases, the draft agricultural policy, draft agricultural policy guiding principles,
Toronto plans, Bob Hunter Memorial Park Plan, Bob Hunter Memorial Park new boundary, the Little Rouge
Corridor Plan, the Little Rouge Corridor (north and south), Markham East Lands, land use areas once habitat
restoration is complete, etc.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
R24
Page 3 of 17
MOTION:
Res. #15/10
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: David Cohen
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the presentation by Alan Wells on the Rouge Park Plans update.
CARRIED
''ACTION
- Staff to send copies of the presentation to Alliance members.
KEY ISSUE
During the past two years, the Rouge Park Alliance has been engaged in an extensive review and consultation
process related to the Bob Hunter Memorial Park, Little Rouge Corridor Plans, and Markham East Lands to
address partners and community concerns regarding the Rouge Park Plans.
MOTION:
Res. #16/10
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Logan Kanapathi
THAT THE Rouge Park Alliance receive the attached Rouge Park Plans Update;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance agree to proceed with the steps outlined in this report.
AMENDMENT:
Res. #16A/10:
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: David Cohen
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance continue consultations with stakeholders and Markham Council during
the development of the plan;
AMENDMENT CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
ACTION
1. Rouge Park consultations to continue with stakeholders and municipal council during
the development of the plan.
2. Deputy Mayor Jack Heath requested that issues dealing with Cedarena and Milne Park 2
be managed by Markham and that these issues be forwarded to Markham Council.
BACKGROUND
Please see attached report (Attachment 1).
Attachment 1:
ROUGE PARK PLANS UPDATE - February 26, 2010
Background:
The purpose of this report is to update the members of the Rouge Park Alliance on the many discussions that
have occurred over the past two years as a result of our review of the Rouge Park plans, including ongoing
discussions with the agricultural community and with Markham Council and staff as we develop Rouge Park in
Markham.
R25
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 4 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
Issues related to energy and food supply have been a subject of great discussion in the Greater Toronto Area.
The importance of local food supply has become more prominent. Rouge Park staff has also recognized that
farmland fulfills ecological functions and serves as habitat for a variety of wildlife species.
Our review of the Rouge Park plans has resulted in a staff recommendation to include an agriculture objective
as a fundamental component of the Rouge Park plans and to develop a policy framework jointly with
stakeholders. That report has been presented to the Rouge Park Alliance for consideration.
The agriculture community has also stressed the need for a better understanding of their economic needs,
including long -term leases. We have worked with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to
develop a new lease strategy that will provide longer leases and assist the farm community.
Mandate:
The stated goals of the 1994 Rouge Park Management Plan are to conserve and restore natural heritage, to
conserve cultural heritage, and to provide passive recreational opportunities. In the past, agriculture has been
included as part of the cultural heritage features of Rouge Park, but has not been explicitly presented as an
objective of the Park. In Markham, the agriculture community dominates Rouge Park and needs to be
recognized as part of the primary mandate. Our plans should show agriculture as a mandated objective. This
is now included in the Agricultural Policy Report.
Plans:
Agricultural land is an important component of Rouge Park (Rouge Park Management Plan 1994). Agriculture
currently comprises 1582 ha of the total Park area of 3482 ha excluding infrastructure (see Table 1 and Map 1).
Of the total existing agriculture area, the Agricultural Heritage Reserve in the Toronto portion of Rouge Park
represents 276 ha of the total lands of 456 ha that are currently farmed in Toronto, see Map 1.
Table 1: Approximate Areas of Existing Land Use in Rouge Park (shown in ha)
LRC -N
LRC -M
LRC -S
BHMP
MEL
Markham
Toronto
Total
Agri-
culture
236
35
128
139
588
1126
456
1582
Natural
Heritage
118
28
126
53
31
356
1544
1900
Infra-
structure
9
1
22
10
34
76
383
459
Total
363
64
276
202
653
1558
2383
3941
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
R26
Page 5 of 17
Legend •
Rouge Park
5 yr Restoration
Deferred Restoration
AHR
Infrastructure
Natural Cover
Agriculture
Map 1: Location of the 276 ha of Agricultural Heritage Reserve Lands (shown in brown) located just
south of Steeles Avenue in the Toronto portion of Rouge Park
It is equally important to recognize agriculture in the Markham area of Rouge Park. Currently, there are three
separate planning areas in Markham - the Little Rouge Corridor (LRC), the Bob Hunter Memorial Park (BHMP),
and the Markham East Lands (MEL). Each of these areas has a primary purpose.
The BHMP was created as an ecological park. In order to facilitate park programming, it is proposed that the
part of BHMP west of Reesor Road be joined with that part of the LRC west of Reesor Road and north of Steeles
Avenue to form a 500 acre combined Nature Park, called the BHMP, as illustrated by Map 2.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
R27
Page 6 of 17
Legend
['Bob Hunter Park
Rouge Park
5 yr Restoration
0 Deferred Restoration
AHR
Infrastructure
Natural Cover
Agriculture
Map 2: Proposed area of Bob Hunter Memorial Park programming, west of Reesor Road, outlined in
black. Note that areas shown as white will be planned as part of the Little Rouge Corridor plan.
The part of BHMP east of Reesor Road, both north and south of 14th Avenue, should be included in the
planning process for the LRC (see areas shown as white in map 2). This combined area includes the Hamlet of
Cedar Grove. It includes several significant heritage buildings, such as a community centre and the famous
Cedarena. Further discussions with the community, Markham Planning staff and the folks on the Markham
East Lands Planning Steering Committee need to occur to determine how to include cultural protection and
recreational opportunities in these lands, including community vegetable gardens or allotments.
The Little Rouge Corridor needs to be planned in several phases (see map 3). South of Highway 407,
restoration of the 600 -metre wide protection corridor is well underway, although there are two parcels where
restoration has been delayed to accommodate the current farmers. The rest of the area is in the process of
being restored.
R28
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 7 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
Between Highways 407 and 7, the agricultural lands will be restored as other plans in Markham develop. The
corridor will be widened and protected.
Areas north of Highway 7 comprise active farm land, including the largest homestead farm iri Rouge Park that
is a concession wide, almost a square block and makes up the majority of the LRC north of Highway 7. It is also
part of both the LRC and MEL planning areas and therefore, further study should be carried out on these lands
to ascertain how this farm could function in an ecologically compatible manner for Rouge Park, with a high
level of natural heritage protection along with a trail route to achieve our vision of a continuous trail from Lake
Ontario to the Oak Ridges Moraine. During this period of review, farming should continue.
The Markham East Lands are presently included in the Markham /Pickering Agriculture Preserve. The area is
roughly 70% agriculture and 30% natural features, as shown in map 3. Planning for the MEL is being done
with the intent of maintaining agriculture as a primary function in this area as well as the ecological integrity
of existing habitats and streams that run through the area. In addition to the MEL, plans for the LRC will be re-
examined in order to evaluate the potential to maintain farmland in the area north of Highway 7. The
standard of planning will demand a high and robust level of protection for the natural heritage features of the
Little Rouge, Duffins and Petticoat Creek watersheds. A trail system will also wind through East Markham to
connect to trails near 14th Avenue. About two thirds of this area will remain in agriculture.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
R29
Page 8 of 17
Legend
OBob Hunter Park
x '
Rouge Park
Syr Restoration
Deferred Restoration
AHR
rllnfrastructure
Natural Cover
Agriculture
N
Map 3: Location of the North, Middle and South Sections of the Little Rouge Corridor, as well as the
Markham East Lands. Markham East Lands agriculture shown in yellow and existing natural habitats in
dark green.
R30
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 9 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
Summary
It is proposed that the Markham East Lands planning process be expanded in order to create a consolidated
plan for all of the lands in Markham, including the Little Rouge Corridor and Bob Hunter Memorial Park. The
plan will include an agriculture preserve in the east, a forested protected corridor for the Little Rouge Creek
and a nature park with a visitor experience area in Bob Hunter Memorial Park. A multi -use trail system is
currently being planned for this entire area to connect with the trails in Toronto to the south and eventually
north to the Oak Ridges Moraine.
Table 2 shows the land use mix that would be in place when planned natural heritage restorations have been
completed. An addition of approximately 701 ha of Agricultural Heritage Reserve in Markham will be added to
the 276 ha in Toronto for a total of approximately 1000 ha. In the Rouge Park areas of Markham, close to 50%
of the total land use will remain agriculture (see table 2).
Table 2: Approximate land use mix in Rouge Park once planned habitat restorations have been
completed (shown in ha). Note -that the areas that will be used for recreation and visitor experience
(trails, parking lots, visitor centres, etc.) have not yet been decided on and so areas of natural heritage
or agriculture may change.
2. New Agriculture Objective, Policy and Guiding Principles
KEY ISSUE
Rouge Park has steadily increased in size over the past 6 years due to the addition of lands donated by the
Province. With each new addition came active agricultural lands. Our existing plans provide limited policy
direction on the management of agricultural lands in the Park.
MOTION: Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Res. #17/10 Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the attached Agriculture Policy report as amended;
AND THAT -the Rouge Park Alliance accept the new Agriculture Objective, Agriculture Policy,
Agriculture Guiding Principles, and Implementation in the attached report as amended;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to insert the operative section of the amended report
into both the Rouge Park Management Plan and Rouge North Management Plan;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to commence with the advancement of the Guiding
Principles and Implementation recommendations as amended;
LRC -N
LRC -M
LRC -S
BHMP
MEL
Markham
Toronto
Total
Agri-
culture
236
0
61
0
404
701
276
977
Natural
Heritage
118
63
193
192
215
781
1724
2505
Infra-
structure
9
1
22
10
34
76
383
459
Total
363
64
276
202
653
1558
2383
3941
2. New Agriculture Objective, Policy and Guiding Principles
KEY ISSUE
Rouge Park has steadily increased in size over the past 6 years due to the addition of lands donated by the
Province. With each new addition came active agricultural lands. Our existing plans provide limited policy
direction on the management of agricultural lands in the Park.
MOTION: Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Res. #17/10 Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the attached Agriculture Policy report as amended;
AND THAT -the Rouge Park Alliance accept the new Agriculture Objective, Agriculture Policy,
Agriculture Guiding Principles, and Implementation in the attached report as amended;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to insert the operative section of the amended report
into both the Rouge Park Management Plan and Rouge North Management Plan;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to commence with the advancement of the Guiding
Principles and Implementation recommendations as amended;
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
R31
Page 10 of 17
AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this amended report be circulated to the Province of Ontario, York
Region, City of Toronto, Town of Markham, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and York
Region Federation of Agriculture.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #17A/10 Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the attached report, "Draft Agricultural Policy for Rouge Park ", be amended under the heading
"Guiding Principles ", to add point #7, to read: "Ensure that farmers be required to have Environmental
Farm Plans as a condition of leases, and that Rouge Park staff work with farmers to set standards
approved and monitored by the Rouge Park General Manager."
AMENDMENT CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
ACTION
- Staff to take appropriate action.
BACKGROUND
At the December 5, 2008 Rouge Park Alliance meeting, a draft staff discussion paper relating to guiding
principles for agriculture in Rouge Park was presented and recommended to the Alliance for further review
and discussion. Some Alliance members had concerns regarding the recommendations and felt staff needed
to prepare a more detailed report and bring it back to the Alliance. The motion to accept the
recommendations as presented was deferred.
Since that time, an Agriculture Working Group has been established in which the membership includes York
Region Federation of Agriculture as well as Rouge Park tenant farmers. This group has reviewed the draft
Agriculture Policy for Rouge Park which is being presented today.
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: 2010.February.22
Attachment 1: Draft Agricultural Policy For Rouge Park
Attachment 1:
DRAFT AGRICULTURAL POLICY FOR ROUGE PARK
February 19, 2010
Bob Clay, Manager, Ecological Restoration and,
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy and Administration
Bob Clay, Manager, Ecological Restoration, 905 - 713 -6022; bob_clay @rougepark.com or,
Barb Davies, 905 - 713 -7426, bdavies @rougepark.com
Background
Park Plans
"Rouge Park will be a special place of outstanding natural features and diverse cultural heritage in an urban -rural
setting, protected and flourishing as an ecosystem in perpetuity. Human activities will exist in harmony with the
natural values of the Park. The Park will be a "sanctuary for nature and the human spirit ".
That is the Vision statement as stated in both the Rouge Park Management Plan, 1994 and the Rouge North
Plan Management Plan, 2001.
R32
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 11 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
Although there is no specific agriculture objective in either plan, agriculture is considered within the cultural
heritage objective of the Park. The Cultural Heritage objective reads as follows: "To identify, protect and
conserve the cultural heritage features of the Park for their inherent value and depiction of the long term human use
and occupancy of the area ". Additionally, both plans contain the zone designation: Agriculture Heritage
Reserve (AHR), in which the following policy specific to agricultural practices applies - "maintain agricultural
operations and promote land management techniques which conserve soil, water, and ecological functions over
the long term, (i.e. adequate set backs /buffers from streams, wetlands, and significant natural areas, and reduction
in the use of chemicals)." It is now time to refine and expand on this policy, and create an Agricultural Objective
for Rouge Park. The significant role and presence of agriculture as a Rouge Park objective makes it important
that there be a clear policy with guiding principles regarding agriculture in the Park.
Park Design
Rouge Park lands in Markham are different from those in Toronto. In Toronto, the Park Agriculture Heritage
Reserves are clearly separate from the valley lands and Nature Reserves. Whereas, in Markham, Rouge Park
lands have been brought together in three phases: the Little Rouge Corridor lands, primarily preserved for a
natural linkage; the Bob Hunter Memorial Park lands, as nature preserve; and the East Lands, in which the
lands will primarily be agriculture. It is therefore appropriate to develop a more specific policy framework for
the agriculture lands in Rouge Park, Markham.
Management
The Rouge Park Alliance (RPA) maintains a strong commitment to and support for a diverse agricultural
community on Park lands designated for farming and those designated for ecological restoration which are
currently active farmland. The RPA encourages farm practices that provide a diverse visual landscape, direct
interactions with non -farm residents and wildlife habitats. The RPA is committed to the development of a set
of guiding principles for the management of agricultural lands in Rouge Park.
Each of our plans designates ecological restoration on a portion of the lands that are recently farmed.
Implementation of the ecological restoration component from these plans will occur over several years. In the
mean time, the lands will continue to be farmed. A comprehensive set of guiding principles will help manage
these lands during the transition period.
Planning
Rouge Park is subject to provincial and municipal land use policies and regulations. Decisions on how the Park
lands are managed will be consistent with Ontario's Provincial Policy Statement and Greenbelt Plan, York's
Regional Official Plan and Markham's and Toronto's Official Plans. In addition, York's Land Evaluation Area
Review (LEAR) process and Markham's Agricultural Assessment Study and Environmental Policy Review and
Consolidation Study should inform land use decisions in Rouge Park.
On September 19, 2008, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) passed Resolution A200/08
which approved a policy for agriculture on TRCA -owned lands and gave direction to TRCA staff to implement
the policy. The resolution included an amendment that directed TRCA staff to develop a sustainable near -
urban agriculture policy in conjunction with the Rouge Park Alliance. The RPA should have an agricultural
policy and implementation framework that is consistent with TRCA policy. Rouge Park agricultural policy
should also complement the agriculture policies of the Alliance Members and neighbouring communities.
Philosophical Basis
The 1994 Rouge Park Management Plan is clear in that the main priority for Rouge Park is the conservation
and establishment of a natural ecosystem. Agriculture in Rouge Park will be undertaken within the priorities
of both people and wildlife firmly in view and it must be recognized that farming activities in Rouge Park will
maintain high standards. Farmers of Rouge Park lands and the RPA must interact in partnership to manage
R33
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 12 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2110, March 12, 2010
the Park so that all can achieve the simultaneous goals of a healthy Park ecology and economically viable
agriculture.
The reality of a local food base has become forefront in the minds of the local community and all levels of
government. Rouge Park is in an ideal situation both geographically and from a planning perspective to
support the concept of local food in the GTA.
Certain wildlife species co -exist and, in some cases, thrive near an agricultural landscape. This cultivated
field /forest edge habitat is currently found throughout Rouge Park lands. This suggests that with the use of
innovative approaches (sensitive to crop production) agriculture may assist in maintaining the current levels
of biodiversity in the Park.
In summary, the agricultural landscape of Rouge Park should be one that is diverse. The diversity should
include not only a visually appealing landscape that contains various crops and natural lands, but also a
diversity of opportunities for the farm community and Park visitors to interact.
Agriculture Objective
Protect agriculture as a land use that is consistent with all other Park objectives.
Policy Statement
The Rouge Park Alliance will encourage and promote agriculture uses in the Park that complement the natural
heritage objectives, cultural heritage objectives, interpretation and recreation objectives as stated in its
management plans. Agriculture in Rouge Park will be a vibrant activity that helps promote and address the
needs of the neighbouring municipalities.
Guiding Principles
The Rouge Park Alliance has developed a set of guiding principles that will help the farming community
manage agricultural land use. These principles are a set of statements that encapsulate the values of the RPA
as they relate to agriculture in Rouge Park. They are intended to create a context in which management of
farmlands can be carried out in partnership between the farmers who have the agricultural knowledge and
the RPA who are interested in good stewardship of the Park lands. -The Rouge Park Alliance will support
viable agriculture in Rouge Park through the following guiding principles:
1. Proactively collaborate with local farmers, local farm groups and municipalities.
2. Support heritage farms and landscapes that contribute to the Rouge Park character and offer a diverse
agricultural landscape that provides a rural landscape, diverse land uses and a diverse economic base.
3. Support local municipal and provincial policies on local food and therefore contribute directly to local
food supplies for people in the urban communities adjacent to the Park. This will contribute to local
economies as well as provide recreational or social benefits for Park visitors, including such uses as agro-
tourism, farm markets and community gardens.
4. Ensure that: Park design and management allow for beneficial interactions between the farm community,
Park visitors and wildlife; and, farm operations and residences are not inconvenienced by Park visitors.
S. Work with farmers to enable a fair transition from agriculture to natural habitats on lands that are
designated for ecological restoration in approved Park plans.
6. Ensure that farmers will be able to operate the farm business, including such things as crop choice and
R34
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 13 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
other agricultural practices, within the context of good agricultural practice, while protecting the natural
features, such as trees, hedgerows, wetlands and woodlots.
Amendment - Point #7 (added):
7. Ensure that farmers be required to have Environmental Farm Plans as a condition of leases, and that
Rouge Park staff work with farmers to set standards approved and monitored by the Rouge Park
General Manager.
Implementation
Implementation of this policy will require a strong partnership between farmers and the RPA. A strong
partnership is developed through a shared vision, good communication, capitalizing on partner strengths and
early dispute resolution. This will be accomplished with the following actions:
1. The Agricultural Working Group (AWG) that was established in early 2009 will continue to meet at least
annually and more often as they arise.
2. Meetings with the Rouge Park's farm community will be held as frequently as the AWG feels appropriate.
In addition, Rouge Park staff will remain in at least annual contact with each farmer that leases land in the
Park. Communication between the individual farmer and the Park will be enhanced through the mutual
development and review of Environmental Farm Plans for each farm in the Park. Farm plans should
include encouragement of:
(a) long -term best agricultural management practices,
(b) soil, water, and ecological conservation.
3. The RPA will encourage viability of farms in the Park by providing:
a. Long -term leases that will provide stability and create reasonable conditions for farm crop and
investment decisions,
b. Assistance with maintenance of agricultural infrastructure on agricultural lands in Rouge Park,
c. Continued communication and cooperation with farmers and the Park's farm community, and
d. Contribution to innovation in agriculture consistent with the RPA priorities and by provision of long-
term land leases, as well as financial and policy support.
3. Rouge Park Lands Lease Framework
KEY ISSUE
The Ontario Conservation Authorities Act empowers the Conservation Authorities to enter into leases that are
up to 5 years in length, but requires the Minster of Natural Resources approval for lease terms that extend
beyond 5 years for a period up to 21 years. Long -term leases would be beneficial to the management of
Rouge Park lands by providing tenants the ability to make capital investments in agricultural lands and
heritage buildings.
MOTION: Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Res. #18/10 Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receives the attached Rouge Park Lease Framework report as prepared
by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA);
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance agrees with the categories of tenants and associated lease terms in
the attached report, as presented by TRCA;
R35
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 14 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
AND THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority be requested to pursue approval from the
Minister of Natural Resources to enter into long term leases as outlined in the attached report;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to coordinate with Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources staff to put into practice the recommended
lease terms once approval from the Minister of Natural Resources has been confirmed.
AMENDMENT 1:
Res. #18A/10:
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Chin Lee
THAT the attached report be referred to as "Draft" report, and that in the first two paragraphs the
words referring to the Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) be removed, to read as follows:
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receives the attached Draft Rouge Park Lease Framework report;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance agrees with the categories of tenants and associated lease terms in
the attached draft report;
AND THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority be requested to pursue approval from the
Minister of Natural Resources to enter into long term leases as outlined in the attached draft report;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to coordinate with Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources staff to put into practice the recommended
lease terms once approval from the Minister of Natural Resources has been confirmed.
AMENDMENT 2:
Res. #18B/10:
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: David Cohen
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance request that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority include the
following clause within all farm leases: "Must submit an Environmental Farm Plan to the satisfaction of
the General Manager of Rouge Park which must be monitored on a regular basis."
AMENDMENT 1 CARRIED
AMENDMENT 2 CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath requested a recorded vote.
YEA NAY
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York X
Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Town of Markham X
Councillor David Cohen, Town of Richmond Hill X
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc. X
Councillor Ron Moeser, City of Toronto X
Councillor Chin Lee, City of Toronto X
Paul Harpley, Toronto Zoo X
Gerri Lynn O'Connor, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority X
7 1
7 YEAs, 1 NAY - Motion Carried.
R36
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 15 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
BACKGROUND
When the first Provincial lands were transferred from the Province to Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) for Rouge Park purposes, it became very clear that investment in the properties by tenants
would be limited with the current practice of short term leases.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has the ability to enter into leases which are more than 5 years,
and up to 21 years, subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources.
More recently the agricultural tenants have longer term leases. Long -term leases would allow for longer term
planning and capital investment in the lands such as tile drainage and associated farm buildings.
Entering into long -term leases must be considerate of our plans and proposed uses for these lands. At the
same time, the need is great for improving the tenants' willingness to invest in the lands and associated
buildings. Discussions between TRCA, Rouge Park, Toronto and Markham staff and the Agriculture Working
Group have resulted in the preparation of the attached TRCA report that should satisfy both needs. The issue
of even longer term leases can be reviewed after Rouge Park gains status as a National, Provincial or legal
status Park.
Report prepared by: Bob Clay, Manager, Ecological Restoration and,
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy and Administration
For information contact: Bob Clay, 905 - 713 -6022; bob_clay @rougepark.com or,
Barb Davies, 905 - 713 -7426, bdavies @rougepark.com
Date: 2010.February.22
Attachment 1: Rouge Park Lease Framework
Attachment 1:
Draft Report:
January 21, 2010
ROUGE PARK LEASE FRAMEWORK
DISCUSSION
Currently most of the leases both commercial /agriculture and residential in Rouge Park are year to year.
Categories of leases are as follows:
• commercial /agriculture land only lease
• commercial /agriculture farm unit lease - land, residential house and farm buildings
• commercial
• residential
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has the ability to enter into leases which are more than 5
years, subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources.
Leases over 21 years require Planning Act approval (severance). It is TRCA's practice that long -term leases
should be under 21 years to avoid the Planning approvals. Leases over 21 years are only considered when the
prospective tenant can demonstrate that such longevity is required relative to the investment the tenant is
proposing to make in the property.
Agricultural tenants have argued that, as a minimum, the term of their leases should coincide with their crop
rotation cycles of 4 -5 years and possibly be longer if they are to be encouraged to make capital improvements,
R37
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 16 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
i.e. tile fields. Also, the landlord should not have the ability to terminate the lease except for cause /non
compliance. However, landlord should retain the ability to retire marginal lands or use certain portions of the
leased lands for park purposes (i.e. trails).
Another concern in Rouge Park is the condition of designated and listed historic homes. Currently, there are 5
vacant historic homes in poor condition. There are no funds for capital improvements while at the same time
TRCA is carrying costs for security and minimum maintenance. Longer term leases may provide opportunities
for tenants to invest in the required capital improvements in return for long -term lease /rental rate that
recognizes a payback period on their investment. To avoid the requirements of the Ontario Residential
Tenancies Act (former Landlord and Tenant Act), these leases should become commercial.
RECOMMENDATION
Where mutually advantageous terms and conditions for TRCA, the tenant, and Rouge Park can be achieved
which meet the goals and objectives of Rouge Park:
IT I5 RECOMMENDED THAT lease terms for the following categories of tenants should apply.
AGRICULTURE HERITAGE RESERVE AREAS
Commercial /agriculture land only lease
o maximum term of 21 years less a day
o landlord does not have the right to terminate except for non - compliance
o landlord retains the ability to retire marginal lands or use certain portions within the leased
area for park purposes
o assignment of lease requires approval of the landlord
o subject to Minister Approval
Commercial /agriculture farm unit
o maximum term of 21 years less a day
o landlord does not have the right to terminate except for non - compliance
o landlord retains the ability to retire marginal lands or use certain portions within the leased
area for park purposes
o assignment of lease requires approval of the landlord
o tenant will be responsible for the regular maintenance and upkeep of the house and farm
buildings and structures at rental rates commensurate with the value of the work being done
by the tenant
o landlord will be responsible for major maintenance, i.e. septic replacement, major structural,
well replacement, as determined on a case by case basis
o subject to Minister Approval
AGRICULTURE /FARM UNIT LEASES OUTSIDE THE RESERVE AREAS
o generally 5 -year term or as required /defined by the Rouge Park restoration
implementation plan
o where it can be demonstrated that tiling fields is beneficial to yield and the improvements are
consistent with Rouge Park objectives, the landlord may consider terms of up to 10 years
o landlord retains the ability to retire marginal lands or use certain portions within the leased
area for park purposes
o assignment of lease requires approval of the landlord
R38
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 17 of 17
MINUTES of Meeting #2/10, March 12, 2010
COMMERCIAL
• Maximum term of 12 months, unless supporting business case merits term of up to 5 years
RESIDENTIAL
• Maximum term of 12 months
HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL
Maximum term of 21 years less a day with supporting business case acceptable to TRCA and
subject to Minister Approval
4. Correspondence
MOTION:
Res. #19/10
Moved by: David Cohen
Seconded by: Chin Lee
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following correspondence:
1. Email dated February 2, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, and Members of the Rouge Park Alliance, from
Shelley Bourne, Co- Chair, and Bernard Szederzenki, Chairman, Boyington Heights Ratepayers
Assoc. Inc., re: Milne Conservation Area.
2. Letter dated February 19, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Tom Friesen,
President, Hike Ontario, re: Support for Rouge Park Trails Master Plan and the Guided Walks
Program.
3. Letter dated February 25, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Deputy Mayor Jack
Heath, Town of Markham, re: Support for Rouge Park Trails Master Plan and the Guided Walks
Program.
CARRIED
New Business
Deputy Mayor Jack Heath talked about the proposed guided walk on May 29, 2010 during Rouge Days Events.
Alan Wells, Chair, congratulated Paul Harpley on receiving the George R. Richardson Conservation Award of
Honour from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority. This Award is presented to individuals and
groups who have demonstrated a lifetime commitment to improving the environmental health of the Lake
Simcoe watershed.
Mr. Wells also brought to attention the featured article of Jim Robb in the ON Nature magazine.
Glenn De Baeremaeker informed everyone of the Toronto Zoo upcoming events - the Shark and Stingray Bay
Exhibit and the Seafood for Thought event on June 22, 2010.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:00 p.m., on March 12, 2010.
Alan Wells
Chair, Rouge Park Alliance and Acting General Manager, Rouge Park
Rab,
Rouge Park
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES - MEETING #3/10 - April 23, 2010
R39
The Rouge Park-Alliance met in Committee Room #2, Town of Richmond Hill Office, 225 East Beaver Creek Road,
Richmond Hill. Alan Wells, Chair, welcomed everyone and called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m.
PRESENT
Members:
Alan Wells, Chair
Hon. Pauline Browes, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Hon. Michael Chong, MP, Government of Canada
Councillor David Cohen, Town of Richmond Hill
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York
Dr. Helena Jaczek, MPP, Province of Ontario
Regional Councillor Bonnie Littley, Region of Durham
Councillor Ron Moeser, City of Toronto
Councillor Clyde Smith, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
John Tracogna, Toronto Zoo
ABSENT
Members:
Councillor Paul Ainslie, City of Toronto
Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City of Pickering
Gerri Lynn O'Connor, Toronto & Region C. A.
Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham
Staff:
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy & Administration
Ron Dewell, Acting General Manager
Michelle Holmes, Manager, Visitor Experience
Doreen McCarty, Administrative Coordinator
Observers:
Cat Beattie, Public Participant
Thomas Boudreault, City of Toronto Parks
Bob Clay, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Jim Dillane, TRCA
Lilli Duoba, Town of Markham
David Harvey, Consultant
Sheila Lathe, Resident
Alternates:
Councillor Raymond Cho, City of Toronto
Brian Denney, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Sue Gunton, Toronto Zoo
Debbie Pella Keen, Province of Ontario
Jim Robb, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Alternates:
Wayne Arthurs, MPP, Province of Ontario
Ian Buchanan, Region of York
Nestor Chornobay, Region of Durham
Mayor Wayne Emmerson, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
Adele Freeman, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Paul Harpley, Toronto Zoo
Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Town of Markham
Mark Graham, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Keith Laushway, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Councillor Chin Lee, City of Toronto
Tom Melymuk, City of Pickering
Tracey Steele, Town of Richmond Hill
Carolyn Woodland, Toronto & Region C. A.
Staff (Continued...)
Vicki MacDonald, Biologist
Maria Papoulias, Manager, Natural Heritage
Sheryl Santos, Stewardship Coordinator
Diana Smyth, Trail Coordinator
Observers (Continued...)
Nancy Lowies, City of Toronto Parks
Andy McKinnon, "Rouge Watch"
Danielle Miller, Toronto Community News
Lesley Sherban, Government of Ontario Office
Cristina Taglione, Government of Ontario Office
Tupper Wheatley, Milne Park Conservation Association
R40
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 2 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
CHAIR'S REMARKS
Alan Wells, Chair, introduced John Tracogna, new Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Zoo, and representative on
the Alliance. He talked about Rouge Park planting on Earth Day, April 22, 2010. The Chair thanked all Alliance
member agencies for getting their response in regarding the Governance Review report.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #20/10 Seconded by: Brian Denney
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the minutes of Meeting #2110 held on March 12, 2010.
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
None
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None
PRESENTATIONS /DELEGATIONS
CARRIED
- The Chair advised that the delegation by Brian Buckles, Rouge Duffins Greenspace Coalition, was
withdrawn, along with Correspondence 5.3.1. This issue will be brought back to the Alliance at a later
date.
Delegation by Andy McKinnon, Rouge Watch
Andy McKinnon handed out copies of his presentation that was prepared for a meeting held on March 23,
2010. That meeting was attended by the Chair, Rouge Park, TRCA and City of Toronto staff; enforcement
personnel from TRCA, City of Toronto, Ministry of Natural Resources, Town of Markham, City of Pickering,
Toronto Zoo, Toronto Police, York Regional Police and Durham Regional Police; Andy McKinnon and Cat
Beattie. Andy McKinnon's presentation outlined his goals; action plan; issues encountered (such as poaching
of Park species, vandalism, dumping, signage, enforcement); proposed program requirements; etc.
"Rouge Watch" is an informal group, established by Andy McKinnon.
MOTION: Moved by: Jack Heath
Res. #21/10 Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the delegation by Andy McKinnon.
1. Rouge Park Governance Review Update
CARRIED
The Chair recommended the following handouts be added to this report: Letter dated April 22, 2010 to
the Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of the Environment, from Mayor David Miller, City of Toronto; Excerpt from
the Town of Richmond Hill Council meeting on April 12, 2010 approving the recommendations of the
Governance Review Report; Letter dated April 22, 2010 to the Chair and Members of the Rouge Park
Alliance, from Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System; and, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
Council approved resolution regarding the Governance Review Report.
R41
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 3 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
Dr. Helena Jaczek, Alliance member for the Province of Ontario, expressed the Province's support for the
national park proposal. She said the Hon. Linda Jeffrey, Minister of Natural Resources, in consultation with
caucus, endorsed the national park proposal:
KEY ISSUE
Update of response by member organizations to the recommendations contained in the Governance Review
Report and the Recommendation made by the Alliance Board at its meeting of February 5, 2010.
MOTION:
Res. #22/10
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Helena Jaczek
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the report;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the next steps outlined in this report.
AMENDMENT A
Res. #22A /10
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Clyde Smith
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance add the following correspondence to this report:
- Letter dated April 22, 2010 to the Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of the Environment, from Mayor David
Miller, City of Toronto, re: National Park for the Rouge Valley.
- Excerpt from the Town of Richmond Hill Council Meeting on April 12, 2010 approving the
'recommendations of the Governance Review Report.
- Letter dated April 22, 2010 to Chair and Members of the Rouge Park Alliance, from Glenn De
Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System, re: Support for Recommendations in the Rouge Park
Governance Review Report.
- The Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville Council's approved resolution regarding the Governance
Review report.
AMENDMENT B
Res. #22B/10
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance forward the Alliance motion and the input and correspondence from the
Alliance members to the appropriate federal and provincial ministers as soon as possible;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to prepare a chart, with comparisons, on all the
responses as soon as possible.
AMENDMENT A CARRIED
AMENDMENT B CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
R42
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 4 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
Glenn De Baeremaeker requested a recorded vote.
YEA NAY
Hon. Michael Chong, Government of Canada X
Dr. Helena Jaczek, Province of Ontario X
Regional Councillor Bonnie Littley, Region of Durham X
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York X
Councillor David Cohen, Town of Richmond Hill X
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc. X
Councillor Ron Moeser, City of Toronto X
Councillor Raymond Cho, City of Toronto X
John Tracogna, Toronto Zoo X
Brian Denney, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority X
Hon. Pauline Browes, Waterfront Regeneration Trust X
Councillor Clyde Smith, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville X
12
12 YEAs, 0 NAY - Motion Carried Unanimously.
ACTION
Staff to take appropriate action as soon as possible.
BACKGROUND
At its meeting on February 5, 2010, the Rouge Park Alliance approved the following recommendation (Res.
#3/10):
1. THAT the Rouge Park Governance Review Final Report, under separate cover, be received.
2. THAT the recommendations of the Rouge Park Governance Review Steering Committee be received as
follows:
a. The Steering Committee advises the Rouge Park Alliance that the Governance Review Report,
prepared by the consulting team of StrategyCorp and Hemson Consulting, is a competent and
professional report on the options for governance and financing for Rouge Park
b. That the Rouge Park Governance Review Final Report be forwarded to the Rouge Park Alliance for
consideration
c. That the Steering Committee recommends to the Alliance the Rouge Park Governance Review Final
Report be circulated to the constituent member organizations of the Alliance for comments within 60
days
d. That the Rouge Park Governance Review Final Report be forwarded to the Federal and Provincial
political party leaders for their information.
3. THAT the Chairman formally request the heads of the constituent member organizations to consider the
following:
a. The recommendations of the Rouge Park Governance Review Report
b. The concept of a Founding Deal and elements as they relate to their specific organization
c. Participation with the Alliance to engage the Federal and Provincial governments in the creation of
the proposed Federal Park governance structure and creation of a joint interpretive /educational
centre for Rouge Park.
R43
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 5 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
4. THAT the Chairman of the Rouge Park Alliance appear before the constituent member organizations to
answer questions and receive comments pertaining to the Governance Review Report.
5. THAT the Chairman provides briefings to the appropriate Federal and Provincial officials and elected
representatives on the recommendations of the Governance Review Report and the process underway to
receive input and comments from the constituent members of the Alliance.
6. THAT the Chairman be authorized to undertake briefings of key stakeholders on the recommendations of
the Governance Review Report and the process underway to receive input and comments.
7. THAT the Chairman report back to the Alliance regarding the following matters:
a. Response of the Rouge Park Alliance constituent member organizations to the Governance Review
Report recommendations and any related matter
b. The results of the briefings with Federal and Provincial officials, elected representative and key
stakeholders
c. Recommended Alliance Governance Model and advocacy position
d. A strategy and work program necessary to engage the Federal and Provincial Governments in the
implementation.
8. THAT the Chair upon receipt of the responses from the member organizations (Recommendation 7)
organize and host a workshop with the constituent members of the Alliance to develop a draft "Founding
Deal" as recommended by the Governance Review Report.
I am pleased to report that I did make a presentation to each municipality, except Toronto, and have
contacted each organization that is a member of the Alliance. The result of the action taken by each member
is attached as a resolution or letter. A summary of each member organization is as follows:
• Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), approve in principle, with suggestions for an interim
plan, see recommendations.
• City of Toronto; letter of support for a National Park and a resolution of support, to follow under separate
cover.
• Region of Durham and Region of York, support in principle, with certain conditions to be dealt with
through the Founding Deal, see resolutions.
• City of Pickering, Town of Markham, and Town of Richmond Hill, approve support in principle, and state
that detailed concerns will be addressed through the Founding Deal discussions, see resolutions.
• Waterfront Regeneration Trust, approve support for a National Park, see letter.
• Save the Rouge Valley System Inc., letter of support, to follow under separate cover.
• Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, will deal with report at Council on May 4, 2010.
• Toronto Zoo, will deal with issue at their May Board meeting, as April meeting was cancelled.
R44
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 6 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
We have received very favourable responses from all member organizations that have considered the
Governance Review Report and the other items that we requested.
It is now time to formally request that the Government of Canada consider the Alliance's request that Rouge
Park be a National Park and the Ministry of Environment, through Parks Canada, enter into discussions with
the Province of Ontario and the Rouge Park Alliance, to carry out the re commendations contained in the
report. We will seek assistance from our Federal (Hon. Michael Chong) and Provincial (Dr. Helena Jaczek)
Alliance members, Hon. Pauline Browes, P.C., consultants and other Board members.
The next steps start with meeting with both the Federal and Provincial Government Officials. The Chair, with
assistance from our consultants, will continue to carry out the plans listed in recommendations 5, 6, 7, and 8.
Report prepared by: Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance
For information contact: Alan Wells, 905 - 713 -7426 - email: awells @rougepark.com
Date: April 14, 2010
Attachments (Per Agenda Package: Reports from RPA Member Organizations: TRCA Report; Region of Durham; Region of
York; City of Pickering; Town of Markham; Town of Richmond Hill; Waterfront Regeneration Trust Letter)
Handout Attachments:
1. Letter dated April 22, 2010 from Mayor David Miller, City of Toronto
2. Excerpt from the Town of Richmond Hill Council Meeting on April 12, 2010 approving the
Recommendations of the Governance Review Report
3. Letter dated April 22, 2010 from Save the Rouge Valley System
4. Approved Resolution from the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville Council dated April 20, 2010
pertaining to Rouge Park
. ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 7ofJO
MINUTES of Meeting #3/lO' April 23'2OlO
Handouts: Attachment 1 - Letter dated April 22, 2010 from Mayor David Miller, City of Toronto.
April 22, 2010
The Honourable Jim Prentice
Minister of ihe Environment
l.:xTv,m^sevdn|xChxvdiere
10 Weffington Street. 28'1' Floor
Gatineau, Quebec
KlA0HB
Subject: National Park for the Rouge Valley
Dear Minister Prentice:
1 am pleased to write in support of the federal government designating the Rouge Park as
a national park.
In August 2009 Toronto City Council 'adopted chebdkwbg,eooluboo:
1. City Council alfirms that it believes that the Rouge Valley watershed is of national
signiFicance and that it supports the creation o[m4O/00 acre Rouge VulleyNational
Park in order eo protecr the extraordinary Wealth contained [within] the Toroato. ¥ork
and 1)urham areas of the Park, and
2, Thc City of Toronto request and enconrage the government of Canada and Province
of Ontario to estahlish a Rouge Valley National Park and conimit to having u visiblc
and welcomed presence in the largest urban centre in Canada.
In adopting this resolution, City Council ixconsistent with recommendations of the
Hon. DuviUCnomhic`s Federal Comniission on the Future of Toronto's Watcrft-ont, a federal
Private Members Hill, and resolutions "[ the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the
Rouge Park Alliance.
Rouge Park is an incredihlc environnicntal and recreational asset tor the people of
Toronto, the region and the nation. Our residents are fortunate 10 have access to trails through
towering whire pine forests and beautiful river valleys. The las remaining working farms in
Toronto are in Rouge Park. 'These farmlands provide not only great local food for our citizens
but can also provide an important opportunity for our urban residents to learn and grow their own
food in community- gardens. xnd, all of this is in a park that is accessible by transit_
A signUicant proportion o/Tovnto'a population iv horn ouuigeofCanada. Pot many of
these new Cuuodmno, their first and most important experience, with /heuo/vm| environment
would he in the Rouge Valley National Park.
HO TORONTO
City /m|~1m/Qm`" Street nc,,^ 2nd /x..,'ruw",",o"mri" N1511 2N 2
+m 397 u/, ~ Fax 416-696 368/ ^ 1' ".^./ .wpui "ixle^ew.o"m/"
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
R46
Page 8 of 20
Rouge Park is a logical choice as Canada's first near -urban national park. These lands
are in a nationally significant ecological area and home to a number of important endangered and
rare species. including Butternut and the Loggerhead Shrike_
All residents want to fully realize the potential of the Park and preserve it for future
generations of Canadians. Rouge Park needs a new governance structure, enhanced funding
commitments and the incorporation of federal and provincial lands to fulfill the vision of the
park from Lake Ontario to the Oak Ridges Moraine. City Council believes that the hest way of
achieving this is by the Federal Government making Rouge Park a national park.
For further information. City staff contact for this initiative is Brenda Patterson. General
Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation. at 416-392-8182.
Thank you for your careful consideration of this request and I look forward to receiving
your response.
Yours truly,
; _
Mayor David Miller
City of 'Toronto
cc. Hon. Jim Bradley, Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Hon. John Gerretson. Ontario Minister of the Environment
Hon. Brad Duguid, Ontario Minister of Energy and Infrastructure
Roger Anderson. Chair and CEO, Regional Municipality of Durham
Bill Fisch, Chair and CEC). Regional Municipality of York
Mayor Dave Ryan, City of Pickering
Mayor Frank Scarpitti. Town of Markham
Mayor Dave Barrow, Town of Richmond Hill
Mayor Wayne Emmerson. Town of Whitchurch- Stouffvi1le
Alan Wells, Chair. Rouge Park Alliance
Gerri -Lynn O'Conncr, Chair, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Joseph P. Pcnnachetti, City Manager
R47
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 9 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
Handouts: Attachment 2 - Excerpt from the Town of Richmond Hill Council Meeting on April 12, 2010
approving the recommendations of the Governance Review Report.
EXCERPT FROM TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL COUNCIL MEETING ON APRIL 12, 2010:
"...ADOPTION OF REPORTS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
Moved by: Councillor Papa
Seconded by: Councillor Foster
That the following Items be approved and that the various officials of the Corporation be hereby
authorized and directed to take such action as may be necessary to give effect to the
recommendations contained therein:
1.0 Minutes - Committee of the Whole meeting CW #06 -10 of April 6, 2010
That the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting CW #06 -10 held on April 6, 2010 be adopted
as circulated and the following recommendations be approved:
(Page 5)
1.11
Governance, Organization and Finance Review of the Rouge Park Alliance -
(SRPRC.10.16) (Item No. 11)
Rec. 11 a) That the recommendations of the Governance, Organization and Finance Review of the Rouge Park
Alliance, attached as Appendix 3 to SRPRC.10.16 dated February 2010 and prepared by Strategy
Corp. and Hemson Consulting for the Rouge Park Alliance, be endorsed;
b) That the elements of the proposed "Founding Deal" for a new "Rouge National Park ", as outlined
in the Governance, Organization and Finance Review of the Rouge Park Alliance be endorsed in
principle, recognizing the following Town of Richmond Hill comments with regard to specific
elements of the proposed Founding Deal:
i) Funding - Given that the proposed boundaries of the new Rouge National Park position the
Park well outside the limits of the Town of Richmond Hill, the Town should not be responsible
for any sort of funding in relation to the Park;
ii) Park Boundaries - The Town of Richmond Hill supports the proposed Rouge National Park
boundaries acknowledging the value of a "near urban" National Park to residents of the entire
Greater Toronto Area;
iii) Governance and Transitional Arrangements - In the interim (until such time as the Rouge Park
Alliance is converted to an advisory board or reconstituted as an arms - length, not - for - profit
agency) the Town of Richmond Hill's lands identified in Appendix 2 of SRPRC.10.16 should
continue to be recognized as part of the Rouge Park, and the Town of Richmond Hill will
remain a member of the Rouge Park Alliance. Additionally, when the Rouge Park Alliance's
structure and mandate are revised, the Alliance's watershed - related role should be limited,
and the TRCA and municipal partners should instead be recognized as primarily responsible
for Rouge Watershed planning and management.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
R48
Page 10 of 20
c) That, as a member of the Rouge Park Alliance, the Town of Richmond Hill supports the proposal to
engage the federal and provincial governments in the creation of the proposed Federal Park
governance structure and the establishment of a joint interpretive /educational centre for the
Rouge Park.
Carried Unanimously
Handouts: Attachment #3 - Save the Rouge Valley System Letter dated April 22, 2010.
Save the Rouge Valley System
94 Torrance Road, Scarborough, Ontario M1 J 2J4
Thursday, April 24 2010
Dear Chair and Members of the Rouge Park Alliance:
Re: Support for recommendations in the Rouge Park Governance Review Report
Please accept this letter as our support for the recommendations and direction contained
within the consultants report on Rouge Park governance. We believe the
recommendations and directions contained within the report are the next logical step
towards realizing the grand vision of a National Park that stretches from the shores of
Lake Ontario in Toronto to the Oak Ridges Moraine in Whitchurch- Stoufville.
Our Board has discussed this issues many times and supports the recommendations that
the Rouge Park he protected within the federal or national park system. We also agree
that a strong federal presence is needed to protect and enhance the national wildlife
treasure that is found within the most populated urban centre of Canada. Not only will the
federal presence bring a welcomed additional level of protection for the park, but the.
federal presence will act as a gateway for residents of the Greater Toronto Area to all the
magnificent parks that our nation has been blessed with and had the foresight to protect.
While our Board does take issue with some specific comments within the report, we are
pleased to lend our full support to this federal park initiative.
If you have any questions regarding our letter or position, please feel free to contact me at
416- 392 -0204.
Cheers,
Glenn De Baeremaeker
Presiders Save the Rouge Valley System
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
R49
Page 11 of 20
Handouts: Attachment #4 - Approved Resolution from the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville dated April
20, 2010 pertaining to Rouge Park.
+'m town of led tcterch- stouffvil1e (11E11)APR 21 2010 3:20 /ST. 3:18/No.7600000718 P 2
MOVvb 6'1 (.:42) r.)NC/L4.04 304
E'cocvPM Sy. CouNGLe;mt ) A.)
THAT the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffviite concurs that a new Governance Model for the
operation of the Rouge Pork is necessary;
AND THAT the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville adopts in principle the Rouge Alliance's
objectives of o submission to the Federal Govemment to estob1Ish the Rouge Pork as a
National Park
AND THAT the "Elements of the Pounding Deal" for the future structure and
management of the Rouge Park shall recognize the urban setting in which it resides so
os as to ensure a balance between a greenlands system; o community resource: and,
community building objectives:
AND THAT the Town re -affirm its long standing practice that Rouge Park shall sustain
capital, program and operational delivery on the basis of upper level government
funding;
AND THAI Staff bring a full Report to Council on thls matter of a later date.
R50
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 12 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
2. Rouge Park Enforcement Report
KEY ISSUE
Since the inception of Rouge Park and the implementation of an Interim Enforcement Plan in 1996, the Park
has expanded in size and become a popular local and international destination for park enthusiasts. With this
increase in size and visitors comes an increase in reports of enforcement occurrences.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #23/10 Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park General Manager be the point person responsible for maintaining
communications and relationships with the various enforcement agencies with jurisdictions that cover
Rouge Park;
AND THAT the number of signs in the Park informing Park users of permissible activities be increased
and expanded to include the non - public use areas of the Park;
AND THAT Rouge Park staff continue to coordinate with local enforcement agencies to develop the
content, and to install additional signage informing Park users on how to report occurrences;
AND THAT Rouge Park staff continue to develop and implement a Park watch program, with trained
volunteers, whose focus should be to cooperate with enforcement agencies and provide for
observation and citizen patrols, but not directly engage those contravening regulations;
AND FURTHER THAT Rouge Park staff continue to communicate with the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff to ensure that deer related issues in Rouge Park are dealt with
consistently with the developing TRCA policy.
AMENDMENT:
MOTION:
Res. #23A/10
Moved by: Brian Denney
Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the 4th paragraph, last phrase, be amended to read:
"AND THAT Rouge Park staff continue to develop and implement a Park watch program, with trained
volunteers, whose focus should be to cooperate with enforcement agencies and provide for
observation and citizen patrols, with particular attention to avoid risks to staff and volunteers;"
AMENDMENT CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
ACTION
- Staff to take appropriate action as noted above.
BACKGROUND
Prior to the Park's inception in 1995, local enforcement agencies met to develop a Rouge Park Interim
Enforcement Plan, much of which was implemented. However, the Park has changed significantly in size and
together with the existing complex ownership, management responsibilities and political jurisdictions and
R51
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 13 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
updated Rouge Park plans, it is timely for the Park to review the Interim Plan. In addition, in 2007 a
presentation was made to the Rouge Park Alliance (RPA) raising the issue of possible deer poaching occurring
in Rouge Park. The issue was raised again at subsequent RPA meetings and reports were submitted to a
variety of local enforcement agencies. Over this period, other enforcement related issues such as off road
vehicle use, unauthorized cycling, garbage dumping, etc., have become increasingly common. In addition,
there is increasing evidence that illegal removal of other species including species at risk and other forms of
flora and fauna is occurring in the Park.
Existing Communication Initiatives
As part of the Park's Visitor Experience Program, we have improved our communications with the Park visitors
in regards to acceptable behaviours and activities as follows:
• In 2007, with the launch of the new website, the 'Explore' section was created in which you can find
information on planning your visit in a safe and responsible manner.
• . In 2008, orientation signs were installed at the main trail heads in the City of Toronto. These signs
include information on permissible uses.
• In 2009, a new Trails map was printed which includes a section on Park Visitor's code.
• In 2010, our volunteer trail leaders will act as park ambassadors, educating Park visitors on appropriate
trail activities, and emphasizing the importance of keeping these lands protected.
Current Level of Response
In the fall of 2006, Rouge Park Alliance partner members responded to the increase in reports of incidents
within lands identified as Rouge Park as follows:
City of Toronto parks staff installed No Trespassing signs which reference Parks Bylaw #608 along
Reesor Road, Old Finch Avenue, and within the Finch Meander parking lot; and,
TRCA property management staff made contact with tenants in the vicinity of the reported
occurrence; and,
Rouge Park staff have forwarded reports of occurrences to the enforcement and management
agencies with responsibilities in the vicinity of the occurrence; and,
• TRCA enforcement staff carry out regular patrols and have worked with Andy McKinnon to remove
ground blinds and tree stand's, and installed additional no trespassing signs.
TRCA Deer Management Policy and Other Enforcement Policies
TRCA is currently developing a Policy for the Management of Human /Wildlife Conflicts on TRCA Lands. To
date, the approach has been to develop local plans to maintain healthy deer herds and yet alleviate conflicts
with landowners who have experienced property damage by deer. TRCA has not yet reached a point where a
plan for Rouge Park has been developed but TRCA staff believes the time is nearing. RPA staff will be involved
in developing that plan in the near future.
In a similar manner, TRCA has policies about public access and what activities are appropriate on TRCA lands
(for example, TRCA allows fishing, hiking, etc., but does not allow hunting on any properties). As the RPA
considers what activities are to be allowed and encouraged in the Park, TRCA policies should be kept in mind.
R52
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 14 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
Legal Context for Hunting
From December 2009 to present, RPA staff consulted with provincial and municipal enforcement agencies to
review the relevant laws, regulations, policies and bylaws related to the deer poaching /hunting issue. The
following is a summary of that consultation:
1. Rouge Park is included in Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Wildlife Management Unit area 78E and
under regulations provided for by the Ontario Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act (OFWCA), MNR sets a
season for deer (October 1- December 31) that allows for bow hunting of deer, as well as hunting
seasons for turkey and small game. Violations of the Wildlife Act can be laid for hunting out of season,
without license /tag, over - limit, etc., by Police, MNR Conservation Officers and Conservation Authority
Officers (under the Conservation Authorities Act).
2. The OFWCA specifies that hunters must obtain permission to hunt on private property or else there is
a violation of the Ontario Trespass to Property Act.
3. TRCA, Toronto and Markham do not provide permission to hunt anywhere on their properties,
including Rouge Park. Trespass allows for arrest and is enforceable by Police and TRCA Enforcement
Officers and MNR Conservation Officers where there are violations of the OFWCA or Ontario Species at
Risk Act.
4. Markham and Toronto also have bylaws or other codes that forbid discharge of weapons that could
cause injury - bows would be included. Pickering is presently reviewing their bylaw. Note that the
weapon must be discharged, possession is likely not an offence. Bylaw officers call Municipal Police if
weapons are involved. Bylaws are enforceable only by issuance of ticket.
Unless the activity is a violation of a clear Act or Code (e.g., hunting out of season, collection of species at risk,
etc.), the best enforcement strategy is to treat the issue as trespass to property and therefore responsibility of
landowners - TRCA, Toronto Parks (under agreement with TRCA) and Markham.
Recommendations
When this was complete, staff convened a meeting of those agencies (see appendix 1 for list of attendees) on
March 23, 2010 to discuss the legal context and develop the detailed recommendations that are proposed
below.
1. It is clear that the issue of enforcement of the deer hunting /poaching issue in Rouge Park must have
its resolution in a coherent approach to enforcement of various laws and regulations in general,
mostly based in trespass law. Enforcing trespass law is usually dependent on ensuring the public
knows when it trespasses. This may require a plan that includes clear RPA policies about what is
permitted in the Park and what is not and that provides for zoning of acceptable activities by the
public rather than a simple 'No trespassing' approach. It is crucial that there be a strong public
education campaign that leaves no doubt in the public's mind about what is allowed and what is not.
Such a campaign should include notice in provincial hunting regulation summary brochures, media,
clear and abundant signage so that it is clear to the public which activities are permissible and which
are prohibited.
The enforcement agencies that attended the meeting expressed concern that they may not have legal
access to tenanted properties to enforce trespass to hunt or no hunting clauses in tenant leases. They
felt it was more appropriate that occurrences on tenanted properties be addressed by the landlord.
R53
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 15 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
2. Establish a park watch among residents and volunteers so that inappropriate activities can be
reported. Establish small groups of trained, managed volunteers who can do planned, coordinated
patrols. These volunteers should be observers who report activities to enforcement agencies, but
should not confront or contact those who are participating in potentially prohibited activities.
3. RPA staff should continue to foster cooperative working relationships among enforcement agencies
that might allow for joint agency enforcement activities and ongoing advice as enforcement related
issues arise. As was recommended in the 1995 Interim Plan, RPA staff should develop and maintain
contacts with local enforcement agencies and host at a minimum annual meetings such as the March
23, 2010 meeting to discuss emerging enforcement issues and needs.
RPA staff should ensure that the enforcement agencies are informed of Park boundaries, land
ownership, enforcement issues on a routine basis so that they have adequate information when
complaints are received. The RPA should ask the various Rouge Park land title holders to send letters
to local Police services and other appropriate enforcement agencies that provide a priori authorization
to act on Park lands.
When complaints are received encourage response by the appropriate agencies. Where there is a
concern for public safety or for instances of simple trespass, the local Police should be notified first.
Where the concern is primarily Ontario Fish and Wildlife Conservation or Species at Risk Acts concerns
the MNR TIPS line should be contacted first and, where hunting with bows or firearms are concerned
Police should also be contacted.
4. TRCA Conservation Officers already do weekly weekday patrols in marked vehicles. Toronto Zoo,
Municipal Police Services, Toronto and Markham Bylaw Officers report similar but Tess frequent patrols.
If possible, patrols should be coordinated and there should be patrols that are expanded to Friday
evenings and weekends, especially during the peak periods of activity (e.g., deer season). Resources
may have to be directed to patrol agencies or direction provided by their managers.
5. RPA should include coordination /communication of enforcement issues in a staff role so that liaisons
and relationships are built with the enforcement agencies.
Appendix 1. Attendees at the March 23, 2010
TRCA - Ron Dewell, Pat Doody (CO)
Toronto - Moe Cabral (Supervisor Bylaw Enforcement for the
Parks Bylaw), Beth McEwen (Forestry), Tom Boudreault (Parks)
Toronto Police - Staff Sergeant David Rydzik
MNR - Mark Russell (Conservation Officer), Bill Lafferty (Staff Sergeant - Supervisor),
Jay Downey (Conservation Officer)
Andy McKinnon, Cat Beattie
Markham - Bill Wiles (Bylaw Enforcement Officer),
York Regional Police - PC Ivan Liew
Toronto Zoo - Shane Alexander (Supervisor of Safety and Security)
Rouge Park - Alan Wells, Bob Clay
Pickering - Kim Thompson, Supervisor Bylaw Enforcement
Durham Regional Police
R54
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 16 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: 2010.04.14
Bob Clay, Project Manager, Restoration Services, TRCA
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy and Administration, Rouge Park
Ron Dewell, Acting General Manger, 905- 713 -7374, rdewell @trca.on.ca or
Barb Davies, 905 - 713 -7426, bdavies @rougepark.com
3. Rouge Park New TraIL Planning and Guided Walks Report
KEY ISSUE
Receipt and circulation of the Rouge Park new Trail Planning and Guided Walks Report.
MOTION:
Res. #24/10
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the report detailing the Rouge Park trail planning initiatives, and
the guided walks program led by Rouge Park Trail Coordinator.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Rouge Park Trail Coordinator is a valuable new addition to the Rouge Park Alliance staff. This person acts
as staff support for the Trails Advisory Committee, drives the interpretive walks program, and assists in
delivering important Rouge Park interpretive messaging as part of the HAVE program.
Since October 2009, the Trail Coordinator has been working to build a profile for Rouge Park as a prime
destination for near -urban wilderness walking /hiking in Toronto by creating a program of guided walks led by
volunteers, and by assisting in the development of a comprehensive Rouge Park Trails Master Plan along with
the Park's Trails Advisory Committee.
Our objective is to foster a strong sense of stewardship and pride for Rouge Park and its special place in the
Greenbelt. By engaging volunteers as hike leaders, having a stronger Park presence, and a much needed Trail
Master Plan, we will be better able to protect and enhance this spectacular area of the Greenbelt.
RATIONALE
Since its inception, Rouge Park has been in a land acquisition and restoration phase, with a strong focus on
establishing a protected nature reserve stretching from Lake Ontario north to the Oak Ridges Moraine. The
trail system plays an integral role in providing our visitors with a tangible experience, by allowing them to see
the diverse habitats and rich cultural history that Rouge Park strives to protect.
The Trails Master Plan is a natural and necessary extension of this growth and elevates the Park as an easily
accessible tourism destination and the only Greenbelt gateway in Toronto. The Trails Advisory Committee,
with the support of the Rouge Park Alliance, offers a wealth of experience and knowledge that will ensure
successful execution of the project. This Plan will be an essential tool for connecting areas within Rouge Park,
and to the surrounding communities and their trail systems. One primary objective of the plan is to create a
continuous south to north trail in Rouge Park from Lake Ontario to the Oak Ridges Moraine.
By engaging volunteers from the communities around the Park as well as outdoor enthusiasts from all parts of
the GTA and beyond, we encourage our visitors to play a larger role in the protection and celebration of the
R55
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 17 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
Park and the Greenbelt. Under the Trail Coordinator's supervision, these volunteers will plan, promote and
lead diverse guided outings in the Park for a wide audience of visitors, year- round.
By working directly with a network of trained and certified volunteers, providing meaningful interpretive
outings and offering an interesting and varied trail system, we feel that people will be willing to protect and
enjoy this unique reservoir of biodiversity in perpetuity.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) convened in late October, 2009. The Committee is comprised of staff
representation from Rouge Park Alliance Members including Rouge Park staff, as well as other trail advocacy
groups and individuals.
Subsequent meetings of the TAC ultimately delivered a Terms of Reference that became a foundation piece
for the Trails Master Plan Request for Proposal. The RFP is currently with a group of proponents as chosen by
the Trails Advisory Committee. As of April 22, 2010, proposals for the Trails Master Plan were received. A
reviewing group from the TAC will next review the proposals and award the contract by early May. Work on
the Trails Master Plan is expected to commence in early summer 2010.
Guided walks began in December 2009 and continue to be led by the Rouge Park Trail Coordinator until the
volunteer leaders are fully trained and prepared. Now offering 16 walks a month, the program has essentially
been built from the ground up by the Trail Coordinator.
A grassroots promotion plan focused on:
• in -Park signage,
• the Rouge Park and other external websites,
• personal approach and word of mouth on the walks by the Trail Coordinator,
• communications to our Rouge Park partners and volunteer network,
• media relations in the Rouge Park communities.
We have had 2 visits from the KX -96 (Durham /Toronto Country Radio) Community Cruiser and coverage in the
Scarborough Mirror. Online listings are proving to be the main source visitors quote when asked how they
found out about the walks.
As of April 14, 2010, the guided walks have welcomed almost 250 visitors and covered approximately 225
kilometres on the Toronto section trails. The majority of the walkers were experiencing their first outing in the
Park, and declared they purposely came because a guided walk was offered.
We are aiming to have 20 volunteers with a 1 -year commitment, leading an increased number of walks, with a
variety of themes. We are currently training 16 volunteer walks leaders to begin leading in May.
The leaders represent a wide range of ages, heritages, skill sets and personal interests. Some are relatively
new to the Park, and others virtually grew up in the Park, but they all share a love of the outdoors and an
immense enthusiasm for and pride in the role they are about to take on. It is with equal enthusiasm that the
Trail Coordinator looks forward to working with this inaugural group of volunteer walk leaders to bring a
vibrant and diverse program of outings for all Park visitors. New leader training is planned for October 20.10.
R56
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 18 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The Town of Markham has committed $50,000 toward the creation of the Trails Master Plan to hire a
consultant. We are also seeking funding from the Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation and Mountain
Equipment Co -op to support the Trail Coordinator position, the remainder of the consultant's costs for the
Trails Master Plan and the maintenance of the volunteer program (recruitment, training, equipment,
recognition).
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: 2010, April 14
Diana Smyth, Trail Coordinator, Rouge Park
Diana Smyth, 905 713 3184, diana_smyth @rougepark.com
4. Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes - January 20, 2010
KEY ISSUE
Present the actions, recommendations and outcomes of the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee meeting
held on January 20, 2010.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #25/10 Seconded by: David Cohen
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the minutes of the January 20, 2010 Rouge Park Natural Heritage
Committee meeting.
CARRIED
5. Correspondence
*Note: As mentioned earlier under Presentations /Delegations by Alan Wells, Chair, Delegation by Brian
Buckles, Rouge Duffins Greenspace Coalition, along with correspondence 5.3.1 : "Rouge Duffins
Greenspace Coalition March 9, 2010 Meeting Resolution (revised April 5, 2010) to Alan Wells, Rouge
Park Alliance, re: Rouge Park ", was withdrawn.
MOTION:
Res. #26/10
Moved by: Brian Denney
Seconded by: Bonnie Littley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following correspondence (as amended):
1. Letter dated March 4, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Stan Butcher, Interim
Executive Director, Oak Ridges Trail Association, re: Support for Rouge Park Trails Master Plan and
the Guided Walks Program.
2. Letter dated March 4, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Gillian Angus- Traill,
Acting Council Coordinator, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, re: Rouge Park Governance and
Finance Review Report.
*3. Withdrawn — "Rouge Duffins Greenspace Coalition March 9, 2010 Meeting Resolution (revised April
5, 2010) to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, re: Rouge Park."
R57
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 19 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
4. Letter dated April 13, 2010 to Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, from Tupper Wheatley,
Chairman, Milne Park Conservation Association, re: Support for a Rouge National Park.
MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
6. Rouge Park Finance Committee Meeting Minutes of April 16, 2010
KEY ISSUE
Present the minutes of the Rouge Park Finance Committee meeting held on April 16, 2010.
MOTION: Moved by: Brian Denney
Res. #27/10 Seconded by: Pauline Browes
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receives the minutes of the Rouge Park Finance Committee meeting held
on April 16, 2010.
CARRIED
7. 2009 Unaudited Financial Report and 2010 UpdatedBudget
KEY ISSUE
Present the 2009 unaudited financial report and 2010 updated budget.
MOTION: Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #28/10 Seconded by: David Cohen
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the 2009 unaudited financial report and 2010 updated budget.
CARRIED
8. New Business
Councillor Ron Moeser asked if there were any new incidents of coyotes in the Park, and the answer was "No ".
Debbie Pella Keen, Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Aurora District Manager, said that she could arrange
for John Pisapio, MNR biologist, to make a presentation on coyotes at an Alliance meeting, if so desired.
The Rouge Park Alliance agreed to hold a Working Session regarding Rouge Park properties on May 28, 2010,
9:00 a.m., Main Boardroom, Toronto Zoo, 361 A Old Finch Avenue, Scarborough.
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath reminded Alliance members of the Rouge Days hike that he would be
leading on May 29`h, and that invitations would be sent out shortly.
R58
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 20 of 20
MINUTES of Meeting #3/10, April 23, 2010
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:10 p.m., on April 23, 2010.
Alan Wells Ron Dewell
Chair, Rouge Park Alliance Acting General Manager, Rouge Park
Rouge Park
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE MINUTES
- MEETING #4/10 -JUNE 11, 2010
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
R59
The Rouge Park Alliance met at the Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club, Scarborough. The Chair, Alan Wells, welcomed
everyone, and thanked the Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club management and staff for hosting the meeting. He
called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m.
PRESENT
Members:
Alan Wells, Chair
Councillor Paul Ainslie, City of Toronto
Hon. Pauline Browes, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Hon. Michael Chong, MP, Government of Canada
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Dr. Helena Jaczek, MPP, Province of Ontario
Councillor Ron Moeser, City of Toronto
Regional Councillor Bonnie Littley, Region of Durham
Gerri Lynn O'Connor, TRCA
ABSENT
Members:
Councillor David Cohen, Town of Richmond Hill
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York
Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham
Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City of Pickering
Councillor Clyde Smith, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
John Tracogna, Toronto Zoo
Staff:
Heidi Brown, Species at Risk Technician
Barb Davies, Manager, Policy & Administration
Ron Dewell, Acting General Manager
Michelle Holmes, Manager, Visitor Experience
Vicki MacDonald, Biologist
Observers:
Brenda Breedon, TRCA
Bob Clay, TRCA
Colin Creasey, 10000 Trees for the Rouge
Gail Crossman, Transport Canada
Jim Dillane, TRCA
Lilli Duoba, Town of Markham
Alternates:
Ian Buchanan, Region of York
Councillor Raymond Cho, City of Toronto
Paul Harpley, Toronto Zoo
Councillor Chin Lee, City of Toronto
Tom Melymuk, City of Pickering
Debbie Pella Keen, Province of Ontario
Jim Robb, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Carolyn Woodland, TRCA
Alternates:
Nestor Chornobay, Region of Durham
Brian Denney, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Mayor Wayne Emmerson, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville
Adele Freeman, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority
Mark Graham, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Sue Gunton, Toronto Zoo
Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Town of Markham
Keith Laushway, Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp.
Tracey Steele, Richmond Hill
Staff (Continued...)
Doreen McCarty, Administrative Coordinator
Maria Papoulias, Manager, Natural Heritage
Sheryl Santos, Stewardship Coordinator
Diana Smyth, Trail Coordinator
Jennifer Tang, Field Technician
Observers (Continued...)
Hovavi Engineer & Mona Brindley, Residents
David Harvey, Consultant - GreenThink
Garry Hunter, Hunter & Associates
Lois James, Green Door Alliance
Sheila Lathe, Resident
Mark Lowe, TRCA
Nancy Lowes, City of Toronto Parks
R60
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 2 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
Observers (Continued...)
Marvin Macaraig, Dept. Of Geography, U. Of T.
Gord MacPherson, TRCA
Bernadette Manning, Cedargrove Community
John Mason
Beth McEwen, City of Toronto
Andy McKinnon, Rouge Watch
Edith Montgomery, Resident
Eha Naylor, Dillon Consulting
Colin O'Neill, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
Don Prince, Oak Ridges Moraine Land Trust
Lionel Purcell, Rouge Valley Foundation
Linda Sarang /Volunteers, Rouge Valley Naturalists
Patricia Short- GaIIe, Oak Ridges Moraine Land Trust
Caroline Shultz, Ontario Nature
Lorne Smith
Ben Stacey
Volunteers, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
Volunteers, Rouge Valley Foundation
Susan Walmer, Oak Ridges Moraine Land Trust
Anne Wells
R61
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 3 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
CHAIR'S REMARKS
Alan Wells, Chair, welcomed everyone and advised that the Annual General Meeting would follow
immediately after the Alliance meeting.
MINUTES OF MEETING #3/10, APRIL 23, 2010 .
MOTION:
Res. #29/10
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Helena Jaczek
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the minutes of Meeting #3/10 held on April 23, 2010.
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
None
CARRIED
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
Regional Councillor Bonnie Littley, Region of Durham, and Tom Melymuk, City of Pickering, disclosed a conflict
with agenda item #1 (York Region Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Projects), as their
municipalities have ongoing legal issues with regard to the York - Durham Sewage System expansion.
PRESENTATION /DELEGATIONS
Jim Robb deferred his presentation to a future Rouge Park Alliance meeting.
1. York Region Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Projects
KEY ISSUE
The Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Projects at Bob Hunter Memorial Park.
MOTION:
Res. #30/10
Moved by: Ian Buchanan
Seconded by: Paul Harpley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the attached report from the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to continue to work with Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority and York Region on the Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement
Projects at the Bob Hunter Memorial Park, and report back to the Alliance on the completion of the
projects.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #30A/10 Seconded by: Helena Jaczek
That the following paragraph be added to the motion:
THAT pursuant to the wishes of the Hunter family and Rouge Park:
1. No paved trails will be built in the Bob Hunter Memorial Park;
2. Ecological restoration planting shall be done by non - government organizations (NGOs) to the
extent of their capacity.
AMENDMENT CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
R62
Page 4 of 18
ACTION
- Staff to take appropriate action and report back to the Alliance on completion of the
enhancement projects.
BACKGROUND
TRCA Report:
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A49/1 0 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
YORK REGION SOUTHEAST COLLECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
Approval of the Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Projects at the Bob
Hunter Memorial Park, and funding agreement with York Region.
Richard Whitehead
David Barrow
THAT the Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Projects at the Bob Hunter
Memorial Park be approved;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to enter into a funding
agreement with the Region of York to implement the Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement
Projects at Bob Hunter Memorial Park on TRCA lands within Rouge Park;
THAT staff assist York Region with the various Environmental Assessment conditions that pertain to
Bob Hunter Memorial Park;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Authority on the completion of the
Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancements Projects at Bob Hunter Memorial
Park.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since 2005, TRCA staff has been working on various aspects of the planning, approval and implementation of
the York Durham Sanitary Sewer System (YDSS). One product of this working relationship is a service delivery
partnership to facilitate review of the Environmental Assessment and permits of the various YDSS projects. In
addition, staff has been actively assisting the regions of York and Durham with the planning and
implementation of the Ecological Enhancement associated with the 16th Avenue Sewer, Southeast Collector
and the expansion of the Duffins Water Pollution Control Plant.
At Authority Meeting #9/07, held on November 30, 2007, Resolution #A268/07, was approved, in part, as
follows:
...THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff be directed to report to the Authority once the final 16th Avenue
Environmental Improvements Initiative, Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Plan and Duffins
Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) Greening and Biodiversity Plan, have been developed;...
The plan for the 16th Avenue Environmental Improvement Initiatives is still being finalized. The Duffins Water
Pollution Control Plant Greening and Biodiversity Plan was approved at Authority Meeting #3/08, held on April
25, 2008, and the associated habitat enhancement work is currently under way.
A portion of the overall Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Plan is the implementation of
various aspects of the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Plan. This implementation will focus on a five year phased
R63
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 5 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
plan that invests in natural heritage and the recreational trails components of the Bob Hunter Memorial Park.
The natural heritage features include the restoration of wetlands, rehabilitation of riparian zones, establishing
natural cover including meadow habitats and forests. The recreation plan includes the development of multi-
use trails, a nature trail, bridge crossings, parking and interpretive signage. All of the proposed projects in
phases one to three are on TRCA properties within Rouge Park while phases four and five are on lands
currently held by the Province of Ontario which have been dedicated for Rouge Park purposes.
The Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancement Plan portion of the Bob Hunter Memorial Park has been
developed in close cooperation with the Rouge Park, municipalities and a number of different agencies. All of
the restoration works and multi -use trails are consistent with Rouge Park planning, including the Bob Hunter
Memorial Park Plan, the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Action Plan, the Rouge watershed plan, as well as,
municipal and provincial planning. There is a strong commitment amongst the project partners to build
functional habitats, trails that will enhance the public use of the area, and engage the community in
establishing the Bob Hunter Memorial Park within Rouge Park.
On March 31, 2010, the Ministry of the Environment granted approval of the overall Environmental
Assessment of the Southeast Collector Project. This approval was subject to a number of conditions, including
the following conditions that are specific to the Bob Hunter Memorial Park:
• specific conditions relate to the tunnel boring operation and alignment within Bob Hunter Memorial
Park;
• a requirement to work with interested stakeholders including TRCA, Rouge Park Alliance, Town of
Markham, and the family of Bob Hunter on any refinements to the proposed environmental plan;
• within six months of the approval, prepare for approval to the satisfaction of the Regional Director,
Ministry of Environment, a Bob Hunter Memorial Park Enhancement Plan that includes details of the
proposed restoration and trails, project implementation timelines, and annual compliance reports on
the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Enhancement Plan; and
• ensure that the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Enhancement Plan is posted on the proponent website.
On Authority approval, staff will enter into a funding agreement with York Region to implement the Southeast
Collector Environmental Enhancements at Bob Hunter Memorial Park. Prior to implementation and working
closely with Rouge Park, and the Region, staff will secure all approvals and notify all parties interested with the
Bob Hunter Memorial Park. Work is scheduled to commence in 2010 and end in 2014.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancements at Bob Hunter Memorial Park consist of natural
heritage restoration and the recreational multi -use trail. The natural heritage projects are focused on habitat
restoration including restoring wetlands, forest and riparian cover and creating meadows. The following table
outlines a summary of the natural heritage and recreational components of each phase of the Southeast
Collector Environmental Initiatives at Bob Hunter Memorial Park:
Phase
1
Approximately 0.9 km of 3m paved multi -use trail; 0.9 km of 1.8 m (limestone) secondary
(2010)
trail; 50 car parking area with paved entrance; gateway and visitor signs and kiosks; 13.7
ha of meadow areas; approx. 4.0 ha of wetlands, riparian areas
Phase
2
A total of 1.95 km of 3m (limestone) multi use trail; 2.9 km of looped hiking trail; two
(2011)
pedestrian bridge crossings of Little Rouge River, directional and interpretive signs; 6.6 ha
of wetland and riparian areas; 11.1 ha of meadow areas
Phase
3
A total of 30.6 ha of natural forest cover; 8.5 ha of wetland and riparian
(2012)
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
R64
Page 6 of 18
Phase
4
A total of 2.6 km of 3m paved multi use trail; 30 car parking area with paved entrance
(2013)
Phase
5
A total of 3.2 km of 3m paved multi use trail; pedestrian crossing at York /Durham Line
(2014)
and 14`h Ave.
TRCA has created a process that utilizes GIS and field techniques to identify and prioritize restoration
opportunities on a hydrologic basis. The GIS approach is rooted in an understanding of topography and
drainage to delineate and prioritize restoration opportunities (wetland, riparian and forest) which are then
verified in the field. In cooperation with Rouge Park, this technique was used as a foundation for the Rouge
Park Natural Heritage Action Plan and the habitat restoration opportunities associated with the Bob Hunter
Memorial Park. The habitat restoration work will fulfill our natural heritage objective for this area, provide
ecologically appropriate natural cover, and restore altered hydrology. In total, there will be four hectares of
wetlands, 26 hectares of riparian cover and 27 hectares of forest cover created within Bob Hunter Memorial
Park.
A unique component of the plan is the establishment of 24 hectares of meadow and grassland habitat. To
create this meadow feature, staff is working with the Rural Lambton Stewardship Network. The Stewardship
Network is a cooperative venture between the Ministry of Natural Resources and the St. Clair Region
Conservation Authority and this group is recognized as the provincial experts in grassland restoration. The
meadows will establish a parkland landscape that is comprised of regionally and ecologically appropriate
plant species and allows for the quick establishment of a park amenity. The meadows can either be managed
for the long term or allowed natural succession to establish forest cover over time.
The multi -use recreational trails are focused on the establishment of primary trails, secondary and natural trail
systems, bridge crossings, trail head areas, and parking. This extensive new trail network will provide
community access in an orderly way to the environmental features of the Bob Hunter Memorial Park and
Rouge Park while at the same time ensure the integrity of the parks are maintained as a natural habitat. The
trail systems will be aligned and maximize the public's enjoyment of the parks, including an educational
opportunity of the parks natural features including signage and an interpretation of park history from the
early First Nations to present day.
Cooperatively with Rouge Park, we have detailed a project funding agreement with the Region of York. A
detailed implementation description and schedule of restoration and recreational activities has also been
developed with Rouge Park, and to ensure consistency with current planning, the project will be reviewed by
the other project partners including the Town of Markham. The implementation of this project will be
supported by the direct guidance and assistance of Rouge Park staff.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Southeast Collector Environmental Enhancements at Bob Hunter Memorial Park is a substantial
investment in Rouge Park of $6.00 million. The habitat restoration components of Phase One to Phase Three
are a total of $1.20 million. The recreational components of Phase One to Phase Three are a total of $3.60, and
$1.20 million in Phase Four and Phase Five. Funding is provided by the Region of York as a special project
independent of regular TRCA funding and will be administered under account codes 117- 89,117 -90,1 17 -91.
Report prepared by:
For Information contact:
Date: April 15, 2010
Gord MacPherson, Manager, Restoration & Environmental Monitoring Projects,
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Gord MacPherson, 416 - 661 -6600, extension 5246
Email: gmacpherson @trca.on.ca
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
R65
Page 7 of 18
2. City of Toronto Adopted Motion re: Support for Creation of a Rouge National /Federal Park
KEY ISSUE
Motion adopted by the City of Toronto Council on May 11 and 12, 2010 regarding support for the creation of a
Rouge Valley National /Federal Park.
MOTION: Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Res. #31/10 Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the attached motion that was adopted by the City of Toronto
Council on May 11 and 12, 2010 regarding support for the creation of a Rouge Valley National /Federal
Park;
AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this motion be forwarded to the Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of the
Environment, for his information.
CARRIED
ACTION.
BACKGROUND
- Staff to take appropriate action.
dTORON111
1116 S. Watkre
City Chet
CO, Ca,k'a Ofide
May 17, 2010
Mr Alan Wells
Chair, Rouge Park Alliance
50 Bloomington Road West
Aurora, Ontario
L4G OL8
Secretariat
Marlyn Taft
CanaSaanune• Sow
Cry Hat 12' Haw. GM
169 Cana Simi W¢t
Iarnia 0iaano M5112112
TO. 410132 7032
oar410112.2HO
ern* ima,tptaren a ea
area 1.w :wainn
Ref: 20104M49,27
Dear Mr" Wells.
Subject: City Council — Member Morton — MM49.27
Support for creation of a Rouge Valley National /Federal Park
City Council on May 11 and 12, 2010. =opted the following -
City Council star_ that it believes the Rouge Valley watershed is of national sign•ficance
and that it supports the creation cf a Rouge Vary National Park or Federal Park m
order to protect the extraoroinary weath contairad the Toronto, York and Durham areas
of the Park
2
City Counal support the findings of the Rouge Park Alliance Consultants report on
Rouge Park Governance that includes supporting tie creation of a federal park m the
Rouge, supporting the inclusion of approximately 5,000 acres of federally owned land m
addition to the existing designated park lands as outlined on Figure 2 11 (Area 1, 2, and
3) in the consultant's report, and supporting a formal federal role m managing the pane
3. City Council request and encourage the Government of Canada and the Province of
Ontano to establish a Rouge Valley National Park and commit to having a visible and
waicomad presence in the la•gcst ,mbar, centre in Canada
Yours truly,
for City Clark
M. tff /gc
Attachment
Sent tc Pnme Muster of Canaa
Prernter, Province of Onto',
Chair, POLae Par< alliance
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
R66
Page 8 of 18
Member Motion
City Council
Motion without Notice
I1 ACTION I
I I I
Support for creation of a Rouge Valley National /Federal Park - by
Councillor De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Moeser
*This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. Council has added this Motion to the
agenda for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Moeser, recommends that:
City Council state that it believes the Rouge Valley watershed is of national
significance and that it supports the creation of a Rouge Valley National Park or Federal
Park in order to protect the extraordinary wealth contained the Toronto, York and
Durham areas of the Park.
City Council support the recommendations of the Rouge Park Alliance Consultants
report on Rouge Park Governance that includes: supporting the creation of a Federal
Park in the Rouge, supporting the inclusion of approximately 5,000 acres of federally
owned land in additional to the existing designated park lands as outlined on Maps I. 2
and 3 in the Consultant's report, and supporting a formal federal role in managing the
Park.
3 City Council request and encourage the Government of Canada and Province of
Ontario to establish a Rouge Valley National Park and corrunit to having a visible and
welcomed presence in the largest urban centre in Canada
Summary
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Rouge Park Alliance unanimously voted
to recognize that the Rouge Park is of national significance and also voted unanimously to
request and encourage the provincial and federal governments to support the creation of a
federal park model to protect and preserve the Rouge Watershed as outlined in the Consultants
Report on Rouge Park Governance. The Government of Ontario.
The Rouge Park was first announced in 1990 and comprised of approximately 4,500 acres. The
Park has been expanded into York and Durham Regions and now consists of approximately
12,000 acres of publicly owned lands stretching from the shore of Lake Ontario to the Oak
Ridges Moraine. The federal government is currently considering adding approximately 5,000
R67
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 9 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
2
acres of federally owned lad to the Rouge Park and protecting the Rouge Park as a federal park.
The Rouge Park has a wealth of locally, provincially and nationally rare species and is
currently facing challenges posed by urban sprawl, illegal hunting and poaching, and illegal
dumping of garbage and construction waste.
(Submitted to City Council on May 11 and 12, 2010 as MM49.27)
3. Rouge Park 2009 Annual Report
KEY ISSUE
Rouge Park 2009 Annual Report including an abridged version of the unaudited financial statements.
MOTION:
Res. #32/10
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Tom Melymuk
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the 2009 Annual Report.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Our Annual Report communicates our work in a given year to our supporters and others, as well as helps us
review the work we do to ensure that we are continuously improving Rouge Park and meeting Park objectives
in our management plans. This report includes an abridged version of our unaudited financial statements.
After the 2009 Annual Report has been approved by the Alliance, the Report will be distributed.
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: June 2, 2010
Ron Dewell, Acting General Manager, Rouge Park
Ron Dewell, 905 - 713 -7374 - email: rdewell @trca.on.ca
Hon. Pauline Browes complimented Michelle Holmes and Rouge Park staff on the 2009 Annual Report and
requested that it be circulated widely, to the federal, provincial governments, partner agencies and other
community groups.
ACTION
4. Correspondence
MOTION:
Res. #33/10
- Staff to take appropriate action.
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Paul Ainslie
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following correspondence:
R68
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 10 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
1. Copy of Letter dated May 11, 2010 to The Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of the Environment, from Hon.
Linda Jeffrey, Minister of Natural Resources, re: Federal Park Designation for Rouge Park.
2. Copy of Letter dated April 1, 2010 to The Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of t he Environment, from Hon.
Michael Chong, M.P., Wellington - Halton Hills, re: Governance, Organization and Finance Review
Report.
3. Letter dated April 20, 2010 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from Andrew Brouwer, Deputy Town
Clerk, Town of Markham, re: Rouge Park Governance Review - National Park Proposal.
4. Letter dated April 22, 2010 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from Debbie Shields, City Clerk, City
of Pickering, re: Rouge Park Governance Review - Rouge National Park Proposal.
5. Letter dated April 23, 2010 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from P. M. Madill, Region of Durham,
re: Rouge Park Governance Review - Rouge National Park Proposal.
6. Letter dated April 29, 2010 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from Denis Kelly, Region of York, re:
Rouge Park Governance Review.
7. Copy of Letter dated May 5, 2010 to Minister Prentice, Minister of the Environment, from Peter
Robinson, David Suzuki Foundation, re: Proposed Rouge National Park.
8. Letter dated May 5, 2010 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from Grant Robinson, Region of York
and Jim McGilton, Region of Durham, re: Southeast Collector Trunk Sewer Advisory Committee.
9. Letter dated May 7 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance, from John Tracogna, Toronto Zoo, re:
National Park Proposal.
10. Copy of Letter dated May 10, 2010 to The Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of the Environment, from
Denis Kelly, Region of York, re: Rouge Park Governance Review.
11. Letter dated May 18, 2010 to Chair and Members of Rouge Park Alliance, from Kathy Stranks, TRCA,
re: Rouge Park Governance and Finance Review.
CARRIED
With regard to correspondence 4.8, Alan Wells, Chair, advised that he was the Alliance's representative on the
Southeast Collector Advisory Committee and that he attended the first meeting on June 10, 2010 at the Deer
Creek Golf Club in Pickering. A draft terms of reference was brought forward and would be dealt with at a
subcommittee meeting on June 24`h. The next Committee meeting is to be held on July 8, 2010 at the Ajax
Convention Centre.
S. Rouge Park North Consolidated Plan - Terms of Reference
KEY ISSUE
The Rouge Park North Consolidated Plan Terms of Reference.
MOTION:
Res. #34/10
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Paul Ainslie
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance endorse the Terms of Reference for the Rouge Park North Consolidated
Plan and direct staff to proceed with the Request for Proposals.
AMENDMENT A:
Res. #34A/10
Moved by: Ian Buchanan
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the Terms of Reference be amended to include consideration of the needs of infrastructure and
growth management.
R69
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 11 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
AMENDMENT B:
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Res. #34B/10 Seconded by: Ian Buchanan
THAT the Terms of Reference include:
1. How to avoid and /or minimize damage from infrastructure and possible future growth; and
2. How to ensure a positive net environmental benefit from any activity that takes place in and around
Rouge Park.
AMENDMENT A CARRIED
AMENDMENT B CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At the Rouge Park Alliance meeting on March 12, 2010, Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, discussed the
need to develop a consolidated plan for Rouge Park lands in Markham, building on and integrating the work
which has been carried out separately on the Markham East Lands, the Little Rouge Corridor and Bob Hunter
Memorial Park.
The Rouge Park in Markham began with the transfer of the Little Rouge Corridor lands in 2004 (708 hectares)
and grew with the addition of the Bob Hunter Memorial Park lands in 2006 (197 hectares) and the Provincial
announcement regarding the addition of the Markham East lands in 2007 (653 hectares). Park planning was
carried out separately as the land components were added. It is now felt that it would be beneficial to carry
out a consolidated plan and staff are recommending we proceed with Requests for Proposals based on the
attached Terms of Reference.
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: June 8, 2010
Attachment
Ron Dewell, Acting General Manager, Rouge Park
Ron Dewell, 905 - 713 -7374, email: rdewell @trca.on.ca
Terms of Reference
Rouge Park North Consolidated Plan
PROJECT NAME:
Rouge Park North Consolidated Plan
PURPOSE
The purpose of this project is to develop a consolidated plan for Rouge Park lands in Markham, which include
Bob Hunter Memorial Park, the Little Rouge Corridor and the Markham East Lands.
The plan will be developed under the guidance of a Steering Committee comprised of staff representation
from: Rouge Park Alliance, City of Toronto, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Regional Municipality
of York, Town of Markham, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Regional Municipality of Durham, City of Pickering,
Transport Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Realty Corporation, Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Toronto Zoo, Friends of the Rouge
Watershed, and representatives from the agriculture community.
Rouge Park will be retaining a consulting firm to prepare a consolidated plan for Rouge Park lands north of
Steeles Avenue (Markham, Regional Municipality of York).
R70
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 12 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
BACKGROUND:
Rouge Park is over 47 km2, encompassing a unique mosaic of river valley, creeks, forests, meadow and rural
landscapes, within the Rouge River, Petticoat Creek and Duffins Creek watersheds. The Park is part of Ontario's
Greenbelt, and it represents Canada's largest natural environment park in an urban setting.
Rouge Park was formally established in 1994 by the Province of Ontario, following years of citizen support for
the preservation of the Rouge River valley. The initial land dedication for Rouge Park comprised extensive
lands south of Steeles Avenue, in the Cities of Toronto and Pickering. In subsequent years, lands north of
Steeles Avenue, including the Little Rouge Corridor, Bob Hunter Memorial Park and most recently, the
Markham East Lands, were dedicated to Rouge Park by the Province. The Park is managed as a partnership,
with land and funds from the Province of Ontario, the Government of Canada, Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA), municipal governments and other agencies. The Rouge Park Alliance, a
partnership of twelve organizations and one not - for - profit group, directs the planning and management of
Rouge Park.
Since its inception, Rouge Park has increased in size through land acquisition and many significant restoration
projects have been implemented. Through planning there has been a strong vision on establishing a
protected nature reserve stretching from Lake Ontario north to the Oak Ridges Moraine, including a
continuous trail system and areas dedicated to the preservation of near -urban agriculture.
There are also numerous plans in place for lands within and surrounding Rouge Park including:
Rouge Park Management Plan (1994)
Rouge North Management Plan (2001)
Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan (2007)
Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan (2007);
Heritage Appreciation and Visitor Experience (HAVE) Plan (2008);
Rouge Park Trail Development and Management Plan (1998, Toronto section);
Rouge Park Trails Master Plan (in progress)
Rouge Park East Lands Management Plan (draft).
Our member organizations have also developed plans relevant to the Park, which include:
• Ontario Greenbelt Plan (2005);
• Markham OPA 140 — Rouge North Management Area /Greenbelt (2005)
• York Region Pedestrian and Cycling Master Plan;
• The Town of Markham's Pathways and Trails Master Plan;
Central Pickering Development Plan
Rouge Park now has the need to update and consolidate its management plans for all Park lands in Markham,
which include the Little Rouge Corridor, Bob Hunter Memorial Park and the Markham East Lands. This
updated plan should have regard for Rouge Park plans in the adjacent lands south of Steeles Avenue, and for
all other Rouge Park and partner planning documents listed above.
STUDY ADMINISTRATION:
The study will be managed by Rouge Park with the support of a Core Team and a Steering Committee. The
Core Team will be comprised of key Rouge Park staff (primarily the Project Manager and General Manager),
Chair of the Rouge Park Alliance, Chair of the Steering Committee, and representatives from the TRCA and
Town of Markham.
R71
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 13 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
The Steering Committee is comprised of staff representation from: Rouge Park Alliance, City of Toronto,
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Regional Municipality of York, Town of Markham, Durham
Region, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Transport Canada, Ontario Realty Corporation, City of Pickering,
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, the Toronto Zoo, Ontario Ministry
of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Friends of the Rouge Watershed, and representatives from the
agriculture community. Its role in the development of the Consolidated Plan will primarily be to provide
direction and technical guidance, share information and give feedback to the Rouge Park staff and the
consultants.
Members of the Steering Committee, along with other key participants from partner organizations, where
appropriate, will be invited to participate in three working groups that were previously set up as part of the
Markham East Lands planning process. These three groups focussed specifically on 1) agriculture, 2) natural
heritage, and 3) recreation, visitor experience and cultural heritage.
Project Goal and Objectives:
To complete a consolidated plan for Rouge Park lands in Markham that will:
1. Build upon the vision, goals and strategies outlined in the Rouge Park Management Plan (1994) Rouge
North Management Plan (2001) and HAVE Plan (2008), incorporate recommendations of the Rouge
Park Trails Master Plan (in progress) and have regard for relevant partner documents (i.e. Ontario
Greenbelt Plan and Markham OPA 140).
2. Consolidate current plans for the Little Rouge Corridor (2007), Bob Hunter Memorial Park (2007) and
the Markham East Lands (draft, incomplete) in order to streamline management of these contiguous
parcels of property in Markham.
3. Update plans as appropriate to incorporate new information and Rouge Park Alliance direction.
4. Incorporate the results of consultations with partners, stakeholders and the public.
5. Recommend land use zoning for park lands in Markham. This will incorporate natural heritage system
delineation and restoration plans developed collaboratively by TRCA and Rouge Park staff, trail routes
to be determined as part of the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan, and consideration of best agricultural
areas. The zoning recommendations should be high -level and leave sufficient flexibility to develop
detailed site plans as needs and opportunities arise.
6. Identify significant natural features and recommend measures to protect or enhance them.
7. Analyze and recommend areas that would be suitable for visitor facilities and /or trailheads. Highlight
cultural and natural features that should form part of a future interpretive program, and recommend
ways to incorporate existing built heritage structures into park functions.
8. Identify best areas for farming and recommend measures needed to sustain viable agriculture there.
9. Recommend strategies to establish the targeted natural heritage system, incorporate quality visitor
experiences and maintain agriculture in designated areas.
Special Considerations
There are several topics that will require specific analysis and recommendations as part of this plan. These
include:
Consideration of one or several locations for large public use areas, as has been requested by the
Town of Markham.
Consideration of areas where dog off -leash parks may be appropriate and feasible.
Critical infrastructure and support needed to sustain near -urban farming in areas of the Park
designated for long -term agricultural use.
R72
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 14 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
Study Process
Phase 1: Background Review
Convene a start -up meeting with the Core Team to review the proposed work plan, discuss strategies
and issues of concern, and agree on approach to first Steering Committee meeting.
Review and summarize relevant information on natural, cultural and agricultural heritage in the area.
(Most of this has already been compiled as part of the Little Rouge Corridor, Bob Hunter Memorial
Park, and Markham East Lands management plans.)
Review relevant planning documents, including, but not limited to, those listed in this document, and
articulate how these relate to the current management plan.
Circulate background review document to the Core Team for feedback (via the project manager) and
incorporate changes as necessary.
Hold a Steering Committee meeting to update members on the new planning initiative, review work
that has been done to date, review background information and gather feedback on the planning
strategy and next steps. Steering Committee members will be invited to join one or more of the three
working groups (agriculture, natural heritage, recreation and culture) in order to participate in the
development of management strategies in the next phase.
Target Completion Date: July 2010
Phase 2: Development of Strategies
Hold a second Core Team meeting to review information collected to date and confirm strategy for
moving forward.
Based on findings of the background review and consultations with the Steering Committee and Core
Team, draft a set of management strategies, including schematic mapping, for Rouge Park lands north
of Steeles Avenue, considering:
1. Compatibility with other Rouge Park and partner plans.
2. Natural heritage features /systems, protection to be afforded to them, and restoration required
to fulfill natural heritage objectives (incorporate restoration /natural heritage system analysis
to be completed by TRCA /Rouge Park staff)
3. Future trail alignments (to be determined by the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan, currently in
progress).
4. Appropriate visitor use areas (interpretive nodes, trailheads, etc.).
5. Interpretive themes and key stories to be incorporated into future visitor experience
initiatives.
6. Opportunities for use of existing buildings and structures.
7. Maintaining viable agriculture on lands best suited for farming, and ensuring that agriculture
carried out in the Park is innovative, sustainable and ecologically compatible.
8. Opportunities to engage First Nations, particularly in interpretation of the historic Carrying
Place trail.
9. Opportunities to engage local communities, particularly the hamlets of Locust Hill and Cedar
Grove, the local Mennonite Community, and the local farm community.
• Hold meetings of the Agriculture, Natural Heritage and Recreation /Culture working groups to review
draft mapping and strategies, and make modifications as necessary.
• Hold a third Core Team meeting to review draft mapping and strategies, make changes as necessary,
and prepare for presentations to the Rouge Park Alliance and residents.
• Make a presentation to the Rouge Park Alliance to present draft mapping and strategies, collect
feedback, and obtain Rouge Park Alliance endorsement before public meetings.
• Convene two separate meetings for residents in the hamlets of Locust Hill and Cedar Grove, to present
an overview of the management planning process, schematic park mapping, and a summary of
management strategies. Collect comments and circulate to the Core Team (via the project manager)
for discussion.
R73
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 15 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
Target Completion Date: November 2010
Phase 3: Management Plan •
Draft a recommended management plan for Rouge Park lands in Markham.
Circulate the draft management plan to the Core Team (via the project manager) and plan a fourth
Core Team meeting, allowing for an appropriate review period. Modify the plan as necessary
following direction from the Core Team.
Hold meetings of the agriculture, natural heritage and recreation /culture working groups to review
the draft management plan, and make modifications as necessary.
Circulate the draft management plan to the Steering Committee (via the project manager) and plan a
second Steering Committee meeting, allowing for an appropriate review period. Incorporate
modifications as necessary, following consultations with the Core Team.
Hold a fifth Core Team meeting to agree upon final draft management plan to be presented to the
Rouge Park Alliance.
Present the final draft management plan to the Rouge Park Alliance.
Once approved by the Rouge Park Alliance, submit final management plan, along with all associated
mapping (including digital copies and GIS layers) to the Rouge Park project manager.
Target Completion Date: February 2011
AVAILABLE INFORMATION:
The following documents will be available to the successful consultant:
DRAFT Rouge Park East Lands Management Plan
2008 Rouge Park Heritage Appreciation and Visitor Experience Plan
2008 Rouge Park Natural Heritage Action Plan
2001 Rouge North Management Plan
1998 Rouge Park Trail Development and Management Plan
1994 Rouge Park Management Plan
2008 Rouge Park Visitor Guide
2007 Little Rouge Creek Corridor Management Plan
2008 Bob Hunter Memorial Park Management Plan
2009 Markham Town Wide Pathways and Trails Master Plan
2006 Central Pickering Development Plan
2005 Ontario Greenbelt Plan
2005 Markham OPA 140 - Rouge North Management Area /Greenbelt
Existing Rouge Park and area trail maps and others.
DELIVERABLES:
Phase 1 Report - Background review
Phase 2. Report - Draft strategies and mapping
Phase 3 Report - Final management plan
DELIVERABLE FORMATS:
Reports /updates: 25 hard copies, PDF for email
Maps: CAD /GIS files, PDF for email
Other deliverable items and formats to be determined
R74
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 16 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
SCHEDULE:
The targeted completion date is eight to ten (8 -10) months from the date of consultant selection and project
initiation. A detailed work plan will be required and will include schedules, tasks and dates for deliverables.
The consultant will provide a start date for commencement of work for approval..
BUDGET:
The consultant will propose a budget for this study, subject to approval by the Rouge Park. Submissions
should be organized by study components and by each professional staff and provide detailed cost
breakdowns. Alternative approaches are also invited based on the consultant's knowledge and experience
with projects of a similar nature.
CONSULTANT EXPERTISE:
• Natural System Planning
• Environmental Planning
• Regional and Local Trail Planning
• Public Participation and Facilitation
• GIS /Mapping
6. Briefing Note - Restoration Areas Available in Rouge Park for 2010 and 2011
KEY ISSUE
For information Purposes - Briefing Note: Restoration Areas Available in Rouge Park for 2010 and 2011.
MOTION:
Res. #35/10
Moved by: Bonnie Littley
Seconded by: Paul Ainslie
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the Briefing Note.
BACKGROUND
Attached Briefing Note:
BRIEFING NOTE
Restoration Areas Available in Rouge Park for 2010 and 2011
CARRIED
This briefing is intended to summarize areas that are available for planting by community groups in 2010 and
2011, based on current park plans approved by the Rouge Park Alliance and notice that was provided to
tenants in 2009.
In 2010, 58.5 ha of habitat in Rouge Park will be restored with the help of community groups and the TRCA.
These restoration initiatives will include a diversity of habitat types including wetlands, native grass meadows,
riparian areas and forests. Much of the work has been and will continue to be accomplished by volunteers
who provide invaluable assistance. Furthermore, staff is planning for the implementation of 69 ha of diverse
habitat restoration in 2011, including arrangements for work in Bob Hunter Memorial Park. Areas available for
planting in 2010 and 2011 are summarized in Table 1.
In addition to the Rouge Park lands currently designated for restoration, additional areas may soon become
available on the recently acquired Runnymede property and at the Beare Road landfill. Park staff are
beginning the process of consulting with partners and developing plans for these additional areas.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
R75
Page 17 of 18
As well, a consolidated management plan for Rouge Park lands in Markham is expected to be completed in
2011. This management plan, to be followed by a revised restoration Action Plan, will designate additional
restoration areas in the Little Rouge Corridor, Bob Hunter Memorial Park and Markham East Lands.
Table 1: Estimated areas of habitat restoration available in 2010 and 2011.
Planning area
2010 (ha)
2011 (ha)
Toronto (South of Steeles Avenue)
16.5
4
Little Rouge Corridor
13
20
Bob Hunter Memorial Park
;community groups)
2
15
Bob Hunter Memorial Park
(TRCA — will include some planting
components by community groups)
27
30
Total
58.5
69
Report prepared by:
For information contact:
Date: June 9, 2010
7. New Business
Ron Dewell, Acting General Manager, Rouge Park
Ron Dewell, 905 - 713 -7374, email: rdewell @trca.on.ca
Hon. Pauline Browes wanted to know when the Beare Road Landfill site was going to be opened for public
use.
Ron Dewell said that the City of Toronto was thinking of turning the site over to the City's Parks, Forestry and
Recreation Division, and asking Rouge Park to take a lead role in the development of a master plan for the site.
Glenn De Baeremaeker said the City is moving forward with the development of a master plan for the end use
of the site. This plan is envisioned to be a multi -year plan. There is also consideration of whether interim
activities should be carried out.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the Rouge Park Alliance Meeting #4/10 terminated at 10:05 a.m. on June 11, 2010, and the
Annual General Meeting commenced immediately after.
R76
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 18 of 18
MINUTES of Meeting #4/10, June 11, 2010
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Immediately after the Rouge Park Alliance meeting, the Annual General Meeting commenced. Alan Wells,
Chair, welcomed everyone and again thanked the Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club personnel for hosting the
meeting.
Maria Papoulias introduced the first presenter, Caroline Shultz, Executive Director, Ontario Nature.
Caroline Shultz spoke about the importance of Rouge Park as a reservoir of biodiversity in the Greater Toronto
Area and endorsed the "Rouge National Park" campaign.
Mark Lowe and Gord MacPherson, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and Maria Papoulias, Rouge
Park, presented updates on the Bob Hunter Memorial Park area.
Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, presented the Annual Report. He described Rouge Park as a
partnership park, and talked about its significant accomplishments during 2009, together with our partners
and volunteers. In his remarks, he said: "This past year is one we can be proud of. However, the job is far from
complete - we are building a legacy by pursuing our dream of becoming Canada's first near -urban National
Park. Exciting things to come - we hope you will join us on this journey."
Each year, Rouge Park recognizes individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions towards
the goal and objectives of Rouge Park.
The 2010 Rouge Park Award winners were Hon. Tom McMillan and 10,000 Trees for the Rouge Valley.
The Hon. Pauline Browes said that Mr. McMillan was called away on a family emergency. The Hon. Michael
Chong accepted the award on behalf of the Hon. Tom McMillan.
Colin Creasey accepted the award on behalf of 10,000 Trees for the Rouge Valley.
Paul Harpley, the artist of the paintings that were awarded, talked about the background of the paintings.
Alan Wells Ron Dewell
Chair, Rouge Park Alliance Acting General Manager, Rouge Park