Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDon Watershed Regeneration Council 2009 MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/09 January 22, 2009 Page F1 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #1/09 was held on Thursday January 22, 2009. Phil Goodwin, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. PRESENT Phil Goodwin............................................................................................................................Chair Joe Agg...............................................................................................................................Member Margaret Buchinger............................................................................................................Member Shan Dhingra......................................................................................................................Member George Fells........................................................................................................................Member Michael Halder....................................................................................................................Member Kate Hayes..........................................................................................................................Member Moyra Haney.......................................................................................................................Member Peter Heinz..........................................................................................................................Member Margaret McRae..................................................................................................................Member Doug Obright.......................................................................................................................Member Janice Palmer......................................................................................................................Member GUESTS Marc Kramer...................................................................................................Guest, Toronto Parks John Laraway..........................................................................................................................Guest Sarah Robertson.......................................................................................Guest, Dillon Consulting Bill Snodgrass................................................................................................Guest, Toronto Water STAFF Sameer Dhalla..................................................................................….Manager, Water Resources Janet Ivey........................................................................….Don Watershed Plan Project Manager Amy Thurston.............................................................Project Manager - Don Watershed Planning Michelle Vanderwel................................................... Don/Highland Public Programs Coordinator January 22, 2009 Page F 2 Prior to the meeting, DWRC members highlighted the 2008 accomplishments of the Don Council and of its constituent community groups. These accomplishments included: the release of the Walk the Don trail guides, watershed signage that was approved in 2008 and will be in the ground in 2009, the agreement that the Vaughan MNR site will be a Don Watershed Plan concept site, the community activism on Earl Bales Park issues, the CFC site proposals, work at Todmorden Mills Wildflower Preserve, activism on Toronto waterfront projects, activism on the conservation of the David Dunlap Observatory and community walks on the property, tree plantings in the East Don Parklands and Richmond Hill, the approval of a plan to restore a wetland in the East Don Parklands, the production and release of the revitalized On the Don newsletter, new signage and trail work in Sherwood Park, improvement of the Spadina Slip, the 10th annual Mill Pond Splash and the 15th annual Paddle the Don events, and the progress on the Don Watershed Plan. PRESENTATIONS Don Council members may contact Michelle Vanderwel to receive a copy of any of the evening’s presentations. • Canadian Film Centre Stormwater Management Proposals Margaret Buchinger, Toronto Green Community and Don Council member, gave a presentation on the project proposals at the Canadian Film Centre (CFC). The site is a 21 acre area that was once part of the estate of E.P. Taylor, an important figure in Toronto’s history. In 1929, this area was rural farmland before the construction that year of the Bayview Bridge that spanned the Don and helped link this area to developed areas to the south. Over several years, various buildings were erected on the site including the main housing and the stables. The area became known as Windfields Estate. A large horse-breeding farm was established over 1,000 acres spreading north and south of York Mills and from Bayview to Leslie. By the 1960s, most of the horses were moved to operations in Oshawa. Portions of the estate were sold at this time, and 60 acres were donated to the City of North York (largely lands in the river valley). Later, the main buildings and area surrounding these were donated to the City and the remaining lands sold. E.P. Taylor was also very involved with the arts. He expressed interest in the buildings becoming an arts centre. Norman Jewison approached Mr. Taylor with the proposal to transform the site to a film centre and he approved the project. The CFC was opened in 1988 and the western portion of the site was designated a Canadian Heritage Site in 1992. Toronto Green Community (TGC) became involved with the site in 2004. Their “Green Garden Visit” program was offered the use of the greenhouse on the CFC site. Later, TGC restored a small garden and constructed a butterfly garden on the site. Discussions began to focus on more extensive gardens and landscaping plans to provide stormwater management for the site. Through University of Guelph, a graduate student project in the Landscape Architecture program was coordinated with Professor Robert Corry. The project had two aims – to celebrate the history January 22, 2009 Page F 3 of the site in an original style of landscaping and to provide control for the 2-year flood level (2.5 inches of rainfall within 24 hours). It must be noted that there are very few locations within Toronto with sufficient area to provide significant source control of stormwater. Although the drainage area of the CFC site is too small to provide for a stormwater management pond, rainwater infiltration can be increased. There are significant erosion and flooding issues on Wilket Creek. Also, control here can help ameliorate some of the problems the creek experiences downstream, especially in the Lawrence Avenue area. Sixteen student designs were submitted to manage these challenges and were short-listed to four by a team including CFC staff, Toronto Water staff, Margaret, and Robert Corry. Each of these designs was showcased with an animation and four drawings. Each is briefly described below. The proposal by Cameron involves berms and swales to create a design resembling a pebble dropped in water. This proposal involves few plantings and no significant tree canopy would be added. The Lehong design features forest fingers and swirls of grasses in a figure-eight design. Flags throughout the property relate to the racehorse breeding history of the site and can also be used for film festival promotions. The design by Lewis involves vegetation in patches, which would require very little grading. Also, frames are distributed across the site, representing both horse jumping and a film frame. The Pulver proposal involves vegetation in swirls and the planting of trembling aspen trees. Public consultation on these four designs would involve a mid-February meeting with the adjacent property owners, followed by a meeting with the general public. Costing has not yet been done, as it was thought that a preferred concept should be decided upon first. University of Guelph researchers came up with a very rough estimate of costs of between $50,000 and $200,000. Fundraising for the final costs will be needed. Bill Snodgrass noted that the CFC is fundraising to rehabilitate the buildings on the site. Their goal for this campaign is a total of $5 million from federal, provincial, municipal and private sources. Don Council Comments Trees are key to slowing run-off. I would prefer the designs with tree plantings. The first design would not be preferred since mowing the grass on those small berms would be very difficult, and the construction of this design would disturb ground birds. Did the students submit species lists, and were they given direction to use native species in the designs? Yes, only native species are used in the four plans. Is the area accessible to the general public? Yes, many people walk the trails. January 22, 2009 Page F 4 Who owns the property? The City of Toronto. When the land to the south of the property was sold, a covenant was put in place that gives those eight landowners a veto over activities on the CFC site. Is there flooding on the site? There has been some flooding, which these proposals are meant to resolve. All of the proposals involve very designed, manufactured landscapes. The “pit and mound” technique mimics a natural forest, including depressions from tree fall, which increases infiltration. I don’t see anything like that here. These landscapes look too artificial to me. Marc Kramer – The designs were done by landscape architecture students, so an artistic element was involved. Private sponsors would like to be involved in a project like this early on, i.e. we should invite their input at this stage. Originally, this area was a forest. I would like to see more forest, more trails and more wetlands in the designs. We need more urban forest canopy and can still include an element of historical significance. It was agreed that the opportunity to encourage private fundraising for this project exists and that many on the DWRC may be interested in helping with fundraising efforts. RES. # F1/09 – DWRC SUPPORT FOR A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE ON THE CANADIAN FILM CENTRE SITE Moved by: Peter Heinz Seconded by: Kate Hayes THAT the Don Council supports, in principle, a project to promote stormwater management on the Canadian Film Centre Site; AND FURTHER THAT this is support for the work rather than any design, per se. • Don Watershed Plan – Stormwater Management Modeling Janet Ivey, Don Watershed Plan Project Manager, Toronto and Region Conservation, gave a presentation on the Stormwater Management modeling completed for the Don Watershed Plan. The majority of the work done on stormwater management was done in areas to the north of Toronto, since the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP) identifies the needs and opportunities within the City. The “905” municipalities have stormwater pond retrofit plans, but no comprehensive plan for lot and conveyance controls. This study examined the potential impacts of three scenarios on water quantity and quality and aquatic habitat. The scenarios were : current conditions (as of 2005); future conditions assuming full build-out and conventional stormwater management in new developments with no retrofits; and future conditions assuming January 22, 2009 Page F 5 full build-out and low impact development (LID) measures in new areas and LID and pond retrofits in existing areas (FSC scenario). Detailed results are available in the consultant’s report, which is expected to be available for download at http://www.trca.on.ca/donwatershedplan shortly. The main conclusions of the study were: that the FSC scenario can reduce impacts of urbanization, but not fully offset them; that benefits will be realized only after significant implementation has occurred; and that implementation of the FSC measures could increase the success of Toronto’s WWFMMP. Also, adaptation to changing climate will need to be considered. Don Council Comments How does TRCA measure high volume events such as seen in extreme weather or snow melt? Sameer – We have a gauging network which includes sensors measuring water quantity and quality indicators. We work with the City on this. Monitoring helps us to prioritize flood risks and to respond. How do you choose the model and know that it is reliable? Sameer – Any model is only as good as the data used to run it. We selected a Canadian model, QUALHYMO, that had been developed for government use. All of these models are based on the same principles. We looked at several models; we needed one that was a continuous model. Calibration was based on the most recent data that we had available. Runs of the model were compared to current conditions to verify the results. What is the take-away message from this study? It gives us a complete picture to look at the “905” area and to match it to the work that has been done for WWFMMP. We wanted to know the impact of infiltration and end-of-pipe measures and identify priority areas. This information will be included in the watershed plan and will help to guide its recommendations. We concluded that the sustainable communities model, a very aggressive scenario, will not solve all of the water quality and quantity issues in the watershed. Rather, such measures will help to keep current conditions stable or allow up to 30% improvement. Bill Snodgrass – Our hope with WWFMMP is that we can maintain water quality from the 905 area. We see that we’ll need aggressive measures there to meet that assumption. Targeting no net change in in-stream erosion after development is likely unfeasible, as this has not been seen anywhere in North America to date. Adaptive management requires the assumption that a stream will widen after nearby development and work with this assumption. We would require an order of magnitude decrease in E. coli concentrations to reach the goal of a swimmable Inner Harbour, and it looks like we may be able to achieve 20 – 30% reduction. Over the next 20 years we will see improvements but we have a long way to go to meet our objectives. Sameer – There have been improvements in water quality and quantity with LID measures. There are many simple things that can be done; for instance, education for homeowners. Treating water as a resource will be helpful. We do need to realize that the Don is an urban watershed. There has been a lot of work done over the last 20 to 30 years. Without LID measures, we could lose the gains that we have made. January 22, 2009 Page F 6 Janet – It’s important to recognize that since Forty Steps, overall water quality in the Don has not significantly decreased, nor have flows increased. We have reached a plateau. We do have an opportunity to improve through new measures. How do you finance measures across several municipalities and several departments? Sameer – There are many pieces to this puzzle. We work closely with municipalities, which plan for implementation within their capital budgets. Private developers are looking for more straightforward criteria in development plans. There are education programs for homeowners. We have completed a manual on LID for stormwater; it is available on the STEP website at http://www.sustainabletechnologies.ca. The Don Council thanked Margaret Buchinger, Janet Ivey and Sameer Dhalla for their presentations. MINUTES RES. #F2/09 – MINUTES TO MEETINGS #10/08 Moved by: Moyra Haney Seconded by: Doug Obright THAT the minutes of meeting #10/08, held on November 27, 2008, be approved………..CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS There were no pecuniary interests disclosed. CORRESPONDENCE OUTGOING 4.1 Don Watershed Regeneration Council Comments on the Cosmetic Pesticide Ban Regulation, EBR Registry #010-5080 INFORMATION ITEMS January 22, 2009 Page F 7 5.1 Liaison Committee Meeting #2 – West Thornhill Stormwater Flood Remediation Study 5.2 Regional Watershed Monitoring Program: Program Review 2001-2008 5.3 Environmental Assessment for the Naturalization and Flood Protection of the Lower Don River – Delivery Agreement and Gartner Lee Limited Contract Amendments 5.4 Reforestation Planting – Metrics, Methods and Management 5.5 Stormwater Management Ponds – Environmental Protection During Clean Out 5.6 Red Tape Freezes Don Mills Arena Scheme 5.7 Urban Forestry Update 5.8 Toronto Sign By-Law Project, Public Consultations Meeting Notice 5.9 Sheppard Avenue East Light Rail Transit (LRT) Class Environmental Assessment Study 5.10 Community Fisheries and Wildlife Involvement Program (CFWIP) Project Approvals for 2008, TRCA Jurisdiction 5.11 Quest for Chowder #10 5.12 10th Annual Stewardship Forum 5.13 Waterfront Toronto Newsletter RES. # F3/09 – INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: Moyra Haney THAT information items 5.1 through 5.13 be received……………………………………….. CARRIED WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Don River Watershed Plan – Concept Sites Update Janet Ivey summarized the update memo briefly. After the long list of potential Don concept sites was produced (summer 2008), staff negotiations and discussions with municipal partners led to January 22, 2009 Page F 8 the decision on the five sites noted here. The long list of sites will still be included in the Don watershed plan as “sites of interest” but detailed development of concept sites will be limited to these five. The remaining details on process and scheduling were laid out in the memo. George Fells asked what the target date for the Don Watershed Plan was. Janet Ivey responded that the team was still looking at either June or July 2009 to bring the plan to TRCA’s board. Margaret Buchinger noted her concern that the CFC site should have some status in the plan. Although not a concept site, it should still be featured in some way. Janet Ivey agreed to contact Margaret Buchinger to further discuss the CFC site’s inclusion in the plan in some fashion. Shan Dhingra asked what level of detail was currently available for each site. Janet Ivey replied that mostly general information was available, such as aerial photos and some information from background studies. Some sites had more detailed information available. RES. # F4/09 – WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: George Fells Seconded by: Michael Halder THAT watershed plan information item 6.1 be received……………………………………….CARRIED ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 7.1 Proposed City of Toronto Green Roof By-law Margaret Buchinger informed the DWRC that the City proposed a by-law in late 2008 that would make green roofs mandatory if a building was over a certain size threshold. Industrial use buildings and schools may be exempted but would need to install cool roofing materials (white roofs), measures to retain stormwater and a green wall. Additionally, shade trees would be required to be planted on the property. Concerns raised by those attending the public meeting on the proposed by-law included: green roofs are not expected to function properly on buildings over 30 stories high; maintenance issues for white roofs (they are difficult to keep clean and white); that recreational use of green roofs should be included in the plan; the suggestion that the 20,000 m2 threshold for residential buildings to be required to install a green roof was too high; and various technical aspects of installing green roofs. The City is considering the technical concerns that were raised. It was agreed that the DWRC did not have the expertise to assist with such concerns but could be involved in further public consultation expected for February 2009. January 22, 2009 Page F 9 It was suggested that a letter to the Mayor’s office in support of the proposed green roof by-law be sent by the Don Council. RES. #F5/09 – LETTER TO MAYOR DAVID MILLER, CITY OF TORONTO, SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED CITY OF TORONTO GREEN ROOF BY-LAW Moved by: Peter Heinz Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger THAT a letter be drafted to Mayor David Miller, City of Toronto, to show the support of the Don Council for the proposed City of Toronto Green Rood By-Law; AND FURTHER THAT two of the Don Council Chairs will review the draft letter before finalizing……………………………………………………………………………………………..CARRIE D 7.2 Paddle the Don Update Phil Goodwin noted that a media plan was being developed for Paddle the Don 2009 and a February 2 meeting was held with staff on this. The launch site was moved to a new location in 2008 and will remain there for 2009. A landing party, located at the take-out site, will again be part of the event. A registration fee was considered but not adopted. The organizing team will be increasing the number of people on the waiting list. Don Council members will be asked to assist with the registration for this year’s Paddle. There will be a phone blitz to participants to confirm their participation and to encourage pledges. Also, DWRC members will be asked to help contact corporations participating in the Banrock Corporate Challenge. Banrock Station sponsors the Corporate Challenge but the team is looking for three additional sponsors, one for each of three sections of the river. For their donation of $5,000, these sponsors will receive signage and publicity. Honda and Toyota have been suggested as potential sponsors, both produce hybrid cars and Honda will be launching a new hybrid model soon. Media sponsors are also being approached to provide advertising space and to promote the sponsors and pledges for paddlers. This year, registration for paddlers and pledges will be available on-line. The website is anticipated to go live during the first week of March. COMMITTEE REPORTS Community Outreach and Education Committee George Fells noted that the next Outreach Committee meeting will be held Thursday February 5, 2009. Amy Thurston added that a full agenda was planned, including a presentation by Evergreen on their School Grounds program and one by Adrian O’Driscoll of TRCA’s Stewardship January 22, 2009 Page F 10 department on the Yellow Fish Road program. Also, John Wilson will be presenting on the Pedal the Don event that is to coincide with Paddle the Don 2009. January 31, 2009 is the anticipated release date of the Winter 2009 edition of On the Don. Amy Thurston reported that surveys to update the Registry of Accomplishments for 2007 and 2008 would be going out soon. Details on plantings and other activities of Don watershed groups will be requested. This information supports the Don watershed plan and future report cards. DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY Joe Agg reported that the Conservation Review Board hearings are scheduled to end January 23, 2009 but they may be extended. Very divergent views were presented. The public gave their input on one day and the Town of Richmond Hill also presented at the hearings. The hearings were well publicized in local media. The final decision from the Board may be months away. UPDATES FROM OTHER WATERSHED GROUPS Janice Palmer reported that the Task Force to Bring Back the Don is inviting all DWRC members to their next meeting, on Wednesday February 18, 2009. Waterfront Toronto will be addressing TFBBD to discuss a number of projects on the waterfront surrounding the Don Mouth Naturalization area. Taylor Massey Project, FODE and similar Don-focused groups will also be invited to attend. The meeting will be held at Toronto City Hall, Committee Room 4, and will begin at 6:30 p.m. Phil Goodwin reminded DWRC members that tickets were still available for the Quest for Chowder fundraiser for the East Don Parkland Partners (details in Item 5.11). He further noted that the 2009 Charles Sauriol Dinner would feature Gordon Downie, active in the environmental field and also known as the lead singer from the Tragically Hip. The 2009 dinner will be held at the Pearson Centre but for 2010 the event will be relocated to the Royal York Hotel, a downtown location that is more easily accessible by transit. NEW BUSINESS John Laraway informed the DWRC that the City of Toronto has approved a bid for the Pan-Am games that involves one of two potential sites – York University or the West Don Portlands area. The Don Council may wish to monitor this proposal, as it may have an effect on the work on the lower Don. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:05 pm. January 22, 2009 Page F 11 Phil Goodwin Brian Denney Chair Chief Administrative Officer /mv MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/09 February 26, 2009 Page F11 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #2/09 was held on Thursday February 26, 2009. Phil Goodwin, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Phil Goodwin............................................................................................................................Chair Joe Agg................................................................................................................................Member Alex Brunton.........................................................................................................................Member Margaret Buchinger.............................................................................................................Member Shan Dhingra.......................................................................................................................Member George Fells.........................................................................................................................Member Michael Halder.....................................................................................................................Member Moyra Haney........................................................................................................................Member Peter Heinz...........................................................................................................................Member Catherine Kurucz..................................................................................................................Member Vivien Lee.............................................................................................................................Member Margaret McRae...................................................................................................................Member Doug Obright........................................................................................................................Member Janice Palmer.......................................................................................................................Member John Routh...........................................................................................................................Member Andy Wickens.......................................................................................................................Member David Yudelman...................................................................................................................Member GUESTS Barbara Anderson...................................................................................................................Guest Julie Beddoes....................................................Gooderham & Worts Neighbourhood Association Don Cross...............................................................................................................................Guest Micheal D’Andrea...............................Director, Water Infrastructure Management, Toronto Water Christina Hanvari.....................................................................................................................Guest John Laraway..........................................................................................................................Guest Andrew McCammon.......................................................................................Taylor Massy Project Sarah Robertson...................................................................................................Dillon Consulting Bill Snodgrass.............................Senior Engineer, Water & Wastewater Services, Toronto Water STAFF Adele Freeman.........................................................…Director, Watershed Management Division Janet Ivey........................................................................….Don Watershed Plan Project Manager Amy Thurston.............................................................Project Manager - Don Watershed Planning February 26, 2009 Page F 12 PRESENTATIONS Don Council members may contact Michelle Vanderwel to receive a copy of any of the evening’s presentations. • Recognition Event for Don Cross, Former DWRC Chair and Member 1992 - 2006 The DWRC and TRCA staff thanked former member and Chair of the DWRC, Don Cross for his many years of service and for his ongoing commitment to the Don watershed. Don was a member of the Don Watershed Task Force between1992 – 1994; the Don Watershed Regeneration Council between1994 – 2006; and was the Don Watershed Regeneration Council Chair in 2005 and 2006. • Coxwell Sanitary Truck Sewer Update Michael D’Andrea, Director, Infrastructure Asset Management, Works and Emergency Services, City of Toronto gave an update on the damaged section of the Coxwell Sanitary Truck Sewer. Michael reviewed the history of the issue as well as the City’s efforts to repair the compromised section and mitigate any potential impacts. He also discussed the City’s contingency plan in the event of an emergency breech of the system. For more information visit www.toronto.ca/water or email coxwellsewer@toronto.ca The Don Council thanked Michael D’Andrea for his presentation. MINUTES RES. #F6/09 – MINUTES TO MEETINGS #1/09 Moved by: George Fells Seconded by: Margaret McRae THAT the minutes of meeting #1/09, held on January 22, 2009, be approved………..CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS There were no pecuniary interests disclosed. February 26, 2009 Page F 13 CORRESPONDENCE INCOMING 4.1 Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation OUTGOING 4.2 Don Watershed Regeneration Council Support for the Proposed City of Toronto Green Roof By-Law RES. #F7/09 - CORRESPONDENCE ITEMS Moved by: Moyra Haney Seconded by: Joe Agg THAT correspondence items 4.1 through 4.2 be received..................…………………...CARRIED INFORMATION ITEMS 5.1 Permeable Pavement and Bioretention Swale Demonstration Project – Final Report RES. # F8/09 – INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: Andy Wickens THAT information item 5.1 be received................................................…………………...CARRIED ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 7.1 Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Manual Margaret Buchinger informed the DWRC that both she and Shan Dhingra have reviewed the technical document. They commend the TRCA and partners for creating such a manual. There are however a couple of concerns that they have, mostly around potential conflicts between recommendations outlined in this document and the City’s desire to increase development. Margaret and Shan will provide a full report at the next DWRC meeting. February 26, 2009 Page F 14 7.2 Baker Sugarbush Update and Recommendation Adele Freeman updated the DWRC on the Baker Sugarbush Agreement. After much effort over many years a management agreement for Bakers Sugar Bush between Vaughan, Richmond Hill and TRCA has been worked out. Adele reported that there is a small corner piece of the property that still requires some additional restoration work. TRCA has identified some funding to support this work; however, additional funding through grant proposals will be required. TRCA staff are working on a plan for the site and then funding partners can be sought. At meeting #1/09 held on February 5, 2009 the following recommendation was made by the Community Education and Outreach Committee. RES. # F9/09 –BAKER SUGAR BUSH Moved by: George Fells Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger THAT the DWRC continue its interest in the work planned for Bakers Sugar Bush by supporting a $5,000 donation to the project from the Paddle the Don fund and by supporting/developing other funding applications for the work ................................................…….…………………...CARRIED 7.3 Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation Funding RES. # F10/09 – OAK RIDGES MORAINE FOUNDATION FUNDING Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: George Fells THAT the Chair of the DWRC write a letter similar to the one written by the Humber Watershed Alliance (Item 4.1) in support of the reinstatement of ORMF funding .....................…….CARRIED 7.4 Pioneer Park Update Amy Thurston relayed a brief update on the retrofit of the Pioneer Park stormwater management facility to the Council as provided to her from John Nemeth at the Town of Richmond Hill. Work on the stormwater management pond retrofit has been delayed subject to tender approval. The first tender for the project closed; however, none of the bids were accepted as the prices were above budget. Currently, the Town is undertaking a value engineering exercise which is an approach to improving the value of products, processes and projects. In April, subject to the results of the value engineering exercise and a recommendation from Council, the Town will proceed in reissuing the tender. February 26, 2009 Page F 15 The Town also had an agreement with TRCA to work on three small sites upstream of Pioneer Park. These projects included two stream modifications as well as some infrastructure protection work. The Town has received 2.25 million dollars in infrastructure funding from the Province. Don Cross commented that there is a lot of stormwater management work going on by municipalities and the province right now. The Province is working on a report linking stormwater management and climate change. The report should be ready next year. WATERSHED PLAN ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 8.1 Public Consultation Plan - Don River Watershed Plan and Concept Site Plans Janet Ivey reported on the upcoming public consultation plan in support of the watershed plan as outlined in the staff communication found in the agenda. Janet advised that she was interested in hearing feedback from members on this round of consultation. Janet also reported that while the Canadian Film Centre was not one of the concept sites chosen, it will be included in the long list of “sites of regeneration interest”. It will also receive some additional profile within the Watershed Plan itself. COMMITTEE REPORTS 9.1 Community Education and Outreach Committee Draft Minutes to Meeting #1/09 – February 5, 2009 In addition to what was reported in the meeting minutes, Phil Goodwin advised that as one of the incentive prizes for Paddle the Don, he is working with Rodney Clark from Rodney’s Oyster House to support a ‘Chair’s challenge’. The idea of this challenge is to invite individual fundraisers to try to beat the Chair of the DWRC in his fundraising efforts. The top two or three that do so will be invited for oysters and chowder with Rodney Clark and Phil at Rodney’s Oyster House. Details and final commitments from Rodney Clark still require finalization. TORONTO AND AREA REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN Adele Freeman reported that Stephanie Hawkins has been hired as the new RAP Coordinator. DON MOUTH NATURALIZATION AND PORT LANDS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT Adele Freeman reported that a joint public meeting with MVVA is being planned for Saturday May 9 at St. Lawrence Hall. Full details to be available shortly. February 26, 2009 Page F 16 DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY Nothing new to report. CANADIAN FILM CENTRE SITE Margaret Buchinger reported that the logistics around funding for the proposed work on the site have become an issue. The Canadian Film Centre understood that the City would fund this project. However, the City and others understood that fundraising would be required by Toronto Green Community and other environmental groups to support this project. UPDATES FROM OTHER WATERSHED GROUPS Phil Goodwin reports that the first planting event for the East Don Parkland Partners will be held on April 18, 2009 and will be funded by their recent Quest for Chowder event. Andrew McCammon reported that Adele Freeman and Janet Ivey met recently with the Taylor Massy Project board to discuss the watershed plan and the Warden Woods concept site. NEW BUSINESS New Trail Linkages in the Moccasin Park/Charles Sauriol Reserve Area Adele Freeman reported that TRCA is constructing a new trail link in this area on behalf of the City of Toronto. Adele suggested that someone from the City’s Parks Recreation and Forestry Department should come to the next DWRC meeting to provide an update on the project. Sherwood Park Tour Janice Palmer is planning a tour of Sherwood Park for any interested members to attend. The tour will be held Tuesday May 26, 2009, 6:00 to 8:30 pm. Members who plan on attending are asked to bring their own dinner to eat prior to the tour. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:15 pm. Phil Goodwin Brian Denney Chair Chief Administrative Officer /mv MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/09 March 26, 2009 Page F17 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #3/09 was held on Thursday March 26, 2009. Peter Heinz, Vice-Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Peter Heinz.......................................................................................................................Vice-Chair Joe Agg................................................................................................................................Member Sue Arndt..............................................................................................................................Member Margaret Buchinger.............................................................................................................Member Shan Dhingra.......................................................................................................................Member George Fells.........................................................................................................................Member Moyra Haney........................................................................................................................Member Vivien Lee.............................................................................................................................Member Margaret McRae...................................................................................................................Member Doug Obright........................................................................................................................Member Janice Palmer.......................................................................................................................Member John Routh...........................................................................................................................Member Andy Wickens.......................................................................................................................Member GUESTS John Laraway..........................................................................................................................Guest STAFF Janet Ivey........................................................................….Don Watershed Plan Project Manager Amy Thurston.............................................................Project Manager - Don Watershed Planning Michelle Vanderwel................................................... Don/Highland Public Programs Coordinator March 26, 2009 Page F 18 PRESENTATIONS Don Council members may contact Michelle Vanderwel to receive a copy of any of the evening’s presentations. The presentation on the Moccasin Trail Link was postponed to a future DWRC meeting. • CBC The Current Don River Radio Program The March 20, 2009 CBC Radio airing of a segment on the Don River on The Current program was played for DWRC members. The show discussed Mud Creek, the Keating Channel and the RC Harris water treatment facility. • TRCA The Living City 2009 Annual Meeting Presentation The presentation made at the February 27, 2009 Annual General Meeting of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, which highlights the events and achievements of 2008 across TRCA’s jurisdiction, was shown to the Don Council. MINUTES RES. #F11/09 – MINUTES TO MEETINGS #2/09 Margaret Buchinger requested that the minutes be amended to remove the line “Margaret also has a concern with compensation” on page F13. Moved by: Moyra Haney Seconded by: Joe Agg THAT the minutes of meeting #2/09, held on February 26, 2009, be approved subject to the edits above……………………………………………………………………………………….………..CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS There were no pecuniary interests disclosed. CORRESPONDENCE INCOMING March 26, 2009 Page F 19 4.1 Thank You for Recognition Event OUTGOING 4.2 Funding for the Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation RES. #F12/09 - CORRESPONDENCE ITEMS Moved by: Doug Obright Seconded by: Margaret McRae THAT correspondence items 4.1 through 4.2 be received..................…………………...CARRIED INFORMATION ITEMS 5.1 Liaison Committee Meeting #2 – West Thornhill Stormwater Flood Remediation Study George Fells questioned whether the DWRC should take any action to influence the planning of this study or its integration with work across the watershed. Amy Thurston explained that the Don Watershed Plan will help to integrate initiatives being implemented in the upper and lower reaches of the Don watershed. Janet Ivey added that municipalities are required to integrate watershed plans into their Official Plans. Also, the subwatershed regeneration plans are designed to show integrated plans within a subwatershed and to help transition these to the implementation stage. George Fells then questioned the financing of plans such as these, and whether they are part of a provincial or regional budget. He added that financial integration of projects affecting watercourses between municipalities across the watershed should be considered. 5.2 Ontario to Prohibit 85 Cosmetic Pesticides Andy Wickens informed the DWRC that the MOE website has a lot of additional information on this bill. MOE had announced that public education initiatives would support this bill, but none have yet been announced. This bill will override all municipal bylaws on pesticide use. Amy Thurston added that the next On the Don newsletter will include an article on the pesticide ban bill. Janice Palmer questioned whether cemeteries were exempt from these regulations. Andy Wickens stated that they were not, even though they had been under Toronto’s pesticide ban bylaw. Janice Palmer then asked who will be responsible for enforcement of these regulations. Andy Wickens replied that MOE will enforce the bill; there is a budget in place to hire enforcement staff. However, it is reasonable to expect that enforcement will likely be in response to specific complaints to the Ministry. Andy Wickens expects that the focus of enforcement will be on lawn care companies rather than on homeowners. His understanding is that the onus will be on whoever applies the product rather than on retailers. MOE has stated that they plan to work closely with municipalities on education and enforcement of these regulations. March 26, 2009 Page F 20 5.3 Reports on York Transportation Master Plan of Nov. 18, 2008 and Toronto's Biosolids and Residuals Master Plan on Feb. 10, 2009 Shan Dhingra explained his concept of the “Quad Bottom Line” as an addition to the current, well- known concept of the “Triple Bottom Line”. The latter concept suggests that public works projects should consider environmental, social and economic effects. To this, Shan suggests adding the issue of security. If added to planning documents, it would require that engineers consider sabotage or possible terrorist activity in the design of a project. Shan has included mention of this concept in comments on initiatives that he has sent as a member of the public to various agencies, including York Region. Amy Thurston stated that the York Region Transportation Master Plan has not yet been released for public comment. It was agreed that when this plan becomes available, DWRC comments will be coordinated by the Policy Committee. Also, Amy Thurston will look into when the York Region Water and Wastewater Master Plan will be available for public comments. Janice Palmer raised the issue that a Toronto Biosolids Master Plan was also being drafted but had not yet been released for comment. It was agreed that the Policy Committee should also comment on this draft plan when it is available. RES. # F13/09 – INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Andy Wickens Seconded by: Sue Arndt THAT information items 5.1 through 5.3 be received...........................…………………...CARRIED ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 7.1 Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Manual Margaret Buchinger went through the proposed comments on the manual as listed in this communication. The first comment is that the manual should take into consideration the idea that as development within cities is intensified, a major decrease in open space can be expected. The second comment deals with questions of who is financially responsible for these measures. If a property owner is expected to maintain stormwater control measures on their property, this should be specifically stated in the property title documents. Shan Dhingra added that the final four comments were his input on this manual. He has called for manuals such as this one to include consideration of the future and of designs presently on the horizon but that may be in use in the near future. For instance, low impact development measures may be in use in Europe although they are not yet commonly used in North America. Shan Dhingra also called for this consideration of the future to be included to the extent possible in the Don Watershed Plan. Shan then added a request that the comments on the Low Impact March 26, 2009 Page F 21 Development Stormwater Management (LID) Manual include mention of the “Quad Bottom Line” concept as explained above. Andy Wickens asked for clarification of the intended audience for this manual. It was confirmed that the manual will be for use by municipal planning staff, designers, engineers and students. Andy Wickens then added that it will be important to consider that the bibliography be geared to the needs of the readers. George Fells felt that stronger language was needed for the first point; that is, that such measures must be done rather than a recommendation that they be done. Margaret Buchinger raised the issue that there may be multiple measures that could be implemented to control stormwater and that stronger language could be an issue if the maintenance of a stormwater control measure falls on the property owner. Andy Wickens stated that Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) has also completed a low impact development manual and that the City of Mississauga has shown strong willingness to implement many of these measures. A Mississauga bylaw states that the resident must maintain such measures at the boulevard. There may be multiple bylaws and various issues affecting maintenance and this should be considered before recommending that these measures be mandatory. Andy Wickens felt that CVC’s document involved a cooperative approach and that if it had stated that measures must be taken rather than having been recommended, cooperation with municipal partners would have negatively impacted. Discussion focused on whether to include additional information on the Quad Bottom Line concept in the DWRC’s comments on the LID manual. Janice Palmer requested that “LID” be spelled out in full in the letter. Janice then motioned that the letter be sent to Sameer Dhalla without additional information on the Quad Bottom Line concept, with members submitting their own comments as individuals. RES. # F14/09 – LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL – DON COUNCIL COMMENTS Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: George Fells THAT the Don Council will forward the letter as it is, subject to the above edits, and invite Sameer Dhalla to respond to the DWRC with any comments..................…….…………………...CARRIED It was agreed that the Policy Committee would discuss whether the issue of security should be included in future Don Council comment letters. 7.2 Paddle the Don Amy Thurston reported that Paddle the Don will be an agenda item for next week’s Outreach Committee meeting. The Paddle is fully booked and a waiting list has been established. Over 180 canoes and kayaks are booked. The online pledge function was launched this year and is working well. Seven corporate teams from five organizations are signed up to date. The route has been split into three segments and a sponsor for each segment is being sought. Manulife is sponsoring the bottom segment, from Weir 3 to the Keating Channel. Construction at Weir 1 in the DVP/Don March 26, 2009 Page F 22 Mills area will stabilize the bank and allow paddlers to get out of their canoes more easily for this first portage. An email will be sent out requesting volunteers for the day and for an evening a few days prior to the event to help contact paddlers with last minute information. A sign-up sheet was made available at tonight’s meeting, also. Any DWRC members may suggest corporations that may wish to take part in the Corporate Canoe Challenge. Please contact Amy Thurston with that information. There are several events being run in tandem with the Paddle. Pedal the Don is a biking event beginning at Yonge Street and Lawrence Avenue at 1:00 pm on May 3. Michelle Vanderwel will send DWRC members a link to the Pedal the Don website. Also, there are two Jane’s Walks in the Don. One will cover the Lower Don and will be led by Ken Greenberg. The second will be led by the West Don Lands Committee. Additionally, there will be a Walking Information Fair at Todmorden Mills on May 3. Peter Heinz and Marg McRae will run a Don Council table and the Walk the Don guides will be available. 7.3 Richmond Hill Mill Pond Splash Michelle Vanderwel reminded DWRC members that the Mill Pond Splash will be held Sunday May 31, 2009 from 12:00 to 4:30 pm. Volunteers for the day are still needed, as are community exhibitors. DWRC members should contact Michelle Vanderwel for more information. 7.4 2009 Don Council Meeting Dates If any DWRC members have agenda items for the April 16 meeting, please advise Phil Goodwin and Amy Thurston as soon as possible. The Chairs will discuss at the next Chairs Teleconference whether to go ahead with an April 16 meeting or not. DWRC members will be informed of the decision. WATERSHED PLAN ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 8.1 Public Consultation Plan - Don River Watershed Plan and Concept Site Plans Janet Ivey stated that DWRC members may download the Watershed Plan from the website at: http://www.trca.on.ca/donwatershedplan or they may contact Janet to request a hard copy. The deadline for comments on the plan is April 30, 2009. The Don Council as a whole will also be asked to finalize comments at a future DWRC meeting. Regarding the Leaside business area, Janet Ivey reported that the decision was made to make broader, general recommendations that could be applied to industrial areas throughout the watershed. The Leaside area was selected because the Leaside Business Improvement Association (BIA) was very interested in the Partners in Project Green initiative. This group is still interested in participating in a similar project for their area and discussions with local businesses March 26, 2009 Page F 23 are underway but producing a concept site at this time is premature. Therefore, the decision to base the concept on real world examples but not on a specific site was made. There will be a scoping meeting on Friday April 3, 2009 in the morning. Shan Dhingra and Margaret Buchinger, as the DWRC representatives to the technical advisory committee, have already been invited and have agreed to attend. If an additional DWRC member would like to attend the meeting, please contact Janet Ivey. The public consultations will be held April 15, 2009 in Toronto and April 22, 2009 in York Region. The draft agenda for the meetings was reviewed. All DWRC members were encouraged to attend and to participate in one or both meetings and are asked to note that RSVPs are required. Janice Palmer commented that attendees have tended, in the past, to want to discuss implementation early in the meetings, so it may be a good idea to consider this well before 9:00 pm as indicated in the draft agenda. Shan Dhingra suggested that less time be allotted to discussion on overview presentation so that more could be allotted to the subwatershed regeneration plans and concept site plans sections. George Fells questioned whether these sessions were expected to be the last discussions of the draft watershed plan with the public and Janet Ivey confirmed that they were. George Fells then asked what the target was for release of the implementation guide. Janet Ivey responded that the guide was expected to be released within a few months, although actual implementation would be over a 10-year period. Ongoing public consultation would be held on individual projects; certainly some projects would be implemented early on and others later. John Routh pointed out that some of the background technical documents are not yet available on the TRCA website. Janet Ivey confirmed that IT staff are still in the process of uploading these to the site. Eight documents of the eleven have been available since Fall 2008. One has been uploaded recently, one is completed and should be on the site this week and the final document will be posted within a week. DWRC members that have requested these reports as hard copies will receive all of them once they are ready, or they may request through Janet Ivey two of the outstanding documents now and will receive the final document once it is printed. Amy Thurston noted that there is no Policy/Watershed Plan Committee meeting scheduled until after April 30. Janet Ivey stated that the deadline for DWRC comment could be extended until after the next Committee or full DWRC meeting, as needed. COMMITTEE REPORTS Amy Thurston updated the Don Council on the watershed identification signs that have been posted throughout the Don watershed. Many DWRC members confirmed that they have seen them. Amy added that an unveiling event is being planned with Councillor Janet Davis’ office and that DWRC members would be invited once the date is confirmed. (Editor’s Note: this unveiling took place on Earth Day, April 22, 2009) March 26, 2009 Page F 24 DON MOUTH NATURALIZATION AND PORT LANDS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT Adele Freeman reminded DWRC members that a joint public meeting with MVVA is being planned for Saturday May 9 at St. Lawrence Hall. DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY Joe Agg reported that Saturday March 28, in honour of Earth Hour, an event for the DDO would be held at the Elvis Stojko arena in Richmond Hill at 8:00 pm. Also, the AstroNuts meet the first Friday of every month; those interested in these meetings should contact Joe Agg. CANADIAN FILM CENTRE SITE Margaret Buchinger reported that CFC staff were not going to proceed with public consultation at this time. Instead, the coordination of public meetings concerning both the restoration of the buildings on the site and the stormwater management component is the preferred approach. UPDATES FROM OTHER WATERSHED GROUPS Janice Palmer reported that the next Task Force to Bring Back the Don meeting is currently scheduled for April 15, 2009. TFBBD are considering cancelling this meeting and encouraging members to instead attend the Don Watershed Plan public consultation in Toronto. NEW BUSINESS Peter Heinz reported that he had raised $150 for TRCA after making presentations on the Don watershed to various groups. TRCA supplied the photos for the presentation. Any DWRC members interested in using this presentation may contact Peter Heinz. Joe Agg stated that the Oak Ridges Trail Association hold walks almost every day, and they are a great opportunity for DWRC members to see the Oak Ridges Moraine. Moyra Haney reported on the Celebrate World Water day held March 21, 2009 at the Northern District Library. The audience was composed mainly of young people. Also, Waterfront Toronto will be holding a drop-in centre on Saturday March 28, 2009 on the Gardiner EA. Amy Thurston noted that there will be a corporate TRCA display at the Green Living Show April 24 – 26, 2009. Marg McRae informed the DWRC of a meeting to be held March 30 at University of Toronto’s OISE location to showcase the new Al Gore film “The Climate Crisis”. March 26, 2009 Page F 25 ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 8:40 pm. Phil Goodwin Brian Denney Chair Chief Administrative Officer /mv • TORONTO AND REGION ,-- on T�e` VatIElll yy� t eDon for The Living City MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL#4/09 May 14, 2009 Page F26 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #4/09 was held on Thursday May 14, 2009. Phil Goodwin, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:45 p.m. PRESENT Phil Goodwin Chair Joe Agg Member Margaret Buchinger Member Shan Dhingra Member George Fells Member Michael Haider Member Moyra Haney Member Kate Hayes Member Peter Heinz Member Catherine Kurucz Member Vivien Lee Member Margaret McRae Member Doug Obright Member Janice Palmer Member GUESTS Don Cross Guest John Laraway Guest STAFF Adele Freeman Director, Watershed Management Julie Hordowick Project Ecologist, Oak Ridges Moraine Janet Ivey ....Don Watershed Plan Project Manager Sonya Meek .Manager, Watershed Planning Joanna Parsons Coordinator, Public Programs—Etobicoke-Mimico Michelle Vanderwel Don/Highland Public Programs Coordinator May 14, 2009 Page F27 PRESENTATION Paddle the Don 2009 Joanna Parsons gave a verbal update on the very successful May 3, 2009 Paddle the Don and thanked all the Don Council members that had assisted with the event. To date, $53,461 has been raised, which is the highest total in the 16 years of the event's history. This year was the first in which on-line pledges have been an option, and this component of the event raised over$13,000 (across individual and corporate donations). Corporate donations that included the $1,000 per team entry donation were in addition to the $13,000. Phil Goodwin asked what the amount raised by individuals was; Joanna Parsons replied that she would obtain that figure and inform the DWRC of it. Four hundred individuals registered but the total number that actually participated is not yet known. The Paddle is usually fully booked within two weeks of registration opening, but this year this milestone was reached in only 48 hours. Approximately 240 to 250 canoes and kayaks were launched. A debriefing and thank you for all volunteers that participated is being planned to take place within the next few weeks. Don Council feedback on the event was requested. Phil Goodwin noted that at later launch times, there was room to launch more boats. The number of no-shows on event day continues to be high. Janice Palmer commented that the issue of charging participants for registration has been raised in the past but has met with opposition. Perhaps a minimum donation should instead be established. The example of the World Wildlife Fund's CN Tower Climb was given; at this event, there is no charge but participants must raise at least$25 in donations to take part. George Fells mentioned that the DWRC table at the takeout should face the entrance to the event to be more visible. Catherine Kurucz, who paddled this year, stated that she would have preferred not to have the Manulife sign at Weir 1. Phil Goodwin explained that Manulife sponsored that portion of the Paddle. The suggestion was made that signage thanking sponsors could be displayed at the launch and/or the takeout rather than on the river. Adele Freeman commented on Pedal the Don, which ran in tandem with the Paddle, plus the two Jane's Walks in the area on May 3. The Pedal had 65 cyclists involved and over 100 people participated in each walk. Some walkers suggested that they would have liked to do both walks and to reconsider holding them at the same time. Ken Greenberg's lower Don walk was filmed by Waterfront Toronto and the video has been posted on Youtube. Adele Freeman also noted that the 2009 Paddle received a lot of press coverage. No injuries occurred. Canoes should be checked prior to launch to be certain they are in good shape, including those that are rented for the event. Catherine Kurucz commented that more money could be charged at the takeout for the barbecue. Joanna Parsons noted that$1 profit was made on each meal sold. John Laraway suggested that any souvenirs of the event, such as the hats for this year's Paddle, be manufactured in Canada. May 14, 2009 Page F28 Joe Agg noted that parking spots were filled early on, so having some of the early paddlers coming back while participants were still arriving for later launches was very helpful in freeing these spots. Janice Palmer added that the shuttle bus system operated at the launch site worked well. Peter Heinz commented that while the barbecue and music at the takeout continued to attract people throughout the day, the displays did not generate much interest after 1:00 pm and he suggested that this component of the event need not run all afternoon. Joanna Parsons asked that any additional feedback on the event be sent to Michelle Vanderwel. WORKSHOP Don Watershed Plan Workshop Margaret Buchinger chaired the workshop portion of the meeting. Please see the communication from Janet Ivey (Agenda Item 6.1, Don Watershed Regeneration Council meeting #5/09, June 18, 2009) for a summary of this workshop. MINUTES RES. #F15/09—MINUTES TO MEETINGS #3/09 Moyra Haney noted that on page F24 of the minutes, "North York District Library" should be revised to state "Northern District Library". Moved by: Moyra Haney Seconded by: Janice Palmer THAT the minutes of meeting #3/09, held on March 26, 2009, be approved subject to the edits above CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS There were no pecuniary interests disclosed. CORRESPONDENCE May 14, 2009 Page F29 OUTGOING 4.1 L.I.D. Stormwater Management Manual—Proposed Don Watershed Regeneration Council Comments RES. #F16/09- CORRESPONDENCE ITEMS Moved by: Margaret McRae Seconded by: Joe Agg THAT correspondence item 4.1 be received CARRIED INFORMATION ITEMS 5.1 West Thornhill Stormwater Flood Remediation Study 5.2 Natural Environment and Stand Alone Projects Implementation 5.3 Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Manual 5.4 Moving Forward: Restoring Toronto's Waters DWRC members were encouraged to attend this May 27 event on the RAP. RES. # F17/09—INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Peter Heinz Seconded by: George Fells THAT information items 5.1 through 5.4 be received CARRIED WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Don River Watershed Plan Update—Implementation Guide RES. # F18/09—WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Marg McRae Seconded by: Michael Haider May 14, 2009 Page F30 THAT information item 6.1 be received CARRIED ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 7.1 Proposed 2009 Don Council Meeting Dates Phil Goodwin noted that the DWRC's current term is two years which began in July 2007. The primary mandate for this term has been to contribute to and provide comment on the Don Watershed Plan. As the Watershed Plan will be wrapping up over this summer and the two year term will end in July 2009, the last meeting for this term of the DWRC is scheduled for July 23, 2009. Adele Freeman added that the Humber Alliance has completed its term and the Etobicoke-Mimico Coalition will hold its last meeting of this term next week. We do need to continue meetings for the DWRC until July to complete the Watershed Plan. It was suggested that the July meeting could be in the form of a barbecue at Adele's house. This will be a celebration of the achievements of this term of the DWRC but there will be a component of the meeting to deal with the final business of the Don Council. The intent is to take the Watershed Plan to TRCA's board in September for approval. A new Terms of Reference would then be developed for the next term of the Don Council over the fall, with a new Don Council being formed to begin meeting in late 2009 or early 2010. Adele Freeman informed the DWRC that Keri McMahon will begin working Tuesday May'19, 2009 in the capacity of Project Manager, Watershed Planning for the Don watershed. Keri will be covering Amy Thurston's maternity leave for one year. She will assist with the formation of a new Don Council, which may focus on progress on concept sites. The On the Don newsletter will continue over the fall. It was agreed that the current Don Council would continue to discuss issues as they arise by email. Keri McMahon and Michelle Vanderwel would continue to send items of interest by email to DWRC members over the late summer and fall. Janet Ivey noted that the topics of the June 18 and July 23 meetings will be reversed. June 18 will cover the Don Watershed Plan Implementation Guide and July 23 will be the date for the DWRC endorsement of the Watershed Plan. COMMITTEE REPORTS Community Education and Outreach Committee It was noted that the agenda lists these minutes incorrectly as those of the Policy and Watershed Plan Committee. May 14, 2009 Page F31 Peter Heinz updated the DWRC on the status of the watershed signage project. An unveiling event of the Toronto signage took place on April 25. Some good publicity was generated there. The following week, a brief presentation on the project was made to the City of Toronto's Works Committee. From this meeting arose the following decision: "The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in cooperation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to develop a phased-in strategy to introduce watershed signage in the remaining five watersheds in Toronto as part of the 2010 Operating Budget." Peter Heinz added that Jack Heath, Deputy Mayor of Markham, would like to see all watershed signage in Markham completed by the end of the summer. Also, Deputy Mayor Heath hopes to meet with the City of Vaughan and the Town of Richmond Hill to coordinate producing signage for Vaughan and replacing old signage in Richmond Hill. DON MOUTH NATURALIZATION AND PORT LANDS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT Adele Freeman informed DWRC members that Mayor David Miller was highlighting the lower Don Lands and the Keating Channel Precinct Plan at various international meetings. It was agreed that a letter of support stating that the project is needed now and that funding must be made available for implementation should be sent as part of the public comment on the May 9 public meeting and could be copied to Mayor Miller. DWRC members that attended the public meeting (Shan Dhingra and Moyra Haney) agreed to be responsible for this letter. Anyone who attended the May 9 event may also submit comment as individuals to Michelle Vanderwel. DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY Joe Agg reported that the Conservation Review Board's report on the DDO property is not yet available. The new owners of the site are developing a plan for it and the Town of Richmond Hill has approved the production of this preliminary plan. UPDATES FROM OTHER WATERSHED GROUPS Janice Palmer distributed a flyer from the Task Force to Bring Back the Don on policies that apply to landowners in the City of Toronto regarding trees on their property. Janice Palmer also updated the DWRC on the status of the area previously designated as an emergency snow dump site in the Pottery Road area. TFBBD is now referring to this site as Cottonwood Flats and the City as delisted the site from its snow dump locations. The site will no longer be used to store snow plowed from city roads even on an emergency basis. Gary Welsh, general manager of Transportation Services, confirmed this delisting in a letter to TFBBD. (Editor's Note: Janice Palmer later confirmed with Gary Welsh that the delisting need not go through City Council and can be considered to be finalized as of this point) May 14, 2009 Page F32 Janice Palmer,also reminded DWRC members of the May 26 Don Council walk of Sherwood Park. Michael Haider informed the DWRC that the City of Toronto's Community Stewardship Program held a community event on May 13 in Riverdale Park East.A large amount of garlic mustard was discovered, and much work remains to be done to remove this invasive weed from the park. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:20 pm. Phil Goodwin Brian Denney Chair Chief Administrative Officer /mv theDon for The Living City MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL#5/09 June 18, 2009 Page F33 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #5/09 was held on Thursday June 18, 2009. Phil Goodwin, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Phil Goodwin Chair Joe Agg Member Margaret Buchinger Member Shan Dhingra Member George Fells Member Kate Hayes Member Vivien Lee Member Margaret McRae Member Doug Obright Member Janice Palmer Member Andy Wickens Member David Yudelman Member GUESTS John Laraway Guest Nancy Penny Guest STAFF Adele Freeman Director, Watershed Management Stephanie Hawkins Project Manager, RAP Julie Hordowick Project Ecologist, Oak Ridges Moraine Janet Ivey Don Watershed Plan Project Manager Keri McMahon Project Manager, Don Watershed Planning Sonya Meek Manager, Watershed Planning Michelle Vanderwel Don/Highland Public Programs Coordinator June 18, 2009 Page F34 PRESENTATIONS Moving Forward: Restoring Toronto's Waters Stephanie Hawkins, Project Manager, RAP, TRCA, gave the presentation on the Toronto RAP that had been given to the public on May 27, 2009 for the benefit of DWRC members who had not been able to attend that meeting. It was noted that the data used to determine existing conditions covered the period of 2001 - 2006. Also, the Toronto and Region Area of Concern (AOC) was clarified to cover a different area than that of TRCA's jurisdiction. The AOC includes 6 watersheds, over 2000 km2 and 40 km of lakefront. One of the main conclusions regarding water quality was that although a number of projects have taken place and legislation has come into effect over the monitoring period, the increasing urbanization in the northern portions of the AOC has offset these effects so that overall there has been no net gain in water quality. DWRC members were referred to Chapter 4 of the report, which includes charts showing the progress on beneficial use impairments and priority actions from the 2001 RAP report. A copy of the presentation and/or the accompanying report may be requested from Michelle Vanderwel. Don Council Comments How does the Toronto AOC compare with other areas of concern? It is the only major urban centre on the Canadian side of one of the Great Lakes in an AOC, so it is unique. Toronto also faces historical and ongoing challenges. There is a project being undertaken near Steeles and Bayview for odour control. How does it work? A. Freeman -TRCA staff worked with York Region on this project. The project deals with odour from sewer gas. Staff will follow up and provide details. How do we get this report out to interested groups and individuals? The May 27 meeting at the Gladstone was widely publicized. Emails were sent to all stewardship groups, NGOs, education institution contacts, and contacts at all three levels of government. In addition, advertisements were placed in the Toronto Star and in Now, plus notices were placed on the Gladstone website. The event was hosted by Bob McDonald of the CBC's Quirks & Quarks program. Bob McDonald has also agreed to paddle the Don at the 2010 Paddle. A. Freeman -We would like to get the Moving Forward report out to more contacts, and if DWRC members have suggestions on this, please let us know. A communications plan for the RAP program is being developed by Stephanie Hawkins. One positive outcome of the Gladstone meeting was that many senior federal and provincial staff members that attended the meeting had not previously met each other, and this allowed a good networking opportunity for staff that work on comparable projects. June 18, 2009 Page F35 Adele Freeman added that the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) between the U.S. and Canada had been reopened last week. This action provides an opportunity to reengage residents of both countries on Great Lakes issues and could provide a tie-in with the RAP program. Perhaps a series of events located in areas near Lake Ontario could be arranged. George Fells suggested a quiz in the On the Don newsletter could help to bring attention to RAP issues. Each edition could contain questions such as "What is RAP?". Adele Freeman added that questions as basic as "Name the five Great Lakes" would be beneficial since TRCA's Education staff are discovering that this type of basic knowledge is not being adequately communicated within the school system. Sonya Meek pointed out that municipalities were identified in the 1980s to be included in the Areas of Concern. Some municipalities' decisions not to be included in an AOC may have been made to avoid developing a reputation as a polluted area. How does the RAP fit with SOLEC? A. Freeman - SOLEC is the State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference. These conferences are still active but attendance has decreased over the years. Indicators to be used for evaluation across different systems have been developed through the conferences. Lake Area Management Plans have also been developed and are useful. COA, the Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin, is a federal-provincial agreement that is expected to be extended until the GLWQA can be aligned with COA. Presently, the Great Lakes Sustainability fund provides $8 million in funding, but this is to cover all Great Lakes initiatives across Ontario and is insufficient to fund all of the necessary projects. Adele Freeman stressed that it is not the case that nothing is being done on the Great Lakes in the GTA. Source Water Protection initiatives, for instance, have begun recently and will be important projects over the next few years. The hope is that the GLWQA will provide incentive for a number of such projects to get off the ground in the coming years. Don River Watershed Plan - Implementation Guide Julie Hordowick, Project Manager, Watershed Planning, TRCA, gave a presentation on the draft Don Watershed Implementation Guide. Julie Hordowick described the production of the draft implementation guide. Implementation guides were developed to compliment the recent Humber and Rouge watershed plans. These are envisioned as practical tools for managers and practitioners. They are arranged by implementation tool. For example, all stewardship activities are grouped together. The document provides a reference for implementation partners to incorporate Don Watershed Plan recommendations into their annual workplans and budgets. It facilitates partnerships between agencies. Detailed workplans, however, are not included in the guide. This is because the implementing partners are better able to determine how to develop these plans. Municipalities may have different programs that fit their particular areas better than another municipality's program. Each agency will need to have flexibility on how to implement these recommendations. Watershed plans do not come equipped with funding for the recommended projects, and implementation of projects will need to be fit into the workplans and budgets of municipalities and other agencies. June 18, 2009 Page F36 The setup of the guide was explained. Each implementation tool has a table with four columns - the general theme of the recommendations; the reference to the recommendations in the watershed plan; a listing of existing related programs and projects and the next steps for each recommendation. For each table, priority next steps have been identified. It was noted that TRCA technical staff had given input into prioritizing projects and that these draft recommendations were now being reviewed by municipalities and, tonight, with the Don Council. DWRC members were encouraged to submit their comments on any or all sections of the implementation guide. Chapter 1 on Policy is the only section which does not follow the above format. Instead, it is in the form of a top ten list. These recommendations are intended to fit well with municipal official plan updates; they will inform those processes while still being flexible for each municipality. Master Environmental Servicing Plans (MESPs) are an important recommendation made in the guide. Sonya Meek added that some municipalities and agencies are further ahead than others with such measures, so the guide is also intended to highlight what has been done and recognize these achievements. Shan Dhingra asked whether the Town of Richmond Hill, presently updating its Official Plan, had received the draft implementation guide. Janet Ivey confirmed that they had recently received review copies. A number of municipalities are in the process of updating their official plans and the hope is that the Don watershed plan and implementation guide would help to inform these processes. Phil Goodwin asked whether the guide would include an element of accountability or enforcement. Janet Ivey clarified that rather than an enforcement aspect, the guide makes recommendations and can be thought of as a checklist for municipalities to determine whether their plans are heading in a direction compatible with the watershed plan. John Laraway and Janice Palmer pointed out that the list of acronyms on the document (on page 8-2) was not complete, as it did not include terms such as MESPs. Also, it was somewhat hidden and should be moved to the beginning of the guide. It was agreed that the glossary would be made more complete and more prominent. Chapter 2 is on regeneration projects. General themes are sustainable greenfield development and retrofitting existing built areas in urban growth centres and redevelopment areas. Chapter 3 is on land securement. It focuses on opportunities that arise for land easements and coordination with private landowners. Adele Freeman questioned whether the map in the presentation had been compared to TRCA's Greenlands Acquisition Project. While that project had not identified large tracts of land in the Don to be targeted for purchase, it was agreed that key acquisitions that come onto the market would be considered. Properties need to be identified but would not be listed in the implementation guide or watershed plan. DWRC members should make suggestions to Janet Ivey and Julie Hordowick on any privately-owned properties that they know of that would allow trail linkages should an easement or sale become possible. June 18, 2009 Page F37 Chapter 4 of the Implementation Guide concerns stewardship and outreach education. There is a strong focus on targeting schools to reach out to students. Particular schools are not listed; rather, strengthening in-class programs and introducing Don-specific local content are recommended. Chapters 5, 6 and 7 concern Operations and Maintenance, Enforcement, and Monitoring and Research, respectively. Recommendations in these sections are often specific to TRCA, municipalities or agencies. Chapter 8, on Tracking Progress, has yet to be completed. Suggestions on how to track progress are being solicited from the reviewing partners, including the DWRC. Margaret Buchinger asked for clarification on TRCA's comprehensive monitoring program and whether this includes the Ministry of Environment's monitoring efforts. Further, would results from this monitoring fit into RAP and Don Watershed reports? Janet Ivey replied that this is the process, and the implementation guide does make some recommendations for improvements to it. George Fells asked whether tracking progress should include some measure of public awareness, either through surveys done by TRCA or by piggy-backing onto other groups' surveys. Janet Ivey clarified that the focus has been to date on progress on technical issues rather than attitudinal. Adele Freeman added that consumer surveys have been used in the past but are very expensive to conduct. One was done that tracked GTA-wide data but it was not specific to the Don. It found that there are pockets of knowledge in specific areas. This may be related to socioeconomic factors. The Living City report card will be jurisdiction-wide and may be able to incorporate such data. Sonya Meek added that Stats Canada has a new product as part of the census that tracks households; she has a copy of the questionnaire. The document will be examined to see whether it could be used for this type of attitudinal study. Sonya Meek will send the questionnaire to Keri McMahon. Phil Goodwin questioned whether tracking progress is now a formalized process, as it has long been done more informally. Adele Freeman clarified that implementation guide components are new additions to watershed plans. In the past, many methods have been used to track progress. It is relatively easy to track new policies and plans from municipalities but difficult to track new programs and initiatives by NGOs. Also, some programs coordinated by NGOs may then be reported to or in partnership with municipalities, leading to potential "double-counting" of these efforts. Kate Hayes added that it is difficult to obtain such data annually. Adele Freeman agreed, and added that monitoring over a three-year period has been more successful and often allows changes to be seen more easily. Kate Hayes mentioned the Province's online Stewardship Tracking System at http://www.comap.ca/ccmap/. It would be quite an effective tool for monitoring progress on community and NGO projects if it was well-used; however, it is not. Adele Freeman agreed, and added that TRCA staff had tried to integrate this tool into their monitoring. It will be looked at again to see how it can become a more effective tool for staff. George Fells suggested specific, targeted research. It was agreed that attitudinal measures are subjective, but that gathering such data is important. Contacting ratepayers groups was suggested. Adele Freeman agreed that such groups can be a useful source of information but that it is also necessary to understand broader, watershed-wide issues across unbiased samples of the population. June 18, 2009 Page F38 Adele Freeman asked that Michelle Vanderwel send an email to DWRC members asking for their top five suggestions on what measures should be tracked to determine progress. Shan Dhingra suggested a survey across time, e.g. tracking responses of Grade 8 students each year, could be useful. Adele Freeman responded that it is difficult to get access to classrooms to do such surveys. Janice Palmer added that there is very little discretion on the part of teachers now to use specific questions or lesson plans not included in the official curriculum. Adele Freeman clarified that Education staff have worked to get material into schools and into the curriculum and continue to do so. Joe Agg noted that the water in German Mills Creek appears to differ in quality (visually) depending on rain levels, but in nearby Beaver Creek the water always appears clean. The difference is that there is stormwater management control, by the use of ponds, on Beaver Creek. Doug Obright emphasized that to know whether an objective was the correct one to monitor it is important to keep in mind that monitoring must be done with appropriate indicators. Adele Freeman emphasized that DWRC members should suggest key objectives to monitor. Janet Ivey added that there are measurable objectives and targets in the watershed plan. It was agreed that there is also a need to develop objectives as effort indicators apart from technical objectives. Shan Dhingra questioned whether the implementation guide will become a living document, i.e. produced in an electronic and updatable. Adele Freeman responded that the guide would be kept in its current format but progress reports will be issued that will provide ongoing updates and as part of the Living City report card, a review TRCA's policies as a comprehensive effort would be undertaken. Janet Ivey further commented that staff are proposing to allow a few weeks for DWRC members to read the implementation guide and provide comments. It was suggested that if members would like one, an evening meeting could be set up for DWRC members to discuss comments. Otherwise, members were free to provide individual comments by email or through hard copy edits. It was agreed that an evening meeting was not desired. Therefore, all comments are to be forwarded to Julie Hordowick at jhordowick@trca.on.ca or by mail to: Julie Hordowick, TRCA, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON, M3N 1 S4 by July 31, 2009. Members can also bring written comments to the final DWRC meeting on July 23, 2009. MINUTES RES. #F19/09- MINUTES TO MEETINGS #4/09 Moved by: Joe Agg Seconded by: Doug Obright THAT the minutes of meeting #4/09, held on May 14, 2009, be approved CARRIED June 18, 2009 Page F39 DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS There were no pecuniary interests disclosed. CORRESPONDENCE OUTGOING 4.1 Don Water Wise Stewardship Project RES. #F20/09- CORRESPONDENCE ITEMS Moved by: Margaret Buchinger Seconded by: David Yudelman THAT correspondence item 4.1 be received CARRIED INFORMATION ITEMS 5.1 Headwater Drainage Features 5.2 August 19, 2005 Storm Damage Project Progress Report 5.3 Toronto's Lower Don Lands Selected for Newly Launched Climate Positive Development Program 5.4 Intention to Designate the Property Known as the David Dunlap Observatory, 123 Hillsview Drive, Richmond Hill It was noted that this report was issued from the Conservation Review Board rather than from the Town of Richmond Hill. DWRC members may request a hard copy of the report from Michelle Vanderwel. 5.5 Reach by Reach: Regenerating Taylor Massey Creek and Completing the Taylor Massey Trail 5.6 Natural Environment Trails Program 5.7 Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT) June 18, 2009 Page F40 5.8 Biosolids Master Plan Update- Notice of Public Information Session #4 5.9 Study for Effluent Disinfection at the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant- Notice of Commencement 5.10 Notice of Study Completion -York Region Transportation and Water &Wastewater Master Plan Updates RES. # F21/09- INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Kate Hayes Seconded by: Marg McRae THAT information items 5.1 through 5.10 be received CARRIED WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Don River Watershed Plan Workshop, May 14, 2009 Janice Palmer questioned whether comments submitted after the workshop were included in this summary. Janet Ivey replied that they were not, but would be included with all comments received from the public Open Houses, municipalities and other commenting agencies in a document to be submitted to the DWRC when the Watershed Plan is brought forward for final approval at the July 23, 2009 DWRC meeting. RES. # F22/09-WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: George Fells THAT information item 6.1 be received CARRIED COMMITTEE REPORTS Community Education and Outreach Committee George Fells confirmed that the minutes are complete and accurate. Keri McMahon added that after discussion with the Committee, it was agreed that the Summer On the Don newsletter would be postponed until an August 15 release. George Fells added that any ideas for short articles for this newsletter or events for the event calendar should be submitted to Keri McMahon. June 18, 2009 Page F41 DON MOUTH NATURALIZATION AND PORT LANDS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT Adele Freeman informed DWRC members that a letter in support of moving forward on funding for the implementation of the DMNP Project had been drafted. The letter will be reviewed by Adele Freeman, Shan Dhingra, Moyra Haney and Phil Goodwin, under whose signature the letter will be sent to John Campbell of Waterfront Toronto and Mayor David Miller. David Yudelman asked about the Gardiner-DVP linkage and the impacts on the DMNP Project should a change to the current alignment be the preferred alternative as determined by that EA. Adele Freeman replied that the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Gardiner EA are presently out for review and should be posted on the EBR website for public comment soon. It will be important to be vigilant in ascertaining that the ToR upholds the DMNP Project objectives. DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY Joe Agg reported that the Conservation Review Board had issued a report on the DDO property. The report was available at the DWRC meeting, or members may request a copy from Michelle Vanderwel. A large portion of the property, 70-80%, was recommended for historical designation. Shan Dhingra added that the area not designated and open to development is along Bayview Avenue. This area was noted to be highly saturated and underground parking may not be possible, at least without installing pumps. Sonya Meek added that this area has highly variable till, and that thickness of the till can differ even between adjacent properties. Shan Dhingra clarified that the Conservation Review Board makes recommendations to the Town of Richmond Hill, but it is up to the municipality to set the final policy. If this decision is disputed by the developer, they may choose to take the case to the OMB. Joe Agg added that for the development to proceed, the Town would need to change the zoning of the site (it is presently zoned for institutional use). CANADIAN FILM CENTRE SITE Margaret Buchinger reported that the Canadian Film Centre is currently looking at a plan to increase stormwater filtration on their site. This would be Phase 1 of the stormwater management initiative on the lands, and Phase 2 would involve the remainder of the meadow, where the student projects had been focused. UPDATES FROM OTHER WATERSHED GROUPS Nancy Penny reminded the DWRC that Taylor Massey Project had recently finalized their Reach by Reach report. Included in the final version is the "5-5-5 Plan"; an ambitious plan to restore or rehabilitate five areas in five years at a total cost of $5 million. Copies of the plan are available on June 18, 2009 Page F42 the TMP website and a limited number of hard copies were available at tonight's meeting. Nancy Penny added that Andrew McCammon has resigned as Chair of TMP, and that Nancy now holds this position. Keri McMahon informed the DWRC that she and Adele Freeman have been in contact with City staff and had conducted a site visit of Warden Woods to point out some of the concerns in this area. Garth Armour, Natural Environment Coordinator, Parks and Recreation Division, City of Toronto, will be following up on this. Adele Freeman added that she has been in touch with Councillor Adrian Heaps' office to make the Councillor aware of issues in Warden Woods that need attention. It was noted on these site visit walks that dog-strangling vine, an invasive species that is a large problem in many park areas in the GTA, was not observed to grow under walnut trees. Black walnuts are native to Ontario, and this observation may be worth follow- up to determine whether walnut trees or walnut oil applications could help to stem the spread of dog-strangling vine. Adele Freeman noted that the targets in the Reach by Reach plan could be more easily met if some were of a shorter term than five years. Nancy Penny clarified that some recommendations were small scale and short term, such as the enhancements to the Warden Hydro Trail. These changes could be made as part of the City's Toronto Bike Plan. Adele Freeman suggested a meeting be set up between herself, Keri McMahon and Nancy Penny to discuss how TRCA can assist with the recommendations in Reach by Reach. Janet Ivey noted that recommendations contained in an earlier draft of the Reach by Reach report had been incorporated into the Don Watershed Plan. Joe Agg reported that the "Richmond Hill Astronats" meet on Fridays at sundown, if sky conditions are clear, at the David Dunlap Observatory to view the night sky. The public is welcome to join these meetings. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:00 pm. Phil Goodwin Brian Denney Chair Chief Administrative Officer /mv theDon for The Living City MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL#6/09 July 23, 2009 Page F43 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #6/09 was held on Thursday July 23, 2009. Phil Goodwin, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. PRESENT Phil Goodwin Chair Joe Agg Member Alex Brunton Member Margaret Buchinger Member Shan Dhingra Member George Fells Member Michael Haider Member Moyra Haney Member Kate Hayes Member Peter Heinz Member Brenda Hogg Member Catherine Kurucz Member Vivien Lee Member Margaret McRae Member Doug Obright Member Janice Palmer Member John Routh Member Andy Wickens Member John Wilson Member GUESTS John Laraway Guest STAFF Lauren Cummings Office/Accounting Assistant Adele Freeman Director, Watershed Management Julie Hordowick Project Manager, Watershed Planning Keri McMahon Project Manager, Don Watershed Planning Sonya Meek Manager, Watershed Planning Alexandra Papaiconomou Watershed Technical Assistant Michelle Vanderwel Don/Highland Public Programs Coordinator Lana Zinina Financial Analyst July 23, 2009 Page F44 WORKSHOP/DISCUSSION Don Council Endorsement of Don River Watershed Plan Michelle Vanderwel noted that a slightly revised version of Agenda Item 6.2, containing revisions in the table in Appendix A, was available in hard copy at tonight's meeting. Sonya Meek recapped the steps that had been taken by Janet Ivey and TRCA staff to produce the Don Watershed Plan and to gather input on the plan from various stakeholders, including municipalities, agencies, the Don Council, and the public. Table 1 in Appendix A contains a summary of the comments received and how staff recommends that they be addressed in the watershed plan. The Don Council is being asked tonight to approve a final draft of the plan that would incorporate the changes in the table. The final draft plan would then be submitted to the TRCA Authority. Upon the approval of the plan by the Board, the plan would be considered to be the final Don Watershed Plan. Julie Hordowick noted that some comments had been received from the Town of Richmond Hill after the table was produced. However, these comments were of a minor, editorial nature. Sonya Meek added that editorial comments were not included in the table and will be addressed in the final draft of the plan. Adele Freeman clarified that meetings between TRCA and municipal staff from York Region, Markham and Richmond Hill had been recently conducted or were scheduled over the next few days to be certain that all concerns on the watershed plan have been addressed. The City of Toronto did submit their comments before the City labour dispute; therefore, TRCA can be assured that their comments are included. Sonya Meek added that the municipalities have had input into the watershed plan throughout the entire process through the technical advisory committee, so their comments at this point have been relatively minor. Kate Hayes asked for clarification on the timing of the implementation guide to accompany the watershed plan. Sonya Meek replied that the draft implementation guide was sent to the municipalities in June, as well as input being solicited through one-on-one meetings. Don Council members may submit comments up to July 31, 2009. These should be sent to Julie Hordowick. The implementation guide will be part of the background reports supporting the watershed plan to be approved by the Authority in the Fall. The implementation guide is meant to help direct workplans for projects, and such workplans do receive direct Authority approval. Adele Freeman noted that an email will go out to all DWRC members informing them of the Authority meeting at which the Don Watershed Plan will be approved (anticipated to be Friday, September 25, 2009). All are invited to attend this meeting. TRCA Authority meetings are held at Black Creek Pioneer Village at 1000 Murray Ross Parkway, from 9:30 AM - 1:00 PM. Sonya Meek noted that York Region released its draft Official Plan update for public comment. Many of the key recommendations of various watershed plans were included in this plan. The draft official plan is available at: http://tinyurl.com/kjgfxf. RES. # F23/09- REPORT ON FINAL REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT DON RIVER WATERSHED PLAN July 23, 2009 Page F45 Moved by: John Routh Seconded by: George Fells THAT the staff report on the consultation process be received; THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council approve the recommended revisions to the draft Don River Watershed Plan as presented in Table 1, such that their incorporation in the February 23, 2009 draft Watershed Plan will constitute the final draft Don River Watershed Plan; THAT TRCA be requested to approve the Don River Watershed Plan; THAT TRCA direct staff to work with partners to implement the Plan; THAT TRCA direct staff to use the Reports on Current Conditions, Upper Don River Watershed Sustainable Stormwater Management Study, Action Plan for Sustainable Practices and Don River Watershed Plan Implementation Guide as reference documents to inform and guide ongoing work and long term work planning and budget preparation; AND FURTHER THAT the Municipal partners, the Provincial and Federal governments as well as all residents, organizations and relevant interest groups be requested to provide their ongoing support for the implementation of the principles and goals of the Don River Watershed Plan CARRIED MINUTES RES. #F24/09— MINUTES TO MEETINGS #5/09 Moved by: Andy Wickens Seconded by: George Fells THAT the minutes of meeting #5/09, held on June 18, 2009, be approved CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS There were no pecuniary interests disclosed. CORRESPONDENCE OUTGOING July 23, 2009 Page F46 4.1 Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project- Detailed Design Work Funding Letter to John Campbell, Waterfront Toronto and David Miller, Mayor, City of Toronto from Phil Goodwin, Chair, Don Watershed Regeneration Council. This item was walked in to the meeting. RES. #F25/09 - CORRESPONDENCE ITEMS Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: Peter Heinz THAT correspondence item 4.1 be received CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE 4.1 July 23, 2009 John Campbell President and CEO Waterfront Toronto 20 Bay Street, Suite 1310 Toronto, ON M5A 2N8 His Worship David Miller Mayor City of Toronto City Hall, 2nd Floor 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Dear Mr. Campbell and Mayor Miller, RE: Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project- Detailed Design Work Funding Over the past years the Don Watershed Regeneration Council (DWRC*) has followed the development of the Lower Don Lands Precinct Planning, Master Servicing Plan and the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project. As the Chair and a member of the DWRC, this is a pivotal "Bold Step" that we have envisaged for many years. We understand that you are moving toward completion of the Master Servicing Environmental Assessment for the first phase. We share your pride and excitement in the Lower Don Lands being declared one of 16 founding projects of the Climate Positive Development Program, worldwide, under the Clinton Climate Change Initiative. With the objective of below zero carbon July 23, 2009 Page F47 emissions, it will be an international example. Moreover, the economic evidence shows a gross output of$1.6 billion with Waterfront Toronto's investment of$642 million from 2001 to 2009. It is not difficult to fathom a similar economic boost as the Lower Don Lands project progresses. We are also delighted to note that the Lower Don Lands project won the Best Futuristic Design Award at the Building Exchange conference. We consider it imperative that the financial resources be identified and committed to secure funding for the Detailed Design Work for the naturalization and flood protection of the Don River mouth to proceed. We await the finalization of the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project EA, which we understand is scheduled for the end of the year. We ask you, despite challenging economic times, to find a way to begin the Detailed Design work in 2010. Watershed/waterfront planning yields sustainable dividends. Sincerely, <original signed by> Phil Goodwin Chair, Don Watershed Regeneration Council Cc. Raffi Bedrosyan, Director, Port Lands Development, Waterfront Toronto Chris Glaisek, Vice President, Planning and Design, Waterfront Toronto Elaine Baxter-Trahair, Director, Waterfront Secretariat, City of Toronto Councillor Paula Fletcher, City of Toronto Peter Tabuns, MPP, Toronto-Danforth Jack Layton, MP, Toronto-Danforth Suzanne Barrett, Chair, Etobicoke-Mimico Watershed Coalition lain Craig, Chair, Humber Watershed Alliance Alan Wells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance Adele Freeman, Director, Watershed Management, TRCA *Don Watershed Regeneration Council The Don Watershed Regeneration Council(DWRC)is a volunteer, watershed-wide advisory committee established by Toronto and Region Conservation(TRCA)in 1994 to help restore the Don River watershed to a healthy, sustainable natural environment. The DWRC is a sub-committee of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. The Council is composed of community members, elected officials and representatives from agencies, businesses, environmental non- governmental organizations and academic institutions located within or concerned with the future of the watershed. A comprehensive strategy-Forty Steps to a New Don-was completed in 1994 and, through the efforts of thousands of volunteers and in partnership with municipalities and environmental groups, we are achieving progress towards the goals of the strategy. Three major principles guide us: 1. protect what is healthy, 2. regenerate what is degraded;and 3. take responsibility for the Don. July 23, 2009 Page F48 A new, updated Don Watershed Plan is in preparation which will reflect broader watershed issues of sustainability including water and energy efficiency and emerging challenges such as climate change. As well as advising TRCA, the DWRC provides comments to other government agencies(federal,provincial and municipal)on matters pertaining to the interests and activities of the environmental nongovernmental organizations which are members of the Council. The comments provided are the views of the DWRC and are not necessarily the views of TRCA. INFORMATION ITEMS 5.1 Taylor Massey Project Reach by Reach - Recommendations to TRCA 5.2 The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989-2005 RES. # F26/09- INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Peter Heinz Seconded by: Marg McRae THAT information items 5.1 through 5.2 be received CARRIED WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Don River Watershed Plan - Draft Implementation Guide- DWRC Feedback RES. # F27/09-WATERSHED PLAN INFORMATION ITEMS Moved by: Moyra Haney Seconded by: Kate Hayes THAT watershed plan information item 6.1 be received CARRIED COMMITTEE REPORTS Community Education and Outreach Committee George Fells asked DWRC members with any input on the Fall 2009 On the Don newsletter or on the four Walk the Don guides currently in production to contact him and Keri McMahon. July 23, 2009 Page F49 DON MOUTH NATURALIZATION AND PORT LANDS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT Adele Freeman informed DWRC members that the final public meeting for this project is still expected in the Fall. DWRC members will receive notice of the meeting. Note: This is now being scheduled for early 2010. George Fells brought to the attention of the DWRC an article in the July 23 Globe and Mail on the Toronto Waterfront projects. Michelle Vanderwel will email an electronic copy of the article to members. DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY Joe Agg reported that the Town of Richmond Hill has received the Conservation Review Board report on the DDO property and will need to review it after their summer break. Also, the DDO property had been listed on Heritage Canada Foundation's "Top Ten Endangered Places List". For more information, see the website at: http://www.heritagecanada.org/eng/news/new.html#July7_09 CANADIAN FILM CENTRE SITE Margaret Buchinger reported that the Canadian Film Centre is working on the renovation of the buildings on the site. Once this is completed, they expect to do a new scope of work on the exterior renovations and will meet with Toronto Green Community members at that time to discuss stormwater management options. This is presently expected to occur later in the summer of this year. OTHER BUSINESS Adele Freeman noted that the City of Vaughan has funding to implement the MNR nature reserve concept site described in the draft Don Watershed Plan. This will be supplemented by funds raised by Paddle the Don. Mark Schollen has been hired to do the detailed design work. Keri McMahon added that there have been meetings between Vaughan and TRCA staff to discuss the project. Time is a factor, as half of the funds must be used by March 2010. Therefore, on the ground work is expected to begin by this Fall. The first stage of work will involve removing the buildings, turning the asphalt and building interpretative trails and signage. Phil Goodwin remarked that this term of the Don Council, which ended with tonight's meeting, was unique, in that there was a specific mandate to advise on the updated Don Watershed Plan for its approval by the TRCA Board. This is now complete. However, there have been many other July 23, 2009 Page F50 large and small victories for this term of the DWRC. Watershed signage, the new On the Don newsletter, the Walk the Don guides and Paddle the Don and the funds raised by this event were mentioned. Phil Goodwin thanked all members of the DWRC, TRCA staff and the members of the public that have worked over the last two years on Don Watershed issues. Special thanks went to Peter Heinz (Vice-Chair, DWRC), Margaret Buchinger (Chair, Policy and Watershed Planning Committee) and George Fells (Chair, Community Outreach and Education Committee). (Editor's Note: these minutes are the last of the 2007-2009 DWRC term.) ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 7:10 pm. Phil Goodwin Brian Denney Chair Chief Administrative Officer /mv